Understanding vancomycin nephrotoxicity augmented by β-lactams: a synthesis of endosymbiosis, proximal renal tubule mitochondrial metabolism, and β-lactam chemistry

The recent understanding that hydrophobic β-lactams have greater affinity for organic anion transporter-3 (OAT-3) of the proximal renal tubule could provide valuable insights for anticipating β-lactams that may exacerbate vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin alone provides oxidative stress on the highly metabolic proximal tubular cells. Hydrophobic β-lactams (eg, piperacillin and anti-staphylococcal β-lactams) could have greater OAT-3 mediated uptake into proximal tubular cells than hydrophilic β-lactams (eg, most cephalosporins and carbapenems), thereby causing greater mitochondrial stress on these susceptible cells. It remains to be seen whether concomitant drugs that inhibit OAT-3 mediated cellular uptake of β-lactams into proximal tubular cells or provide antioxidant effects might mitigate β-lactam augmented vancomycin nephrotoxicity. Furthermore, the serum creatinine rise seen with vancomycin and hydrophobic β-lactams might represent competition for creatinine-secreting transporters (of which OAT-3 is one), thus, indicating creatinine retention rather than renal injury. In the meantime, clinicians are advised to utilise less nephrotoxic combinations in both empirical and directed antibiotic selection settings until further research is conducted.

Dalbavancin Sequential Therapy for Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infection: A Multicenter Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting lipoglycopeptides such as dalbavancin may have utility in patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSI), particularly in those with barriers to discharge or who require prolonged parenteral antibiotic courses. A retrospective cohort study was performed to provide further multicenter real-world evidence on dalbavancin use as a sequential therapy for Gram-positive BSI.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients received dalbavancin with Gram-positive BSI, defined as any positive blood culture or diagnosed with infective endocarditis, from 13 centers geographically spread across the United States between July 2015 and July 2021.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean (SD) age of 48.5 (17.5) years, the majority were male (54%), with many who injected drugs (40%). The most common infection sources (non-exclusive) were primary BSI (89%), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) (25%), infective endocarditis (19%), and bone and joint infection (17%). Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 72% of index cultures, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus accounted for 18%, and Streptococcus species in 16%. Dalbavancin started a median (Q1-Q3) of 10 (6-19) days after index culture collection. The most common regimen administered was dalbavancin 1500 mg as one dose for 50% of cases. The primary outcome of composite clinical failure occurred at 12.2%, with 90-day mortality at 7.0% and 90-day BSI recurrence at 3.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Dalbavancin may serve as a useful tool in facilitating hospital discharge in patients with Gram-positive BSI. Randomized controlled trials are anticipated to validate dalbavancin as a surrogate to current treatment standards.

Eravacycline, the first four years: health outcomes and tolerability data for 19 hospitals in 5 U.S. regions from 2018 to 2022

IMPORTANCE

The rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, especially MDR Gram-negatives, poses a significant challenge to clinicians and public health. These resilient bacteria have rendered many traditional antibiotics ineffective, underscoring the urgency for innovative therapeutic solutions. Eravacycline, a broad-spectrum fluorocycline tetracycline antibiotic approved by the FDA in 2018, emerges as a promising candidate, exhibiting potential against a diverse array of MDR bacteria, including Gram-negative, Gram-positive, anaerobic strains, and Mycobacterium. However, comprehensive data on its real-world application remain scarce. This retrospective cohort study, one of the largest of its kind, delves into the utilization of eravacycline across various infectious conditions in the USA during its initial 4 years post-FDA approval. Through assessing clinical, microbiological, and tolerability outcomes, the research offers pivotal insights into eravacycline's efficacy in addressing the pressing global challenge of MDR bacterial infections.

Long-term evaluation of clinical success and safety of omadacycline in nontuberculous mycobacteria infections: a retrospective, multicenter cohort of real-world health outcomes

Infections due to nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) continue to increase in prevalence, leading to problematic clinical outcomes. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic with FDA orphan drug and fast-track designations for pulmonary NTM infections, including Mycobacteroides abscessus (MAB). This multicenter retrospective study across 16 U.S. medical institutions from January 2020 to March 2023 examined the long-term clinical success, safety, and tolerability of OMC for NTM infections. The cohort included patients aged ≥18 yr, who were clinically evaluable, and` had been treated with OMC for ≥3 mo without a previous diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. The primary outcome was 3 mo clinical success, with secondary outcomes including clinical improvement and mortality at 6- and 12 mo, persistence or reemergence of infection, adverse effects, and reasons for OMC utilization. Seventy-five patients were included in this analysis. Most patients were female (48/75, 64.0%) or Caucasian (58/75, 77.3%), with a median (IQR) age of 59 yr (49-67). Most had NTM pulmonary disease (33/75, 44.0%), skin and soft tissue disease (19/75, 25.3%), or osteomyelitis (10/75, 13.3%), and Mycobacterium abscessus (60/75, 80%) was the most commonly isolated NTM pathogen. The median (IQR) treatment duration was 6 mo (4 - 14), and the most commonly co-administered antibiotic was azithromycin (33/70, 47.1%). Three-month clinical success was observed in 80.0% (60/75) of patients, and AEs attributable to OMC occurred in 32.0% (24/75) of patients, leading to drug discontinuation in 9.3% (7/75).

Risk Factors for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Clinical Treatment Failure

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) categorized carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections as an "urgent" health care threat requiring public attention and research. Certain patients with CRE infections may be at higher risk for poor clinical outcomes than others. Evidence on risk or protective factors for CRE infections are warranted in order to determine the most at-risk populations, especially with newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) antibiotics available to treat CRE. We aimed to identify specific variables involved in CRE treatment that are associated with clinical failure (either 30-day mortality, 30-day microbiologic recurrence, or clinical worsening/failure to improve throughout antibiotic treatment). We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study of hospitalized patients with CRE infection sampled from 2010 to 2020 at two medical systems in Detroit, Michigan. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old and culture positive for an organism in the Enterobacterales order causing clinical infection with in vitro resistance by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints to at least one carbapenem. Overall, there were 140 confirmed CRE infections of which 39% had clinical failure. The most common infection sources were respiratory (38%), urinary (20%), intra-abdominal (16%), and primary bacteremia (14%). A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to identify statistically significant associated predictors with clinical failure, and they included Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.32), chronic dialysis (aOR, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.51-22.7), and Klebsiella pneumoniae in index culture (aOR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.28 to 7.47). Further research on CRE infections is needed to identify best practices to promote treatment success. IMPORTANCE This work compares carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections using patient, clinical, and treatment variables to understand which characteristics are associated with the highest risk of clinical failure. Knowing which risk factors are associated with CRE infection failure can provide clinicians better prognostic and targeted interventions. Research can also further investigate why certain risk factors cause more clinical failure and can help develop treatment strategies to mitigate associated risk factors.

