1
|
Steadman JA, Glasgow AE, Neequaye NN, Habermann EB, Hieken TJ. Distinct presentation of melanoma in Black patients may inform strategies to improve outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1041-1050. [PMID: 38436625 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Melanoma guidelines stem largely from data on non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. We aimed to identify features of melanoma within non-Hispanic Black (NHB) patients to inform strategies for earlier detection and treatment. METHODS From 2004 to 2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, we identified nonmetastatic melanoma patients with known TN category and race. Kaplan-Meier cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling analyses were performed. RESULTS Of 492 597 patients, 1499 (0.3%) were NHB, who were younger (21% vs. 17% age <50) and more commonly female (54% vs. 41%) than NHW, both p < 0.0005. For NHBs, lower extremity was the most common site (52% vs. 15% for NHWs, p < 0.0001), T category was higher (55% Tis-T1 vs. 82%; 27% T3-T4 vs. 8%, p < 0.0001) and stage at presentation was higher (19% Stage III, vs. 6%, p < 0.0001). Within the NHB cohort, males were older, and more often node-positive than females. Five-year Stage III CSS was 42% for NHB males versus 71% for females, adjusting for age and clinical nodal status (hazard ratio 2.48). CONCLUSIONS NHB melanoma patients presented with distinct tumor characteristics. NHB males with Stage III disease had inferior CSS. Focus on this high-risk patient cohort to promote earlier detection and treatment may improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Steadman
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amy E Glasgow
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nikki N Neequaye
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth B Habermann
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davidson TM, Hieken TJ, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, Yan Y. Pregnancy-associated melanoma: characteristics and outcomes from 2002 to 2020. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:175-181. [PMID: 38265469 PMCID: PMC10906198 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Melanoma diagnosed within 1 year of pregnancy is defined as pregnancy-associated melanoma (PAM). No robust data on how pregnancy influences melanoma nor guidelines for PAM management exist. With IRB approval, female patients with a pathology-confirmed melanoma diagnosis within 1 year of pregnancy treated at our institution from 2000 to 2020 were identified. Controls from the cancer registry were matched 1 : 4 when available on decade of age, year of surgery (±5), and stage. We identified 83 PAM patients with median follow-up of 86 months. Mean age at diagnosis was 31 years. 80% AJCC V8 stage I, 2.4% stage II, 13% stage III, 4.8% stage IV. Mean Breslow thickness was 0.79 mm and 3.6% exhibited ulceration. The mean mitotic rate was 0.76/mm 2 . In terms of PAM management, 98.6% of ESD patients and 86.7% of LSD patients received standard-of-care therapy per NCCN guidelines for their disease stage. No clinically significant delays in treatment were noted. Time to treatment from diagnosis to systemic therapy for LSD patients was an average of 46 days (95% CI: 34-59 days). Comparing the 83 PAM patients to 309 controls matched on age, stage, and year of diagnosis, similar 5-year overall survival (97% vs. 97%, P = 0.95) or recurrence-free survival (96% vs. 96%, P = 0.86) was observed. The outcomes of PAM following SOC treatment at a highly specialized center for melanoma care were comparable to non-PAM when matched by clinical-pathologic features. Specialty center care is encouraged for women with PAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tina J. Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic
| | - Amy E. Glasgow
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic
| | - Elizabeth B. Habermann
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic
| | - Yiyi Yan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Olofsson Bagge R, Hieken TJ. A new era of risk prediction for patients with high-risk melanoma. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:415-416. [PMID: 38547888 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00101-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy and Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steadman JA, Hoskin TL, Klassen C, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Piltin MA, Mrdutt MM, Johnson JE, Hieken TJ. Assessment of the effect of the American Society of Breast Surgery guidelines on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates for unilateral breast cancer. Surgery 2024; 175:677-686. [PMID: 37863697 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In July 2016, the American Society of Breast Surgeons published guidelines discouraging contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for average-risk women with unilateral breast cancer. We incorporated these into practice with structured patient counseling and aimed to assess the effect of this initiative on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates. METHODS We evaluated female patients with unilateral breast cancer undergoing mastectomy at our institution from January 2011 to November 2022. Variables associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and trends over time were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test or χ2 analysis as appropriate. RESULTS Among 3,208 patients, (median age 54 years) 1,366 (43%) had a unilateral mastectomy, and 1,842 (57%) also had a concomitant contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Across all patients, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates significantly decreased post-implementation from 2017 to 2019 (55%) vs 2015 to 2016 (62%) (P = .01) but increased from 2020 to 2022 (61%). Immediate breast reconstruction rate was 70% overall (81% with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and 56% without contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, P < .001). Younger age, White race, mutation status, and earlier stage were also associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Genetic testing increased from 27% pre-guideline to 74% 2020 to 2022, as did the proportion of patients with a pathogenic variant (4% pre-guideline vs 11% from 2020-2022, P < .001), of whom 91% had a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Among tested patients without a pathogenic variant and patients not tested, contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates declined from 78% to 67% and 48% to 38% pre -and post-guidelines, respectively, P < .001. CONCLUSION Implementation of specific patient counseling was effective in decreasing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates. While recognizing that patient choice plays a significant role in the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, further educational efforts are warranted to affect contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates, particularly in the setting of negative genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Steadman
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Division of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mara A Piltin
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mary M Mrdutt
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jeffrey E Johnson
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma CX, Suman VJ, Sanati S, Vij K, Anurag M, Leitch AM, Unzeitig GW, Hoog J, Fernandez-Martinez A, Fan C, Gibbs RA, Watson MA, Dockter TJ, Hahn O, Guenther JM, Caudle A, Crouch E, Tiersten A, Mita M, Razaq W, Hieken TJ, Wang Y, Rimawi MF, Weiss A, Winer EP, Hunt KK, Perou CM, Ellis MJ, Partridge AH, Carey LA. Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:362-371. [PMID: 38236590 PMCID: PMC10797521 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Importance Adding fulvestrant to anastrozole (A+F) improved survival in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer. However, the combination has not been tested in early-stage disease. Objective To determine whether neoadjuvant fulvestrant or A+F increases the rate of pathologic complete response or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 2.7% or less residual disease (referred to as endocrine-sensitive disease) over anastrozole alone. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing differences in clinical and correlative outcomes between each of the fulvestrant-containing arms and the anastrozole arm. Postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III, ER-rich (Allred score 6-8 or >66%)/ERBB2-negative breast cancer were included. All analyses were based on data frozen on March 2, 2023. Interventions Patients received anastrozole, fulvestrant, or a combination for 6 months preoperatively. Tumor Ki67 was assessed at week 4 and optionally at week 12, and if greater than 10% at either time point, the patient switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immediate surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). A secondary outcome was the percentage change in Ki67 after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) (week 4 Ki67 suppression). Results Between February 2014 and November 2018, 1362 female patients (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.2] years) were enrolled. Among the 1298 evaluable patients, ESDRs were 18.7% (95% CI, 15.1%-22.7%), 22.8% (95% CI, 18.9%-27.1%), and 20.5% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.6%) with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Compared to anastrozole, neither fulvestrant-containing regimen significantly improved ESDR or week 4 Ki67 suppression. The rate of week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10% was 25.1%, 24.2%, and 15.7% with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden class I occurred in 8 of 167 patients and 17 of 167 patients, respectively (15.0%; 95% CI, 9.9%-21.3%), after switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. PAM50 subtyping derived from RNA sequencing of baseline biopsies available for 753 patients (58%) identified 394 luminal A, 304 luminal B, and 55 nonluminal tumors. A+F led to a greater week 4 Ki67 suppression than anastrozole alone in luminal B tumors (median [IQR], -90.4% [-95.2 to -81.9%] vs -76.7% [-89.0 to -55.6%]; P < .001), but not luminal A tumors. Thirty-six nonluminal tumors (65.5%) had a week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, neither fulvestrant nor A+F significantly improved the 6-month ESDR over anastrozole in ER-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibition remains the standard-of-care NET. Differential NET response by PAM50 subtype in exploratory analyses warrants further investigation. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia X. Ma
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Vera J. Suman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Souzan Sanati
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kiran Vij
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | - Jeremy Hoog
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Cheng Fan
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | - Mark A. Watson
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Travis J. Dockter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Olwen Hahn
- University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Erika Crouch
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Monica Mita
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Wajeeha Razaq
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| | | | - Yang Wang
- Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | - Anna Weiss
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schulze AK, Hoskin TL, Mrdutt MM, Mutter RW, Hieken TJ. Repeat sentinel lymph node surgery for locally recurrent breast cancer after prior mastectomy. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:461-467. [PMID: 37929785 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Current NCCN guidelines discourage repeat sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery in patients with local recurrence (LR) of breast cancer following prior mastectomy. This study addresses the feasibility and therapeutic impact of this approach. METHODS We identified 73 patients managed with repeat SLN surgery for post-mastectomy isolated LR. Lymphatic mapping was performed using radioisotope with or without lymphoscintigraphy and/or blue dye. Successful SLN surgery was defined as retrieval of ≥1 SLN. RESULTS SLN surgery was successful in 65/73 (89%), identifying a median of 2 (range 1-4) SLNs, with 10/65 (15%) SLN-positive. Among these, 5/10 (50%) proceeded to ALND. In unsuccessful cases, 1/8 (13%) proceeded to ALND. Seven of 10 SLN-positive patients and 50/55 SLN-negative patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was administered in 31 (42%) and endocrine therapy in 50 of 57 HR+ patients (88%). After 28 months median follow-up, eight patients relapsed with the first site local in two, distant in five, and synchronous local/distant in one. No nodal recurrences were observed. CONCLUSIONS SLN surgery for patients with LR post-mastectomy is feasible and informative. This approach appears oncologically sound, decreases axillary dissection rates and may be used to tailor adjuvant radiation target volumes and systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy K Schulze
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mary M Mrdutt
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hieken TJ, Nelson GD, Flotte TJ, Grewal EP, Chen J, McWilliams RR, Kottschade LA, Yang L, Domingo-Musibay E, Dronca RS, Yan Y, Markovic SN, Dimou A, Montane HN, Erskine CL, Piltin MA, Price DL, Khariwala SS, Hui J, Strand CA, Harrington SM, Suman VJ, Dong H, Block MS. Neoadjuvant cobimetinib and atezolizumab with or without vemurafenib for high-risk operable Stage III melanoma: the Phase II NeoACTIVATE trial. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1430. [PMID: 38365756 PMCID: PMC10873383 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45798-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Both targeted therapies and immunotherapies provide benefit in resected Stage III melanoma. We hypothesized that the combination of targeted and immunotherapy given prior to therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) would be tolerable and drive robust pathologic responses. In NeoACTIVATE (NCT03554083), a Phase II trial, patients with clinically evident resectable Stage III melanoma received either 12 weeks of neoadjuvant vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab (BRAF-mutated, Cohort A, n = 15), or cobimetinib and atezolizumab (BRAF-wild-type, Cohort B, n = 15) followed by TLND and 24 weeks of adjuvant atezolizumab. Here, we report outcomes from the neoadjuvant portion of the trial. Based on intent to treat analysis, pathologic response (≤50% viable tumor) and major pathologic response (complete or near-complete, ≤10% viable tumor) were observed in 86.7% and 66.7% of BRAF-mutated and 53.3% and 33.3% of BRAF-wild-type patients, respectively (primary outcome); these exceeded pre-specified benchmarks of 50% and 30% for major pathologic response. Grade 3 and higher toxicities, primarily dermatologic, occurred in 63% during neoadjuvant treatment (secondary outcome). No surgical delays nor progression to regional unresectability occurred (secondary outcome). Peripheral blood CD8 + TCM cell expansion associated with favorable pathologic responses (exploratory outcome).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Garth D Nelson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas J Flotte
