1
|
Peters MLB, Eckel A, Seguin CL, Davidi B, Howard DH, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Pancreatic Cancer Among High-Risk Populations. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:278-290. [PMID: 38086003 PMCID: PMC10911581 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among populations at high risk for the disease. METHODS We used a microsimulation model of the natural history of PDAC to estimate the lifetime health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of PDAC screening among populations with specific genetic risk factors for PDAC, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, Lynch syndrome, TP53, CDKN2A, and STK11. For each high-risk population, we simulated 29 screening strategies, defined by starting age and frequency. Screening included MRI with follow-up EUS in a subset of patients. Costs of tests were based on Medicare reimbursement for MRI, EUS, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and pancreatectomy. Cancer-related cost by stage of disease and phase of treatment was based on the literature. For each high-risk population, we performed an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, assuming a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 US dollars (USD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS For men with relative risk (RR) 12.33 (CDKN2A) and RR 28 (STK11), annual screening was cost-effective, starting at age 55 and 40 years, respectively. For women, screening was only cost-effective for those with RR 28 (STK11), with annual screening starting at age 45 years. CONCLUSION Combined MRI/EUS screening may be a cost-effective approach for the highest-risk populations (among mutations considered, those with RR >12). However, for those with moderate risk (RR, 5-12), screening would only be cost-effective at higher WTP thresholds (eg, $200K USD/QALY) or with once-only screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Linton B. Peters
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Claudia L. Seguin
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Barak Davidi
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David H. Howard
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Amy B. Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Pari V. Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seguin CL, Davidi B, Peters MLB, Eckel A, Harisinghani MG, Goiffon RJ, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Ultrasound Surveillance of Small, Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Projected Benefits by Sex, Age, and Comorbidity Level. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:1031-1041. [PMID: 37406750 PMCID: PMC10777737 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps are commonly encountered when performing upper abdominal ultrasound. Our purpose was to estimate the life expectancy (LE) benefit of ultrasound-based gallbladder surveillance in patients with small (6-7 to <10 mm), incidentally detected gallbladder polyps, accounting for patient sex, age, and comorbidity level. METHODS We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate hypothetical cohorts of women and men with small gallbladder polyps, with varying age (66-80 years) and comorbidity level (none, mild, moderate, severe). Drawing from current evidence, in the base case, we assumed no increased risk of gallbladder cancer in patients with small gallbladder polyps. To estimate maximal possible LE gains from surveillance, we assumed perfect cancer control consequent to 5 years of surveillance. We varied key assumptions including cancer risk and test performance characteristics in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS Projected LE gains from surveillance were <3 days across most cohorts and scenarios evaluated. For 66- and 80-year-olds with no comorbidities, LE gains were 1.46 and 1.45 days, respectively, for women, and 0.67 and 0.75 days for men. With 10 years of surveillance, LE gains increased to 2.94 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 1.35 days). If we assumed a 10% increase in gallbladder cancer risk among individuals with polyps, LE gains increased slightly to 1.60 days for 66-year-old women with no comorbidities (men: 0.74 days). Results were sensitive to test performance and surgical mortality. DISCUSSION Even under unrealistic, optimistic assumptions of cancer control, ultrasound surveillance of incidentally detected small gallbladder polyps provided limited benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia L Seguin
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Barak Davidi
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary Linton B Peters
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mukesh G Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Director of Abdominal MRI, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Reece J Goiffon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amy B Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Chair of Radiology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and Chief of Radiology Services for the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Health System, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Langlotz CP, Mauro MA, Mahmood U, Klein JS, Meltzer CC, Bhalla S, Heller RE, Scott JA, Flanders AE, Pandharipande PV. Truth and Transformation: RSNA's Journey Toward Equity. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2023; 5:e239001. [PMID: 37124648 PMCID: PMC10141329 DOI: 10.1148/ryct.239001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
|
4
|
Langlotz CP, Mauro MA, Mahmood U, Klein JS, Meltzer CC, Bhalla S, Heller RE, Scott JA, Flanders AE, Pandharipande PV. Truth and Transformation: RSNA's Journey Toward Equity. Radiographics 2023; 43:e239005. [PMID: 36862085 DOI: 10.1148/rg.239005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
|
5
|
Langlotz CP, Mauro MA, Mahmood U, Klein JS, Meltzer CC, Bhalla S, Heller RE, Scott JA, Flanders AE, Pandharipande PV. Truth and Transformation: RSNA's Journey Toward Equity. Radiology 2023; 307:e239008. [PMID: 36862088 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.239008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
|
6
|
Langlotz CP, Mauro MA, Mahmood U, Klein JS, Meltzer CC, Bhalla S, Heller RE, Scott JA, Flanders AE, Pandharipande PV. Truth and Transformation: RSNA's Journey Toward Equity. Radiol Artif Intell 2023; 5:e239001. [PMID: 37035432 PMCID: PMC10077070 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.239001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
|
7
|
Langlotz CP, Mauro MA, Mahmood U, Klein JS, Meltzer CC, Bhalla S, Heller RE, Scott JA, Flanders AE, Pandharipande PV. Truth and Transformation: RSNA's Journey Toward Equity. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2023; 5:e239005. [PMID: 36862089 PMCID: PMC10077064 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.239005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
|
8
|
Mojtahed A, Kilcoyne A, Crowley C, Furtado F, Anderson MA, Catalano OA, Gee MS, Kambadakone A, Saini S, Pandharipande PV. Introduction of a daily peer learning process with added value for faculty and trainees. Clin Imaging 2022; 92:83-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
9
|
Peters MLB, Eckel A, Lietz A, Seguin C, Mueller P, Hur C, Pandharipande PV. Genetic testing to guide screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a microsimulation model. Pancreatology 2022; 22:760-769. [PMID: 35752568 PMCID: PMC9474673 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have elevated PDAC risk, partially due to germline genetic variants. We evaluated the potential effectiveness of genetic testing to target MRI-based screening among FDRs. METHODS We used a microsimulation model of PDAC, calibrated to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, to estimate the potential life expectancy (LE) gain of screening for each of the following groups of FDRs: individuals who test positive for each of eight variants associated with elevated PDAC risk (e.g., BRCA2, CDKN2A); individuals who test negative; and individuals who do not test. Screening was assumed to take place if LE gains were achievable. We simulated multiple screening approaches, defined by starting age and frequency. Sensitivity analysis evaluated changes in results given varying model assumptions. RESULTS For women, 92% of mutation carriers had projected LE gains from screening for PDAC, if screening strategies (start age, frequency) were optimized. Among carriers, LE gains ranged from 0.1 days (ATM+ women screened once at age 70) to 510 days (STK11+ women screened annually from age 40). For men, LE gains were projected for all mutation carriers, ranging from 0.2 days (BRCA1+ men screened once at age 70) to 620 days (STK11+ men screened annually from age 40). For men and women who did not undergo genetic testing, or for whom testing showed no variant, screening yielded small LE benefit (0-2.1 days). CONCLUSIONS Genetic testing of FDRs can inform targeted PDAC screening by identifying which FDRs may benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Linton B Peters
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, USA.
