Napabucasin Drug-Drug Interaction Potential, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics Following Oral Dosing in Healthy Adult Volunteers

Napabucasin is an orally administered reactive oxygen species generator that is bioactivated by the intracellular antioxidant nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate:quinone oxidoreductase 1. Napabucasin induces cell death in cancer cells, including cancer stem cells. This phase 1 study (NCT03411122) evaluated napabucasin drug‐drug interaction potential for 7 cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and the breast cancer resistance protein transporter/organic anion transporter 3. Healthy volunteers who tolerated napabucasin during period 1 received probe drugs during period 2, and in period 3 received napabucasin (240 mg twice daily; days 1‐11) plus a phenotyping cocktail containing omeprazole (CYP2C19), caffeine (CYP1A2), flurbiprofen (CYP2C9), bupropion (CYP2B6), dextromethorphan (CYP2D6), midazolam (CYP3A) (all oral; day 6), intravenous midazolam (day 7), repaglinide (CYP2C8; day 8), and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein/organic anion transporter 3; day 9). Drug‐drug interaction potential was evaluated in 17 of 30 enrolled volunteers. Napabucasin coadministration increased the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval]) of caffeine (124% [109.0%‐141.4%]), intravenous midazolam (118% [94.4%‐147.3%]), repaglinide (127% [104.7%‐153.3%]), and rosuvastatin (213% [42.5%‐1068.3%]) and decreased the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity of dextromethorphan (71% [47.1%‐108.3%]), bupropion (79% [64.6%‐97.0%]), and hydroxybupropion (45% [15.7%‐129.6%]). No serious adverse events/deaths were reported. Generally, napabucasin is not expected to induce/inhibit drug clearance to a clinically meaningful degree.

Mass balance and pharmacokinetics of an oral dose of 14 C-napabucasin in healthy adult male subjects

This phase 1, open-label study assessed14 C-napabucasin absorption, metabolism, and excretion, napabucasin pharmacokinetics, and napabucasin metabolites (primary objectives); safety/tolerability were also evaluated. Eight healthy males (18-45 years) received a single oral 240-mg napabucasin dose containing ~100 μCi14 C-napabucasin. Napabucasin was absorbed and metabolized to dihydro-napabucasin (M1; an active metabolite [12.57-fold less activity than napabucasin]), the sole major circulating metabolite (median time to peak concentration: 2.75 and 2.25 h, respectively). M1 plasma concentration versus time profiles generally mirrored napabucasin; similar arithmetic mean half-lives (7.14 and 7.92 h, respectively) suggest M1 formation was rate limiting. Napabucasin systemic exposure (per Cmax and AUC) was higher than M1. The total radioactivity (TRA) whole blood:plasma ratio (AUClast : 0.376; Cmax : 0.525) indicated circulating drug-related compounds were essentially confined to plasma. Mean TRA recovery was 81.1% (feces, 57.2%; urine, 23.8%; expired air, negligible). Unlabeled napabucasin and M1 recovered in urine accounted for 13.9% and 11.0% of the dose (sum similar to urine TRA recovered); apparent renal clearance was 8.24 and 7.98 L/h. No uniquely human or disproportionate metabolite was quantified. Secondary glucuronide and sulfate conjugates were common urinary metabolites, suggesting napabucasin was mainly cleared by reductive metabolism. All subjects experienced mild treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the majority related to napabucasin. The most commonly reported TEAEs were gastrointestinal disorders. There were no clinically significant laboratory, vital sign, electrocardiogram, or physical examination changes. Napabucasin was absorbed, metabolized to M1 as the sole major circulating metabolite, and primarily excreted via feces. A single oral 240-mg dose was generally well tolerated.

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of oral napabucasin in healthy adults

142

Background: Napabucasin is an NQO1-bioactivatable investigational agent hypothesized to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways including pSTAT3 through the generation of reactive oxygen species. This phase 1 open-label study evaluated the DDI potential of napabucasin and its major metabolite (M1) with respect to 7 major human drug cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) transporter. Methods: Healthy adult subjects who initially demonstrated they could tolerate administration of 240 or 480 mg twice daily (BID) napabucasin over 2-days (D) received single doses of the CYP and transporter substrates, followed by ≥7-day washout. In the DDI portion, subjects received napabucasin 240 mg BID on D1–11 with the phenotyping cocktail administered on D6 (omeprazole [CYP2C19] 20 mg, caffeine [CYP1A2] 100 mg, flurbiprofen [CYP2C9] 50 mg, bupropion [CYP2B6] 150 mg, dextromethorphan [CYP2D6] 30 mg, and oral midazolam [CYP3A] 2 mg), intravenous (IV) midazolam 2 mg on D7, repaglinide (CYP2C8) 0.25 mg on D8, and rosuvastatin (BRCP transporter) 10 mg on D9. Results: DDI potential was evaluated in 17 subjects. Exposure to omeprazole, flurbiprofen, and oral midazolam with (test) or without (reference) napabucasin 240 mg BID were similar. Napabucasin increased exposure (area under the curve to infinity) to caffeine (124%), IV midazolam (118%), repaglinide (127%), and rosuvastatin (213%); and decreased exposure to bupropion (79%) and dextromethorphan (71%). None of these changes were expected to be clinically meaningful. The exposure of the major metabolites of the probe drugs with or without napabucasin or M1 were similar. Of the 17 subjects, 12 (70.6%) reported adverse events (AEs); 58.8% reported gastrointestinal disorders. One patient had a grade 3 AE (neutrophil count low); no serious AEs were observed. Conclusions: The data suggest minimal in vivo DDI potential for napabucasin with respect to 7 major human drug CYP enzymes and the BCRP transporter. Napabucasin 240 mg BID was generally tolerable in healthy subjects. Co-administration of napabucasin with CYP and transporter substrates was safe and tolerable. Clinical trial information: NCT03411122.

