Identification and Characterization of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Toxicities From Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, yet their use is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Estimating the prevalence and patient impact of these irAEs in the real-world data setting is critical for characterizing the benefit/risk profile of ICI therapies beyond the clinical trial population. Diagnosis codes, such as International Classification of Diseases codes, do not comprehensively illustrate a patient's care journey and offer no insight into drug-irAE causality. This study aims to capture the relationship between ICIs and irAEs more accurately by using augmented curation (AC), a natural language processing-based innovation, on unstructured data in electronic health records.

METHODS

In a cohort of 9,290 patients treated with ICIs at Mayo Clinic from 2005 to 2021, we compared the prevalence of irAEs using diagnosis codes and AC models, which classify drug-irAE pairs in clinical notes with implied textual causality. Four illustrative irAEs with high patient impact-myocarditis, encephalitis, pneumonitis, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions, abbreviated as MEPS-were analyzed using corticosteroid administration and ICI discontinuation as proxies of severity.

RESULTS

For MEPS, only 70% (n = 118) of patients found by AC were also identified by diagnosis codes. Using AC models, patients with MEPS received corticosteroids for their respective irAE 82% of the time and permanently discontinued the ICI because of the irAE 35.9% (n = 115) of the time.

CONCLUSION

Overall, AC models enabled more accurate identification and assessment of patient impact of ICI-induced irAEs not found using diagnosis codes, demonstrating a novel and more efficient strategy to assess real-world clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICIs.

A Phase I trial of Nab-Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab (AB160) Nano-Immunoconjugate Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies

PURPOSE

AB160 is a 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate consisting of nab-paclitaxel (ABX) nanoparticles non-covalently coated with bevacizumab (BEV) for targeted delivery into tissues expressing high levels of VEGF. Preclinical data showed that AB160 resulted in greater tumor targeting and tumor inhibition compared to sequential treatment with ABX then BEV. Given individual drug activity, we investigated the safety and toxicity of AB160 in patients with gynecologic cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 3+3 phase I trial was conducted with 3 potential dose levels in patients with previously treated endometrial (EC), cervical (CC), and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC) patients to ascertain the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). AB160 was administered intravenously on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle (ABX 75-175 mg/m2, BEV 30-70 mg/m2). Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were seen among the 3 DLs tested. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia, thromboembolic events, and leukopenia. DL2 (ABX 150 mg/m2, BEV 60 mg/m2) was chosen as the RP2D. Seven of the 19 patients with measurable disease (36.8%) had confirmed partial responses (95% CI: 16.3%-61.6%). Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated that AB160 allowed 50% higher paclitaxel dosing and that paclitaxel clearance mirrored that of therapeutic antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile and clinical activity of AB160 supports further clinical testing in patients with gynecologic cancers; the RP2D is DL2 (ABX 150 mg/m2, BEV 60 mg/m2).

Neoadjuvant cobimetinib and atezolizumab with or without vemurafenib for high-risk operable Stage III melanoma: the Phase II NeoACTIVATE trial

Both targeted therapies and immunotherapies provide benefit in resected Stage III melanoma. We hypothesized that the combination of targeted and immunotherapy given prior to therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) would be tolerable and drive robust pathologic responses. In NeoACTIVATE (NCT03554083), a Phase II trial, patients with clinically evident resectable Stage III melanoma received either 12 weeks of neoadjuvant vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab (BRAF-mutated, Cohort A, n = 15), or cobimetinib and atezolizumab (BRAF-wild-type, Cohort B, n = 15) followed by TLND and 24 weeks of adjuvant atezolizumab. Here, we report outcomes from the neoadjuvant portion of the trial. Based on intent to treat analysis, pathologic response (≤50% viable tumor) and major pathologic response (complete or near-complete, ≤10% viable tumor) were observed in 86.7% and 66.7% of BRAF-mutated and 53.3% and 33.3% of BRAF-wild-type patients, respectively (primary outcome); these exceeded pre-specified benchmarks of 50% and 30% for major pathologic response. Grade 3 and higher toxicities, primarily dermatologic, occurred in 63% during neoadjuvant treatment (secondary outcome). No surgical delays nor progression to regional unresectability occurred (secondary outcome). Peripheral blood CD8 + TCM cell expansion associated with favorable pathologic responses (exploratory outcome).

Proton Craniospinal Irradiation with Immunotherapy in Two Patients with Leptomeningeal Disease from Melanoma

Introduction

Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a treatment option for leptomeningeal disease (LMD), which permits whole neuroaxis treatment while minimizing toxicity. Despite this, patients inevitably experience progression. Adding systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes.

Methods

In this single-institution retrospective case series, we present the feasibility of treatment with pCSI (30Gy, 10 fractions) and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in two sequential patients with LMD from melanoma.

Results

The first patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E-mutant melanoma after prior ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. After pCSI with concurrent nivolumab, the addition of relatlimab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, he remained alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite central nervous system progression. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma after up-front ICI. He received pCSI with concurrent ipilimumab and nivolumab, then nivolumab maintenance. Though therapy was held for ICI hepatitis, the patient remained progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis.

Conclusion

Adding an ICI to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD and demonstrates a tolerable toxicity profile. While prospective evaluation is ultimately warranted, pCSI with ICI may confer survival benefits, even after prior ICI.

Real-world outcomes with immuno-oncology therapies in advanced melanoma: final results of the OPTIMIzE registry study

Aim: The OPTIMIzE registry study evaluated real-world outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma receiving immuno-oncology therapies. Materials and methods: Data were collected for patients treated with anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab; n = 147) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 81) from 2015-2017 and followed for ≥3 years. Results: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of death (adjusted HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.54-1.28; p = 0.41), higher disease control rate (72 vs 56%; p = 0.04), and stable quality of life, but more grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (54 vs 26%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: These results support the use of immuno-oncology therapy in advanced melanoma.

A phase I oncolytic virus trial with vesicular stomatitis virus expressing human interferon beta and tyrosinase related protein 1 administered intratumorally and intravenously in uveal melanoma: safety, efficacy, and T cell responses

Introduction

Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) has a poor prognosis and treatment options are limited. These patients do not typically experience durable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Oncolytic viruses (OV) represent a novel approach to immunotherapy for patients with MUM.

Methods

We developed an OV with a Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) vector modified to express interferon-beta (IFN-β) and Tyrosinase Related Protein 1 (TYRP1) (VSV-IFNβ-TYRP1), and conducted a Phase 1 clinical trial with a 3 + 3 design in patients with MUM. VSV-IFNβ-TYRP1 was injected into a liver metastasis, then administered on the same day as a single intravenous (IV) infusion. The primary objective was safety. Efficacy was a secondary objective.

Results

12 patients with previously treated MUM were enrolled. Median follow up was 19.1 months. 4 dose levels (DLs) were evaluated. One patient at DL4 experienced dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), including decreased platelet count (grade 3), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). 4 patients had stable disease (SD) and 8 patients had progressive disease (PD). Interferon gamma (IFNγ) ELIspot data showed that more patients developed a T cell response to virus encoded TYRP1 at higher DLs, and a subset of patients also had a response to other melanoma antigens, including gp100, suggesting epitope spreading. 3 of the patients who responded to additional melanoma antigens were next treated with ICIs, and 2 of these patients experienced durable responses.

Discussion

Our study found that VSV-IFNβ -TYRP1 can be safely administered via intratumoral (IT) and IV routes in a previously treated population of patients with MUM. Although there were no clear objective radiographic responses to VSV-IFNβ-TYRP1, dose-dependent immunogenicity to TYRP1 and other melanoma antigens was seen.

Triple M Syndrome: Implications for Hematology-Oncology Advanced Practice Providers

During the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment. ICI-related side effects occur via direct overactivation of the immune system, and patients can experience sym.

Plasma Methylated DNA Markers for Melanoma Surveillance

PURPOSE

Surveillance after primary melanoma treatment aims to detect early signs of low-volume systemic disease. The current standard of care, surveillance imaging, is costly and difficult to access. We therefore sought to develop methylated DNA markers (MDMs) as promising alternatives for disease surveillance.

METHODS

We used reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) to identify MDMs in DNA samples obtained from metastatic melanoma, benign nevi, and normal skin tissues. The identified MDMs underwent validation in an independent cohort of tissue and buffy coat DNA samples. Subsequently, we tested the validated MDMs in the plasma DNA of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing surveillance with total body imaging and compared them with cancer-free controls. To estimate the overall predictive accuracy of the MDMs, we used random forest modeling with bootstrap cross-validation.