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Anna Lietz
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Claudia Seguin
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Peter Mueller
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Chin Hur
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Current Affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pandharipande PV, Shah ZK. Diversity in Our Workforce: An Urgent Need to Do More. Radiology 2022; 305:648-649. [PMID: 35943340 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pari V Pandharipande
- From the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Wexner Medical Center, 450 Faculty Office Tower, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210
| | - Zarine K Shah
- From the Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Wexner Medical Center, 450 Faculty Office Tower, 395 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Petranovic M, Raoof S, Digumarthy SR, Sharma A, Shepard JAO, Gainor JF, Pandharipande PV. Liquid Biopsy, Diagnostic Imaging, and Future Synergies. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:336-343. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
12
|
Munden RF, Black WC, Hartman TE, MacMahon H, Ko JP, Dyer DS, Naidich D, Rossi SE, McAdams HP, Goodman EM, Brown K, Kent M, Carter BW, Chiles C, Leung AN, Boiselle PM, Kazerooni EA, Berland LL, Pandharipande PV. Managing Incidental Findings on Thoracic CT: Lung Findings. A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:1267-1279. [PMID: 34246574 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The ACR Incidental Findings Committee presents recommendations for managing incidentally detected lung findings on thoracic CT. The Chest Subcommittee is composed of thoracic radiologists who endorsed and developed the provided guidance. These recommendations represent a combination of current published evidence and expert opinion and were finalized by informal iterative consensus. The recommendations address commonly encountered incidental findings in the lungs and are not intended to be a comprehensive review of all pulmonary incidental findings. The goal is to improve the quality of care by providing guidance on management of incidentally detected thoracic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald F Munden
- Professor, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina; Chair, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - William C Black
- Professor of Radiology, Emeritus, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Heber MacMahon
- Professor of Radiology, Section of Thoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jane P Ko
- Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York; Fellowship Director, Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Debra S Dyer
- Professor, Department of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado; Chair, Department of Radiology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
| | - David Naidich
- Professor, Emeritus, NYU-Langone Health, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Santiago E Rossi
- Chairman, Centro Rossi, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Chest Section Head, Hospital Cetrángolo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - H Page McAdams
- Professor of Radiology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric M Goodman
- Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York; Associate Program Director, Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, New York
| | - Kathleen Brown
- Professor, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Section Chief, Thoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Assistant Dean, Equity and Diversity Inclusion, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael Kent
- Associate Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Director, Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brett W Carter
- Associate Professor, Department of Thoracic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Director of Clinical Operations, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Chief Patient Safety and Quality Officer, Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline Chiles
- Professor, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Ann N Leung
- Professor, Clinical Affairs, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Associate Chair, Clinical Affairs, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Phillip M Boiselle
- Professor, Quinnipiac's Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, North Haven, Connecticut; Dean, Quinnipiac's Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, William and Barbara Weldon Dean's Chair of Medicine, North Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ella A Kazerooni
- Professor of Radiology, Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology and Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lincoln L Berland
- Professor Emeritus, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Director, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Associate Chair, Integrated Imaging & Imaging Sciences, MGH Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Executive Director, Clinical Enterprise Integration, Mass General Brigham (MGB) Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Associate Professor of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thrall JH, Fessell D, Pandharipande PV. Rethinking the Approach to Artificial Intelligence for Medical Image Analysis: The Case for Precision Diagnosis. J Am Coll Radiol 2021; 18:174-179. [PMID: 33413896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
To date, widely generalizable artificial intelligence (AI) programs for medical image analysis have not been demonstrated, including for mammography. Rather than pursuing a strategy of collecting ever-larger databases in the attempt to build generalizable programs, we suggest three possible avenues for exploring a precision medicine or precision imaging approach. First, it is now technologically feasible to collect hundreds of thousands of multi-institutional cases along with other patient data, allowing stratification of patients into subpopulations that have similar characteristics in the manner discussed by the National Research Council in its white paper on precision medicine. A family of AI programs could be developed across different examination types that are matched to specific patient subpopulations. Such stratification can help address bias, including racial or ethnic bias, by allowing unbiased data aggregation for creation of subpopulations. Second, for common examinations, larger institutions may be able to collect enough of their own data to train AI programs that reflect disease prevalence and variety in their respective unique patient subpopulations. Third, high- and low-probability subpopulations can be identified by application of AI programs, thereby allowing their triage off the radiology work list. This would reduce radiologists' workloads, providing more time for interpretation of the remaining examinations. For high-volume procedures, investigators should come together to define reference standards, collect data, and compare the merits of pursuing generalizability versus a precision medicine subpopulation-based strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H Thrall
- Chair Emeritus, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - David Fessell
- Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Director, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment; Associate Chair, Integrated Imaging & Imaging Sciences, MGH Radiology; Executive Director, Clinical Enterprise Integration, Mass General Brigham (MGB) Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reinhold C, Ueno Y, Akin EA, Bhosale PR, Dudiak KM, Jhingran A, Kang SK, Kilcoyne A, Lakhman Y, Nicola R, Pandharipande PV, Paspulati R, Shinagare AB, Small W, Vargas HA, Whitcomb BP, Glanc P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Evaluation and Follow-Up of Endometrial Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:S472-S486. [PMID: 33153558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
To date, there is little consensus on the role of pelvic imaging in assessing local disease extent during initial staging in patients with endometrial carcinoma, with practices differing widely across centers. However, when pretreatment assessment of local tumor extent is indicated, MRI is the preferred imaging modality. Preoperative imaging of endometrial carcinoma can define the extent of disease and indicate the need for subspecialist referral in the presence of deep myometrial invasion, cervical extension, or suspected lymphadenopathy. If distant metastatic disease is clinically suspected, preoperative assessment with cross-sectional imaging or PET/CT may be performed. However, most patients with low-grade disease are at low risk of lymph node and distant metastases. Thus, this group may not require a routine pretreatment evaluation for distant metastases. Recurrence rates in patients with endometrial carcinoma are infrequent. Therefore, radiologic evaluation is typically used only to investigate suspicion of recurrent disease due to symptoms or physical examination and not for routine surveillance after treatment. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoshiko Ueno
- Research Author, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Esma A Akin
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | | | | - Anuja Jhingran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stella K Kang
- New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Yulia Lakhman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Refky Nicola
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Rajmohan Paspulati
- University Hospitals Medical Group Radiology, Cleveland, Ohio, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- Brigham & Women's Hospital Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William Small
- Stritch School of Medicine Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | | | - Bradford P Whitcomb
- University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut; Society of Gynecologic Oncology