Abstract A113: Mass balance and pharmacokinetics of an oral dose of 14C-napabucasin in healthy adult male subjects

Introduction: Napabucasin is an NQO1-bioactivatable investigational agent hypothesized to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways including pSTAT3 through the generation of reactive oxygen species. The primary objectives of this phase 1, open-label study in healthy male subjects were to characterize the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-napabucasin and to determine the pharmacokinetics of 14C-napabucasin and relevant metabolites in plasma, urine, and feces. The secondary objective was to assess safety and tolerability of napabucasin. Methods: Healthy male adult (age 18–45 years) subjects were eligible to receive a single oral 240-mg dose of napabucasin containing ~100 μCi of 14C-napabucasin. Blood, urine, and feces were collected up to 264 hours (h; 11 days) postdose. Whole blood, plasma, urine, fecal, and expired air samples were assayed for total radioactivity (TR). Plasma, urine, and fecal samples were assayed for napabucasin and metabolites. Results: Overall, 8 subjects (mean [range] age 29 [23–39] years) were enrolled. The mean TR recovered was 81.1%. In general, elimination of 14C-napabucasin was predominantly via feces (57.2%), to a lesser extent via urine (23.8%), and was negligible in expired air. Most (76.0%) recovery was within 48 h postdose. 14C-napabucasin was rapidly absorbed (median time to peak concentration 2.8 h) and underwent extensive reductive metabolism to yield dihydro-napabucasin (M1), the sole major circulating metabolite. Systemic exposure to 14C-napabucasin was higher than M1, and M1 plasma concentration versus time profiles generally mirrored 14C-napabucasin. Similar arithmetic mean half-lives for 14C-napabuscasin and M1 (7.9 h and 7.1 h, respectively) suggest that the rate of formation of the reduced metabolite is rate limiting. The TR whole blood:plasma ratio of 0.4 indicated that circulating drug-related compounds were essentially confined to plasma. Four minor metabolites were identified but accounted for ≤7.0% of TR in plasma. Consistent with preclinical animal models, no uniquely human or disproportionate metabolite was quantified. Secondary glucuronide and sulfate conjugates were common urinary metabolites. These data suggest that 14C-napabucasin was mainly cleared by reductive metabolism and, to a lesser extent, by renal elimination.  14C-napabucasin and M1 recovered in urine accounted for 13.2% and 9.6% of the administered dose, respectively. Apparent renal clearance of 14C-napabucasin and M1 were 8.1 L/h and 7.9 L/h, respectively. All subjects experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). All TEAEs were mild (grade 1) and the majority were assessed as related to napabucasin. The most commonly reported TEAEs were gastrointestinal disorders and, of these, diarrhea was reported most frequently and generally started within 4.5–5.0 h postdose and resolved without treatment. There were no clinically significant laboratory, vital sign, electrocardiogram, or physical examination changes. Conclusions: 14C-napabucasin is primarily excreted through feces. 14C-napabucasin underwent extensive metabolism to yield M1 as the sole major circulating metabolite. No uniquely human or disproportionate metabolite was quantified. A single oral 240-mg dose of napabucasin was tolerated in healthy male subjects.

Citation Format: Xiaoshu Dai, Michael D Karol, Matthew Hitron, Marjie Hard, J Evan Blanchard, Nicola Eraut, Natalie Rich, Brandon Gufford. Mass balance and pharmacokinetics of an oral dose of 14C-napabucasin in healthy adult male subjects [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A113. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A113

A first in human, safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity phase I study of once weekly administration of the Hsp90 inhibitor ganetespib (STA-9090) in patients with solid malignancies

Background

This phase I study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of ganetespib in patients with solid malignancies.

Methods

Patients were enrolled in cohorts of escalating ganetespib doses, given as 1 hour IV infusion, once weekly for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters and preliminary clinical activity.

Results

Fifty-three patients were treated at doses escalating from 7 to 259 mg/m². The most common adverse events were Grade 1 and 2 diarrhea, fatigue, nausea or vomiting. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) observed were: one Grade 3 amylase elevation (150 mg/m²), one Grade 3 diarrhea and one Grade 3 and one Grade 4 asthenia (259 mg/m²). The MTD was 216 mg/m² and the recommended phase 2 dose was established at 200 mg/m² given IV at Days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. There was a linear relationship between dose and exposure. Plasma HSP70 protein levels remained elevated for over a week post treatment. Disease control rate (objective response and stable disease at ≥ 16 weeks) was 24.4%.

Conclusions

Ganetespib is well tolerated as a weekly infusion for 3 of every 4 weeks cycle. The recommended phase II dose is 200 mg/m², and is associated with an acceptable tolerability profile.

Trial registration

NCT00687934

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of multiple schedules of ganetespib (STA-9090), a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel for subjects with advanced solid tumor malignancies

3094

Background: Ganetespib is a next-generation Hsp90 inhibitor unrelated to the first-generation ansamycin class of Hsp90 inhibitors and has superior activity to these agents in preclinical studies. Ganetespib is well tolerated with promising antitumor activity. Based on synergy between ganetespib (G) and docetaxel (D), a phase I study evaluating preclinical dosing models was performed. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumor malignancies and ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2 were eligible. Sequential cohorts of pts were treated (3+3 design) with increasing doses of D (day 1) and G (days 1, 8) (A) Q 21 days. Following MTD determination, safety and exploratory cohorts of D day 1 with G days 1, 15 (B); or G days 1, 4, 15 (C) were completed. PK sampling was performed during schedule A. The primary endpoint was determination of optimal doses and schedule of the two agents for combination therapy. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in schedules A (n=12), B (n=8), and C (n=7). Median age-64 (44-75); 11-M, 16-F; ECOG PS: 0 (n=5), 1 (n=21), 2 (n=1). Most pts had NSCLC (n=9), others were head/neck (n=4), and SCLC (n=3). The defined MTD was level 2 (D-75 mg/m2, G-150 mg/m2), as 2 of 4 pts at level 3 (D-75 mg/m2, G-200 mg/m2) had DLTs (febrile neutropenia and one g4 neutropenia of > 7 days), requiring expansion of level 2. The median number of cycles received is 2 (1-11), with 3 pts in schedule C still on study. Among 22 pts evaluable for response, 1 had a PR (head/neck), 12 had SD following 6 weeks evaluation, 10 pts for 12 weeks and 6 pts for 18 weeks. Common AEs included neutropenia, diarrhea, anemia, fatigue, nausea, and febrile neutropenia. Prophylactic filgrastim/pegfilgrastim was not used at any time. PK data indicates similar G exposure alone compared to G administered prior to D. No accumulation was observed following once-weekly dosing, consistent with studies of G alone. Conclusions: The combination is well tolerated at the recommended doses of D 75 mg/m2 and G 150 mg/m2. Promising anti-cancer activity was noted, and a randomized phase 2b/3 study with D day 1 and G days 1, 15 regimen is ongoing in advanced NSCLC (NCT01348126).