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eric P Grewal
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Lu Yang
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Computational Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Evidio Domingo-Musibay
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Roxana S Dronca
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yiyi Yan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mara A Piltin
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Daniel L Price
- Department of Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Samir S Khariwala
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jane Hui
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Carrie A Strand
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Susan M Harrington
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Vera J Suman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Haidong Dong
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pavlick AC, Ariyan CE, Buchbinder EI, Davar D, Gibney GT, Hamid O, Hieken TJ, Izar B, Johnson DB, Kulkarni RP, Luke JJ, Mitchell TC, Mooradian MJ, Rubin KM, Salama AK, Shirai K, Taube JM, Tawbi HA, Tolley JK, Valdueza C, Weiss SA, Wong MK, Sullivan RJ. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, version 3.0. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e006947. [PMID: 37852736 PMCID: PMC10603365 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the first approval for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma more than a decade ago, immunotherapy has completely transformed the treatment landscape of this chemotherapy-resistant disease. Combination regimens including ICIs directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) agents or, more recently, anti-lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) agents, have gained regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, with long-term follow-up data suggesting the possibility of cure for some patients with advanced disease. In the resectable setting, adjuvant ICIs prolong recurrence-free survival, and neoadjuvant strategies are an active area of investigation. Other immunotherapy strategies, such as oncolytic virotherapy for injectable cutaneous melanoma and bispecific T-cell engager therapy for HLA-A*02:01 genotype-positive uveal melanoma, are also available to patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of these regimens for many patients with cutaneous melanoma, traditional immunotherapy biomarkers (ie, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, T-cell infiltrate and/or microsatellite stability) have failed to reliably predict response. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles, particularly for the highly active combination of anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 agents. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, including rare subtypes of the disease (eg, uveal, mucosal), with the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the Expert Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using immunotherapy to treat melanoma, with topics including therapy selection in the advanced and perioperative settings, intratumoral immunotherapy, when to use immunotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutated disease, management of patients with brain metastases, evaluation of treatment response, special patient populations, patient education, quality of life, and survivorship, among others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charlotte E Ariyan
- Department of Surgery Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Diwakar Davar
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Geoffrey T Gibney
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Benjamin Izar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rajan P Kulkarni
- Departments of Dermatology, Oncological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, and Center for Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Operative Care Division, VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jason J Luke
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tara C Mitchell
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Meghan J Mooradian
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Krista M Rubin
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - April Ks Salama
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, Carolina, USA
| | - Keisuke Shirai
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Janis M Taube
- Department of Dermatology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J Keith Tolley
- Patient Advocate, Melanoma Research Alliance, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Caressa Valdueza
- Cutaneous Oncology Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarah A Weiss
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Patient Advocate, Melanoma Research Alliance, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fastner S, Hieken TJ, McWilliams RR, Hyngstrom J. Anorectal melanoma. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:635-644. [PMID: 37395165 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Anorectal melanoma is an aggressive mucosal melanoma subtype with a poor prognosis. Although recent advancements have been seen for cutaneous melanoma, the optimal treatment paradigm for management of anorectal melanoma is evolving. In this review, we highlight differences in the pathogenesis of mucosal versus cutaneous melanoma, new concepts of staging for mucosal melanoma, updates to surgical management of anorectal melanoma, and current data for adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy in this unique patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - John Hyngstrom
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stafford AP, Hoskin TL, Hieken TJ, Sanders S, Pruthi S, Boughey J, Degnim A. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: Using telemedicine for pre-operative surgical evaluation in breast disease. J Telemed Telecare 2023:1357633X231194377. [PMID: 37615191 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x231194377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic motivated telemedicine care to decrease potential exposures for both patients and staff. We hypothesized that select breast surgical patients can be successfully evaluated pre-operatively with telemedicine. METHODS With institutional review board approval, patients with telemedicine surgical consults between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2020 were identified retrospectively from our prospective breast surgical registry. The frequency of successful pre-operative evaluation using telemedicine alone was assessed, defined as cases in which surgery was completed on the planned day without changes to the surgical plan after physical examination in the pre-operative area. Differences in disease presentation, patient characteristics, and complications were evaluated by whether the first in-person visit occurred on the day of surgery versus the prior. RESULTS A total of 374 patients underwent breast surgery between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2020, of which 96 (25.7%) had a telemedicine consultation. After the telemedicine visit, 38 patients (39.6%) had additional in-person visits with the breast surgeon prior to their operative date, and 58 patients (60.4%) did not. Forty-five patients underwent breast-conserving therapies, 41 mastectomies (25 with reconstruction), two axillary dissections, and eight excisional biopsies. All surgeries were completed on the planned operative day, with no changes in surgical plans. Patients with telemedicine only prior to surgery were more likely to speak English (100% vs. 92.1%, p = 0.02) and have lower body mass index (median 24.9 vs. 29.2, p = 0.01). The frequency of in-person pre-operative visits varied significantly by surgeon (p < 0.001). Age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, distance from facility, clinical T/N category, surgery type, and complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine can be utilized successfully for select breast surgical patients, with the ability to proceed to surgery in the majority of patients without additional in-person visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle P Stafford
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Schar Cancer Institute, Inova, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stacy Sanders
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sandhya Pruthi
- General Internal Medicine/Breast Diagnostic Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Judy Boughey
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy Degnim
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Degnim AC, Siontis BL, Ahmed SK, Hoskin TL, Hieken TJ, Jakub JW, Baum CL, Day C, Schrup SE, Smith L, Carter JM, Sae Kho TM, Glazebrook KN, Vijayasekaran A, Okuno SH, Petersen IA. Trimodality Therapy Improves Disease Control in Radiation-Associated Angiosarcoma of the Breast. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:2885-2893. [PMID: 37223927 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of trimodality treatment versus monotherapy or dual therapy for radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) after prior breast cancer treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN With Institutional Review Board approval, we identified patients diagnosed with RAASB and abstracted data on disease presentation, treatment, and oncologic outcomes. Trimodality therapy included (i) taxane induction, (ii) concurrent taxane/radiation, and then (iii) surgical resection with wide margins. RESULTS A total of 38 patients (median age 69 years) met inclusion criteria. Sixteen received trimodality therapy and 22 monotherapy/dual therapy. Skin involvement and disease extent were similar in both groups. All trimodality patients required reconstructive procedures for wound closure/coverage, compared with 48% of monotherapy/dual therapy patients (P < 0.001). Twelve of 16 (75%) patients receiving trimodality therapy had a pathologic complete response (pCR). With median follow-up of 5.6 years, none had local recurrence, 1 patient (6%) had distant recurrence, and no patients died. Among 22 patients in the monotherapy/dual therapy group, 10 (45%) had local recurrence, 8 (36%) had distant recurrence, and 7 (32%) died of disease. Trimodality therapy demonstrated significantly better 5-year recurrence-free survival [RFS; 93.8% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.004; HR, 7.6 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.3-44.2)]. Combining all patients with RAASB regardless of treatment, local recurrence was associated with subsequent distant recurrence (HR, 9.0; P = 0.002); distant recurrence developed in 3 of 28 (11%) patients without local recurrence compared with 6 of 10 (60%) with local recurrence. The trimodality group had more surgical complications that required reoperation or prolonged healing. CONCLUSIONS Trimodality therapy for RAASB was more toxic but is promising, with a high rate of pCR, durable local control, and improved RFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Degnim
- Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Safia K Ahmed
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - James W Jakub
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Courtney Day
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sarah E Schrup
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lauren Smith
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jodi M Carter
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim H, Hieken TJ, Abraha F, Jakub JW, Corbin KS, Furutani KM, Boughey JC, Stish BJ, Deufel CL, Degnim AC, Shumway DA, Ahmed SK, Piltin MA, Sandhu NP, Conners AL, Ruddy KJ, Mutter RW, Park SS. Long-term outcomes of intraoperatively-placed applicator brachytherapy for rapid completion of breast conserving treatment: An analysis of a prospective registry data. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100639. [PMID: 37251618 PMCID: PMC10212787 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To evaluate the long-term outcome of accelerated partial breast irradiation utilizing intraoperatively placed applicator-based brachytherapy (ABB) in early-stage breast cancer. Materials and methods From our prospective registry, 223 patients with pTis-T2, pN0/pN1mic breast cancer were treated with ABB. The median treatment duration including surgery and ABB was 7 days. The prescribed doses were 32 Gy/8 fx BID (n = 25), 34 Gy/10 fx BID (n = 99), and 21 Gy/3 fx QD (n = 99). Endocrine therapy (ET) adherence was defined as completion of planned ET or ≥ 80% of the follow-up (FU) period. Cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was estimated and influencing factors for IBTR-free survival rate (IBTRFS) were analyzed. Results 218/223 patients had hormone receptor-positive tumors, including 38 (17.0%) with Tis and 185 (83.0%) with invasive cancer. After a median FU of 63 months, 19 (8.5%) patients had recurrence [17 (7.6%) with an IBTR]. Rates of 5-year IBTRFS and DFS were 92.2% and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year IBTRFS rates were significantly higher for post-menopausal women (93.6% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.04), BMI < 30 kg/m2 (97.4% vs. 88.1%, p = 0.02), and ET-adherence (97.5% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.02). IBTRFS did not differ with dose regimens. Conclusions Postmenopausal status, BMI < 30 kg/m2, and ET- adherence predicted favorable IBTRFS. Our results highlight the importance of careful patient selection for ABB and encouragement of ET compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haeyoung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University of School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Feven Abraha
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James W. Jakub
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Bradley J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Amy C. Degnim
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Dean A. Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mara A. Piltin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nicole P. Sandhu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy L. Conners