Nephrotoxicity of Vancomycin in Combination With Beta-Lactam Agents: Ceftolozane-Tazobactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin (VAN)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is increased when VAN is combined with certain beta-lactams (BLs) such as piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) but has not been evaluated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Our aim was to investigate the AKI incidence of VAN in combination with C/T (VAN/C/T) compared with VAN in combination to TZP (VAN-TZP).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, observational, comparative study across the United States. The primary analysis was a composite outcome of AKI and risk, injury, failure, loss, end stage renal disease; Acute Kidney Injury Network; or VAN-induced nephrotoxicity according to the consensus guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for confounding variables and stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis to assess the time to nephrotoxicity between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

We included VAN/C/T (n = 90) and VAN-TZP (n = 284) at an enrollment ratio of 3:1. The primary outcome occurred in 12.2% vs 25.0% in the VAN-C/T and VAN-TZP groups, respectively (P = .011). After adjusting for confounding variables, VAN-TZP was associated with increased odds of AKI compared with VAN-C/T; with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.308 (95% confidence interval, 1.560-6.993). Results of the stratified Kaplan-Meir analysis with log-rank time-to-nephrotoxicity analysis indicate that time to AKI was significantly shorter among patients who received VAN-TZP (P = .004). Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that TZP was consistent with the primary analysis (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, our results suggest that the AKI is not likely to be related to tazobactam but rather to piperacillin, which is a component in VAN-TZP but not in VAN-C/T.

679. Traditional vs. Alternative Agents in Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Susceptible to Traditional Agents

Background

Comparative effectiveness studies to guide treatment decisions for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) susceptible to traditional agents (non-carbapenem β-lactams and fluoroquinolones) are unavailable. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with traditional and alternative treatment regimens for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) caused by CRPA that remain susceptible to traditional agents.

Methods

Multi-center, retrospective cohort from January 2016 to December 2019. We included adults with CRPA (resistant to ≥ 1 carbapenem; meropenem or imipenem) that were susceptible to ≥1 traditional agent (piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, or aztreonam) by CLSI breakpoints isolated from an LRTI sample. All other antibiotics were considered alternative agents. We excluded patients with known colonization, cystic fibrosis, or who expired ≤24 hours after antibiotic receipt. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission and 30-day recurrence.

Results

In total, 87 patients, ‘traditional’ treatment (n=53) and ‘alternative’ treatment (n=34), were included from 2 institutions in Detroit, MI, USA: median(IQR) age 59(20) years, 64.4% male, and 59.8% African American. Median(IQR) APACHE II and Charlson Comorbidity index scores were 24(10) and 4(5), respectively. Most patients received traditional therapy (n=53), most commonly with cefepime (60.4%) or piperacillin-tazobactam (41.5%). While 34(39.0%) were treated with alternative agents, most commonly ceftolozane-tazobactam (64.7%) or an aminoglycoside (29.4%) alone or in combination. Thirty-day mortality was not significantly different between traditional and alternative therapy groups (22.6% and 11.8%), respectively. There was no significant difference between 30-day recurrence (17.0% and 20.6%) or 30-day readmission (22.6% and 17.6%) between groups.

Conclusion

Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between patients receiving traditional vs. alternative agents for LRTI caused by CRPA susceptible to traditional agents. Traditional agents may be considered for these infections. Further comparative studies are needed to guide treatment decisions for CRPA.

Disclosures

All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Clinical Outcomes of Eravacycline in Patients Treated Predominately for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Forty-six patients were treated with eravacycline (ERV) for Acinetobacter baumannii infections, where 69.5% of isolates were carbapenem resistant (CRAB). Infections were primarily pulmonary (58.3%), and most patients received combination therapy (84.4%). The median (IQR) ERV duration was 6.9 days (5.1 to 11.1). Thirty-day mortality was 23.9% in the cohort and 21.9% in CRAB patients. One patient experienced an ERV-possible adverse event. IMPORTANCE Acinetobacter baumannii, particularly when carbapenem resistant (CRAB), is one of the most challenging pathogens in the health care setting. This is complicated by the fact that there is no consensus guideline regarding management of A. baumannii infections. However, the recent Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections provided expert recommendations for CRAB management. The panel suggest using minocycline among tetracycline derivatives rather than eravacycline (ERV) until sufficient clinical data are available. Therefore, we present the largest multicenter real-world cohort in patients treated with ERV for A. baumannii, where the majority of isolates were CRAB (69.5%). Our analysis demonstrate that patients treated with ERV-based regimens achieved a 30-day mortality of 23.9% and had a low incidence of ERV-possible adverse events (2.1%). This study is important as it fills the gap in the literature regarding the use of a novel tetracycline (i.e., ERV) in the treatment of this challenging health care infection.

Clinical Characteristics Associated with Bacterial Bloodstream Coinfection in COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Inappropriate antibiotic use in COVID-19 is often due to treatment of presumed bacterial coinfection. Predictive factors to distinguish COVID-19 from COVID-19 with bacterial coinfection or bloodstream infection are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 595 COVID-19 patients admitted between March 8, 2020, and April 4, 2020, to describe factors associated with a bacterial bloodstream coinfection (BSI). The primary outcome was any characteristic associated with BSI in COVID-19, with secondary outcomes including 30-day mortality and days of antibiotic therapy (DOT) by antibiotic consumption (DOT/1000 patient-days). Variables of interest were compared between true BSI (n = 25) and all other COVID-19 cases (n = 570). A secondary comparison was performed between positive blood cultures with true BSI (n = 25) and contaminants (n = 33) on antibiotic use.

