Psychometric evaluation of the Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19 (SIC): results from a cross-sectional study and a phase 3 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19 (SIC) is a 30-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure scored by body system composites to assess signs/symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In addition to cross-sectional and longitudinal psychometric evaluations, qualitative exit interviews were conducted to support the content validity of the SIC.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, adults diagnosed with COVID-19 in the United States completed the web-based SIC and additional PRO measures. A subset was invited to participate in phone-based exit interviews. Longitudinal psychometric properties were assessed in ENSEMBLE2, a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of the Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 vaccine. Psychometric properties evaluated included structure, scoring, reliability, construct validity, discriminating ability, responsiveness, and meaningful change thresholds of SIC items and composite scores.

RESULTS

In the cross-sectional study, 152 participants completed the SIC (mean age, 51.0 ± 18.6 years) and 20 completed follow-up interviews. Fatigue (77.6%), feeling unwell (65.8%), and cough (60.5%) were symptoms most frequently reported. SIC inter-item correlations were all positive and mostly moderate (r ≥ 0.3) and statistically significant. SIC items and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) scores correlated as hypothesized (all r ≥ 0.32). Internal consistency reliabilities of all SIC composite scores were satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha, 0.69-0.91). SIC composite scores correlated moderately (r = 0.30-0.49) to strongly (r ≥ 0.50) with PROMIS-29 scores and Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) ratings (all P < 0.01). A variety of signs/symptoms were cited in exit interviews, and participants considered the SIC straightforward, comprehensive, and easy to use. From ENSEMBLE2, 183 participants with laboratory-confirmed moderate to severe/critical COVID-19 were included (51.5 ± 14.8 years). Strong test-retest reliabilities were observed for most SIC composite scores (intraclass correlations ≥ 0.60). Statistically significant differences across PGIS severity levels were found for all but 1 composite score, supporting known-groups validity. All SIC composite scores demonstrated responsiveness based on changes in PGIS.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric evaluations provided strong evidence for the reliability and validity of the SIC for measuring COVID-19 symptoms, supporting its use in vaccine and treatment trials. In exit interviews, participants described a broad range of signs/symptoms consistent with previous research, further supporting the content validity and format of the SIC.

Systematic literature review of the signs and symptoms of respiratory syncytial virus

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is responsible for over 30 million lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and 3 million hospitalizations worldwide each year. Despite the risk RSV poses to young children, older adults, and individuals with comorbidities or suppressed immunity, there is limited understanding of RSV symptom presentation across these at-risk groups, and there is no vaccine for RSV. We conducted two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) of studies that document signs and symptoms (S&S) of RSV in (1) children aged ≤5 years and (2) immunocompromised adolescents and adults, and adults at high risk for severe RSV due to age or comorbidities. Symptom duration and hospital length of stay (LOS) were explored. Electronic database searches were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Studies captured RSV S&S across community and hospital settings. Clinicians and caregivers reported (n = 25 studies) nasal discharge/congestion, cough, shortness of breath, feeding abnormalities, and fever in ≥40% of children across studies and settings. Median hospital stays for children ranged from 2 days in the United States to 7.5 days in China. High-risk adults with RSV (n = 6 studies) commonly (≥40% of adults) reported cough, sputum, dyspnea, and fever/feverishness. Median length of hospital stay in adults ranged from 6 to 15 days across studies. Caregivers and clinicians reported similar RSV S&S in young children, including upper and lower respiratory and systemic symptoms. In high-risk and immunocompromised adults, the most frequent (in multiple publications) and commonly reported RSV S&S were primarily LRTI symptoms. RSV symptoms could last for weeks and are variable based on geography.

Development of patient- and observer-reported outcome measures to assess COVID-19 signs and symptoms in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

The Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19 (SIC) is a 30-item patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate the presence and severity of COVID-19 signs/symptoms in adults. This study expanded the context of use of the adult SIC among adolescents aged 12-17 years and supported a pediatric adaptation (the Pediatric SIC [PedSIC]) for caregiver assessment of signs/symptoms in children aged < 12 years.

