Validation and responsiveness of the English version of the Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Distress Scale (CADS) in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

This study aimed to validate the Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Distress Scale (CADS) in a diverse English-speaking population and patients with endocrine treatment-induced alopecia (EIA).

OBJECTIVE

Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy commonly cause alopecia in breast cancer patients, leading to significant psychological and social challenges. The CADS was developed to assess the psychosocial impact of alopecia, but its generalizability beyond Korean patients requires further investigation.

METHODS

Data from the CHANCE study (NCT02530177), which focused on non-metastatic breast cancer, was used. The cohort included 256 patients, and CADS data were collected at baseline, 6 months after chemotherapy completion, or 12 months after initiating endocrine therapy. The CADS questionnaire comprised 17 items covering physical and emotional health, daily activities, and relationships. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and responsiveness was measured by effect size.

RESULTS

The CADS exhibited good reliability, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 for the overall score, indicating acceptable internal consistency in both chemotherapy (0.89) and endocrine therapy (0.86) groups. Longitudinal responsiveness was supported by an effect size of 0.49 between decreasing satisfaction with hair growth and increasing emotional distress. Cross-sectional validity was confirmed, with effect sizes of 0.91 and 0.92 for satisfaction with hair growth and emotional and activity domains, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The CADS is a valid and responsive tool for assessing the psychosocial impact of chemotherapy-induced alopecia and endocrine treatment-induced alopecia in a diverse Western patient population.

Immunologic Profiling of Immune-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events with Checkpoint Inhibitors Reveals Polarized Actionable Pathways

PURPOSE

Immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) occur in ≥50% of patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), but mechanisms are poorly understood.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Phenotyping/biomarker analyses were conducted in 200 patients on CPIs (139 with ircAEs, 61 without, control) to characterize their clinical presentation and immunologic endotypes. Cytokines were evaluated in skin biopsies, skin tape strip (STS) extracts and plasma using real-time PCR and Meso Scale Discovery multiplex cytokine assays.

RESULTS

Eight ircAE phenotypes were identified: pruritus (26%), maculopapular rash (MPR; 21%), eczema (19%), lichenoid (11%), urticaria (8%), psoriasiform (6%), vitiligo (5%), and bullous dermatitis (4%). All phenotypes showed skin lymphocyte and eosinophil infiltrates. Skin biopsy PCR revealed the highest increase in IFN-gamma mRNA in patients with lichenoid (p<0.0001) and psoriasiform dermatitis (p<0.01) as compared to patients without ircAEs, while the highest IL-13 mRNA levels were detected in the eczema (p<0.0001, compared to control). IL-17A mRNA was selectively increased in psoriasiform (p<0.001), lichenoid (p<0.0001), bullous dermatitis (p<0.05) and MPR (p<0.001), compared to control. Distinct cytokine profiles were confirmed in STS and plasma. Analysis determined increased skin/plasma IL-4 cytokine in pruritus, skin IL-13 in eczema, plasma IL-5 and IL-31 in eczema and urticaria, and mixed-cytokine pathways in MPR. Broad inhibition via corticosteroids or type 2-cytokine targeted inhibition resulted in clinical benefit in these ircAEs. In contrast, significant skin upregulation of type 1/type 17 pathways was found in psoriasiform, lichenoid, bullous dermatitis, and type 1 activation in vitiligo.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct immunologic ircAE endotypes suggest actionable targets for precision medicine-based interventions.

Mixed histiocytic neoplasms: A multicentre series revealing diverse somatic mutations and responses to targeted therapy

Histiocytic neoplasms are diverse clonal haematopoietic disorders, and clinical disease is mediated by tumorous infiltration as well as uncontrolled systemic inflammation. Individual subtypes include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease (RDD) and Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), and these have been characterized with respect to clinical phenotypes, driver mutations and treatment paradigms. Less is known about patients with mixed histiocytic neoplasms (MXH), that is two or more coexisting disorders. This international collaboration examined patients with biopsy-proven MXH with respect to component disease subtypes, oncogenic driver mutations and responses to conventional (chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressive) versus targeted (BRAF or MEK inhibitor) therapies. Twenty-seven patients were studied with ECD/LCH (19/27), ECD/RDD (6/27), RDD/LCH (1/27) and ECD/RDD/LCH (1/27). Mutations previously undescribed in MXH were identified, including KRAS, MAP2K2, MAPK3, non-V600-BRAF, RAF1 and a BICD2-BRAF fusion. A repeated-measure generalized estimating equation demonstrated that targeted treatment was statistically significantly (1) more likely to result in a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) (odds ratio [OR]: 17.34, 95% CI: 2.19-137.00, p = 0.007), and (2) less likely to result in progression (OR: 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03-0.23, p < 0.0001). Histiocytic neoplasms represent an entity with underappreciated clinical and molecular diversity, poor responsiveness to conventional therapy and exquisite sensitivity to targeted therapy.

Defining D-irAEs: consensus-based disease definitions for the diagnosis of dermatologic adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs) are the most common and earliest to manifest, often with important downstream consequences for the patient. Current guidelines lack clarity in terms of diagnostic criteria for D-irAEs. The goal of this project is to better define D-irAE for the purposes of identification, diagnosis, and future study of this important group of diseases.The objectives of this project were to develop consensus guidance for an approach to D-irAEs including disease definitions and severity grading. Knowing that consensus among oncologists, dermatologists, and irAE subspecialists would be critical for usability, we formed a Dermatologic irAE Disease Definition Panel. The panel was composed of 34 experts, including oncologists, dermatologists, a rheumatologist, and an allergist/immunologist from 22 institutions across the USA and internationally. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two virtual meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness, and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. A working group aggregated survey responses and incorporated them into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions.Following revisions based on panelist feedback, all items received consensus in the second round of ratings. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10 core D-irAE diagnoses: ICI-vitiligo, ICI-lichen planus, ICI-psoriasis, ICI-exanthem, ICI-bullous pemphigoid, ICI-Grover's, ICI-eczematous, ICI-eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, ICI-pruritus without rash, and ICI-erosive mucocutaneous. A standard evaluation for D-irAE was also found to reach consensus, with disease-specific exceptions detailed when necessary. Each disorder's description includes further details on disease subtypes, symptoms, supportive exam findings, and three levels of diagnostic certainty (definite, probable, and possible).These consensus-driven disease definitions standardize D-irAE classification in a useable framework for multiple disciplines and will be the foundation for future work. Given consensus on their accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that they can be used broadly across clinical and research settings.

Managing hyperglycemia and rash associated with alpelisib: expert consensus recommendations using the Delphi technique

Hyperglycemia and rash are expected but challenging adverse events of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibition (such as with alpelisib). Two modified Delphi panels were conducted to provide consensus recommendations for managing hyperglycemia and rash in patients taking alpelisib. Experts rated the appropriateness of interventions on a 1-to-9 scale; median scores and dispersion were used to classify the levels of agreement. Per the hyperglycemia panel, it is appropriate to start alpelisib in patients with HbA1c 6.5% (diabetes) to <8%, or at highest risk for developing hyperglycemia, if they have a pre-treatment endocrinology consult. Recommend prophylactic metformin in patients with baseline HbA1c 5.7% to 6.4%. Metformin is the preferred first-line anti-hyperglycemic agent. Per the rash panel, initiate prophylactic nonsedating H1 antihistamines in patients starting alpelisib. Nonsedating H1 antihistamines and topical steroids are the preferred initial management for rash. In addition to clinical trial evidence, these recommendations will help address gaps encountered in clinical practice.

Phase 1b study of enzalutamide plus CC-115, a dual mTORC1/2 and DNA-PK inhibitor, in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

BACKGROUND

CC-115, a dual mTORC1/2 and DNA-PK inhibitor, has promising antitumour activity when combined with androgen receptor (AR) inhibition in pre-clinical models.

METHODS

Phase 1b multicentre trial evaluating enzalutamide with escalating doses of CC-115 in AR inhibitor-naive mCRPC patients (n = 41). Primary endpoints were safety and RP2D. Secondary endpoints included PSA response, time-to-PSA progression, and radiographic progression.

