Predictive factors of tumour necrosis inhibitor treatment persistence for rheumatoid arthritis: An observational study in 8052 patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether changes in ultrasonography (US) features of monosodium urate crystal deposition is associated with the number of gouty flares after stopping gout flare prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed a 1-year multicentre prospective study including patients with proven gout and US features of gout. The first phase of the study was a 6-month US follow-up after starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT) with gout flare prophylaxis. After 6 months of ULT, gout flare prophylaxis was stopped, followed by a clinical follow-up (M6 to 12) and ULT was maintained. Outcomes were the proportion of relapsing patients between M6 and M12 according to changes of US features of gout and determining a threshold decrease in tophus size according to the probability of relapse.

RESULTS

We included 79 gouty patients (mean [±SD] age 61.8±14 years, 91% males, median disease duration 4 [IQR 1.5; 10] years). Among the 49 completers at M12, 23 (47%) experienced relapse. Decrease in tophus size≥50% at M6 was more frequent without than with relapse (54% vs. 26%, P=0.049). On ROC curve analysis, a threshold decrease of 50.8% in tophus size had the best sensitivity/specificity ratio to predict relapse. Probability of relapse was increased for patients with a decrease in tophus size <50% between M0 and M6 (OR 3.35 [95% confidence interval 0.98; 11.44]).

CONCLUSION

A high reduction in US tophus size is associated with low probability of relapse after stopping gout prophylaxis. US follow-up may be useful for managing ULT and gout flare prophylaxis.

Incidence of solitary pulmonary nodules in Northeastern France: a population-based study in five regions

Background

The discovery of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) on a chest imaging exam is of major clinical concern. However, the incidence rates of SPNs in a general population have not been estimated. The objective of this study was to provide incidence estimates of SPNs in a general population in 5 northeastern regions of France.

Methods

This population-based study was undertaken in 5 regions of northeastern France in May 2002-March 2003 and May 2004-June 2005. SPNs were identified by chest CT reports collected from all radiology centres in the study area by trained readers using a standardised procedure. All reports for patients at least 18 years old, without a previous history of cancer and showing an SPN between 1 and 3 cm, were included.

Results

A total of 11,705 and 20,075 chest CT reports were collected for the 2002–2003 and 2004–2005 periods, respectively. Among them, 154 and 297 reports showing a SPN were included, respectively for each period. The age-standardised incidence rate (IR) was 10.2 per 100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval 8.5–11.9) for 2002–2003 and 12.6 (11.0–14.2) for 2004–2005. From 2002 to 2005, the age-standardised IR evolved for men from 16.4 (13.2–19.6) to 17.7 (15.0–20.4) and for women from 4.9 (3.2–6.6) to 8.2 (6.4–10.0). In multivariate Poisson regression analysis, gender, age, region and period were significantly associated with incidence variation.

Conclusions

This study provides reference incidence rates of SPN in France. Incidence was higher for men than women, increased with age for both gender and with time for women. Trends in smoking prevalence and improvement in radiological equipment may be related to incidence variations.

Quality assessment of economic evaluation studies in pediatric surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To assess economic evaluation studies (EES) in pediatric surgery and to identify potential factors associated with high-quality studies.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify EES in pediatric surgery published between 1 June 1993 and 30 June 2013. Assessment criteria are derived from the Drummond checklist. A high quality study was defined as a Drummond score ≥7. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with high quality studies.

RESULTS

119 studies were included. 43.7% (n=52) of studies were full EES. Cost-effectiveness analysis was the most frequent (61.5%) type of full EES. Only 31.6% of studies had a Drummond score ≥7 and 73% of these were full EES. The factors associated with high quality were identification of costs (OR: 14.08; 95% CI: 3.38-100; p<0.001), estimation of utility value (OR: 8.13; 95% CI: 2.02-43.47; p=0.005) and study funding (OR: 3.50; 95% CI: 1.27-10.10; p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

This review shows that the number and the quality of EES are low despite the increasing number of studies published in recent years. In the current context of budget constraints, our results should encourage pediatric surgeons to focus more on EES.

Quality of life after the initial treatments of non-small cell lung cancer: a persistent predictor for patients' survival

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before treatment may predict survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the predictive role of HRQoL after the initial treatments, on the survival of these patients.

Methods

A prospective multi-center study conducted in northeastern France. The SF-36 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ C-30) were mailed to patients 3 months after the end of the diagnostic process. High scores for functioning dimensions on both questionnaires indicated better QoL, and low scores for symptom dimensions on the QLQ C-30 indicated few symptoms. Cox regression modeling was used to identify predictive factors of survival.

Results

In total, 230 (63.5%) patients responded to the SF-36 and QLQ C-30. Before completing the questionnaires, almost 60% of patients had undergone some chemotherapy, about 10% underwent radio/chemotherapy or both and more than 30% underwent surgery or surgery plus chemo/radiotherapy.

On SF-36, the highest mean score was for social functioning dimension (55.5 ± 28), and the lowest was for the physical role dimension (17.9 ± 32.2).