RESULTS

Forty MDMs demonstrated discrimination between melanoma cases and controls consisting of benign nevi and normal skin. Nine MDMs passing biological validation in tissue were run on 77 plasma samples from individuals with a history of metastatic melanoma, 49 of whom had evidence of disease detected by imaging at the time of blood draw, and 100 cancer-free controls. The cross-validated sensitivity of the panel for imaging-positive disease was 80% with a specificity of 100% in cancer-free controls, resulting in an overall AUC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.96). The survival estimates for patients with melanoma who tested positive for the panel at 6 months and 1 year were 67% and 56%, respectively, while those who tested negative had survival rates of 100% and 92%.

CONCLUSION

MDMs identified by RRBS demonstrate a high degree of concordance with imaging results in the plasma of patients with metastatic melanoma. Further prospective studies in larger intended use cohorts are needed to confirm these findings.

SALVO: Single-Arm Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Mucosal Melanoma

PURPOSE

Mucosal melanoma is a rare, aggressive form of melanoma with extremely high recurrence rates despite definitive surgical resection with curative intent. Currently there is no consensus on adjuvant therapy. Data on checkpoint inhibitors for adjuvant therapy are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a single-arm, multicenter clinical trial using "flip dose" ipilimumab (1 mg/kg q3w × 4 cycles), and nivolumab (3 mg/kg q3w × 4 cycles), then nivolumab 480 mg q4w × 11 cycles to complete a year of adjuvant therapy. Participants must have had R0/R1 resection ≤90 days before registration, no prior systemic therapy (adjuvant radiotherapy allowed), ECOG 0/1, and no uncontrolled autoimmune disease or other invasive cancer. Patients were recruited through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Oncology Network.

RESULTS

From September 2017 to August 2021, 35 patients were enrolled. Of these, 29 (83%) had R0 resections, and 7 (20%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. Median age was 67 years, 21 (60.0%) female. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates at 1 and 2 years were 50% [95% confidence interval (CI), 31%-66%] and 37% (95% CI, 19%-55%), respectively. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 87% (95% CI, 68%-95%) and 68% (95% CI, 46%-83%), respectively. Median RFS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 5.7-25.8). Most common grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (14%), hypertension (14%), and hyponatremia (11%), with no grade 4/5 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

Flip-dose ipilimumab and nivolumab after resection of mucosal melanoma is associated with outcomes improved over that of surgical resection alone. Long-term follow-up, subgroup analyses and correlative studies are ongoing.

A mixed-methods study to identify key priorities around improving team-based care coordination for patients receiving combination IV and oral systemic anti-cancer therapy

52

Background: When combination medical therapy incorporates both IV and oral anti-cancer agents, patients may experience compound side effects and face challenges with treatment adherence. To assess how community cancer programs may improve care coordination for patients receiving combination IV/oral systemic therapy, the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) conducted a mixed-methods study that involved healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and caregivers. Methods: The study followed a sequential quantitative-qualitative design to answer questions around the barriers or challenges associated with combination IV/oral systemic therapy. The quantitative phase included an online survey of HCPs (by ACCC) and a survey of patients and caregivers (by Edge Research, in collaboration with several patient advocacy organizations). In the quantitative phase, the survey results were contextualized through two HCP focus groups and individual HCP interviews. Results: Comparing and contrasting the patient survey (n = 113) and HCP survey (n = 157) results revealed insights around the following themes: Top Challenges: Patients felt their top challenges were side effects (57.5%); inconvenience going to medical appointments (37.2%); and financial burden (36.3%). HCPs perceived top challenges as cost of care to the patient (24.0%); coordination and delivery of oral agents (22.1%); and health insurance coverage (21.9%). In focus groups, HCPs explained how they were investing significant staffing resources to prevent and mitigate financial toxicity, especially for patients receiving oral therapies. Methods of Communication: 35.4% of patients “highly preferred” using email to communicate with HCPs about their combination regimens. However, HCPs felt that email was one of the least effective methods of communicating with patients. In focus groups, HCPs agreed that email is convenient when communicating about non-urgent matters. However, they were concerned that some patients may use email to communicate about urgent issues. Treatment-related AEs: When patients experienced treatment-related AEs, 30.1% said their clinicians tried a dose modification or hold. HCPs had mixed perceptions regarding the effectiveness of dose holidays. Those who felt this was highly effective included: advanced practice providers (42.9%), nurses (28.1%); oncologists (16.7%); and pharmacists (16.7%). Conclusions: This study identifies opportunities to improve care coordination for patients receiving combination IV/oral systemic anti-cancer regimens. These findings may inform the creation and dissemination of effective practices and quality improvement projects. These results may also help cancer programs tailor resources and incorporate proactive steps to address some of the key challenges patients may face.

Effect of Electronic Symptom Monitoring on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Electronic systems that facilitate patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys for patients with cancer may detect symptoms early and prompt clinicians to intervene.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether electronic symptom monitoring during cancer treatment confers benefits on quality-of-life outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Report of secondary outcomes from the PRO-TECT (Alliance AFT-39) cluster randomized trial in 52 US community oncology practices randomized to electronic symptom monitoring with PRO surveys or usual care. Between October 2017 and March 2020, 1191 adults being treated for metastatic cancer were enrolled, with last follow-up on May 17, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

In the PRO group, participants (n = 593) were asked to complete weekly surveys via an internet-based or automated telephone system for up to 1 year. Severe or worsening symptoms triggered care team alerts. The control group (n = 598) received usual care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 3 prespecified secondary outcomes were physical function, symptom control, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 3 months, measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30; range, 0-100 points; minimum clinically important difference [MCID], 2-7 for physical function; no MCID defined for symptom control or HRQOL). Results on the primary outcome, overall survival, are not yet available.

RESULTS

Among 52 practices, 1191 patients were included (mean age, 62.2 years; 694 [58.3%] women); 1066 (89.5%) completed 3-month follow-up. Compared with usual care, mean changes on the QLQ-C30 from baseline to 3 months were significantly improved in the PRO group for physical function (PRO, from 74.27 to 75.81 points; control, from 73.54 to 72.61 points; mean difference, 2.47 [95% CI, 0.41-4.53]; P = .02), symptom control (PRO, from 77.67 to 80.03 points; control, from 76.75 to 76.55 points; mean difference, 2.56 [95% CI, 0.95-4.17]; P = .002), and HRQOL (PRO, from 78.11 to 80.03 points; control, from 77.00 to 76.50 points; mean difference, 2.43 [95% CI, 0.90-3.96]; P = .002). Patients in the PRO group had significantly greater odds of experiencing clinically meaningful benefits vs usual care for physical function (7.7% more with improvements of ≥5 points and 6.1% fewer with worsening of ≥5 points; odds ratio [OR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.08-1.70]; P = .009), symptom control (8.6% and 7.5%, respectively; OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.15-1.95]; P = .003), and HRQOL (8.5% and 4.9%, respectively; OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.10-1.81]; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this report of secondary outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of adults receiving cancer treatment, use of weekly electronic PRO surveys to monitor symptoms, compared with usual care, resulted in statistically significant improvements in physical function, symptom control, and HRQOL at 3 months, with mean improvements of approximately 2.5 points on a 0- to 100-point scale. These findings should be interpreted provisionally pending results of the primary outcome of overall survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03249090.

Effect of Electronic Symptom Monitoring on Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Electronic systems that facilitate patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys for patients with cancer may detect symptoms early and prompt clinicians to intervene.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether electronic symptom monitoring during cancer treatment confers benefits on quality-of-life outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Report of secondary outcomes from the PRO-TECT (Alliance AFT-39) cluster randomized trial in 52 US community oncology practices randomized to electronic symptom monitoring with PRO surveys or usual care. Between October 2017 and March 2020, 1191 adults being treated for metastatic cancer were enrolled, with last follow-up on May 17, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

In the PRO group, participants (n = 593) were asked to complete weekly surveys via an internet-based or automated telephone system for up to 1 year. Severe or worsening symptoms triggered care team alerts. The control group (n = 598) received usual care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 3 prespecified secondary outcomes were physical function, symptom control, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 3 months, measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30; range, 0-100 points; minimum clinically important difference [MCID], 2-7 for physical function; no MCID defined for symptom control or HRQOL). Results on the primary outcome, overall survival, are not yet available.

RESULTS

Among 52 practices, 1191 patients were included (mean age, 62.2 years; 694 [58.3%] women); 1066 (89.5%) completed 3-month follow-up. Compared with usual care, mean changes on the QLQ-C30 from baseline to 3 months were significantly improved in the PRO group for physical function (PRO, from 74.27 to 75.81 points; control, from 73.54 to 72.61 points; mean difference, 2.47 [95% CI, 0.41-4.53]; P = .02), symptom control (PRO, from 77.67 to 80.03 points; control, from 76.75 to 76.55 points; mean difference, 2.56 [95% CI, 0.95-4.17]; P = .002), and HRQOL (PRO, from 78.11 to 80.03 points; control, from 77.00 to 76.50 points; mean difference, 2.43 [95% CI, 0.90-3.96]; P = .002). Patients in the PRO group had significantly greater odds of experiencing clinically meaningful benefits vs usual care for physical function (7.7% more with improvements of ≥5 points and 6.1% fewer with worsening of ≥5 points; odds ratio [OR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.08-1.70]; P = .009), symptom control (8.6% and 7.5%, respectively; OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.15-1.95]; P = .003), and HRQOL (8.5% and 4.9%, respectively; OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.10-1.81]; P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this report of secondary outcomes from a randomized clinical trial of adults receiving cancer treatment, use of weekly electronic PRO surveys to monitor symptoms, compared with usual care, resulted in statistically significant improvements in physical function, symptom control, and HRQOL at 3 months, with mean improvements of approximately 2.5 points on a 0- to 100-point scale. These findings should be interpreted provisionally pending results of the primary outcome of overall survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03249090.

