Quantification of serum HDV RNA by Robogene 2.0 in HDV patients is significantly influenced by the extraction methods

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Management of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) requires reliable tests for HDV RNA quantification. The aim of the study was to compare two extraction methods for the quantification of HDV RNA in untreated and bulevirtide (BLV)-treated CHD patients.

METHODS

Frozen sera from untreated and BLV-treated CHD patients were tested in a single-centre study for HDV RNA levels (Robogene 2.0, Roboscreen GmbH, Leipzig, Germany; LOD 6 IU/mL) with two extraction methods: manual (INSTANT Virus RNA/DNA kit; Roboscreen GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) versus automated (EZ1 DSP Virus Kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). BLV-treated patients were sampled at baseline and during therapy.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-four sera collected from 157 CHD (139 untreated, 18 BLV-treated) patients were analysed: age 51 (28-78), 59% males, 90% of European origin, 60% cirrhotics, ALT 85 (17-889) U/L, HBsAg 3.8 (1.7-4.6) Log IU/mL, 81% HBV DNA undetectable, 98% HDV genotype 1. Median HDV RNA was 4.53 (.70-8.10) versus 3.77 (.70-6.93) Log IU/mL by manual versus automated extraction (p < .0001). Manual extraction reported similar HDV RNA levels in 31 (20%) patients, higher in 119 (76%) [+.5 and +1 log10 in 60; > +1 log10 in 59] and lower in 7 (4%). Among 18 BLV-treated patients, rates of HDV RNA < LOD significantly differed between the two assays at Weeks 16 and 24 (0% vs. 22%, p = .02; 11% vs. 44%, p = .03), but not at later timepoints. By contrast, virological response rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of HDV RNA by Robogene 2.0 is influenced by the extraction method, the manual extraction being 1 Log more sensitive.

Severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a hospital population: a clinical comparison across age groups

BACKGROUND

Children tend to have milder forms of COVID-19 than adults, however post-acute complications have been observed also in the paediatric population. In this study, we compared COVID-19-related outcomes and long-term complications between paediatric and adult patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

The study is based on individuals enrolled from October 2020 to June 2021 in the DECO COVID-19 multicentre prospective study supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (COVID-2020-12371781). We included individuals with RT-PCR -confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, who were evaluated in the emergency department and/or admitted to COVID-dedicated wards. The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection was compared across age groups (children/adolescents aged < 18 years, young/middle-aged adults aged 18-64 years and older individuals) through the relative risk (RR) of severe COVID-19. Severity was defined by: 1) hospitalization due to COVID-19 and/or 2) need or supplemental oxygen therapy. RR and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated using log-binomial models.

RESULTS

The study included 154 individuals, 84 (54.5%) children/adolescents, 50 (32.5%) young/middle-aged adults and 20 (13%) older adults. Compared to young/middle-aged adults the risk of hospitalization was lower among paediatric patients (RR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.75) and higher among older adults (RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.12-2.06). The RR of supplemental oxygen was 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05-0.30) among children/adolescents and 1.46 (95% CI: 0.97-2.19) among older adults. Three children developed multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C), none was admitted to intensive care unit or reported post-acute Covid-19 complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that COVID-19 is less severe in children. MIS-C is a rare yet severe complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and its risk factors are presently unknown.

Multicenter epidemiological investigation and genetic characterization of respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus infections in the pre-pandemic 2018-2019 season in northern and central Italy

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (HMPV) cause a high burden of disease, particularly in children and the elderly. With the aim to add knowledge on RSV and HMPV infections in Italy, a prospective, multicenter study was conducted by eight centers of the Working Group on Respiratory Virus Infections (GLIViRe), from December 2018-April 2019. Weekly distribution and patients' demographic and clinical data were compared in 1300 RSV and 222 HMPV-positive cases. Phylogenetic analysis of the G-glycoprotein coding region was performed to characterize circulating strains. RSV positivity ranged from 6.4% in outpatients of all ages to 31.7% in hospitalized children; HMPV positivity was 4-1.2% with no age-association. RSV season peaked in February and ended in mid-April: HMPV circulation was higher when RSV decreased in early spring. RSV was more frequent in infants, whereas HMPV infected comparatively more elderly adults; despite, their clinical course was similar. RSV-B cases were two-thirds of the total and had similar clinical severity compared to RSV-A. Phylogenetic analysis showed the circulation of RSV-A ON1 variants and the predominance of RSV-B genotype BA10. HMPV genotype A2c was the prevalent one and presented insertions of different lengths in G. This first multicenter Italian report on seasonality, age-specific distribution, and clinical presentation of RSV and HMPV demonstrated their substantial disease burden in young patients but also in the elderly. These data may provide the basis for a national respiratory virus surveillance network.

