1
|
Pedersen MRV, Kusk MW, Lysdahlgaard S, Mork-Knudsen H, Malamateniou C, Jensen J. A Nordic survey on artificial intelligence in the radiography profession - Is the profession ready for a culture change? Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:1106-1115. [PMID: 38781794 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the radiography profession remains uncertain. Although AI has been increasingly used in clinical radiography, the perspectives of the radiography professionals in Nordic countries have yet to be examined. The primary aim was to examine views of Nordic radiographers 'on AI, with focus on perspectives, engagement, and knowledge of AI. METHODS Radiographers from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Island were invited through social media platforms to participate in an online survey from March to June 2023. The survey encompassed 29-items and included 4 sections a) demographics, b) barriers and enablers on AI, c) perspectives and experiences of AI and d) knowledge of AI in radiography. Edgars Schein's model of organizational culture was employed to analyse Nordic radiographers' perspectives on AI. RESULTS Overall, a total of 421 respondents participated in the survey. A majority were positive/somewhat positive towards AI in radiography e.g., 77.9 % (n = 342) thought that AI would have a positive effect on the profession, and 26% thought that AI would reduce the administrative workload. Most radiographers agreed or strongly agreed that clinicians may have access to AI generated reports (76.8 %, n = 297). Nevertheless, a total of 86 (20.1%) agree or somewhat agreed that AI a potential risk for radiography. CONCLUSION Nordic radiographers are generally positive towards AI, yet uncertainties regarding its implementation persist. The findings underscore the importance of understanding these challenges for the responsible integration of AI systems. Carefully weighing the expected influence of AI against key incentives will support a seamless integration of AI for the benefit not just of the patients, but also of the radiography profession. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Understanding incentives factors and barriers can help address uncertainties during implementation of AI in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Discipline of Medical Imaging & Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - M W Kusk
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; IRIS - Imaging Research Initiative Southwest, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S Lysdahlgaard
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; IRIS - Imaging Research Initiative Southwest, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - H Mork-Knudsen
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
| | - C Malamateniou
- Department of Radiography, Division of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, University of London, UK; European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, 3527 GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J Jensen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pedersen MRV, Kusk MW, Lysdahlgaard S, Mork-Knudsen H, Malamateniou C, Jensen J. Nordic radiographers' and students' perspectives on artificial intelligence - A cross-sectional online survey. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:776-783. [PMID: 38461583 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the domain of radiography holds substantial potential in various aspects including workflow efficiency, image processing, patient positioning, and quality assurance. The successful implementation of AI within a Radiology department necessitates the participation of key stakeholders, particularly radiographers. The study aimed to provide a comprehensive investigation about Nordic radiographers' perspectives and attitudes towards AI in radiography. METHODS An online 29-item survey was distributed via social media platforms to Nordic students and radiographers working in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands including items on demographics, specialization, educational background, place of work and perspectives and knowledge on AI. The items were a mix of closed-type and scaled questions, with the option for free-text responses when relevant. RESULTS The survey received responses from all Nordic countries with 586 respondents, 26.8% males, 72.1% females, and 1.1% non-binary/self-defined or preferred not to say. The mean age was 37.2 with a standard deviation (SD) of ±12.1 years, and the mean number of years since qualification was 14.2 SD ± 10.3 years. A total of 43% (n = 254) of the respondents had not received any AI training in clinical practice. Whereas 13% (n = 76) had received AI during radiography undergrad training. A total of 77.9% (n = 412) expressed interest in pursuing AI education. The majority of respondents were aware of the potential use of AI (n = 485, 82.8%) and 39.1% (n = 204) had no reservations about AI. CONCLUSION Overall, this study found that Nordic radiographers have a positive attitude toward AI. Very limited training or education has been provided to the radiographers. Especially since 82.8% reports on plans to implement AI in clinical practice. In general, awareness of AI applications is high, but the educational level is low for Nordic radiographers. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE This study emphasises the favourable view of AI held by students and Nordic radiographers. However, there is a need for continuous professional development to facilitate the implementation and effective utilization of AI tools within the field of radiography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital- Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Discipline of Medical Imaging & Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - M W Kusk
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; IRIS - Imaging Research Initiative Southwest, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S Lysdahlgaard
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark; IRIS - Imaging Research Initiative Southwest, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - H Mork-Knudsen
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway
| | - C Malamateniou