SALVO: Single-arm trial of ipilimumab and nivolumab as adjuvant therapy for resected mucosal melanoma

9573

Background: Mucosal melanoma is a rare, highly aggressive form of melanoma with extremely high recurrence rates, despite definitive surgical resection. Median RFS has been reported to be 5.4m, with RFS rates at 1 and 2 years of 10%, and 0%, respectively (Lian B, Si L, Cui C, et al. Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing High-Dose IFN-α2b with Temozolomide Plus Cisplatin as Systemic Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Mucosal Melanoma. Clinical Cancer Research 2013, 19(16):4488-4498). Currently there is no consensus on recommendations for adjuvant therapy. Data on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) adjuvantly is lacking. Methods: We performed a single arm, multicenter clinical trial using “flip dose” ipilimumab (1mg/kg q3w x4 cycles),and nivolumab (3 mg.kg q3w x4 cycles), then Nivolumab 480 mg q4w x 11 cycles to complete a year of adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and the study had 85% power to detect an improvement in RFS between 5.5 and 9.5 months using a one-sided log rank test. Participants must have had R0/R1 resection <90 days prior to registration, and no prior systemic therapy (adjuvant radiation allowed), ECOG 0/1, no uncontrolled significant autoimmune disease or other invasive cancer. Patients were recruited through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Oncology Network. Results: From 9/17 to 8/21, 44 patients were approached at 6 centers. Of these 9 were ineligible, and 35 were enrolled. Of these, 29 (83%) had R0 resections, and 7 (20%) had adjuvant radiation prior to enrollment. As of Dec 2021, 31 patients have completed the treatment phase. Of the 35 patients treated on study, 20 patients have recurred (7 local, 5 distant, 3 regional, 5 sites unconfirmed), 6 stopped therapy due to adverse effects, and 8 have died. The mean age of patients was 65.8 years and 21 (60.0%) were female. The primary site of disease was vulvovaginal N=12 (32.4%) patients, sinonasal N= 11 (29.7%), anorectal N= 9 (24.3%) and other site N= 5 (13.5%). Adjuvant radiation had been given in 7 pts. Driver mutations were rare, with only 3 (8.6%) patients having a KIT mutation, and one patient (2.9%) each having a NRAS or BRAF mutation. RFS rates at 1 and 2 years were 50% (95% CI 31-66%) and 37% (95% CI 19-55%), with OS rates at 1 and 2 years of 87% (95% CI 68-95%) and 68% (95% CI 46-83%). Median RFS was 10.3 m (95% CI5.7-25.8). Most common grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (14%), hypertension (14%), hyponatremia (11%), with no grade 4/5 toxicities. Conclusions: Flip dose ipilimumab and nivolumab after resection is associated with outcomes improved over previously reported outcomes in the absence of therapy. Long term follow up is ongoing as are subgroup analyses and correlative studies. Clinical trial information: NCT03241186.

Digital symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes in community oncology practices: A U.S. national cluster randomized trial

349527

Background: Symptoms are common during cancer care but often go undetected. Digital systems that elicit patient-reported outcomes (PRO) surveys may detect symptoms early and prompt clinicians to intervene, thereby alleviating suffering and averting complications. Methods: In a cluster-randomized trial, U.S.-based community oncology practices were randomized 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring with PRO surveys, or to usual care control. Patients receiving systemic treatment for metastatic cancer were eligible. At PRO practices, participants were invited to complete a weekly survey via web or automated telephone system for up to one year, including questions about nine common symptoms, performance status, and falls. Severe or worsening symptoms triggered electronic alerts to care team nurses, and reports showing longitudinal symptom data were available to oncologists at visits. Pre-specified secondary outcomes included impact on physical function, symptom control, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). The primary outcome of survival is not yet mature. Results: At 52 practices, 1,191 patients were eligible and enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control). Clinically meaningful benefits were experienced in physical function by 13.8% more patients with PRO versus control (P=0.009); symptom control by 16.1% (P=0.003); and HRQL by 13.4% (P=0.006). Mean changes from baseline were superior with PRO versus control for physical function (mean difference 2.47, 95% CI 0.41-4.53; P=0.02), symptom control (2.56, 0.95-4.17; P=0.002), and HRQL (2.43, 0.90-3.96; P=0.002). Patients completed 20,565/22,486 (91.5%) of expected weekly PRO surveys. Conclusions: Digital symptom monitoring during cancer treatment confers clinical benefits. Clinical trial information: NCT03249090.

Clinical Utility and User Perceptions of a Digital System for Electronic Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Care: Findings From the PRO-TECT Trial

PURPOSE

There is increasing interest in implementing digital systems for remote monitoring of patients' symptoms during routine oncology practice. Information is limited about the clinical utility and user perceptions of these systems.

METHODS

PRO-TECT is a multicenter trial evaluating implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) among adults with advanced and metastatic cancers receiving treatment at US community oncology practices (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03249090). Questions derived from the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) are administered weekly by web or automated telephone system, with alerts to nurses for severe or worsening symptoms. To elicit user feedback, surveys were administered to participating patients and clinicians.

RESULTS

Among 496 patients across 26 practices, the majority found the system and questions easy to understand (95%), easy to use (93%), and relevant to their care (91%). Most patients reported that PRO information was used by their clinicians for care (70%), improved discussions with clinicians (73%), made them feel more in control of their own care (77%), and would recommend the system to other patients (89%). Scores for most patient feedback questions were significantly positively correlated with weekly PRO completion rates in both univariate and multivariable analyses. Among 57 nurses, most reported that PRO information was helpful for clinical documentation (79%), increased efficiency of patient discussions (84%), and was useful for patient care (75%). Among 39 oncologists, most found PRO information useful (91%), with 65% using PROs to guide patient discussions sometimes or often and 65% using PROs to make treatment decisions sometimes or often.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the clinical utility and value of implementing digital systems for monitoring PROs, including the PRO-CTCAE, in routine cancer care.

Peptide vaccine with glucopyranosyl lipid A-stable oil-in-water emulsion for patients with resected melanoma

Aim: We tested the safety and immunogenicity of a novel vaccine in patients with resected high-risk melanoma. Patients & methods: HLA-A2-positive patients with resected Stage II-IV melanoma were randomized to receive up to three vaccinations of melanoma-associated peptide (MART-1a) combined with a stable oil-in-water emulsion (SE) either with the Toll-like receptor 4 agonist glucopyranosyl lipid A (GLA-SE-Schedule 1) or alone (SE-Schedule 2). Safety and immunogenicity of the vaccines were monitored. Results: A total of 23 patients were registered. No treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed. Increases in MART-1a-specific T cells were seen in 70 and 63% of Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 patients, respectively. Conclusion: Both vaccine schedules were well-tolerated and resulted in an increase in MART-1a-specific T cells. Clinical Trial registration: NCT02320305 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Chemo-immunotherapy combination after PD-1 inhibitor failure improves clinical outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients

Management of PD-1 blockade resistance in metastatic melanoma (MM) remains challenging. Immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone provides limited benefit in this setting. Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) has demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in lung cancer. Our pre-clinical study showed that in MM patients who have failed PD-1 blockade, the addition of chemotherapy increases CX3CR1+ therapy-responsive CD8+ T-cells with enhanced anti-tumor activity, resulting in improved clinical response. Here, we examined the clinical outcomes of CIT in MM patients after PD-1 blockade failure and the treatment-related changes in CX3CR1+ therapy-responsive CD8+ T-cells. We reviewed MM patients seen between January 2012 and June 2018 who failed anti-PD-1-based therapy and received subsequent CIT, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or chemotherapy alone. Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), and toxicities were assessed. Among 60 patients, 33 received CIT upon disease progression on PD-1 blockade. At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the CIT group had a median OS of 3.5 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-NR] vs. 1.8 years (95% CI 0.9-2; P = 0.002) for those who received subsequent ICI (n = 9) or chemotherapy alone (n = 18), with ORR of 59% vs. 15% (P = 0.0003), respectively. The median EFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 6-10) following CIT vs. 3.4 months (95% CI 2.8-4.1; P = 0.0005) following ICI or chemotherapy alone. Therapy-responsive CX3CR1+CD8+ T-cells showed dynamic increase with successful CIT. CIT showed favorable clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile in PD-1 blockade-resistant patients. CX3CR1+CD8+ therapy-responsive T-cells can be potentially used for monitoring disease response to CIT.

