1
|
Labadie JG, Dover JS. Hyperconcentrated glabellar injections to mitigate risk of botulinum toxin A-induced blepharoptosis: An unnecessary precaution. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90:1311-1312. [PMID: 38151056 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica G Labadie
- Department of Dermatology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shipman WD, Williams MN, Suozzi KC, Eisenstein AS, Dover JS. Efficacy of laser hair removal in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Surg Med 2024. [PMID: 38769894 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by painful nodules, draining tunnels, and fibrotic scarring in intertriginous, hair-bearing areas. The pathogenesis involves follicular occlusion and subsequent rupture, leading to uncontrolled inflammation. Treatment options for HS are limited and lack universal effectiveness. Laser hair removal (LHR) has been explored as a potential treatment; however, the efficacy and appropriate laser modalities remain unclear. This systematic review examined the efficacy and adverse effects of LHR in HS. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception to September 2023 in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and The Cochrane Library (Wiley) with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS Ten studies were selected (n = 227 total patients) and included six randomized controlled trials, two nonrandomized experimental studies, and two case series. Various laser modalities, including long-pulsed neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) (n = 115), intense pulsed light (n = 18), Alexandrite (n = 54), intralesional 1064 nm diode (n = 20), and combined fractional CO2 and long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser (n = 20), consistently demonstrated significant improvement in HS disease severity, irrespective of the disease scoring method used. Minimal adverse effects (primarily mild pain and erythema) were reported. A meta-analysis of three studies utilizing long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser demonstrated a standardized mean difference in disease severity of -1.68 (95% confidence interval: -2.99; -0.37), favoring treatment with LHR for HS. CONCLUSIONS Hair follicles are key in HS pathogenesis and all included studies showed a significant improvement in HS disease severity after LHR regardless of the laser device used, likely related to hair follicle unit destruction. HS is a complex and heterogenous condition, and multiple disease scoring methods complicate outcome comparisons across studies. However, LHR, utilizing various techniques, is an effective treatment option for HS with minimal adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Shipman
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Monica N Williams
- Department of Dermatology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Kathleen C Suozzi
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Anna S Eisenstein
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ugwu N, Xun H, Dover JS, Boustany AN, Chung HJ. Histological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Microneedling Device-Assisted Filler Delivery. Dermatol Surg 2024:00042728-990000000-00781. [PMID: 38691514 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000004206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microneedling is used to enhance transcutaneous drug delivery. However, the extent to which microneedling devices impact filler delivery and whether this varies by filler type, microneedling device type, and treatment sequence is not known. OBJECTIVE To histologically assess and quantify the delivery of commonly used fillers through microneedling, using both a microneedling pen and a microneedling roller. In addition, the authors investigated whether there is a variation in filler delivery based on the sequence of microneedling in relation to topical filler application. METHODS Ex vivo human abdominal skin samples were subjected to microneedling pen or microneedling roller treatment. Black tissue marking ink, hyaluronic acid, poly-l-lactic acid, or undiluted calcium hydroxyapatite was topically applied before or immediately after microneedling treatment. RESULTS Histological evaluation revealed a notable presence of black ink within channels formed by both microneedling treatments (15.5%-98.1%), whereas there was limited presence of the various filler types tested (0%-6.6%) in all settings. Topical application before microneedling treatment led to relatively higher filler/ink deposition within the channels formed by the microneedling treatments compared with topical application after microneedling. CONCLUSION Transcutaneous delivery of fillers was not significantly helped by microneedling treatment, whereas the microneedling devices demonstrated effective delivery of an aqueous solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson Ugwu
- Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen Xun
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ashley N Boustany
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hye Jin Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen LC, Dover JS, McGee JS, Khang J, Chung HJ. Histology-Based Resident Lectures in Cosmetic Dermatology. Dermatol Surg 2024; 50:402-405. [PMID: 38150327 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000004070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Chi Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jean S McGee
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Juna Khang
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hye Jin Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eber AE, Hogan S, Ndagijimana JB, McCall N, Phillips TJ, Dover JS. Advancing Dermatology Education and Care in Rwanda: The Impact of a New Academic Partnership. J Drugs Dermatol 2024; 23:e120. [PMID: 38564389 DOI: 10.36849/jdd.7833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
It is the realization of a long-dreamed aspiration to create a university that would advance global health delivery by training a new generation of global health leaders who are equipped to not just build, but sustain effective and equitable health systems.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bittar J, Hooper P, Dover JS. 1726 nm Lasers for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris. Skin Therapy Lett 2024; 29:5-7. [PMID: 38271552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of acne vulgaris traditionally consists of a combination of topical and oral medications. The use of lasers to treat this condition has been an area of increasing research, and several types have previously been used in the treatment of acne. New 1726 nm lasers specifically target the sebaceous gland, which is known to be pivotal in acne pathophysiology. This laser wavelength demonstrates substantial potential as a safe and effective therapeutic option for moderate to severe acne without the risks of systemic therapy. This paper reviews the 1726 nm lasers for acne vulgaris.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Bittar
- Rush University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey S Dover
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jablon K, Theisen E, Hsu SH, Dover JS, Chung HJ. Fractional non-ablative assisted bimatoprost delivery: A synergistic approach for treating post-inflammatory hypopigmentation following cosmetic procedures in skin of color patients. Lasers Surg Med 2024; 56:11-13. [PMID: 38018657 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelli Jablon
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Erin Theisen
- Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah H Hsu
- Department of Dermatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Hye Jin Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee N, Dover JS, Labadie JG. Lack of Diversity of Sexes in Clinical Trials for Laser Hair Removal. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:1213-1214. [PMID: 37699130 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nari Lee
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eber AE, Hooper PB, McCabe L, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. How We Do It: A Single Center's Approach for Optimal Analgesia, Hemostasis, and Technique During Dermal Microcoring Treatment to the Lower Face and Perioral Region. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:1051-1053. [PMID: 37647165 PMCID: PMC10617662 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Leah McCabe
- Cytrellis Biosystems, Inc, Woburn, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lilly E, Hamilton HK, Dover JS. Response to Richey et al's "Psychiatric comorbidity and pharmacology in a cosmetic dermatology setting: A retrospective cohort study". J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 89:e187. [PMID: 37343835 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.02.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn Lilly
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts; Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alexiades M, Kothare A, Goldberg D, Dover JS. Novel 1726 nm laser demonstrates durable therapeutic outcomes and tolerability for moderate-to-severe acne across skin types. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 89:703-710. [PMID: 37328000 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.05.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditional acne management with topical therapy, systemic antibiotics, hormonal agents, or oral isotretinoin requires compliance and may produce significant side effects. However, alternative treatments with lasers had failed to demonstrate durable clearance. OBJECTIVE To assess the tolerability and therapeutic outcomes of a novel 1726 nm laser treatment of moderate-to-severe acne across skin types. METHODS A prospective, open-label, single-arm, Investigational Device Exemption-approved, institutional review board-approved study of 104 subjects with moderate-to-severe facial acne and Fitzpatrick Skin Types ranging from II-to-VI was conducted. Subjects received 3 laser treatments at 3 (-1/+2)-week intervals. RESULTS Following final treatment, ≥50% reduction in active acne inflammatory lesions was 32.6% at 4-weeks follow-up, increasing further to 79.8% and 87.3% at 12 and 26-weeks, respectively. The percentage of subjects clear or almost clear increased from 0% at baseline to 9%, 36.0%, and 41.8% at 4-, 12-, and 26-weeks follow-up. No serious adverse events were observed related to device or protocol; treatments were well tolerated, requiring no anesthetic. Therapeutic outcomes and discomfort were similar across all skin types. LIMITATIONS Lack of control group. CONCLUSIONS The study findings demonstrate the novel 1726 nm laser is well tolerated with durable progressive posttreatment improvement to at least 26 weeks for moderate-to-severe acne across skin types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macrene Alexiades
- Founder & Director, Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center of New York, New York, New York; Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Adjunct Professor of Dermatology, Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | | | - David Goldberg
- Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists, Division of Schweiger Dermatology Group, New York, New York; Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Director, SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts; Adjunct Professor, Department of Dermatology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Humphrey S, Dover JS, Bowsher RR, Clancy A, Liu Y, Prawdzik G, Gallagher CJ. Immunogenicity of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Glabellar Lines. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43:1189-1193. [PMID: 37051886 PMCID: PMC10501746 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjad101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