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert W. Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean S. Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Joshi U, Budhathoki P, Gaire S, Yadav SK, Shah A, Adhikari A, Choong G, Couzi R, Giridhar KV, Leon-Ferre RA, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Mutter R, Ruddy KJ, Haddad TC, Goetz MP, Couch FJ, Yadav S. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 200:217-224. [PMID: 37210429 PMCID: PMC10782581 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06959-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (TN-ILC) of breast cancer is a rare disease and the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well-defined. METHODS Women with stage I-III TN-ILC or triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) of the breast undergoing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare overall survival (OS) and evaluate prognostic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS The median age at diagnosis for women with TN-ILC was 67 years compared to 58 years in TN-IDC (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the OS between TN-ILC and TN-IDC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.96, p = 0.44). Black race and higher TNM stage were associated with worse OS, whereas receipt of chemotherapy or radiation was associated with better OS in TN-ILC. Among women with TN-ILC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS was 77.3% in women with a complete pathological response (pCR) compared to 39.8% in women without any response. The odds of achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower in women with TN-ILC compared to TN-IDC (OR 0.53, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Women with TN-ILC are older at diagnosis but have similar OS compared to TN-IDC after adjusting for tumor and demographic characteristics. Administration of chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in TN-ILC, but women with TN-ILC were less likely to achieve complete response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to TN-IDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utsav Joshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, 14621, USA
| | - Pravash Budhathoki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA
| | - Suman Gaire
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60608, USA
| | - Sumeet K Yadav
- Department of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Mankato, MN, 56001, USA
| | - Anish Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bronxcare Health System, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA
| | - Anurag Adhikari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Grace Choong
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Rima Couzi
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | | | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Robert Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Tufia C Haddad
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Matthew P Goetz
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Broman KK, Hughes TM, Bredbeck BC, Sun J, Kirichenko D, Carr MJ, Sharma A, Bartlett EK, Nijhuis AAG, Thompson JF, Hieken TJ, Kottschade L, Downs J, Gyorki DE, Stahlie E, van Akkooi A, Ollila DW, O'shea K, Song Y, Karakousis G, Moncrieff M, Nobes J, Vetto J, Han D, Hotz M, Farma JM, Deneve JL, Fleming MD, Perez M, Baecher K, Lowe M, Bagge RO, Mattsson J, Lee AY, Berman RS, Chai H, Kroon HM, Teras J, Teras RM, Farrow NE, Beasley GM, Hui JYC, Been L, Kruijff S, Sinco B, Sarnaik AA, Sondak VK, Zager JS, Dossett LA. International Center-Level Variation in Utilization of Completion Lymph Node Dissection and Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma at Major Referral Centers. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e1106-e1115. [PMID: 35129464 PMCID: PMC10097464 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine overall trends and center-level variation in utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and adjuvant systemic therapy for sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Based on recent clinical trials, management options for SLN-positive melanoma now include effective adjuvant systemic therapy and nodal observation instead of CLND. It is unknown how these findings have shaped practice or how these contemporaneous developments have influenced their respective utilization. METHODS We performed an international cohort study at 21 melanoma referral centers in Australia, Europe, and the United States that treated adults with SLN-positive melanoma and negative distant staging from July 2017 to June 2019. We used generalized linear and multinomial logistic regression models with random intercepts for each center to assess center-level variation in CLND and adjuvant systemic treatment, adjusting for patient and disease-specific characteristics. RESULTS Among 1109 patients, performance of CLND decreased from 28% to 8% and adjuvant systemic therapy use increased from 29 to 60%. For both CLND and adjuvant systemic treatment, the most influential factors were nodal tumor size, stage, and location of treating center. There was notable variation among treating centers in management of stage IIIA patients and use of CLND with adjuvant systemic therapy versus nodal observation alone for similar risk patients. CONCLUSIONS There has been an overall decline in CLND and simultaneous adoption of adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with SLN-positive melanoma though wide variation in practice remains. Accounting for differences in patient mix, location of care contributed significantly to the observed variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy K Broman
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amanda A G Nijhuis
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Emma Stahlie
- Netherlands Cancer institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Yun Song
- University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Marc Moncrieff
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny Nobes
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - John Vetto
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Dale Han
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jan Mattsson
- University Medical Center, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Harvey Chai
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Juri Teras
- North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Roland M Teras
- North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amod A Sarnaik
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Vernon K Sondak
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Joshi U, Budhathoki P, Gaire S, Yadav SK, Shah A, Adhikari A, Choong G, Couzi R, Giridhar K, Leon-Ferre R, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Mutter R, Ruddy KJ, Haddad TC, Goetz MP, Couch FJ, Yadav S. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Triple-Negative Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2658909. [PMID: 36993608 PMCID: PMC10055567 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2658909/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Triple-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (TN-ILC) of breast cancer is a rare disease and the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors are not well-defined. Methods: Women with stage I-III TN-ILC or triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (TN-IDC) of the breast undergoing mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery between 2010 and 2018 in the National Cancer Database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were used to compare overall survival (OS) and evaluate prognostic factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The median age at diagnosis for women with TN-ILC was 67 years compared to 58 years in TN-IDC (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the OS between TN-ILC and TN-IDC in multivariate analysis (HR 0.96, p=0.44). Black race and higher TNM stage were associated with worse OS, whereas receipt of chemotherapy or radiation was associated with better OS in TN-ILC. Among women with TN-ILC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year OS was 77.3% in women with a complete pathological response (pCR) compared to 39.8% in women without any response. The odds of achieving pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower in women with TN-ILC compared to TN-IDC (OR 0.53, p<0.001). Conclusion: Women with TN-ILC are older at diagnosis but have similar OS compared to TN-IDC after adjusting for tumor and demographic characteristics. Administration of chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in TN-ILC, but women with TN-ILC were less likely to achieve complete response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to TN-IDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rima Couzi
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Department of Oncology: Johns Hopkins Medicine Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nash AL, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, Hieken TJ, Ludwig KK, Jacobs LK, Miller ME, Gallagher KK, Wong J, Neuman HB, Tseng J, Hassinger TE, King TA, Hwang ES, Jakub JW, Rosenberger LH. Racial-ethnic variations in phyllodes tumors among a multicenter United States cohort. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:369-373. [PMID: 36206024 PMCID: PMC9892174 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Previous studies have identified racial-ethnic differences in the diagnostic patterns and recurrence outcomes of women with phyllodes tumors (PT). However, these studies are generally limited in size and generalizability. We therefore sought to explore racial-ethnic differences in age, tumor size, subtype, and recurrence in a large US cohort of women with PT. METHODS We performed an 11-institution retrospective review of women with PT from 2007 to 2017. Differences in age at diagnosis, tumor size and subtype, and recurrence-free survival according to race-ethnicity. RESULTS Women of non-White race or Hispanic ethnicity were younger at the time of diagnosis with phyllodes tumor. Non-Hispanic Other women had a larger proportion of malignant PT. There were no differences in recurrence-free survival in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS Differences in age, tumor size, and subtype were small. Therefore, the workup of young women with breast masses and the treatment of women with PT should not differ according to race-ethnicity. These conclusions are supported by our finding that there were no differences in recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L. Nash
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Samantha M. Thomas
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Suniti N. Nimbkar
- Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tina J. Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kandice K. Ludwig
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Lisa K. Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Megan E. Miller
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Jasmine Wong
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Jennifer Tseng
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Taryn E. Hassinger
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Tari A. King
- Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - E. Shelley Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James W. Jakub
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Laura H. Rosenberger
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Basu A, Umashankar S, Blevins K, Northrop A, Christofferson A, Olunuga E, Cha J, Mittal A, Molina-Vega J, Sit L, Brown T, Parker B, Heditsian D, Brain S, Simmons C, Taboada A, Hieken TJ, Ruddy K, Salvador C, Mainor C, Afghahi A, Tevis S, Blaes A, Kang IM, Perlmutter J, Rugo H, Kanaparthi S, Peterson G, Weiss LT, Asare A, Esserman LJ, Melisko M, Hershman D. Abstract P5-07-03: The Association Between Symptom Severity and Physical Function among Participants in I-SPY2. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p5-07-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as a valuable component to understand treatment tolerability and toxicity among patients on clinical trials. We have implemented a system for monitoring patient reported outcomes (PROs), symptoms, and quality of life (QOL) using electronic PRO (ePRO) instruments for patients enrolled in the I-SPY2 trial. I-SPY2 is a phase II multi-site clinical trial evaluating the effect of novel neoadjuvant therapies for locally advanced breast cancer. We correlated patient demographic factors with symptoms, investigated the trajectory of symptoms throughout treatment, and sought to characterize symptoms associated with decline in physical function (PF). Methods. Our study population included 259 I-SPY2 patients that completed surveys on one of 9 study arms (including novel oral taxane/immunotherapy combinations, IV paclitaxel, checkpoint inhibitor+/- LAG3 inhibitor, and control IV paclitaxel +/- trastuzumab/pertuzumab). After the 12 week period of investigational agents, most patients received standard adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC). Symptom severity, frequency, and interference was assessed weekly using 33 items from the PRO-CTCAE item bank. PF was assessed using the NIH PROMIS instrument and was evaluated at baseline, inter-regimen (after 12 weeks of treatment), pre-surgery, and 1 and 6 months at follow-up. An odds ratio was used to assess univariate associations between age and race, and symptoms. Regularized multi-variate regression was used to evaluate early symptoms (prior to week 6) predictive of a clinically significant (>5 point T-score) decline in PF from baseline to post-treatment follow-up among all races and age groups. Results. Of 259 patients (mean age (SD) = 46.8 (13.6)), 160 (58%) were White, 13 (5%) were Asian, 26 (10%) were African American (AA), 25 (9.3%) were Hispanic, and 35 (13.5%) self-reported “Other”. At baseline, AA patients had a higher severity of joint pain than White patients (OR = 14.9, P < 0.05). During study treatment with paclitaxel and/or novel agent within the first 12 weeks of treatment, AA patients and non-white (NW) patients were more likely to report severe vomiting than White patients (OR =13.22 and 12.72, P< 0.05 and P< 0.03 respectively). During treatment with AC, NW patients were more likely to report higher severity of neuropathy than White patients (OR = 5.43, P< 0.03). Among all patients, in analysis of early symptoms predictive of a clinically significant decline in PF between baseline and 1 month post treatment, predictors included high frequency of diarrhea, severity of itching, and severity of joint pain. Further analysis of symptom trajectories revealed that frequency of diarrhea reported rose sharply between baseline and Cycle 2 with 9 patients (7%) reporting occasional or frequent diarrhea to 39 patients (28%) reporting occasional to almost constant diarrhea and remained stable at that proportion for the remainder of treatment. Frequency of diarrhea declined slightly during AC (17%) and dropped to baseline levels by follow-up. In contrast, severity of joint pain persisted post-treatment, rising consistently from baseline through follow- up with 3 patients (2%) reporting moderate to severe joint pain at baseline to 18 patients (35%) reporting moderate to severe joint pain at follow-up. Conclusion. Among I-SPY2 participants, when higher grade of diarrhea is persistent (or uncontrolled), it impacts physical function even after end of therapy. In some cases, race was also a determinant in symptom trajectory, although a higher enrollment of AA and NW patients will enable more robust estimates to be computed. While some of these early symptom predictors are transient and resolve by the time of follow-up, others persist long-term and contribute more directly towards impaired physical function at follow-up.
