Two-year long-term follow-up of treatment with the Optilume BPH catheter system in a randomized controlled trial for benign prostatic hyperplasia (The PINNACLE Study)

BACKGROUND

Patient outcomes were assessed 2 years after treatment with the Optilume BPH Catheter System, a minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

One-hundred forty-eight adult males with symptomatic BPH were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 fashion to Optilume BPH or Sham (100 Optilume BPH; 48 Sham). Long-term measures include International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), Post-Void Residual Urine (PVR), quality of life measures and sexual function. Follow-up beyond one year was limited to those treated with Optilume BPH.

RESULTS

At 2 years, 67.5% (56/83 CI 56.3%, 77.4%) of participants in the Optilume BPH arm were symptomatic responders as defined by ≥30% improvement in IPSS without medical or surgical retreatment. IPSS significantly improved from 23.4 ± 5.5 (n = 100) to 11.0 ± 7.0 (n = 74). Qmax improved by 116.8.% (8.9 ± 2.2 (n = 97) to 19.0 ± 16.3 (n = 65)), while PVR showed a slight reduction (83.7 ± 70.3 (n = 99) to 65.9 ± 74.5 (n = 65)). Improvement in uroflowmetry measures was consistent across all prostate volumes. BPH-II improved from 7.0 ± 2.9 (n = 98) to 2.3 ± 2.5 at 1 year (n = 89) and remained consistent at 2.3 ± 2.9 at the 2-years (n = 74), representing a 53.9% improvement. IPSS QoL also improved from 4.6 ± 1.3 (n = 100) at baseline to 2.2 ± 1.5 (n = 74). The most common adverse events reported in the Optilume BPH arm were hematuria and urinary tract infection (UTI). No device and/or treatment related serious adverse events were reported occurring beyond 12 months post-procedure. There was no impact to sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

In the PINNACLE study, participants treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System demonstrated continued and durable results at 2 years, affirming tolerability, safety, and the enduring effectiveness. The Optilume BPH Catheter System provides lasting results that are comparable to the more invasive therapies, while preserving the advantages with being a minimally invasive therapy.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04131907.

The Role of Remote Diagnostics to Better Assess Uroflow Variability: Insights From Combining at Home Uroflows and Frequency Volume Charts From 19,868 Voids Using a Novel, Hand Held, Cellular Embedded Device

OBJECTIVE

To examine how representative 24-hour data collection is of the overall patient experience utilizing a home uroflow device in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Home uroflow data were collected with the iO Urology CarePath device from men at a single urology clinic and retrospectively analyzed. Void characteristics were summarized for data collected over 24 hours compared to data collected over several days or weeks with the device (overall study excludes the 24-hour data). A linear mixed-effects model was used to evaluate differences in average Qmax from voids collected during a single 24-hour period compared to the overall study.

RESULTS

A total of 486 men (mean age 67.4) used the device resulting in 465 included in the analysis with a total of 15,521 voids in the overall study and 4347 voids in the single-day analysis. Average Qmax from the model was 11.2 mL/s (95% CI: 10.80, 11.65) and 11.2 mL/s (95% CI: 10.81, 11.64) in the 24-hour and overall study groups, respectively. Both groups had similar between (20.3% vs 20.4%) and within-subject (12.0% vs 11.9%) variance. The difference in Qmax was not significantly different (P = .970). A subgroup analysis including voids >150 mL yielded similar results.

CONCLUSION

Data show variability in voiding parameters, but similar average Qmax collected in 24 hours as compared to several days/weeks. The combination of home uroflowmetry with frequency-volume chart information can provide objective data and a unique perspective on uroflow variability (UFV) for clinician review to support the development of individualized patient treatment plans.

Ejaculation sparing of classic and minimally invasive surgical treatments of LUTS/BPH

BACKGROUND

The surgical landscape for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved with the introduction of Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies (MISTs), recognizing the impact of sexual function on patients' well-being, and prioritizing ejaculation-sparing approaches.

METHODS

This systematic review explored ejaculation sparing after classic endoscopic procedures and MISTs (iTind, Rezūm, Urolift, Aquablation, and TPLA) and a literature search yielded 41 studies.