On QLQ C-30, for the functioning dimensions, the highest mean score was for cognitive functioning (74.6 ± 25.9) and the lowest was for role functioning (47.2 ± 34.1). For symptom dimensions, the lowest score was for diarrhoea (11.5 ± 24.2) and the highest was for fatigue (59.7 ± 27.7).

On multivariate analysis, high bodily pain, social functioning and general health scores (SF-36) were associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0.580; 95% confidence interval [0.400–0.840], p = 0.004; HR 0.652 [0.455–0.935], p < 0.02; HR 0.625 [0.437–0.895] respectively). Better general QoL on QLQ C-30 was related to lower risk of death (HR 0.689 [0.501–0.946], p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Adding to previous knowledge about factors that may influence patients QoL, this study shows a persisting relationship between better perceived health in HRQoL after the initial treatment of NSCLC and better survival.

Cost Effectiveness of Cardioprotective Strategies in Patients with Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

The cardiotoxicity of anthracyclines remains a key problem in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). With regard to the actual long-term prognosis of aggressive NHL, the development of cardioprotective strategies is mandatory for these patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out to determine the potential economic profile of dexrazoxane or liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin in patients with aggressive NHL treated with a CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) as first-line therapy.

METHODS

A decision-analysis model described clinical events and economic consequences for theoretical patients who were to receive eight consecutive cycles of a CHOP regimen containing 50 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy. The timeframe of the model was the patient's lifetime. The probabilities were related to the cumulative dose of doxorubicin and age. The study was carried out from the perspective of the French healthcare system. Patients entered the model at 'choose' node: no cardioprotection versus cardioprotection with dexrazoxane or liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin. The model was based on a retrospective epidemiological study and on published data. The clinical end-point was life expectancy. Direct medical costs related to the cardioprotection and the treatment of congestive heart failure were considered. Monetary values for French prices in the year 2002 were used. Several univariate sensitivity analyses were carried out with varying clinical and economic parameters.

RESULTS

Per 100 patients, the two cardioprotective strategies provided similar benefits that were estimated as 24.5 and 13.4 life-years in 60- and 40-year-old patients, respectively. The cost per life-year saved with dexrazoxane was estimated as euro6931 and euro15 599 in 60- and 40-year-old patients, respectively, and euro22 940 and euro44 982, respectively, with liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin. Several sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of the model.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest the potential clinical and economic usefulness of cardioprotective therapies in patients with aggressive NHL. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Cytomegalovirus exposure, immune exhaustion and cancer occurrence in renal transplant recipients

The role of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in carcinogenesis is controversial. We studied whether CMV may contribute to cancer occurrence in renal transplant recipients. We studied a prospective cohort of 455 consecutive patients who received a kidney transplant between January 1995 and December 2006. All cancers and types of cancers were assessed. Lymphocyte phenotype and cytokines production were analysed according to CMV status in a subset population of this cohort. Mean follow-up was 84 ± 29 months. One hundred and nineteen cancers (26.2%) occurred during the study follow-up. There was a higher cumulated incidence of cancers in CMV-exposed patients (30.4% vs. 20%; P=0.018). Mean time to cancer occurrence was shorter in CMV-exposed patients than in CMV-naïve patients (4.7 ± 2.6 vs. 6.7 ± 2.8; P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed that both pretransplant CMV exposure (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.17-2.88; P = 0.009) and post-transplant CMV replication (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.02-4.59; P = 0.044) were risk factors for cancer. Among CD8+ T cells, exhausted T cells assessed as CD57+CD28- were expanded in CMV-exposed patients (26 ± 20 vs. 9 ± 8%; P < 0.0001), whereas CD8+CD57+IL2- cells were more frequent in CMV-exposed patients. Our results highly suggest that CMV increases the risk of cancer after transplantation.

Cost of pretherapeutic staging of patients with colorectal cancer metastases in a French population

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the economic burden of pretherapeutic staging of patients presenting colorectal cancer metastases.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to estimate the cost of pretherapeutic staging and identify cost determinants for 132 patients presenting colorectal metastases and living in the north-east of France.

METHOD

Staging cost was estimated using direct medical costs from the point of view of the French Health Insurance System. Independent factors were identified using a linear regression model, and bootstrap resampling was used to estimate unbiased standard errors and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The overall mean cost for pretherapeutic staging was estimated to be 1534€ [95% CI: 1250€-1818€]. Staging costs increased significantly with the number of medical procedures performed during the staging, and according to health care patterns (in-patient hospital stay versus out-patient episodes, public versus private care).

CONCLUSION

These results could now be used to estimate the impact of new imaging techniques on clinical practices and pretherapeutic staging costs.