Citation Format: Amrita Basu, Saumya Umashankar, Kaylee Blevins, Anna Northrop, Anika Christofferson, Ebunoluwa Olunuga, Jaeyoon Cha, Ananya Mittal, Julissa Molina-Vega, Laura Sit, Thelma Brown, Bev Parker, Diane Heditsian, Susie Brain, Carol Simmons, Alessandra Taboada, Tina J. Hieken, Kathryn Ruddy, Carolina Salvador, Candace Mainor, Anosheh Afghahi, Sarah Tevis, Anne Blaes, Irene M. Kang, Jane Perlmutter, Hope Rugo, Sai Kanaparthi, Garry Peterson, Lisa T. Weiss, Adam Asare, Laura J. Esserman, Michelle Melisko, Dawn Hershman. The Association Between Symptom Severity and Physical Function among Participants in I-SPY2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jaeyoon Cha
- 7University of California, San Francisco, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Laura Sit
- 10University of California, San Francisco
| | - Thelma Brown
- 11University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sarah Tevis
- 22University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery
| | - Anne Blaes
- 23University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | | | - Hope Rugo
- 26University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | - Adam Asare
- 30Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, GREENBRAE, California
| | | | - Michelle Melisko
- 32University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lillemoe HA, Williams JK, Teshome MK, Zheng L, Francescatti AB, Hieken TJ, Katz MH, Hunt KH, Vreeland TJ, Asare EA. Setting the Standard for Cutaneous Melanoma Wide Local Excision: An Overview of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Standard 5.5. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:424-428. [PMID: 36648270 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to review the objectives of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Operative Standards with a specific focus on Standard 5.5, which pertains to curative intent wide local excision of primary cutaneous melanoma lesions. We review the details and rationale of the standard itself, including its requirement to include specific elements and responses in synoptic format in operative reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Lillemoe
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology (Lillemoe, Katz), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jelani K Williams
- the Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL (Williams)
| | - Mediget K Teshome
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology (Teshome, Hunt), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Linda Zheng
- the Cancer Surgery Standards Program, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Zheng, Francescatti, Katz, Hunt)
| | - Amanda B Francescatti
- the Cancer Surgery Standards Program, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Zheng, Francescatti, Katz, Hunt)
| | - Tina J Hieken
- the Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (Hieken)
| | - Matthew Hg Katz
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology (Lillemoe, Katz), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- the Cancer Surgery Standards Program, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Zheng, Francescatti, Katz, Hunt)
| | - Kelly H Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology (Teshome, Hunt), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- the Cancer Surgery Standards Program, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL (Zheng, Francescatti, Katz, Hunt)
| | - Timothy J Vreeland
- the Department of Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX (Vreeland)
| | - Elliot A Asare
- the Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (Asare)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hieken TJ, Kreidieh F, Aedo-Lopez V, Block MS, McArthur GA, Amaria RN. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Melanoma: The Paradigm Shift. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390614. [PMID: 37116111 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Clinical stage III melanoma, defined as resectable RECIST measurable nodal disease with or without in-transit metastases, represents approximately 15% of new melanoma diagnoses every year with additional cases presenting as recurrent nodal disease following previous treatment of a primary melanoma. The standard of care for patients with resectable clinical stage III melanoma is surgical resection, consisting of therapeutic lymph node dissection and/or resection of in-transit disease and consideration of adjuvant systemic therapy and occasionally adjuvant radiation. These patients have high rates of regional recurrence and progression to metastatic disease postsurgery, highlighting the need for better treatment options. With the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings, the use of these agents in the neoadjuvant setting has been an emerging area of research interest. In this chapter, we will discuss the rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy; review impactful clinical trials; and define response monitoring, surgical considerations, emerging therapies, and unanswered questions for neoadjuvant therapy as a recent paradigm shift in the management of clinical stage III melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, MN
| | - Firas Kreidieh
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Rodabe N Amaria
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Robbins T, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Mrdutt MM, Hieken TJ, Jakub JW, Glazebrook K, Boughey JC, Degnim AC. ASO Visual Abstract: Node Positivity Among Sonographically Suspicious but FNA-Negative Axillary Nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:622-623. [PMID: 36109410 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12474-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Robbins
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mary M Mrdutt
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James W Jakub
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Osdoit M, Yau C, Symmans WF, Boughey JC, Ewing CA, Balassanian R, Chen YY, Krings G, Wallace AM, Zare S, Fadare O, Lancaster R, Wei S, Godellas CV, Tang P, Tuttle TM, Klein M, Sahoo S, Hieken TJ, Carter JM, Chen B, Ahrendt G, Tchou J, Feldman M, Tousimis E, Zeck J, Jaskowiak N, Sattar H, Naik AM, Lee MC, Rosa M, Khazai L, Rendi MH, Lang JE, Lu J, Tawfik O, Asare SM, Esserman LJ, Mukhtar RA. Association of Residual Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Breast Cancer Recurrence in the Neoadjuvant I-SPY2 Trial. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:1034-1041. [PMID: 36069821 PMCID: PMC9453630 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer strongly correlates with overall survival and has become the standard end point in neoadjuvant trials. However, there is controversy regarding whether the definition of pCR should exclude or permit the presence of residual ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Objective To examine the association of residual DCIS in surgical specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer with survival end points to inform standards for the assessment of pathologic complete response. Design, Setting, and Participants The study team analyzed the association of residual DCIS after NAC with 3-year event-free survival (EFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and local-regional recurrence (LRR) in the I-SPY2 trial, an adaptive neoadjuvant platform trial for patients with breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. This is a retrospective analysis of clinical specimens and data from the ongoing I-SPY2 adaptive platform trial of novel therapeutics on a background of standard of care for early breast cancer. I-SPY2 participants are adult women diagnosed with stage II/III breast cancer at high risk of recurrence. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive taxane and anthracycline-based neoadjuvant therapy with or without 1 of 10 investigational agents, followed by definitive surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures The presence of DCIS and EFS, DRFS, and LRR. Results The study team identified 933 I-SPY2 participants (aged 24 to 77 years) with complete pathology and follow-up data. Median follow-up time was 3.9 years; 337 participants (36%) had no residual invasive disease (residual cancer burden 0, or pCR). Of the 337 participants with pCR, 70 (21%) had residual DCIS, which varied significantly by tumor-receptor subtype; residual DCIS was present in 8.5% of triple negative tumors, 15.6% of hormone-receptor positive tumors, and 36.6% of ERBB2-positive tumors. Among those participants with pCR, there was no significant difference in EFS, DRFS, or LRR based on presence or absence of residual DCIS. Conclusions and Relevance The analysis supports the definition of pCR as the absence of invasive disease after NAC regardless of the presence or absence of DCIS. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01042379.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Female
- Humans
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/drug therapy
- Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm, Residual/drug therapy
- Receptor, ErbB-2
- Retrospective Studies
- Young Adult
- Middle Aged
- Aged
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Osdoit
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Christina Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - W. Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Cheryl A. Ewing
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Ron Balassanian
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Yunn-Yi Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Gregor Krings
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Anne M Wallace
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Somaye Zare
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Oluwole Fadare
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Rachael Lancaster
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - Shi Wei
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Constantine V. Godellas
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ping Tang
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Todd M Tuttle
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Molly Klein
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Sunati Sahoo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Tina J. Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jodi M. Carter
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, May Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Beiyun Chen
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, May Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Julia Tchou
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Michael Feldman
- Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Eleni Tousimis
- Department of Surgery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Jay Zeck
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | | | - Husain Sattar
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arpana M. Naik
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | | | - Marilin Rosa
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Laila Khazai
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mara H. Rendi
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Julie E. Lang
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Janice Lu
- Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Ossama Tawfik
- Department of Pathology, University of Kansas, Kansas City
| | | | - Laura J. Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Rita A. Mukhtar
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sanders SB, Hoskin TL, Solanki MH, Stafford AP, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ. ASO Visual Abstract: Lack of Clinical Value for Immunohistochemistry for Sentinel Lymph Node Assessment in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6468. [PMID: 35870053 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12248-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy B Sanders
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Malvika H Solanki
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arielle P Stafford
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gonzalez TV, Sae-Kho TM, Robinson SI, Hieken TJ, Folpe AL, Broski SM, Degnim AC, Glazebrook KN. Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast with initial presentation as non-mass enhancement on MRI. Radiol Case Rep 2022; 17:3624-3629. [PMID: 35923341 PMCID: PMC9340125 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is a rare and aggressive malignancy occurring after radiation therapy as part of breast cancer treatment. RAASB usually presents several years after prior radiation and typically involves the skin with or without involvement of the parenchyma. Most RAASB are detected as cutaneous changes on physical exam. Herein, we present a unique case of a clinically occult RAASB diagnosed as non-mass enhancement on annual surveillance breast MRI.
