Atypical presentation of dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor in an adult without epilepsy: a case report

Aim of the study: Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNET) is a rare glioneuronal tumor usually found in the temporal lobe of children and young adults. DNETs are commonly associated with drug-resistant partial seizures, with most cases diagnosed before age 20. Asymptomatic brain tumors are rare in the general healthy population, and the frequency of incidental DNETs in adults remains unknown.Materials and methods: We report the case of a 34-year-old healthy man who presented with a facial rash but was incidentally found to have a large T1 hypointense lesion in the left temporal cortex on neuroimaging. The patient opted for surgical removal of the mass, which was subsequently identified as a DNET, positive for a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mutation.Results: This case report presents the first incidentally discovered DNET in an adult without epilepsy, highlighting its atypical presentation. In addition, the presence of an FGFR mutation emphasizes its role in DNET pathogenesis and potential therapeutic implications. DNETs exhibit varied behavior based on age, tumor location, and cortical dysplasia.Conclusions: In this case, the absence of seizure onset may be attributed to the lack of cortical dysplasia. Further research is needed to understand the incidence of DNETs and their association with seizure onset and cortical dysplasia.

Vascular steal and associated intratumoral aneurysms in highly vascular brain tumors: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Intratumoral aneurysms in highly vascular brain tumors can complicate resection depending on their location and feasibility of proximal control. Seemingly unrelated neurological symptoms may be from vascular steal that can help alert the need for additional vascular imaging and augmenting surgical strategies.

OBSERVATIONS

A 29-year-old female presented with headaches and unilateral blurred vision, secondary to a large right frontal dural-based lesion with hypointense signal thought to represent calcifications. Given these latter findings and clinical suspicion for a vascular steal phenomenon to explain the blurred vision, computed tomography angiography was obtained, revealing a 4 × 2-mm intratumoral aneurysm. Diagnostic cerebral angiography confirmed this along with vascular steal by the tumor from the right ophthalmic artery. The patient underwent endovascular embolization of the intratumoral aneurysm, followed by open tumor resection in the same setting without complication, minimal blood loss, and improvement in her vision.

LESSONS

Understanding the blood supply of any tumor, but highly vascular ones in particular, and the relationship with normal vasculature is undeniably important in avoiding potentially dangerous situations and optimizing maximal safe resection. Recognition of highly vascular tumors should prompt thorough understanding of the vascular supply and relationship of intracranial vasculature with consideration of endovascular adjuncts when appropriate.

Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter: An international randomized phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150-200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS.

RESULTS

A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 2.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of the following adult CNS cancers: glioma (WHO grade 1, WHO grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma [1p19q codeleted, IDH-mutant], WHO grade 2-4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 4 glioblastoma), intracranial and spinal ependymomas, medulloblastoma, limited and extensive brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, non-AIDS-related primary CNS lymphomas, metastatic spine tumors, meningiomas, and primary spinal cord tumors. The information contained in the algorithms and principles of management sections in the NCCN Guidelines for CNS Cancers are designed to help clinicians navigate through the complex management of patients with CNS tumors. Several important principles guide surgical management and treatment with radiotherapy and systemic therapy for adults with brain tumors. The NCCN CNS Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's most recent recommendations regarding molecular profiling of gliomas.

NIMG-105. DEUTERIUM METABOLIC IMAGING (DMI) DETECTS A LARGER WARBURG EFFECT IN HIGH-GRADE BRAIN TUMORS AND IN IDH WILD TYPE GLIOMAS

BACKGROUND

The Warburg Effect (WE) is a metabolic change in which tumors favor glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation and has been linked to cancer aggressiveness. Mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes in gliomas are associated with improved outcomes. We deployed a magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopic imaging technique coined Deuterium Metabolic Imaging (DMI) to measure the WE in multiple brain tumor types.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients underwent DMI, acquired on a Bruker 4T MR scanner after oral administration of 0.75g/kg of deuterated glucose. The WE was defined as the ratio of deuterated lactate, representing glycolysis, over deuterated glutamate and glutamine, representing oxidative phosphorylation. We devised an interval scale from 0 to 2 for the WE results. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to detect differences between groups.