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- Specialty Chair, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dudiak KM, Maturen KE, Akin EA, Bell M, Bhosale PR, Kang SK, Kilcoyne A, Lakhman Y, Nicola R, Pandharipande PV, Paspulati R, Reinhold C, Ricci S, Shinagare AB, Vargas HA, Whitcomb BP, Glanc P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Gestational Trophoblastic Disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 16:S348-S363. [PMID: 31685103 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), a rare complication of pregnancy, includes both benign and malignant forms, the latter collectively referred to as gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). When metastatic, the lungs are the most common site of initial spread. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, elaborated to some extent by all forms of GTD, is useful in facilitating disease detection, diagnosis, monitoring treatment response, and follow-up. Imaging evaluation depends on whether GTD manifests in one of its benign forms or whether it has progressed to GTN. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound with duplex Doppler evaluation of the pelvis are usually appropriate diagnostic procedures in either of these circumstances, and in posttreatment surveillance. The appropriateness of more extensive imaging remains dependent on a diagnosis of GTN and on other factors. The use of imaging to assess complications, typically hemorrhagic, should be guided by the location of clinical signs and symptoms. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Esma A Akin
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Maria Bell
- Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | | | - Stella K Kang
- New York University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Yulia Lakhman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Refky Nicola
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | | | | | | | - Stephanie Ricci
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | - Atul B Shinagare
- Brigham & Women's Hospital Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Bradford P Whitcomb
- University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, Society of Gynecologic Oncology
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- Specialty Chair, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yuan C, Babic A, Khalaf N, Nowak JA, Brais LK, Rubinson DA, Ng K, Aguirre AJ, Pandharipande PV, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Rosenthal MH, Sander C, Kraft P, Wolpin BM. Diabetes, Weight Change, and Pancreatic Cancer Risk. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:e202948. [PMID: 32789511 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Pancreatic cancer is the third-leading cause of cancer death in the United States; however, few high-risk groups have been identified to facilitate early diagnosis strategies. Objective To evaluate the association of diabetes duration and recent weight change with subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study obtained data from female participants in the Nurses' Health Study and male participants in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, with repeated exposure assessments over 30 years. Incident cases of pancreatic cancer were identified from self-report or during follow-up of participant deaths. Deaths were ascertained through reports from the next of kin, the US Postal Service, or the National Death Index. Data collection was conducted from October 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2019, to June 30, 2019. Exposures Duration of physician-diagnosed diabetes and recent weight change. Main Outcome and Measures Hazard ratios (HRs) for subsequent development of pancreatic cancer. Results Of the 112 818 women (with a mean [SD] age of 59.4 [11.7] years) and 46 207 men (with a mean [SD] age of 64.7 [10.8] years) included in the analysis, 1116 incident cases of pancreatic cancers were identified. Compared with participants with no diabetes, those with recent-onset diabetes had an age-adjusted HR for pancreatic cancer of 2.97 (95% CI, 2.31-3.82) and those with long-standing diabetes had an age-adjusted HR of 2.16 (95% CI, 1.78-2.60). Compared with those with no weight loss, participants who reported a 1- to 4-lb weight loss had an age-adjusted HR for pancreatic cancer of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.03-1.52), those with a 5- to 8-lb weight loss had an age-adjusted HR of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.06-1.66), and those with more than an 8-lb weight loss had an age-adjusted HR of 1.92 (95% CI, 1.58-2.32). Participants with recent-onset diabetes accompanied by weight loss of 1 to 8 lb (91 incident cases per 100 000 person-years [95% CI, 55-151]; HR, 3.61 [95% CI, 2.14-6.10]) or more than 8 lb (164 incident cases per 100 000 person-years [95% CI, 114-238]; HR, 6.75 [95% CI, 4.55-10.00]) had a substantially increased risk for pancreatic cancer compared with those with neither exposure (16 incident cases per 100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 14-17). Incidence rates were even higher among participants with recent-onset diabetes and weight loss with a body mass index of less than 25 before weight loss (400 incident cases per 100 000 person-years) or whose weight loss was not intentional judging from increased physical activity or healthier dietary choices (334 incident cases per 100 000 person-years). Conclusions and Relevance This study demonstrates that recent-onset diabetes accompanied by weight loss is associated with a substantially increased risk for developing pancreatic cancer. Older age, previous healthy weight, and no intentional weight loss further elevate this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana Babic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natalia Khalaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jonathan A Nowak
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lauren K Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew J Aguirre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael H Rosenthal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chris Sander
- Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,cBio Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ciprani D, Weniger M, Qadan M, Hank T, Horick NK, Harrison JM, Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Pandharipande PV, Ferrone CR, Lillemoe KD, Warshaw AL, Bassi C, Salvia R, Fernández-Del Castillo C. Risk of malignancy in small pancreatic cysts decreases over time. Pancreatology 2020; 20:1213-1217. [PMID: 32819844 PMCID: PMC8168401 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cysts <15 mm without worrisome features have practically no risk of malignancy at the time of diagnosis but this can change over time. Optimal duration of follow-up is a matter of debate. We evaluated predictors of malignancy and attempted to identify a time to safely discontinue surveillance. METHODS Bi-centric study utilizing prospectively collected databases of patients with pancreatic cysts measuring <15 mm and without worrisome features who underwent surveillance at the Massachusetts General Hospital (1988-2017) and at the University of Verona Hospital Trust (2000-2016). The risk of malignant transformation was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and parametric survival models, and predictors of malignancy were evaluated using Cox regression. RESULTS 806 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 58 months (6-347). Over time, 58 (7.2%) cysts were resected and of those, 11 had high grade dysplasia (HGD) or invasive cancer. Three additional patients had unresectable cancer for a total rate of malignancy of 1.7%. Predictors of development of malignancy included an increase in size ≥2.5 mm/year (HR = 29.54, 95% CI: 9.39-92.91, P < 0.001) and the development of worrisome features (HR = 9.17, 95% CI: 2.99-28.10, P = 0.001). Comparison of parametric survival models suggested that the risk of malignancy decreased after three years of surveillance and was lower than 0.2% after five years. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic cysts <15 mm at the time of diagnosis have a very low risk of malignant transformation. Our findings indicate the risk decreases over time. Size increase of ≥2.5 mm/year is the strongest predictor of malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Ciprani
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - M Weniger
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - T Hank
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - N K Horick
- Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J M Harrison
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - G Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - S Andrianello
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - P V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - C R Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - K D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A L Warshaw
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - C Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - R Salvia
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - C Fernández-Del Castillo
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pandharipande PV, Anderson MA. Imaging-based Risk Scores for Treatment Selection in Early Pancreatic Cancer: A Step Forward for Tailored Treatment. Radiology 2020; 296:552-553. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020202567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pari V. Pandharipande
- From the Department of Radiology, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Mark A. Anderson
- From the Department of Radiology, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bhayana R, Som A, Li MD, Carey DE, Anderson MA, Blake MA, Catalano O, Gee MS, Hahn PF, Harisinghani M, Kilcoyne A, Lee SI, Mojtahed A, Pandharipande PV, Pierce TT, Rosman DA, Saini S, Samir AE, Simeone JF, Gervais DA, Velmahos G, Misdraji J, Kambadakone A. Abdominal Imaging Findings in COVID-19: Preliminary Observations. Radiology 2020; 297:E207-E215. [PMID: 32391742 PMCID: PMC7508000 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020201908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, a target of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), demonstrates its highest surface expression in the lung, small bowel, and vasculature, suggesting abdominal viscera may be susceptible to injury. Purpose To report abdominal imaging findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cross-sectional study, patients consecutively admitted to a single quaternary care center from March 27 to April 10, 2020, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were included. Abdominal imaging studies performed in these patients were reviewed, and salient findings were recorded. Medical records were reviewed for clinical data. Univariable analysis and logistic regression were performed. Results A total of 412 patients (average age, 57 years; range, 18 to >90 years; 241 men, 171 women) were evaluated. A total of 224 abdominal imaging studies were performed (radiography, n = 137; US, n = 44; CT, n = 42; MRI, n = 1) in 134 patients (33%). Abdominal imaging was associated with age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03 per year of increase; P = .001) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR, 17.3; P < .001). Bowel-wall abnormalities were seen on 31% of CT images (13 of 42) and were associated with ICU admission (OR, 15.5; P = .01). Bowel findings included pneumatosis or portal venous gas, seen on 20% of CT images obtained in patients in the ICU (four of 20). Surgical correlation (n = 4) revealed unusual yellow discoloration of the bowel (n = 3) and bowel infarction (n = 2). Pathologic findings revealed ischemic enteritis with patchy necrosis and fibrin thrombi in arterioles (n = 2). Right upper quadrant US examinations were mostly performed because of liver laboratory findings (87%, 32 of 37), and 54% (20 of 37) revealed a dilated sludge-filled gallbladder, suggestive of bile stasis. Patients with a cholecystostomy tube placed (n = 4) had negative bacterial cultures. Conclusion Bowel abnormalities and gallbladder bile stasis were common findings on abdominal images of patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Patients who underwent laparotomy often had ischemia, possibly due to small-vessel thrombosis. © RSNA, 2020
