Efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy for patients with BRCA1/2-mutated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer progressing on olaparib versus placebo maintenance: post-hoc analyses of the SOLO2/ENGOT Ov-21 trial

BACKGROUND

In the SOLO2 trial (ENGOT Ov-21; NCT01874353), maintenance olaparib in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) and BRCA mutation significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and prolonged overall survival (OS). Following disease progression on olaparib, efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a post-hoc hypothesis-generating analysis of SOLO2 data to determine the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens following RECIST disease progression in patients who received olaparib or placebo. We evaluated time to second progression (TTSP) calculated from the date of RECIST progression to the next progression/death.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 147 patients who received chemotherapy as their first subsequent treatment after RECIST progression. Of these, 69 (47%) and 78 (53%) were originally randomized to placebo and olaparib arms, respectively. In the placebo-treated cohort, 27/69 and 42/69 received non-platinum and platinum-based chemotherapy, respectively, compared with 24/78 and 54/78, respectively, in the olaparib-treated cohort. Among patients treated with chemotherapy (N = 147), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo than in the olaparib arm: 12.1 versus 6.9 months [hazard ratio (HR) 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-3.19]. Similar result was obtained on multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic factors at RECIST progression (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.41-3.22). Among patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 96), TTSP was significantly longer in the placebo arm: 14.3 versus 7.0 months (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.73-4.82). Conversely, among patients treated with non-platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 51), the TTSP was comparable in the placebo and olaparib arms: 8.3 versus 6.0 months (HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.86-2.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Following progression from maintenance olaparib in the recurrent setting, the efficacy of platinum-based subsequent chemotherapy seems to be reduced in BRCA1/2-mutated patients with PSROC compared to patients not previously receiving poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). The optimal strategy for patients who relapse after PARPi is an area of ongoing research.

Final report on serial phase II trials of all-intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for women with newly diagnosed, optimally cytoreduced carcinoma of Müllerian origin

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy can improve outcomes for women with optimally cytoreduced epithelial ovarian cancer but toxicities are a concern. We conducted 2 phase 2 trials of an IV/IP regimen using carboplatin and paclitaxel without (Trial A) and with bevacizumab (Trial B).

METHODS

Both trials consisted of carboplatin AUC 6 day 1, and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² on days 1,8, 15 of a 21-day cycle; in Trial B, patients received IV bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every cycle starting cycle 2. Chemotherapy was administered IV for cycle 1 and then IP for all subsequent cycles. Primary objectives included safety and tolerability, pathologic CR rate (Trial A), and the rate of completion of IP cycles of therapy (Trial B). Progression-free (PFS), overall survival (OS), and pharmacokinetic analysis were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

81 patients were treated on both trials (n = 40 and 41 in trials A and B, respectively). Median age for trials A and B was 59 (range, 36-76) and 55 (range, 19-69) years, respectively. 68% and 85% of patients, respectively for A and B, completed at least 4 cycles of treatment in both trials. Treatment with bevacizumab resulted in higher rates of grade 3 fatigue (37 versus 33%) and grade 3-4 diarrhea (22 versus 8%). Median PFS was 23.5 (95%CI 16.2-35.3) and 25 (95%CI 16.4-42.7) months, respectively; median OS was 68 (95%CI 49.5-NR) and 79.7 (95%CI 59.0-79.7) months, respectively for Trial A and B.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly administered IP carboplatin and IP paclitaxel is tolerable and safe with similar activity with and without concommittant bevacizumab in these 2 trials.

A SNaPshot of potentially personalized care: Molecular diagnostics in gynecologic cancer

BACKGROUND

Genetic abnormalities underlie the development and progression of cancer, and represent potential opportunities for personalized cancer therapy in Gyn malignancies.

METHODS

We identified Gyn oncology patients at the MGH Cancer Center with tumors genotyped for a panel of mutations by SNaPshot, a CLIA approved assay, validated in lung cancer, that uses SNP genotyping in degraded DNA from FFPE tissue to identify 160 described mutations across 15 cancer genes (AKT1, APC, BRAF, CTNNB1, EGFR, ERBB2, IDH1, KIT, KRAS, MAP2KI, NOTCH1, NRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, TP53).

RESULTS

Between 5/17/10 and 8/8/13, 249 pts consented to SNaPshot analysis. Median age 60 (29-84) yrs. Tumors were ovarian 123 (49%), uterine 74(30%), cervical 14(6%), fallopian 9(4%), primary peritoneal 13(5%), or rare 16(6%) with the incidence of testing high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) halving over time. SNaPshot was positive in 75 (30%), with 18 of these (24%) having 2 or 3 (n=5) mutations identified. TP53 mutations are most common in high-grade serous cancers yet a low detection rate (17%) was likely related to the assay. However, 4 of the 7 purely endometrioid ovarian tumors (57%) harbored a p53 mutation. Of the 38 endometrioid uterine tumors, 18 mutations (47%) in the PI3Kinase pathway were identified. Only 9 of 122 purely serous (7%) tumors across all tumor types harbored a 'drugable' mutation, compared with 20 of 45 (44%) of endometrioid tumors (p<0.0001). 17 pts subsequently enrolled on a clinical trial; all but 4 of whom had PIK3CA pathway mutations. Eight of 14 (47%) cervical tumors harbored a 'drugable' mutation.

