Mapping the location of local and regional recurrences according to breast cancer surgery and radiation therapy: Results from EORTC 22922/10925

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the extent of surgery and radiation therapy (RT) on the rates and sites of local (LR) and regional recurrences (RR) in the EORTC 22922/10925 trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All data were extracted from the trial's individual patients' case report forms (CRF) and analysed with a median follow-up of 15.7 years. Cumulative incidence curves were produced for LR and RR accounting for competing risks: an exploratory analysis of the effect of the extent of surgical and radiation treatments on LR rate was conducted using the Fine & Gray model accounting for competing risks and adjusted for baseline patient and disease characteristics. The significance level was set at 5%, 2-sided. Frequency tables were used to describe the spatial location of LR and RR.

RESULTS

Out of 4004 patients included in the trial, 282 (7%) patients experienced LR and 165 (4.1%) RR, respectively. Cumulative incidence rate of LR at 15 years was lower after mastectomy (3.1%) compared to BCS + RT (7.3%) (F&G: HR (Hazard Ratio) = 0.421, 95%CI = 0.282-0.628, p-value < 0.0001). LR were similar up to 3 years for both mastectomy and BCS but continued to occur at a steady rate for BCS + RT, only. The spatial location of the recurrence was related to the locoregional therapy applied and the absolute gain of RT correlated to stage of disease and extent of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of locoregional therapies impacts significantly on LR and RR rates and spatial location.

A Delphi study and International Consensus Recommendations: The use of bolus in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy for early breast cancer

Bolus serves as a tissue equivalent material that shifts the 95-100% isodose line towards the skin and subcutaneous tissue. The need for bolus for all breast cancer patients planned for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) has been questioned. The work was initiated by the faculty of the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) breast cancer courses and represents a multidisciplinary international breast cancer expert collaboration to optimize PMRT. Due to the lack of randomised trials evaluating the benefits of bolus, we designed a stepwise project to evaluate the existing evidence about the use of bolus in the setting of PMRT to achieve an international consensus for the indications of bolus in PMRT, based on the Delphi method.

Side Effects 15 Years after Lymph Node Irradiation in Breast Cancer: Randomized EORTC Trial 22922/10925

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty about the benefit/risk ratio of regional lymph node irradiation led to varying clinical protocols. We investigated long-term late side effects after internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) lymph node irradiation to improve shared decision-making.

METHODS

The multicentre EORTC trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00002851) randomized stage I-III breast cancer patients with involved axillary nodes and/or a medially located primary tumor. We analyzed late side effects, both longitudinally at every follow-up and cross-sectionally at 5-year intervals. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 2004, 46 departments from 13 countries accrued 4004 patients. Median follow-up was 15.7 years. Longitudinal follow-up data showed cumulative incidence rates at 15 years of 2.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2%-3.8%) vs. 5.7% (95% CI = 4.7%-6.9%) (P<.001) for lung fibrosis, of 1.1% (95% CI = 0.7%-1.7%) vs. 1.9% (95% CI = 1.3%-2.6%) (P=.07) for cardiac fibrosis, and of 9.4% (95% CI = 8.0%-10.8%) vs. 11.1% (95% CI = 9.6%-12.7%) (P=.04) for any cardiac disease, when treated without or with IM-MS lymph node irradiation. There was no evidence for differences between left- and right-sided breast cancer (Wald chi-square test of treatment by breast side interaction, P=.33 and P=.35, for cardiac fibrosis and for any cardiac disease, respectively). The cumulative incidence probabilities of cross-sectionally reported side effects with a score of 2 or greater at 15 years were 0.1% (95% CI = 0.0%-0.5%) vs. 0.8% (95% CI = 0.4%-1.4%) for pulmonary (P=.02), 1.8% (95% CI = 1.1%-2.8%) vs. 2.6% (95% CI = 1.8%-3.7%) for cardiac (P=.15), and 0.0% (95% CI not evaluated) vs. 0.1% (95% CI = 0.0%-0.4%) for oesophageal (P=.16), respectively. No difference was observed in the incidence of second malignancies, contralateral breast cancer or cardiovascular deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of late pulmonary side effects was statistically significantly higher after IM-MS lymph node irradiation, as were some of the cardiac events, without a difference between left- and right-sided treatments. Absolute rates and differences were very low, without increased non-breast cancer related mortality, even before introducing heart-sparing techniques.

Association of Breast Cancer Irradiation With Cardiac Toxic Effects: A Narrative Review

IMPORTANCE

To promptly recognize and manage cardiovascular (CV) risk factors before, during, and after cancer treatment, decreasing the risk of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction is crucial. After recent advances in breast cancer treatment, mortality rates from cancer have decreased, and the prevalence of survivors with a potentially higher CV disease risk has increased. Cardiovascular risks might be associated with the multimodal approach, including systemic therapies and breast radiotherapy (RT).

OBSERVATIONS

The heart disease risk seems to be higher in patients with tumors in the left breast, when other classic CV risk factors are present, and when adjunctive anthracycline-based chemotherapy is administered, suggesting a synergistic association. Respiratory control as well as modern RT techniques and their possible further refinement may decrease the prevalence and severity of radiation-induced heart disease. Several pharmacological cardioprevention strategies for decreasing cardiac toxic effects have been identified in several guidelines. However, further research is needed to ascertain the feasibility of these strategies in routine practice.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This review found that evidence-based recommendations are lacking on the modalities for and intensity of heart disease screening, surveillance of patients after RT, and treatment of these patients. A multidisciplinary and multimodal approach is crucial to guide optimal management.

Internal mammary and medial supraclavicular lymph node chain irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer (EORTC 22922/10925): 15-year results of a randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

10-year results from several studies showed improved disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival, reduced breast cancer-related mortality, and variable effects on overall survival with the addition of partial or comprehensive regional lymph node irradiation after surgery in patients with breast cancer. We present the scheduled 15-year analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22922/10925 trial, which aims to investigate the impact on overall survival of elective internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) irradiation.

METHODS

EORTC 22922/10925, a randomised, phase 3 trial done across 46 radiation oncology departments from 13 countries, included women up to 75 years of age with unilateral, histologically confirmed, stage I-III breast adenocarcinoma with involved axillary nodes or a central or medially located primary tumour. Surgery consisted of mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery and axillary staging. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally using minimisation to receive IM-MS irradiation at 50 Gy in 25 fractions (IM-MS irradiation group) or no IM-MS irradiation (control group). Stratification was done for institution, menopausal status, site of the primary tumour within the breast, type of breast and axillary surgery, and pathological T and N stage. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, breast cancer mortality, any breast cancer recurrence, and cause of death. Follow-up is ongoing for 20 years after randomisation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00002851.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 5, 1996, and Jan 13, 2004, we enrolled 4004 patients, of whom 2002 were randomly assigned to the IM-MS irradiation group and 2002 to the no IM-MS irradiation group. At a median follow-up of 15·7 years (IQR 14·0-17·6), 554 (27·7%) patients in the IM-MS irradiation group and 569 (28·4%) patients in the control group had died. Overall survival was 73·1% (95% CI 71·0-75·2) in the IM-MS irradiation group and 70·9% (68·6-72·9) in the control group (HR 0·95 [95% CI 0·84-1·06], p=0·36). Any breast cancer recurrence (24·5% [95% CI 22·5-26·6] vs 27·1% [25·1-29·2]; HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·77-0·98], p=0·024) and breast cancer mortality (16·0% [14·3-17·7] vs 19·8% [18·0-21·7]; 0·81 [0·70-0·94], p=0·0055) were lower in the IM-MS irradiation group than in the control group. No significant differences in the IM-MS irradiation group versus the control group were seen for disease-free survival (60·8% [95% CI 58·4-63·2] vs 59·9% [57·5-62·2]; HR 0·93 [95% CI 0·84-1·03], p=0·18), or distant metastasis-free survival (70·0% [67·7-72·2] vs 68·2% [65·9-70·3]; 0·93 [0·83-1·04], p=0·18). Causes of death between groups were similar.

