Pitfalls of Current Diagnostic Criteria of Tumor Lysis Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Tumor Lysis syndrome (TLS) is a well-recognized medical emergency in patients with cancer diagnosis. The diagnostic criteria of TLS have been revised many times since it was recognized, but still have many drawbacks limit diagnosis accuracy.

SUMMARY

Autopsy studies in patients with perimortem diagnoses of TLS have shown that they may not have actually had TLS. Therefore, many cancer patients who are at risk for TLS, clinical and laboratory criteria may be fulfilled due to other causes of acute kidney injury. In this review, we aim to cast a spotlight on the shortcomings and pitfalls of the current diagnostic criteria for TLS, and propose a roadmap for developing a more rigorous criteria that improve on the diagnostic accuracy.

KEY MESSAGES

Causes of AKI in patients with cancer other than TLS should be considered. Because current diagnostic criteria may miss those differential diagnosis, specific biomarkers that can tell when TLS is the underlying process is an important need, besides appropriate criteria that can jump over the pitfalls in the current criteria and enhance the recognition of TLS among other causes.

Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients on ibrutinib compared to other CLL treatments in a real-world US cross sectional study

The objective of this study was to describe real-world health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction of ibrutinib-treated patients with CLL compared to a reference group. This study was completed in two parts. The first portion (Norming Study) was a US online survey conducted to serve as a reference population. The Norming Study included a total of 139 patients with CLL, excluding those treated with ibrutinib: 64 were treatment naive (Tx naive), 36 were 1st line (1L), and 38 were in or had completed ≥2 lines (2L+) patients with CLL. The second portion (CLL Ibrutinib Study) included 1L and 2L+ ibrutinib patients with CLL treated for ≥6 months in which 118 patients (1L n = 88 and 2L+ n = 30) completed the study. Respondents completed demographic and clinical information and the following HRQoL surveys: (Short Form-12v2® Health Survey [SF-12v2], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General [FACT-G], FACT-Leukemia [FACT-Leu] Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue, and Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire [CTSQ]). Higher scores indicate better HRQoL/treatment satisfaction. Differences in effect sizes between the two samples at the group level were calculated using Hedges' g. Medium to large positive effects were seen in the CLL Ibrutinib group on several measures compared to the Reference Study groups. The FACT-G total score was 89.2±11.1 for CLL Ibrutinib Study patients compared to 75.8±22.6 CLL Norming Tx naïve patients, 61.3±21.8 in 1L, and 61.7±20.7 in 2L+. Similar trends were seen with FACT-Leu total score and FACIT-Fatigue. CLL Ibrutinib Study patients scored higher on all CTSQ domain scores compared to the CLL Norming patients treated with other CLL therapies. We found that Ibrutinib-treatment had better HRQoL and treatment satisfaction compared to patients receiving other therapies, irrespective of line of therapy.

Prognostic testing and treatment patterns in Black patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) from the informCLL prospective, observational registry

e18559

Background: Real-world data on practice patterns in Black pts with CLL are limited. We evaluated treatment (tx) patterns and prognostic biomarker testing in Black pts enrolled in the informCLL registry. Methods: Pts who initiated FDA-approved tx for CLL/SLL (index tx) were enrolled from October 2015 to June 2019. Baseline (BL) characteristics, FISH testing rates, BL factors associated with FISH testing, and patterns of index tx are summarized by line of therapy (LOT; previously untreated [1L] and relapsed/refractory [R/R]). Results: Of 1462 enrolled pts (overall registry population), 106 (7%) were Black (Table). Community-based practices enrolled 87% of Black pts, similar to the overall population (93%). Black pts were predominantly enrolled in the South (69%). Among Black pts, median age was 66 y, 65% had ECOG status ≥1, 64% had Rai stage III-IV, and median time from diagnosis to tx on registry was 40 mo (7 mo for 1L). In the overall population, median age was 71 y, 53% had ECOG status ≥1, 51% had Rai stage III-IV, and median time from diagnosis to tx was 41 mo (19 mo for 1L). FISH testing was performed in 25% of Black pts, similar to the testing rate in the overall population (28%). In a multivariate analysis, BL factors significantly associated with FISH testing were shorter time from initial diagnosis to tx, better ECOG status, earlier LOT (1L), community practice setting, and prior malignancy (p<0.05 for all); race was not a predictive factor. As in the overall population, ibrutinib was the most frequent tx among Black pts in 1L (50%) and R/R (67%), followed by chemoimmunotherapy (CIT; 1L, 43%; R/R, 15%). In 1L pts, tx with ibrutinib generally increased over time (2016, 31%; 2017, 57%; 2018, 63%; 2019, 55%) while CIT use persisted (56%; 36%; 38%; 36%, respectively). In R/R pts, use of ibrutinib decreased over time while CIT remained consistent and tx with other novel agents increased. Conclusions: Black pts with CLL tended to be younger, with worse ECOG status, more advanced disease, and shorter time to 1L therapy than the overall informCLL registry population. While ibrutinib was the most common tx in Black pts, CIT use in 1L remained persistent. Similar to the overall registry population, prognostic testing rates were suboptimal in Black pts. These results highlight the importance of prognostic testing and the need to more closely monitor disease status in Black pts as they will tend to require initial CLL therapy more rapidly than other pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02582879. [Table: see text]

Phase 1/2 study of cirmtuzumab and ibrutinib in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