RESULTS

Common adverse effects included rash (31.7% Grades 1-2 (Gr); 31.7% Gr 3), pruritis (43.9% Gr 1-2), diarrhoea (37% Gr 1-2), and hypertension (17% Gr 1-2; 9.8% Gr 3). CC-115 RP2D was 5 mg twice a day. In 40 evaluable patients, 80% achieved ≥50% reduction in PSA (PSA50), and 58% achieved ≥90% reduction in PSA (PSA90) by 12 weeks. Median time-to-PSA progression was 14.7 months and median rPFS was 22.1 months. Stratification by PI3K alterations demonstrated a non-statistically significant trend towards improved PSA50 response (PSA50 of 94% vs. 67%, p = 0.08). Exploratory pre-clinical analysis suggested CC-115 inhibited mTOR pathway strongly, but may be insufficient to inhibit DNA-PK at RP2D.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of enzalutamide and CC-115 was well tolerated. A non-statistically significant trend towards improved PSA response was observed in patients harbouring PI3K pathway alterations, suggesting potential predictive biomarkers of response to a PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitor.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02833883.

Pruritus related to trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER2 + breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

The combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP) as part of a taxane-based regimen has shown benefit in the adjuvant and metastatic HER2 + breast cancer setting. In the CLEOPATRA trial, pruritus was reported in 11-17.6% of patients. The clinical phenotype and potential treatment strategies for this event have not been reported.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 2583 patients receiving trastuzumab and pertuzumab for the treatment of HER2 + breast cancer from 11/23/2011 to 6/21/2021 was performed at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Patient demographics, pruritus characteristics, and treatments as documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) were included in this analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2583 pts treated with HP, 122 (4.72%) with pruritus were identified. On average, patients experienced pruritus 319.0 days (8-3171) after initiation of HP. The upper extremities (67.4%), back (29.3%), lower extremities (17.4%), and shoulders (14.1%) were the most commonly affected regions. Grade 1/2 pruritus (97.6%) occurred in most cases. Patients responded primarily to treatment with topical steroids (52.2%), antihistamines (29.9%), emollients (20.9%), and gabapentinoids (16.4%). Of those with pruritus, 4 patients (3.3%) required treatment interruption or discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pruritus is uncommon in patients on trastuzumab and pertuzumab, generally a chronic condition, with gabapentinoids or antihistamines representing effective therapies.

Validation and Responsiveness of the English version of the Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Distress Scale (CADS) in Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

This study aimed to validate the chemotherapy-induced alopecia distress scale (CADS) in a diverse English-speaking population and patients with endocrine treatment- induced alopecia (EIA).

Objective

Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy commonly cause alopecia in breast cancer patients, leading to significant psychological and social challenges. The CADS was developed to assess the psychosocial impact of alopecia, but its generalizability beyond Korean patients requires further investigation.

Methods

Data from the CHANCE study ( NCT02530177 ), which focused on non-metastatic breast cancer, was used. The cohort included 256 patients, and CADS data were collected at baseline, six months after chemotherapy completion, or 12 months after initiating endocrine therapy. The CADS questionnaire comprised 17 items covering physical and emotional health, daily activities, and relationships. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and responsiveness was measured by effect size.

Results

The CADS exhibited good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 for the overall score, indicating acceptable internal consistency in both chemotherapy (0.89) and endocrine therapy (0.86) groups. Longitudinal responsiveness was supported by an effect size of 0.49 between decreasing satisfaction with hair growth and increasing emotional distress. Cross-sectional validity was confirmed, with effect sizes of 0.91 and 0.92 for satisfaction with hair growth and emotional and activity domains, respectively.

Conclusion

The CADS is a valid and responsive tool for assessing the psychosocial impact of chemotherapy-induced alopecia and endocrine treatment-induced alopecia in a diverse Western patient population.

IL12/23 Blockade with Ustekinumab as a Treatment for Immune-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events

Background: Immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) are frequent and may reduce quality of life and consistent dosing. IL12/23 has been implicated in psoriasis, which is reminiscent of the psoriasiform/lichenoid ircAE phenotype. We report the use of ustekinumab as a therapeutic option. Methods: Patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, who received immune checkpoint inhibitors and were treated with ustekinumab or had the keywords "ustekinumab" or "Stelara" in their clinical notes between 1 March 2017 and 1 December 2022 were retrospectively identified via a database query. Documentation from initial and follow-up visits was manually reviewed, and response to ustekinumab was categorized into complete cutaneous response (CcR, decrease to CTCAE grade 0), partial cutaneous response (PcR, any decrease in CTCAE grade exclusive of decrease to grade 0), and no cutaneous response (NcR, no change in CTCAE grade or worsening). Labs including complete blood count (CBC), cytokine panels, and IgE were obtained in a subset of patients as standard of care. Skin biopsies were reviewed by a dermatopathologist. Results: Fourteen patients with psoriasiform (85.7%), maculopapular (7.1%), and pyoderma gangrenosum (7.1%) ircAEs were identified. Ten (71.4%) receiving ustekinumab had a positive response to treatment. Among these 10 responders, 4 (40%) demonstrated partial cutaneous response and 6 (60%) demonstrated complete cutaneous resolution. Six patients (42.9%) experienced interruptions to their checkpoint inhibitor treatment as a result of intolerable ircAEs, and following ircAE management with ustekinumab, two (33.3%) were successfully rechallenged with their checkpoint inhibitors. On histopathology, patients primarily had findings of interface or psoriasiform dermatitis. No patients reported an adverse event related to ustekinumab. Conclusions: Ustekinumab showed a benefit in a subset of patients with psoriasiform/lichenoid ircAEs. No safety signals were identified. However, further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Outcomes after interruption of targeted therapy in patients with histiocytic neoplasms

Little is known about outcomes following interruption of targeted therapy in adult patients with histiocytic neoplasms. This is an IRB-approved study of patients with histiocytic neoplasms whose BRAF and MEK inhibitors were interrupted after achieving complete or partial response by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). 17/22 (77%) of patients experienced disease relapse following treatment interruption. Achieving a complete response prior to interruption, having a mutation other than BRAFV600E, and receiving MEK inhibition only were each associated with a statistically significant improvement in relapse-free survival. Relapse is common following treatment interruption however some patients may be suitable for limited-duration treatment.

First-line regorafenib with nivolumab and chemotherapy in advanced oesophageal, gastric, or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer in the USA: a single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The addition of nivolumab to chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced oesophagogastric (oesophageal, gastric, or gastro-oesophageal junction) adenocarcinoma; however, outcomes remain poor. We assessed the safety and activity of regorafenib in combination with nivolumab and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This investigator-initiated, single-arm, phase 2 trial in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with previously untreated, HER2-negative, metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma was done at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY, USA). Eligible patients had measurable disease or non-measurable disease that was evaluable (defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST] version 1.1) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients received FOLFOX chemotherapy (fluorouracil [400 mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 over 48 h], leucovorin [400 mg/m2], and oxaliplatin [85 mg/m2]) and nivolumab (240 mg) intravenously on days 1 and 15, and oral regorafenib (80 mg) on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression (defined by RECIST version 1.1), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival in the per-protocol population (ie, all participants who received a dose of all study treatments). The regimen would be considered worthy of further investigation if at least 24 of 35 patients were progression free at 6 months. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04757363, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 11, 2021, and May 4, 2022, 39 patients were enrolled, received at least one dose of study drug, and were included in safety analyses. 35 patients were evaluable for 6-month progression-free survival. Median age was 57 years (IQR 52-66), nine (26%) patients were women, 26 (74%) were men, 28 (80%) were White, and seven (20%) were Asian. At data cutoff (March 3, 2023), median follow-up was 18·1 months (IQR 12·7-20·4). The primary endpoint was reached, with 25 (71%; 95% CI 54-85) of 35 patients progression free at 6 months. Nine (26%) of 35 patients had disease progression and one (3%) patient died; the death was unrelated to treatment. The most common adverse event of any grade was fatigue (36 [92%] of 39). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (18 [46%]), hypertension (six [15%]), dry skin, pruritus, or rash (five [13%]), and anaemia (four [10%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in ten (26%) patients, which were acute kidney injury (three [8%]), hepatotoxicity (two [5%]), sepsis (two [5%]), dry skin, pruritus, or rash (one [3%]), nausea (one [3%]), and gastric perforation (one [3%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Regorafenib can be safely combined with nivolumab and chemotherapy and showed promising activity in HER2-negative metastatic oesophagogastric cancer. A randomised, phase 3 clinical trial is planned.

FUNDING

Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer and National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute.

