Clinical Pathway for Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients Without Conventional Modifiable Risk Factors: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Reducing the incidence and prevalence of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) is critical to tackling the global burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, a substantial number of individuals develop coronary atherosclerosis despite no SMuRFs. SMuRFless patients presenting with myocardial infarction have been observed to have an unexpected higher early mortality compared to their counterparts with at least 1 SMuRF. Evidence for optimal management of these patients is lacking. We assembled an international, multidisciplinary team to develop an evidence-based clinical pathway for SMuRFless CAD patients. A modified Delphi method was applied. The resulting pathway confirms underlying atherosclerosis and true SMuRFless status, ensures evidence-based secondary prevention, and considers additional tests and interventions for less typical contributors. This dedicated pathway for a previously overlooked CAD population, with an accompanying registry, aims to improve outcomes through enhanced adherence to evidence-based secondary prevention and additional diagnosis of modifiable risk factors observed.

Geographic differences in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the PARADISE-MI trial

AIM

The globalization of clinical trials has highlighted geographic differences in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. We examined these differences in PARADISE-MI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Overall, 23.0% were randomized in Eastern Europe/Russia, 17.5% in Western Europe, 12.2% in Southern Europe, 10.1% in Northern Europe, 12.0% in Latin America (LA), 9.3% in North America (NA), 10.0% in East/South-East Asia and 5.8% in South Asia (SA). Those from Asia, particularly SA, were different from patients enrolled in the other regions, being younger and thinner. They also differed in terms of comorbidities (high prevalence of diabetes and low prevalence of atrial fibrillation), type of myocardial infarction (more often ST-elevation myocardial infarction), and treatment (low rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention). By contrast, patients from LA did not differ meaningfully from those randomized in Europe or NA. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (34.8%) and beta-blockers (65.5%) was low in SA, whereas mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use was lowest in NA (22%) and highest in Eastern Europe/Russia (53%). Rates of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or incident heart failure varied two-fold among regions, with the lowest rate in SA (4.6/100 person-years) and the highest in LA (9.2/100 person-years). Rates of incident heart failure varied almost six-fold among regions, with the lowest rate in SA (1.0/100 person-years) and the highest in Northern Europe (5.9/100 person-years). The effect of sacubitril/valsartan was not modified by region.

CONCLUSION

In PARADISE-MI, there were substantial regional differences in patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes. Although the generalizability of these findings to a 'real-world' unselected population may be limited, these findings underscore the importance of considering both regional and within-region differences when designing global clinical trials.

Safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a pooled analysis of GLASSY and TWILIGHT

Background

Biodegradable polymer (BP) drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown similar safety and efficacy compared with second-generation durable polymer (DP)-DES in several randomized trials and meta-analyses. However, study participants were generally maintained on a standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for at least 6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, the differences in thrombogenicity between these two stent technologies may have been unappreciated, especially among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Purpose

We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of BP Biolimus-Eluting Stent (BP-BES) versus 2nd generation DP-DES among ACS patients undergoing PCI and receiving ticagrelor alone or in combination with aspirin.

Methods

We pooled individual patient-level data from two randomized controlled trials, the Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention (TWILIGHT, n=9,006) (1) and the GLOBAL LEADERS Adjudication Sub-Study (GLASSY, n=7,585) (2). In order to reduce biases related to trial design differences, only NST-ACS patients not fulfilling any exclusion criterion of both studies were included and 2 separate analysis for short (0 to 3 months after PCI) and long-term (3 to 12 months after PCI) outcomes were performed. Patients were stratified according to the stent used at index PCI (BP-BES vs 2nd generation DP-DES). In both analysis, the primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and definite or probable stent thrombosis); the key secondary outcomes were target-vessel failure (TVF) and BARC 2, 3 or 5 bleeding. Events rate and risk were assessed separately for the two study periods and subsequently 12-months risk estimates were derived by pooling the results of the two analysis.

Results

Out of 7,729 and 6,572 NST-ACS patients included in the two analysis, 2,321 (30%) and 2,211 (33.6%) received a BP-BES, respectively. Among patients treated with BP-BES versus DP-DES, the occurrence of MACE was similar at 3 months after PCI (1.1% vs 1.4%, adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.51–1.29), while it was significantly lower in the former group between 3 and 12 months (1.7% vs 3.1%, adj. HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.32–0.67) and in the overall period (pooled adjusted HR estimate 0.58, 95% CI 0.43–0.77).

Similarly, significant differences were observed for TVF and BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding, whose risk at 12 months was lower among BP-BES than DP-DES patients (pooled adj. HR estimate 0.49, 95% CI 0.38–0.63 and 0.79, 95% CI 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.97, respectively).

Conclusion

As compared to 2nd generation DP-DES, BP-BES was associated with a lower risk of MACE, TVF and bleeding among NST-ACS patients undergoing PCI and treated with ticagrelor with or without aspirin. The findings of this analysis are exploratory and need further confirmation.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Biosensors (Singapore)

Prognostic importance of NT-proBNP following high-risk myocardial infarction in the PARADISE-MI Trial

Background/Introduction

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a marker of ventricular wall stress and a potent predictor of death and heart failure (HF) across multiple populations (from healthy insurance applicants to various disease entities).

Purpose

To evaluate the prognostic importance of NT-proBNP in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, or both and ≥1 of 8 predefined risk-augmenting factors (age ≥70 years, diabetes, previous MI, eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, atrial fibrillation, LVEF <30%, Killip class III/IV, or ST elevation MI without reperfusion) enrolled in PARADISE-MI.

Methods

Patients were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan 200mg or ramipril 5mg twice daily within 0.5 to 7 days of presenting with an AMI. Patients with prior HF were excluded. NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) were collected at randomization in a prespecified sub-study of 1129 patients. The primary endpoint of PARADISE-MI was a time-to-first composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or incident HF (hospitalization or outpatient symptomatic HF); secondary endpoints included all-cause death and the composite of fatal or non-fatal MI or stroke.

Results

Median NT-proBNP was 1757 pg/ml [interquartile range, 896–3462 pg/ml] at randomization (4.0±1.8 days after presentation with the index MI). Patients with higher NT-proBNP levels at baseline were older, more commonly women and more frequently had hypertension, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, and pulmonary congestion at randomization (all p<0.001). NT-proBNP concentrations were only weakly correlated with levels of hsTnT at randomization (r=0.38, p<0.001). NT-proBNP at baseline was strongly associated with the primary composite endpoint (adjusted HR 1.45 per doubling NT-proBNP; 95% CI, 1.23–1.70), independent of clinical variables as well as hsTnT (Figure). NT-proBNP was also independently associated with all-cause death (aHR 1.74; 95% CI, 1.38–2.21) and fatal or non-fatal MI or stroke (aHR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05–1.45). The relative effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus ramipril on the primary composite endpoint was not statistically different across the spectrum of NT-proBNP (p-interaction = 0.46).

Conclusions

When assessed within the first week of a high risk AMI NT-proBNP is not only associated with incident HF and death but also with atherosclerotic events and provides prognostic information that is independent of hsTnT in this post AMI population.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Blood pressure and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease in THEMIS

Background

Various BP characteristics, e.g., systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP), as well as heart rate (HR) may affect the risk of both cardiovascular events and bleeding events. However, the exact way in which these characteristics and outcomes are associated among patients with diabetes and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains debated. Moreover, it is unknown whether the risks and benefits of intensified antiplatelet therapy in this patient population are affected by their baseline BP and HR.

Purpose

To assess the relationship between BP components (including HR) and cardiovascular and bleeding events, and to determine if the effects of ticagrelor vs. placebo varied across the BP and HR spectrum, in patients with diabetes and stable CAD.

Methods

THEMIS was a randomized, controlled trial in which 19,220 individuals ≥50 years of age with stable CAD and type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either ticagrelor plus aspirin or placebo plus aspirin. Patients with a prior myocardial infarction or stroke, or already on dual antiplatelet therapy, were excluded. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding. We examined prognostic implications of BP components using 1) restricted cubic splines for the overall trends with outcomes; 2) Cox proportional-hazards regression models with predefined BP component intervals adjusted for demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables; and 3) Cox regression models for the effects of ticagrelor vs. placebo on outcomes across the spectrum of BP component values (test for interaction). THEMIS is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991795).

Results

Mean values of baseline BP components were similar between the two study groups. Median follow-up duration was 39.9 months (range 0–57), with 1554 primary efficacy events and 306 primary safety events occurring over the course of the study. All BP components (including HR) displayed various, independent relationships with the tested outcomes. For example, in adjusted spline models, SBP displayed non-linear relationships with the primary outcome, all-cause death, any bleeding, serious adverse events, and intracranial bleeding, and linear relationships with the remaining outcomes. Figure 1 shows the associations of each BP component with the primary efficacy outcome. BP components did not substantially modify the risks and benefits of ticagrelor vs. placebo for the tested outcomes.

Conclusions

BP components were independently associated with efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with stable CAD and type 2 diabetes. However, no important modification of BP components on the effect of ticagrelor vs. placebo was detected.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): AstraZeneca

Longer-term safety of alirocumab with 24,610 patient-years of placebo-controlled observation: further insights from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial

Background

In the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (NCT01663402), alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from ∼2.3 mmol/L to ∼1.0 mmol/L at 4 months, reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal/nonfatal ischemic stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization), and was associated with fewer deaths compared with placebo in 18924 patients (pts) with recent acute coronary syndrome followed for up to 5 years (yrs).

Purpose

In the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial, the overall safety of alirocumab and placebo was similar, except for an excess of local injection-site reactions with alirocumab. However, the safety among pts eligible for longer follow-up has not been fully explored.

Methods

The present post hoc analyses describe the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in a pre-specified subgroup (for efficacy) of pts eligible for a minimum of 3 and up to 5 yrs of follow-up.

Results

There were 8242 pts (43.5%) eligible for ≥3 yrs follow-up, of whom 8228 received at least one dose of study medication, comprising 24,610 pt-years of observation with a median follow-up of 3.3 yrs; 6651 pts were eligible for 3 up to 4 yrs, and 1574 patients were eligible for 4–5 yrs, follow-up. As previously reported in a pre-specified analysis of this subgroup, alirocumab significantly reduced death (4.7% vs. 5.9%; p=0.01) compared with placebo. In the present post hoc analysis, alirocumab also significantly reduced MACE vs. placebo (12.0% vs. 14.2%; Hazard Ratio 0.83 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.94]; p=0.003). In a safety analysis, 3217 (78.3%) vs. 3303 (80.2%) pts in the alirocumab vs. placebo group had at least one adverse event (AE) of whom 27.5% vs. 29.4% had a serious AE (Fig. 1). The frequency of permanent discontinuation of study drug due to AEs, incident diabetes, diabetes worsening or complications, neurocognitive events, elevations of ALT>3, AST>3, bilirubin>2, and creatine phosphokinase>10 times the upper limit of normal, were similar with alirocumab vs. placebo (Fig. 1). While pt-reported local injection-site reactions occurred more frequently with alirocumab, the Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence for time to first local injection site reaction in the longer-term follow-up subgroup was <5% over ∼4 yrs, with most occurring within the first 6 months (Fig. 2).