Collapse
|
24
|
Eroglu Z, Broman KK, Thompson JF, Nijhuis A, Hieken TJ, Kottschade L, Farma JM, Hotz M, Deneve J, Fleming M, Bartlett EK, Sharma A, Dossett L, Hughes T, Gyorki DE, Downs J, Karakousis G, Song Y, Lee A, Berman RS, van Akkooi A, Stahlie E, Han D, Vetto J, Beasley G, Farrow NE, Hui JYC, Moncrieff M, Nobes J, Baecher K, Perez M, Lowe M, Ollila DW, Collichio FA, Bagge RO, Mattsson J, Kroon HM, Chai H, Teras J, Sun J, Carr MJ, Tandon A, Babacan NA, Kim Y, Naqvi M, Zager J, Khushalani NI. Outcomes with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma without completion lymph node dissection. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004417. [PMID: 36002183 PMCID: PMC9413295 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Until recently, most patients with sentinel lymph node-positive (SLN+) melanoma underwent a completion lymph node dissection (CLND), as mandated in published trials of adjuvant systemic therapies. Following multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial-II, most patients with SLN+ melanoma no longer undergo a CLND prior to adjuvant systemic therapy. A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes in SLN+ melanoma patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy after July 2017 was performed in 21 international cancer centers. Of 462 patients who received systemic adjuvant therapy, 326 patients received adjuvant anti-PD-1 without prior immediate (IM) CLND, while 60 underwent IM CLND. With median follow-up of 21 months, 24-month relapse-free survival (RFS) was 67% (95% CI 62% to 73%) in the 326 patients. When the patient subgroups who would have been eligible for the two adjuvant anti-PD-1 clinical trials mandating IM CLND were analyzed separately, 24-month RFS rates were 64%, very similar to the RFS rates from those studies. Of these no-CLND patients, those with SLN tumor deposit >1 mm, stage IIIC/D and ulcerated primary had worse RFS. Of the patients who relapsed on adjuvant anti-PD-1, those without IM CLND had a higher rate of relapse in the regional nodal basin than those with IM CLND (46% vs 11%). Therefore, 55% of patients who relapsed without prior CLND underwent surgery including therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND), with 30% relapsing a second time; there was no difference in subsequent relapse between patients who received observation vs secondary adjuvant therapy. Despite the increased frequency of nodal relapses, adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy may be as effective in SLN+ pts who forego IM CLND and salvage surgery with TLND at relapse may be a viable option for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA .,University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kristy K Broman
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA,University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda Nijhuis
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Lisa Kottschade
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Farma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Meghan Hotz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeremiah Deneve
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin Fleming
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Avinash Sharma
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lesly Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Tasha Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David E Gyorki
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Downs
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giorgos Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yun Song
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ann Lee
- Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Russell S Berman
- Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emma Stahlie
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dale Han
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - John Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Georgia Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Norma E Farrow
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - Jenny Nobes
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Kirsten Baecher
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Perez
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael Lowe
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David W Ollila
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Frances A Collichio
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Mattsson
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hidde M Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Harvey Chai
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jyri Teras
- North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - James Sun
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Michael J Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Nalan Akgul Babacan
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Younchul Kim
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mahrukh Naqvi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jonathan Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA,University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Nikhil I Khushalani
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA,University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hieken TJ, Solanki MH. ASO Author Reflections: Standardizing Pathology Examination of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma: Less Is More. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6466-6467. [PMID: 35930110 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12330-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Malvika H Solanki
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Robbins T, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Mrdutt MM, Hieken TJ, Jakub JW, Glazebrook K, Boughey JC, Degnim AC. Node Positivity Among Sonographically Suspicious but FNA-Negative Axillary Nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6276-6287. [PMID: 35854027 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12131-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of sonographically suspicious axillary lymph nodes is helpful to clinically stage patients and guide consideration of neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. However, data are limited for suspicious nodes that are FNA negative. Our goal is to compare the frequency of node positivity between patients with negative axillary ultrasound (AUSneg) versus suspicious AUS with negative FNA (FNAneg). METHODS With IRB approval, we identified all clinically node-negative (cN0) patients with invasive breast cancer treated with upfront surgery at our tertiary care center between 2016 and 2021. AUS is routinely performed with FNA of suspicious lymph node(s). We compared clinicopathologic characteristics and nodal positivity rates between AUSneg and FNAneg groups. RESULTS A total of 1580 cN0 patients with invasive breast cancer were analyzed, including 1240 AUSneg and 340 FNAneg patients. The FNAneg group was younger (median age 59.7 years versus 63.5 years, p < 0.001) and had higher clinical T (cT) category (29.1% versus 21.7% with cT2-cT4 disease, p = 0.005). Final axillary pathologic node positivity did not differ significantly between the AUSneg and FNAneg groups (16.5% versus 19.1%, p = 0.25). Among FNAneg patients, 58/340 (17.1%) had a clip placed, with retrieval confirmed in 28/58 (48.3%). Of the 28 retrieved clipped nodes, 27 were sentinel nodes. Final pathologic nodal status (pN+%) did not differ between patients in whom retrieval of the clipped node was confirmed versus not confirmed (28.6% versus 16.7%, p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS Both patients with sonographically suspicious node(s) and negative FNA and patients with negative AUS have a similarly low chance of positive nodes. Additionally, routine targeted excision of FNA-negative clipped nodes is not warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Robbins
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mary M Mrdutt
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James W Jakub
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sanders SB, Hoskin TL, Solanki MH, Stafford AP, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ. Lack of Clinical Value for Immunohistochemistry for Sentinel Lymph Node Assessment in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6458-6465. [PMID: 35849283 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12195-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The distinct histologic appearance of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) may pose diagnostic challenges for sentinel lymph node (SLN) analysis. We evaluated the impact of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) on SLN assessment in ILC and its contribution to pathologic nodal upstaging. METHODS We identified ILC patients treated with SLN surgery at our institution between September 2008 and August 2021. IHC for SLN assessment was employed at the discretion of the pathologist. Differences between groups evaluated with and without IHC were compared using Chi-square tests. RESULTS Overall, 608 cases of ILC were identified in patients who underwent SLN surgery. IHC was used in 301 cases (49.5%) and was not associated with cT category, pT category, or tumor grade. Use of IHC increased detection of SLN+ disease when isolated tumor cells (ITCs) were included in the analysis (35.9% with IHC vs. 21.2% without IHC; p < 0.001). There was no effect on nodal upstaging to micrometastatic disease (pN1mi) or greater (21.9% with IHC vs. 21.2% without IHC; p = 0.82). IHC did not increase the number of positive SLNs detected (median 1 with and without IHC) nor did it increase axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rates (11.6% with IHC vs. 15.3% without IHC; p = 0.18). CONCLUSION IHC improved detection of pN0(i+) disease among ILC patients undergoing SLN surgery. IHC did not increase upstaging to pN1mi or higher categories of nodal disease, detection of a greater number of positive SLNs, or ALND rates. Our data suggest routine use of IHC for SLN assessment in ILC patients does not add clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy B Sanders
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Malvika H Solanki
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arielle P Stafford
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Broida SE, Chen XT, Baum CL, Brewer JD, Block MS, Jakub JW, Pockaj BA, Foote RL, Markovic SN, Hieken TJ, Houdek MT. Merkel cell carcinoma of unknown primary: Clinical presentation and outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:1080-1086. [PMID: 35809230 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous malignancy that usually occurs in the head/neck or extremities. However, there are reports of MCC developing in the lymph nodes or parotid gland without evidence of a primary cutaneous lesion. METHODS We reviewed 415 patients with biopsy-proven MCC. Patients with MCC of unknown primary (n = 37, 9%, MCCUP) made up the study cohort. The primary endpoints of the study were rate of recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Patients with MCCUP presented with tumors in lymph nodes (n = 34) or parotid gland (n = 3). Nodal disease was most commonly detected in the inguinal/external iliac (n = 15) or axillary (n = 14) regions. The mean age at diagnosis was 70 years and 24% were female. Patients presented with distant metastases in 24.3% of cases. Patients with stage IIIA disease treated with regional lymph node dissection (RLND) had a lower risk of disease recurrence (hazard ratio 0.26, p = 0.046). Recurrence-free survival was 59.3% at 5 years. Disease-specific survival was 63.3% at 5 years. CONCLUSION Patients with MCCUP have a high risk of recurrence and mortality. The optimal treatment for MCCUP has yet to be elucidated, although therapeutic RLND appears beneficial for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel E Broida
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Xiao T Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Christian L Baum
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jerry D Brewer
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - James W Jakub
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthew T Houdek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hieken TJ, Hoskin TL. ASO Author Reflections: Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Durable Breast Cancer-Specific Survival for HER2-Positive Patients with a Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:597-598. [PMID: 35798892 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12181-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hieken TJ, Sadurní MB, Quattrocchi E, Kobic A, Sominidi‐Damodaran S, Dwarkasing JT, Meerstein‐Kessel L, Bridges AG, Meves A. Using the Merlin assay for reducing sentinel lymph node biopsy complications in melanoma: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Dermatol 2022; 61:848-854. [PMID: 35100440 PMCID: PMC9203934 DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The assessment of the sentinel lymph node is a cornerstone of melanoma staging. However, ~80% of sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) are negative and nontherapeutic, and patients are unnecessarily exposed to surgery-related complications. Here, we gauged the potential of the Merlin assay to reduce SLNB-associated complications. The Merlin assay uses clinicopathologic variables and tumor gene expression profiling to identify low-risk patients who may forgo SLNB. METHODS We utilized the Merlin test development cohort to determine SLNB complication rates for procedures performed between 2004 and 2018 at Mayo Clinic. Complications evaluated were lymphedema, seroma, infection/cellulitis, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. Patients who underwent a completion lymph node dissection were excluded. RESULTS A total of 558 patients were included. The overall 90-day complication rate specific to SLNB (1 year for lymphedema) was 17.4%. The most common complications were seroma (9.3%), infection/cellulitis (4.8%), and lymphedema (4.3%). All three were more common in patients with a lower extremity primary tumor location versus other locations. With Merlin test results applied, SLNB-related complications would have decreased by 59%. CONCLUSION SLNB is a safe procedure but carries a significant complication rate. Merlin testing might reduce the need for SLNB and its associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ajdin Kobic
- Department of DermatologyMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | | | | | | | - Alina G. Bridges
- Richfield Laboratory of DermatopathologyDermpath DiagnosticsCincinnatiOHUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Holmberg CJ, Ny L, Hieken TJ, Block MS, Carr MJ, Sondak VK, Örtenwall C, Katsarelias D, Dimitriou F, Menzies AM, Saw RPM, Rogiers A, Straker RJ, Karakousis G, Applewaite R, Pallan L, Han D, Vetto JT, Gyorki DE, Tie EN, Vitale MG, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Cohen J, Hui JYC, Schachter J, Asher N, Helgadottir H, Chai H, Kroon H, Coventry B, Rothermel LD, Sun J, Carlino MS, Duncan Z, Broman K, Weber J, Lee AY, Berman RS, Teras J, Ollila DW, Long GV, Zager JS, van Akkooi A, Olofsson Bagge R. The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma in-transit with or without nodal metastases - A multicenter cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 169:210-222. [PMID: 35644725 PMCID: PMC9975793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Guidelines addressing melanoma in-transit metastasis (ITM) recommend immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as a first-line treatment option, despite the fact that there are no efficacy data available from prospective trials for exclusively ITM disease. The study aims to analyze the outcome of patients with ITM treated with ICI based on data from a large cohort of patients treated at international referral clinics. METHODS A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated between January 2015 and December 2020 from Australia, Europe, and the USA, evaluating treatment with ICI for ITM with or without nodal involvement (AJCC8 N1c, N2c, and N3c) and without distant disease (M0). Treatment was with PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and/or CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab). The response was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria modified for cutaneous lesions. RESULTS A total of 287 patients from 21 institutions in eight countries were included. Immunotherapy was first-line treatment in 64 (22%) patients. PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitor monotherapy was given in 233 (81%) and 23 (8%) patients, respectively, while 31 (11%) received both in combination. The overall response rate was 56%, complete response (CR) rate was 36%, and progressive disease (PD) rate was 32%. Median PFS was ten months (95% CI 7.4-12.6 months) with a one-, two-, and five-year PFS rate of 48%, 33%, and 18%, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, and the one-, two-, and five-year MSS rates were 95%, 83%, and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION Systemic immunotherapy is an effective treatment for melanoma ITM. Future studies should evaluate the role of systemic immunotherapy in the context of multimodality therapy, including locoregional treatments such as surgery, intralesional therapy, and regional therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl-Jacob Holmberg