Assessing cancer drugs for reimbursement: methodology, relationship between effect size and medical need

Reimbursement is assessed by the Transparency Commission from the Health Authority (HAS) using a medical benefit (SMR) score that gives access to reimbursement, an "improvement of medical service rendered" (ASMR) that determines the added therapeutic value, and the target population. Assessing cancer drugs for reimbursement raises the same issues as other therapeutic classes, with some key differences. Overall survival (OS) is considered by the Transparency Commission as the endpoint for assessing clinical benefit, and yet it is not an applicable primary endpoint in all types of cancer. Later lines of treatment, particularly during the development process, may make it difficult to interpret OS as the primary endpoint. Therefore, progression-free survival (PFS) for metastatic situations and disease-free survival (DFS) in adjuvant situations are wholly relevant endpoints for decisions on the reimbursement of a new cancer drug. Effect size is assessed using actuarial survival curves of the product versus the comparator, and it is difficult to summarise them into one single parameter. Results are generally interpreted based on median survival, which is fragmented because it only measures one point of the curve. The hazard ratio measures the effect of treatment throughout the duration of survival and is therefore more comprehensive in quantifying clinical benefit. Determining an effect size threshold for granting reimbursement is difficult given the diversity of cancer settings and the level of medical need, which influences assessment of the clinical relevance of the observed difference. Rapid progress in comparators (700 molecules in development) and the identification of predictive factors of efficacy (biomarkers, histology, etc.) during development may lead to different ASMR scores per population, or to the restriction of the target population to a subgroup of the marketing authorisation (MA) population in which the expected effect size is greater. To address these issues, the roundtable recommends the possibility of early scientific opinions by the office of the Transparency Commission in order to discuss comparators and the relevance of responder subgroups. It also recommends the possibility of granting a temporary ASMR, on condition of subsequent confirmation by production of data, when reimbursement appears justified in a subpopulation of the MA for which only subgroup analysis is available.

Does the availability of positron emission tomography modify diagnostic strategies for solitary pulmonary nodules? An observational study in France

Background

Previous studies showed that at the individual level, positron emission tomography (PET) has some benefits for patients and physicians in terms of cancer management and staging. We aimed to describe the benefits of (PET) in the management of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) in a population level, in terms of the number of diagnostic and invasive tests performed, time to diagnosis and factors determining PET utilization.

Methods

In an observational study, we examined reports of computed tomography (CT) performed and mentioning "spherical lesion", "nodule" or synonymous terms. We found 11,515 reports in a before-PET period, 2002–2003, and 20,075 in an after-PET period, 2004–2005. Patients were followed through their physician, who was responsible for diagnostic management.

Results

We had complete data for 112 patients (73.7%) with new cases of SPN in the before-PET period and 250 (81.4%) in the after-PET period. Patients did not differ in mean age (64.9 vs. 64.8 years). The before-PET patients underwent a mean of 4 tests as compared with 3 tests for the after-PET patients (p = 0.08). Patients in the before-PET period had to wait 41.4 days, on average, before receiving a diagnosis as compared with 24.0 days, on average, for patients in the after-PET period who did not undergo PET (p < 0.001). In the after-PET period, 11% of patients underwent PET during the diagnostic process. A spiculated nodule was more likely to determine prescription for PET (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients in both periods underwent fewer tests when PET was prescribed by general practitioners (p < 0.001) and if the nodule was not spiculated (p < 0.001). The proportion of unnecessary invasive approaches prescribed (47% vs. 49%) did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion

In our study, 1 year after the availability of PET, the technology was not the first choice for diagnostic management of SPN. Even though we observed a tendency for reduced number of tests and mean time to diagnosis with PET, these phenomena did not fully relate to PET availability in health communities. In addition, the availability of PET in the management of SPN diagnosis did not reduce the overall rate of unnecessary invasive approaches.

Cost effectiveness of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support as initial treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The GOELAMS 072 study showed that first-line high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) support was superior to the standard chemotherapy regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone; CHOP) in adults with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic profile of HDT with PBSCT support relative to standard CHOP therapy as first-line treatment in adults with aggressive NHL. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the French Public Health Insurance perspective, restricted to hospital costs (euro, year 2008 values). The clinical effectiveness criterion was censured overall survival (OS) difference after a median follow-up of 4 years for the entire cohort. A total of 197 patients were included (CHOP, n = 99; HDT, n = 98). Uncertainty was assessed using non-parametric bootstrap simulations and various scenario analyses. Five-year OS did not differ significantly between groups for the entire cohort. Nevertheless, subgroup analyses appeared to be more relevant for decision making: among patients with a high-intermediate risk according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), HDT yielded a significantly higher 5-year OS than CHOP (74% vs 44%; p = 0.001). Among these patients, the mean censured OS survival, adjusted for time discounting and quality of life (QOL), increased with HDT by 1.20 years (95% CI 1.19, 1.21). The cost per life-year saved with HDT was estimated as euro34 315 (95% CI 32 683, 35 947) in this subgroup. Results suggested that HDT with PBSCT support might be considered a cost-effective strategy among patients with high-intermediate-risk NHL according to the age-adjusted IPI. Its place and its cost effectiveness potential versus, or in combination with, rituximab still need further research.