RESULTS

The WE measurements for the largest groups, by diagnosis, showed: glioblastoma (n= 9, mean= 1.67); astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, WHO grade 3 (n= 2, mean= 0.25); oligodendroglioma, WHO grade 3 (n= 3, mean= 0.5); low grade glioma, IDH-mutant (n= 2, mean= 0); and meningioma, WHO grade 2 (n= 2, mean= 0). The WE for high-grade tumors (n= 15, mean= 1.27) was significantly different from the WE for low-grade tumors (n= 5, mean= 0), with p= 0.010. The WE for IDH wild type gliomas (n= 9, mean= 1.67) was significantly different from the WE for IDH-mutant gliomas (n= 9, mean= 0.44), with p= 0.007. Analysis is ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

DMI successfully and non-invasively detects the WE in many types of brain tumors. The WE was larger in high-grade tumors as compared to low-grade tumors, and the WE was larger in IDH wild type gliomas as compared to IDH-mutant gliomas. If validated with future studies, our results suggest that DMI is a useful tool to measure differences in the metabolism of brain tumors with different clinical behaviors.

Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide plus nivolumab or placebo for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter

BACKGROUND

Nearly all patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma experience recurrence following standard-of-care radiotherapy (RT) + temozolomide (TMZ). The purpose of the phase III randomized CheckMate 548 study was to evaluate RT + TMZ combined with the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (NIVO) or placebo (PBO) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (NCT02667587).

METHODS

Patients (N = 716) were randomized 1:1 to NIVO [(240 mg every 2 weeks × 8, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) + RT (60 Gy over 6 weeks) + TMZ (75 mg/m2 once daily during RT, then 150-200 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-5 of every 28-day cycle × 6)] or PBO + RT + TMZ following the same regimen. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients without baseline corticosteroids and in all randomized patients.

RESULTS

As of December 22, 2020, median (m)PFS (blinded independent central review) was 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.9-11.8) with NIVO + RT + TMZ vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.7-12.5) with PBO + RT + TMZ (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3) and mOS was 28.9 months (95% CI, 24.4-31.6) vs 32.1 months (95% CI, 29.4-33.8), respectively (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3). In patients without baseline corticosteroids, mOS was 31.3 months (95% CI, 28.6-34.8) with NIVO + RT + TMZ vs 33.0 months (95% CI, 31.0-35.1) with PBO + RT + TMZ (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.4). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 52.4% vs 33.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

NIVO added to RT + TMZ did not improve survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated or indeterminate MGMT promoter. No new safety signals were observed.

P11.58.A Case of a complex neurocutaneous syndrome characterized by extensive peripheral nerve sheath tumors and somatic ERBB2 mutation

Schwannomatosis is a rare genetic tumor predisposition syndrome characterized by the presence of multiple non-intradermal schwannomas and the definitive absence of vestibular nerve involvement. Though considered benign, the burden of tumors can cause significant morbidity in the form of motor dysfunction and refractory neuropathic pain. Treatment is focused on mitigating these symptoms, which includes resection of offending tumors when feasible and anti-angiogenesis therapy with bevacizumab. Options for targeted medical therapies are lacking. Schwannomatosis is molecularly distinct from the other neurofibromatoses and by definition lacks constitutional mutations in NF1 and NF2. Instead, constitutional mutations in SMARCB1 or LZTR1 are often the “first hit” in tumorigenesis. Activating mutations in ERBB2 (also designated HER2) have been identified as oncogenic drivers in peripheral nerve sheath tumors in patients who lack these typical constitutional tumor suppressor gene mutations.

Here we report a case of extensive peripheral nerve sheath tumors in the setting of apparent somatic mosaicism of an ERBB2 mutation. A 48-year-old man with history of chronic back pain presented with diffuse enlarging soft tissues masses primarily involving the left neck and occiput. Examination revealed areas of cutaneous heterogeneous hyperpigmentation, decreased muscle bulk and dorsiflexor weakness in the bilateral lower extremities, and steppage gait. Neuroimaging showed extensive T2 hyperintense, mildly enhancing masses within the bilateral thoracic and lumbar spine neuroforamina, intercostal nerves, paraspinal musculature, and lumbosacral plexus. Tissue from two separate tumor sites was morphologically consistent with schwannoma with some features of neurofibroma. Immunohistochemistry revealed partial loss of staining for SMARCB1. Whole exome sequencing (WES) on blood and tumor tissue did not show pathogenic germline or somatic variants for NF1, NF2, SMARCB1, LZTR1, or an array of tumor predisposition syndromes. WES on tumor tissue from both sites however did reveal a somatic ERBB2 variant (p.D769Y), suggesting mosaicism. ERBB2 D769Y has previously been classified as an activating mutation that confers sensitivity to some small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Patients with ERRB2-mutated peripheral nerve sheath tumors may have broader therapeutic options in the variety of available tyrosine kinase inhibitors studied in other cancers.

Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent and residual high-grade meningiomas

High-grade meningiomas are associated with neuro-cognitive morbidity and have limited treatments. High-grade meningiomas harbor an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression may contribute to their aggressive phenotype. Here, we present the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial (NCT03279692) evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in a cohort of 25 evaluable patients with recurrent and progressive grade 2 and 3 meningiomas. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 6 months (PFS-6). Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival, best intracranial response, and toxicity. Our study has met its primary endpoint and achieved a PFS-6 rate of 0.48 (90% exact CI: 0.31-0.66) and a median PFS of 7.6 months (90% CI: 3.4-12.9 months). Twenty percent of patients have experienced one (or more) grade-3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. These results suggest that pembrolizumab exerts promising efficacy on a subset of these tumors. Further studies are needed to identify the biological facets within the meningioma TME that may drive response to immune-based therapies.

Nivolumab plus radiotherapy with or without temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results from exploratory phase 1 cohorts of CheckMate 143

Background

The phase 1 cohorts (1c+1d) of CheckMate 143 (NCT02017717) evaluated the safety/tolerability and efficacy of nivolumab plus radiotherapy (RT) ± temozolomide (TMZ) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Methods

In total, 136 patients were enrolled. In part A (safety lead-in), 31 patients (n=15, methylated/unknown MGMT promoter; n=16, unmethylated MGMT promoter) received nivolumab and RT+TMZ (NIVO+RT+TMZ) and 30 patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter received NIVO+RT. In part B (expansion), patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter were randomized to NIVO+RT+TMZ (n=29) or NIVO+RT (n=30). Primary endpoint was safety/tolerability; secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results

NIVO+RT±TMZ was tolerable; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 51.6% (NIVO+RT+TMZ) and 30.0% (NIVO+RT) of patients in part A and 46.4% (NIVO+RT+TMZ) and 28.6% (NIVO+RT) in part B. No new safety signals were detected. In part A, median OS (mOS) with NIVO+RT+TMZ was 33.38 months (95% CI, 16.2 to not estimable) in patients with methylated MGMT promoter. In patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter, mOS was 16.49 months (12.94-22.08) with NIVO+RT+TMZ and 14.41 months (12.55-17.31) with NIVO+RT. In part B, mOS was 14.75 months (10.01-18.6) with NIVO+RT+TMZ and 13.96 months (10.81-18.14) with NIVO+RT in patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter.

Conclusions

CheckMate 143 was the first trial evaluating immune checkpoint inhibition with first-line treatment of glioblastoma. Results showed that NIVO can be safely combined with RT±TMZ, with no new safety signals. Toxicities, including lymphopenia, were more frequent with NIVO+RT+TMZ. OS was similar with or without TMZ in patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter, and differences by MGMT methylation status were observed.

Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibition with nivolumab improve overall survival compared with bevacizumab treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma?

Findings

In this randomized phase 3 clinical trial of 369 patients diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma treated with nivolumab, an improved survival benefit was not observed in patients who received nivolumab compared with bevacizumab-treated control patients.

Meaning

Additional research is needed; nivolumab monotherapy did not improve overall survival compared with bevacizumab in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. A study of nivolumab in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter is ongoing.

Importance

Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has shown benefits in many cancer types. To our knowledge, data from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluating a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma have not been reported.

Objective

To determine whether single-agent PD-1 blockade with nivolumab improves survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared with bevacizumab.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial, 439 patients with glioblastoma at first recurrence following standard radiation and temozolomide therapy were enrolled, and 369 were randomized. Patients were enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. The median follow-up was 9.5 months at data cutoff of January 20, 2017. The study included 57 multicenter, multinational clinical sites.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 369 patients were randomized to nivolumab (n = 184) or bevacizumab (n = 185). The MGMT promoter was methylated in 23.4% (43/184; nivolumab) and 22.7% (42/185; bevacizumab), unmethylated in 32.1% (59/184; nivolumab) and 36.2% (67/185; bevacizumab), and not reported in remaining patients. At median follow-up of 9.5 months, median OS (mOS) was comparable between groups: nivolumab, 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.8); bevacizumab, 10.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.8); HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.30); P = .76. The 12-month OS was 42% in both groups. The objective response rate was higher with bevacizumab (23.1%; 95% CI, 16.7%-30.5%) vs nivolumab (7.8%; 95% CI, 4.1%-13.3%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between groups (nivolumab, 33/182 [18.1%]; bevacizumab, 25/165 [15.2%]), with no unexpected neurological TRAEs or deaths due to TRAEs.

