Harm Reduction for Opioid Use Disorder: Strategies and Outcome Metrics

Tweet: The authors discuss harm reduction strategies and associated outcome metrics in relation to the ongoing opioid crisis.

Suvorexant alters dynamics of the sleep-electroencephalography-power spectrum and depressive-symptom trajectories during inpatient opioid withdrawal

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Opioid withdrawal is an aversive experience that often exacerbates depressive symptoms and poor sleep. The aims of the present study were to examine the effects of suvorexant on oscillatory sleep-electroencephalography (EEG) band power during medically managed opioid withdrawal, and to examine their association with withdrawal severity and depressive symptoms.

METHODS

Participants with opioid use disorder (N = 38: age-range:21-63, 87% male, 45% white) underwent an 11-day buprenorphine taper, in which they were randomly assigned to suvorexant (20 mg [n = 14] or 40 mg [n = 12]), or placebo [n = 12], while ambulatory sleep-EEG data was collected. Linear mixed-effect models were used to explore: (1) main and interactive effects of drug group, and time on sleep-EEG band power, and (2) associations between sleep-EEG band power change, depressive symptoms, and withdrawal severity.

RESULTS

Oscillatory spectral power tended to be greater in the suvorexant groups. Over the course of the study, decreases in delta power were observed in all study groups (β = -189.082, d = -0.522, p = <0.005), increases in beta power (20 mg: β = 2.579, d = 0.413, p = 0.009 | 40 mg β = 5.265, d = 0.847, p < 0.001) alpha power (20 mg: β = 158.304, d = 0.397, p = 0.009 | 40 mg: β = 250.212, d = 0.601, p = 0.001) and sigma power (20 mg: β = 48.97, d = 0.410, p < 0.001 | 40 mg: β = 71.54, d = 0.568, p < 0.001) were observed in the two suvorexant groups. During the four-night taper, decreases in delta power were associated with decreases in depressive symptoms (20 mg: β = 190.90, d = 0.308, p = 0.99 | 40 mg: β = 433.33, d = 0.889 p = <0.001), and withdrawal severity (20 mg: β = 215.55, d = 0.034, p = 0.006 | 40 mg: β = 192.64, d = -0.854, p = <0.001), in both suvorexant groups and increases in sigma power were associated with decreases in withdrawal severity (20 mg: β = -357.84, d = -0.659, p = 0.004 | 40 mg: β = -906.35, d = -1.053, p = <0.001). Post-taper decreases in delta (20 mg: β = 740.58, d = 0.964 p = <0.001 | 40 mg: β = 662.23, d = 0.882, p = <0.001) and sigma power (20 mg only: β = 335.54, d = 0.560, p = 0.023) were associated with reduced depressive symptoms in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Results highlight a complex and nuanced relationship between sleep-EEG power and symptoms of depression and withdrawal. Changes in delta power may represent a mechanism influencing depressive symptoms and withdrawal.

Xylazine suppresses fentanyl consumption during self-administration and induces a unique sex-specific withdrawal syndrome that is not altered by naloxone in rats

Prescription and illicit opioid use are a public health crisis, with the landscape shifting to fentanyl use. Since fentanyl is 100-fold more potent than morphine, its use is associated with a higher risk of fatal overdose that can be remediated through naloxone (Narcan) administration. However, recent reports indicate that xylazine, an anesthetic, is increasingly detected in accidental fentanyl overdose deaths. Anecdotal reports suggest that xylazine may prolong the fentanyl "high," alter the onset of fentanyl withdrawal, and increase resistance to naloxone-induced reversal of overdose. To date, no preclinical studies have evaluated the impacts of xylazine on fentanyl self-administration (SA; 2.5 μg/kg/infusion) or withdrawal to our knowledge. We established a rat model of xylazine/fentanyl co-SA and withdrawal and evaluated outcomes as a function of biological sex. When administered alone, chronic xylazine (2.5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) induced unique sex-specific withdrawal symptomatology, whereby females showed delayed onset of signs and a possible enhancement of sensitivity to the motor-suppressing effects of xylazine. Xylazine reduced fentanyl consumption in both male and female rats regardless of whether it was experimenter-administered or added to the intravenous fentanyl product (0.05, 0.10, and 0.5 mg/kg/infusion) when compared to fentanyl SA alone. Interestingly, this effect was dose-dependent when self-administered intravenously. Naloxone (0.1 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection) did not increase somatic signs of fentanyl withdrawal, regardless of the inclusion of xylazine in the fentanyl infusion in either sex; however, somatic signs of withdrawal were higher across time points in females after xylazine/fentanyl co-SA regardless of naloxone exposure as compared to females following fentanyl SA alone. Together, these results indicate that xylazine/fentanyl co-SA dose-dependently suppressed fentanyl intake in both sexes and induced a unique withdrawal syndrome in females that was not altered by acute naloxone treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Novel methods for the remote investigation of emerging substances: Application to kratom

The botanical product commonly called "kratom" is still relatively novel to the United States. Like other natural products marketed as supplements, kratom is highly variable, both in terms of the alkaloids naturally occurring in kratom leaves and in terms of processing and formulation. Kratom products sold in the United States are not well-characterized, nor are daily use patterns among regular users. Surveys and case reports have comprised most of the literature on kratom use among humans. To advance our understanding of real-world kratom use, we developed a protocol for the remote study of regular kratom-using adults in the United States. Our study had three aspects implemented in one pool of participants nationwide: an in-depth online survey, 15 days of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) via smartphone app, and the collection and assay of the kratom products used by participants during EMA. Here, we describe these methods, which can be used to investigate myriad drugs or supplements. Recruiting, screening, and data collection occurred between July 20, 2022 and October 18, 2022. During this time, we demonstrated that these methods, while challenging from a logistical and staffing standpoint, are feasible and can produce high-quality data. The study achieved high rates of enrollment, compliance, and completion. Substances that are emerging or novel, but still largely legal, can be productively studied via nationwide EMA combined with assays of shipped product samples from participants. We discuss challenges and lessons learned so other investigators can adapt these methods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

The IMPOWR Network Divided or Single Exposure Study (DOSE) Protocol: A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Once Versus Split Dosing of Methadone for the Treatment of Comorbid Chronic Pain and Opioid Use Disorder

BACKGROUND

The Divided or Single Exposure (DOSE) trial is a double-blind, placebo-controlled examination of once versus split dosing of methadone for comorbid pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) among persons receiving methadone for OUD treatment.

METHODS

This multisite trial consists of a 12-week active intervention phase and 6-month follow-up period. Persons receiving methadone who endorse clinically-significant chronic pain are randomized into once-daily dosing or split dosing that is managed remotely via an electronic pillbox. Clinical pain is assessed weekly and using ecological momentary assessments. Experimentally-evoked pain is assessed using a quantitative sensory testing battery. Additional outcomes related to OUD, including withdrawal and craving, are also collected.

RESULTS

The study hypothesizes that persons assigned to the split dosing condition will report lower pain and opioid withdrawal relative to persons assigned to the traditional once-daily dosing strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Split dosing is a relatively common technique in OUD treatments; therefore, if data support this hypothesis, there is high potential for implementation.

Establishing a research agenda for the study and assessment of opioid withdrawal

The opioid crisis is an international public health concern. Treatments for opioid use disorder centre largely on the management of opioid withdrawal, an aversive collection of signs and symptoms that contribute to opioid use disorder. Whereas in the past 50 years more than 90 medications have been developed for depression, only five medications have been developed for opioid use disorder during this period. We posit that underinvestment has occurred in part due to an underdeveloped understanding of opioid withdrawal syndrome. This Personal View summarises substantial gaps in our understanding of opioid withdrawal that are likely to continue to limit major advancements in its treatment. There is no firm consensus in the field as to how withdrawal should be precisely defined; 10-550 symptoms of withdrawal can be measured on 18 scales. The imprecise understanding of withdrawal is likely to result in overestimating or underestimating the severity of an individual's withdrawal syndrome or potential therapeutic effects of different candidate medications. The severity of the opioid crisis is not remitting, and an international research agenda for the study and assessment of opioid withdrawal is necessary to support transformational changes in withdrawal management and treatment of opioid use disorder. Nine actionable targets are delineated here: develop a consensus definition of opioid withdrawal; understand withdrawal symptomatology after exposure to different opioids (particularly fentanyl); understand precipitated opioid withdrawal; understand how co-exposure of other drugs (eg, xylazine and stimulants) influences withdrawal expression; examine individual variation in withdrawal phenotypes; precisely characterise the protracted withdrawal syndrome; identify biomarkers of opioid withdrawal severity; identify predictors of opioid withdrawal severity; and understand which symptoms are most closely associated with treatment attrition or relapse. The US Food and Drug Administration recently established a formal indication for opioid withdrawal that has invigorated interest in drug development for opioid withdrawal management. Action is now needed to support these interests and help industry identify new classes of medications so that real change can be achieved for people with opioid use disorder.