7556

Background: Cirmtuzumab (Cirm) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the tumor promoting activity of ROR1 and had demonstrated additive/synergistic activity with many anti-cancer agents including ibrutinib (Ibr). Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) MCL or treatment naïve (TN) or RR CLL were enrolled. In Part 1 (Dose Escalation), doses of Cirm IV q2wks x5 then q4wks of 2-16 mg/kg and 300 or 600 mg were examined. Safety of Cirm alone was assessed during the first 28 days, then Ibr was started at approved doses for each indication. Cirm 600 mg IV q2wks x3 then q4wks in combination with Ibr starting day 0 was chosen as the recommended dosing regimen for use in Part 2 (Expansion) and Part 3 (CLL only, Cirm/Ibr vs. Ibr alone). Results: Twelve evaluable MCL pts were enrolled into Part 1, and 5 into Part 2. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5), including pts relapsing after Ibr (4), auto-SCT (3), auto-SCT/ allo-SCT (1), auto-SCT/CAR-T (1). In CLL, 34 evaluable pts (12 TN and 22 RR) enrolled into Part 1 (18) or Part 2 (16). At least 74% of CLL pts in Parts 1 and 2 were high risk as determined by unmutated IGHV, del17p, and/or del11q. In Part 3, 22 evaluable pts received Cirm/Ibr (15) or Ibr (7). As of the 30OCT2020 safety cut-off for MCL and CLL, common TEAEs (all grades) included diarrhea (41%), contusion (39%), fatigue (39%), URI (31%), hypertension (25%) arthralgia (23%). Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 13% and thrombocytopenia 1%. There were no Cirm dose reductions or discontinuations for toxicity. Overall, Cirm did not appear to negatively impact the safety of Ibr. Efficacy (MCL): As of the 02FEB2021 efficacy cutoff, the best response of 17 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, 41% CR/CMR, 41% PR, 12% SD, and 6% PD. CR/CMR remain durable from 8-28+ mos. Most responses occurred rapidly after ̃3 mos of Cirm/Ibr. Notably, responses were achieved in all pts who received prior SCT+/- CAR-T (4CR, 1PR) or prior Ibr (2CR, 2PR). At a median follow-up of 14.6 mos, the median PFS (mPFS) had not been reached (NR) (95% CI: 17.5, NA). Efficacy (CLL): The best response of 34 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included 91% ORR, 3% CR, 88% PR/PR-L, 9% SD, 0% PD. In Part 3, both arms achieved 100% ORR (all PRs). At a median follow-up of 20.2 mos, the mPFS was NR (95% CI: NA, NA), and the PFS estimate at 24 months was 95% for R/R, and 87% for TN, respectively, for evaluable CLL pts receiving Cirm/Ibr. Conclusions: Cirm/Ibr is a well-tolerated, active regimen in both MCL and CLL. For MCL, the mPFS of NR (95% CI: 17.5, NA) and CRR (41%), with all CRs remaining without PD, compare favorably to mPFS of 12.8 mos (95% CI 8.5-16.6) and CRR (20%) reported for single agent Ibr (Rule 2017). For CLL, the high ORR and PFS are encouraging, particularly for RR CLL. The study is ongoing, with MCL enrollment expanded to study Cirm + Ibr in pts who have had a suboptimal response to an Ibr regimen, or who have failed other approved BTKi agents. Clinical trial information: NCT03088878.

Acalabrutinib in treatment-naïve chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Mature results from phase II study demonstrating durable remissions and long-term tolerability

8024

Background: The next-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor acalabrutinib was approved in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) based on two complementary phase 3 studies, ELEVATE-TN and ASCEND. This report of ACE-CL-001 (NCT02029443), the first phase 2 study of acalabrutinib, provides the longest safety and efficacy follow-up to date in symptomatic TN CLL pts. Methods: Adults with TN CLL/SLL were eligible if they met iwCLL 2008 criteria for treatment, were inappropriate for/declined standard chemotherapy and had ECOG performance status 0–2. Pts received acalabrutinib 100 mg BID or 200 mg QD, later switching to 100 mg BID, until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was safety. Events of clinical interest (ECI) were based on combined AE terms for infections, bleeding events, hypertension, and second primary malignancies (SPM) excluding non-melanoma skin, and on a single AE term for atrial fibrillation. Additional endpoints included investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), and event-free survival (EFS). Results: Ninety-nine pts (n = 62 100 mg BID; n = 37 200 mg QD), were treated [median age: 64 years, 47% Rai stage 3–4 disease, 10% del(17p), 62% unmutated IGHV]. At median follow-up of 53 months (range, 1–59), 85 (86%) pts remain on treatment; most discontinuations were due to AEs (n = 6) or PD (n = 3 [n = 1 Richter transformation]). Most common AEs (any grade) were diarrhea (52%), headache (45%), upper respiratory tract infection (44%), arthralgia (42%), and contusion (42%). All-grade and grade ≥3 ECIs included infection (84%, 15%), bleeding events (66%, 3%), and hypertension (22%, 11%). Atrial fibrillation (all grades) occurred in 5% of pts (incidence: 1% in years 1, 2, 4; 3% in year 3). SPMs excluding non-melanoma skin (all grades) occurred in 11%. Serious AEs were reported in 38% of pts; those in > 2 pts were pneumonia (n = 4) and sepsis (n = 3). ORR was 97% (7% complete response; 90% partial response). Median TTR was 3.7 months (range, 2–22). Response rates were similar across high-risk groups. Median DOR and median EFS were not reached; 48-month DOR rate was 97% (95% CI, 90%–99%), and 48-month EFS rate was 90% (95% CI, 82%–94%). Conclusions: Long-term data from ACE-CL-001 further support the favorable results with acalabrutinib in phase 3 studies and demonstrate durable responses with no new long-term safety issues. Clinical trial information: NCT02029443 .