RESULTS

Fever (> 38 °C) (as a COVID-19 symptom) was not different between true BSI (n = 25) and all other COVID-19 patients (n = 570) (p = 0.93), although it was different as a reason for emergency department (ED) admission (p = 0.01). Neurological symptoms (ED reason or COVID-19 symptom) were significantly higher in the true BSI group (p < 0.01, p < 0.01) and were independently associated with true BSI (ED reason: OR = 3.27, p < 0.01; COVID-19 symptom: OR = 2.69, p = 0.03) on multivariate logistic regression. High (15-19.9 × 109/L) white blood cell (WBC) count at admission was also higher in the true BSI group (p < 0.01) and was independently associated with true BSI (OR = 2.56, p = 0.06) though was not statistically significant. Thirty-day mortality was higher among true BSI (p < 0.01). Antibiotic consumption (DOT/1000 patient-days) between true BSI and contaminants was not different (p = 0.34). True bloodstream coinfection was 4.2% (25/595) over the 28-day period.

CONCLUSION

True BSI in COVID-19 was associated with neurological symptoms and nonsignificant higher WBC, and led to overall higher 30-day mortality and worse patient outcomes.

Real-World, Multicenter Case Series of Patients Treated with Oral Omadacycline for Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria have been associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and have limited treatment options available. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic that has been shown to exhibit broad in vitro activity against antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Given the lack of real-world data, the primary objective of our report was to describe early experience with OMC for the treatment of resistant Gram-negative infections.

METHODS

This was a real-world, multicenter, observational cases series/pilot study conducted in the USA. Inclusion criteria included any adult patient aged ≥ 18 years who received OMC for ≥ 72 h either in the inpatient and/or outpatient setting. Clinical success was defined as a composite of 90-day survival from initiation of OMC, lack of alteration in treatment/addition of other antibiotic due to concerns of OMC failure, and lack of microbiologic recurrence within 30 days from the end of therapy.

RESULTS

Oral OMC was used in nine cases primarily for multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections (55.6% XDR and/or carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]). The majority of infections were of bone/joint (55.6%) origin, followed by intra-abdominal (33.3%) origin. Clinical success occurred in 66.7% of cases, with 80.0% success each in infections of bone/joint origin or those caused by CRAB. One patient experienced an adverse effect that was not treatment limiting while on therapy (gastrointestinal).

CONCLUSION

The use of oral OMC in MDR/XDR Gram-negative infections exhibited a relatively high success rate with minimal adverse effects. Real-world studies with larger case numbers are needed to confirm our initial findings.

Early Multicenter Experience With Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

A multicenter case series of 21 patients were treated with imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam. There were mixed infection sources, with pulmonary infections (11/21,52%) composing the majority. The primary pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16/21, 76%), and 15/16 (94%) isolates were multidrug-resistant. Thirty-day survival occurred in 14/21 (67%) patients. Two patients experienced adverse effects.

Vancomycin Area Under the Curve to Predict Timely Clinical Response in the Treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

INTRODUCTION

Although recent guidelines have recommended monitoring vancomycin (VAN) area under the curve (AUC)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to ensure clinical efficacy and minimize toxicity in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for various infections, there are no recommendations regarding complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). We aimed to evaluate the association between VAN AUC and clinical outcomes in MRSA cSSTIs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients treated with ≥72 hours of VAN for MRSA cSSTI from 2008 to 2013 at Detroit Medical Center. The primary outcome was timely clinical success (TCS) defined as (1) resolution of signs and symptoms of infection within 72 hours, (2) stabilization and/or reduction in lesion size, (3) alternative agents not required due to VAN failure or toxicity as elected by the prescribing clinician. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was performed to determine the AUC associated with TCS in the cohort. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between VAN-AUC and the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were included in this analysis. CART identifed an AUC ≥435 mg*hr/L for TCS. Overall, 60.9% of patients experienced TCS; 69.7% in the target-AUC group versus 52.5% in the below-target AUC group, (P = .013). Target-AUC attainment was independently associated with increased odds of TCS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.208; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.047-4.659).

CONCLUSIONS

In adults treated with VAN for MRSA cSSTI, target-AUC attainment was independently associated with improved clinical outcomes and maybe most warranted for patients at high risk of VAN failure or VAN-associated toxicity.

686. Comparing Treatments of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infective Endocarditis by People Who Inject Drugs

Background

People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for infective endocarditis (IE) with high-mortality pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Stigma against PWID may cause differences in treatment and outcomes between these patients infected with MRSA IE.

Methods

Single center retrospective cohort study from August 2006 to February 2021 that includes adult patients diagnosed with IE. Primary outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, 60-day MRSA recurrence, 60-day readmission, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was performed by chi-square, t-test, and Mann-Whitney-U as appropriate.

Results

A total of 214 patients were diagnosed with MRSA IE; 89 PWID and 125 non-PWID. The mean (SD) age was 47.4±12.4 years (PWID) vs 59.3 ±16.0 years (non-PWID) (p&lt; 0.001). Patients were primarily male (56%), but differed in terms of race 34% African-American (AA) (PWID) vs 66% AA (non-PWID) (p&lt; 0001). Mean APACHE II scores differed between groups: 16(±9.9) (PWID) vs 19(±8.1) (non-PWID) (p&lt; 0.008). Among patients who cleared bacteremia, mean (SD) duration was 5.7(±3.9) days and was not significant between groups (p&lt; 0.64). Valve-type was 93% native and 7% prosthetic and not different between groups (p&lt; 0.16). Infectious Diseases consult did not differ at 96% overall (p&lt; 0.31), but pursuit of source control nearly reached significance at 27% for PWID vs 41% non-PWID (p&lt; 0.06). Similarly, use of combination therapy daptomycin and ceftaroline was nearly significant: 21% (PWID) vs 12% (non-PWID) (p&lt; 0.09). Odds ratio of PWID and combination therapy remained non-significant after regression: 0.39(0.14-1.1,p&lt; 0.07). Primary 90-day mortality was lower in PWID vs non-PWID (15% vs 30%) respectively (p&lt; 0.01), but did not differ in 60-day MRSA recurrence (p&lt; 1.0) at 9%, 60-day readmission (p&lt; 1.0) at 33%, or median LOS (IQR) (p&lt; 0.46) at 15 (10-24) days overall.