METHODS

Draft versions of the PedSIC and reference materials containing sign/symptom definitions for adolescents, based on an assessment of the reading level of SIC items by a professional linguist, were developed to facilitate accurate completion of the SIC by adolescents and observer-report (PedSIC) by caregivers. For adolescents, reference materials were intended to provide definitions for selected signs/symptoms identified to have a higher reading level. Iterative rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted from November 2020 to January 2021 to evaluate adolescent understanding of the SIC reference materials and inform refinement of the PedSIC for caregivers of children too young to reliably self-report. Participants were identified via databases of individuals who previously expressed interest in participating in qualitative research and were then screened for eligibility. Recruitment quotas were established to improve sample diversity. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to assess qualitative and demographic data, respectively.

RESULTS

Nine healthy adolescents (mean [SD, range] age, 14 [1.76, 12-17] years, 56% female, 22% non-White; round 1, n = 6; round 2, n = 3) and 17 caregivers (mean [SD, range] age, 34 [6.28, 26-41] years, 59% female, 35% non-White; round 1, n = 9; round 2, n = 8) were interviewed. Adolescents understood the majority of signs/symptoms (22 of the 30 SIC items) without assistance or use of the reference materials during the cognitive debriefing interview. Definitions were added to the reference materials for 5 additional items, and clarifications provided to existing definitions for 3 items. Seven observer-report (PedSIC) items were modified following feedback from caregivers of healthy young children. Reference materials (similar to those for adolescent use) were developed to support caregiver understanding of the intent of the PedSIC items collecting input from children ages ≥ 5- < 12 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support using the SIC, PedSIC, and their associated reference materials to evaluate the presence and severity of COVID-19 signs/symptoms in adolescents and children aged < 12 years via caregiver-supported report, respectively.

1061. Evaluation of Measures for the Assessment of Covid-19 Signs and Symptoms in Children and Adolescents

Background

The Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19 (SIC) is a 30-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure developed to assess the presence and severity of COVID-19 signs and symptoms in adults. To further facilitate the evaluation of new vaccines and treatments in development, similar tools are needed for use within pediatric populations. The objectives of this study were to support adolescent self-completion and create an adaptation of the measure for caregiver assessment of signs and symptoms in children aged &lt; 12 years (henceforth, the Pediatric SIC [PedSIC]).

Methods

After developing draft versions of the PedSIC and reference materials with definitions to facilitate accurate completion of both measures, iterative rounds of cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted from November 2020 through January 2021 to evaluate understanding of the SIC (in adolescents aged 12-17), and inform refinement of the PedSIC for caregivers of children aged &lt; 12. Recruitment quotas were employed to support sample diversity.

Results

Nine adolescents (mean [SD, range] age, 14 [1.76, 12-17] years, 56% female, 78% white; round 1, n=6; round 2, n=3) and 17 caregivers (mean [SD, range] age, 34 [6.28, 26-41] years, 59% female, 65% white; round 1, n=9; round 2, n=8) completed interviews. All adolescents understood and completed the adult version of the SIC without instrument modification. Ease and accuracy of self-completion was improved through the use of reference materials. Caregiver feedback resulted in modification of the PedSIC to include two sections: observable signs (ages &lt; 12), and symptoms assessed with input from children (ages ≥ 5-&lt; 12). Reference materials provided standardization of item intent.

Conclusion

Results support using the SIC, PedSIC, and their associated reference materials to assess the presence and severity of COVID-19 signs/symptoms in adolescents and children aged &lt; 12 years, respectively, who participate in vaccine and treatment clinical trials. Supported by Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.

Disclosures

Carla Romano, MS, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support Margaret Mayorga, MS , MPH, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support Javier Ruiz-Guiñazu, MD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Géralyn C. Trudel, PhD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Sheri Fehnel, PhD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support Kelly McQuarrie, BSN, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Eric K. H. Chan, PhD, Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Eva G. Katz, PhD, MPH, RD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds.

