Long-Term Results After Aortic Valve Replacement with Last-Generation Stentless Prostheses

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and hemodynamic results in patients affected by severe aortic valve disease after aortic valve replacement with third-generation stentless aortic prostheses (3F® stentless equine pericardial [Medtronic plc, Minneapolis Minnesota] and Pericarbon Freedom™ stentless bovine pericardial [LivaNova plc, London, United Kingdom]) and to analyze the benefits and the drawbacks associated to their use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June, 2003 and Sept, 2015 a cohort of 548 consecutive patients affected by aortic valve disease received an aortic valve replacement using a last-generation stentless pericardial aortic prosthesis at our unit. Respectively, 322 patients received a Pericarbon Freedom™ and 226 received a 3F® aortic valve. Size ranged between 19 and 29, with prevalence of 23 and 25 devices. Mean age at operation was 71± 11 years, 57% of patients were males, the mean logistic EuroScore was 8.9 ± 7.2 and 44.2% received concomitant procedures. The mean extracorporeal circulation (ECC) time was 119.2 ± 40.6. The mean cross clamp time was 90.5' ± 21.4'. In 30 patients, the aortic prosthesis was included in a Dacron tube straight graft for a Bentall operation.

RESULTS

Early/in-hospital mortality was 2.55% (14 cases) for the entire cohort. In patients receiving isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), it was 0.91% (5 cases). Follow up ranged between six months and 12 years (median follow-up time: 6.77 years). During follow up, 137 patients died of all causes (25%), of whom 32 patients died of cardiac causes (5.8%). Cardiac survival probability was 91% at 12 years. All surviving patients were in NYHA class I at last follow up. Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration was 86% at 12 years. Freedom from endocarditis was 95% at 12 years. Freedom from a valve-related reoperation at 12 years follow up was 95%. Mean residual transprosthetic gradient at 12 years was 10.3 ± 4.8MmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

Last-generation stentless pericardial valves offer excellent hemodynamics and adequate durability and freedom from structural deterioration at 12 years follow up. The implantation technique of a stentless valve is a little more demanding when compared to a stented valve, but it can be easily reproduced after minimal training. Incidence of endocarditis and thromboembolic events is low and comparable to stented pericardial valves. Young and active patients, and patients with large BSA where a patient-prosthesis mismatch may be anticipated are, in our opinion, ideal candidates to receive these kinds of valves.

Aortic Annuloplasty: Focus on the Use of an External Teflon Ring

Aortic annuloplasty has been clearly demonstrated to have a protective influence in aortic valve repair. Over the past 20 years, different annuloplasty concepts have been proposed by different groups. However, the most appropriate approach to enable long-term annular stability remains highly controversial. The aim of this article is to give a general overview of all types of aortic annuloplasty, particularly focusing on the use of an external Teflon ring, as proposed by our group. In this technique, external root dissection is performed in the same fashion as for reimplantation; the only difference is that it is necessary to go below the coronary ostia take-off. A series of pledgeted sutures (usually between 6 and 9 sutures) are placed at the level of the virtual basal ring. The external ring is made using a Teflon strip with a length of 8 to 9 cm, to reduce the annulus to a diameter of between 21 and 23 mm. The sub-annular sutures are then passed at the appropriate level through the Teflon strip and the strip is parachuted outside the aortic root base, passing under the coronary ostia. The two ends of the Teflon strip are tied at the level of the non-coronary sinus. Aortic annuloplasty is a crucial step to improve valve competence and stabilization. While several techniques offer good mid- to long-term results, annuloplasty with an external Teflon ring appears to be a simple and effective alternative to guarantee stable root diameters. Longer follow-up studies are needed to confirm the mid- to long-term results.

Surgical Options for Physiological Treatment of Aortic Root Dilatation Either Isolated or Associated with Aortic Valve Disease

Patients affected by severe aortic root pathology require an operation to replace the dilated aortic root and repair or replace the aortic valve, which is very frequently involved in the disease. Among the surgical options available for aortic root replacement, the Bentall operation and the David aortic valve reimplantation procedure are the most commonly used by surgeons. This article provides an overview of the Bio-Bentall and David operations. It illustrates their surgical details and discusses the correct indications for both procedures to achieve excellent long-term outcomes. Finally, the authors present their experience with the physiologic treatment of aortic root pathology by using stentless Bio-conduits and David reimplantation in a cohort of patients with long-term follow-up. A comparative analysis of early and late results along with an evaluation of possible benefits and drawbacks related to each technique concluded that both procedures were effective in correcting the aortic root pathology, and the results were adequate and stable over time. Since hemodynamic performance was more improved after the David operation, it should be preferred, whenever feasible, in younger and active patients.