Conclusions

In an 8228-pt subgroup of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial eligible for at least 3, and up to 5 yrs follow-up, the safety of alirocumab was similar to placebo except for an excess of local injection site reactions. This subgroup also derived significant benefit from reduced MACE and death. Thus, alirocumab appears to be both a safe and effective lipid-modifying treatment when used for up to 5 yrs.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Sanofi and Regeneron

Lipoprotein(a), cardiovascular events, and benefit of P2Y12 inhibition: insights from the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial

Background

Lp(a) plays a causal role in atherogenesis and may exert pro-thrombotic effects by inhibiting fibrinolysis owing to its structural homology with plasminogen. Patients with higher Lp(a) concentrations may derive greater benefit from anti-thrombotic therapy.

Purpose

We assessed whether patients with higher Lp(a) derive greater risk reduction from P2Y12 inhibition with ticagrelor vs. placebo on a background of aspirin therapy.

Methods

Lp(a) concentration was measured (Randox) in a prospective nested cohort of 8,967 pts enrolled in PEGASUS-TIMI 54, a randomized trial of ticagrelor vs. placebo in patients 1–3 years post MI (median follow-up: 2.7 y). Lp(a) was dichotomized at 200 nmol/L as an established threshold of risk. The prespecified MACE endpoint was CV death, MI or stroke, with KM rates reported at 3y. Cox proportional hazards were used to assess the relationship between Lp(a), MACE and treatment benefit. Models were adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics including apolipoprotein B.

Results

The median Lp(a) was 29 (25th-75th percentile: 12–137) nmol/L. A total of 1,053 pts (11.7%) had a high Lp(a) (≥200 nmol/L). In the pooled trial population, high Lp(a) concentration was associated with a 29% higher risk of MACE (9.1% vs 7.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [adj HR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.62; p=0.03), including a 37% higher risk of MI (6.9% vs. 5.3%; adj HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05–1.79; p=0.02). The hazard ratios for MACE with ticagrelor vs. placebo were 0.73 (95% CI 0.48–1.11) for patients with higher Lp(a) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.74–1.05) for patients with lower Lp(a) (p-interaction=0.41; Figure 1). The absolute risk reductions were 2.4% and 1.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Lp(a) above 200 nmol/L identifies patients with prior MI at increased risk of MACE who may derive greater absolute risk reduction from treatment with ticagrelor. These exploratory observations provide insights for therapeutics that are evaluating the clinical benefit of Lp(a) reduction.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): The PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial was funded by AstraZeneca

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

In patients with symptomatic heart failure, sacubitril-valsartan has been found to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death from cardiovascular causes more effectively than an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor. Trials comparing the effects of these drugs in patients with acute myocardial infarction have been lacking.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with myocardial infarction complicated by a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary congestion, or both to receive either sacubitril-valsartan (97 mg of sacubitril and 103 mg of valsartan twice daily) or ramipril (5 mg twice daily) in addition to recommended therapy. The primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or incident heart failure (outpatient symptomatic heart failure or heart failure leading to hospitalization), whichever occurred first.

RESULTS

A total of 5661 patients underwent randomization; 2830 were assigned to receive sacubitril-valsartan and 2831 to receive ramipril. Over a median of 22 months, a primary-outcome event occurred in 338 patients (11.9%) in the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 373 patients (13.2%) in the ramipril group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.04; P = 0.17). Death from cardiovascular causes or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 308 patients (10.9%) in the sacubitril-valsartan group and in 335 patients (11.8%) in the ramipril group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.07); death from cardiovascular causes in 168 (5.9%) and 191 (6.7%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.08); and death from any cause in 213 (7.5%) and 242 (8.5%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.05). Treatment was discontinued because of an adverse event in 357 patients (12.6%) in the sacubitril-valsartan group and 379 patients (13.4%) in the ramipril group.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacubitril-valsartan was not associated with a significantly lower incidence of death from cardiovascular causes or incident heart failure than ramipril among patients with acute myocardial infarction. (Funded by Novartis; PARADISE-MI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02924727.).

Cardiovascular benefits outweigh risks in patients with atrial fibrillation in REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial)

Background/Introduction

REDUCE-IT, a multinational, double-blind trial, randomized 8179 statin-treated patients with controlled low density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, and cardiovascular (CV) risk, to icosapent ethyl (IPE) 4 grams/day or placebo. IPE reduced the primary (CV death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, coronary revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina) and key secondary (CV death, MI, stroke) endpoints 25% and 26%, respectively (each p<0.0001), and individual components including stroke (28%), MI (31%), cardiac arrest (48%), and sudden cardiac death (31%) (all p≤0.01). With IPE, bleeding was greater (11.8% vs 9.9%; p=0.006), serious bleeding trended higher (2.7% vs 2.1%; p=0.06), and atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/F) hospitalization endpoints increased (3.1% vs 2.1%; p=0.004).

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of IPE on the risk of CV events and safety measures in patients by either history of AF/F or in-study occurrence of positively adjudicated AF/F hospitalization.

Methods

Conduct post hoc efficacy and safety subgroup analyses of patients with or without either baseline history of AF/F or in-study adjudicated AF/F hospitalization, including hospitalization for ≥24 hours; AF/F not meeting endpoint criteria were reported as adverse events.

Results

Patients with (n=751; 9.2%) AF/F history at baseline (vs without; n=7428; 90.8%) (Figure 1), or those with (n=211; 2.6%) positively adjudicated in-study AF/F hospitalization endpoints (vs without; n=7968; 97.4%) (Figure 2), had higher event rates of primary, key secondary, and fatal or nonfatal stroke endpoints, but relative risk reductions with IPE were not significantly different (all interaction p-values [pint]=ns). Similar reductions were observed with IPE across the prespecified endpoint testing hierarchy in patients with or without AF/F history or in-study hospitalization endpoints. Patients with baseline AF/F history had similar relative risk for in-study occurrence of AF/F hospitalization with IPE versus placebo (pint=0.21) but had greater absolute risk (12.5% vs 6.3%, IPE vs placebo) vs patients without baseline AF/F history (2.2% vs 1.6%, IPE vs placebo); i.e., recurrent AF/F in those with a prior history of AF/F was more prevalent than de novo AF/F. Serious bleeding trended higher regardless of AF/F history or in-study AF/F hospitalization endpoints (all pint=ns); absolute risk of serious bleeding was greater in patients with AF/F history at baseline (7.3% vs 6.0%) vs those without a baseline history of AF/F (2.3% vs 1.7%), and serious bleeding also trended higher in patients with in-study AF/F hospitalization (8.7% vs 6.0%) vs without (2.5% vs 2.0%) [all IPE vs placebo].

Conclusion

REDUCE-IT patients with AF/F history or in-study AF/F hospitalization endpoints had greater CV risk, but similar relative risk reduction in primary, key secondary, and fatal or nonfatal stroke endpoints with IPE.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Amarin Pharma, Inc.

Impact of chronic coronary syndromes on cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality: the ESC-EORP CICD-LT registry

Background

In Europe, global data on guideline adherence, potential geographic variations and determinants of major clinical events in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) remain suboptimal. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) EURObservational Research Programme (EORP) Chronic Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease Long-Term (CICD-LT) registry, a prospective European registry, was designed and conducted to describe the profile, care and outcomes of patients with CCS across the ESC countries

Purpose

We aimed to investigate clinical events at one-year follow-up from the ESC EORP CICD-LT Registry and identify the variables associated with an increased risk of clinical events.

Methods

Consecutive adults presenting with a diagnosis of CCS during a routine ambulatory visit or an elective coronary revascularisation procedure at participating centres were recruited across 154 centers from 20 countries between 1 May 2015 and 31 July 2018. Information on clinical and survival status was collected after 1 year from study inclusion. Composite events were cardio-vascular (CV) mortality and/or CV rehospitalisations, all-cause mortality and/or all cause rehospitalisation. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of each composite. Cox models were also performed with age, sex and region forced in the model. Significance levels of 0.05 were required to allow a variable to stay within the model. Co-linearity between all candidate variables (variables with p<0.05 in univariable) within the model and variables considered of relevant clinical interest were tested before proceeding to the multivariable model. Missing data were not imputed.

Results

One-year outcomes of 6655 patients from the 9174 recruited in this European registry were analyzed. Overall, 168 patients (2.5%) died, mostly from CV causes (n=97, 1.5%). Northern Europe had the lowest CV mortality rate, while southern Europe had the highest (0.5% vs 2.0%, p=0.04). Women had a higher rate of CV mortality compared with men (2.0% vs 1.3%, p=0.02). During follow-up, 1606 patients (27.1%) were hospitalised at least once, predominantly for CV indications (n=1220, 20.6%). Among the population with measured LDL-cholesterol level at one year, 1434 patients (66.5%) were above the currently recommended target. Age, history of atrial fibrillation, previous stroke, liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, increased serum creatinine and impaired left ventricular function were each independently associated with an increased risk of CV death or hospitalization.

Conclusion

In the CICD registry, the majority of patients with CCS have uncontrolled CV risk factors. The mortality rate at one year was low, but these patients are frequently hospitalised for CV causes. Early identification of comorbidities may represent an opportunity for enhanced care and better outcomes.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): The study was funded by the EORP program.

Multivessel PCI Guided by FFR or Angiography for Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who have multivessel disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for nonculprit lesions (complete revascularization) is superior to treatment of the culprit lesion alone. However, whether complete revascularization that is guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is superior to an angiography-guided procedure is unclear.

METHODS

In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients with STEMI and multivessel disease who had undergone successful PCI of the infarct-related artery to receive complete revascularization guided by either FFR or angiography. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization at 1 year.

RESULTS

The mean (±SD) number of stents that were placed per patient for nonculprit lesions was 1.01±0.99 in the FFR-guided group and 1.50±0.86 in the angiography-guided group. During follow-up, a primary outcome event occurred in 32 of 586 patients (5.5%) in the FFR-guided group and in 24 of 577 patients (4.2%) in the angiography-guided group (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 2.23; P = 0.31). Death occurred in 9 patients (1.5%) in the FFR-guided group and in 10 (1.7%) in the angiography-guided group; nonfatal myocardial infarction in 18 (3.1%) and 10 (1.7%), respectively; and unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization in 15 (2.6%) and 11 (1.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with STEMI undergoing complete revascularization, an FFR-guided strategy did not have a significant benefit over an angiography-guided strategy with respect to the risk of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at 1 year. However, given the wide confidence intervals for the estimate of effect, the findings do not allow for a conclusive interpretation. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and Abbott; FLOWER-MI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02943954.).