DaxibotulinumtoxinA-lanm for injection (DAXI), a novel botulinum toxin type A formulation, contains a purified 150-kD core neurotoxin (daxibotulinumtoxinA) and proprietary stabilizing peptide (RTP004), and is approved for glabellar line treatment. As with any biologic product, DAXI may potentially be immunogenic and elicit unwanted antibody formation, possibly resulting in partial or complete treatment failure. The immunogenicity of DAXI was assessed in 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose studies and an open-label safety study of up to 3 repeat treatments. Of the 2737 evaluable patients, none developed neutralizing antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA and 0.8% developed treatment-related nonneutralizing anti-daxibotulinumtoxinA-binding antibodies. Of evaluable patients exposed to RTP004 with either DAXI or placebo, 1.3% developed treatment-related anti-RTP004-binding antibodies, which were mostly transient. No patient developed binding antibodies to both daxibotulinumtoxinA and RTP004. All patients with treatment-related binding antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA or RTP004 achieved a clinical response (none or mild glabellar line severity) at Week 4 following each DAXI treatment cycle. The duration of clinical response was not different between treatment cycles when antibodies were detected vs when they were absent. Although the analysis population was small compared to the number of patients likely to receive repeated treatment in clinical practice, these results suggest that DAXI administration at the approved glabellar lines dose has low immunogenic potential and that nonneutralizing antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA or RTP004 occur infrequently and often transiently, and have no impact on clinical efficacy, safety, or duration of action. Real-world data encompassing larger numbers of patients is needed to substantiate these results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Conor J Gallagher
- Corresponding Author: Dr Conor J. Gallagher, Vice President Medical Affairs and Scientific Innovation, Revance Therapeutics, Inc., 1222 Demonbreun St Suite 2000, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dover JS, Solish N, Gross TM, Gallagher CJ, Brown J. Bridging the Gap: Sustained Treatment Effect of Glabellar Lines With Twice-A-Year Treatment With DaxibotulinumtoxinA. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:862-864. [PMID: 37384899 PMCID: PMC10461716 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To achieve natural-looking outcomes when treating dynamic lines with botulinum toxin (BoNT), retreatment must be timed such that the patient maintains a relatively constant aesthetic outcome. Although first-generation BoNT products require retreatment with 3- to 4-month frequency to avoid discontinuous correction, the average patient returns for treatment every 6 months, when these toxins have generally fully worn off. OBJECTIVE To discuss the number of days a typical patient treated with daxibotulinumtoxinA for injection (DAXI) or legacy BoNT products will spend undertreated or uncorrected in a given calendar year. MATERIALS AND METHODS Median time for maintaining glabellar lines in the "none" or "mild" severity range was compared for approved doses of onabotulinumtoxinA (ONA; 120 days) and DAXI (168 days). RESULTS The average patient treated with 40U of DAXI every 6 months can expect to be uncorrected (with "moderate" or "severe" glabellar lines) for 14.5 days between visits compared with 61.5 days for 20U of ONA. CONCLUSION An extended duration BoNT product can be expected to create greater consistency in aesthetic outcome and minimize the discontinuous correction commonly seen with first-generation BoNT products for patients treated twice a year, without requiring a change in patient behavior regarding visit frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S. Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Dermatology, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Nowell Solish
- Dermatology at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Todd M. Gross
- Data Science and Interim Head of Clinical Development at Revance Therapeutics Inc., Nashville Tennessee
| | - Conor J. Gallagher
- Medical Affairs and Scientific Innovation at Revance Therapeutics Inc., Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jessica Brown
- Medical Affairs, at Revance Therapeutics, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cervantes J, Chang YF, Dover JS, Hernandez Alvarez A, Chung HJ. Laser-Assisted and Device-Assisted Filler Delivery: A Histologic Evaluation. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:865-870. [PMID: 37389474 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lasers and devices are used to enhance transcutaneous delivery of fillers. However, little has been published on the histologic findings of this form of laser/device-assisted delivery to determine the optimal devices and fillers. OBJECTIVE To objectively evaluate the histological effects of laser-assisted and device-assisted filler delivery. METHODS Ex vivo human abdominoplasty skin samples were treated with fractional CO 2 laser (ECO 2 , 120 μm tip, 120 mJ), fractional radiofrequency microneedling (FRMN, Genius, 1.5 mm, 20 mJ/pin), and microneedling (2.0 mm). Immediately after poly- l -lactic acid (PLLA), hyaluronic acid gel, calcium hydroxylapatite, and black tissue marking dye were topically applied. After treatment, biopsies were collected for histologic evaluation. RESULTS Histology revealed that PLLA and black dye were found in greatest abundance, hyaluronic acid was found to a lesser extent, and calcium hydroxylapatite was least found within channels created by fractional CO 2 laser. Microneedling was effective only at delivering black dye, whereas FRMN failed to show significant channel formation or delivery of the studied products. CONCLUSION Among the devices and fillers studied, fractional CO 2 laser and PLLA proved to be the most effective combination for laser/device-assisted filler delivery. Neither microneedling nor FRMN was effective as devices to enhance filler delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Cervantes
- Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yu-Feng Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Hye Jin Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Anvery N, Kang B, Christensen RE, Dirr MA, Nadir U, Brieva JC, Council ML, Dover JS, Kuzel TM, Minkis K, Mittal BB, Wayne JD, Yoo SS, Alam M. Minimum thresholds deemed acceptable by patients and physicians for sensitivity and specificity of mobile skin cancer screening algorithms. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 89:595-597. [PMID: 37187429 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Anvery
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bianca Kang
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rachel E Christensen
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - McKenzie A Dirr
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Umer Nadir
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joaquin C Brieva
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - M Laurin Council
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Timothy M Kuzel
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Cell Therapy, Department of Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kira Minkis
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell/New York Presbyterian, New York, New York
| | - Bharat B Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeffrey D Wayne
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Simon S Yoo
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Murad Alam
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Otolaryngology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cices A, Dover JS, Labadie JG. Changes in melanocytic nevi treated with laser hair removal: A systematic review. Lasers Surg Med 2023; 55:617-624. [PMID: 37493510 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incidental treatment of melanocytic nevi during laser hair removal (LHR) has been noted to cause clinical and dermoscopic changes that may appear similar to findings seen in atypical or neoplastic melanocytic lesions. The rate and characteristics of these changes has not been well-studied. OBJECTIVES The objective of this review article is to assess the literature for reported changes in melanocytic nevi following LHR to guide clinical practice. METHODS PubMed was searched December 5, 2022 for articles evaluating changes in melanocytic nevi after LHR treatment using the following search terms: "nevi laser hair removal," "nevi diode," "nevi long pulse alexandrite," "nevi long pulse neodymium doped yttrium aluminum garnet," and "melanoma laser hair removal." All English language patient-based reports discussing incidental treatment of melanocytic nevi while undergoing LHR with a laser were eligible for inclusion, while reports of changes following hair removal with non-laser devices such as intense pulsed light were excluded. Studies evaluating non-melanocytic nevi such as Becker's nevus or nevus of Ota were excluded as were those evaluating the intentional ablation or removal of melanocytic lesions. RESULTS Ten relevant studies were included, consisting of seven case reports or series and three observational trials, two of which were prospective and one retrospective. Among the seven case reports or series there were a total of 11 patients, six of which had multiple affected nevi. Clinical and dermoscopic changes to nevi following LHR appear to be common in clinical practice, though not well studied. Clinical and dermoscopic changes have been noted to present as early as 15 days after treatment and persist to the maximum time of follow up at 3 years. Commonly reported changes include regression, decreased size, laser induced asymmetry, bleaching, darkening, and altered pattern on dermoscopy. Histologic changes include mild atypia, thermal damage, scar formation, and regression. Although some of the clinical and dermoscopic alterations may be concerning for malignancy, to our knowledge, there are no documented cases of malignant transformation of nevi following treatment with LHR. LIMITATIONS This study is limited by the low number of relevant reports and their generally small sample size, many of which is limited to single cases. Additionally, comparison of available data was limited by variable reporting of treatment regimens and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Changes to nevi treated during LHR are not uncommon. Modifications to nevi may occur and look similar to changes seen in dysplastic or neoplastic melanocytic lesions. Notably, despite the widespread use of LHR since the first device was Food and Drug Administration approved in 1995, a time span of nearly three decades, there have been no reported cases of melanoma or severe dysplastic changes within treated nevi. However, dermatologists should be aware that morphologic and dermoscopic alterations can occur after LHR to prevent unnecessary surgical procedures. Although melanoma has not been reported to occur in nevi treated with LHR nor with any other laser exposures, further long-term data is needed to fully elucidate this concern. Optimally, nevi should be examined by a dermatologist before LHR to determine a baseline clinical and dermoscopic morphology. If there is concern for potential atypia, laser should be avoided over such nevi to avoid confusion at future follow up visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahuva Cices
- Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Dermatology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jessica G Labadie
- Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hooper PB, Dover JS, Arndt KA, Rohrer TE. Letter on "Hyaluronic Acid Fillers, Needle Contamination by Fastidious Microorganisms, and Risk of Complications". Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:717-718. [PMID: 37249546 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kenneth A Arndt