CONCLUSION

Although SNaPshot can identify potentially important therapeutic targets, the incidence of 'drugable' targets in ovarian cancer is low. In this cohort, only 7% of subjects eventually were treated on a relevant clinical trial. Geneotyping should be used judiciously and reflect histologic subtype and available platform.

A phase I study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat administered in combination with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel in patients with solid tumours

Background:

This phase I study assessed the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and pharmacokinetics of belinostat with carboplatin and paclitaxel and the anti-tumour activity of the combination in solid tumours.

Methods:

Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalating doses of belinostat administered intravenously once daily, days 1–5 q21 days; on day 3, carboplatin (area under the curve (AUC) 5) and/or paclitaxel (175 mg m⁻²) were administered 2–3 h after the end of the belinostat infusion.

Results:

In all 23 patients received 600–1000 mg m⁻² per day of belinostat with carboplatin and/or paclitaxel. No DLT was observed. The maximal administered dose of belinostat was 1000 mg m⁻² per day for days 1–5, with paclitaxel (175 mg m⁻²) and carboplatin AUC 5 administered on day 3. Grade III/IV adverse events were (n; %): leucopenia (5; 22%), neutropenia (7; 30%), thrombocytopenia (3; 13%) anaemia (1; 4%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (2; 9%), fatigue (1; 4%), vomiting (1; 4%) and myalgia (1; 4%). The pharmacokinetics of belinostat, paclitaxel and carboplatin were unaltered by the concurrent administration. There were two partial responses (one rectal cancer and one pancreatic cancer). A third patient (mixed mullerian tumour of ovarian origin) showed a complete CA-125 response. In addition, six patients showed a stable disease lasting ⩾6 months.

Conclusion:

The combination was well tolerated, with no evidence of pharmacokinetic interaction. Further evaluation of anti-tumour activity is warranted.

Phase II trial of the oral PARP inhibitor olaparib (AZD2281) in BRCA-deficient advanced ovarian cancer

5500

Background: Olaparib (AZD2281; KU-0059436) is a novel, orally active PARP inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in homozygous BRCA-deficient cells. A phase I trial identified 400 mg bd as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with an initial signal of efficacy in BRCA-deficient cancers (ASCO 2008; abst 5510). The primary aim of this study was to test the efficacy of olaparib in confirmed BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers with advanced chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer. The secondary aim was to assess the safety and tolerability profile in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 deficiency. Methods: In an international, multicenter, proof-of-concept, single-arm, phase II study, two patient (pt) sequential cohorts received continuous oral olaparib in 28-day cycles, initially at the MTD, 400 mg bd (33 pts), and subsequently at 100 mg bd (24 pts), a previously shown clinically active and PARP inhibitory dose. Eligibility criteria included confirmed genetic BRCA1/2 mutation and recurrent, measurable, incurable disease (previous chemotherapy, median 3 lines). The primary efficacy endpoint was best objective response rate (ORR; RECIST) post baseline. Change in CA125 was a secondary efficacy endpoint. All adverse events were reported using CTCAE v3. Results: At this interim analysis dated October 31, 2008, of 57 enrolled pts (39 BRCA1 deficient and 18 BRCA2 deficient), 33 were evaluable at 400 mg bd and 24 at 100 mg bd. The confirmed RECIST ORR was 33% at 400 mg bd and 12.5% at 100 mg bd. Clinical benefit rate (ORR and/or confirmed >50% decline in CA125) was 57.6% at 400 mg bd and 16.7% at 100 mg bd. Toxicity was mainly mild in severity, reflecting grade 1/2 nausea (44%); fatigue (35%); and anemia (14%). Grade 3 toxicity occurred infrequently, and comprised primarily nausea (7%) and leukopenia (5%). Conclusions: Oral olaparib is well tolerated and highly active in advanced, chemotherapy-refractory BRCA-deficient ovarian cancer, with greater activity seen at the higher dose. Toxicity in BRCA1/2 carriers was similar to that seen in non-carriers. This study provides positive proof of the concept of the activity and tolerability of genetically defined targeted therapy with olaparib in BRCA-deficient ovarian cancers.

[Table: see text]

Potential benefit of Sunitinib in recurrent and refractory ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma

Ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (OCCA) is a unique biological subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, with a similar gene profile to renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Sunitinib is a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with proven antitumor activity in RCC and a rational biological option for treatment of OCCA. A 60-year-old woman presented with recurrent and refractory stage IA OCCA, after 9 years of remission. Sunitinib was initiated as fifth-line chemotherapy, associated with cystic degeneration of liver metastasis and a short downward trend in her CA125 level. Recurrent and refractory OCCA may respond to Sunitinib. Clinical trials are needed to objectively confirm these findings, as benefit may be limited in patients with extensively pretreated tumors.