Clinical activity of cirmtuzumab, an anti-ROR1 antibody, in combination with ibrutinib: Interim results of a phase Ib/II study in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

8036

Background: ROR1 is an onco-embryonic tyrosine kinase receptor that is re-expressed at high levels on many hematologic and solid cancers but not on normal adult tissues. ROR1 binds Wnt5a, resulting in increased tumor growth and survival, cancer cell stemness and epithelial mesenchymal transition. Cirmtuzumab (Cirm) is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to inhibit the tumor promoting activity of ROR1. In this study, we examined the safety and efficacy of Cirm in combination with ibrutinib (Ibr) in MCL or CLL. Methods: As of Jan 29, 2020, 12 pts with relapsed refractory (RR) MCL were enrolled into Part 1 Dose Escalation (DE). All MCL pts had stage 3/ 4 at original diagnosis, 25% had bulky tumor at study entry, 58% had intermediate/high risk MIPI scores and the majority (83%) had ≥ 2 prior regimens. 34 pts with CLL [12 treatment naïve (TN) and 22 RR pts] enrolled into Part 1 DE (n = 18) or Part 2 Expansion (n = 16). At least 79% of CLL pts were high risk as determined by unmutated IGHV, 17p/p53 loss, and/or del 11q. DE pts received Cirm IV q2wks x 3-5 doses then q4wks plus Ibr (starting D28). Following DE, Cirm 600mg IV q2wks x3 then q4wks plus Ibr (420mg/day CLL or 560mg/day MCL) was chosen for Expansion. Results: Safety : only grade 1/ 2 AEs were reported as possibly related to Cirm alone, whereas the safety profile attributed to Ibr or Ibr / Cirm was similar to published data, with no new or unexpected events. Efficacy for MCL: 83% ORR, 33% (4) CR, 50% (6) PR, 17% (2) SD. CRs were achieved at a median of 3.6 mos in heavily pretreated pts, including 2 with bulky disease > 5cm. Prior therapy of the 4 CR pts: 2 pts failed R-Ibr (7-10 mos) and R-hyperCVAD, 1 pt, auto-SCT and allo-SCT, 1 pt, auto-SCT and CAR-T. Efficacy for CLL : 88% ORR (92% TN, 86% RR), 3% (1) CR, 85% (22) PR/ (7) PR-L, 12% (4) SD. In addition, 3 PR pts with CLL met criteria for “Clinical CR, bone marrow biopsy not performed”. The pt achieving a CR had RR disease with del 11q; this pt remains in remission > 6 mos after stopping all therapy. At a median follow-up of 9.9 mos, 100% of CLL pts are free of disease progression and > 82% remain on study. Conclusions: Cirm in combination with Ibr is a well-tolerated and active regimen for RR MCL and TN or RR CLL. In this evaluation of 46 pts, the ORR and PFS continue to improve with longer follow-up and additional pts, supporting continued investigation of this regimen in ROR1 expressing tumors. This study is ongoing and enrolling an Expansion arm for MCL pts and an open-label randomized Phase 2 in CLL pts comparing Ibr alone to Cirm /Ibr. Clinical trial information: NCT03088878 .

Final analysis from RESONATE: Six-year follow-up in patients (pts) with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) on ibrutinib

7510

Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has redefined treatment paradigms for CLL/SLL. We report final analysis with up to 6 years of follow-up on ibr from the phase 3 RESONATE study of single-agent ibr vs ofatumumab (ofa) in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive oral ibr 420 mg daily until PD or intravenous ofa for up to 24 weeks. Long-term efficacy endpoints were investigator-assessed. Results: Among 391 pts randomized to receive ibr (n=195) or ofa (n=196), 86% and 79%, respectively, were in the genomic high-risk population (del(17p), del(11q), TP53 mutation, and/or unmutated IGHV). At final analysis, median follow-up was 64 mo (range, 0.3-72) on ibr. Of pts randomized to ofa, 68% crossed over to receive ibr. Significant sustained PFS benefit was observed with ibr vs ofa, with median PFS 44.1 vs 8.1 mo (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.11-0.20; P˂0.0001) and was consistent across baseline subgroups. Median PFS in genomic high-risk population was 44.1 vs 8.0 mo on ibr vs ofa (HR 0.11; 95% CI 0.08-0.15). ORR with ibr was 88% (CR/CRi in 11%). Initial ibr treatment conferred better OS than ofa when censored for crossover (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.98). Median duration of ibr was 41 mo (range 0.2-71); 41% of pts received ibr >4 yrs. AE profile with ibr remained consistent with prior reports. Cumulatively during long-term ibr therapy, all-grade (grade ≥3) hypertension and atrial fibrillation occurred in 21% (9%) and 12% (6%) of pts, respectively; major hemorrhage occurred in 10%. Most common reasons for ibr discontinuation (DC) prior to study closure were PD (37%) and AEs (16%); DC due to AEs occurred in 6%, 3%, 4%, 4%, 6% and 4% of pts during yrs 0-1, 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5 and 5-6, respectively. Conclusions: With up to 6 years of follow-up, extended ibr treatment showed sustained efficacy in pts with R/R CLL, including in pts with high-risk genomic features. Safety remained acceptable with low rates of DC due to AEs, and with no new safety signals over long-term therapy. These results establish long-term benefit and tolerability for continuous ibr treatment in pts with R/R CLL. Clinical trial information: NCT01578707.