Phase 1 clinical results with tandutinib (MLN518), a novel FLT3 antagonist, in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics

Tandutinib (MLN518/CT53518) is a novel quinazoline-based inhibitor of the type III receptor tyrosine kinases: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and KIT. Because of the correlation between FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations and poor prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), we conducted a phase 1 trial of tandutinib in 40 patients with either AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Tandutinib was given orally in doses ranging from 50 mg to 700 mg twice daily The principal dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of tandutinib was reversible generalized muscular weakness, fatigue, or both, occurring at doses of 525 mg and 700 mg twice daily. Tandutinib's pharmacokinetics were characterized by slow elimination, with achievement of steady-state plasma concentrations requiring greater than 1 week of dosing. Western blotting showed that tandutinib inhibited phosphorylation of FLT3 in circulating leukemic blasts. Eight patients had FLT3-ITD mutations; 5 of these were evaluable for assessment of tandutinib's antileukemic effect. Two of the 5 patients, treated at 525 mg and 700 mg twice daily, showed evidence of antileukemic activity, with decreases in both peripheral and bone marrow blasts. Tandutinib at the MTD (525 mg twice daily) should be evaluated more extensively in patients with AML with FLT3-ITD mutations to better define its antileukemic activity.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole 15- and 30-mg sachets for suspension versus intact capsules

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetic profiles of single doses of lansoprazole 15- and 30-mg sachets for suspension were compared with those of corresponding doses of lansoprazole oral capsules.

METHODS

Healthy adult male and female subjects were randomized (1:1 ratio) into 2 Phase 1, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period complete crossover studies. In the first study, each subject received 1 lansoprazole 15-mg sachet mixed with water and 1 lansoprazole 15-mg oral capsule; in the second study, each subject received 1 lansoprazole 30-mg sachet mixed with water and 1 lansoprazole 30-mg oral capsule. Administration of the 2 formulations was separated by a washout period of > or =7 days. Blood samples were collected before and after each administration to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters of lansoprazole and bioequivalence between suspension and capsule.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects (19 males, 17 females) with a mean (SD) age of 32.0 (9.6) years and mean (SD) body weight of 68.6 (10.5) kg received lansoprazole 15 mg. Thirty-six subjects (22 males, 14 females) with a mean (SD) age of 38.0 (8.3) years and mean (SD) body weight of 75.1 (9.7) kg received lansoprazole 30 mg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the 15- and 30-mg lansoprazole sachets for suspension were similar to those of the corresponding doses of the oral capsules. The mean (SD) values for C(max) and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity) for the lansoprazole 15-mg sachet (591.9 [242.3] ng/mL and 1614 [2065] ng.h/mL, respectively) did not differ significantly from those for the lansoprazole 15-mg capsules (578.6 [275.2] ng/mL and 1620 [2290] ng.h/mL, respectively). These parameters also did not differ significantly between the lansoprazole 30-mg sachet and 30-mg capsule: mean (SD) C(max), 1103 (428.3) and 1077 (465.6) ng/mL, respectively; mean (SD) AUC(0-infinity), 2655 (1338) and 2669 (1311) ng.h/mL, respectively. The 90% Cls for C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) ratios were contained within the 0.80 to 1.25 equivalence range, supporting bioequivalence.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the 15- and 30-mg lansoprazole sachets for suspension are bioequivalent to the corresponding doses of oral capsules. The sachet for suspension may provide an alternative route of administration to patients who have difficulty swallowing solid oral formulations.

Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine infusions for sedation of postoperative patients requiring intensive caret

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics of the alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine were studied in 10 patients requiring postoperative sedation and mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), and compared with previous volunteer data.

METHODS

On arrival in the ICU, sedation with dexmedetomidine was commenced with a loading dose of 2.5 microg kg(-1) h(-1) over 10 min followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.7 microg kg(-1) h(-1) into a central vein. Blood samples for measurement of plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations were taken during and after sedative infusions at predetermined intervals. Pharmacokinetic variables were estimated using non-compartmental methods. In addition, non-linear mixed effects modelling was used to obtain variable estimates not readily attainable from non-compartmental methods. Respiratory and haemodynamic data were recorded to enable correlation of any adverse events with the calculated pharmacokinetic profile.