1069. Psychometric Properties of the Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for COVID-19 Signs and Symptoms

Background

The Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19 (SIC), a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure, was developed to assess COVID-19 signs and symptoms. Qualitative and cross-sectional studies demonstrated its content validity and preliminary psychometric properties. This study provides additional evidence on the reliability, responsiveness, known-group validity, and meaningful change thresholds of the SIC using methods aligned with regulatory guidance and best practices.

Methods

Data were from ENSEMBLE-2, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of Ad26.COV2.S for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections in adults (aged 18+). The SIC was used in the trial to evaluate COVID-19 signs and symptoms and the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) was used as an anchor for validation. Intra-class correlations (ICCs) and Cronbach’s alphas were computed to evaluate the test-retest reliability and internal consistency, and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were performed to assess the known-group validity of the SIC. Responsiveness was evaluated using PGIS as an anchor variable and a 1- or 2-point improvement in PGIS was used to estimate the meaningful change thresholds of the SIC.

Results

183 participants with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirmed moderate to severe/critical COVID-19 were included (mean ± SD age: 51.5 ± 14.8 y; female: 44%; White 65%). ICCs showed strong test-retest reliabilities for most SIC domains (.60 and above). The internal consistency reliability of the SIC had a Cronbach’s alpha &gt; .70 for all but one domain (Neurological). Statistically significant differences (p values &lt; 0.05) for the different PGIS severity levels were found for all but one domain (Sensory), supporting known-group validity. All domains showed responsiveness based on changes (improvement and worsening) in PGIS, supporting the ability of the SIC to detect changes in COVID-19 signs and symptoms. Based on mean changes in the PGIS, estimated meaningful change thresholds for SIC domains ranged from -.36 to -2.11.

Conclusion

These results, based on data from ENSEMBLE-2, build upon prior cross-sectional analyses and provide additional supportive psychometric evidence on the SIC. Support: Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.

Disclosures

Eric K. H. Chan, PhD, Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Jeffrey Stoddard, MD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Jerald Sadoff, MD, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV: Employee Yan Liu, PhD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Ilse van Dromme, PhD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Eva G. Katz, PhD, MPH, RD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Yi-hsuan Liu, PhD, MS, RD, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds Kelly McQuarrie, BSN, Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Employee|Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Stocks/Bonds.

Development of a novel patient-reported outcome measure to assess signs and symptoms of COVID-19

Background

Given the urgent need for vaccines and treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19 (SIC), a comprehensive, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure of signs and symptoms associated with COVID-19, was developed in full alignment with current US regulatory guidance to support evaluations of vaccines and treatments in development.

Methods

An initial version of the SIC was developed to address concepts identified through a targeted literature review and consultation with experts in infectious diseases and clinicians routinely managing COVID-19 in a hospital setting. A qualitative study was conducted in sites in the United States among 31 participants aged ≥ 18 years who were English-speaking and willing and able to provide informed consent and a self-reported history by telephone or online method. The measure was refined based on additional feedback from the clinicians and three iterative rounds of combined concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews conducted with patients, caregivers, and healthy volunteers.

Results

Among 39 scientific articles identified in the literature review, 35 COVID-19 signs and symptoms were reported and confirmed during interviews with clinicians, patients, and caregivers. Patients and healthy participants suggested changes for refining the draft SIC to ensure consistent interpretation and endorsed both the 24-h recall period and use of an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) for capturing change in symptom severity. The final version of the SIC captures the daily presence or absence of 30 symptoms and a rating of severity for 25 of the 30 symptoms using an NRS for those symptoms reported as present.

Conclusions

The SIC comprehensively addresses observations described in the literature, by clinicians, and by patients, and captures patients’ experiences with COVID-19 in a manner that minimizes complexity and facilitates completion for both patients and healthy volunteers. This measure is thus appropriate for use in clinical trials of both therapeutics and vaccines for COVID-19.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00471-w.