Effects of kratom on driving: Results from a cross-sectional survey, ecological momentary assessment, and pilot simulated driving Study

OBJECTIVES

Despite widespread kratom use, there is a lack of knowledge regarding its effects on driving. We evaluated the self-reported driving behaviors of kratom consumers and assessed their simulated-driving performance after self-administering kratom products.

METHODS

We present results from: 1) a remote, national study of US adults who regularly use kratom, and 2) an in-person substudy from which we re-recruited participants. In the national study (N = 357), participants completed a detailed survey and a 15-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) that monitored naturalistic kratom use. For the remote study, outcomes were self-reported general and risky driving behaviors, perceived impairment, and driving confidence following kratom administration. For the in-person substudy, 10 adults consumed their typical kratom products and their driving performance on a high-fidelity driving simulator pre- and post-kratom administration was evaluated.

RESULTS

Over 90% of participants surveyed self-reported driving under the influence of kratom. Most reported low rates of risky driving behavior and expressed high confidence in their driving ability after taking kratom. This was consistent with EMA findings: participants reported feeling confident in their driving ability and perceived little impairment within 15-180 min after using kratom. In the in-person substudy, there were no significant changes in simulated driving performance after taking kratom.

CONCLUSIONS

Using kratom before driving appears routine, however, self-reported and simulated driving findings suggest kratom effects at self-selected doses among regular kratom consumers do not produce significant changes in subjective and objective measures of driving impairment. Research is needed to objectively characterize kratom's impact on driving in regular and infrequent consumers.

Virtual focus groups among individuals with use disorders: assessing feasibility and acceptability in an underserved clinical population

Objective

There are substantial barriers to conducting research among individuals with stigmatized and complicated health conditions like substance use disorders. These barriers slow progress when developing, refining, and assessing interventions to better treat underserved populations. Virtual focus groups are an innovative method for collecting data from individuals via a discreet and accessible platform which can inform novel as well as existing treatment approaches. This article reports on the feasibility and acceptability of virtual focus groups as a mechanism to recruit and engage geographically and demographically diverse samples of participants with substance use disorders that are otherwise logistically difficult to assess.

Method

Participants were assessed for eligibility for a virtual focus group study based on demographic features, drug use history, and psychiatric history via a remote, interview-based screening. Focus groups were completed anonymously without video or name-sharing. Discussion contributions, quantified with number of times speaking and total number of words spoken, were compared across gender, and treatment status. Participants provided quantitative and qualitative feedback on the focus group experience in a follow-up survey.

Results

Focus groups (N=26) based in geographical areas throughout the United States were conducted with 88 individuals with opioid use disorder or stimulant use disorder. Discussion contributions were comparable between genders and among individuals in treatment versus those seeking treatment. A follow-up survey (n=50, 57% of focus group participants) reflected high levels of enjoyment, comfort, and honesty during focus group discussions.

Discussion

Findings suggest virtual focus groups can be an effective and efficient tool for substance use research.

Responses to a "Typical" Morning Dose of Kratom in People Who Use Kratom Regularly: A Direct-Observation Study

INTRODUCTION

Use of kratom has outpaced systematic study of its effects, with most studies reliant on retrospective self-report.

METHODS

We aimed to assess acute effects following kratom use in adults who use regularly, and quantify alkaloids in the products, urine, and plasma. Between July and November 2022, 10 adults came to our clinic and orally self-administered their typical kratom dose; blinding procedures were not used. Physiological measures included blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, pulse oximetry, temperature, and pupil diameter. Subjective outcomes included Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale, Addiction Research Center Inventory, and Drug Effects Questionnaire. Psychomotor performance was also assessed.

RESULTS

Participants were 6 men and 4 women, mean age 41.2 years. Nine were non-Hispanic White; 1 was biracial. They had used kratom for 6.6 years (SD, 3.8 years) on average (2.0-14.1). Sessions were 190.89 minutes on average (SD, 15.10 minutes). Mean session dose was 5.16 g (median, 4.38 g; range, 1.1-10.9 g) leaf powder. Relative to baseline, physiological changes were minor. However, pupil diameter decreased (right, b = -0.70, P < 0.01; left, b = -0.73, P < 0.01) 40-80 minutes postdose and remained below baseline >160 minutes. Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale pre-dosing was mild (5.5 ± 3.3) and decreased postdose (b = [-4.0, -2.9], P < 0.01). Drug Effects Questionnaire "feeling effects" increased to 40/100 (SD, 30.5) within 40 minutes and remained above baseline 80 to 120 minutes (b = 19.0, P = 0.04), peaking at 72.7/100; 6 participants rated euphoria as mild on the Addiction Research Center Inventory Morphine-Benzedrine-scale. Psychomotor performance did not reliably improve or deteriorate postdosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Among regular consumers, we found few clinically significant differences pre- and post-kratom dosing. Alkaloidal contents in products were within expected ranges.

Impacts of xylazine on fentanyl demand, body weight, and acute withdrawal in rats: A comparison to lofexidine

The opioid use landscape has recently shifted to include xylazine, a veterinary anesthetic, as an adulterant in the fentanyl supply. The health impacts of xylazine as an emerging fentanyl adulterant has raised alarm regarding xylazine as a public health threat, warranting research on the impacts of xylazine on fentanyl's behavioral effects. No prior studies have evaluated the effects of xylazine on fentanyl consumption at various unit doses, fentanyl demand, or withdrawal as compared to the Food and Drug Administration-approved opioid withdrawal medication, lofexidine (Lucemyra®). This is important because lofexidine and xylazine are both adrenergic α2a (A2aR) agonists, however, lofexidine is not a noted fentanyl adulterant. Here we evaluated xylazine and lofexidine combined with self-administered fentanyl doses in male and female rats and evaluated fentanyl demand, body weight, and acute withdrawal. Consumption of fentanyl alone increased at various unit doses compared to saline. Xylazine but not lofexidine shifted fentanyl consumption downward at a number of unit doses, however, both lofexidine and xylazine suppressed fentanyl demand intensity as compared to a fentanyl alone control group. Further, both fentanyl + lofexidine and fentanyl + xylazine reduced behavioral signs of fentanyl withdrawal immediately following SA, but signs increased by 12 h only in the xylazine co-exposed group. Weight loss occurred throughout fentanyl SA and withdrawal regardless of group, although the xylazine group lost significantly more weight during the first 24 h of withdrawal than the other two groups. Severity of weight loss during the first 24 h of withdrawal was also correlated with severity of somatic signs of fentanyl withdrawal. Together, these results suggest that body weight loss may be an important indicator of withdrawal severity during acute withdrawal from the xylazine/fentanyl combination, warranting further translational evaluation.

Intersectional Risk and the Significant Gap in Care for Persons with Co-occurring Chronic Pain and Opioid Withdrawal

OBJECTIVES

Persons with chronic pain and women tend to enter treatment for opioid use disorder with greater opioid withdrawal severity than persons without chronic pain and men, respectively. This study examined characteristics of facilities with opioid withdrawal treatment, including gender-based services, as a function of whether they reported having a tailored pain management program.

METHODS

The National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services 2020 was used to examine 3942 facilities with opioid withdrawal treatment in the United States. Using a multivariable binary logistic regression model, facilities were examined for the presence of a tailored program for individuals with co-occurring pain. Regional location of the facility, ownership status, and availability of tailored gender programs, nonhospital residential services, and outpatient services served as independent variables in the analysis.