The matryoshka procedure

We present the case of a 73-year-old male patient undergoing a modified Bentall-DeBono procedure in 2015 due to aortic stenosis and aortic aneurism involving the root. A bioprosthetic stented conduit made with a stented Edwards Perimount 21-mm bioprosthesis and a Vascutek Valsalva 28-mm Dacron graft was implanted along with a mitral annuloplasty. Five years later, due to early degeneration of the bioprosthesis and a progression of the mitral disease, he underwent a second surgical procedure where a Medtronic Mosaic 27-mm valve prosthesis was implanted in mitral position and a sutureless Livanova Perceval 23-mm valve in aortic position. Because of the difficulty in removing the previously implanted aortic prosthesis, the Perceval valve was inserted inside the frame of the PeriMount as an open "valve-in-valve" procedure. In October 2020, the patient underwent a ViV TAVI with a 23-mm Edwards Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifescience). After induction of general anesthesia and heparin administration, the procedure was performed via right femoral artery approach with preimplantation of two Proglides. After transfemoral insertion of a 14-French sheath, the aortic valve was crossed with a 0.035-in. straight guide-wire, taking care to avoid crossing the crowns of Perceval frame. After exchange of the standard wire with an extra-stiff 0.035-in. Safari wire, the Sapien-3 valve was advanced across the two previously implanted surgical valves and deployed at the level of the Perceval ring. After bioprosthesis deployment, peak-to-peak left ventricular aortic gradient was reduced from 51 to 16 mmHg.

The Skirt and Collar of The Valsalva Graft: One Dress Fits All

In the original pre-formed Valsalva graft, the skirt is the defining feature. It is a self-expanding portion, obtained by 90° rotation of the Dacron fabric corrugation with respect to the rest of the graft. Due to this manufacturing feature, the skirt length is equal to the graft diameter and, once pressurized, it expands by 25-30% (up to 10 mm) from the nominal size. Proximal to this bulged portion, a small collar completes the prosthesis. By virtue of this anatomical design, the Valsalva graft is recommended for most aortic root surgeries including valve-sparing and Bentall procedures. The skirt, by recreating the pseudo-sinuses, represents the key feature of the graft when used for aortic valve-sparing procedures (remodeling and reimplantation). However, in the Bentall procedure, the graft collar is an important feature because it is useful to attach the Valsalva graft to the valve prosthesis sewing ring when making a valved conduit. Moreover, once the graft is pressurized, the whole volume of the skirt better accommodates the struts and the leaflets of biological and mechanical prostheses. Furthermore, the expanded skirt reduces the distance and the tension on the coronary button anastomosis, increasing safety and possibly reducing complication rates. This review demonstrates the versatility of the Valsalva graft in various scenarios of aortic root surgery, with special emphasis on different uses of the skirt and the collar.

Optimized use of the "skirt" of the Valsalva graft for the completion Bentall

We report the case of a patient with an aortic root aneurysm who had previously undergone aortic valve replacement with a large mechanical prosthesis which proved to be normally functioning at the time of reoperation. We describe a new technique of replacing the aortic root while retaining the existing aortic valve similar to the "completion Bentall" procedure using a 32 mm Valsalva graft by suturing the skirted portion of the graft to the sewing ring of the mechanical valve. The ability of the skirt to increase its diameter was the key of this approach.

Intermediate-Term Outcomes After Aortic Valve Replacement With the Medtronic 3F Stentless Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the early and intermediate-term clinical and hemodynamic results after implant of the Medtronic 3F (Minneapolis, MN) stentless aortic valve.

METHODS

Between March 2007 and August 2015, 226 consecutive patients affected by aortic valve disease received a 3F valve at our unit by a single surgeon. The valve in 30 patients was included in a tubular prosthesis for a Bentall procedure. Size ranged between 21 and 29, age at operation was 74.17 ± 8.58 years, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 9.73 ± 6.00, and 51.3% of patients received a concomitant procedure. For isolated valve replacement, mean extracorporeal circulation time was 92 ± 17 minutes, and cross-clamp time was 73 ± 11 minutes. Follow-up was 100% complete and was a mean of 63 ± 2.4 months (range, 6-138 months). Primary end points were early and late mortality, freedom from endocarditis, freedom from structural valve deterioration, and freedom from valve-related reoperation.