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rajanala S, Watchmaker JD, Dover JS. TikTok Sheds Light on Lasers: An Analysis of Laser, Light, and Energy-based Device Videos. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:534-535. [PMID: 37052598 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Susruthi Rajanala
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gallagher CJ, Bowsher RR, Clancy A, Dover JS, Humphrey S, Liu Y, Prawdzik G. Clinical Immunogenicity of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Glabellar Lines: Pooled Data from the SAKURA Phase 3 Trials. Toxins (Basel) 2023; 15:60. [PMID: 36668880 PMCID: PMC9862169 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15010060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection (DAXI) is a novel botulinum toxin type A product containing daxibotulinumtoxinA with a stabilizing excipient peptide (RTP004). DAXI immunogenicity was assessed in three phase 3 glabellar line studies (two placebo-controlled, single-dose studies and an open-label repeat-dose safety study). Binding antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA and RTP004 were detected by validated ELISAs. Samples positive for daxibotulinumtoxinA-binding antibodies were evaluated further for titer and neutralizing antibodies by mouse protection assay. Overall, 2786 subjects received DAXI and 2823 subjects were exposed to RTP004 as DAXI (n = 2786) or placebo (n = 37). Treatment-related anti-daxibotulinumtoxinA binding antibodies were detected in 21 of 2737 evaluable subjects (0.8%). No subject developed neutralizing antibodies. Treatment-related anti-RTP004 binding antibodies were detected in 35 (1.3%) of 2772 evaluable subjects. Binding antibodies were generally transient, of low titer (<1:200), and no subject had binding antibodies to both daxibotulinumtoxinA and RTP004. All subjects with treatment-induced binding antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA or RTP004 achieved none or mild glabellar line severity at Week 4 following each DAXI cycle, indicating no impact on DAXI efficacy. No subjects with binding antibodies to daxibotulinumtoxinA or RTP004 reported immune-related adverse events. This evaluation of anti-drug antibody formation with DAXI shows low rates of antibody formation to both daxibotulinumtoxinA and RTP004.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Shannon Humphrey
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia and Humphrey Cosmetic Dermatology, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E1, Canada
| | - Yan Liu
- Revance Therapeutics, Inc., Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Labadie JG, Ibrahim SA, Worley B, Kang BY, Rakita U, Rigali S, Arndt KA, Bernstein E, Brauer JA, Chandra S, Didwania A, DiGiorgio C, Donelan M, Dover JS, Galadari H, Geronemus RG, Goldman MP, Haedersdal M, Hruza G, Ibrahimi OA, Kauvar A, Kelly KM, Krakowski AC, Miest R, Orringer JS, Ozog DM, Ross EV, Shumaker PR, Sobanko JF, Suozzi K, Taylor MB, Teng JMC, Uebelhoer NS, Waibel J, Wanner M, Ratchev I, Christensen RE, Poon E, Miller CH, Alam M. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:1193-1201. [PMID: 35976634 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD. Objective To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD. Evidence Review A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved. Findings Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline's 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica G Labadie
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah A Ibrahim
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brandon Worley
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bianca Y Kang
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Uros Rakita
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah Rigali
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kenneth A Arndt
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Eric Bernstein
- Main Line Center for Laser Surgery, Ardmore, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeremy A Brauer
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York
| | - Sunandana Chandra
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aashish Didwania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Mattias Donelan
- Shriners Hospital for Children-Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hassan Galadari
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Mitchel P Goldman
- Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, West Dermatology Company, San Diego, California
| | - Merete Haedersdal
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - George Hruza
- Departments of Dermatology and Otolaryngology, St Louis University-Laser and Dermatologic Surgery Center, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Arielle Kauvar
- New York Laser & Skin Care, New York.,New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Kristen M Kelly
- Department of Dermatology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine
| | - Andrew C Krakowski
- Department of Dermatology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Easton, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel Miest
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeffrey S Orringer
- Department of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - David M Ozog
- Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Peter R Shumaker
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System and University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Joseph F Sobanko
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathleen Suozzi
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mark B Taylor
- Gateway Aesthetic Institute & Laser Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Joyce M C Teng
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | - Jill Waibel
- Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Molly Wanner
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Ina Ratchev
- Section of Cutaneous Surgery, Northwestern Medical Group, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rachel E Christensen
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Emily Poon
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Corinne H Miller
- Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Murad Alam
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Otolaryngology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Humphrey S, Dover JS, Bowsher RR, Clancy A, Liu Y, Gallagher CJ. Clinical Immunogenicity of DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection in Glabellar Lines Including Subjects With Multiple Exposures: Pooled Data From the SAKURA Phase 3 Trials. Toxicon 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.11.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
Labadie JG, Dover JS. Commentary On: Facial Soft Tissue Repositioning With Neuromodulators: Lessons Learned From Facial Biomechanics. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42:1172-1174. [PMID: 35576932 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjac123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
23
|
Chen SX, Cheng J, Watchmaker J, Dover JS, Chung HJ. Review of Lasers and Energy-Based Devices for Skin Rejuvenation and Scar Treatment With Histologic Correlations. Dermatol Surg 2022; 48:441-448. [PMID: 35165220 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lasers and energy-based devices (EBD) are popular treatments for skin rejuvenation and resurfacing. Achieving desired outcomes and avoiding complications require understanding the effects of these devices at a histologic level. Currently, no comprehensive review summarizing the histologic effects of laser and energy-based treatments exists. OBJECTIVE To describe how lasers and EBD alter skin histology and improve the overall understanding of these devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PubMed search was conducted for studies with histologic analysis of fractional picosecond laser, fractional radiofrequency microneedling, nonablative lasers, and ablative lasers. RESULTS Fractional picosecond lasers induce intraepidermal and/or dermal vacuoles from laser-induced optical breakdown. Fractional radiofrequency microneedling delivers thermal energy to the dermis while sparing the epidermis, making it safer for patients with darker skin phototypes. Fractional nonablative lasers induce conical zones of coagulation of the epidermis and upper dermis. Ablative lasers vaporize the stratum corneum down to the dermis. Traditional ablative lasers cause diffuse vaporization while fractional ablative lasers generate columns of tissue ablation. CONCLUSION Lasers and EBD are effective for skin resurfacing and rejuvenation and have different mechanisms with disparate targets in the skin. Safe and effective use of devices requires understanding the histologic laser-tissue interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella X Chen
- Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Judy Cheng
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern Medical Group, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hye Jin Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Spring LK, Petrell K, Depina J, Dover JS. Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Abdominal and Quadriceps Muscle Strengthening: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Dermatol Surg 2022; 48:334-338. [PMID: 34966120 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiographic imaging has demonstrated muscle hypertrophy after treatment with noninvasive body contouring devices that target skeletal muscles. OBJECTIVE This pilot study sought to evaluate whether increased muscle mass translated to improved functional strength and endurance. METHODS A prospective, single-center, randomized open-label controlled study included 26 subjects randomized into 3 groups: 2 treatment groups and 1 control group. Both treatment groups received 4 neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) treatments over a 2-week period. Muscle performance testing was conducted at baseline and 2-week and 4-week posttreatment. Anthropometric measurements were assessed at baseline and at 4-week posttreatment. Study participants completed subject satisfaction surveys and a personal experience assessment. RESULTS Treatment with NMES resulted in statistically significant improvements in abdominal and quadriceps strength and endurance from baseline through 4-week posttreatment. Mean waist circumference decreased and quadriceps circumference increased, both nonsignificantly. Subject satisfaction regarding abdominal and quadriceps strength was reported as "satisfied or very satisfied" in 89% and 92% at 4-week and 8-week posttreatment, respectively. CONCLUSION Treatment of the abdomen and quadriceps with NMES leads to significant improvements in muscular strength and endurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah K Spring
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Commander, Medical Corps, United States Navy, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia
| | | | | | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Friedman PM, Dover JS, Chapas A, Rahman Z, Ross EV, Kilmer SL, Roberts WE, Sodha P, Stimmel JB, Moncrief MBC, Waibel JS. 1,550 nm Erbium-Doped and 1,927 nm Thulium Nonablative Fractional Laser System: Best Practices and Treatment Setting Recommendations. Dermatol Surg 2022; 48:195-200. [PMID: 35050945 PMCID: PMC8806037 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Fraxel Dual laser system (Solta Medical, Inc., Bothell, WA) contains a 1,550 and 1,927 nm wavelength single handpiece with different indications for each wavelength. OBJECTIVE To discuss treatment setting recommendations and best practices for select on-label and investigational applications of the 1,550 and 1,927 nm dual laser system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight board-certified dermatologists with 10 or more years of experience with the 1,550 and 1,927 nm laser system completed an online survey about their clinical experience with the system and then participated in a roundtable to share clinical perspectives and best practices for using the laser system. RESULTS For all Fitzpatrick skin types, treatment recommendations were described for selected approved indications for the 1,550 and 1,927 nm laser system, including both lasers in combination. Treatment recommendations were also reached for investigational applications with the 1,550 nm laser and 1,927 nm laser. Best practices for using the lasers during the treatment session to achieve optimal outcomes and decrease the post-treatment recovery time were compiled. CONCLUSION The 1,550 and 1,927 nm dual laser system is effective for a wide range of aesthetic and therapeutic applications, on and off the face and across all Fitzpatrick skin types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anne Chapas
- Union Square Laser Dermatology, New York, New York
| | - Zakia Rahman
- Stanford Department of Dermatology, Redwood City, California
| | | | | | - Wendy E. Roberts
- Generational and Cosmetic Dermatology, Rancho Mirage, California
| | - Pooja Sodha
- Department of Dermatology, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Julie B. Stimmel
- Synchrony Medical Communications, LLC, West Chester, Pennsylvania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Labadie JG, Compres E, Sunshine JC, Alam M, Gerami P, Harikumar V, Poon E, Arndt KA, Dover JS. Actinic Keratosis Color and Its Associations: A Retrospective Photographic, Dermoscopic, and Histologic Evaluation. Dermatol Surg 2022; 48:57-60. [PMID: 34812188 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Actinic keratoses (AKs) have been described with varying color and morphology; however, no reports have demonstrated associations between color, vasculature, and inflammation. In this retrospective study, we analyze the clinical, dermoscopic, and histopathologic features of AKs to elucidate this relationship. METHODS A retrospective search for patients diagnosed with AK between January 2018 and October 2019 was performed. Clinical and dermoscopic photographs and pathology slides for all included subjects were reviewed. RESULTS Forty-nine images and histopathology slides were analyzed. Dermoscopy of white AKs demonstrated scale and absence of erythema with corresponding absence of inflammation on histopathology. Dermoscopy of brown AKs revealed pseudonetwork, absent scale, and a variable vessel pattern with pigment incontinence and absence of inflammation on histopathology. Red AKs had a distinct polymorphous vessel pattern and presence of erythema on dermoscopy. On histopathology, about half of samples showed increased vascularity and variable inflammation. Pink AK dermoscopy revealed a presence of erythema with corresponding presence of inflammation on histopathology. CONCLUSION This report adds to our understanding of AKs and confirms that, in general, the pinker or redder the AK, the more prominent the inflammatory infiltrate and vasculature, respectively. Dermatologists should continue to use their diagnostic skills to successfully diagnose and triage AKs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica G Labadie
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Elsy Compres
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joel C Sunshine
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Dermatopathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Murad Alam
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Pedram Gerami
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Dermatopathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vishnu Harikumar
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Emily Poon
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kenneth A Arndt
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Patel S, Watchmaker JD, Dover JS. Darker skin types are underrepresented in sunscreen clinical trials: Results of a literature review. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 87:862-864. [PMID: 34793928 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shreya Patel
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Jacqueline D Watchmaker
- Southwest Skin Specialists, Scottsdale, Arizona; SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lorenc ZP, Adelglass JM, Avelar RL, Baumann L, Beer KR, Cohen JL, Cox SE, Dayan SH, Dover JS, Downie JB, Draelos ZD, Goldman MP, Gross JE, Joseph JH, Kaufman-Janette J, Moy RL, Nestor M, Schlessinger J, Smith SR, Weiss RA. Corrigendum to: The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1494-1495. [PMID: 34189562 PMCID: PMC8598192 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjab230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
29
|
Lorenc ZP, Adelglass JM, Avelar RL, Baumann L, Beer KR, Cohen JL, Cox SE, Dayan SH, Dover JS, Downie JB, Draelos ZD, Goldman MP, Gross JE, Joseph JH, Kaufman-Janette J, Moy RL, Nestor M, Schlessinger J, Smith SR, Weiss RA. The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:1423-1438. [PMID: 33944913 PMCID: PMC8598184 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PrabotulinumtoxinA is a 900-kDa botulinum toxin type A produced by Clostridium botulinum. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to investigate the safety of prabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS This was a multicenter, open-label, repeat-dose, 1-year phase II safety study. Adults with moderate to severe glabellar lines at maximum frown, as independently assessed by both investigator and patient on the validated 4-point photonumeric Glabellar Line Scale (0 = no lines, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), were enrolled. On day 0, patients received an initial treatment (IT) of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA (4 U/0.1 mL final vacuum-dried formulation injected into 5 glabellar sites). On and after day 90, patients received a repeat treatment (RT) if their Glabellar Line Scale score was ≥2 at maximum frown by investigator assessment. Safety outcomes were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS The 570 study patients received a median total dose of 60 U, that is, 3 treatments. Sixty-one patients (10.7%) experienced adverse events (AEs) assessed as possibly study drug related; 6.5% experienced study drug-related AEs after the IT. With each RT, progressively lower percentages of patients experienced study drug-related AEs. Eight patients (1.4%) experienced study drug-related AEs of special interest: 5 experienced eyelid ptosis (0.9%), 3 eyebrow ptosis (0.5%), 1 blepharospasm (0.2%), and 1 blurred vision (0.2%). Seven patients (1.2%) experienced serious AEs, but none were study drug related. A total of 4060 serum samples were tested for antibotulinum toxin antibodies; no seroconversion was observed. CONCLUSIONS The safety of RTs of 20 U of prabotulinumtoxinA for moderate to severe glabellar lines was confirmed in this second phase II study based on a broad range of outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Paul Lorenc
- Corresponding Author: Dr Z. Paul Lorenc, 983 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10028, USA. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Watchmaker J, Dover JS. Commentary on: The Effects of Aesthetic Lasers on Three Study Materials Used for Ocular Protection. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:NP1972-NP1974. [PMID: 33580653 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
31
|
Watchmaker J, Dover JS. Commentary on: The Role of the Laser Safety Officer and Laser Safety Programs in Clinical Practice. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41:NP1555-NP1556. [PMID: 33580655 DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjaa245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
32
|
Suozzi KC, Kibbi N, Lee KC, Worley B, Furlan KC, Kang BY, Ibrahim SA, Poon E, Alam M, Harikumar V, Keimig EL, Alster TS, Bolotin D, Dover JS, Galadari H, Goodman GJ, Hexsel D, Kaminer MS, Kim JYS, Karen J, Lask G, Lewis AB, Maher IA, Paul BC, Negishi K, Touma DJ, Waldman A, Beer K, Bertucci V, Burgess CM, Casabona G, De Boulle KL, Fitzgerald R, Green JB, Goldman MP, Humphrey S, Ibrahim SF, Ibrahimi OA, Jagdeo J, Kim HS, Lawrence N, Marmur E, Matarasso SL, McDonald M, Obagi S, Ortiz AE, Philipp-Dormston WG, Rossi AM, Solish N, Taylor SC, Trindade de Almeida AR, Weinkle SH. Development of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills in Facial Cosmetic Procedures: Botulinum Toxin Neuromodulator and Soft Tissue Filler Injection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 86:463-467. [PMID: 34499988 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.08.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen C Suozzi
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nour Kibbi
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kachiu C Lee
- Main Line Center for Laser Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Brandon Worley
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karina C Furlan
- Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bianca Y Kang
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sarah A Ibrahim
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily Poon
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Murad Alam
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | - Vishnu Harikumar
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily L Keimig
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Tina S Alster
- Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Diana Bolotin
- Section of Dermatology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - Hassan Galadari
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
| | - Greg J Goodman
- Monash University, Melbourne, AUA; University College of London, London, UK
| | - Doris Hexsel
- Brazilian Center for Studies in Dermatology, Porto Alegre, GBR
| | - Michael S Kaminer
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
| | - John Y S Kim
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Gary Lask
- Department of Dermatology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Ian A Maher
- Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Kei Negishi
- Institute of Geriatrics, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, JPN
| | | | - Abigail Waldman
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Vince Bertucci
- Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CAN
| | - Cheryl M Burgess
- Center for Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jeremy B Green
- Skin Associates of South Florida, Skin Research Institute, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Mitchel P Goldman
- Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, A West Dermatology Company, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Shannon Humphrey
- Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CAN
| | - Sherrif F Ibrahim
- Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Jared Jagdeo
- Department of Dermatology, State University of New York, Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA; Dermatology Service, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System-Brooklyn Campus, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Hei Sung Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, KOR
| | - Naomi Lawrence
- Division of Dermatology, Section of Procedural Dermatology, Cooper Hospital, Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Ellen Marmur
- Marmur Medical, Dermatology, New York, NY, USA; Department of Dermatology, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seth L Matarasso
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michel McDonald
- Department of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Suzan Obagi
