Prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia in the United States Medicare population

Objective: To estimate the prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia in the United States (US) Medicare population.Methods: Patients were selected from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (01 January 2010-31 December 2014) to estimate the prevalence and economic burden of hyperkalemia. The prevalence for each calendar year was calculated as the number of patients with hyperkalemia divided by the total number of eligible patients per year. To estimate the economic burden of hyperkalemia, patients with hyperkalemia (cases) were matched 1:1 to patients without hyperkalemia (controls) on age group, chronic kidney disease [CKD] stage, dialysis treatment, and heart failure. The incremental 30-day and 1-year resource utilization and costs (2016 USD) associated with hyperkalemia were estimated.Results: The estimated prevalence of hyperkalemia was 2.6-2.7% in the overall population and 8.9-9.3% among patients with CKD and/or heart failure. Patients with hyperkalemia had higher 1-year rates of inpatient admissions (1.28 vs. 0.44), outpatient visits (30.48 vs. 23.88), emergency department visits (2.01 vs. 1.17), and skilled nursing facility admissions (0.36 vs. 0.11) than the matched controls (all p < .001). Patients with hyperkalemia incurred on average $7208 higher 30-day costs ($8894 vs. $1685) and $19,348 higher 1-year costs ($34,362 vs. $15,013) than controls (both p < .001). Among patients with CKD and/or heart failure, the 30-day and 1-year total cost differences between cohorts were $7726 ($9906 vs. $2180) and $21,577 ($41,416 vs. $19,839), respectively (both p < .001).Conclusions: Hyperkalemia had an estimated prevalence of 2.6-2.7% in the Medicare population and was associated with markedly high healthcare costs.

Postdischarge Health Care Costs and Readmission in Patients With Hyperkalemia-Related Hospitalizations

Introduction

Limited evidence is available regarding the postdischarge economic and readmission burdens of hyperkalemia.

Methods

Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare-Supplemental Claims database (January 1, 2010–December 31, 2014), adult patients with a hospitalization with a hyperkalemia diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 276.7, hyperkalemia cohort) were 1:1 matched with patients with a hospitalization without evidence of hyperkalemia (nonhyperkalemia cohort) on age, chronic kidney disease stage, heart failure, dialysis, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor use, and major diagnostic categories of the hospitalization. All-cause health care costs and health care resource utilization measures were compared between cohorts during the 1-year postdischarge period. Postdischarge readmission and length of stay (LOS) were compared between hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations from the hyperkalemia cohort and matched hospitalizations unrelated to hyperkalemia from the nonhyperkalemia cohort.

Results

Patients with hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations (n = 4426) incurred $30,379 (95% confidence interval, $25,423–$35,335) higher 1-year total all-cause costs ($68,861 vs. $38,482) and had higher rates of inpatient admissions (1.0 vs. 0.4), emergency department visits (2.0 vs. 1.2), and outpatient visits (49.6 vs. 39.1) than the nonhyperkalemia cohort during the 1-year postdischarge study period (all P < 0.001). Hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations (n = 5377) were associated with significantly higher readmission rates (within 30 days: 0.15 vs. 0.09; 60 days: 0.25 vs. 0.16; 90 days: 0.36 vs. 0.23; all P < 0.001), longer LOS per readmission (8.1 vs. 7.1 days), and longer total inpatient days (10.5 vs. 5.8 days) compared with hospitalizations unrelated to hyperkalemia (all P < 0.001). Similar trends were observed across comorbidity subgroups.

Conclusion

Hyperkalemia-related hospitalizations were associated with significant economic and readmission burdens during the 1-year postdischarge period.

The prevalence of hyperkalemia in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The retrospective study aimed to estimate prevalence of hyperkalemia using a large US commercial claims database.

METHODS

Adults with serum potassium lab data (2010 to 2014) and ≥1 calendar year of data were included from a large US commercial claims database. Hyperkalemia was defined as ≥2 serum potassium measurements >5.0 mEq/L or one hyperkalemia diagnosis code (ICD-9-CM, 276.7) or one sodium polystyrene sulfonate fill. Hyperkalemia prevalence was estimated for the overall population and subgroups with hyperkalemia-related comorbidities by calendar year. Hyperkalemia prevalence was also standardized to the US population to estimate the number of US adults with hyperkalemia.

RESULTS

The analysis included 2,270,635 patients (2010-2014). The annual prevalence of hyperkalemia in the overall population was 1.57% in 2014, with higher rates observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure, diabetes and hypertension. Among patients with CKD and/or heart failure, the 2014 annual prevalence was 6.35%. Among patients with hyperkalemia, 48.43% had CKD and/or heart failure in 2014. The prevalence of hyperkalemia was higher in patients with more severe CKD, as well as older patients and men. Extrapolating those results to the US population supports that 1.55% or 3.7 million US adults had hyperkalemia in 2014.

CONCLUSIONS

An estimated 3.7 million US adults had hyperkalemia in 2014, and this prevalence rate has increased since 2010. In patients with CKD and/or heart failure, the annual prevalence of hyperkalemia was 6.35% in 2014, and about half of all patients with hyperkalemia have either CKD and/or heart failure.

The Cost of Hyperkalemia in the United States

Introduction

There are limited data on the cost of hyperkalemia.

Methods

This retrospective analysis of the Truven MarketScan claims database assessed the economic burden of hyperkalemia among selected adult patients with hyperkalemia and matched controls.

