1
|
Anil A, Stokes AM, Karis JP, Bell LC, Eschbacher J, Jennings K, Prah MA, Hu LS, Boxerman JL, Schmainda KM, Quarles CC. Identification of a single-dose, low flip angle based CBV threshold for fractional tumor burden (FTB) mapping in recurrent glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024:ajnr.A8357. [PMID: 38782593 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE DSC-MRI can be used to generate fractional tumor burden (FTB) maps, via application of relative CBV thresholds, to spatially differentiate glioblastoma recurrence from post treatment radiation effects (PTRE). Image-localized histopathology was previously used to validate FTB maps derived from a reference DSC-MRI protocol using preload, a moderate flip angle (MFA, 60°) and post-processing leakage correction. Recently, a DSC-MRI protocol with a low flip angle (LFA, 30°) with no preload was shown to provide leakage-corrected RCBV equivalent to the reference protocol. This study aims to identify the RCBV thresholds for the LFA protocol that generate the most accurate FTB maps, concordant with those obtained from the reference MFA protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-two patients with grade IV GBM who had prior surgical resection and received chemotherapy and radiotherapy were included in the study. Two sets of DSC-MRI data were collected sequentially first using LFA protocol with no preload, which served as the preload for the subsequent MFA protocol. Standardized relative CBV maps (sRCBV) were obtained for each patient and co-registered with the anatomical post-contrast T1-weighted images. The reference MFA-based FTB maps were computed using previously published sRCBV thresholds (1.0 and 1.56). An ROC analysis was conducted to identify the optimal, voxelwise LFA sRCBV thresholds, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the LFA-based FTB maps were computed with respect to the MFA-based reference. RESULTS The mean sRCBV values of tumors across patients exhibited strong agreement (CCC = 0.99) between the two protocols. Using the ROC analysis, the optimal lower LFA threshold that accurately distinguishes PTRE from tumor recurrence was found to be 1.0 (sensitivity: 87.77%; specificity: 90.22%), equivalent to the ground truth. To identify aggressive tumor regions, the ROC analysis identified an upper LFA threshold of 1.37 (sensitivity: 90.87%; specificity: 91.10%) for the reference MFA threshold of 1.56. CONCLUSION For LFA-based FTB maps, a sRCBV threshold of 1.0 and 1.37 can differentiate PTRE from recurrent tumor. FTB maps aids in surgical planning, guiding pathological diagnosis and treatment strategies in the recurrent setting. This study further confirms the reliability of single-dose LFA-based DSC-MRI. ABBREVIATIONS LFA = low flip angle; MFA = moderate flip angle; sRCBV = standardized relative cerebral blood volume; FTB = fractional tumor burden; PTRE = post treatment radiation effects; ROC = receiver operating characteristics; CCC = concordance correlation coefficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliya Anil
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Ashley M Stokes
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - John P Karis
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Laura C Bell
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Jennifer Eschbacher
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Kristofer Jennings
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Melissa A Prah
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Leland S Hu
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Jerrold L Boxerman
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| | - C Chad Quarles
- From the Department of Cancer Systems Imaging (A.A., C.C.Q.), and Department of Biostatistics (K.J.), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States; Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center (A.M.S.), Department of Neuroradiology (J.P.K.), and Department of Neuropathology (J.E.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Clinical Imaging Group (L.C.B.), Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, United States; Department of Biophysics (M.A.P., K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States; Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States. Laura C Bell is employed by Genentech Inc. Kathleen M. Schmainda has ownership interest in IQ-AI Ltd and Prism Clinical Imaging. Kathleen M. Schmainda has financial interest in Imaging Biometrics LLC. Kathleen M. Schmainda is a board member for Prism Clinical Imaging
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shalom ES, Kim H, van der Heijden RA, Ahmed Z, Patel R, Hormuth DA, DiCarlo JC, Yankeelov TE, Sisco NJ, Dortch RD, Stokes AM, Inglese M, Grech-Sollars M, Toschi N, Sahoo P, Singh A, Verma SK, Rathore DK, Kazerouni AS, Partridge SC, LoCastro E, Paudyal R, Wolansky IA, Shukla-Dave A, Schouten P, Gurney-Champion OJ, Jiřík R, Macíček O, Bartoš M, Vitouš J, Das AB, Kim SG, Bokacheva L, Mikheev A, Rusinek H, Berks M, Hubbard Cristinacce PL, Little RA, Cheung S, O'Connor JPB, Parker GJM, Moloney B, LaViolette PS, Bobholz S, Duenweg S, Virostko J, Laue HO, Sung K, Nabavizadeh A, Saligheh Rad H, Hu LS, Sourbron S, Bell LC, Fathi Kazerooni A. The ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI): Results from the OSIPI-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced challenge. Magn Reson Med 2024; 91:1803-1821. [PMID: 38115695 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ has often been proposed as a quantitative imaging biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment for various tumors. None of the many software tools forK trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ quantification are standardized. The ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging-Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (OSIPI-DCE) challenge was designed to benchmark methods to better help the efforts to standardizeK trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ measurement. METHODS A framework was created to evaluateK trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ values produced by DCE-MRI analysis pipelines to enable benchmarking. The perfusion MRI community was invited to apply their pipelines forK trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ quantification in glioblastoma from clinical and synthetic patients. Submissions were required to include the entrants'K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ values, the applied software, and a standard operating procedure. These were evaluated using the proposedOSIP I gold $$ \mathrm{OSIP}{\mathrm{I}}_{\mathrm{gold}} $$ score defined with accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility components. RESULTS Across the 10 received submissions, theOSIP I gold $$ \mathrm{OSIP}{\mathrm{I}}_{\mathrm{gold}} $$ score ranged from 28% to 78% with a 59% median. The accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility scores ranged from 0.54 to 0.92, 0.64 to 0.86, and 0.65 to 1.00, respectively (0-1 = lowest-highest). Manual arterial input function selection markedly affected the reproducibility and showed greater variability inK trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ analysis than automated methods. Furthermore, provision of a detailed standard operating procedure was critical for higher reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS This study reports results from the OSIPI-DCE challenge and highlights the high inter-software variability withinK trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} $$ estimation, providing a framework for ongoing benchmarking against the scores presented. Through this challenge, the participating teams were ranked based on the performance of their software tools in the particular setting of this challenge. In a real-world clinical setting, many of these tools may perform differently with different benchmarking methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve S Shalom
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Harrison Kim
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Rianne A van der Heijden
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Zaki Ahmed
- Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Reyna Patel
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - David A Hormuth
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Julie C DiCarlo
- Biomedical Imaging Center, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Diagnostic Medicine, Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicholas J Sisco
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Richard D Dortch
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Ashley M Stokes
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Marianna Inglese
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Matthew Grech-Sollars
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
- Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicola Toschi
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Prativa Sahoo
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anup Singh
- Center for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Sanjay K Verma
- Institute of Bioengineering and Bioimaging, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Divya K Rathore
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK
| | - Anum S Kazerouni
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Eve LoCastro
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ramesh Paudyal
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ivan A Wolansky
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pepijn Schouten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver J Gurney-Champion
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Imaging and Biomarkers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Radovan Jiřík
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Ondřej Macíček
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Bartoš
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Praha, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Vitouš
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | - S Gene Kim
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Louisa Bokacheva
- Department of Radiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Artem Mikheev
- Department of Radiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Henry Rusinek
- Department of Radiology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Berks
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ross A Little
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan Cheung
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Radiology, The Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Geoff J M Parker
- Center for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
- Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester, UK
| | - Brendan Moloney
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Peter S LaViolette
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Samuel Bobholz
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Savannah Duenweg
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - John Virostko
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Hendrik O Laue
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Kyunghyun Sung
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ali Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery, Division of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Center for Computational Imaging & Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine, School of Computing/School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Leland S Hu
- Neuroradiology Division, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Steven Sourbron
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Laura C Bell
- Clinical Imaging Group, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang L, Wang H, D’Angelo F, Curtin L, Sereduk CP, Leon GD, Singleton KW, Urcuyo J, Hawkins-Daarud A, Jackson PR, Krishna C, Zimmerman RS, Patra DP, Bendok BR, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Donev K, Baxter LC, Mrugała MM, Ceccarelli M, Iavarone A, Swanson KR, Tran NL, Hu LS, Li J. Quantifying intra-tumoral genetic heterogeneity of glioblastoma toward precision medicine using MRI and a data-inclusive machine learning algorithm. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299267. [PMID: 38568950 PMCID: PMC10990246 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and lethal human cancers. Intra-tumoral genetic heterogeneity poses a significant challenge for treatment. Biopsy is invasive, which motivates the development of non-invasive, MRI-based machine learning (ML) models to quantify intra-tumoral genetic heterogeneity for each patient. This capability holds great promise for enabling better therapeutic selection to improve patient outcome. METHODS We proposed a novel Weakly Supervised Ordinal Support Vector Machine (WSO-SVM) to predict regional genetic alteration status within each GBM tumor using MRI. WSO-SVM was applied to a unique dataset of 318 image-localized biopsies with spatially matched multiparametric MRI from 74 GBM patients. The model was trained to predict the regional genetic alteration of three GBM driver genes (EGFR, PDGFRA and PTEN) based on features extracted from the corresponding region of five MRI contrast images. For comparison, a variety of existing ML algorithms were also applied. Classification accuracy of each gene were compared between the different algorithms. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was further applied to compute contribution scores of different contrast images. Finally, the trained WSO-SVM was used to generate prediction maps within the tumoral area of each patient to help visualize the intra-tumoral genetic heterogeneity. RESULTS WSO-SVM achieved 0.80 accuracy, 0.79 sensitivity, and 0.81 specificity for classifying EGFR; 0.71 accuracy, 0.70 sensitivity, and 0.72 specificity for classifying PDGFRA; 0.80 accuracy, 0.78 sensitivity, and 0.83 specificity for classifying PTEN; these results significantly outperformed the existing ML algorithms. Using SHAP, we found that the relative contributions of the five contrast images differ between genes, which are consistent with findings in the literature. The prediction maps revealed extensive intra-tumoral region-to-region heterogeneity within each individual tumor in terms of the alteration status of the three genes. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated the feasibility of using MRI and WSO-SVM to enable non-invasive prediction of intra-tumoral regional genetic alteration for each GBM patient, which can inform future adaptive therapies for individualized oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lujia Wang
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Hairong Wang
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Fulvio D’Angelo
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Lee Curtin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Christopher P. Sereduk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Gustavo De Leon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kyle W. Singleton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Javier Urcuyo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Pamela R. Jackson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Chandan Krishna
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Richard S. Zimmerman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Devi P. Patra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Bernard R. Bendok
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kris A. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute—St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Peter Nakaji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute—St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kliment Donev
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Leslie C. Baxter
- Department of Neuropsychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Maciej M. Mrugała
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Michele Ceccarelli
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Iavarone
- Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, United States of America
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Nhan L. Tran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jing Li
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hu LS, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Knutsson L, Rapalino O, Galldiks N, Sundgrene PC, Cha S. Advanced Imaging in the Diagnosis and Response Assessment of High-Grade Glioma: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024. [PMID: 38477525 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.30612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
This AJR Expert Panel Narrative explores the current status of advanced MRI and PET techniques for the post-therapeutic response assessment of high-grade adult-type gliomas, focusing on ongoing clinical controversies in current practice. Discussed techniques that complement conventional MRI and aid the differentiation of recurrent tumor from post-treatment effects include DWI and diffusion tensor imaging; perfusion MRI techniques including dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and arterial spin labeling; MR spectroscopy including assessment of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) concentration; glucose- and amino acid (AA)-based PET; and amide proton transfer imaging. Updated criteria for Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology are presented. Given the abundant supporting clinical evidence, the panel supports a recommendation that routine response assessment after HGG treatment should include perfusion MRI, particularly given the development of a consensus recommended DSC-MRI protocol. Although published studies support 2HG MRS and AA PET, these techniques' widespread adoption will likely require increased availability (for 2HG MRS) or increased insurance funding in the United States (for AA PET). The article concludes with a series of consensus opinions from the author panel, centered on the clinical integration of the advanced imaging techniques into posttreatment surveillance protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linda Knutsson
- F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Dept. of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
- Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pia C Sundgrene
- Institution of Clinical Sciences Lund/Radiology, Lund University, Lund Sweden
- Lund BioImaging Center, Lund University, Lud, Sweden
- Department of Medical Imaging and Function Skane University hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Soonmee Cha
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Urcuyo JC, Curtin L, Langworthy JM, De Leon G, Anderies B, Singleton KW, Hawkins-Daarud A, Jackson PR, Bond KM, Ranjbar S, Lassiter-Morris Y, Clark-Swanson KR, Paulson LE, Sereduk C, Mrugala MM, Porter AB, Baxter L, Salomao M, Donev K, Hudson M, Meyer J, Zeeshan Q, Sattur M, Patra DP, Jones BA, Rahme RJ, Neal MT, Patel N, Kouloumberis P, Turkmani AH, Lyons M, Krishna C, Zimmerman RS, Bendok BR, Tran NL, Hu LS, Swanson KR. Image-localized biopsy mapping of brain tumor heterogeneity: A single-center study protocol. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287767. [PMID: 38117803 PMCID: PMC10732423 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain cancers pose a novel set of difficulties due to the limited accessibility of human brain tumor tissue. For this reason, clinical decision-making relies heavily on MR imaging interpretation, yet the mapping between MRI features and underlying biology remains ambiguous. Standard (clinical) tissue sampling fails to capture the full heterogeneity of the disease. Biopsies are required to obtain a pathological diagnosis and are predominantly taken from the tumor core, which often has different traits to the surrounding invasive tumor that typically leads to recurrent disease. One approach to solving this issue is to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of molecular, genetic, and cellular features of glioma through the intraoperative collection of multiple image-localized biopsy samples paired with multi-parametric MRIs. We have adopted this approach and are currently actively enrolling patients for our 'Image-Based Mapping of Brain Tumors' study. Patients are eligible for this research study (IRB #16-002424) if they are 18 years or older and undergoing surgical intervention for a brain lesion. Once identified, candidate patients receive dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), in addition to standard sequences (T1, T1Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR) at their presurgical scan. During surgery, sample anatomical locations are tracked using neuronavigation. The collected specimens from this research study are used to capture the intra-tumoral heterogeneity across brain tumors including quantification of genetic aberrations through whole-exome and RNA sequencing as well as other tissue analysis techniques. To date, these data (made available through a public portal) have been used to generate, test, and validate predictive regional maps of the spatial distribution of tumor cell density and/or treatment-related key genetic marker status to identify biopsy and/or treatment targets based on insight from the entire tumor makeup. This type of methodology, when delivered within clinically feasible time frames, has the potential to further inform medical decision-making by improving surgical intervention, radiation, and targeted drug therapy for patients with glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier C Urcuyo