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Ny
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Tina J. Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA,Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Matthew S. Block
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, USA,Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Michael J. Carr
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Vernon K. Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Christoffer Örtenwall
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Katsarelias
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden,Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Florentia Dimitriou
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn PM. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Aljosja Rogiers
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia
| | - Richard J. Straker
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Giorgos Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Rona Applewaite
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lalit Pallan
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dale Han
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - John T. Vetto
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - David E. Gyorki
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emilia Nan Tie
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paulo A. Ascierto
- Department of Skin Cancers, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Jade Cohen
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Jane YC. Hui
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Jacob Schachter
- The Ella Lemelbaum Institite for Immuno-oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nethanel Asher
- The Ella Lemelbaum Institite for Immuno-oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - H. Helgadottir
- Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Harvey Chai
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Hidde Kroon
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Brendon Coventry
- Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Luke D. Rothermel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA,Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - James Sun
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA,Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Matteo S. Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zoey Duncan
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Kristy Broman
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | - Jeffrey Weber
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Ann Y. Lee
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, USA,NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Russell S. Berman
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, USA,NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Jüri Teras
- North Estonian Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - David W. Ollila
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney Australia,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan S. Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hieken TJ, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Glazebrook KN, Hoskin TL. Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Durable Breast Cancer-Specific Survival for HER2-Positive Patients with a Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5383-5386. [PMID: 35773563 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12037-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yadav S, Sangaralingham L, Payne SR, Giridhar KV, Hieken TJ, Boughey JC, Mutter RW, Hawse JR, Jimenez RE, Freedman RA, Khanani S, Couch FJ, Vachon C, Shah N, Leon-Ferre RA, Ruddy KJ. Surveillance mammography after treatment for male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:693-698. [PMID: 35713802 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06645-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify the practice patterns related to use of surveillance mammography in male breast cancer (MaBC) survivors. METHODS Using administrative claims data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse, we identified men who underwent surgery for breast cancer during 2007-2017. We calculated the proportion of men who had at least one mammogram (a) within 13 months for all patients and (b) within 24 months amongst those who maintained their insurance coverage for at least that length of time after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with mammography within each timeframe. RESULTS Out of 729 total MaBC survivors, 209 (29%) underwent mammography within 13 months after surgery. Among those who had lumpectomy, 41% underwent mammography, whereas among those who had mastectomy, 27% had mammography. Amongst 526 men who maintained consistent insurance coverage for 24 months after surgery, 215 (41%) underwent mammography at least once during that 24-month period. In this cohort, the proportion who had at least one mammogram during the 24-month period was 49% after lumpectomy and 40% after mastectomy. In a multivariate logistic regression model, more recent diagnosis (2015+) and older age at diagnosis were associated with lower odds of undergoing mammography, while receipt of radiation was associated with higher odds of undergoing mammography. CONCLUSIONS Although recent ASCO guidelines recommend surveillance mammography after lumpectomy, a minority of MaBC survivors undergo surveillance mammography, even after lumpectomy. This is likely due to the paucity of data regarding the true benefits and harms of surveillance/screening mammography for MaBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lindsey Sangaralingham
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Stephanie R Payne
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - John R Hawse
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Rafael E Jimenez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Rachel A Freedman
- Division of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sadia Khanani
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Celine Vachon
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nilay Shah
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. .,Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ellis MJ, Anurag M, Hoog J, Fernandez-Martinez A, Fan C, Gibbs R, Sanati S, Vij K, Watson M, Dockter T, Hahn O, Guenther J, Caudle A, Crouch E, Tiersten A, Mita M, Razaq W, Hieken TJ, Wang Y, Leitch AM, Unzeitig GW, Winer E, Weiss A, Hunt K, Partridge AH, Perou CM, Suman V, Ma CX, Carey LA. Abstract CT026: The effect of intrinsic subtype on inhibition of tumor growth by anastrozole vs. fulvestrant vs. the combination: Results from the Alliance neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) ALTERNATE trial. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: The ALTERNATE trial randomized postmenopausal women with ER Allred 6-8 HER2- breast cancer to 6 months of NET with anastrozole (A), fulvestrant (F) or the combination (A+F). Biopsies were taken preNET and after 4-weeks(wks). Patients with Ki67 values >10% at 4-wks were offered triage to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with on-treatment Ki67 ≤ 10% who completed NET underwent surgery and Ki67 was reassessed. The primary endpoint was endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). ESD is defined as pCR or PEPI-0 residual disease (pT1-2, pN0, Ki67 ≤ 2.7%). We previously reported that the ESDR difference between the F-containing arms and the A arm was not >10% (ASCO 2020) and that baseline RNA-seq-based intrinsic subtypes predicted outcomes overall (SABCS 2021). Herein we describe relationships between PAM50 intrinsic subtype and Ki67 values by treatment arm because comparative drug effectiveness in adjuvant endocrine therapy studies in ER+ HER2- breast cancer can be predicted by the degree of Ki67 suppression (PMC3518447).
Methods: 743 of the 1297 eligible patients (A: 264; F: 231; A+F: 248) had RNA extracted from preNET frozen tumor biopsies with >50% tumor content and subjected to RNA seq. Intrinsic subtypes were then assigned as LumA, LumB, and NonLum (Basal or HER2-E) using open-source PAM50-based informatics. Differences in the proportion with wk4 Ki67 > 10%, % change in wk4 ki67, and surgical CCCA (Ki67 ≤ 2.7%) rate (sxCCCA) between treatments and by intrinsic subtype was assessed using stratified logistic regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Fisher’s exact test, respectively. Analysis of sxCCCA excluded those who failed to complete NET for reasons other than disease progression or early Ki67 >10%.
Results: Amongst the 358 LumA cases there were no significant differences in Ki67-based endpoints between treatments. Among the 292 LumB cases, the wk4 ki67 > 10% rate was lower with A+F (19.4%) than A (43%) (P=0.0002) and was somewhat lower in F (31%) versus A (P=0.076). The % change in wk4 Ki67 in LumB cases, adjusted for baseline Ki67, showed markedly superior suppression for A+F versus A (-90% vs. -77%; P=<0.0001) and versus F (-90% vs. -80%; P=0.0026). Furthermore sxCCCA rates were significantly higher with A+F than A (53% vs. 25% P = <0.0001) and somewhat higher for F (37%) than A (p=0.068), indicating that superior antiproliferative effects for A+F persist after 6 months on therapy. Lack of Ki67 suppression in response to treatment was observed in the majority of 43 NonLum samples regardless of treatment.
Conclusion: The combination of A+F was significantly more effective than either drug alone for the control of LumB breast cancer cell proliferation. This suggests that A+F may be a more effective adjuvant endocrine therapy than A alone in LumB disease. The lower Ki67 suppression with A alone also suggests that poorer outcome in some LumB tumors may be due to insufficient ER targeting rather than ER-independent tumor growth
Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50-CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01-CA214125, U24-CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588
Citation Format: Matthew J. Ellis, Meenakshi Anurag, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Travis Dockter, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erica Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J. Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W. Unzeitig, Eric Winer, Anna Weiss, Kelly Hunt, Ann H. Partridge, Charles M. Perou, Vera Suman, Cynthia X. Ma, Lisa A. Carey. The effect of intrinsic subtype on inhibition of tumor growth by anastrozole vs. fulvestrant vs. the combination: Results from the Alliance neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) ALTERNATE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT026.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jeremy Hoog
- 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Cheng Fan
- 3University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Kiran Vij
- 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Mark Watson
- 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Travis Dockter
- 5Alliance Statistics and Data Center and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Erica Crouch
- 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Monica Mita
- 4Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Wajeeha Razaq
- 10University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | - Yang Wang
- 12Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital, Albuquerque, NM
| | | | | | - Eric Winer
- 15Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Anna Weiss
- 15Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Vera Suman
- 5Alliance Statistics and Data Center and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Cynthia X. Ma
- 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
van Akkooi ACJ, Hieken TJ, Burton EM, Ariyan C, Ascierto PA, Asero SVMA, Blank CU, Block MS, Boland GM, Caraco C, Chng S, Davidson BS, Duprat Neto JP, Faries MB, Gershenwald JE, Grunhagen DJ, Gyorki DE, Han D, Hayes AJ, van Houdt WJ, Karakousis GC, Klop WMC, Long GV, Lowe MC, Menzies AM, Olofsson Bagge R, Pennington TE, Rutkowski P, Saw RPM, Scolyer RA, Shannon KF, Sondak VK, Tawbi H, Testori AAE, Tetzlaff MT, Thompson JF, Zager JS, Zuur CL, Wargo JA, Spillane AJ, Ross MI. Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) in Patients with Melanoma: Surgical Considerations by the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC). Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3694-3708. [PMID: 35089452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11236-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Exciting advances in melanoma systemic therapies have presented the opportunity for surgical oncologists and their multidisciplinary colleagues to test the neoadjuvant systemic treatment approach in high-risk, resectable metastatic melanomas. Here we describe the state of the science of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for melanoma, focusing on the surgical aspects and the key role of the surgical oncologist in this treatment paradigm. This paper summarizes the past decade of developments in melanoma treatment and the current evidence for NAST in stage III melanoma specifically. Issues of surgical relevance are discussed, including the risk of progression on NAST prior to surgery. Technical aspects, such as the definition of resectability for melanoma and the extent and scope of routine surgery are presented. Other important issues, such as the utility of radiographic response evaluation and method of pathologic response evaluation, are addressed. Surgical complications and perioperative management of NAST related adverse events are considered. The International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium has the goal of harmonizing NAST trials in melanoma to facilitate rapid advances with new approaches, and facilitating the comparison of results across trials evaluating different treatment regimens. Our ultimate goals are to provide definitive proof of the safety and efficacy of NAST in melanoma, sufficient for NAST to become an acceptable standard of care, and to leverage this platform to allow more personalized, biomarker-driven, tailored approaches to subsequent treatment and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Corrado Caraco
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Sydney Chng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Mark B Faries
- The Angeles Clinic, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - David E Gyorki
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dale Han
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Winan J van Houdt
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willem M C Klop
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
- The Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael C Lowe
- Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
- The Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Hussein Tawbi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Mike T Tetzlaff
- University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Charlotte L Zuur
- Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