Digital RT-PCR Chip method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus

The “gold standard” method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 is the real time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, but due to pre-analytical and technical limitations, biological samples with low viral load are not sometimes detected. For this purpose a digital RT-PCR method on-chip was developed for detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, using two TaqMan™ Assays for quantification of the N Protein (Nucleocapsid) and the S Protein (Spike), and the QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR instrument. The method was applied to assess the nasopharyngeal swabs of asymptomatic subjects recruited in the UNICORN Study. The digital RT-PCR method is characterized by a higher sensitivity than the RT-qPCR method, even if performed with the same TaqMan™, and could be a promising tool for SARS-CoV-2 viral load quantification.

Immunogenicity and effectiveness of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in a cohort of healthcare workers in Milan (Lombardy Region, Northern Italy)

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate immunogenicity and effectiveness of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in a cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs).

DESIGN

cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

in a hospital in Milan (Lombardy Region, Northern Italy) HCWs without ("negative cohort") and with ("positive cohort") history of SARS-CoV-2 infection or elevated serum antibody before the vaccination campaign (27.12.2020) were included. Data collection and follow-up covered the period 27.12.2020-13.05.2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

1. serum anti-spike-1 (anti-S1) antibody levels after vaccination; 2. vaccine effectiveness (VE) against SARS-CoV-2 infections (either symptomatic or not) in the negative cohort. Data on infections were extracted from multiple sources (laboratory, accident reports, questionnaires). Vaccination was treated as a time-dependent variable. Using unvaccinated person-time as reference, hazard ratios (HR) of infections and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated with a Cox regression model adjusted for gender, age, and occupation. VE was calculated as (1 - HR)×100.

RESULTS

5,596 HCWs were included, 4,771 in the negative and 825 in the positive cohort. In both cohorts, serum anti-S1 antibodies were high one months after the second dose, halved after six months, and returned to high levels after the third dose. In the negative cohort, 1,401 SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified. VE was 70% (95%CI 54-80; 46 infected) in the first four months after the second dose and later declined to 16% (95%CI 0-43; 97 infected). After the third dose, VE increased to 57% (95%CI 35-71; 61 infected) in the first month but rapidly declined over time, particularly after three months (24% in the fourth month and 1% afterwards). The number of infections avoided by vaccination was estimated to be 643 (95%CI 236-1,237).

CONCLUSIONS

in spite of rapidly declining effectiveness, vaccination helped to avoid several hundred infections in the considered hospital.

Italian migrants study: An HCV and HBV micro-elimination pilot project

BACKGROUND

Migrants represent a key target population for viral hepatitis micro-elimination programs and are important targets for specific prevention, screening and treatment programs.

AIMS

To raise awareness on viral hepatitis among migrants and key stakeholders, assess the prevalence of HBV and HCV among migrants, and determine an optimal and scalable viral hepatitis screening and treatment protocol.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Unselected, consecutive migrants reaching the costs of Italy were screened for HBV, HCV, HDV and HIV markers. Anagraphic and anamnestic information were used to identify viral hepatitis endemic hotspots in the countries of birth or transit. Personal data, including migration route, test results and treatment, were collected and stored in a dedicated database RESULTS: 362 patients were recruited in 2019; median age was 28 years, 71% were male. Most of the patients were African (54%) or Asian (40%). 49% positive for at least one HBV marker: 2.2% HBsAg (asymptomatic carriers with low viremia); 10.6% anti-HBs; 28.5% anti-HBs and anti-HBc, 1.7% anti-HCV, 0.6% anti-HIV, with low or undetectable viral load. Libya was the nexus shared by most of the positive, reactive cases. HCV and HIV markers were only found in migrants already resident in Italy for more than 6-12 months.

CONCLUSION

Low to moderate prevalence of hepatitis B markers were observed in African and Asian first arrival migrants. Migrants positive for HCV and HIV likely acquired the infection after arrival in Italy, suggesting migrants are at risk of contracting viral infections once in Italy, highlighting the importance of ensuring access to prevention for migrant communities.