Results

A total of 39,626 cases (patients with hyperkalemia) were matched to 39,626 controls (patients without hyperkalemia) based on age, dialysis, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage, heart failure, and renin-angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitor use. Compared with controls, cases incurred $4128 (95% confidence interval [CI] $3893-$4363) higher 30-day total health care costs ($5994 vs. $1865) and $15,983 (95% CI $15,026-$16,940) higher 1-year costs ($31,844 vs. $15,861). Among 11,221 matched pairs of patients with CKD and/or heart failure, cases incurred $5553 (95% CI $5059-$6047) higher 30-day total health care costs ($8165 vs. $2612) and $24,133 (95% CI $21,748-$26,518) higher 1-year costs ($48,994 vs. $24,861) than controls. The multivariable adjusted 1-year total health care cost difference was $15,606 (95% CI $14,648-$16,576) among all patients and $25,156 (95% CI $23,529-$26,757) among patients with CKD and/or heart failure. Cases had higher resource utilization rates including inpatient admissions (30-day: 0.14 vs. 0.03; 1-year: 0.44 vs. 0.19), outpatient visits (30-day: 3.33 vs. 2.28; 1-year: 26.58 vs. 18.53), and emergency department visits (30-day: 0.16 vs. 0.06; 1-year: 0.86 vs. 0.50) (all P < 0.001). When hospitalized, cases stayed 1.51 days (95% CI 1.22-1.80) longer and were 40% more likely to be readmitted.

Conclusion

These data indicate that hyperkalemia is associated with a significant economic burden on afflicted patients and the health care system.

Migraine Prophylaxis and Acute Treatment Patterns Among Commercially Insured Patients in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To describe prophylactic and acute medication treatment patterns, including timing, medication type, and duration of use in migraine patients initiating prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND

Patients with migraine can be treated with acute and prophylactic therapies. Current treatment options for migraine prophylaxis are associated with poor tolerability and low adherence and persistence.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan^® Research Databases to identify adults in the United States with a migraine diagnosis who initiated migraine prophylactic medication (index event) between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2011. Prescribed prophylactic medications evaluated included topiramate, beta-blockers, and tricyclic antidepressants. Patients were required to have 12 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment. Patient characteristics, migraine-specific prescribed prophylactic treatment patterns (including gaps in therapy, treatment switches, and additions of index medications), and prescribed acute medication utilization were assessed.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 107,122 patients, with 52,275 (49%) initiating topiramate, 22,658 (21%) initiating beta-blockers, and 32,189 (30%) initiating tricyclic antidepressants. Mean (SD) age was 41 (12) years and 83% were female. Persistence with migraine prophylactic medication was low; 81% of patients had gaps of >90 days in their migraine prophylaxis in the first year. The gap in therapy occurred early in treatment (mean, 95 days), and only 10% of patients restarted prophylactic therapy within that year. Switching from index medication to another prophylactic medication or adding prophylaxis was uncommon (13% and 5%, respectively). One year after initiating prophylaxis, 65% of patients were not receiving any prophylactic therapies. Most patients initiating migraine prophylaxis also utilized acute treatments (81%); opioid use was more frequent than triptan use (53% vs 48%) and was common (40%) among patients without other chronic pain conditions (eg, arthritis, fibromyalgia, and lower back pain).

CONCLUSION

Patients with migraine who initiated prophylactic therapy had poor persistence with early gaps in therapy, were unlikely to switch prophylactic treatments, and most discontinued prophylaxis by the end of the first year.

PCSK9 Loss-of-Function Variants, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke: Data From 9 Studies of Blacks and Whites

BACKGROUND

PCSK9 loss-of-function (LOF) variants allow for the examination of the effects of lifetime reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on cardiovascular events. We examined the association of PCSK9 LOF variants with LDL-C and incident coronary heart disease and stroke through a meta-analysis of data from 8 observational cohorts and 1 randomized trial of statin therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

These 9 studies together included 17 459 blacks with 403 (2.3%) having at least 1 Y142X or C679X variant and 31 306 whites with 955 (3.1%) having at least 1 R46L variant. Unadjusted odds ratios for associations between PCSK9 LOF variants and incident coronary heart disease (851 events in blacks and 2662 events in whites) and stroke (523 events in blacks and 1660 events in whites) were calculated using pooled Mantel-Haenszel estimates with continuity correction factors. Pooling results across studies using fixed-effects inverse-variance-weighted models, PCSK9 LOF variants were associated with 35 mg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI], 32-39) lower LDL-C in blacks and 13 mg/dL (95% CI, 11-16) lower LDL-C in whites. PCSK9 LOF variants were associated with a pooled odds ratio for coronary heart disease of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.92) in blacks and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.63-1.06) in whites. PCSK9 LOF variants were not associated with incident stroke (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.48-1.47 in blacks and odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.80-1.41 in whites).

CONCLUSIONS

PCSK9 LOF variants were associated with lower LDL-C and coronary heart disease incidence. PCSK9 LOF variants were not associated with stroke risk.

The Clinical and Economic Burden of Hyperkalemia on Medicare and Commercial Payers

BACKGROUND

Hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.0 mEq/L) may be caused by reduced kidney function and drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and is often present in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the burden of hyperkalemia in US Medicare fee-for-service and commercially insured populations using real-world claims data, focusing on prevalence, comorbidities, mortality, medical utilization, and cost.

METHODS

A descriptive, retrospective claims data analysis was performed on patients with hyperkalemia using the 2014 Medicare 5% sample and the 2014 Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter databases. The starting study samples required patient insurance eligibility during ≥1 months in 2014. The identification of hyperkalemia and other comorbidities required having ≥1 qualifying claims in 2014 with an appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code in any position. To address the differences between patients with and without hyperkalemia, CKD subsamples were analyzed separately. Mortality rates were calculated in the Medicare sample population only. The claims were grouped into major service categories; the allowed costs reflected all costs incurred by each cohort divided by the total number of member months for that cohort.

RESULTS

The prevalence of hyperkalemia in the Medicare and commercially insured samples was 2.3% and 0.09%, respectively. Hyperkalemia was associated with multiple comorbidities, most notably CKD. The prevalence of CKD in the Medicare and the commercially insured members with hyperkalemia was 64.8% and 31.8%, respectively. After adjusting for CKD severity, the annual mortality rate for Medicare patients with CKD and hyperkalemia was 24.9% versus 10.4% in patients with CKD without hyperkalemia. The allowed costs in patients with CKD and hyperkalemia in the Medicare and commercially insured cohorts were more than twice those in patients with CKD without hyperkalemia. Inpatient care accounted for >50% of costs in patients with CKD and hyperkalemia.

