Anemia at 1 year after kidney transplantation has a negative long-term impact on graft and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Anemia, a common complication after kidney transplantation, has a controversial impact on graft or patient survivals or the appearance of cardiovascular disease. The present study investigated the incidence and risk factors for anemia in the first year after transplantation and its effects on graft and patient outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 389 patients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2008, the 331 with functioning grafts at 1 year were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 84 ± 31.8 months. Anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization as a hemoglobin < 13 g/dL in men and < 12 g/dL in women.

RESULTS

The 88 patients (26.6%) with anemia included 21 (6.3%) who were receiving erythropoiesis stimulant agents. The predictive factors for anemia were: initial immunosuppression with cyclosporine (odds ratio [OR] 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-3.47; P = .005), serum creatinine (mg/dL) at discharge (OR 1.7; CI 95% 1.26-2.15 P = .000), and 1-year serum albumin (g/dL; OR 0.21; CI 95% 0.10-0.71 P = .001). Donor age in years (OR 1.02; CI 95% 1.00-1.03, P = .054) was close to significance. Cox multivariate analysis showed 1-year hemoglobin (g/dL) to be associated with graft (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.96, P = .003) and patient survivals after adjusting for other variables (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0-59-0.96, P = .023). But it was only a cardiovascular risk factor when serum creatinine was not included in the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one quarter of patients with functioning grafts show anemia at 1-year. Graft function, initial immunosuppression, serum albumin, and perhaps donor age were risk factors for anemia, which had a negative impact on graft and patient survival, and could be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

Utilization of elderly kidney donors (>70 years) does not affect graft survival in the medium term

BACKGROUND

The need for organs for renal transplantation has encouraged the use of grafts from increasingly older donors. Earlier studies performed in Spain have shown the suitability of donors aged 60-65 years. In this single-center study, we evaluated our results using donors >70 years old.

METHODS

We evaluated 401 primary transplantations performed from January 2000 to December 2009. Their initial immunosuppression was a tacrolimus-based (n = 324), cyclosporine-based (n = 70) or calcineurin inhibitor-free (n = 7) regimen patients. Recipients were classified according to the donors age: <50 (42.6%); 50-70 (39.7%) and >70 (17.5%) years.

RESULTS

There were no differences in recipient or donor gender, time on dialysis, cold ischemia, delayed graft function, or acute rejection episodes. However, the mean age was higher among patients who received grafts from donors >70 years old; 42.5 ± 12.4 years for <50, 58.1 ± 8.2 years for 50-70, and 65.7 ± 7.2 years for >70; (P = .000). The serum creatinine at 12 months was increased according to the age of the donor; 1.4 ± 0.6, 1.8 ± 0.6, 70 and 1.7 ± 0.5 mg/dL, respectively (P = .001). The graft survival rates at 5 years were 81%, 74%, and 70%, respectively (P = .519). Upon multivariate analysis only HLA-DR mismatches, delayed graft function, and acute rejection episodes were associated with graft loss. Patient survival rates (86%) at 5 years were similar among recipients from donors aged 50-70 and >70 years, but higher (96%) for those who received a graft from a donor <50 years (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 20% of donors were >70 years old in our study. Their kidneys displayed excellent short-term outcomes.

Effects of the new immunosuppressive agents on the occurrence of malignancies after renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The risk of malignancies in renal transplant recipients is considerably greater than in the general population. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects on the appearance of malignancies of 3 immunosuppressive periods: azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CsA), and tacrolimus (TAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 1029 first renal transplant recipients of mean age at transplantation of 44.6±14.9 years with a mean follow-up of 95.6±84.2 months. Initial immunosuppression was AZA-based (n=198), CsA-based (n=524), and TAC (n=307). A total of 280 recipients were also treated with mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid.

RESULTS

There were 157 patients (15.3%) who displayed≥1 malignancy; there were 95 skin (9.2%) and 74 (7.8%) non-skin malignancies with presentations at 74±62 and 107±77 months, respectively (P=.003). The skin malignancies included squamous cell carcinomas (n=41), basal cell carcinomas (n=41), Kaposi sarcomas (n=7), and melanomas (n=4). Among the solid tumors, lymphoproliferative disorders (n=15), digestive tract (n=14), kidney and urinary tract (n=11), lung (n=10), and breast (n=3) carcinomas. The cumulative incidences at 5, 10, and 15 years were 6%, 10%, and 18% for skin and 3%, 7%, and 14% for non-skin malignancies, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age at transplant in years (P=.000) and male gender (P=.000) were the only variables associated with skin malignancies; age at transplant in years (P=.004) and treatment with OKT3 (P=.000) were associated with non-skin malignancies. Malignancies were the cause of death in 18% of recipients who died with functioning grafts.