Management of immune-related cutaneous adverse events with dupilumab

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) target the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways and allows the immune system to deliver antitumor effects. However, it is also associated with well-documented immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs), affecting up to 70-90% of patients on ICI. In this study, we describe the characteristics of and patient outcomes with ICI-associated steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent ircAEs treated with dupilumab. Patients with ircAEs treated with dupilumab between March 28, 2017, and October 1, 2021, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were included in this retrospective study, which assessed the rate of clinical response of the ircAE to dupilumab and any associated adverse events (AEs). Laboratory values were compared before and after dupilumab. All available biopsies of the ircAEs were reviewed by a dermatopathologist. Thirty-four of 39 patients (87%, 95% CI: 73% to 96%) responded to dupilumab. Among these 34 responders, 15 (44.1%) were complete responders with total ircAE resolution and 19 (55.9%) were partial responders with significant clinical improvement or reduction in severity. Only 1 patient (2.6%) discontinued therapy due to AEs, specifically, injection site reaction. Average eosinophil counts decreased by 0.2 K/mcL (p=0.0086). Relative eosinophils decreased by a mean of 2.6% (p=0.0152). Total serum immunoglobulin E levels decreased by an average of 372.1 kU/L (p=0.0728). The most common primary inflammatory patterns identified on histopathological examination were spongiotic dermatitis (n=13, 33.3%) and interface dermatitis (n=5, 12.8%). Dupilumab is a promising option for steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent immune-related cutaneous adverse events, particularly those that are eczematous, maculopapular, or pruritic. Among this cohort, dupilumab was well-tolerated with a high overall response rate. Nonetheless, prospective, randomized, controlled trials are warranted to confirm these observations and confirm its long-term safety.

PRO-CTCAE reveals under-recognition of dermatologic symptom burden in hospitalized cancer patients

PURPOSE

Dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) occur frequently in hospitalized patients and can significantly reduce quality of life. Physicians grade dAEs using the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE). However, they often underestimate symptom frequency and severity. The patient-reported outcomes (PRO) version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to assess symptoms from the patient's perspective. In this study, we assessed the patient-reported burden of dAEs via the PRO-CTCAE questionnaire and compared results with dAE assessment by treating oncologists and dermatologists.

METHODS

Patients admitted to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 6/1/2018 to 4/30/2019 and received a dermatology consultation were eligible. Once enrolled, participants completed a PRO-CTCAE questionnaire on 14 dermatologic symptoms. CTCAE grades assigned by oncology and dermatology were obtained from clinical notes, and kappa statistics were calculated to evaluate the level of agreement between physician and patient evaluations.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (mean age 59.4, 55% male) were prospectively enrolled. The most common patient-reported dAEs were rash (72%), swelling (67%), pruritus (64%), bruising (53%), and hives (37%). Oncologists and dermatologists underreported dAEs except for rash (median kappa values 0.3 [0.02-0.84] and 0.32 [0.02-0.87], respectively). Oncologists and dermatologists were concordant with each other's documented assessment of dAEs (median kappa value 0.985 [0.55-1]).

CONCLUSION

Oncology patient-reported dAEs in a tertiary academic oncologic referral center were under-recognized by providers. PRO-CTCAE may be a useful tool to optimize inpatient dermatologic care for cancer patients by detecting and allowing management of patient-reported dAEs.

NOVA-II: Part 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OQL011 on VEGF inhibitor-associated hand-foot skin reaction in patients with cancer

TPS741

Background: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is associated with the use of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors sharing vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (VEGFRi) activity (e.g., cabozantinib, regorafenib, sorafenib, sunitinib). HFSR results from impaired vascular repair mechanisms from inhibition of VEGF signaling and is characterized by painful palmoplantar lesions that may impact the quality of life and consistent dosing of anticancer agents. NOVA-II is a two-part, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating OQL011, a nitroglycerin (NTG) topical ointment. Part 1 enrolled 31 subjects and studied OQL011 0.2% NTG for Grade ≥2 NCI CTCAE v5.0 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). Part 1 safety and pharmacokinetic data support the continuance of NOVA-II, Part 2 dose-ranging study. The Part 1 inclusion criteria and primary endpoint were based on NCI CTCAE PPE. A unique investigator global assessment (IGA) was evaluated in Part 1 for HFSR severity (Grades 0-4) and has been revised utilizing Part 1 data for use as the primary endpoint for Part 2. We hypothesize that OQL011 containing NTG, a nitric oxide donor releasing free nitric oxide and activating guanylate cyclase in skin vessels, will mitigate HFSR symptoms and disease severity via local upregulation of the VEGF/VEGFR signaling pathways. Methods: NOVA-II Part 2 is a global, dose-ranging phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 doses of OQL011 (0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.5% NTG) compared to vehicle control for the treatment of moderate to severe VEGFRi associated HFSR. Part 2 will enroll up to 140 patients (randomized 1:1:1:1; vehicle: OQL011@ 0.1%: 0.2%: 0.5% NTG) with IGA Grade ≥3 (IGA scale 0-4). Subjects will apply the study drug (i.e., OQL011 or vehicle) to palmar and plantar surfaces TID and will be evaluated at Visit 1 (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 14), and Visit 3 (Day 28). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving an IGA Grade ≤1 at Visit 2 (Day 14). A superiority test will be performed to compare each of the OQL011 doses to the vehicle, and the study drug exposure-response relationship will be explored. The correlation between IGA and NCI CTCAE v5.0 PPE, patient-reported outcomes including a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), and Hand-foot Quality of Life (HF-QoL) questionnaire will be measured. Pharmacokinetics will be evaluated in a subset of subjects randomized 2:2:2:1, with 6 patients in each of the 3 OQL011 dose level groups and 3 patients in the vehicle group. PK samples will be collected on Day 0 at pre-dose, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h, after the first application of investigational drugs. Study enrollment for Part 2 is currently ongoing in the United States, India, and China. (NCT04088318) Clinical trial information: NCT04088318 .

Non-invasive, in vivo, characterization of cutaneous metastases using a novel multimodal RCM-OCT imaging device: a case-series

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous metastases (CM) diagnosis is clinically challenging, requiring an invasive biopsy for confirmation. A novel, RCM-OCT device combines the advantage of horizontal high-resolution reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) images and vertical deeper optical coherence tomography (OCT) images to aid in non-invasive diagnosis of CM from breast cancers.

OBJECTIVE

Characterize CM from breast cancers using RCM-OCT device.

METHODS

Seven patients suffering from breast cancers with suspicious CM were consented and imaged with RCM-OCT device. CM features were defined by comparing with histopathology. Tumour depths were measured on OCT and on H&E-images and correlated using statistical analysis Pearson test. 3D-OCT images were reconstructed to enhance tumour visualization.

RESULTS

6/7 lesions were CM from breast cancers, and one was vascular ectasia, on histopathology. CM appeared as greyish-darkish oval to round structures within the dermis on RCM and OCT-images. On RCM, individual tumour cells were seen, enabling identification of even small tumour foci; while, on OCT deeper tumours were detected. Inflammatory cells, dilated vessels and coarse collagen were identified in the dermis. Pearson correlation had an r2 of 0.38 and a significant P-value <0.004 for depth measurements. CM from breast cancers could be differentiated from ecstatic vessels on 3D-reconstructed OCT image.

LIMITATION

Small sample size and lack of clinical mimickers.

CONCLUSION

RCM-OCT can detect CM and has potential in aiding non-invasive diagnosis and management.

Shared decision making for patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy associated with persistent alopecia

Objective

To assess patient-perceived involvement in shared decision making among those diagnosed with breast or gynecologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy associated with persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (pCIA). We also sought to identify factors that influence shared decision making.

Methods

We recruited patients from the Gynecologic Medical Oncology and Breast Medicine Services at a large academic center for this prospective cohort study. All patients were scheduled to start chemotherapy between June 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017. Following medical consultation, including discussion of the risk of pCIA, patients completed the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Clinical and sociodemographic information was also collected. Univariate analysis was used to evaluate SDM-Q-9 total scores and their constituents for all variables.

Results

Sixty-one patients completed the survey. The median total SDM-Q-9 score was 95.6 (95% CI: 90-100). Most patients (n = 57, 93%) reported a high level of involvement (SDM-Q-9 total score > 66). There was no difference in total scores between patients with breast compared with gynecologic cancer (P > .05). By individual item, the scores for item Q1 ("My doctor made clear that a decision needs to be made") were significantly lower for Black patients and those with advanced disease (P < .05).

Conclusions

Most patients indicated they were adequately involved in shared decision making regarding chemotherapy treatment options and their risk for pCIA. Patients from underrepresented populations and those with advanced disease may benefit from additional support from their clinicians to better address the anticipated psychosocial impacts of pCIA and facilitate the provision of optimal and equitable care.