A phase I trial of nab-paclitaxel/bevacizumab (AB160) nano-immunoconjugate therapy for unresectable stage IV malignant melanoma (MM): MC1371 (NCT02020707)

e22020

Background: The combination of nab-paclitaxel (NP) and bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with MM has shown promising clinical activity. AB160 is a 160 nm nano-immunoconjugate of NP nanoparticles non-covalently coated with BEV for targeted delivery into high VEGF expressing tissues. Preclinical data showed that AB160 improved tumor targeting/ tumor inhibition more than NP followed by BEV. Methods: A 3+3 phase I trial was conducted in patients (pts) with MM who had prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease to determine the maximum tolerated dose of AB160 administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Dose level 1 (DL1) was 125 mg/m2 NP /50 mg/m2 BEV. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) included grade (G) 4 neutropenia or anemia, PLT < 25,000, serum creatinine ≥ 2 times baseline, G2-4 neurologic toxicity or G3-4 non-hematologic toxicities. Tumor evaluations (RECIST) were conducted every 8 weeks. Treatment continued until progression or intolerability. Results: 21 pts (11 ♀) aged 36-78 years old were enrolled. One of the first 3 pts on DL1 developed a G2 colonic perforation; this was considered a DLT. One of the next 3 pts on DL1 had a DLT: G4 neutropenia. Of the 3 pts on DL-1 (100 mg/m2 NP/40 mg/m2 BEV), 2 had no DLTs and 1 died of sepsis after C1D1 dose. Enrollment was suspended until an amendment modifying the eligibility criteria was approved by the IRB. The trial reopened. One of the 4 pts on DL-1 and 1 of the 5 pts on DL1 had a DLT: G3 pain and G3 fatigue, respectively. Enrollment ended after 2 of the 3 pts on DL2 (150 mg/m2 NP/ 60 mg/m2 BEV) developed G4 neutropenia. Thus, MTD is DL1. A median of 3 cycles was administered. Treatment ended due to progression (9), intolerability (9), refusal (2) and death (1). There were no objective tumor responses. Common G3-4 toxicities were: neutropenia (33%) and thromboembolic events (19%). Conclusions: AB160 was found to have insufficient clinical benefit in patients with previously treated MM to justify further development. However, parallel phase I testing in gynecologic cancers suggests clinical benefit (abstract #300225). Clinical trial information: NCT02020707.

Patterns of hepato-pulmonary metastasis and their impact on clinical outcomes in uveal melanoma

e22052

Background: Metastatic Uveal Melanoma (MUM) is a rare tumor with poor prognosis following development of liver metastasis. We hypothesized that patterns of metastasis in Uveal Melanoma correlate with clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with MUM at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from January 1999 to August 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the pattern of hepatic and pulmonary metastasis at the time of diagnosis of metastatic disease: Group 1 (≤5 liver metastasis or lung metastasis) and Group 2 ( > 5 liver metastasis without lung metastasis). Baseline characteristics were compared between both groups. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for Overall Survival (OS). Results: 147 patients were included in the study (n = 67 Group 1; n = 80 Group 2). In Group 1, 49/67 patients presented with ≤5 liver metastasis and 18/67 had lung metastasis without liver metastasis. Median OS for Group 1 was significantly longer than Group 2 (38 vs. 15 months; p < 0.0001) (Table). On univariate analysis, predictors for OS were: Pattern of Metastasis, ECOG PS > 0, Time to metastasis > 60 months, and Surgical metastatectomy. Pattern of Metastasis was an independent predictor for OS in a multivariate model that included these predictors (p = 0.0004). Group 1 patients were more likely to undergo surgical metastatectomy compared to group 2 (21.5% vs. 1.3%; p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the median time to metastasis from diagnosis of UM was significantly longer for Group 1 as compared to Group 2 (67 vs. 24.5 months; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Limited (≤5) liver metastasis or lung metastasis (without liver metastasis) at diagnosis predict favorable clinical outcomes in MUM. The occurrence of such metastasis following a significantly longer time from primary diagnosis suggests the existence of a distinct sub-type of metastatic disease with relatively indolent behavior. [Table: see text]

Assessment of clinical outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in melanoma patients with CDKN2A and TP53 pathogenic mutations

Background

CDKN2A and TP53 mutations are recurrent events in melanoma, occurring in 13.3% and 15.1% of cases respectively and are associated with poorer outcomes. It is unclear what effect CDKN2A and TP53 mutations have on the clinical outcomes of patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.

Methods

All patients with cutaneous melanoma or melanoma of unknown primary who received checkpoint inhibitor therapy and underwent genomic profiling with the 50-gene Mayo Clinic solid tumor targeted cancer gene panel were included. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of mutations in BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A, and TP53. Patients without mutations in any of these genes were termed quadruple wild type (Quad^WT). Clinical outcomes including median time to progression (TTP), median overall survival (OS), 6-month and 12-month OS, 6-month and 12-month without progression, ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were analyzed according to the mutational status of CDKN2A, TP53 and Quad^WT.

Results

A total of 102 patients were included in this study of which 14 had mutations of CDKN2A (CDKN2A^mut), 21 had TP53 mutations (TP53^mut), and 12 were Quad^WT. TP53^mut, CDKN2A^mut and Quad^WT mutational status did not impact clinical outcomes including median TTP, median OS, 6-month and 12-month OS, 6-month and 12-month without progression, ORR and DCR. There was a trend towards improved median TTP and DCR in CDKN2A^mut cohort and a trend towards worsened median TTP in the Quad^WT cohort.

Conclusion

Cell cycle regulators such as TP53 and CDKN2A do not appear to significantly alter clinical outcomes when immune checkpoint inhibitors are used.

Sex-Based Differences in Melanoma Survival in a Contemporary Patient Cohort

Background: A female survival advantage in cutaneous melanoma has been long recognized. However, whether this extends across all age groups, with risk stratification using the latest prognostic staging system or in the current era of efficacious systemic therapies is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated whether sex-based differences in melanoma survival persisted within a recent population-based patient cohort with consideration of these factors. Materials and Methods: We identified stage II-IV cutaneous melanoma patients from 2010 to 2014 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries data. We recalculated stage per American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition guidelines. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of 16,807 patients (39.8% female), 8,990 were stage II, 4,826 stage III, and 2,991 stage IV at diagnosis. Unadjusted 3-/5-year CSS estimates for females versus males were 64.2% versus 59.7%, and 53.5% versus 49.9%, respectively, p ≤ 0.0001. Five-year CSS varied within each stage and across age strata of <45, 45 - 59, and ≥60 years. Within each stage, females <45 had better CSS than all other sex/age groups (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis of stage II/III patients, female sex, younger age, and lower mitotic index retained favorable CSS prognostic significance (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Sex-based differences in melanoma survival persist in a contemporary patient cohort staged with the latest prognostic system. These data may guide decision marking regarding adjuvant therapy, highlight the importance of including sex as a pre-specified clinical trial variable, and suggest that investigation of underlying biologic mechanisms may drive discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets to improve patient care.

Atypical Presentations and Management of Endocrine and Hepatic Immune-Related Adverse Events From Adjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Stage III Resected Melanoma

Patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma who have undergone curative-intent surgery still remain at relatively high risk of disease recurrence. Recently approved adjuvant therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have brought increased relapse-free and overall survival rates. However, they have introduced a new range of side effects that can be difficult to diagnose, are challenging to treat, and may have lifelong consequences for patients. Oncologists and other members of the oncology care team should be aware of these side effects, including atypical presentations, and be prepared to intervene to prevent increased morbidity and mortality. Oncologists also need to have a low threshold for referral to other subspecialists, as many of these immune-related adverse events (irAEs) need to be comanaged using a multidisciplinary approach. Herein, we present a case that illustrates challenging presentations of endocrinopathy and hepatic irAEs in a patient with stage III melanoma receiving ICI therapy in the adjuvant setting.