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Lee Curtin
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jazlynn M. Langworthy
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Gustavo De Leon
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Barrett Anderies
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kyle W. Singleton
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Pamela R. Jackson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kamila M. Bond
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Sara Ranjbar
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Yvette Lassiter-Morris
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kamala R. Clark-Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Lisa E. Paulson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Chris Sereduk
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Maciej M. Mrugala
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Alyx B. Porter
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Leslie Baxter
- Department of Neurophysiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Marcela Salomao
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kliment Donev
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Miles Hudson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jenna Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Qazi Zeeshan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Mithun Sattur
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Devi P. Patra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Breck A. Jones
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Rudy J. Rahme
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Matthew T. Neal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Naresh Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Pelagia Kouloumberis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Ali H. Turkmani
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Mark Lyons
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Chandan Krishna
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Richard S. Zimmerman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Bernard R. Bendok
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Nhan L. Tran
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lewis EM, Mao L, Wang L, Swanson KR, Barajas RF, Li J, Tran NL, Hu LS, Plaisier CL. Revealing the biology behind MRI signatures in high grade glioma. medRxiv 2023:2023.12.08.23299733. [PMID: 38168377 PMCID: PMC10760280 DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.08.23299733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements are routinely collected during the treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) to characterize tumor boundaries and guide surgical tumor resection. Using spatially matched MRI and transcriptomics we discovered HGG tumor biology captured by MRI measurements. We strategically overlaid the spatially matched omics characterizations onto a pre-existing transcriptional map of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) to enhance the robustness of our analyses. We discovered that T1+C measurements, designed to capture vasculature and blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown and subsequent contrast extravasation, also indirectly reveal immune cell infiltration. The disruption of the vasculature and BBB within the tumor creates a permissive infiltrative environment that enables the transmigration of anti-inflammatory macrophages into tumors. These relationships were validated through histology and enrichment of genes associated with immune cell transmigration and proliferation. Additionally, T2-weighted (T2W) and mean diffusivity (MD) measurements were associated with angiogenesis and validated using histology and enrichment of genes involved in neovascularization. Furthermore, we establish an unbiased approach for identifying additional linkages between MRI measurements and tumor biology in future studies, particularly with the integration of novel MRI techniques. Lastly, we illustrated how noninvasive MRI can be used to map HGG biology spatially across a tumor, and this provides a platform to develop diagnostics, prognostics, or treatment efficacy biomarkers to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika M Lewis
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Lingchao Mao
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - Lujia Wang
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Ramon F Barajas
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Sciences University, USA
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Sciences University, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Sciences University, USA
| | - Jing Li
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - Nhan L Tran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Christopher L Plaisier
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bond KM, Curtin L, Ranjbar S, Afshari AE, Hu LS, Rubin JB, Swanson KR. An image-based modeling framework for predicting spatiotemporal brain cancer biology within individual patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1185738. [PMID: 37849813 PMCID: PMC10578440 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1185738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging is central to the clinical surveillance of brain tumors yet it provides limited insight into a tumor's underlying biology. Machine learning and other mathematical modeling approaches can leverage paired magnetic resonance images and image-localized tissue samples to predict almost any characteristic of a tumor. Image-based modeling takes advantage of the spatial resolution of routine clinical scans and can be applied to measure biological differences within a tumor, changes over time, as well as the variance between patients. This approach is non-invasive and circumvents the intrinsic challenges of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity that have historically hindered the complete assessment of tumor biology and treatment responsiveness. It can also reveal tumor characteristics that may guide both surgical and medical decision-making in real-time. Here we describe a general framework for the acquisition of image-localized biopsies and the construction of spatiotemporal radiomics models, as well as case examples of how this approach may be used to address clinically relevant questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamila M. Bond
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
- Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurosurgery, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lee Curtin
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Sara Ranjbar
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Ariana E. Afshari
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Joshua B. Rubin
- Departments of Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu LS, D'Angelo F, Weiskittel TM, Caruso FP, Fortin Ensign SP, Blomquist MR, Flick MJ, Wang L, Sereduk CP, Meng-Lin K, De Leon G, Nespodzany A, Urcuyo JC, Gonzales AC, Curtin L, Lewis EM, Singleton KW, Dondlinger T, Anil A, Semmineh NB, Noviello T, Patel RA, Wang P, Wang J, Eschbacher JM, Hawkins-Daarud A, Jackson PR, Grunfeld IS, Elrod C, Mazza GL, McGee SC, Paulson L, Clark-Swanson K, Lassiter-Morris Y, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Bendok BR, Zimmerman RS, Krishna C, Patra DP, Patel NP, Lyons M, Neal M, Donev K, Mrugala MM, Porter AB, Beeman SC, Jensen TR, Schmainda KM, Zhou Y, Baxter LC, Plaisier CL, Li J, Li H, Lasorella A, Quarles CC, Swanson KR, Ceccarelli M, Iavarone A, Tran NL. Integrated molecular and multiparametric MRI mapping of high-grade glioma identifies regional biologic signatures. Nat Commun 2023; 14:6066. [PMID: 37770427 PMCID: PMC10539500 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41559-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Sampling restrictions have hindered the comprehensive study of invasive non-enhancing (NE) high-grade glioma (HGG) cell populations driving tumor progression. Here, we present an integrated multi-omic analysis of spatially matched molecular and multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) profiling across 313 multi-regional tumor biopsies, including 111 from the NE, across 68 HGG patients. Whole exome and RNA sequencing uncover unique genomic alterations to unresectable invasive NE tumor, including subclonal events, which inform genomic models predictive of geographic evolution. Infiltrative NE tumor is alternatively enriched with tumor cells exhibiting neuronal or glycolytic/plurimetabolic cellular states, two principal transcriptomic pathway-based glioma subtypes, which respectively demonstrate abundant private mutations or enrichment in immune cell signatures. These NE phenotypes are non-invasively identified through normalized K2 imaging signatures, which discern cell size heterogeneity on dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI. NE tumor populations predicted to display increased cellular proliferation by mean diffusivity (MD) MRI metrics are uniquely associated with EGFR amplification and CDKN2A homozygous deletion. The biophysical mapping of infiltrative HGG potentially enables the clinical recognition of tumor subpopulations with aggressive molecular signatures driving tumor progression, thereby informing precision medicine targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
| | - Fulvio D'Angelo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Taylor M Weiskittel
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Francesca P Caruso
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples, "Federico II", I-80128, Naples, Italy
- BIOGEM Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, I-83031, Ariano Irpino, Italy
| | - Shannon P Fortin Ensign
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Mylan R Blomquist
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Matthew J Flick
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Lujia Wang
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christopher P Sereduk
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Kevin Meng-Lin
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gustavo De Leon
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Ashley Nespodzany
- Department of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Dignity Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Javier C Urcuyo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Ashlyn C Gonzales
- Department of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Dignity Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Lee Curtin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Erika M Lewis
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Kyle W Singleton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Aliya Anil
- Department of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Dignity Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Natenael B Semmineh
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Teresa Noviello
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples, "Federico II", I-80128, Naples, Italy
- BIOGEM Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, I-83031, Ariano Irpino, Italy
| | - Reyna A Patel
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Panwen Wang
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Junwen Wang
- Division of Applied Oral Sciences & Community Dental Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jennifer M Eschbacher
- Department of Neuropathology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Dignity Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Pamela R Jackson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Itamar S Grunfeld
- Department of Psychology, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Gina L Mazza
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Sam C McGee
- Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Lisa Paulson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Kris A Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Dignity Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Peter Nakaji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Banner University Medical Center, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Bernard R Bendok
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Richard S Zimmerman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Chandan Krishna
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Devi P Patra
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Naresh P Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Mark Lyons
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Matthew Neal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Kliment Donev
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Scott C Beeman
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | | | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- Departments of Biophysics and Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Yuxiang Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Leslie C Baxter
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, AZ, USA
| | - Christopher L Plaisier
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Jing Li
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hu Li
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anna Lasorella
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Michele Ceccarelli
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Antonio Iavarone
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Nhan L Tran
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shiroishi MS, Weinert D, Cen SY, Varghese B, Dondlinger T, Prah M, Mendoza J, Nazemi S, Ameli N, Amini N, Shohas S, Chen S, Bigjahan B, Zada G, Chen T, Neman-Ebrahim J, Chang EL, Chow FE, Fan Z, Yang W, Attenello FJ, Ye J, Kim PE, Patel VN, Lerner A, Acharya J, Hu LS, Quarles CC, Boxerman JL, Wu O, Schmainda KM. A cross-sectional study to test equivalence of low- versus intermediate-flip angle dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume in patients with high-grade gliomas at 1.5 Tesla field strength. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1156843. [PMID: 37799462 PMCID: PMC10548232 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1156843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction 1.5 Tesla (1.5T) remain a significant field strength for brain imaging worldwide. Recent computer simulations and clinical studies at 3T MRI have suggested that dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI using a 30° flip angle ("low-FA") with model-based leakage correction and no gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) preload provides equivalent relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements to the reference-standard acquisition using a single-dose GBCA preload with a 60° flip angle ("intermediate-FA") and model-based leakage correction. However, it remains unclear whether this holds true at 1.5T. The purpose of this study was to test this at 1.5T in human high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. Methods This was a single-institution cross-sectional study of patients who had undergone 1.5T MRI for HGG. DSC-MRI consisted of gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) with a low-FA without preload (30°/P-); this then subsequently served as a preload for the standard intermediate-FA acquisition (60°/P+). Both normalized (nrCBV) and standardized relative cerebral blood volumes (srCBV) were calculated using model-based leakage correction (C+) with IBNeuro™ software. Whole-enhancing lesion mean and median nrCBV and srCBV from the low- and intermediate-FA methods were compared using the Pearson's, Spearman's and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results Twenty-three HGG patients composing a total of 31 scans were analyzed. The Pearson and Spearman correlations and ICCs between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ acquisitions demonstrated high correlations for both mean and median nrCBV and srCBV. Conclusion Our study provides preliminary evidence that for HGG patients at 1.5T MRI, a low FA, no preload DSC-MRI acquisition can be an appealing alternative to the reference standard higher FA acquisition that utilizes a preload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S. Shiroishi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Imaging Genetics Center, USC Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, United States
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Dane Weinert
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Steven Y. Cen
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bino Varghese
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Melissa Prah
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Jesse Mendoza
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sina Nazemi
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nima Ameli
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Negin Amini
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Salman Shohas
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shannon Chen
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bavrina Bigjahan
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Gabriel Zada
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Thomas Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Josh Neman-Ebrahim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Eric L. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Frances E. Chow
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Zhaoyang Fan
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Wensha Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Frank J. Attenello
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jason Ye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Paul E. Kim
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Vishal N. Patel
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | - Alexander Lerner
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jay Acharya
- Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jerrold L. Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Ona Wu