RESULTS

While all procedures demonstrated efficacy in improving LUTS/BPH symptoms (IPSS, QoL, Qmax), a subset of studies evaluated ejaculatory function. Positive outcomes were noted, challenging the historical association of BPH surgeries with ejaculatory dysfunction. Variations in study design, patient cohorts, and limited long-term data present challenges. Notably, the lack of baseline specificity, use of alpha-blockers, and non-specific sexual function assessments underscore potential biases.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations, the review tentatively concluded that MISTs, including iTind, Rezūm, Urolift, Aquablation, and TPLA, appear comparable in sparing ejaculation. Long-term studies are essential to validate sustainability, and comparative research should assess trade-offs between MISTs and traditional surgeries. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes and quality of life assessments will enhance future investigations, refining MISTs as standard therapeutic options for LUTS/BPH.

The PINNACLE Study: A Double-blind, Randomized, Sham-controlled Study Evaluating the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

PURPOSE

The Optilume BPH Catheter System is a novel drug/device combination minimally invasive surgical therapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. The PINNACLE study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Optilume BPH against a sham surgical procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were men 50 years or older with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and a prostate size between 20 and 80 g. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive treatment with Optilume BPH or a sham surgical procedure. Blinding was maintained for subjects in both arms and evaluating personnel through 1 year postprocedure. Follow-up assessments included the International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry, and other quality-of-life and sexual function assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 148 men were randomized (100 active, 48 sham) at 18 centers in the U.S. and Canada. Subjects randomized to receive Optilume BPH saw a reduction in International Prostate Symptom Score of 11.5±7.8 points at 1 year posttreatment, as compared to a reduction of 8.0±8.3 points at 3 months in the sham arm. Flow rate was dramatically improved after treatment with Optilume BPH, with an improvement of +10.3 mL/s from baseline to 1 year (+125%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with Optilume BPH provides immediate and sustained improvements in obstructive symptoms and flow rate while preserving erectile and ejaculatory function. Treatment is well tolerated and can be done in an office or ambulatory setting.

Durable benefit after treatment of obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia with a novel drug-device combination product: 2-year outcomes from the EVEREST-I study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Optilume BPH Catheter System for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

This open-label, single-arm study enrolled eighty subjects with LUTS secondary to BPH who were treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System. Symptoms were recorded utilizing the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPH-II). Functional improvement was measured utilizing peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR). Adverse events were systematically captured and reported at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Subjects treated with the Optilume BPH Catheter System experienced a significant improvement in LUTS from baseline through 2 years of follow-up, as measured by IPSS (22.3 vs 8.2, p < 0.001) and BPH-II (6.9 vs 2.3, p < 0.001). Functional improvement was also significant, with Qmax improving from an average of 10.9 mL/s at baseline to 17.2 mL/s at the 2-year follow-up and PVR improving from 63.1 to 45.0 mL. Treatment-related adverse events were typically minor, with none occurring between 1- and 2-year post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The Optilume BPH Catheter System is a unique minimally invasive surgical therapy that combines mechanical and pharmaceutical aspects for the treatment of BPH. The functional and symptomatic improvements seen after treatment are significant and have been sustained through 2 years in this early feasibility study.

REGISTRATION

NCT03423979, registered February 6, 2018.

How I Do It: Optilume BPH catheter system

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common and progressive disease affecting aging men which has a significant impact on quality of life. The Optilume BPH Catheter System (Optilume BPH) is a prostatic dilation system that combines balloon dilation with a localized transfer of paclitaxel to maintain long term patency. Optilume BPH can be deployed using standard rigid cystoscopy without general anesthesia in an office setting. Prospective data indicate that Optilume BPH has favorable functional and sexual patient outcomes. Readers will familiarize themselves with Optilume BPH, significant historical studies and the technique for deploying Optilume BPH.