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Bhayana
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Avik Som
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Matthew D Li
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Denston E Carey
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Mark A Anderson
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Michael A Blake
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Onofrio Catalano
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Michael S Gee
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Peter F Hahn
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Aoife Kilcoyne
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Susanna I Lee
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Theodore T Pierce
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - David A Rosman
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Sanjay Saini
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Anthony E Samir
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Joseph F Simeone
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Debra A Gervais
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - George Velmahos
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Joseph Misdraji
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- From the Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology (R.B., A.S., M.D.L., M.A.A., M.A.B., O.C., M.S.G., P.F.H., M.H., A. Kilcoyne, S.I.L., A.M., P.V.P., T.T.P., D.A.R., S.S., A.E.S., J.F.S., D.A.G., A. Kambadakone), Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (G.V.), and Department of Pathology (J.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim J, Yuan C, Babic A, Bao Y, Clish CB, Pollak MN, Amundadottir LT, Klein AP, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Pandharipande PV, Brais LK, Welch MW, Ng K, Giovannucci EL, Sesso HD, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Fuchs CS, Wolpin BM, Kraft P. Genetic and Circulating Biomarker Data Improve Risk Prediction for Pancreatic Cancer in the General Population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:999-1008. [PMID: 32321713 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States, and 80% of patients present with advanced, incurable disease. Risk markers for pancreatic cancer have been characterized, but combined models are not used clinically to identify individuals at high risk for the disease. METHODS Within a nested case-control study of 500 pancreatic cancer cases diagnosed after blood collection and 1,091 matched controls enrolled in four U.S. prospective cohorts, we characterized absolute risk models that included clinical factors (e.g., body mass index, history of diabetes), germline genetic polymorphisms, and circulating biomarkers. RESULTS Model discrimination showed an area under ROC curve of 0.62 via cross-validation. Our final integrated model identified 3.7% of men and 2.6% of women who had at least 3 times greater than average risk in the ensuing 10 years. Individuals within the top risk percentile had a 4% risk of developing pancreatic cancer by age 80 years and 2% 10-year risk at age 70 years. CONCLUSIONS Risk models that include established clinical, genetic, and circulating factors improved disease discrimination over models using clinical factors alone. IMPACT Absolute risk models for pancreatic cancer may help identify individuals in the general population appropriate for disease interception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Kim
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana Babic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ying Bao
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clary B Clish
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Michael N Pollak
- Cancer Prevention Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laufey T Amundadottir
- Laboratory of Translational Genomics, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Alison P Klein
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lauren K Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marisa W Welch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Howard D Sesso
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Prevention Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - JoAnn E Manson
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Prevention Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meir J Stampfer
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.,Department of Medical Oncology, Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Peter Kraft
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Atwi NE, Sabottke CF, Pitre DM, Smith DL, Danrad R, Dharaiya E, Kambadakone A, Pandharipande PV, Toshav AM. Follow-up Recommendation Rates Associated With Spectral Detector Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Retrospective Comparison to Single-Energy CT. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:940-950. [PMID: 32032553 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Revised: 12/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual-energy CT image sets have many applications in abdominopelvic imaging but no demonstrated clinical effect. PURPOSE To determine the effect of dual-energy CT iodine maps on abdominopelvic imaging follow-up recommendation rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study of abdominopelvic CTs acquired from April 2017 through June 2018. CT reports were analyzed for radiologic follow-up recommendation and follow-up recommendation reason. Follow-up MRI reports were analyzed for benign or nonbenign diagnosis. CT scans with iodine maps (CTIMs) and conventional CT scans (CCTs) subgroups were compared using χ2 testing. RESULTS In all, 3,221 abdominopelvic CT scans of 2,401 patients (1,326 men, 1,075 women, mean age 54.1 years) were analyzed; 1,423 were CTIMs and 1,798 were CCTs. Follow-up recommendation rates were not significantly different for CTIMs and CCTs (19.5% and 21.4%, respectively, P = .19). Follow-up recommendations because of incomplete diagnosis were significantly lower in CTIMs (9.1%) than in CCTs (11.9%, P = .01). Follow-up recommendations for MRI and PET/CT were significantly lower in CTIMs (9.6%) than CCTs (13.0%, P = .003). Follow-up MRI outcomes (n = 111) were not different between CTIMs (61.2% benign) and CCTs (59.6%, P = .87). CONCLUSION Dual-energy CT iodine maps are associated with decreased follow-up examinations because of incomplete diagnosis and decreased recommendations for follow-up MRI, suggesting that abdominopelvic iodine maps may benefit patient care and decrease institutional cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah E Atwi
- Department of Radiology, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Carl F Sabottke
- School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - David M Pitre
- School of Medicine, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - David L Smith
- Department of Radiology, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Raman Danrad
- Clinical Director of MRI, Academic Director of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Radiology, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Ekta Dharaiya
- Head of CT Clinical Marketing, Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- Medical Director, Martha's Vineyard Hospital Imaging, Chief of CT, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Director, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment; Associate Chair, Integrated Imaging & Imaging Sciences, MGH Radiology; Executive Director, Clinical Enterprise Integration, Mass General Brigham (MGB) Radiology; Associate Professor of Radiology Harvard Medical School; Radiologist, Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aran M Toshav
- Program Director of the diagnostic residency, Department of Radiology, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Patel MD, Ascher SM, Horrow MM, Pickhardt PJ, Poder L, Goldman M, Berland LL, Pandharipande PV, Maturen KE. Management of Incidental Adnexal Findings on CT and MRI: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:248-254. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
23
|
Tramontano AC, Chen Y, Watson TR, Eckel A, Sheehan DF, Peters MLB, Pandharipande PV, Hur C, Kong CY. Pancreatic cancer treatment costs, including patient liability, by phase of care and treatment modality, 2000-2013. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e18082. [PMID: 31804317 PMCID: PMC6919520 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Our study provides phase-specific cost estimates for pancreatic cancer based on stage and treatment. We compare treatment costs between the different phases and within the stage and treatment modality subgroups. METHODS Our cohort included 20,917 pancreatic cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database diagnosed between 2000 and 2011. We allocated costs into four phases of care-staging (or surgery), initial, continuing, and terminal- and calculated the total, cancer-attributable, and patient-liability costs in 2018 US dollars. We fit linear regression models using log transformation to determine whether costs were predicted by age and calendar year. RESULTS Monthly cost estimates were high during the staging and surgery phases, decreased over the initial and continuing phases, and increased during the three-month terminal phase. Overall, the linear regression models showed that cancer-attributable costs either remained stable or increased by year, and either were unaffected by age or decreased with older age; continuing phase costs for stage II patients increased with age. CONCLUSIONS Our estimates demonstrate that pancreatic cancer costs can vary widely by stage and treatment received. These cost estimates can serve as an important baseline foundation to guide resource allocation for cancer care and research in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yufan Chen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Tina R. Watson