Magnesium effect on testosterone-SHBG association studied by a novel molecular chromatography approach

A biochromatographic approach is developed to measure for the first time thermodynamic data and magnesium (Mg(2+)) effect for the binding of testosterone (TT) to sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) in a wide temperature range. For this, the SHBG was immobilized on a chromatographic support. It was established that this novel SHBG column was stable during an extended period of time. The affinity of TT to SHBG is high and changes slightly with the Mg(2+) concentration because the number of Mg(2+) linked to binding is low. The determination of the testosterone retention with the steroid hormone at different Mg(2+) concentrations and temperatures demonstrated that the Mg(2+) binding heat effect associated with this Mg(2+) release or uptake during this binding was in magnitude around 17kJ/mol corresponding to the model describing the electrostatic attraction that occurs between the negatively charged non specific areas of SHBG and the positively charged of magnesium. At all the magnesium concentrations studied, the DeltaH values were negative due to van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonding which are engaged at the complex interface confirming strong TT-SHBG hydrogen bond networks. As well, the DeltaS values were all positive due to hydrophobic forces in the testosterone-SHBG complex formation. In addition our results suggest that adaptive conformational transitions contribute to the specific testosterone-SHBG complex formation. As well, in the biological Mg(2+) concentration domain, it was clearly demonstrated that there was an uncompetitive inhibition of Mg(2+) on TT-SHBG binding which led an enhancement of bioavailable TT. Our work indicated that our biochromatographic approach could soon become very attractive for study other SHBG-steroid (or phytoestrogen) binding.

Relative added value: what are the tools to evaluate it?

The relative added value of a drug is currently evaluated in France by the Transparency Commission (TC) of the National Health Authority (HAS), by assigning a level of Improvement in Actual Benefit (IAB). IAB is based on two parameters, efficacy and safety of the product, in a defined target population, either as compared to one or more other drugs with similar indications, or within therapeutic strategy. The items used for evaluation, including the level of clinical effect, the relevance of the comparator, the choice of comparison criteria and the methodology used (indirect comparison, non-inferiority studies, etc.), have been reviewed by the working group in Giens with regard to an analysis of the opinion on TC issued between 2004 and 2007 in several therapeutic areas First of all, this attempt at rationalisation based on the criteria used to assess the relative added value demonstrated the rareness of direct comparative data, and was followed by a discussion on the possible broadening of the evaluation criteria. The group discussed taking into account the Public Health Impact (PHI), which has now been incorporated into the assessment of Actual Benefit (AB). The group believes that PHI seems to be more related to the notion of IAB than to that of AB. Indeed, it is frequently the relative added value of a new drug that produces an impact in public health. Conversely, considering the comparative evaluation criteria of PHI, which are not systematically taken into account in IMSR (such as improvement in the health of the population, meeting a public health need or impact on the healthcare system), PHI could legitimately be included in the assessment of the relative added value of a drug. Other parameters such as compliance or impact on professional practice have been considered. Thus, the notion of relative added value, evaluated at initial registration, could be based on an expected improvement in medical service. The notion of expected medical service leads to the requirement of producing additional data in real life (post-registration studies), which would support the definitive notion of improvement in actual benefit at the time of renewed registration, while taking into account the place occupied by the drug in the therapeutic strategy.

Management of SPN in France. Pathways for definitive diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule: a multicentre study in 18 French districts

Background

The process of diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) between 1 and 3 cm is not standardized. This multicentre study investigated how diagnosis of newly discovered SPNs is managed in routine practice.

Methods

We examined 11,515 radiology reports of patients undergoing chest computed tomography (CT) at all 76 radiology centres in 18 French administrative districts covering 8,220,000 people. Information on diagnostic procedures and treatment administered from discovery to definitive diagnosis of SPN was collected prospectively.

Results

We identified 152 cases of newly diagnosed SPNs. Follow-up was complete for 112 patients. The median number of diagnostic tests was 4 and the mean time to diagnosis was 41.4 days. Marked variability was observed in the sequence of diagnostic tests, and 8 diagnostic pathways were identified. Patients' characteristics and radiological features of SPNs influenced the number of tests performed. Referral by specialist, history of smoking and spiculated SPN predicted the performance of at least one invasive procedure (P < 0.01). Definitive diagnosis was a malignant disease in 30 patients (26%).

Conclusion

The diagnosis of SPN is a complex process that physicians approach in markedly different ways. Implementing practice guidelines for managing the diagnosis of SPN requires clarification.

Relative Added Value: What are the Tools to Evalue it?

The relative added value of a drug is currently evaluated in France by the Transparency Commission (TC) of the National Health Authority (HAS), by assigning a level of Improvement in Actual Benefit (IAB). IAB is based on two parameters, efficacy and safety of the product, in a defined target population, either as compared to one or more other drugs with similar indications, or within therapeutic strategy. The items used for evaluation, including the level of clinical effect, the relevance of the comparator, the choice of comparison criteria and the methodology used (indirect comparison, non-inferiority studies, etc.), have been reviewed by the working group in Giens with regard to an analysis of the opinion on TC issued between 2004 and 2007 in several therapeutic areas. First of all, this attempt at rationalisation based on the criteria used to assess the relative added value demonstrated the rareness of direct comparative data, and was followed by a discussion on the possible broadening of the evaluation criteria. The group discussed taking into account the Public Health Impact (PHI), which has now been incorporated into the assessment of Actual Benefit (AB). The group believes that PHI seems to be more related to the notion of IAB than to that of AB. Indeed, it is frequently the relative added value of a new drug that produces an impact in public health. Conversely, considering the comparative evaluation criteria of PHI, which are not systematically taken into account in IMSR (such as improvement in the health of the population, meeting a public health need or impact on the healthcare system), PHI could legitimately be included in the assessment of the relative added value of a drug. Other parameters such as compliance or impact on professional practice have been considered. Thus, the notion of relative added value, evaluated at initial registration, could be based on an expected improvement in medical service. The notion of expected medical service leads to the requirement of producing additional data in real life (post-registration studies), which would support the definitive notion of improvement in actual benefit at the time of renewed registration, while taking into account the place occupied by the drug in the therapeutic strategy.