- The Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Merrick I Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hieken TJ, Egger ME, Angeles CV, Lowe MC, Burke EE, Bartlett E, Hyngstrom JR, Sondak VK. MERLIN_001: A prospective registry study of a primary melanoma gene-signature to predict sentinel node (SN) status and determine its prognostic value for more accurate staging of patients with SN-negative melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps9606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS9606 Background: For patients with cutaneous melanoma, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) provides important staging and prognostic information that guides surveillance and adjuvant systemic therapy decisions. At most centers, SLNB is indicated for patients with cutaneous melanoma with at least a 5% risk of having nodal metastases, typically melanomas ≥ 0.8 mm in thickness or thinner lesions with high-risk features such as elevated mitotic rate and/or ulceration. SLNB, generally involving a separate incision, does carry a small but measurable risk of complications including seroma, infection and rarely lymphedema, and most patients have negative sentinel lymph nodes. Currently, there is an unmet clinical need to identify patients who may safely forgo SLNB due to a low (<5%) risk of nodal metastasis, who otherwise meet established criteria for SLNB. Previously, a model consisting of gene expression profile (GEP) of the primary tumor combined with clinicopathological features (CP) has been developed to identify melanoma patients with a low risk of having a positive SLNB. The model has also been validated in multiple retrospective studies. The aim of the MERLIN_001 registry study is to prospectively validate the CP-GEP model in an independent multicenter cohort of primary cutaneous melanoma patients who undergo SLNB for standard indications. Methods: In the next two years, a total of 10 centers across the US will enroll 2,340 patients with clinically node-negative cutaneous melanoma undergoing SLNB using current guideline indications and will follow these patients for 5 years (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04759781). Enrollment of patients started in September 2021 and 242 patients have been enrolled as of February 1, 2022. FFPE material from the initial melanoma biopsy will be used to assess the GEP of the primary melanoma. The CP-GEP probability scores will be expressed as a binary classification (Low Risk or High Risk for nodal metastasis) and will be compared to SLN pathology. Performance metrics for CP-GEP will be evaluated and will include: Negative Predictive Value, Positive Predictive Value, Sensitivity and Specificity, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Risk for nodal metastasis will be calculated for Low Risk and High Risk CP-GEP patients. Finally, the performance of CP-GEP to stratify patients according to risk of recurrence (local, regional, distant, death) will also be studied, since data will be collected for up to 5 yrs. Clinical trial information: NCT04759781.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Edmund Bartlett
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center-Fellowship (GME Office), New York, NY
| | | | - Vernon K. Sondak
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Olofsson Bagge R, Holmberg CJ, Hieken TJ, Zager JS, Long GV, Van Akkooi ACJ, Karakousis GC, Pallan L, Vetto JT, Gyorki DE, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Hui JYC, Schachter J, Helgadottir H, Kroon H, Rothermel LD, Carlino MS, Broman KK, Ny L. The efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma in-transit with or without nodal metastases: A multicenter cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9569 Background: Guidelines addressing melanoma in-transit metastasis (ITM) recommend immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as a first-line treatment option, despite the fact that there are no efficacy data available from prospective trials for exclusively ITM disease. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of patients with ITM treated with ICI based on data from a large cohort of patients treated at international high‐volume melanoma centers. Methods: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated between January 2015 and December 2020 from Australia, Europe, and USA, evaluating treatment with ICI for ITM with or without nodal involvement (AJCC8 N1c, N2c and N3c) and without distant disease (M0). Patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and/or CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab). We assessed response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 287 patients from 21 institutions in 8 countries were included. Immunotherapy was first-line treatment in 64 (22%) patients. Monotherapy with a PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitor was given in 233 (81%) and 23 (8%) patients respectively, while 31 (11%) received both in combination. Overall response rate was 56%, complete response (CR) rate 36% and progressive disease (PD) rate 32%. Median PFS was 10 months (95% CI 7.4-12.6 months) with a 1-, 2- and 5-year PFS rate of 48%, 33% and 18% respectively. Median MSS was not reached, and the 1-, 2- and 5-year MSS rates were 95%, 83% and 71% respectively. Conclusions: Systemic immunotherapy is an effective treatment for melanoma ITM. Future studies should evaluate the optimal role for systemic immunotherapy in the context of multimodality therapy including locoregional treatments such as surgery, intralesional therapy, and regional therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carl Jacob Holmberg
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Division of Endocrine and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lalit Pallan
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John T. Vetto
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | | | | | | | - Jacob Schachter
- Ella Lemelbaum Institute for Immuno Oncology and Melanoma, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | | | - Hidde Kroon
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Lars Ny
- University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Racz JM, Harless CA, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Nguyen MDT, Harris AM, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Degnim AC. ASO Visual Abstract: Sexual Well-Being After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Does Preservation of the Nipple Matter? Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11637-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
39
|
van Akkooi ACJ, Hieken TJ, Burton EM, Ariyan C, Ascierto PA, Asero SVMA, Blank CU, Block MS, Boland GM, Caraco C, Chng S, Davidson BS, Duprat Neto JP, Faries MB, Gershenwald JE, Grunhagen DJ, Gyorki DE, Han D, Hayes AJ, van Houdt WJ, Karakousis GC, Klop WMC, Long GV, Lowe MC, Menzies AM, Bagge RO, Pennington TE, Rutkowski P, Saw RPM, Scolyer RA, Shannon KF, Sondak VK, Tawbi H, Testori AAE, Tetzlaff MT, Thompson JF, Zager JS, Zuur CL, Wargo JA, Spillane AJ, Ross MI. Correction to: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (NAST) in Patients with Melanoma: Surgical Considerations by the International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium (INMC). Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5241-5242. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11622-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
40
|
Racz JM, Harless CA, Hoskin TL, Day CN, Nguyen MDT, Harris AM, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Degnim AC. Sexual Well-Being After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Does Preservation of the Nipple Matter? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:10.1245/s10434-022-11578-1. [PMID: 35385996 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11578-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The primary aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction (immediate or delayed) with and without nipple preservation. METHODS All female patients undergoing mastectomy between 2011 and 2015 at Mayo Clinic Rochester were identified and were mailed the BREAST-Q survey. Breast satisfaction, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being were evaluated and compared by surgery type using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for univariate analysis and linear regression for multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Of 1547 patients, 771 completed the BREAST-Q survey (response rate 50%). Of these 771 respondents, 237 (31%) did not have reconstruction, 198 (26%) had nipple-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (NSM), and 336 (44%) had skin-sparing mastectomy with reconstruction (SSM) ± nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction (via surgery ± tattoo). Patients with breast reconstruction had consistently higher BREAST-Q scores versus those without. Comparing NSM with all SSMs, there was no difference in satisfaction with breasts (mean 71.8 vs. 70.2, p = 0.21) or psychosocial well-being (mean 81.9 vs. 81.3, p = 0.47); however, sexual well-being was significantly higher in the NSM group on univariate (mean 64.5 vs. 58.0, p = 0.002) and multivariable (β = -4.69, p = 0.03) analysis. Sexual well-being scores were similar for NSM and the SSM subgroups with any type of NAC reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that NSM positively impacts patient sexual well-being after breast reconstruction compared with SSM, particularly SSM without nipple reconstruction or tattoo. SSM with any type of NAC reconstruction achieved similar satisfaction and sexual well-being to those undergoing NSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Racz
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Courtney N Day
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Ann M Harris
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hieken TJ, Sadurní MB, Quattrocchi E, Kobic A, Sominidi-Damodaran S, Meerstein L, Dwarkasing JT, Bridges AG, Meves A. QIM22-194: Using the Merlin Assay to Reduce Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Rates and Its Complications: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
42
|
Hieken TJ, Chen J, Chen B, Johnson S, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, Walther-Antonio MR, Chia N. The breast tissue microbiome, stroma, immune cells and breast cancer. Neoplasia 2022; 27:100786. [PMID: 35366464 PMCID: PMC8971327 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2022.100786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stromal and immune cell composition alterations in benign breast tissue associate with future cancer risk. Pilot data suggest the innate microbiome of normal breast tissue differs between women with and without breast cancer. Microbiome alterations might explain tissue microenvironment variations associated with disease status. METHODS Prospectively-collected sterile normal breast tissues from women with benign (n=16) or malignant (n=17) disease underwent 16SrRNA sequencing with Illumina MiSeq and Hybrid-denovo pipeline processing. Breast tissue was scored for fibrosis and fat percentages and immune cell infiltrates (lobulitis) classified as absent/mild/moderate/severe. Alpha and beta diversity were calculated on rarefied OTU data and associations analyzed with multiple linear regression and PERMANOVA. RESULTS Breast tissue stromal fat% was lower and fibrosis% higher in benign disease versus cancer (median 30% versus 60%, p=0.01, 70% versus 30%, p=0.002, respectively). The microbiome varied with stromal composition. Alpha diversity (Chao1) correlated with fat% (r=0.38, p=0.02) and fibrosis% (r=-0.32, p=0.05) and associated with different microbial populations as indicated by beta diversity metrics (weighted UniFrac, p=0.08, fat%, p=0.07, fibrosis%). Permutation testing with FDR control revealed taxa differences for fat% in Firmicutes, Bacilli, Bacillales, Staphylococcaceae and genus Staphylococcus, and fibrosis% in Firmicutes, Spirochaetes, Bacilli, Bacillales, Spirochaetales, Proteobacteria RF32, Sphingomonadales, Staphylococcaceae, and genera Clostridium, Staphylococcus, Spirochaetes, Actinobacteria Adlercreutzia. Moderate/severe lobulitis was more common in cancer (73%) than benign disease (13%), p=0.003, but no significant microbial associations were seen. CONCLUSION These data suggest a link between breast tissue stromal alterations and its microbiome, further supporting a connection between the breast tissue microenvironment and breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Beiyun Chen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Stephen Johnson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Tanya L Hoskin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Amy C Degnim
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Nicholas Chia
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hieken TJ, Burns WR, Francescatti AB, Morris AM, Wong SL. Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: Improving Patient Care through Synoptic Operative Reporting. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6526-6533. [PMID: 35174447 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11330-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery manuals define critical elements of optimal cancer surgery based on data and expert opinion. These key aspects of commonly performed cancer operations define technical standards that can be used as a quality assurance tool for practicing surgical oncologists and as an educational tool for trainees. This article provides background on these operative standards and their subsequent integration into synoptic operative report templates. With the goal of codifying the most important aspects of surgical oncology care to elevate and harmonize cancer care, the American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs has developed comprehensive synoptic operative reports. Synoptic operative reports are structured so that key data elements are recorded in a standardized format with prespecified terminology. In contrast to the narrative or structured operative reports frequently used by surgeons, these synoptic operative reports improve semantic clarity, provide uniform fields for abstraction, and facilitate passive data collection and real-time analytics while delivering key information for downstream multidisciplinary patient care. In this way, the synoptic operative report is a key component of a comprehensive effort to elevate the quality of cancer care nationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Arden M Morris
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ma CX, Anurag M, Dockter T, Hoog J, Fernandez-Martinez A, Fan C, Gibbs R, Sanati S, Vij K, Watson M, Hahn O, Guenther J, Caudle A, Crouch E, Tiersten A, Mita M, Razaq W, Hieken TJ, Wang Y, Leitch AM, Unzeitig GW, Weiss A, Winer EP, Hunt K, Partridge AH, Carey LA, Perou CM, Ellis MJ, Suman V. Abstract PD9-03: Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106). Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd9-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant ET (NET) offers an opportunity to assess ET sensitivity for ER+ HER2- BC and potentially to tailor therapy. Ki67 >10% on biopsy after 2-4 weeks (wks) of NET identifies patients (pts) with intrinsic ET resistance; while pathologic complete response (pCR) and modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index of 0 (mPEPI 0: pT1-2N0, Ki67 ≤2.7%) at surgery indicates sensitivity to ET. However, on-NET biopsy is not always acceptable or feasible and delays the ET sensitivity determination. PAM50 ROR score and intrinsic subtypes by tumor RNA profiling are prognostic in pts with early stage ER+ HER2- BC, and predict pCR rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) (PMC2667820). We therefore hypothesized that PAM50 analysis on pre-NET biopsies could predict the likelihood of a) a high on-NET Ki67, b) mPEPI-0 or pCR at surgery and, c) pCR for pts triaged to NCT. Methods: The ALTERNATE trial is a phase III study that randomized postmenopausal pts with clinical stage II/III ER+ (Allred score 6-8) HER2- BC to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole, fulvestrant, or both for 6 months before surgery. Research biopsy was required at pre-NET and wk 4, then optional at wk 12. Pts with Ki67 >10% on biopsy at wk 4 or 12 discontinued NET and were offered NCT. PAM50 intrinsic subtype and ROR-P values were generated from mRNA sequencing (RNASeq) analysis on pre-NET biopsies using open-source informatics (PMC7723687) and evaluated for prediction of on-NET Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12, pCR or mPEPI-0 post NET, and pCR post NCT. Results: 749 of 1,297 eligible trial pts were included in the analyses, after excluding 548 pts due to insufficient pre-NET tumor for RNASeq (n=511) or PAM50 normal subtype (n=37). Similar to the entire ALTERNATE population, the rate of Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 was 24.4% (95% CI: 21.4-27.7%) and the rate of mPEPI-0/pCR post NET was 19.8% (95% CI: 17.0-22.8%). There were 393 (52.5%) Lum A, 302 (40.3%) Lum B, and 54 (7.2%) non-Lum (9 Basal, 45 HER2-E) BCs. These included 196 (26.2%) ROR-P low, 354 (47.3%) ROR-P medium and 199 (26.6%) ROR-P high BCs. Both the rates of Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 and mPEPI-0/pCR differed significantly with respect to PAM50 subtype or ROR-P category, such that Lum A or ROR-P low BCs were least likely to have a Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 and most likely to achieve mPEPI-0/pCR (Table).
