Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Adding fulvestrant to anastrozole (A+F) improved survival in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer. However, the combination has not been tested in early-stage disease.

Objective

To determine whether neoadjuvant fulvestrant or A+F increases the rate of pathologic complete response or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 2.7% or less residual disease (referred to as endocrine-sensitive disease) over anastrozole alone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing differences in clinical and correlative outcomes between each of the fulvestrant-containing arms and the anastrozole arm. Postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III, ER-rich (Allred score 6-8 or >66%)/ERBB2-negative breast cancer were included. All analyses were based on data frozen on March 2, 2023.

Interventions

Patients received anastrozole, fulvestrant, or a combination for 6 months preoperatively. Tumor Ki67 was assessed at week 4 and optionally at week 12, and if greater than 10% at either time point, the patient switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immediate surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). A secondary outcome was the percentage change in Ki67 after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) (week 4 Ki67 suppression).

Results

Between February 2014 and November 2018, 1362 female patients (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.2] years) were enrolled. Among the 1298 evaluable patients, ESDRs were 18.7% (95% CI, 15.1%-22.7%), 22.8% (95% CI, 18.9%-27.1%), and 20.5% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.6%) with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Compared to anastrozole, neither fulvestrant-containing regimen significantly improved ESDR or week 4 Ki67 suppression. The rate of week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10% was 25.1%, 24.2%, and 15.7% with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden class I occurred in 8 of 167 patients and 17 of 167 patients, respectively (15.0%; 95% CI, 9.9%-21.3%), after switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. PAM50 subtyping derived from RNA sequencing of baseline biopsies available for 753 patients (58%) identified 394 luminal A, 304 luminal B, and 55 nonluminal tumors. A+F led to a greater week 4 Ki67 suppression than anastrozole alone in luminal B tumors (median [IQR], -90.4% [-95.2 to -81.9%] vs -76.7% [-89.0 to -55.6%]; P < .001), but not luminal A tumors. Thirty-six nonluminal tumors (65.5%) had a week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, neither fulvestrant nor A+F significantly improved the 6-month ESDR over anastrozole in ER-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibition remains the standard-of-care NET. Differential NET response by PAM50 subtype in exploratory analyses warrants further investigation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588.

Circulating tumor DNA association with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer in TBCRC 030

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its association with residual cancer burden (RCB) using an ultrasensitive assay in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified responders (RCB 0/1) and matched non-responders (RCB 2/3) from the phase II TBCRC 030 prospective study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel versus cisplatin in TNBC. We collected plasma samples at baseline, 3 weeks and 12 weeks (end of therapy). We created personalized ctDNA assays utilizing MAESTRO mutation enrichment sequencing. We explored associations between ctDNA and RCB status and disease recurrence.

RESULTS

Of 139 patients, 68 had complete samples and no additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-two were responders and 19 of those had sufficient tissue for whole-genome sequencing. We identified an additional 19 non-responders for a matched case-control analysis of 38 patients using a MAESTRO ctDNA assay tracking 319-1000 variants (median 1000 variants) to 114 plasma samples from 3 timepoints. Overall, ctDNA positivity was 100% at baseline, 79% at week 3 and 55% at week 12. Median tumor fraction (TFx) was 3.7 × 10-4 (range 7.9 × 10-7-4.9 × 10-1). TFx decreased 285-fold from baseline to week 3 in responders and 24-fold in non-responders. Week 12 ctDNA clearance correlated with RCB: clearance was observed in 10 of 11 patients with RCB 0, 3 of 8 with RCB 1, 4 of 15 with RCB 2 and 0 of 4 with RCB 3. Among six patients with known recurrence, five had persistent ctDNA at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for TNBC reduced ctDNA TFx by 285-fold in responders and 24-fold in non-responders. In 58% (22/38) of patients, ctDNA TFx dropped below the detection level of a commercially available test, emphasizing the need for sensitive tests. Additional studies will determine whether ctDNA-guided approaches can improve outcomes.

Modulation of the proteostasis network promotes tumor resistance to oncogenic KRAS inhibitors

Despite substantial advances in targeting mutant KRAS, tumor resistance to KRAS inhibitors (KRASi) remains a major barrier to progress. Here, we report proteostasis reprogramming as a key convergence point of multiple KRASi-resistance mechanisms. Inactivation of oncogenic KRAS down-regulated both the heat shock response and the inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) branch of the unfolded protein response, causing severe proteostasis disturbances. However, IRE1α was selectively reactivated in an ER stress-independent manner in acquired KRASi-resistant tumors, restoring proteostasis. Oncogenic KRAS promoted IRE1α protein stability through extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent phosphorylation of IRE1α, leading to IRE1α disassociation from 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl reductase degradation (HRD1) E3-ligase. In KRASi-resistant tumors, both reactivated ERK and hyperactivated AKT restored IRE1α phosphorylation and stability. Suppression of IRE1α overcame resistance to KRASi. This study reveals a druggable mechanism that leads to proteostasis reprogramming and facilitates KRASi resistance.

