Rapid access to antiretroviral therapy, receipt of naltrexone, and strengths-based case management versus standard of care for HIV viral load suppression in people with HIV who inject drugs in Russia (LINC-II): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage in Russia is low for people with HIV who inject drugs. HIV and addiction treatment in Russia are not well integrated. We aimed to evaluate an intervention to link people with HIV in addiction treatment to HIV care to achieve HIV viral load suppression.

METHODS

LINC-II was a two-arm, open-label, randomised controlled trial at the City Addiction Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Russia. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had a positive HIV status, were not currently on ART, were admitted to a narcology hospital, and had a current diagnosis of opioid use disorder. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to a multicomponent intervention (ie, rapid access to ART, naltrexone for opioid use disorder, and strengths-based case management) or standard of care. Blocked randomisation was stratified by history of ART use. The primary outcome was undetectable HIV viral load at 12 months, defined as less than 40 copies per mL. The trial was conducted and analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03290391.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 19, 2018, and Dec 25, 2020, 953 individuals were screened for eligibility, 225 of whom were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=111) or standard of care (n=114). 136 (60%) participants were male and 89 (40%) were female. Participants in the intervention group had higher odds of HIV viral load suppression at 12 months compared with participants in the standard-of-care group (52 [47%] vs 26 [23%]; adjusted odds ratio 3·0 [95% CI 1·4-6·4]; p=0·0039). 21 adverse events (18 in the intervention group and three in the standard-of-care group)and 14 deaths (four in the intervention group and ten in the standard-of-care group) were reported in the study.

INTERPRETATION

Given the effectiveness of the LINC-II intervention, scaling up this model could be one strategy to advance the UNAIDS goal of ending the HIV epidemic.

FUNDING

National Institute on Drug Abuse and Providence/Boston Center for AIDS Research.

Correlates of Intersectional HIV and Substance Use Stigma Affecting People with HIV and Substance Use in St. Petersburg, Russia

People with HIV (PWH) who inject drugs often experience coexisting HIV- and substance use-related stigma manifestations. We assessed correlates of HIV stigma (Berger HIV stigma scale), substance use stigma (Substance Abuse Self-stigma scale) and intersectional HIV and substance use stigma in a cohort of PWH with a lifetime history of drug use in St. Petersburg, Russia. Intersectional stigma was defined as having a score greater than the median for both forms of stigma. Of the 208 participants, 56 (27%) had intersectional stigma. Depressive symptoms and alcohol dependence were significantly associated with a higher HIV and substance stigma score, but not with intersectional stigma. Individual and community interventions to reduce the impact of HIV stigma and substance use stigma affecting PWH who inject drugs should consider assessing and addressing mental health and unhealthy substance use. Further work with longitudinal data is needed to understand mechanisms leading to intersectional stigma.

Stigma and ART initiation among people with HIV and a lifetime history of illicit drug use in Saint-Petersburg, Russia–A prospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

HIV-positive people who inject drugs (PWID) are stigmatized and face more challenges in accessing ART. The natural course of stigma and its role on ART initiation in this population is unclear. We examined 1] whether HIV stigma changes over time and 2] whether HIV and substance use stigma are associated with ART initiation in a prospective cohort of HIV-positive PWID in St. Petersburg, Russia.

METHODS

We used data from 165 HIV-positive PWID who were ART-naïve at enrollment andgeneralized estimating equations to assess changes in HIV stigma between baseline, 12- and 24-month study visits. Logistic regression estimated associations of HIV stigma and substance use stigma with ART initiation. All models were adjusted for gender, age, CD4 count, duration of HIV diagnosis, recent (past 30-day) drug use and depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