- Cosmetic Surgery & Skin Health Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Arisa E Ortiz
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Wolfgang G Philipp-Dormston
- Faculty of Health, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, DEU; Hautzentrum Koeln, Klinik Links vom Rhein, Cologne, DEU
| | - Anthony M Rossi
- Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nowell Solish
- Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CAN
| | - Susan C Taylor
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Susan H Weinkle
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Alam M, Kakar R, Dover JS, Harikumar V, Kang BY, Wan HT, Poon E, Jones DH. Rates of Vascular Occlusion Associated With Using Needles vs Cannulas for Filler Injection. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:174-180. [PMID: 33377939 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.5102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance Soft-tissue augmentation with skin fillers can be delivered with needles or microcannulas, but unwanted vascular occlusions are possible. Objective To determine whether filler-associated vascular occlusion events of the face occur more often with injections performed with needles than with microcannulas. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included a random sample of board-certified dermatologists deemed eligible based on membership in relevant professional societies and attendance at relevant national professional meetings. Participants completed detailed forms in which they could enter deidentified data and volume statistics pertaining to patients undergoing filler procedures in their practices. Data were collected from August 2018 to August 2019. Exposures Injectable fillers approved by the US Food and Drug Administration delivered via needles or microcannulas. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measure was intravascular occlusion. Occlusion events were graded by severity (no sequelae, scar, and ocular injury or blindness). Results A total of 370 dermatologists (mean [SD] years in practice, 22.3 [11.1] years) participated and reported 1.7 million syringes injected. The risk of occlusion with any particular filler type using needle or cannula never exceeded 1 per 5000 syringes injected. Overall, 1 occlusion per 6410 per 1-mL syringe injections was observed with needles and 1 per 40 882 with cannulas (P < .001). Of the 370 participants, 106 (28.6%) reported at least 1 occlusion. Multivariate analysis found that injections with cannula had 77.1% lower odds of occlusion compared with needle injections. Participants injecting fillers for more than 5 years had 70.7% lower odds of occlusion than those who were less experienced. For each additional injection per week, the odds of occlusion decreased by 1%, and 85% of occlusions had no long-term sequelae. Nasolabial folds and lips were most likely to be occluded, with mean severity level of occlusions highest at the glabella. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, filler injections with either needles or cannulas were associated with a very low risk of intravascular occlusion events. Moreover, the vast majority of such events were minor and resolved without scar or other injury. Injections with microcannulas were less often associated with occlusion events than injections with needles. Occlusion risk per syringe appeared decreased after the first few years of clinical practice and was also lower among those who more frequently inject fillers. Whether a needle or cannula is most appropriate for injection may depend on patient factors, anatomic site, and the type of defect being treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murad Alam
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rohit Kakar
- Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
| | - Vishnu Harikumar
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City
| | - Bianca Y Kang
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hoi Ting Wan
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Emily Poon
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Derek H Jones
- Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sikora BC, Wortzman M, Nelson DB, Dover JS. A pilot study evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of a comprehensive, hydrating topical antioxidant developed specifically for men. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021; 20:2816-2823. [PMID: 34189833 PMCID: PMC8457217 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Introduction There is growing interest in skincare products designed for men. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a comprehensive antioxidant product in men. Methods This 12‐week study evaluated improvements from baseline in erythema, lines/wrinkles, skin tone, texture, brightness, dryness/flaking and pores (6‐point scale), global improvements (5‐point scale), and sebum levels following daily application in males with mild to moderate photodamaged skin. Subject self‐assessments and adverse events (AEs) were captured. Results Twenty‐two subjects completed the study. Early mean percent improvements from baseline were demonstrated in all categories at week 4 with visible improvements in skin tone (29%; p = .0001) and pores (28%; p < .0001). Reductions in skin surface sebum levels (forehead region) from baseline were demonstrated at 8 (p < .0001) and 12 (p < .0003) weeks. Ninety‐six percent of subjects reported overall visible improvement of their skin and that the study product calmed/soothed skin, reducing redness and irritation after shaving. One subject reported mild dryness. Conclusion Once daily application of a comprehensive topical antioxidant designed for men led to significant improvements in skin appearance, substantial reductions in skin surface sebum levels, and was well tolerated with a high level of subject satisfaction over 12 weeks.
Collapse
|
35
|
Watchmaker J, Gwinn C, Dover JS. Positive and Negative Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Cosmetic Fellowships. Dermatol Surg 2021; 47:1175-1176. [PMID: 34397551 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Moustafa FA, Qureshi AA, Dover JS. Cutaneous Photoaging: A Notable Pattern of Distribution of Lentigines on the Face. J Drugs Dermatol 2021; 19:755-757. [PMID: 32722913 DOI: 10.36849/jdd.2020.5193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Importance: Facial lentigines are a common patient complaint encountered in general and cosmetic dermatology practices. Lentigines are a marker of photoaging and understanding their distribution will provide insight into the aging process in order to better counsel patients. Objectives: To compare the relative distribution of lentigines in facial cosmetic subunits. Methods: We reviewed clinical photographs of patients receiving Alexandrite laser treatment for facial lentigines during the time period 11/1/2017-12/1/2018. Individual lentigines were plotted for each patient into one of 21 aesthetic units. A "heat map" was created to compare the relative density of these lesions. Results: Grouped peripheral cosmetic subunits contained more lentigines compared to grouped central cosmetic units. The mean number of lentigines in the central units was 0.60 and in the peripheral units was 0.85. This finding was statistically significant with a p value of 0.0001. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(7): doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5193.
Collapse
|
37
|
Bailey AJM, Li HOY, Tan MG, Cheng W, Dover JS. Microneedling as an adjuvant to topical therapies for melasma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 86:797-810. [PMID: 33857549 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.03.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microneedling as an adjuvant to topical medications has shown promising but variable results in the treatment of melasma. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of microneedling as an adjuvant to topical therapies for the treatment of melasma. METHODS This study followed PRISMA guidelines. All comparative, prospective studies on the use of topical interventions with microneedling for the treatment of melasma were included. Studies involving radiofrequency microneedling were excluded. RESULTS Twelve eligible studies comprising 459 patients from 7 different countries were included. Topical therapies included topical tranexamic acid, vitamin C, platelet-rich plasma, non-hydroquinone-based depigmentation serums, and hydroquinone-based depigmenting agents. Topical therapy with microneedling improved melasma severity with a large effect (standardized mean difference >0.8) beyond 8 weeks, with best results seen at 12 weeks. Compared to topical therapy alone, topical therapy with microneedling resulted in an additional improvement in melasma severity with a moderate effect at 8 weeks and a large effect at 12-16 weeks. Microneedling was well tolerated across studies, with no serious adverse events reported. LIMITATIONS Heterogeneity in study designs did not allow for a comparison of the efficacy of various topical therapies with microneedling. CONCLUSION Microneedling is useful adjuvant to topical therapies for the treatment of melasma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heidi Oi-Yee Li
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus G Tan
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Division of Dermatology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wei Cheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts; Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bonati LM, Petrell K, MacGregor J, Kandula P, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. The effects of neurotoxin and soft tissue fillers on gender perception in transgender individuals: A pilot prospective survey-based study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 86:690-693. [PMID: 33684490 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.02.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
39
|
Moustafa F, Hoverson K, Dover JS, Arndt KA. Needle Manufacturing, Quality Control, and Optimization for Patient Comfort. J Drugs Dermatol 2021; 20:44-48. [PMID: 33400423 DOI: 10.36849/jdd.5591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an increasing rise of cosmetic injectables. We sought to understand the manufacturing, quality control process, and needle selection of hypodermic needles for fillers. OBJECTIVE To understand the process of manufacturing and quality control of hypodermic needles and the relevance to an aesthetic clinician. METHODS We conducted a search of the internet and contacted medical device companies to understand the manufacturing process. We then collaborated with the Executive director of global pharmaceutical technology from Abbvie as well as the packaging and device engineer at Galderma and summarized our findings. Finally, we reviewed the literature and summarized existing recommendations on techniques to minimize pain related to injection. RESULTS Hypodermic needles undergo an extensive manufacturing and regulatory process. Many considerations are taken into account in needle manufacturing as well as the selection process with commercially available hyaluronic acid filler products. Needle manufacturers are held to universal standards though the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Filler companies perform their own testing to evaluate suitability of needles for their product including leakage force, penetration force, extrusion force, etc. Finally, parameters such as needle length, needle diameter, and wall thickness are considered for selection of needle/hub with individual filler viscosity. CONCLUSION There is extensive consideration that goes into needle manufacturing, quality control, and optimization for hyaluronic acid filler. Understanding the technical process helps inform the clinician and guide patient care for maximum comfort. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(1):44-48. doi:10.36849/JDD.5591.