RESULTS

Early mortality after isolated aortic valve replacement was 1.7%. Of the 59 (25.3%) late overall deaths, 15 (6.6%) were cardiac-related, and survival rate was 93% at 10 years. At follow-up, 97% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I or II. Actuarial freedom from reoperation due to structural deterioration was 100% at 5 years and 96% at 10 years. Freedom from endocarditis at 10 years was 97%. Mean aortic pressure gradient measured by echocardiography was 11.5 mm Hg at hospital discharge and 10.4 mm Hg at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3F valve is a user-friendly third-generation stentless aortic prosthesis with proven durability and remarkable hemodynamic performance preserved over time. The 3F is particularly useful in cases of expected patient/prosthesis mismatch.

Successful Reoperation in 3 Cases of Failed Sorin Freedom Stentless Aortic Valve Using the LivaNova Perceval Sutureless Prosthesis

Reoperations for deteriorated stentless bioprostheses are quite challenging procedures. Calcification of the aortic annulus and of the subcoronary root makes often impossible the removal of the failed valve, living a complex Bentall operation or a high-risk transcatheter aortic valve implantation valve-in-valve procedure as the only options, particularly in cases of small-size prostheses. The Perceval sutureless prosthesis (LivaNova PLC, London, UK) can be a valid alternative for failed stentless valve replacement. We report our experience with 3 complex cases of degenerated Sorin Pericarbon Freedom prosthesis treated successfully by means of Perceval sutureless implantation and demonstrating the reproducibility and the safety of this surgical approach.

Outcome at 26 Years After Repair of Fallot's Tetralogy With Absent Left Pulmonary Artery

We report long-term outcome after two-stage, "one lung repair" in a four-year-old boy with tetralogy of Fallot and congenital absence of the left pulmonary artery. The operation was carried out two years after a palliative aortopulmonary central shunt and was uneventful. Twenty-six years later, the patient is in excellent clinical condition, with normal peripheral oxygen saturation. A recent radionuclide lung scan and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging show the pulmonary flow entirely directed into the right lung. In selected cases, the long-term prognosis of patients with tetralogy of Fallot and true absence of left pulmonary artery after "one lung repair" may be excellent.

Stentless Pericarbon Freedom Versus Stented Perimount Aortic Bioprosthesis: Propensity-Matched Long-Term Follow-Up

OBJECTIVE

Stentless aortic valves have shown superior hemodynamic performance and faster left ventricular mass regression compared to stented bioprostheses. Yet, controversies exist concerning the durability of stentless valves. This case-matched study compared short- and long-term clinical outcomes of stentless LivaNova-Sorin Pericarbon Freedom™ (SPF) and stented Carpentier-Edwards Perimount (CEP) aortic prostheses.

METHODS

From 2003 through 2006, 134 consecutive patients received aortic valve replacement with SPF at our institution. This cohort was matched, according to 20 preoperative clinical parameters, with a control group of 390 patients who received CEP prosthesis during the same time. The resulting 55 + 55 matched patients were analyzed for perioperative results and long-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Early mortality was 0% for both groups. Lower transvalvular gradients were found in the SPF group (10.6 ± 2.9 versus 15.7 ± 3.1 mmHg, P < 0.001). Overall late mortality (mean follow-up: 10.03 years) was similar for both groups (50.1% versus 42.8%, P = 0.96). Freedom from structural valve degeneration (SVD) at 13 years was similar for both groups (SPF = 92.3%, CEP = 73.9%, P = 0.06). Freedom from aortic valve reinterventions did not differ (SPF = 92.3%, CEP = 93.5%, P = 0.55). Gradients at 13-year follow-up remained significantly lower in SPF group (10.0 ± 4.5 versus 16.2 ± 9.5 mmHg, P < 0.001). Incidence of acute bacterial endocarditis (ABE) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

SPF and CEP demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes related to late mortality, SVD, aortic valve reinterventions, and incidence of ABE and MACCE. Superior hemodynamic performance of SPF over time can make this valve a suitable choice in patients with small aortic root and large body surface area.

Right ventricular assessment can improve prognostic value of Euroscore II

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to evaluate the prognostic weight of preoperative right ventricular assessment on early mortality in cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This is a multicenter prospective observational study performed by the Italian Group of Research for Outcome in Cardiac Surgery (GIROC) including 11 centers. From October 2017 to March 2019, out of 923 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, 28 patients with some missing data were excluded and 895 patients were enrolled in the study right ventricular dilatation was defined as a basal end-diastolic diameter >42 mm. The right ventricle (RV) function was assessed using the combination of three parameters: fractional area changing (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), and S'-wave using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI-S'); RV dysfunction was defined as the presence of at least two of the following cutoffs: FAC <35%, TAPSE <17 mm, and TDI S' <9.5 mm RESULTS: Among the entire cohort, 624 (70%) showed normal RV, 92 (10%) isolated RV dilatation, 154 (17%) isolated RV dysfunction, and 25 (3%) both RV dilatation and dysfunction. Non-surviving patients showed a significantly higher rate of RV alteration at multivariable analysis, RV status was found to be an independent predictor for higher in-hospital mortality beside Euroscore II.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective multicenter observation study shows the importance to assess RV preoperatively and to include both RV function and dimension in a risk score model such as Euroscore II to implement its predictivity, since PH cannot always mirror the status of the right ventricle.