CONCLUSION

Hyperkalemia is associated with substantial clinical and economic burden among US commercially insured and Medicare populations.

LDL cholesterol response and statin adherence among high-risk patients initiating treatment

OBJECTIVES

The 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) cholesterol treatment guideline recommends monitoring percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among patients initiating statins as an indication of response and adherence. We examined LDL-C reduction and statin adherence among high-risk patients initiating statins in a real-world setting.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study population included Kaiser Permanente Georgia members (n = 1066) with a history of coronary heart disease or risk equivalent(s) initiating statins in 2011. Percent change in LDL-C was defined using measurements before and 60 to 450 days after statin initiation. Statin adherence was defined by proportion of days covered, categorized as high (≥80%), intermediate (50%-79%), and low (< 50%).

RESULTS

Overall, 58.4% of patients failed to achieve a ≥ 30% LDL-C reduction after statin initiation. The prevalences of high, intermediate, and low statin adherence were 41.3%, 23.2%, and 35.6%, respectively. Of patients with high adherence, 42.3% did not achieve a ≥ 30% reduction in LDL-C compared with 54.7% and 79.7% of those with intermediate and low statin adherence, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, and compared with those with high adherence, the risk ratios for not achieving a ≥ 30% LDL-C reduction were 1.31 (95% CI, 1.13-1.52) and 1.88 (95% CI, 1.67-2.11), for those with intermediate and low adherence. Women and African Americans were less likely to have high adherence, whereas having cardiologist visits was associated with high adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world setting, many patients did not achieve a 30% or larger LDL-C reduction. These data support the ACC/AHA recommendation to monitor LDL-C response among patients initiating statins.

Characterizing the severe asthma population in the United States: claims-based analysis of three treatment cohorts in the year prior to treatment escalation

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the disposition of severe patients prior to treatment escalation. To classify patients by treatment step using pharmacy data and describe their economic and healthcare utilization, insurance status, and sociodemographic characteristics in the year prior to escalation to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps 4 and 5.

METHODS

This was a retrospective claims cohort study of asthma patients (age 12-75 years) newly initiated on "stable therapy" (three consecutive months of therapy) with omalizumab, high intensity corticosteroids (HICS; ≥1000 µg/d inhaled fluticasone equivalent or oral prednisone), or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (HDICS; ≥500-<1000 µg/d fluticasone equivalent) from 2002 to 2011. Other asthma treatments were compared as a reference.

RESULTS

Of 25,297 patients, 856 initiated omalizumab, 6926 initiated HICS, and 11,445 initiated HDICS. In the year prior to treatment escalation to omalizumab, HICS, and HDICS, respectively, individuals had high annual mean medical expenditures ($14,071, $12,030, and $7570), utilization (27 outpatient and 10 specialty care visits; 19 outpatient and three specialty; 15 outpatient and two specialty), asthma-related prescription drugs (11.74, 7.8, and 5.17) and chronic comorbidities (2.68, 2.67, and 2.19). Prior to omalizumab treatment, patients were more likely to be salaried, full-time employees with commercial PPO/POS insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior to escalating treatment to GINA steps 4 and 5, individuals experienced significant annual medical expenditures, healthcare resource utilization and polypharmacy burden, which may reflect poorly controlled asthma and the need to escalate treatment. Medical claims data and utilization-based measures may be helpful in classifying individuals by GINA treatment step.

Statin underuse and low prevalence of LDL-C control among U.S. adults at high risk of coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Statins reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in individuals with a history of CHD or risk equivalents. A 10-year CHD risk >20% is considered a risk equivalent but is frequently not detected. Statin use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control were examined among participants with CHD or risk equivalents in the nationwide Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study (n = 8812).

METHODS

Participants were categorized into 4 mutually exclusive groups: (1) history of CHD (n = 4025); (2) no history of CHD but with a history of stroke and/or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n = 946); (3) no history of CHD or stroke/AAA but with diabetes mellitus (n = 3134); or (4) no history of the conditions in (1) through (3) but with 10-year Framingham CHD risk score (FRS) >20% calculated using the third Adult Treatment Panel point scoring system (n = 707).

RESULTS

Statins were used by 58.4% of those in the CHD group and 41.7%, 40.4% and 20.1% of those in the stroke/AAA, diabetes mellitus and FRS >20% groups, respectively. Among those taking statins, 65.1% had LDL-C <100 mg/dL, with no difference between the CHD, stroke/AAA, or diabetes mellitus groups. However, compared with those in the CHD group, LDL-C <100 mg/dL was less common among participants in the FRS >20% group (multivariable adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.85). Results were similar using the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol treatment guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that many people with high CHD risk, especially those with an FRS >20%, do not receive guideline-concordant lipid-lowering therapy and do not achieve an LDL-C <100 mg/dL.

Declines in coronary heart disease incidence and mortality among middle-aged adults with and without diabetes

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate secular changes in coronary heart disease (CHD) incidence and mortality among adults with and without diabetes and to determine the effect of increased lipid-lowering medication use and reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels on these changes.

METHODS

We analyzed data on participants aged 45 to 64 years from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study in 1987-1996 (early period) and the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study in 2003-2009 (late period). Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of diabetes and period with incident CHD and CHD mortality were obtained after adjustment for sociodemographics cardiovascular risk factors, lipid-lowering medication use, and LDL-C.