CONCLUSION

Malignancies are an important cause of morbidity and mortality among renal transplant recipients. The new immunosuppressive agents do not increase the risk of malignancies. Special surveillance is needed for older, male recipients.

[Recurrence of p-ANCA positive vasculitis with lung hemorrhage in a patient on hemodialysis]

Relapses of p-ANCA vasculitis during chronic dialysis treatment are infrequent. We report a patient with a pulmonary-renal syndrome and p-ANCA vasculitis who relapsed one year after starting hemodialysis treatment. Treatment with steroids and cyclosphosphamide successfully controlled the relapse, though cyclophosphamide had to be discontinued because of leucopenia. Clinical features of renal vasculitis, relapse after dialysis, the usefulness of ANCA titles as possible predictors and therapeutic options are discussed.

[Vaccination scheme in advanced chronic kidney disease]

1. VACCINATION AGAINST HEPATITIS B a) All patients with chronic advanced renal disease and negative serology for HBsAg and antiHBs are to be vaccinated against hepatitis B (Evidence level: B). b) For classic vaccines (Engerix B and HBVAxpro) the adult vaccine dose is 40 mcg (20 mcg in the paediatric population). There are two dose regimens based on the medicinal product used: 0, 1 and 6 months with HBVAxpro and 0, 1, 2 and 6 months with Engerix B. With the new vaccine Fendrix, the dose is 20 mcg and the schedule 0, 1, 2 and 6 months (Evidence level: C). c) The antiHBs titre is to be measured 1-2 months after administration of the last dose. In patients whose antibody titres are below 10 mIU/mL, a booster may be administered, checking the response or administering a second full vaccination (Evidence level: B). d) In responders, antibody levels are to be tested at least once a year. If the antiHBs titre is below 10 mIU/mL, a booster is to be administered (Evidence level: C). 2. VACCINATION AGAINST INFLUENZA a) All patients with chronic advanced renal disease are to be vaccinated every year against influenza (Evidence level: B). b) The vaccination dose and regimen are the same as recommended for the general population (Evidence level: C) 3. VACCINATION AGAINST PNEUMOCOCCUS a) Vaccination against pneumococcus is recommended in patients with chronic renal disease associated with nephrotic syndrome or who may be future candidates for renal transplant (Evidence level: B). b) There is no evidence of the clinical value of the pneumococcal vaccine in adult patients with chronic renal failure, not transplanted. However, some regions are recommending routine vaccination in the population aged >or= 60 years, the age of a high percentage of our patients. c) To maintain immunisation, revaccination is required every 3- 5 years. 4. OTHER VACCINES a) Vaccination against hepatitis A is recommended in patients with renal failure associated with chronic liver disease or who are candidates for renal transplant (Evidence level: C). b) The recommendations for vaccination against tetanus and diphtheria are the same as for the general population (Evidence level: C). c) Chickenpox vaccine is indicated in children with chronic renal disease, particularly if they are candidates for transplant (Evidence level: B). Although there is no evidence of the value of this vaccine in adults, it is advisable to perform it in those who may be candidates for renal transplant with no protecting antibodies. d) There is no evidence of the clinical value of the vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus.

A Mediterranean age-comorbidity prognostic index for survival in dialysis populations

BACKGROUND

The most widely used prognostic indices for estimation of survival, including for dialysis patients, were described by Charlson, and an adaptation was proposed by Hemmelgarn for dialysis patients. We present the first age-comorbidity prognostic index (ACPI) designed in a Mediterranean incident dialysis population and examine its concordance with other prognostic indices.

METHODS

Incident dialysis patients were scored in relation to age and 11 diseases. Cox regression analysis was performed to construct multiple regression models, and diseases with a hazard ratio (HR) higher than 1.2 were included in the index. The impact of age was assessed by including it in a separate multivariate model. Scores were categorized in 3 levels of risk: low (0-1 points), medium (2-4 points) and high levels (5 or more points). The probability of survival of each group was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to examine the concordance with other prognostic indices.