SALVO: Single-arm phase II study of ipilimumab and nivolumab as adjuvant therapy for resected mucosal melanoma

TPS65

Background: Mucosal melanoma is a rare and, therefore, poorly studied malignancy. Patients with resected primary tumors have a median time to recurrence of 5.5 months. While no one adjuvant therapy is of proven benefit for patients, immunotherapy has shown activity in metastatic mucosal melanoma. Methods: We are performing a single arm, phase II clinical trial through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Cancer Research Network (6 sites) for resected mucosal melanoma. The primary endpoint is recurrence free survival (RFS), and it will include 36 subjects. Patients must have had an R0 or R1 resection of a mucosal melanoma (sinonasal, anorectal, vulvar, or other), and register within 90 days of surgery. Adjuvant radiation is allowed prior to registration but not required. Therapy consists of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) IV q3w x 4, then 480 mg nivolumab x 1 year. Statistical power is calculated to be 85% to detect a change in RFS from 5.5 months to 9.5 months, with a one sided alpha of 0.05. Enrollment began Sept 2017, with current participation from 6 large volume centers in the United States, with 17 patients enrolled as of Sept 2019. Full accrual is anticipated to complete by year end 2020. Patients will be followed for RFS and OS. Translational studies will include mutational burden, c-kit, BRAF, NRAS status, and serum markers of immunity -- including soluble PD-L1 and Bim. Clinical trial information: NCT03241186.

The Future of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To discuss future direction and present an overview of the evolution of immunotherapy long-term toxicity issues, financial toxicity, and new emerging survivorship considerations.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed manuscripts, Web sites.

CONCLUSION

Cancer treatments involving immunotherapy have had a major impact on long-term survival, toxicity, and survivorship issues.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses play a pivotal role in the care of the cancer patient across the continuum. With the unique toxicities associated with immunotherapy, it is essential that nurses be keenly aware of all aspects of management, from physical to financial care.

Abstract CT121: Neoadjuvant combination targeted and immunotherapy for high-risk resectable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE), NCT03554083

Background: Standard treatment for stage III melanoma is surgery followed by consideration of adjuvant therapy. This strategy is inadequate for high-risk stage III patients who have a substantial risk of subsequent relapse and distant metastasis. The goals of this trial are to improve oncologic outcomes, assess treatment response and spare patients with poorly responsive, rapidly metastatic disease from a futile operation. This protocol based on the hypothesis that treatment before surgery will immunize patients against his or her own unique tumor. While new drugs are now FDA-approved for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma, outcomes are still suboptimal in high-risk patients. The neoadjuvant approach is largely untested and preclinical data suggest neoadjuvant therapy is more effective than adjuvant immunotherapy. While targeted therapies can be rapidly effective, immunotherapy responses, when they occur, tend to be much more durable, prompting this study. Our specific strategy is based on the fact that BRAFm melanoma patients benefit both from BRAF/MEK inhibition (vemurafenib/cobimetinib) and PD-1 axis inhibition (atezolizumab) while patients with BRAFwt melanoma benefit from PD-1 axis inhibition (atezolizumab) and intermittent MEKi (cobimetinib) may increase effector function in tumor-infiltrating T cells. A second component of the study is robust evaluation of biomarkers of response, toxicity and outcome. Specific correlatives include assessment of the predictive value of Bim levels in tumor-related T cells, correlation of sPD-L1 with efficacy and toxicity, correlation of PD-L1 expression with efficacy, and determination of key relationships between tumor and immune cells via mIHC spatial analysis, gene expression profiles and microbiome associations with clinical response.

Methods: The NeoACTIVATE trial enrolls melanoma patients with resectable clinically detectable nodal metastases (by physical examination or imaging), dual nodal basin disease or nodal recurrence of melanoma. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is based on BRAF mutation status; participants receive either vemurafenib, cobimetinib and atezolizumab (vem/cobi/atezo), or cobimetinib and atezolizumab (cobi/atezo) before surgery. Following surgery, all patients receive atezo immunotherapy. The primary aim of the study is RFS estimates for each cohort. Secondary aims are safety/toxicity, pathologic complete response rate and prospective evaluation of biomarkers of treatment response and toxicity. This study is significant in that it is the first to test 1) combined of targeted and immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with resectable Stage III melanoma and 2) the novel combination of MEK-inhibition with immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable Stage III melanoma. As of January 1, 2019, 10% of planned patients have been enrolled and enrollment continues.

Citation Format: Tina J. Hieken, Vera J. Suman, Shernan G. Holtan, Thomas J. Flotte, Lisa A. Kottschade, Matthew S. Block. Neoadjuvant combination targeted and immunotherapy for high-risk resectable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE), NCT03554083 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT121.

IL-12p40 and MIP3a to predict clinical responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma

9535

Background: A broad understanding of baseline immunity is needed in order to predict responses to PD-1 blockade. We previously reported in a preclinical model that elevated Th1 signature cytokines are present after successful therapy with PD-1 blockade. In this study we evaluated serum cytokines as biomarkers of response in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing anti-PD1 therapy. Methods: 27 pts diagnosed with metastatic melanoma (MM) received anti-PD-1 therapy and had peripheral blood collected prior to anti-PD-1 therapy start and 12 weeks after; 55 proinflammatory-related serum cytokines were analyzed at both times using the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) assay. At week 12, we identified 15 pts who had radiographic complete or partial response (TR) and 12 had progressive disease (PD) using RECIST criteria. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rho) were used to assess association between pre-treatment serum cytokine levels. For each cytokine, differences in pretreatment serum levels and the ratio of the 12 week to pre-treatment serum levels between TR and PD groups were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Results: Pretreatment serum IL-12p40 and MIP3a (CCL20) were moderately correlated (rho=0.3944). Pretreatment IL-12p40 and was found to be significantly higher (p=0.0025) in the TR group (median=48.5; 25th to 75th percentile [IQR]:25.3-63.8) relative to the PD group (median=17.3; IQR: 8.6-30.3). Pretreatment MIP3a was also found to be significantly higher (p=0.0359) in the TR group (median=1.72; IQR: 1.41-2.65) relative to the PD group (median=1.33; IQR: 1.09-1.98). The 12th week pretreatment IL-12p40 ratio (median=1.98; IQR: 1.4-11.3) in the TR group was greater than that (median=0.64; IQR: 0.23-1.61) in the PD group (p=0.0029); we identified that baseline serum levels >15pg/ml of IL12p40 prior to immunotherapy were associated with significantly prolonged event free survival (p=0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of IL-12p40 and MIP-3a levels before immunotherapy may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-PD1 therapy. Additionally, exploration of combination therapies that increase IL-12P40 and MIP3 prior or during immunotherapy should be undertaken.

Quantitative assessment of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils to predict immunotherapy responses in metastatic melanoma

e21039

Background: Tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) and their myeloid precursors play an important role in cancer biology. While activated neutrophils have been shown to kill tumor cells, there is growing evidence that neutrophils may also support tumor progression by impairing T cell-dependent anti-tumor immunity. We hypothesized that low TINs would be associated with better responses to immunotherapy (IO). Methods: Pretreatment biopsies from 15 metastatic melanoma (MM) pts treated with anti-CTL4 and anti-PD-1 therapy from 2012-17 were collected and stained with myeloperoxidase (MPO). Slides were scanned at 40x magnification on the Aperio ScanScope AT Turbo brightfield instrument (Leica Biosystems) at a resolution of 0.25 microns per pixel. To indicate the region of analysis, the digital pen tool was used to trace a minimum 85% of tumor. Ten fixed-sized boxes were placed on the hottest staining region in a second annotation layer on the image. The boxes equaled 1mm2 in total area. If the tumor tracing had an area of 1mm2, or less, boxes were not placed on the image. The selected tissue was analyzed using an Aperio imaging quatification algorithm . The number of 3+ cells were considered positive for neutrophils and used in subsequent calculations. Quality control review was performed on a subset of cases by Anatomic Pathologists. Response to therapy was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: The median number of treatment lines before the biopsy was 1 (range 0-2). The treatment immediately following the biopsy consisted of ipilimumab (n = 10, 66.6%), pembrolizumab (n = 4, 26.6%), ipilimumab/nivolumab (n = 1, 6.6%). The median number of neutrophils in the biopsy hotspot was 92/mm2 (range 6-219) for the entire cohort. For patients achieving PR and CR after 4 cycles of therapy, the median neutrophils were 36/mm2 (IQ 14-78) while the median was 106/mm2 (IQ 60-138) for patients who had progressive disease,( p = 0.04). There was no correlation between the numbers of neutrophils in the biopsy with the absolute neutrophil count in the peripheral blood (R value: 0.012). Conclusions: Decreased TINs are significantly associated with better responses to IO in MM pts. Measurements of TINs may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-CTL4 and anti-PD-1 therapy. Additionally, exploration of whether combining therapies that decrease neutrophils intratumorally should be explored.