INTERPRETATION

The 15-year results show a significant reduction of breast cancer mortality and any breast cancer recurrence by IM-MS irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer. However, this is not converted to improved overall survival.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, and KWF Kankerbestrijding.

Evaluating the Age-Based Recommendations for Long-Term Follow-Up in Breast Cancer

Background

After 5 years of annual follow‐up following breast cancer, Dutch guidelines are age based: annual follow‐up for women <60 years, 60–75 years biennial, and none for >75 years. We determined how the risk of recurrence corresponds to these consensus‐based recommendations and to the risk of primary breast cancer in the general screening population.

Subjects, Materials, and Methods

Women with early‐stage breast cancer in 2003/2005 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 18,568). Cumulative incidence functions were estimated for follow‐up years 5–10 for locoregional recurrences (LRRs) and second primary tumors (SPs). Risks were compared with the screening population without history of breast cancer. Alternative cutoffs for age were determined by log‐rank tests.

Results

The cumulative risk for LRR/SP was lower in women <60 years (5.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3–6.6) who are under annual follow‐up than for women 60–75 (6.3%, 95% CI 5.6–7.1) receiving biennial visits. All risks were higher than the 5‐year risk of a primary tumor in the screening population (ranging from 1.4% to 1.9%). Age cutoffs <50, 50–69, and > 69 revealed better risk differentiation and would provide more risk‐based schedules. Still, other factors, including systemic treatments, had an even greater impact on recurrence risks.

Conclusion

The current consensus‐based recommendations use suboptimal age cutoffs. The proposed alternative cutoffs will lead to a more balanced risk‐based follow‐up and thereby more efficient allocation of resources. However, more factors should be taken into account for truly individualizing follow‐up based on risk for recurrence.

Implications for Practice

The current age‐based recommendations for breast cancer follow‐up after 5 years are suboptimal and do not reflect the actual risk of recurrent disease. This results in situations in which women with higher risks actually receive less follow‐up than those with a lower risk of recurrence. Alternative cutoffs could be a start toward risk‐based follow‐up and thereby more efficient allocation of resources. However, age, or any single risk factor, is not able to capture the risk differences and therefore is not sufficient for determining follow‐up. More risk factors should be taken into account for truly individualizing follow‐up based on the risk for recurrence.

Actual survival benefits related to the intensive follow‐up recommendations of current guidelines for patients with breast cancer are unclear. This article analyses long‐term breast cancer recurrence patterns to determine how the current age‐based recommendations on follow‐up schedules after 5 years correspond to the actual risk of locoregional recurrence and second primary breast cancer. Alternative guidelines are proposed.

Platinum exposure and cause-specific mortality among patients with testicular cancer

Background

Although testicular cancer (TC) treatment has been associated with severe late morbidities, including second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and ischemic heart disease (IHD), cause‐specific excess mortality has been rarely studied among patients treated in the platinum era.

Methods

In a large, multicenter cohort including 6042 patients with TC treated between 1976 and 2006, cause‐specific mortality was compared with general population mortality rates. Associations with treatment were assessed with proportional hazards analysis.

Results

With a median follow‐up of 17.6 years, 800 patients died; 40.3% of these patients died because of TC. The cumulative mortality was 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5%‐10.7%) 25 years after TC treatment. In comparison with general population mortality rates, patients with nonseminoma experienced 2.0 to 11.6 times elevated mortality from lung, stomach, pancreatic, rectal, and kidney cancers, soft‐tissue sarcomas, and leukemia; 1.9‐fold increased mortality (95% CI, 1.3‐2.8) from IHD; and 3.9‐fold increased mortality (95% CI, 1.5‐8.4) from pneumonia. Seminoma patients experienced 2.5 to 4.6 times increased mortality from stomach, pancreatic, bladder cancer and leukemia. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with 2.1 (95% CI, 1.8‐2.5) and 2.5 times higher SMN mortality (95% CI, 2.0‐3.1), respectively, in comparison with the general population. In a multivariable analysis, patients treated with platinum‐containing chemotherapy had a 2.5‐fold increased hazard ratio (HR; 95% CI, 1.8‐3.5) for SMN mortality in comparison with patients without platinum‐containing chemotherapy. The HR for SMN mortality increased 0.29 (95% CI, 0.19‐0.39) per 100 mg/m² platinum dose administered (P_trend < .001). IHD mortality was increased 2.1‐fold (95% CI, 1.5‐4.2) after platinum‐containing chemotherapy in comparison with patients without platinum exposure.

Conclusions

Platinum‐containing chemotherapy is associated with a dose‐dependent increase in the risk of SMN mortality.

Platinum‐containing chemotherapy is associated with a dose‐dependent increase in the risk of cancer mortality among patients with testicular cancer. Patients with testicular cancer experience increased mortality from second malignancies as well as causes other than cancer, particularly ischemic heart diseases.

Is preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer patients modulated by ACE inhibitors? Results from the Dutch Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on patients who received chemoradiation prior to surgery for rectal cancer between 2010 and 2015 were retrieved from linkage between the PHARMO Database Network, Dutch Pathology Registry and Netherlands Cancer Registry. Pathological complete response rates (pCR) were compared between patients who did or did not use ACEIs/ARBs during treatment. Multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Out of 345 patients, 92 patients (26.7%) used ACEIs/ARBs during treatment. Median age was 65 years (range 30-85). Older and male patients were more likely to use ACEIs/ARBs. pCR (ypT0N0) was observed in 17.4% of patients using ACEIs/ARBs compared to 14.6% of patients who did not use ACEIs/ARBs (p = 0.595). A good response (ypT0-1N0) was observed in 21.7% of ACEIs/ARBs patients vs. 19.4% of patients who did not use ACEIs/ARBs (p = 0.724). Multivariable analysis, taking into account background variables and co-medication, showed increased pCR in patients using beta-blockers (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0-5.4).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective cohort, the use of ACEIs/ARBs was not associated with tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer patients. Thereby, the suggested potentiating effect of ACEIS/ARBs could not be confirmed in our study. Further research could be directed to investigate a possible benefit of beta-blockers or other anti-hypertensive drugs.