Clinical characteristics of healthcare workers with SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination with BNT162b2 vaccine

Background

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), had a significant impact worldwide. Vaccines against COVID-19 appear as a tool able to curb out mortality and reduce the circulation of the virus. Little is known so far about the clinical characteristics of individuals who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection after having received the vaccination, as well as the temporal relationship between vaccine administration and symptoms onset.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study among the 3219 healthcare workers (HCWs) of the Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milano who received a full immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine and who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection (documented through positive RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab) in March–April 2021.

Results

Overall, we have identified 15 HCWs with SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, 7 (46.7%) of them were male and the mean age was 38.4 years (SD 14). In 4 of them, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid (anti-N) antibodies was assessed before vaccination and resulted positive in 1 case. In all HCWs the presence of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike (anti-S1) antibodies was assessed, on average 42.2 days after the completion of vaccination, with a mean value of 2055 U/mL (SD 1927.3). SARS-CoV-2 infection was ascertained on average 56.2 days after vaccination. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) of SARS-CoV-2 PCR was 26.4, the lineage was characterized in 9 HCWs. None of the HCWs reported a primary or secondary immunodeficiency. Regarding symptoms, they were reported only by 7 (46.7%) HCWs and appeared on average 55 days after the second dose of vaccination. Of those who reported symptoms, one (14.3%) had fever, 7 (100%) rhinitis/conjunctivitis, 4 (57.1%) taste and smell alterations, none had respiratory symptoms, 4 headache/arthralgia (57.1%) and 1 gastrointestinal symptom (14.3%). All symptoms disappeared in a few days and no other unclassified symptoms were reported.

Conclusions

Infections occurring after vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine are mostly asymptomatic and are not associated with the serum titre of anti-S1 antibodies. We did not find a predominance of specific viral variants, with several lineages represented.

Clinical Evaluation of Plasma Separation Cards as a Tool to Collect, Store, and Test Blood Samples for Hepatitis B and C Serological Markers

BACKGROUND

The plasma separation card (PSC) is a new device for collecting finger-pricking-derived small amount of blood in a solid support that is stable at room temperature and can be archived, mailed, and processed at a later time. This tool can facilitate screening at risk populations located in rural areas without local health care infrastructures. We evaluated the performance of PSC in the collection and preparation of blood samples for the determination of hepatitis B and C serological markers.

METHODS

Blood obtained from 334 consecutive patients referred for the detection of hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg), hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs) and hepatitis C antibodies (anti-HCV) was analyzed in parallel using standard (STD) and PSC-based sample collection and preparation procedures. Results obtained from STD or PSC processed samples were compared for their detection rate and correlation.

RESULTS

Using STD, we detected 5 samples positive for HBsAg, 150 for anti-HBs, and 23 for anti-HCV with a rate of concordance with PSC of 100%, 100%, and 91% respectively. The 100% concordance observed for anti-HBs was based on a cutoff of 2.6 IU/L for PSC-derived sample corresponding to the 10 IU/L threshold associated with immunity to hepatitis B. STD and PSC showed a good correlation (R2 = 0.85) in the detection of anti-HBs titers. The 2 anti-HCV PSC negative samples had no detectable viremia.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm the utility of PSC as a tool to support viral hepatitis screening programs in rural areas lacking local clinical infrastructures and testing facilities.

Side effects among healthcare workers from a large Milan university hospital after second dose of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine

BACKGROUND

In Italy, healthcare workers (HCWs) were among the first to receive COVID-19 vaccination. Aim of the present study is to evaluate frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) following the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine among HCWs of a large university hospital in Milan, Italy.

METHODS

One month after having received the second dose of vaccine, HCWs filled-in a form about type, severity, and duration of post-vaccination local and systemic symptoms. We calculated the overall frequency of AEs and used multivariable Poisson regression models (adjusted for sex, age, BMI, smoking, allergy history, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, anti-hypertensive therapy, and occupation) to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of AEs according to selected variables.