A randomized phase II study of apalutamide (APA), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or APA + ADT in patients (pts) with biochemically relapsed (BCR) prostate cancer (PC)

320

Background: While there is no standard therapy for BCR PC following local therapy, intermittent ADT is widely used. We evaluated utility of APA alone, ADT (luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone agonist [LHRHa]) alone, or APA + LHRHa in ADT-naïve BCR PC pts. Methods: Pts with BCR PC after primary definitive local therapy and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (PSADT) ≤ 12 mo were randomized 1:1:1 to open-label 240 mg APA daily, LHRHa alone, or APA + LHRHa for 12 mo, followed by a 12-mo observation period off therapy. Pts were stratified by PSADT (< 6 vs 6-12 mo) and age (≤ 70 vs > 70 y). Primary end point: mean change from baseline (BL) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate total score at 12 mo. Secondary end points included PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/mL by 7 mo, time to PSA progression (TTPpsa), and time to testosterone (T) recovery. Results: 90 pts (APA, n = 29; LHRHa, n = 30; APA + LHRHa, n = 31) were treated for median of 12 mo with similar distribution of BL characteristics across groups: 67% age ≤ 70 y; 67% PSADT < 6 mo. There was no significant difference in HRQoL in APA vs LHRHa at 12 mo, or between LHRHa vs APA + LHRHa groups. At median follow-up of 30-33 mo, TTPpsa in APA, LHRHa, and APA + LHRHa groups was 26 mo, 31 mo, and 36 mo, respectively. Compared to LHRHa alone, APA + LHRHa resulted in a trend toward improved TTPpsa (HR [95% CI] 0.56 [0.23-1.36], p = 0.196), and APA alone resulted in a trend for shorter TTPpsa (HR 1.09 [0.49-2.43], p = 0.824). PSA nadir < 0.2 ng/mL was reached in 89%, 89%, and 97% in APA, LHRHa, and APA + LHRHa pts. Median time to T recovery was similar in LHRHa and APA + LHRHa groups (23 mo vs 24 mo). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17% of APA, 14% of LHRHa, and 29% of APA + LHRHa pts. The only grade 3-4 AE reported in > 1 pt per group was hypertension (APA, 3%; LHRHa, 0; APA + LHRHa, 13%). Conclusions: Addition of APA to LHRHa resulted in a trend for longer TTPpsa and a higher proportion of pts achieving optimal PSA nadir without significant difference in HRQoL or time to T recovery. Observed AEs were consistent with known safety profiles. Results support further evaluation of APA + LHRHa for a specified duration in BCR PC. Clinical trial information: NCT01790126.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life and Adverse Events of Apalutamide Versus Enzalutamide in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The present study aimed to indirectly compare apalutamide and enzalutamide with respect to tolerability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).

METHODS

Patient-level data from the SPARTAN study [apalutamide + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus placebo + ADT] and aggregate published data from the PROSPER study (enzalutamide + ADT versus placebo + ADT) were used. Anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted by weighting patients' baseline characteristics from SPARTAN to match aggregated baseline characteristics in PROSPER. Odds ratios (ORs) of reported adverse events (AEs) and baseline-to-follow-up least squares mean differences in HRQoL [measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) score] with 95% credible intervals were re-estimated for SPARTAN arms using weighted population and indirectly compared with those in PROSPER through a Bayesian framework. Events of special interest included fatigue, hot flush, nausea, diarrhea, hypertension, falls, dizziness, decreased appetite, arthralgia, asthenia and headache. In addition, any AEs and serious AEs were explored.

RESULTS

Of 1207 SPARTAN patients, 1171 were matched to 1401 PROSPER patients. Relative to enzalutamide, apalutamide demonstrated better tolerability as evidenced by the highest probability of reduced occurrence of fatigue [p(OR < 1) = 99.5%], hypertension [p(OR < 1) = 99.2%], decreased appetite [p(OR < 1) = 98.3%], fall [p(OR < 1) = 90.3%], headaches [p(OR < 1) = 86.7%], and nausea [p(OR < 1) = 80.0%]. The probabilities of reduced occurrence of any AEs and SAEs with apalutamide versus enzalutamide were 66.9% and 90.9%, respectively. Relative to enzalutamide, apalutamide treatment was associated with a higher probability of a better HRQoL based on the FACT-P total score [p(diff > 0) = 73.1%]. The probability of a better HRQoL with apalutamide versus enzalutamide was highest for the physical [p(diff > 0) = 97.3%] and functional [p(diff > 0) = 86.7%] wellbeing subscales, and the pain-related subscale [p(diff > 0) = 90.1%].