Expert consensus recommendations for managing hyperglycemia and rash in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with alpelisib (ALP)

422

Background: ALP is a PI3Kα inhibitor and degrader approved with fulvestrant for the treatment (tx) of patients (pts) with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2– ABC. Hyperglycemia (HG) and rash are expected adverse events with ALP tx and remain a challenge for physicians and pts. Management guidance is primarily based on clinical trial experience, which is not necessarily reflective of real-world pts. Here we report guidance for optimizing prevention and management of HG and rash in pts taking ALP based on an integrated Delphi panel, a systematic, validated approach to organize consensus from experts in the absence of definitive evidence. Methods: Two modified Delphi panels were conducted, focusing on HG and rash, respectively. Each panel included 4 oncologists, 4 endocrinologists or dermatologists, 1 clinical pharmacist, and 1 pt advocate. Experts were asked to rate appropriateness of 908 interventions for HG and 348 for rash on hypothetical pt scenarios on a 1 (highly inappropriate) to 9 (highly appropriate) scale. Results were reviewed at virtual meetings, after which experts repeated the rating. The level of agreement or disagreement was determined using the median scores and dispersion from the final rating, and this level of agreement was used to develop consensus statements and tx algorithms. Results: Per the HG panel, (a) ALP tx is appropriate in individuals with HbA1c 6.5% to < 8% with a pre-tx endocrinology consult; (b) low carbohydrate diet is appropriate in all pts starting ALP; (c) prophylactic metformin is appropriate in pts with baseline HbA1c 5.7%-6.4%; may also be appropriate in pts with HbA1c < 5.7%; (d) after metformin, an SGLT2 inhibitor or a thiazolidinedione is an appropriate second-/third-line anti-HG agent (or first-line in metformin-intolerant pts), while insulin is not. Per the rash panel, (a) prophylactic nonsedating (NS) H1 antihistamines (standard dose) are appropriate for all pts; (b) starting/escalating NS H1 antihistamines and topical steroids (TS) is the preferred first step for managing rash; (c) it is appropriate to add, but not replace with, a sedating H1 antihistamine, if response to high-dose, NS option is inadequate, and to add an H2 antihistamine if response is still inadequate; (d) it is appropriate to hold ALP and start oral corticosteroids (OCS) if rash affects > 30% body surface area and is recurrent or has moderate/severe symptoms; (e) if angioedema is present, it is appropriate to either hold ALP and start OCS, or permanently discontinue ALP tx. Conclusions: Until further evidence is available, these expert recommendations provide guidance on prevention and management of HG and rash related to ALP tx in routine clinical practice.

Contribution of the Skin-Gut Axis to Immune-Related Adverse Events with Multi-System Involvement

Simple Summary

Increasing numbers of cancer patients are treated with immunotherapy that activates their immune systems to control or even eliminate tumors. However, a substantial proportion of patients experience adverse events mediated by the unleashed immune system. The skin is one of the most frequently affected organs, with toxicities typically manifesting as distinct types of rashes. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is also commonly affected, with a wide spectrum of symptom manifestations that can range from self-limited diarrhea to life-threatening colitis. Here we present the relationship between skin and GI adverse events among cancer patients receiving treatment with immune checkpoint blockade, which has not been well-studied.

Abstract

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) frequently complicate treatment with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1, which are commonly used to treat solid and hematologic malignancies. The skin and gastrointestinal (GI) tract are most frequently affected by irAEs. While extensive efforts to further characterize organ-specific adverse events have contributed to the understanding and management of individual toxicities, investigations into the relationship between multi-organ toxicities have been limited. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a characterization of irAEs occurring in both the skin and gut. A retrospective analysis of two cohorts of patients treated with ICB at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center was conducted, including a cohort of patients with cutaneous irAEs (ircAEs) confirmed by dermatologists (n = 152) and a cohort of patients with biopsy-proven immune-related colitis (n = 246). Among both cohorts, 15% (61/398) of patients developed both skin and GI irAEs, of which 72% (44/61) patients had ircAEs preceding GI irAEs (p = 0.00013). Our study suggests that in the subset of patients who develop both ircAEs and GI irAEs, ircAEs are likely to occur first. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate our findings, to assess the overall incidence of co-incident irAEs, and to determine whether ircAEs are predictors of other irAEs. This analysis highlights the development of multi-system dermatologic and gastrointestinal irAEs and underscores the importance of oncologists, gastroenterologists, and dermatologists confronted with an ircAE to remain alert for additional irAEs.

The PROTECT Study: A phase II, open-label trial of prophylactic skin toxicity therapy with clindamycin and triamcinolone in patients with glioblastoma treated with tumor-treating fields

TPS2084

Background: Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM), is the most common and aggressive brain tumor. Tumor Treatment Fields (TTFields) is a noninvasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality approved for the treatment of recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM by the US Food and Drug Administration. TTFields delivers low intensity (1-3 V/cm), intermediate frequency (100-300 kHz), alternating electric fields to the tumor through noninvasive transducer arrays placed on the skin, around the region of the body containing the tumor. During mitosis, TTFields disrupt the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase resulting in apoptosis. Dermatologic adverse events (AEs) to TTFields include dermatitis and infections and were reported in 54% of patients in a phase III trial. Topical triamcinolone and clindamycin have demonstrated anecdotal benefit because of their anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activity. Pre-clinical studies have shown no negative effect on impedance when applied onto skin under the arrays. The effect of topical triamcinolone and clindamycin for the prevention of skin AEs to TTFields has not been studied prospectively. Methods: We are conducting a phase II multicenter clinical trial in patients receiving standard-of-care TTFields therapy for GBM to determine the efficacy of a prophylactic intervention: topical clindamycin 1% solution and triamcinolone 0.1% lotion in preventing grade ≥2 epicutaneous device-related events. Eligible patients must be ≥18 years of age, newly diagnosed with GBM and initiating TTFields within 7 days of study enrollment. The primary objective is to determine the effect of topical clindamycin 1% and triamcinolone 0.1% on the prevention of grade ≥2 device-related skin AEs. Secondary objectives include investigating the effect of study agents on skin-related quality of life (using the PRO-CTCAE modules for rash, ulcer, and pruritus), evaluating the efficacy of study agents applied to the scalp at every array change by standardized photography evaluated by a blinded investigator, measuring the duration of skin toxicities and usage of the TTFields device, measuring the duration of treatment interruptions and time to first grade ≥ 2 skin events, determining the bacterial flora of scalp infections, and determining the effect of study agents on TTFields’ impedance. Patients will be on study for 90 days. An end-of-study assessment will occur on day 90, and a post-treatment visit will occur on day 120. The first patient was enrolled on October 21, 2020 and hitherto, 8 patients have been consented. Participating sites include Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, Tufts University Medical Center, Northwestern University, Washington University, University of Cincinnati, and John Theurer Cancer Center - Hackensack Meridian Health. Clinical trial information: NCT04469075.

Interim analysis of a single-center, single-arm, prospective phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for alpelisib rash in metastatic PIK3CA-mutant, hormone receptor–positive breast cancer

12100

Background: Rash associated with increased peripheral eosinophils develops in approximately 50% of metastatic breast cancer patients receiving alpelisib. Antihistamines and corticosteroids have limited benefit. Refractory rash may lead to decreased dose intensity and affect clinical outcome. Benralizumab is an anti-IL-5Rα chimeric monoclonal antibody that depletes peripheral eosinophils and has demonstrated benefit in eosinophilic asthma and hypereosinophilic syndrome. We investigate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for the treatment of alpelisib rash. Methods: We performed a single-center, single-arm, prospective phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in cancer patients who developed CTCAE grade 2/3 skin events resulting from immunotherapy or targeted therapies with absolute blood eosinophil counts of ≥300/mcl. While remaining on culprit drugs, patients were treated with benralizumab 30mg once every 4 weeks for the first 3 doses followed by once every 8 weeks for 3 additional doses (approved dosing for eosinophilic asthma). Primary endpoint was clinical response measured as reduction in CTCAE grade 2/3 skin event to grade ≤1 by week 4. Secondary endpoints were patient quality of life (QoL) measured by skindex16, safety data, need for supportive oral corticosteroids, and changes in cytokines and eosinophil biomarkers. This interim analysis focuses on patients with PIK3CA-mutant metastatic breast cancer receiving alpelisib. Results: Between September 16th 2020 and January 1st 2022, we enrolled 10 metastatic breast cancer patients with grade 2/3 rash attributed to alpelisib (5 pts with G3). All patients had a reduction of rash to grade ≤1 (n = 10, p < 0.0001), and a decrease in peripheral absolute eosinophils (mean 500/mcl to 0, p < 0.0001). Of these, 6 patients had been on prophylactic oral antihistamines and 2 had oral steroid coadministration. QoL significantly improved (Skindex16 mean score 58 to 16, p = 0.0001) and eosinophils in skin histology decreased per HPF (mean 6.25 to 0.25, n = 8, p = 0.2) by week 4. An increase in IL-5 > 600% and reduction IL-6 and TNF-α > 50% were reported by week 4 and 8. Grade 1/2 mucositis in 4 patients were reported as adverse events. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that benralizumab is safe and effective for the treatment of grade 2/3 rash with eosinophilia related to alpelisib in patients with breast cancer. A reduction in rash severity was evidenced in all patients, along with improved QoL. Larger controlled studies are in development to evaluate the efficacy of benralizumab for the prevention of alpelisib rash. Clinical trial information: NCT04552288.