Abstract P1-08-19: 10-year conditional recurrence risks, overall and relative survival for breast cancer patients in the Netherlands: Taking account of event-free years

Background

Survival estimates valid at the time of diagnosis are of limited value for (ex-)breast cancer patients who survived several years, as it includes information on already deceased patients. This study analyzed the 10-year conditional risk of recurrent breast cancer in specific prognostic subgroups according to T and N stage and breast cancer subtypes. Secondly, we investigated 10-year conditional overall (OS) and relative survival (RS), adjusted for confounding.

Patients and methods

We selected all women diagnosed in 2005 with operated T1-2N0-1 breast cancer from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were classified into T1N0, T1N1, T2N0 and T2N1 stage. Ten-year conditional recurrence rates were calculated for every year from diagnosis for patients without an event (local (LR), regional recurrence (RR), distant metastasis (DM) or death). Ten-year conditional OS was calculated using multivariable Cox regression. RS was estimated by dividing patient survival rates by those of the general Dutch population.

Results

We included 7,969 patients: 52.3% had T1N0, 15.3% T1N1, 19.9% T2N0 and 12.5% T2N1 stage. For T1N0, 10-year LR rates changed from 4.6% at diagnosis to 0.5% in year 10. RR rates decreased from 2.3% to 0.2% and DM rates decreased from 7.8% to 0.6%. For T2N1 stage, the LR, RR and DM rates decreased from 6.2% to 0.8%, 5.2% to 0.4% and 19.6% to 1.5%, respectively. Of all patients, 1,702 patients (21.4%) had an unknown breast cancer subtype and were consequently excluded from the analyses according to subtype. Of the remaining 6,267 patients, 3,774 (60.2%) had luminal A, 1,465 (23.4%) had luminal B, 314 (5.0%) had HER2 positive and 714 (11.4%) had triple negative disease For the luminal A subtype, LR, RR and DM rates ranged from 3.9% to 0.4%, 1.7% to 0.5% and 7.3% to 1.1%, while for triple negative these rates ranged between 5.6% to 0.7%, 4.9% to 0.2% and 16.7% to 0%, respectively. Differences between subgroups attenuated over time and all recurrence rates became ≤1.5% in year 10. Ten-year OS and RS, adjusted for confounding, showed diminishing risk differences between subgroups over time.

Conclusion

Differences in recurrence rates, OS and RS between prognostic subgroups decreased as years passed by. These results highlight the importance of taking into account disease-free years to more accurately predict (ex-)breast cancer patients' prognosis over time.

Citation Format: van Maaren MC, Strobbe LJ, Smidt ML, Moossdorff M, Poortmans PM, Siesling S. 10-year conditional recurrence risks, overall and relative survival for breast cancer patients in the Netherlands: Taking account of event-free years [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-19.

Risk of Solid Cancer After Treatment of Testicular Germ Cell Cancer in the Platinum Era

Purpose

Testicular cancer (TC) treatment increases risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs). It is unknown whether changes in TC treatment over time have affected SMN risk.

Methods

Solid SMN risk was evaluated in a multicenter cohort comprising 5,848 1-year survivors treated for TC before age 50 years between 1976 and 2007. SMN incidence was compared with cancer incidence in the general population. Treatment-specific risks were assessed using multivariable regression in a case-cohort design.

Results

After a median follow-up of 14.1 years, 350 solid SMNs were observed, translating into a 1.8-fold (95% CI, 1.6-2.0) increased risk compared with general population rates. Solid SMN risk was increased in patients with seminoma and those with nonseminoma (standardized incidence ratio, 1.52 and 2.21, respectively). Patients with nonseminoma experienced increased risk of SMNs of the thyroid, lung, stomach, pancreas, colon, and bladder and of melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma, whereas those with seminoma experienced increased risk of SMNs of the small intestine, pancreas, and urinary bladder. The 25-year cumulative incidence of solid SMNs was 10.3% (95% CI, 9.0% to 11.6%). In multivariable analysis, platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of a solid SMN (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% CI, 1.58 to 3.62), colorectal SMN (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.67 to 8.92), and noncolorectal GI SMN (HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.28 to 10.95). Receipt of platinum 400 to 499 and ≥ 500 mg/m2 increased solid SMN risk compared with surgery only (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.23 and HR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.90, respectively), whereas risk was not significantly increased with lower doses (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.90 to 3.43). The HR of a GI SMN increased by 53% (95% CI, 26% to 80%) per 100 mg/m2 of platinum-containing chemotherapy. The HR of an infradiaphragmatic SMN increased by 8% per Gray of radiation dose administered (95% CI, 6% to 9%; P < .001).

Conclusion

Radiotherapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy are associated with increased solid SMN risk, specifically with GI SMNs.

Patterns and predictors of first and subsequent recurrence in women with early breast cancer

Purpose

Little is known about the occurrence, timing and prognostic factors for first and also subsequent local (LR), regional (RR) or distant (DM) breast cancer recurrence. As current follow-up is still consensus-based, more information on the patterns and predictors of subsequent recurrences can inform more personalized follow-up decisions.

Methods

Women diagnosed with stage I-III invasive breast cancer who were treated with curative intent were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 9342). Extended Cox regression was used to model the hazard of recurrence over ten years of follow-up for not only site-specific first, but also subsequent recurrences after LR or RR.

Results

In total, 362 patients had LR, 148 RR and 1343 DM as first recurrence. The risk of first recurrence was highest during the second year post-diagnosis (3.9%; 95% CI 3.5–4.3) with similar patterns for LR, RR and DM. Young age (<40), tumour size >2 cm, tumour grade II/III, positive lymph nodes, multifocality and no chemotherapy were prognostic factors for first recurrence. The risk of developing a second recurrence after LR or RR (N = 176) was significantly higher after RR than after LR (50 vs 29%; p < 0.001). After a second LR or RR, more than half of the women were diagnosed with a third recurrence.

Conclusions

Although the risk of subsequent recurrence is high, absolute incidence remains low. Also, almost half the second recurrences are detected in the first year after previous recurrence and more than 80% are DM. This suggests that more intensive follow-up for early detection subsequent recurrence is not likely to be (cost-)effective.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4340-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-term survival of gastrointestinal cancer diagnosed in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors

40

Background: The risk of developing gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is increased in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. This study aims to compare overall survival of GI cancer in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors with survival of first primary GI cancer patients. Methods: This cohort study compared overall survival of GI cancer patients in a Hodgkin lymphoma survivor population (HL-GI (n = 92) including esophageal (n = 25), gastric (n = 31), small intestinal (n = 2), colorectal cancer (n = 34)) with survival of a population-based cohort of first primary GI cancer patients (GI-1, n = 911) which was generated by individual matching of the 92 cases, based on tumor location, gender, age and year at diagnosis. Clinical characteristics were compared by Chi square tests. Cox regression was used for multivariable survival analysis (corrected for age, gender, and clinicopathological characteristics related to the GI tumor). Results: When comparing HL-GI and GI-1 patients, no differences in tumor stage, grade of differentiation or frequency of surgery were found. HL-GI patients were less frequently treated for their GI tumor with radiation therapy (7% vs. 24% in GI-1 patients, p < 0.001) or chemotherapy (28% vs. 41%, p = 0.02). Overall 5-year and 20-year survival of HL-GI patients and GI-1 patients was non-significantly lower (28% vs. 38%, p = 0.13 and 19% vs. 29%, p = 0.06, respectively). This result was confirmed multivariably (5-year survival, p = 0.33, 20-year survival, p = 0.14). Also, for esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer separately, no differences in overall survival were found between HL-GI patients and GI-1 patients. Conclusions: Long-term overall survival of GI cancer patients is similar in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors and first primary GI cancer patients. HL-GI patients did however receive less treatment with radiation therapy or chemotherapy. These treatments may not have been recommended due to prior Hodgkin lymphoma treatment or comorbidity. As risks of other causes of mortality are also increased in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, the relatively good survival in this population is remarkable.