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bond KM, Curtin L, Hawkins-Daarud A, Urcuyo JC, De Leon G, Singleton KW, Afshari AE, Paulson LE, Sereduk CP, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Baxter LC, Patra DP, Gustafson MP, Dietz AB, Zimmerman RS, Bendok BR, Tran NL, Hu LS, Parney IF, Rubin JB, Swanson KR. Image-based models of T-cell distribution identify a clinically meaningful response to a dendritic cell vaccine in patients with glioblastoma. medRxiv 2023:2023.07.13.23292619. [PMID: 37503239 PMCID: PMC10370220 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.13.23292619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is an extraordinarily heterogeneous tumor, yet the current treatment paradigm is a "one size fits all" approach. Hundreds of glioblastoma clinical trials have been deemed failures because they did not extend median survival, but these cohorts are comprised of patients with diverse tumors. Current methods of assessing treatment efficacy fail to fully account for this heterogeneity. METHODS Using an image-based modeling approach, we predicted T-cell abundance from serial MRIs of patients enrolled in the dendritic cell (DC) vaccine clinical trial. T-cell predictions were quantified in both the contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions of the imageable tumor, and changes over time were assessed. RESULTS A subset of patients in a DC vaccine clinical trial, who had previously gone undetected, were identified as treatment responsive and benefited from prolonged survival. A mere two months after initial vaccine administration, responsive patients had a decrease in model-predicted T-cells within the contrast-enhancing region, with a simultaneous increase in the T2/FLAIR region. CONCLUSIONS In a field that has yet to see breakthrough therapies, these results highlight the value of machine learning in enhancing clinical trial assessment, improving our ability to prospectively prognosticate patient outcomes, and advancing the pursuit towards individualized medicine.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferreri AJM, Calimeri T, Cwynarski K, Dietrich J, Grommes C, Hoang-Xuan K, Hu LS, Illerhaus G, Nayak L, Ponzoni M, Batchelor TT. Primary central nervous system lymphoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2023; 9:29. [PMID: 37322012 PMCID: PMC10637780 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-023-00439-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a diffuse large B cell lymphoma in which the brain, spinal cord, leptomeninges and/or eyes are exclusive sites of disease. Pathophysiology is incompletely understood, although a central role seems to comprise immunoglobulins binding to self-proteins expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and alterations of genes involved in B cell receptor, Toll-like receptor and NF-κB signalling. Other factors such as T cells, macrophages or microglia, endothelial cells, chemokines, and interleukins, probably also have important roles. Clinical presentation varies depending on the involved regions of the CNS. Standard of care includes methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by age-tailored thiotepa-based conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation and, in patients unsuitable for such treatment, consolidation with whole-brain radiotherapy or single-drug maintenance. Personalized treatment, primary radiotherapy and only supportive care should be considered in unfit, frail patients. Despite available treatments, 15-25% of patients do not respond to chemotherapy and 25-50% relapse after initial response. Relapse rates are higher in older patients, although the prognosis of patients experiencing relapse is poor independent of age. Further research is needed to identify diagnostic biomarkers, treatments with higher efficacy and less neurotoxicity, strategies to improve the penetration of drugs into the CNS, and roles of other therapies such as immunotherapies and adoptive cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Teresa Calimeri
- Lymphoma Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Kate Cwynarski
- Department of Haematology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Cancer and Neurotoxicity Clinic and Brain Repair Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian Grommes
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Khê Hoang-Xuan
- APHP, Groupe Hospitalier Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, IHU, ICM, Service de Neurologie 2, Paris, France
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Clinic of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Lakshmi Nayak
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maurilio Ponzoni
- Pathology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Ateneo Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Turcotte EL, Jones BA, Chhabra N, Porter AB, Donev K, Hu LS, Bendok BR. Awake Microsurgical Resection of a Motor Cortex Glioma With Cortical and Subcortical Motor Mapping, Image Guidance, and Augmented Reality: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 24:e122. [PMID: 36637320 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn L Turcotte
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Precision Neuro-therapeutics Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Neurosurgery Simulation and Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Breck A Jones
- Neurosurgery Simulation and Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Division of Neurosurgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Nikita Chhabra
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Kliment Donev
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Bernard R Bendok
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Precision Neuro-therapeutics Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Neurosurgery Simulation and Innovation Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anil A, Stokes AM, Chao R, Hu LS, Alhilali L, Karis JP, Bell LC, Quarles CC. Identification of single-dose, dual-echo based CBV threshold for fractional tumor burden mapping in recurrent glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1046629. [PMID: 36733305 PMCID: PMC9887158 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1046629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is widely used to distinguish high grade glioma recurrence from post treatment radiation effects (PTRE). Application of rCBV thresholds yield maps to distinguish between regional tumor burden and PTRE, a biomarker termed the fractional tumor burden (FTB). FTB is generally measured using conventional double-dose, single-echo DSC-MRI protocols; recently, a single-dose, dual-echo DSC-MRI protocol was clinically validated by direct comparison to the conventional double-dose, single-echo protocol. As the single-dose, dual-echo acquisition enables reduction in the contrast agent dose and provides greater pulse sequence parameter flexibility, there is a compelling need to establish dual-echo DSC-MRI based FTB mapping. In this study, we determine the optimum standardized rCBV threshold for the single-dose, dual-echo protocol to generate FTB maps that best match those derived from the reference standard, double-dose, single-echo protocol. Methods The study consisted of 23 high grade glioma patients undergoing perfusion scans to confirm suspected tumor recurrence. We sequentially acquired single dose, dual-echo and double dose, single-echo DSC-MRI data. For both protocols, we generated leakage-corrected standardized rCBV maps. Standardized rCBV (sRCBV) thresholds of 1.0 and 1.75 were used to compute single-echo FTB maps as the reference for delineating PTRE (sRCBV < 1.0), tumor with moderate angiogenesis (1.0 < sRCBV < 1.75), and tumor with high angiogenesis (sRCBV > 1.75) regions. To assess the sRCBV agreement between acquisition protocols, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was computed between the mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimum dual-echo sRCBV threshold. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared between the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) and the standard reference threshold (1.75) for the dual-echo sRCBV threshold. Results The mean tumor sRCBV values across the patients showed a strong correlation (CCC = 0.96) between the two protocols. The ROC analysis showed maximum accuracy at thresholds of 1.0 (delineate PTRE from tumor) and 1.64 (differentiate aggressive tumors). The reference threshold (1.75) and the obtained optimized threshold (1.64) yielded similar accuracy, with slight differences in sensitivity and specificity which were not statistically significant (1.75 threshold: Sensitivity = 81.94%; Specificity: 87.23%; Accuracy: 84.58% and 1.64 threshold: Sensitivity = 84.48%; Specificity: 84.97%; Accuracy: 84.73%). Conclusions The optimal sRCBV threshold for single-dose, dual-echo protocol was found to be 1.0 and 1.64 for distinguishing tumor recurrence from PTRE; however, minimal differences were observed when using the standard threshold (1.75) as the upper threshold, suggesting that the standard threshold could be used for both protocols. While the prior study validated the agreement of the mean sRCBV values between the protocols, this study confirmed that their voxel-wise agreement is suitable for reliable FTB mapping. Dual-echo DSC-MRI acquisitions enable robust single-dose sRCBV and FTB mapping, provide pulse sequence parameter flexibility and should improve reproducibility by mitigating variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliya Anil
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Ashley M. Stokes
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Renee Chao
- Division of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neuroimaging Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Lea Alhilali
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - John P. Karis
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Laura C. Bell
- Early Clinical Development, Genentech, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Cancer System Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,*Correspondence: C. Chad Quarles,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aizer AA, Lamba N, Ahluwalia MS, Aldape K, Boire A, Brastianos PK, Brown PD, Camidge DR, Chiang VL, Davies MA, Hu LS, Huang RY, Kaufmann T, Kumthekar P, Lam K, Lee EQ, Lin NU, Mehta M, Parsons M, Reardon DA, Sheehan J, Soffietti R, Tawbi H, Weller M, Wen PY. Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1613-1646. [PMID: 35762249 PMCID: PMC9527527 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayal A Aizer
- Corresponding Author: Dr. Ayal A. Aizer, MD/MHS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA ()
| | | | | | - Kenneth Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Neuro-Oncology and Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keng Lam
- Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Parsons
- Departments of Oncology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang L, Hawkins-Daarud A, Swanson KR, Hu LS, Li J. Knowledge-infused Global-Local Data Fusion for Spatial Predictive Modeling in Precision Medicine. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2022; 19:2203-2215. [PMID: 37700873 PMCID: PMC10497221 DOI: 10.1109/tase.2021.3076117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
The automated capability of generating spatial prediction for a variable of interest is desirable in various science and engineering domains. Take Precision Medicine of cancer as an example, in which the goal is to match patients with treatments based on molecular markers identified in each patient's tumor. A substantial challenge, however, is that the molecular markers can vary significantly at different spatial locations of a tumor. If this spatial distribution could be predicted, the precision of cancer treatment could be greatly improved by adapting treatment to the spatial molecular heterogeneity. This is a challenging task because no technology is available to measure the molecular markers at each spatial location within a tumor. Biopsy samples provide direct measurement, but they are scarce/local. Imaging, such as MRI, is global, but it only provides proxy/indirect measurement. Also available are mechanistic models or domain knowledge, which are often approximate or incomplete. This paper proposes a novel machine learning framework to fuse the three sources of data/information to generate spatial prediction, namely the knowledge-infused global-local data fusion (KGL) model. A novel mathematical formulation is proposed and solved with theoretical study. We present a real-data application of predicting the spatial distribution of Tumor Cell Density (TCD)-an important molecular marker for brain cancer. A total of 82 biopsy samples were acquired from 18 patients with glioblastoma, together with 6 MRI contrast images from each patient and biological knowledge encoded by a PDE simulator-based mechanistic model called Proliferation-Invasion (PI). KGL achieved the highest prediction accuracy and minimum prediction uncertainty compared with a variety of competing methods. The result has important implications for providing individualized, spatially-optimized treatment for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lujia Wang
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab in the Department of Neurosurgery at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab in the Department of Neurosurgery at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
| | - Jing Li
- H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ranjbar S, Singleton KW, Curtin L, Rickertsen CR, Paulson LE, Hu LS, Mitchell JR, Swanson KR. Weakly Supervised Skull Stripping of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Tumor Patients. Front Neuroimaging 2022; 1:832512. [PMID: 37555156 PMCID: PMC10406204 DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.832512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Automatic brain tumor segmentation is particularly challenging on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with marked pathologies, such as brain tumors, which usually cause large displacement, abnormal appearance, and deformation of brain tissue. Despite an abundance of previous literature on learning-based methodologies for MRI segmentation, few works have focused on tackling MRI skull stripping of brain tumor patient data. This gap in literature can be associated with the lack of publicly available data (due to concerns about patient identification) and the labor-intensive nature of generating ground truth labels for model training. In this retrospective study, we assessed the performance of Dense-Vnet in skull stripping brain tumor patient MRI trained on our large multi-institutional brain tumor patient dataset. Our data included pretreatment MRI of 668 patients from our in-house institutional review board-approved multi-institutional brain tumor repository. Because of the absence of ground truth, we used imperfect automatically generated training labels using SPM12 software. We trained the network using common MRI sequences in oncology: T1-weighted with gadolinium contrast, T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, or both. We measured model performance against 30 independent brain tumor test cases with available manual brain masks. All images were harmonized for voxel spacing and volumetric dimensions before model training. Model training was performed using the modularly structured deep learning platform NiftyNet that is tailored toward simplifying medical image analysis. Our proposed approach showed the success of a weakly supervised deep learning approach in MRI brain extraction even in the presence of pathology. Our best model achieved an average Dice score, sensitivity, and specificity of, respectively, 94.5, 96.4, and 98.5% on the multi-institutional independent brain tumor test set. To further contextualize our results within existing literature on healthy brain segmentation, we tested the model against healthy subjects from the benchmark LBPA40 dataset. For this dataset, the model achieved an average Dice score, sensitivity, and specificity of 96.2, 96.6, and 99.2%, which are, although comparable to other publications, slightly lower than the performance of models trained on healthy patients. We associate this drop in performance with the use of brain tumor data for model training and its influence on brain appearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ranjbar
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Kyle W. Singleton
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Lee Curtin
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Cassandra R. Rickertsen
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Lisa E. Paulson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Joseph Ross Mitchell
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry and the Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Provincial Clinical Excellence Portfolio, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Malik DG, Rath TJ, Urcuyo Acevedo JC, Canoll PD, Swanson KR, Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Schmainda KM, Burns TC, Hu LS. Advanced MRI Protocols to Discriminate Glioma From Treatment Effects: State of the Art and Future Directions. Front Radiol 2022; 2:809373. [PMID: 37492687 PMCID: PMC10365126 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2022.809373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
In the follow-up treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGGs), differentiating true tumor progression from treatment-related effects, such as pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis, presents an ongoing clinical challenge. Conventional MRI with and without intravenous contrast serves as the clinical benchmark for the posttreatment surveillance imaging of HGG. However, many advanced imaging techniques have shown promise in helping better delineate the findings in indeterminate scenarios, as posttreatment effects can often mimic true tumor progression on conventional imaging. These challenges are further confounded by the histologic admixture that can commonly occur between tumor growth and treatment-related effects within the posttreatment bed. This review discusses the current practices in the surveillance imaging of HGG and the role of advanced imaging techniques, including perfusion MRI and metabolic MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dania G. Malik
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Tanya J. Rath
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Javier C. Urcuyo Acevedo
- Mathematical Neurooncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Peter D. Canoll
- Departments of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical Neurooncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Jerrold L. Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research & Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurologic Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics & Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Terry C. Burns
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery and Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
- Mathematical Neurooncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Curtin L, Whitmire P, White H, Bond KM, Mrugala MM, Hu LS, Swanson KR. Shape matters: morphological metrics of glioblastoma imaging abnormalities as biomarkers of prognosis. Sci Rep 2021; 11:23202. [PMID: 34853344 PMCID: PMC8636508 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02495-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Lacunarity, a quantitative morphological measure of how shapes fill space, and fractal dimension, a morphological measure of the complexity of pixel arrangement, have shown relationships with outcome across a variety of cancers. However, the application of these metrics to glioblastoma (GBM), a very aggressive primary brain tumor, has not been fully explored. In this project, we computed lacunarity and fractal dimension values for GBM-induced abnormalities on clinically standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In our patient cohort (n = 402), we connect these morphological metrics calculated on pretreatment MRI with the survival of patients with GBM. We calculated lacunarity and fractal dimension on necrotic regions (n = 390), all abnormalities present on T1Gd MRI (n = 402), and abnormalities present on T2/FLAIR MRI (n = 257). We also explored the relationship between these metrics and age at diagnosis, as well as abnormality volume. We found statistically significant relationships to outcome for all three imaging regions that we tested, with the shape of T2/FLAIR abnormalities that are typically associated with edema showing the strongest relationship with overall survival. This link between morphological and survival metrics could be driven by underlying biological phenomena, tumor location or microenvironmental factors that should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Curtin
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| | - Paula Whitmire
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Haylye White
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Kamila M Bond
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stokes AM, Bergamino M, Alhilali L, Hu LS, Karis JP, Baxter LC, Bell LC, Quarles CC. Evaluation of single bolus, dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocols in brain tumor patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021; 41:3378-3390. [PMID: 34415211 PMCID: PMC8669280 DOI: 10.1177/0271678x211039597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) obtained from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI is adversely impacted by contrast agent leakage in brain tumors. Using simulations, we previously demonstrated that multi-echo DSC-MRI protocols provide improvements in contrast agent dosing, pulse sequence flexibility, and rCBV accuracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the in-vivo performance of dual-echo acquisitions in patients with brain tumors (n = 59). To verify pulse sequence flexibility, four single-dose dual-echo acquisitions were tested with variations in contrast agent dose, flip angle, and repetition time, and the resulting dual-echo rCBV was compared to standard single-echo rCBV obtained with preload (double-dose). Dual-echo rCBV was comparable to standard double-dose single-echo protocols (mean (standard deviation) tumor rCBV 2.17 (1.28) vs. 2.06 (1.20), respectively). High rCBV similarity was observed (CCC = 0.96), which was maintained across both flip angle (CCC = 0.98) and repetition time (CCC = 0.96) permutations, demonstrating that dual-echo acquisitions provide flexibility in acquisition parameters. Furthermore, a single dual-echo acquisition was shown to enable quantification of both perfusion and permeability metrics. In conclusion, single-dose dual-echo acquisitions provide similar rCBV to standard double-dose single-echo acquisitions, suggesting contrast agent dose can be reduced while providing significant pulse sequence flexibility and complementary tumor perfusion and permeability metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M Stokes