Functional and oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients with history of surgery for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic enlargement: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in men with history of lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic enlargement (LUTS/BPE) surgery represents a controversial issue. We performed an updated systematic review and meta- analysis evaluating oncological and functional outcomes of RP in this subset of patients.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, Web of Science and the Scopus databases. The following outcomes were evaluated: incidence of positive surgical margins (PSM), incidence of biochemical recurrence (BCR), 3-mo and 1-year urinary continence (UC) rates, incidence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedures, 1-year erectile function (EF) recovery rates. We estimated pooled Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effects models. Sub-analyses were performed according to the type of RP and LUTS/BPE surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-five retrospective studies including 11,101 patients undergoing RP were included in the analysis (2113 with history of LUTS/BPE surgery, and 8898 controls). PSM rate was significantly higher in patients with history of LUTS/BPE surgery (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.18-1.63, p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in terms of BCR emerged between patients with or without history of LUTS/BPE surgery (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.97-2.18, p = 0.066). Three-months and 1-year UC rates were significantly lower in patients with previous LUTS/BPE surgery (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.68, p < 0.001 and OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.62, p < 0.001; respectively). Although not statistically significant differences between the two groups emerged in terms of adoption of NS procedures (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.32-1.12, p = 0.107), 1-year EF recovery was significantly lower in patients with history of LUTS/BPE procedures (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.89, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusions, RP in patients with history of previous LUTS/BPE surgery is associated with increased incidence of PSM, lower UC rates at both 3-months and 1-year follow-up as well as lower rates of EF recovery at 1-year follow-up.

Surgical treatment for BPH refractory to medication: robotic water jet ablation vs. TURP functional outcomes from two FDA clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

A common indication for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) therapies is failure to improve with medical therapy. However, pivotal Federal Drug Administration (FDA) registered randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) are designed to be compared to either sham or placebo while off medical therapy at baseline, and as an alternative to medical therapy. There are few if any RCTs reporting the MISTS efficacy in patients with true medical therapy failure. We report on the efficacy of robotic water jet ablation therapy (RWT) and TURP in patients who have failed to improve with medical therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was obtained from the WATER and WATER II clinical trials. Both clinical trials did not implement a drug washout period. Only patients with reported BPH medical therapy such as alpha-blockers (AB) and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) usage were included. Functional outcomes as post-void residual volume (PVR), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), internal prostate symptom score (IPSS), and quality of life score (QoL) were analyzed.

RESULTS

AB and/or 5-ARIs usage at baseline were reported in 146 and 39 patients who underwent RWT (prostate sizes up to 150 cc) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP, prostate sizes up to 80 cc) respectively. Baseline median (IQR) IPSS, QoL, Qmax and PVR were 24 (18,28), 5 (4,5), 8.9 (6.4,11.5), and 95 (36,172), respectively. Functional outcomes did not statistically differ between Aquablation and TURP at baseline and at 36-month. In cohort of true medical failure, both RWT and TURP demonstrated group statistical improvements in PVR, Qmax, IPSS, and QoL at 36-month compared to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

RWT and TURP are effective BPH therapy in patients who truly failed medical therapy, and RWT demonstrated this in a much broader prostate size range.

Medium-Term Real-World Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Water Vapor Thermal Therapy (Rezum) vs Prostatic Urethral Lift (UroLift) in a High-Volume Urban Academic Center

Purpose: Water vapor thermal therapy (WVTT, i.e., Rezum^®) and prostatic urethral lift (PUL, i.e., Urolift^®) are minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Few studies have directly compared the two procedures. We examined the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing WVTT and PUL at our high-volume urban academic center. Methods: We reviewed our institutional MIST database to identify patients with prostate sizes ≥30 and ≤80 cc who underwent WVTT or PUL for treatment of BPH between January 2017 and September 2021. Pre- and postoperative outcomes, including retreatment rates, American Urological Association symptom score (AUA-SS), maximum flow (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), medication usage, trial of void success rates, catheterization requirements, and postoperative complications within 90 days were extracted and compared between procedures. Results: Three hundred seven patients received WVTT and 110 patients received PUL with average follow-up times of 11.3 and 12.8 months, respectively. WVTT patients showed significant improvements in AUA-SS, Qmax, and PVR, whereas PUL patients showed improvements in only AUA-SS and Qmax. Both WVTT and PUL patients with longitudinal follow-up demonstrated improvements in AUA-SS, Qmax, and PVR. Postoperatively, alpha-blocker utilization was significantly decreased following both WVTT and PUL (WVTT: 73.9%-46.6%, PUL: 76.4%-38.2%, both p < 0.001). Compared to patients receiving PUL, WVTT patients more frequently reported postoperative dysuria (22.8% vs 8.3%, p = 0.001) and nonclot-related retention (18.9% vs 7.3%, p = 0.005); PUL patients more frequently experienced postoperative clot retention (7.3% vs 2.6%, p = 0.027). There were no differences in rates of postoperative bladder spasm, trial of void success, urinary tract infections, or emergency department visits. Postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation were rare and occurred at similar rates. Conclusion: In the real-world setting, WVTT and PUL have similar medium-term efficacy in improving symptoms and decreasing medication utilization for patients with BPH. Differences in postoperative complication profiles should inform patient counseling.