CONCLUSION

Anchored MAIC suggests that treatment of men with nmCRPC with apalutamide is associated with a higher probability of better tolerability due to fewer AEs and better HRQoL than enzalutamide.

Does recall period matter? Comparing PROMIS® physical function with no recall, 24-hr recall, and 7-day recall

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of recall periods on the assessment of physical function, we compared, in cancer and general population samples, the standard administration of PROMIS Physical Function items without a recall period to administrations with 24-hour and 7-day recall periods.

METHODS

We administered 31 items from the PROMIS Physical Function v2.0 item bank to 2400 respondents (n = 1001 with cancer; n = 1399 from the general population). Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three recall conditions (no recall, 24-hours, or 7-days) and one of two "reminder" conditions (with recall periods presented only at the start of the survey or with every item). We assessed items for potential differential item functioning (DIF) by recall time period. We then tested recall and reminder effects with analysis of variance controlling for demographics, English fluency, and co-morbidities.

RESULTS

Based on conservative pre-set criteria, no items were flagged for recall time period-related DIF. Using analysis of variance, each condition was compared to the standard PROMIS administration for Physical Function (no recall period). There was no evidence of significant differences among groups in the cancer sample. In the general population sample, only the 24-hour recall condition with reminders was significantly different from the "no recall" PROMIS standard. At the item level, for both samples, the number of items with non-trivial effect size differences across conditions was minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to no recall, the use of a recall period has little to no effect upon PROMIS physical function responses or scores. We recommend that PROMIS Physical Function be administered with the standard PROMIS "no recall" period.

Understanding symptomatic experience, impact, and emotional response in recently diagnosed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

We sought to explore the symptomatic experience of men recently told their castration-resistant prostate cancer has metastasized (mCRPC); the impact and emotional response to this; the emotional burden of monitoring development to metastatic status; and the emotional impact on the primary support person (PSP).

METHODS

Interviews were conducted with 25 men recently diagnosed with mCRPC from the United States (US), France, and Germany. We also interviewed 14 PSPs. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 72.2 years; mean time since metastasis 7.8 months. The most frequent symptoms were fatigue/tiredness, sexual dysfunction, and pain. Metastasis had a negative emotional impact on the patient and PSP. Some explicitly associated certain symptoms/impacts with metastasis, such as localized pain, diarrhea, blood in stool, and increased impact on activities of daily living. About 72% of patients highlighted the emotional impact of a metastatic diagnosis, reporting worry/anxiety/fear, low mood/depression, shock, increased burden on PSP, and strain on relationships. Monitoring prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values was important; ten patients explicitly discussed feeling fear/worry when PSA was rising, and glad/happy/excited when PSA was falling. Most reported that, if a medication had been available to them to delay metastasis, they would have taken it, even if they were asymptomatic.

CONCLUSIONS

Interviews highlighted the substantial burden of mCRPC to both patient and PSP. Development of metastasis was associated with symptoms worsening rather than the development of new symptoms, with physical and emotional impacts. Most patients were willing to take a medication to delay metastasis.

