Completion total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and local excision for rectal cancer

AIM

Local excision (LE) in selected cases after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) for locally advanced rectal cancer in clinically complete or major responders has been recently reported as an alternative to standard radical resection. Completion total mesorectal excision (cTME) is generally performed when high-risk pathological features are found in LE surgical specimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of residual tumour and lymph node metastases after cTME in patients previously treated by RCT + LE. The secondary aims were to quantify the rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality and to evaluate the long-term oncological outcome of this group of patients.

METHODS

All patients treated from 2007 to 2020 by LE for locally advanced rectal cancer with a clinically complete or major response to RCT who had a subsequent cTME for high-risk pathological factors (ypT >1 and/or TRG >2 and/or positive margins) were included in this multicentre retrospective study. Pathological data, postoperative short-term morbidity (classified according to Clavien-Dindo) and mortality and oncological long-term outcome after cTME were recorded in a database. Statistical analysis was performed using Wizard for iOS version 1.9.31.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The rate of R0 resection was 95.7%, and a sphincter-saving procedure was performed in 37 patients (78.7%), with a protective stoma rate of 78.4%. In 28 cases (59.6%), it was possible to perform a minimally invasive approach. A residual tumour (pT and/or pN) on cTME specimens was found in 21 cases (44.7%). The rate of lymph node metastases was 12.8%. The overall short-term (within 30 days) postoperative morbidity was 34%, but grade >2 postoperative complications occurred in only nine patients (19.1%), with a reoperation rate of 6.4%. No short-term postoperative deaths occurred. At a median follow-up of 57 months (range: 21-174), the long-term stoma-free rate was 70.2%, and the actuarial 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) were 86.7%, 88.9% and 95.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

When patients exhibit high-risk pathological factors after RCT + LE, cTME should be suggested due to the high risk of residual tumour or lymph node involvement (44.7%). The results after cTME in terms of the rate of R0 resection, sphincter-saving procedure, postoperative morbidity and mortality and long-term oncological outcome seem to be acceptable and do not represent a contraindication to use LE as a first-step treatment in patients with major or complete clinical response after RCT.

The COVID - AGICT study: COVID-19 and advanced gastro-intestinal cancer surgical treatment. A multicentric Italian study on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impact on gastro-intestinal cancers surgical treatment during the 2020. Analysis of perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

This Italian multicentric retrospective study aimed to investigate the possible changes in outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

Our primary endpoint was to determine whether the pandemic scenario increased the rate of patients with colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers resected at an advanced stage in 2020 compared to 2019. Considering different cancer staging systems, we divided tumors into early stages and advanced stages, using pathological outcomes. Furthermore, to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical outcomes, perioperative data of both 2020 and 2019 were also examined.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 8250 patients, 4370 (53%) and 3880 (47%) were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 respectively, in 62 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (P = 0.25). Nevertheless, the analysis of quarters revealed that in the second half of 2020 the rate of advanced cancer resected, tented to be higher compared with the same months of 2019 (P = 0.05). During the pandemic year 'Charlson Comorbidity Index score of cancer patients (5.38 ± 2.08 vs 5.28 ± 2.22, P = 0.036), neoadjuvant treatments (23.9% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), rate of urgent diagnosis (24.2% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001), colorectal cancer urgent resection (9.4% vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and the rate of positive nodes on the total nodes resected per surgery increased significantly (7 vs 9% - 2.02 ± 4.21 vs 2.39 ± 5.23, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not influence the pathological stage of colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers at the time of surgery, our study revealed that the pandemic scenario negatively impacted on several perioperative and post-operative outcomes.

Long-term outcomes in ypT0 rectal cancers: An international multi-centric investigation on behalf of Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Young Board (YSICO)

AIM

To investigate the outcome and pattern of survivals of rectal cancer patients presenting a complete or nearly complete tumor response after neo-adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

Young surgeons <40 years old affiliated to the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (YSICO) from 13 referral centers for colorectal cancer treatment, were invited to participate a retrospective study. Records from patients treated from 2005 to 2015 with a pathological diagnosis of ypT0/ypTis were retrieved and pooled in a common data-base for statistical purposes. All clinical and pathological variables were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted with the end-point of survivals.

RESULTS

Two hundreds and sixty-one patients were analyzed including 237 ypT0 and 24 ypTis. Nodal positive patients were 8.7%. More than sixty-six percent of the patients did not perform adjuvant chemotherapy, with a statistical difference comparing N0 versus N+ patients (66.8% vs 40.9%, p 0.02). Mean follow-up was of 47.6 months. Twenty-two relapses were observed, 91.6% at a distant site. The mean time to recurrence was of 35.3 months. On univariate analysis, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy correlated with better OS exclusively in ypT0N + patients and not in ypT0N0. Univariate and multivariate analyses documented nodal positivity as the only prognostic factor correlated with a worse OS.

