Are We Improving? Update and Critical Appraisal of the Reporting of Decision Process and Quality Measures in Trials Evaluating Patient Decision Aids.
Med Decis Making 2021;
41:954-959. [PMID:
33966534 PMCID:
PMC8474325 DOI:
10.1177/0272989x211011120]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background
In 2014, a systematic review found large gaps in the quality of reporting of
measures used in 86 published trials evaluating the effectiveness of patient
decision aids (PtDAs). The purpose of this study was to update that
review.
Methods
We examined measures of decision making used in 49 randomized controlled
trials included in the 2014 and 2017 Cochrane Collaboration systematic
review of PtDAs. Data on development of the measures, reliability, validity,
responsiveness, precision, interpretability, feasibility, and acceptability
were independently abstracted by 2 paired reviewers.
Results
Information from 273 measures was abstracted, and 109 of these covered the
core domains of decision processes (n = 55) and decision
quality including informed choice/knowledge (n = 48) and
values-choice concordance (n = 12). Very few studies
reported data on the performance and clinical sensibility of measures, with
reliability (23%) and validity (6%) being the most common. Studies using new
measures were less likely to include information about their psychometric
performance compared with previously published measures.
Limitations
The review was limited to reporting of measures in studies included in the
Cochrane review and did not consult prior publications.
Conclusion
There continues to be very little reported about the development or
performance of measures used to evaluate the effectiveness of PtDAs in
published trials. Minimum reporting standards have been published, and
efforts to require investigators to use them are needed.
Collapse