RESULTS

A slight majority of the sample had a program for both adult men and adult women (n = 2010, 51.0%). Most facilities had outpatient services (n = 3289, 83.4%) and did not have a tailored program for addressing co-occurring pain (n = 2756, 69.9%). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that among opioid withdrawal facilities, programs with nonhospital residential services, government or private nonprofit funding, or tailored gender programming had higher odds of reporting having a tailored program for pain and substance use disorder. Facilities in the Western United States were most likely to have tailored programs for pain and substance use disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should investigate what support patients may receive and how to better scale access to pain management during opioid withdrawal treatment.

Knowledge, Preference, and Adverse Effects of Xylazine Among Adults in Substance Use Treatment

This cross-sectional study evaluates aspects of xylazine adulteration of opioids among individuals entering substance use disorder treatment.

Moving forward while looking back: Reflections on the history and future of the journal Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

In this editorial, the incoming editor for Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (ECP) reflects on the history and future of the journal. The author looks forward to working together with the American Psychological Association publishing community and ECP authors, reviewers, and board members as they navigate changes to their publishing policies and procedures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Ecological Momentary Assessment of Self-Reported Kratom Use, Effects, and Motivations Among US Adults

Importance

Kratom products, which are sold legally in most of the US, contain alkaloids with opioidergic, adrenergic, and serotonergic activity. Millions of people use kratom to relieve pain, improve mood, or self-manage substance use disorders (SUDs). Kratom use has primarily been examined via surveys, in which recall biases among satisfied users may lead to minimization of transient negative outcomes. Further prospective study of kratom use, such as with ecological momentary assessment (EMA), is needed.

Objective

To characterize proximal motivators, effects, and patterns of kratom use and to assess whether use frequency is associated with motivations, effects, past-year criteria for SUD for kratom (KUD), or other substance use.

Design, Setting, and Participants

For this prospective cross-sectional study, an intensive longitudinal smartphone-based EMA in which participants' current behaviors and experiences were repeatedly sampled in real time was conducted between July 1 and October 31, 2022. Participants comprised a convenience sample of US adults who used kratom at least 3 days per week for at least 4 weeks at the time of online screening. Criteria for past-year KUD were based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Data analysis was performed between November 2022 and November 2023.

Exposure

The exposure was 13 401 kratom-use events across 15 days.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A baseline survey covering demographics, health, kratom attitudes and behaviors, use motivations, other substance use, and KUD was administered before EMA. Data for the following EMA entries were then collected: event-contingent entries for kratom use (product, dose, and proximal motivations), follow-up entries (short-term effects and consequences of use events), random-prompt entries (mood), beginning-of-day entries (effects of kratom on sleep), and end-of-day entries (daily subjective descriptions of kratom effects). Bayesian regression was used to estimate means and credible intervals.

Results

A total of 357 participants completed the EMA. Their mean (SD) age was 38.0 (11.1) years; more than half were men (198 [55.5%]). Participants reported overall motivators of use on the baseline survey that involved managing psychiatric and SUD problems, but proximal motivators evaluated during the EMA involved situation-specific needs such as increasing energy and productivity and decreasing pain. Acute effects were considered congruent with daily obligations. Use patterns, despite having some distinguishing features, were generally similar in their motivators and effects; participants used kratom predominantly during the daytime and seemed to find use frequencies that suited their needs. Higher use patterns were associated with symptoms of physical dependence (eg, withdrawal or tolerance). Co-used substances included caffeine, nicotine, vitamins, and cannabis.

Conclusions and Relevance

Most participants in this study reported using kratom in a seemingly nonproblematic way. When such use appeared problematic, the key element was usually that withdrawal avoidance became a proximal motivator. Longitudinal studies examining changes in kratom use patterns and effects over time are needed.

Polymorphisms in the A118G SNP of the OPRM1 gene produce different experiences of opioids: A human laboratory phenotype-genotype assessment

Allelic variations in the A118G SNP of the OPRM1 gene change opioid signaling; however, evaluations of how allelic differences may influence opioid effects are lacking. This human laboratory paradigm examined whether the AA versus AG/GG genotypes determined opioid response profiles. Individuals with limited opioid exposure (N = 100) completed a five-day within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, residential study. Participants were admitted (Day 1), received 4 mg hydromorphone (Day 2) and 0 mg, 2 mg and 8 mg hydromorphone in randomized order (Days 3-5) and completed self-reported visual analog scale (VAS) ratings and Likert scales, observed VAS, and physiological responses at baseline and for 6.5 h post-dose. Outcomes were analysed as peak/nadir effects over time as a function of genotype (available for N = 96 individuals; AG/GG = 13.5%, AA = 86.4%). Participants with AG/GG rated low and moderate doses of hydromorphone as significantly more positive (e.g., Good Effects VAS, coasting, drive, friendly, talkative, stimulation) with fewer negative effects (e.g., itchy skin, nausea, sleepiness), and were also observed as being more talkative and energetic relative to persons with AA. Persons with AG/GG were less physiologically reactive as determined by diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, but had more changes in core temperature compared with those with AA. Persons with AA also demonstrated more prototypic agonist effects across doses; persons with AG/GG showed limited response to 2 mg and 4 mg. Data suggest persons with AG/GG genotype experienced more pleasant and fewer unpleasant responses to hydromorphone relative to persons with AA. Future studies should replicate these laboratory findings in clinical populations to support a precision medicine approach to opioid prescribing.

Clinically meaningful individual differences in opioid withdrawal expression

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant public health concern. An individual with an OUD may experience withdrawal after stopping opioid use. There has been limited exploration of the individual differences in withdrawal expression. This study expands understanding of this issue by examining the presence and frequency at which persons who have ever had opioid withdrawal have experienced different opioid withdrawal symptoms. Using cross-sectional data captured online from Amazon Mechanical Turk, 124 adults with a lifetime experience of opioid withdrawal were included. Respondents were able to indicate ever experiencing 31 individual opioid withdrawal symptoms. If a symptom was ever experienced, respondents would indicate if it was common and whether it bothered them. A cluster analysis was used to explore variability between the withdrawal symptoms. The sample was primarily men (n = 76, 61.3%) with an average age of 34.7 (SD = 11.6). The typical withdrawal syndrome lasted 6.5 days (SD = 4.9) and was most severe at 5.7 (SD = 4.9) days. Lifetime endorsement of individual symptoms ranged from a high of 73.4% (anxious) to a low of 43.5% (nausea). The cluster analysis was significant, F(1, 122) = 215.6, p < .001, with good Bayesian information criteria (0.7). The two clusters are conceptualized here as HIGH (N = 73; 59%) and LOW (N = 51; 41%) endorsing, with a mean of 21.9 and 8.5 items endorsed. These data add to prior studies by suggesting high variability in the individual expression of opioid withdrawal symptoms. It may be time for the field to develop a consensus regarding opioid withdrawal symptom expression and measurement to enhance clinical care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Factors Associated with High-Risk Substance Use in Persons Receiving Psychiatric Treatment for a Primary Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorder Diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

Although mental health disorders and high-risk substance use frequently co-occur, they are typically investigated independently. Clinical trials focused on treatment for individuals with trauma- and stressor-related disorders often exclude individuals with high-risk substance use. Little is also known about the role of gender in the relationship between trauma- and stressor-related disorders and high-risk substance use. We examined the relationship between trauma- and stressor-related disorders, high-risk substance use, and gender.

METHODS

Using the Mental Health Client-Level Data dataset, we examined 15,772 adults receiving treatment in psychiatric hospitals in the United States from 2013 to 2019.

RESULTS

A logistic regression model showed that for men, relative to women, having multiple mental health diagnoses and having a serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance was associated with greater odds of high-risk substance use.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the value of comprehensive gender-centered treatment for people with trauma- and stressor-related disorders engaging in high-risk substance use.