[IFCT-0302 trial: randomised study comparing two follow-up schedules in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer]

BACKGROUND

The authorities advocate a minimalist attitude towards the follow-up of resected bronchial carcinoma (clinical examination and chest x-ray). A survey showed that 70% of French respiratory physicians have chosen to use the CT scanner and often endoscopy. The published data are equivocal and are often based on retrospective studies. Lung cancer is a good model for a study of post-operative surveillance. Recurrences often occur in easily observed areas, they may be detected while still asymptomatic and are sometimes potentially curable. Second primary tumours may develop at the same site.

METHODS

The Intergroupe Francophone de Cancerologie Thoracique (IFCT) has initiated a trial comparing simple follow-up (clinical examination, chest x-ray) with a more intensive follow-up (CT scan, fibreoptic bronchoscopy). The surveillance will take place every 6 months for 2 years and then annually until 5 years.

EXPECTED RESULTS

The main aim is to determine whether intensive follow-up improves patient survival. The opposite question is equally important. If an expensive and demanding follow-up does not affect the chances of cure these results will influence our practice.

[Appropriate cytotoxic drug usages in solid tumors: conformity to official labelling and level of scientific evidence]

The definition of appropriate use of drugs is questioned in oncology. Daily therapeutic practices were compared to official labelling and to published scientific data in this retrospective study. It was carried out in two respective specialised centers, from January to September 2004. All chemotherapies administered for adult solid tumours and including one of the eleven studied drugs were evaluated. The analysis of use was performed by drug : conformity to the validated labelling and level of scientific evidence (at the period study). The study included 1,561 drug uses in 1,211 patients. The overall rate of conformity to official labelling was 81.7 % (67.1 % of strict conformity). In 73.8 % of cases, the indications were supported by at least one randomized phase III trial. The results appeared to be significantly different in rare tumours. The potential economic stake of the "contrat de bon usage" was estimated as less than 5 % in our study. This analysis showed an appropriate and controlled use of onerous drugs in solid tumours. The official labelling of drugs are unable to answer to all clinical situations. The definition of a sufficient level of evidence is mandatory for the use of scientific data in clinical practice. This process has to be adapted for rare tumours.

[Cost of hospital-based management of acute myeloid leukemia: from analytical to procedure-based tarification]

The confrontation of the macro- and micro-economic approaches of hospital costs is a recurrent question, in particular for pathologies where length of stay is highly variable, like acute myeloid leukemias (AML). This monocentric and retrospective study compares direct hospital medical costs of induction and relapse treatment sequences for AML, valued according to four different approaches: the analytic accounting system of our hospital, the French Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) cost databases of hospital discharges (readjusted, or not, to actual hospital stay duration), and official tariffs from the new French DRG prospective payment system. The average cost of hospital AML care valued by the analytic accounting system of our hospital is 61,248 euros for the induction phase and 91,702 euros for the relapse phase. All other national valuation methods result in a two- to four-fold underestimation of these costs. Even though AMLs are now individualized in the 10th version of the French diagnosis related group (DRG) classification, the impact of this issue in other pathologies is going to increase with the gradual implementation of the French DRG prospective payment system. That is why it must be assessed before the progressive extension of this financing system.

Clinical and economic impact of epoetin in adjuvant-chemotherapy for breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Anaemia is a common toxicity in cancer patients and epoetins (EPOs) are now an established treatment. The economic profile of EPO treatment was assessed in patients with breast cancer treated by adjuvant-chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two strategies were compared: without treatment by EPO and with the possible use of treatment by EPO (epoetin alfa) when required. The clinical effectiveness criterion was time adjusted to quality of life and economic data included only direct medical costs.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred ninety-two patients were included. In the group with the strategy containing the possible use of EPO, 45.5% of patients effectively received EPO. A significant difference in the haemoglobin level profile over time was observed which provided a significant overall benefit of 0.0052 (p<10(-4)) quality-adjusted life year (QALY) associated with an extra cost of <euro>1,615 (p<10(-4)). In the base case analysis, the cost per added QALY was estimated as <euro>310,577 with the strategy containing the possible use of EPO.

CONCLUSION

This robust result seems to be unacceptable, but the only relevant point of discussion might be the level of acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for a patient.