Long-term efficacy and safety with ibrutinib (ibr) in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): Up to four years follow-up of the RESONATE study

7510

Background: Ibr, a first-in-class, once-daily inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, is FDA-approved for all pts with CLL/SLL. We report updated safety and efficacy results with up to 4 y follow-up from the ph III RESONATE trial of ibr vs ofatumumab (ofa). Methods: Pts had ≥1 prior therapy. Pts received 420 mg ibr PO until PD or ofa up to 24 wks. At interim analysis (median 9 mo follow-up), the DMC declared superiority of ibr vs ofa for PFS and OS, and ibr access was recommended for all ofa pts. Long-term follow-up efficacy endpoints are per investigator assessment. Ofa pts were censored at crossover for OS. Results: 391 pts were randomized to receive ibr (n = 195) or ofa (n = 196). Median age was 67 y (40% ≥70 y); 57% had Rai stage III/IV. With median follow-up of 44 mo (53 mo max) for ibr arm, PFS was significantly longer for ibr vs ofa (median NR vs 8 mo, [HR 0.133; P< 0.0001]; 3-y PFS 59% vs 3%) with significant benefit across subgroups. PFS with ibr for del11q subgroup trended to have the most favorable outcome; however, PFS was not statistically different for pts with del17p or del11q or without these FISH abnormalities. At analysis, with the majority of pts (68%) randomized to ofa crossing over to ibr, OS was longer for ibr vs ofa (median OS NR for either arm). The OS rate for ibr at 3 y was 74%. ORR for ibr was 91% with CR/CRi rates (now 9%) increasing over time. Baseline cytopenias improved with extended ibr therapy for hemoglobin (85%), platelet (95%), and absolute neutrophil counts (95%). AE profile of ibr was consistent with previous reports. Major hemorrhage, Gr ≥3 atrial fibrillation, and Gr ≥3 hypertension occurred in 6%, 6%, and 8% of pts, respectively, over a follow-up of up to 4 y. Incidence of most Gr ≥3 AEs decreased from y 1 vs y 2-3: neutropenia- 18% vs 8%; pneumonia- 11% vs 4%; atrial fibrillation- 4% vs 2%, respectively. Discontinuations were most frequently PD (27%) and AE (12%). At analysis, 90 ibr pts (46%) continue ibr on study. Conclusions: Long-term treatment with ibr in this international ph III RESONATE study is tolerable and continues to show sustained PFS and OS regardless of high-risk cytogenetics. Ph III results in relapsed del17p and del11q pts compare favorably to prior ph II reports. Clinical trial information: NCT01578707.

Richter's syndrome (RS) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) on novel agent therapy

7505

Background: Novel agents (NA) targeting B cell receptor kinases and Bcl-2 have substantially improved outcomes in CLL; however, the development of RS in CLL patients (pts) on NAs has been observed, and has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pts at 9 academic centers diagnosed with pathologically-confirmed RS from 2011-16. Informed consent was provided through IRB-approved protocols. Descriptive statistics were utilized and overall survival (OS) was calculated from RS diagnosis (dx) to death or last follow-up by Kaplan-Meier. Results: 71 pts who developed RS on NAs for CLL were identified. Median age at CLL dx was 55 yrs (range 21-82), median of 3 therapies (range 0-12) prior to the NA. 68% pts were fludarabine-refractory, and 5 pts (7%) had relapsed post alloHCT. Median time from CLL dx to initiation of NA was 68.5 mo. (range 1.1-246.2). FISH at NA initiation: del(17p) 30/61 (49%), del(11q) 15/61 (25%), trisomy 12 15/61 (25%). Complex karyotype was present in 40/53 (75%). 46/52 (88%) were IGHV unmutated, VH1-69 10/43 (23%), VH4-39 4/43 (9%). 59 (83%) pts were on a BTK inhibitor, 6 (8%) PI3K inhibitor, 6 (8%) venetoclax. RS histology: DLBCL (87%), plasmablastic (6%), Hodgkin (4%), 3% other. RS Ki-67%: >90 (23%), 75-90 (25%), 50-75% (25%), <50% (28%). Median time from start of NA to RS dx was 9.1 mo (range 0.9-48.2), with 65% developing RS within 12 mo. of starting NA. In 56 pts, 19 different regimens were used as initial RS therapy, including: R-EPOCH (36%), R-CHOP (20%), checkpoint blockade (9%), OFAR (7%), or a different NA (7%). Of the 48 pts evaluable for response, ORR was 42% (15% CR, 27% PR). In 29 evaluable pts receiving R-EPOCH/CHOP, ORR was 48% (21% CR). With a median follow-up of 10.6 mo., median OS was only 3.3 mo. (95%CI 2.2-6.0), though none of the 7 pts who achieved CR has died. Conclusions: We report to our knowledge the largest series of CLL pts developing RS on NAs. Pts often had high risk CLL, particularly complex cytogenetics, and RS frequently developed within the first year of NA therapy. Substantial variation exists in treatment, and outcomes are poor for those who do not achieve CR. Identification of molecular drivers of RS and development of novel treatment strategies are urgently needed.