I Can't Get No Satisfaction: Patient-reported Outcomes After Different Treatment Options for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Effective clinical management of benign prostatic obstruction is determined by the ability to address lower urinary tract symptoms as measured via patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs) offer better erectile or ejaculatory side effects and potentially faster recovery time in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Premature excitement for MISTs derives from prospective sham-controlled trials with several years of follow-up data. Currently there is a lack of randomized controlled trials that directly compare MISTs to TURP and of a clearer definition of treatment failure. These types of studies are important in comparing efficacy between treatments. In head-to-head comparison, TURP yields the most robust improvement in PROs when compared to MISTs. At best, MISTs may achieve equivalent urological symptom-relief profiles to TURP; however, noninferiority assessments are needed. MISTs are potentially advantageous for their side-effect profiles and lower complication rates, but consistency in reporting these data is needed. PATIENT SUMMARY: We looked at the current data on patient-reported outcomes after each type of treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms. We found that the efficacy of these procedures is difficult to compare given the lack of direct studies comparing new options to the standard procedure. We can only conclude that the standard procedure, transurethral resection of the prostrate, will provide the best relief of voiding symptoms as reported by patients.

Rezum therapy for patients with large prostates (≥ 80 g): initial clinical experience and postoperative outcomes

PURPOSE

Rezum is a minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Current guidelines recommend Rezum for prostates < 80 cc, but little data exist describing outcomes in patients with prostates ≥ 80 cc. We compare outcomes after Rezum between men with small < 80 cc (SP) and large ≥ 80 cc prostates (LP).

METHODS

Patients undergoing Rezum between Jan 2017-Feb 2020 were subdivided by prostate volume (< 80, ≥ 80 cc). Outcomes were documented pre- and postoperatively. Descriptive analyses of urodynamics data (Qmax, PVR), symptom scores (AUA-SS, SHIM), disease management (medications, catheterization, retreatments), and clinical outcomes were conducted.

RESULTS

36 (17.6%) men had prostates ≥ 80 cc (LP mean prostate size 106.8 cc). LP men had improved Qmax and PVR postoperatively; those with longitudinal follow-up exhibited improved Qmax, PVR, and AUA-SS. After one year, alpha-blocker usage decreased significantly (LP 94.44-61.11%, p = 0.001, SP 73.96-46.15%, p = 0.001); other medication usage and self-catheterization rates remained unchanged. Compared to SP patients, differences in passing trial void (LP 94.44%, SP 93.45%), postoperative UTI (LP 19.44%, SP 10.12%), ED visits (LP 22.22%, SP 17.86%), readmissions (LP 8.33%, SP 4.76%), and retreatment (LP 8.33%, SP 4.76%) were insignificant. However, mean days to foley removal (LP 9, SP 5.71, p = 0.003) and urosepsis rates (LP 5.56%, SP 0.00%, p = 0.002) differed.

CONCLUSION

In select LP patients, Rezum provided short-term symptomatic relief and improved voiding function comparable to SP patients. Postoperatively, though alpha-blocker usage decreased significantly, use of other medications did not change, and nearly two-thirds of patients still needed alpha-blockade. Further efforts should explore the possibility of expanding Rezum's inclusion criteria.

Focal bladder neck cautery associated with low rate of post-Aquablation bleeding

INTRODUCTION To determine if focal bladder neck cautery is effective in reducing bleeding following prostate tissue resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia using Aquablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients at 11 countries in Asia, Europe and North America who underwent Aquablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia between late 2019 and January 2021 were included in the analysis. All patients received post-Aquablation non-resective focal cautery at the bladder neck.