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Maurizio Bergamino
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Lea Alhilali
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - John P Karis
- Neuroradiology, Southwest Neuroimaging at Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Leslie C Baxter
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Laura C Bell
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Ambady
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute Translational Oncology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Letterio S. Politi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Neuroradiology Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Anzalone
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ramon F. Barajas
- Knight Cancer Institute Translational Oncology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barajas RF, Politi LS, Anzalone N, Schöder H, Fox CP, Boxerman JL, Kaufmann TJ, Quarles CC, Ellingson BM, Auer D, Andronesi OC, Ferreri AJM, Mrugala MM, Grommes C, Neuwelt EA, Ambady P, Rubenstein JL, Illerhaus G, Nagane M, Batchelor TT, Hu LS. Consensus recommendations for MRI and PET imaging of primary central nervous system lymphoma: guideline statement from the International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative Group (IPCG). Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:1056-1071. [PMID: 33560416 PMCID: PMC8248856 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Advanced molecular and pathophysiologic characterization of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) has revealed insights into promising targeted therapeutic approaches. Medical imaging plays a fundamental role in PCNSL diagnosis, staging, and response assessment. Institutional imaging variation and inconsistent clinical trial reporting diminishes the reliability and reproducibility of clinical response assessment. In this context, we aimed to: (1) critically review the use of advanced positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of PCNSL; (2) provide results from an international survey of clinical sites describing the current practices for routine and advanced imaging, and (3) provide biologically based recommendations from the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) on adaptation of standardized imaging practices. The IPCG provides PET and MRI consensus recommendations built upon previous recommendations for standardized brain tumor imaging protocols (BTIP) in primary and metastatic disease. A biologically integrated approach is provided to addresses the unique challenges associated with the imaging assessment of PCNSL. Detailed imaging parameters facilitate the adoption of these recommendations by researchers and clinicians. To enhance clinical feasibility, we have developed both “ideal” and “minimum standard” protocols at 3T and 1.5T MR systems that will facilitate widespread adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon F Barajas
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Section, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Oregon, USA.,Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Knight Cancer Institute Translational Oncology Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Letterio S Politi
- Humanitas University and Humanitas Research and Clinical Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicoletta Anzalone
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christopher P Fox
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | - C Chad Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research & Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Departments of Radiological Sciences and Psychiatry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Dorothee Auer
- Versus Arthritis Pain Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ovidiu C Andronesi
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andres J M Ferreri
- Lymphoma Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.,Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Christian Grommes
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edward A Neuwelt
- Blood-Brain Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Prakash Ambady
- Blood-Brain Barrier Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - James L Rubenstein
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Clinic of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Motoo Nagane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tomblinson CM, Fletcher GP, Hu LS, Mi L, Howard BE, Nagel TH, Hinni ML, Hoxworth JM. Determination of posterolateral oropharyngeal wall thickness and the potential implications for transoral surgical margins in tonsil cancer. Head Neck 2021; 43:2185-2192. [PMID: 33780072 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Margins in transoral surgery for tonsil cancer can be limited by oropharyngeal wall thickness (OWT), but the normal range is not well established. METHODS In 240 noncancer subjects, OWT was measured bilaterally in the vicinity of the tonsils with MRI. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for interaction of age, sex, location, and obesity. RESULTS Mean(SD) OWT measured 3.4(0.6) mm posteriorly, 3.7(2.0) mm between the styloglossus and stylopharyngeus, and 5.3(0.8) mm laterally. OWT was greater in men, correlated with obesity, decreased posteriorly and laterally in the 60-80 versus 40-59 year age groups, and increased when styloglossus/stylopharyngeus were closer. OWT was <5 mm in 36.7%-97.9% of locations, with the largest percentage below this threshold located posteriorly. CONCLUSIONS OWT is frequently <5 mm, particularly in the posterior and intermuscular areas, suggesting that a smaller surgical margin may need to be accepted in transoral tonsil cancer surgery for anatomic reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Lanyu Mi
- Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Thomas H Nagel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Michael L Hinni
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hu LS, Wang L, Hawkins-Daarud A, Eschbacher JM, Singleton KW, Jackson PR, Clark-Swanson K, Sereduk CP, Peng S, Wang P, Wang J, Baxter LC, Smith KA, Mazza GL, Stokes AM, Bendok BR, Zimmerman RS, Krishna C, Porter AB, Mrugala MM, Hoxworth JM, Wu T, Tran NL, Swanson KR, Li J. Uncertainty quantification in the radiogenomics modeling of EGFR amplification in glioblastoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3932. [PMID: 33594116 PMCID: PMC7886858 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83141-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiogenomics uses machine-learning (ML) to directly connect the morphologic and physiological appearance of tumors on clinical imaging with underlying genomic features. Despite extensive growth in the area of radiogenomics across many cancers, and its potential role in advancing clinical decision making, no published studies have directly addressed uncertainty in these model predictions. We developed a radiogenomics ML model to quantify uncertainty using transductive Gaussian Processes (GP) and a unique dataset of 95 image-localized biopsies with spatially matched MRI from 25 untreated Glioblastoma (GBM) patients. The model generated predictions for regional EGFR amplification status (a common and important target in GBM) to resolve the intratumoral genetic heterogeneity across each individual tumor-a key factor for future personalized therapeutic paradigms. The model used probability distributions for each sample prediction to quantify uncertainty, and used transductive learning to reduce the overall uncertainty. We compared predictive accuracy and uncertainty of the transductive learning GP model against a standard GP model using leave-one-patient-out cross validation. Additionally, we used a separate dataset containing 24 image-localized biopsies from 7 high-grade glioma patients to validate the model. Predictive uncertainty informed the likelihood of achieving an accurate sample prediction. When stratifying predictions based on uncertainty, we observed substantially higher performance in the group cohort (75% accuracy, n = 95) and amongst sample predictions with the lowest uncertainty (83% accuracy, n = 72) compared to predictions with higher uncertainty (48% accuracy, n = 23), due largely to data interpolation (rather than extrapolation). On the separate validation set, our model achieved 78% accuracy amongst the sample predictions with lowest uncertainty. We present a novel approach to quantify radiogenomics uncertainty to enhance model performance and clinical interpretability. This should help integrate more reliable radiogenomics models for improved medical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA. .,School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA. .,Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| | - Lujia Wang
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.,Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jennifer M Eschbacher
- Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA
| | - Kyle W Singleton
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Pamela R Jackson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Kamala Clark-Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Christopher P Sereduk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Sen Peng
- Cancer and Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA
| | - Panwen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Junwen Wang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Leslie C Baxter
- Department of Neuropsychology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Kris A Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA
| | - Gina L Mazza
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Ashley M Stokes
- Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute-St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA
| | - Bernard R Bendok
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Richard S Zimmerman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Chandan Krishna
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Joseph M Hoxworth
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Teresa Wu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Nhan L Tran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E. Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.,Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hu LS, Brat DJ, Bloch O, Ramkissoon S, Lesser GJ. The Practical Application of Emerging Technologies Influencing the Diagnosis and Care of Patients With Primary Brain Tumors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2020; 40:1-12. [PMID: 32324425 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_280955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, a variety of new and innovative technologies has led to important advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with primary malignant brain tumors. New approaches to surgical navigation and tumor localization, advanced imaging to define tumor biology and treatment response, and the widespread adoption of a molecularly defined integrated diagnostic paradigm that complements traditional histopathologic diagnosis continue to impact the day-to-day care of these patients. In the neuro-oncology clinic, discussions with patients about the role of tumor treating fields (TTFields) and the incorporation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data into therapeutic decision-making are now a standard practice. This article summarizes newer applications of technology influencing the pathologic, neuroimaging, neurosurgical, and medical management of patients with malignant primary brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Daniel J Brat
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Orin Bloch
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Shakti Ramkissoon
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Morrisville, NC.,Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC.,Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Curtin L, Whitmire P, Rickertsen CR, Mazza GL, Canoll P, Johnston SK, Mrugala MM, Swanson KR, Hu LS. Assessment of Prognostic Value of Cystic Features in Glioblastoma Relative to Sex and Treatment With Standard-of-Care. Front Oncol 2020; 10:580750. [PMID: 33282737 PMCID: PMC7705378 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.580750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and can have cystic components, identifiable through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Previous studies suggest that cysts occur in 7–23% of GBMs and report mixed results regarding their prognostic impact. Using our retrospective cohort of 493 patients with first-diagnosis GBM, we carried out an exploratory analysis on this potential link between cystic GBM and survival. Using pretreatment MRIs, we manually identified 88 patients with GBM that had a significant cystic component at presentation and 405 patients that did not. Patients with cystic GBM had significantly longer overall survival and were significantly younger at presentation. Within patients who received the current standard of care (SOC) (N = 184, 40 cystic), we did not observe a survival benefit of cystic GBM. Unexpectedly, we did not observe a significant survival benefit between this SOC cystic cohort and patients with cystic GBM diagnosed before the standard was established (N = 40 with SOC, N = 19 without SOC); this significant SOC benefit was clearly observed in patients with noncystic GBM (N = 144 with SOC, N = 111 without SOC). When stratified by sex, the survival benefit of cystic GBM was only preserved in male patients (N = 303, 47 cystic). We report differences in the absolute and relative sizes of imaging abnormalities on MRI and the prognostic implication of cysts based on sex. We discuss hypotheses for these differences, including the possibility that the presence of a cyst could indicate a less aggressive tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Curtin
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States
| | - Paula Whitmire
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States
| | - Cassandra R Rickertsen
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States
| | - Gina L Mazza
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States
| | - Peter Canoll
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Sandra K Johnston
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States.,Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mitchell JR, Kamnitsas K, Singleton KW, Whitmire SA, Clark-Swanson KR, Ranjbar S, Rickertsen CR, Johnston SK, Egan KM, Rollison DE, Arrington J, Krecke KN, Passe TJ, Verdoorn JT, Nagelschneider AA, Carr CM, Port JD, Patton A, Campeau NG, Liebo GB, Eckel LJ, Wood CP, Hunt CH, Vibhute P, Nelson KD, Hoxworth JM, Patel AC, Chong BW, Ross JS, Boxerman JL, Vogelbaum MA, Hu LS, Glocker B, Swanson KR. Deep neural network to locate and segment brain tumors outperformed the expert technicians who created the training data. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2020; 7:055501. [PMID: 33102623 PMCID: PMC7567400 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.7.5.055501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Deep learning (DL) algorithms have shown promising results for brain tumor segmentation in MRI. However, validation is required prior to routine clinical use. We report the first randomized and blinded comparison of DL and trained technician segmentations. Approach: We compiled a multi-institutional database of 741 pretreatment MRI exams. Each contained a postcontrast T1-weighted exam, a T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery exam, and at least one technician-derived tumor segmentation. The database included 729 unique patients (470 males and 259 females). Of these exams, 641 were used for training the DL system, and 100 were reserved for testing. We developed a platform to enable qualitative, blinded, controlled assessment of lesion segmentations made by technicians and the DL method. On this platform, 20 neuroradiologists performed 400 side-by-side comparisons of segmentations on 100 test cases. They scored each segmentation between 0 (poor) and 10 (perfect). Agreement between segmentations from technicians and the DL method was also evaluated quantitatively using the Dice coefficient, which produces values between 0 (no overlap) and 1 (perfect overlap). Results: The neuroradiologists gave technician and DL segmentations mean scores of 6.97 and 7.31, respectively (p<0.00007). The DL method achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.87 on the test cases. Conclusions: This was the first objective comparison of automated and human segmentation using a blinded controlled assessment study. Our DL system learned to outperform its “human teachers” and produced output that was better, on average, than its training data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ross Mitchell
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Machine Learning, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | | | - Kyle W Singleton
- Mayo Clinic, Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Scott A Whitmire
- Mayo Clinic, Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | | | - Sara Ranjbar
- Mayo Clinic, Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | | | - Sandra K Johnston
- Mayo Clinic, Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.,University of Washington, Department of Radiology, Seattle, Washington, United States
| | - Kathleen M Egan
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Dana E Rollison
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - John Arrington
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Karl N Krecke
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Theodore J Passe
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Jared T Verdoorn
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | | | - Carrie M Carr
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - John D Port
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Alice Patton
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Norbert G Campeau
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Greta B Liebo
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Laurence J Eckel
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Christopher P Wood
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Christopher H Hunt
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Prasanna Vibhute
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Kent D Nelson
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Joseph M Hoxworth
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Ameet C Patel
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Brian W Chong
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Jerrold L Boxerman
- Rhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Leland S Hu
- Mayo Clinic, Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.,Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Ben Glocker
- Imperial College, Biomedical Image Analysis Group, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mayo Clinic, Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Phoenix, Arizona, United States.,Mayo Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Boxerman JL, Quarles CC, Hu LS, Erickson BJ, Gerstner ER, Smits M, Kaufmann TJ, Barboriak DP, Huang RH, Wick W, Weller M, Galanis E, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Shankar L, Jacobs P, Chung C, van den Bent MJ, Chang S, Al Yung WK, Cloughesy TF, Wen PY, Gilbert MR, Rosen BR, Ellingson BM, Schmainda KM. Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2020; 22:1262-1275. [PMID: 32516388 PMCID: PMC7523451 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40-50 ms at 1.5 T, 20-35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerrold L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
- Representative of the American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR)
| | - Chad C Quarles
- Department of Neuroimaging Research and Barrow Neuroimaging Innovation Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Bradley J Erickson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Elizabeth R Gerstner