Conclusions and Relevance

Although the primary end point was not met in this randomized clinical trial, mOS was comparable between nivolumab and bevacizumab in the overall patient population with recurrent glioblastoma. The safety profile of nivolumab in patients with glioblastoma was consistent with that in other tumor types.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02017717

Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of adult CNS cancers ranging from noninvasive and surgically curable pilocytic astrocytomas to metastatic brain disease. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, radiation therapists, oncologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists, is a key factor in the appropriate management of CNS cancers. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization of brain tumors such as gliomas should be standard practice. This article describes NCCN Guidelines recommendations for WHO grade I, II, III, and IV gliomas. Treatment of brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumors in adults, is also described.

64. AN ENT2-DEPENDENT, CELL-PENETRATING, AND DNA-DAMAGING LUPUS AUTOANTIBODY CROSSES THE BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER TO TARGET BRAIN TUMORS

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits conventional antibody-based approaches to brain tumors. ENT2, an equilibrative nucleoside transporter, facilitates penetration of autoantibodies into live cells and is expressed in the BBB. PAT-DX1 (also known as Deoxymab-1 or DX1) is an ENT2-dependent, cell-penetrating, and DNA-damaging lupus autoantibody that is synthetically lethal to cancer cells with defects in the DNA damage response. PTEN loss renders sensitivity to DX1 and is common in primary and metastatic brain tumors. We show that DX1 is toxic to spheroids derived from primary PTEN-deficient glioblastoma (GBM), and crosses the BBB to suppress the growth of orthotopic GBM and breast cancer brain metastases. Mechanistically, we find the ENT2 inhibitor dipyridamole blocks DX1 penetration into brain endothelial cells and transport across the BBB in vitro and in vivo, consistent with ENT2-mediated uptake of DX1 into brain tumors. Autoantibodies that hijack nucleoside transporters to cross cell membranes may open new frontiers in brain tumor therapy.

Upfront Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stereotactic Laser-Ablation in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Multicenter Review of Survival Outcomes Compared to a Matched Cohort of Biopsy-Only Patients

BACKGROUND

Laser ablation (LA) is used as an upfront treatment in patients with deep seated newly diagnosed Glioblastoma (nGBM).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of LA in patients with nGBM and compare them with a matched biopsy-only cohort.

METHODS

Twenty-four nGBM patients underwent upfront LA at Cleveland clinic, Washington University in St. Louis, and Yale University (6/2011-12/2014) followed by chemo/radiotherapy. Also, 24 out of 171 nGBM patients with biopsy followed by chemo/radiotherapy were matched based on age (< 70 vs ≥ 70), gender, tumor location (deep vs lobar), and volume (<11 cc vs ≥11 cc). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific PFS and OS were outcome measures. Three prognostic groups were identified based on extent of tumor ablation by thermal-damage-threshold (TDT)-lines.

RESULTS

The median tumor volume in LA (n = 24) and biopsy only (n = 24) groups was 9.3 cm3 and 8.2 cm3 respectively. Overall, median estimate of OS and PFS in LA cohort was 14.4 and 4.3 mo compared to 15.8 mo and 5.9 mo for biopsy only cohort. On multivariate analysis, favorable TDT-line prognostic groups were associated with lower incidence of disease specific death (P = .03) and progression (P = .05) compared to other groups including biopsy only cohort. Only age (<70 yr, P = .02) and tumor volume (<11 cc, P = .03) were favorable prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

The maximum tumor coverage by LA followed by radiation/chemotherapy is an effective treatment modality in patients with nGBM, compared to biopsy only cohort. The TDT-line prognostic groups were independent predictor of disease specific death and progression after LA.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 1.2017

For many years, the diagnosis and classification of gliomas have been based on histology. Although studies including large populations of patients demonstrated the prognostic value of histologic phenotype, variability in outcomes within histologic groups limited the utility of this system. Nonetheless, histology was the only proven and widely accessible tool available at the time, thus it was used for clinical trial entry criteria, and therefore determined the recommended treatment options. Research to identify molecular changes that underlie glioma progression has led to the discovery of molecular features that have greater diagnostic and prognostic value than histology. Analyses of these molecular markers across populations from randomized clinical trials have shown that some of these markers are also predictive of response to specific types of treatment, which has prompted significant changes to the recommended treatment options for grade III (anaplastic) gliomas.

Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results from exploratory phase I cohorts of CheckMate 143

Background

Immunotherapies have demonstrated efficacy across a diverse set of tumors supporting further evaluation in glioblastoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety/tolerability and describe immune-mediated effects of nivolumab ± ipilimumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Exploratory efficacy outcomes are also reported.

Methods

Patients were randomized to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W; NIVO3) or nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W) for 4 doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W (NIVO1+IPI3). An alternative regimen of nivolumab 3 mg/kg + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses, then nivolumab 3 mg/kg Q2W (NIVO3+IPI1) was investigated in a nonrandomized arm.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled (NIVO3, n = 10; NIVO1+IPI3, n = 10; NIVO3+IPI1, n = 20). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (NIVO3, 30%; NIVO1+IPI3, 80%; NIVO3+IPI1, 55%) and diarrhea (10%, 70%, 30%, respectively). AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 10% (NIVO3), 30% (NIVO1+IPI3), and 20% (NIVO3+IPI1) of patients. Three patients achieved a partial response (NIVO3, n = 1; NIVO3+IPI1, n = 2) and 8 had stable disease for ≥12 weeks (NIVO3, n = 2; NIVO1+IPI3, n = 2; NIVO3+IPI1, n = 4 [Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria]). Most patients (68%) had tumor-cell programmed death ligand-1 expression ≥1%. Immune-mediated effects mimicking radiographic progression occurred in 2 patients.

Conclusions

Nivolumab monotherapy was better tolerated than nivolumab + ipilimumab; the tolerability of the combination was influenced by ipilimumab dose. These safety and exploratory findings merit further investigation of immunotherapies in glioblastoma.

Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 1.2015

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers provide interdisciplinary recommendations for managing adult CNS cancers. Primary and metastatic brain tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with varied outcomes and management strategies. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN CNS Cancers Panel's discussion and highlight notable changes in the 2015 update. This article outlines the data and provides insight into panel decisions regarding adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy treatment options for high-risk newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas and glioblastomas. Additionally, it describes the panel's assessment of new data and the ongoing debate regarding the use of alternating electric field therapy for high-grade gliomas.

Primary leptomeningeal lymphoma: International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group report

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical presentation, optimal diagnostic evaluation and treatment, and outcome in primary leptomeningeal lymphoma, a rare form of primary CNS lymphoma without parenchymal or systemic involvement.

METHODS

The International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group, a multidisciplinary group of physicians with a particular interest in primary CNS lymphoma, retrospectively identified cases of lymphoma isolated to the leptomeninges as diagnosed by CSF cytology, flow cytometry, or biopsy, without systemic or parenchymal brain/spinal cord lymphoma or immunodeficiency.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were identified, with median age at diagnosis of 51 years and median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2. Presenting symptoms were multifocal in 68%. Leptomeningeal enhancement was seen in 74% and CSF profile was abnormal in all cases. CSF cytology detected malignant lymphocytes in 67%. Flow cytometry identified monoclonal population in 80%, as did receptor gene rearrangement studies in 71%. Sixty-two percent had B-cell lymphoma, 19% T-cell, and 19% unclassified. Treatment varied and included fractionated radiotherapy (36%), systemic chemotherapy (78%), and intra-CSF chemotherapy (66%), with 66% receiving ≥ 2 modalities. Seventy-one percent had a favorable clinical response; ultimately, 44% received salvage treatment. Median overall survival was 24 months, with 11 patients still alive at 50 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Primary leptomeningeal lymphoma is a rare form of primary CNS lymphoma. Patients usually present with multifocal symptoms, with evidence of leptomeningeal enhancement and diagnostic CSF analysis. Although treatment is highly variable, patients have a better prognosis than previously reported and a subset may be cured.