Within-subject, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of combining the cannabinoid dronabinol and the opioid hydromorphone in adults with chronic pain

The potential synergistic effects of combining cannabinoids and opioids for analgesia has received considerable attention. No studies to date have evaluated this combination in patients with chronic pain. The present study aimed to evaluate the combined analgesic and drug effects of oral opioid (hydromorphone) and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (dronabinol), as well as their effects on physical and cognitive functioning, and human abuse potential (HAP) outcomes among individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This was a within-subject, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Participants (N = 37; 65% women; mean age = 62) diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis of ≥3/10 average pain intensity were included. Participants received (1) placebo-placebo, (2) hydromorphone (4 mg)-placebo; (3) dronabinol (10 mg)-placebo, and (4) hydromorphone (4 mg)-dronabinol (10 mg). Clinical and experimentally-induced pain, physical and cognitive function, subjective drug effects, HAP, adverse events, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. No significant analgesic effects were observed for clinical pain severity or physical functioning across all drug conditions. Little enhancement of hydromorphone analgesia by dronabinol was observed on evoked pain indices. While subjective drug effects and some HAP ratings were increased in the combined drug condition, these were not significantly increased over the dronabinol alone condition. No serious adverse events were reported; hydromorphone produced more mild adverse events than placebo, but hydromorphone + dronabinol produced more moderate adverse events than both placebo and hydromorphone alone. Only hydromorphone impaired cognitive performance. Consistent with laboratory studies on healthy adults, the present study shows minimal benefit of combining dronabinol (10 mg) and hydromorphone (4 mg) for analgesia and improving physical functioning in adults with KOA.

Within subject, double blind, examination of opioid sensitivity in participant-reported, observed, physiologic, and analgesic outcomes

Background

Inter-individual differences in opioid sensitivity may underlie different opioid risk profiles but have often been researched in persons who have current or past opioid use disorder or physical dependence. This study examined how opioid sensitivity manifests across various assessments of opioid effects in a primarily opioid-naïve population.

Procedures

Data were harmonized from two within-subject, double-blind trials wherein healthy participants (N = 123) received placebo and 4 mg oral hydromorphone. Demographics, self-report ratings, observer ratings, physiological, and cold pressor measures were collected. Participants were categorized as being responsive or nonresponsive to the opioid dose tested and compared using mixed-models, Pearson product correlations, and paired t-tests.

Findings

Participants were 49.6% female, mean 33.0 (SD=9.3) years old, and 44.7% Black/African American and 41.5% White, with 89.4% reporting no prior exposure to opioids. Within-subject sensitivity to opioids varied depending on the measure. One in five participants did not respond subjectively to the 4 mg hydromorphone dose based on their "Drug Effects" rating. Persons who were responsive showed more evidence of drug-dependent effects than did persons who were not responsive on ratings of Bad Effects (p= .03), feeling High (p= .01), Nausea (p= .03), pupil diameter (p< 0.01), and on the circular lights task (p< 0.001).

Conclusions

This study provides initial evidence that the experience of opioids may be domain specific. Data suggest potentially clinically meaningful differences exist regarding opioid response patterns, evident following one dose among opioid inexperienced individuals.

Fentanyl Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion: Narrative Review and Clinical Significance Related to Illicitly Manufactured Fentanyl

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review summarizes literature on pharmaceutical fentanyl's absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion patterns to inform research on illicitly manufactured fentanyl (IMF).

RESULTS

Fentanyl is highly lipophilic, lending itself to rapid absorption by highly perfused tissues (including the brain) before redistributing from these tissues to muscle and fat. Fentanyl is eliminated primarily by metabolism and urinary excretion of metabolites (norfentanyl and other minor metabolites). Fentanyl has a long terminal elimination, with a documented secondary peaking phenomenon that can manifest as "fentanyl rebound." Clinical implications in overdose (respiratory depression, muscle rigidity, and "wooden chest syndrome") and opioid use disorder treatment (subjective effects, withdrawal, and buprenorphine-precipitated withdrawal) are discussed. The authors highlight research gaps derived from differences in medicinal fentanyl studies and IMF use patterns, including that medicinal fentanyl studies are largely conducted with persons who were opioid-naive, anesthetized, or had severe chronic pain and that IMF use is characterized by supratherapeutic doses and frequent and sustained administration patterns, as well as adulteration with other substances and/or fentanyl analogs.

CONCLUSIONS

This review reexamines information yielded from decades of medicinal fentanyl research and applies elements of the pharmacokinetic profile to persons with IMF exposure. In persons who use drugs, peripheral accumulation of fentanyl may be leading to prolonged exposure. More focused research on the pharmacology of fentanyl in persons using IMF is warranted.

Noninvasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Opioid Use Disorder

Background

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is an escalating public health problem with over 100,000 drug overdose-related deaths last year most of them related to opioid overdose, yet treatment options remain limited. Non-invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation (nVNS) can be delivered via the ear or the neck and is a non-medication alternative to treatment of opioid withdrawal and OUD with potentially widespread applications.

Methods

This paper reviews the neurobiology of opioid withdrawal and OUD and the emerging literature of nVNS for the application of OUD. Literature databases for Pubmed, Psychinfo, and Medline were queried for these topics for 1982-present.

Results

Opioid withdrawal in the context of OUD is associated with activation of peripheral sympathetic and inflammatory systems as well as alterations in central brain regions including anterior cingulate, basal ganglia, and amygdala. NVNS has the potential to reduce sympathetic and inflammatory activation and counter the effects of opioid withdrawal in initial pilot studies. Preliminary studies show that it is potentially effective at acting through sympathetic pathways to reduce the effects of opioid withdrawal, in addition to reducing pain and distress.

Conclusions

NVNS shows promise as a non-medication approach to OUD, both in terms of its known effect on neurobiology as well as pilot data showing a reduction in withdrawal symptoms as well as physiological manifestations of opioid withdrawal.

Examining the paradoxical effects of kratom: a narrative inquiry

Introduction: Surveys and case reports have documented kratom use in the United States (US) for over a decade. However, those reports have generally not examined in depth the role kratom plays in the lives of those who use it regularly for sustained periods. Until there are controlled studies of the pharmacology and subjective effects of kratom alkaloids in humans, one of the best sources of insight on kratom-product use remains qualitative data with nuanced descriptions of kratom effects from those who use it regularly. Method: We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with adults who regularly use kratom products, as part of a laboratory study of kratom-product self-administration. This qualitative component of the study was conducted as a narrative case-report series (n = 10). Results: Despite some differences among participants, all experienced acute combination effects that were largely, even simultaneously, analgesic and stimulatory. Most participants had decreased their dosages over time, and one planned to quit. Five of the 10 participants met DSM-5-based criteria for kratom-use disorder (3 mild, 1 moderate, 1 severe, by symptoms counts). When kratom was inadvertently taken in larger than intended doses, participants described a constellation of symptoms that they called "the wobbles" (a jittery feeling accompanied by what seemed to be nystagmus); this was rare, but could be of scientific and clinical interest as a possible manifestation of serotonin syndrome. Most participants described tolerance but considered kratom generally safe at low-moderate doses, providing perceived benefits with less potential risk for adverse effects compared to pharmaceuticals or illicit drugs. Discussion: In-depth interview data like these help confirm and clarify findings from larger survey studies and clinician-driven case reports. They are needed to inform the policy practice regarding kratom and may also help inform future experimental designs.

Operational definition of precipitated opioid withdrawal

Background

Opioid withdrawal can be expressed as both a spontaneous and precipitated syndrome. Although spontaneous withdrawal is well-characterized, there is no operational definition of precipitated opioid withdrawal.

Methods

People (N = 106) with opioid use disorder maintained on morphine received 0.4 mg intramuscular naloxone and completed self-report (Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale, SOWS), visual analog scale (VAS), Bad Effects and Sick, and observer ratings (Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale, COWS). Time to peak severity and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in withdrawal severity were calculated. Principal component analysis (PCA) during peak severity were conducted and analyzed with repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Within 60 min, 89% of people reported peak SOWS ratings and 90% of people had peak COWS scores as made by raters. Self-reported signs of eyes tearing, yawning, nose running, perspiring, hot flashes, and observed changes in pupil diameter and rhinorrhea/lacrimation were uniquely associated with precipitated withdrawal. VAS ratings of Bad Effect and Sick served as statistically significant severity categories (0, 1-40, 41-80, and 81-100) for MCID evaluations and revealed participants' identification with an increase of 10 [SOWS; 15% maximum percent effect (MPE)] and 6 (COWS; 12% MPE) points as meaningful shifts in withdrawal severity indicative of precipitated withdrawal.