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC–University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Timothy J Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Daniel P Barboriak
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Raymond H Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurooncology, National Center of Tumor Disease, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lalitha Shankar
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paula Jacobs
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Representative of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Representative of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)
| | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - W K Al Yung
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
| | - Mark R Gilbert
- Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Representative of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program and UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Departments of Radiological Sciences, Psychiatry, and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Representative of the Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC)
- Representative of the Ivy Consortium for Early Phase Clinical Trials
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
- Representative of the RSNA Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA)
- Representative of the American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR)
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
- Representative of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) Cancer Research Group
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Morris B, Curtin L, Hawkins-Daarud A, Hubbard ME, Rahman R, Smith SJ, Auer D, Tran NL, Hu LS, Eschbacher JM, Smith KA, Stokes A, Swanson KR, Owen MR. Identifying the spatial and temporal dynamics of molecularly-distinct glioblastoma sub-populations. Math Biosci Eng 2020; 17:4905-4941. [PMID: 33120534 PMCID: PMC8382158 DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2020267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most aggressive primary brain tumours and have no known cure. Each individual tumour comprises multiple sub-populations of genetically-distinct cells that may respond differently to targeted therapies and may contribute to disappointing clinical trial results. Image-localized biopsy techniques allow multiple biopsies to be taken during surgery and provide information that identifies regions where particular sub-populations occur within an individual GBM, thus providing insight into their regional genetic variability. These sub-populations may also interact with one another in a competitive or cooperative manner; it is important to ascertain the nature of these interactions, as they may have implications for responses to targeted therapies. We combine genetic information from biopsies with a mechanistic model of interacting GBM sub-populations to characterise the nature of interactions between two commonly occurring GBM sub-populations, those with EGFR and PDGFRA genes amplified. We study population levels found across image-localized biopsy data from a cohort of 25 patients and compare this to model outputs under competitive, cooperative and neutral interaction assumptions. We explore other factors affecting the observed simulated sub-populations, such as selection advantages and phylogenetic ordering of mutations, which may also contribute to the levels of EGFR and PDGFRA amplified populations observed in biopsy data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Morris
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Lee Curtin
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | | | - Matthew E. Hubbard
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Ruman Rahman
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Stuart J. Smith
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Dorothee Auer
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - Nhan L. Tran
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA
| | - Jennifer M. Eschbacher
- Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA
| | - Kris A. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA
| | - Ashley Stokes
- Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona 85054, USA
| | - Markus R. Owen
- School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bell LC, Semmineh N, An H, Eldeniz C, Wahl R, Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Wu C, Sorace AG, Yankeelov TE, Rutledge N, Chenevert TL, Malyarenko D, Liu Y, Brenner A, Hu LS, Zhou Y, Boxerman JL, Yen YF, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Beers AL, Muzi M, Madhuranthakam AJ, Pinho M, Johnson B, Quarles CC. Evaluating the Use of rCBV as a Tumor Grade and Treatment Response Classifier Across NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites: Part II of the DSC-MRI Digital Reference Object (DRO) Challenge. Tomography 2020; 6:203-208. [PMID: 32548297 PMCID: PMC7289259 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2020.00012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We have previously characterized the reproducibility of brain tumor relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) using a dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging digital reference object across 12 sites using a range of imaging protocols and software platforms. As expected, reproducibility was highest when imaging protocols and software were consistent, but decreased when they were variable. Our goal in this study was to determine the impact of rCBV reproducibility for tumor grade and treatment response classification. We found that varying imaging protocols and software platforms produced a range of optimal thresholds for both tumor grading and treatment response, but the performance of these thresholds was similar. These findings further underscore the importance of standardizing acquisition and analysis protocols across sites and software benchmarking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C. Bell
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Natenael Semmineh
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Hongyu An
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Cihat Eldeniz
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Richard Wahl
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Departments of Radiology; and
- Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | | | | | - Chengyue Wu
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Diagnostic Medicine, and Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Anna G. Sorace
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Diagnostic Medicine, and Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Neal Rutledge
- Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Diagnostic Medicine, and Oncology, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | | | | | - Yichu Liu
- UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Yuxiang Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Jerrold L. Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital and Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Yi-Fen Yen
- Department of Radiology, MGH—Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, MA
| | | | - Andrew L. Beers
- Department of Radiology, MGH—Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, MA
| | - Mark Muzi
- Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Marco Pinho
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; and
| | - Brian Johnson
- Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; and
- Philips Healthcare, Gainesville, FL
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Whitmire P, Rickertsen CR, Hawkins-Daarud A, Carrasco E, Lorence J, De Leon G, Curtin L, Bayless S, Clark-Swanson K, Peeri NC, Corpuz C, Lewis-de Los Angeles CP, Bendok BR, Gonzalez-Cuyar L, Vora S, Mrugala MM, Hu LS, Wang L, Porter A, Kumthekar P, Johnston SK, Egan KM, Gatenby R, Canoll P, Rubin JB, Swanson KR. Sex-specific impact of patterns of imageable tumor growth on survival of primary glioblastoma patients. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:447. [PMID: 32429869 PMCID: PMC7238585 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06816-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sex is recognized as a significant determinant of outcome among glioblastoma patients, but the relative prognostic importance of glioblastoma features has not been thoroughly explored for sex differences. Methods Combining multi-modal MR images, biomathematical models, and patient clinical information, this investigation assesses which pretreatment variables have a sex-specific impact on the survival of glioblastoma patients (299 males and 195 females). Results Among males, tumor (T1Gd) radius was a predictor of overall survival (HR = 1.027, p = 0.044). Among females, higher tumor cell net invasion rate was a significant detriment to overall survival (HR = 1.011, p < 0.001). Female extreme survivors had significantly smaller tumors (T1Gd) (p = 0.010 t-test), but tumor size was not correlated with female overall survival (p = 0.955 CPH). Both male and female extreme survivors had significantly lower tumor cell net proliferation rates than other patients (M p = 0.004, F p = 0.001, t-test). Conclusion Despite similar distributions of the MR imaging parameters between males and females, there was a sex-specific difference in how these parameters related to outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Whitmire
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| | - Cassandra R Rickertsen
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Eduardo Carrasco
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Julia Lorence
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Gustavo De Leon
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Lee Curtin
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,Centre for Mathematical Medicine and Biology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Spencer Bayless
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Kamala Clark-Swanson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Noah C Peeri
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Christina Corpuz
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Bernard R Bendok
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Luis Gonzalez-Cuyar
- Department of Pathology, Division of Neuropathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sujay Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alyx Porter
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology, Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sandra K Johnston
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathleen M Egan
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Robert Gatenby
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Peter Canoll
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua B Rubin
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd , SSB 02-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Massey SC, White H, Whitmire P, Doyle T, Johnston SK, Singleton KW, Jackson PR, Hawkins-Daarud A, Bendok BR, Porter AB, Vora S, Sarkaria JN, Hu LS, Mrugala MM, Swanson KR. Image-based metric of invasiveness predicts response to adjuvant temozolomide for primary glioblastoma. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230492. [PMID: 32218600 PMCID: PMC7100932 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Temozolomide (TMZ) has been the standard-of-care chemotherapy for glioblastoma (GBM) patients for more than a decade. Despite this long time in use, significant questions remain regarding how best to optimize TMZ therapy for individual patients. Understanding the relationship between TMZ response and factors such as number of adjuvant TMZ cycles, patient age, patient sex, and image–based tumor features, might help predict which GBM patients would benefit most from TMZ, particularly for those whose tumors lack O6–methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Methods and findings Using a cohort of 90 newly–diagnosed GBM patients treated according to the standard of care, we examined the relationships between several patient and tumor characteristics and volumetric and survival outcomes during adjuvant chemotherapy. Volumetric changes in MR imaging abnormalities during adjuvant therapy were used to assess TMZ response. T1Gd volumetric response is associated with younger patient age, increased number of TMZ cycles, longer time to nadir volume, and decreased tumor invasiveness. Moreover, increased adjuvant TMZ cycles corresponded with improved volumetric response only among more nodular tumors, and this volumetric response was associated with improved survival outcomes. Finally, in a subcohort of patients with known MGMT methylation status, methylated tumors were more diffusely invasive than unmethylated tumors, suggesting the improved response in nodular tumors is not driven by a preponderance of MGMT methylated tumors. Conclusions Our finding that less diffusely invasive tumors are associated with greater volumetric response to TMZ suggests patients with these tumors may benefit from additional adjuvant TMZ cycles, even for those without MGMT methylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Christine Massey
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Haylye White
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Paula Whitmire
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Tatum Doyle
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- College of Literature, Science and the Arts, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Sandra K. Johnston
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Kyle W. Singleton
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Pamela R. Jackson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Bernard R. Bendok
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT)/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Neurosurgery Simulation and Innovation Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Alyx B. Porter
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Sujay Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jann N. Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Maciej M. Mrugala
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hoxworth JM, Eschbacher JM, Gonzales AC, Singleton KW, Leon GD, Smith KA, Stokes AM, Zhou Y, Mazza GL, Porter AB, Mrugala MM, Zimmerman RS, Bendok BR, Patra DP, Krishna C, Boxerman JL, Baxter LC, Swanson KR, Quarles CC, Schmainda KM, Hu LS. Performance of Standardized Relative CBV for Quantifying Regional Histologic Tumor Burden in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: Comparison against Normalized Relative CBV Using Image-Localized Stereotactic Biopsies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41:408-415. [PMID: 32165359 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Perfusion MR imaging measures of relative CBV can distinguish recurrent tumor from posttreatment radiation effects in high-grade gliomas. Currently, relative CBV measurement requires normalization based on user-defined reference tissues. A recently proposed method of relative CBV standardization eliminates the need for user input. This study compares the predictive performance of relative CBV standardization against relative CBV normalization for quantifying recurrent tumor burden in high-grade gliomas relative to posttreatment radiation effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS We recruited 38 previously treated patients with high-grade gliomas (World Health Organization grades III or IV) undergoing surgical re-resection for new contrast-enhancing lesions concerning for recurrent tumor versus posttreatment radiation effects. We recovered 112 image-localized biopsies and quantified the percentage of histologic tumor content versus posttreatment radiation effects for each sample. We measured spatially matched normalized and standardized relative CBV metrics (mean, median) and fractional tumor burden for each biopsy. We compared relative CBV performance to predict tumor content, including the Pearson correlation (r), against histologic tumor content (0%-100%) and the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for predicting high-versus-low tumor content using binary histologic cutoffs (≥50%; ≥80% tumor). RESULTS Across relative CBV metrics, fractional tumor burden showed the highest correlations with tumor content (0%-100%) for normalized (r = 0.63, P < .001) and standardized (r = 0.66, P < .001) values. With binary cutoffs (ie, ≥50%; ≥80% tumor), predictive accuracies were similar for both standardized and normalized metrics and across relative CBV metrics. Median relative CBV achieved the highest area under the curve (normalized = 0.87, standardized = 0.86) for predicting ≥50% tumor, while fractional tumor burden achieved the highest area under the curve (normalized = 0.77, standardized = 0.80) for predicting ≥80% tumor. CONCLUSIONS Standardization of relative CBV achieves similar performance compared with normalized relative CBV and offers an important step toward workflow optimization and consensus methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Hoxworth
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| | | | | | - K W Singleton
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - G D Leon
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K A Smith
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (A.M.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - A M Stokes
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (A.M.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Y Zhou
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| | - G L Mazza
- Department of Health Sciences Research (G.L.M.), Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | | | | | - B R Bendok
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - D P Patra
- Departments of Neurosurgery (D.P.P.)
| | | | - J L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - L C Baxter
- Neuropsychology (L.C.B.), Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K R Swanson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (K.W.S., G.D.L., B.R.B., K.R.S.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - K M Schmainda
- Department of Radiology (K.M.S.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - L S Hu
- From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.H., Y.Z., L.S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hu LS, Hawkins-Daarud A, Wang L, Li J, Swanson KR. Imaging of intratumoral heterogeneity in high-grade glioma. Cancer Lett 2020; 477:97-106. [PMID: 32112907 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
High-grade glioma (HGG), and particularly Glioblastoma (GBM), can exhibit pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity that confounds clinical diagnosis and management. While conventional contrast-enhanced MRI lacks the capability to resolve this heterogeneity, advanced MRI techniques and PET imaging offer a spectrum of physiologic and biophysical image features to improve the specificity of imaging diagnoses. Published studies have shown how integrating these advanced techniques can help better define histologically distinct targets for surgical and radiation treatment planning, and help evaluate the regional heterogeneity of tumor recurrence and response assessment following standard adjuvant therapy. Application of texture analysis and machine learning (ML) algorithms has also enabled the emerging field of radiogenomics, which can spatially resolve the regional and genetically distinct subpopulations that coexist within a single GBM tumor. This review focuses on the latest advances in neuro-oncologic imaging and their clinical applications for the assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support, Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| | - Lujia Wang
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
| | - Jing Li
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Support, Services Building Suite 2-700, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Singleton KW, Porter AB, Hu LS, Johnston SK, Bond KM, Rickertsen CR, De Leon G, Whitmire SA, Clark-Swanson KR, Mrugala MM, Swanson KR. Days gained response discriminates treatment response in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab-based therapies. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:vdaa085. [PMID: 32864609 PMCID: PMC7447137 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Accurate assessments of patient response to therapy are a critical component of personalized medicine. In glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive form of brain cancer, tumor growth dynamics are heterogenous across patients, complicating assessment of treatment response. This study aimed to analyze days gained (DG), a burgeoning model-based dynamic metric, for response assessment in patients with recurrent GBM who received bevacizumab-based therapies.