Randomized comparison of ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: Results from the phase III RESONATE trial

LBA7008

Background: Treatment options for CLL/ SLL patients (pts) who fail chemoimmunotherapy are limited. We report interim results from a phase III randomized study of ibrutinib (ibr), a first in class covalent BTK inhibitor, vs ofatumumab (ofa) in R/R CLL/SLL. The Data Monitoring Committee recommended this analysis be considered final, based on meeting the primary and a key secondary endpoint. Methods: R/R CLL/SLL pts who failed ≥1 therapy received 420 mg oral ibr daily until progression or IV ofa 300/2000mg for 12 doses. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), IRC assessed overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Of 391 pts enrolled (median age 67 years; 40% ≥70 years; 57% Rai stage III/IV disease; 30% del 17p), 195 were randomized to ibr and 196 to ofa. Ibr pts had median 3 prior therapies vs 2 for ofa. Median follow-up was 9.4 months (m). Ibr significantly lengthened PFS (median not reached vs 8.1 m; HR 0.215, CI 0.146–0.317, p<0.0001; 78.5% risk reduction), and significantly improved OS (median not reached; HR 0.434, CI 0.238–0.789, p=0.0049) compared with ofa. ORR was 42.6 vs 4.1% (p<0.0001) and ORR+PR with lymphocytosis was 62.6 vs 4.1% for ibr vs ofa. Similar effects were seen in del17p and purine analog refractory subsets. In each arm 2 pts had confirmed Richter’s transformation. Most frequent adverse events (AE) for ibr vs ofa were diarrhea (47.7 vs 17.8%) fatigue (27.7 vs 29.8%), and nausea (26.2 vs 18.3%). Atrial fibrillation was more frequent with ibr (5.1 vs 0.5%). Major hemorrhages were reported in 1.0 vs 1.6% for ibr vs ofa. Drug discontinuation due to AE was 4.1 vs 3.6% for ibr vs ofa. 86% of ibr pts were continuing treatment. 57 pts randomized to ofa with confirmed PD had initiated ibr at cross-over. Conclusions: Compared with ofa, ibr significantly improved PFS, OS and ORR in pts with R/R CLL/SLL. The safety profile was comparable with that previously reported (Byrd NEJM 2013). These results support ibr as a beneficial therapy for R/R CLL patients irrespective of del 17p or purine analog refractory disease. Clinical trial information: NCT01578707.

A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of idelalisib (GS-1101) in combination with bendamustine and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

TPS7133

Background: PI3K-delta is critical for the activation, proliferation and survival of B cells and plays a role in homing and retention of B cells in lymphoid tissues. PI3Kδ signaling is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib is a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ that reduces proliferation, enhances apoptosis, and alters trafficking of malignant B cells in lymphoid tissues (Lannutti, 2011). Phase 1 trials demonstrated that idelalisib is highly active in heavily pretreated pts with CLL as a single agent or in combination with rituximab (R), bendamustine (B), or BR: pts experienced reductions in disease-associated chemokines, profound and rapid reductions in lymphadenopathy, and durable clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile (Coutre et al, 2012; Sharman et al, 2011). Methods: Study will enroll 390 pts with previously treated CLL who have measurable lymphadenopathy, have received prior therapy containing a purine analog or B and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, are not refractory to B, have experienced CLL progression within 36 months from the completion of the last prior therapy, and are currently sufficiently fit to receive cytotoxic therapy. Pts are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Arm A or B. On Arm A, subjects receive idelalisib continuously at 150 mg BID + R at 375 mg/m2 (1st dose) and then 500 mg/m2 every 4 weeks for 6 cycles + B at 70 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2 of each 4-week cycle for 6 cycles. On Arm B, subjects receive placebo instead of idelalisib. Stratification factors address IGHV mutational status, del(17p)/p53 mutation status, and refractory vs relapsed disease. The primary endpoint is PFS and key secondary endpoints include ORR, lymph node response rate, CR rate, and OS. This is an event-driven trial and primary endpoint evaluation will be based on independent central review. For the primary efficacy analysis, the difference in PFS between the treatment arms will be assessed in the ITT analysis set. The study was initiated in June 2012 and a data monitoring committee has begun regular review of data. Clinical trial information: NCT01569295.

Tolerability and activity of combinations of the PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib (GS-1101) with rituximab and/or bendamustine in patients with previously treated, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL): Updated results from a phase I study

8500

Background: PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib is a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ that has shown considerable monotherapy activity in recurrent iNHL (Kahl, ICML 2011), as well as combination therapy (Fowler, ASCO 2012). Methods: This phase I study evaluated the activity of continuous (48 weeks) idelalisib (Id), 100/150 mg BID, in combination with rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2 weekly x 8 doses) (Id+R), with bendamustine (B) (90 mg/m2 x 2, for 6 cycles) (Id+B), or in combination with R (375 mg/m2 monthly x 6) and B (90 mg/m2 x 2), for 6 cycles (Id+BR). Investigators assessed response according to standard criteria (Cheson 2007). Patients who continued to benefit were able to enroll on an extension study. Results: Study enrolled 78 pts with relapsed/refractory iNHL, with 34 (44%) pts continuing on treatment in the ongoing extension protocol. The 3 cohorts included Id+R (N=30), Id+B (N=34), and Id+BR (N=14). Pts were 67% male, median age [range] of 62 [37E84] years, 41% with refractory disease, 88% stage III/IV, and 36% of FL with high FLIPI scores. The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1E10]. The median [range] duration of treatment was 10.6 [0.5-29.2] months. Overall response rate (ORR) was 63/78 (81%), with 22/78 (28%) CR. The ORR/CR for Id+R was 77%/20%, Id+B was 85%/29%, and Id+BR was 79%/43%. At 20 months, the PFS was 66%. For responders, 73% were progression-free at 20 months. Most common adverse events included (total%/≥G3%) pyrexia (56/4), fatigue (45/4), nausea (41/0), rash (40/8), cough (37/0), diarrhea (36/8), chills (18/0), URI (18/1), and pneumonia (17/15). Lab abnormalities included (total%/≥G3%) ALT/AST elevations (56/17). Conclusions: Idelalisib-based combination therapy is highly active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed/refractory iNHL. These data support further clinical development. Phase III trials evaluating the efficacy of idelalisib in combination with R, or BR in iNHL are ongoing (NCT01732913, NCT01732926). Clinical trial information: NCT01732913, NCT01732929.