A survey study of prevention and treatment patterns by academic and community oncologists for papulopustular, acneiform skin rash associated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) therapy

e24083

Background: EGFRi’s are associated with dermatologic AEs that include an acneiform skin rash. This rash occurs in up to 80% for all grades and 18% for grades ≥3. Treatments are based on grade and include topical antibiotics or corticosteroids for grades 1 and 2, and EGFRi dose interruption and/or oral corticosteroids for severe grades (i.e., ≥ grade 3). For prevention, topical corticosteroids or oral antibiotics are recommended. This survey was conducted to assess current toxicity management patterns and treatment gaps for EGFRi associated skin rash. Methods: An online survey (MedSurvey) with 5 eligibility & 8 questions related to EGFRi practice patterns was conducted (April 2021). Fifty-one practicing oncologists completed the survey. Results: Among the 51 oncologists, 86% have been practicing ≥ 11 yrs with 37% from an academic and 63% from a community setting. They (percent of respondents) prescribed cytotoxic chemotherapy (91%) and targeted agents (84%) > 10x/week. Prevention of EGFRi skin rash with topical antibiotics (33%), topical steroids (45%), and oral antibiotics (45%) were commonly administered prophylactic treatments, while 26% do not treat prophylactically. EGFRi’s were started at a lower dose always 6%, frequently (≥50%) 26%, sometimes (< 50%) 24%, and never 45% of the time. Skin rash treatment is started by 47% at Grade 1, 33% at Grade 2, and 2% ≥Grade 3, while 18% start treatment prophylactically. The majority (57%) would use a novel agent to treat skin rash, while 26% would use it for patients with a previous occurrence, 13% for those not responding to the standard of care and 2% would use this agent for selected EGFR inhibitors. For Grade 1 skin rash (multiple choices allowed), 33% used observation only for management, whereas 55% prescribed topical antibiotics, 35% prescribed oral antibiotics, and 55% used topical steroids. Dose reduction was implemented 4% of the time. For Grade 2 skin rash (multiple choices allowed) 51% used topical antibiotics, 63% prescribed an oral antibiotic, and 77% used topical steroids. Dose reduction was used 35% of the time. For patients not responding to standard therapy 6% switched to a different anti-cancer regimen, 16% changed to another EGFRi, while 77% interrupted the EGFRi therapy. Conclusions: Treating EGFRi-associated skin rash continues to be a significant challenge with Grade 2/3 toxicity or patients not responding to standard treatment. This often requires a therapeutic dose reduction or interruption that may impact the efficacy of anti-cancer treatment. Effective management (prevention and treatment) for skin toxicities associated with EGFRi inhibitors remains an unmet need for many patients and a treatment challenge for oncologists.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with histiocytic neoplasms harboring class 3 MAP2K1 mutations, including treatment with the ERK inhibitor ulixertinib

e19081

Background: Histiocytic neoplasms (HN) are clonal myeloid disorders with diverse clinical phenotypes. HN nearly invariably harbor mutations of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, including the BRAFV600E mutation in HN subtypes that are responsive to BRAF inhibition. More recently characterized, the second most frequently mutated gene driving HN is MAP2K1, with broad responsiveness to MEK inhibition reported. The most common MAP2K1 variant observed in our cohort (n=300 patients) is the exon 3 p.E102_I103 in-frame deletion, among the Class 3 MAP2K1 mutants predicted to be resistant to allosteric MEK inhibition. We present clinical and treatment characteristics of HN patients with Class 3 MAP2K1 mutations. Methods: Patients with HN and exon 3 p.E102_I103del or similar mutations identified by tumor sequencing were included. Sites of disease were captured. First- and later-line treatments were categorized as observation, chemotherapy (vinblastine, cytarabine, cladribine, methotrexate), immune modulation (anakinra or interferon), MEK inhibition (trametinib or cobimetinib), or ERK inhibition (ulixertinib). Clinical and radiologic responses were captured as partial response (PR), complete response (CR), or progressive disease (PD). PD includes relapse following PR or CR. Results: 16 patients were identified. 8 (50%) were female, and median age at HN diagnosis was 31 (range 22-58). 10 patients had Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), 4 had Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), 2 had mixed histiocytosis. Sites of HN were bone (16; 100%), lymph node (8; 50%), brain (8; 50%), skin/subcutaneous (4; 25%), retroperitoneum (3; 19%), cardiovascular (3; 19%), abdomen (2; 13%), reproductive (1; 6%) and other sites (5; 31%). Mutations identified were MAP2K1 p.E102_103del (13; 81%), p.L101_103delinsF (1; 6%), p.P105_I107delinsL (1; 6%), and p.I103_A106del (1; 6%). 2 (13%) patients had spontaneous regression of disease and were observed; 3 (19%) patients had CR to first-line chemotherapy. 3 (19%) patients have had CR/PR to first-line MEK inhibition. 8 (50%) patients had PD following chemotherapy and/or immune modulation; of those, 1 was lost to follow-up, 4 had CR/PR to MEK inhibition; however, 3 had PD despite MEK inhibition. These three patients and one treatment-naïve patient were treated with an oral ERK1/2 inhibitor, ulixertinib, on prospective protocols. 3 of 4 had a clinical or radiologic PR (1) or CR (2). Conclusions: Histiocytic neoplasms with Class 3 MAP2K1 mutations represent a diverse spectrum of disease characterized by frequent bone, nodal and neurologic involvement, by frequent resistance to chemotherapy. This entity is resistant to MEK inhibition in some patients, a phenomenon previously undocumented, and responsive to ERK inhibition, which may be a promising therapeutic approach to HN.

Targeting insulin feedback to enhance alpelisib (TIFA): A phase II randomized trial in metastatic, PIK3CA-mutant, hormone receptor–positive breast cancer

TPS1113

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the U.S. and is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Among women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, 45% harbor activating mutations in the PIK3CA gene , which induces hyperactivation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and drives cell growth and survival. The SOLAR-1 trial found that the combination of alpelisib, a PI3K inhibitor, and fulvestrant, an endocrine therapy, significantly improved progression-free survival compared to fulvestrant alone, leading to Food and Drug Administration approval in PIK3CA-mutated metastatic breast cancer. While PI3K inhibition induces apoptosis of cancer cells, inhibition of this pathway in the liver and skeletal muscle impairs physiologic insulin signaling leading to hyperglycemia. This affects > 60% of patients, results in grade 3-4 hyperglycemia in 36% of patients, and is a major cause of interrupted/reduced dosing or discontinuation. In preclinical models, application of a very low carbohydrate (ketogenic) diet or a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), a commonly used diabetes medication, minimized hyperglycemia and improved the anti-tumor efficacy of PI3K inhibition. These interventions are safe and feasible in cancer patients but have not been studied for the prevention of PI3K inhibitor-associated hyperglycemia. Methods: We are conducting a multicenter phase II clinical trial (NCT05090358) in patients receiving standard-of-care alpelisib plus fulvestrant to test the efficacy of three interventions (n = 106): 1) ketogenic diet, 2) low-carbohydrate diet, or 3) canagliflozin (a SGLT2i) in preventing alpelisib-associated hyperglycemia. The goal of this study is to mitigate a major toxicity of PI3K inhibitors and maximize their clinical efficacy. Eligible patients must be postmenopausal and have histologically confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, ≥1 activating PIK3CA mutations, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 or at least one predominantly lytic bone lesion, recurrence or progression during or after endocrine-based therapy, ECOG performance status of 0-1, hemoglobin A1c < 8%, and fasting blood glucose < = 140mg/dL. Prior CDK4/6 inhibitor use is allowed. The primary endpoint is the grade 3-4 hyperglycemia-free rate at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include the 6- and 12-month overall response rate, 6- and 12-month progression-free survival, alpelisib adherence, changes in systemic hormones and metabolites related to glucose homeostasis, changes in body composition, and quality of life. The first patient was enrolled on October 15, 2021. Participating sites include Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, and the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Clinical trial information: NCT05090358.