RESULTS

A cohort of 304 patients on hemodialysis (80%) and peritoneal dialysis was analyzed. Global mortality rate was 31% (93/304). The mean score was 4.41 +/- 2.84. Diseases that received the highest scores were ischemic heart disease (IHD) with chronic heart failure (CHF), and malignancies of less than 5 years of evolution. With regard to age, the maximum score was received by patients over 60 years old. The probability of survival at 3 years was 89%, 77% and 54% for low-, medium- and high-risk groups, respectively (log-rank test, 19; p=0.0001). The ROC curves showed similar areas for our index (0.749), the Charlson index (0.758) and Hemmelgarn index (0.708), but our index scored higher than Charlson in older patients, IHD with CHF, CHF, peripheral vascular disease and systemic diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Although prospective external validation of this new index is required, this index adequately estimates the probability of survival at 3 years. The prognostic power of ACPI is similar to that of the Charlson index; however, relevant differences were found, concerning the weight of factors age, cardiovascular diseases and myocardial dysfunction. In end-stage renal disease we recommend estimating survival by indices established in incident dialysis patients, due to the particular comorbid conditions of this population.

High Body Mass Index and Posttransplant Weight Gain Are Not Risk Factors for Kidney Graft and Patient Outcome

BACKGROUND

High body mass constitutes a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality in the general population, but it has been associated with an increased survival among dialysis patients. Its effects on renal transplant outcomes are controversial. The aim of our present work was to investigate the impact of high body mass and posttransplant weight gain on patient and graft outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One thousand consecutive renal transplant recipients (631 men and 369 women) were included in the study. Their mean age was 42.9 years and the follow-up was at least 2 years. Basal immunosuppression was azathioprine (Aza) and steroids in 196 patients, cyclosporine (CsA) without or with antiproliferative agent in 557, and 239 were presented tacrolimus (Tac).

RESULTS

At the time of transplantation the body mass index (BMI) was 23.7 +/- 3.9 kg/m2, namely, <18.5 kg/m2 in 6.3%; 18.5 to 25 in 61.7%; 25 to 30 in 25.4%; and >30 in 6.5%. Pretransplant obesity was associated with old age and female gender. Obese patients experienced a greater risk of delayed graft function (P < .01) and surgical wound complications (P < .01). After 1 year, 299 patients (29.9%) displayed weight gain >10% (mean 8.6% +/- 10.4% or 5.0 +/- 6.1 kg). Patients on Aza showed increased body weight by 11.9% +/- 10.9%; CsA patients by 9.5% +/- 10.3%, and Tac patients by 4.9% +/- 9.1% (P < .001). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant BMI had no effect on graft or patient survival either in the whole group or in the patients treated with CsA or TAC. Posttransplant weight gain above 5% or 10% did not influence graft or patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The new immunosuppressive regimes reduce posttransplant weight gain. Pretransplant high body mass and 1-year posttransplant weight gain were not risk factors for graft or patient survival in our experience.

[Control of the dialysis dose by ionic dialysance and bioimpedance]

INTRODUCTION

The ionic dialysance monitor allows an automated measure of Kt in each dialysis session. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) determines the total body water which it is equivalent to the urea volume of distribution (V). If the Kt, determined by ionic dialysance, is divided by the V, estimated by bioelectrical impedance, a Kt/V at the end of dialysis session (Kt/VDiBi) is obtained.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the agreement between the Kt/VDiBi and the Kt/V obtained by two simplified formulas: the monocompartimental (Kt/Vm) and the equilibrated (Kt/Ve) Daugirdas equations.

METHODS

The Kt/VDiBi, the Kt/Vm and the Kt/Ve were determined in 38 hemodialysis patients (27 males and 11 females) in the same hemodialysis session. The patients were on dialysis three times a week for 3.5 to 4 hours. The V was determined by monofrequency bioelectrical impedance (50 kHz) at the end of the dialysis session.

RESULTS

The Kt/VDiBi, Kt/Vm and Kt/Ve were 1.29+/-0.26, 1.54+/-0.29 and 1.36+/-0.25, respectively (p<0.001 between the Kt/VDiBi and the KtVm, and p<0.001 between the KtV/DiBi and the Kt/Ve). The intraclass correlation coefficient showed better concordance between the KtV/DiBi and the Kt/Ve (coefficient 0.88) than between the Kt/VDiBi and the KtVm (coefficient 0.65). The relative difference of the Kt/VDiBi was 8.3+/-6.4% with respect to the Kt/Ve and 18.4+/-7.8 % with respect to the Kt/Vm (p<0.001). The relative difference between the Kt/VDiBi and the Kt/Ve was lower than 15% in the 84% of the patients and lower than 10% in the 64% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

If the V obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis is included in the ionic dialysance monitor, we can obtain a Kt/V for each patient in real time, which is similar to the equilibrated Kt/V obtained from the Daugirdas equation.