RESULTS

The harmonic mean distribution half-life of dexmedetomidine was 8.6 min and the harmonic mean terminal half-life was 3.14 h. Steady-state volume of distribution averaged 173 litres, clearance averaged 48.3 litres h(-1), and the mean residence time averaged 3.86 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic variables seen in postoperative, intensive care patients were similar to those previously found in volunteers, with the exception of the steady-state volume of distribution. A small loading dose provided effective sedation with no adverse events.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on propofol requirements in healthy subjects

Dexmedetomidine-propofol pharmacodynamic interaction was evaluated in nine healthy subjects in a crossover design. Dexmedetomidine/placebo was infused using a computer-controlled infusion pump (CCIP) to maintain a pseudo-steady-state plasma concentration of 0.66 +/- 0.080 or 0 ng/mL, respectively. Forty-five minutes after the dexmedetomidine/placebo infusion was started, propofol was infused using a second CCIP to achieve a stepwise logarithmically ascending propofol concentration (1.00 to 13.8 microg/mL) profile. Each propofol step lasted 10 min. Blood was sampled for plasma concentration determination, and pharmacodynamic endpoint assessments were made during the study. Propofol and dexmedetomidine/placebo infusions were terminated when three endpoints (subjects were too sedated to hold a syringe, followed by loss of eyelash reflex, followed by loss of motor response to electrical stimulation) were achieved sequentially. The concentration of propofol associated with 50% probability of achieving a pharmacodynamic endpoint in the absence of dexmedetomidine (EC50; placebo treatment) was 6.63 microg/mL for motor response to electrical stimulation and ranged from 1.14 to 1.98 microg/mL for the ability to hold a syringe, eyelash reflex, and sedation scores. The apparent EC50 values of propofol (EC50APP; concentration of propofol at which the probability of achieving a pharmacodynamic endpoint is 50% in the presence of dexmedetomidine concentrations observed in the current study; dexmedetomidine treatment) were 0.273, 0.544-0.643, and 3.89 microg/mL for the ability to hold a syringe, sedation scores, and motor response, respectively. Dexmedetomidine reduced propofol concentrations required for sedation and suppression of motor response. Therefore, the propofol dose required for sedation and induction of anesthesia may have to be reduced in the presence of dexmedetomidine.

Duration of effect of lansoprazole on gastric pH and acid secretion in normal male volunteers

AIM

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the duration of effect of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. on intragastric pH, acid secretion, gastrin levels, the potential for rebound acidity, and the relationship between gastric acid and drug pharmacokinetic parameters.

METHODS

Sixteen subjects were treated with lansoprazole 30 mg daily or placebo for 14 days, followed by a 7-day post-dosing period and a post-study evaluation on day 28. Ambulatory 24-h pH was recorded and pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion measured. Plasma kinetics of lansoprazole were determined.

RESULTS

Mean intragastric pH in the lansoprazole group increased significantly (P < 0.05) from baseline to day 14 compared to placebo. After cessation of treatment, secretory activity, as measured by intragastric pH, basal acid output and stimulated acid output, returned to baseline in 2 to 4 days without any overshoot, indicating the absence of acid rebound. Lansoprazole's terminal disposition half-life was 1.11 h. Mean pH and serum gastrin returned to baseline with half-lives of 22 and 19 h, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lansoprazole 30 mg daily significantly increases mean intragastric pH without producing acid rebound. Regeneration of acid production depends primarily on de novo synthesis of the acid pump.

Influence of cardiac output on dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics

Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, reduces the requirements for anesthetic, analgesic, sedative, and hypnotic drugs. Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics were characterized in healthy subjects after intravenous administration by means of a computer-controlled infusion pump. A series of seven stepwise increasing pseudo-steady-state plasma concentrations were targeted. The influence of cardiac output on the pharmacokinetics was investigated by use of a compartmental modeling approach in which the elimination clearance was characterized as being either cardiac output independent or dependent. At dexmedetomidine concentrations of 0, 0.6, and 1.2 ng/mL, mean (SD) estimated cardiac outputs were 5. 6 (0.85), 5.1 (0.67), and 4.5 (0.83) L/min, and mean (SD) clearances were 40 (10), 38 (9.0), and 35 (8.5) L/h, respectively. Dexmedetomidine V(SS) and elimination half-life were 72 (19) L and 1. 9 (0.62) h, respectively. The approximately 3 to 19% decrease in cardiac output observed within the anticipated therapeutic range of 0.3 to 1.2 ng/mL was similar to that observed for clonidine. The decrease in cardiac output with increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine resulted in a corresponding decrease in drug elimination clearance of < or =12% within the therapeutic range; however, this decrease in dexmedetomidine clearance is likely not clinically relevant.

Lack of interaction between lansoprazole and propranolol, a pharmacokinetic and safety assessment

Due to the prevalence of both gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases, it is likely that patients may be coprescribed gastric parietal cell proton pump inhibitors and beta-adrenergic antagonists. Therefore, the objectives of this phase I study were to assess the potential effects of the coadministration of lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of propranolol and to evaluate the safety of propranolol with concomitant lansoprazole dosing. In a double-blind fashion, 18 healthy male nonsmokers were initially randomized to receive either 60 mg oral lansoprazole, each morning for 7 days, or an identical placebo (period 1). On day 7, all subjects were concomitantly administered oral propranolol, 80 mg. After a minimum of 1 week following the last dose of either lansoprazole or placebo, subjects were crossed over to the opposite treatment for another 7 days (period 2). Subjects were again administered oral propranolol on day 7. During both treatment periods, blood samples for the determination of plasma propranolol and 4-hydroxy-propranolol were obtained just before the dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours postdose. Plasma propranolol and 4-hydroxy-propranolol concentrations were determined by using HPLC with fluorescence detection. The Cmax, tmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 values for propranolol, as well as the AUC0-infinity for 4-hydroxy-propranolol, were calculated and compared between the lansoprazole and placebo regimens. The mean age of the 15 subjects who successfully completed the study was 31 years (range: 24-38 years), and their average weight was 174.8 pounds (range: 145-203 pounds). There were no statistically significant differences between the lansoprazole and placebo regimens for the propranolol Cmax, tmax, AUC0-infinity, and t1/2 values. Also, there were no statistically significant differences between regimens for the 4-OH-propranolol AUC0-infinity. Safety evaluations, which included adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory determinations, ECG, and physical examinations, revealed no unexpected clinically significant findings and did not suggest a drug-drug interaction. In conclusion, lansoprazole does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of propranolol, suggesting that it does not interact with the CYP2D6- or CYP2C19-mediated metabolism of propranolol. Modification of a propranolol dosage regimen in the presence of lansoprazole is not indicated, based on the pharmacokinetic analysis and the lack of a clinically significant alteration in the pharmacodynamic response.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between lansoprazole and intravenously administered phenytoin

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study was to investigate whether concomitant steady-state lansoprazole influences the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C9 substrates using single intravenously dosed phenytoin as a model substrate. In addition, the safety of concomitant administration of these two drugs was evaluated. Twelve healthy, nonsmoking, adult male subjects received 60 mg lansoprazole or placebo once daily for 9 days during each study period. On the morning of day 7, each subject received a single 250 mg intravenous phenytoin dose. There were no statistically significant differences between the two regimens for mean phenytoin Cmax or tmax. There was a minor (< 3%) but statistically significant difference between the two regimens for phenytoin AUC resulting from a very low intrasubject coefficient of variation (2.3%). The treatment and control mean plasma concentration phenytoin profiles were virtually super-imposable. In conclusion, concomitant multidose lansoprazole administration is unlikely to have any clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of CYP2C9 substrates in general or intravenous phenytoin specifically.