Safety of maintenance bevacizumab after first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian and müllerian cancers

5517

Background: Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes VEGF, but is associated with arterial complications and GI perforations in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Maintenance antiangiogenic therapy is an attractive strategy for patients after first line therapy. However, no data exist on the safety of maintenance bevacizumab in this setting. Methods: An open label phase II clinical trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab (CPB) in newly diagnosed patients =ECOG 2, with chemotherapy naïve, stage =IC, epithelial müllerian tumors. Patients receive carboplatin AUC 5 IV, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV for 6–8 cycles D1 Q21. Bevacizumab is omitted in the first cycle, and continued as single agent for one year. Results: 58 patients are evaluable. Median age is 58 (18–77), and 39(67%) were ECOG 1. 43(74%) have ovarian, 8(14%) uterine papillary serous (UPSC) tumors, 4(7%) peritoneal, and 3(5%) fallopian tube cancers. 38(65%) were serous, 8(14%) MMMT, 4(7%) clear cell, and 3(5%) endometrioid cancers (5(9%) mixed/other). 36(62%) were stage III and 11(19%) stage IV. Surgery was optimal in 45(80%) patients. 50 patients have completed chemotherapy, associated with 2 PEs, and 2 GI perforations, all occurring during the induction chemotherapy phase of treatment. 43 patients have received 360 cycles of maintenance therapy with mild toxicity. 6(14%) have come off for PD, 4(9%) for toxicity (inc. 1 nasal perforation), 4 withdrew consent, and 3 patients asymptomatic, continue despite a rising CA125. During maintenance there has been no grade IV toxicity, and 13 grade III toxicities (musculoskeletal pain (5), dyspnea, hyperglycemia, hypertension (1 grade III, 4 grade II), infection, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, proteinuria, syncope). Radiographic responses were documented in 21 of 28 (75%: CR 11, PR 10). Median PFS is 11(1–21) months at 13 months median FU. Conclusion: Maintenance bevacizumab is feasible and well tolerated with mild myalgias, and hypertension common but treatable side effects.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Three sequential chemotherapy doublets for the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced müllerian malignancies: The modified triple doublet regimen

OBJECTIVE

Previously, we reported the use of three sequential doublets (Triple Doublets) in the treatment of women with newly diagnosed and advanced stage müllerian malignancies. The surgically defined negative second look operation (SLO) rate to Triple Doublets was 38%. Modifications were made to this treatment regimen that were predicted to reduce toxicity and possibly increase efficacy.

METHODS

Open label two-cohort study. Patients with a new diagnosis of Stages II-IV müllerian malignancy were eligible. After cytoreductive surgery, patients were treated with three sequential doublets including 3 cycles of carboplatin and gemcitabine, and 3 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel, and 3 cycles of doxorubicin and topotecan. After therapy, all women were clinically staged and evaluated at SLO if clinical staging was negative for residual disease. Primary endpoints were toxicity and negative SLO rate with rates of 60% and 40% defined a priori in optimally cytoreduced (cohort 1) and suboptimally cytoreduced or Stage IV (cohort 2), respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-five eligible patients were enrolled with a median age of 52 years. Forty-seven and thirty-eight women were in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. 723 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered with no toxic deaths. Grades 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 75% of patients and thrombocytopenia in 65% of patients during at least one cycle of therapy. Fever and neutropenia were seen in 3.5% of patients. All Grades 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen at a frequency of <10%. Seventy women underwent SLO with a negative SLO rate of 53% with an additional 9% having microscopically positive procedures. Negative SLO rate was 74% in cohort 1 and 36% in cohort 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the modified triple doublet regimen is tolerable with an encouraging pathologic CR rate.

Phase I/II dose finding study of combination cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with recurrent cervix cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of cisplatin and gemcitabine in women with recurrent cervical cancer.

METHODS

A multi-institutional phase I/II dose finding study of cisplatin and gemcitabine delivered to women with recurrent previously radiated cervical carcinoma.

RESULTS

Twenty eight patients were enrolled. The mean and median age of patients was 51 years (age range 35 to 70 years). Chemotherapy was given on a 28-day cycle; cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2), day 1 and gemcitabine, days 1, 8, and 15. Gemcitabine doses started at 600 mg/m(2) (dose level 1) and were escalated by 100 mg/m(2)/dose level until 1000 mg/m(2) (dose level 5). Twenty seven patients were evaluable for toxicity and disease response, and 75 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. Toxicities were predominantly hematological; 18% of patients experienced grade 3 anemia, 37% grade 3 and 11% grade 4 leukopenia, 41% grade 3 neutropenia, and 26% grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity on dose level 2 (febrile neutropenia). One patient had a CR and 3 patients had a PR to therapy (15% response rate), 41% of patients had SD, and 44% had progression of cancer. Median survival was 11.9 months.

CONCLUSION

Although this 28-day gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen in recurrent cervix cancer has tolerable toxicity, 21-day regimens are recommended because of improved practicality, higher dose intensity, and higher response rates.

Long-term impact of chemotherapy on early stage ovarian cancer patients

5024

Background: Quality of life (QOL) assessments in early stage (stage I and II) ovarian cancer survivors (CS) are limited and have to date not focused on CS who have received adjuvant platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy (CT). Methods: 55 early stage ovarian patients (pts) were identified from patient logs from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital. 54 pts. received CT. QOL and long-term medical sequelae were measured in pts who were > 3 years from diagnosis and had no evidence of recurrent cancer. Pts were interviewed by phone, and the following surveys were administered: EORTC QLQ-C30 (EORTC) and QLQ-OV28 (OV-28), MHI-17, CALGB sexual functioning, GOG Neuropathy, FACT Fatigue, Beck’s Hopelessness, Fear of Recurrence (FOR), Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), PCL-C post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Unmet Needs, FACT-Spirituality (FACT-Sp), complementary therapy use, and MOS Social Support (MOS). Results: 55 pts were interviewed (mean age 58 yrs, range 34 to 77 yrs). Mean time between diagnosis and interview was 5.6 yrs. CS reported significantly higher MHI-17 scores than the population norm, and higher MHI-17 scores were associated with better overall QOL (EORTC, r = 0.57, p < 0.0001), increased social support (MOS, r = 0.54, p < 0.0001), and better marital relationships (DAS, r = 0.42, p < 0.001). Sexual problems (1.57 out of 6) and unmet needs (1.5 out of 14) were minimal. FOR was correlated with lowered overall QOL (EORTC, r = −0.63, p < 0.0001), increased abdominal symptoms (OV-28 abdominal scale, r = 0.48, p < 0.0002), increased hopelessness (Beck’s, r = 0.46, p < 0.0005), and increased spirituality (FACT-Sp, r = −0.57, p < 0.0001). CS were using 5.4 complementary therapies for QOL purposes and 5.8 for cancer treatment. Minimal negative socioeconomic impact was observed in CS (0.16 out of 4). However, 12.5% of pts had scores indicative of a diagnosis of PTSD. Conclusions: Long-term QOL follow-up of early stage ovarian cancer survivors demonstrated minimal long-term symptoms, excellent mental health, minimal unmet needs, and minimal socioeconomic impact.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab as first line chemotherapy and consolidation for advanced müllerian tumors