Prospective ARNI vs. ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction (PARADISE-MI): design and baseline characteristics

AIMS

Patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at risk of developing symptomatic heart failure (HF) or premature death. We hypothesized that sacubitril/valsartan, effective in the treatment of chronic HF, prevents development of HF and reduces cardiovascular death following high-risk AMI compared to a proven angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. This paper describes the study design and baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Prospective ARNI vs. ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction (PARADISE-MI) trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PARADISE-MI, a multinational (41 countries), double-blind, active-controlled trial, randomized patients within 0.5-7 days of presentation with index AMI to sacubitril/valsartan or ramipril. Transient pulmonary congestion and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and at least one additional factor augmenting risk of HF or death (age ≥70 years, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m² , diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, LVEF <30%, Killip class ≥III, ST-elevation myocardial infarction without reperfusion) were required for inclusion. PARADISE-MI was event-driven targeting 708 primary endpoints (cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization or outpatient development of HF). Randomization of 5669 patients occurred 4.3 ± 1.8 days from presentation with index AMI. The mean age was 64 ± 12 years, 24% were women. The majority (76%) qualified with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; acute percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 88% and thrombolysis in 6%. LVEF was 37 ± 9% and 58% were in Killip class ≥II.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline therapies in PARADISE-MI reflect advances in contemporary evidence-based care. With enrollment complete PARADISE-MI is poised to determine whether sacubitril/valsartan is more effective than a proven ACE inhibitor in preventing development of HF and cardiovascular death following AMI.

Clinical Application of High-Sensitivity Troponin Testing in the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Framework of the Current Cholesterol Guidelines

Importance

The 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) cholesterol management guidelines identified 2 distinct groups of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prompting different treatment recommendations.

Objective

To investigate whether the addition of high-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) testing to guideline-derived ASCVD risk can improve risk classification and downstream treatment recommendations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A prospective cohort biomarker substudy was performed that included 8635 patients enrolled in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54 (PEGASUS-TIMI 54) trial. Patients were assigned to risk groups of either very high-risk ASCVD or lower-risk ASCVD based on their cardiovascular history and comorbidities, in line with the 2018 AHA/ACC cholesterol management guidelines criteria. Patients were also classified on the basis of hsTnI level (ARCHITECT assay; Abbott) using cut points of 2 ng/L (limit of detection) and 6 ng/L (risk threshold), followed by joint classification on the basis of clinical features and hsTnI level. The setting was a nested prospective cohort study in a completed multinational trial. Participants were all patients who had a myocardial infarction 1 to 3 years before enrollment, were at least 50 years of age, and had at least 1 high-risk feature. The study dates were October 2010 to December 2014. The dates of analysis were June 2019 to January 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Results

Among 8635 patients enrolled in the PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial, the median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 58-71 years), and 6614 (76.6%) were men; 8340 (96.6%) were White individuals and 176 (2.0%) were Black individuals. Patients meeting clinical criteria for the very high-risk ASCVD group had a primary end point 3-year event rate of 8.8% compared with 5.0% in the lower-risk ASCVD group (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.58-2.57; P < .001). When patients in the very high-risk ASCVD group were further risk stratified by hsTnI level, 614 of 6789 patients (9.0%) with an undetectable hsTnI level had a 3-year event rate of 2.7% (<1% per year), which was less than the overall rate in the lower-risk ASCVD group. Analogously, in the lower-risk ASCVD group, 417 of 1846 patients (22.6%) with an hsTnI level exceeding 6 ng/L had an event rate of 9.1%, comparable to the overall rate in the very high-risk ASCVD group. The addition of hsTnI to guideline-derived ASCVD risk led to a net reclassification index at event rate of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10-0.21). Overall, use of hsTnI reclassified 1031 of 8635 patients (11.9%) (1 in 11 with very high-risk ASCVD and 1 in 4 with lower-risk ASCVD).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort substudy suggest that a strategy incorporating hsTn into a guideline-derived ASCVD risk algorithm provides enhanced risk stratification and reclassifies 11.9% of patients into a more appropriate risk group. This application of hsTn testing might be used to optimize the care of patients with ASCVD.

Antiplatelet strategies in acute coronary syndromes: design and methodology of an international collaborative network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The optimal choice of oral P2Y<inf>12</inf> receptor inhibitors has the potential to significantly influence outcomes. We seek to compare the safety and efficacy of the three most commonly used oral P2Y<inf>12</inf> receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) via a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a comprehensive search for RCTs which compared cardiovascular and hemorrhagic outcomes after use of at least two of the distinct oral P2Y<inf>12</inf> receptor inhibitors (i.e. clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor). A search strategy has been designed to systematically search multiple databases, including MEDLINE with PubMed interface, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase. In addition, key inclusion criteria will be trial size of at least 100 patients and at least 1 month of follow-up time. Several prespecified subgroups will be explored, including Asian patients, patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, patients of advanced age, and others.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Exploratory frequentist pairwise meta-analyses will be based primarily on a random-effects method, relying on relative risks (RR) for short-term outcomes and incidence rate ratios (IRR) for long-term outcomes. Inferential frequentist network meta-analysis will be based primarily on a random-effects method, relying on RR and IRR as specified above. Results will be reported as point summary of effect, 95% CI, and P values for effect, and graphically represented using forest plots.

CONCLUSIONS

An international collaborative network meta-analysis has begun to comprehensively analyze the safety and efficacy of prasugrel, ticagrelor and clopidogrel, each on a background of aspirin, for management of patients with ACS. It is our hope that the rigor and breadth of the undertaking described herein will provide novel insights that will inform optimal patient care for patients with ACS treated conservatively, or undergoing revascularization.

Antiplatelet strategies in acute coronary syndromes: design and methodology of an international collaborative network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The optimal choice of oral P2Y<inf>12</inf> receptor inhibitors has the potential to significantly influence outcomes. We seek to compare the safety and efficacy of the three most commonly used oral P2Y<inf>12</inf> receptor inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) via a comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a comprehensive search for RCTs which compared cardiovascular and hemorrhagic outcomes after use of at least two of the distinct oral P2Y<inf>12</inf> receptor inhibitors (i.e. clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor). A search strategy has been designed to systematically search multiple databases, including MEDLINE with PubMed interface, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase. In addition, key inclusion criteria will be trial size of at least 100 patients and at least 1 month of follow-up time. Several prespecified subgroups will be explored, including Asian patients, patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, patients of advanced age, and others.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Exploratory frequentist pairwise meta-analyses will be based primarily on a random-effects method, relying on relative risks (RR) for short-term outcomes and incidence rate ratios (IRR) for long-term outcomes. Inferential frequentist network meta-analysis will be based primarily on a random-effects method, relying on RR and IRR as specified above. Results will be reported as point summary of effect, 95% CI, and P values for effect, and graphically represented using forest plots.

CONCLUSIONS

An international collaborative network meta-analysis has begun to comprehensively analyze the safety and efficacy of prasugrel, ticagrelor and clopidogrel, each on a background of aspirin, for management of patients with ACS. It is our hope that the rigor and breadth of the undertaking described herein will provide novel insights that will inform optimal patient care for patients with ACS treated conservatively, or undergoing revascularization.

Predicting 10-year risk of recurrent cardiovascular events andcardiovascular interventions in patients with established cardiovascular disease: results from UCC-SMART and REACH

BACKGROUND

Existing cardiovascular risk scores for patients with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) estimate residual risk of recurrent major cardiovascular events (MACE). The aim of the current study is to develop and externally validate a prediction model to estimate the 10-year combined risk of recurrent MACE and cardiovascular interventions (MACE+) in patients with established CVD.

METHODS

Data of patients with established CVD from the UCC-SMART cohort (N = 8421) were used for model development, and patient data from REACH Western Europe (N = 14,528) and REACH North America (N = 19,495) for model validation. Predictors were selected based on the existing SMART risk score. A Fine and Gray competing risk-adjusted 10-year risk model was developed for the combined outcome MACE+. The model was validated in all patients and in strata of coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease (CeVD), peripheral artery disease (PAD).

RESULTS

External calibration for 2-year risk in REACH Western Europe and REACH North America was good, c-statistics were moderate: 0.60 and 0.58, respectively. In strata of CVD at baseline good external calibration was observed in patients with CHD and CeVD, however, poor calibration was seen in patients with PAD. C-statistics for patients with CHD were 0.60 and 0.57, for patients with CeVD 0.62 and 0.61, and for patients with PAD 0.53 and 0.54 in REACH Western Europe and REACH North America, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-year combined risk of recurrent MACE and cardiovascular interventions can be estimated in patients with established CHD or CeVD. However, cardiovascular interventions in patients with PAD could not be predicted reliably.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COMPASS eligible patients in France. An analysis from the REACH Registry

BACKGROUND

Following the publication of the COMPASS trial, the European Medicines Agency has approved a regimen of combination of rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily and a daily dose of 75-100mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) at high risk of ischemic events. However, the applicability of such a therapeutic strategy in France is currently unknown.

AIMS

To describe the proportion of patients eligible to COMPASS in France, their baseline clinical characteristics and the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, using the REACH registry.

METHODS

From the the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry database, a large international registry of patients with, or at risk, of atherothrombosis, we analyzed patients included in France with either established CAD and/or PAD and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the COMPASS trial. The ischemic outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, and serious bleeding were defined as haemorrhagic stroke or bleeding leading to hospitalization or transfusion.

RESULTS

Among more than 65000 patients enrolled in REACH, 2.012 patients were evaluable and enrolled in France. Among them, 1194 patients (59.3%) were eligible to COMPASS. The main reasons for exclusion of the COMPASS trial, were high bleeding risk (59.1%), anticoagulant use (43.4%), requirement for dual antiplatelet therapy within 1 year of an ACS or PCI (24.7%). In the "COMPASS eligible population", the rate of MACE (CV, MI and stroke) at 4 years follow-up was 13.4% [11.3-15.8], and serious bleeding was 2.5% at 4 years [1.6-3.4]. Patients with polyvascular disease (n=219) had the highest rate of MACE, compared with patients with CAD only and PAD only (19.1% [13.9-26.1] vs. 11.6% [9.1-14.8] vs 13.2% [9.2-18.8], P<0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The COMPASS therapeutic strategy in France appears to be applicable to more than half of CAD or PAD patients. This population appears at high residual risk of atherothrombotic events, and patients with polyvascular disease experienced the highest rate of events.

Blood transfusion and ischaemic outcomes according to anemia and bleeding in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the TAO randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The benefits and risks of blood transfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction who are anemic or who experience bleeding are debated. We sought to study the association between blood transfusion and ischemic outcomes according to haemoglobin nadir and bleeding status in patients with NST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

METHODS

The TAO trial randomized patients with NSTEMI and coronary angiogram scheduled within 72h to heparin plus eptifibatide versus otamixaban. After exclusion of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, patients were categorized according to transfusion status considering transfusion as a time-varying covariate. The primary ischemic outcome was the composite of all-cause death or MI within 180 days of randomization. Subgroup analyses were performed according to pre-transfusion hemoglobin nadir and bleeding status.