Conclusion

Data suggested that a change of 10 (15% MPE) and 6 (12% MPE) points on the SOWS and COWS, respectively, that occurred within 60 min of antagonist administration was identified by participants as a clinically meaningful increase in symptom severity. These data provide a method to begin examining precipitated opioid withdrawal.

Iteration is not solving the opioid crisis, it's time for transformation

Opioid use disorder (OUD) produces exceedingly high rates of morbidity and mortality in the United States and throughout the world. Almost 90% of persons qualifying for treatment do not enter treatment and 72% of those who initiate treatment leave within 60 days. This Perspective posits that over the past decade our OUD treatment system has produced only small iterative gains in treatment access because, in part, it is founded in a series of top-down regulatory policies dating back more than 100 years. These policies prioritized restricting persons with OUD from having access to opioid agonists over empirical discovery of treatment best practice. It further suggests that for persons who are not already responding positively to our existing treatments, we may need to fundamentally transform care to enact true, meaningful change. Four potential considerations are outlined: expanding beyond long-acting opioids for treatment, embracing safe use as a viable therapeutic target, ending closed medication distribution systems, and partnering with our patients. The overarching aim of this discussion is to motivate broader thinking about new solutions for the patients for whom the existing strategies are not working and who may benefit from more transformative approaches. Though efforts to-date to expand existing treatment systems and find new ways to promote existing MOUDs have been important, these efforts have represented iterative changes. For us to meet our goal of substantially reducing opioid-related harms, it may be time to consider strategies that represent true transformation.

Bupropion Slow Release vs Placebo With Adaptive Incentives for Cocaine Use Disorder in Persons Receiving Methadone for Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Opioid-stimulant co-use is a common problem with few evidence-based treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To examine bupropion slow release (SR) enhancement of a tailored abstinence incentive program for stimulant use in persons with opioid use disorder.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with a 4-week follow-up period was conducted at 4 methadone treatment programs in Baltimore, Maryland. Included participants were persons receiving methadone for the treatment of opioid use disorder with past 3-month cocaine use and current cocaine use disorder between March 2015 and September 2019. Data were analyzed from November 2020 through August 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

A 6-week incentive induction period with monetary incentives for evidence of cocaine abstinence during thrice-weekly urine testing was conducted. Persons achieving 2 weeks of consecutive abstinence during induction were assigned to the relapse prevention group (20 individuals); otherwise, individuals were assigned to the abstinence initiation group (60 individuals). Participants were randomized within incentive groups to bupropion SR (150 mg oral twice daily; 40 participants) or placebo (40 participants). Incentives were available until week 26, and study medication ended week 30.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The mean percentage of participants with cocaine abstinence (by negative urinalysis or self-report) during weeks 7 to 26 (ie, the incentive intervention period) and 27 to 30 (ie, the follow-up period) and the percentage of participants testing negative for cocaine at weeks 26 and 30 were assessed. Main effects of medication collapsed across incentive conditions and sensitivity analyses of medications within incentive conditions were assessed. Analyses were conducted in the modified intention-to-treat sample (ie, 80 individuals who received ≥1 dose of study medication) and completers (ie, 52 individuals who completed ≥1 visit during week 30).

RESULTS

Among 80 participants (42 Black [52.5% ] and 35 White [43.8%]; mean [SD] age, 45.7 (9.4) years; 52 males [65.0%]) receiving methadone for opioid use disorder, 40 participants were randomized to receive bupropion SR and 40 participants to receive placebo. No significant difference on urinalysis or self-reported cocaine use was observed between medication groups. Sensitivity analyses revealed differential patterns for incentive subgroups. Participants in the relapse prevention group had high abstinence (>80%; eg, during weeks 7-26 in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 410 of 456 samples [89.9%] from participants in the bupropion SR group tested negative for cocaine) throughout the trial regardless of whether they were randomized to bupropion SR or placebo. Participants in the abstinence initiation group had better outcomes with bupropion SR than placebo throughout the trial (mean [SD] total number of samples testing negative for cocaine, 30.3 [21.6] samples for bupropion SR vs 17.1 [14.9] samples for placebo; P = .05) and more participants receiving bupropion SR than placebo were abstinent at the end of the study (20 of 30 participants [66.7%] vs 9 of 30 participants [30.0%]; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, an overall benefit for bupropion SR vs placebo when combined with a financial abstinence incentive program was not observed. Results among incentive subgroups suggest that continued evaluation of medications, including bupropion SR, for stimulant treatment using a tailored approach that factors early abstinence into study design and interpretation may be needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111798.

Patterns of polysubstance use and clinical comorbidity among persons seeking substance use treatment: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

Polysubstance use is common among individuals seeking treatment for substance use disorders (SUD). However, we know less about patterns and correlates of polysubstance use among treatment-seeking populations. The current study aimed to identify latent patterns of polysubstance use and associated risk factors in persons entering SUD treatment.

METHODS

Patients (N = 28,526) being admitted for substance use treatment reported on their use of thirteen substances (e.g., alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, methamphetamines, other stimulants, heroin, other opioids, benzodiazepines, inhalants, synthetics, hallucinogens, and club drugs) in the month before treatment and prior to the month before treatment. Latent class analysis (LCA) determined the relationship between class membership and gender, age, employment status, unstable housing, self-harm, overdose, past treatment, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and/or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

RESULTS

Identified classes included: 1) Alcohol primary, 2) Moderate probability of past-month alcohol, cannabis, and/or opioid use; 3) Alcohol primary, Lifetime cannabis and cocaine use; 4) Opioid primary, Lifetime use of alcohol, cannabis, hallucinogens, club drugs, amphetamines, and cocaine; 5) Moderate probability of past-month alcohol, cannabis, and/or opioid use, Lifetime use of various substances; 6) Alcohol and cannabis primary, Lifetime use of various substances; and 7) High past-month polysubstance use. Individuals who engaged in past-month polysubstance use attended to face elevated risk of screening positive for recent unstable housing, unemployment, depression, anxiety, PTSD, self-harm, and overdose.

CONCLUSIONS

Current polysubstance use is associated with significant clinical complexity. Tailored treatments that reduce harms resulting from polysubstance use and related psychiatric comorbidity may improve treatment outcomes in this population.

Transplant of organs from donors with positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing: A report from the organ procurement and transplantation network ad hoc disease transmission advisory committee

BACKGROUND

Decisions to transplant organs from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donors must balance risk of donor-derived transmission events (DDTE) with the scarcity of available organs.

METHODS

Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data were used to compare organ utilization and recipient outcomes between SARS-CoV-2 NAT+ and NAT- donors. NAT+ was defined by either a positive upper or lower respiratory tract (LRT) sample within 21 days of procurement. Potential DDTE were adjudicated by OPTN Disease Transmission Advisory Committee.

RESULTS

From May 27, 2021 (date of OTPN policy for required LRT testing of lung donors) to January 31, 2022, organs were recovered from 617 NAT+ donors from all OPTN regions and 53 of 57 (93%) organ procurement organizations. NAT+ donors were younger and had higher organ quality scores for kidney and liver. Organ utilization was lower for NAT+ donors compared to NAT- donors. A total of 1241 organs (776 kidneys, 316 livers, 106 hearts, 22 lungs, and 21 other) were transplanted from 514 NAT+ donors compared to 21 946 organs from 8853 NAT- donors. Medical urgency was lower for recipients of NAT+ liver and heart transplants. The median waitlist time was longer for liver recipients of NAT+ donors. The match run sequence number for final acceptor was higher for NAT+ donors for all organ types. Outcomes for hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and 30-day graft loss were similar for all organ types. No SARS-CoV-2 DDTE occurred in this interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation of SARS-CoV-2 NAT+ donor organs appears safe for short-term outcomes of death and graft loss and ameliorates the organ shortage. Further study is required to assure comparable longer term outcomes.