5020

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major promoter of tumor angiogenesis. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes VEGF and is active in several tumor types, including epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: We are conducting a phase II trial of carboplatin, paclitaxel and bevacizumab (CPB) in newly diagnosed patients with chemotherapy naïve, stage ≥ IC, epithelial ovarian, fallopian, primary peritoneal, or uterine papillary serous (UPSC) tumors. Patients receive carboplatin AUC of 5 IV, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg IV for 6–8 cycles on a 21-day cycle. Bevacizumab is omitted in the first cycle, and continued for one year’s consolidation. Principle endpoints include response rate and progression free survival. Results: Since 3/05, 35 patients have been enrolled. Of the 30 evaluable patients, 24 have ovarian, 4 peritoneal, 1 fallopian tube cancer, and 1 UPSC (1 stage IIB, 22 stage III, and 7 stage IV), and median age is 57 (range 18–77). 133 cycles of chemotherapy have been administered with acceptable toxicity. Grade IV neutropenia has been seen in 3 cycles with 1 episode of febrile neutropenia. Grade I, II, and III HTN was observed in 1, 3, and 4 cycles, and grade I (42% hematuria 45% epistaxis) and II bleeding observed in 36 and 1 cycle(s), respectively. There has been 1 nasal perforation, 2 delayed wound healing, and no bowel perforation. 1 woman withdrew consent (for PMH diverticulitis), and 3 women have been removed for toxicity (1 autonomic neurotoxicity, 1 HTN, and 1 PE). To date, 13 patients have completed the chemotherapy phase of treatment, and only one patient has come off study for progression on consolidation bevacizumab. Conclusion: First line CBP is a highly active regimen that has been well tolerated thus far. Updated toxicity and response data will be available in the spring of 2006.

[Table: see text]

A phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with relapsed mullerian tumors

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a novel purine analog with clinical activity against ovarian cancer. Accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) increases in a linear fashion with prolonged infusions of gemcitabine, and there is a strong relationship between intracellular accumulation of dFdCTP and DNA damage. Women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma and documented recurrent disease were eligible for the study. Patients could not have received more than four prior lines of chemotherapy and had to have measurable or evaluable disease. Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 administered by intravenous infusion at 10 mg/m2/min (fixed dose rate [FDR]) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day schedule. Twenty-eight patients with a median age 60 (range, 40-77) years were treated. Although 43% were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0, 50% had liver metastases. Eighty-eight cycles of therapy were delivered (median 2 [range, 1-6]). Five of the first ten patients treated at 800 mg/m2 could not receive day 8 FDR-gemcitabine because of neutropenia, and the starting dose was reduced to 700 mg/m2. Even at this dose there was cumulative hematologic toxicity resulting in dose reductions. Vomiting, mucositis, diarrhea, allergy, rash, fever, and alopecia were mild. In 28 patients, there was only one partial response (4%, 95% CI 0-18%) and median time to progression was 1.7 (interquartile range, 1.2-3.9) months. FDR-gemcitabine 700 mg/m2 administered by intravenous infusion at an FDR of 10 mg/m2/min had minimal activity against heavily pretreated recurrent tumors of müllerian origin. The optimal dose and schedule of gemcitabine is yet to be defined in this population.

A phase I clinical trial of continual alternating etoposide and topotecan in refractory solid tumours

The goal of this phase I study was to develop a novel schedule using oral etoposide and infusional topotecan as a continually alternating schedule with potentially optimal reciprocal induction of the nontarget topoisomerase. The initial etoposide dose was 15 mg m(-2) b.i.d. days (D)1-5 weeks 1,3,5,7,9 and 11, escalated 5 mg per dose per dose level (DL). Topotecan in weeks 2,4,6,8,10 and 12 was administered by 96 h infusion at an initial dose of 0.2 mg m(-2) day(-1) with a dose escalation of 0.1, then at 0.05 mg m(-2) day(-1). Eligibility criteria required no organ dysfunction. Two dose reductions or delays were allowed. A total of 36 patients with a median age of 57 (22-78) years, received a median 8 (2-19) weeks of chemotherapy. At DL 6, dose-limiting toxicities consisted of grade 3 nausea, vomiting and intolerable fatigue. Three patients developed a line-related thrombosis or infection and one subsequently developed AML. There was no febrile neutropenia. There were six radiologically confirmed responses (18%) and 56% of patients demonstrated a response or stable disease, typically with only modest toxicity. Oral etoposide 35 mg m(-2) b.i.d. D1-5 and 1.8 mg m(-2) 96 h (total dose) infusional topotecan D8-11 can be administered on an alternating continual weekly schedule for at least 12 weeks, with promising clinical activity.