The comparative effects of lansoprazole, omeprazole, and ranitidine in suppressing gastric acid secretion

The effects on 24-hour intragastric pH levels of once-daily doses of lansoprazole 15 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg were compared with the effects of omeprazole 20 mg QD and ranitidine 150 mg QID in a phase I, randomized, double-masked, four-way crossover study conducted in 29 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received each treatment regimen for 5 consecutive days with at least a 2-week washout between treatment periods. Ambulatory 24-hour intragastric pH values were monitored in each subject at baseline (2 days before crossover period 1) and again before dosing on day 5 of each of the four crossover treatment periods. Gastric pH values increased during all four regimens, with significantly higher mean 24-hour pH values noted in subjects receiving lansoprazole 30 mg QD (4.53 +/- 0.16) compared with those receiving lansoprazole 15 mg QD (3.97 +/- 0.16), omeprazole 20 mg QD (4.02 +/- 0.16), or ranitidine 150 mg QID (3.59 +/- 0.16). Lansoprazole 30 mg produced significantly greater mean percentages of time that the gastric pH was above 3.0 and 4.0 (75% and 63%, respectively) compared with the other treatment regimens. The mean percentages of time during which gastric pH was above 3.0 and 4.0, respectively, for the other treatments were lansoprazole 15 mg, 64% and 48%; omeprazole 20 mg, 63% and 51%; and ranitidine 150 mg, 52% and 38%. All treatment regimens were well tolerated, with no clinically significant differences between the regimens. Multiple-dose lansoprazole 30 mg QD produced a significantly increased intragastric pH level and significantly longer durations of increased intragastric pH level compared with lansoprazole 15 mg QD, omeprazole 20 mg QD, and ranitidine 150 mg QID.

Averaging pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from experimental studies: statistical theory and application

In most experimental pharmacokinetic studies, parameter estimates are computed separately for each subject, then averaged across subjects. Average estimators for ratios and functions of parameters are often of interest; examples include half-life and clearance. For these parameters, recommendations regarding averaging using the arithmetic versus the harmonic mean have been based on computer simulations.1-3 The goal in this paper was to demonstrate that these empirically generated results can be derived using approximations for the expected values of reciprocals and ratios. We first consider estimating the reciprocal of a parameter, and predict the earlier simulation results for half-life. We additionally predict results for clearance when computed as dose divided by area under the curve. Next we consider estimating the ratio of two parameters, and predict the earlier simulation results for clearance in a first-order exponential model. As a further example, we predict results for the mean residence time in noncompartmental analysis. These approximations provide a unifying approach that can be used to determine optimal summary estimators, without the need for extensive computer simulations.

Lansoprazole pharmacokinetics in subjects with various degrees of kidney function

The pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole, a new benzimidazole proton pump inhibitor, was evaluated after multiple-dose oral administration to 20 subjects with various degrees of kidney function. Multiple blood samples were obtained after doses 1 and 7 of the once-daily seven-dose regimen, and plasma concentrations of lansoprazole and five metabolites were quantitated with use of HPLC. The free fraction of lansoprazole increased as kidney function declined. A significant, although weak, relationship existed between creatinine clearance (CLCR) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and terminal disposition half-life (t1/2), calculated with total concentration data. Those individuals with lower CLCR values also had lower total AUC and t1/2 values. However, there was no statistically significant relationship between CLCR and peak plasma concentration or AUC, calculated with unbound concentration data. No adjustment of lansoprazole dose is recommended on the basis of impaired kidney function.

The effects of oral doses of lansoprazole and omeprazole on gastric pH

We compared gastric pH values after therapeutic doses of lansoprazole and omeprazole in 17 healthy adult men. The pharmacokinetics of the two drugs were studied. A three-way crossover design compared the effects on gastric pH of 15 and 30 mg lansoprazole and 20 mg omeprazole--each given once daily for 5 days. Ambulatory 24-h intragastric pH levels were measured before dosing, after the first and fifth doses in each period, and 15 days after each dosing period. A positive relationship between the lansoprazole or omeprazole area under the curve (AUCs) and the 24-h mean pH values was found for each regimen. No differences in maximum concentration (Cmax) and AUC were noted from day 1 to day 5 for the two lansoprazole doses. With omeprazole, both Cmax and AUC levels were greater on day 5 than on day 1. All three regimens increased 24-h mean gastric pH, although 30 mg lansoprazole had the most significant effect. The percentage of time that gastric pH was >3, >4, and >5 was also significantly higher with 30 mg lansoprazole. All three regimens were associated with reversible elevations of serum gastrin, which more than doubled at some points. No clinically significant adverse events were documented.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction after administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole with prednisone