- Department of Radiography, Division of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, UK; European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, 3527 GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - J Jensen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jensen J, Blackburn PA, Gale N, Senior C, Woznitza N, Heales CJ, Pedersen MRV. Reporting radiographers within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries - motivation for becoming a reporting radiographer. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:731-736. [PMID: 38428197 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiographer-led reporting originated in the United Kingdom as a strategy to reduce reporting backlog and time taken to report images. The effectiveness of reporting radiographers has been demonstrated, but their motivational factors have not been thoroughly explored. This survey aims to understand the incentives for radiographers to pursue postgraduate education in reporting radiography across Europe. METHODS An online survey was conducted, collecting data across a range of topics such as demographic information, professional role, and job satisfaction. Questions assessing the influence of motivational factors on the decision to become a reporting radiographer are presented in this study. Descriptive statistics characterized the respondents' demographics. The motivational aspects were analysed quantitatively by regression analyses. Thematic analyses were performed for the free text responses on motivational aspects. RESULTS 239 respondents from the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands, Ireland, and Malta completed the survey's motivation section. Increased knowledge and new challenges were the most motivating factors for becoming a reporting radiographer, while less exposure to radiation and less patient contact were the least motivating factors. Job satisfaction was a significant motivator. Gender significantly correlated with the importance of social connections for female reporting radiographers. A cross-country comparison showed that title and position and job security were more important for reporting radiographers from the UK. CONCLUSION Taking in consideration that a sample of 239 is not generalisable for the role, this survey does provides insights into the motivation behind being a reporting radiographer in Europe. Factors such as increased knowledge, new challenges, and job satisfaction play significant roles. Hindrances experienced by reporting radiographers included lack of time, support, and standards, while aspirations for further professional development were expressed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE A thorough understanding of the motivation behind pursuing postgraduate studies in reporting radiography is a valuable tool for managers, aiding in fostering a positive work environment and attracting/keeping qualified personnel. The findings of this study can be employed in the development of strategies to support and enhance the practice of reporting radiographers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jensen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - P A Blackburn
- Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital- Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - N Gale
- Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, UK
| | - C Senior
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - N Woznitza
- University College London Hospitals, UK; Canterbury Christ Church University, UK
| | - C J Heales
- Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, UK
| | - M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital- Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pedersen MRV, Precht H, Jensen J, Mussmann B, Abdi AJ, Hansen PL, Holm S, Mørup SD, Brage K. Radiographers use of social media - SoMe in a Nordic perspective. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:651-658. [PMID: 38341986 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Social media (SoMe) is widely used as a communication platform in everyday life. Also, healthcare professionals have embraced SoMe as a communication tool for both peers and patients. It is becoming an interactive tool for discussing professionals' issues and a place where learning and education occur. This study explores the specific patterns of SoMe use for radiographers' in the Nordic countries. The aim of this survey was to investigate radiographers use of social platforms in a professional setting. METHODS A 29-item survey was prepared, and pilot-tested. The survey was produced in Danish a language that all Nordic countries master. In general, most Nordic languages are very similar. The survey was distributed by online platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter/X, and also distributed by newsletters by the Norwegian and Danish national radiographers societies. All data was collected anonymously. An Ethical Research approval was obtained from the University of Southern Denmark. RESULTS A total of 242 respondents completed the survey (Denmark n = 183, Norway n = 48, Sweden n = 8, and n = 3 from other Scandinavian countries). The respondents included 186 females, 52 males and four were undisclosed. On average, the respondents spent approximately 2 h and 23 min daily on SoMe, with 27 min specifically dedicated to content relevant to radiographers. Facebook was the preferred platform with 93 % (n = 226). A total of 5.4 % (n = 13) respondents had experienced contact from patients and/or next of kin, while 92 % (n = 222) reported no such interactions and 2.9 % (n = 7) were undisclosed. A total of 52.8 % (n = 128) used SoMe in relation to courses, conferences, or online meetings. This shows that time spent on content relevant to radiographers imply that SoMe can be a relevant tool for reaching radiographers. CONCLUSION The survey demonstrates radiographers' use of SoMe for personal and professional interest, with Facebook as the preferred social media platform. SoMe were mostly used during courses, conferences, or online meetings with half of the respondent reported using SoMe platforms during working hours. These results underscore the untapped potential of SoMe in professional healthcare settings. Additionally, the study offers insight into current practices, facilitating comparisons to identify trends in SoMe usage within the radiographer community. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The findings advocate for the strategic use of SoMe by radiographers', emphasizing professional networking and knowledge sharing. However, clear guidelines are necessary to ensure patient confidentiality and data security in these digital interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
| | - H Precht
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark; Education of Radiography, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark
| | - J Jensen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - B Mussmann
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - A J Abdi
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Engineering, Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - P L Hansen
- Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark
| | - S Holm
- Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark; Education of Radiography, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark
| | - S D Mørup
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - K Brage
- Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark; Education of Radiography, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pedersen MRV, Kraus B, Santos R, Harrison G. Sonographers' perspectives on research - A worldwide online questionnaire study. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:483-491. [PMID: 38219390 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Research has been performed by sonographers (also known as ultrasound reporting radiographers) for many years for improving diagnosis of disease, developing new imaging approaches, and enhancing patient outcomes. Despite this, sonographers' perspectives on research have not been well studied. To understand the views of sonographers is essential, as they have an important role in the successful implementation of research outcomes during their daily work. The study aimed to explore sonographers' perspectives on research. METHODS This cross-sectional online questionnaire was developed, and pilot tested, before distribution on social media platforms by the research group to sonographers or reporting radiographers in ultrasound worldwide. The questionnaire included 21-items. The link was open for 8 weeks in the spring of 2023. A mix of closed, open and scale questions were used. Informed consent was mandatory, and information about the study and anonymity was presented. RESULTS A total of 165 sonographers participated in the questionnaire of which 66.1 % were from Europe (n = 109), 6.1 % from North America (n = 10), 0.6 % from South America (n = 1), 2.4 % from Asia (n = 4), 13.3 % from Africa (n = 22) and 11.5 % from Oceania (n = 19). A total of 32 % of the participants had performed research. Also, 68.5 % would like to become more involved in research. CONCLUSION Most sonographers work in large hospitals, and half of them have obtained academic level 7 education. A limited number of sonographers have published peer reviewed papers. Many sonographers expressed an interest in research. This suggests a potential for future development of the sonographers' role in research. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The findings for this study provide insight that could be used to improve research practice for sonographers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital- Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS), Rue Marechal Teixeira Rebelo 425, 5030-058 Cumiera, Portugal.
| | - B Kraus
- Department of Health Sciences, Radiological Technology, University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wien, Favoritenstrasse 226, A-1100 Vienna, Austria; European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS), Rue Marechal Teixeira Rebelo 425, 5030-058 Cumiera, Portugal
| | - R Santos
- Medical Imaging Radiotherapy Department, Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Rue 5 de Outubro, 3046-854, Portugal; Laboratory for Applied Health Research ((LabinSaúde), Coimbra 3046-854, Portugal; European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS), Rue Marechal Teixeira Rebelo 425, 5030-058 Cumiera, Portugal
| | - G Harrison
- Society and College of Radiographers, 207 Providence Square Mill Street, London SE1 2EW, UK; European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS), Rue Marechal Teixeira Rebelo 425, 5030-058 Cumiera, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pedersen MRV, Jensen J, Gale N, Senior C, Woznitza N, Heales CJ. Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: Support, role satisfaction, and advanced clinical practice within the European federation of radiographer society (EFRS) member countries. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:87-94. [PMID: 37871370 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increasing number of radiographers are undertaking image reporting throughout Europe. However, there are variations in practice and experience in European countries. The study aim was to investigate reporting radiographer's perceptions in relation to support for their role and workload satisfaction and elements of advanced practice that may also be undertaken. METHODS Following institutional ethical approval an online 34 item questionnaire survey was circulated via social media; Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn in a 12-week period in 2022 across Europe. The survey data were managed by the online secure database REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Data was collected across a range of questions, of which those relating to support for, and barriers to radiographer reporting, role and job satisfaction, and other role elements are reported here. RESULTS A response level of 345 individual reporting radiographers replied to the survey from 15 European countries; some questions were optional and therefore had a lower response rate. There was consensus about the need for support from radiologists and management, protected time, and funding to support the reporting role. The majority of respondents received additional pay for taking on this role and expressed satisfaction with their role and workload. In relation to elements of advanced practice, the majority of respondents were involved in educational and managerial activities, and there was interest, but limited involvement, in research. CONCLUSION There was a consensus about the support needed, and perceived barriers to, radiographer reporting, between reporting radiographers from different countries. Whilst there is some commonality in relation to activities such as supervision and education, there was clearer variety in relation to opportunities for research between the respondents, perhaps reflecting the differences between reporting as a standalone role development and reporting as part of an advanced clinical practice role. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE As there is increasingly an emphasis on advanced clinical practice, reporting radiographers are likely to require support to develop their skills so that they can actively participate in the broader activities associated with this role, including education, leadership, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital- Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - J Jensen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - N Gale
- Medical Imaging, University of Exeter, UK
| | - C Senior
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - N Woznitza
- University College London Hospitals, UK; Canterbury Christ Church University, UK
| | - C J Heales
- Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pedersen MRV, Jensen J, Senior C, Gale N, Heales CJ, Woznitza N. Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: An overview of the role within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29:1100-1107. [PMID: 37757677 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reporting radiographers undertake an important role in healthcare and for the radiographer profession in general. First introduced in the United Kingdom, reporting radiographers are now practicing in several other European countries. Our objective was to investigate the workforce of reporting radiographers across the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) community. METHOD AND MATERIAL A voluntary anonymous 34 item electronic survey was distributed online using social media accounts such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn covering a wide range of topics relating to professional role, advanced practice, education, and seniority. The questionnaire was distributed during a 12-week period in 2022. RESULT A total of 345 individual responses were received from 15 countries with majorities of respondent from United Kingdom (n = 245, 71%) and Denmark (n = 66, 19%). Mean age was 41.9 (S.D 9.8), similar for females, 42.5 (S.D 9.0) and men 40.9 years (S.D 9.7). Most reporting radiographers worked in public hospitals (90%). The vast majority of the respondents (n = 270, n = 94%) authored and signed their own clinical reports while a minority (n = 18, 6%) stated that their reports were checked by radiologists. CONCLUSION The survey highlights the scope of practice of reporting radiographers working in Europe. Reporting is becoming a career path for an increasing number of radiographers across Europe and there is assess to academic education and clinical support. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE Reporting radiographers fulfil an important role within the current demands of healthcare. This demand is likely to increase in the future, and therefore it is vital that there is some form of standardisation in the level of education that this group of healthcare professionals receive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Vejle Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Kolding Hospital - Part of Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - J Jensen