RESULTS

12,547 patients were enrolled. Among these, blood transfusion was used in 489 (3.9%) patients. Patients who received transfusion had a higher rate of death or MI (29.9% vs. 8.1%, p<0.01). This excess risk persisted after adjustment on GRACE score and nadir of hemoglobin (HR 3.36 95%CI 2.63-4.29 p<0.01). Subgroup analyses showed that blood transfusion was associated with a higher risk in patients without overt bleeding (adjusted HR 6.25 vs. 2.85; p-interaction 0.001) as well as in those with hemoglobin nadir > 9.0 g/dl (HR 4.01; p-interaction<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with NSTEMI, blood transfusion was associated with an overall increased risk of ischaemic events. However, this was mainly driven by patients without overt bleeding and those hemoglobin nadir > 9.0g/dl. This suggests possible harm of transfusion in those groups.

Profile and treatment of chronic coronary syndromes in European Society of Cardiology member countries: The ESC EORP CICD-LT registry

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend pharmacotherapy combinations for chronic coronary syndromes (CCSs) but medical management remains suboptimal.

DESIGN

The CICD-LT registry is investigating short- and long-term outcomes and management in patients in European Society of Cardiology (ESC) member countries, in a longitudinal ESC EURObservational Research Programme aimed at improving CCS management.

METHODS

Between 1 May 2015 and 31 July 2018, 9174 patients with previous ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI or coronary revascularisation, or other CCS, were recruited during a routine ambulatory visit or elective revascularisation procedure. Baseline clinical data were recorded and prescribed medications analysed at initial contact and discharge, and according to patient gender and age (<75 vs. ≥75 years).

RESULTS

Poorly controlled cardiovascular risk factors, including current smoking (18.5%), obesity (33.9%), diabetes (25.8%), raised low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (73.3%) and persistent hypertension (24.7%), were common across all cohorts. At ambulatory visit or admission, the guidelines-recommended combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blocker, aspirin, statin and any antiplatelet agent was prescribed to 57.8% of patients with STEMI/NSTEMI. Differences in prescribing rates, including for combination therapies, were observed based on age and gender and persisted after adjustment for demographic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiovascular risk factors were common in contemporary CCS patients and secondary prevention prescribing was suboptimal. Patients aged ≥75 years and, to some extent, female patients were less likely to receive guidelines-recommended drug combinations than younger and male patients. One- and two-year follow-up will study prescribing changes and associations between baseline characteristics/prescribing and subsequent clinical outcomes.

P34 The effect of sex on the efficacy and safety of dabigatran dual therapy in atrial fibrillation after PCI: a subgroup analysis from the RE-DUAL PCI trial

Funding Acknowledgements

Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH

On Behalf

The Re-DUAL PCI Investigators

Background

The RE-DUAL PCI study (NCT02164864) compared dabigatran dual antithrombotic therapy (D-DAT) with warfarin triple antithrombotic therapy (W-TAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). As previously reported D-DAT reduced bleeding compared with W-TAT and was non-inferior with regard to thromboembolic events. 

Aim 

The aim of this subgroup analysis of RE-DUAL was to assess the relationship between sex and treatment effects of D-DAT and W-TAT on bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes.

Methods

Patients were randomized to receive W-TAT (warfarin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor, and aspirin) or D-DAT (dabigatran 110 or 150 mg twice daily with clopidogrel or ticagrelor; D110- or D150-DAT). Younger patients (aged &lt; 80 yrs. [&lt; 70 yrs. in Japan]) and US patients irrespective of age received D110-DAT, D150-DAT or W-TAT; older patients (aged ≥ 80 yrs. in non-US countries [≥ 70 yrs. in Japan]) received only D110-DAT or W-TAT. Bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes were assessed according to treatment group and by sex (female vs. male).

Results

A total of 2725 patients were randomized; 2070 patients were male (76.0%) and 655 (24.0%) were female. Overall females were older at time of PCI than males (73.2 ± 7.9 vs. 70.0 ± 8.8 years). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and modified HAS-BLED scores were higher in women at 4.5 and 2.8, respectively, than in men at 3.3 and 2.7, respectively. 

For the primary endpoint of major bleeding events or clinically relevant non-major bleeding events, treatment effects of D110-DAT vs. W-TAT were consistent for female and male patients (females: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.01, males HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.37-0.59, interaction p-value 0.084). Similarly, consistent treatment effects were seen for the primary endpoint with D150-DAT vs W-TAT in female and male patients (females HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48-1.16, males HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.90, interaction p value 0.83). 

No interaction between sex and treatment was observed for D110- or D150-DAT vs W-TAT with regard to the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thromboembolic events or unplanned revascularization (interaction p values 0.73 and 0.72, respectively) (figure).

Conclusion

The treatment effect of dabigatran 110 mg and 150 mg dual therapy vs warfarin triple therapy was consistent across sex groups. This suggests that female and male patients with AF undergoing PCI should be treated equally in terms of the dosage of dabigatran selected for dual therapy strategies.

Abstract P34 Figure. Re-DUAL sex subgroup analysis

2387Recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality in relation to antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA)

Background

Approximately 10% of patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA). The role of antiplatelet therapy and outcomes in this group remain unclear. We assessed prognosis and the effect of an intensified clopidogrel regimen in MINOCA patients.

Methods

We analyzed data from the CURRENT-OASIS 7 trial, which randomized 25,086 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) referred for early intervention to receive either double-dose (600mg day 1; 150mg days 2–7; then 75mg daily) or standard-dose (300mg day 1; then 75mg daily) clopidogrel. We evaluated clinical outcomes at 30-days in patients with versus without obstructive CAD and in relation to standard versus double-dose clopidogrel.

Results

Overall, 23,783 MI patients were included, of which 1,599 (6.7%) had MINOCA. MINOCA patients were younger, more frequently presented with non-ST-segment elevation MI and had fewer comorbidities. Rates of all-cause mortality (0.7% versus 2.4%, p=0.0046), cardiovascular mortality (0.6 versus 2.2%, p=0.0056), repeat MI (0.5% versus 2.3%, p=0.0009) and major bleedings (0.7% versus 2.5%, p=0.0001) were significantly lower among patients with MINOCA versus those with obstructive CAD. Compared with the standard-dose clopidogrel regimen, the double-dose regimen appeared to increase the risk of cardiovascular death, MI or stroke in MINOCA patients (0.8% versus 2.1%, hazard ratio (HR) 2.74, P=0.033). There was no difference in those with obstructive CAD (4.7% versus 4.4%, HR 0.93, P=0.226; P-for-interaction=0.023) (see Figure 1A). Major bleeding did not occur more frequently in MINOCA patients with double- versus standard-dose clopidogrel regimen (0.7% versus 0.6%, (HR 1.16 (95% CI 0.35–3.80), p=0.805), but their rate was higher In MI patients with obstructive CAD (2.7% versus 2.2% (HR 1.26 (95% CI 1.06–1.49), p=0.008) (Figure 1B).

Figure 1A & B

Conclusions

Compared to MI patients with obstructive CAD, patients presenting with MINOCA represent a distinct cohort, which is generally younger, has a higher NSTEMI prevalence and fewer comorbidities. Their risk for adverse events, especially repeat MI, stroke, death, and bleeding, is low (<1%) at 30 days. Applying an intensified clopidogrel regimen in MINOCA patients appears to be related to a higher risk for CV death, MI and stroke. Accordingly, more potent antiplatelet regimens might be harmful among MINOCA patients and should not be administered routinely. Nevertheless, there is a need for more prospective studies evaluating the role of dual antiplatelet therapies in MINOCA patients.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The CURRENT-OASIS 7 trial was sponsored by Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Interleukin-18 in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Background

We aimed to assess associations between circulating IL‐18 concentrations and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Hypothesis and Methods

Plasma IL‐18 concentrations were measured at admission, discharge, 1 month, and 6 months in patients with ACS in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Associations with outcomes were evaluated with Cox regression models on the composite of CV death, spontaneous myocardial infarction (sMI), or stroke; and on CV death or sMI separately, including adjustment for clinical risk factors and biomarkers (cTnT‐hs, NT‐proBNP, cystatin C, CRP‐hs, and GDF‐15).

Results

Median IL‐18 concentrations at baseline, discharge, 1 month, and 6 months were 237, 283, 305, and 320 ng/L (n = 16 636). Male sex, obesity, diabetes, and plasma levels of cystatin C, GDF‐15, and CRP‐hs were independently associated with higher IL‐18 levels. Higher baseline IL‐18 levels were associated with the composite endpoint and with CV death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02‐1.07 and HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06‐1.14, respectively, per 25% increase of IL‐18 levels). Associations remained significant after adjustment for clinical variables but became non‐significant after adjustment for all biomarkers (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98‐1.04 and HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00‐1.08, respectively). There were no associations with sMI.

Conclusions

In ACS patients, IL‐18 concentrations increased after the acute event and remained increased for 6 months. Baseline IL‐18 levels were significantly associated with CV mortality, independent of clinical characteristics and indicators of renal/cardiac dysfunction but this association was attenuated after adjustment for multiple biomarkers.

P1226Very low achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level with alirocumab treatment after acute coronary syndrome: ODYSSEY OUTCOMES

Background

Recent guidelines for cholesterol management recognize uncertainty regarding long-term efficacy and safety of prolonged very low levels of LDL-C on treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor, including risk of new-onset diabetes. ODYSSEY OUTCOMES used a treat-to-target approach to demonstrate reduction of coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or unstable angina (MACE) with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab (ALI) vs placebo (PBO) in 18,924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome and elevated LDL-C despite intensive statin therapy. ALI was blindly adjusted (75 or 150 mg dose) to target LDL-C 0.6–1.3 mmol/L (25–50 mg/dL). To avoid sustained very low LDL-C, blind substitution of PBO for ALI was intended if 2 consecutive LDL-C levels were <0.39 mmol/L (15 mg/dL). Patients were followed for median of 2.8 years (maximum of 5 years).

Purpose

We report the efficacy and safety of ALI in patients who reached very low LDL-C (consecutively <0.39 mmol/L), compared with matched patients from the PBO group.

Methods

Of 9462 patients randomized to receive ALI, 730 (7.7%) reached very low LDL-C and had substitution of PBO a median 8.3 months after randomization. Using propensity score matching, they were compared (3:1) with 2152 patients initially assigned to PBO. Propensity score matching was also used to compare the incidence of new-onset diabetes in 525 patients without diabetes at baseline who had very low LDL-C levels on ALI with 1675 matched patients in the PBO group. Neurocognitive events and haemorrhagic stroke were also evaluated in relation to very low LDL-C.