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Deirdre F. Sheehan
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Linton B. Peters
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Pari V. Pandharipande
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Chin Hur
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, NY
| | - Chung Yin Kong
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ferrone C, Goyal L, Qadan M, Gervais D, Sahani DV, Zhu AX, Hong TS, Blaszkowsky LS, Tanabe KK, Vangel M, Amorim BJ, Wo JY, Mahmood U, Pandharipande PV, Catana C, Duenas VP, Collazo YQ, Canamaque LG, Domachevsky L, Bernstine HH, Groshar D, Shih TTF, Li Y, Herrmann K, Umutlu L, Rosen BR, Catalano OA. Management implications of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance in untreated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:1871-1884. [PMID: 31705172 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04558-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is associated with a poor prognosis with surgical resection offering the best chance for long-term survival and potential cure. However, in up to 36% of patients who undergo surgery, more extensive disease is found at time of operation requiring cancellation of surgery. PET/MR is a novel hybrid technology that might improve local and whole-body staging in ICC patients, potentially influencing clinical management. This study was aimed to investigate the possible management implications of PET/MR, relative to conventional imaging, in patients affected by untreated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS Retrospective review of the clinicopathologic features of 37 patients with iCCC, who underwent PET/MR between September 2015 and August 2018, was performed to investigate the management implications that PET/MR had exerted on the affected patients, relative to conventional imaging. RESULTS Of the 37 patients enrolled, median age 63.5 years, 20 (54%) were female. The same day PET/CT was performed in 26 patients. All patients were iCCC-treatment-naïve. Conventional imaging obtained as part of routine clinical care demonstrated early-stage resectable disease for 15 patients and advanced stage disease beyond the scope of surgical resection for 22. PET/MR modified the clinical management of 11/37 (29.7%) patients: for 5 patients (13.5%), the operation was cancelled due to identification of additional disease, while 4 "inoperable" patients (10.8%) underwent an operation. An additional 2 patients (5.4%) had a significant change in their operative plan based on PET/MR. CONCLUSIONS When compared with standard imaging, PET/MR significantly influenced the treatment plan in 29.7% of patients with iCCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION 2018P001334.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Debra Gervais
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Department of Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Department of Oncology, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 2114 Washington St., Newton, MA, 02462, USA
| | - Kenneth K Tanabe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Mark Vangel
- Department of Biostatics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Barbara J Amorim
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Umar Mahmood
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ciprian Catana
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Virginia P Duenas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Avda Carlos V 70, 28938, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda Q Collazo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Avda Carlos V 70, 28938, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lina G Canamaque
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Hospital HM Puerta del Sur, Avda Carlos V 70, 28938, Madrid, Spain
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, HaBarzel St. 20, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Hanna H Bernstine
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, HaBarzel St. 20, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - David Groshar
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Assuta Medical Center, HaBarzel St. 20, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Tiffany Tsing-Fang Shih
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Rd., Taipei, 10016, Taiwan
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Radiology, Universitatsklinikum, Essen University, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitatsklinikum, Essen University, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Radiology, Universitatsklinikum, Essen University, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, WHT 270, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA, 02114, USA. .,Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 13th, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA. .,Department of Radiology, University of Naples "Parthenope", Via Acton 38, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li X, Thrall JH, Digumarthy SR, Kalra MK, Pandharipande PV, Zhang B, Nitiwarangkul C, Singh R, Khera RD, Li Q. Deep learning-enabled system for rapid pneumothorax screening on chest CT. Eur J Radiol 2019; 120:108692. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
26
|
Lietz AP, Weaver DT, Melamed A, Rauh-Hain JA, Wright JD, Wright AA, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Potential survival benefits from optimized chemotherapy implementation in advanced ovarian cancer: Projections from a microsimulation model. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222828. [PMID: 31539415 PMCID: PMC6754166 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed in advanced stages, when survival is poor. Treatment advances have been made, but are inconsistently implemented. Our purpose was to project the maximum life expectancy gains that could be achieved in women with stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer if the implementation of available chemotherapy regimens could be optimized. METHODS We used a microsimulation model to estimate life expectancy benefits associated with "optimized" implementation of four post-operative chemotherapy options: standard intravenous chemotherapy; intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy; bevacizumab + intravenous chemotherapy; and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy + intravenous chemotherapy. Optimized implementation was defined as follows. Patients triaged to primary cytoreductive surgery received intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy if optimally or completely cytoreduced, and bevacizumab + intravenous chemotherapy if suboptimally cytoreduced. Patients triaged to neoadjuvant chemotherapy received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at interval cytoreductive surgery if optimally or completely cytoreduced, and standard IV chemotherapy if suboptimally cytoreduced. Life expectancy associated with optimized implementation was compared with that of current utilization practices, estimated using published literature and the National Cancer Database. Effects of model uncertainty were evaluated in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS Life expectancy associated with optimized implementation vs. current practice was 76.7 vs. 64.5 months (life expectancy gain = 12.2 months). Providing intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy to all eligible patients was the largest driver of life expectancy gains, due to both the potential benefit conferred by intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy and the proportion of eligible women who do not receive intraperitoneal + intravenous chemotherapy in current practice. CONCLUSION Population-level life expectancy in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer could be substantially improved through greater uptake of available chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna P. Lietz
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Davis T. Weaver
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX, United States of America
| | - Jason D. Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Alexi A. Wright
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Amy B. Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Pari V. Pandharipande
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kang SK, Reinhold C, Atri M, Benson CB, Bhosale PR, Jhingran A, Lakhman Y, Maturen KE, Nicola R, Pandharipande PV, Salazar GM, Shipp TD, Simpson L, Small W, Sussman BL, Uyeda JW, Wall DJ, Whitcomb BP, Zelop CM, Glanc P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Staging and Follow-Up of Ovarian Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 15:S198-S207. [PMID: 29724422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In the management of epithelial ovarian cancers, imaging is used for cancer detection and staging, both before and after initial treatment. The decision of whether to pursue initial cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer depends in part on accurate staging. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis (and chest where indicated) is the current imaging modality of choice for the initial staging evaluation of ovarian cancer. Fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET/CT and MRI may be appropriate for problem-solving purposes, particularly when lesions are present on CT but considered indeterminate. In patients who achieve remission, clinical suspicion for relapse after treatment prompts imaging evaluation for recurrence. Contrast-enhanced CT is the modality of choice to assess the extent of recurrent disease, and fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET/CT is also usually appropriate, as small metastatic foci may be identified. If imaging or clinical examination confirms a recurrence, the extent of disease and timing of disease recurrence then determines the choice of treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stella K Kang
- Principal Author, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York.