Attitudes to chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ovarian cancer (OVCA) has become the model for cancer as a chronic disease, yet little is known about what motivates patients and physicians in treatment choices.

METHODS

We investigated the attitudes of patients with epithelial OVCA and staff towards palliative chemotherapy for recurrent OVCA with a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

RESULTS

Instruments were developed and piloted in 15 patients. This exploratory study reflects substantial bias in the sample populations. One hundred twenty-two patients and 37 staff were enrolled in the US and 39 patients and 25 staff were enrolled in the UK. UK patients had a lower educational status (P = 0.001), lower stage disease (P = 0.025), and less prior lines of chemotherapy (P < 0.001). 61% of patients had recurrent OVCA and 67% of staff were physicians. Seventy-three percent of patients recalled a discussion about prognosis and 74% wanted to know details of the prognosis for a typical patient (US = UK). Most patients (48%) thought that their physician was realistic, and 57% of staff felt that they were optimistic. The vast majority of both staff and patients thought that patients positively reinterpreted what they were told. Five percent of staff thought that palliative care was "incompatible" when considering chemotherapy as an option for their second recurrence of OVCA, compared with 36% of US patients, significantly more than the 12% of UK patients (P = 0.007). Patients thought that standard chemotherapy for a second recurrence of OVCA produced remission in 50% and cure in 15% of patients. Staff reported 20% and 0%, respectively. Fifty percent of patients and 57% of staff would want chemotherapy as an asymptomatic patient with a normal CT and a rising CA-125. Patients generally appear to be very tolerant of grade II chemotherapy-induced toxicity with staff being less tolerant than patients of nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, and rash. Staff rated life prolongation by 3 months to 1 year very much less acceptable than patients (P < 0.001). Although possibly allowing comprehensive collection of sensitive data, the questionnaire was too distressing for some patients and made 11% of patients feel uncomfortably anxious.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are optimistic and in the US, may be more reluctant than staff to see the Palliative Care Team. These data challenge the assertion that the use of palliative chemotherapy is physician-driven.

Paclitaxel resistance: molecular mechanisms and pharmacologic manipulation

It has been approximately ten years since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved paclitaxel for the treatment of platinum resistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Since the approval, the drug has found therapeutic applications in a variety of schedules and in a wide variety of epithelial malignancies. Its novel mechanism of action provided the hope that it would demonstrate anti-neoplastic activity in multidrug resistant tumor cells. Unfortunately, as with other chemotherapeutic drugs, resistance is commonly seen. Laboratory investigation has defined a wide variety of resistance mechanisms including overexpression of multidrug resistance (MDR-1) gene, molecular changes in the target molecule (betatubulin), changes in apoptotic regulatory and mitosis checkpoint proteins, and more recently changes in lipid composition and potentially the overexpression of interleukin 6 (IL-6). This review describes the in vitro molecular data that define and support the various mechanisms of resistance and critically evaluates the evidence for the participation of these mechanisms in clinically relevant paclitaxel resistance. This review also explores pharmacologic attempts to modulate paclitaxel resistance, principally through inhibition of the MDR-1 drug efflux pump. Future avenues for drug resistance research and its pharmacologic manipulation in the clinic are discussed.

Overexpression of human phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) induces a multidrug resistance phenotype

BACKGROUND

Multidrug resistance is a significant barrier to the development of successful cancer treatment. To identify genetic alterations that are directly involved in paclitaxel resistance, a functional cloning strategy was developed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using mRNA from paclitaxel resistant human ovarian cancer cell line SW626TR, a cDNA library was established in a pCMV-Script vector that permits expression of cDNA inserts in mammalian cells. Transfection of the pCMV-Script/SW626TR cDNA library into the paclitaxel-sensitive human osteogenic sarcoma cell line, U-20S, resulted in several paclitaxel-resistant clones.

RESULTS

DNA sequencing of clone C16 demonstrates complete homology to human phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1). Retransfection of the PGK1 insert into U-20S confers a multidrug resistant phenotype, characterized by a 30-fold increase in paclitaxel resistance, and cross-resistance to vincristine; adriamycin and mitoxantrone, but not methotrexate or cisplatin. Enzymatic analysis of the PGK1 transfectants demonstrates an increase in PGK1 activity as compared to the parental cell line, U-20S. Northern and Western analysis of PGK1 transfectants reveals no change in MDR-1 expression compared with the parental cell line. In addition, co-culture of PGK1 transfectants with verapamil only partially reverses the multidrug resistant phenotype. Rhodamine 123 studies are also consistent with an MDR-1 independent mechanism of increased drug efflux.

CONCLUSION

Together this data suggests that PGK1 can induce a multidrug resistant phenotype through an MDR-1 independent mechanism.