Outcomes after surgical ventricular restoration for ischemic cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy after surgical ventricular restoration and to identify risk factors related to poor results.

METHODS

Between August 2002 and April 2016, 62 patients affected by ischemic cardiomyopathy underwent surgical left ventricular restoration at our unit. Patients' mean age at operation was 63 years (39-79 years). Mean ejection fraction was 29.6%. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure trial criteria have been used as indications for surgery. Fifty-seven patients (91%) received surgical myocardial revascularization. Mitral valve repair was performed in 39 patients (63%). The surgical technique consisted of the classic Dor operation or a different approach reducing the equatorial diameter of the left ventricle and avoiding the use of a patch. The data were analyzed retrospectively for perioperative results and short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

One patient died of noncardiac causes within 30 days (1.6%). All-cause death occurred in 36 patients (58%) during follow-up (0.6-14.7 years; median follow-up time, 7.02 years), of whom 15 died of cardiac causes. Age, need for preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, reduction less than 35% of postoperative left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, type of surgical technique, and ejection fraction less than 25% were identified as risk factors for late cardiac mortality. Perioperative levosimendan administration and presence of preoperative moderate to severe mitral regurgitation influenced early and intermediate-term outcomes, but no statistical relevance on long-term results was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ischemic dilative cardiomyopathy have favorable short- and long-term outcomes after ventricular restoration. Age, preoperative ejection fraction less than 25%, inadequate left ventricular surgical reverse remodeling, and type of surgical technique negatively affect long-term survival.

Long-term follow-up after Bentall operation using a stentless Shelhigh NR-2000 bio-conduit

BACKGROUND

To analyze the long-term results after Bentall operation using the stentless Shelhigh No-React (NR)-2000 bio-root prosthesis.

MATERIAL

From 2004 to 2008, 26 consecutive, nonselected patients (mean age at surgery: 67 ± 9 years) underwent a Bentall operation using a stentless Shelhigh valved conduit at our institution. Mean preoperative Logistic-EuroSCORE was 17.1 ± 12.9. The mean size of the aortic root was 53.2 ± 5 mm. The mean preoperative ejection fraction was 55 ± 7.4%. Three patients had a bicuspid valve. One patient with acute endocarditis and one patient with type A aortic dissection were operated on an emergency. Three patients (11.54%) had a previous cardiac operation. The Button-Bentall technique was used in all cases. Seven patients (26.92%) received an associated procedure. The mean size of the implanted prosthesis was 26.1 ± 2.2. Follow-up ranged between 6 and 174 months (mean 93.4 ± 59.1 months). Primary endpoints consisted of early and late mortality, freedom from acute endocarditis, freedom from structural valve deterioration, and freedom from valve-related-reoperation.

RESULTS

Two patients died in hospital, while 10 patients died during follow-up time, of which three for cardiac causes (12.5%). Overall survival probability was 52.9% at 15 years. Freedom from acute endocarditis was 95.7% at 5 and 15 years. Freedom from severe aortic incompetence due to structural deterioration was 100% at 5 and 10 years, 90.9% at 15 years. The mean aortic gradient at follow-up was 11.4 ± 5 mm Hg. Freedom from valve-related reoperation was 100% at 5 and 10 years, 90.9% at 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, Bentall's operation using the Shelhigh NR-2000 stentless bio-conduit provided satisfactory early and long-term results. However, our findings are not consistent with unfavorable long-term outcomes following the implantation of this device reported by other authors.