RESULTS

After multivariable adjustment, diabetes was associated with an increased CHD risk during the early (HR = 1.99, 95% confidence interval = 1.59-2.49) and late (HR = 2.39, 95% confidence interval = 1.69-3.35) periods. CHD incidence and mortality declined between the early and late periods for individuals with and without diabetes. Increased use of lipid-lowering medication and lower LDL-C explained 33.6% and 27.2% of the decline in CHD incidence and CHD mortality, respectively, for those with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rates have declined, diabetes remains associated with an increased risk of CHD incidence and mortality, highlighting the need for continuing diabetes prevention and cardiovascular risk factor management.

Discordance between high non-HDL cholesterol and high LDL-cholesterol among US adults

BACKGROUND

Although low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is recommended as the primary marker to guide lipid-lowering therapy, some data suggest non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) may better reflect coronary heart disease risk. Discordance between these measures has not been evaluated.

METHODS

We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005-2010 (n = 4986) to examine the discordance between these lipid parameters. Elevated levels of non-HDL-C and LDL-C were defined by using the 2004 Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.

RESULTS

The prevalence of high non-HDL-C and LDL-C was 22.7% and 24.5%, respectively. Of participants with high non-HDL-C, 9.7% had normal LDL-C, whereas 15.7% of participants with high LDL-C had normal non-HDL-C. We estimate 3.9 million US adults had high non-HDL-C and normal LDL-C, whereas 6.8 million US adults had high LDL-C and normal non-HDL-C. Persons with high non-HDL-C and normal LDL-C were older, more likely to be men, Hispanic, and have impaired fasting glucose, diabetes metabolic syndrome, and more risk factors for coronary heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial discordance exists between high non-HDL-C and high LDL-C among US adults. Reliance on either single measure could result in failure to classify cardiovascular heart disease risks appropriately.

Awareness, treatment, and control of LDL cholesterol are lower among U.S. adults with undiagnosed diabetes versus diagnosed diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes is often undiagnosed, resulting in incorrect risk stratification for lipid-lowering therapy. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010 to determine the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) among U.S. adults with undiagnosed diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Fasting NHANES participants 20 years of age or older who had 10-year Framingham coronary heart disease (CHD) risk scores <20% and were free of CHD or other CHD risk equivalents (n = 5,528) were categorized as having normal glucose, impaired fasting glucose, undiagnosed diabetes, or diagnosed diabetes. High LDL-C was defined by the 2004 Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III guidelines.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diagnosed and of undiagnosed diabetes was 8 and 4%, respectively. Mean LDL-C was 102 ± 2 mg/dL among those with diagnosed diabetes and 117 ± 3 mg/dL for those with undiagnosed diabetes (P < 0.001). The prevalence of high LDL-C was similar among individuals with undiagnosed (81%) and diagnosed (77%) diabetes. Among individuals with undiagnosed diabetes and high LDL-C, 38% were aware, 27% were treated, and 16% met the ATP III LDL-C goal for diabetes. In contrast, among individuals with diagnosed diabetes and high LDL-C, 70% were aware, 61% were treated, and 36% met the ATP III goal. Subjects with undiagnosed diabetes remained less likely to have controlled LDL-C after multivariable adjustment (prevalence ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved screening for diabetes and reducing the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes may identify individuals requiring more intensive LDL-C reduction.

Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of high low density lipoprotein-cholesterol among United States adults from 1999-2000 through 2009-2010

Marked increases in the awareness, treatment, and control of high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol occurred among United States (US) adults from 1988-1994 to 1999-2004. An update to the Third Adult Treatment Panel guidelines was published in 2004, and it is unknown if these improvements have continued since the publication of these revised treatment recommendations. The aim of this study was to determine trends in the awareness, treatment, and control of high LDL cholesterol among US adults from 1999-2000 to 2009-2010 using nationally representative samples of US adults aged ≥20 years from 6 consecutive National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) in 1999-2000 (n = 1,659), 2001-2002 (n = 1,897), 2003-2004 (n = 1,698), 2005-2006 (n = 1,692), 2007-2008 (n = 2,044), and 2009-2010 (n = 2,318). LDL cholesterol was measured after an overnight fast, and high LDL cholesterol and controlled LDL cholesterol were defined using the 2004 updated Third Adult Treatment Panel guidelines. Awareness and treatment of high cholesterol were defined using self-report. Among US adults, the prevalence of high LDL cholesterol did not change from 1999-2000 (37.2%) to 2009-2010 (37.8%). Awareness of high LDL cholesterol increased from 48.9% in 1999-2000 to 62.8% in 2003-2004 but did not increase further through 2009-2010 (61.5%). Among those aware of having high LDL cholesterol, treatment increased from 41.3% in 1999-2000 to 72.6% in 2007-2008 and was 70.0% in 2009-2010. Among US adults receiving treatment for high LDL cholesterol, the percentage with controlled LDL cholesterol increased from 45.0% in 1999-2000 to 65.3% in 2005-2006 and had decreased slightly by 2009-2010 (63.6%). In conclusion, high LDL cholesterol remains common among US adults. Additional efforts are needed to prevent high LDL cholesterol and increase the awareness, treatment, and control of high LDL cholesterol among US adults.

Minimally important difference of Health Assessment Questionnaire in psoriatic arthritis: relating thresholds of improvement in functional ability to patient-rated importance and satisfaction

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in function as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and the meaningfulness of the changes, in importance and satisfaction, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

HAQ-DI was assessed at baseline and at Weeks 4, 12, and 24 in a randomized double-blind study of 205 patients with active PsA receiving etanercept 25 mg twice weekly or placebo. Concurrently, patients rated the importance of and satisfaction with their change in function on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all important/satisfied; 7 = extremely important/satisfied). Mean HAQ-DI improvement corresponding to ratings of minimally (2-3) or very (6-7) important or satisfied was determined using a posthoc linear mixed-model analysis. Patient importance ratings were used as an anchor to estimate minimally important difference (MID) for HAQ-DI; distribution-based estimates were also calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients (69 placebo; 92 etanercept) had ≥ 1 HAQ-DI scores showing improvement from baseline and a corresponding importance or satisfaction rating. HAQ-DI improvements corresponding to importance scale ratings of 2 or 3 were 0.335 (95% CI 0.214, 0.455) and 0.360 (95% CI 0.263, 0.456), respectively, suggesting an MID of about 0.35. HAQ-DI improvements corresponding to satisfaction scale ratings of 2 and 3 were 0.293 (95% CI 0.230, 0.357) and 0.360 (95% CI 0.307, 0.413). For a given change in HAQ-DI, nearly two-thirds of patients indicated a lower rating for satisfaction than for importance. This trial was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT00317499).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests the MID for HAQ-DI in PsA is about 0.35. The results may also provide insight into patient satisfaction with changes in function and expectations for therapy.

