1
|
Palm ME, Thompson DD, Edwards T, Swartz K, Herzog KA, Bansal S, Echalier B, DeHart KC, Denmark S, Wilson JL, Nelson S, Waddy SP, Dunsmore SE, Atkinson JC, Wiley K, Hassani S, Dwyer JP, Hanley DF, Dean JM, Ford DE. The Trial Innovation Network Liaison Team: building a national clinical and translational community of practice. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e249. [PMID: 38229890 PMCID: PMC10790104 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
In 2016, the National Center for Advancing Translational Science launched the Trial Innovation Network (TIN) to address barriers to efficient and informative multicenter trials. The TIN provides a national platform, working in partnership with 60+ Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs across the country to support the design and conduct of successful multicenter trials. A dedicated Hub Liaison Team (HLT) was established within each CTSA to facilitate connection between the hubs and the newly launched Trial and Recruitment Innovation Centers. Each HLT serves as an expert intermediary, connecting CTSA Hub investigators with TIN support, and connecting TIN research teams with potential multicenter trial site investigators. The cross-consortium Liaison Team network was developed during the first TIN funding cycle, and it is now a mature national network at the cutting edge of team science in clinical and translational research. The CTSA-based HLT structures and the external network structure have been developed in collaborative and iterative ways, with methods for shared learning and continuous process improvement. In this paper, we review the structure, function, and development of the Liaison Team network, discuss lessons learned during the first TIN funding cycle, and outline a path toward further network maturity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisha E. Palm
- Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dixie D. Thompson
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Terri Edwards
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kitt Swartz
- Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Keith A. Herzog
- Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Shweta Bansal
- University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Signe Denmark
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jurran L. Wilson
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute at Children’s National Hospital, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sarah Nelson
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Salina P. Waddy
- Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sarah E. Dunsmore
- Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jane C. Atkinson
- Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ken Wiley
- Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sara Hassani
- Division of Clinical Innovation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jamie P. Dwyer
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniel F. Hanley
- Acute Care Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - J. Michael Dean
- Clinical & Translational Science Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniel E. Ford
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heffernan ME, Barrera L, Guzman ZR, Golbeck E, Jedraszko AM, Hays PT, Herzog KA, D’Aquila RT, Ison MG, McColley SA. Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of underrepresented research participants: Perspectives of clinical research coordinators. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e193. [PMID: 37745931 PMCID: PMC10514687 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Insufficient recruitment of groups underrepresented in medical research threatens the generalizability of research findings and compounds inequity in research and medicine. In the present study, we examined barriers and facilitators to recruitment of underrepresented research participants from the perspective of clinical research coordinators (CRCs). Methods CRCs from one adult and one pediatric academic medical centers completed an online survey in April-May 2022. Survey topics included: participant language and translations, cultural competency training, incentives for research participation, study location, and participant research literacy. CRCs also reported their success in recruiting individuals from various backgrounds and completed an implicit bias measure. Results Surveys were completed by 220 CRCs. CRCs indicated that recruitment is improved by having translated study materials, providing incentives to compensate participants, and reducing the number of in-person study visits. Most CRCs had completed some form of cultural competency training, but most also felt that the training either had no effect or made them feel less confident in approaching prospective participants from backgrounds different than their own. In general, CRCs reported having greater success in recruiting prospective participants from groups that are not underrepresented in research. Results of the implicit bias measure did not indicate that bias was associated with intentions to approach a prospective participant. Conclusions CRCs identified several strategies to improve recruitment of underrepresented research participants, and CRC insights aligned with insights from research participants in previous work. Further research is needed to understand the impact of cultural competency training on recruitment of underrepresented research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie E. Heffernan
- Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leo Barrera
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Zecilly R. Guzman
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emily Golbeck
- Mary Ann & J. Milburn Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Stanley Manne Children’s Research Institute, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Aneta M. Jedraszko
- Department of Pediatrics (Neonatology), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - P. Toddie Hays
- Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Keith A. Herzog
- Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Richard T. D’Aquila
- Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medicine (Infection Diseases), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael G. Ison
- Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Respiratory Diseases Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Susanna A. McColley
- Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NUCATS), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pediatrics (Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine), Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Breast biopsy results in many radiographic abnormalities, some of which may be mistaken for carcinoma. A retrospective review of 4,023 mammographic examinations was undertaken to determine the incidence and natural history of postbiopsy changes, in order to provide background information helpful in differentiating postsurgical scarring from breast cancer. The study comprised 863 patients who had undergone biopsy before mammography (1,049 breasts). Abnormalities attributed to prior biopsy were found in 474 breasts (45%). Skin changes (thickening and deformity), architectural distortion, and parenchymal scars (poorly defined masses often with spiculated margins) were observed much less frequently 3 years after biopsy than they were within the first 6 months, suggesting that considerable resolution can be expected with time. All abnormal mammographic findings were detected in patients radiographed within 6 months of biopsy, most within 1-2 months of biopsy. These observations may be helpful, in carefully selected cases, in establishing the benign (i.e., postsurgical) nature of radiographic abnormalities that might otherwise be confused with malignancy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Scar tissue within the breast parenchyma, when dense and located adjacent to fatty tissue, often appears as a poorly defined, spiculated mass on mammography. Intramammary scars may also appear as areas of architectural distortion or clustered microcalcification, sometimes associated with thickening or retraction of overlying skin. Because of the difficulty in differentiating such benign lesions from carcinoma, false-positive diagnoses of cancer occur. This article illustrates the radiographic spectrum of intramammary scars to familiarize the reader with this entity. Although several differential criteria have been described to help distinguish benign scarring from carcinoma, these features are not totally dependable, resulting in the need for biopsy in most cases and careful clinical and radiographic observation in others.
Collapse
|