Can initial experiences with drugs predict future drug abuse risks?

Initial experiences with drugs may influence an individual's motivations for continued use. This study evaluated the relationship between subjective effects elicited by an individual's first use of alcohol or cannabis, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) alcohol use disorder (AUD) or cannabis use disorder (CUD) severity, and behavioral economic demand for alcohol or cannabis. Self-reports of initial subjective effects associated with drugs were analyzed for N = 463 participants whose first substance use was either alcohol or cannabis. The likelihood that a particular subjective effect at the time of first use was associated with current AUD/CUD was assessed using ordinal logistic regression with subjective effects as predictors of DSM-5 severity. Behavioral economic demand was assessed using a hypothetical purchase task in which participants indicated their hypothetical consumption of alcohol or cannabis as a function of price. Significant associations were observed for initial subjective effects elicited by alcohol or cannabis and increased DSM-5 severity: (alcohol) relief (OR = 2.52 [95% CI 1.51-4.25], p = .0005) and (cannabis) energetic (OR = 2.31 [95% CI 3.27-55.5], p = .0004). The mean (± SEM) P_max value for the alcohol subgroup endorsing relief ($96.22 ± $26.48) was significantly greater than the P_max value for the alcohol subgroup not endorsing relief ($33.81 ± $12.93), t(237) = 2.276, p = .0237. These results suggest that the initial subjective effects associated with a given substance may predict the development and/or severity of substance misuse and substance use disorders (SUDs). These findings are consistent with anecdotal reports that persons with SUD feel energized by the use of substances whereas persons without SUD do not report experiencing such subjective effects upon first use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot clinical trial examining buspirone as an adjunctive medication during buprenorphine-assisted supervised opioid withdrawal

Successful management of opioid withdrawal improves long-term treatment outcomes and reduces opioid use-related morbidity and mortality. Mechanistically supported pharmacotherapeutic approaches are needed to effectively manage acute and protracted opioid withdrawal. Buspirone is a D2 antagonist and 5-HT1a agonist that may decrease opioid withdrawal. Individuals (n = 15) admitted to a residential treatment center for opioid use disorder (OUD) were enrolled into a double-blind randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy and acceptability of buspirone (45 mg/day) as an adjunctive medication to buprenorphine-assisted, supervised opioid withdrawal. Participants completed daily questionnaires which consisted of the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) and a consensus sleep diary, which assessed total sleep time, time to sleep onset, and sleep quality. Total SOWS scores, individual opioid withdrawal symptoms and sleep outcomes were assessed between treatment groups (Placebo and Buspirone) and over time in a repeated measures linear mixed model. Total SOWS scores significantly decreased across study phases for both groups but decreased to a greater extent among individuals assigned to buspirone during both the first and second week of stable buspirone. Greater decreases in withdrawal were observed during Week 2 of stable buspirone relative to Week 1 of stable buspirone. Participants also reported significant increases in sleep duration and significant decreases in latency to sleep onset. This study provides further support that buspirone can help mitigate opioid withdrawal during a supervised opioid taper. Buspirone may confer unique benefits during protracted withdrawal periods. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Clinical Trial Design Challenges and Opportunities for Emerging Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder: A Review

Importance

Novel treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) are needed to address both the ongoing opioid epidemic and long-standing barriers to existing OUD treatments that target the endogenous μ-opioid receptor (MOR) system. The goal of this review is to highlight unique clinical trial design considerations for the study of emerging treatments for OUD that address targets beyond the MOR system. In November 2019, the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public-private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration sponsored a meeting to discuss the current evidence regarding potential treatments for OUD, including cannabinoids, psychedelics, sedative-hypnotics, and immunotherapeutics, such as vaccines.

Observations

Consensus recommendations are presented regarding the most critical elements of trial design for the evaluation of novel OUD treatments, such as: (1) stage of treatment that will be targeted (eg, seeking treatment, early abstinence/detoxification, long-term recovery); (2) role of treatment (adjunctive with or independent of existing OUD treatments); (3) primary outcomes informed by patient preferences that assess opioid use (including changes in patterns of use), treatment retention, and/or global functioning and quality of life; and (4) adverse events, including the potential for opioid-related relapse or overdose, especially if the patient is not simultaneously taking maintenance MOR agonist or antagonist medications.

Conclusions and Relevance

Applying the recommendations provided here as well as considering input from people with lived experience in the design phase will accelerate the development, translation, and uptake of effective and safe therapeutics for individuals struggling with OUD.

Wireless electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor sleep among patients being withdrawn from opioids: Evidence of feasibility and utility

Sleep impairment is a common comorbid and debilitating symptom for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). Research into underlying mechanisms and efficacious treatment interventions for OUD-related sleep problems requires both precise and physiologic measurements of sleep-related outcomes and impairment. This pilot examined the feasibility of a wireless sleep electroencephalography (EEG) monitor (Sleep Profiler™) to measure sleep outcomes and architecture among participants undergoing supervised opioid withdrawal. Sleep outcomes were compared to a self-reported sleep diary and opioid withdrawal ratings. Participants (n = 8, 100% male) wore the wireless EEG 85.6% of scheduled nights. Wireless EEG detected measures of sleep architecture including changes in total, NREM and REM sleep time during study phases, whereas the diary detected changes in wakefulness only. Direct comparisons of five overlapping outcomes revealed lower sleep efficiency and sleep onset latency and higher awakenings and time spent awake from the wireless EEG versus sleep diary. Associations were evident between wireless EEG and increased withdrawal severity, lower sleep efficiency, less time in REM and non-REM stages 1 and 2, and more hydroxyzine treatment; sleep diary was associated with total sleep time and withdrawal only. Data provide initial evidence that a wireless EEG is a feasible and useful tool for objective monitoring of sleep in persons experiencing acute opioid withdrawal. Data are limited by the small and exclusively male sample, but provide a foundation for using wireless EEG sleep monitors for objective evaluation of sleep-related impairment in persons with OUD in support of mechanistic and treatment intervention research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Social, psychological, and substance use characteristics of U.S. adults who use kratom: Initial findings from an online, crowdsourced study

Kratom, a plant that produces opioid-like effects, has gained popularity in the U.S. for self-treating symptoms of chronic pain, mood disorders, and substance-use disorders (SUDs). Most data on kratom are from surveys into which current kratom-using adults could self-select; such surveys may underrepresent people who have used kratom and chosen to stop. Available data also do not adequately assess important psychosocial factors surrounding kratom use. In this study, U.S. adults who reported past 6-month alcohol, opioid, and/or stimulant use (N = 1,670) were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk between September and December 2020. Of the 1,510 evaluable respondents, 202 (13.4%) reported lifetime kratom use. Kratom-using adults, relative to others, were typically younger, male, unpartnered, without children, and had lower income. They had higher rates of chronic pain (31.7% vs. 21.9%, p = .003), childhood adversity, anxiety, and depression (p < .001), and lower perceived social rank (d = .19, .02-.22) and socioeconomic status (d = .37 .16-.26). They also reported higher use rates for most substances (except alcohol); this included medically supervised and unsupervised use of prescription opioids and diverted opioid agonist therapy (OAT) medications. Most (83.2%) met diagnostic criteria for any past-year SUD. Those reporting kratom use were less likely to reside in an urban/suburban area. The strongest predictors of kratom use were use of other drugs: cannabidiol (OR = 3.73), psychedelics (OR = 3.39), and nonmedical prescription opioids (OR = 1.72). Another strong predictor was lifetime OAT utilization (OR = 2.31). Despite seemingly poorer psychosocial functioning and health among respondents reporting lifetime kratom use, use of other substances may be the strongest indicators of kratom use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Kratom use as more than a "self-treatment"