Patient-reported outcomes in a randomized trial of etanercept in psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of etanercept treatment on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

A 24-week double-blind comparison to placebo was followed by a 48-week open-label phase in which all eligible patients received etanercept. PRO were measured using the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form (SF-36), the EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS), and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) patient pain assessment.

RESULTS

Beginning at Week 4 and continuing through Week 24 of double-blind treatment, patients treated with etanercept had significantly higher mean percentage improvement in HAQ-DI relative to baseline than patients given placebo (53.6% vs 6.4% at Week 24; p < 0.001). After 48 weeks of open-label treatment with etanercept, the mean percentage change from study baseline was 52.8% for the original etanercept group and 46.9% for the original placebo group, with 41.2% of patients overall achieving a HAQ-DI of 0. Mean changes relative to baseline for SF-36 physical component summary scores, EQ-5D VAS, and ACR pain assessment were also significant in the double-blind period for etanercept compared with placebo (p < 0.001 for all 3 measures). Patients taking placebo achieved similar improvements once they began treatment with etanercept in the open-label period.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PsA treated with etanercept reported significant improvements in physical function that were almost 10 times the improvement seen with placebo and were maintained for up to 2 years. Almost half of patients treated with etanercept reported no disability by the end of the study.

Effect of anakinra on functional status in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant therapy with traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: evidence from the OMEGA Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in functional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra in addition to a disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD).

METHODS

In this large, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study, adult patients with RA receiving methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or hydroxychloroquine for > or = 3 months were given anakinra 100 mg once daily for up to 36 weeks. The primary objective was to evaluate changes from baseline to week 36 in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index and subscales. Changes in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), proportion of patients meeting European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, and the safety of each combination regimen were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 1207 patients were enrolled, received > or = 1 dose of anakinra, and were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. A statistically significant change in the HAQ disability index was observed (p = 0.0001); no significant differences were seen among the 3 DMARD groups. A clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ (> 0.22) was observed in 51% of patients. Mean improvement in DAS28 was 1.5 (p < 0.0001), and 64% of patients achieved a good or moderate EULAR response score. Injection site reaction was the most frequently (62%) reported adverse event. The incidence of infections (24%), most commonly respiratory infection, was similar across treatment groups. No notable changes were observed in laboratory findings and vital signs.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that anakinra 100 mg/day in combination with DMARD therapy safely improved functional status in patients with active RA.

Current Status of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Industry-Sponsored Oncology Clinical Trials and Product Labels

Assessing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials is of interest to clinicians, patients, regulators, and industry. The use and impact of PROs is a growing area of methodologic research, particularly as they relate to tumor types, biomarkers, and various patient populations and cultures. Both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products in recent guidance have acknowledged the need to account for treatment-related impact on patient symptoms and/or health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Clinical research likely reflects the informative value of PROs. A search of www.clinicaltrials.gov , the FDA Web site, and product package inserts was conducted to assess the inclusion of symptom assessment and HRQOL within industry-sponsored clinical trials in cancer and approved cancer therapies and their respective product labels. Overall, there were 2,704 industry-sponsored oncology trials, of which 322 (12%) included a PRO measure. Of the 70 FDA new or revised labels, only six package inserts include PRO data. Symptoms were assessed uniformly across the phases of clinical trials, whereas HRQOL assessment increased in the later phases of clinical trials. Collecting PRO data can enhance our understanding of cancer burden and the impact of interventions on patients' lives.

Etanercept improves psoriatic arthritis patient-reported outcomes: results from EDUCATE

Experience Diagnosing, Understanding Care, and Treatment With Etanercept (EDUCATE) is a multicenter, phase 4, 24-week, open-label study of the safety and efficacy of etanercept therapy in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in routine dermatologic practice. We present data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from EDUCATE, which demonstrate that subjects with PsA achieved clinically meaningful improvements in both skin- and joint-related PROs after 24 weeks of treatment.

Reductions in healthcare resource utilization in psoriatic arthritis patients receiving etanercept therapy: results from the educate trial

The Experience Diagnosing, Understanding Care, and Treatment with Enbrel (EDUCATE) trial is a phase IV, 24-week, multicenter, open-label study of etanercept 50 mg weekly in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in community dermatology clinics. In this study, patients with active PsA and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis have measurable uses of healthcare resources at baseline, reflecting a burden of illness. Etanercept significantly reduced healthcare resource utilization, absenteeism, and caregiver assistance in PsA patients after 24 weeks of treatment. These results could translate into savings on both direct and indirect costs and improvements in health-related quality of life for patients with PsA.

Long-term experience with etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly and younger patients: patient-reported outcomes from multiple controlled and open-label extension studies

BACKGROUND

The impact of long-term therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in elderly (> or = 65 years of age) and younger (< 65 years of age) patients, especially on patient-reported outcomes, has not been well studied. We evaluated patient-reported outcomes in elderly patients treated with etanercept, in contrast to outcomes in younger patients, using data from multiple controlled and open-label extension studies of patients with early RA (ERA; < or = 3 years) and late RA (LRA; disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD]-refractory RA).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis included adult patients with RA enrolled in controlled, double-blind studies (up to 2 years) and subsequent open-label extension studies (up to 4 years). Patients were evaluated according to age at baseline of the original study. Patients may have received etanercept, placebo or methotrexate during the blinded treatment phases, but all patients had been receiving etanercept 25 mg twice weekly for at least 4 years. Both ERA and LRA extension studies are ongoing. Patient-reported outcome assessments included improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), proportions of patients achieving an improvement in HAQ-DI > or = 0.22 points, patients exhibiting worsening of HAQ-DI and patients achieving an HAQ-DI score of 0.