Collapse
|
40
|
Fabi S, Dover JS, Tanzi E, Bowes LE, Tsai Fu F, Odusan A. A 12-Week, Prospective, Non-Comparative, Non-Randomized Study of Magnetic Muscle Stimulation for Improvement of Body Satisfaction With the Abdomen and Buttocks. Lasers Surg Med 2020; 53:79-88. [PMID: 33161584 PMCID: PMC7894278 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objective Magnetic muscle stimulation (MMS) is a relatively new energy‐based technology that provides a non‐invasive option for body contouring through stimulation and toning of underlying skeletal muscles. This study was conducted to examine the safety, efficacy, and body satisfaction scores of MMS using a CoolToneTM prototype for the aesthetic improvement of abdominal and buttock contour. Study Design/Materials and Methods This was a prospective, non‐comparative, non‐randomized, 12‐week, multicenter study. Male and female participants aged 22‐65 years received 4 MMS treatment sessions to the abdomen and/or buttocks. Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) scores for abdomen and/or buttocks were assessed at baseline, immediately post final treatment, at 4 weeks (primary endpoint), and 12 weeks post final treatment. Subject‐rated Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) was assessed at 4 weeks post final treatment (secondary endpoint), and 12 weeks post final treatment. Additional efficacy assessment included abdominal circumference obtained by 3D imaging at baseline, immediately post final treatment, and at 4 and 12 weeks post final treatment. A Subject Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) was used to assess treatment satisfaction and perspectives at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post final treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Results A total of 110 participants were recruited, who were 75% female, 80% Caucasian (mostly non‐Hispanic), average age of 39.5 years (range 22–59) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 23.3 kg/m2 (range 18–29.9). At the 4‐week post final treatment visit, the average BSQ score for participants receiving abdominal treatment (n = 93) was significantly improved with a 5.1 average increase in total score from baseline (possible score range 10–50) and by a 5.5 average increase from baseline for participants receiving buttocks treatment (n = 32) (p < 0.05). At 4 weeks post final treatment, the proportion of participants with SGAIS scores >“Improved” was 68.1% for participants receiving treatment of the abdomen (n = 94), and 81.8% for those receiving buttocks treatment (n = 33). The mean total decrease from baseline in waist circumference was significant at all time points. At the 12‐week post final treatment visit, SEQ data revealed that a majority of participants were “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” with overall treatment results and “Agreed” or “Strongly Agreed” that they were motivated to maintain results either by working out or by additional treatment. A total of 6 AEs related to the device and/or treatment were reported, which resolved spontaneously during the study. Conclusion Treatment of the abdomen and/or buttocks with MMS was well‐tolerated and demonstrated significant improvement in aesthetic appearance through the 12‐week post final treatment study duration. As a stand‐alone treatment, MMS expands the range of options for individualized treatment planning for patients seeking abdominal and/or gluteal muscle toning. © 2020 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Fabi
- Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, San Diego, California, 92121
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Dayan E, Theodorou S, Katz B, Dover JS. Plume Effect of Fractional Radiofrequency Verus Laser Resurfacing: Considerations in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Lasers Surg Med 2020; 53:115-118. [PMID: 33161606 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic requires us all to re-evaluate aesthetic practices to ensure optimal patient safety during elective procedures. Specifically, energy-based devices and lasers require special consideration, as they may emit plume which has been shown to contain tissue debris and aerosolized biological materials. Prior studies have shown transmission of viruses and bacteria via plume (i.e., HIV and papillomavirus). The purpose of this study was to evaluate plume characteristics of the Er:YAG resurfacing laser (Sciton; Palo Alto, CA) and compare it to the Morpheus8 fractional radiofrequency device (InMode; Lake Forest, CA). METHODS Five patients who underwent aesthetic resurfacing and/or skin tightening of the face and neck were treated with the Er:YAG (Sciton Joule, Palo Alto, CA) and/or fractional radiofrequency (Morpheus8, Lake Forest, CA) between April 1 and May 11, 2020. Data collected included patient demographics, past medical history, treatment parameters, adverse events, particle counter data, as well as high magnification video equiptment. Patients were evaluated during treatment with a calibrated particle meter (PCE; Jupiter, FL). The particle meter was used at a consistent focal distance (6-12 inches) to sample the surrounding environment during treatment at 2.83 L/min to a counting efficiency of 50% at 0.3 µm and 100% at >0.45 µm. Recordings were obtained with and without a smoke evacuator. RESULTS Of our cohort (n = 5), average age was 58 years old (STD ±7.2). Average Fitzpatrick type was between 2 and 3. Two patients received Er:YAG fractional resurfacing in addition to fractional radiofrequency during the same treatment session. Two patients had fractional radiofrequency only, and one patient had laser treatment with the Er:YAG only. There were no adverse events recorded. The particle counter demonstrated ambient baseline particles/second (pps) at 8 (STD ±6). During fractional radiofrequency treatment at 1-mm depth, the mean recording was 8 pps (STD ±8). At the more superficial depth of 0.5 mm, recordings showed 10 pps (STD ±6). The Er:YAG laser resurfacing laser had mean readings of 44 pps (STD ±11). When the particle sizes were broken down by size, the fractional radiofrequency device had overall smaller particle sizes with a count of 251 for 0.3 µm (STD ±147) compared with Er:YAG laser with a count of 112 for 0.3 µm (STD ±84). The fractional radiofrequency did not appear to emit particles >5 µm throughout the treatment, however, the Er:YAG laser consistently recorded majority of particles in the range of 5-10 µm. The addition of the smoke evacuator demonstrated a 50% reduction in both particles per second recorded as well as all particle sizes. CONCLUSION Re-evaluation of the plume effect from aesthetic devices has become important during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further studies are required to characterize viability of COVID-19 viability and transmissibility in plume specimens. Based on this pilot study, we recommend that devices that generate little to no plume such as fractional radiofrequency devices be used in Phase I reopening of practice while devices that generate a visible plume such as Er:YAG laser resurfacing devices be avoided and only used with appropriate personal protective equipment in addition to a smoke evacuator in Phase IV reopening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erez Dayan
- Avance Plastic Surgery Institute, Reno, Nevada
| | - Spero Theodorou
- Department of Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
| | - Bruce Katz
- Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Artzi O, Cohen JL, Dover JS, Suwanchinda A, Pavicic T, Landau M, Goodman GJ, Ghannam S, Al Niaimi F, van Loghem JAJ, Goldie K, Sattler S, Cassuto D, Lim TS, Wanitphakdeedecha R, Verner I, Fischer TC, Bucay V, Sprecher E, Shalmon D. Delayed Inflammatory Reactions to Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Literature Review and Proposed Treatment Algorithm. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2020; 13:371-378. [PMID: 32547150 PMCID: PMC7244356 DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s247171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives There is a wide diversity of opinions regarding the management of delayed inflammatory reactions (DIRs) secondary to hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers. The plethora of approaches has led the authors to conduct a review regarding management and treatment of DIRs as well as establish therapeutic guidelines for this purpose. Materials and Methods A review of the literature was performed through databases such as PubMed using keywords including HA-fillers and complications, delayed HA filler sequelae and therapy, soft tissue and dermal filler reactions and management. Additionally, a survey comprised of questions regarding the management and treatment of DIRs was sent to 18 physicians highly experienced with soft-tissue filler injections in 10 countries. Their answers and recommendations were analyzed and debated amongst these panelists. Results Sixteen panelists favored antibiotic therapy as first-line treatment for DIRs, specifically dual antibiotic therapy consisting of a fluoroquinolone along with a tetracycline or macrolide for a period of 3-6 weeks. The majority refrained from the use of intralesional (IL) or systemic steroids except in the case of disfiguring or recalcitrant reactions. IL hyaluronidase was recommended by 13 panelists; however, some preferred a watchful waiting approach for a period of 48 hours to 2 weeks prior to IL hyaluronidase, and in cases where antibiotics did not lead to improvement. Conclusion A consensus was reached and summarized to propose a clear, easy-to-follow, stepwise algorithm for the treatment of DIRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ofir Artzi
- Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joel L Cohen
- AboutSkin Dermatology and AboutSkin Research, , Greenwood Village and Lone Tree, CO, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.,Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Dermatology, Brown Medical School, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Atchima Suwanchinda
- Department of Dermatology, School of Anti-Aging and Regenerative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Bangkok, Thailand.,Division of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Tatjana Pavicic
- Private Practice for Dermatology and Aesthetics Dr. Tatjana Pavicic, Munich 80539, Germany
| | | | | | - Sahar Ghannam
- Associate Prof. of Dermatology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | | | | | - Kate Goldie
- Medical Director European Medical Aesthetics Ltd, London W1G 8QN, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Ines Verner
- Verner Clinic, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Dermatology, University of Rome, Guglielmo Marconi, Italy
| | - Tanja C Fischer
- Skin and Laser Center, Potsdam, Germany.,School of Medicine, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Vivian Bucay
- Bucay Center for Dermatology and Aesthetics, UTHSC, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Eli Sprecher
- Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Human Molecular Genetics & Biochemistry, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dana Shalmon