Economic impact of simplified de Gramont regimen in first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

The cost of chemotherapy has dramatically increased in advanced colorectal cancer patients, and the schedule of fluorouracil administration appears to be a determining factor. This retrospective study compared direct medical costs related to two different de Gramont schedules (standard vs. simplified) given in first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. This cost-minimization analysis was performed from the French Health System perspective. Consecutive unselected patients treated in first-line therapy by LV5FU2 de Gramont with oxaliplatin (Folfox regimen) or with irinotecan (Folfiri regimen) were enrolled. Hospital and outpatient resources related to chemotherapy and adverse events were collected from 1999 to 2004 in 87 patients. Overall cost was reduced in the simplified regimen. The major factor which explained cost saving was the lower need for admissions for chemotherapy. Amount of cost saving depended on the method for assessing hospital stay. In patients treated by the Folfox regimen the per diem and DRG methods found cost savings of Euro 1,997 and Euro 5,982 according to studied schedules; in patients treated by Folfiri regimen cost savings of Euro 4,773 and Euro 7,274 were observed, respectively. In addition, travel costs were also reduced by simplified regimens. The robustness of our results was showed by one-way sensitivity analyses. These findings demonstrate that the simplified de Gramont schedule reduces costs of current first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer. Interestingly, our study showed several differences in costs between two costing approaches of hospital stay: average per diem and DRG costs. These results suggested that standard regimen may be considered a profitable strategy from the hospital perspective. The opposition between health system perspective and hospital perspective is worth examining and may affect daily practices. In conclusion, our study shows that the simplified de Gramont schedule in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan is an attractive option from the French Health System perspective. This safe and less costly regimen must compared to alternative options such as oral fluoropyrimidines.

Impact of medical practices on the costs of management of rheumatoid arthritis by anti-TNFalpha biological therapy in France

When the anti-TNFalpha drugs first came onto the market, their high price was the subject of much debate. Moreover, we must add the costs associated with their administration to the purchase price. Variations in medical practices may be the source of substantial variations in these costs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costs involved with the use of infliximab and etanercept in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to study the impact of variations in medical practices on them.

METHODS

A pragmatic cost minimization analysis was conducted from the payer's perspective to compare the costs of administration, that is, the direct medical costs, of the first two available anti-TNFalpha agents: infliximab and etanercept. Records of 60 patients from three university hospital rheumatology departments were reviewed retrospectively for a 52-week period. This analysis considered the following costs: purchase costs for the drugs and for any co-prescribed disease-modifying drugs, inpatient or outpatient administration, medical follow-up and the transportation costs associated with treatment that were reimbursed by the French health insurance system. Costs that did not differ between the two products were excluded (work-up for inclusion, etc.).

RESULTS

Data were collected for 58 patients, 30 treated with infliximab and 28 with etanercept. Patients' mean age was 52 years; 81% were women. RA had first developed on average 15 years earlier; the disease was positive for rheumatoid factors in 68% of cases and erosive in 93%. The total average annual cost of administration did not differ for infliximab and etanercept: 19,469 and 19,619 , respectively (P=0.56). The mean costs of administration nonetheless varied considerably between the three hospital centers: from 16,566 to 24,313 for infliximab (P<0.0001) and from 16,069 to 24,383 for etanercept (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The financial burden of biological treatments for RA is strongly influenced by the substantial heterogeneity in medical practices.

Use of a decision analysis model to assess the medicoeconomic implications of FDG PET imaging in diagnosing a solitary pulmonary nodule

This study assessed the use of positron emission tomography (PET) in identifying and diagnosing solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). For this a decision analysis model was constructed, and three alternatives were compared: wait and watch (WW), PET and anatomical computed tomography (PET), and CT plus PET (CT+PET). Transition probabilities were estimated from published data and consultations with experts. Costs of diagnosis were derived from the French reimbursement scale, and treatment costs from a national hospital database of diagnosis-related groups. The base case was defined as a 65-year-old male smoker with a 2-cm SPN and an associated high risk of malignancy of 43%. Evaluation criteria included incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and the proportion of unnecessary operations avoided in patients without malignant SPN. For the base case WW was the least effective and cheapest strategy. CT+PET was more effective and presented lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (<euro>3,022 per life-year gained). It also was superior to PET in cost-effectiveness terms and resulted in 4.3% fewer unnecessary resections of benign SPN than did PET. Risk profile analyses performed on SPN malignancy risk showed that CT + PET remains the most cost-effective strategy in the range of 5.7-87%, and that WW is more cost-effective in the range of 0.3-5.0%. CT+PET is thus cost-effective in detecting malignant SPN in patients with a risk of malignity of at least 5.7% and may avoid inappropriate resections of benign SPN. These findings support the attempts to introduce a larger number of PETs in France for SPN diagnosis.

Étude comparative rétrospective de l'impact médicoéconomique d'un renfort innovant dans la cure des éventrations de la paroi abdominale antérieure

STUDY AIM

Determine the gain of hospitalization cost using a new intraperitoneal mesh compared to the retro-muscular pre-fascial implantation of a polyester mesh.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1998 to June 2000, 52 patients with incisional hernia of the anterior abdominal wall were operated using intraperitoneal Parietex composite Mesh. The cost of surgery, anesthesia and hospitalization in this group were compared to similar data from a group of 21 patient where a Mesrsuture mesh in a prefascial retromuscular position was used.