Postoperative Radiation Therapy after Nipple-Sparing or Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: A Survey of European, North American, and South American Practices

Skin sparing mastectomy, a surgical procedure sparing a large portion of the overlying skin of the breast, and nipple-sparing mastectomy, sparing the whole nipple-areolar complex, are increasingly used, although their oncologic efficacy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the radiation oncologists' opinions regarding the indications of radiation therapy (RT) after skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy. Radiation oncology members of four national and international societies were invited to complete a questionnaire comprising of 22 questions to assess their opinions regarding RT indications in the context of skin-sparing and nipple-sparing mastectomy. A total of 298 radiation oncologists answered the questionnaire. 90.9% of respondents affirmed that breast cancer is one of their specializations. The majority declared that post-mastectomy RT is indicated for early-stage (stages I and II) breast cancer patients who present with risk factors for recurrence after skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy (87.2% and 80.2%, respectively). All suggested risk factors (tumor size, lymph node involvement, extracapsular extension, lymphovascular space invasion, positive surgical margins, triple negative tumor, multicentric tumor, and age) were considered as major elements (important or very important). There is no consensus regarding the necessity of evaluating residual breast tissue or the definition of residual breast tissue after mastectomy. All classic factors were considered as major elements, potentially influencing the decision to advice or not postoperative RT. Many uncertainties remain about the indications for RT after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy.

The incidence of secondary pelvic tumors after previous (chemo)radiation for rectal cancer

491

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the association between radiotherapy (RT) for rectal cancer and the development of second primary tumors. Methods: Data on all surgically treated, non-metastasized primary rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2007 were retrieved from a population-based cancer registry and retrospectively reviewed. To estimate the cumulative incidence of a second tumor, Fine and Gray’s competing risk model was used with death as a competing event. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR’s) were calculated for comparison with the incidence of primary tumors in the general population, taking in account sex, age and calendar year. Results: The cohort consisted of 29,214 patients of which 15,454 patients had undergone (chemo)RT. Median follow-up was 6.2 years (range 0-24). 3655 patients were diagnosed with at least one second primary tumor of which 808 patients had pelvic tumors. The SIR for any second tumor was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.17), resulting in 23.3/10,000 excess cases per year. RT reduced the cumulative incidence of second pelvic tumors compared to patients who received no RT (SHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.81). Second pelvic tumors were more common in patients who underwent post-operative RT than in patients who underwent pre-operative RT (SHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.10-1.70). Organ-specific analyses showed that second prostate tumors were less common in patients who received RT compared to patients who received no RT (SHR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.43-0.62). RT also reduced the risk for a second primary tumor in the rectum(sigmoid) compared to patients who did not receive RT (SHR 0.59 95% CI 0.37-0.94). Patients who received post-operative RT had higher chances of developing a second rectum(sigmoid) tumor then patients who received pre-operative RT (SHR 2.25, 95% CI 1.07-4.73). Patients without RT had worse overall survival than patients who received RT (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.19-1.26). Conclusions: In this nationwide study, patients with previous rectal cancer had a slightly increased chance of developing another primary tumor compared with the general population. We found a protective effect of RT on the development of secondary pelvic tumors, predominantly for prostate cancer.

EORTC trial 22991: Results of a phase III study comparing 6 months of androgen suppression and irradiation versus irradiation alone for localized T1b-cT2aN0M0 prostate cancer

22

Background: Up to 30% patients irradiated for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer experience relapse biochemically within 5 years. We assessed if biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) is improved by adding 6 months of androgen suppression (AS) – twice 3-month depot LHRH-agonist to primary irradiation (RT) for intermediate or high risk localized T1b-cT2a N0M0 prostate cancer. Methods: 819 patients staged cT1b-c with PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml or Gleason ≥ 7 or cT2a (UICC TNM 1997) N0 M0 with PSA ≤ 50 ng/ml were randomized between RT or RT+ADT. Centers elected one dose of prostate irradiation: 70, 74, or 78 Gy. Irradiation of pelvic nodes was left to the discretion of each institution. The trial aimed to show an increase of +7.5% in 5-year BPFS (HR=0.714) with 80% power. This requires 274 events in intent-to-treat analysis. HRQoL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30+PR25 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00021450). Results: Patients were 70 y old in median, 88% had WHO PS 0, 74.8% were intermediate risk, and 24.8% high risk. In the RT arm, 407/409 received RT, in the RT+ADT, 403/410 received RT+ AS and 3 RT. Six patients refused treatment. After a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 201 and 118 events for BPFS were observed in the RT and RT+ AS arm. RT+ AS improved BPFS compared to RT (HR=0.53, CI: 0.42-0.67, P<0.001) irrespective of the radiation dose (heterogeneity P>0.1). The 5-y BPFS increased from 69.3% to 82.5%. Clinical PFS was also statistically significantly improved (205 events, HR=0.63, CI: 0.48-0.84, P=0.001, +7.9% at 5 years). Late genitourinary toxicity was reported by 5.9% vs. 3.6% of the patients, on RT+ AS and RT, respectively (p=0.14), whereas 27.0% vs 19.4% reported severe impairment of sexual function (p=0.010). Overall HRQoL did not differ between the groups. Hormonal treatment symptoms, sexual activity and functioning scales are clinically significantly impaired by AS at month 6 and year 1; from year 2 no marked difference is seen. Conclusions: The addition of 6 months of medical castration to primary irradiation improves BPFS and PFS in intermediate- and high-risk localized T1b-cT2a N0M0 prostatic carcinoma with no persistent detriment on HRQoL or sexual function. Clinical trial information: NCT00021450.

Should breathing adapted radiotherapy also be applied for right-sided breast irradiation?

BACKGROUND

Voluntary moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (vmDIBH) is widely used for left sided breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of vmDIBH in local and locoregional radiation therapy (RT) of right-sided breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For fourteen right-sided breast cancer patients, 3D-conformal (3D-CRT) RT plans (i.e., forward IMRT) were calculated on free-breathing (FB) 3D-CRT(FB) and vmDIBHCT-scans, for local- as well as locoregional breast treatment, with and without internal mammary nodes (IMN). Dose volume parameters were compared.

