Concerted and multidisciplinary management of COVID-19 drug therapies during the first two epidemic waves in a tertiary hospital in Marseille, France: Results of the PHARMA-COVID study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of local therapeutic recommendation updates made by the COVID multidisciplinary consultation meeting (RCP) at the Hôpital Européen Marseille (HEM) through the description of the drug prescriptions for COVID-19 during the first two waves of the epidemic.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study analysed data from the hospital's pharmaceutical file. We included all patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between February 1, 2020 and January 21, 2021 and extracted specific anti-COVID-19 therapies (ST) from computerized patient record, as well as patients' demographic characteristics, comorbidities and outcome. The evolution of ST prescriptions during the study period was described and put into perspective with the updates of local recommendations made during the first (V1, from 2/24/2020 to 7/27/2020), and second (V2, from 7/28/2020 to 1/21/2021) epidemic waves.

RESULTS

A total of 607 COVID-19 hospitalized patients, 197 during V1 and 410 during V2. Their mean age was 65 years-old, and they presented frequent comorbidities. In total, 93% of hospitalized patients received ST: anticoagulants (90%), glucocorticoids (39%) mainly during V2 (49% vs 17%, P<0.001), and azithromycin (30%) mainly during V1 (71% vs 10%, P<0.001). Lopinavir/ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine were prescribed to 17 and 7 inpatients, respectively, and only during V1. Remdesivir was never administered. A total of 22 inpatients were enrolled into clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The effective dissemination of evidence-based and concerted recommendations seems to have allowed an optimized management of COVID-19 drug therapies in the context of this emerging infection with rapidly evolving therapeutic questions.

Abstract LB120: Comprehensive biomarkers analysis to explain resistances to PD1-L1 ICIs: The precision immuno-oncology for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (PIONeeR) trial

Background: Resistance to PD1/L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC patients is observed in about 80% of individuals with no robust predictive biomarker yet. The PIONeeR trial (NCT03493581) aims to predict such resistances through a comprehensive multiparametric biomarkers analysis.

Methodology: Among the &gt;300 advanced NSCLC patients (pts) recruited in PIONeeR, we focused on the first 137 ≥2nd line ECOG PS0-1 pts treated with single-agent nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. Tumor tissue was collected at baseline and pts were re-biopsied at 6 weeks, and blood-sampled every cycle throughout the 24 weeks post C1D1. Response to PD1/L1 ICIs was assessed by RECIST 1.1 every 6 weeks. Immune contexture was characterized in tumor & blood of each pt through FACS for circulating immune cell subtypes quantification and endothelial activation, blood soluble factors dosage, dual- & multiplex IHC/digital pathology to quantify immune cells infiltrating the tumor, WES for TMB & ICI plasma dosage, leading to 331 measured biomarkers in addition to routine clinical parameters. Multivariable (MV) logistic regression was used to examine the association of each biomarker (controlled by sex, age, smoking status, histological type & PDL1+ Tumor Cells) with the risk of Early Progression (EP), i.e. within 3.5 months of treatment. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was conducted for association with PFS and OS.

Results: Overall, the 137 pts were mainly male (64%), smokers (92%) and &lt;70yrs (68%). Tumors were mainly non-squamous (79%) with &gt;1% PDL1+ TC in 36% of the cases, and 21% of pts were still on treatment at data cut-off. Archived samples were available for 80% of pts at inclusion and re-biopsy was available in 52.9% of these cases. The median follow up was 19.8 months, 22.5% of pts did not progress at data cut-off while 62% presented EP. Tumor Cytotoxic T-cells density, especially PD1+ were lower in EP (MV OR=0.45, p=0.022); conversely, higher proportions of circulating cytotoxic T-cells and activated T-cells (HLA-DR+) were observed in EP (MV OR=3.8, p&lt;0.001). Among other biomarkers, Tregs (MV OR=0.44, p=0.018), NK cell subsets (MV OR≤0.44, p&lt;0.05), albumin (MV OR=0.4, p&lt;0.01) and PDL1 TC % (MV OR=0.27, p&lt;0.01) were decreased whereas alkaline phosphatase was increased (OR=3, p=0.018). &gt;65% inter-pt variability was observed in plasma exposures for all ICIs, with 8-10% of pts displaying trough levels below the target engagement threshold. Data will be presented through unsupervised clustering algorithms & multi-modal supervised learning methods. Changes after 6 weeks of treatment will be analyzed to further investigate drugs mechanisms of action.