RESULTS

Parietex Composite Mesh in intraperitoneal position allows a significative reduction in surgery time, anesthesia time and hospitalization. The clinical results were confirmed by cost savings.

CONCLUSION

Using new innovative medical device changing surgery technique insures significant cost saving despite its initial additional cost and increases patient's comfort during hospitalization.

[Prevention of preparation errors of cytotoxic drugs in centralized units: from epidemiology to quality assurance]

The centralized preparation of cytotoxic drugs is supposed to help preventing medication errors. Nevertheless, the residual risk of preparation errors has been demonstrated. Above all, prevention is based on the quality assurance policy. Following a previous work, this study valuates the effectiveness of a quality assurance policy and the impact of corrective actions. The study compares the rates of preparation errors observed before and after the corrective actions. The risk factors have also been studied. The study included 84,017 consecutive preparations. The results showed a significant reduction of overall (0.2% versus 0.4%) and major (0.1% versus 0.2%) errors between the two periods. This period impact has been validated by a multivariate analysis (OR were respectively 0.49 and 0.6, p < 10(-3)). The daily workload (> 60 preparations) appeared to be the most important risk factor (OR were respectively 2.4 and 3.2, p < or = 10(-3)). These results demonstrated the effectiveness of simple corrective actions. The follow-up on preparation errors appeared to be useful to raise technicians' awareness and to motivate them. An epidemiological approach allows to identify risk factors, and to definite relevant corrective actions.

Infliximab continuation rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in everyday practice

Infliximab is a major breakthrough in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated infliximab continuation rates and reasons for discontinuation in patients with RA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied patients with RA started on infliximab at any time between March 2000 and December 2002, under the conditions of everyday practice (as opposed to clinical trial settings), as recommended by the French marketing license (3 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion at weeks 0, 2, and 6 then at 8-week intervals). The number of infliximab infusions, side effects, and nonresponse rates was recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate treatment continuation. Reasons for discontinuation were studied.

RESULTS

We included 41 patients, with a mean age of 54 years, a mean RA duration of 9 years, and a mean of three previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatments. The total number of infliximab infusions was 461 with a mean of 10.8 per patient and a mean follow-up under treatment of 15.3 months. The proportions of patients still on infliximab were 82%, 74%, and 67% after 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. The main reasons for discontinuation were escape phenomenon (n = 6, 42.8% of discontinuations) and allergy (n = 3); in one case each, the reason was primary ineffectiveness, severe infection, plans to start a pregnancy, poor compliance, and unavailability for follow-up. There were 59 recorded episodes of side effects, with a profile similar to that in the literature and in postmarketing databases.

CONCLUSION

The infliximab continuation rate in everyday practice in patients with RA (67% after 2 years) was consistent with published data and with the results of controlled trials.

[Economic impact of outpatient chemotherapy in multiple myeloma]

The development of alternatives to hospitalisation is mandatory in cancer patients. A retrospective analysis compared the costs relative to two modalities of administration of VAD chemotherapy (hospital versus outpatient) in multiple myeloma. This study was carried out from the perspective of the French health care system, including direct hospital and ambulatory costs. The robustness of results was tested in a sensitivity analysis. Forty four patients were included: 27 in the "hospitalisation" arm and 17 in the "outpatient" arm. Among the cycles planned to be administered in outpatient, only 5 cycles (4 patients) have to be administered in hospital. The length of hospitalisation was consequently reduced with outpatient administration (-11.2 days) and it induced a significant cost saving as 3,066 euros (-32%) per patient. In sensitivity analysis, this cost saving varied from 1,282 to 3,667 euros. Our study showed the safety and the economic interest of outpatient administration of VAD chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Facilities and training are required to develop ambulatory chemotherapy.

Methodological validation of monitoring indicators of antibiotics use in hospitals

BACKGROUND

For several years now, the French national recommendations have been trying to set up a surveillance system in hospitals to link data on antibiotic resistance and data on the use of antibiotics, particularly for certain 'micro-organism/antibiotic' pairs. The indicators recommended in the lastest newsletter of the Direction Générale de la Santé (French Public Health Department) for monitoring the consumption of antibiotics were the number of days of treatment or the number of defined daily doses (DDD), both (in)directly related to the number of days of hospitalisation and/or the number of patients hospitalised.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the actual number of days of treatment, which is an observed indicator, with two indicators calculated on the basis of the DDD and the DPD (daily prescribed dose), both in terms of feasibility of collection and the relevance of the information generated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For several hospital care units, the 'length of exposure' to a given antibiotic was determined by four different indicators: two actual observed indicators [the patient's medical file (reference) and the named-patient based, computerised dispensing system from the central pharmacy] and two derived calculated indicators [obtained by dividing the number of grams prescribed by the DDD or by the DPD].

