International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: An excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines

The International Guidelines 2000 Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiac Care (ECC) formulated new evidenced-based recommendations for neonatal resuscitation. These guidelines comprehensively update the last recommendations, published in 1992 after the Fifth National Conference on CPR and ECC. As a result of the evidence evaluation process, significant changes occurred in the recommended management routines for: * Meconium-stained amniotic fluid: If the newly born infant has absent or depressed respirations, heart rate <100 beats per minute (bpm), or poor muscle tone, direct tracheal suctioning should be performed to remove meconium from the airway. * Preventing heat loss: Hyperthermia should be avoided. * Oxygenation and ventilation: 100% oxygen is recommended for assisted ventilation; however, if supplemental oxygen is unavailable, positive-pressure ventilation should be initiated with room air. The laryngeal mask airway may serve as an effective alternative for establishing an airway if bag-mask ventilation is ineffective or attempts at intubation have failed. Exhaled CO(2) detection can be useful in the secondary confirmation of endotracheal intubation. * Chest compressions: Compressions should be administered if the heart rate is absent or remains <60 bpm despite adequate assisted ventilation for 30 seconds. The 2-thumb, encircling-hands method of chest compression is preferred, with a depth of compression one third the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest and sufficient to generate a palpable pulse. * Medications, volume expansion, and vascular access: Epinephrine in a dose of 0.01-0.03 mg/kg (0.1-0.3 mL/kg of 1:10,000 solution) should be administered if the heart rate remains <60 bpm after a minimum of 30 seconds of adequate ventilation and chest compressions. Emergency volume expansion may be accomplished with an isotonic crystalloid solution or O-negative red blood cells; albumin-containing solutions are no longer the fluid of choice for initial volume expansion. Intraosseous access can serve as an alternative route for medications/volume expansion if umbilical or other direct venous access is not readily available. * Noninitiation and discontinuation of resuscitation: There are circumstances (relating to gestational age, birth weight, known underlying condition, lack of response to interventions) in which noninitiation or discontinuation of resuscitation in the delivery room may be appropriate.

Guidelines based on the principle 'First, do no harm'. New guidelines on tracheal tube confirmation and prevention of dislodgment

In summary, this editorial and the one on pulse check point out another area in which a total reliance on evidence-based guidelines amy do our patients a disservice. The debate over dropping the pulse check hinged less on the strength of the evidence and more on the widespread clinical principle of fear of false-negative errors. The discussion of secondary confirmation of tracheal tube placement also lacks a strong base of evidence that identifies the one best technique of tube confirmation for patients with a pulse versus those without a pulse. The principles of the zero-risk intervention and first, do no harm come into play in this situation. We must deal with the growing awareness of the fact that tracheal intubation is not only a potentially lethal intervention but now is also a confirmed lethal intervention, and at a much higher death rate than has ever been suspected. Factors that contribute to the transformation of the tracheal tube from a life-saving to a death-causing intervention are being identified by honest and open researchers. National societies in emergency medicine are responding appropriately. We strongly recommend shifting from making an evidence-based recommendation to instead making a principle-based recommendation--killing our patients is unacceptable; we must act on the widespread concept regarding errors in medicine. We must adopt zero-risk interventions in all possible situations.

The most important changes in the international ECC and CPR guidelines 2000

Many people involved with resuscitation have specific interests and enthusiasm. They will review the new guidelines to see how their favorite interventions fared. This essay lists a number of the new guidelines that merit special attention: support for family presence at resuscitations, pronouncing death at the scene rather than after futile transport efforts, honoring advance directives, comparable effectiveness of bag-mask ventilation versus tracheal intubation, revision of compression rates and compression-ventilation ratios, and devices to confirm tracheal intubation and prevent tube dislodgment. Even more important are the new principles and concepts that the International Guidelines 2000 endorse: international guideline science, international guideline development, evidence-based guidelines, training by objectives, expanded scope of ECC to first aid and periarrest conditions, avoidance of false-negative (type II) errors, video-mediated instruction, and a philosophy to 'do no harm.' The number and magnitude of these new guidelines reflect the dynamic nature of resuscitation at the start of the 21st century. There is great optimism that these new and revised guidelines will help achieve our ultimate objective. This objective is to be ready when fate brings some lives to a premature end. If we are, we can restore more of these people to a high-quality life, ready for many more years of living.