[The Cockcroft-Gault equation is better than MDRD equation to estimate the glomerular filtration rate in patients with advanced chronic renal failure]

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of three kidney function estimating equations: classic Cockcroft-Gault (classic CG), corrected Cockcroft-Gault (corrected CG) and simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), in patients with advanced chronic renal failure. The study was made in 84 nondialyzed patients with chronic renal disease in stage 4 or 5. The glomerular filtration rate was measured on a 24-hour urine collection as the arithmetic mean of the urea and creatinine clearances (CUrCr). In each patient, the difference between each estimating equation and the measured glomerular filtration rate was calculated. The absolute difference expressed as a percentage of the measured glomerular filtration rate indicates the intermethod variability. In the total group the glomerular filtration rate measured as the CUrCr was de 13,5+/-5,1 ml/min/1.73 m(2); and the results of the estimating equations were: classic CG 14,2+/-5 (p<0,05); corrected CG 12+/-4,2 (p<0,01) and MDRD : 12,1+/-4,8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (p<0,01). The variability of the estimating equations was 15,2+/-12,2%, 17,1+/-13,4 % and 19,3+/-13,3% (p<0,05), for classic CG, corrected CG and MDRD respectively. The percent of estimates falling within 30% above o below the measured glomerular filtration rate was 90% for CG classic, 87% for corrected CG and 79% for MDRD. The intraclass correlation coefficients respect to CUrCr were 0,86 for classic CG, 0,81 for corrected CG and 0,77 for MDRD. The MDRD variability, but not classic CG variability or corrected CG variability, showed a positive correlation with the glomerular filtration rate (r=0,25, p<0,05). In patients with chronic renal disease in stage 5, the variability of the different estimating equations was similar. We conclude that in our population with advanced chronic renal failure the classic CG equation is more accurate than the MDRD equation. Corrected CG equation has not any advantage respect to classic CG equation.

[Temperature dialysate and hemodialysis tolerance]

In this study, the effect of dialysate temperature on hemodynamic stability, patients' perception of dialysis discomfort and postdialysis fatigue were assessed. Thirty-one patients of the morning shift were eligible to participate in the study. Three patients refused. Patients were assessed during 6 dialysis sessions: in three sessions the dialysate temperature was normal (37 degrees C) and in other three sessions the dialysate temperature was low (35.5 degrees C). To evaluate the symptoms along the dialysis procedure and the postdialysis fatigue, specific scale questionnaires were administered in each dialysis session and respective scores were elaborated. Low temperature dialysate was associated with higher postdialysis systolic blood pressure (122 +/- 24 vs. 126 +/- 27 mmHg, p < 0.05), and lower postdialysis heart rate (82 +/- 13 vs. 78 +/- 9 beats/min, p < 0.05) with the same ultrafiltration rate. Dialysis symptoms score and postdialysis fatigue score were better with the low dialysate temperature (0.7 +/- 0.9 vs. 0.4 +/- 1 vs. p < 0.05, and 1.3 +/- 1 vs. 1 +/- 0.9 p < 0.05, respectively). Furthermore, low temperature dialysate shortened the post-dialysis fatigue period (5.4 +/- 6.3 vs. 3.1 +/- 3.3 vs. hours, p < 0.05). The clinical improvement experimented with the low temperature dialysate was not universal. A beneficial effect was exclusively observed in the patients with higher dialysis symptoms and postdialysis fatigue scores or having more than one episode of hypotension in a week. The patients were asked about their temperature preference, 7 patients (23%) request a dialysate at 37 degrees C, 19 patients (61%) prefered to be dialysed with the low temperature dialysate, and 5 patients (16%) were indifferent. The later two groups of the patients continued with the low temperature dialysate during other 4 weeks. At the end of that period, the clinical improvement remained unchanged. In summary, low temperature dialysate is particularly beneficial for highly symptomatic patients.

[Urea distribution volume calculated by ionic dialysance]

BACKGROUND

Direct dialysis quantification is considered the gold standard for determining urea distribution volume, but it is impractical for routine use. So, urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients is usually estimated from anthropometric equations. Ionic dialysance allows to calculate the urea distribution volume dividing the Kt obtained by ionic dialysance by the Kt/V obtained by a simplified formula. The aim of the present work was to analyse the concordance between the ionic dialysance and the direct dialysis quantification methods to estimate de urea distribution volume.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 15 hemodialysis patients (10 males and 5 females), we have estimated the urea distribution volume by the direct dialysis quantification (Vurea), by the anthropometrics equations of Watson (VWatson) and Chertow (VChertow) and by the ionic dialysance method (VDI). To obtain VDI we have used two simplified Kt/V formulas: the monocompartimental and the equilibrated Daugirdas equations (VDIm and VDIe respectively). The intermethod variability was assessed by the relative difference (absolute difference between VUrea and the other methods, divided by the mean).