Conclusion: The PIONeeR trial provides with the 1st comprehensive biomarkers’ analysis to establish predictive models of resistance in advanced NSCLC pts treated with PD1/L1 ICIs and highlights how tumor and circulating biomarkers are complementary.

Citation Format: Laurent Greillier, Florence Monville, Vanina Leca, Frédéric Vely, Stephane Garcia, Joseph Ciccolini, Florence Sabatier, Gilbert Ferrani, Nawel Boudai, Lamia Ghezali, Marcellin Landri, Clémence Marin, Mourad Hamimed, Laurent Arnaud, Melanie Karlsen, Kevin Atsou, Sivan Bokobza, Pauline Fleury, Arnaud Boyer, Clarisse Audigier-Valette, Stéphanie Martinez, Hervé Pegliasco, Patrice Ray, Lionel Falchero, Antoine Serre, Nicolas Cloarec, Louisiane Lebas, Stephane Hominal, Patricia Barre, Sarah Zahi, Ahmed Frikha, Pierre Bory, Maryannick Le Ray, Lilian Laborde, Virginie Martin, Richard Malkoun, Marie Roumieux, Julien Mazieres, Maurice Perol, Eric Vivier, Sebastien Benzekry, Jacques Fieschi, Fabrice Barlesi. Comprehensive biomarkers analysis to explain resistances to PD1-L1 ICIs: The precision immuno-oncology for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (PIONeeR) trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr LB120.

Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Aside from PD-L1 expression, biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are needed. In a previous retrospective analysis, we documented that fecal Akkermansia muciniphila (Akk) was associated with clinical benefit of ICI in patients with NSCLC or kidney cancer. In the current study, we performed shotgun-metagenomics-based microbiome profiling in a large cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC (n = 338) treated with first- or second-line ICIs to prospectively validate the predictive value of fecal Akk. Baseline stool Akk was associated with increased objective response rates and overall survival in multivariate analyses, independent of PD-L1 expression, antibiotics, and performance status. Intestinal Akk was accompanied by a richer commensalism, including Eubacterium hallii and Bifidobacterium adolescentis, and a more inflamed tumor microenvironment in a subset of patients. However, antibiotic use (20% of cases) coincided with a relative dominance of Akk above 4.8% accompanied with the genus Clostridium, both associated with resistance to ICI. Our study shows significant differences in relative abundance of Akk that may represent potential biomarkers to refine patient stratification in future studies.

Séquelles physiques et psychiques 3–6 mois après la COVID-19 : premiers résultats de la cohorte prospective ALCOVID

Introduction

Patients et méthodes

Résultats

Conclusion

460 Spatial distribution of infiltrating T lymphocytes with Immunoscore® CR T cells exhaustion test helps stratification of NSCLC patients treated with PD1/PDL1 inhibitors in the PIONeeR project

Background

PD1/L1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved long-term outcome in about 20% of advanced Non Small Cells Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts), but 80% present primary or secondary resistance. The PIONeeR project (NCT03493581) aims to predict the response/resistance to PD1/L1 ICIs in advanced NSCLC pts through a comprehensive agnostic multiparametric and longitudinal biomarkers assessment. Data presented here are a focus on the quantification of tumor infiltration by lymphocytes, their activation as potential markers of the resistance to treatment by ICI.

Methods

Advanced NSCLC pts with available archived tumor tissue at screening visit (VS), treated with standard PD1/L1 ICIs (nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab), alone (2nd line or more) or combined with chemotherapy (1st line), were re-biopsied at 6 weeks (V2) of treatment. PD1/L1 ICIs overall response rate (ORR) was assessed by RECIST 1.1 every 6 weeks. The multiplex IHC test ”Immunoscore® CR T Cells Exhaustion” (IS TCE) quantifies cytotoxic lymphocytes expressing three checkpoints: PD1, LAG3, TIM3, extrapolating their exhaustion status, both in the stroma and parenchyma. The unsupervised neural-network-based machine learning algorithm SOM (Self-Organizing Maps) was used to classify samples based on the 27 IS TCE variables. Statistical significance of survival differences between groups was evaluated using the log-rank test.