RESULTS

For local breast treatment, no relevant reduction in mean lung dose (MLD) was found. For locoregional breast treatment without IMN, the average MLD reduced from 6.5 to 5.4 Gy (p < 0.005) for the total lung and from 11.2 to 9.7 Gy (p < 0.005) for the ipsilateral lung. For locoregional breast treatment with IMN, the average MLD reduced from 10.8 to 9.1 Gy (p < 0.005) for the total lung and from 18.7 to 16.2 Gy (p < 0.005) for the ipsilateral lung, whilea small reduction in mean heart dose of 0.4 Gy (p = 0.07) was also found.

CONCLUSIONS

Breathing adapted radiation therapy in left-sided breast cancer patients is becoming widely introduced. As a result of the slight reduction in lung dose found for locoregional right-sided breast cancer treatment in this study, a slightly lower risk of pneumonitis and secondary lung cancer (in ever smoking patients) can be expected.In addition, for some patients the heart dose will also be reduced by more than 0.5 up to 2.6 Gy. We therefore suggest to also apply breath-hold for locoregional irradiation of right-sided breast cancer patients.

Internal Mammary and Medial Supraclavicular Irradiation in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The effect of internal mammary and medial supraclavicular lymph-node irradiation (regional nodal irradiation) added to whole-breast or thoracic-wall irradiation after surgery on survival among women with early-stage breast cancer is unknown.

METHODS

We randomly assigned women who had a centrally or medially located primary tumor, irrespective of axillary involvement, or an externally located tumor with axillary involvement to undergo either whole-breast or thoracic-wall irradiation in addition to regional nodal irradiation (nodal-irradiation group) or whole-breast or thoracic-wall irradiation alone (control group). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were the rates of disease-free survival, survival free from distant disease, and death from breast cancer.

RESULTS

Between 1996 and 2004, a total of 4004 patients underwent randomization. The majority of patients (76.1%) underwent breast-conserving surgery. After mastectomy, 73.4% of the patients in both groups underwent chest-wall irradiation. Nearly all patients with node-positive disease (99.0%) and 66.3% of patients with node-negative disease received adjuvant systemic treatment. At a median follow-up of 10.9 years, 811 patients had died. At 10 years, overall survival was 82.3% in the nodal-irradiation group and 80.7% in the control group (hazard ratio for death with nodal irradiation, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.00; P=0.06). The rate of disease-free survival was 72.1% in the nodal-irradiation group and 69.1% in the control group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.00; P=0.04), the rate of distant disease-free survival was 78.0% versus 75.0% (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.98; P=0.02), and breast-cancer mortality was 12.5% versus 14.4% (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.97; P=0.02). Acute side effects of regional nodal irradiation were modest.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with early-stage breast cancer, irradiation of the regional nodes had a marginal effect on overall survival. Disease-free survival and distant disease-free survival were improved, and breast-cancer mortality was reduced. (Funded by Fonds Cancer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00002851.).

Satisfaction with information provision is associated with baseline but not with follow-up quality of life among lymphoma patients: Results from the PROFILES registry

BACKGROUND

Appropriate information provision is an important determinant of patient satisfaction and might also affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between perceived information provision at baseline and HRQoL, anxiety and depression among lymphoma patients two years later.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is part of a longitudinal, population-based survey among all lymphoma patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2009 as registered in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (southern part of The Netherlands). Patients between six months and 10 years after diagnoses received the first questionnaire including the EORTC QLQ-INFO25, EORTC QLQ-C30 and HADS at baseline (T1) and the second two years later (T2). All analyses are stratified for time since diagnosis (< 2 and ≥ 2 years since diagnosis).

RESULTS

At baseline 69% of the patients (n = 1186) responded, at T2 355 (30%) patients responded. For patients < 2 years since diagnosis, receiving more medical test information was associated with higher levels of cognitive functioning (ß = 0.46; p = 0.04) and lower levels of anxiety (ß = -0.41; p = 0.04) at baseline, no prospective relationships were found. For patients ≥ 2 years since diagnosis, receiving more medical test information (ß = 0.20; p = 0.03) was associated with better emotional functioning, while receiving more treatment information was associated with worse emotional functioning (ß = -0.21; p = 0.04). Among this group, satisfaction with the received information was associated with better functioning (ß ranging from -0.15 to -0.33; all p < 0.05) at baseline, and these relationships remained significant prospectively for physical (ß = -0.13; p = 0.02) and emotional functioning (ß = -0.13; p = 0.04) only. Stability of satisfaction with received information over time was associated with better emotional (ß = -0.13) and better cognitive functioning (ß = -0.09; p < 0.05) at T2.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that satisfaction with received information among lymphoma patients was associated with better HRQoL at baseline (only for patients ≥ 2 years since diagnosis), but not at follow-up when corrected for baseline HRQoL.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI): are breath-hold and volumetric radiation therapy techniques useful?

BACKGROUND

In a selective group of patients accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) might be applied after conservative breast surgery to reduce the amount of irradiated healthy tissue. The role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and voluntary moderately deep inspiration breath-hold (vmDIBH) techniques in further reducing irradiated healthy--especially heart--tissue is investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 37 partial breast planning target volumes (PTVs), three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) (3-5 coplanar or non-coplanar 6 and/or 10 MV beams) and VMAT (two partial 6 MV arcs) plans were made on CTs acquired in free-breathing (FB) and/or in vmDIBH. Dose-volume parameters for the PTV, heart, lungs, and breasts were compared.

RESULTS

Better dose conformity was achieved with VMAT compared to 3D-CRT (conformity index 1.24±0.09 vs. 1.49±0.20). Non-PTV ipsilateral breast receiving ≥50% of the prescribed dose was on average reduced by 28% in VMAT plans compared to 3D-CRT plans. Mean heart dose (MHD) reduced from 2.0 (0.1-5.1) Gy in 3D-CRT(FB) to 0.6 (0.1-1.6) Gy in VMAT(vmDIBH). VMAT is beneficial for MHD reduction if MHD with 3D-CRT exceeds 0.5Gy. Cardiac dose reduction as a result of VMAT increases with increasing initial MHD, and adding vmDIBH reduces the cardiac dose further. Mean dose to the ipsilateral lung decreased from 3.7 (0.7-8.7) to 1.8 (0.5-4.0) Gy with VMAT(vmDIBH) compared to 3D-CRT(FB). VMAT resulted in a slight increase in the contralateral breast dose (DMean) always remaining <1.9 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

For APBI patients, VMAT improves PTV dose conformity and delivers lower doses to the ipsilateral breast and lung compared to 3D-CRT. This goes at the cost of a slight but acceptable increase of the contralateral breast dose. VMAT reduces cardiac dose if MHD exceeds 0.5 Gy for 3D-CRT. Adding vmDIBH results in a further reduction of heart and ipsilateral lung dose.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy and breath-hold in image-guided locoregional left-sided breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and/or voluntary moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (vmDIBH) in the radiation therapy (RT) of left-sided breast cancer including the regional lymph nodes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 13 patients, four treatment combinations were compared; 3D-conformal RT (i.e., forward IMRT) in free-breathing 3D-CRT(FB), 3D-CRT(vmDIBH), 2 partial arcs VMAT(FB), and VMAT(vmDIBH). Prescribed dose was 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. For 10 additional patients, 3D-CRT and VMAT in vmDIBH only were also compared.