RESULTS

The average incidence density of antibiotic treatment (length of exposure per 1000 days of hospitalisation) obtained by the calculated indicators was higher than that obtained with the observed reference (+52% for the DDD and +33% for the DPD) but lower than that obtained with the second observed indicator (computerised system) (-10%). The differences were large and random (high variability depending on the hospital department, the antibiotic and the administration route; variations in both directions: actual length of treatment longer or shorter than the calculated length of treatment).

CONCLUSION

The question which indicator should be chosen is inconclusive for the evaluation of the selection pressure exerted by an antibiotic. The two indicators proposed in the newsletter (observed indicator and calculated indicator) seem to be complementary for use in a regional or national network to monitor resistance and consumption of antibiotics. Each hospital should validate the indicators and define for itself which indicator is most appropriate for estimating the actual length of antibiotic exposure. This may imply different indicators for different units, antibiotics or even administration routes within one particular hospital setting. Once validated the hospital has a powerful tool generating data that can be linked to resistance data.

From randomised clinical trials to clinical practice : a pragmatic cost-effectiveness analysis of Paclitaxel in first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer

INTRODUCTION

Paclitaxel plus cisplatin is considered to be the standard first-line therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Previous to this study, economic data on this combination resulted from randomised clinical trials (RCTs). Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the clinical and economic outcomes associated with paclitaxel-cisplatin (PC) and cyclophosphamide-cisplatin (CC) regimens using a pragmatic perspective based on daily clinical practice in a French university hospital.

METHOD

A retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis, from the hospital-payer perspective, was carried out as a before-after case study in fifty-nine consecutive women with verified International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II, III or IV ovarian cancer treated between 1995 and 2000. Median overall survival (OS) was used as the primary endpoint. The quality-adjusted time was assessed by the quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) method. Direct medical costs were collected for each patient. Monetary values for French prices in the year 2000 were used and converted to US dollars using an exchange rate of USD 1 = 7 French francs. Several univariate sensitivity analyses were carried out varying unit costs, medical practices and administration of paclitaxel.

RESULTS

The incremental cost of the PC regimen was USD 10,716 per patient. OS and quality-adjusted time were improved by 10.8 and 9.3 months with the PC regimen. The cost per life-year gained and per added QALY were USD 11,907 and USD 13,827, respectively. The robustness of the results was confirmed in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that PC may be a cost-effective regimen for advanced ovarian cancer in a French university hospital setting. We reported higher incremental costs and lower clinical benefits than RCT-based findings, suggesting that RCT-based findings were clearly balanced by our pragmatic approach based on clinical practices. Observational studies can provide complementary and balanced data for decision making.

Observational study of potential risk factors of medication administration errors

OBJECTIVE

Medication administration errors (MAEs) are the second most frequent type of medication errors, as has been shown in different studies in the literature. The aims of this observational study were to assess the rate and the potential clinical significance of MAEs and to determine the associated risk factors.

DESIGN

In two departments, Geriatric Unit (GU) and Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery Unit (CTSU) of Besançon University Hospital (France), MAEs were identified using the undisguised observation technique and classified according to the definitions of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Injectable administration, lack of nurses's standardized protocol for the preparation and administration of drugs, incomplete or illegible prescription and nurse's workload were analysed as potential risk factors of MAEs in multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

During a period of 20 days, opportunities for error concerning 56 patients and 78 MAEs (58 in CTSU and 26 in GU) were observed. The medication administration error rate was 14.9%. Dose errors were the most frequent (41%) errors, followed by wrong time (26%) and wrong rate errors (1996). No potential fatal errors were observed, 8 (10%) were estimated as potentially life-threatening, 20 (26%) potentially significant and 50 (64%) potentially minor. Nurse workload and incomplete or illegible prescriptions were two independent risk factors of MAEs.

CONCLUSION

According to these data, the quality of the medication administration process needs to be optimized in hospitals in order to minimize the incidence of iatrogenic preventable diseases.

Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of disposable biopsy forceps seems to be effective and safer than reusable biopsy forceps with respect to the risk of infection transmission. The results of cost analysis studies comparing reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps are conflicting. This study compared the cost of reusable versus disposable biopsy forceps.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis was carried out from the viewpoint of a hospital. Direct costs were included. The study design was retrospective. For reusable biopsy forceps, the evaluation of costs included purchase prices, cleaning (chemicals, equipment, technician time), and a fee for sterilization in a centralized facility. The cost evaluation for disposable biopsy forceps included acquisition and destruction costs. Costs were expressed in United States dollars.

RESULTS

The mean number of uses was approximately 90 per reusable forceps. The cost per use of reusable biopsy forceps was 6.84 US dollars (acquisition 3.59 US dollars, cleaning 2.28 US dollars, centralized sterilization fee 0.97 US dollars). The cost per use of disposable biopsy forceps varied from 10.72 US dollars to 15.63 US dollars. Additional cost per use of disposable biopsy forceps ranged from 3.88 US dollars to 8.79 US dollars.

CONCLUSIONS

From a strictly economic point of view, the use of reusable biopsy forceps is advantageous. However, additional factors should be considered. It would be essential to take into account the potential risk of infectious disease transmission related to the use of both types of forceps, which remains uncharacterized.