Latest Advances in Annuloplasty Protheses for Valvular Reconstructive Surgery

This is the third and final part of our update on the latest advances in cardiac valvular replacement. Part 1 was dedicated to cardiac valvular replacement, and Part 2 focused on transcatheter cardiac valvular treatment. This part concerns annuloplasty prostheses for valvular reconstructive surgery. The number of patients undergoing surgical heart valve repair has been increasing, particularly in high-volume centers. Annuloplasty is now considered the gold standard in mitral valve regurgitation repair secondary to degenerative, ischemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy disease. The techniques of mitral valve reconstruction have been well established, but controversies remain regarding the type of annuloplasty ring to be used. The available annuloplasty rings include rigid, flexible, complete, partial, and semi-rigid/flexible. The choice of annuloplasty ring has been the focus of extensive investigation and debate, but to date it still largely remains a matter of "surgeon's preference" rather than an evidence-based selection. Functional tricuspid regurgitation was traditionally treated by the classic De Vega annuloplasty, but has since evolved after the development of prosthetic tricuspid annuloplasty. Head-to-head comparisons have demonstrated superior long-term outcomes with device-based annuloplasty compared to suture-based surgery, but the type of ring to be used (flexible versus rigid) has recently been questioned, without reaching definitive conclusions. In contrast to mitral and tricuspid valve repair, aortic repair is more difficult with respect to specific valve features. Annuloplasty is considered to play a key role in controlling aortic regurgitation and preventing recurrence after valve repair. Various modifications of annuloplasty have been advocated (internal/external, with/without ring (suture), rigid/flexible ring). but none of them has become a de facto standard. This paper describes the various rings that are available to help orient surgeons and to serve as a reference for students.

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy with the Adsorbing Filter oXiris in Septic Patients: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal treatment may be useful during sepsis, but definitive recommendations are lacking. Aim of this study is to review retrospectively the medical records of septic patients submitted to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with the adsorbing membrane oXiris and evaluate (1) the safety of the device, (2) the cardiorenal response, and (3) the immunological response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 60 septic patients submitted to CRRT with the membrane oXiris from April 2011 to December 2018 have been reviewed. The adsorbing membrane oXiris® (Baxter, IL, USA) was used through a Prisma plataform (Prismaflex - Baxter, IL, USA). At basal time (T0), at 24 h (T1), and at the end of the treatment (T2) were analyzed the clinical data, the cytokines, and the time course of endotoxin.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study. In total, 85% of patients had acute kidney injury (AKI). Every CRRT treatment was of 72 ± 13 h, with the consumption of 3.2 ± 1 filters. No AE events were reported. The main cardiorenal and respiratory parameters improved with a decrease of the noradrenaline dosage. Cytokines, procalcitonin, and endotoxin activity assay decreased too. SOFA total improved from 12.4 ± 2 to 9 ± 2.

CONCLUSION

In sepsis/septic shock patients with AKI, CRRT with the adsorbing membrane oXiris may be safe and improves the cardiorenal - function and the clinical condition. The effect on cytokines and endotoxin may explain in part these results. A RCT is warranted to confirm these data.

Latest Advances in Transcatheter Cardiac Valvular Treatment

When the original monograph on valvular prostheses was published in Surgical Technology International, back in 1993, transcatheter technology had not yet been invented. These techniques have been gradually revealed in subsequent issues. When we first considered writing a paper that described both surgical and transcatheter prosthesis, we realized that such a combined paper would be impractically large. Therefore, we decided to split our survey into more than one paper. This paper seeks to address the paucity of information available regarding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and similar devices. This publication may serve as a reference point for critically organizing information on an evolving topic. The following article deals with the large number of transcatheter devices related to valvular and ventricular pathologies: TAVI for the aortic and mitral valves, with a focus on indications, techniques and complications, as well as specific aortic devices, and devices to treat mitral regurgitation with non-conventional access. Every effort has been made to make the content relevant and up-to-date, which proved to be particularly challenging due to the continuous technological evolution which characterizes this field.

4D flow characterization of aortic blood flow after valve sparing root reimplantation procedure

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) with reimplantation technique is an effective alternative for young patients with dilated roots and preserved cusps, which avoids the risks of lifelong anticoagulation or valve degeneration. New grafts with anatomically-shaped sinuses have been developed in order to preserve aortic root physiology, which could decrease complication rates and improve durability. However, controversy remains regarding the effect of recreation of the sinuses of Valsalva during VSRR on long-term outcomes. The novel 4D flow technique, exploiting its unique ability to combine anatomical evaluation of the root with fluid-dynamic assessment of aortic flow, enables integrated analysis of the close interaction between graft design, valvular morphology and three-dimensional (3D) flow characteristics. Early experimental studies have shown how graft shape affects the aortic root flow pattern, formation of vortexes and helicity of downstream flow; however, the clinical significance of these findings is yet to be clarified. Various and still unexplored knowledge can be obtained from the qualitative and quantitative analysis of these complex datasets, that could shed more light on which is the best among myriad surgical techniques and grafts adopted in VSRR. The extraordinary potential 4D flow imaging opens new boundless horizons in the perspective of an increasingly patient-tailored surgical planning.