CONCLUSION

Recurrences were mostly diagnosed at a distant site and within the third year of follow-up. Nodal positivity was the only variable independently correlated with a worse OS. Univariate analysis documented a benefit for the use of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment exclusively in ypT0N + rectal cancers.

Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: why, how and when

Down-to-up total mesorectal excision (TME) or transanal TME (taTME) has gained worldwide popularity. taTME is one of the most promising innovations of the last years in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Due to the better view of the dissection planes even in difficult patients (i.e., narrow pelvis or low rectal cancer), taTME seems to achieve both better TME quality reducing the rate of incomplete TME and lower rates of positive circumferential resection margins. taTME has overall morbidity and anastomotic leak rates comparable with the up-to-down TME. Mid-term results of taTME seems to be comparable with those of the up-to-down approach but definitive conclusions cannot be drawn since the short follow-up and small cohort of patients of the present studies.

Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for cancer located in the lower rectum: short- and mid-term results

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic trans-abdominal total mesorectal excision is technically demanding. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (taTME) is a new technique which seems to provide technical advantages. This study describes the results of taTME in a consecutive series of patients with low rectal cancer.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2013, a consecutive series of 26 patients with low rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic taTME with coloanal anastomosis. cT4 or Type II-III rectal cancer (according to Rullier's classification) were contraindications to taTME. After anal sleeve mucosectomy, the rectal wall was transected at the ano-rectal junction. A single-access multichannel port was inserted in the anal canal. taTME was performed from down to up until the sacral promontory posteriorly and the Pouch of Douglas anteriorly were reached. A laparoscopic trans-abdominal approach was used to complete the left colon mobilization.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (61.5%) were male. The mean distance of the rectal cancer from the anal verge was 4.4 cm (range 3-6). Nineteen patients (73.1%) received long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy. At final pathology, resection margins were negative in all the patients: the mean distal and radial resection margins were 19 mm and 11.2 mm, respectively. TME was complete in 23 patients (88.5%) and nearly complete in three. Postoperative mortality was 3.8%. The overall morbidity rate was 26.9% (7 patients): two patients (7.7%) had an anastomotic leakage (Dindo I-d). After a mean follow up of 23 months, no patients have developed a local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

laparoscopic taTME allow wide resection margins and good quality TME.

Radiofrequency vessel-sealing system versus the clamp-crushing technique in liver transection: results of a prospective randomized study on 100 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Liver transection is considered a critical factor influencing intra-operative blood loss. A increase in the number of complex liver resections has determined a growing interest in new devices able to 'optimize' the liver transection. The aim of this randomized controlled study was to compare a radiofrequency vessel-sealing system with the 'gold-standard' clamp-crushing technique.

METHODS

From January to December 2012, 100 consecutive patients undergoing a liver resection were randomized to the radiofrequency vessel-sealing system (LF1212 group; N = 50) or to the clamp-crushing technique (Kelly group, N = 50).

RESULTS

Background characteristics of the two groups were similar. There were not significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood loss, transection time and transection speed. In spite of a not-significant larger transection area in the LF1212 group compared with the Kelly group (51.5 versus 39 cm(2) , P = 0.116), the overall and 'per cm(2) ' blood losses were similar whereas the transection speed was better (even if not significantly) in the LF1212 group compared with the Kelly group (1.1 cm(2) /min versus 0.8, P = 0.089). Mortality, morbidity and bile leak rates were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiofrequency vessel-sealing system allows a quick and safe liver transection similar to the gold-standard clamp-crushing technique.

Treatment of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC

AIM

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare and locally aggressive tumor with poor prognosis, related in most cases to asbestos exposure. It is increasing in frequency, but currently no standard therapy is available. The biology of this disease is still poorly understood. Several highly specialized centers have recently reported improved survival by means of an innovative local-regional approach. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the survival benefit and the morbidity rate of patients affected by DMPM treated at our institution by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) associated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

This study includes 42 patients affected by DMPM treated by an uniform approach consisting of cytoreductive surgery associated with HIPEC using cisplatin and doxorubicin. The primary end point was overall survival and morbidity rate. The secondary end point was evaluation of prognostic variables for overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 72 months (range 1-235 months). Thirty-five patients (83.3%) presented epithelial tumors and 7 were affected by multicystic mesothelioma. The mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 13. Thirty-eight patients (90.4%) had complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1). The overall morbidity rate was 35.7% associated to a perioperative mortality of 7.1%. Median overall survival rate was 65 months with a 1- and 5-year survival rates of 63% and 44%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of DMPM by CRS+HIPEC in selected patients is a feasible technique that allows to achieve encouraging results in terms of overall survival rate, with an acceptable morbidity rate. Further investigations are needed to clarify the role and the timing of this promising technique.