In a recently reported case, administration of omeprazole, a "proton pump" inhibitor, was temporally associated with the clinical relapse of pemphigus in a 44-year-old woman whose condition had been stabilized with a fixed dose of prednisone, suggesting the possibility of a drug interaction. This placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, three-period crossover study was conducted to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone after a single dose of prednisone given during multi-dose administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole. Lansoprazole (30 mg), omeprazole (40 mg), or placebo was administered once daily under fasted conditions for 7 days to healthy male volunteers. On the seventh day, a single dose of prednisone (40 mg) was administered concomitantly with the study medication, and plasma prednisolone concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography for 24 hours thereafter. Two weeks separated the first doses of each study period. Eighteen volunteers entered the study; pharmacokinetic data were evaluable for 15 participants. Safety data were evaluable for 16 participants in the lansoprazole/prednisone group; 17 in the omeprazole/ prednisone group; and 17 in the placebo/prednisone group. The pharmacokinetic parameters for prednisolone, including the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax), terminal-phase half-life (t1/2), and area under the concentration-time curve, were comparable for the three regimens. Adverse events (AEs) rated as possibly or probably drug related were reported by 50%, 24%, and 47% for subjects in the lansoprazole, omeprazole, and placebo treatment groups, respectively. Headache was the most common drug-related AE. No serious AEs were reported, and no subject withdrew from the study because of an AE. Concomitant administration of lansoprazole or omeprazole does not affect the absorption, biotransformation, or disposition of a single dose of prednisone. All three treatment regimens were well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between lansoprazole and theophylline

The pharmacokinetic interaction potential of the new proton-pump inhibitor lansoprazole and theophylline was assessed in a double-blind, two-period (13-day duration per period), multiple-dose crossover study in 14 healthy male volunteers. Lansoprazole 60 mg or placebo once daily was coadministered with anhydrous theophylline 200 mg four times daily. Plasma theophylline concentrations were quantitated via high-performance liquid chromatography. Lansoprazole did not appear to affect substantially the absorption profile or clearance of theophylline. Theophylline area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve over the 6-h dosing interval decreased slightly (13%) but statistically significantly during lansoprazole coadministration. As the magnitude of this effect was small, this interaction is likely to be clinically insignificant.

Pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole in hemodialysis patients

The pharmacokinetics of the new benzimidazole proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole and five of its metabolites were assessed after single oral dose administration to five hemodialysis patients. Patients were studied on dialysis and nondialysis days. Multiple blood and dialysate samples were collected after dosing and were assayed for lansoprazole and metabolite content via high-performance liquid chromatography. The degree of lansoprazole plasma protein binding was lower in hemodialysis patients than in subjects with normal renal function or patients with renal impairment not requiring dialytic therapy, although this tended to moderate when assessed immediately after dialysis. Examination of venous plasma concentration, paired arterial-venous concentration, and dialysate data revealed that lansoprazole and its metabolites were poorly dialyzable. No dosage adjustment of lansoprazole is necessary in hemodialysis patients nor is supplementation after hemodialysis sessions necessary.

The Effects of Lansoprazole on the Disposition of Antipyrine and Indocyanine Green in Normal Human Subjects

This study was designed to evaluate the potential effects of acute and chronic daily oral doses of lansoprazole (60 mg) on the disposition of antipyrine, an almost completely metabolized low hepatic extraction compound, and indocyanine green, a hepatically secreted compound with high extraction ratio. The study utilized a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, two-period crossover design. Sixteen of 18 subjects completed all phases of the study. Both antipyrine (10 mg kg(minus sign1)) and indocyanine green (0.5 mg kg(minus sign1)) were administered as single intravenous bolus doses on Days 1 and 7 of lansoprazole or placebo dosing. Acute exposure to lansoprazole had no statistically significant effects on the plasma pharmacokinetics of indocyanine green or antipyrine. After the seventh dose, there was a small but statistically significant reductions in indocyanine green total body clearance (CL), and elimination rate constant of 10.6% and 8%, respectively. Additionally, a small statistically significant reduction (8.6%) in antipyrine volume of distribution was detected. No other plasma antipyrine pharmacokinetic parameters were changed with concomitant lansoprazole administration. About a 12% increase in the recovery of one of the major antipyrine urine metabolites (NORA) was detected. Overall, this study demonstrates little or no effect of lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics of antipyrine and indocyanine green.

Determination of lansoprazole and five metabolites in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of lansoprazole, a new proton-pump inhibitor, and five of its metabolites in human plasma is described. Lansoprazole, its metabolites, and internal standard (omeprazole) were extracted into diethyl ether-methylene chloride and separation was obtained using a reversed-phase column under isocratic conditions. The method features monochromatic ultraviolet detection at 285 nm, and single extraction, single evaporation sample handling. The lower limit of quantitation, based on standards with acceptable coefficients of variation, was 10 ng/ml for all compounds. No endogenous compounds were found to interfere. This method has been demonstrated to be suitable for pharmacokinetic studies in humans.

Clinical sevoflurane metabolism and disposition. II. The role of cytochrome P450 2E1 in fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol formation