Qualitative study to understand the emotional response to a metastatic diagnosis in castration-resistant prostate cancer

201

Background: To explore the emotional response of men with a recent metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) diagnosis, emotional burden of monitoring their condition prior to additional treatment for metastasis (“watch and wait”), and emotional impact on caregivers. Methods: In-depth, qualitative, one-to-one interviews with 25 men with a recent diagnosis of mCRPC from the US (n = 4), France (n = 12) and Germany (n = 9). Additional interviews were conducted with 12 of the participants’ primary support person (PSP) - a friend/family member who provided support to the participants emotionally and/or in everyday tasks; US (n = 2), France (n = 8), Germany (n = 4). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematic analyzed. Results: Participants were 54-85 years old; 88% retired; mean time since metastatic diagnosis was 7.5 months (seven were within 12 weeks of metastasis, all others within 24 months of metastasis); and 19 experienced pain related to their CRPC. Symptoms and impacts associated with mCRPC were consistent across countries. The most frequent symptoms (reported by ≥75%) were fatigue/tiredness, sexual dysfunction and pain. Metastasis had a negative emotional impact, participants reported fear of what happens next. Some explicitly associated certain symptoms/impacts with metastasis, such as localized pain, diarrhea, blood in stool, and increased impact of activities of daily living. 72% highlighted that metastatic diagnosis impacted their emotional state, experiencing worry, anxiety, fear, low mood/depression and shock, with increased burden on PSP and strain on relationships. 80% highlighted that monitoring PSA values was important, and ten discussed the emotional impact of this: fear and worry when rising; glad, happy, and excited when falling. Most participants (80%) reported that, if a medication had been available to them to delay metastasis, they would have taken it, even if asymptomatic. Conclusions: Metastatic diagnosis was associated with a worsening of symptoms and both physical and emotional impacts. Rising PSA levels prior to metastasis had a negative emotional impact. Most participants were willing to take a medication to delay metastasis.

Effect of Two Long-acting Treatments, The Paliperidone Palmitate 1-month and 3-month Formulations on Caregiver Burden in European patients with Schizophrenia

Introduction

Schizophrenia puts a significant burden on caregivers.

Objectives

To explore the effects of two long-acting treatments (LAT), paliperidone palmitate 1-month and 3-month formulations on caregiver burden (CGB) in European patients with schizophrenia using the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ)

Aims

To conduct a subgroup analysis of two randomized, double-blind studies (NCT01515423 and NCT01529515).

Methods

Caregivers (≥ 1 h of contact/week with the patients) were offered to complete the IEQ (31 items, each scoring: 0–4; total score: sum of 27 items [0–108]).

Results

Among 756 European caregivers (53% parents, 18% spouse/partner or girl/boyfriend, 10% sister/brother), 60% reported a CGB of ≥ 32 hours/week at open-label baseline (BL-OL). CGB reduced significantly for patients with both BL-OL and at least one double-blind IEQ sum-score (n = 433): mean improvement [SD] (9.9 [12.66], P < 0.001) from BL-OL (mean [SD] 26.0 [13.30]) to study end (16.0 [10.47]); (reduction in burden associated with worrying [2.9 points] and urging [4.3 points]). CGB significantly improved in patients on prior oral antipsychotics post-switching to LAT with less leisure days impacted and less hours spent in caregiving (P < 0.001). There was significant relationship between improvements and relapse status, patient age (P < 0.001), age at diagnosis (P < 0.002), and number of prior psychiatric hospitalizations in the last 24 months (P < 0.05). Prior use of long-acting antipsychotics other than paliperidone palmitate 1-month or 3-month formulations at BL-OL and duration of prior psychiatric hospitalizations in the last 24 months did not show significant effect on improvements.

Conclusion

Switching from an oral antipsychotic to an LAT can provide a meaningful and significant improvement in caregiver burden.

Disclosure of interest

All authors are employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC and hold stocks in the company.

Patient-reported Symptoms of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors

Purpose

Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), a rare locally aggressive neoplasm of the synovium of joints and tendon sheaths, is associated with joint destruction, inflammation, pain, and swelling, in part due to colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor–bearing macrophages recruited to the tumor by genetic elevation of colony-stimulating factor 1 activity. The most common treatment is surgery, although promising pharmacologic treatments are in development. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are critical end points in demonstrating the clinical relevance of standard oncologic outcome measures and the overall impact of novel pharmacologic therapies in nonmalignant neoplastic conditions such as TGCT. The content validity of PROs relevant to patients with TGCT has not been formally investigated, and instruments to evaluate such outcomes do not exist for this condition.