Methods
DG response scores were calculated using volumetric tumor segmentations for patients receiving bevacizumab with and without concurrent cytotoxic therapy (N = 62). Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were implemented to examine DG prognostic relationship to overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the onset of treatment for recurrent GBM.
Results
In patients receiving concurrent bevacizumab and cytotoxic therapy, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significant differences in OS and PFS at DG cutoffs consistent with previously identified values from newly diagnosed GBM using T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (T1Gd). DG scores for bevacizumab monotherapy patients only approached significance for PFS. Cox regression showed that increases of 25 DG on T1Gd imaging were significantly associated with a 12.5% reduction in OS hazard for concurrent therapy patients and a 4.4% reduction in PFS hazard for bevacizumab monotherapy patients.
Conclusion
DG has significant meaning in recurrent therapy as a metric of treatment response, even in the context of anti-angiogenic therapies. This provides further evidence supporting the use of DG as an adjunct response metric that quantitatively connects treatment response and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle W Singleton
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Alyx B Porter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sandra K Johnston
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kamila M Bond
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Cassandra R Rickertsen
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Gustavo De Leon
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Scott A Whitmire
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Kamala R Clark-Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Mathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision NeuroTherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Johnston SK, Whitmire P, Massey SC, Kumthekar P, Porter AB, Raghunand N, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Mrugala MM, Hawkins-Daarud A, Jackson PR, Hu LS, Sarkaria JN, Wang L, Gatenby RA, Egan KM, Canoll P, Swanson KR. ENvironmental Dynamics Underlying Responsive Extreme Survivors (ENDURES) of Glioblastoma: A Multidisciplinary Team-based, Multifactorial Analytical Approach. Am J Clin Oncol 2019; 42:655-661. [PMID: 31343422 PMCID: PMC7416695 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Although glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal primary brain cancer with short median survival of 15 months, a small number of patients survive >5 years after diagnosis; they are known as extreme survivors (ES). Because of their rarity, very little is known about what differentiates these outliers from other patients with GBM. For the purpose of identifying unknown drivers of extreme survivorship in GBM, the ENDURES consortium (ENvironmental Dynamics Underlying Responsive Extreme Survivors of GBM) was developed. This consortium is a multicenter collaborative network of investigators focused on the integration of multiple types of clinical data and the creation of patient-specific models of tumor growth informed by radiographic and histologic parameters. Leveraging our combined resources, the goals of the ENDURES consortium are 2-fold: (1) to build a curated, searchable, multilayered repository housing clinical and outcome data on a large cohort of ES patients with GBM; and (2) to leverage the ENDURES repository for new insights into tumor behavior and novel targets for prolonging survival for all patients with GBM. In this article, the authors review the available literature and discuss what is already known about ES. The authors then describe the creation of their consortium and some preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra K. Johnston
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Paula Whitmire
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Susan Christine Massey
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Luis F. Gonzalez-Cuyar
- Department of Pathology, Neuropathology Division, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Pamela R. Jackson
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - Lei Wang
- Departments of Radiology & Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert A. Gatenby
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Peter Canoll
- Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Mathematical Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
- School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gaw N, Hawkins-Daarud A, Hu LS, Yoon H, Wang L, Xu Y, Jackson PR, Singleton KW, Baxter LC, Eschbacher J, Gonzales A, Nespodzany A, Smith K, Nakaji P, Mitchell JR, Wu T, Swanson KR, Li J. Integration of machine learning and mechanistic models accurately predicts variation in cell density of glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI. Sci Rep 2019; 9:10063. [PMID: 31296889 PMCID: PMC6624304 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46296-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a heterogeneous and lethal brain cancer. These tumors are followed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is unable to precisely identify tumor cell invasion, impairing effective surgery and radiation planning. We present a novel hybrid model, based on multiparametric intensities, which combines machine learning (ML) with a mechanistic model of tumor growth to provide spatially resolved tumor cell density predictions. The ML component is an imaging data-driven graph-based semi-supervised learning model and we use the Proliferation-Invasion (PI) mechanistic tumor growth model. We thus refer to the hybrid model as the ML-PI model. The hybrid model was trained using 82 image-localized biopsies from 18 primary GBM patients with pre-operative MRI using a leave-one-patient-out cross validation framework. A Relief algorithm was developed to quantify relative contributions from the data sources. The ML-PI model statistically significantly outperformed (p < 0.001) both individual models, ML and PI, achieving a mean absolute predicted error (MAPE) of 0.106 ± 0.125 versus 0.199 ± 0.186 (ML) and 0.227 ± 0.215 (PI), respectively. Associated Pearson correlation coefficients for ML-PI, ML, and PI were 0.838, 0.518, and 0.437, respectively. The Relief algorithm showed the PI model had the greatest contribution to the result, emphasizing the importance of the hybrid model in achieving the high accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Gaw
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Andrea Hawkins-Daarud
- Precision NeuroTherapeutics (PNT) Lab, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA.
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | - Hyunsoo Yoon
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Lujia Wang
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Yanzhe Xu
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Pamela R Jackson
- Precision NeuroTherapeutics (PNT) Lab, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | - Kyle W Singleton
- Precision NeuroTherapeutics (PNT) Lab, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | - Leslie C Baxter
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | - Jennifer Eschbacher
- Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Ashlyn Gonzales
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | - Ashley Nespodzany
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | - Kris Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Peter Nakaji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - J Ross Mitchell
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, 33612, USA
| | - Teresa Wu
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Precision NeuroTherapeutics (PNT) Lab, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA
| | - Jing Li
- School of Computing, Informatics, and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Hu LS, Quarles CC, Semmineh N, Rand SD, Connelly JM, Anderies B, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Logan B, Stokes A, Baird G, Boxerman JL. Moving Toward a Consensus DSC-MRI Protocol: Validation of a Low-Flip Angle Single-Dose Option as a Reference Standard for Brain Tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:626-633. [PMID: 30923088 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a6015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE DSC-MR imaging using preload, intermediate (60°) flip angle and postprocessing leakage correction has gained traction as a standard methodology. Simulations suggest that DSC-MR imaging with flip angle = 30° and no preload yields relative CBV practically equivalent to the reference standard. This study tested this hypothesis in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-four patients with brain lesions were enrolled in this 3-institution study. Forty-three patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. DSC-MR imaging (3T, single-dose gadobutrol, gradient recalled-echo-EPI, TE = 20-35 ms, TR = 1.2-1.63 seconds) was performed twice for each patient, with flip angle = 30°-35° and no preload (P-), which provided preload (P+) for the subsequent intermediate flip angle = 60°. Normalized relative CBV and standardized relative CBV maps were generated, including postprocessing with contrast agent leakage correction (C+) and without (C-) contrast agent leakage correction. Contrast-enhancing lesion volume, mean relative CBV, and contrast-to-noise ratio obtained with 30°/P-/C-, 30°/P-/C+, and 60°/P+/C- were compared with 60°/P+/C+ using the Lin concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Equivalence between the 30°/P-/C+ and 60°/P+/C+ protocols and the temporal SNR for the 30°/P- and 60°/P+ DSC-MR imaging data was also determined. RESULTS Compared with 60°/P+/C+, 30°/P-/C+ had closest mean standardized relative CBV (P = .61), highest Lin concordance correlation coefficient (0.96), and lowest Bland-Altman bias (μ = 1.89), compared with 30°/P-/C- (P = .02, Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.59, μ = 14.6) and 60°/P+/C- (P = .03, Lin concordance correlation coefficient = 0.88, μ = -10.1) with no statistical difference in contrast-to-noise ratios across protocols. The normalized relative CBV and standardized relative CBV were statistically equivalent at the 10% level using either the 30°/P-/C+ or 60°/P+/C+ protocols. Temporal SNR was not significantly different for 30°/P- and 60°/P+ (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS Tumor relative CBV derived from low-flip angle, no-preload DSC-MR imaging with leakage correction is an attractive single-dose alternative to the higher dose reference standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K M Schmainda
- From the Departments of Biophysics (K.M.S., M.A.P.) .,Radiology (K.M.S., S.D.R.)
| | - M A Prah
- From the Departments of Biophysics (K.M.S., M.A.P.)
| | - L S Hu
- Departments of Radiology (L.S.H., Y.Z.)
| | - C C Quarles
- Division of Imaging Research (C.C.Q., N.S., A.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - N Semmineh
- Division of Imaging Research (C.C.Q., N.S., A.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - B Anderies
- Neurosurgery (B.A.), Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Y Zhou
- Departments of Radiology (L.S.H., Y.Z.)
| | - Y Liu
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society (Y.L., B.L.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - B Logan
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society (Y.L., B.L.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - A Stokes
- Division of Imaging Research (C.C.Q., N.S., A.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - G Baird
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B., G.B.), Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - J L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B., G.B.), Rhode Island Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bell LC, Semmineh N, An H, Eldeniz C, Wahl R, Schmainda KM, Prah MA, Erickson BJ, Korfiatis P, Wu C, Sorace AG, Yankeelov TE, Rutledge N, Chenevert TL, Malyarenko D, Liu Y, Brenner A, Hu LS, Zhou Y, Boxerman JL, Yen YF, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Beers AL, Muzi M, Madhuranthakam AJ, Pinho M, Johnson B, Quarles CC. Evaluating Multisite rCBV Consistency from DSC-MRI Imaging Protocols and Postprocessing Software Across the NCI Quantitative Imaging Network Sites Using a Digital Reference Object (DRO). Tomography 2019; 5:110-117. [PMID: 30854448 PMCID: PMC6403027 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2018.00041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) cannot be used as a response metric in clinical trials, in part, because of variations in biomarker consistency and associated interpretation across sites, stemming from differences in image acquisition and postprocessing methods (PMs). This study leveraged a dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging digital reference object to characterize rCBV consistency across 12 sites participating in the Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN), specifically focusing on differences in site-specific imaging protocols (IPs; n = 17), and PMs (n = 19) and differences due to site-specific IPs and PMs (n = 25). Thus, high agreement across sites occurs when 1 managing center processes rCBV despite slight variations in the IP. This result is most likely supported by current initiatives to standardize IPs. However, marked intersite disagreement was observed when site-specific software was applied for rCBV measurements. This study's results have important implications for comparing rCBV values across sites and trials, where variability in PMs could confound the comparison of therapeutic effectiveness and/or any attempts to establish thresholds for categorical response to therapy. To overcome these challenges and ensure the successful use of rCBV as a clinical trial biomarker, we recommend the establishment of qualifying and validating site- and trial-specific criteria for scanners and acquisition methods (eg, using a validated phantom) and the software tools used for dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging analysis (eg, using a digital reference object where the ground truth is known).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C. Bell
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Natenael Semmineh
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Hongyu An
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Cihat Eldeniz
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Richard Wahl
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Kathleen M. Schmainda
- Departments of Radiology and Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI
| | - Melissa A. Prah
- Departments of Radiology and Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI
| | | | | | - Chengyue Wu
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Anna G. Sorace
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Thomas E. Yankeelov
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Neal Rutledge
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | | | | | - Yichu Liu
- UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Yuxiang Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Jerrold L. Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI;,Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Yi-Fen Yen
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Andrew L. Beers
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mark Muzi
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Marco Pinho
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; and
| | - Brian Johnson
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; and,Philips Healthcare, Gainesville, FL
| | - C. Chad Quarles
- Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hu LS, Yoon H, Eschbacher JM, Baxter LC, Dueck AC, Nespodzany A, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Xu Y, Wang L, Karis JP, Hawkins-Daarud AJ, Singleton KW, Jackson PR, Anderies BJ, Bendok BR, Zimmerman RS, Quarles C, Porter-Umphrey AB, Mrugala MM, Sharma A, Hoxworth JM, Sattur MG, Sanai N, Koulemberis PE, Krishna C, Mitchell JR, Wu T, Tran NL, Swanson KR, Li J. Accurate Patient-Specific Machine Learning Models of Glioblastoma Invasion Using Transfer Learning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019; 40:418-425. [PMID: 30819771 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MR imaging-based modeling of tumor cell density can substantially improve targeted treatment of glioblastoma. Unfortunately, interpatient variability limits the predictive ability of many modeling approaches. We present a transfer learning method that generates individualized patient models, grounded in the wealth of population data, while also detecting and adjusting for interpatient variabilities based on each patient's own histologic data. MATERIALS AND METHODS We recruited patients with primary glioblastoma undergoing image-guided biopsies and preoperative imaging, including contrast-enhanced MR imaging, dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging. We calculated relative cerebral blood volume from DSC-MR imaging and mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy from DTI. Following image coregistration, we assessed tumor cell density for each biopsy and identified corresponding localized MR imaging measurements. We then explored a range of univariate and multivariate predictive models of tumor cell density based on MR imaging measurements in a generalized one-model-fits-all approach. We then implemented both univariate and multivariate individualized transfer learning predictive models, which harness the available population-level data but allow individual variability in their predictions. Finally, we compared Pearson correlation coefficients and mean absolute error between the individualized transfer learning and generalized one-model-fits-all models. RESULTS Tumor cell density significantly correlated with relative CBV (r = 0.33, P < .001), and T1-weighted postcontrast (r = 0.36, P < .001) on univariate analysis after correcting for multiple comparisons. With single-variable modeling (using relative CBV), transfer learning increased predictive performance (r = 0.53, mean absolute error = 15.19%) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.27, mean absolute error = 17.79%). With multivariate modeling, transfer learning further improved performance (r = 0.88, mean absolute error = 5.66%) compared with one-model-fits-all (r = 0.39, mean absolute error = 16.55%). CONCLUSIONS Transfer learning significantly improves predictive modeling performance for quantifying tumor cell density in glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Hu
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.)