Results

Overall, ALI reduced the incidence of MACE (9.5% vs 11.1%; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.93; P<0.001). Characteristics used in propensity score matching (and associated with very low LDL-C on ALI) included sex (male), diabetes (present), baseline LDL-C and lipoprotein(a) (lower), region (Asia), statin treatment, smoking, hypertension, and body mass index. Despite being switched to PBO, patients with very low LDL-C on ALI had fewer MACE than matched patients from the PBO group (6.4% vs 8.5%; HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52–0.98; P=0.039; Figure). Very low LDL-C on ALI was not associated with risk of new-onset diabetes, compared with matched patients from the PBO group (15.1% vs 13.0%; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.85–1.43; P=0.46). There was no association of very low LDL-C on ALI with neurocognitive events or haemorrhagic stroke.

Conclusions

The overall efficacy of ALI on cardiovascular outcomes was not diminished by the patients who had blinded substitution of PBO for sustained very low LDL-C. Despite a short duration of active treatment, these patients had fewer MACE than matched controls from the PBO group. No adverse consequence of very low LDL-C was identified. However, because patients with sustained very low LDL-C were switched to PBO, the long-term safety of more prolonged very low LDL-C, including risk of new-onset diabetes, deserves further study.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

P6408Potential benefit of ticagrelor monotherapy for patients with hypertension undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Global Leaders trial

Background

Hypertension is one of the most frequent modifiable risk factors for coronary artery disease. Due to the increased risk of bleeding associated with it, hypertensive patients might benefit from an antiplatelet monotherapy following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Purpose

We sought to investigate the effect of 1-month DAPT followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy (ticagrelor monotherapy) compared with the reference arm, 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy (standard DAPT), on clinical outcomes in patients with hypertension undergoing PCI.

Methods

This is a post-hoc analysis of the prospective, multi-center, open-label, all-comers, randomized controlled trial Global Leaders, that tested ticagrelor monotherapy versus standard DAPT in patients receiving PCI with biolimus A9-eluting stent. Patients were stratified by the hypertension status. The primary endpoint for the present analysis was the patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE - defined as composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, or all revascularization) and safety endpoint of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding, both at 2 years. Event rates are presented as Kaplan-Meier estimates (%).

Results

In Global Leaders 15,991 patients were randomized, 23 (0.14%) requested complete deletion of their data from the database and 54 (0.34%) had no information on hypertension status. Of the 15,914 (99.52%) included in the analysis 11,715 were hypertensive. In the non-hypertensive patients, comparing ticagrelor monotherapy with standard DAPT, no difference was found regarding POCE (12.17% vs. 12.13%, HR 1.004, 95% CI 0.843 to 1.195, p=0.965) nor bleeding (1.71% vs. 1.72%, HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.628 to 1.592, p=1.0, respectively). In hypertensive patients the experimental treatment of ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in less POCE (13.62% vs. 15.04%, HR 0.898, 95% CI 0.816 to 0.988, p=0.028, p for interaction=0.271) with similar bleeding (2.21% vs. 2.26%, HR 0.976, 95% CI 0.765 to 1.246, p=0.846), compared with the standard DAPT at 2 years.

Conclusion

In this sub-group analysis of Global Leaders, in patients with hypertension undergoing PCI the experimental treatment of 1-month DAPT followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy may offer ischemic protection without increasing bleeding. The results must be interpreted cautiously as there was no interaction between treatment strategy and the status of hypertension. Thus, the present results are hypothesis generating.

Acknowledgement/Funding

ECRI - Astra Zeneca - Biosensors - Medicine Company

P1255Comparative safety and effectiveness of standard doses of apixaban versus dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKAs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in France: the NAXOS study

Background

Real-world data comparing all available oral anticoagulants (OAC) on a nationwide scale (i.e. in France: apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran and vitamin K antagonists – VKAs) are lacking. In everyday practice, oral anticoagulants are often underdosed, which may render comparisons between agents difficult.

Purpose and methods

NAXOS is a French real-world study comparing the safety (major bleeding), effectiveness (stroke, systemic thromboembolic events (STE)) and all-cause mortality for apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and VKAs, in adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating a given OAC between 2014 and 2016. The French national health insurance data (SNIIRAM) were used. Analyses were performed with adjustment on propensity scores. To avoid bias potentially related to underdosing, the present analysis included only patients receiving standard doses of apixaban (5mg bid), rivaroxaban (20mg od), and dabigatran (150 mg bid), or VKAs. Only OAC naïve patients were included.

Results

In the OAC-naive cohorts treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, 54,575 (62.3%), 65,208 (65.2%), and 9,000 (42.4%), respectively, had the standard dose at the index dispensation, and 112,628 patients received VKAs. After adjustment on propensity scores, apixaban 5 mg was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, compared to VKAs (Hazard Ratio: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.43–0.51) and rivaroxaban 20mg (HR: 0.64; 0.59–0.71), but not to dabigatran 150 mg (HR: 0.97; 0.79–1.18). Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke and STE, compared to VKAs (HR: 0.62; 0.56–0.69) but not to rivaroxaban (HR: 1.03; 0.92–1.16), and dabigatran (HR: 0.96; 0.76–1.21). Apixaban showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to VKAs (HR: 0.44; 0.41–0.47) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.87; 0.81–0.94) but not to dabigatran (HR: 1.10; 0.92–1.32).

Figure 1. Forest plot presenting the results of the standard dose analysis (PS adjusted).

Conclusions

The NAXOS population-based country-wide observational study shows that 42% to 65% of patients were treated with standard doses of OACs. Analyses of standard doses confirmed the superiority of apixaban compared with VKAs for the three studied outcomes and suggests better safety profile of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban but similar to dabigatran.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The Alliance Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer

P2531Impact of age on clinical outcomes after PCI in patients with ACS and stable CAD treated with 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month DAPT in the randomized GLOBAL LEADERS study

Background

The efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been evaluated.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI in relation to age and clinical presentation in the GLOBAL LEADERS study cohort.

Methods

This is a subanalysis of the randomized multicentre GLOBAL LEADERS study, comparing the experimental strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy after 1 month of ticagrelor and aspirin with the reference strategy of 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy in 15991 patients undergoing PCI. Patients were categorized into elderly and very elderly according to a pre-specified cut-off of 75 years and a post-hoc defined cut-off of 80 years. Impact of age and clinical presentation (ACS versus stable CAD) on clinical outcome at 2 years was evaluated. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or nonfatal, centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction.

Results

In the overall elderly (>75 years) population (n=2565), primary endpoint occurred in 7.2% of patients in the experimental group and in 9.4% of patients in the reference group (p=0.041) at 2 years (p int =0.23). Elderly patients in the experimental group had a lower rate of definite stent thrombosis (ST) (0.2% vs. 0.9%, p=0.043, p int=0.03), definite or probable ST (0.4 vs. 1.3%, p=0.015, p int=0.01) and a numerically higher rates of BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (5.0% vs. 3.9%, p=0.192, p int=0.06), when compared to the reference arm.

Among elderly patients presenting with ACS both treatment groups did not differ in the rates of primary endpoint (9.1% vs. 10.8%, p=0.367) and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (4.7% vs. 5.7%, p=0.458), whereas among elderly patients with stable CAD the experimental strategy was associated with numerically lower rates of the primary endpoint (5.7% vs. 8.4%, p=0.046) (p int =0.42) and a higher rate of BARC 3 or 5 type bleedings (5.3% vs. 2.6%, p=0.012) (p int =0.02) at 2 years.

Exploratory analyses among very elderly (≥80 years) patients (n=1169) indicated no significant differences between treatment groups in the rates of the primary endpoint (10.2% vs. 11.7% p=0.411, p int=0.940) and BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding (6.0% vs. 5.3%, p=0.630, p int=0.514) at 2 years.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of the experimental treatment strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-month DAPT following PCI was not identified as age-dependent. Among elderly patients the anti-ischemic benefit was derived at the expense of increased rate of BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding in stable CAD subgroup, but not in ACS subgroup.

Acknowledgement/Funding

European Clinical Research Institute, which received unrestricted grants from Biosensors International, AstraZeneca, and the Medicines Company.

4115Effect of alirocumab on recurrent cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndrome, according to the intensity of background statin treatment

Background

Statins are a cornerstone of therapy for coronary heart disease. We describe the effects of alirocumab (ALI) in patients (pts) with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and dyslipidaemia per category of statin use.

Methods

ODYSSEY OUTCOMES compared ALI with placebo (PBO) in 18,924 pts with recent ACS and dyslipidaemia despite high-intensity/maximum tolerated statin (atorvastatin 40–80 mg/d or rosuvastatin 20–40 mg/d). Lower doses could be used if there were symptoms, laboratory abnormalities, or contraindications with higher doses. In cases of documented intolerance to ≥2 statins, pts could qualify on no statin treatment. Pts were randomized to ALI (75 mg SC Q2W, with possible uptitration to 150 mg Q2W) or PBO. Median follow-up was 2.8 years. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: CHD death, non-fatal MI, ischaemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization). Pts were categorized by statin therapy at baseline: high intensity (88.8%), low or moderate intensity (8.7%), or no statin use (2.4%). In each category we determined the relative (hazard ratio [HR]) and absolute risk reductions (ARR) for MACE with ALI.

Results

Overall, ALI reduced MACE (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.93; P<0.001). HRs were consistent across statin categories (Table). Baseline LDL-C increased across high-intensity, low/moderate-intensity, and no statin categories. Correspondingly, there was a gradient of the risk of MACE in the PBO group across these categories (10.8%, 10.7%, and 26%). With ALI treatment, the mean reduction in LDL-C from baseline to Month 4 increased across the 3 statin categories and correspondingly the ARRs for MACE were 1.3%, 3.2%, and 8.0% (P interaction <.001).

LDL-C values and MACE events All patients High-intensity statin Low-/moderate-intensity statin No statin Interaction P-value N=18,924 (100%) N=16,811 (88.8%) N=1653 (8.7%) N=460 (2.4%) (treatment x statin category) PBO (N=9462) ALI (N=9462) PBO (N=8431) ALI (N=8380) PBO (N=804) ALI (N=849) PBO (N=227) ALI (N=233) LDL-C at baseline, mmol/L, mean (SE)* 2.39 (0.01) 2.39 (0.01) 2.35 (0.01) 2.35 (0.01) 2.41 (0.03) 2.43 (0.03) 3.76 (0.08) 3.82 (0.08) Change in LDL-C from baseline to Month 4, mmol/L, mean (SE) 0.03 (0.01) −1.4 (0.01) 0.03 (0.01) −1.37 (0.01) 0.01 (0.02) −1.47 (0.02) −0.004 (0.06) −2.27 (0.06) <0.001 MACE, n (%)* 1052 (11.1) 903 (9.5) 907 (10.8) 797 (9.5) 86 (10.7) 64 (7.5) 59 (26.0) 42 (18.0) HR (95% CI) 0.85 (0.78−0.93) 0.88 (0.80−0.96) 0.69 (0.50−0.95) 0.65 (0.43−0.96) 0.14 ARR (%) (95% CI) 1.6 (0.7−2.4) 1.3 (0.3−2.2) 3.2 (0.4−5.9) 8.0 (0.4−15.5) <0.001 *P<0.001 for difference among statin categories.