RESULTS

Dose conformity, PTV coverage, ipsilateral and total lung doses were significantly better for VMAT plans compared to 3D-CRT. Mean heart dose (D(mean,heart)) reduction in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) was between 0.9 and 8.6 Gy, depending on initial D(mean,heart) (in 3D-CRT(FB) plans). VMAT(vmDIBH) reduced the D(mean,heart) further when D(mean,heart) was still >3.2 Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH). Mean contralateral breast dose was higher for VMAT plans (2.7 Gy) compared to 3DCRT plans (0.7 Gy).

CONCLUSIONS

VMAT and 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) significantly reduced heart dose for patients treated with locoregional RT of left-sided breast cancer. When Dmean,heart exceeded 3.2 Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) plans, VMAT(vmDIBH) resulted in a cumulative heart dose reduction. VMAT also provided better target coverage and reduced ipsilateral lung dose, at the expense of a small increase in the dose to the contralateral breast.

Small but significant excess mortality compared with the general population for long-term survivors of breast cancer in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Coinciding with the relatively good and improving prognosis for patients with stage I-III breast cancer, late recurrences, new primary tumours and late side-effects of treatment may occur. We gained insight into prognosis for long-term breast cancer survivors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on all 205 827 females aged 15-89 diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer during 1989-2008 were derived from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Conditional 5-year relative survival was calculated for every subsequent year from diagnosis up to 15 years.

RESULTS

For stage I, conditional 5-year relative survival remained ~95% up to 15 years after diagnosis (a stable 5-year excess mortality rate of 5%). For stage II, excess mortality remained 10% for those aged 15-44 or 45-59 and 15% for those aged 60-74. For stage III, excess mortality decreased from 35% at diagnosis to 10% at 15 years for those aged 15-44 or 45-59, and from ~40% to 30% for those aged ≥60.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage I or II breast cancer had a (very) good long-term prognosis, albeit exhibiting a small but significant excess mortality at least up to 15 years after diagnosis. Improvements albeit from a lower level were mainly seen for patients who had been diagnosed with stage III disease. Caregivers can use this information to better inform (especially disease-free) cancer survivors about their actual prognosis.

Guidelines for the definitions of time-to-event endpoints in randomized clinical trials: Results of the DATECAN Project for Breast Group

1094

Background: With the necessity of reducing randomized clinical trial (RCT) duration, cost and number of patients, surrogate endpoints of overall survival (OS) are increasingly being used in cancer RCTs. However, most of these endpoints currently lack of standardized definition enabling a comparison of RCT results. Some recommendations have been proposed for specific cancer sites but they do not rely on a formal consensus methodology. The objective of the Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials (DATECAN) project is to provide guidelines to standardize definitions of time-to-event endpoints in RCTs for different cancer sites. Here, we present results for BREAST cancer. Methods: We relied on the modified Delphi consensus method, a validated formalized consensus process for the development of practice guidelines. International experts with various backgrounds and expertises were involved. First, the coordinating committee, a group of statisticians and epidemiologists involved in the design and conduct of RCTs, led a comprehensive literature review to identify time-to-event endpoints, events of interest and the existence of guidelines in adjuvant and metastatic settings. The steering committee, which included additional medical experts, validated the list and prepared the questionnaire sent for rating to an independent expert committee. Results: The consensus process involved 2 rounds of scoring (31 experts) and 1 in-person meeting (in parallel to ASCO'12). Each expert had to rate on a 1-9 scale if s/he agreed or not for including events (e.g. death from breast cancer) in the definition of time-to-event endpoints (e.g. progression-free survival). 150 events had to be scored for the 11 selected endpoints. Consensus was reached for 57% of the events after the 2 rounds of scoring. After the in-person meeting, consensus was reached for all the remaining events except one. Conclusions: The DATECAN guidelines should help standardizing definitions of commonly used endpoints. This process should (i) facilitate the comparison of RCTs and (ii) improve the quality of future RCTs by providing better estimation of sample size and treatment effect.

Second cancer risk 40 years after cure for Hodgkin lymphoma

8039

Background: During the last decades Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) treatment changed towards less toxic chemotherapy schemes and smaller radiation fields. The impact of these changes on second cancer (SC) risk is still unknown. Methods: We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIR), comparing SC risk after HL treatment with expected risk, based on cancer incidence in the general population, and compared SC risk between treatment modalities, accounting for competing events, in a large Dutch cohort comprising 3,390 5-years HL survivors, aged 15-51 years at HL treatment and diagnosed between 1965-2000. Results: The median follow-up was 18.2 years; 23% of the patients was followed ≥25 years. During follow-up 734 SCs and 92 third cancers (TC) occurred. The SIR for any SC was 4.5 (95% confidence interval (95%CI) 4.1-4.9). SC risk was still elevated after 35 years of follow-up (SIR 3.9; 95%CI 2.5-5.8) and cumulative incidence (CI) reached 47.1% (95%CI 43.6-50.5) at 40 years follow-up. For TCs the SIR was 5.5 (95%CI 4.4-6.9); the 20-year CI was 22.3% (95%CI 17.8-27.2). Risks of NHL and leukemia strongly decreased in more recent treatment periods (P-trend <0.001). The CI of solid tumors (ST) between 5-19 years after HL treatment did not differ for patients treated between 1965-1979, 1980-1989 or 1990-2000 (P=0.21; 19-year CI 9.1%, 11.6% and 11.4%, respectively). Radiotherapy (RT) above the diaphragm increased risk of STs above the diaphragm (hazard ratio (HR) 2.4, P<0.001), while subdiaphragmatic RT was associated with a 1.7-fold increased HR of a subdiaphragmatic ST (P=0.001). An incomplete mantle field was associated with significantly lower breast cancer (BC) risk (hazard ratio (HR) 0.4, 95%CI 0.2-0.8). A cumulative procarbazine dose >4.2 g/m2 yielded a 1.3-fold increased HR (95%CI 1.0-1.7) for non-breast STs and a 2-fold (95%CI 1.2-3.1) increased HR for gastrointestinal STs, but was associated with a strongly decreased BC risk (HR 0.3, 95%CI 0.2-0.6). Conclusions: SC risk after HL has decreased with treatment changes over the last decades, due to strongly decreasing risk of leukemia and NHL. Smaller radiation fields and procarbazine doses >4.2 g/m2 are associated with lower breast cancer risk, while high procarbazine doses increase risk of gastrointestinal STs.

Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' trial

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer treated with breast-conserving radiotherapy, the influence of the boost dose on cosmetic outcome after long-term follow-up is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 348 patients participating in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' mega trial with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. Digitalised pictures were analysed using specific software, enabling quantification of seven relative asymmetry features associated with different aspects of fibrosis.