Oral minoxidil for the treatment of late alopecia in cancer survivors

12022

Background: Late alopecia is defined as incomplete hair regrowth > 6 months following cytotoxic chemotherapy or from initiation of endocrine therapy. It has been reported in up to 25-30% of cancer survivors and is associated with decreased quality of life and reduced dose intensity of cancer therapies. Minoxidil is an aminopyridine potassium channel opener, resulting in vasodilation and premature entry of resting hair follicles into the anagen (growth) phase and increase in hair follicle size. This study aims to assess clinical outcomes and adverse events of oral minoxidil for the treatment of cancer therapy-related late alopecia. Methods: We retrospectively assessed all women with late alopecia treated with oral minoxidil (1.25 mg daily) evaluated at an oncodermatology referral program between 1/2018-5/2021. Outcomes were assessed by standardized photography (4 views) and trichoscopy (HairMetrix, Canfield Scientific, Inc.). Trichoscopy recorded hair density (hair count/cm2) and hair thickness (shaft diameter) at uniform frontal and occipital target areas (12 and 36 cm midline from the glabella, respectively). Adverse events were recorded and graded using CTCAE v5.0. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Changes in trichoscopy measurements from baseline to follow-up were estimated using paired t-tests. Results: Two hundred and sixteen patients (mean age 57.8±13.7) were included for analysis. Thirty-one (14%) received chemotherapy alone, 65 (30%) endocrine monotherapy, and 120 (56%) chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy. The majority of patients (n = 170, 79.1%) had a history of breast cancer. Standardized photography assessments (n = 119) after a median of 105 days (IQR = 70) on oral minoxidil revealed clinical improvement in 88 (74%). Trichoscopy assessments (n = 42) after a median of 91 days (IQR = 126) demonstrated increased frontal hair density (124.2 vs 153.2 hairs/cm2, p = 0.008) and occipital hair density (100.3 vs 123.5 hairs/cm2, p = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference in average frontal or occipital hair thickness (69.3 vs 67.3 μm, p = 0.22, and 70.3 vs 69.9 μm, p = 0.84, respectively). No patients reported discontinuation of oral minoxidil due to adverse effects. Conclusions: Oral minoxidil may benefit both frontal and occipital late alopecia in cancer survivors treated with cytotoxic and/or endocrine therapy. This regimen was well tolerated by patients. Prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The scope of dermatologic adverse events to ibrutinib has not been systematically described. We sought to determine the incidence and severity of ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities and provide management recommendations. We conducted a systematic literature search of clinical trials and cohorts investigating ibrutinib monotherapy for cancer or chronic graft-versus-host disease through June 2020. Thirty-two studies with 2258 patients were included. The incidence of all-grade toxicities included cutaneous bleeds (24.8%; 95%CI, 18.6-31.0%), mucocutaneous infections (4.9%; 95%CI, 2.9-7.0%), rash (10.8%; 95%CI. 6.1-15.5%), mucositis (6%; 95%CI, 3.6-8.5%), edema (15.9%; 95%CI, 11.1-20.6%), pruritus (4.0%; 95%CI, 0.0-7.9%), xerosis (9.2%; 95%CI, 5.5-13.0%), nail changes (17.8%; 95%CI, 4.1-31.5%), and hair changes (7.9%; 95%CI, 0.0-21.3%). The incidence of high-grade toxicities included mucocutaneous infection (1.3%; 95%CI, 0.5-2.2%), rash (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.2%), mucositis (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.3%), and edema (0.1%; 95%CI, 0.0-0.2%). It is imperative that clinicians familiarize themselves with ibrutinib-associated dermatologic toxicities to learn how to manage them, prevent discontinuation, and improve patient outcomes.

Phase 1/2 study of topical submicron particle paclitaxel for cutaneous metastases of breast cancer

Purpose

This Phase 1/2 study evaluated safety and efficacy of a topical submicron particle paclitaxel (SPP) in an anhydrous ointment base (SOR007), primarily in breast cancer patients with cutaneous metastases (CM).

Methods

One of three concentrations of SOR007 SPP (0.15%, 1.0%, or 2.0%) was applied twice daily over an area of 50 cm² under a 3 + 3 phase 1 design for up to 28 days, with the option for expansion to an additional 28 days at the highest dose under a Phase 2a once safety was established. Efficacy was analyzed by lesion measurements and photographs to determine overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), and progression free survival by day 28 or 56.

Results

Twenty-three subjects were enrolled, 21 with cutaneous metastases of breast cancer (CMOBC). Four subjects received SOR007 0.15% for a median of 28 days (range = 17–29), three at a dose of 1.0% for a median of 28 days (range = 6–29), and sixteen at 2.0% for a median of  55 days (range = 6–60). All doses were well tolerated, and 19 subjects were evaluable for efficacy. At day 28 across all dose levels, 16% (95% CI 3.4 to 39.6%) of subjects achieved an ORR and another 63% (95% CI 34.9–96.8%) had stable disease (SD). The proportion of patients being progression free at 28 days across all treatments was 79% (95 CI 54–94%).

Conclusion

Application of SOR007 0.15%, 1.0%, and 2.0% to CM was safe and well tolerated with some reduction in lesion pain, and minimal systemic absorption of paclitaxel. Lesion stabilization was observed in most subjects over the study period. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial to confirm these findings is warranted.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT03101358.

A survey study of prevention and treatment patterns by academic and community oncologists for hand-foot skin reaction associated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (VEGFRi) therapy

322

Background: VEGFRi therapies are associated with hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) that affects up to 69% of patients depending on the VEGFRi administered. The incidence and severity of HFSR are dose-dependent and have been associated with improved clinical outcomes suggesting a direct toxicity mechanism. HFSR significantly diminishes patients’ quality of life and effects optimal treatment. Current HFSR treatments focus on managing symptoms since there are no effective therapies that address the underlying cause of HFSR. Small studies and expert opinion have suggested treating HFSR with topical corticosteroids or urea-based creams. However, the most effective management remains dose reduction/interruption or treatment discontinuation. This survey was conducted to assess current toxicity management patterns and treatment gaps for VEGFRi associated HFSR. Methods: An online survey (MedSurvey) with 5 eligibility & 8 questions related to VEGFRi practice patterns was conducted (April 27 to 30, 2021). Fifty-one (51) practicing oncologists completed the survey. Results: Among the 51 oncologists, 86% have been practicing ≥ 11 yrs with 37% from an academic setting and 63% from a community setting. They (percent of respondents) prescribed cytotoxic chemotherapy (91%) and targeted agents (84%) more than 10 times per week. Prevention of VEGFRi-induced HFSR with urea (57%) or topical steroids (75%) were the commonly administered prophylactic treatments. The majority (53%) would prophylactically use a novel agent to prevent HFSR, while 33% would use it for HFSR prevention in a patient with a previous occurrence, and 12% would use this agent for selected VEGFR inhibitors. Many oncologists (4% always, 61% sometime/frequently) start a VEGFRi at a lower dose and titrate up to prevent HFSR. For grade 1 HFSR (multiple choices allowed), 37% used observation only for management, whereas 51% prescribed urea ointment, and 63% used a topical steroid. Dose reduction was implemented 20% of the time. For grade 2 HFSR (multiple choices allowed) 53% used urea ointment, 84% prescribed a topical steroid and 59% considered dose reduction as a treatment strategy. For patients not responding to standard therapy 2% switched to a different anti-cancer regimen, 18% changed the VEGFRi, while 78% interrupted the VEGFRi therapy. Conclusions: Treating VEGFRi-associated HFSR continues to be a significant challenge with grade 2/3 toxicity or patients not responding to standard treatment. This often requires a therapeutic dose reduction or interruption that may impact the efficacy of anti-cancer treatment. Effective management (prevention and treatment) for skin toxicities associated with targeted-multikinase/VEGFRi inhibitors remains an unmet need for many patients and a treatment challenge for oncologists.