RESULTS

We included 3659 HCWs. Overall, 2801 (76.6%) experienced at least one local event, with pain at injection site being the most frequent (2788, 76.2%). Systemic events were reported by 2080 (56.8%) HCWs, with fatigue (52.3%), muscle pain (42.2%), headache (37.7%), joint pain (31.9%), and fever (26.2%) being the most frequent. Risks of systemic events were associated with female gender (RR=1.14, CI: 1.06-1.23), age (strong decrease with increasing age, p-trend<0.001), allergy history (RR=1.13, CI: 1.05-1.20), and current smoking (RR=0.90, CI: 0.84-0.97). HCWs with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (even if symptomatic) were not at increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Both local and systemic acute effects after second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine were frequently reported. However, symptoms were mostly light/mild and of short duration. Thus, our findings support the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in adults in relatively good health.

Trends and risk factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic blood donors

Background

A large proportion of SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected individuals does not develop severe symptoms. Serological tests help in evaluating the spread of infection and disease immunization. The aim of this study was to prospectively examine the trends and risk factors of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in blood donors.

Study design and methods

We screened 8798 asymptomatic donors presenting in Milan from July 2020 to February 2021 (10,680 presentations) before the vaccination campaign for anti‐nucleoprotein (NP) antibodies, and for anti‐spike receptor‐binding domain (RBD) antibodies and nasopharyngeal swab PCR in those who tested positive.

Results

The prevalence of anti‐NP+/RBD+ tests increased progressively with time up to ~15% (p < .0001), preceded by a peak of PCR+ tests. Anti‐RBD titers were higher in anti‐NP IgG+/IgM+ than in IgG+/IgM− individuals and in those with a history of infection (p < .0001); of these 197/630 (31.2%) displayed high titers (>80 AU/ml). Anti‐RBD titers declined during follow‐up, depending on baseline titers (p < .0001) and time (p = .025). Risk factors for seroconversion were a later presentation date and non‐O ABO blood group (p < .001). A positive PCR was detected in 0.7% of participants in the absence of SARS‐CoV‐2 viremia.

Conclusions

During the second wave of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in Northern Italy, we detected an increase in seroprevalence in healthy blood donors from ~4% to ~15%, with a trend paralleling that observed in the general population. Seroconversion was more frequent in carriers of non‐O blood groups. The persistence of anti‐RBD antibodies was short‐lived.

Increased Risk of Urticaria/Angioedema after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Health Care Workers Taking ACE Inhibitors

Urticarial eruptions and angioedema are the most common cutaneous reactions in patients undergoing mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations. The vasoactive peptide bradykinin has long been known to be involved in angioedema and recently also in urticaria. Bradykinin is mainly catabolized by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), which is inhibited by ACE inhibitors, a commonly employed class of antihypertensive drugs. We evaluated the risk of developing urticaria/angioedema after inoculation with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a population of 3586 health care workers. The influences of ACE inhibitors and selected potential confounding variables (sex, age, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and allergy history) were evaluated by fitting univariate and multivariable Poisson regression models. The overall cumulative incidence of urticaria/angioedema was 1.8% (65 out of 3586; 95% CI: 1.4–2.3%). Symptoms were mild, and no subject consulted a physician. Subjects taking ACE inhibitors had an adjusted three-fold increased risk of urticaria/angioedema (RR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.12–7.96). When we restricted the analysis to those aged 50 years or more, the adjusted RR was 3.98 (95% CI: 1.44–11.0). In conclusion, our data indicate that subjects taking ACE inhibitors have an increased risk of urticaria/angioedema after vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Symptoms are mild and self-limited; however, they should be considered to adequately advise subjects undergoing vaccination.

SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titres after vaccination with BNT162b2 in naïve and previously infected individuals

Great expectations are placed in vaccines against COVID-19 to control the pandemic. We reviewed the antibody titres in a cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs) vaccinated with BNT162b2 to assess the influence of a previous infection on them. We stratified the results according to the individual history of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) and symptoms. Among 3475 HCWs the highest titres were recorded among those infected more than 6 months before vaccination, independently of symptoms, followed by those infected less than 6 months before vaccination, especially in those with symptoms, and by uninfected HCWs. Vaccination with BNT162b2 can boost immunity acquired through infection, particularly in those infected more than 6 months before vaccination.