93 of 168 (55.4%) pts triaged to NCT had RNA-seq results, yielding 26 Lum A, 49 Lum B, 4 Basal and 14 HER2-E, with the pCR rates of 0%, 6.1%, 0%, and 21.4%, respectively. There were 10 ROR-P low, 39 medium, and 44 high tumors, with a pCR rate of 0%, 5.1% and 9.1%, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate that both baseline ROR-P and intrinsic subtype are predictive of early on-NET Ki67 > 10% and mPEPI 0/pCR at surgery after NET. For pts triaged to NCT based on an early on-NET Ki67 >10%, the HER2-E group had the highest pCR rate (20%) and no pCRs were observed in Lum A. These data may be useful for directing neoadjuvant therapy in postmenopausal pts with ER+ HER2- BC. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG), NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. (MJE) CPRIT RR140033, P50CA186784, P50-CA58223, U01 CA214125, U24CA210954, Gift from Ralph and Lisa Eads, McNair Scholarship. Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588.
Table 1.Rates of Ki67 >10% and mPEPI-0/pCR post NET by PAM50 subtype and ROR-P categoryKi67 >10% at wk 4 or 12mPEPI 0/pCR post NETPAM50 SubtypenYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLum A37251 (13.7%) 95% CI: 10.4-17.6%<0.0001393104 (26.5%) 95%CI: 22.2-31.1%<0.0001Lum B29394 (32.1%) 95% CI: 26.8-37.8%30243 (14.2%) 95%CI: 10.5-18.7%Non-luminal (Basal and HER2-E)5338 (71.7%) 95%CI: 57.6-83.2%541 (1.9%) 95%CI: 0.05-9.9%ROR-P CategorynYes, n (%)PnNo, n (%)PLow18018 (10.0%) 95%CI: 6.0-15.3%<0.000119660 (30.6%) 95%CI: 24.2-37.6%<0.0001Intermediate34474 (21.5%) 95%CI: 17.3-26.2%35471 (20.1%) 95%CI: 16.0-24.6%High19491 (46.9%) 95%CI: 39.7-54.2%19917 (8.5%) 95%CI: 5.1-13.3%
Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Meenakshi Anurag, Travis Dockter, Jeremy Hoog, Aranzazu Fernandez-Martinez, Cheng Fan, Richard Gibbs, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, A. Marilyn Leitch, Gary W Unzeitig, Anna Weiss, Eric P Winer, Kelly Hunt, Ann H Partridge, Lisa A Carey, Charles M Perou, Matthew J Ellis, Vera Suman. Pam50 intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence score (ROR) for the prediction of endocrine (ET) sensitivity and pathologic response to chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) in the alternate trial (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia X Ma
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Travis Dockter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center/Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jeremy Hoog
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Cheng Fan
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Kiran Vij
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Mark Watson
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | - Erika Crouch
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Monica Mita
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angelos, CA
| | - Wajeeha Razaq
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | - Yang Wang
- Presbyterian Kaseman Hospital, Albuquerque, NM
| | | | | | - Anna Weiss
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center/Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Vera Suman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center/Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hieken TJ, Burns WR, Francescatti AB, Morris AM, Wong SL. ASO Visual Abstract: Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery—Improving Patient Care through Synoptic Operative Reporting. Ann Surg Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11342-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
46
|
Hieken TJ, Morris AM, Burns WR, Francescatti AB, Wong SL. ASO Author Reflections: Surgeons Adding Value-Are Synoptic Operative Reports a Step Forward in Cancer Care? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6534-6535. [PMID: 35015181 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11299-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Arden M Morris
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - William R Burns
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hieken TJ, Price DL, Piltin MA, Turner HJ, Block MS. ASO Visual Abstract: Surgeon Assessment of the Technical Impact of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy on Operable Stage III Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021. [PMID: 34850302 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11146-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. .,Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Daniel L Price
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mara A Piltin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Heidi J Turner
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hieken TJ, Price DL, Piltin MA, Turner HJ, Block MS. Surgeon Assessment of the Technical Impact of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy on Operable Stage III Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:780-786. [PMID: 34825282 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11112-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effect of neoadjuvant systemic therapies (NST) on technical aspects of operation for resectable stage III melanoma is unknown. Prospective capture of the estimated and actual degree of difficulty of therapeutic lymphadenectomy at presentation and after NST may inform the relative merits of NST versus surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. METHODS We designed surgeon survey tools to capture key impressions at baseline prior to NST and postoperatively. We conducted a sub-study within a multi-institutional clinical trial for high-risk operable stage III melanoma (NeoACTIVATE, NCT03554083) which enrolls clinically node-positive patients to 12 weeks of combinatorial NST determined by BRAF status. Survey data were analyzed. RESULTS Surveys were completed for 24 of 25 patients (96%). Affected nodal basins were cervical (3, 13%) axillary (9, 38%), inguinal ± pelvic (14, 58%); 2 (8%) involved ≥ 2 basins. Baseline estimates included largest affected node size (median/range 4/1.4-11 cm), number of involved nodes (median/range 3/1-10) and tumor fixation (present in 12, 50%). At operation, actual degree of difficulty increased from the baseline estimate in 4 (17%) and decreased in 6 (25%). Surgery was less difficult, average, or more difficult versus usual operation in 4, 9, and 11 cases (17%, 38%, 46%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although many operations were judged to be more difficult than the usual therapeutic lymphadenectomy, operation following NST was more often perceived as easier than more difficult versus baseline impression. Engaging surgical oncologists to perform similar structured assessments across clinical trials will permit cross-study analysis of the effect of NSTs on the technical conduct of lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast & Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. .,Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Daniel L Price
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mara A Piltin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast & Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Heidi J Turner
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew S Block
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hieken TJ, Piltin MA, Block MS. ASO Author Reflections: Adding Value to Multidisciplinary Care by Incorporating Structured Surgeon Survey Assessment of the Effect of Neoadjuvant Therapies on Melanoma Operations. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:787-788. [PMID: 34802106 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11117-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
50
|
Rentroia-Pacheco B, Tjien-Fooh FJ, Quattrocchi E, Kobic A, Wever R, Bellomo D, Meves A, Hieken TJ. Clinicopathologic models predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cutaneous melanoma patients: Are they useful for patients with a single positive sentinel node? J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:516-524. [PMID: 34735719 PMCID: PMC8799494 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Of clinically node‐negative (cN0) cutaneous melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis, between 10% and 30% harbor additional metastases in non‐sentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs). Approximately 80% of SLN‐positive patients have a single positive SLN. Methods To assess whether state‐of‐the‐art clinicopathologic models predicting NSLN metastasis had adequate performance, we studied a single‐institution cohort of 143 patients with cN0 SLN‐positive primary melanoma who underwent subsequent completion lymph node dissection. We used sensitivity (SE) and positive predictive value (PPV) to characterize the ability of the models to identify patients at high risk for NSLN disease. Results Across Stage III patients, all clinicopathologic models tested had comparable performances. The best performing model identified 52% of NSLN‐positive patients (SE = 52%, PPV = 37%). However, for the single SLN‐positive subgroup (78% of cohort), none of the models identified high‐risk patients (SE > 20%, PPV > 20%) irrespective of the chosen probability threshold used to define the binary risk labels. Thus, we designed a new model to identify high‐risk patients with a single positive SLN, which achieved a sensitivity of 49% (PPV = 26%). Conclusion For the largest SLN‐positive subgroup, those with a single positive SLN, current model performance is inadequate. New approaches are needed to better estimate nodal disease burden of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ajdin Kobic
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Renske Wever
- Division of Bioinformatics, SkylineDx B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Domenico Bellomo
- Division of Bioinformatics, SkylineDx B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Meves
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|