| | | | - Mostafa Atri
- Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Anuja Jhingran
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yulia Lakhman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Refky Nicola
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | | | | | - Thomas D Shipp
- Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | - Lynn Simpson
- Columbia University, New York, New York; American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | - William Small
- Stritch School of Medicine Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Betsy L Sussman
- The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | | | | | - Bradford P Whitcomb
- Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii; Society of Gynecologic Oncology
| | - Carolyn M Zelop
- Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, and NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York; American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
| | - Phyllis Glanc
- Specialty Chair, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Bayview Campus, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kang SK, Huang WC, Elkin EB, Pandharipande PV, Braithwaite RS. Personalized Treatment for Small Renal Tumors: Decision Analysis of Competing Causes of Mortality. Radiology 2019; 290:732-743. [PMID: 30644815 PMCID: PMC6394736 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To compare the effectiveness of personalized treatment for small (≤4 cm) renal tumors versus routine partial nephrectomy (PN), accounting for various competing causes of mortality. Materials and Methods A state-transition microsimulation model was constructed to compare life expectancy of management strategies for small renal tumors by using 1 000 000 simulations in the following ways: routine PN or personalized treatment involving percutaneous ablation for risk factors for worsening chronic kidney disease (CKD), and otherwise PN; biopsy, with triage of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to PN or ablation depending on risk factors for worsening CKD; active surveillance for growth; and active surveillance when MRI findings are indicative of papillary RCC. Transition probabilities were incorporated from the literature. Effects of parameter variability were assessed in sensitivity analysis. Results In patients of all ages with normal renal function, routine PN yielded the longest life expectancy (eg, 0.67 years in 65-year-old men with nephrometry score [NS] of 4). Otherwise, personalized strategies extended life expectancy versus routine PN: in CKD stages 2 or 3a, moderate or high NS, and no comorbidities, MRI guidance for active surveillance extended life expectancy (eg, 2.60 years for MRI vs PN in CKD 3a, NS 10); and with Charlson comorbidity index of 1 or more, biopsy or active surveillance for growth extended life expectancy (eg, 2.70 years for surveillance for growth in CKD 3a, NS 10). CKD 3b was most effectively managed by using MRI to help predict papillary RCC for surveillance. Conclusion For patients with chronic kidney disease and small renal tumors, personalized treatment selection likely extends life expectancy. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella K. Kang
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K.), Population Health (S.K.K., R.S.B.), Urology (W.C.H.), and Medicine (R.S.B.), NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (E.B.E.); and Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - William C. Huang
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K.), Population Health (S.K.K., R.S.B.), Urology (W.C.H.), and Medicine (R.S.B.), NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (E.B.E.); and Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Elena B. Elkin
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K.), Population Health (S.K.K., R.S.B.), Urology (W.C.H.), and Medicine (R.S.B.), NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (E.B.E.); and Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Pari V. Pandharipande
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K.), Population Health (S.K.K., R.S.B.), Urology (W.C.H.), and Medicine (R.S.B.), NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (E.B.E.); and Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - R. Scott Braithwaite
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K.), Population Health (S.K.K., R.S.B.), Urology (W.C.H.), and Medicine (R.S.B.), NYU School of Medicine, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (E.B.E.); and Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Criss SD, Weaver DT, Sheehan DF, Lee RJ, Pandharipande PV, Kong CY. Effect of PD-L1 testing on the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:180.e11-180.e18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
30
|
Chen Q, Larochelle MR, Weaver DT, Lietz AP, Mueller PP, Mercaldo S, Wakeman SE, Freedberg KA, Raphel TJ, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV, Chhatwal J. Prevention of Prescription Opioid Misuse and Projected Overdose Deaths in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e187621. [PMID: 30707224 PMCID: PMC6415966 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Deaths due to opioid overdose have tripled in the last decade. Efforts to curb this trend have focused on restricting the prescription opioid supply; however, the near-term effects of such efforts are unknown. OBJECTIVE To project effects of interventions to lower prescription opioid misuse on opioid overdose deaths from 2016 to 2025. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This system dynamics (mathematical) model of the US opioid epidemic projected outcomes of simulated individuals who engage in nonmedical prescription or illicit opioid use from 2016 to 2025. The analysis was performed in 2018 by retrospectively calibrating the model from 2002 to 2015 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. INTERVENTIONS Comparison of interventions that would lower the incidence of prescription opioid misuse from 2016 to 2025 based on historical trends (a 7.5% reduction per year) and 50% faster than historical trends (an 11.3% reduction per year), vs a circumstance in which the incidence of misuse remained constant after 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Opioid overdose deaths from prescription and illicit opioids from 2016 to 2025 under each intervention. RESULTS Under the status quo, the annual number of opioid overdose deaths is projected to increase from 33 100 in 2015 to 81 700 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 63 600-101 700) in 2025 (a 147% increase from 2015). From 2016 to 2025, 700 400 (95% UI, 590 200-817 100) individuals in the United States are projected to die from opioid overdose, with 80% of the deaths attributable to illicit opioids. The number of individuals using illicit opioids is projected to increase by 61%-from 0.93 million (95% UI, 0.83-1.03 million) in 2015 to 1.50 million (95% UI, 0.98-2.22 million) by 2025. Across all interventions tested, further lowering the incidence of prescription opioid misuse from 2015 levels is projected to decrease overdose deaths by only 3.0% to 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study's findings suggest that interventions targeting prescription opioid misuse such as prescription monitoring programs may have a modest effect, at best, on the number of opioid overdose deaths in the near future. Additional policy interventions are urgently needed to change the course of the epidemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiushi Chen
- Harold and Inge Marcus Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marc R. Larochelle
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Davis T. Weaver
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Anna P. Lietz
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Peter P. Mueller
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Mercaldo
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah E. Wakeman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Kenneth A. Freedberg
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Amy B. Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pari V. Pandharipande
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jagpreet Chhatwal
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wang GX, Baggett TP, Pandharipande PV, Park ER, Percac-Lima S, Shepard JAO, Fintelmann FJ, Flores EJ. Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Engagement from the Patient and Provider Perspective. Radiology 2019; 290:278-287. [PMID: 30620258 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT reduces mortality among high-risk current and former smokers and has been covered by public and private insurers without cost sharing since 2015. Patients and referring providers confront numerous barriers to participation in screening. To best serve in multidisciplinary efforts to expand LCS nationwide, radiologists must be knowledgeable of these challenges. A better understanding of the difficulties confronted by other stakeholders will help radiologists continue to collaboratively guide the growth of LCS programs in their communities. This article reviews barriers to participation in LCS for patients and referring providers, as well as possible solutions and interventions currently underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary X Wang
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Travis P Baggett
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Elyse R Park
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Jo-Anne O Shepard
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Florian J Fintelmann
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Efren J Flores
- From the Department of Radiology (G.X.W., P.V.P., J.O.S., F.J.F., E.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine (T.P.B., S.P.L.), and Department of Psychiatry (E.R.P.), Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Founders 202, Boston, MA 02114; and Institute for Technology Assessment (P.V.P.), Mongan Institute Health Policy Center (E.R.P.), and Tobacco Research and Treatment Center (E.R.P., T.P.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Peters MLB, Eckel A, Mueller PP, Tramontano AC, Weaver DT, Lietz A, Hur C, Kong CY, Pandharipande PV. Progression to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: Results of a simulation model. Pancreatology 2018; 18:928-934. [PMID: 30143405 PMCID: PMC9201992 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To gain insight into the natural history and carcinogenesis pathway of Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PanIN) lesions by building a calibrated simulation model of PanIN progression to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) METHODS: We revised a previously validated simulation model of solid PDAC, calibrating the model to fit data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and published literature on PanIN prevalence by age. We estimated the likelihood of progression from PanIN states (1, 2, and 3) to PDAC and the time between PanIN onset and PDAC (dwell time). We evaluated a hypothetical intervention to test for and treat PanIN 3 lesions to estimate the potential benefits from PanIN detection. RESULTS We estimated the lifetime probability of progressing from PanIN 1 to PDAC to be 1.5% (men), 1.3% (women). Progression from PanIN 1 to PDAC took 33.6 years and 35.3 years, respectively, and from PanIN 3 to PDAC took 11.3 years and 12.3 years. A hypothetical test for PanIN 3 detection and treatment could provide a maximum, average life expectancy gain of 40 days. CONCLUSIONS Our modeling analysis estimates PanINs have a relatively indolent course to PDAC, supporting the feasibility of potential future early detection strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Linton B Peters