Part 1 results from NOVA-II, a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of OQL011 on VEGFR inhibitor associated hand-foot skin reaction in cancer patients

TPS396

Background: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is associated with the use of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors sharing vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitory (VEGFRi) activity (e.g., cabozantinib, regorafenib, sorafenib, sunitinib). HFSR affects the palms and soles with edema, erythema, hyperkeratosis, pain, and bullae/blisters impacting quality-of-life, activities of daily living, and consistent VEGFRi dosing. HFSR incidence differs among VEGFRi, ranging from 5-69% (all grades) and 1-19% (grade 3). Topical urea has marginal benefit, and to date, there are no regulatory authority approved HFSR treatments. The pathogenesis of HFSR has been partially associated with impaired vascular repair mechanisms resulting from inhibition of VEGF signaling. Nitric oxide (NO) has been reported to induce VEGF upregulation at a moderate concentration. We hypothesized that topical stimulation of VEGF signaling through OQL011, an NO donor, will safely and effectively mitigate HFSR. Methods: NOVA-II is a phase 2, double-blind, randomized vehicle-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of OQL011 for the treatment of moderate to severe HFSR. Subjects receiving a VEGFRi (either mono- or combination therapy) and have Grade ≥2 HFSR per NCI CTCAE v5.0 for palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) were eligible. For Part 1, 31 subjects were randomized (2:1) and received 0.2% OQL011 topical ointment or vehicle TID for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve an NCI CTCAE v5.0 for PPE Grade 0 or 1 by Week 3. An investigator global assessment (IGA) scale is being developed to assess HFSR recovery, and a secondary endpoint will measure the proportion of patients who have improvement in HFSR severity and achieve an IGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) by Week 3 and/or Week 6. A Chi-square test will be used to detect a difference between the treatment arm and the vehicle-control arm. Additionally, the IGA score will be validated by assessing the inter- & intra-rater reliability. The correlation between IGA, NCI CTCAE v5.0 for PPE, and patient outcomes including Visual Analog Scale of Pain, HFSR Quality of Life questionnaire will also be reported. This study began enrolling patients in December 2019 and completed the last patient Visit in August 2021. Data lock, unblinding and data analysis will be completed by mid-November. Clinical trial information: NCT04088318.

A multidisciplinary approach to optimizing care of patients treated with alpelisib

PURPOSE

The oral, α-specific phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3Kα) inhibitor alpelisib is the first PI3K inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. As alpelisib is a relatively new therapeutic option, specific guidance and a multidisciplinary approach are needed to provide optimal patient care. The primary objective of this manuscript is to provide comprehensive guidance on minimizing and managing adverse events (AEs) for patients with advanced breast cancer who are receiving alpelisib.

METHODS

Clinical studies, prescribing information, published literature, and relevant guidelines were reviewed to provide recommendations on the prevention and management of alpelisib-associated AEs.

RESULTS

The most common AEs associated with alpelisib in the phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial were hyperglycemia and rash (which are considered on-target effects of PI3Kα inhibition) and gastrointestinal AEs, including diarrhea, nausea, and decreased appetite. These AEs require regular monitoring, early recognition, and prompt initiation of appropriate treatment. In addition, there are effective strategies to reduce the onset and severity of frequently observed AEs-in particular, onset of hyperglycemia and rash may be reduced by lifestyle changes (such as reduced intake of carbohydrates and regular exercise) and antihistamine prophylaxis, respectively. To reduce risk of severe hyperglycemia, it is essential to achieve adequate glycemic control prior to initiation of alpelisib treatment.

CONCLUSION

Overall, alpelisib-associated AEs are generally manageable with prompt recognition, regular monitoring, and appropriate intervention, preferably with a multidisciplinary approach.

Dermatologic Events Associated with the Anti-CCR4 Antibody Mogamulizumab: Characterization and Management

The CCR4-directed monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab has been shown to significantly improve progression-free survival and overall response rate compared with vorinostat in adults with relapsed/refractory mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). One of the most common adverse events seen with mogamulizumab in MF/SS patients is rash. Because of the protean nature of MF/SS and the variable clinical and histopathological features of mogamulizumab-associated rash, healthcare providers may have difficulty distinguishing rash from disease, and may not be aware of appropriate treatment strategies for this generally manageable adverse event. The objective of this report was to combine results from published literature with experiences and recommendations from multiple investigators and institutions into clinical best practice recommendations to assist healthcare providers in identifying and managing mogamulizumab-associated rash. Optimal management, which includes biopsy confirmation and steroid treatment, requires a multidisciplinary approach among oncology, dermatology, and pathology practitioners.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing psoriasis: safety and efficacy

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved to treat multiple cancers. Retrospective analyses demonstrate acceptable safety of ICIs in most patients with autoimmune disease, although disease exacerbation may occur. Psoriasis vulgaris is a common, immune-mediated disease, and outcomes of ICI treatment in patients with psoriasis are not well described. Thus we sought to define the safety profile and effectiveness of ICIs in patients with pre-existing psoriasis.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients from eight academic centers with pre-existing psoriasis who received ICI treatment for cancer were evaluated. Main safety outcomes were psoriasis exacerbation and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We also assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

Results

Of 76 patients studied (50 (66%) male; median age 67 years; 62 (82%) with melanoma, 5 (7%) with lung cancer, 2 (3%) with head and neck cancer, and 7 (9%) with other cancers; median follow-up 25.1 months (range=0.2–99 months)), 51 (67%) received anti-PD-1 antibodies, 8 (11%) anti-CTLA-4, and 17 (22%) combination of anti-PD-1/CTLA-4. All patients had pre-existing psoriasis, most frequently plaque psoriasis (46 patients (61%)) and 15 (20%) with psoriatic arthritis. Forty-one patients (54%) had received any prior therapy for psoriasis although only two (3%) were on systemic immunosuppression at ICI initiation. With ICI treatment, 43 patients (57%) experienced a psoriasis flare of cutaneous and/or extracutaneous disease after a median of 44 days of receiving ICI. Of those who experienced a flare, 23 patients (53%) were managed with topical therapy only; 16 (21%) needed systemic therapy. Only five patients (7%) required immunotherapy discontinuation for psoriasis flare. Forty-five patients (59%) experienced other irAEs, 17 (22%) of which were grade 3/4. PFS with landmark analysis was significantly longer in patients with a psoriasis flare versus those without (39 vs 8.7 months, p=0.049).

Conclusions

In this multicenter study, ICI therapy was associated with frequent psoriasis exacerbation, although flares were manageable with standard psoriasis treatments and few required ICI discontinuation. Patients who experienced disease exacerbation performed at least as well as those who did not. Thus, pre-existing psoriasis should not prevent patients from receiving ICIs for treatment of malignancy.

Reducing Skin Toxicities from EGFR Inhibitors with Topical BRAF Inhibitor Therapy

Treatment of cancer with EGFR inhibitors is limited by on-target skin toxicities induced by inhibition of the MAPK pathway. BRAF inhibitors are known to paradoxically activate the MAPK downstream of EGFR, which we confirmed using human skin keratinocytes. We then conducted a phase I clinical trial testing the hypothesis that topical therapy with the BRAF inhibitor LUT014 could improve skin toxicities induced by EGFR inhibitors. Ten patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had developed acneiform rash while being treated with cetuximab or panitumumab were enrolled in three cohorts. LUT014 was well tolerated, and there were no dose-limiting toxicities. The acneiform rash improved in the 6 patients who started with grade 2 rash in the low and intermediate cohorts. We conclude that topical LUT014 is safe and efficacious in improving rash from EGFR inhibitors, consistent with the mechanism of action inducting paradoxical MAPK activation. SIGNIFICANCE: BRAF inhibitor topical therapy could avoid dose reductions of EGFR inhibitors, locally treating the main dose-limiting skin toxicity of this class of agents.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2113.

US Cutaneous Oncodermatology Management (USCOM): A Practical Algorithm

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients survive or are living with cancer. Anticancer treatments frequently have cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) that may severely impact patients' quality of life and interrupt anticancer treatment. The US Cutaneous Oncodermatology Management (USCOM) project aims to improve cancer patients' and survivors' quality of life by offering tools for preventing and managing cAEs.

METHODS

An algorithm was designed to reduce the incidence of cAEs, treat cAEs, and maintain healthy skin using general measures and over-the-counter agents to support all healthcare providers treating oncology patients, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and advanced providers. The panel used a modified Delphi approach, developed, discussed, and reached a consensus on statements and an evidence-based algorithm.

RESULTS

The USCOM algorithm includes education on cAEs for patients and clinicians supporting prevention, treatment, and maintenance using skincare measures before, during, and after cancer treatment. A skincare regimen including hygiene, moisturization, and sun protection products should be safe and effective in helping to minimize cAEs and improving skin conditions such as erythema, xerosis, pruritus, and photosensitivity. The number and quality of studies evaluating skincare formulations and regimens for cAEs are increasing, but the evidence on the benefits of specific formulations is still scarce.

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm focuses on general measures and skincare to prevent or reduce the severity of cAEs. Increased awareness of cAEs by the multidisciplinary team treating and guiding the cancer patient throughout their care may improve patient outcomes. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20:9(Suppl):s3-19.

Beyond Steroids: Immunosuppressants in Steroid-Refractory or Resistant Immune-Related Adverse Events

INTRODUCTION

The optimal management for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients who do not respond or become intolerant to steroids is unclear. Guidelines suggest additional immunosuppressants on the basis of case reports and expert opinion.