| | - H Yoon
- Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | | | | | - A C Dueck
- Department of Biostatistics (A.C.D.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | | | - P Nakaji
- Neurosurgery (K.A.S., P.N., N.S.)
| | - Y Xu
- Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | - L Wang
- Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | | | - A J Hawkins-Daarud
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.)
| | - K W Singleton
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.)
| | - P R Jackson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.)
| | - B J Anderies
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - B R Bendok
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.).,Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - R S Zimmerman
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - C Quarles
- Neuroimaging Research (C.Q.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - M M Mrugala
- Department of Neuro-Oncology (A.B.P.-U., M.M.M., A.S.)
| | - A Sharma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology (A.B.P.-U., M.M.M., A.S.)
| | - J M Hoxworth
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.)
| | - M G Sattur
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - N Sanai
- Neurosurgery (K.A.S., P.N., N.S.)
| | - P E Koulemberis
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - C Krishna
- Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - J R Mitchell
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.).,H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (J.R.M.), Tampa, Florida
| | - T Wu
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.).,Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| | - N L Tran
- Department of Cancer Biology (N.L.T.), Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - K R Swanson
- Precision Neurotherapeutics Lab (A.J.H.-D., K.W.S., P.R.J, B.R.B., K.R.S.).,Department of Neurosurgery (B.J.A., B.R.B., R.S.Z., M.G.S., P.E.K., C.K., K.R.S.)
| | - J Li
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H., J.M.H., J.R.M., T.W., J.L.).,Arizona State University (H.Y., Y.X., L.W., T.W., J.L.), Tempe, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sarkaria JN, Hu LS, Parney IF, Pafundi DH, Brinkmann DH, Laack NN, Giannini C, Burns TC, Kizilbash SH, Laramy JK, Swanson KR, Kaufmann TJ, Brown PD, Agar NYR, Galanis E, Buckner JC, Elmquist WF. Is the blood-brain barrier really disrupted in all glioblastomas? A critical assessment of existing clinical data. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:184-191. [PMID: 29016900 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 381] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The blood-brain barrier (BBB) excludes the vast majority of cancer therapeutics from normal brain. However, the importance of the BBB in limiting drug delivery and efficacy is controversial in high-grade brain tumors, such as glioblastoma (GBM). The accumulation of normally brain impenetrant radiographic contrast material in essentially all GBM has popularized a belief that the BBB is uniformly disrupted in all GBM patients so that consideration of drug distribution across the BBB is not relevant in designing therapies for GBM. However, contrary to this view, overwhelming clinical evidence demonstrates that there is also a clinically significant tumor burden with an intact BBB in all GBM, and there is little doubt that drugs with poor BBB permeability do not provide therapeutically effective drug exposures to this fraction of tumor cells. This review provides an overview of the clinical literature to support a central hypothesis: that all GBM patients have tumor regions with an intact BBB, and cure for GBM will only be possible if these regions of tumor are adequately treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jann N Sarkaria
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Leland S Hu
- Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (L.S.H., K.R.S.)
| | - Ian F Parney
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Deanna H Pafundi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Debra H Brinkmann
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Caterina Giannini
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Terence C Burns
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Sani H Kizilbash
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Janice K Laramy
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., W.F.E.)
| | | | - Timothy J Kaufmann
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Paul D Brown
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | | | - Evanthia Galanis
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - Jan C Buckner
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| | - William F Elmquist
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.N.S., I.F.P., D.H.P., D.H.B., N.N.L., C.G., T.C.B., S.H.K., T.J.K., P.D.B., E.G., J.C.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Semmineh NB, Bell LC, Stokes AM, Hu LS, Boxerman JL, Quarles CC. Optimization of Acquisition and Analysis Methods for Clinical Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Using a Population-Based Digital Reference Object. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018; 39:1981-1988. [PMID: 30309842 PMCID: PMC6239921 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a5827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The accuracy of DSC-MR imaging CBV maps in glioblastoma depends on acquisition and analysis protocols. Multisite protocol heterogeneity has challenged standardization initiatives due to the difficulties of in vivo validation. This study sought to compare the accuracy of routinely used protocols using a digital reference object. MATERIALS AND METHODS The digital reference object consisted of approximately 10,000 simulated voxels recapitulating typical signal heterogeneity encountered in vivo. The influence of acquisition and postprocessing methods on CBV reliability was evaluated across 6912 parameter combinations, including contrast agent dosing schemes, pulse sequence parameters, field strengths, and postprocessing methods. Accuracy and precision were assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation. RESULTS Across all parameter space, the optimal protocol included full-dose contrast agent preload and bolus, intermediate (60°) flip angle, 30-ms TE, and postprocessing with a leakage-correction algorithm (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.97, coefficient of variation = 6.6%). Protocols with no preload or fractional dose preload and bolus using these acquisition parameters were generally less robust. However, a protocol with no preload, full-dose bolus, and low (30°) flip angle performed very well (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.93, coefficient of variation = 8.7% at 1.5T and concordance correlation coefficient = 0.92, coefficient of variation = 8.2% at 3T). CONCLUSIONS Schemes with full-dose preload and bolus maximize CBV accuracy and reduce variability, which could enable smaller sample sizes and more reliable detection of CBV changes in clinical trials. When a lower total contrast agent dose is desired, use of a low flip angle, no preload, and full-dose bolus protocol may provide an attractive alternative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N B Semmineh
- From the Department of Imaging Research (N.B.S., L.C.B., A.M.S., C.C.Q.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - L C Bell
- From the Department of Imaging Research (N.B.S., L.C.B., A.M.S., C.C.Q.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - A M Stokes
- From the Department of Imaging Research (N.B.S., L.C.B., A.M.S., C.C.Q.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - L S Hu
- Department of Radiology (L.S.H.), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - J L Boxerman
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging (J.L.B.), Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - C C Quarles
- From the Department of Imaging Research (N.B.S., L.C.B., A.M.S., C.C.Q.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dhamija R, Weindling SM, Porter AB, Hu LS, Wood CP, Hoxworth JM. Neuroimaging abnormalities in patients with Cowden syndrome: Retrospective single-center study. Neurol Clin Pract 2018; 8:207-213. [PMID: 30105160 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 03/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background We retrospectively reviewed the neuroimaging findings of patients with Cowden syndrome and determined their frequency in a single cohort. Methods Electronic medical records were queried from January 1999 to January 2017 to identify patients who fit the clinical criteria for diagnosis of Cowden syndrome with or without a documented PTEN mutation. Patients with brain MRI examinations were then identified. Results We retrospectively identified 44 patients with Cowden syndrome, 22 of whom had neuroimaging for review. Eleven (50%) had Lhermitte-Duclos disease, 4 (18.1%) had meningiomas, 13 (59.1%) had at least one developmental venous anomaly, 3 had cavernous malformations, 2 had evidence of dural arteriovenous fistula, 7 had increased white matter signal abnormalities relative to age (31.8%), 4 had prominent perivascular spaces, cerebellar tonsillar ectopia was present in 7 of 21 (33.3%), and 1 had cortical malformation. Conclusions It is important to recognize that in addition to Lhermitte-Duclos disease, other intracranial findings such as multiple venous anomalies, meningiomas, greater than expected white matter signal abnormality, prominent perivascular spaces, and cortical malformations may warrant a thorough evaluation for Cowden syndrome in the appropriate clinical setting. We further recommend that this broader spectrum of intracranial abnormalities be considered for addition to the Cowden syndrome diagnostic criteria at the time of next revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhika Dhamija
- Departments of Clinical Genomics (RD), Neurology (RD, ABP), and Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (LSH, JMH), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (SMW), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; and Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (CPW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Steven M Weindling
- Departments of Clinical Genomics (RD), Neurology (RD, ABP), and Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (LSH, JMH), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (SMW), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; and Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (CPW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alyx B Porter
- Departments of Clinical Genomics (RD), Neurology (RD, ABP), and Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (LSH, JMH), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (SMW), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; and Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (CPW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Leland S Hu
- Departments of Clinical Genomics (RD), Neurology (RD, ABP), and Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (LSH, JMH), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (SMW), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; and Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (CPW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Christopher P Wood
- Departments of Clinical Genomics (RD), Neurology (RD, ABP), and Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (LSH, JMH), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (SMW), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; and Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (CPW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joseph M Hoxworth
- Departments of Clinical Genomics (RD), Neurology (RD, ABP), and Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (LSH, JMH), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (SMW), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; and Department of Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology) (CPW), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bell LC, Hu LS, Stokes AM, McGee SC, Baxter LC, Quarles CC. Characterizing the Influence of Preload Dosing on Percent Signal Recovery (PSR) and Cerebral Blood Volume (CBV) Measurements in a Patient Population With High-Grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 3:89-95. [PMID: 28825039 PMCID: PMC5557059 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2017.00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
With DSC-MRI, contrast agent leakage effects in brain tumors can either be leveraged for percent signal recovery (PSR) measurements or be adequately resolved for accurate relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements. Leakage effects can be dimished by administration of a preload dose before imaging and/or specific postprocessing steps. This study compares the consistency of both PSR and rCBV measurements as a function of varying preload doses in a retrospective analysis of 14 subjects with high-grade gliomas. The scans consisted of 6 DSC-MRI scans during 6 sequential bolus injections (0.05 mmol/kg). Mean PSR was calculated for tumor and normal-appearing white matter regions of interest. DSC-MRI data were corrected for leakage effects before computing mean tumor rCBV. Statistical differences were seen across varying preloads for tumor PSR (P value = 4.57E-24). Tumor rCBV values did not exhibit statistically significant differences across preloads (P value = .14) and were found to be highly consistent for clinically relevant preloads (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93). For a 0.05 mmol/kg injection bolus and pulse sequence parameters used, the highest PSR contrast between normal-appearing white matter and tumor occurs when no preload is used. This suggests that studies using PSR as a biomarker should acquire DSC-MRI data without preload. The finding that leakage-corrected rCBV values do not depend on the presence or dose of preload contradicts that of previous studies with dissimilar acquisition protocols. This further confirms the sensitivity of rCBV to preload dosing schemes and pulse sequence parameters and highlights the importance of standardization efforts for achieving multisite rCBV consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura C Bell
- Division of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Ashley M Stokes
- Division of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Samuel C McGee
- Division of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Leslie C Baxter
- Division of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Division of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Korfiatis P, Kline TL, Kelm ZS, Carter RE, Hu LS, Erickson BJ. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-MRI Quantification Software Tool: Development and Evaluation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 2:448-456. [PMID: 28066810 PMCID: PMC5217187 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) is a magnetic resonance imaging biomarker that is used to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme, the most common primary brain tumor. However, calculated rCBV depends considerably on the software used. Automating all steps required for rCBV calculation is important, as user interaction can lead to increased variability and possible inaccuracies in clinical decision-making. Here, we present an automated tool for computing rCBV from dynamic susceptibility contrast-magnetic resonance imaging that includes leakage correction. The entrance and exit bolus time points are automatically calculated using wavelet-based detection. The proposed tool is compared with 3 Food and Drug Administration-approved software packages, 1 automatic and 2 requiring user interaction, on a data set of 43 patients. We also evaluate manual and automated white matter (WM) selection for normalization of the cerebral blood volume maps. Our system showed good agreement with 2 of the 3 software packages. The intraclass correlation coefficient for all comparisons between the same software operated by different people was >0.880, except for FuncTool when operated by user 1 versus user 2. Little variability in agreement between software tools was observed when using different WM selection techniques. Our algorithm for automatic rCBV calculation with leakage correction and automated WM selection agrees well with 2 out of the 3 FDA-approved software packages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Zachary S Kelm
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rickey E Carter
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hu LS, Ning S, Eschbacher JM, Baxter LC, Gaw N, Ranjbar S, Plasencia J, Dueck AC, Peng S, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Karis JP, Quarles CC, Wu T, Loftus JC, Jenkins RB, Sicotte H, Kollmeyer TM, O'Neill BP, Elmquist W, Hoxworth JM, Frakes D, Sarkaria J, Swanson KR, Tran NL, Li J, Mitchell JR. Radiogenomics to characterize regional genetic heterogeneity in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2016; 19:128-137. [PMID: 27502248 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) exhibits profound intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Each tumor comprises multiple genetically distinct clonal populations with different therapeutic sensitivities. This has implications for targeted therapy and genetically informed paradigms. Contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI and conventional sampling techniques have failed to resolve this heterogeneity, particularly for nonenhancing tumor populations. This study explores the feasibility of using multiparametric MRI and texture analysis to characterize regional genetic heterogeneity throughout MRI-enhancing and nonenhancing tumor segments. METHODS We collected multiple image-guided biopsies from primary GBM patients throughout regions of enhancement (ENH) and nonenhancing parenchyma (so called brain-around-tumor, [BAT]). For each biopsy, we analyzed DNA copy number variants for core GBM driver genes reported by The Cancer Genome Atlas. We co-registered biopsy locations with MRI and texture maps to correlate regional genetic status with spatially matched imaging measurements. We also built multivariate predictive decision-tree models for each GBM driver gene and validated accuracies using leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV). RESULTS We collected 48 biopsies (13 tumors) and identified significant imaging correlations (univariate analysis) for 6 driver genes: EGFR, PDGFRA, PTEN, CDKN2A, RB1, and TP53. Predictive model accuracies (on LOOCV) varied by driver gene of interest. Highest accuracies were observed for PDGFRA (77.1%), EGFR (75%), CDKN2A (87.5%), and RB1 (87.5%), while lowest accuracy was observed in TP53 (37.5%). Models for 4 driver genes (EGFR, RB1, CDKN2A, and PTEN) showed higher accuracy in BAT samples (n = 16) compared with those from ENH segments (n = 32). CONCLUSION MRI and texture analysis can help characterize regional genetic heterogeneity, which offers potential diagnostic value under the paradigm of individualized oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Shuluo Ning