Primary CNS lymphoma in children and adolescents: a descriptive analysis from the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG)

PURPOSE

To describe the demographic and clinical features and outcomes for children and adolescents with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A retrospective series of children and adolescents with PCNSL was assembled from 10 cancer centers in 3 countries.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 14 years were identified. Sixteen (55%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 1 or greater. Frontline therapy consisted of chemotherapy only in 20 patients (69%), while 9 (31%) had chemotherapy plus cranial radiotherapy. Most patients received methotrexate (MTX)-based regimens. Overall response rate was 86% (complete remission 69%, partial remission 17%). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 61% and 86%, respectively; the 3-year OS was 82%. Univariate analyses were conducted for age (≤ 14 vs. >14 years), PS (0 or 1 vs. >1), deep brain lesions, MTX dose, primary treatment with chemotherapy alone, intrathecal chemotherapy, and high-dose therapy. Primary treatment with chemotherapy alone was associated with better overall response rates with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.125 (P = 0.02). There was a marginally significant relationship between higher doses of MTX and response (OR = 1.5, P = 0.06). ECOG-PS of 0 to 1 was the only factor associated with better outcome with hazard ratios of 0.136 (P = 0.017) and 0.073 (P = 0.033) for PFS and OS, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest series collected of pediatric PCNSL. The outcome of children and adolescents seems to be better than in adults. PS of 0 to 1 is associated with better survival.

Anaplastic oligoastrocytoma in Turcot syndrome

Turcot syndrome (TS), a rare variant of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), is characterized by familial clustering of cancer of the large bowel, extracolonic body sites and brain. It is caused by germline mutations in genes encoding for components of the DNA mismatch repair system. We report a 72 year old woman with anaplastic oligoastrocytoma in the setting of TS. Careful analysis of tumor DNA is required to exclude the chance occurrence of a brain tumor in HNPCC kindreds and increase our understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease. Our case adds to the handful of cases published with detailed molecular data previously.

A Single Institution's Experience with Bevacizumab in Combination with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy in Progressive Malignant Glioma

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab and irinotecan may represent one of the most active treatments in progressive malignant glioma. Limited published experience with bevacizumab in patients with CNS tumors raises concerns regarding toxicity, particularly in regards to hemorrhage and thromboembolism.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with progressive malignant glioma after prior resection, chemotherapy and radiation who were treated with bevacizumab at our institution. Patients were evaluated for bevacizumab-related adverse events, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Two patients who progressed or died prior to completion of 4 cycles of therapy were analyzed for adverse events only.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with bevacizumab alone (1), bevacizumab plus irinotecan (31), or bevacizumab plus carboplatin (4). In 34 patients who received >4 cycles of bevacizumab, median TTF and OS were 16 and 32 weeks, respectively. Toxicities included 1 arterial thrombosis, 4 venous thromboses, and 3 clinically significant CNS hemorrhages.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our results confirm the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with progressive malignant glioma. Although the TTF and OS were less than previously reported with the combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan, this was an unselected patient population with 50% of patients having received >1 prior chemotherapy regimen.

A ‘Nonsense’ Mutation Leads to Aberrant Splicing of hMLH1 in a German Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer Family

Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in at least four genes encoding integral components of the cellular DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system. The spectrum of genetic alterations encompasses missense- and nonsense mutations, intronic mutations affecting splice donor or acceptor sites as well as small-scale deletions and insertions. We have identified a 'nonsense' mutation that activates a cryptic splice site generating an in frame deletion of the last 17 codons of exon1 of the hMLH1 gene causing HNPCC in a German family. We present a comprehensive genetic analysis of this family that demonstrates important aspects of HNPCC pathogenesis.

Treatment-related myelodysplasia/AML in a patient with a history of breast cancer and an oligodendroglioma treated with temozolomide: case study and review of the literature

The emergence of temozolomide as an effective alkylating agent with little acute toxicity or cumulative myelosuppression has led to protracted courses of chemotherapy for many patients with gliomas. Secondary, or treatment-related, myelodysplasia (t-MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (t-AML) are life-threatening complications of alkylating chemotherapy and have been reported in patients with primary brain tumors. We describe a case of temozolomide-related t-MDS/AML and discuss the clinical features of this condition. Administration of an alkylating agent in patient populations with long median survivals must be undertaken with an understanding of the potential for this treatment complication.