RESULTS

Elderly patients, with either ERA or LRA, had significantly worse baseline mean HAQ-DI scores than younger patients (p < 0.05, Student's t-test) in most studies, indicating greater disability. Improvement in HAQ-DI was greatest during the first 3 months after starting etanercept treatment in the controlled phase and appeared to be sustained over 3-6 months in patients with early or DMARD-refractory RA. Across the various controlled trials, mean improvements from baseline in HAQ-DI ranged from 0.39 to 0.92 points in elderly patients and from 0.57 to 1.00 points in younger patients. Patients with ERA and LRA, regardless of age group, maintained their improvement in HAQ-DI throughout the open-label extension trials for up to a total of 6 years of etanercept therapy. Change from baseline in HAQ-DI was moderately correlated with 28-joint Disease Activity Score within each age group across the multiple trials.

CONCLUSION

Both elderly and younger patients with RA treated with etanercept exhibited similar and rapid improvements in functional status during controlled studies, and these improvements were sustained during open-label extension trials.

Comparison of costs associated with the use of etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

A retrospective study of health plan costs related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) revealed that etanercept was associated with the lowest drug and outpatient costs to the health plan than infliximab and adalimumab. Compared with etanercept, infliximab was related to 55% higher postindex RA-related monthly total health care costs paid by the health plan, based on adjusted analyses (95% confidence interval, 1.47-1.64). Patients receiving adalimumab had 12% higher costs (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.21). The study showed the average dispensing dose increase was greatest for infliximab (17.4%) and least for etanercept (4.1%).

Clinical and economic burden of psoriasis

In an effort to assess the burden associated with psoriasis, the MEDLINE database and bibliographies of articles published from 1975 through 2004 were searched, emphasizing patients with moderate-to-severe disease, to summarize the current understanding on various aspects of disease burden. The clinical burden of psoriasis is both well documented and significant. The disease is debilitating: Sufficient disease severity interferes with patients' work and day-to-day living. Perhaps even more damaging is the psychosocial toll psoriasis exacts on the afflicted. Numerous studies document the extent of mental and emotional anguish, features not often revealed through objective measures. Successful treatment must focus on improving a patient's quality of life as well as reducing the clinical features of psoriasis. The economic burden is also significant, though far fewer studies of the associated indirect costs have been published in the literature.

Patient-reported outcomes of psoriasis improvement with etanercept therapy: results of a randomized phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Etanercept, a soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor, lessens the severity of psoriasis as measured by physician-reported clinical outcomes. Equally important is the patient perspective on the effect of etanercept therapy on daily life.

OBJECTIVES

To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with psoriasis receiving etanercept therapy.

METHODS

In this multinational, randomized, phase III trial, patients with psoriasis received placebo (n = 193), etanercept 50 mg per week (n = 196) or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (n = 194) during the initial 12-week, double-blind period. Thereafter, all patients received open-label etanercept (50 mg per week). The following PROs were assessed: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), patient rating of pruritus, and patient global assessment of psoriasis.

RESULTS

At week 12, DLQI total score improved by 65-70% in patients receiving etanercept compared with 6% in patients receiving placebo (P < 0.0001), and improvement in DLQI was clinically meaningful (> or = 5-point improvement or 0 score) for 72-77% of patients receiving etanercept therapy. All DLQI and SF-36 subscales and the SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores demonstrated significantly greater improvement with etanercept therapy than with placebo, illustrating that etanercept benefits patients with psoriasis across multiple domains that contribute to health-related quality of life. With etanercept therapy, distributions of patient ratings of pruritus and global assessment of disease shifted from moderate to severe (baseline) to minimal to good (week 12). Etanercept-induced benefits of PROs were maintained for patients who reduced their dose after 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Etanercept therapy improves PROs in patients with psoriasis and makes a meaningful difference to their lives. These results support the efficacy profile of physician-reported clinical measures while providing a more complete understanding of the benefits experienced by patients with psoriasis treated with etanercept.

Etanercept improves the health-related quality of life of patients with psoriasis: Results of a phase III randomized clinical trial

In this randomized, double-blind, phase III trial, patients with psoriasis received etanercept for 24 weeks or placebo for 12 weeks followed by etanercept for 12 weeks. At week 12, improvement in Dermatology Life Quality Index was 47% to 61% with etanercept compared with 11% with placebo (P < .0001). Etanercept rapidly and substantially improved patients' health-related quality of life.

Retrospective study of the costs of care during the first year of therapy with etanercept or infliximab among patients aged ≥65 years with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to retrospectively examine the costs of therapy with etanercept and infliximab, among patients aged > or = 65 years with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), from a health-care system perspective.