RESULTS

A total of 2,089 consecutive Aquablation procedures were included. Mean prostate size was 87 cc (range 20 cc to 363 cc). Postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 17 cases (0.8%, 95% CI 0.5%-1.3%) and take-back to the operating room for fulguration occurred in 12 cases (0.6%, 95% CI 0.3%-1.0%). This result compares favorably (p < .0001) to the previously published hemostasis transfusion rate of 3.9% (31/801) using methods performed in the years 2014 to 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

In prostates sizes averaging 87cc (range 20 cc-363 cc), Aquablation procedures performed with focal bladder neck cautery that required a transfusion postoperatively occurred in a remarkably low number of cases.

Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron in Men with Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the efficacy and safety of mirabegron in men with overactive bladder (OAB) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous studies have shown mirabegron to be efficacious and safe in treating symptoms of OAB. More recent studies evaluating the use of mirabegron in men with OAB and BPH have also shown the medication to be effective with few adverse side effects when used as monotherapy or in combination therapy. Mirabegron is an effective and safe treatment for men with OAB and BPH.

Outcomes of combination therapy with daily tadalafil 5 mg plus tamsulosin 0.4 mg to treat lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in men with or without metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of tadalafil 5 mg/die plus tamsulosin 0.4 mg/die combination therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and erectile dysfunction (ED), according to presence vs. absence of metabolic syndrome (MetS).

METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive men presenting with ED and LUTS were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to MetS presence. All subjects were treated with combination therapy for 12 weeks. Patients were re-evaluated after treatment with uroflowmetry and post-void residual volume (PVR), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), IPSS Quality of Life (QoL), overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) and International Index Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) Score.

RESULTS

After enrollment, 50 patients were included: 31 (62.0%) with MetS and 19 (38.0%) without MetS. At baseline, patients without MetS showed a significantly better IPSS, IIEF and OAB-q, as compared to those with MetS. After 12 weeks of combination therapy LUTS, ED and flowmetry significantly improved in both groups (P<0.001). The improvement after 12 weeks was similar between groups in all parameters (P>0.05), except for ∆OAB-q that was significantly better for patients with MetS (P=0.028). Nevertheless, total IPSS, all IPSS subscores and OAB-q were significantly better at 12 weeks in men without MetS (P<0.05). Despite IIEF-5 was significantly different at baseline, after 12 weeks of combination therapy, erectile function was similar in men with or without METS: 16.3±3.8 vs. 17.7±4.7 (P=0.238). No serious adverse event (AE) was reported, and complications were comparable between groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MetS have worse LUTS and ED profiles. However, tadalafil plus tamsulosin combination treatment provided them a similar ED profile and a greater relief of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms at the end of the trial. Combination therapy had the same safety profile in men besides MetS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed.

Outcomes of combination therapy with daily Tadalafil 5mg plus Tamsulosin 0.4mg to treat lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction in men with or without metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of Tadalafil 5mg/die plus Tamsulosin 0.4mg/die combination therapy on LUTS and ED, according to presence vs. absence of Mets.

METHODS

75 consecutive men presenting with ED and LUTS were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to MetS presence. All subjects were treated with combination therapy for 12 weeks. Patients were re-evaluated after treatment with Uroflowmetry and PVR, IPSS, IPSS QoL, OAB-q and IIEF-5.

RESULTS

After enrollment, 50 patients were included: 31(62.0%) with MetS and 19(38.0%) without MetS. At baseline, patients without MetS showed a significantly better IPSS, IIEF and OAB-q, as compared to those with MetS. After 12 weeks of combination therapy LUTS, ED and flowmetry significantly improved in both groups(p<0.001). The improvement after 12 weeks was similar between groups in all parameters(p>0.05), except for ΔOAB-q that was significantly better for patients with MetS(p=0.028). Nevertheless, total IPSS, all IPSS subscores and OAB-q were significantly better at 12 weeks in men without MetS(p<0.05). Despite IIEF-5 was significantly different at baseline, after 12 weeks of combination therapy, erectile function was similar in men with or without METS:16.3±3.8 vs 7.7±4.7(p=0.238). No serious AE was reported and complications were comparable between groups(p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MetS have worse LUTS and ED profiles. However, tadalafil plus tamsulosin combination treatment provided them a similar ED profile and a greater relief of OAB symptoms at the end of the trial. Combination therapy had the same safety profile in men besides MetS. Further randomized controlled trials are needed.