Results

Among the first 100 pts, (male (64%), smokers (91,8%), <70yrs (69%), with an ECOG PS0/1 (97%), treated in 2nd line setting (86%)), 79 VS + 30 V2 biopsies were tested with IS TCE. SOM clustering highlighted four distinct clusters: a group with moderate T-cells infiltration (group 1), hot tumors with high T cells infiltration in both stroma and parenchyma (group 2), cold tumors with very low T cells infiltration (group 3), and finally, a highly distinguishable group with important T-cells density in stroma only (group 4). None of the 11 responders was present in the Group 3, ”Cold” cluster. The four groups presented different Progression Free Survival (PFS) rates (p=5,2e-4) with better relapse-free survival Groups 1 and 2. Additionally, V2/VS ratios showed lymphocytes recruitment induced by the treatment in parenchyma only: no significant lymphocytes recruitment was observed in the stromal compartment. Interestingly, the most recruited lymphocyte populations expressed PD1.

Conclusions

IS TCE test may help stratifying and predicting responders to anti PD1/L1 therapy through checkpoint expressing lymphocytes quantification and spatial distribution. Additional tests performed on the PIONeeR cohort to explore other aspects of the immune response to cancer should complete these results.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by French National Research Agency (ANR-17-RHUS-0007), a partnership of AMU, APHM, AstraZeneca, Centre Léon Bérard, CNRS, HalioDx, ImCheck Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Inserm, Institut Paoli Calmettes and sponsored by AP HM. Drug supply is funded by AstraZeneca. Special thanks to patients and families.

Trial Registration

NCT03493581

Ethics Approval

The study is conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the French applicable regulatory requirements (Public Health Code, article L.1121-1/La loi n° 2012–300 du 5 mars 2012 relative aux recherches impliquant la personne humaine (dite loi Jardé), the applicable subject privacy requirements, and the ethical principles that are outlined in the Declaration of Helsinski. The study was approved by the French Ethic Committee, CPP Ouest II - Angers, ref. CPP: 2028/08, Ref ANSM (French competent authority) 2018020500208, 2018072600120, 2019083000148. Freely given written informed consent was signed and obtained from each individual participating in the study, before any study specific procedure was undertaken and after the provision of information about the study by the investigator during a physician-patient consultation and sufficient time for reflection.

An optimized stepwise algorithm combining rapid antigen and RT-qPCR for screening of COVID-19 patients

Background & aim

We investigated the combination of rapid antigen detection (RAD) and RT-qPCR assays in a stepwise procedure to optimize the detection of COVID-19.

Methods

From August 2020 to November 2020, 43,399 patients were screened in our laboratory for COVID-19 diagnostic by RT-qPCR using nasopharyngeal swab. Overall, 4,691 of the 43,399 were found to be positive, and 200 were retrieved for RAD testing allowing comparison of diagnostic accuracy between RAD and RT-qPCR. Cycle threshold (Ct) and time from symptoms onset (TSO) were included as covariates.

Results

The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR-, and LR+ of RAD compared with RT-qPCR were 72% (95%CI 62%–81%), 99% (95% CI95%–100%), 99% (95%CI 93%–100%), and 78% (95%CI 70%–85%), 0.28 (95%CI 0.21–0.39), and 72 (95%CI 10–208) respectively. Sensitivity was higher for patients with Ct ≤ 25 regardless of TSO: TSO ≤ 4 days 92% (95%CI 75%–99%), TSO > 4 days 100% (95%CI 54%–100%), and asymptomatic 100% (95%CI 78–100%). Overall, combining RAD and RT-qPCR would allow reducing from only 4% the number of RT-qPCR needed.

Conclusions

This study highlights the risk of misdiagnosing COVID-19 in 28% of patients if RAD is used alone. A stepwise analysis that combines RAD and RT-qPCR would be an efficient screening procedure for COVID-19 detection and may facilitate the control of the outbreak.