Paediatric life support. An advisory statement by the Paediatric Life Support Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

This document reflects the deliberations of ILCOR. The epidemiology and outcome of paediatric cardiopulmonary arrest and the priorities, techniques and sequence of paediatric resuscitation assessments and interventions differ from those of adults. The working group identified areas of conflict and controversy in current paediatric basic and advanced life support guidelines, outlined solutions considered and made recommendations by consensus. The working group was surprised by the degree of conformity already existing in current guidelines advocated by the American Heart Association (AHA), the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), the Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC), and the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa (RCSA). Differences are currently based upon local and regional preferences, training networks and customs, rather than scientific controversy. Unresolved issues with potential for future universal application are highlighted. This document does not include a complete list of guidelines for which there is no perceived controversy and the algorithm/decision tree figures presented attempt to follow a common flow of assessments and interventions, in coordination with their adult counterparts. Survival following paediatric prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest occurs in only approximately 3-17% and survivors are often neurologically devastated. Most paediatric resuscitation reports have been retrospective in design and plagued with inconsistent resuscitation definitions and patient inclusion criteria. Careful and thoughtful application of uniform guidelines for reporting outcomes of advanced life support interventions using large, randomized, multicenter and multinational clinical trials are clearly needed. Paediatric advisory statements from ILCOR will, by necessity, be vibrant and evolving guidelines fostered by national and international organizations intent on improving the outcome of resuscitation for infants and children worldwide.

Basic life support: controversial and unresolved issues

The author presents an overview of basic life support for pediatric and adult victims of prehospital cardiac arrest. Current guidelines regarding the practice of basic life support are included, with emphasis on controversial or unresolved aspects of basic life support and lay rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This article concludes with a list of recommended questions for research activities.

Children's traffic safety program: influence of early elementary school safety education on family seat belt use

HYPOTHESIS

Young children can learn safety behavior in the public school system. These children will modify family seat belt use. SETTING DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort analytic study conducted in a 50,000 square mile regionalized trauma center referral area.

METHODS

A school-based injury prevention program targeting kindergarten through second-grade (K-2) students addressed four aspects of traffic safety: seat belt use, pedestrian and bicycle safety, school bus safety, and unsafe rides. After inservice instruction, teachers taught the program over a 10-week period. A simultaneous community traffic safety program was conducted through the media. Family seat belt use was monitored by blinded observation at six study schools and one control school. Income level of schools was characterized as low or high, based on student use of federal lunch subsidies. School program implementation was defined as good or poor, based on adherence to teaching protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 68,650 K-2 students have completed this traffic safety program during 1990 to 1994. During the study year (1992 to 1993), 25,900 students completed the program taught by 1,400 teachers in 95 schools. A total of 5,936 observations of seat belt use were made in seven schools. Income stratification delineated a subset of these schools in which seat belt use increased by 86% (p = 0.01). Half of the schools failed to follow protocol, and no change in seat belt use was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) School K-2 safety education improves family seat belt use, (2) low income schools should be targeted, and (3) strict adherence to the teaching protocol is essential.

Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of pediatric advanced life support: the pediatric Utstein style

This statement is the product of a task force meeting held June 8, 1994, in Washington DC in conjunction with the First International Conference on Pediatric Resuscitation and a follow-up task force writing group meeting held September 18, 1994, in Chicago. Draft versions of the statement were circulated for comment to all members of the task force, the American Heart Association Subcommittee on Pediatric Resuscitation, and several outside reviewers. This statement and the International Conference on Pediatric Resuscitation were cosponsored by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Heart Association. The development of this statement was authorized by the American Academy of Pediatrics; the American Heart Association National Subcommittees on Pediatric Resuscitation, Basic Life Support, and Advanced Cardiac Life Support, the Committee on Emergency Cardiac Care, the Science Advisory Committee; and the European Resuscitation Council. In addition to the writing group, members of the Pediatric Utstein Task Force are Paul Anderson, M Douglas Baker, Jane Ball, Desmond Bohn, Dena Brownstein, J Michael Dean, Niranjan Kissoon, Bruce Klein, Patrick Malone, Karin McCloskey, James McCrory, P Pearl O'Rourke, Mary Patterson, Charles Schleien, James Seidel, Joseph J Tepas III, and Becky Yano.

Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of pediatric advanced life support: the Pediatric Utstein Style. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association, and the European Resuscitation Council

This consensus document is an attempt to provide an organized method of reporting pediatric ALS data in out-of-hospital, emergency department, and in-hospital settings. For this methodology to gain wide acceptance, the task force encourages development of a common data set for both adult and pediatric ALS interventions. In addition, every effort should be made to ensure that consistent definitions are used in all age groups. As health care changes, we will all be challenged to document the effectiveness of what we currently do and show how new interventions or methods of treatment improve outcome and/or reduce cost. Only through collaborative research will we obtain the necessary data. For these reasons, and to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes, it is the hope of the task force that clinical researchers will follow the recommendations in this document. It is recognized that further refinements of this statement will be needed; these recommendations will improve only when researchers, clinicians, and EMS personnel use them, work with them, and modify them. Suggestions, recommendations, and other comments aimed at improving the reporting of pediatric resuscitation should be sent to Arno Zaritsky, MD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughter, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 601 Children's Lane, Norfolk, VA 23507.

Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of pediatric advanced life support: the pediatric Utstein style. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association, and the European Resuscitation Council

This consensus document is an attempt to provide an organized method of reporting pediatric ALS data in out-of-hospital, emergency department, and in-hospital settings. For this methodology to gain wide acceptance, the task force encourages development of a common data set for both adult and pediatric ALS interventions. In addition, every effort should be made to ensure that consistent definitions are used in all age groups. As health care changes, we will all be challenged to document the effectiveness of what we currently do and show how new interventions or methods of treatment improve outcome and/or reduce cost. Only through collaborative research will we obtain the necessary data. For these reasons, and to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes, it is the hope of the task force that clinical researchers will follow the recommendations in this document. It is recognized that further refinements of this statement will be needed; these recommendations will improve only when researchers, clinicians, and EMS personnel use them, work with them, and modify them. Suggestions, emendations, and other comments aimed at improving the reporting of pediatric resuscitation should be sent to Arno Zaritsky, MD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of The King's Daughter, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 601 Children's Lane, Norfolk, VA 23507.

Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of pediatric advanced life support: the pediatric Utstein Style. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association, and the European Resuscitation Council. Writing Group

This consensus document is an attempt to provide an organized method of reporting pediatric ALS data in out-of-hospital, emergency department, and in-hospital settings. For this methodology to gain wide acceptance, the task force encourages development of a common data set for both adult and pediatric ALS interventions. In addition, every effort should be made to ensure that consistent definitions are used in all age groups. As health care changes, we will all be challenged to document the effectiveness of what we currently do and show how new interventions or methods of treatment improve outcome and/or reduce cost. Only through collaborative research will we obtain the necessary data. For these reasons, and to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes, it is the hope of the task force that clinical researchers will follow the recommendations in this document. It is recognized that further refinements of this statement will be needed; these recommendations will improve only when researchers, clinicians, and EMS personnel use them, work with them, and modify them. Suggestions, emendations, and other comments aimed at improving the reporting of pediatric resuscitation should be sent to Arno Zaritsky, MD, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughter, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 601 Children's Lane, Norfolk, VA 23507.

Mediator-specific therapies for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock: present and future approaches

Despite recent advances in critical care and cardiopulmonary support, mortality from septic shock and its complications remains high. Effective therapies are needed to halt the progression of SIRS and the septic cascade prior to development of shock and organ ischemia/dysfunction. Such therapies are directed at prevention of infection/endotoxemia and modulation of mediators. These therapies are the focus of this article.

Outcome of cardiovascular collapse in pediatric blunt trauma

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the survival and functional outcome of pediatric blunt trauma victims demonstrating cardiovascular collapse, including pulseless cardiopulmonary arrest or severe hypotension, on initial presentation in an emergency department.

DESIGN

Seven-year consecutive case-control series.

SETTING

Level I trauma center and university teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Two thousand one hundred twenty consecutive pediatric victims of blunt trauma less than 16 years old admitted to a Level I trauma center from August 1984 through December 1991 had a mortality of 5.2%. Thirty-eight patients (1.8%) demonstrated pulseless cardiac arrest or severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure of 50 mm Hg or less) on initial presentation in the ED.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received basic and advanced life support consistent with guidelines published by the American Heart Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Surgeons.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Survival, functional outcome, and donor status were reviewed. Outcome of ED resuscitation (death or reanimation), post-ED destination (morgue, operating room, or pediatric ICU) length of hospitalization, functional outcome after hospital discharge, time to death (time from admission to ED to declaration of death), cause of death, total hospital costs, total hospital charges, and organ donation were reviewed. There were no functional survivors among 38 pediatric victims of blunt trauma who presented to the ED in pulseless cardiac arrest or with severe hypotension. Eleven of the 12 patients who were transferred to the pediatric ICU died; the single survivor demonstrated profound neurologic impairment six years after hospitalization. Six of these 12 patients were eligible potential donors and resulted in four multiorgan donors during the seven-year study. The mean hospital unreimbursed care for the 38 study patients was $3,514 per patient.

CONCLUSION

No child who presented with pulseless cardiac arrest or severe hypotension following blunt trauma achieved functional survival. Reimbursed care for pediatric victims of blunt trauma demonstrating cardiovascular collapse is disproportionately poor compared with that for pediatric patients who maintain hemodynamic integrity in the ED. Half of all patients who were stabilized sufficiently for transfer to the pediatric ICU were eligible potential organ donors. Therefore aggressive resuscitation of these patients may be justified if organ donation is seriously contemplated and aggressively pursued.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical presentation of gram-negative sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To review the epidemiology and pathophysiology of gram-negative sepsis and the new consensus terminology describing the clinical signs of sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the medical literature and compiled data from animal and clinical trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians and American Association of Critical-Care Nurses with expertise on the subject of sepsis and its complications.