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer by surgical cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)

AIM

Ovarian cancer may be considered as an "intraperitoneal disease" by itself. When surgical removal associated with systemic chemotherapy fails, usually, the history of the patients is characterized by poor prognosis. Some encouraging results have been reported by the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from ovarian cancer by complete surgical cytoreduction, peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The purpose of this article was to evaluate the survival benefit and the morbidity of patients with ovarian cancer treated at our institution by cytoreductive surgery associated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

Between October 1995 and December 2012 more than 600 operations for PC were performed; in 308 cases surgical cytoreduction associated with HIPEC was carried out. Eighty-five patients treated by cytoreduction associated with HIPEC were affected by recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Statistical analysis was performed on 70 patients (last 15 patients were too recent for evaluation). Two trials were applied: 1) patients presenting first peritoneal relapse after surgery and systemic chemotherapy (CT), 6 months later from last CT administration; 2) multiple relapse patients.

RESULTS

On 70 patients, morbidity and mortality rates were 35.7% and 7.1%, respectively. Overall median survival was 42.0 months, but in primary EOC was 48.0 months and in recurrent EOC was 28 months (P=0.12). Statistical analysis revealed that the completeness of cytoreduction was the most statistically significant factor related to survival: in completely citoreduced patients, overall survival was 48 months.

CONCLUSION

Citoreductive surgery associated to platinum compounds HIPEC is feasible and relatively safe in recurrent and primary PC from ovarian cancer. Better selection of patients and second-look surgery in high risk-patients have to be investigated to improve those encouraging results.

Treatment of pseudomyxoma peritonei with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a single center experience

AIM

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare form of peritoneal carcinomatosis characterized by abnormal quantity of extracellular mucinous material. It almost originates from a primary appendiceal tumor with different malignancy degrees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcome and long-term survival on 80 patients affected by PMP after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) associated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

From October 1995 to June 2012, about 550 operations for PC were performed; in 300 cases surgical cytoreduction in association with HIPEC was carried out. Regarding PMP, 80 procedures of CRS and HIPEC were performed. This approach is based on surgical removal of the primitive cancer, peritonectomy (stripping of implants on the peritoneal surface) and HIPEC performed with cisplatinum and C mytomicin. The rationale of this treatment is to obtain, after macroscopic disease removal, an elevated and persistent drug concentration in the peritoneal cavity, with limited systemic effects.

RESULTS

The complication rate was 52.5% (42/80) with no postoperative deaths. The median overall and progression-free survival were 144 and 88 months, respectively. Not complete cytoreductive surgery (P<0.001), tumor histology (P=0.02) and previous systemic chemotherapy (p = 0.03) were identified in the univariate analysis as independent predictors for a poorer long-term survival. In the multivariate analysis, the completeness of cytoreduction was the only significant variable influencing the outcome. Incomplete cytoreduction (P<0.01) resulted the only statistically significant variable associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

PMP can be treated with curative intent in a large percentage of cases by cytoreductive surgery associated with HIPEC. This new approach could be performed safely with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients treated in specialized centers. Completeness of cytoreduction allows to achieve the best results.

Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colonic cancer by cytoreduction, peritonectomy and HIPEC: preliminary results in highly selected patients

AIM

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is one of the routes of spread of abdominal neoplasms and is generally considered a lethal disease, with a poor prognosis by conventional chemotherapeutic treatments. While systemic chemotherapy has little impact on the treatment of peritoneal disease, some centers have reported encouraging results on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with surgical cytoreduction associated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The purpose of this article is to evaluate the survival benefit and the morbidity in patients affected by colorectal PC treated at our institution by cytoreductive surgery associated with HIPEC.

METHODS

In our institution, from October 1995 to June 2012, about 550 operations for PC were performed; in 300 cases cytoreduction plus HIPEC was carried out. Out of 90 operations for colonic cancer: 50 cytoreduction plus HIPEC, 12 cytoreduction and EPIC (early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy) and 28 debulking or explorative laparoscopies/laparotomies were performed. For the present study, 50 patients who had undergone cytoreduction and HIPEC for PC of colorectal cancer origin (CRC) were considered.

RESULTS

The morbidity and mortality rates were 34% (17/50) and 2% (1/50), respectively. The patients were divided in two groups according to PCI (peritoneal cancer index, range 0-39) and CC score (completeness of cytoreduction): in Group A (23 patients, PCI>16, CC-2) the median survival time was 15 months compared to 48.1 months for Group B (27 patients, PCI≤16, CC-0/1). The poor survival of Group A seemed to be related to higher PCI and CC score.

CONCLUSION

Patient selection based on a maximum PCI of 16 associated with a complete cytoreduction (CC-0) produced encouraging results.