Conclusion

While PWID are significantly younger, less critically ill, and have lower mortality compared to non-PWID, they have similar LOS, MRSA recurrence, and readmission rates. Analyses suggest a potential difference in the pursuit of source control and combination therapy among PWID, however more studies may be needed to achieve significance.

Disclosures

Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Research Grant or Support)

1082. Real-World Experience with Omadacycline for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections: A Multicenter Evaluation

Background

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are resistant to numerous antibiotics and lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic that is Food and Drug Administration-approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Furthermore, OMC has shown in vitro activity against NTM. Given that real-world evidence is lacking, our primary objective was to evaluate the clinical success and tolerability of OMC when used for a variety of NTM infections.

Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted from January 2020 to June 2021. We included all patients ≥ 18 years of age that received OMC of any indication for Mycobacterium spp. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as a lack of all-cause mortality, lack of persistence or re-emergence of infection during or after therapy, and lack of alteration of OMC. Incidence of adverse effects potentially attributable to OMC and reasons for OMC utilization were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 31 patients were included from 12 geographically distinct academic health systems (median age: 57 (IQR, 45-63) years; 45% male; 81% Caucasian). The majority of isolated pathogens were Mycobacterium abscessus complex (84%) and of those with subspeciation performed (54%), the majority (86%) were subsp. abscessus. The primary infections were of pulmonary origin (67%) and the median (IQR) duration of OMC therapy was 5.3 (3.2-9.4) months. Most isolates did not have OMC susceptibility conducted (87%), while the majority did for tigecycline (90%). Clinical success was reported in 81% of the population. Most patients were on combination antimicrobial therapy, and 39% of patients reported an adverse effect while on OMC (58% gastrointestinal distress). The majority of patients were prescribed OMC due to ease of administration (61%) and antimicrobial resistance to previous antibiotics (42%).

Conclusion

OMC may be a potential option for the therapy of NTM infections. Prospective, randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Disclosures

Julie V. Philley, MD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Advisor or Review Panel member)Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Consultant) Michael P. Veve, Pharm.D., Cumberland (Grant/Research Support)Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Research Grant or Support) Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek Pharmaceuticals (Research Grant or Support)

Real-world, Multicenter Experience With Meropenem-Vaborbactam for Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections Including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Background

We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV) for a variety of gram-negative infections (GNIs), primarily including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE).

Methods

This is a real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort within the United States between 2017 and 2020. Adult patients who received MEV for ≥72 hours were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used to identify the time breakpoint (BP) that delineated the risk of negative clinical outcomes (NCOs) and was examined by multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLR).

Results

Overall, 126 patients were evaluated from 13 medical centers in 10 states. The most common infection sources were respiratory tract (38.1%) and intra-abdominal (19.0%) origin, while the most common isolated pathogens were CRE (78.6%). Thirty-day mortality and recurrence occurred in 18.3% and 11.9%, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 4 patients: nephrotoxicity (n = 2), hepatoxicity (n = 1), and rash (n = 1). CART-BP between early and delayed treatment was 48 hours (P = .04). MEV initiation within 48 hours was independently associated with reduced NCO following analysis by MLR (adusted odds ratio, 0.277; 95% CI, 0.081–0.941).

Conclusions

Our results support current evidence establishing positive clinical and safety outcomes of MEV in GNIs, including CRE. We suggest that delaying appropriate therapy for CRE significantly increases the risk of NCOs.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on training of pharmacy residents and fellows: Results from a national survey of postgraduate pharmacy trainees

Purpose

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted the activities of healthcare workers, including postgraduate pharmacy trainees. Quality training experiences must be maintained to produce competent pharmacy practitioners and maintain program standards.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of postgraduate pharmacy trainees in the United States was conducted to evaluate training experience changes and assess perceived impacts on residents and fellows following the COVID-19 pandemic’s onset.

Results

From June 4 through June 22, 2020, 511 pharmacy trainees in 46 states completed the survey. Participants’ median age was 26 (interquartile range [IQR], 25-28) years, with included responses from postgraduate year 1 residents (54% of sample), postgraduate year 2 residents (40%), and postgraduate fellows (6%). Compared to experiences prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, fewer trainees conducted direct patient care (38.5% vs 91.4%, P < 0.001), more worked from home (31.7% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001), and less time was spent with preceptors per day (2 [IQR, 2-6] hours vs 4 [IQR, 1-4] hours, P < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of respondents reported experiencing changes in their training program, 39% reported being asked to work in areas outside of their routine training experience, and 89% stated their training shifted to focus on COVID-19 to some degree. Most respondents perceived either major (9.6%) or minor (52.0%) worsening in quality of experience, with major and minor improvement in quality of experience reported by 5.5% and 8.4% of respondents, respectively.

Conclusion

Pharmacy resident/fellow experiences were perceived to have been extensively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in varying ways. Our findings describe shifts in postgraduate training and may aid in the development of best practices for optimizing trainee experiences in future crises.

Standardized Treatment and Assessment Pathway Improves Mortality in Adults With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: STAPH Study

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) management remains challenging for clinicians. Numerous in vitro studies report synergy when vancomycin (VAN) and daptomycin (DAP) are combined with beta-lactams (BLs), which has led to clinical implementation of these combinations. While shorter durations of bacteremia have often been reported, there has been no significant impact on mortality.

Methods

The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) developed and implemented a clinical pathway algorithm for MRSA BSI treatment in 2016 that included the early use of BL combination therapy with standard of care (VAN or DAP) and a mandatory Infectious Diseases consultation. This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study at the DMC between 2013 and 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between pathway implementation and 30-day mortality while adjusting for confounding variables.