Adverse Events Induced by PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Real-World Single-Centre Experience with a Management-Based Approach

AIM

To assess the efficacy and tolerance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and the impact of a standardised management-based protocol in a real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from patients who had received anti-PD-(L)1 were collected from our pharmacy database. Clinical response and toxicity were assessed using RECIST criteria and CTCAE version 5.0, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic factors were identified using Cox's model.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients and 201 lines of treatment were included (median age: 66 (range: 38-89) years). Types of cancer included non-small cell lung cancer (73%), transitional cell carcinoma (10%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), small cell lung cancer (5%), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (4%) and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (1%). Twenty-five (12%) patients had pre-existing autoimmune conditions. Our standardised management-based protocol included 129 (64%) patients. Objective response rate was 29%, median OS was 10 months (IQR: 7-15) and median PFS was 5 months (IQR: 1-22). Patients with an abnormal baseline complete blood count had a worse OS (HR=2.48 [95% CI: 1.24-4.96]; p=0.0103). Thirty-three (16%) patients experienced severe (grade 3 or 4) immune-related adverse event (irAE). There were three (1%) irAE-related deaths. AEs resolved faster when patients were assessed by an internist before anti-PD-(L)1 initiation (p=0.0205).

CONCLUSION

PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are effective and safe in a real-world setting. Implementation of a standardised management-based protocol with internal medicine specialists is an effective way to optimise irAE management.

Dual versus triple therapy in patients hospitalized for COPD in France: a claims data study

Purposes

Following a hospitalization for COPD, dual and triple therapies were compared in terms of persistence and relations with outcomes (exacerbations, health care resource use and costs).

Methods

This was a historical observational database study. All patients aged ≥45 hospitalized for COPD between 2007 and 2015 were identified in a 1/97^th random sample of French claims data. Patients receiving dual therapy within 60 days after hospitalization were compared to patients receiving triple therapy, after propensity score matching on disease severity.

Results

Of the 3,089 patients hospitalized for COPD, 1,538 (49.8%) received either dual or triple therapy in the 2 months following inclusion, and 1,500 (48.6%) had at least 30 days of follow-up available; 846 (27.4%) received dual therapy, and 654 (21.2%) received triple therapy. After matching, the number of exacerbations was 2.4 per year in the dual vs 2.3 in the triple group (p=0.45). Among newly treated patients (n=206), persistence at 12 months was similar in the dual and triple groups (48% vs 41%, respectively, p=0.37). As compared to patients on dual therapy, more patients on triple therapy received oral corticosteroids (49.1 vs 40.4%, p=0.003) or were hospitalized for any reason (67% vs 55.8%, p=0.0001) or for COPD (35.3 vs 25.1%, p=0.0002) during follow-up. Cost of care was higher for patients on triple than for those on dual therapy (€11,877.1 vs €9,825.1, p=0.01).

Conclusion

Following hospitalizations for COPD, patients on dual and triple therapy experienced recurrent exacerbations, limited adherence to therapies and high cost of care. Patients on triple therapy appeared more severe than those on dual therapy, as reflected by exacerbations and health care resource use.

Opinions toward pain management and palliative care: Comparison between HIV specialists and oncologists

Despite the introduction of HAART, pain is still a common symptom in people living with HIV/AIDS. For these persons, pain management supplied by palliative care teams may support standard HIV care. This study compares opinions toward palliative care of 83 HIV specialists and 217 oncologists (French national survey: Palliative Care 2002). Data were collected by phone questionnaire. A cluster analysis was carried out in order to identify contrasted profiles of opinions toward palliative care. A logistic regression was performed to test the relationships between identified clusters and physicians' characteristics. With a two-cluster partition, we observed a profile corresponding to a restrictive conception of palliative care. Within this profile, physicians were more prone to consider that palliative care should be used only for terminally-ill patients, and only after all curative treatments have failed, with a restrained prescriptive power for physicians providing palliative care. This conception was associated with reluctance toward morphine analgesia. Once controlled for other physicians' characteristics, HIV specialists were more likely than oncologists to endorse this restrictive conception (OR=1.9, CI 95% [1.1; 3.3]). Thus French HIV specialists should be more informed about the utility of providing palliative care, even for patients who are not in terminal stage.

Immunotherapy with an Aluminum Hydroxide-Adsorbed Juniperus ashei Foreign Pollen Extract in Seasonal Indigenous Cypress Pollen Rhinoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of standardized Juniperus ashei extract was assessed in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to European cypress pollens.