Conclusions

In ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, patients unable to receive high-intensity statin treatment showed greater ARRs with ALI, consistent with higher baseline LDL-C concentration and greater absolute LDL-C reduction. Patients unable to receive high-intensity statin treatment are an important group to consider for treatment with ALI after ACS.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

P2817Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients with complex percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Global Leaders trial

Background/Introduction

Purpose

Methods

The Global Leaders trial recruited 15,991 patients treated by default with a biolimus A9-eluting stent, and randomised in a 1:1 ratio either to the experimental strategy (1-month dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy) or to the reference regimen (12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy). Complex PCI includes at least one of the following characteristics; left main and/or multivessel PCI, long stenting (defined as total stent length≥46mm), and bifurcation treatment with two stents. The present sub-analysis of the trial evaluated at two years the primary endpoint (composite of all-cause death and new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI] centrally adjudicated with the Minnesota code). In addition, the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) (composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, and any revascularization) and the net adverse clinical events (NACE) (composite of POCE and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 3 or 5 bleeding) were also evaluated at two years.

Results

Of 15,450 patients included in the present analysis, 5,188 (26.7%) patients underwent complex PCI. The experimental strategy, when compared with the reference one, had a significantly lower risk of the primary endpoint (3.56% vs. 5.33%, HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.51–0.86; p-value= 0.002; p-value for interaction= 0.019) in patients with complex PCI. Similarly, the experimental treatment was associated with a significantly reduced risk of POCE (14.41% vs. 16.88%, HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.74–0.97; p=0.016, p-value for interaction= 0.099) and NACE (15.77% vs. 18.37%, HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74–0.97; p=0.014; p-value for interaction= 0.096). The reduction in ischemic events was predominantly observed in patients with 2 or more characteristics of complex PCI (Figure). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the risk of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding between the two regimens (2.40% vs. 2.38%, HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.71–1.44; p-value=0.956; p-value for interaction= 0.935).

Central illustration

Conclusion

Together with other well-established clinical risk factors, the extent and complexity of stenting should be taken into account in tailoring antiplatelet regimens for secondary prevention. The 1-month DAPT followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy reduced the ischemic events without increasing the risk of bleeding in patients who underwent complex PCI, when compared with the conventional DAPT.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The Global Leaders trial was supported by the resource from AstraZeneca, Biosensors, and The Medicines Company.

P6411Dyspnea in ticagrelor treated patients in the all-comer randomized GLOBAL LEADERS study and its association with clinical outcomes

Background

Dyspnea represents a drug adverse effect reported with a higher frequency for ticagrelor, as compared with other P2Y12 antagonists. The impact of dyspnea on clinical outcomes has not been yet evaluated in the context of aspirin-free therapies after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Purpose

The study aimed to evaluate the incidence of dyspnea and its associations with demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI treated with ticagrelor either as monotherapy or as a part of a dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in the GLOBAL LEADERS cohort.

Methods

This is a sub-analysis of the randomized all-comer GLOBAL LEADERS study (n=15991), comparing the experimental strategy of ticagrelor monotherapy following one-month DAPT after PCI with the reference strategy of 12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy. The incidence of dyspnea reported as adverse event (AE) and its relation to demographic characteristics and 2-year clinical outcomes was evaluated (intention-to-treat analysis). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were performed, including randomized treatment and incidence of first dyspnea event as a time-dependent covariate. The primary endpoint was a composite of 2-year all-cause mortality or centrally adjudicated, new Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). Patient-oriented clinical endpoints (POCE) comprised all-cause death, any stroke, MI or revascularization, whereas net adverse clinical events (NACE) included POCE and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-defined bleeding type 3 or 5.

Results

Overall, dyspnea was reported as an AE in 2101 patients (13.2%) up to two years of follow-up, with a higher frequency in the experimental arm (16.4%) as compared with the reference group (11.1%) (hazard ratio [HR]1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56–1.86, p=0.001).

Predictors of dyspnea AE up to 2 years by multivariate analyses were: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR1.71, 95% CI 1.56–1.87, p=0.001), female gender (HR1.31, 95% CI 1.18–1.44, p=0.001), hypertension (HR1.31, 95% CI 1.19–1.44, p=0.001, prior coronary artery bypass grafting (HR1.30, 95% CI 1.10–1.54, p=0.003), left ventricle ejection fraction below 40% (HR1.22, 95% CI 1.04–1.42, p=0.012), presentation with acute coronary syndrome (HR1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.29, p=0.001) and body mass index (≥27kg/m2) (HR1.17, 95% CI 1.08–1.28, p=0.001).

In patients who reported dyspnea AE, the two-year rates of the efficacy and safety endpoints in the experimental and reference arm were: for the primary endpoint 3.4% vs. 4.3% (p adjusted=0.807), for POCE 15.8% vs. 17.6% (p adjusted=0.218), for NACE 17.2% vs. 19.6% (p adjusted=0.082), for BARC 3 or 5 type bleeding 17.2% vs. 19.6% (p adjusted=0.082), respectively.

Conclusions

The occurrence of dyspnea AE up to two years after PCI appeared not to affect the safety of the experimental treatment strategy of 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy following one-month DAPT after PCI.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Study founded by European Cardiovascular Research Institute, which received unrestricted grants from Biosensors Int., AstraZeneca, Medicines Company.

P1694Sex is not an independent predictor of ischemic outcomes or bleeding in NSTEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Insights from the TAO trial

Background

There is uncertainty regarding whether female sex is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Purpose

We sought to describe and compare ischemic and bleeding outcomes between men and women with Non–ST-segment–Elevation (NSTE) ACS enrolled in the large Treatment of Acute coronary syndromes with Otamixaban (TAO) trial in which antithrombotic treatment was standardized and a systematic invasive approach was performed.

Methods

The TAO trial randomized moderate to high-risk NSTE-ACS patients with diagnostic coronary angiography planned in the first 72 hours to heparin plus eptifibatide versus otamixaban. This post-hoc analysis describes ischemic (all-cause death, new myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis within 180 days of randomization) and bleeding outcomes (TIMI major and minor bleeding within 30 days of randomization) according to sex.

Results

Of 13,229 patients with NSTE-ACS randomized in 55 countries, 3,980 (30.1%) were female and 9,249 (69.9%) were male. Mean age was 64.8±11.0 and 60.7±11.1 years, respectively. The prevalence of diabetes (34.0% vs. 25.8%), hypertension (80.8% vs. 67.0%), and hypercholesterolemia (55.9% vs. 52.2%) was higher among women compared with men but current smoking (21.5% vs. 38.7%) and history of previous MI were more frequent in males (15.5% vs. 20.7%).

Females experienced a higher incidence of both ischemic outcomes (10.2% vs. 9.1%; OR=1.15; 95% CI, 1.01–1.30; p=0.034) and bleeding events (4.1% vs. 3.4%; OR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.49; p=0.029). Bleeding risk and CV death were particularly increased in women younger than 50 years, compared to males of the same age, at 5.5% vs. 1.4% (OR=4.00; 95% CI, 2.13–7.69; p=0.034) and 1.7% vs. 0.5% (OR=4.35; 95% CI, 1.02–20.00; p=0.02), respectively. No difference in either outcome was found between women and men between 50 and 80 years old. Above 80 years, women experienced a lower rate of bleeding (3.9% vs. 7.8%; OR=0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.88; p=0.024) but a similar rate of in ischemic events (16.0% vs. 17.2%; OR=0.92; 95% CI, 0.63–1.33; p=0.67).

After adjustment for age, body weight, diabetes mellitus, prior PCI, serum creatinine, presenting systolic blood pressure, elevated biomarker at presentation, heart failure, the risk of ischemic (OR=1.03; 95% CI, 0.89–1.18; p=0.71) and bleeding events (OR=1.05; 95% CI, 0.85–1.33; p=0.65) were similar between men and women.

Conclusions

In this large international randomized trial of NSTE-ACS with standardized invasive management, women (particularly those younger than 50 years) experienced higher risks of ischemic and bleeding events than men, but the difference was not sustained after adjustment. In this population, sex was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in NSTE-ACS. The type of ACS (NSTE-ACS) and routine invasive management in women and men may explain this absence of difference.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The TAO trial was sponsored and funded by SANOFI. The present analysis was supported by the RHU iVASC grant “#ANR-16-RHUS-00010”

4114Efficacy of alirocumab treatment after acute coronary syndrome according to new ACC/AHA guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy

Background

The 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol management guidelines recommend additional lipid-lowering therapies for secondary prevention in patients with LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L despite maximally tolerated statin therapy who are considered “very high-risk” on the basis of history of multiple ischaemic events or an ischaemic event and multiple high-risk conditions.

Purpose

We examined the frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and efficacy of PCSK9 inhibition with alirocumab to reduce MACE in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) categorized as very high-risk or not very high-risk by guideline criteria.

Methods

Patients in ODYSSEY OUTCOMES (n=18,924) with recent ACS and residual dyslipidaemia despite optimal statin therapy were randomized to alirocumab or placebo and followed for median 2.8 years. The primary MACE outcome was a composite of coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), ischaemic stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina.

Results

Of 18,924 randomized patients, 11,935 (63.1%) were categorized as very high-risk and 6989 (36.9%) as not very high risk (per ACC/AHA guidelines criteria). In the very high-risk category, 4450 (37.3%) had a prior ischaemic event plus the trial-qualifying index ACS (MI, 3633; stroke, 524; peripheral artery disease, 759); 7485 (62.7%) had no ischaemic event before the index ACS but had ≥2 high-risk conditions (diabetes, 3319; age ≥65 years, 3087; current smoking, 2371; chronic kidney disease, 1583). In the placebo group, the incidence of MACE was higher among those in the very high-risk category (14.4%) vs those not at very high-risk (5.6%). Overall, alirocumab reduced the risk of MACE vs placebo (9.5% vs 11.1%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78–0.93; P=0.003), with consistent relative reductions in both risk categories (very high risk HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76–0.92; not very high risk HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.70–1.06). However, the absolute reduction in MACE with alirocumab was greater among patients classified as very high-risk (2.1%) vs not very high risk (0.8%), and greater in particular among those classified as very high risk based on multiple ischaemic events (2.4%, Figure).

Conclusions

Application of 2018 ACC/AHA cholesterol guidelines criteria accurately identifies patients with ACS and dyslipidaemia who are at very high risk for recurrent MACE, and who derive a large absolute benefit from alirocumab treatment. Patients categorized as very high-risk based upon multiple ischaemic events derive a particularly large absolute benefit from treatment with alirocumab.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Supported by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

P4752Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily is effective and safe for patients with atrial fibrillation and combinations of advanced age, low body weight, and elevated creatinine: insights from ARISTOTLE

Background

In ARISTOTLE, patients with atrial fibrillation and ≥2 dose-reduction criteria [age ≥80 years, weight ≤60 kg, and creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL (133 μmol/L)] were randomized to apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (b.i.d) or warfarin.