RESULTS

VUrea (26,2 L) was statistically different from theVDIe (30,6 L, p < 0.01), VWatson 35.2 L (p < 0.001) and VChertow (38 L, p < 0.001). VDIm was 26.3 L (p = ns). VUrea represents the 42% of the body weight for the males (range 36 to 49%) and the 33% of the body weight for the female (range 28 to 38%). The intermethod variability was high for the VDIe (21.6%), VWatson (37.4%) and VChertow (48. 1%), but it was low for the VDIm (9.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Urea distribution volume calculated by the ionic dialysance method using the monocompartimental Daugirdas Kt/V equation has an acceptable agreement with the urea distribution volume calculated by the direct dialysis quantification. Anthropometry-based equations overestimate the urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients.

[Chronic renal failure secondary to hyperoxaluria following small bowel syndrome]

A 70-year-old woman was admitted in the Department of Nephrology because of renal insufficiency. Six years previously, as consequence of a venous mesenteric thrombosis, she underwent an extense intestinal resection with subsequent short intestine syndrome. Five years after the surgery an increase in the creatinine concentration was observed (1.4 mg/dl). One year later, it increased up to 3.1 mg/dl and the patient was remitted to our Department. The radiological study revealed calcifications on both kidney silhouettes. In the next year, renal function worsened and the calcifications increased. Coinciding with the beginning of the chronic hemodialysis treatment she suffered a renal colic with passage of a calcium oxalate stone.

Chronic Kidney Disease in Renal Transplant Recipients

The aim of the present study was to investigate the utility in renal transplant patients of the guidelines for the diagnosis and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) elaborated by the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) of the National Kidney Foundation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred forty-seven cadaveric kidney transplants performed between 1980 and 1994 with graft function at 12 months were included in the study. The GFR was calculated according to the MDRD equation.

RESULTS

The mean GFR at 12 months was 54.5 +/- 20.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2): 23 patients (5.1%) had a GFR > or =90 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 136 patients (30.6%), 60-89; 246 (54.7%), 30-59; 35 patients (7.8%), 15-29; and 7 patients (1.6%), GFR <15. Similar distribution of CKD stages was observed at 5 and 10 years. Unadjusted graft survival at 10 years was better among patients with a higher GFR at 12 months: 87% in patients with GFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 83% of GFR 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 63%, GFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2); and 23%, GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < .001). The association between GFR and graft survival persisted when adjusted by the age and gender of the recipients and donors, time on dialysis, body mass index, immunosuppression, delayed graft function, rejection, and HLA mismatches. The prevalence of complications, such as anemia, hypertension, dyslipidemias, and number of drugs increased as GFR declined.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 60% of recipients presented chronic kidney disease. GFR was a predictive factor for graft survival at 10 years. The classification of renal transplant patients by CKD stages may help to identify patients with increased risk of graft loss and also to design strategies to improve outcomes.

Wisconsin and Celsior solutions in renal preservation: a comparative preliminary study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Celsior (C) solution for flushing and cold storage of cadaveric renal allografts. Among 177 cadaveric renal allografts harvested and transplanted in our unit, 138 were preserved with the University of Wisconsin (W) solution and 39 with the C solution. The mean age of the recipients was 48.1 +/- 13.5 years, including 107 men and 70 women. The immunosuppressive regimens were tacrolimus-based (n = 118) or cyclosporine-based (n = 59). Grafts perfused with W solution were obtained from older donors than those perfused with C solution (42.3 +/- 16.9 vs 38.1 +/- 12.5 years; P = .017) and had been transplanted to older recipients (49.5 +/- 14.4 vs 43.3 +/- 13.0 years; P = .017). The prevalence of delayed graft function (DGF) was similar in the 2 groups (39.1% in the W group vs 23.7% in the C group; P = .097), as well as the incidence of primary nonfunction grafts (5.8% vs 2.7%; P = .427). The serum creatinine value at 1 month was significantly higher among grafts preserved with W versus solution (1.9 +/- 0.9 vs 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL; P = .000) as well as at 12 months (1.63 +/- 0.5 vs 1.35 +/- 0.4 mg/dL; P = .003). There were no differences in graft survival at 12 months (97% C group vs 88% W group; P = .069). Our results showed that C solution was equivalent to W solution with respect to DGF and primary function of kidneys. The differences in renal function may have been due to differences in donor and recipient ages.