A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study of the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) versus ofatumumab in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL): RESONATE

TPS8619

Background: Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) treatment approaches such as FCR have markedly improved outcomes for CLL pts when administered as initial or second-line therapy. Despite this progress, virtually all pts relapse and effective salvage regimens that induce durable remissions or can be administered safely to elderly pts or those with comorbidities are lacking. BTK, an essential mediator of B-cell receptor signaling, is a novel target in CLL. Ibrutinib, a first-in class inhibitor of BTK, promotes apoptosis and inhibits proliferation, migration and adhesion in CLL cells. Phase II data of ibrutinib monotherapy in RR CLL demonstrated an estimated PFS and OS of 75% and 83% respectively at 26 months (Byrd Abst #189 ASH 2012). These findings confirmed BTK as an important target in CLL and supported initiation of a pivotal phase III study in pts with RR CLL/SLL. Methods: PCYC-1112-CA is an ongoing international Phase 3 randomized controlled study of ibrutinib versus ofatumumab for treatment of pts with RR CLL/SLL. The study is enrolling 350 planned pts in 9 countries. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive ibrutinib 420 mg orally once daily or ofatumumab per the package insert at 300 mg for the first dose, then 2000 mg for a total of 12 doses over 24 weeks. Pts are stratified based on del 17p and disease refractory to purine analogs. Key inclusion criteria include RR CLL/SLL with >= 1 prior line of therapy including pts who experienced a short remission duration to purine analog based CIT, pts who are older or have comorbidities, and pts with del 17p. Pts must have active disease meeting criterion for requiring therapy and measurable nodal disease by CT. Key exclusion criteria include Richter’s transformation, stem cell transplantation within 6 months, GVHD or immunosuppression, platelet count <30,000 cells/ul or use of warfarin The primary objective of the study is PFS evaluated by an IRC. Other outcomes include ORR, OS, hematologic improvement, and safety. An independent DMC is monitoring the study. Clinical trial information: NCT01744691.

Update on a phase I study of the selective PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib (GS-1101) in combination with rituximab and/or bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL

7017

Background: PI3K-delta signaling is critical for proliferation, survival, homing and tissue retention of malignant B cells. Idelalisib is a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ that has shown considerable monotherapy activity in pts with heavily pretreated CLL. Methods: This phase I study evaluated idelalisib continuously given at 150 mg BID in combination with rituximab (R, 375 mg/m2 every wk x 8), bendamustine (B, 70 or 90 mg/m2 x 2, every 4 wks x 6) or BR (every 4 wks x 6) for relapsed/refractory CLL. Pts still on treatment after 48 weeks were eligible to continue idelalisib on an extension study. Clinical response was evaluated according to published criteria (Hallek 2008; Cheson 2012). Results: 52 pts (23F/29M) with a median (range) age of 64 (41-87) years were enrolled. Adverse disease characteristics included bulky lymphadenopathy (62%), refractory disease (50%), multiple prior therapies (median 3, range: 1-14) with 96% receiving prior R and 44% receiving prior B. As of 14 Jan 2013, the median (range) treatment duration was 18 (1-33) months. 31/52 (60%) pts enrolled into the extension study; of those, 24/52 (46%) pts are continuing idelalisib treatment on the extension study. The ORR was 81%, with 1 CR, and a median (range) time to response of 1.9 (1.5-8.3) months. The 2-year PFS and OS were 62% and 85%, respectively. At 2 years follow up, 71% of responses were still enduring. There was no difference in outcomes for pts with <3 prior treatments (n=21) vs ≥3 prior treatments (n=31). The most common TEAEs (any Grade/≥Gr 3, independent of causality) included pyrexia (44%/6%), diarrhea (40%/14%), cough (31%/2%), fatigue (29%/2%), nausea (29%/0%). Pneumonia (any Gr/≥Gr 3) occurred in 15%/12% and rash was seen in 15%/0%. 10% of patients experienced ≥Gr 3 ALT/AST elevation based on laboratory values. Conclusions: A lack of overlapping toxicities allowed idelalisib to be co-administered with R, B, or BR, and all 3 combination regimens were highly active, resulting in durable tumor control in pts with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory CLL. Phase III trials evaluating the efficacy of idelalisib in combination with R or BR are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01088048.