Real-world outcomes with immuno-oncology (IO) therapies: A prospective, observational cohort study in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (OPTIMIzE)

e14144

Background: There is little real-world evidence evaluating treatment patterns and outcomes with IO therapies for pts with advanced melanoma (aMEL). We present results from the OPTIMIzE (NCT02780089) study in pts with aMEL receiving IO therapies. Methods: OPTIMIzE is a US-based multisite (150 sites), community-based study of adult pts with aMEL. Pts receiving first-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO)+ipilimumab (IPI), anti-PD-1 (NIVO/pembrolizumab), or IPI between 2011-2018 with a minimum 1 y of follow-up were included. Baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. QoL assessments included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Melanoma (FACT-M), EQ-5D index, and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Cohort size: 81 NIVO+IPI, 147 anti-PD-1, and 16 IPI (IPI arm not included in the analysis). Overall, mean age was 64.5 y; 42% had BRAF mutation. Mean follow-up was 14.1 mo. Pts in the NIVO+IPI group were younger, had better ECOG performance status, and a higher likelihood of M1c disease and elevated LDH vs the anti-PD-1 group. ORR was higher for pts treated with NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 (48% vs 33%, P= 0.08). Unadjusted 1-y OS was 78.4% for NIVO+IPI and 73.1% for anti-PD-1. In multivariate Cox model analysis, the hazard ratio for OS for NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.46–1.33; P= 0.36). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 53% and 22% of pts in the NIVO+IPI and anti-PD-1 groups, respectively ( P˂0.001). QoL changes from baseline were clinically meaningful for EQ-5D VAS and FACT-M in the NIVO+IPI group at 12 mo (Table). After adjusting for baseline covariates, the difference at 12 mo between NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 6.7 ( P= 0.04) for EQ-5D VAS and 8.8 ( P= 0.02) for FACT-M. Conclusions: Safety and efficacy outcomes from this prospective real-world study are consistent with those reported in prior clinical trials in treatment-naive aMEL pts. No clinically meaningful deterioration in QoL measures was observed in either group. Clinical trial information: NCT02780089. [Table: see text]

Sex Differences in Tolerability to Anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Are We All Equal?

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have emerged as a serious clinical issue in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Risk factors for irAEs remain controversial. Therefore, we studied sex differences in irAEs in patients treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-PD-1 therapy at Mayo Clinic Rochester and Florida from 2015 to 2018 were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used for time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

In 245 patients with metastatic melanoma, premenopausal women were more likely to experience irAEs (all grades) compared with postmenopausal women and men (67% vs. 60% vs. 46%), primarily because of an increase in endocrinopathies (33% vs. 12% vs. 10%, respectively). In patients with NSCLC (231 patients), women (all ages) were also more likely to develop irAEs of all grades (48% vs. 31%). Women with NSCLC were more likely to develop pneumonitis (11% vs. 4%) and endocrinopathies (14% vs. 5%). No differences in grade ≥3 toxicities were seen across sexes in both cohorts, but women were more likely to receive systemic steroids for the treatment of irAEs compared with men. Better progression-free-survival was observed in women with NSCLC and irAEs (10 months vs. 3.3 months) compared with women without irAEs.

CONCLUSION

Women with metastatic melanoma and NSCLC are more likely to experience irAEs compared with men. We also observed differences between sexes in the frequency of certain irAEs. Larger studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying these associations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results of this study suggest that women may be at a higher risk for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) compared with men when treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy. In addition, women were more likely to develop certain irAEs, including endocrinopathies and pneumonitis. Close follow-up of women undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors will allow clinicians to diagnose these treatment-related complications early, potentially reducing their associated morbidity and mortality. In addition, a possible association between irAEs and response to therapy was observed.

Chemo-immunotherapy combination after PD-1 inhibitor failure improves clinical outcomes in metastatic melanoma patients

138

Background: Clinical management of metastatic melanoma (MM) after PD-1 blockade failure remains challenging and lacks a standard of care. Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) combinations have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in lung cancer patients. In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of CIT with immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone after PD-1 blockade failure. Methods: We reviewed MM patients seen at Mayo Clinic between Jan, 2012 and Jun, 2018 who failed anti-PD1 therapy and received subsequent CIT, or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or chemotherapy alone. A total of 60 patients were analyzed, the CIT cohort [n=33 (55%)] treatment consisted of carboplatin/paclitaxel (n=29), nab-paclitaxel (n=2), paclitaxel (n=1), and temozolomide (n=1). In the ICI (n=9) or chemotherapy alone cohort (n=18) [n=27 (45%)], treatment consisted of carboplatin/paclitaxel (n=11), temozolomide (n=4), nab-paclitaxel (n=3), ipilimumab/nivolumab (n=4), pembrolizumab (n=4), or nivolumab (n=1). Results: Patients in the CIT cohort had a median OS of 3.5 years (95% CI: 1.7-NR) compared to 1.8 years (95% CI: 0.9-2) in the ICI or chemotherapy alone cohort, p=0.02. The median EFS following CIT was 7.6 months (95% CI: 6-10) compared to 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.1) following either ICI or chemotherapy alone, p=0.0005. A trend towards longer median EFS with use of CIT was seen in patients with BRAF wild-type [median 9 months (95% CI: 6-12)] compared to those harboring a BRAF mutation [median 6.5 months (95% CI: 1.8-9.1), p=0.29]. Side effects were similar among both groups. Conclusions: In MM patients who have failed anti-PD-1 therapy, the CIT combination showed favorable clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile. This regimen should be considered for MM pts in this setting who have limited treatment options. [Table: see text]

Methods for alerting clinicians to concerning symptom questionnaire responses during cancer care: Approaches from two randomized trials (STAR, AFT-39 PRO-TECT)

158

Background: There is limited research on methods for alerting clinicians to concerning patient-reported outcome (PRO) responses and how often PROs trigger alerts to nurses during cancer care. Methods: In two randomized trials, adults with advanced cancer receiving chemotherapy were enrolled. Participants were randomized to usual care vs. weekly PROs completed between visits (with automated feedback to nurses). PRO responses in the intervention arm triggered automated email alerts to nurses for frequent, severe, or worsening symptoms in the last 7 days. Alert thresholds for PROs were chosen a priori but were unique to each study. The “Symptom Tracking and Reporting” (STAR) trial was conducted at one academic medical center. The “PROs to Enhance Cancer Treatment” (PRO-TECT [AFT-39]) cluster-randomized trial is being conducted in > 30 community practices. Results: In STAR, 766 patients participated (58% female, 38% ages ≥65, 17% minority, 28% ≤high school). 441 participants were randomized to the intervention arm, where 1,431/84,212 items (2%) triggered a concerning symptom alert, during 1,070/8,498 weeks (13%). Frequent alerts were for fatigue (62%), pain (32%), and appetite (16%). In PRO-TECT (AFT-39), 300 patients have been enrolled (58% female, 49% ages ≥65, 8% minority, 47% ≤high school) out of 1,000. 146 participants have been randomized to the intervention arm, where 1,422/24,739 items (6%) triggered an alert, during 824/2249 weeks (37%). Common alerts were for pain (48%), physical function (35%), and diarrhea (15%). PRO-TECT provided clinical decision support with alerts. Conclusions: In two randomized trials in advanced cancer, PROs collected during care delivery enabled tailored treatment based on issues identified on PROs. Pain, physical function, appetite, and diarrhea commonly triggered alerts for concerning symptoms. Early PRO-TECT results are showing a trend for higher weekly alert rates for concerning symptoms (37% vs. 13% in STAR), which may indicate that the PRO intervention will be even more effective in community practices. Results assist in addressing logistical considerations for implementing PROs into routine care. Clinical trial information: NCT03249090.

Association between the use of surveillance PET/CT and the detection of potentially salvageable occult recurrences among patients with resected high-risk melanoma

The optimal surveillance for patients with resected high-risk melanoma is controversial. Select locoregional or oligometastatic recurrences can be cured with salvage resection. Data on the ability of PET/CT to detect such recurrences are sparse. We evaluated whether surveillance PET/CT in patients with resected stage III-IV melanoma led to detection of clinically occult recurrences amenable to curative-intent salvage treatment. We retrospectively identified 1429 melanoma patients who underwent PET/CT between January 2008 and October 2012 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota). A total of 1130 were excluded because of stage I-II, ocular or mucosal melanoma, incomplete resection, PET/CT not performed for surveillance or performed at a different institution, and records not available. A total of 299 patients were eligible. Overall, 162 (52%) patients developed recurrence [locoregional: 77 (48%), distant: 85 (52%)]. The first recurrence was clinically occult in 98 (60%) and clinically evident in 64 (40%). Clinically evident recurrences were more often superficial (skin, subcutaneous, or nodal) or in the brain, whereas clinically occult recurrences more often visceral. Overall, 90% of all recurrences were detected by 2.8 years. In all, 70% of patients with recurrence underwent curative-intent salvage treatment (locoregional: 94%, distant: 48%), with similar rates for clinically occult versus clinically evident recurrences (66 vs. 75%, P=0.240). Overall survival was superior among those who underwent curative-intent salvage treatment [5.9 vs. 1.2 years; hazard ratio=4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.68-6.80; P<0.001], despite 79% developing recurrence again. PET/CT had high sensitivity (88%, 95% CI=79.94-93.31%), specificity (90%, 95% CI=88.56-91.56%), and negative predictive value (99%, 95% CI=98.46-99.52%). However, the positive predictive value was only 37% (95% CI=31.32-43.68%). In patients with resected stage III-IV melanoma, surveillance PET/CT detected a large proportion of clinically occult recurrences amenable to curative-intent salvage treatment. Despite a high rate of second relapse, curative-intent salvage treatment was associated with superior overall survival. Even though PET/CT had high sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value, positive predictive value was poor, highlighting the need for histologic confirmation of PET/CT-detected abnormalities.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for regionally advanced melanoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with regionally advanced melanoma are at high risk of distant failure and unlikely to be cured by surgery alone. Neoadjuvant therapy may provide benefit in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate our experience with neoadjuvant systemic therapy in high-risk stage III patients.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with advanced stage III disease who received neoadjuvant therapy between August 2009 and August 2016 at Mayo Clinic Rochester.