Participants characteristics were the following: median age of 34 (Q1; Q3: 30; 37) years; 30% female; 28% with CD4 count <350; 44% reported recent drug use. During the study period, 31% initiated ART and the median time between HIV diagnosis and ART initiation was 8.5 years (Q1; Q3: 4.68; 13.61). HIV stigma scores decreased yearly by 0.57 (95% CI -1.36, 0.22). More than half (27/47 [57.4%]) of participants who were eligible for ART initiation per local ART guidelines did not initiate therapy. Total HIV stigma and substance use stigma scores were not associated with ART initiation (AOR 0.99, 95%CI 0.94-1.04; AOR 1.01, 95%CI 0.96-1.05, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this Russian cohort of HIV-positive, ART-naïve PWID, stigma did not change over time and was not associated with ART initiation. Addressing stigma alone is unlikely to increase ART initiation rates in this population. Reducing further existing structural barriers, e.g., by promoting equal access to ART and the value of substance-use treatment for ART treatment success should complement stigma-reduction approaches.

Linking HIV-positive people in addiction care to HIV services in St. Petersburg, Russia - Mixed-methods implementation study of strengths-based case management

Access to HIV services for HIV-positive patients in addiction care is challenging in Russia, because both care systems are organised independently from each other. Strengths-based case management is an effective strategy to connect people with HIV (PHIV) to HIV care. This mixed-methods study's objective was to investigate implementation of a case management intervention in St. Petersburg, Russia, designed to connect PHIV who inject drugs to HIV care. We analysed survey data from 118 HIV-positive patients in addiction care and conducted six focus groups (n=38). Quantitative analyses of fidelity and satisfaction outcomes and qualitative text analysis assessed intervention implementation. Participants who linked to HIV services embraced empowerment and motivation resulting from case management as supporting self-efficacy and linkage to services. Among participants who did not link to care, drug use impeded their care engagement. Main levers to implementation were empowerment to cope with challenges of a fragmented health system and persistent stigma. Those who connected to HIV services credited case managers for facilitating linkage; those who did not link attributed it to personal issues. Implementation of case management for HIV care in Russia should focus on effective substance use treatment and empowerment, motivation and support in addressing personal and system factors.

Design of a randomized controlled trial to Link Infectious and Narcology Care (LINC-II) in St. Petersburg, Russia

BACKGROUND

If Russia is to achieve the UNAIDS 90-90-90 HIV targets, better approaches to engage, effectively treat, and retain patients in care are needed. This paper describes the protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) testing the effectiveness of LINC-II, a strength-based case management program for HIV-positive people who inject drugs (PWID) to increase rates of HIV viral suppression, ART initiation, and opioid abstinence.

METHODS

This RCT will enroll and randomize 240 participants, recruited from a narcology (addiction care) hospital in St. Petersburg, Russia. Participants are randomized to the intervention or control arms. Those in the intervention arm receive: (1) strengths-based HIV case management supporting coordinated care; (2) rapid ART initiation; and (3) pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder. We will evaluate the intervention's effectiveness compared to standard of care on the following outcomes: (1) undetectable HIV viral load at 12 months (primary); (2) initiation of ART within 28 days of randomization; (3) change in CD4 count from baseline to 12 months; (4) retention in HIV care (i.e., ≥ 1 visit to medical care in 2 consecutive 6 month periods); (5) undetectable HIV viral load at 6 months; and (6) past 30-day opioid abstinence (at 6 and at 12 months).

DISCUSSION

This RCT will assess the LINC-II intervention in an urban Russian setting. If effective, it will offer a new approach for increasing the uptake of both HIV and opioid use disorder treatment and coordination of these modalities in standard Eastern European clinical settings. Trial registration This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov through the National Institutes of Health, NCT03290391. Registered 19 September 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03290391.

Slow-release naltrexone implant versus oral naltrexone for improving treatment outcomes in people with HIV who are addicted to opioids: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Untreated opioid addiction in people with HIV is associated with poor HIV treatment outcomes. Slow-release, long-acting, implantable naltrexone might improve these outcomes. Here, we present results of a study aimed to test this hypothesis.

