1
|
Daza JF, Cuthbertson BH, Myles PS, Shulman MA, Wijeysundera DN, Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Myles PS, Abbott TEF, Shulman MA, Torres E, Ambosta A, Melo M, Mamdani M, Thorpe KE, Wallace S, Farrington C, Croal BL, Granton JT, Oh P, Thompson B, Hillis G, Beattie WS, Wijeysundera HC, Ellis M, Borg B, Kerridge RK, Douglas J, Brannan J, Pretto J, Godsall MG, Beauchamp N, Allen S, Kennedy A, Wright E, Malherbe J, Ismail H, Riedel B, Melville A, Sivakumar H, Murmane A, Kenchington K, Kirabiyik Y, Gurunathan U, Stonell C, Brunello K, Steele K, Tronstad O, Masel P, Dent A, Smith E, Bodger A, Abolfathi M, Sivalingam P, Hall A, Painter TW, Macklin S, Elliott A, Carrera AM, Terblanche NCS, Pitt S, Samuels J, Wilde C, Leslie K, MacCormick A, Bramley D, Southcott AM, Grant J, Taylor H, Bates S, Towns M, Tippett A, Marshall F, McCartney CJL, Choi S, Somascanthan P, Flores K, Karkouti K, Clarke HA, Jerath A, McCluskey SA, Wasowicz M, Day L, Pazmino-Canizares J, Belliard R, Lee L, Dobson K, Stanbrook M, Hagen K, Campbell D, Short T, Van Der Westhuizen J, Higgie K, Lindsay H, Jang R, Wong C, McAllister D, Ali M, Kumar J, Waymouth E, Kim C, Dimech J, Lorimer M, Tai J, Miller R, Sara R, Collingwood A, Olliff S, Gabriel S, Houston H, Dalley P, Hurford S, Hunt A, Andrews L, Navarra L, Jason-Smith A, Thompson H, McMillan N, Back G. Measurement properties of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for evaluating functional status after inpatient surgery. Br J Surg 2022; 109:968-976. [PMID: 35929065 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Expert recommendations propose the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a core outcome measure in surgical studies, yet data on its long-term measurement properties remain limited. These were evaluated in a secondary analysis of the Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) prospective cohort. METHODS Participants were adults (40 years of age or older) who underwent inpatient non-cardiac surgery. The 12-item WHODAS and EQ-5DTM-3L questionnaires were administered preoperatively (in person) and 1 year postoperatively (by telephone). Responsiveness was characterized using standardized response means (SRMs) and correlation coefficients between change scores. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation coefficients between 1-year scores and comparisons of WHODAS scores across clinically relevant subgroups. RESULTS The analysis included 546 patients. There was moderate correlation between changes in WHODAS and various EQ-5DTM subscales. The strongest correlation was between changes in WHODAS and changes in the functional domains of the EQ-5D-3L-for example, mobility (Spearman's rho 0.40, 95 per cent confidence interval [c.i.] 0.32 to 0.48) and usual activities (rho 0.45, 95 per cent c.i. 0.30 to 0.52). When compared across quartiles of EQ-5D index change, median WHODAS scores followed expected patterns of change. In subgroups with expected functional status changes, the WHODAS SRMs ranged from 'small' to 'large' in the expected directions of change. At 1 year, the WHODAS demonstrated convergence with the EQ-5D-3L functional domains, and good discrimination between patients with expected differences in functional status. CONCLUSION The WHODAS questionnaire has construct validity and responsiveness as a measure of functional status at 1 year after major surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian F Daza
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian H Cuthbertson
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul S Myles
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark A Shulman
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Duminda N Wijeysundera
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shulman M, Cuthbertson B, Wijeysundera D, Pearse R, Thompson B, Torres E, Ambosta A, Wallace S, Farrington C, Myles P, Wallace S, Thompson B, Ellis M, Borg B, Kerridge R, Douglas J, Brannan J, Pretto J, Godsall M, Beauchamp N, Allen S, Kennedy A, Wright E, Malherbe J, Ismail H, Riedel B, Melville A, Sivakumar H, Murmane A, Kenchington K, Gurunathan U, Stonell C, Brunello K, Steele K, Tronstad O, Masel P, Dent A, Smith E, Bodger A, Abolfathi M, Sivalingam P, Hall A, Painter T, Macklin S, Elliott A, Carrera A, Terblanche N, Pitt S, Samuels J, Wilde C, MacCormick A, Leslie K, Bramley D, Southcott A, Grant J, Taylor H, Bates S, Towns M, Tippett A, Marshall F, McCartney C, Choi S, Somascanthan P, Flores K, Beattie W, Karkouti K, Clarke H, Jerath A, McCluskey S, Wasowicz M, Granton J, Day L, Pazmino-Canizares J, Hagen K, Campbell D, Short T, Van Der Westhuizen J, Higgie K, Lindsay H, Jang R, Wong C, Mcallister D, Ali M, Kumar J, Waymouth E, Kim C, Dimech J, Lorimer M, Tai J, Miller R, Sara R, Collingwood A, Olliff S, Gabriel S, Houston H, Dalley P, Hurford S, Hunt A, Andrews L, Navarra L, Jason-Smith A, Thompson H, McMillan N, Back G, Melo M, Mamdani M, Hillis G, Wijeysundera H. Using the 6-minute walk test to predict disability-free survival after major surgery. Br J Anaesth 2019; 122:111-119. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
3
|
Zukotynski K, Jarrin J, Babyn PS, Carcao M, Pazmino-Canizares J, Stain AM, Doria AS. Sonography for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy in children: a systematic protocol. Haemophilia 2007; 13:293-304. [PMID: 17498079 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01414.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Radiological imaging of joints in children with haemophilia is important to detect abnormalities, grade their severity and monitor the effects of treatment. Scoring systems for staging haemophilic arthropathy have been developed based on plain film or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Radiographs alone may be inadequate for evaluating joint disease in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis while MRI may be difficult to access and require the child to be sedated. Sonography can be a useful complementary modality in the evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy that is readily available and does not require the child to be sedated. In this paper, we briefly review the current imaging scales available for the assessment of haemophilic arthropathy and present a systematic protocol for sonographic assessment of the knee and ankle in haemophilic children along with examples of findings in joint effusion/hemarthrosis, synovial hypertrophy and cartilage loss. Also, we correlate the ultrasound findings with the corresponding MRI images demonstrating the anatomic planes used for imaging acquisition. Sonography is a promising technique for the assessment of soft tissue changes which are the earliest findings in haemophilic arthropathy. Further investigation is required for evaluation of osteochondral changes given limitations of sonography in this regard and in minimizing operator dependency, especially if applied in multicentric clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Zukotynski
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|