Use of tumor genomic profiling to reveal mechanisms of resistance to the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

7014

Background: Ibrutinib interacts covalently with cysteine 481 of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK), resulting in targeted inhibition of B cell receptor signaling. Early trials of ibrutinib mono- or combination therapy enrolled 246 CLL patients receiving a median of 14 months of ibrutinib. 20 patients (8%) experienced progressive disease (PD), including 8 patients with Richter's transformation. Here we examine changes to the CLL genome in 3 patients that acquired resistance to ibrutinib. Methods: Ibrutinib resistance was defined as patients achieving partial response (PR) or better lasting ≥ 6 months, then developing PD without Richter’s transformation. RNAseq and whole exome sequencing (WES) followed by comparative genome analysis was performed at baseline and after PD and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. RNAseq and WES data were aligned using TopHat and BWA software. Single nucleotide variations (SNVs) were identified using SAMtools mpileup. Results: Compared to patients who relapsed from conventional chemotherapy, minimal genomic changes were acquired in ibrutinib resistant patients, reflecting relative genomic stability. SNVs were discovered in 3 patients specific to the relapse sample (Table). 2 out of 3 patients had distinct SNVs that each encode a cysteine-to-serine substitution at position 481of BTK (C481S). Homologous cysteine residues in BMX, ITK, TEC and BLK were wild-type (WT). Ibrutinib inhibited recombinant C481S 25 fold less potently than WT, and could not covalently bind C481S expressed in cells. The third patient had WT BTK, but acquired a potential gain-of-function mutation encoding a R665W substitution in PLCg2, a substrate of BTK, consistent with constitutive PLCg2 activation. Conclusions: Although rare, the acquisition of C481S BTK and R665W PLCg2 mutations in the setting of resistance confirms BTK as an important pharmacologic target of ibrutinib, and suggests mechanisms of ibrutinib resistance. [Table: see text]

Preliminary results of PI3Kδ inhibitor idelalisib (GS-1101) treatment in combination with everolimus, bortezomib, or bendamustine/rituximab in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)

8501

Background: PI3K-delta is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells and plays a role in homing and retention in lymphoid tissues. PI3Kδ signaling is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib is a first-in-class, selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ that has shown monotherapy activity in recurrent MCL (Kahl, ICML 2011). Methods: This phase 1 study is evaluating the activity of continuous idelalisib (Id), 150 mg BID, in combination with everolimus (E) (10 mg PO qD) (Id+E regimen), with bortezomib (V) (1.3 mg/m2 SC day 1, 8, 15 per 28 day cycle) (Id+V regimen), or with rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2, on Day 1) and bendamustine (B) (90 mg/m2x 2), for 6 cycles (Id+BR regimen). Investigators assessed response according to standard criteria (Cheson 2007). Results: Study enrolled 22 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Results are from 14 Jan 2013 data cutoff. The 3 cohorts included Id+E (N=12), Id+V (N=6), and Id+BR (N=4). Patients were 73% male, median age [range] of 68 [47E79] years, 32% with refractory disease and 73% stage III/IV. The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1E7]. The median [range] duration of treatment was 2.5 [0.5-8.3+] months. Overall response rate (ORR) was 10/22 (46%), with 2 CR (9%). The ORR/CR for Id+E, was 25%/0%, Id+V was 50%/0%, and Id+BR was 100%/50%. The median duration of response (mDOR) and median PFS (mPFS) were not reached. Most common adverse events included (total%/≥G3%) diarrhea (41/9), fatigue (41/0), rash (27/14), cough (27/0), decreased appetite (23/0), and epistaxis (23/0). Lab abnormalities included (total%/≥G3%) thrombocytopenia (82/27), neutropenia (32/14), and ALT/AST elevations (50/5). Conclusions: Preliminary data indicates idelalisib-based combination therapy is active in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. All combinations were tolerable. These data support further clinical development in larger trials to further characterize safety and response duration. Clinical trial information: NCT01088048.

Combination of the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor PCI-32765 with bendamustine (B)/rituximab (R) (BR) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): Interim results of a phase Ib/II study

6515^

Background: BTK is an essential mediator of B cell receptor signaling and a critical kinase for lymphoma cell survival. PCI-32765 (P), an oral, selective, irreversible inhibitor of BTK, inhibits proliferation, migration and adhesion in CLL cells, and is highly active as a single agent for the treatment of R/R CLL pts. (O’Brien ASH 2011). BR produces an overall response rate (ORR) of 59% in R/R CLL (Fischer JCO 2011). We report interim data on P combined with BR. Methods: R/R CLL pts received P 420 mg orally daily for 28-day (D) cycles (C) until disease progression (PD). B was administered 70 mg/m2 on D1 and D2 combined with R 375 mg/m2 on D0 for C1 and 500 mg/m2 on D1 for subsequent courses for a maximum of 6 cycles. Response was evaluated according to IWCLL criteria. Results: 30 pts were enrolled. Median age of pts was 62 yrs (range 41-82). 46% of pts were Rai stage III/IV and the median # of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-4). 37% and 13% were considered refractory (treatment free interval <12 mo) to a purine analog containing regimen or BR, respectively. Bulky disease was present in 52%. Adverse events (AE) have been consistent with that expected with BR. Gr 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia have been noted in 47% and 10% of pts, respectively. Grade >3 non-hematologic AEs potentially related to P included rash (3 pts) and fatigue and tumor lysis reported in 2 pts each. There were no Gr 3/4 infusion reactions. There have been no discontinuations (D/C) due to AE and no deaths on study. At a median follow-up of 4.9 mos (range 2.7-8.3 mo) 16 pts have completed BR and 14 pts are still receiving BR. The ORR is 90% (27/30 pts) (CR 10%, PR 80%). 2 additional pts achieved a nodal response with residual lymphocytosis. Responses appear independent of high-risk clinical or genomic features. 90% of pts remain on study; reasons for D/C include PD (n=2) and 1 pt pursuing SCT. Conclusions: PCI-32765, in combination with BR, is highly active. The high ORR, low rate of PD, and good tolerability compares very favorably with historical controls, warranting additional investigation of this combination.