Results

Overall, 813 adult patients treated for MRSA BSI were evaluated. Compared with prepathway (PRE) patients (n = 379), those treated postpathway (POST; n = 434) had a significant reduction in 30-day and 90-day mortality: 9.7% in POST vs 15.6% in PRE (P = .011) and 12.2% in POST vs 19.0% in PRE (P = .007), respectively.

The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in the PRE compared with the POST group: 9.6% vs 7.2% (P = .282), respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables including Infectious Diseases consult, POST was independently associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.608; 95% CI, 0.375–0.986).

Conclusions

Implementation of an MRSA BSI treatment pathway with early use of BL reduced mortality with no increased rate of AKI. Further prospective evaluation of this pathway approach is warranted.

Daptomycin Plus β-Lactam Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Mounting evidence suggests the addition of a β-lactam (BL) to daptomycin (DAP) results in synergistic in vitro activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and bolsters the innate immune response to infection. This study's objective was to provide clinical translation to these experimental data and determine if DAP+BL combination therapy results in improved clinical outcomes compared with treatment with DAP alone in patients with MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, comparative cohort study conducted at 2 academic medical centers between 2008 and 2018. Adults with MRSA BSI treated with DAP for ≥72 hours and initiated ≤5 days of culture collection were included. Patients who received a BL for ≥24 hours and initiated ≤24 hours of DAP comprised the DAP+BL group. The primary outcome was composite clinical failure (60-day all-cause mortality and/or 60-day recurrence). Analyses were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients were included (72 DAP+BL and 157 DAP). In unadjusted and IPTW-adjusted analyses, DAP+BL was associated with significantly reduced odds of clinical failure (odds ratio [OR], 0.362; 95% confidence interval [CI], .164-.801; adjusted OR, 0.386; 95% CI, .175-.853). Adjusted analyses restricted to prespecified subgroups based on infection complexity and baseline health status were consistent with the main analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a BL to DAP was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with MRSA BSI. This study provides support to ongoing and future studies evaluating the impact of combination therapy for invasive MRSA infections.Patients treated with daptomycin plus a β-lactam for MRSA bloodstream infection had lower odds of composite clinical failure defined as 60-day all-cause mortality and/or 60-day recurrence compared with patients treated with daptomycin monotherapy after adjusting for confounding variables using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

COVID-19: Before the Fall, An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Treatment Options

The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has quickly become one of the most dire international pandemic crises since the 1918 Spanish flu. Evidence for COVID-19 pharmacological therapies has shown rapid growth and a diverse array of results, but an assessment of the value of each piece of evidence must be reinforced. This article aims to review utilized therapies, the evidence level supporting these therapies, as well as drugs under investigation for the treatment of COVID-19. Primary scrutinized therapies include antiviral regimens, such as remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, immunomodulating drugs, such as corticosteroids and interleukin (IL) inhibitors, and other therapies including convalescent plasma. Only one therapy, dexamethasone, has shown a mortality benefit in randomized controlled trials and summarized evidence for other therapies show limited positive results. Reviewing these therapies in a historical way shows how limited evidence can drive therapy decisions. A broad summary of available evidence can assist clinicians in a return to hierarchical assessments of evidence which can lead to safer patient outcomes, improved distribution of resources, and better targets for appropriate therapy decisions.

Preliminary, Real-world, Multicenter Experience With Omadacycline for Mycobacterium abscessus Infections

Twelve patients were treated with omadacycline (OMC) as part of a multidrug regimen for Mycobacterium abscessus. The majority of infections were of pulmonary origin (7/12; 58.3%). The median (interquartile range) duration of OMC was 6.2 (4.2-11.0) months. Clinical success occurred in 9/12 (75.0%) patients. Three patients experienced a possible adverse effect while on therapy.

1575. Predictors of Negative Clinical Outcomes among Patients treated with Meropenem-Vaborbactam for Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: Impact of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Selection

Background

Numerous number of studies have found a positive correlation between delayed appropriate antibiotic therapy and negative clinical outcomes (NCO) in Gram-negative bacterial infections (GNBI). The combination of meropenem with vaborbactam (MVB) received Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis caused by susceptible organisms in August 2017. We sought to determine the impact of delayed appropriate therapy with MVB on NCO among patients with GNBI.

Methods

Multi-center, retrospective cohort study from October 2017 to March 2020. We included adult patients treated with MVB for &gt;72 hours. We excluded patients who received alternative appropriate antibiotics for GNB prior to MVB and patients with unknown dates for index culture. NCO were defined as 30-day mortality and/or microbiological recurrence. All outcomes were measured from MVB start date. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used to identify the time breakpoint (BP) that delineates the risk of NCO. Multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLR) was used to examine the independent association between the CART-derived-BP and NCO. Variables were retained in the model if P&lt; 0.2 and removed in a backward stepwise approach.

Results

A total of 86 patients were included from 13 institutions in the United States: median(IQR) age 55 (37-67) years, 67% male, and 48% Caucasian. Median(IQR) APACHE II and Charlson Comorbidity index scores were 18(11-26) and 4(2-6), respectively. Common sources of infection were respiratory (37%) and intra-abdominal (21%). The most common pathogens were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (83%). CART-derived BP between early and delayed treatment was 48 hours, where NCO was increased (36% vs.7%; P=0.04). Delayed MVB initiation was independently associated with NCO in the MLR (aOR=7.4, P=0.02).

Results of Regression Analysis of Variables Associated With Negative Clinical Outcomes and Delayed Appropriate Therapy with Meropenem-vaborbactam

Conclusion

Our results suggest that delaying appropriate antibiotic therapy with MVB for &gt;48 hours significantly increases the risk of NCO in patients with GNBI. Clinicians must ensure timely administration of MVB to assure best outcomes in patients with GNBI.