Spanish experience with cyclosporine

Our experience with cyclosporine (CsA) in de novo renal transplantation (RT) may be systematized in four consecutive periods. From February 1986 to December 1989, patient survival was higher among 128 consecutive CsA-prednisone-treated cadaver allograft recipients than in previous patients on azathioprine. One-year graft survival was significantly higher in CsA patients, a difference that was thereafter progressively reduced: at 10 years graft survivals were 50% versus 45%, and at 15 years 37% versus 35%, respectively. The most frequent cause of graft loss was death with a functioning graft. Acute rejection caused more graft losses among Aza-treated patients than CsA-treated ones. However, chronic allograft nephropathy produced more graft losses in CsA patients. After this initial experience with CsA-based immunosuppression we developed a second phase in which better results were obtained in 209 first cadaveric RT recipients. The use of lower initial CsA doses, more rapid steroid tapering, and a better approach to CsA nephrotoxicity or chronic nephropathy by substantial reductions in CsA exposure and delayed azathioprine addition, lead to these improvements. From March 1995 through 2000, we used the new microemulsion CsA formulation (Neoral) with steroids or azathioprine in 110 first de novo RT recipients. Mean donor and recipient ages were significantly higher in this phase than in previous ones; consequently, survival and function results were slightly worse. Blood CsA concentrations measured 2 hours after administration represent a more precise predictor of exposure than trough concentrations. The last step in optimizing Neoral use in RT on our service was application of reduced-dosage with C2 monitoring instead of classical C0 testing. Acute rejection and treatment failure rates were low and renal allograft function improved with respect to previous full-dose C0 experiences. CsA use has evolved in these two decades in four consecutive phases. Short-term results have improved or been maintained from phase to phase, even with expanded-criteria donors until excellent features during last years with C2 monitoring and combination with potent drugs such as MMF or everolimus. During the coming years, new drugs and protocols will allow even more optimized use.

[Therapy with interferon plus ribavirin in hemodialysis patient with PCR-positive viral hepatitis C]

Traditionally, the treatment of viral hepatitis C (positive Polymerase Chain Reaction -PCR-) was with Interferon. A combination of Interferon plus Ribavirin has been producing better results in last years. Currently, Ribavirin is not indicated for patients with Chronic Kidney Disease because of a high risk of severe anaemia. In a few cases, this treatment is producing good results with previous dose adjustment. We show a case of a 28-year-old man with Chronic Kidney Disease on treatment with periodical hemodialysis and chronic hepatopathy HCV Positive RNA HCV (> 1,000,000 copies/ml) and persistent transaminase elevation. Before kidney transplantation, we decided to use Interferon (3,000,000 IU/48 hours) and Ribavirin (200 mg/24 hours) treatment. After 15 days, we saw normal transaminase values and HCV RNA was negative. The patient required temporary suspension of Ribavirin and two red blood cell transfusions due to severe anaemia. Ribavirin was reintroduced 200 mg/48 h posthemodialysis. The patient did not present any complication again, and could be treated for 14 months. After next 11 months of evolution the patient has normal rates of liver function and negative HCV RNA values.

[Membranous nephropathy associated to autoimmune thyroiditis, chronic pancreatitis and suprarrenal insufficiency]

A 33 year old female was admitted to the hospital to study aedema and bocio, A nephrotic syndrome was diagnosed and the renal biopsy demonstrated membranous glomerulonephritis, stage II. She was also diagnosed of Hashimoto's autoinmmune thyroiditis: TSH (41.5 uUl/ml), T4 (0.07 ng/dl), antithyroglobuline (1/2560) and antimicrosome (1/6400). Four year latter she was diagnosed of autoinmmune pancreatitis, without evidence of diabetes mellitus or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Eight years latter she was diagnosed of primary autoimmune suprarrenal insufficiency: basal cortisol: 2.7 mcg/dl, post ACTH estimulated cortisol: 5.6 mcg/dl, antinuclear antibody (1/160) and antiparietal (1/320). We present a pluriglandular autoimmune syndrome with membranous glomerulonephritis, thyroiditis, pancreatitis and suprarrenal insufficiency. To the best of our knowledge this complex syndrome has not been previously described.

[Colitis due to cytomegalovirus in a dialysis patient]

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an ubiquitous agent and a pathogen in all age groups. Although CMV disease in normal adults is not very usual, the virus is well known to produce severe symptoms, mostly in immunocompromised patients. Chronic hemodialysed patients constitute a risk population for developing CMV infection, nevertheless, clinical manifestations are not usual. One chronic renal failure patient who developed acute and severe colitis due to CMV infection is presented. Of interest are, the rarity of this case, the favorable clinical course after the treatment and the differential diagnosis with other gastrointestinal disorders frequently found in renal patients.