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, USA,Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA,Corresponding author. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Shapiro 9, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. (M.L.B. Peters)
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Peter P. Mueller
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | | | - Davis T. Weaver
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Anna Lietz
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Chin Hur
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Chung Yin Kong
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Neal CD, Weaver DT, Raphel TJ, Lietz AP, Flores EJ, Percac-Lima S, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Patient Navigation to Improve Cancer Screening in Underserved Populations: Reported Experiences, Opportunities, and Challenges. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:1565-1572. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
34
|
Royce TJ, Feldman AS, Mossanen M, Yang JC, Shipley WU, Pandharipande PV, Efstathiou JA. Comparative Effectiveness of Bladder-preserving Tri-modality Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 17:23-31.e3. [PMID: 30482661 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are limited randomized data comparing radical cystectomy (RC) with bladder-sparing tri-modality therapy (TMT) in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Both strategies are thought to have similar survival outcomes with different morbidity profiles. We compare the effectiveness of TMT and RC using decision-analytic modeling and the endpoint of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Using a Markov model, we simulated the lifetime outcomes after TMT versus RC ± neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 67-year-old patients with clinical stage T2-T4aN0M0 MIBC. Model probabilities and utilities were extracted from the literature. The incremental effectiveness was reported in QALYs and sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS For all patients with MIBC, although the model showed identical survival, TMT was the most effective strategy with an incremental gain of 0.59 QALYs over RC (7.83 vs. 7.24 QALYs, respectively). When limiting the model to favorable, contemporary cohorts in both the TMT and RC strategies, TMT remained more effective with an incremental gain of 1.61 QALYs (9.37 vs. 7.76 QALYs, respectively). One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated the model was sensitive to the quality of life parameters (ie, the utilities) for RC and TMT. When testing the 95% confidence interval of the RC utility parameter the model demonstrated an incremental gain with TMT from -0.54 to 4.23 QALYs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that TMT was more effective than RC for 63% of model iterations. CONCLUSIONS This modeling study found that treatment of MIBC with organ-sparing TMT in appropriately-selected patients may result in a gain of QALYs relative to RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trevor J Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Adam S Feldman
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joanna C Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - William U Shipley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Johnson PT, Bello JA, Chatfield MB, Flug JA, Pandharipande PV, Rohatgi S, Fishman EK, Megibow AJ. New ACR Choosing Wisely Recommendations: Judicious Use of Multiphase Abdominal CT Protocols. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 16:56-60. [PMID: 30219345 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela T Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Jacqueline A Bello
- Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | | | | | | | - Saurabh Rohatgi
- Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Choy G, Khalilzadeh O, Michalski M, Do S, Samir AE, Pianykh OS, Geis JR, Pandharipande PV, Brink JA, Dreyer KJ. Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology. Radiology 2018; 288:318-328. [PMID: 29944078 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 423] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recent advances and future perspectives of machine learning techniques offer promising applications in medical imaging. Machine learning has the potential to improve different steps of the radiology workflow including order scheduling and triage, clinical decision support systems, detection and interpretation of findings, postprocessing and dose estimation, examination quality control, and radiology reporting. In this article, the authors review examples of current applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence techniques in diagnostic radiology. In addition, the future impact and natural extension of these techniques in radiology practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garry Choy
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - Omid Khalilzadeh
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - Mark Michalski
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - Synho Do
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - Anthony E Samir
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - Oleg S Pianykh
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - J Raymond Geis
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - James A Brink
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| | - Keith J Dreyer
- From the Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, Mass 02114 (G.C., O.K., M.M., S.D., A.E.S., O.S.P., P.V.P., J.A.B., K.J.D.); and Department of Radiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo (J.R.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Munden RF, Carter BW, Chiles C, MacMahon H, Black WC, Ko JP, McAdams HP, Rossi SE, Leung AN, Boiselle PM, Kent MS, Brown K, Dyer DS, Hartman TE, Goodman EM, Naidich DP, Kazerooni EA, Berland LL, Pandharipande PV. Managing Incidental Findings on Thoracic CT: Mediastinal and Cardiovascular Findings. A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:1087-1096. [PMID: 29941240 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The ACR Incidental Findings Committee presents recommendations for managing incidentally detected mediastinal and cardiovascular findings found on CT. The Chest Subcommittee was composed of thoracic radiologists who developed the provided guidance. These recommendations represent a combination of current published evidence and expert opinion and were finalized by informal iterative consensus. The recommendations address the most commonly encountered mediastinal and cardiovascular incidental findings and are not intended to be a comprehensive review of all incidental findings associated with these compartments. Our goal is to improve the quality of care by providing guidance on how to manage incidentally detected thoracic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald F Munden
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
| | - Brett W Carter
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Caroline Chiles
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - William C Black
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Jane P Ko
- NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Ann N Leung
- Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Phillip M Boiselle
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida
| | - Michael S Kent
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathleen Brown
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - Eric M Goodman
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, New York
| | | | | | - Lincoln L Berland
- Professor Emeritus, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Raphel TJ, Weaver DT, Berland LL, Herts BR, Megibow AJ, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Imaging Follow-up of Low-Risk Incidental Pancreas and Kidney Findings: Effects of Patient Age and Comorbidity on Projected Life Expectancy. Radiology 2018; 287:504-514. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018171701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tiana J. Raphel
- From the Department of Radiology (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.) and Institute for Technology Assessment (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (L.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.J.M.)
| | - Davis T. Weaver
- From the Department of Radiology (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.) and Institute for Technology Assessment (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (L.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.J.M.)
| | - Lincoln L. Berland
- From the Department of Radiology (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.) and Institute for Technology Assessment (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (L.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.J.M.)
| | - Brian R. Herts
- From the Department of Radiology (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.) and Institute for Technology Assessment (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (L.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.J.M.)
| | - Alec J. Megibow
- From the Department of Radiology (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.) and Institute for Technology Assessment (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (L.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.J.M.)
| | - Amy B. Knudsen
- From the Department of Radiology (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.) and Institute for Technology Assessment (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (L.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.J.M.)