Disclosures

Kevin W. Garey, PharMD, MS, FASHP, Merck & Co. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator) Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)

1290. Real-World Experience with Omadacycline for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial and Gram-Negative Infections: A Multicenter Evaluation

Background

Omadacycline (OMC) is an aminomethylcycline antibiotic in the tetracycline class that has been Food and Drug Administration-approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. OMC has been shown to have potent in vitro activity against a broad-spectrum of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, as well as Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM). Due to it’s unique activity and availability as an oral agent, off-label use of OMC has been increasing. We evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of OMC for a variety of infections.

Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study that was conducted from January 2020 to June 2020. We included all patients ≥ 18 years of age that received OMC for ≥ 72 hours for any indication and/or pathogen. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as a lack of 30-day (non-NTM) or 90-day (NTM) mortality or microbiologic recurrence and absence of therapy escalation or alteration. Reasons for OMC utilization and incidence of potential adverse effects attributable to OMC were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 18 patients were included from six geographically distinct academic health systems (median age: 56 (IQR, 49-60.5) years; 61% male; 72% Caucasian). The majority of OMC use was in NTM (61%; 100% Mycobacterium abscessus) and in Acinetobacter baumannii (22%) for bone/joint (39%) and respiratory tract (33%) infections. OMC was used primarily in the outpatient setting alone (83%) and most isolates did not have OMC susceptibility conducted (89%). Clinical success was reported in 83% of the total population (71% non-NTM and 91% NTM). The majority of patients were prescribed OMC due to antimicrobial resistance to previous antibiotic(s) (61%) and/or due to OMC’s availability as an oral agent (44%). Three patients experienced side effects while on therapy (serum creatinine elevation, AST/ALT increase, and gastrointestinal distress).

Conclusion

OMC appears to be effective and well-tolerated for a variety of infections caused by various pathogens, including M. abscessus and A. baumannii.

Disclosures

Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)

1577. Real-World, Multicenter Experience with Eravacycline for Various Infections

Background

Eravacycline (ERV) is Food and Drug Administration approved in patients for the treatment of adults complicated intra-abdominal infections in 2018. Real-world data regarding the indications for ERV use are is limited. We evaluated the clinical/safety outcomes of patients treated with ERV in FDA and non-FDA approved indications.

Methods

Multicenter, retrospective, observational study from September 2018 to June 2020. Adult patients treated with ERV for ³ 72 hours were included. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included a lack of 30-day infection-recurrence, resolution of signs/symptoms of infection and safety. All outcomes were measured from ERV start date.

Results

Overall, 108 patients were included from 12 geographically-distinct medical centers across the United States. The median(IQR) age was 60(52-67) years and 60% were male. Median(IQR) APACHE II and Charlson Comorbidity scores were 15(11-21) and 3 (2-6), respectively. The most common sources of infection were intra-abdominal (32%), and respiratory (24%). Common pathogens included Acinetobacter baumannii (19%), Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecium (16%). Infectious diseases consultation was obtained in 98%, and surgical interventions in 51% of cases. Patients often received active therapy prior to ERV(40%). Median(IQR) ERV therapy duration was 7.7(4.4-14.0) days. Among cases with documented cultures, ERV was initiated within a median(IQR) of 4.8(2.5-9.9) days. Combination therapy ³ 48 hours was given in 45%. The primary endpoint was achieved in 79%(85/108). Of patients who died(n=23), 57% were on monotherapy, 39% were critically ill, 39% had intra-abdominal as a source, and 30% had positive blood cultures. For secondary outcomes, 94%(102/108) lacked 30-day infection-recurrence and 74%(80/108) resolved signs/symptoms of infection. ERV was selected primarily for consolidation of the regimen(40%). Eight patients experienced a probable ERV-related adverse event, mainly gastrointestinal(87.5%) and none experienced clostridium difficile.

Conclusion

30-day survival was achieved in the majority of patients treated with ERV. Studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm these findings.

Disclosures

Madeline King, PharmD, Tetraphase (Speaker’s Bureau) Bruce M. Jones, PharmD, BCPS, ALK-Abello (Research Grant or Support)Allergan/Abbvie (Speaker’s Bureau) Michael J. Rybak, PharmD, MPH, PhD, Paratek (Grant/Research Support)

Cefiderocol: A Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

Cefiderocol (CFDC), (formerly S-649266), is a novel injectable siderophore cephalosporin developed by Shionogi & Co., Ltd., with potent in vitro activity against Gram-negative pathogens including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting organisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Burkholderia cepacia, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Characterized by its siderophore catechol-moiety, CFDC uses a "trojan-horse approach" to navigate through the bacterial periplasmic space, thus evading various beta-lactam degrading enzymes and other mechanisms of resistance present in Gram-negative bacteria. More specifically in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, CFDC has been shown to have activity against extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), such as CTX-type, SHV-type, and TEM-type, as well as the Ambler classes of beta-lactamases, including class A (KPC), class B (NDM, IMP, and VIM), class C (AmpC), and class D (OXA, OXA-24, OXA-48, and OXA-48-like). In addition to the strong activity that CFDC has been shown to have against MDR P. aeruginosa, it has also displayed activity against the OXA-23, OXA-24, and OXA-51, beta-lactamases commonly found in MDR A. baumannii. Cefiderocol was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including pyelonephritis, for use in patients 18 years or older with limited or no alternative options for treatment, and is currently being evaluated in a phase III trial for use in nosocomial pneumonia caused by Gram-negative pathogens. The unique features and enhanced activity of CFDC suggest that it is likely to serve as a viable therapeutic option in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of previously published literature explaining CFDC's pharmacology, pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic (PK / PD) properties, microbiologic activity, resistance mechanisms, safety parameters, dosing and administration, clinical data, and potential place in therapy.

A comparison of daptomycin alone and in combination with ceftaroline fosamil for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia complicated by septic pulmonary emboli

The use of daptomycin (DAP) in septic pulmonary emboli (SPE) remains controversial. We analyzed 29 cases of MRSA bacteremia complicated by SPE treated with DAP (n = 14) or DAP-ceftaroline fosamil (CPT; n = 15). Initial treatment with DAP monotherapy was found to have a success rate comparable with DAP-CPT (71% vs. 80%; p = 0.68).