- Department of Dermatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tanghetti EA, Goldberg DJ, Dover JS, Geronemus RG, Bai Z, Alvandi N, Shanler SD. Oxymetazoline and Energy-Based Therapy in Patients with Rosacea: Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability in an Open-Label, Interventional Study. Lasers Surg Med 2020; 53:55-65. [PMID: 32378241 PMCID: PMC7891417 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives The objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oxymetazoline hydrochloride cream, 1% (oxymetazoline) when used as an adjunctive treatment with energy‐based therapy for patients with moderate to severe facial erythema associated with rosacea. Study Design/Materials and Methods In this Phase 4, multicenter, interventional, open‐label study, eligible patients received one of four energy‐based therapies (potassium titanyl phosphate laser, intense pulsed light therapy, pulsed‐dye laser Vbeam Perfecta, or pulsed‐dye laser Cynergy) on day 1 and day 29 and once‐daily application of oxymetazoline on days 3 through 27 and days 31 through 56. Improvement from baseline in Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) score, patient satisfaction measures, incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and worsening from baseline on dermal tolerability assessments and the Clinician Telangiectasia Assessment (CTA) were assessed. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results A total of 46 patients (mean age, 51.1 years; 78.3% female) enrolled in this study. Similar numbers of patients received each of the energy‐based therapies in addition to oxymetazoline. All patients demonstrated an improvement from baseline in CEA during the study with 39 of 43 evaluable patients (90.7%) demonstrating an improvement 6 hours posttreatment on day 56. Most patients were satisfied or very satisfied with treatment at the end of the study. All TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Some patients experienced worsening in dermal tolerability assessment symptoms (range: 4–21 patients; 8.7–45.7%). Worsening in CEA and CTA were each reported by three patients (6.5%) at any time during the study. Conclusions Treatment with oxymetazoline as adjunctive therapy with energy‐based therapy was safe, well tolerated, and reduced facial erythema in patients with moderate to severe persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emil A Tanghetti
- Center for Dermatology and Laser Surgery, 5601 J Street, Sacramento, California, 95819
| | - David J Goldberg
- Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of New York and New Jersey, 115 E 57th Street, #400, New York, New York, 10022
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- Skin Care Physicians, 1244 Boylston Street (Route 9), Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, 02467
| | - Roy G Geronemus
- Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York, 317 East 34th Street, New York, New York, 10016
| | - Zane Bai
- Allergan, Giralda Farms, Dodge Drive, Madison, New Jersey, 07940
| | - Nancy Alvandi
- Allergan, Giralda Farms, Dodge Drive, Madison, New Jersey, 07940.,Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 30 Enterprise, Suite 200, Aliso Viejo, California, 92656
| | - Stuart D Shanler
- Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc., 640 Lee Road, Suite 200, Wayne, Pennsylvania, 19087
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dover JS, Moran ML, Figueroa JF, Furnas H, Vyas JM, Wiviott LD, Karchmer AW. A Path to Resume Aesthetic Care: Executive Summary of Project AesCert Guidance Supplement-Practical Considerations for Aesthetic Medicine Professionals Supporting Clinic Preparedness in Response to the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020; 22:125-151. [PMID: 32374192 PMCID: PMC7312742 DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2020.0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S. Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Mary Lynn Moran
- Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jose F. Figueroa
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Heather Furnas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Jatin M. Vyas
- Division of Infectious Disease, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lory D. Wiviott
- Department of Medicine, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Adolf W. Karchmer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Infectious Disease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Dover JS, Moran ML, Figueroa JF, Furnas H, Vyas JM, Wiviott LD, Karchmer AW. A PATH TO RESUME AESTHETIC CARE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF PROJECT AesCert™ GUIDANCE SUPPLEMENT: PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR AESTHETIC MEDICINE PROFESSIONALS SUPPORTING CLINIC PREPAREDNESS IN RESPONSE TO THE SARS-CoV-2 OUTBREAK. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2020:abc.2020.0239. [PMID: 32362134 DOI: 10.1089/abc.2020.0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This Project AesCert™ Guidance Supplement ("Guidance Supplement") was developed in partnership with a multi-disciplinary panel of board-certified physician and doctoral experts in the fields of Infectious Disease, Immunology, Public Health Policy, Dermatology, Facial Plastic Surgery and Plastic Surgery. The Guidance Supplement is intended to provide aesthetic medicine physicians and their staffs with a practical guide to safety considerations to support clinic preparedness for patients seeking non-surgical aesthetic treatments and procedures following the return-to-work phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, once such activity is permitted by applicable law. Many federal, state and local governmental authorities, public health agencies and professional medical societies have promulgated COVID-19 orders and advisories applicable to health care practitioners. The Guidance Supplement is intended to provide aesthetic physicians and their staffs with an additional set of practical considerations for delivering aesthetic care safely and generally conducting business responsibly in the new world of COVID-19. Aesthetic providers will face new and unique challenges as government stay-at-home orders and related commercial limitations are eased, and the U.S. economy reopens and healthcare systems transition from providing only urgent and other essential treatment to resuming routine care and elective procedures and services. The medical aesthetic specialties will therefore wish to resume practice in order to ensure high quality, expert care is available, and importantly to help promote patients' positive self-image and sense of well-being following a lengthy and stressful period of quarantine. In a number of areas, this Guidance Supplement exceeds traditional aesthetic office safety precautions, recognizing reduced tolerance in an elective treatment environment for any risk associated with COVID-19's highly variable presentation and unpredictable course. The disease has placed a disturbing number of young, otherwise healthy patients in extremis with severe respiratory and renal failure, stroke, pericarditis, neurologic deficits and other suddenly life-threatening complications, in addition to its pernicious effects on those with pre-existing morbidities and advanced age. Accordingly, the Guidance Supplement seeks to establish an elevated safety profile for providing patient care while reducing, to the greatest extent reasonably possible, the risk of infectious processes to both patients and providers. While the Guidance Supplement cannot foreclose the risk of infection, nor serve to establish or modify any standards of care, it does offer actionable risk-mitigation considerations for general office comportment and for certain non-surgical procedures typically performed in aesthetic medical settings. It is axiomatic that all such considerations are necessarily subject to the ultimate judgment of each individual healthcare professional based on patient situation, procedure details, office environment, staffing constraints, equipment and testing availability, and local legal status and public health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Dover
- Yale University School of Medicine, 12228, Dermatology, New Haven, Connecticut, United States;
| | - Mary Lynn Moran
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 12327, Otolaryngology, Nashville, Tennessee, United States;
| | - Jose F Figueroa
- Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, 1857, Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Heather Furnas
- Stanford University School of Medicine, 10624, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford, California, United States;
| | - Jatin M Vyas
- Harvard Medical School, 1811, Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Lory D Wiviott
- California Pacific Medical Center, 7153, Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States;
| | - Adolf W Karchmer
- Harvard Medical School, 1811, Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
McDaniel DH, Dover JS, Wortzman M, Nelson DB. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a moisture treatment cream containing three critical elements of natural skin moisturization. J Cosmet Dermatol 2020; 19:1121-1128. [PMID: 32141711 PMCID: PMC7217153 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.13359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate skin barrier and hydration effects of a new rebalancing moisture treatment (TRMT) and to assess efficacy and tolerability in subjects with photodamaged skin. Methods In an epidermal skin model, tissues (n = 5/group) were topically treated with 25 µL of TRMT, 25 µL of a market‐leading moisturizer (MLM), or untreated for 60 minutes. Hydration was measured at 0, 15, and 30 minutes. Tissues were harvested for gene expression analysis of markers associated with skin barrier and hydration: Claudin (CLD), Aquaporin (AQP), Hyaluronic Acid Syntheses (HAS), and Hyaluronidase (HYAL). A clinical study evaluated twice‐daily application of TRMT, assessing changes in fine lines/wrinkles, brightness, texture, erythema, and tolerability from baseline through week 8. Hydration was measured using electrical impedance. Results TRMT and MLM demonstrated significant increases in hydration vs untreated tissue at each timepoint (P < .005), with greater hydration effects observed for TRMT vs MLM. TRMT‐treated tissues demonstrated greater expression of CLD, AQP, and HA, and reduced expression of HYAL vs untreated and MLM‐treated tissues. Twice‐daily application of TRMT demonstrated significant improvements at 2 weeks in fine lines/wrinkles (P < .001), brightness (P < .0001), texture (P < .0004), and hydration (P < .004). At 8 weeks, statistically significant improvements were achieved in all categories. Conclusion In an epidermal skin model, TRMT demonstrated significant increases in hydration, greater hydration effects, and expression of key markers associated with skin barrier and hydration vs a MLM. Twice‐daily application of TRMT was well tolerated and resulted in early, significant improvements in hydration and visible improvements in skin brightness, texture, fine lines/wrinkles, and erythema at 8 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H McDaniel