The CCR5 and CXCR3 Pathways in Hepatitis C Virus Liver Transplanted Recipients Treated by a Direct Antiviral Agent Regimen: Informative Kinetics Profiles

The CC5 and CXC3 chemokines (CK) pathways are involved in the pathogenesis and outcome of several disease states, including chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The kinetics of Regulated upon Activation Normal T cell Expressed and Secreted (RANTES) (CCL5) and IP-10 (CXCL10) during direct-acting antivirals (DAA) treatment was retrospectively analyzed in 18 liver transplant recipients (LT-R) compared with 20 patients with CHC and 49 healthy controls (HC). CK levels were determined at baseline, week 4, end of treatment, 24 weeks post-treatment (sustained virological response [SVR]), and later-on during follow-up (FU), 12 and 24 months post-DAA. At baseline, median RANTES levels were higher in HC than in both LT-R (p > 0.01) and CHC (p > 0.01), whereas IP-10 levels were higher in LT-R and CHC than in HC (p > 0.05 and p = 0.01), respectively. Mean RANTES values increased during DAA therapy to peak at SVR and FU with significantly higher levels than at baseline in LT-R (p < 0.01) and in CHC, but only at FU (p < 0.003). A subsequent return to baseline or lower levels was observed at extended FU. On the contrary, IP-10 values showed a significant decrease from baseline to SVR and FU in both LT-R (p < 0.03) and CHC (p < 0.01). RANTES profiles during the first 4 weeks of DAA treatment showed an increase or decrease from baseline according to baseline RANTES levels. CCR5 genotyping in LT-R showed the presence of 1 homozygous Δ32/Δ32 and 2 heterozygous WT/Δ32 haplotypes with a prevalence of 5.5% and 11.1%, respectively. In conclusion, although IP-10 showed the expected kinetics, the CC5 pathway appears extensively altered during CHC infection: monitoring these patients may be indicated as they may be at risk of other infections or immune-mediated disorders.

Clinical relevance of SARS-CoV-2 infection in late pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy is generally reassuring but yet not definitive.

METHODS

To specifically assess the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in late pregnancy, we prospectively recruited 315 consecutive women delivering in a referral hospital located in Lombardy, Italy in the early phase of the epidemic. Restriction of the recruitment to this peculiar historical time period allowed to exclude infections occurring early in pregnancy and to limit the recall bias. All recruited subjects underwent a nasopharyngeal swab to assess the presence of Sars-Cov-2 using Real-time PCR. In addition, two different types of antibodies for the virus were evaluated in peripheral blood, those against the spike proteins S1 and S2 of the envelope and those against the nucleoprotein of the nucleocapsid. Women were considered to have had SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy if at least one of the three assessments was positive.

RESULTS

Overall, 28 women had a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy (8.9%). Women diagnosed with the infection were more likely to report one or more episodes of symptoms suggestive for Covid-19 (n = 11, 39.3%) compared to unaffected women (n = 39, 13.6%). The corresponding OR was 4.11 (95%CI: 1.79-9.44). Symptoms significantly associated with Covid-19 in pregnancy included fever, cough, dyspnea and anosmia. Only one woman necessitated intensive care. Pregnancy outcome in women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection did not also differ.

CONCLUSIONS

SARS-CoV-2 infection is asymptomatic in three out of five women in late pregnancy and is rarely severe. In addition, pregnancy outcome may not be markedly affected.

Time Length of Negativization and Cycle Threshold Values in 182 Healthcare Workers with Covid-19 in Milan, Italy: An Observational Cohort Study

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide, becoming an unprecedented public health emergency. Rapid detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) suspected cases is crucial to control the spread of infection. We aimed to evaluate the time length of negativization from the onset of symptoms in healthcare workers (HCWs) with COVID-19, and to evaluate significant variations in cycle threshold (CT) values and gene positivity (E, RdRP, and N genes) among positive individuals who returned to work. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 182 SARS-CoV-2-positive HCWs in Milan, from 16 March to 30 April 2020. Nasopharyngeal swabs were tested by RT-PCR. Results: Asymptomatic HCWs were 17.6% (32/182), and 58 healed at 30 April 2020. The median time length of negativization was 4 weeks (35% of symptomatic versus 40% of asymptomatic HCWs). Four HCWs, healed at 30 April, turned positive within three weeks during controls set up in the work unit. Three-gene positivity had the greatest variability, and increasing CT values from single- to three-gene positivity among all age groups were observed. Conclusions: Self-isolation longer than two weeks and prolonged follow-up periods for the staff returning to work after COVID-19 could be the most suitable choices to counter the SARS-CoV-2 spread. Further studies are needed to investigate infectiousness profiles among positive individuals.