The Evolving Reduction of Vancomycin and Daptomycin Susceptibility in MRSA-Salvaging the Gold Standards with Combination Therapy

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Vancomycin (VAN) has been used as the gold standard treatment for invasive MRSA infections for decades but, unfortunately, the reliance of VAN as the primary treatment option against these infections has led to a reduction in VAN susceptibility in MRSA isolates. Although daptomycin (DAP) is another common treatment option against invasive MRSA infections, it has been shown that the development of VAN resistance can lead to DAP nonsusceptibility. VAN or DAP backbone regimens in combination with other antibiotics has been advocated as an alternative approach to improve patient outcomes in VAN/DAP-susceptible infections, enhance outcomes in infections caused by isolates with reduced VAN/DAP susceptibility, and/or prevent the emergence of VAN/DAP resistance or further resistance. A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted using Medline, Google Scholar and PubMed databases. The primary purpose of this review is to describe the mechanisms and epidemiology of MRSA isolates with a reduction in VAN and/or DAP susceptibility, evaluate in vitro and in vivo literature describing combination therapy (CT) against MRSA isolates with reduced VAN and/or DAP susceptibility and describe studies involving the clinical outcomes of patients treated with CT against invasive MRSA infections.

Monotherapy with Vancomycin or Daptomycin versus Combination Therapy with β-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. More in vitro, in vivo, and clinical data suggest that vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) combination therapy with β-lactams (BL) improves outcomes of MRSA infections. We hypothesize that BL combination with VAN or DAP would reduce the odds of clinical failure compared to VAN or DAP monotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients ≥ 18 years treated with VAN or DAP for MRSA BSI from 2006 to 2019 at Detroit Medical Center. Combination therapy (CT) was defined as VAN or DAP plus any BL for ≥ 24 h within 72 h of index culture. Monotherapy (MT) was defined as ≥ 72 h VAN or DAP within 72 h of index culture and no BL for ≥ 24 h up to 7 days following VAN/DAP initiation. Primary outcome was composite endpoint of clinical failure defined as: (1) 30-day mortality, (2) 60-day recurrence, or (3) persistent bacteremia (PB). PB was defined as bacteremia > 5 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between CT and the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 597 patients were included in this analysis, 153 in the MT group and 444 in the CT group. CT was independently associated with reduced odds of clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.523; 95% confidence interval, 0.348-0.787). The composite endpoint was driven by 60-day recurrence and PB but not 30-day mortality. There were no difference in adverse events including nephrotoxicity between the two study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized adults with MRSA BSI, CT with any BL was independently associated with improved clinical outcomes and may ultimately be selected as preferred therapy.

Early Experience With Eravacycline for Complicated Infections

Eravacycline (ERV) was used in 35 patients for various infections. The most common pathogen was Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 30-day survival was 74%. Absence of 30-day recurrence and resolution of signs and symptoms of infection were 91% and 57%, respectively. ERV was well-tolerated, with adverse events leading to drug discontinuation in one patient.

Evaluation of Eravacycline: A Novel Fluorocycline

Eravacycline (ERV), formerly known as TP-434, is a novel tetracycline (TET) antibiotic that exhibits in vitro activity against various gram-positive, gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic pathogens, including those exhibiting TET-specific acquired resistance mechanisms. Similar to other TETs, it inhibits protein synthesis through binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit. Eravacycline was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in August 2018 for the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections (cIAIs) in adults following the Investigating Gram-Negative Infections Treated with Eravacycline (IGNITE)1 and IGNITE4 phase III trials. In these two, double-blind, multicenter clinical trials, ERV was proven noninferior in terms of clinical response in comparison to ertapenem and meropenem, respectively. Eravacycline was well tolerated with nausea, vomiting, and infusion site reactions being the most commonly reported adverse reactions. Clinicians now have ERV as a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of adults with intraabdominal infections, allergies to β-lactam agents, Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea, or if tolerability to other agents is a concern.

Real-world Multicenter Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam in Patients Treated for Serious Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Fourty patients were treated with meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV) for serious Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) comprised 80.0% of all GNB infections. Clinical success occurred in 70.0% of patients. Mortality and recurrence at 30 days were 7.5% and 12.5%, respectively. One patient experienced a probable rash due to MEV.

200. Real-World Experience with Dalbavancin for Complicated Gram-Positive Infections: A Multicenter Evaluation

Background

Dalbavancin (DAL) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) caused by Gram-positive organisms including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Due to its unique activity and dosing schedule, use in non-FDA approved indications has been increasing. We evaluated the clinical and safety outcomes of patients treated with DAL for various infections.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective observational study was conducted from April 2017 to February 2019. We included adult patients who received 1 dose of DAL for any indication. The primary outcome was clinical success defined as 30-day survival from DAL initiation, resolution of signs and symptoms of infection, and absence of therapy escalation/change. Reasons for DAL therapy selection were also investigated.

Results

A total of 30 patients were included. The median age was 49 (35–58) years, 50% were female and 93.3% were Caucasian. Median APACHE II score was 9 (5–12). Persons who inject drugs (PWID) comprised 50%. Common DAL indications were bacteremia (53.3%), bone and joint infections (33.3%) and ABSSSI (26.7%). Pathogens were MRSA (43.3%), coagulase-negative Staphylococci (23.3%) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) (13.3%). Previous antibiotics were administered in 93.3% of patients for a median of 9 (7–15) days and (13.3%) received combination antibiotic therapy with DAL. In a subgroup of patients with confirmed microbiological eradication (73.3%), DAL was initiated at a median of 8 days (4–14) after clearance. Clinical success was achieved in 80% of patients and 10% were de-escalated to oral therapy. Rash/pruritus and hypotension occurred in two and one patient, respectively. DAL was selected because of ease of administration (60%), inability to be discharged with a line (43.3%), poor candidacy for outpatient therapy (36.7%), and/or inadequate adherence (30%).