METHODS

Forty adults with European cypress-allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were randomized to receive immunotherapy or a matched placebo. Specific immunotherapy was performed with a standardized, aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed J. ashei extract with a potency of 100 IR (arbitrary index of reactivity) containing 54 microg of Jun a 1/ml (Alustal, Stallergenes, France). Subcutaneous injections started in October 2000. The maintenance dose was 0.30 ml of the 100-IR concentration per month. Rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptoms were rated according to a 4-point score.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients from the treated group and 15 patients from the placebo group completed year 2001; 14 in each group completed year 2002. A statistically significant improvement (41%, p < 0.02) in the conjunctivitis symptom score was observed in actively treated patients compared to the placebo group at the peak of the 2001 pollen season. Improvement in rhinitis (17%) was not significant. This significant improvement was greater at the peak of the 2002 pollen season (63%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study therefore indirectly validates the concept of treatment by major allergen because J. ashei is absent from the region in which this study was conducted.

[Doctors' opinions on palliative care: results from a French survey on physicians attitudes and practices]

OBJECTIVE

To examine practitioners' opinions on palliative care.

METHOD

Statistical analyses were carried out on data collected from 1000 physicians recruited to participate in a study on knowledge, attitudes and practices with respect to palliative care ("Palliative Care 2002"). A cluster analysis (CAH) was conducted based on responses to nine questions in order to identify homogeneous and contrasting profiles of opinions on palliative care.

RESULTS

Two distinctly different categories of profiles emerged. The first one had a restrictive approach to palliative care (n = 387; 38.7%), while the second one supported its expansion (n = 613; 61.3%).

CONCLUSION

A newly revised communication campaign which favoured and recognised palliative care could assist in the dissemination of related practices among physicians.

Disclosure of Prognosis to Terminally Ill Patients: Attitudes and Practices Among French Physicians

BACKGROUND

Disclosure of the prognosis to terminally ill patients is a strong prerequisite for integrating the physical, psychological, spiritual, and social aspects of end-of-life care.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess French physicians' general attitudes and effective practices (with patients followed up to death recently) toward such disclosure.

DESIGN/SUBJECTS

We used data from a cross-sectional survey conducted among a national sample of 917 French general practitioners, oncologists, and neurologists.

RESULTS

A majority of respondents opted for prognosis disclosure only at patients' request, very few opted for systematic disclosure without patient's request, and a significant minority opted for systematic concealment. Concerning deceased patients described by respondents, 44.5% of competent patients were informed of prognosis by their physician, 27.3% were informed by someone else, 9.0% refused to be informed, and 19.2% were simply not informed. Concealment was more frequent for older patients, and physicians involved in a nongovernmental organization (NGO) for patients' support were more likely to disclose the prognosis, even without patient's request.

CONCLUSIONS

Disclosure of the prognosis to terminally ill patients is still far from systematic in France. Further research is needed to better understand the motivations of French physicians' disclosure practices, which are probably culturally shaped.

[Opinion of general and specialized physicians toward euthanasia. Results from the French survey on attitudes and practices against palliative care, 2002]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate opinion of physicians about the legalization of euthanasia according to their professional characteristics, their attitudes toward morphine, their attitudes toward communication with end-of-life patients, and their perception of specific types of terminal care.

METHOD

Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out from data collected among 1.000 general practitioners, oncologists, neurologists and HIV specialists (French cross-sectional survey on palliative care, 2002).

RESULTS

42.5% of physicians agreed with the statement that euthanasia should be legalized as it is already the case in the Netherlands. Inadequate prescription of morphine and calling terminal sedation as active euthanasia were associated with a favorable opinion toward legalization of euthanasia.

CONCLUSION

Specific training on pain management and terminal sedation would help physicians to have a better view of the problem of euthanasia.

[Terminal care of patients by the general practitioner and the specialist. Results of a French survey "Attitudes and practices in palliative treatment--2002"]

OBJECTIVE

Assess the attitude of the practitioners with regard to the management of patients at the end of their lives, depending on the physician/patient communication and treatment of pain. Method Statistical analysis of the data collected among 1,000 practitioners recruited for a survey on knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding palliative care in 2002.

RESULTS

The practitioners who felt "ill at ease" in the management of patients at the end of their life often had a poor opinion regarding morphine and did not systematically their patients of the therapeutic aims.

CONCLUSION

Greater awareness by the practitioners of palliative care would help to improve the quality of care supplied to terminally ill patients.