Influence of cyclosporin A (CyA) on renal handling of urate

Hyperuricaemia is a frequent side-effect of cyclosporin A (CyA) therapy in renal transplant patients, and gout arthritis is the cause of considerable morbidity among these patients. However, neither the potential predisposing factors nor the mechanisms of hyperuricaemia have been clearly elucidated. It has been reported that hyperuricaemia in patients on CyA is associated with a lowered glomerular filtration rate, or with a reduced urate clearance, due to an increase in the net tubular urate reabsorption or to a decrease in secretion. These conclusions are mostly supported by measurements of the basal clearance rate and fractional excretion of urate, but more precise studies of renal handling of urate by the renal tubule have seldom been performed. The purpose of our study was to investigate the prevalence of hyperuricaemia in our population of renal transplant patients, as well as the risk factors involved. Furthermore, we have evaluated the mechanism of hyperuricaemia by a combined pyrazinamide and probenecid test allowing a better evaluation of urate transport processes than pyrazinamide alone.

[Ionic dialysance to control the dose of dialysis. One year experience]

The Diascan equipment (Hospal) measures ionic dialysane which it derives the K and the Kt. If we divide the Kt obtained with Diascan between the Kt/V obtained by a simplified formula, it result a value of V for every patient. Entering this V in the Diascan software we can obtain a Kt/V (Diascan Kt/V), similar in theory to the simplified Kt/V. In the year 2002 we have controlled the delivered dialysis in our unit with the Diascan Kt/V. The aim of the present study was to study the agreement between de Diascan Kt/V and the Lowrie Kt/V. During the year 2002, 63 patients have been dialyzed in monitors with Diascan equipment. We calculated the V of each patient by dividing the Kt Diascan between the Lowrie Kt/V in the same dialysis session. The mea of the two consecutive measurements was considered the V value. Throughout the year 2002, 7 agreement studies were realized. The inter-method variability was assessed by the relative difference (absolute difference Diascan Kt/V-Lowrie Kt/V, divided by the average of both tests). A good agreement was considered when the relative difference was equal or lower than 10%. In the 7 agreement studies realized, the mean of the relative difference oscilled between 5.2 and 6.6%, and the percentage of patients with a relative difference equal or lower than 10% oscilled between 83 and 91%. During a month, the Diascan Kt/V was controlled in all dialysis sessions in 41 patients (554 sessions in total). Failure in the lecture of Kt/V Diascan was observed in 41 sessions (7%). A Diascan Kt/V greater than 1 (the minimum delivered dialysis considered in our unit) was obtained in 93% of the valid sessions. 38 of 41 patients had a mean monthly Diascan Kt/V greater than 1. The coefficient of variability of any patient oscilled between 2.1 and 12.4% (mean 5.1%). Diascan Kt/V is good procedure for the monitoring the delivered dialysis without blood sampling or any additional costs.

Influence of immunosuppression on the prevalence of cancer after kidney transplantation

The prevalence of cancer in renal transplant patients is greater than in the general population. It is influenced by demographic and ethnic characteristics. We performed a retrospective study of 793 patients who received 872 kidney transplants at our center during 23 years. The age at transplantation was 41.4+/-14.0 years, the follow up 75.4+/-69.4 months. The cohorts include 203 patients treated with azathioprine-prednisone; 510, cyclosporine-based therapy; and 159, tacrolimus-based therapy. There were 95 patients (10.9%) who developed at least one neoplasm with 9 having more than one type of tumor. The incidence was of 17.3 cases per 1000 patients-years. Forty-four (46.3%) had skin cancer, 8 (8.4%) Kaposi sarcoma and 43 (45.3%) a non-skin cancer. Seven of eight patients with Kaposi sarcoma were on CsA therapy. The risk of developing a neoplasm at 5, 10, and 15 years was 8%, 17%, and 30% respectively. In a multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with neoplastic diseases were older age (OR=1.061; 95% CI 1.039-1.084; P=.000), male sex (OR=2.658; 95% CI 1.536-4.599; P=.000), length of follow-up (OR=1.121; 95% CI 1.073-1.172; P =.000), and immunosuppression with CsA (OR=4.448; 95% CI 1.334-14.764; P=.015). Cancer was the cause of death in 26 patients, the fourth most common cause after cardiovascular disease, infection, and liver failure. We conclude that malignancies are an important cause of morbidity and mortality among transplant patients. Special attention must be devoted to older male patients with a long-term follow up to develop preventive and surveillance strategies.