BACKGROUND

Sevoflurane is metabolized to free fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). Cytochrome P450 2E1 is the major isoform responsible for sevoflurane metabolism by human liver microsomes in vitro. This investigation tested the hypothesis that P450 2E1 is predominantly responsible for sevoflurane metabolism in vivo. Disulfiram, which is converted in vivo to a selective inhibitor of P450 2E1, was used as a metabolic probe for P450 2E1.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients within 30% of ideal body weight, who provided institutional review board-approved informed consent and were randomized to receive disulfiram (500 mg oral, n = 11) or nothing (control, n = 10) the night before surgery, were evaluated. All patients received sevoflurane (2.7% end-tidal, 1.3 MAC) in oxygen for 3 h after propofol induction. Thereafter, sevoflurane was discontinued, and anesthesia was maintained with propofol, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide. Blood sevoflurane concentrations during anesthesia and for 8 h thereafter were measured by gas chromatography. Plasma and urine fluoride and total (unconjugated plus glucuronidated) HFIP concentrations were measured by an ion-selective electrode and by gas chromatography, respectively, during anesthesia and for 96 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Patient groups were similar with respect to age, weight, sex, case duration, and intraoperative blood loss. The total sevoflurane dose, measured by cumulative end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations (3.7 +/- 0.1 MAC-h; mean +/- SE), total pulmonary uptake, and blood sevoflurane concentrations, was similar in both groups. In control patients, plasma fluoride and HFIP concentrations were increased compared to baseline values intraoperatively and postoperatively for the first 48 and 60 h, respectively. Disulfiram treatment significantly diminished this increase. Plasma fluoride concentrations increased from 2.1 +/- 0.3 microM (baseline) to 36.2 +/- 3.9 microM (peak) in control patients, but only from 1.7 +/- 0.2 to 17.0 +/- 1.6 microM in disulfiram-treated patients (P < 0.05 compared with control patients). Peak plasma HFIP concentrations were 39.8 +/- 2.6 and 14.4 +/- 1.1 microM in control and disulfiram-treated patients (P < 0.05), respectively. Areas under the plasma fluoride- and HFIP-time curves also were diminished significantly to 22% and 20% of control patients, respectively, by disulfiram treatment. Urinary excretion of fluoride and HFIP was similarly significantly diminished in disulfiram-treated patients. Cumulative 96-h fluoride and HFIP excretion in disulfiram-treated patient was 1,080 +/- 210 and 960 +/- 240 mumol, respectively, compared to 3,950 +/- 560 and 4,300 +/- 540 mumol in control patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Disulfiram, an effective P450 2E1 inhibitor, substantially decreased fluoride ion and HFIP production during and after sevoflurane anesthesia. These results suggest that P450 2E1 is a predominant P450 isoform responsible for human sevoflurane metabolism in vivo.

Clinical sevoflurane metabolism and disposition. I. Sevoflurane and metabolite pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

Sevoflurane has low blood and tissue solubility and is metabolized to free fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). Although sevoflurane uptake and distribution and fluoride formation have been described, the pharmacokinetics of HFIP formation and elimination are incompletely understood. This investigation comprehensively characterized the simultaneous disposition of sevoflurane, fluoride, and HFIP.

METHODS

Ten patients within 30% of ideal body weight who provided institutional review board-approved informed consent received sevoflurane (2.7% end-tidal, 1.3 MAC) in oxygen for 3 h after propofol induction, after which anesthesia was maintained with propofol, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide. Sevoflurane and unconjugated and total HFIP concentrations in blood were determined during anesthesia and for 8 h thereafter. Plasma and urine fluoride and total HFIP concentrations were measured during and through 96 h after anesthetic administration. Fluoride and HFIP were quantitated using an ion-selective electrode and by gas chromatography, respectively.

RESULTS

The total sevoflurane dose, calculated from the pulmonary uptake rate, was 88.8 +/- 9.1 mmol. Sevoflurane was rapidly metabolized to the primary metabolites fluoride and HFIP, which were eliminated in urine. HFIP circulated in blood primarily as a glucuronide conjugate, with unconjugated HFIP < or = 15% of total HFIP concentrations. In blood, peak unconjugated HFIP concentrations were less than 1% of peak sevoflurane concentrations. Apparent renal fluoride and HFIP clearances (mean +/- SE) were 51.8 +/- 4.5 and 52.6 +/- 6.1 ml/min, and apparent elimination half-lives were 21.4 +/- 2.8 and 20.1 +/- 2.6 h, respectively. Renal HFIP and net fluoride excretion were 4,300 +/- 540 and 3,300 +/- 540 mumol. Compared with the estimated sevoflurane uptake, 4.9 +/- 0.5% of the dose taken up was eliminated in the urine as HFIP. For fluoride, 3.7 +/- 0.4% of the sevoflurane dose taken up was eliminated in the urine, which, because a portion of fluoride is sequestered in bone, corresponded to approximately 5.6% of the sevoflurane dose metabolized to fluoride.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane was rapidly metabolized to fluoride and HFIP, which was rapidly glucuronidated and eliminated in the urine. The overall extent of sevoflurane metabolism was approximately 5%.

Effect of phenytoin on the clinical pharmacokinetics of amiodarone

Five healthy male volunteers were given oral amiodarone hydrochloride, 200 mg per day for 6 1/2 weeks, to determine its effects on the pharmacokinetics of both intravenous and oral phenytoin. Predose amiodarone and N-desethylamiodarone serum concentrations were obtained weekly during weeks 2-6. Amiodarone serum concentrations (ASC) increased during weeks 2-4 and then decreased sharply during weeks 5-6 when oral phenytoin, 2-4 mg/kg/day, was co-administered. In addition, N-desethylamiodarone serum concentrations (DEASC) exceeded corresponding ASC during weeks 5-6 whereas during weeks 2-4, DEASC were less than ASC. Because of the long elimination half-life for amiodarone previously reported in healthy volunteers after single doses of amiodarone and the frequent administration of amiodarone associated with this half-life, a modified equation for a continuous infusion was used to describe each subject's ASC versus time data. Pre-phenytoin ASC were fitted to an appropriate function to predict ASC during weeks 5-6 assuming no interaction. Observed versus predicted ASC were compared for weeks 5 and 6. Observed ASC during weeks 5 and 6 were (mean +/- SD) 0.25 +/- 0.09 micrograms/mL and 0.19 +/- 0.07 micrograms/mL, respectively. Corresponding predicted ASC were 0.36 +/- 0.12 micrograms/mL (P = .011) and 0.38 +/- 0.13 micrograms/mL (P = .004). These represented percent differences of 32.2 +/- 12.5% and 49.3 +/- 5.6% for weeks 5 and 6, respectively. Assuming there were no changes in the bioavailability of amiodarone during continuous administration, these findings strongly suggest induction of amiodarone metabolism by phenytoin. The clinical significance of this interaction remains to be determined.

DNA binding by antitumor anthracene derivatives

The relative DNA binding strengths of bisantrene and nine new analogues were measured by spectrophotometric titration and melt transition temperature (Tm) techniques. Data from the spectrophotometric titrations could not be fit by simple Scatchard plots. However, they were fit by a McGhee-von Hippel equation over part of the binding range. The entire range of data was fit by a smoothing cubic spline function. The first derivative of this function gave, for each compound, a curve whose intercept provided a measure of relative binding strength. The delta Tm values agreed qualitatively with the spectrophotometric titration results, although there was not a precise linear relationship. Determinations of macroscopic pKas revealed that most of the compounds were dications at pH 7.0, but a few were mixtures of monocations and dications. No correlation was found between these binding studies and antitumor potencies in a clonogenic assay, which suggests that factors other than DNA binding can determine cytotoxicity for some of the analogues.