METHODS

We did a 48 week double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3, randomised trial with men and women addicted to opioids who were starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV and whose viral loads were higher than 1000 copies per mL. Participants were seeking treatment at two HIV and two narcology programme centres in Saint Petersburg, Russia, and the surrounding Leningrad region. The Pavlov statistical department created a table with stratification on gender distribution, viral load, and CD4 cell count. We stratified participants according to gender, viral load, and CD4 cells per μL, and randomly assigned (1:1) them to addiction treatment with a naltrexone implant and oral naltrexone placebo (implant group) or oral naltrexone and placebo implant (oral group). The primary outcome was plasma viral load of less than 400 copies per mL at 24 weeks and 48 weeks. We included all randomly assigned participants in outcome analyses (intention to treat). Treatment staff and patients were masked to group assignment. The study is complete and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01101815.

FINDINGS

Between July 14, 2011, and April 14, 2014, 238 potential participants were recruited and screened, 35 were excluded for not meeting inclusion criteria, three declined to participate, and 200 were randomly assigned to treatment (100 to each group). At week 24, 38 (38) participants in the implant group and 35 (35%) in the oral group had viral loads less than 400 copies per mL (risk ratio 1·1, 95% CI 0·76-1·56; p=0·77). At week 48, 66 participants in the implant group and 50 in the oral group had viral loads less than 400 copies per mL (risk ratio 1·32, 95% CI 1·04-1·68; p=0·045). There were seven serious adverse events: three deaths in the implant group (one due to heart disease, one trauma, and one AIDS), and four in the oral group (two overdoses, one pancreatic cancer, and one AIDS). The overdose deaths occurred 9-10 months after the last naltrexone dose.

INTERPRETATION

The longer the blockade of opioid effects, the more protection an individual gets from missed ART doses and impulsive behaviours that lead to relapse and poor, even fatal, outcomes. Commercial development of implants could result in a meaningful addition to addiction treatment options.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Penn Centre for AIDS Research, and Penn Mental Health AIDS Research Centre.

"It is easier for me to shoot up": stigma, abandonment, and why HIV-positive drug users in Russia fail to link to HIV care

Many HIV-positive people who inject drugs (PWID) globally are not receiving HIV care. This represents a major challenge among key populations to end the global HIV epidemic. This qualitative study explored the process and associated barriers of linking HIV-positive PWID who are in addiction treatment to HIV care in St. Petersburg, Russia. We conducted three focus groups and seven semi-structured interviews with participants in the LINC ("Linking Infectious and Narcology Care") project at addiction and HIV hospitals in St. Petersburg. The sample consisted of 25 HIV-infected patients with opioid dependence and seven health-care providers, including addiction and infectious disease physicians and case managers. A variety of intertwining factors influence effective engagement of PWID with HIV treatment. Stigma, problematic patient-provider relationships, and fragmented health care were the main challenges for HIV care initiation by PWID, which were further exacerbated by injection drug use. Effective linkage of PWID to HIV care requires acknowledging and addressing stigma's role and different perspectives of patients and providers.

Anhedonia, depression, anxiety, and craving in opiate dependent patients stabilized on oral naltrexone or an extended release naltrexone implant

BACKGROUND

Naltrexone is a μ-opioid receptor antagonist that blocks opioid effects. Craving, depression, anxiety, and anhedonia are common among opioid dependent individuals and concerns have been raised that naltrexone increases them due to blocking endogenous opioids. Here, we present data that address these concerns.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the relationship between affective responses and naltrexone treatment.

METHODS

Opioid dependent patients (N = 306) were enrolled in a three cell (102ss/cell) randomized, double blind, double dummy, placebo-controlled 6-month trial comparing extended release implantable naltrexone with oral naltrexone and placebo (oral and implant). Monthly assessments of affective responses used a Visual Analog Scale for opioid craving, the Beck Depression Inventory, Spielberger Anxiety Test, and the Ferguson and Chapman Anhedonia Scales. Between-group outcomes were analyzed using mixed model analysis of variance (Mixed ANOVA) and repeated measures and the Tukey test for those who remained and treatment and did not relapse, and between the last measure before dropout with the same measure for those remaining in treatment.