Diagnostic and methodological evaluation of studies on the urinary shedding of SARS-CoV-2, compared to stool and serum: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Investigating the infectivity of body fluid can be useful for preventative measures in the community and ensuring safety in the operating rooms and on the laboratory practices. We performed a literature search of clinical trials, cohorts, and case series using PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library, and downloadable database of CDC. We excluded case reports and searched all-language articles for review and repeated until the final drafting. The search protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database. Thirty studies with urinary sampling for viral shedding were included. A total number of 1,271 patients were enrolled initially, among which 569 patients had undergone urinary testing. Nine studies observed urinary viral shedding in urine from 41 patients. The total incidence of urinary SARS-CoV-2 shedding was 8%, compared to 21.3% and 39.5 % for blood and stool, respectively. The summarized risk ratio (RR) estimates for urine positive rates compared to the pharyngeal rate was 0.08. The pertaining RR urine compared to blood and stool positive rates were 0.20 and 0.33, respectively. Our review concludes that not only the SARS-CoV-2 can be excreted in the urine in eight percent of patients but also its incidence may have associations with the severity of the systemic disease, ICU admission, and fatality rates. Moreover, the findings in our review suggest that a larger population size may reveal more positive urinary cases possibly by minimizing biases.

An evaluation of the federal adverse events reporting system data on adverse effects of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the sexual, physical, and mental adverse effects associated with exposure to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs).

METHODS

FAERS data containing finasteride and dutasteride reports were analyzed from January 2000 to April 2019. Reports identified one or more adverse effects, along with all concurrent medications. Cases of monotherapy of finasteride or dutasteride were identified. We conducted a chi-square test of independence to assess the relationship between the three drug groups and adverse event (AE) occurrence across 19 sexual, physical, and mental AE categories. The frequency procedure in SAS was utilized to summarize rates of AEs between various dosages of each drug.

RESULTS

A total of 16,014 case reports were obtained. After excluding females, 7436 case reports of 5ARI monotherapy were identified: 2628 of dutasteride 0.5 mg, 3266 of finasteride 1 mg, and 744 of finasteride 5 mg. Differences in rates of AEs occurrence were statistically significant across all 19 variables (p < 0.001) with a significantly higher proportion of AEs attributed to finasteride 1 mg, with gynecomastia being the only exception. Case report submissions rose dramatically following FDA-mandated finasteride label change.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of FAERS data suggests AEs of 5ARIs are dose-independent with greater likelihood of occurrence in younger patients, particularly in sexual and mental domains. The causality and the rate of AEs are not certain based on the FAERS data and future prospective studies are necessary to determine the true rates.

Modern best practice in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia in the elderly

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), with its associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), can be a debilitating disease in the elderly male. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard; however, many patients will choose to avoid surgery if possible. Medical therapy is an effective alternative, however, new studies are showing that there may be more side effects than previously realized in the elderly male. Newer, novel minimally invasive techniques, including UroLift® and Rezūm™, are gaining favor as alternative office-based procedural techniques that do not require general anesthesia and may better preserve ejaculatory function. Though promising, at this point, these techniques are not approved for all patients. With a range of medical, procedural, and surgical options for treatment of BPH with LUTS, it is important to have a discussion with your patient regarding the short- and long-term risks and benefits, as well as alternatives, before deciding on a treatment plan for your patient with BPH.

Prospective evaluation of fexapotide triflutate injection treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: 4-year results

Purpose

This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of fexapotide triflutate (FT) 2.5 mg and 15 mg for the treatment of Grade Group 1 prostate cancer.

Methods

Prospective randomized transrectal intraprostatic single injection FT 2.5 mg (n = 49), FT 15 mg (n = 48) and control active surveillance (AS) (n = 49) groups were compared in 146 patients at 28 U.S. sites, with elective AS crossover (n = 18) to FT after first follow-up biopsy at 45 days. Patients were followed for 5 years including biopsies (baseline, 45 days, and 18, 36, and 54 months thereafter), and urological evaluations with PSA every 6 months. Patients with Gleason grade increase or who elected surgical or radiotherapeutic intervention exited the study and were cumulatively included in the data analysis. Percentage of normal biopsies in baseline focus quadrant, tumor grades, and volumes; and outcomes including Gleason grade in entire prostate as well as treated prostate lobe, interventions associated with Gleason grade increase and total incidence of interventions were assessed.