Background: Mitragyna speciosa (kratom) is increasingly used in the United States for its pharmacological effects. Kratom's relative novelty makes for a dynamic situation, such that use motivations are not firmly established and may be changing. Investigators and clinicians require frequent updates on kratom trends.Objectives: To assess the current state of kratom-use initiation, sourcing, motivations, preference, conceptualizations, and perceived stigma, using survey responses from current and former users.Methods: Between April-May 2021 we recontacted 289 respondents who reported lifetime kratom use (on an unrelated survey) to answer kratom-specific questions.Results: The sample (N=129) was majority female (51.9%) and white (71.9%). Most (69.0%) reported first trying kratom after 2015. Mean age of use initiation (29.9 years) was older than for other substances, including opioids. Kratom ranked as a preferred substance by 48.5%. The strongest drug association with past-year kratom use was vaped nicotine (OR=3.31,95% CI 1.23-8.88). Use was less likely among those prescribed buprenorphine in the past year (OR=0.03, CI 0.01-0.28). Past-month cannabis use (OR=4.18,CI 1.80-9.72) had the strongest association with past-month kratom use. Over 40 use motivations were endorsed, many (but not all) supporting the "self-treatment" narrative of kratom use, including use as an opioid, alcohol, or stimulant substitute. Treatment shortfalls were associated with decisions to try kratom.Conclusions: Kratom use motivations are diversifying, with multiple factors driving use. As sales continue to increase, the public-health, clinical, and policy responses to kratom should be grounded in rigorous bench-to-bedside scientific research. Comprehensive study of kratom is currently lacking.

Real-Time Monitoring of Cannabis and Prescription Opioid Co-Use Patterns, Analgesic Effectiveness, and the Opioid-Sparing Effect of Cannabis in Individuals With Chronic Pain

Despite a rapid expansion of cannabis use for pain management, how cannabis and prescription opioids are co-used and whether co-use improves analgesia and promotes reduction of opioid use in the daily lives of individuals with chronic pain is poorly understood. Based upon ecological momentary assessment (EMA), the present study examined 1) how pain and use of opioids and/or cannabis in the previous moment is associated with individuals' choice of opioids and/or cannabis in the next moment, 2) the effects of co-use on pain severity and pain relief, and 3) whether daily total opioid consumption differs on days when people only used opioids versus co-used. Adults with chronic pain (N = 46) using both opioids and cannabis who were recruited online completed a 30-day EMA. Elevated pain did not increase the likelihood of co-use in subsequent momentary assessments. Switching from sole use of either opioids and cannabis to co-use was common. Neither co-use nor sole use of either cannabis or opioids were associated with reductions in pain in the next moment. However, participants reported the highest daily perceived pain relief from co-use compared to cannabis and opioid use only. Post hoc analysis suggested recall bias as a potential source of this discrepant findings between momentary versus retrospective assessment. Lastly, there was no evidence of an opioid-sparing effect of cannabis in this sample. The present study shows preliminary evidence on cannabis and opioid co-use patterns, as well as the effects of co-use on pain and opoid dose in the real-world setting. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the overall patterns and effects of co-using cannabis and prescription opioids among individuals with chronic pain employing ecological momentary assessment. There were conflicting findings on the association between co-use and analgesia. Co-use was not associated with a reduction in daily opioid consumption in this sample.

The association of chronic pain and opioid withdrawal in men and women with opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Approximately 2.7 million individuals in the United States had an opioid use disorder (OUD) in 2020. Chronic pain may exacerbate opioid withdrawal severity, yet most research on opioid withdrawal has not collected data on chronic pain status. Moreover, there is limited evidence that women tend to experience greater opioid withdrawal severity than men, but large, confirmatory studies on this topic have not been published. The goal of this study was to examine the roles of chronic pain and gender on opioid withdrawal severity using a large, multi-site database.

METHODS

Data were collected from N = 1252 individuals with OUD entering eight residential addiction treatment facilities. Demographic, drug use behaviors, and chronic pain status were collected at treatment intake, and self-reported opioid withdrawal and craving were measured at intake and 1-3 days, 4-6 days, and 7-9 days after intake. Regression analyses were used to predict withdrawal and craving severity at intake and across the four timepoints.

RESULTS

At intake, withdrawal was higher in persons who were older, had greater SUD severity, women, had chronic pain, and used > 1 substance (p-values ≤.007) and craving was higher in persons with greater SUD severity (p < .001) and women (p = .033). Withdrawal remained higher in women and persons with chronic pain across timepoints but decreased at a similar rate relative to comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

Women and persons with chronic pain would benefit from earlier engagement in treatment and may require a more intensive strategy to mitigate opioid withdrawal in early treatment.

Effects of Early Life Trauma on Risks for Adult Opioid Use Disorder Are Mediated by Stress and Occur Independent of Depression and Anxiety

OBJECTIVES

Adverse childhood experiences, or early life trauma (ELT), may be a potential risk factor for opioid use disorders (OUDs) that could be further influenced by depression, anxiety, and stress. The prevalence and strength of these associations are largely unknown.

METHODS

This study examined the association between current OUD severity and lifetime history of ELT, and the degree to which current depression, anxiety, and stress influenced this association, in persons (n = 310) with at least 1 lifetime exposure to opioids using an online survey.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent of respondents experienced at least 1 trauma in their lifetime, and 65% met the criteria for OUD. Early life trauma was largely unassociated with demographics but demonstrated an almost "dose-dependent" association among all forms of ELT (total, general, physical, emotional, sexual), whereby more ELT was associated with more severe current OUD. A multivariate mediation model found perceived stress to be a robust mediator of this association. Current psychiatric functioning did not significantly moderate the relationship between ELT and OUD, suggesting that ELT may impact OUD severity at varying levels of psychiatric functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support existing evidence that greater ELT may influence adult OUD severity and identify perceived stress as a potential mechanistic contributor to this association. Results are preliminary in nature but support continued research into mechanisms underlying the association between ELT and OUD, particularly conformational changes in the stress system resultant from ELT, and interventions to mitigate the impact of ELT on OUD development and/or develop trauma-informed OUD treatment approaches.

Patient-reported sleep outcomes in randomized-controlled trials in persons with substance use disorders: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Sleep disturbances and disorders are a common and sometimes recalcitrant problem in persons recovering from substance use disorders (SUDs). As such, several randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to address sleep disturbances in a variety of SUD subpopulations and clinical scenarios. The goal of this systematic review was to collate patient-reported sleep outcomes used in past SUD-related RCTs to provide guidance for future sleep research in persons with SUDs.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on May 7th, 2020 (CRD42020182004). Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed manuscripts describing RCTs in an SUD population.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 13,403 candidate articles, and 76 met a priori criteria and were included in this review. Thirty-five (46.1%) assessed sleep as a primary outcome (i.e., sleep improvement was the primary goal of the research) and 41 (53.9%) assessed sleep as a secondary outcome (i.e., sleep improvement was an important outcome, but not the primary outcome). The most commonly used measures included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Insomnia Severity Index, and sleep diaries. However, multiple additional sleep assessments were also used, including visual analogue and Likert scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of addiction medicine would benefit from a streamlined approach in assessing patient-reported sleep in RCTs, including commonly used and validated assessments of sleep quality, inserting daily or repeated measures into RCTs, and including questionnaires that assess clinically relevant insomnia or other sleep disorders.

Suvorexant ameliorated sleep disturbance, opioid withdrawal, and craving during a buprenorphine taper

Increased orexin/hypocretin signaling is implicated in opioid withdrawal, sleep disturbances, and drug-seeking behaviors. This study examined whether a dual-orexin receptor antagonist would improve sleep and withdrawal outcomes when compared with placebo during a buprenorphine/naloxone taper. Thirty-eight participants with opioid use disorder were recruited to a clinical research unit and maintained on 8/2 to 16/4 mg of buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for 3 days before being randomized to 20 mg of suvorexant (n = 14), 40 mg of suvorexant (n = 12), or placebo (n = 12); 26 individuals completed the study. After randomization, participants underwent a 4-day buprenorphine/naloxone taper and 4-day post-taper observation period. Total sleep time (TST) was collected nightly with a wireless electroencephalography device and wrist-worn actigraphy; opioid withdrawal symptoms were assessed via the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS); and abuse potential was assessed on a 0- to 100-point visual analog scale of "High" every morning. A priori outcomes included two-group (collapsing suvorexant doses versus placebo) and three-group comparisons of area-under-the-curve (AUC) scores for TST, SOWS, and High. In two-group comparisons, participants receiving suvorexant displayed increased TST during the buprenorphine/naloxone taper and decreased SOWS during the post-taper period. In three-group comparisons, participants receiving 20 mg of suvorexant versus placebo displayed increased AUC for TST during the buprenorphine/naloxone taper, but there was no difference in SOWS among groups. There was no evidence of abuse potential in two- or three-group analyses. The results suggest that suvorexant might be a promising treatment for sleep and opioid withdrawal in individuals undergoing a buprenorphine/naloxone taper.