| | - Pari V. Pandharipande
- From the Department of Radiology (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.) and Institute for Technology Assessment (T.J.R., D.T.W., A.B.K., P.V.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (L.L.B.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (B.R.H.); and Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY (A.J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Weaver DT, Raphel TJ, Melamed A, Rauh-Hain JA, Schorge JO, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Modeling treatment outcomes for patients with advanced ovarian cancer: Projected benefits of a test to optimize treatment selection. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:256-262. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Besa C, Lewis S, Pandharipande PV, Chhatwal J, Kamath A, Cooper N, Knight-Greenfield A, Babb JS, Boffetta P, Padron N, Sirlin CB, Taouli B. Erratum to: Hepatocellular carcinoma detection: diagnostic performance of a simulated abbreviated MRI protocol combining diffusion-weighted and T1-weighted imaging at the delayed phase post gadoxetic acid. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:760. [PMID: 28755071 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1256-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Besa
- Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Sara Lewis
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jagpreet Chhatwal
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amita Kamath
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Nancy Cooper
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Ashley Knight-Greenfield
- Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - James S Babb
- Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paolo Boffetta
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Norma Padron
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Bachir Taouli
- Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Megibow AJ, Baker ME, Morgan DE, Kamel IR, Sahani DV, Newman E, Brugge WR, Berland LL, Pandharipande PV. Author's Reply. J Am Coll Radiol 2018; 15:591-593. [PMID: 29483047 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alec J Megibow
- NYU-Langone Medical Center, Department of Radiology, NYU Radiology Associates, 530 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10016.
| | - Mark E Baker
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Desiree E Morgan
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Ihab R Kamel
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elliot Newman
- Department of Surgery, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - William R Brugge
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Gastroenterology, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Lincoln L Berland
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pahade JK, Trout AT, Zhang B, Bhambhvani P, Muse VV, Delaney LR, Zucker EJ, Pandharipande PV, Brink JA, Goske MJ. What Patients Want to Know about Imaging Examinations: A Multiinstitutional U.S. Survey in Adult and Pediatric Teaching Hospitals on Patient Preferences for Receiving Information before Radiologic Examinations. Radiology 2018; 287:554-562. [PMID: 29436946 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To identify what information patients and parents or caregivers found useful before an imaging examination, from whom they preferred to receive information, and how those preferences related to patient-specific variables including demographics and prior radiologic examinations. Materials and Methods A 24-item survey was distributed at three pediatric and three adult hospitals between January and May 2015. The χ2 or Fisher exact test (categorical variables) and one-way analysis of variance or two-sample t test (continuous variables) were used for comparisons. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine associations between responses and demographics. Results Of 1742 surveys, 1542 (89%) were returned (381 partial, 1161 completed). Mean respondent age was 46.2 years ± 16.8 (standard deviation), with respondents more frequently female (1025 of 1506, 68%) and Caucasian (1132 of 1504, 75%). Overall, 78% (1117 of 1438) reported receiving information about their examination most commonly from the ordering provider (824 of 1292, 64%), who was also the most preferred source (1005 of 1388, 72%). Scheduled magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or nuclear medicine examinations (P < .001 vs other examination types) and increasing education (P = .008) were associated with higher rates of receiving information. Half of respondents (757 of 1452, 52%) sought information themselves. The highest importance scores for pre-examination information (Likert scale ≥4) was most frequently assigned to information on examination preparation and least frequently assigned to whether an alternative radiation-free examination could be used (74% vs 54%; P < .001). Conclusion Delivery of pre-examination information for radiologic examinations is suboptimal, with half of all patients and caregivers seeking information on their own. Ordering providers are the predominant and preferred source of examination-related information, with respondents placing highest importance on information related to examination preparation. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay K Pahade
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Andrew T Trout
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Bin Zhang
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Pradeep Bhambhvani
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Victorine V Muse
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Lisa R Delaney
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Evan J Zucker
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - James A Brink
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| | - Marilyn J Goske
- From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, Conn 06520 (J.K.P.); Department of Radiology (A.T.T., M.J.G.) and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.Z.), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala (P.B.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (V.V.M., J.A.B.); Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, Ind (L.R.D.); Department of Radiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (E.J.Z.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Mass (P.V.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pandharipande PV, Lowry KP, Reinhold C, Atri M, Benson CB, Bhosale PR, Green ED, Kang SK, Lakhman Y, Maturen KE, Nicola R, Salazar GM, Shipp TD, Simpson L, Sussman BL, Uyeda J, Wall DJ, Whitcomb B, Zelop CM, Glanc P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Ovarian Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:S490-S499. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
44
|
Gore RM, Pickhardt PJ, Mortele KJ, Fishman EK, Horowitz JM, Fimmel CJ, Talamonti MS, Berland LL, Pandharipande PV. Management of Incidental Liver Lesions on CT: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:1429-1437. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
45
|
Pandharipande PV, Herts BR, Gore RM, Mayo-Smith WW, Harvey HB, Megibow AJ, Berland LL. Authors' Reply. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 13:1025-7. [PMID: 27593092 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.06.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2016] [Revised: 06/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pari V Pandharipande
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology and Institute for Technology Assessment, 101 Merrimac Street, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114.
| | - Brian R Herts
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Richard M Gore
- Department of Radiology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois
| | | | - H Benjamin Harvey
- Department of Radiology and Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alec J Megibow
- Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Lincoln L Berland
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Berland LL, Pandharipande PV. Comment on “Time for Action: Striking Unexpected and Incidental From Our Lexicon”. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:1266. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
47
|
Alkasab TK, Bizzo BC, Berland LL, Nair S, Pandharipande PV, Harvey HB. Creation of an Open Framework for Point-of-Care Computer-Assisted Reporting and Decision Support Tools for Radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Elkan F Halpern
- From the Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- From the Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, 101 Merrimac St, 10th Floor, Boston, MA 02114
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Megibow AJ, Baker ME, Morgan DE, Kamel IR, Sahani DV, Newman E, Brugge WR, Berland LL, Pandharipande PV. Management of Incidental Pancreatic Cysts: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:911-923. [PMID: 28533111 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The ACR Incidental Findings Committee (IFC) presents recommendations for managing pancreatic cysts that are incidentally detected on CT or MRI. These recommendations represent an update from the pancreatic component of the JACR 2010 white paper on managing incidental findings in the adrenal glands, kidneys, liver, and pancreas. The Pancreas Subcommittee-which included abdominal radiologists, a gastroenterologist, and a pancreatic surgeon-developed this algorithm. The recommendations draw from published evidence and expert opinion, and were finalized by informal iterative consensus. Algorithm branches successively categorize pancreatic cysts based on patient characteristics and imaging features. They terminate with an ascertainment of benignity and/or indolence (sufficient to discontinue follow-up), or a management recommendation. The algorithm addresses most, but not all, pathologies and clinical scenarios. Our goal is to improve quality of care by providing guidance on how to manage incidentally detected pancreatic cysts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alec J Megibow
- Department of Radiology, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
| | - Mark E Baker
- Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Desiree E Morgan
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Ihab R Kamel
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elliot Newman
- Department of Surgery, NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - William R Brugge
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lincoln L Berland
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kang SK, Lee CI, Pandharipande PV, Sanelli PC, Recht MP. Residents' Introduction to Comparative Effectiveness Research and Big Data Analytics. J Am Coll Radiol 2017; 14:534-536. [PMID: 28139415 PMCID: PMC5507669 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stella K Kang
- Department of Radiology and the Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York.
| | - Christoph I Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; and the Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and Massachusetts General Hospital, Institute for Technology Assessment, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pina C Sanelli
- Department of Radiology, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Michael P Recht
- Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|