Methods

PRO instruments of potential relevance were evaluated by using a literature review and by clinical and PRO experts. Patients with TGCT were recruited through clinical sites and the Internet for participation in qualitative research interviews to identify predominant symptoms and to test the relevance and content validity of several PRO measures. Select PRO measures were included in a Phase I clinical trial, and preliminary results of the PRO end points are reported descriptively.

Findings

Of the 22 subjects who participated in qualitative interviews, 73% were female, and their mean age was 42.5 years (range, 27–56 years). The TGCTs (19 diffuse and 3 localized) were located in the knee (n = 15), hip (n = 3), ankle (n = 2), elbow (n= 1), and forearm (n = 1). The most common symptoms cited were pain (82%), swelling (86%), stiffness (73%), reduced range of motion (64%), and joint instability (64%), which were consistent with clinical expert input and with the content of instruments chosen by PRO experts. The worst pain numeric rating scale, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical functioning items, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, as well as a worst stiffness numeric rating scale developed for TGCT, were confirmed as meaningful measures of TGCT patient symptoms and were well understood in qualitative interviews. Results from the Phase I trial showed trends of improvement in both pain and stiffness over time.

Implications

This study is the first to gather information directly from patients with TGCT regarding their symptom experiences. Pain, stiffness, and physical functioning are important treatment outcomes in patients with TGCT. We have identified content-valid PRO measures of these concepts, which are included in an ongoing Phase III TGCT clinical trial with pexidartinib (PLX3397) (NCT02371369).

Assessment of sleep in patients with fibromyalgia: qualitative development of the fibromyalgia sleep diary

Objectives

Sleep disturbance is a common experience in fibromyalgia (FM). The field lacks a sleep specific patient reported outcome (PRO) measure developed and validated in a FM population. The study objective is to gain an in-depth understanding of sleep in FM and to develop a PRO measure of it.

Methods

Research involved the following stages: 1) A literature review conducted to identify key concepts associated with FM patient experience of sleep and PRO measures that have been used to assess this; 2) Qualitative interviews with therapeutic area experts; 3) Focus groups with FM patients who experienced sleep disturbance; 4) Development of a conceptual framework and the Fibromyalgia Sleep Diary (FMSD); and 5) Cognitive interviews with patients to explore content validity of the FMSD.

Results

The literature review and expert interviews supported sleep disturbance being an important aspect of the FM patient experience, and underscored the need for a new FM specific sleep PRO measure. Results from the focus groups demonstrated that FM patients experience sleep disturbances that they attribute to their FM symptoms, such as pain and stiffness, confirming the importance of understanding more about sleep changes. Aspects of sleep raised by FM patients included poor sleep quality and insufficient quantity including difficulty with falling asleep, getting comfortable, and staying asleep; restlessness; light sleep; not feeling rested upon awakening; and difficulty starting the day. Cognitive interview results showed that the 8-item FMSD, developed to reflect the concepts identified above, was relevant to FM patients with content that was interpreted as intended.

Conclusions

The FMSD was developed in line with the recommendations of the FDA PRO guidance and ISPOR PRO Task Force. The qualitative evidence generated thus far strongly supports the content validity of the FMSD as a PRO measure of sleep disturbance in FM populations. Psychometric evaluation of the FMSD to demonstrate reliability, validity and sensitivity to change is recommended as a next step.

The association of flushing bother, impact, treatment satisfaction and discontinuation of niacin therapy

BACKGROUND

Niacin has lipid-modifying efficacy and cardiovascular benefit, but is underutilised because of niacin-induced flushing (NIF). This real-world, prospective, observational study characterised the severity and impact of NIF symptoms among participants who were newly prescribed extended-release (ER) niacin.

METHODS

Participants were surveyed daily during week 1 of therapy, at weeks 5, 9, 13, and at months 7, 10 and 13. Surveys included the Flushing Symptom Questionnaire (FSQ), which includes the Global Flushing Severity Score (GFSS) question, the Flushing Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM).