- Research and Innovation Unit of Radiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense Denmark; Department of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - C Senior
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - N Gale
- Medical Imaging, University of Exeter, UK
| | - C J Heales
- Medical Imaging, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, UK
| | - N Woznitza
- University College London Hospitals, UK; Canterbury Christ Church University, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Andersen PAB, Precht H, McEntee MF, Pedersen MRV. How to set up a mobile X-ray unit in the community - Implementation initiatives for patient-centred care. Radiography (Lond) 2023; 29 Suppl 1:S148-S151. [PMID: 36907795 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile X-ray unit have previously been widely used within hospitals in general, predominately for imaging patients admitted to intensive care units or for patients who cannot tolerate a visit to the radiology department. It is now possible to have an X-ray examination outside the hospital in nursing homes or to bring the service to frail, vulnerable or disabled patients. A visit to the hospital can be a frightening experience for vulnerable patients living with dementia or other neurological disorder. It can potentially have a long-term impact on the patient's recovery or behaviour. This technical note aimed to provide insight into the planning and running of a mobile X-ray unit in a Danish setting. METHODS This technical note draws on the lived experiences of radiographers operating and managing a mobile X-ray service, sharing experiences with the implementation process and the challenges and successes of a mobile X-ray unit. RESULTS AND KEY FINDINGS Successes include that frail patient, especially those with dementia, benefit from mobile X-ray examinations, as they can remain in familiar surroundings during an X-ray procedure. In general, patients experienced an increased quality of life and less need for sedation medication due to anxiety. Also, working within a mobile X-ray unit is meaningful work for radiographers. Challenges included increased physicality of work, the funding required for the mobile unit, planning a communication strategy to the referring general practitioners, and permission from authorities to perform mobile examinations. CONCLUSION We have successfully implemented a mobile radiography unit that provides a better service for vulnerable patients through learning from successes and challenges. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The mobile radiography setup can benefit vulnerable patients and provide meaningful work for the radiographers. However, transportation of mobile radiography equipment outside the hospital includes many considerations and challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A B Andersen
- Department of Radiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Kolding. Sygehusvej 4, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
| | - H Precht
- Department of Radiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Kolding. Sygehusvej 4, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløwsvej 19.3, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Niels Bohrs Allé 1, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark
| | - M F McEntee
- Department of Radiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Kolding. Sygehusvej 4, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløwsvej 19.3, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Lille Baelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Beriderbakken 4 DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark; University College Cork, School of Medicine, Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, Ireland
| | - M R V Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Kolding. Sygehusvej 4, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløwsvej 19.3, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Lille Baelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Beriderbakken 4 DK-7100 Vejle, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pedersen MRV, Kraus B, Santos R, Harrison G. Radiographers' individual perspectives on sonography - A survey of European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography (Lond) 2021; 28:31-38. [PMID: 34391653 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiographers can elect to work within many different modalities, one being ultrasound. Within Europe there are differing opinions about how much of a role radiographers should take in relation to the ultrasound examination, particularly report writing. This paper provides findings exploring the radiographer's views on working within sonography. METHODS In 2019 an electronic survey was disseminated to radiographer members by European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) national radiographer societies, following a pilot study. A mix of closed questions, free text, and scale responses aimed to investigate radiographers' practice, legal responsibilities, report writing, educational level and experiences of support and mentoring. RESULTS Of 561 radiographers participating, most (92%) reported performing ultrasound scans. Challenges with legislation, medical protectionism and lack of high-quality education restricted other radiographers. On average, the respondents have practiced ultrasound for 13.5 years. A total of 60% had postgraduate education and carried out a wide range of examinations. A full interpretative report, including advice on further investigations is performed by 52%, whilst 22% provide a checklist or descriptive report. Over 55% of radiographers took legal responsibility for the examination and the majority had clear protocols, good mentoring and support in the workplace. Peer review of their work was less common. CONCLUSION The result shows that in 21 (n = 25) countries radiographers perform ultrasound, however not without challenges. Educational levels range from no formal education or short courses to an MSc in ultrasound. Report writing practice differs across the EFRS countries responding to the survey, as does peer review to enhance skills and clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE National Radiographer societies could review findings to support campaigning for a change in legislation and improvements to educational offerings in ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R V Pedersen
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, 3527 GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands; University Hospital Southern Denmark, Department of Radiology, Vejle, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Department of Regional Health, Campusvej 55, Odense, Denmark.