RESULTS

Depression, anxiety, and anhedonia were elevated at baseline but reduced to normal within the first 1-2 months for patients who remained in treatment and did not relapse. Other than a slight increase in two anxiety measures at week two, there were no significant between-group differences prior to treatment dropout.

CONCLUSION

These data do not support concerns that naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence increases craving, depression, anxiety or anhedonia.

Randomized trial of long-acting sustained-release naltrexone implant vs oral naltrexone or placebo for preventing relapse to opioid dependence

CONTEXT Sustained-release naltrexone implants may improve outcomes of nonagonist treatment of opioid addiction. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes of naltrexone implants, oral naltrexone hydrochloride, and nonmedication treatment. DESIGN Six-month double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial. SETTING Addiction treatment programs in St Petersburg, Russia. PARTICIPANTS Three hundred six opioid-addicted patients recently undergoing detoxification. INTERVENTIONS Biweekly counseling and 1 of the following 3 treatments for 24 weeks: (1) 1000-mg naltrexone implant and oral placebo (NI+OP group; 102 patients); (2) placebo implant and 50-mg oral naltrexone hydrochloride (PI+ON group; 102 patients); or (3) placebo implant and oral placebo (PI+OP group; 102 patients). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Percentage of patients retained in treatment without relapse. RESULTS By month 6, 54 of 102 patients in the NI+OP group (52.9%) remained in treatment without relapse compared with 16 of 102 patients in the PI+ON group (15.7%) (survival analysis, log-rank test, P < .001) and 11 of 102 patients in the PI+OP group (10.8%) (P < .001). The PI+ON vs PI+OP comparison showed a nonsignificant trend favoring the PI+ON group (P = .07). Counting missing test results as positive, the proportion of urine screening tests yielding negative results for opiates was 63.6% (95% CI, 60%-66%) for the NI+OP group; 42.7% (40%-45%) for the PI+ON group; and 34.1% (32%-37%) for the PI+OP group (P < .001, Fisher exact test, compared with the NI+OP group). Twelve wound infections occurred among 244 implantations (4.9%) in the NI+OP group, 2 among 181 (1.1%) in the PI+ON group, and 1 among 148 (0.7%) in the PI+OP group (P = .02). All events were in the first 2 weeks after implantation and resolved with antibiotic therapy. Four local-site reactions (redness and swelling) occurred in the second month after implantation in the NI+OP group (P = .12), and all resolved with antiallergy medication treatment. Other nonlocal-site adverse effects were reported in 8 of 886 visits (0.9%) in the NI+OP group, 4 of 522 visits (0.8%) in the PI+ON group, and 3 of 394 visits (0.8%) in the PI+ON group; all resolved and none were serious. No evidence of increased deaths from overdose after naltrexone treatment ended was found. CONCLUSIONS The implant is more effective than oral naltrexone or placebo. More patients in the NI+OP than in the other groups develop wound infections or local irritation, but none are serious and all resolve with treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00678418.

Nonverbal behavior of human addicts: multimetric analysis

AIMS

Ethological approach followed by multimetric statistical analysis was applied to characterize and discriminate alcohol, heroin and dual, alcohol and heroin, dependent subjects.

DESIGN

Heroin, alcohol, and dual dependent patients (n=51) after one month of stabilization of remission and control volunteers (n=34) without a history of significant drug or alcohol use were interviewed and videotaped during the interview by approbation. Nonverbal behavioral cues monitored during the interview were analyzed by means of general linear procedure followed by correlation, factor and discriminant function analyses.

FINDINGS

By using this approach the attempt to discriminate addicted groups between each other failed. Therefore we found acceptable to combine subjects in one group and to suggest the similarity between alcohol and heroin dependence. It was found that principal markers of behavioral structure in addicted subjects were higher responsivity to communicate distance, less expression of affiliation behavioral pattern, low level of correlations between different behavioral patterns, and unclear factor structure. Behavioral pattern "affiliation" was identified as discriminate behavior between control and addicted subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonverbal cues of human behavior identified clear differences between healthy control and addictive subjects. Therefore, ethological approach described in this paper could be recommended for future use in clinical practice.