RESULTS

After 3 years, we noted a statistically significantly poorer outcome for the boost patients for six features compared with those of the no boost patients. Up to 9 years of follow-up, results continued to worsen in the same magnitude for the both patient groups. We noted the following determinants for poorer outcome: (i) boost treatment, (ii) larger excision volumes, (iii) younger age, (iv) tumours located in the central lower quadrants of the breast and (v) a boost dose administered with photons.

CONCLUSIONS

A boost dose worsens the change in breast appearance in the first 3 years. Moreover, the development of fibrosis associated with whole-breast irradiation, as estimated with the relative asymmetry features, is an ongoing process until (at least) 9 years after irradiation.

Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term impact of pathologic characteristics and an extra boost dose of 16 Gy on local relapse, for stage I and II invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer boost versus no boost trial, after whole breast irradiation, patients with microscopically complete excision of invasive tumor, were randomly assigned to receive or not an extra boost dose of 16 Gy. For a subset of 1,616 patients central pathology review was performed.

RESULTS

The 10-year cumulative risk of local breast cancer relapse as a first event was not significantly influenced if the margin was scored negative, close or positive for invasive tumor or ductal carcinoma in situ according to central pathology review (log-rank P = .45 and P = .57, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma was associated with an increased risk of local relapse (P = .026; hazard ratio [HR], 1.67), as was age younger than 50 years (P < .0001; HR, 2.38). The boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the local relapse rate (P = .0006; HR, 0.47). For patients younger than 50 years old and in patients with high grade invasive ductal carcinoma, the boost dose reduced the local relapse from 19.4% to 11.4% (P = .0046; HR, 0.51) and from 18.9% to 8.6% (P = .01; HR, 0.42), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Young age and high-grade invasive ductal cancer were the most important risk factors for local relapse, while margin status had no significant influence. A boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the negative effects of both young age and high-grade invasive cancer.

Results of the phase II EORTC 22971 trial evaluating combined accelerated external radiation and chemotherapy with 5FU and cisplatin in patients with muscle invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder

INTRODUCTION

We prospectively evaluated concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer in a phase II EORTC trial to test whether it could be further studied as a potential treatment of bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients up to 75 years of age with invasive transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder up to 5 cm, stage pT2 to pT3b, N0M0, without residual macroscopical tumour after transurethral excision were eligible. Radiotherapy consisted of 2 fractions of 1.2 Gy daily up to 60 Gy delivered in a period of 5 weeks. During the first and the last week, cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day and 5 FU 375 mg/m(2)/day were given concomitantly.

RESULTS

The study was interrupted early due to poor recruitment. Nine patients of the originally 43 planned were treated. Mean age was 63 years. Five patients had tumour stage pT2, 1 stage pT3a and 3 stage pT3b. All patients completed radiotherapy and chemotherapy as scheduled. Only one grade 3 and no grade 4 toxicity was seen. All patients were evaluated 3 months after treatment: eight patients had no detectable tumour and one had para-aortic lymph nodes. During further follow-up, a second patient got lymph node metastases and two patients developed distant metastases (lung in the patient with enlarged lymph nodes at the first evaluation and abdominal in one other). Those three patients died at respectively 19, 14, and 18 months after registration. Late toxicity was limited and often temporary. After 26 to 57 months of follow-up, no local recurrences were seen. Six patients remained alive without disease.

DISCUSSION

Despite the small cohort, this combination of concomitant chemotherapy and accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer seemed to be well tolerated and to result in satisfactory local control with limited early and late toxicity. It could therefore be considered for study in further clinical trials.

Predictors of the risk of fibrosis at 10 years after breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer: a study based on the EORTC Trial 22881-10882 'boost versus no boost'

The EORTC 22881-10882 trial in 5178 conservatively treated early breast cancer patients showed that a 16 Gy boost dose significantly improved local control, but increased the risk of breast fibrosis. To investigate predictors for the long-term risk of fibrosis, Cox regression models of the time to moderate or severe fibrosis were developed on a random set of 1797 patients with and 1827 patients without a boost, and validated in the remaining set. The median follow-up was 10.7 years. The risk of fibrosis significantly increased (P<0.01) with increasing maximum whole breast irradiation (WBI) dose and with concomitant chemotherapy, but was independent of age. In the boost arm, the risk further increased (P<0.01) if patients had post-operative breast oedema or haematoma, but it decreased (P<0.01) if WBI was given with >6 MV photons. The c-index was around 0.62. Nomograms with these factors are proposed to forecast the long-term risk of moderate or severe fibrosis.

The addition of a boost dose on the primary tumour bed after lumpectomy in breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. A summary of the results of EORTC 22881-10882 "boost versus no boost" trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of the boost dose to the primary tumour bed in the framework of breast conserving therapy on local control, cosmetic results, fibrosis and overall survival for patients with early stage breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five thousand five hundred and sixty-nine patients after lumpectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomised. After a microscopically complete lumpectomy (5318 patients), the boost doses were either 0 or 16 Gy, while after a microscopically incomplete (251 patients) lumpectomy randomisation was between 10 and 26 Gy. The results at a median follow-up of 10 years are presented.

RESULTS

At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the 0 Gy and the 16 Gy boost groups (p < 0.0001) and 17.5% versus 10.8% for the 10 and 26 Gy boost groups, respectively (p > 0.1). There was no statistically significant interaction per age group but recurrences tended to occur earlier in younger patients. As younger patients had a higher cumulative risk of local relapse by year 10, the magnitude of the absolute 10-year risk reduction achieved with the boost decreased with increasing age. Development of fibrosis was significantly dependent on the boost dose with a 10-year rate for severe fibrosis of 1.6% after 0 Gy, 3.3% after 10 Gy, 4.4% after 16 Gy and 14.4% after 26 Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

An increase of the dose with 16 Gy improved local control for patients after a complete lumpectomy only. The development of fibrosis was clearly dose dependent. With 10 years median follow-up, no impact of survival was observed.

Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term impact of a boost radiation dose of 16 Gy on local control, fibrosis, and overall survival for patients with stage I and II breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 5,318 patients with microscopically complete excision followed by whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomly assigned to receive either a boost dose of 16 Gy (2,661 patients) or no boost dose (2,657 patients), with a median follow-up of 10.8 years.

RESULTS

The median age was 55 years. Local recurrence was reported as the first treatment failure in 278 patients with no boost versus 165 patients with boost; at 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the no boost and the boost group, respectively (P < .0001). The hazard ratio of local recurrence was 0.59 (0.46 to 0.76) in favor of the boost, with no statistically significant interaction per age group. The absolute risk reduction at 10 years per age group was the largest in patients <or= 40 years of age: 23.9% to 13.5% (P = .0014). As a result, the number of salvage mastectomies has been reduced by 41%. Severe fibrosis was statistically significantly increased (P < .0001) in the boost group, with a 10-year rate of 4.4% versus 1.6% in the no boost group (P < .0001). Survival at 10 years was 82% in both arms.

CONCLUSION

After a median follow-up period of 10.8 years, a boost dose of 16 Gy led to improved local control in all age groups, but no difference in survival.