Effects of passive smoking on theophylline clearance

Theophylline disposition was examined in seven passive smokers, defined as nonsmokers with long-term exposure to cigarette smoke, and seven age-matched nonsmokers with minimal smoke exposure. Subjects were given an intravenous infusion of aminophylline (6 mg/kg) and blood samples were drawn before and during the 48-hour postinfusion period. Clearance for passive smokers was 6.01 x 10(-2) L/hr.kg and for nonsmokers, clearance was 4.09 x 10(-2) L/hr.kg (p less than 0.025). Terminal elimination half-life for passive smokers was 6.93 hours versus 8.69 hours for nonsmokers (p less than 0.05). The mean residence time for passive smokers was 9.89 hours. For nonsmokers, the mean residence time was 13.11 hours (p less than 0.05). These measurements were statistically different, whereas there was no difference in volume of distribution between the groups, suggesting that passive smokers metabolize theophylline more rapidly than nonsmokers. Plasma and urine cotinine and nicotine concentrations were measured in all subjects. There was a significant difference between the subject groups in plasma (p less than 0.004) and urine (p less than 0.002) cotinine concentrations. Theophylline clearance correlated with both plasma (r = 0.73, p less than 0.01) and urine (r = 0.79, p less than 0.01) cotinine concentrations. Additional studies should be conducted to further define the pharmacokinetic characteristics of passive smokers and to assess the effects of passive smoking on drugs metabolized by the mixed function oxidase system.

Pharmacokinetics of theophylline before and after nephrectomy in dogs

The role of the kidneys in the elimination of theophylline was directly assessed using nephrectomized dogs. Data was analyzed by two different pharmacokinetic approaches. Analysis indicated that a given dosage regimen produced significantly different serum concentrations before and after nephrectomy. Model independent pharmacokinetic analysis failed to show a significant difference in parameters. A model dependent approach, using a nonlinear regression analysis employing a linear two-compartment model, demonstrated that the differences observed could be accounted for by a change in the first order elimination kinetics.

Effect of alteration of cerebrospinal fluid bulk flow on nicotine cerebrospinal fluid exit transfer kinetics

This study was undertaken to determine if a compound which alters the bulk flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) alters the elimination kinetics of a compound in the CSF. Acetazolamide was chosen as the CSF bulk flow-altering agent. It produces a relatively large effect on the flow process, affecting both choroidal and extrachoroidal CSF production, and has been shown to affect CSF flow following iv administration. The compound monitored was nicotine. Acetazolamide was administered orally for one week before and intravenously during the experiment. Nicotine was administered by a bolus injection directly into the CSF via the cisterna magna. The results indicate that the introduction of acetazolamide into the general circulation increases the rate of removal of nicotine from the CSF. Subjects receiving acetazolamide had elevated CSF pressures. The increase in CSF pressure associated with the administration of acetazolamide suggests pressure as a possible factor in the observed increase in the rate of removal of nicotine.

Metabolite formation pharmacokinetics: rate and extent of metabolite formation determined by deconvolution

A two-step analytic procedure to determine the rate and extent of metabolite production following administration of the parent compound is described. The procedure provides the rate and extent of metabolite production as a function of time by application of the general model independent approach of deconvolution. The metabolite unit impulse response function is obtained by implicit deconvolution of the metabolite data with a truncated constant-rate metabolite input function. Then the obtained unit impulse response function is used in an analytic deconvolution with metabolite data following administration of the parent compound to obtain the rate and extent of metabolite production. The input function is also deconvolved with metabolite data to obtain the unit impulse response function appropriate for prediction of metabolite levels given a selected input of parent compound. The expected profile following administration of the consecutive infusions of parent drug is shown for both parent and metabolite. The rationale for selection of deconvolution methods is discussed. The approach is applied to data for procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide from three human subjects. The results indicate that from 27 to 39% of the procainamide was converted to N-acetylprocainamide in these subjects.

Theophylline blood-brain barrier transfer kinetics in dogs

A simple diffusion-based pharmacokinetic model is proposed relating blood-brain barrier transfer kinetics of theophylline to the difference in the free concentrations of the drug in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The model predicts that the CSF drug level is proportional to the serum drug level convoluted by exp(-kt), where k is the blood-brain barrier diffusion rate constant. An excellent agreement was found by nonlinear regression analysis between serum and CSF theophylline data in eight dogs and the proposed model for the blood-brain barrier transfer kinetics of theophylline. The ratio of the free fractions of theophylline in serum and CSF predicted from the model also agrees with the value determined experimentally.

Diffusion and flow transfer of theophylline across the blood-brain barrier: pharmacokinetic analysis

Two possible schemes describing the transfer of theophylline across the blood-brain barrier are investigated. The first, the "diffusion only model," assumes that the rate of transfer is proportional to the difference in free drug concentration in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid. The second, the "diffusion and flow model," has the added feature that drug may be transferred from the CSF to the blood by the continuous secretion of CSF into the blood. Comparison of the results of nonlinear regression for the two proposed schemes indicated that the "diffusion and flow" model best describes the transfer process. The analysis indicates that the parameters obtained for the "diffusion and flow" model are physiologically meaningful.

Podophyllum: suspected teratogenicity from topical application

A case demonstrating suspected teratogenic effects of topical podophylium is presented. Podophyllum resin was applied five times for a duration of 4 hr from the 23rd to the 29th week of pregnancy. At birth a simian crease on the left hand and a preauricular skin tag were noted. It is suggested that podophyllum be avoided during pregnancy. Alternative treatment for warts of the vaginal, perineal, or anal area are presented.