METHODS

Data from 2 large, automated US health-care claims databases (Constella COMPASS and Ingenix LabRx) were pooled for the analyses. Each database is comprised of paid facility, professional service, and retail (ie, outpatient) pharmacy claims from participating health plans. Using the 2 databases, all RA patients aged > =65 years were identified who began therapy with etanercept or infliximab between July 1, 1999 (Constella COMPASS), or January 1, 2001 (Ingenix LabRx), and December 31, 2002. Costs of RA-related care (including study drugs, selected medications, and outpatient encounters for RA) and non-RA-related care (all other medications and services) for patients in the 2 treatment groups were assessed, in US dollars, over a 1-year period after therapy initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 280 RA patients aged > or = 65 years initiated therapy with etanercept (n = 99) or infliximab (n = 181) and met all other selection criteria. Etanercept patients were younger than infliximab patients (mean [SD] age, 70.5 [4.6] vs 71.8 [4.6] years; P = 0.04), were less likely to be enrolled in a managed care organization (76.7% vs 87.8%; P < 0.01), and had fewer pretreatment rheumatologist visits (mean [SD], 1.3 [2.3] vs 2.2 [3.8]; P = 0.04). Other characteristics, including pretreatment levels of other types of health-care utilization, were generally similar. Mean (95% CI) total cost of RA-related care was lower for etanercept patients in both databases (US 12,159 dollars [US 10,795 dollars-US 13,380 dollars] for etanercept vs US 22,347 dollars [US 20,808 dollars-US 23,912 dollars] for infliximab in one, and US 14,297 [US 12,238 dollars-US 16,326 dollars] for etanercept vs US 22,154 dollars [US 19,688 dollars-US 24,703 dollars] for infliximab in the other), primarily due to lower costs of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (US 10,015 dollars [US 8754 dollars-US 11,224 dollars] for etanercept vs US 18,611 dollars [US 17,169 dollars-US 20,023 dollars] for infliximab in one database; US 11,917 dollars [US 10,128 dollars-US 13,480 dollars] for etanercept vs US 16,759 dollars [US 14,551 dollars-US 19,062 dollars] for infliximab in the other). Mean (95% CI) costs of non-RA-related care were similar among etanercept and infliximab patients in both databases (US 13,100 dollars [US 8956 dollars-US 18,377 dollars] for etanercept vs US 11,789 dollars [US 8326 dollars-US 16,001 dollars] for infliximab in one, and US 16,665 dollars [US 10,329 dollars-US 25,690 dollars] for etanercept vs US 13,959 dollars [US 10,216 dollars-US 18,168 dollars] for infliximab in the other).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that costs of RA-related care during the first year of therapy may be lower among RA patients aged > or =65 years receiving etanercept versus infliximab, a difference attributable primarily to lower costs of drug acquisition.

Reductions in health-related quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and improvements with etanercept therapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) relative to both the general US and chronically-ill populations, and to evaluate whether etanercept therapy can reverse impairments in HRQOL due to AS.

METHODS

Two AS patient populations were evaluated: patients with AS from a US clinical trial who were randomized to receive either etanercept (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) for 16 weeks, and placebo-treated patients from a multinational sample who subsequently received etanercept (n = 129) during a 48-week, open-label extension study. A sample from the US general population and patients with other medical conditions derived from the National Survey of Functional Health Status were used as comparators to evaluate the relative impact of active AS on HRQOL, as measured by the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients with AS in both the US and multinational samples had significantly lower scores than the US general population on all 8 SF-36 scales. Compared with patients with other medical conditions, patients with AS had the lowest scores in the physical domains--Physical Functioning, Role Physical, and Bodily Pain. Impairments in SF-36 scores for psychosocial domains, such as Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health, were somewhat less pronounced in patients with AS. Treatment with etanercept significantly improved the HRQOL of patients with AS on all 8 SF-36 scales, especially in the same physical domains that showed the greatest impairments prior to treatment (Physical Functioning, Role Physical, and Bodily Pain).

CONCLUSION

Patients with active AS despite conventional therapy have significantly reduced HRQOL across a wide range of domains. These reductions are most pronounced in the physical domains and exceed those seen in many other chronic diseases. Etanercept therapy significantly improves patient HRQOL, indicating that decrements in HRQOL due to AS may be at least partly reversible.

Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist anakinra improves functional status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the benefit of anakinra, a human recombinant form of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, on the functional status of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite taking maximally tolerated doses of methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

Patients (n = 419) were randomized to receive, in addition to MTX (15 to 25 mg/wk), placebo or anakinra doses of 0.04, 0.1, 0.4, 1, or 2 mg/kg once daily for 24 weeks. Functional status measured on 8 scales (dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities) was evaluated at baseline and every 4 weeks with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). A weighted sum of the scale scores is the HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI). Primary analysis of the HAQ-DI was based on an omnibus test for a positive dose-response relationship between anakinra treatment and change in HAQ-DI from baseline to week 24.

RESULTS

Patients receiving anakinra experienced rapid and sizeable improvements in their HAQ-DI scores in a dose-related fashion. For patients receiving either of the 2 highest doses of anakinra, improvements in the HAQ-DI occurred by week 4 that were of a magnitude considered clinically important and statistically significantly superior to placebo.

CONCLUSION

In patients with persistence of RA despite MTX therapy, treatment with anakinra results in a rapid improvement in functional status as measured by the HAQ-DI.

Consumer information, price, and nonprice competition among hospitals

The results of the empirical analysis in this paper indicate that broadly defined hospital quality declines in more concentrated markets. The direction of the effect of concentration on hospital charges is smaller and the direction is less clear. Prices are little, if any, lower in more concentrated markets. Hospital price-cost margins are higher in more concentrated markets. Higher concentration discourages price competition. The data do not support the increasing monopoly theory. Further, since hospital price-cost margins do not appear to remain constant, we must reject the redundant resources theory as well, though its stress on nonprice competition rings true. The empirical results are consistent with the traditional antitrust theory. In addition, consumer information plays a surprisingly important role. Consumer information is important in explaining hospital prices, and less important in hospital quality. Consumers are not passive; they do play a role in hospital choice. It is likely that more recent innovations in health insurance will increase consumer awareness. With an increase in consumer copayments, and more active insurer contracting, it is likely that future hospital competition is more likely to stress price, and future antitrust activity could lead to price reductions in addition to declining hospital price-cost margins.

Imputing physical health status scores missing owing to mortality: results of a simulation comparing multiple techniques

BACKGROUND

Having missing data complicates the statistical analysis of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) data and, depending on the extent and nature of missing data, can introduce significant bias in treatment comparisons.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the bias associated with 4 different imputation methods for estimating physical health status (PHS) scores missing as a result of mortality.