A phase I/II study of the selective phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, GS-1101 (CAL-101), with ofatumumab in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

6518^

Background: PI3Kδ is expressed in cells of hematopoietic origin where it regulates the survival and proliferation of malignant B-cells. GS-1101 is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule inhibitor that selectively targets PI3Kδ and is highly active in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods: This Phase 1/2 study evaluated repeated 28-day cycles of GS‑1101 in combination with ofatumumab. GS-1101 (150mg BID) was co-administered with a total of 12 infusions of ofatumumab over 24 weeks (300mg initial dose either on Day 1 or Day 2 (relative to the first dose of GS-1101), followed 1 week later by 1,000mg weekly for 7 doses, followed 4 weeks later by 1,000mg every 4 weeks for 4 doses). Thereafter, each subjects received single-agent GS‑1101 as long as the subject was benefitting. Results: Accrual is complete with 21 subjects enrolled and 11 evaluable. Six subjects started ofatumumab treatment on Day 1 and 5 on Day 2. Median [range] age was 63 [54‑76] years. The majority (9/11; 82%) of patients had bulky adenopathy. The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1‑6], including prior exposure to alkylating agents (10/11; 90%), rituximab (9/11; 82%), purine analogs (8/11; 72%), alemtuzumab (3/11; 28%) and/or ofatumumab (2/11;18%). At the data cutoff, the median [range] treatment duration was 5 [0‑7] cycles. Almost all subjects (9/11;82%) experienced marked and rapid reductions in lymphadenopathy within the first 2 cycles. The lymphocyte mobilization that is expected with PI3Kδ inhibition was significantly reduced in magnitude and duration and persisted past Cycle 1 in only 1 patient. Early follow up data support a favorable safety profile and confirm a lack of clinically significant myelosuppression. Elevated baseline levels of CCL3, CCL4, CXCL13, and TNFa were significantly reduced after 28 days of treatment. Conclusions: GS-1101/ofatumumab offers a well-tolerated noncytotoxic combination regimen with substantial activity in previously treated patient with bulky adenopathy. Data on the complete cohort of 21 subjects will be presented.

Tyrosine kinase inhibition in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: molecular basis for antitumor activity and drug resistance of dasatinib

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although some patients can be cured by current therapies, novel agents are needed to further improve outcomes. We hypothesized that Src tyrosine kinase inhibition by dasatinib may have antilymphoma effects. Here, we demonstrate that dasatinib inhibits cell growth through G(1)-S blockage in five of seven DLBCL cell lines at clinically achievable concentrations. Compared to resting B cells, DLBCL has increased tyrosine phosphorylation activities. As expected, dasatinib inhibits phosphorylation of several Src family kinase members. However, this inhibition occurs in all cell lines regardless of their proliferative response to the drug. In contrast, the activity of two downstream signaling molecules, Syk and phospholipase Cgamma2 (PLCgamma2), are well correlated with cell line sensitivity to dasatinib, suggesting that these molecules are crucial in mediating the proliferation of activated lymphoma cells. Furthermore, dasatinib inhibits B-cell receptor signaling in primary lymphoma cells. Together, our findings not only show dasatinib as a potentially useful therapy for DLBCL but also provide insights into the pathogenesis of the lymphoma. The results further suggest the possibility of using Syk and PLCgamma2 as biomarkers to predict dasatinib therapeutic response in prospective clinical trials.

Synergy of vaccine strategies to amplify antigen-specific immune responses and antitumor effects

Several different vaccine strategies have been evaluated and combined in an attempt to amplify T-cell responses toward induction of antitumor immunity. The model tumor antigen used was carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). While initial T-cell activation studies were conducted in conventional mice, combined vaccine strategy studies and antitumor studies were conducted in transgenic mice in which CEA is expressed in normal gastrointestinal tissue and CEA protein is found in sera. The studies reported here demonstrate: (a) A recombinant avipox (fowlpox, rF) vector expressing the signal 1 (CEA) and the B7-1 costimulatory molecule transgenes (designated rF-CEA/B7-1) is more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than rF-CEA; one administration of recombinant fowlpox vector expressing CEA and three different costimulatory molecule transgenes (B7-1, ICAM-1, LFA-3, designated rF-CEA/TRICOM) was more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than four vaccinations with rF-CEA or two vaccinations with rF-CEA/B7-1. Moreover, up to four vaccinations with rF-CEA/TRICOM induced greater CEA-specific T-cell responses with each vaccination. (b) A diversified prime and boost strategy using a prime with a recombinant vaccinia vector expressing CEA and the triad of costimulatory molecules (designated rV-CEA/TRICOM) and a boost with rF-CEA/TRICOM was more potent in inducing CEA-specific T-cell responses than the repeated use of rF-CEA/TRICOM alone. (c) The addition of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to the rF-CEA or rF-CEA/TRICOM vaccinations via the simultaneous administration of a rF-GM-CSF vector enhanced CEA-specific T-cell responses. These strategies (TRICOM/diversified prime and boost/GM-CSF) were combined to treat CEA-expressing carcinoma liver metastases in CEA-transgenic mice; vaccination was initiated 14 days posttumor transplant. Antitumor effects in terms of survival and CD8(+) and CD4(+) responses specific for CEA were also observed in this CEA-transgenic mouse model. These studies demonstrate that the use of cytokines and diversified prime and boost regimens can be combined with the use of recombinant vectors expressing signal 1 and multiple costimulatory molecules to further amplify T-cell responses toward more effective vaccine strategies.