RESULTS

Twenty-three cases met our inclusion criteria, 16 with resectable disease and 7 with unresectable disease. No patients with resectable disease and one patient with borderline resectable disease progressed regionally, prohibiting surgical resection. Five of seven patients with unresectable disease were down-staged to a resectable state. Six of twenty-three (26%) had a CR and five are alive at last follow-up. Fifteen of twenty three patients (65%) progressed with a median progression free survival of 11 months; however, the 5 year overall survival estimate was 84%.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is a reasonable approach for patients with advanced but resectable/borderline resectable disease and the risk of losing regional control is low. Our data also suggest some patients with unresectable disease will be converted to resectable and a complete clinical response to treatment can be obtained in approximately one quater of patients.

NCCTG N0879 (Alliance): A randomized phase 2 cooperative group trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab ± everolimus for metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Despite the success of immune checkpoint and targeted therapy, many patients with melanoma ultimately require further treatment. The combination of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab (CPB) has demonstrated promising activity in a single-arm study. In the current study, the authors performed a randomized phase 2 study to confirm efficacy and to determine whether adding everolimus would increase the activity of the combination.

METHODS

Through the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, a total of 149 patients with unresectable AJCC 6th edition stage IV melanoma were randomized from May 2010 to May 2014 to either CPB or CPB with everolimus (CPBE). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS), response rate, and tolerability.

RESULTS

The CPB and CPBE treatment arms were balanced with regard to age (median age: 59 years vs 58 years) and high lactate dehydrogenase (48% vs 51%), but were unbalanced with regard to sex (male sex: 72% vs 55%; P = .03). Overall, there was no difference noted with regard to PFS, with a median PFS of 5.6 months for CPB versus 5.1 months for CPBE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.81-1.62 [P = .44]), or for OS, with a median OS of 14.5 months for CPB versus 10.8 months for CPBE (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.84-1.84). The confirmed response rate was 13% for CPB and 23% for CPBE (P = .13). Toxicity was higher for CPBE compared with CPB (83% for grade 3 + and 14% for grade 4 + vs 63% for grade 3 + and 11% for grade 4+, respectively) (toxicities were graded using the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). Common grade 3 + toxicities were neutropenia, leukopenia, and fatigue, which occurred in both treatment arms with comparable frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Both experimental arms demonstrated activity, with a PFS of >5 months. However, the addition of everolimus to CPB failed to improve outcomes, with increased toxicity noted. These findings replicate the moderate antitumor activity of CPB, with future development possibly in combination with targeted or immunotherapy. Cancer 2018;124:537-45. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Survival of cutaneous melanoma based on sex, age, and stage in the United States, 1992-2011

Women diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma have a survival advantage compared to men, which has been hypothesized to be due to difference in behavior and/or biology (sex hormones). It remains controversial whether this advantage is dependent on age or stage of disease. We sought to compare melanoma-specific survival between females in pre, peri, and postmenopausal age groups to males in the same age group, adjusting for stage of disease. This is a retrospective population-based cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed from 1 January 1992 through 31 January 2011 with primary invasive cutaneous melanoma were included in our cohort. Melanoma-specific survival was the main outcome studied. Of the 106,511 subjects that were included, 45% were female. Females in all age groups (18-45, 46-54, and ≥55) with localized and regional disease, were less likely to die from melanoma compared to males in the same age group. Among patients with localized and regional disease, the relative risk of death due to melanoma increased with advancing age at diagnosis; this increase was more pronounced among females than males. In contrast, we observed no female survival advantage among patients with distant disease and no effect of age on relative risk of death from melanoma. Females with localized and regional melanoma have a decreased risk of death compared to males within all age groups. Our data show no differences in survival between men and women with metastatic melanoma, indicating that the influence of sex on survival is limited to early stage disease but not confined to pre or perimenopausal age groups.

Promoting Oral Therapy Adherence: Consensus Statements From the Faculty of the Melanoma Nursing Initiative on Oral Melanoma Therapies

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of BRAF and the downstream signaling protein MEK have improved outcomes for patients with BRAF-mutant advanced malignant melanoma. Despite their ease of administration, these oral therapies pose adherence challenges. 
.

OBJECTIVES

This article aims to increase awareness of causes of nonadherence to oral targeted therapies in advanced malignant melanoma and to provide oncology nurses with strategies to address these nonadherence issues. 
.

METHODS

Members of the Melanoma Nursing Initiative explored issues related to adherence to targeted therapies in advanced malignant melanoma. The current literature and clinical experience were reviewed. 
.

FINDINGS

The authors present a care step pathway focused on increased patient engagement and rapid identification and optimal management of toxicities to avoid toxicity-related nonadherence. Other causes for nonadherence and employment of individualized strategies to support patient adherence are addressed.

The prognostic role of preoperative serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients with resected advanced melanoma

e21054

Background: Up to 50% of patients undergoing resection for advanced melanoma experience recurrence. Identification of preoperative prognostic biomarkers is needed to ascertain risk of relapse and guide postoperative management. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) represents a strong prognostic factor in unresectable metastatic (stage IV) melanoma, but its relevance in patients with resected stage III or IV disease remains unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with stage III and IV melanoma who had undergone complete resection of disease and received follow-up treatment at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2012. Clinical data were collected from electronic records. Survival data were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations of preoperative LDH with time to relapse and death were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models and summarized with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 154 subjects with resectable stage III or IV melanoma were included in the study. Median age at the time of resection was 58; 54 (35.1%) were female. One-hundred sixteen (75.3%) patients were classified as stage III and 38 (24.7%) stage IV. Adjuvant systemic treatment was administered in 75 (48.7%) patients and adjuvant radiation in 32 (20.7%). Median duration of follow-up was 4.0 years. Sixteen (10.3%) patients had preoperative LDH above the upper limit of normal. Each 50-unit increase in LDH was associated with a 15% increased risk of relapse (HR 1.15; p = 0.040) and 23% increased risk of death (HR 1.23; p = 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, stage, number of sites, adjuvant systemic treatment, and adjuvant radiation, preoperative LDH remained associated with time to death (HR 1.25; p = 0.002). Preoperative LDH greater than the upper limit of normal was associated with increased hazard of death, both with univariate (HR 2.44; p = 0.005) and multivariate (HR 2.17; p = 0.017) analyses. Conclusions: This study supports the role of elevated preoperative LDH as a predictor of inferior outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma. Further study to correlate LDH to outcomes in the era of adjuvant immunotherapy is required.

Assessment of treatment response to immunotherapy in melanoma patients with pathogenic mutations of NRAS, BRAF, CDKN2A and P53

e21057

Background: BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 mutations are commonly observed pathogenic mutations in cutaneous melanoma. The influence of mutations such as BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 on treatment response in the PD1 inhibitor era has not been well defined. Methods: This study included patients with melanoma with a cutaneous or unknown primary. All patients had genomic profiling with the Mayo Clinic 50-gene solid tumor mutation panel. Treatment response to first line immunotherapy with PD1, CTLA-4, or combination PD1/CTLA-4 inhibitors were assessed by response rate and time-to-progression (TTP) rate at 12 months. Each patient outcome was stratified by non-mutually exclusive gene mutation status into BRAF, NRAS, P53, CDKN2A, or quadruple negative (N4) groups. Results: Genomic profiling was performed on 208 patients, of whom 102 received first line immunotherapy. Most patients received a PD1 inhibitor (n = 62), followed by CTLA-4 inhibitor (n = 34), and combination therapy (n = 6). A trend towards improved outcomes was observed in CDKN2A and BRAF mutated patients with worse outcomes noted in P53, N4, and NRAS patients. The percent without progression at 12 months were BRAF 52.2%, CDKN2A 58.2%, NRAS 30.5%, P53 37.7%, and N4 26.7% (see table below). Response rates were BRAF 46.4%, CDKN2A 38.5%, NRAS 22.2%, P53 40.0%, and N4 33.3%. Conclusions: There is a trend towards improved outcomes with immunotherapy in BRAF and CDKN2A mutated patients while P53, NRAS and N4 patients have inferior outcomes. [Table: see text]