RESULTS

Overall, 306 participants were enrolled. During week 1, 30.0% of participants reported a maximum GFSS ≥ 4 (moderate or greater). Mean FIQ domain scores increased with increasing flushing severity, primarily driven by the Irritation/Frustration domain. By week 13, only 2.5% of participants had attained a 2 g ER niacin dose. By month 13, 43.5% (n = 133) had discontinued ER niacin. At discontinuation, only 3.1% of participants had attained the 2 g dose. Over half of the participants who discontinued experienced flushing symptoms: 82% reported moderate to extreme flushing (GFSS ≥ 4), and 68% reported severe to extreme flushing (GFSS ≥ 7). Participants who discontinued and had flushing side effects reported high degrees of impact in the FIQ Irritation/Frustration domain, and high dissatisfaction as a result of side effects, as measured by the TSQM.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, NIF side effects were bothersome and had an impact on the continuation of therapy.

Effects of meal size and composition on incretin, alpha-cell, and beta-cell responses

The incretins glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) regulate postprandial insulin release from the beta-cells. We investigated the effects of 3 standardized meals with different caloric and nutritional content in terms of postprandial glucose, insulin, glucagon, and incretin responses. In a randomized crossover study, 18 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 6 healthy volunteers underwent three 4-hour meal tolerance tests (small carbohydrate [CH]-rich meal, large CH-rich meal, and fat-rich meal). Non-model-based and model-based estimates of beta-cell function and incremental areas under the curve of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, and GIP were calculated. Mixed models and Friedman tests were used to test for differences in meal responses. The large CH-rich meal and fat-rich meal resulted in a slightly larger insulin response as compared with the small CH-rich meal and led to a slightly shorter period of hyperglycemia, but only in healthy subjects. Model-based insulin secretion estimates did not show pronounced differences between meals. Both in healthy individuals and in those with diabetes, more CH resulted in higher GLP-1 release. In contrast with the other meals, GIP release was still rising 2 hours after the fat-rich meal. The initial glucagon response was stimulated by the large CH-rich meal, whereas the fat-rich meal induced a late glucagon response. Fat preferentially stimulates GIP secretion, whereas CH stimulates GLP-1 secretion. Differences in meal size and composition led to differences in insulin and incretin responses but not to differences in postprandial glucose levels of the well-controlled patients with diabetes.

Validation of a questionnaire to assess niacin-induced cutaneous flushing

BACKGROUND

Niacin is currently the most effective approved agent for raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, niacin-induced cutaneous flushing (redness, warmth, tingling and/or itching) significantly limits patient acceptance. To further characterize flushing, a patient-reported Flushing Symptom Questionnaire (FSQ) was developed and validated.

METHODS

The FSQ was validated in an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of extended-release (ER) niacin and placebo. The primary flushing endpoint of the study was based on the single Global Flushing Severity Score (GFSS), an item within the FSQ, which assesses overall flushing severity on a 0-10 discretized analog scale.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients were randomized to one of four treatment groups (sequences of placebo and ER niacin [given as niacin (NIASPAN) 1 g (N1) and 2g (N2)]. Test-retest reliability and reproducibility coefficients for the single-item GFSS were all above 0.75. Construct validity was supported by moderate to strong correlations (r > 0.5) with other FSQ items. All FSQ item scores and specifically the GFSS discriminated between treatment groups and demonstrated expected relationships with predefined known groups. The GFSS demonstrated high responsiveness in patients who switched from ER niacin to placebo. The ability of the GFSS and GFBS to discriminate changes in flushing symptoms in patients who increased drug dose was less than expected possibly due to accommodation to the flushing effects of niacin over time; differential drop-out due to flushing; and/or FSQ items not being sensitive enough to detect a change that was present.

CONCLUSIONS

The FSQ items and specifically the Global Flushing Severity Score (GFSS), are reliable and valid measures to assess niacin-induced flushing.