Biological solutions to aortic root replacement: valve-sparing versus bioprosthetic conduit

Composite valve graft implantation described by Bentall and De Bono is a well-documented technique of aortic root replacement used for a large spectrum of pathologic conditions involving the aortic valve and the ascending aorta. While mechanical valves were initially used, biological prostheses were later introduced in order to avoid long-term anticoagulation and its related complications. The increasing age of patients who undergo aortic root surgery, and data supporting the use of a biological aortic valve in the younger population, have significantly increased the need for a composite biological valved conduit. However, parallel to the increased use of biological valve in the context of a Bentall operation, aortic valve-sparing (AVS) operation have also been performed in a growing number of patients. Sarsam and David described the remodeling and the reimplantation procedures more than 25 years ago with the aim of sparing otherwise normal aortic valves in the presence of a root aneurysm. Important achievements in this discipline have occurred over the past decade including development and refinement of valve preserving aortic root replacement techniques, development of a classification system for aortic insufficiency, surgical approaches to cusp disease with different cusp anatomy. Both procedures can now provide excellent root reconstruction and adequate clinical results in terms of late valve durability. The AVS technique offers several advantages over the Bentall procedure, such as no need for oral anticoagulation and lifestyle adjustments. AVS operations have become established alternatives to Bentall procedures for patients with aortic root pathology. However, data comparing the safety and durability of these approaches are lacking.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a sealing hemostat patch (HEMOPATCH) vs standard of care in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

A recent randomized controlled trial showed that patients undergoing ascending aorta surgery treated with HEMOPATCH to control bleeding had a significantly better hemostasis success rate than with dry or wet gauze compression or similar standard of care (SOC).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness using two different agents for hemostasis (HEMOPATCH vs dry or wet gauze compression or similar SOC) in cardiac surgery from the European hospital perspective.

METHODS

A literature-based cost-effectiveness model estimating average cost per successful hemostasis event was developed based on the hemostasis efficacy difference (HEMOPATCH = 97.6%, SOC = 65.8%, p < .001). Additional clinically significant end-points studied in the trial (blood transfusions and surgical revisions) were also analyzed. It was assumed that each surgery utilized two units of HEMOPATCH (dimensions of 4.5 × 9 cm) and two units of SOC. Product acquisition costs for HEMOPATCH and SOC were included along with outcome-related costs derived from the literature and inflation-adjusted to 2017 EUR and GBP. Results are presented for an average hospital with an annual case load of 574 cardiac surgeries. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Considering only product acquisition cost, HEMOPATCH had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €1,659, €1,519, €1,623, and £1,725 per hemostasis success when compared to SOC for Italy, Spain, France, and the UK, respectively. However, when considering the cost and potential difference in the frequency of transfusions and revisions compared to SOC, the use of HEMOPATCH was associated with an annual reduction of six revisions and 60 transfusions, improving the ICER to €1,440, €1,222, €1,461, and £1,592, respectively. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated model robustness.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis supports the use of HEMOPATCH over SOC in cardiac surgery in European hospitals to improve hemostasis success rates and potential cost offsets from reduced transfusions, complications, and surgical revisions.

Biological solutions to aortic root replacement: valve-sparing versus bioprosthetic conduit‡

OBJECTIVES

Valve-sparing operations and root replacement with a biologic composite conduit are viable options in aortic root aneurysm. This study was conceived to compare the early and mid-term results of these 2 procedures.

METHODS

From September 2002 to November 2015, 749 consecutive patients underwent either a valve-sparing operation or a root replacement with a biologic composite conduit at 2 institutions. Propensity score matching was used to compare similar cohorts of patients in the overall population and in the ≤ 55 and ≥ 65-year age groups.

RESULTS

Overall operative mortality was 0.4%, mean age 57.4 ± 14.3 years, 84.6% were male. Individuals in the biologic composite conduit group were older and had worse preoperative risk profiles [chronic pulmonary disease (5.5% vs 0.9%; P  = 0.001), diabetes (6.4% vs 1.5%; P  = 0.001) and NYHA > 2 (25.2% vs 5.2%; P  < 0.001)]. Mean follow-up was 27.5 ± 28.4 months. In the unmatched population, there was no difference in in-hospital deaths (0 in the valve-sparing versus 3 in the biologic composite conduit group; P  = 0.12). These findings were confirmed in the propensity-matched populations. During follow-up, more patients in the biologic composite conduit group underwent reoperation on the aortic valve (2.6% vs 1.5%; P  = 0.026) resulting in a freedom from reoperation of 97.4% vs 98.5%, respectively. Separate analysis for patients stratified by age revealed no difference in outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of aortic root aneurysm, both valve-sparing operations and root replacement with a biologic composite conduit provide excellent outcomes. However, at mid-term follow-up the use of biologic composite conduit is associated with a higher risk of reoperation.