Comparison of C0 and C2 cyclosporine monitoring in long-term renal transplant recipients

Recent data show that monitoring cyclosporine A (CsA) concentrations with 2-hour postdose levels (C2) correlates with the incidence of rejection and graft outcome in de novo renal transplant patients. The purpose of the present work was to evaluate the advantage of C2 monitoring after the first year of kidney transplantation. We studied 161 patients, 96 on CsA-prednisone and 65 on triple therapy (Aza or MMF) who had been transplanted for a mean of 103+/-44 months. Mean serum creatinine (SCr) was 1.65+/-0.69 mg/dL, mean C0 was 174+/-44, and C2 was 667+/-194 ng/mL. Patients were classified according to C2 values: >850 (n=29), between 850 and 450 (n=109), and <450 (n=23) ng/mL. Patients with C2 <450 ng/mL displayed higher SCr values (1.97+/-0.99; 1.59+/-0.51; 1.52+/-0.4 mg/dL; P<.001), received lower CsA doses (172+/-54; 207+/-54; 227+/-56 mg/d, P<.01), showed lower C0 levels (155+/-48; 172+/-41; 199+/-45 ng/mL; P< .001), and included more patients on triple therapy (54.5%; 44%; 17.2%; P<.05). We found weak correlations between C0 and C2 (r=0.37), between C2 and CsA dose (r=0.36), and between C0 and SCr (r=-0.37). Among 117 patients followed up for 1 year with several C0 and C2 measurements, the coefficient of variation of C0 was 17% and of C2 was 21%. Graft functional deterioration occurred in 16 patients independent of the differences among the C2 groups, but 7 recipients (43.7%) had C0 <150 ng/mL and C2/C0 >5. We conclude that C2 in monitoring stable patients needs further evaluation.

Renal transplant recipient outcome after losing the first graft

Renal transplantation is the optimal therapy for end-stage renal failure and considerable attention has been given to graft and patient survival and the effectiveness of immunosuppressive regimens. However, little attention has been given to outcome for patients who lose their grafts. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of the 793 first renal transplants performed at our institution between November 1979 and December 2001. A total of 348 patients lost their grafts, 116 by death with a functioning graft (33.3%) and 232 patients for other causes (66.7%). Eighty-six patients (37.1%) received a second transplant 3.5+/-2.4 years after returning to dialysis and the remainder continued on dialysis. Retransplanted patients were younger at the time of the first transplant (P=.000), and both time on dialysis (P=.012) and duration of graft function (P=.057) were shorter than for those remaining on dialysis. Therefore, retransplant patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was better than among those patients on dialysis not included on the waiting list (P<.001), but when compared with the relisted patients the survival rate was almost identical (96%, 85%, and 67% vs 97%, 82%, and 67%; P=NS). Almost 40% of patients who lost their first grafts were retransplanted. We did not observe differences in patient survival between retransplant and relisted patients. Because the number of cases is limited, our results need to be confirmed by larger series.

Outcome of cadaveric renal transplant patients treated for 10 years with cyclosporine: is chronic allograft nephropathy the major cause of late graft loss?

BACKGROUND

The introduction of cyclosporine (CsA) has improved the short-term outcome of renal transplantation, but its effect on the long-term survival is not well known.

METHODS

We analyzed 128 cadaveric first renal transplant recipients with CsA and prednisone as basal immunosuppression followed for at least 10 years, and we have compared them with a group of 185 historical patients treated with azathioprine (Aza) and prednisone.

RESULTS

The 1-year graft survival was 83% in the CsA-treated patients and 68% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025), and the differences were significant for 3 years. Acute rejection accounted for the 10.9% of losses in CsA-treated patients and for 23.8% of losses in Aza-treated patients (P=0.046). Chronic allograft nephropathy was the cause of graft losses in 40.6% and 16.8% of cases (P=0.008). Patient survival at 5 years was 88% in CsA-treated patients and 79% in the Aza-treated patients (P<0.025). When analyzing the data of the 64 CsA-treated patients and the 84 Aza-treated patients with one functioning graft at 10 years, mean serum creatinine values were significantly higher in the CsA-treated patients at all time points but the increases were not significantly different. At 10 years, mean blood pressure was higher (P=0.002), and hypercholesterolemia (P=0.011) and hyperuricemia (P=0.000) were more prevalent in the CsA-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CsA resulted in a better short-time patient and graft survival that was not maintained in the long-term outcome. Chronic allograft nephropathy was the leading cause of graft loss in CsA-treated patients. Graft function was poorer in the CsA-treated patients, but its decline was similar in the two groups.