- McDaniel Institute of Anti-Aging Research, Virginia Beach, VA.,Hampton University Skin of Color Research Institute, Hampton, VA.,School of Science, Hampton University, Hampton, VA.,Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, MA.,Clinical Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.,Dermatology, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sadeghpour M, Quatrano NA, Bonati LM, Arndt KA, Dover JS, Kaminer MS. Delayed-Onset Nodules to Differentially Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acids: Comparative Incidence and Risk Assessment. Dermatol Surg 2019; 45:1085-1094. [PMID: 30789508 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000001814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robust and long-term data on true incidence of delayed-onset nodules and immune tolerance of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are lacking. OBJECTIVE To characterize the incidence of delayed nodules in Vycross (VYC) HA fillers compared with previously reported FDA and non-FDA data of all HA fillers. METHODS AND MATERIALS The incidence of delayed nodules in all patients who had received VYC fillers in a 12-month period was assessed through a retrospective chart review. Nodule incidence for currently approved nonanimal-stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA) fillers was assessed using the FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data. RESULTS Overall, 1,029 patients received 1,250 VYC filler treatments. Five patients developed delayed nodules to VOB, with an incidence of 1.0% per patient and 0.8% per syringe. No nodules were observed in patients who received VLR or VOL. All nodules were treated successfully using a combination of intralesional triamcinolone and hyaluronidase. Compared with other currently approved NASHA fillers, VOB is associated with a higher incidence of nodule formation. CONCLUSION The introduction of VYC HAs has introduced a new variable that may be changing the immune tolerance of these substances, resulting in a higher incidence of delayed nodules than previously expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Sadeghpour
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Kenneth A Arndt
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI.,Department of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, NH
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI.,Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Michael S Kaminer
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI.,Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Maisel A, Waldman A, Furlan K, Weil A, Sacotte K, Lazaroff JM, Lin K, Aranzazu D, Avram MM, Bell A, Cartee TV, Cazzaniga A, Chapas A, Crispin MK, Croix JA, DiGiorgio CM, Dover JS, Goldberg DJ, Goldman MP, Green JB, Griffin CL, Haimovic AD, Hausauer AK, Hernandez SL, Hsu S, Ibrahim O, Jones DH, Kaufman J, Kilmer SL, Lee NY, McDaniel DH, Schlessinger J, Tanzi E, Weiss ET, Weiss RA, Wu D, Poon E, Alam M. Self-reported Patient Motivations for Seeking Cosmetic Procedures. JAMA Dermatol 2019; 154:1167-1174. [PMID: 30140900 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Despite the growing popularity of cosmetic procedures, the sociocultural and quality-of-life factors that motivate patients to undergo such procedures are not well understood. Objective To estimate the relative importance of factors that motivate patients to seek minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter observational study was performed at 2 academic and 11 private dermatology practice sites that represented all US geographic regions. Adult patients presenting for cosmetic consultation or treatment from December 4, 2016, through August 9, 2017, were eligible for participation. Exposures Participants completed a survey instrument based on a recently developed subjective framework of motivations and a demographic questionnaire. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were the self-reported most common motivations in each quality-of-life category. Secondary outcomes were other frequently reported motivations and those associated with specific procedures. Results Of 529 eligible patients, 511 agreed to participate, were enrolled, and completed the survey. Typical respondents were female (440 [86.1%]), 45 years or older (286 [56.0%]), white (386 [75.5%]), and college educated (469 [91.8%]) and had previously received at least 2 cosmetic procedures (270 [52.8%]). Apart from motivations pertaining to aesthetic appearance, including the desire for beautiful skin and a youthful, attractive appearance, motives related to physical health, such as preventing worsening of condition or symptoms (253 of 475 [53.3%]), and psychosocial well-being, such as the desire to feel happier and more confident or improve total quality of life (314 of 467 [67.2%]), treat oneself or celebrate (284 of 463 [61.3%]), and look good professionally (261 of 476 [54.8%]) were commonly reported. Motivations related to cost and convenience were rated as less important (68 of 483 [14.1%]). Most motivations were internally generated, designed to please the patients and not others, with patients making the decision to undergo cosmetic procedures themselves and spouses seldom being influential. Patients younger than 45 years were more likely to undertake procedures to prevent aging (54 of 212 [25.5%] vs 42 of 286 [14.7%] among patients ≥45 years; P < .001). Patients seeking certain procedures, such as body contouring (19 of 22 [86.4%]), acne scar treatment (36 of 42 [85.7%]), and tattoo removal (8 of 11 [72.7%]), were more likely to report psychological and emotional motivations. Conclusions and Relevance This initial prospective, multicenter study comprehensively assessed why patients seek minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Common reasons included emotional, psychological, and practical motivations in addition to the desire to enhance physical appearance. Differences relative to patient age and procedures sought may need further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Maisel
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Abigail Waldman
- Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Jamaica Plain, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Karina Furlan
- Department of Pathology, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alexandra Weil
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kaitlyn Sacotte
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jake M Lazaroff
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Katherine Lin
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Diana Aranzazu
- Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of New York and New Jersey, New York
| | - Mathew M Avram
- Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Dermatology Cosmetic and Laser Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Ashley Bell
- Advanced Skin Research Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Todd V Cartee
- Department of Dermatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey
| | - Alex Cazzaniga
- Skin Research Institute and Skin Associates of South Florida, Coral Gables
| | - Anne Chapas
- Union Square Laser Dermatology, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Catherine M DiGiorgio
- Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.,Krauss Dermatology, Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Dermatology, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David J Goldberg
- Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists of New York and New Jersey, New York.,Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Division of Dermatology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Rutgers School of Medicine, Newark.,Fordham University Law School, New York, New York
| | - Mitchel P Goldman
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Diego.,Goldman, Butterwick, Groff, Fabi and Wu Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, A West Dermatology Company, San Diego, California
| | - Jeremy B Green
- Skin Research Institute and Skin Associates of South Florida, Coral Gables
| | - Charmaine L Griffin
- Laser and Cosmetic Center/McDaniel Institute of Anti-Aging Research, Virginia Beach
| | - Adele D Haimovic
- Lance H. Brown, MD, PLLC, New York, New York.,Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York
| | - Amelia K Hausauer
- Aesthetx, Campbell, California.,Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Sarah Hsu
- Maryland Laser Skin and Vein Institute, Hunt Valley
| | - Omer Ibrahim
- Chicago Cosmetic Surgery and Dermatology, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Derek H Jones
- Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joely Kaufman
- Skin Research Institute and Skin Associates of South Florida, Coral Gables
| | - Suzanne L Kilmer
- Laser & Skin Surgery Medical Group, Inc, Sacramento, California.,Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Oakland
| | | | - David H McDaniel
- Laser and Cosmetic Center/McDaniel Institute of Anti-Aging Research, Virginia Beach.,Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.,Hampton University Skin of Color Research Institute, Hampton, Virginia.,School of Science, Hampton University, Hampton, Virginia
| | | | - Elizabeth Tanzi
- Capital Laser and Skin Care, Chevy Chase, Maryland.,Department of Dermatology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Eduardo T Weiss
- Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Hollywood Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery Specialist, Hollywood, Florida
| | - Robert A Weiss
- Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, California
| | - Douglas Wu
- Goldman, Butterwick, Groff, Fabi and Wu Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, A West Dermatology Company, San Diego, California
| | - Emily Poon
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Murad Alam
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Otolaryngology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Watchmaker J, Callaghan D, Arndt KA, Dover JS. The Unhappy Cosmetic Patient: Lessons From Unfavorable Online Reviews of Laser and Intense Pulsed Light Treatments. Dermatol Surg 2019; 46:1370-1372. [PMID: 31397777 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000002071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Watchmaker
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bonati LM, Dover JS. Treating Acne With Topical Antibiotics: Current Obstacles and the Introduction of Topical Minocycline as a New Treatment Option. J Drugs Dermatol 2019; 18:240-244. [PMID: 30909327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Oral antibiotics are well established treatments for acne vulgaris but are associated with undesirable side effects. Topical antibiotics offer an improved safety profile but have led to an alarming rise in worldwide P. acnes resistance. Fortunately, a new class of topical minocycline products has been developed for the treatment of acne and rosacea that decreases the risk for antibiotic resistance while maintaining safety and efficacy. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that a hydrophilic minocycline gel (BPX-01) and a lipophilic minocycline foam (FMX101) both reduced acne lesion counts with negligible systemic absorption. Head-to-head studies have yet to be completed, but the hydrophilic gel studies reported greater treatment efficacy than the lipophilic foam studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2019;18(3):240-244.
Collapse
|