Outcomes of a New-Generation Stentless Aortic Valve: A Single-Center Experience with 251 Consecutive Implants

BACKGROUND

The study aim was to investigate the hemodynamic behavior over time and ease of implant and durability of the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom (SPF)® stentless pericardial aortic xenograft.

METHODS

Between March 2003 and April 2010, a total of 251 consecutive, non-selected patients (mean age 70.1 years; range: 17-89 years; 17.1% aged >80 years) received a SPF bioprosthesis as an aortic valve substitute at the authors' institution. All implantations were performed by a single surgeon using a classical, double-line, subcoronary implant technique. Of these patients. 108 (43%) underwent a concomitant procedure. The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 8.3. Patients were followed for complications and hemodynamic evaluation. Echocardiographic controls and clinical data were obtained at discharge, and at six months' and eight years' follow up.

RESULTS

The in-hospital/30-day mortality was 1.2% for the entire group, but 0% for patients with isolated valve replacement. A total of 27 deaths had occurred at the time of the last follow up (22 were due to non-cardiac causes). At follow up (mean 3.7 years; range: 0-7.8 years), 91.1% of survivors were in NYHA classes I or II. Freedom from reoperation and from structural valve deterioration was 96.0% and 96.8%, respectively, at 7.8 years. The mean pressure gradient of the series (measured using echocardiography) was 10.3 ± 4.5 mmHg at discharge, and 8.3 ± 4.5mmHg at the time of the last follow up. The mean effective orifice area was 1.85 ± 0.70 cm2 for the entire series, and there was an absence of prosthesis-patient mismatch in 90% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results confirmed the favourable hemodynamic behavior, low risk of implantation and acceptable durability of the pericardial stentless SPF aortic prosthesis. The data also endorsed use of the SPF as an aortic valve substitute, even in a young and active population, and particularly in the presence of a small aortic annulus. The accuracy of implantation remains a crucial factor for durability and subsequent satisfactory hemodynamic performance. A longer follow up would provide further information with regards to complications and durability of the SPF prosthesis.

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of HEMOPATCH Topical Sealant in Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Hemostasis is a critical component of all surgical procedures and especially cardiac surgery. In addition to traditional means, topical hemostatic agents have been reported to be extremely effective in terminating bleeding during cardiac procedures. We compared a hemostatic matrix sealant agent (HEMOPATCH Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL) with alternative topical hemostatic treatment in patients undergoing ascending aorta surgery with moderate bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following sample size calculation, in a prospective randomized study design, 85 patients were treated with HEMOPATCH matrix sealant and 85 patients received alternative treatment (dry or wet gauze compression or similar [control group]). The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with successful hemostasis within three minutes of HEMOPATCH or traditional treatment application. Other study outcome measures were postoperative blood loss and the rate of transfusion of blood products.

RESULTS

A statistically higher rate of successful hemostasis within three minutes was observed in the HEMOPATCH group (97.6% [83/85] vs. 65.8% [56/85] in the control group; p< 0.001). The percentages of patients with postoperative bleeding and the rate of transfusion were lower in the HEMOPATCH group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HEMOPATCH is effective in terminating bleeding in patients undergoing ascending aorta cardiac procedures. Fewer patients treated with HEMOPATCH required blood transfusion. The cost-utility profile of HEMOPATCH should be addressed in dedicated trials.

Intra-operative Use of Hemopatch®: Interim Results of a Nationwide European Survey of Surgeons

INTRODUCTION

Haemostasis is a critical part of surgery. Haemostatic agent selection is based upon a number of factors including surgeon's experience and choice. This post-marketing survey determined surgeons' intraoperative use and perception of Hemopatch® (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL), a resorbable collagen-based sealing haemostat.

METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS

A one-arm questionnaire was distributed to European general, cardiac, pulmonary, and urologic surgeons who used Hemopatch® to achieve haemostasis in situations where bleeding control by pressure, ligature, or conventional procedures had been ineffective or was impractical. Responses were summarized for patient characteristics, surgical procedures/techniques, and surgeons' assessment of Hemopatch® regarding their overall satisfaction and utilization characteristics of Hemopatch®.