METHODS

A simulation study was conducted in which we systematically varied mortality rates from 0% to 30% and change in PHS scores from -20 to 20 on a 100-point scale for a 2-group clinical trial with follow-up over 18 months. The 4 imputation methods were last value carried forward (LVCF), arbitrary substitution (ARBSUB), empirical Bayes (BAYES), and within-subject modeling (WSMOD). Pseudo-root mean square residuals (RMSRs) and differences between true and estimated slopes were used to evaluate how well the imputation methods reproduced the true characteristics of the simulated population data.

RESULTS

ARBSUB and BAYES methods have the smallest RMSRs compared with LVCF and WSMOD across all mortality rates. As the rate of missing data resulting from mortality increased, all imputation techniques deviated more from population data. The BAYES technique was best at reproducing group slopes in cases with differential mortality rates or when mortality rates exceeded 15%. WSMOD and LVCF significantly underestimated changes in PHS.

CONCLUSIONS

The different imputation methods produced comparable results when there were few missing data. The BAYES approach most closely estimated true population differences and change in PHS regardless of missing data rates. These findings are limited to physical health and functioning measures.

The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it?

It is generally believed that small differences in health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) may be statistically significant yet clinically unimportant. The concept of the minimal clinically meaningful difference (MCID) has been proposed to refer to the smallest difference in a HR-QOL score that is considered to be worthwhile or clinically important. However, there is danger in oversimplification in asking the question: what is the MCID on this HR-QOL instrument? We argue that the attempt to define a single MCID is problematic for a number of reasons and recommend caution in the search for the MCID holy grail. Specifically, absolute thresholds are suspect because they ignore the cost or resources required to produce a change in HR-QOL. In addition, there are several practical problems in estimating the MCID, including: (i) the estimated magnitude varies depending on the distributional index and the external standard or anchor; (ii) the amount of change might depend on the direction of change; and (iii) the meaning of change depends on where you start (baseline value).

Outcomes research in chronic viral hepatitis C: effects of interferon therapy

Although chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is often mild and asymptomatic, it may lead to decompensated hepatic cirrhosis and death. CHC is now the single most important indication for liver transplantation in North America. CHC is also an important cause of morbidity. Recent work is reviewed and shows that the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with CHC is markedly reduced compared with that of age- and sex-matched controls. For as yet unknown reasons, this reduction is more severe in CHC patients than in those with chronic hepatitis B. Successful therapy of CHC with type 1 interferons (IFNs) leads to substantial improvement - to nearly normal levels - in patients' HRQOL. In addition, IFN or IFN plus ribavirin therapy for CHC is highly cost effective, despite its limited long term efficacy; estimates of the costs to gain one year of quality-adjusted life range from no cost (that is, therapy is cost saving) to US$11,400 (for those most difficult to cure). Thus, despite the limited effectiveness of current therapies for CHC, they are fully justified based on their beneficial effects on patients' HRQOL and their cost effectiveness.

Reduction of health-related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C and improvement with interferon therapy. The Consensus Interferon Study Group

The natural history, prognosis, and clinical significance of chronic hepatitis C are highly variable and somewhat controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of chronic hepatitis C infection on patients' perceptions of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and to evaluate whether treatment with interferon improves HRQOL. A total of 642 patients with compensated liver disease who were enrolled in a multicenter trial of interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis C had evaluation of HRQOL using the SF-36 and other instruments derived from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS). These instruments were self-administered by patients at baseline and at the end of a 24-week post-treatment observation period after 24 weeks of interferon treatment. Patients with chronic hepatitis C were compared with healthy controls (n = 750) selected from a representative sample of adults in the United States. Unadjusted and age/gender-adjusted results were similar, as were analyses using parametric or nonparametric methods. Compared with healthy controls, patients with chronic hepatitis C at baseline had lower HRQOL on all eight scales of the SF-36 (P <.001 for all). Patients without cirrhosis (n = 284 ) showed similar although slightly smaller differences. The differences were highly significant, clinically and socially relevant, and greatest for those scales that were more reflective of physical than mental or emotional disease. Patients who had a sustained viral response to interferon therapy (n = 41) exhibited marked improvements in HRQOL, and these improvements exceeded those of nonresponders on 13 of 14 HRQOL scales (8 were statistically significant). Similar improvements were noted in patients with sustained biochemical responses. The authors concluded that patients with chronic hepatitis C with or without cirrhosis have markedly reduced HRQOL. Patients who had a sustained response (virological or biochemical) to interferon therapy experienced significant improvements in perceived wellness and functional status. Successful interferon therapy provides meaningful improvements in HRQOL in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Changing oral hygiene attitudes and habits

Up to the time of establishment (1962) of the Dental Health Education and Research Foundation, the philosophy and practice of preventive dentistry was almost unknown in Australia. Australians' dental health was generally as bad as any country in the world. Children were given little dental health instruction in schools. The majority of parents were seemingly uninformed about the need for the preservation and care of their own or their children's teeth. Dental Health Educators were trained to instruct school children in such subjects as diet, oral hygiene and plaque control. A Good Teeth Puppet Theatre was established and a special preventive dentistry orientated script written. A Mobile Dental Health Education Unit (caravan), equipped with a room darkened and lit by ultraviolet light, audiovisual instruction area and a mini laboratory, was built and set up in secondary schools. Pupils are encouraged to have their plaque disclosed using a yellow dye which becomes fluorescent when viewed under ultraviolet light; descriptive films are demonstrated and personal dental health instruction given. More than two and a half million children have participated in these programs. Evaluation studies of the school programs revealed that after six months children were able to recall more than 70% of the dental health message. Results of a recent WHO survey of the oral health status of 13-14-year-olds in Canterbury (New Zealand), Sydney (Australia), Trondelag (Norway), Yamanashi (Japan) and Hannover (West Germany) showed that the Sydney children had the lowest caries rate. The Sydney survey was carried out in the same are where the above Dental Health Education and Research Foundation community dental health programs operate.