Bim and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) as predictive biomarkers of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with melanoma and lung carcinoma

11534

Background: To date, there are no validated blood-based biomarkers of predicting response to PD-1 blockade. We previously reported that Bim is a downstream signaling molecule of the PD-1 pathway, and that measurement of Bim levels in circulating T-cells may predict and monitor responses to anti–PD-1 therapy in melanoma. We have identified the existence of sPD-L1 in cancer patients and showed that the sPD-L1 is biologically active and capable of triggering apoptosis in activated T-cells. Here we evaluated T cell Bim and sPD-L1 in the peripheral blood (PB) as biomarkers of response in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma and lung cancer undergoing anti-PD1 therapy. Methods: 60 pts treated with anti-PD-1 had PB collected at baseline and at radiographic tumor evaluation. Frequencies of Bim+ T cells and Bim median fluorescence intensity (MFI) were measured by flow cytometry in gated tumor-reactive CD11ahighPD1+ CD8+ T cells. We also measured levels of sPD-L1 at baseline and serially during treatment with sPD-L1 ELISA. Baseline Bim and sPD-L1 levels and percent change in Bim levels in patients (pts) who had a radiographic response (CR/PR) were compared to those who had progressive disease (PD) at 12 wks. Results: Similarly to previously reported preliminary data, pts with objective response (CR/PR, 15/60) after 4 cycles of anti-PD1 therapy had higher frequency of Bim T cells at baseline compared to pts with PD (16/60) (mean 43% vs. 30%, P = 0.0484). The frequencies of Bim+ T cells decreased significantly after the first 3 months of treatment in responders compared with progressors (mean -16% vs. + 40% P = 0.0111). High baseline sPD-L1 were associated with progression on anti-PD1 therapy (mean 2.8 ng/mL vs. 0.7 ng/mL, p = 0.07, n = 13) and the levels increased by the first tumor assessment in patients resistant to anti-PD-1. Conclusions: Measurements of Bim and sPD-L1 levels may help to select patients who are likely to benefit from anti-PD1 monotherapy versus combinatorial strategies, and provide a new non-invasive way to monitor response to anti-PD-1 blockade. A larger validation study is underway.

Association of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) with decreased survival in metastatic melanoma

4

Background: Membrane expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells is associated with poor survival in patients with advanced malignancies including metastatic melanoma (MM). In addition, tumor-associated PD-L1 has been proposed as a predictor of response to anti-PD-1 therapy, although responses are observed in some cases of PD-L1 negative MM. We hypothesize that tumor-derived PD-L1 has additional systemic effects through the release of biologically active soluble forms of PD-L1 (sPD-L1) into the circulation, which further impedes the anti-tumor immune response and contributes to poor clinical outcomes in MM. Methods: We developed a sPD-L1 ELISA and biochemically confirmed the identity of the detected protein. We measured the levels of sPD-L1 in 276 patients with MM enrolled on 3 clinical trials who had stored pre-treatment plasma samples and 37 healthy volunteers (HV) undergoing blood donation at Mayo Clinic. We also measured sPD-L1 in baseline samples from 38 MM patients treated with anti-PD1 (pembrolizumab) 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks. ROC analysis was used to compute sPD-L1 concentration cut-off value and Wald test was used to asses the difference of overall survival (OS) in patients with low versus high sPD-L1 concentration. Results: We found that sPD-L1 levels were significantly elevated in MM patients compared with HV (p=0.0011). Mean sPD-L1 level in MM was 1.73 ng/mL (range: 0.13-18.29) compared with 0.77 ng/mL (range: 0.11–6.02) for HV. Patients with higher levels (>0.293 ng/mL) had a median OS of 11.3 months compared to 14.8 months for patients with sPD-L1 level ≤ 0.293 ng/mL (p=0.040). Similarly to tumor-related PD-L1 findings, patients who had clinical benefit (OR/PR/SD) after 4 cycles of anti-PD1 had higher sPD-L1 levels at baseline (2.1 vs. 1.1 ng/mL). Conclusions: To our knowledge, our study is the first to report a correlation of sPD-L1 with MM patient outcome, although a larger study is needed to establish the utility of sPD-L1 as an independent prognostic and possibly predictive biomarker.

18F-FDG PET response and clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastatic melanoma

Background

Clinical data that support stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) are limited. Furthermore, functional imaging with 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) may offer a more accurate post-SBRT assessment. Therefore, we assessed the clinical outcomes and metabolic response of metastatic MM after SBRT.

Methods and materials

Patients with MM who were treated with SBRT and had pre- and post-PET scans (>1) were included in this study. A total of 390 pre- and post-SBRT PET/computed tomography (CT) scans for 80 metastases were analyzed. The PET metabolic response was evaluated per the PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), version 1.0, criteria. Single-fraction equivalent dose (SFED) was calculated as per the standard. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. The cumulative incidence method was used to estimate metastasis control (MC). A Wilcoxon test was used to compare survival estimates. The prognostic factors for MC and OS were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model, and the Likelihood Ratio was also used for comparisons between groups.

Results

A median of 6 PET scans (range, 2-6 scans) was evaluated for each metastasis. The median SFED was 42.8 Gy (range, 18-56.4 Gy) and the median biologically effective dose was 254.4 Gy_2.5 (range, 100.8-540 Gy_2.5). Twenty percent of patients received chemotherapy and 59% received immunotherapy: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (64%) and ipilimumab (34%). MC was 94% and 90% at 1 year and 3 years, respectively. The OS was 74% and 27% and 1 year and 3 years, respectively. Complete response was achieved in 90% at a median of 2.8 months (range, 0.4-25.2 months). SFED >24 Gy correlated with improved MC (93% vs 75%, P = .01). Acute and late grade 3+ toxicities were 4% and 11%, respectively, with no grade 5 toxicity.

Conclusions

Post-SBRT PET/CT for extracranial metastatic MM resulted in high rates of complete response at a median of 2.8 months, and durable MC was achieved with SFED >24 Gy. SBRT, in addition to surgery and ablation, should be discussed with patients with MM, especially those with oligometastases.

T cell Bim levels reflect responses to anti-PD-1 cancer therapy

Immune checkpoint therapy with PD-1 blockade has emerged as an effective therapy for many advanced cancers; however, only a small fraction of patients achieve durable responses. To date, there is no validated blood-based means of predicting the response to PD-1 blockade. We report that Bim is a downstream signaling molecule of the PD-1 pathway, and its detection in T cells is significantly associated with expression of PD-1 and effector T cell markers. High levels of Bim in circulating tumor-reactive (PD-1⁺CD11a^hiCD8⁺) T cells were prognostic of poor survival in patients with metastatic melanoma who did not receive anti-PD-1 therapy and were also predictive of clinical benefit in patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. Moreover, this circulating tumor-reactive T cell population significantly decreased after successful anti-PD-1 therapy. Our study supports a crucial role of Bim in both T cell activation and apoptosis as regulated by PD-1 and PD-L1 interactions in effector CD8⁺ T cells. Measurement of Bim levels in circulating T cells of patients with cancer may provide a less invasive strategy to predict and monitor responses to anti-PD-1 therapy, although future prospective analyses are needed to validate its utility.

Recurrence and Survival Outcomes After Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Oligometastatic Melanoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate focal treatment of melanoma metastases and to explore whether any potential extended survival benefit exists in a select patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent image-guided local thermal ablation of metastatic melanoma over an 11-year period (January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2013) were retrospectively identified using an internally maintained clinical registry. Only patients with oligometastatic stage IV disease amenable to complete ablation of all clinical disease at the time of ablation were included in the analysis. Overall survival and median progression-free survival periods were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with primary ocular or nonocular melanoma had 66 metastases treated in the lungs, liver, bones, or soft tissues. Eleven (33%) patients were on systemic medical therapy at the time of the procedure. The median survival time was 3.8 years (range, 0.5-10.5 years), with a 4-year estimated survival of 44.1% (95% CI, 28%-68%). Local recurrence at the ablation site developed in 15.1% (5 of 33) of the patients and 13.6% of the tumors (9 of 66). The median progression-free survival time was 4.4 months (95% CI, 1.4 months to 10.5 years), with an estimated 1-year progression-free survival of 30.3% (95% CI, 18%-51%). A subgroup analysis identified 11 patients with primary ocular melanoma and 22 with nonocular melanoma, with a median survival time of 3.9 years (range, 0.9-4.7 years) and 3.8 years (range, 0.5-10.5 years), respectively (P=.58). There were no major complications and no deaths within 30 days of the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Selective use of image-guided thermal ablation of oligometastatic melanoma may provide results similar to surgical resection in terms of technical effectiveness and oncologic outcomes with minimal risk.