RESULTS

Of 1028 responses received from seven European countries, the majority were from Germany (47.3%) or Italy (36%). Most cases were in males (60.7%), 50-75 years of age (61.8%), performed by an open approach (82.5%), with 52.7% general-, 16.2% cardiac-, 7.5% lung, 19.5% urologic-type procedures and 3.7% other/unknown. Successful haemostasis after two minutes of approximation occurred in 93.3% of patients (86.8%-96.9% across surgical subtypes), with similar rates by approach (93.1% open; 94.1% minimally-invasive), and patient's use of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents (87.9% - 93.1%). Over 92% of surgeon's rated Hemopatch® as "excellent" or "good" in assessments of overall satisfaction, haemostasis efficacy, ease of preparation, ease of handling, flexibility/pliability, and tissue adherence. These characteristics were rated as excellent or good by 81% or more of surgeons in analyses by surgical subspecialty and surgical approach of open or minimally invasive.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemopatch® provides effective haemostasis across a variety of surgical procedures, both in open- and minimally-invasive, as well as in patients receiving anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet agents. Surgeon's generally rated their overall satisfaction with Hemopatch®, its haemostatic efficacy, and other characteristics as "much better" or "better" than their previously used haemostat.

The combined role of sinuses of Valsalva and flow pulsatility improves energy loss of the aortic valve

OBJECTIVES

Normal aortic valve opening and closing movement is a complex mechanism mainly regulated by the blood flow characteristics and the cyclic modifications of the aortic root. Our previous in vitro observations demonstrated that the presence of the Valsalva sinuses, independently from root compliance, is important in reducing systolic pressure drop across the aortic valve. This in vitro study was designed to ascertain if this effect is dependent on the flow characteristics.

METHODS

Stentless 21, 23 and 25 mm aortic prostheses were sutured inside Dacron graft with and without sinuses. Hydrodynamic performance of the root models was investigated in steady-state (continuous) and unsteady-state (pulsatile) flow regimes. Aortic transvalvular pressure drop and effective orifice area (EOA) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The continuous flow analysis revealed that no marked differences in pressure drop characterized the two root configurations at flow regimes lower than 15 l/min, independently of valve size. Conversely, at higher flow regimes (up to 30 l/min) a relatively low pressure drop continued to characterize grafts with sinuses, whereas marked increments in pressure drop were measured in straight grafts, especially in the smaller size (77.05 ± 4.58 vs 23.80 ± 2.44 mmHg; 18.40 ± 1.31 vs 7.66 ± 0.37 mmHg and 29.54 ± 0.17 vs 7.12 ± 0.07 mmHg, for 21, 23 and 25 mm valve, respectively). Under pulsatile conditions, the presence of sinuses clearly confirmed lower pressure drops also more evident in the smaller valve sizes (53.89 ± 1.06 vs 11.6 ± 0.24 mmHg at 7 l/min for 21 mm valve). EOA values were always lower in the absence of sinuses. In continuous flow regimes, at 30 l/min EOA of 25 mm valve size was 3.67 ± 0.02 cm(2) in the Valsalva model versus 1.79 ± 0.01 cm(2) for the Straight model. In pulsatile tests, at 7 l/min a 25-valve size demonstrated an EOA of 5.47 ± 0.60 in the Valsalva model versus 2.50 ± 0.02 cm(2) in the Straight model.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings (i) confirm the hypothesis that the sinuses of Valsalva play a key role in optimizing the aortic haemodynamics during systole, minimizing energy losses; (ii) suggest that the sinuses of Valsalva are needed because of the complex nature of blood flow during ejection.

Long-term results of the valve reimplantation technique using a graft with sinuses

OBJECTIVE

Aortic valve reimplantation is the most commonly used technique to spare the aortic valve. Long-term results data are scarce and available only with the use of standard straight graft. We examined the long-term results of reimplantation of the aortic valve using a graft incorporating sinuses of Valsalva.

METHODS

From May 2000 to December 2014, 124 patients had an aortic valve reimplanted into a graft with sinuses of Valsalva. The mean age was 53 ± 13 years and the majority were men (87%). Marfan syndrome was present in 21 patients (17%) and 12% had a bicuspid valve. Patients were prospectively followed by means of transthoracic echocardiography. The mean follow-up was 63 ± 52 months.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 5, 10, and 13 years was 94.4% ± 2.2%, 90.5% ± 4.4%, and 81.4% ± 7.3%, respectively. Six patients required reoperation within a time frame of 6 to 96 months. None of the patients died at reoperation. Freedom from reoperation was 95.4% ± 2.3% at 5 years and 90.1% ± 4.3% at 10 and 13 years. All patients who needed reoperation had surgery during the first 5 years. Three patients had residual aortic insufficiency >2. Considering also all patients who underwent reoperation because of aortic insufficiency, freedom from moderate to severe residual aortic insufficiency was 94.1% ± 2.6% at 5 years, and 87.1% ± 4.7% at 10 and 13 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients who had their valve reimplanted in a graft with sinuses continue to perform well after 10 years.