METHODS

We evaluated patients with lung cancers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center treated with immune checkpoint blockade from 2011 to 2020. Pharmacy records were queried to identify patients who received systemic steroids and an additional immunosuppressant (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil). Patient records were manually reviewed to evaluate baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 2750 patients with lung cancers treated with immune checkpoint blockade, 51 (2%) received both steroids and an additional immunosuppressant for a severe irAE (tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (73%), mycophenolate mofetil (20%)). The most common events were colitis (53%), pneumonitis (20%), hepatitis (12%), and neuromuscular (10%). At 90 days after the start of an additional immunosuppressant, 57% were improved from their irAE, 18% were unchanged, and 25% were deceased. Improvement was more common in hepatitis (five of six) and colitis (18 of 27) but less common in neuromuscular (one of five) and pneumonitis (3 of 10). Of the patients who died, 8 of 13 were attributable directly to the irAE and 4 of 13 were related to toxicity from immunosuppression (three infection-related deaths, one drug-induced liver injury leading to acute liver failure).

CONCLUSIONS

Steroid-refractory or resistant irAEs events are rare. Although existing treatments help patients with hepatitis and colitis, many patients with other irAEs remain refractory or experience toxicities from immunosuppression. A more precise understanding of the pathophysiology of specific irAEs is needed to guide biologically-informed treatments for severe irAEs.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Beyond steroids: Immunosuppressants in steroid-refractory/resistant immune related adverse events

9092

Background: The optimal management for immune related adverse events (irAEs) in patients who do not respond or become intolerant to steroids is unclear. Guidelines suggest additional immunosuppressants based on case reports and expert opinion. Methods: We examined patients with advanced lung cancers at MSK treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) from 2011-2020. Pharmacy records were queried to identify patients who received systemic steroids as well as an additional immunosuppressant (eg TNFα inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil). Patient records were manually reviewed to examine baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes. Results: Among 2,750 patients with lung cancers treated with ICB, 51 (2%) received both steroids and an additional immunosuppressant for a severe irAE (TNFα inhibitor (73%), mycophenolate mofetil (20%)). The most common events were colitis (53%), pneumonitis (20%), hepatitis (12%), and neuromuscular (10%). At 90 days after start of an additional immunosuppressant, 57% were improved from their irAE, 18% were unchanged, and 25% were deceased. Improvement was more common in hepatitis (5/6) and colitis (18/27) but less common in neuromuscular (1/5) and pneumonitis (3/10). All patients with hepatitis received mycophenolate mofetil 500-1000mg BID for a median of 3 months, range 2-5 months. Of the 18 patients with colitis who improved with a TNFα inhibitor, 10 needed just one dose. Of 13 patients who died, 4 were related to toxicity from immunosuppression (3, infection-related deaths; 1, drug-induced liver injury leading to acute liver failure). Those who died from immunosuppressive therapy received higher amounts of systemic steroids than those who did not (max median 525 vs 132 mg prednisone equivalent, Mann Whitney U p = 0.004, total median 5.9k vs 2.3k mg prednisone equivalent, p = 0.004). Of 31 patients who received at least 3 weeks of prednisone ≥ 20mg, most (90%, 28/31) had at least one side effect that was brought to clinical attention (most commonly altered mood/ sleep, 52%, increase in BMI > 1kg/m2, 45%, and infection, 32%). Conclusions: Steroid-refractory/resistant immune related adverse events are rare. While existing treatments help patients with hepatitis and colitis, most patients with other irAEs remain refractory and/or experience toxicities from immunosuppression. Systemic steroid use likely contributed to side effects and mortality. A more precise understanding of the pathophysiology of specific irAEs is needed to guide biologically informed treatment regimens for severe irAEs to realize the true benefit of ICB therapy.

Dermatologic diagnoses in oncology patients of color on anticancer therapy: Five-year retrospective review of outpatient dermatology consultations

12084

Background: Dermatologic toxicities from cancer treatments affecting patients from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds or skin of color (SOC) patients is an understudied area of research. These patients are also significantly underrepresented in therapeutic clinical trials, limiting complete understanding of toxicities associated with cancer therapies. Current treatment algorithms for dermatological adverse events (dAE) also do not take into account possible biologic differences in different skin types affecting toxicity presentation and treatment response. In this study we summarize the demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of oncology patients from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds who developed dermatologic adverse events related to cancer therapies. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all SOC patients (Asian, Black, Hispanic) on active cancer therapy who received outpatient dermatology consultation at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019. Electronic health record information for 2917 patients was obtained. A computational keyword-based text analysis of medical chart text, developed in consultation with a board-certified dermatologist, was performed to determine dermatologic diagnoses categories for each patient. All analyses were conducted using R statistical programming software, version 4.2.06. Results: There were 2917 outpatient dermatology consultations. Our population consisted of 1992 (68.29%) females and 925 (31.71%) males with a mean age of 53 (range 0-97). There were 35.55% Black, 41.28% Asian, 1.02% (30) Native American or Alaskan Native, 0.17% (5) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. 729 were Hispanic ethnicity of which 641 were Caucasian. A total of 4,026 dermatologic diagnoses occurred in the study population. Bacterial infections were the most commonly observed, occurring in 15% of patients. Nail disorders were the second most common dAE, occurring in 14% of the study population, followed by eczema/eczematous reactions at 9%. In all racial groups, eczema/eczematous reactions, nail disorders, and dermatomyositis were in the top five most common observed dAEs. Asian patients made up the largest proportion of those who had morbilliform rash dAEs (55%) while Black patients made up the largest proportion of those with hyperpigmentation dAEs (54%) and vascular insufficiency dAEs (47%). Conclusions: The findings from our study indicate that pigmentary changes, bacterial infections, eczema/eczematous reactions, and nail disorders are the most common dAE types that occurred in our group of SOC patients. We hope to use this information to aid in the development of specific management strategies within the field of supportive oncodermatology to meet the needs of minority patient populations.

Quantifying the clinical severity of immune-related cutaneous adverse events in clinical trial patients: A prospective study using 3D-total body photography

e13548

Background: Accurate and comprehensive assessment of dermatologic adverse events (AEs) in clinical trials is challenging, given the heterogeneity of appearance and perception of these AEs. For dermatologic AEs, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading of clinical severity primarily relies on the clinician’s reporting of body surface area involved (BSA%) estimated by visual assessment combined with clinician’s interpretation of psychosocial impact, which can vary among raters. Although patient reported outcome (PRO-CTCAE) and QoL (SKINDEX-16) measures have been incorporated to improve accuracy and reliability of symptomatic AE evaluations, the subjective nature of dermatologic CTCAE grading remains. Clinical photography is routinely used to aid in visual comparison but cannot be incorporated to standardized measures due to inconsistencies in lighting, distance from the camera, and position. This prospective study aims to validate the accuracy and utility of affected BSA% using 3D-total body photography (TBP) and quantitative imaging analytics for standardized, objective assessment of immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAE) in clinical trials and/or prospective studies. Methods: Polarized and non-polarized TBPs (Canfield Vectra WB360) were acquired on two dermatology clinic visits 2-6 weeks apart (n = 8, to date). CTCAE, PRO-CTCAE, SKINDEX-16 were evaluated by one investigator for both visits. Image analysis including BSA% calculation was conducted using Vectra measurement software by an investigator blinded to clinical grades. Means and ranges for change in CTCAE, BSA%, and SKINDEX-16 were calculated. Results: To date, 29 patients with ircAE have been enrolled with 8 completing both visits. A greater improvement in affected BSA% (-1.9, -13.0, -20.1) and SKINDEX-16 (-8,-11.9,-19.5) were associated with a greater degree of clinical improvement measured by CTCAE (0 to -3). Widest range in the degree of change in BSA% (-24.4, -6.8) and SKINDEX-16 (-31,19) was observed in the group with intermediate change in CTCAE (-2 to -1, n = 5). Conclusions: Estimating affected BSA% via visual assessment is subject to human error and rely on memory or comparison with unstandardized photos to detect clinical improvement of dermatologic conditions. This poses a challenge particularly for cases with mild or moderate clinical improvement, demonstrated by the wide range in the degree of change for BSA% and SKINDEX-16. With consistent lighting, position, and objective measurements, 3D-TBP quantitative image analysis shows promise in reproducible, standardized monitoring and quantification of ircAE clinical severity. Furthermore, the quantitative nature of TBP measurement suggests its potential utility for correlation with underlying immunophenotyping correlative studies and clinical trials.