Overexpression of IL-6 but not IL-8 increases paclitaxel resistance of U-2OS human osteosarcoma cells

The cytokines IL-6, initially recognized as a regulator of immune and inflammatory response and IL-8, a potential regulator of angiogenesis, also regulate the growth of many tumor cells. Human cancer cells selected for multidrug resistance to common chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate increased expression of IL-6 and IL-8. To determine whether IL-6 or IL-8 overexpression contributes directly to the drug resistant phenotype, IL-6 or IL-8 cDNA were introduced into the paclitaxel sensitive human osteosarcoma cell line U-2OS using the pIRESneo bicistronic expression vector. Interleukin-6 and IL-8 transfectants were selected for either high IL-6 or IL-8 secretion and evaluated in drug resistance assays. Two IL-6 and two IL-8 secreting clones express IL-6 or IL-8 levels of 10 ng/ml and 1 ng/ml in culture, while parental U-2OS and pIRESneo vector transfected control cells express IL-6 and IL-8 levels of 0.005 ng/ml and 0.1 ng/ml, respectively. MTT cytotoxicity with IL-6 transfected cells demonstrates a five-fold increase in resistance to paclitaxel and a four-fold increase in resistance to doxorubicin as compared to U-2OS. There are no changes in mitoxantrone or topotecan resistance in the IL-6 transfectants as compared to parental U-2OS. Northern analysis of IL-6 transfectants demonstrates that the resistant phenotype is not related to increased levels of MDR-1, MRP-1, or LRP. Western analysis also confirms that P-glycoprotein levels are not altered in IL-6 transfectants. Further supporting an MDR-1 independent mechanism of drug resistance, verapamil cannot reverse paclitaxel resistance in transfected cells, findings further supported by rhodamine 123 exclusion data. Treatment of IL-6 transfected cells with paclitaxel, compared with drug-sensitive parental U-2OS, shows U-2OS(IL-6) are significantly more resistant to apoptosis induced by paclitaxel and exhibit decreased proteolytic activation of caspase-3. In contrast U-2OS(IL-8) transfectants demonstrate no appreciable increase in paclitaxel resistance when compared with parental cells. In summary, while both IL-6 and IL-8 are overexpressed in paclitaxel resistant cell lines, only IL-6 has the potential to contribute directly to paclitaxel and doxorubicin resistance in U-2OS. This resistance is through a non-MDR-1 pathway.

Complementary, alternative, integrative, or unconventional medicine?

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown exponentially in the past decade, fueled by Internet marketing, dissatisfaction with mainstream medicine, and a desire for patients to be actively involved in their health care. There is a large discordance between physician estimates and reported prevalence of CAM use. Many patients do not disclose their practices mainly because they believe CAM falls outside the rubric of conventional medicine or because physicians do not ask. Concern about drug interactions and adverse effects are compounded by a lack of Food and Drug Administration regulation. Physicians need to be informed about CAM and be attuned to the psychosocial needs of patients.

Limited phase I study of morphine-3-glucuronide

The toxicity of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) has been investigated in an open, uncontrolled, single-blinded, single dose study over a limited range of doses. Three cohorts each of three healthy volunteers received 7.5, 15, and 30 mg/70 kg intravenous (IV) M3G. Blood sampling was undertaken for the following 24 h. Subjective toxicity was recorded on visual analogue scales and plasma M3G concentrations measured by a specific HPLC assay. Virtually no effects and no change in cardiovascular or respiratory parameters were seen. The pharmacokinetics fitted a two-compartment model. The mean elimination half-life (+/- S.D.) of M3G was 1.66 (+/- 0.47) h. Mean AUC standardized to a dose of 1 mg/70 kg was 228 (+/- 62) etamolL(-1) x h. Mean M3G clearance was 169 (+/- 48) mLmin(-1) and the mean volume of distribution was 23.1 (+/- 4.8) liters. At the doses investigated there were no clear neuroexcitatory effects, no opioid effects, and the pharmacokinetics were very similar to those of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G).

A Phase I-II study of 96-hour infusional topotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent Müllerian tumors

BACKGROUND

Topotecan and paclitaxel are schedule dependent chemotherapeutic agents with activity against ovarian carcinoma. A Phase I-II study in which both drugs were administered concurrently by 96-hour, continuous, intravenous infusion was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the combination.

METHODS

Women with ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and documented recurrent disease were eligible for the study. The dose of topotecan was escalated from 1.6 mg/m(2) while maintaining the paclitaxel dose constant at 100 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of both drugs were monitored daily during the first cycle of therapy.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 42-70 years) received 181 cycles of therapy. Five patients were recruited to each of four dose levels (topotecan 1.6 mg/m(2), 2.0 mg/m(2), 2.8 mg/m(2), and 3.6 mg/m(2)), and an additional 25 patients were treated at the MTD (Phase II). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia became dose limiting toxicities (DLT) at the fourth dose level. Emesis, mucositis, peripheral neuropathy, diarrhea, and alopecia were mild. Twenty patients (44%) had line-related occlusion, thrombosis, or infection. The mean values (+/- standard deviation) of the apparent steady-state plasma concentrations at the Phase II doses were 2.3 nM +/- 0.5 nM for topotecan lactone, 5.6 nM +/- 2.1 nM for total topotecan, and 40.1 nM +/- 16.8 nM for paclitaxel. There were seven partial responses (Phase II) contributing to an objective response rate of 28% and a median survival time of 11.7 months (range, 0.6-20.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan at a dose of 2.8 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) administered by concurrent, 96-hour, continuous intravenous infusions shows activity against tumors of Müllerian origin.