Conclusion

DAL appears to be well tolerated and results in high clinical success. Larger studies with longer follow would be valuable to more precisely define the role of DAL in complicated Gram-positive infections, particularly in comparison to other long-acting lipoglycopeptides.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

442. Risk Score for Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Disclosures

1596. Impact of Vancomycin Area Under Curve on Persistent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bloodstream Infections (BSI)

Background

Persistent Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. Vancomycin (VAN) remains the treatment of choice for invasive MRSA BSI. Current guidelines for the treatment of MRSA BSI recommend a VAN AUC_24h/MIC ratio ≥400. The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) implemented an AUC guided dosing strategy. However, data on the association between AUC_24h and clinical outcomes in MRSA BSI are limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between VAN AUC_24h and persistent bacteremia (PB) among patients with BSI.

Methods

Multi-center, retrospective cohort study from January 2015 to November 2018. We included adult patients with MRSA bacteremia treated with VAN for which AUC_24h monitoring was performed. AUC was measured using 2-level guided dosing. The primary outcome was PB defined as continued positive cultures >72 hours after VAN initiation. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was performed to determine the AUC_24h breakpoint (BP) most predictive of PB in the cohort. Mann–Whitney and Fischer exact tests were used for univariate analysis. The independent association between AUC_24h, dichotomized at the CART-derived cut-point, was then examined through multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

Overall, 137 patients were included. The median age was 59 (18–85) years, 69.3% male, and 75.2% African American predominance. Most common sources of BSI were skin/soft tissue (39.4%), pneumonia (25.5%), and osteoarticular (16.8%). The median APACHE II score was 13 (8–20). Median time to microbiological clearance was 2.5 days (0.5–12). Patients with AUC_24h ≤ 406.25 were more likely to have PB compared with those with AUC_24h > 406.25 (59.4% and 35.2%, respectively; P = 0.002). After controlling for age, intensive care stay, and concomitant β-lactam therapy; AUC of ≤ 406.25 (aOR 2.767, 95% CI 1.212–6.318) and endocarditis (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.079–7.638) were independently associated with PB.

Conclusion

VAN AUC_24h BP of <406.25 was independently associated with PB in patients with MRSA BSI. Our findings underscore the importance of VAN dose optimization to achieve timely bacterial clearance in MRSA bacteremia.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

2254. Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime–Avibactam for Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections

Background

Ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) is a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). Real-world experience with CZA for CRE infections is accumulating but data on its use for MDR PA infections remains limited.

Methods

Retrospective, multicenter cohort study describing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with CZA (≥ 72 hours) for MDR PA infections between 2015 and 2018.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included. The median (IQR) age was 61 (43, 71) years. Most patients had MDR risk factors including recent hospitalization (74.5%), recent antimicrobial exposure (84.3%), and/or previous infection or colonization with an MDR pathogen (58.8%). The median Charlson Comorbidity score was 4 (2, 6) and the median APACHE II score was 20 (12, 29). Infections were predominantly (68.6%) hospital-acquired and 52.9% of patients were in the ICU at infection onset. The common sources were respiratory tract (60.8%), osteoarticular (11.8%) and skin and soft tissue (11.8%). Two patients had positive blood cultures. PA antibiotic susceptibilities were as follows: ceftazidime 52.6% (n = 51), CZA 92.0% (n = 25), ciprofloxacin 10% (n = 30), meropenem 19.6% (n = 46), piperacillin–tazobactam 30.4% (n = 4) and tobramycin 72.9% (n = 48). Most (60.8%) infections were polymicrobial including 15 (29.4) CRE co-infections. CZA was started 97 (50, 170) hours after culture collection and continued for 9 (7, 14) days. Only 8 patients (15.7%) received active antibiotic therapy before CZA. Combination CZA therapy was used 35.3%, most often an aminoglycoside (8/18, 44.4%). Clinical cure or improvement was achieved in 40 patients (78.4%), and 42 (82.4%) were discharged alive. Among patients with repeat cultures (n = 11), CZA resistance development was not detected. Three patients (5.9%) experienced infection recurrence within 30 days of completing therapy.

Conclusion

The use of CZA was associated with high rates of favorable outcomes in complex patients with MDR PA infections. Future studies evaluating long-term outcomes and comparative studies are needed to more precisely define the role of CZA for MDR PA infections.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

2250. Combination Vancomycin Plus Cefazolin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

Background

Combination β-lactam and vancomycin (VAN) prevent the emergence of resistance and result in synergistic antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro. We sought to provide clinical translation to these data and determine if patients with MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI) treated with VAN + cefazolin (VAN/CFZ) via our MRSA BSI clinical pathway had improved clinical outcomes compared VAN alone.

Methods

Multicenter, retrospective, comparative cohort study from 2006 to 2019 in adults with MRSA BSI treated with VAN for ≥ 72 hours. VAN/CFZ was defined as VAN + CFZ within ≤ 72 hours of index culture for ≥ 24 hours. Other β-lactams were allowed for < 48 h in the VAN/CFZ group. The VAN alone group could not have other β-lactams within 7 days of treatment initiation. The primary outcome was clinical failure defined as a composite of 30-d all-cause mortality, 60-day recurrence, and persistent BSI (≥ 7 days). The independent effect of VAN/CFZ on clinical failure was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression. The primary safety endpoint was nephrotoxicity within 7 days of treatment initiation.

Results

A total of 237 patients were included (104 VAN/CFZ, 133 VAN). The most common BSI sources were skin/soft tissue (29.1%), IV catheter (21.9%), osteoarticular (20.3%) and infective endocarditis (16.0%). Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups except VAN/CFZ had a higher median APACHE II score (18 vs. 13, P = 0.011). VAN/CFZ patients were also more likely to have received an infectious disease consult (100% vs. 81.2%, P < 0.001). Median (IQR) duration of CFZ was 115 (87–164) hours. After controlling for age, APACHE II score, ID consult and infection source, VAN/CFZ was associated with reduced odds of clinical failure (aOR 0.425, 95% CI 0.228, 0.792). Bivariate outcomes are shown in the table:

Conclusion

Patients with MRSA BSI treated with VAN/CFZ vs. VAN experienced fewer clinical failures, supporting additional studies evaluating the role of adjuvant CFZ for MRSA BSI.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.