Purpose

To determine whether the apixaban dose adjustment in ARISTOTLE resulted in similar efficacy and safety compared to warfarin.

Methods

The effects of apixaban 2.5 mg b.i.d versus warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding and death in ARISTOTLE patients with ≥2 dose-reduction criteria were compared with the effects of apixaban 5 mg b.i.d in patients with 0 or 1 dose-reduction criterion.

Results

Of 751 (4.1%) patients with ≥2 dose-reduction criteria, 386 were assigned to apixaban 2.5 mg b.i.d and 365 to warfarin. Compared to patients with 0 or 1 dose reduction criteria (n=17,322), these patients had a higher risks of stroke/systemic embolism (HR =1.78; 95% CI [1.24–2.57]), major bleeding (HR =1.73; 95% CI [1.28–2.32]) and death (HR=3.21; 95% CI [2.69–3.83]), irrespective of whether they were assigned to apixaban or warfarin. The benefits of apixaban 2.5 mg b.i.d compared with warfarin on stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death in patients with ≥2 dose-reduction criteria were consistent with that of apixaban 5 mg b.i.d in patients with either 0 or 1 dose-reduction criteria (Figure).

Conclusions

While they are at higher overall risk, patients with appropriate dose reduction criteria have consistent benefits with apixaban 2.5 mg b.i.d. over warfarin. Additional analyses investigating the relationship between apixaban dose and both apixaban plasma concentrations and levels of thrombosis biomarkers are underway.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer, Inc.

3294Frequency, management and outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease eligible for COMPASS. An analysis of the CLARIFY registry

Background

The COMPASS trial demonstrated that a combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in high-risk patients with either peripheral artery disease (PAD) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with aspirin alone, at the price of increased bleeding. A previous analysis of the REACH Registry reported an eligibility rate of 52.9% within a population with stable vascular disease. However, most of cardiologists actually treat patients with stable CAD, rather than PAD. Data regarding eligibility to COMPASS in CAD patients from real life practice are scarce.

Purpose

We aimed to describe the proportion of patients eligible to COMPASS within the CLARIFY Registry. Additionally, we aimed to describe their management and outcomes, comparing patients excluded from the trial (COMPASS Excluded), patients eligible for the trial (COMPASS Eligible), and patients who did not meet the “enrichment criteria” for enrolment (COMPASS Not Included).

Methods

We used the CLARIFY Registry, an international observational registry of more than 30.000 patients with stable CAD. In accordance with COMPASS exclusion criteria, patients with a REACH bleeding risk score >10, heart failure (HF), severe renal insufficiency, need for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), or anticoagulant (AC) therapy were excluded. Then, COMPASS inclusion criteria were applied: CAD patients had to be 65 years or more, or, if younger, have documented atherosclerosis (PAD or revascularization involving at least two vascular beds) or at least two enrichment criteria (current smoker, diabetes mellitus, GFR <60 mL/min, or non lacunar ischemic stroke).The ischemic outcome was a composite of CV death, MI, or stroke and bleeding outcome was a composite of bleeding leading to either admission or transfusion, or haemorrhagic stroke.

Results

Among 15.185 patients with comprehensive data allowing precise assessment of eligibility, 43.1% (n=6.540) had at least one exclusion criteria (COMPASS-Excluded), 23.1% (n=3.503) did not have enrichment criteria (COMPASS-Not Included) and 33.9% (n=5.142) were eligible. The vast majority of excluded patients were excluded due to high bleeding risk (62.7% needing DAPT, and 52.7% for high REACH bleeding risk score). The rates (100 patients/year) of ischemic and bleeding outcome were 2.3 [2.1–2.5] and 0.5 [0.4–0.6] respectively for COMPASS-Eligible, 3.0 [2.8–3.2] and 0.6 [0.5–0.7] for COMPASS-Excluded and 1.2 [1.0–1.4] and 0.2 [0.2–0.3] for COMPASS-Not Included.

Ischemic and bleeding events

Conclusion

In a large contemporary registry of stable CAD patients, approximately one of three patients was potentially eligible for adjunction of low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin. This group is at particularly high risk of ischemic outcome. Patients with exclusion criteria for COMPASS had the worse ischemic and bleeding outcomes and represent a group in need of improved therapy.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

P5010Use of risk score to identify lower and higher risk subsets among COMPASS-Eligible patients with stable CAD. Insights from the CLARIFY Registry

Background

The COMPASS trial showed that a combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) compared with aspirin alone, at the expense of increased bleeding. An important issue is to identify in this broad population, patients who are likely to derive the greatest benefit without too great a bleeding risk.

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of the CHA2DS2VaSc (range from 0 to 9), the REACH Recurrent Ischemic Score (RIS) (range from 0 to ≥29) and the REACH Bleeding Risk Score (BRS) (range from 0 to 22) to identify patients with the most favourable trade-off between ischemic and bleeding events, among CAD patients eligible to COMPASS

Methods

We used the CLARIFY Registry, an international registry of >30.000 patients with stable CAD. COMPASS inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the CLARIFY population with complete data (n=15.185) to define the “COMPASS eligible population”. Patients at high bleeding risk (REACH BRS >10), were excluded in accordance to COMPASS exclusion criteria. Patients were categorized as low-intermediate (0–1) or high (≥2) CHA2DS2VaSc; low (0–12) or intermediate (13–19) REACH RIS, and low (0–6) or intermediate (7–10) REACH BRS. The ischemic outcome was a composite of CV death, MI or stroke, and the bleeding outcome was a composite of bleeding leading to either admission or transfusion, or haemorrhagic stroke.

Results

The COMPASS-eligible population comprised 5.142 patients (33.9%). Ischemic and bleeding outcome for this group were 2.3 [2.1–2.5] and 0.5 [0.4–0.6] events/100 patient-years, respectively. Patients with high CHA2DS2VaSc score, intermediate REACH BRS and RIS represented 95.5% (n=4.913), 83.8% (n=4.309) and 37.6% (n=1.934) of the population. Regarding ischemic risk, patients with intermediate REACH RIS had the higher ischemic risk (3.0 [2.6–3.4] vs 1.9 [1.7–2.1] for patients with low REACH RIS, p<0.001), followed by intermediate REACH BRS (2.5 [2.2–2.7] vs 1.5 [1.2–2.0] for patients with low REACH BRS, p=0.0003) and high CHA2DS2VaSc score (2.4 [2.2–2.6]), compared to the overall population. Patients with low CHA2DS2VaSc had the lowest ischemic risk (0.6 [0.3–1.3]) compared to the overall population. Regarding bleeding risk, there were no differences between patients categorized according to CHA2DS2VaSc (0.5 [0.2–1.15] vs 0.5 [0.4–0.6], p=0.95) REACH BRS (0.4 [0.3–0.7] vs 0.5 [0.4–0.6], p=0.80) or REACH RIS (0.4 [0.3–0.5] vs 0.5 [0.4–0.7], p=0.26).

Ischemic (blue) and bleeding (red) event

Conclusions

Among a broad population of CAD patients eligible to COMPASS, low CHA2DS2VaSc score identify a small subset of patients with very low ischemic risk which is unlikely to benefit from the adjunction of low dose rivaroxaban to standard therapy. Patients with intermediate REACH Recurrent Ischemic Score had higher ischemic risk, without increased bleeding risk and may be optimal candidates from adjunction of low dose rivaroxaban.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

P6510Frailty and in-hospital outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions

Background

Frailty may be an important marker for poor outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and there is limited literature on outcomes based on frailty from national cohorts.

Purpose

This study evaluates the prevalence of frailty, changes in frailty over time and outcomes associated with frailty in a national American cohort of patients who underwent PCI.

Methods

The study included adults who underwent PCI in the National Inpatients Sample between 2004 and 2014. Frailty risk was determined using a validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) using the cutoffs <5, 5–15 and >15 corresponding to low, intermediate and high HFRS.

Results

There were 7,306,007 PCI admissions in this cohort. A total of 94.58%, 5.39% and 0.03% of admissions were for low HFRS, intermediate HFRS and high HFRS, respectively. The proportion of intermediate or high frailty risk patients increased over time from 1.9% in 2004 to 11.7% in 2014. In-hospital death increased from 1.0% with low HFRS to 13.9% with high HFRS and average length of stay increased from 2.9±3.3 days to 17.1±15.5 days from low to high HFRS. Greater frailty risk was associated with greater average inpatient cost which was $17,743±11,059, $38,824±34,809 and $56,119±49,772 for low, intermediate and high HFRS, respectively. There were increased adverse outcomes with high frailty including greater in-hospital death (OR 9.91 95% CI 7.17–13.71), in-hospital bleeding complications (OR 4.99 95% CI 3.82–6.51), in-hospital vascular complications (OR 3.96 95% CI 3.00–5.23) and in-hospital stroke (OR 10.49 95% CI 8.28–13.29) comparing high to low HFRS.

Conclusions

More than 1 in 20 patients who undergo PCI have intermediate or high risk of frailty which has significantly increased over time. There are poor outcomes and increased inpatient costs associated with greater frailty. Improvements in education of healthcare workers and increased awareness of frailty could facilitate frailty-tailored care to minimise risk of adverse outcomes and its associated costs.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Research and Development Department at the Royal Stoke Hospital, Keele University and Biosensors International

P2811Impact of ticagrelor monotherapy on two-year clinical outcomes in patients with long stenting: insights from the Global Leaders trial

Background/Introduction

Data on the efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet regimens are limited in patients with increasing total stent length (TSL).

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of the experimental strategy (1-month dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy) vs. the reference regimen (12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy) in patients with increasing TSL.

Methods

The present post-hoc analysis of the Global Leaders trial evaluated the primary endpoint (the composite of the all-cause death and new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI]) at two years in patients with increasing TSL. In addition, the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) (the composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, and any revascularization) and the net adverse clinical events (NACE) (the composite of POCE and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 3 or 5 bleeding) were also assessed.

Results

The cohort of 15,450 patients treated with a biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer stents were included in this analysis. In the longer TSL group (≥46mm), the experimental strategy significantly reduced the risk of the primary endpoint (3.78% vs. 5.68%, hazard ratio (HR): 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.90, p=0.008, P interaction=0.042) as well as POCE (14.57% vs. 18.11%, HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67–0.92, p=0.003, P interaction=0.010) and NACE (16.07% vs. 19.64%, HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69–0.93, p=0.004, P interaction=0.012) at two years. The risk of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding at two years was similar between the two antiplatelet regimens.