Results

Significantly improved long-term clinical outcomes were found after 4-year follow-up, with percentages of patients progressing to interventions with and without Gleason grade increase significantly reduced by FT single treatment. Results in the FT 15-mg group were superior to the FT 2.5-mg dose group. There were no drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs).

Conclusions

FT showed statistically significant long-term efficacy in the treatment of Grade Group 1 patients regarding clinical and pathological progression. FT 15 mg showed superior results to FT 2.5 mg. There were no drug-related SAEs; FT injection was well tolerated.

Which Drug to Discontinue 3 Months After Combination Therapy of Tadalafil plus Tamsulosin for Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptom and Erectile Dysfunction? Results of a Prospective Observational Trial

BACKGROUND

Safety and efficacy of tamsulosin and tadalafil for men with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and/or erectile dysfunction (ED) are defined. However, there are only a few pilot studies on combination therapy with these drugs for men with lower urinary tract symptom (LUTS)/BPE and ED. Moreover, preliminary reports are limited to 12 wk, without any information about subsequent therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of discontinuation of tamsulosin versus tadalafil 12 wk after combination therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Fifty consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] > 7) and mild-to-severe ED (International Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] < 22) were treated with combination therapy (tamsulosin 0.4mg/d plus tadalafil 5mg/d) for 12 wk. After 12 wk, 25 patients discontinued tamsulosin (Group TAD), while 25 patients discontinued tadalafil (Group TAM).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Efficacy variables were IPSS (total, voiding, storage) and IIEF-5. Paired samples t test and analysis of variance were used.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Groups TAD and TAM presented similar features (age, BMI, metabolic profile) including symptoms scores at baseline. Similar and significant improvements in IPSS (total, voiding, and storage) and IIEF-5 were recorded in both groups after 12 wk of combination therapy (all p< 0.001). Total IPSS was similar between the two groups at the end of the trial. However, we found between-group significant differences from baseline to 24 wk and from 12 to 24 wk in storage-IPSS (Group TAD: -3.32 vs Group TAM: -1.24, p= 0.002; Group TAD: +0.24 vs Group TAM: +1.20, p= 0.040, respectively) and in IIEF-5 (Group TAD: +4.64 vs Group TAM: +0.16, p< 0.001; Group TAD: -1.64 vs Group TAM: -4.40, p= 0.003). No significant treatment-related adverse event was recorded in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

After 12 wk of combination therapy, monotherapy with tadalafil for further 12 wk allows to preserve the improvement of storage IPSS and IIEF-5, in addition to total IPSS.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this report we evaluated the discontinuation of tamsulosin or tadalafil after 12 wk of combination therapy. We found that tadalafil monotherapy, for a further 12 wk, aids in retaining the improvement of storage symptoms and erectile function.

Ejaculatory Preserving Middle Lobe Onl-Transurethral Resection and Vaporization of the Prostate: 12-Year Experience

OBJECTIVE

To report long-term safety and efficacy data on middle lobe only-transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (MLO-TURP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated: (1) efficacy: International Prostate Symptom Score, Quality of Life, peak flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine, International Index of Erectile Function and ejaculatory function, which was assessed by the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire. Men were evaluated at 1 month, 6 months, and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

A total 312 men (mean age 61.3 ± 8.6) with significant lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 147) or urinary retention (n = 175 were treated with MLO-TURP from 2005 to 2017. Mean baseline prostate volume was 79.8 g (30-178 g); mean baseline intravesical-prostatic protrusion was 13.6. Improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score, Quality of Life, Qmax and postvoid residual urine were durable throughout the study period. There was no difference in outcomes between monopolar and bipolar MLO-TURPs. Postoperatively, the incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction was 2.6% (N = 8) and there was 1 case of new onset ED (0.3%). There were modest improvement in bother due to ejaculatory function (baseline: 2.4 and at 5 years: 1.27).

CONCLUSION

MLO-TURP is a safe and effective treatment for men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Patients experience long-term improvement of symptoms and preserve antegrade ejaculation. In select men with prominent middle lobes, MLO-- should be considered a therapeutic, ejaculation-sparing option.