| | - B Kraus
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, 3527 GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Radiological Technology, University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wien, Favoritenstrasse 226, A-1100, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Santos
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, 3527 GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Health School, Department of Clinical Physiology, Rua 5 de Outubro - SM Bispo, Apartado 7006, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal; Laboratory for Applied Health Research (LabinSaúde), Rua 5 de Outubro - SM Bispo, Apartado 7006, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - G Harrison
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, 3527 GV, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Society and College of Radiographers, 207 Providence Square Mill Street, London, SE1 2EW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harrison G, Martins Dos Santos R, Kraus B, Pedersen MRV. Radiographers in ultrasound: Motivation and role expansion. A survey of European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS). Radiography (Lond) 2021; 27:1185-1191. [PMID: 34294506 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Variability in non-medical ultrasound practice across Europe has been highlighted in studies. Meanwhile, advanced practice in radiography has undergone rapid development in the United Kingdom (UK). This survey aimed to review results relating to extended role and advanced practice skills, motivation and job satisfaction from a wider survey of radiographers undertaking ultrasound examinations across the European Federation of Radiographer Societies' (EFRS) community. METHODS Following a pilot study, a SurveyMonkey™ on-line questionnaire was disseminated to EFRS member societies to share with their members, and via social media platforms. Quantitative questions for this article related to extended and advanced practice skills, communication of results, job satisfaction, motivation and career development. Theme analysis was used to assess qualitative feedback concerning priorities for future developments within the ultrasound role. RESULTS There were 561 responses, mainly from the UK, Ireland and Spain (81%). The majority (83.4%) of UK sonographers communicate findings to patients, compared with 27.1% in other EFRS countries. More engage with teaching (UK = 90.1%, non-UK 72.9%) compared with activities in the other advanced practice domains. The lowest involvement was the research domain, with only 33% actively involved in research. Radiographers were motivated to undertake ultrasound to develop their knowledge and skills and assume more responsibility. CONCLUSION Wide variations in ultrasound practice were seen across respondent countries. Generally, radiographers are happy with their ultrasound roles, although priorities include legislation for the sonographer role, remuneration, respect or support from medical colleagues, high quality education and role progression opportunities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The findings provide a better understanding of radiographer views which can assist radiographer societies and local teams to develop strategies to enhance advanced practice skills development and career prospects in ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Harrison
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, GV Utrecht, 3527, the Netherlands; Society and College of Radiographers, 207 Providence Square, Mill Street, London, SE1 2EW, UK.
| | - R Martins Dos Santos
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, GV Utrecht, 3527, the Netherlands; Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra Health School, Department of Clinical Physiology, Rua 5 de Outubro - SM Bispo, Apartado 7006, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal; Laboratory for Applied Health Research (LabinSaúde), Rua 5 de Outubro - SM Bispo, Apartado 7006, 3046-854, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - B Kraus
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, GV Utrecht, 3527, the Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Radiological Technology, University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wien, Favoritenstrasse 226, A-1100, Vienna, Austria
| | - M R V Pedersen
- European Federation of Radiographer Societies, Churchilllaan 11, GV Utrecht, 3527, the Netherlands; University Hospital Region of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Beriderbakken 4, 7100, Vejle, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Department of Regional Health, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|