KM in patients with long stenting

Conclusion

Ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of the primary endpoint, POCE and NACE with a similar risk of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding at two years in patients with the longer TSL.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The Global Leaders trial was supported by unrestricted grants from AstraZeneca, Biosensors, and The Medicines Company. ECRI (European Cardiovascular R

2211Prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications of left bundle branch block in patients with stable coronary artery disease. an analysis from the CLARIFY registry

Background

The prevalence, and prognostic implication of left bundle branch block (LBBB) in general population and patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI) as been extensively studied. However, data are scarce about patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and it remains unclear whether LBBB is only a marker of a severe cardiomyopathy or an independent predictor of events in these patients.

Purpose

We aimed to describe the prevalence, incidence and prognostic implications of LBBB in patients with stable CAD. Additionally, we aimed to describe the incidence of newly diagnosed LBBB that occurred without recent myocardial infarction.

Methods

CLARIFY is an international registry of more than 30.000 patients with stable CAD. LBBB was collected at baseline and at each follow-up visit, and patients were considered to have LBBB if the length of the QRS complex was of more than 120 milliseconds. Patients with previous pacemaker implantation of internal cardiac defibrillator were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) Death, MI or stroke, and secondary outcomes included hospitalization for heart failure (HF) or the need for pacemaker implantation.

Results

From the 23.457 patients with available data regarding LBBB status, 1.041 (4.4%) had LBBB at baseline and 1.237 (5.3%) had at least one LBBB assessed during 5-year follow-up. Only 21 patients with newly diagnosed LBBB overtime, had a documented MI the same year. Compared to patients without LBBB, patients with LBBB had a higher risk profile regarding age (67.2±10.1 versus 63.6±10.4 years, p<0.0001), history of coronary artery bypass grafting (29.2% vs 23.7%, p<0.0001), diabetes (35.1% vs 28.4%, p<0.0001), and HF (25.2% vs 16.8%, p<0.0001) (Table). In unadjusted analysis, patients with LBBB had a higher risk of primary outcome (13.4% vs 8.7%, p<0.0001) and each secondary outcome. In multivariate analysis taking into account several possible confounders, there was no difference in the rate of CV death, MI or stroke between LBBB or no-LBBB patients (adjusted HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85–1.29). However, patients with LBBB had a higher rate of pacemaker implantation (adjusted HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.55–3.15, p<0.0001) and hospitalization for HF (adjusted HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25–1.88, p<0.0001) (Figure).

Outcomes according to LBBB status

Conclusion

The prevalence of LBBB in patients with stable CAD was 4.4% and 5.3% with 5-year follow-up. The overwhelming majority of newly diagnosed LBBB were not contemporary of documented myocardial infarction. LBBB was not associated with a higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, including all cause mortality but with a higher risk of pacemaker implantation and hospitalization for heart failure. To our knowledge this is the first study reporting such results in a broad population of stable CAD patients.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

P2812Ischemic efficacy and bleeding safety of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Global Leaders trial

Background/Introduction

The optimal duration of DAPT after coronary stent implantation remains a matter of debate and a novel antiplatelet regimen without an increased risk of bleeding while maintaining an anti-ischemic efficacy is of paramount importance in patients at higher risk of ischemia.

Purpose

The aim of the present sub-study of the Global Leaders trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the experimental antiplatelet strategy (1-month dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT] followed by 23-month ticagrelor monotherapy) vs. the reference regimen (12-month DAPT followed by 12-month aspirin monotherapy) in patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The Global Leaders trial enrolled 15,991 patients treated by default with a biolimus A-9 eluting stent. The present sub-study of the trial sought to evaluate the impact of the long-term ticagrelor monotherapy on the primary endpoint (composite of all-cause death and new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI] centrally adjudicated with the Minnesota code) at two years. In addition, the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) (composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, and any revascularization) and the net adverse clinical events (NACE) (composite of POCE and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 3 or 5 bleeding) were also evaluated at two years.

Results

A total of 15,845 patients was included in this analysis, of whom 3,576 patients received multivessel PCI. At two years, the experimental strategy significantly reduced a risk of the primary endpoint (the composite of all-cause death and new Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI]) (3.05% vs. 4.85%, HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44–0.88, p=0.006, Pinteraction=0.031) in patients with multivessel PCI. Similarly, the experimental treatment had a significant risk reduction in the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), defined as the composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any MI, and any revascularization (13.37% vs. 16.74%, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66–0.93, p=0.005, Pinteraction=0.020) and the net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as the composite of POCE and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] defined bleeding type 3 or 5 (14.65% vs. 18.38%, HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.66–0.92, p=0.003, Pinteraction=0.014) at two years. There was no significant difference in BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding (2.44% vs. 2.65%, HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.61–1.39, p=0.685, Pinteraction=0.754) at two years between the two regimens.

KM in patients with multivessel PCI

Conclusion

The present study has demonstrated the experimental antiplatelet strategy, when compared with the reference regimen, could potentially have a favourable balance between ischemic efficacy and bleeding safety in patients who underwent multivessel PCI.

Acknowledgement/Funding

The Global Leaders trial was supported by unrestricted grants from AstraZeneca, Biosensors, and The Medicines Company. ECRI (European Cardiovascular R

EvaluatioN of ApiXaban in strOke and systemic embolism prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in clinical practice Setting in France, rationale and design of the NAXOS: SNIIRAM study

Non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have recently challenged vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke and systemic embolism prophylaxis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Nevertheless, little information is available in routine clinical practice for France. The aim of this study is to describe the effectiveness and safety of apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran or VKAs in routine clinical practice in adult NVAF patients for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in France. The NAXOS study is a nationwide observational retrospective cohort generated from the French national healthcare insurance database (SNIIRAM-a comprehensive in- and outpatient healthcare consumption database), consisting of eight distinct sub-cohorts of anticoagulant-naive or anticoagulant-experienced patients diagnosed with NVAF, newly initiated with either NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban) or VKAs. Patients will be included if initiating a new anticoagulant treatment for AF during the study period from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016. Primary effectiveness outcome will be the incidence of stroke or systemic thromboembolic events; primary safety outcome will be the incidence of major bleeding during the exposure period. The NAXOS study will provide routine clinical practice data on the effectiveness and safety profiles of apixaban vs other NOACs and VKAs in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with NVAF in clinical practice conditions in France.

The efficacy and safety of cangrelor in single vessel vs multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from CHAMPION PHOENIX

BACKGROUND

The intravenous, rapidly acting P2Y12 inhibitor cangrelor reduces the rate of ischemic events during PCI with no significant increase in severe bleeding. However, the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients treated with single vessel (SV)-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or multivessel (MV)-PCI remains unexplored.

METHODS

We studied the modified intention-to-treat population of patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trial who were randomized to either cangrelor or clopidogrel. We used logistic regression and propensity score matching to evaluate the effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel on the primary efficacy outcome (composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis) at 48 hours. The safety outcome was moderate or severe Global Utilization of Streptokinase and tPA for Occluded Arteries bleeding at 48 hours.

HYPOTHESIS

Cangrelor is as efficacious and safe as clopidogrel in both SV and MV PCI.

RESULTS

Among 10 854 patients, 9204 (85%) underwent SV- and 1650 (15%) MV-PCI. After adjustment, cangrelor was associated with similar reductions vs clopidogrel in the primary efficacy outcome in patients undergoing SV-PCI (4.5% vs 5.2%; odds ratio [OR] 0.81 [0.66-0.98]) or MV-PCI (6.1% vs 9.8%, OR 0.59 [0.41-0.85]; Pint 0.14). Similar results were observed after propensity score matching (SV-PCI: 5.5% vs 5.9%, OR 0.93 [0.74-1.18]; MV-PCI: 6.2% vs 8.9%, OR 0.67 [0.44-1.01]; Pint 0.17). There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the treatment effect of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel for the safety outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing SV- or MV-PCI, cangrelor was associated with similar relative risk reductions in ischemic complications and no increased risk of significant bleeding compared with clopidogrel, which highlights the expanding repertoire of options for use in complex PCI.

Observational Study of Platelet Reactivity in Patients Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Due to Coronary Stent Thrombosis Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the European PREvention of Stent Thrombosis by an Interdisciplinary Global European Effort Registry

OBJECTIVES

High platelet reactivity (HPR) was studied in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to stent thrombosis (ST) undergoing immediate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

HPR on P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (HPR-ADP) is frequently observed in stable patients who have experienced ST. The HPR rates in patients presenting with ST for immediate PCI are unknown.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with definite ST were included in a multicenter ST registry. Platelet reactivity was measured before immediate PCI with the VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ or Aspirin assay.

RESULTS

Platelet reactivity was measured in 129 ST patients presenting with STEMI undergoing immediate PCI. HPR-ADP was observed in 76% of the patients, and HPR on aspirin (HPR-AA) was observed in 13% of the patients. HPR rates were similar in patients who were on maintenance P2Y₁₂ inhibitor or aspirin since stent placement versus those without these medications. In addition, HPR-ADP was similar in patients loaded with a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor shortly before immediate PCI versus those who were not. In contrast, HPR-AA trended to be lower in patients loaded with aspirin as compared with those not loaded.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 3 out of 4 ST patients with STEMI undergoing immediate PCI had HPR-ADP, and 13% had HPR-AA. Whether patients were on maintenance antiplatelet therapy while developing ST or loaded with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors shortly before undergoing immediate PCI had no influence on the HPR rates. This raises concerns that the majority of patients with ST have suboptimal platelet inhibition undergoing immediate PCI.

Management strategies and 5-year outcomes in Polish patients with stable coronary artery disease versus other European countries: data from the CLARIFY registry

INTRODUCTION An international registry of ambulatory patients with stable coronary artery disease (CLARIFY) allows a comparison of management and outcomes in real‑life setting. OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the management strategies and 5‑year outcomes in patients from Poland and from other European countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS Stable coronary artery disease was defined as previous myocardial infarction (MI) or revascularization, coronary stenosis greater than 50%, or documented symptomatic myocardial ischemia. Patients were followed on an annual basis for 5 years. RESULTS Among the total of 32 703 patients, 1000 were enrolled in Poland, and 17 326 in other European countries. Polish patients were younger, with a higher proportion of women, smokers, and patients with previous MI, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Patients in both cohorts received adequate medical treatment, with more Polish patients receiving β‑blockers. Blood pressure and lipid control to target was similar and remained low in both cohorts. Diabetes control and successful smoking cessation rates were lower in Poland than in other European countries. Polish patients more often underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. All‑cause (8.5% vs 7.9%; P = 0.81) and cardiovascular death rates (5.3% vs 4.9%; P = 0.82) did not differ between the groups, but fatal or nonfatal MI occurred more often in the Polish cohort (5% vs 3.1%; P = 0.006). Angina control was better in Poland than in other European countries (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II-IV, 11.5% vs 15.8% of patients; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Risk factor control was insufficient both in patients from Poland and in those from other European countries. The more frequent use of revascularization in Polish patients was not linked to improved outcomes, but, together with more extensive prescription of β‑blockers, might have contributed to better angina control.