Losing God

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Nebulous language, distrust, and dogma confound spiritual aspects of cancer care. However, existential well being is an important determinant of quality of life: finding meaning and purpose make suffering more tolerable. The case presented is of a patient who experienced "losing God" as a Hodgkin's disease survivor with metastatic prostate cancer and severe coronary artery disease. His caregivers were able to provide the sense of community in which he could re-establish his faith. Health care providers do not have to be religious in order to help patients to deal with a spiritual crisis. The clinical skills of compassion need to be deployed to diagnose and respond to spiritual suffering. Acknowledging and addressing anger or guilt, common sources of suffering, are essential to adjustment. Simply being there for the patient and being open to their hurt can help resolve their spiritual crisis, a responsibility that is shared by the whole health care team.

Caring for colleagues

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Caring for colleagues who develop cancer is a privilege woven with an extra dimension-caregiver-patient issues. As well as stretching the usual need for a supportive relationship, when one of the health care team develops cancer it particularly provokes concerns about our own mortality. The case is presented of a well-known physician who developed a second cancer and has been cared for at the MGH Cancer Center Staff discuss her care as it has been effected by her status as a colleague. They perceived unique barriers to optimal care such as assumptions about the patient's level of medical knowledge, and technical, informational, emotional, and hierarchical issues that may obstruct the development of a trusting relationship between caregivers and the physician/patient. Emotional stress may prevent the sharing of an accurate prognosis. In the case under consideration, the patient had a frank and open attitude to her cancer yet her caregivers were concerned about continual breeches of patient confidentiality. Despite the many potential problems inherent when the caregiver becomes the patient, this case discussion was a poignant reminder of the unique challenges of every experience with cancer and the weighty privilege of being involved with patient care.

The clinical utility of liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of single agent off-protocol, liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil Alza), in consecutive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and to investigate the influence of HER-2/neu expression on response to liposomal doxorubicin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 72 consecutive patients treated, typically with liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) q28 days between January 1997 and December 1998. Results. Twenty-nine patients (40%) had platinum- and taxane-resistant tumors. Nineteen patients (27%) responded with clinical or radiological evidence of response with reduction in CA-125 of >50%. One complete response (CR) and 7 partial responses (PRs) occurred in platinum- and taxane-resistant patients (radiological response (RR) 29%) and 8 PRs occurred in patients with visceral metastases (RR 28%). Time to progression was 5.3 (2.1-12.1) months. Only 7 dose delays (3%) and 20 dose reductions (8%) were necessary in 265 cycles of treatment. Hematological toxicity was generally mild with grade (Gr) > or =III neutropenia in 1 (2%), Gr > or =III thrombocytopenia in 1 (1%), and Gr > or =III anemia in 8 patients (11%). One patient (1%) was admitted with fever and neutropenia. Other toxicity was minimal with Gr > or =III mucositis occurring in 3 patients (4%). Gr > or =III cutaneous toxicity was seen in 6 patients (8%). Three patients (4%) had a >10% fall in ejection fraction but there was no unequivocal clinical heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that liposomal doxorubicin is an active drug in both taxane- and platinum-sensitive and resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Liposomal doxorubicin is associated with tolerable toxicity and is particularly well tolerated in patients with multiple prior lines of treatment.

Medical mistakes: a workshop on personal perspectives

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Medical errors are difficult to discuss. Significant medical errors occur in approximately 3% of hospitalizations. Two-thirds are preventable. Despite an entrenched belief that doctors should be infallible, errors are inevitable. Dr. Wendy Levinson of the University of Chicago facilitated a discussion of the impact medical errors have on staff. Staff broke into small groups to share their personal experience and then discussed common themes: the sense of shame and guilt, the punitive culture, guidelines for disclosure to patients and colleagues, and changes in medical practice that can prevent future mistakes. Auditing and improving systems has led to considerable improvements in the field of aviation safety. However, in medicine people are more important than the process. While we should never cease to aim for the very best in delivered care, we must acknowledge how prone we all are to mistakes and that we can learn from and prevent errors. Openly sharing experiences in a confidential setting, such as the Schwartz Rounds, helps defuse feelings of guilt and challenges the culture of shame and isolation that often surrounds medical errors. The Oncologist 2001;6:92-99

A staff dialogue on a socially distanced patient: psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and caregivers

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. The following case of an HIV-positive woman who was diagnosed with cervical cancer during a twin pregnancy was discussed at the May, 1999 Schwartz Center Rounds. The patient was in drug rehabilitation having been dependent on crack cocaine, with a past history of syphilis and gonorrhea. She was single and her other children were in foster care. Initially she was suspicious and non-compliant. A plan was negotiated to biopsy the cervical lesion after cesarean section and with confirmation of malignancy she underwent radical surgery and subsequently radiotherapy. Despite the almost insurmountable social and educational distance between her and her caregivers, they managed to bond and facilitate care. Although there were compromises with which staff were uncomfortable, the relationship was maintained and continues.

Reality testing in cancer treatment: the phase I trial of endostatin

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. The September 1999 Schwartz Center Rounds addressed the growing attention around the phase I trial of Endostatin. Endostatin represents a new treatment paradigm. It is an anti-angiogenic protein, an endogenous fragment of collagen XVIII. In an attempt to ensure a fair allocation of a very limited number of treatment slots in this classical phase I trial, a lottery was established. More than 1,400 patients enrolled within two days of the lottery, all vying for three places in the first cohort. Two contrasting cases are presented, each a potentially eligible patient. The discussion focuses on the dilemma presented by patients desperate for an unproven treatment and the responsibility of staff to explain and support without compounding the hype or suffocating the hope.