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Jennifer M Eschbacher
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Leslie C Baxter
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Nathan Gaw
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Sara Ranjbar
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Jonathan Plasencia
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Amylou C Dueck
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Sen Peng
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Kris A Smith
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Peter Nakaji
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - John P Karis
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - C Chad Quarles
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Teresa Wu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Joseph C Loftus
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Robert B Jenkins
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Hugues Sicotte
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Thomas M Kollmeyer
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Brian P O'Neill
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - William Elmquist
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Joseph M Hoxworth
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - David Frakes
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Jann Sarkaria
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Kristin R Swanson
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Nhan L Tran
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| | - J Ross Mitchell
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (L.S.H., T.W., J.M.H.); Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (A.C.D.); Department of Research, Mayo Clinic, Arizona (J.R.M., K.S.); Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona (K.R.S.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona (J.C.L.); Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (R.B.J., T.M.K.); Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (H.S.); Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (B.P.O.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (J.S.); Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (W.E.); Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona (S.P., N.L.T.); School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.L., T.W., S.N., N.G.); Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (S.R.); School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona (J.P., D.F.); Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (J.M.E.); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (K.A.S., P.N.); Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (L.C.B., J.P. K., L.S.H.); Department of Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute - St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona (C.C.Q.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
This study aimed to assess genetic diversity in the germplasm of black pepper from around the world using SSR markers from EST. In total, 13 markers were selected and successfully amplified the target loci across the black pepper germplasm. All the EST-SSR markers showed high levels of polymorphisms with an average polymorphism information content of 0.93. The genetic similarity coefficients among all accessions ranged from 0.724 to 1.000, with an average of 0.867. These results indicated that black pepper germplasms possess a complex genetic background and high genetic diversity. Based on a cluster analysis, 148 black pepper germplasms were grouped in two major clades: the Neotropics and the Asian tropics. Peperomia pellucida was grouped separately and distantly from all other accessions. These results generally agreed with the genetic and geographic distances. However, the Asian tropics clade did not cluster according to their geographic origins. In addition, compared with the American accessions, the Asian wild accessions and cultivated accessions grouped together, indicating a close genetic relationship. This verified the origin of black pepper. The newly developed EST-SSRs are highly valuable resources for the conservation of black pepper germplasm diversity and for black pepper breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B D Wu
- Spice and Beverage Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning, Hainan, China.,Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources Utilization of Spice and Beverage Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wanning, Hainan, China
| | - R Fan
- Spice and Beverage Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning, Hainan, China.,Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources Utilization of Spice and Beverage Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wanning, Hainan, China
| | - L S Hu
- Spice and Beverage Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning, Hainan, China.,Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources Utilization of Spice and Beverage Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wanning, Hainan, China
| | - H S Wu
- Spice and Beverage Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning, Hainan, China.,Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources Utilization of Spice and Beverage Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wanning, Hainan, China
| | - C Y Hao
- Spice and Beverage Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Wanning, Hainan, China.,Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources Utilization of Spice and Beverage Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Wanning, Hainan, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hu LS, Ning S, Eschbacher JM, Gaw N, Dueck AC, Smith KA, Nakaji P, Plasencia J, Ranjbar S, Price SJ, Tran N, Loftus J, Jenkins R, O’Neill BP, Elmquist W, Baxter LC, Gao F, Frakes D, Karis JP, Zwart C, Swanson KR, Sarkaria J, Wu T, Mitchell JR, Li J. Multi-Parametric MRI and Texture Analysis to Visualize Spatial Histologic Heterogeneity and Tumor Extent in Glioblastoma. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0141506. [PMID: 26599106 PMCID: PMC4658019 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Genetic profiling represents the future of neuro-oncology but suffers from inadequate biopsies in heterogeneous tumors like Glioblastoma (GBM). Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) targets enhancing core (ENH) but yields adequate tumor in only ~60% of cases. Further, CE-MRI poorly localizes infiltrative tumor within surrounding non-enhancing parenchyma, or brain-around-tumor (BAT), despite the importance of characterizing this tumor segment, which universally recurs. In this study, we use multiple texture analysis and machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze multi-parametric MRI, and produce new images indicating tumor-rich targets in GBM. Methods We recruited primary GBM patients undergoing image-guided biopsies and acquired pre-operative MRI: CE-MRI, Dynamic-Susceptibility-weighted-Contrast-enhanced-MRI, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Following image coregistration and region of interest placement at biopsy locations, we compared MRI metrics and regional texture with histologic diagnoses of high- vs low-tumor content (≥80% vs <80% tumor nuclei) for corresponding samples. In a training set, we used three texture analysis algorithms and three ML methods to identify MRI-texture features that optimized model accuracy to distinguish tumor content. We confirmed model accuracy in a separate validation set. Results We collected 82 biopsies from 18 GBMs throughout ENH and BAT. The MRI-based model achieved 85% cross-validated accuracy to diagnose high- vs low-tumor in the training set (60 biopsies, 11 patients). The model achieved 81.8% accuracy in the validation set (22 biopsies, 7 patients). Conclusion Multi-parametric MRI and texture analysis can help characterize and visualize GBM’s spatial histologic heterogeneity to identify regional tumor-rich biopsy targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland S. Hu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Shuluo Ning
- School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jennifer M. Eschbacher
- Department of Pathology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Nathan Gaw
- School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Amylou C. Dueck
- Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kris A. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Peter Nakaji
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Plasencia
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Sara Ranjbar
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Stephen J. Price
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nhan Tran
- Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Joseph Loftus
- Department of Cancer and Cell Biology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States of America
| | - Robert Jenkins
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Brian P. O’Neill
- Department of Neuro-oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - William Elmquist
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Leslie C. Baxter
- Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Fei Gao
- School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - David Frakes
- School of Biological and Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - John P. Karis
- Department of Radiology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Christine Zwart
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Kristin R. Swanson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jann Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Teresa Wu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| | - J. Ross Mitchell
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
- School of Computing, Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hu LS, Kelm Z, Korfiatis P, Dueck AC, Elrod C, Ellingson BM, Kaufmann TJ, Eschbacher JM, Karis JP, Smith K, Nakaji P, Brinkman D, Pafundi D, Baxter LC, Erickson BJ. Impact of Software Modeling on the Accuracy of Perfusion MRI in Glioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36:2242-9. [PMID: 26359151 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 04/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Relative cerebral blood volume, as measured by T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI, represents the most robust and widely used perfusion MR imaging metric in neuro-oncology. Our aim was to determine whether differences in modeling implementation will impact the correction of leakage effects (from blood-brain barrier disruption) and the accuracy of relative CBV calculations as measured on T2*-weighted dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3T field strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 52 patients with glioma undergoing DSC MR imaging. Thirty-six patients underwent both non-preload dose- and preload dose-corrected DSC acquisitions, with 16 patients undergoing preload dose-corrected acquisitions only. For each acquisition, we generated 2 sets of relative CBV metrics by using 2 separate, widely published, FDA-approved commercial software packages: IB Neuro and nordicICE. We calculated 4 relative CBV metrics within tumor volumes: mean relative CBV, mode relative CBV, percentage of voxels with relative CBV > 1.75, and percentage of voxels with relative CBV > 1.0 (fractional tumor burden). We determined Pearson (r) and Spearman (ρ) correlations between non-preload dose- and preload dose-corrected metrics. In a subset of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (n = 25), we determined receiver operating characteristic area under the curve for fractional tumor burden accuracy to predict the tissue diagnosis of tumor recurrence versus posttreatment effect. We also determined correlations between rCBV and microvessel area from stereotactic biopsies (n = 29) in 12 patients. RESULTS With IB Neuro, relative CBV metrics correlated highly between non-preload dose- and preload dose-corrected conditions for fractional tumor burden (r = 0.96, ρ = 0.94), percentage > 1.75 (r = 0.93, ρ = 0.91), mean (r = 0.87, ρ = 0.86), and mode (r = 0.78, ρ = 0.76). These correlations dropped substantially with nordicICE. With fractional tumor burden, IB Neuro was more accurate than nordicICE in diagnosing tumor versus posttreatment effect (area under the curve = 0.85 versus 0.67) (P < .01). The highest relative CBV-microvessel area correlations required preload dose and IB Neuro (r = 0.64, ρ = 0.58, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS Different implementations of perfusion MR imaging software modeling can impact the accuracy of leakage correction, relative CBV calculation, and correlations with histologic benchmarks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Hu
- From the Department of Radiology (L.S.H.) Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (L.S.H., C.E., J.P.K., L.C.B.)
| | - Z Kelm
- the Department of Radiology (Z.K., P.K., T.J.K., B.J.E.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - P Korfiatis
- the Department of Radiology (Z.K., P.K., T.J.K., B.J.E.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - A C Dueck
- Biostatistics (A.C.D.), Mayo Clinic, Phoenix/Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - C Elrod
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (L.S.H., C.E., J.P.K., L.C.B.)
| | - B M Ellingson
- the Department of Radiological Sciences (B.M.E.), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - T J Kaufmann
- the Department of Radiology (Z.K., P.K., T.J.K., B.J.E.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - J P Karis
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (L.S.H., C.E., J.P.K., L.C.B.) Neuroradiology (J.P.K.)
| | - K Smith
- Neurosurgery (K.S., P.N.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - P Nakaji
- Neurosurgery (K.S., P.N.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - D Brinkman
- the Department of Radiation Oncology (D.B., D.P.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - D Pafundi
- the Department of Radiation Oncology (D.B., D.P.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - L C Baxter
- Keller Center for Imaging Innovation (L.S.H., C.E., J.P.K., L.C.B.)
| | - B J Erickson
- the Department of Radiology (Z.K., P.K., T.J.K., B.J.E.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pafundi DH, Laack NN, Youland RS, Parney IF, Lowe VJ, Giannini C, Kemp BJ, Grams MP, Morris JM, Hoover JM, Hu LS, Sarkaria JN, Brinkmann DH. Biopsy validation of 18F-DOPA PET and biodistribution in gliomas for neurosurgical planning and radiotherapy target delineation: results of a prospective pilot study. Neuro Oncol 2013; 15:1058-67. [PMID: 23460322 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delineation of glioma extent for surgical or radiotherapy planning is routinely based on MRI. There is increasing awareness that contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images (T1-CE) may not reflect the entire extent of disease. The amino acid tracer (18)F-DOPA (3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F] fluoro-l-phenylalanine) has a high tumor-to-background signal and high sensitivity for glioma imaging. This study compares (18)F-DOPA PET against conventional MRI for neurosurgical biopsy targeting, resection planning, and radiotherapy target volume delineation. METHODS Conventional MR and (18)F-DOPA PET/CT images were acquired in 10 patients with suspected malignant brain tumors. One to 3 biopsy locations per patient were chosen in regions of concordant and discordant (18)F-DOPA uptake and MR contrast enhancement. Histopathology was reviewed on 23 biopsies. (18)F-DOPA PET was quantified using standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-normal hemispheric tissue (T/N) ratios. RESULTS Pathologic review confirmed glioma in 22 of 23 biopsy specimens. Thirteen of 16 high-grade biopsy specimens were obtained from regions of elevated (18)F-DOPA uptake, while T1-CE was present in only 6 of those 16 samples. Optimal (18)F-DOPA PET thresholds corresponding to high-grade disease based on histopathology were calculated as T/N > 2.0. In every patient, (18)F-DOPA uptake regions with T/N > 2.0 extended beyond T1-CE up to a maximum of 3.5 cm. SUV was found to correlate with grade and cellularity. CONCLUSIONS (18)F-DOPA PET SUV(max) may more accurately identify regions of higher-grade/higher-density disease in patients with astrocytomas and will have utility in guiding stereotactic biopsy selection. Using SUV-based thresholds to define high-grade portions of disease may be valuable in delineating radiotherapy boost volumes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna H Pafundi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|