The safety of breast-conserving therapy in patients with breast cancer aged ≤40 years

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to study the probability of local control after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in a large population of patients with early-stage breast cancer aged < or = 40 years and to determine which factors had prognostic value.

METHODS

All patients (n = 758) aged < or = 40 years with clinical stage I or II breast cancer who underwent BCT in general hospitals in the southern part of the Netherlands between 1988 and 2002 were selected for the current analysis. BCT included local excision of the tumor followed by irradiation of the breast. Of 758 patients, 329 patients (43%) received adjuvant systemic treatment, and 36 patients (5%) underwent a microscopically incomplete excision. The median follow-up was 8.5 years.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 95 patients developed a local recurrence without evidence of distant disease at the time the recurrence was diagnosed. Contralateral breast cancer was diagnosed in 59 patients. The 5- and 10-year actuarial local recurrence rates were 9.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 6.6-11.4%) and 17.9% (95% CI, 14.1-21.7%), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, adjuvant systemic treatment reduced the risk of local recurrence (hazards ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.78) and contralateral breast cancer (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.87) by >50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of local recurrence in young patients who underwent BCT was reduced strongly by using adjuvant systemic treatment. This finding may provide an argument if favor of advising the use of systemic treatment for all patients aged < or = 40 years who undergo BCT.

The quality assurance programme of the Radiotherapy Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: past, present and future

As early as in 1982, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy Group established a quality assurance programme. In the course of 20 years, quality assurance procedures have become a vast and important part of the activities of the group. Today, the membership committee uses standard procedures based on minimal requirements to evaluate current members and new membership applications. Moreover, for every new trial, specific quality assurance procedures are an integral part of the preparation of the protocol and executed under the responsibility of the study coordinator. With the growing complexity of the radiotherapy techniques used in the framework of the more recent trials, quality assurance procedures have also become more complex including trial specific phantom based measurements. Future ways to evaluate all steps of the radiotherapy process using a common platform connecting all users with the internet are currently under development.

Using loco-regional recurrence as an indicator of the quality of breast cancer treatment

The aim of our study was to compare the loco-regional recurrence (LRR) rates after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy between the time periods of 1985-1992 and 1993-1999. The first period reflects the early experiences with breast conservation. The second period covers the years when a mammographical screening programme was introduced for women 50-69 years of age. We collected data on 1212 patients with 1264 resectable breast cancers (i.e. stage I, IIA, IIB and IIIA), of which 385 were removed by breast conserving surgery and 879 by mastectomy. During follow-up, 47 loco-regional recurrences developed after breast conservation, and 67 after mastectomy. The 5- and 10-year loco-regional recurrence rates were 5.7% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 4.0-7.4) and 11.0% (95% CI 8.0-14.0), respectively, after mastectomy and 7.3% (95% CI 4.5-10.1) and 15.8% (95% CI 11.2-20.4), respectively, after breast conservation. The 8-year loco-regional recurrence rate after breast conservation decreased from 20.1% (95% CI 14.7-26.5) in the period of 1985-1992 to 5.4% (95% CI 1.8-9.0) in the period of 1993-1999 (P=0.0018). Despite the more favourable stage distribution of the patients undergoing mastectomy, no significant decrease was observed in the LRR risk in the latter period (P=0.18). Improvements in patient selection and treatment techniques are the most likely explanations of the decreasing LRR rate after breast conservation in our teaching hospital.

Can patient-, treatment- and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients?

The aim of this study was to identify patient-, tumour- or treatment-related factors associated with young age that might explain the higher risk of ipsilateral breast recurrence that occurs after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in young breast cancer patients. In the 'boost versus no boost trial', 5569 early-stage breast cancer patients were entered. All patients underwent tumorectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy. Patients having a microscopically complete excision were randomised between receiving no boost or a 16-Gy boost, while patients with a microscopically incomplete excision were randomised between receiving a boost dose of 10 or 26 Gy. The 5-year local control rate was 82% for patients <or=35 years, 85% for patients aged 36-40 years, 92% for patients 41-50 years, 96% for patients 51-60 years and 97% for patients >60 years of age (P<0.0001). In young patients, the tumour was significantly larger and more often oestrogen and progesterone receptor-negative. Invasive carcinoma and the intraductal component were more often of a high grade. The intraductal component was more frequently incompletely resected in young patients. Re-excisions were performed more often (most probably due to a more frequent incomplete excision at the first attempt). The total volume of breast tissue removed at the tumorectomy was smaller in the younger patient group, even after including the volume removed during re-excision. When relating all these parameters (including age itself) to local control, the multivariate analysis stratified by treatment showed that age was the only independent prognostic factor for local control (P=0.0001). Including the boost treatment as a separate covariate, the analysis retained age and boost treatment as significant factors related to local control (P<0.0001). It was shown that the boost dose significantly reduced the 5-year local recurrence rate from 7 to 4% for patients with a complete excision (P<0.001). For patients 40 years of age or younger, the boost dose reduced the local recurrence rate from 20 to 10% (P=0.002). This large European Orgnaization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial demonstrated an increased local recurrence rate in young patients. Although several associations between patient, tumour and treatment factors and age were found, that might explain the high local recurrence rate in the younger patients, it appears that age itself and the boost dose were the only factors that were independently related to local control.

The Quality Assurance programme of the Radiotherapy Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): a critical appraisal of 20 years of continuous efforts

In 1982, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Radiotherapy Group established the Quality Assurance (QA) programme. During the past 20 years, QA procedures have become a major part of the activities of the group. The methodology and steps of the QA programme over the past 20 years are briefly described. Problems and conclusions arising from the results of the long-lasting QA programme in the EORTC radiotherapy group are discussed and emphasised. The EORTC radiotherapy group continues to lead QA in the European radiotherapy community. Future challenges and perspectives are proposed.

The potential impact of treatment variations on the results of radiotherapy of the internal mammary lymph node chain: a quality-assurance report on the dummy run of EORTC Phase III randomized trial 22922/10925 in Stage I--III breast cancer(1)

PURPOSE

To present the results of the dummy run of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial investigating the role of adjuvant internal mammary and medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) irradiation in Stage I--III breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All participating institutions were asked to produce a treatment plan without (Arm 1) and with (Arm 2) simultaneous IM-MS irradiation of 1 patient after mastectomy and of 1 patient after lumpectomy. Thirty-two dummy runs have been evaluated for compliance to protocol guidelines, with respect to treatment technique and dose prescription.

RESULTS

A number of more or less important deviations in treatment setup and prescription have been found. The dose in the IM-MS region deviated significantly from the prescribed dose in 10% of the cases for Arm 1, and in 21% for Arm 2. Assuming a true 5% 10-year survival benefit from optimal IM-MS irradiation, an increase of only 3.8% will be found due to this suboptimal dose distribution.

CONCLUSION

In the dummy run, a number of potential systematic protocol deviations that might lead to false-negative results were detected. By providing recommendations to the participating institutions, we expect to improve the interinstitutional consistency and to promote a high quality irradiation in all institutions participating in the trial.