A staff dialogue on do not resuscitate orders: psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and caregivers

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The Center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. The following case of a woman who developed lymphoma was discussed at the July and August, 1997 Schwartz Center Rounds. There were considerable delays and uncertainties in the diagnosis, which was followed by an unpredictably chaotic clinical course. Although she had made it clear to her doctor that she did not want "heroic measures," she had unexpectedly rallied so many times that her son and her husband wanted her doctors to do everything possible to keep her alive, including the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The clinical benefit of CPR in the event of cardiac arrest in those with cancer is discussed, as are do not resuscitate (DNR) orders, living wills, and healthcare proxies. In addition, the issues that surround DNR status, including who should discuss DNR status with a patient, and how and when it should be discussed, are reviewed. Staff raised concerns about the effect of discussing DNR status on the doctor-patient relationship, and wondered whether writing DNR orders adversely affect the care of patients.

Sexuality and cancer: conversation comfort zone

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Psychosocial issues profoundly affect patients with cancer. Of the many complexities that make up the psychosocial dynamic, perhaps the medical profession is most uncomfortable with sexuality. Many elements of sexual behavior remain high-profile taboos. A number of diseases and treatments significantly affect sexual function. Male and female sexuality were discussed in two separate rounds with an emphasis on how to begin a dialogue about sexuality without jeopardizing other aspects of the relationship with patients. Three cases were presented. A patient with prostate cancer considering treatment options for early-stage disease and two patients with gynecologic malignancies; one with a colostomy following cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer and the other with a failed vaginal reconstruction for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina. Staff discussed the wide diversity of response to sexual dysfunction and the difficulties that patients face. A sensitive and informed approach to discussing sexuality can provide effective support. The elements of successful dialogue are presented in the PLISSIT model.

Burnout: caring for the caregivers

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Burnout describes the end result of stress in the professional life of a physician or caregiver and combines emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and low personal accomplishment. This problem is common in health care workers in every specialty and may affect not only personal satisfaction, but also the quality of care delivered to patients. Burnout is particularly relevant in oncology where caregivers work closely with patients who have life-threatening illnesses and therapy often has only a limited impact. Burnout was discussed in the rounds with an emphasis on factors which precipitate or prevent stress among health care workers. Presentations were made by Dr. Canellos of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Dr. Picard of the Institute for Health Professions. Staff discussed the main issues contributing to burnout including the health care system, lack of time and inadequate training. They considered preventative measures including psychological support of the health care team, communication and management skills, and effective coping mechanisms.

A phase II study of combined intravenous and subcutaneous interleukin-2 in malignant pleural mesothelioma

A total of 29 previously untreated patients with histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma, with an ECOG score of < or = 2 and UICC stage I-II disease, were enrolled between May 1994 and October 1996. On days 1 and 2, 18 x 10(6) IU/day of rIL-2 was administered by continuous intravenous infusion, and 6 x 10(6) IU/day of rIL-2 by subcutaneous injection on days 5--20 inclusive of a 42-day cycle. Further treatment was administered if no radiological disease progression was demonstrated. A total of 29 patients were assessable for toxicity and 25 for response, and 49 cycles of IL-2 were administered with a median of one per patient (range, < 1-4). Toxicity included mild fever, nausea and vomiting, and skin rashes, < grade II. Three patients failed to complete one cycle of treatment because of toxicity and one died of disease before response evaluation. Two patients achieved a partial response (8%, 95% CI 1-26%) surviving 18.1 and 18.7 months from diagnosis. A total of 11 patients (44%, 95% CI 24-65%) with stable disease had a median survival of 13.6 months (range 6.5-33.8). The median survival was 8.6 months (range 3.7-34.5) for the 12 patients with progressive disease (48%, 95% CI 28-69%). This regimen of rIL-2 is well tolerated and shows limited activity in mesothelioma.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of the activity of the morphine glucuronides

BACKGROUND

Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is an active metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic activity. Morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), the most prevalent metabolite, has minimal affinity for opioid receptors. It has been suggested from animal model data and by examination of metabolite ratios in humans that M3G may functionally antagonize the respiratory depressant and analgesic actions of morphine and M6G.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 10 healthy volunteers. The trial had 6 arms: (1) placebo, (2) 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, (3) 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G, (4) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G, (5) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, and (6) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G; all were give by slow intravenous bolus. Analgesia was assessed with the use of the submaximal ischemic pain model. The effects were quantified on numerical and visual analogue scales. Respiratory parameters and response to steady state 5% carbon dioxide challenge were assessed with spirometry, mass spectroscopy, and earlobe blood gas analysis.

RESULTS

Morphine and M6G produced significant pain relief compared with placebo (morphine, P < .0001; M6G, P = .033). Pain relief after M6G was less than after morphine (P = .009) and M3G was no better than placebo (P = .26). Pain relief with morphine and M6G were not significantly altered by M3G (P = .59 and P = .28, respectively). Significant and similar dysphoria and sedation occurred with both morphine (P < .002) and M6G (P < .016) but were absent with both M3G and placebo. Respiratory parameters suggested that M6G produced less respiratory depression than morphine. Both morphine and M6G caused a significant reduction in respiratory drive compared with placebo (morphine, P = .002; M6G, P = .013); this effect was not reversed by M3G (P = .35 and P = .83, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

M3G appears to be devoid of significant activity; in these circumstances and at these doses, it does not antagonize either the analgesic or respiratory depressant effects of M6G or morphine.