Need for clarity and context in case reports on kratom use, assessment, and intervention

This Letter to the Editor is a response to Broyan and colleagues who recently published a Case Report presenting data on 28 patients in the United States who identified kratom as their primary substance of use and who were subsequently induced on buprenorphine/naloxone for a reported diagnosis of kratom use disorder. We applaud the authors for helping to advance the science on kratom and recognize the difficulties in conducting kratom-related clinical assessment and research. However, a number of inconsistences and generalizations were identified in this Case Report, which also lacked some critical context. Importantly, such inconsistencies and generalizations can be observed throughout kratom-specific case reports. We feel this is now an important opportunity to highlight these issues that are present in the Broyan and colleagues Case report but emphasize that they are not unique to it. We do this with the hope that by acknowledging these issues it can help inform editors, clinicians, and researchers who may not be familiar with kratom and, as a result of this unfamiliarity, may inadvertently present findings in a manner that could confuse readers and even misinform clinical researchers and practitioners.

Buprenorphine treatment retention and comorbidities among patients with opioid use disorder in a primary care setting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: More information is needed about comorbidities among patients receiving buprenorphine maintenance treatment and their relationship with retention. METHODS: Retrospective electronic health record data over a 5-year period from primary care patients receiving buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder were examined (N = 899). The present analysis determined the prevalence of comorbidities and examined associations with treatment retention as defined by cumulative duration of buprenorphine prescription. RESULTS: Tobacco use and comorbidities including hypertension were prevalent but did not predict retention according to survival analyses controlling for demographic characteristics. Retention was poorer among patients testing positive for cocaine (HR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.09-1.74, p = .007) and patients with hepatitis C virus (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.37, p = .04). CONCLUSION AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides new knowledge of previously unexamined associations between comorbidities (e.g., hypertension) and buprenorphine treatment retention. The robust association between cocaine use and poorer buprenorphine retention serves to resolve prior conflicting data in the literature.

Searching for a Signal: Self-Reported Kratom Dose-Effect Relationships Among a Sample of US Adults With Regular Kratom Use Histories

There is limited understanding regarding kratom use among US adults. Although motivations for use are increasingly understood, typical kratom doses, threshold of (low and high) doses for perceived effectiveness, and effects produced during cessation are not well documented. We aimed to extend prior survey work by recruiting adults with current and past kratom exposure. Our goal was to better understand kratom dosing, changes in routines, and perception of effects, including time to onset, duration, and variability of beneficial and adverse outcomes from use and cessation. Among respondents who reported experiencing acute kratom effects, we also sought to determine if effects were perceived as helpful or unhelpful in meeting daily obligations. Finally, we attempted to detect any signal of a relationship between the amount of kratom consumed weekly and weeks of regular use with ratings of beneficial effects from use and ratings of adverse effects from cessation. We conducted an online survey between April-May 2021 by re-recruiting participants from a separate study who reported lifetime kratom use. A total of 129 evaluable surveys were collected. Most (59.7%) had used kratom >100 times and reported currently or having previously used kratom >4 times per week (62 weeks on average). Under half (41.9%) reported that they considered themselves to be a current "regular kratom user." A majority (79.8%) reported experiencing acute effects from their typical kratom dose and that onset of effects began in minutes but dissipated within hours. Over a quarter reported that they had increased their kratom dose since use initiation, whereas 18.6% had decreased. Greater severity of unwanted effects from ≥1 day of kratom cessation was predicted by more weeks of regular kratom use (β = 6.74, p = 0.02). Acute kratom effects were largely reported as compatible with, and sometimes helpful in, meeting daily obligations. In the absence of human laboratory studies, survey methods must be refined to more precisely assess dose-effect relationships. These can help inform the development of controlled observational and experimental studies needed to advance the public health understanding of kratom product use.

Dopamine Supersensitivity: A Novel Hypothesis of Opioid-Induced Neurobiological Mechanisms Underlying Opioid-Stimulant Co-use and Opioid Relapse

Emergent harms presented by the co-use of opioids and methamphetamine highlight the broader public health challenge of preventing and treating opioid and stimulant co-use. Development of effective therapeutics requires an understanding of the physiological mechanisms that may be driving co-use patterns, specifically the underlying neurobiology of co-use and how they may facilitate (or be leveraged to prevent) continued use patterns. This narrative review summarizes largely preclinical data that demonstrate clinically-meaningful relationships between the dopamine and opioid systems with direct implications for opioid and stimulant co-use. Synthesized conclusions of this body of research include evidence that changes in the dopamine system occur only once physical dependence to opioids develops, that the chronicity of opioid exposure is associated with the severity of changes, and that withdrawal leaves the organism in a state of substantive dopamine deficit that persists long after the somatic or observed signs of opioid withdrawal appear to have resolved. Evidence also suggests that dopamine supersensitivity develops soon after opioid abstinence and results in increased response to dopamine agonists that increases in magnitude as the abstinence period continues and is evident several weeks into protracted withdrawal. Mechanistically, this supersensitivity appears to be mediated by changes in the sensitivity, not quantity, of dopamine D2 receptors. Here we propose a neural circuit mechanism unique to withdrawal from opioid use with implications for increased stimulant sensitivity in previously stimulant-naïve or inexperienced populations. These hypothesized effects collectively delineate a mechanism by which stimulants would be uniquely reinforcing to persons with opioid physical dependence, would contribute to the acute opioid withdrawal syndrome, and could manifest subjectively as craving and/or motivation to use that could prompt opioid relapse during acute and protracted withdrawal. Preclinical research is needed to directly test these hypothesized mechanisms. Human laboratory and clinical trial research is needed to explore these clinical predictions and to advance the goal of developing treatments for opioid-stimulant co-use and/or opioid relapse prevention and withdrawal remediation.

Evaluation of Stigma Related to Perceived Risk for Coronavirus-19 Transmission Relative to the Other Stigmatized Conditions Opioid Use and Depression

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic was initially characterized by misinformation and fear related to transmission that has been previously shown to produce stigma toward persons perceived to be at risk for transmission. This study evaluated perceptions toward scenarios with variable levels of perceived risk for COVID-19 acquisition, and compared stigma to COVID-19 to depression and opioid use disorder.

METHODS

Respondents (N = 280) from the United States completed a web-based survey 6 months after pandemic declaration. Questions included demographics and COVID-19 misconceptions, expected response to hypothetical scenarios with variable risk for COVID-19, and the Attribution Questionnaire-9 for COVID-19, depression, and opioid use disorder.

RESULTS

Participants had several COVID-19 misconceptions, including that opioids increased immunity (63.6%), persons were more susceptible based upon racial/ethnic background (63.2%), and underlying health conditions did not influence risk (58.9%). Respondents were highly likely (64/100) to assume someone coughing had COVID-19 and the majority (93.5%) recommended quarantining persons with recent travel. However, the majority of respondents (>70% in all cases) also believed they would not change their COVID-19-related behavior when interacting with persons of different racial, ethnic, and age backgrounds. Finally, persons with COVID-19 engendered greater pity, less fear, less blame, less anger, and more willingness to help from respondents relative to persons with opioid use disorder.

CONCLUSION

Stigma ratings toward persons perceived at risk of transmitting COVID-19, collected soon after the onset of the pandemic, showed less evidence of stigma relative to persons with opioid use disorder despite pronounced misconceptions regarding COVID-19 risk. Data provide a foundation for additional research in this area.