RESULTS

Preconference and general sessions were offered at the National Teaching Institutes of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, with the goal of clarifying the epidemiology, risk factors and pathophysiology of gram-negative sepsis. In addition, current terminology and new (1992) consensus terminology describing the clinical signs of sepsis were presented. Special emphasis was placed on the role of the healthcare provider in the prevention and recognition of sepsis and the role of the septic mediators in the septic cascade.

CONCLUSIONS

If the incidence of sepsis is to be reduced, the healthcare provider must be aware of the risk factors for sepsis and methods of reducing nosocomial infections. A thorough understanding of the role of mediators and consensus terminology used to describe sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is necessary to recognize early or progressive signs of sepsis and to initiate state-of-the-art therapy.

Epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical presentation of gram-negative sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To review the epidemiology and pathophysiology of gram-negative sepsis and the new consensus terminology describing the clinical signs of sepsis. DATA SOURCES: Review of the medical literature and compiled data from animal and clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, American College of Chest Physicians and American Association of Critical-Care Nurses with expertise on the subject of sepsis and its complications. RESULTS: Preconference and general sessions were offered at the National Teaching Institutes of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, with the goal of clarifying the epidemiology, risk factors and pathophysiology of gram-negative sepsis. In addition, current terminology and new (1992) consensus terminology describing the clinical signs of sepsis were presented. Special emphasis was placed on the role of the healthcare provider in the prevention and recognition of sepsis and the role of the septic mediators in the septic cascade. CONCLUSIONS: If the incidence of sepsis is to be reduced, the healthcare provider must be aware of the risk factors for sepsis and methods of reducing nosocomial infections. A thorough understanding of the role of mediators and consensus terminology used to describe sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome is necessary to recognize early or progressive signs of sepsis and to initiate state-of-the-art therapy.

Pediatric injury prevention

Pediatric injuries are the leading cause of childhood death and disability and are responsible for more childhood deaths than all other diseases combined. The panel summarized the principles of pediatric injury prevention and reviewed the incidence, epidemiology, and prevention of six common pediatric injuries.

Citizen response to cardiopulmonary emergencies

Since 1985, it has become apparent that the key to survival from adult sudden cardiac death is prompt defibrillation. Any delay from the time of collapse to the initial countershock will decrease the likelihood of survival. It also has been determined that CPR performed by lay rescuers is not begun promptly and, once started, often is performed for more than one minute before the emergency medical services (EMS) system is accessed, which significantly delays the time to defibrillation. In adults, therefore, the rescuer should phone first to activate the EMS system before performing CPR. In the pediatric population, respiratory arrests are far more common than cardiac arrests. Therefore, a rescuer should perform one minute of rescue support before activating the EMS system (a concept termed phone fast). It is recognized that this change is dependent upon a national EMS system that is still evolving. It is hoped that this change to phone first and phone fast will provide an impetus for rapid development of the EMS infrastructure.

Advances and controversies in cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the young

Pediatric resuscitation is most frequently required for respiratory arrest. Cardiac arrest is a rare and ominous event and usually develops as a complication of shock or respiratory failure. Once asystolic cardiac arrest occurs, the outcome of any resuscitation is dismal; if cardiopulmonary arrest persists longer than 15 minutes in the normothermic child, further efforts are unlikely to result in patient recovery. For this reason, attention must focus on prevention of arrest and prompt restoration of oxygenation and ventilation, heart rate, and systemic perfusion.

Postoperative care of the critically ill child

Postoperative care of the pediatric surgical patient requires knowledge of the signs of cardiorespiratory and neurologic deterioration in the child as well as familiarity with particular postoperative complications associated with various types of surgery. This article briefly reviewed the principles of postoperative care of the critically ill child, and included references for more comprehensive sources of information.

Shock in the pediatric patient

Care of the child in shock requires careful and constant assessment of the child's systemic perfusion. In addition, oxygenation and ventilation must be supported. The child's heart rate must be maintained, since pediatric cardiac output often is directly related to heart rate. The goal of treatment of shock of any origin is to ensure that cardiac output is adequate to provide tissue oxygenation and substrate delivery. This goal is accomplished through careful titration of intravenous fluids to optimize ventricular preload and maximization of ventricular function (often with inotropic or vasodilator support). The child should be kept warm, and careful regulation and evaluation of total fluid intake and output is necessary. Parents should be allowed to remain with the child as much as possible, since this will comfort both the child and the parents. The child should be prepared gently for any painful procedures, and realistic but compassionate communication with the entire family is essential. Through constant assessment and evaluation of patient response to therapy, the nurse is in the best position to detect early signs of compromise and to determine effectiveness of therapy. Therefore, it is imperative that the nurse possess a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology and clinical progression of shock in the child, as well as the rationale and potential complications of management.