High FOXA1 levels induce ER transcriptional reprogramming, a pro-metastatic secretome, and metastasis in endocrine-resistant breast cancer

Aberrant activation of the forkhead protein FOXA1 is observed in advanced hormone-related cancers. However, the key mediators of high FOXA1 signaling remain elusive. We demonstrate that ectopic high FOXA1 (H-FOXA1) expression promotes estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) metastasis in a xenograft mouse model. Mechanistically, H-FOXA1 reprograms ER-chromatin binding to elicit a core gene signature (CGS) enriched in ER+ endocrine-resistant (EndoR) cells. We identify Secretome14, a CGS subset encoding ER-dependent cancer secretory proteins, as a strong predictor for poor outcomes of ER+ BC. It is elevated in ER+ metastases vs. primary tumors, irrespective of ESR1 mutations. Genomic ER binding near Secretome14 genes is also increased in mutant ER-expressing or mitogen-treated ER+ BC cells and in ER+ metastatic vs. primary tumors, suggesting a convergent pathway including high growth factor receptor signaling in activating pro-metastatic secretome genes. Our findings uncover H-FOXA1-induced ER reprogramming that drives EndoR and metastasis partly via an H-FOXA1/ER-dependent secretome.

A Multiparameter Molecular Classifier to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Lapatinib plus Trastuzumab without Chemotherapy in HER2+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Clinical trials reported 25% to 30% pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2+ patients with breast cancer treated with anti-HER2 therapies without chemotherapy. We hypothesize that a multiparameter classifier can identify patients with HER2-"addicted" tumors who may benefit from a chemotherapy-sparing strategy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Baseline HER2+ breast cancer specimens from the TBCRC023 and PAMELA trials, which included neoadjuvant treatment with lapatinib and trastuzumab, were used. In the case of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) tumors, endocrine therapy was also administered. HER2 protein and gene amplification (ratio), HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and PIK3CA mutation status were assessed by dual gene protein assay (GPA), research-based PAM50, and targeted DNA-sequencing. GPA cutoffs and classifier of response were constructed in TBCRC023 using a decision tree algorithm, then validated in PAMELA.

RESULTS

In TBCRC023, 72 breast cancer specimens had GPA, PAM50, and sequencing data, of which 15 had pCR. Recursive partitioning identified cutoffs of HER2 ratio ≥ 4.6 and %3+ IHC staining ≥ 97.5%. With PAM50 and sequencing data, the model added HER2-E and PIK3CA wild-type (WT). For clinical implementation, the classifier was locked as HER2 ratio ≥ 4.5, %3+ IHC staining ≥ 90%, and PIK3CA-WT and HER2-E, yielding 55% and 94% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, respectively. Independent validation using 44 PAMELA cases with all three biomarkers yielded 47% PPV and 82% NPV. Importantly, our classifier's high NPV signifies its strength in accurately identifying patients who may not be good candidates for treatment deescalation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multiparameter classifier differentially identifies patients who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy alone from those who need chemotherapy and predicts pCR to anti-HER2 therapy alone comparable with chemotherapy plus dual anti-HER2 therapy in unselected patients.

Real-World Perspectives and Practices for Pneumonitis/Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Use in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancer

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody drug conjugate with a topoisomerase I payload that targets the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). T-DXd is approved for patients with previously treated HER2-positive or HER2-low (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-) metastatic/unresectable breast cancer (BC). In a second-line HER2-positive metastatic BC (mBC) population (DESTINY-Breast03 [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03529110]), T-DXd demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) over ado-trastuzumab emtansine (12-month rate: 75.8% v 34.1%; hazard ratio, 0.28; P < .001), and in patients with HER2-low mBC treated with one prior line of chemotherapy (DESTINY-Breast04 [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03734029]), T-DXd demonstrated significantly longer PFS and overall survival than physician's choice chemotherapy (10.1 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.51; P < .001, and 23.4 v 16.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.64; P < .001, respectively).Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an umbrella term used for a group of diseases characterized by lung injury including pneumonitis, which can lead to irreversible lung fibrosis. ILD is a well-described adverse event associated with certain anticancer therapies, including T-DXd. An important part of T-DXd therapy for mBC consists of monitoring for and managing ILD. Although information on ILD management strategies is included in the prescribing information, additional information on patient selection, monitoring, and treatment can be beneficial in routine clinical practice. The objective of this review is to describe real-world, multidisciplinary clinical practices and institutional protocols used for patient selection/screening, monitoring, and management related to T-DXd-associated ILD.

Kinase Inhibitor Pulldown Assay Identifies a Chemotherapy Response Signature in Triple-negative Breast Cancer Based on Purine-binding Proteins

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) constitutes 10%-15% of all breast tumors. The current standard of care is multiagent chemotherapy, which is effective in only a subset of patients. The original objective of this study was to deploy a mass spectrometry (MS)-based kinase inhibitor pulldown assay (KIPA) to identify kinases elevated in non-pCR (pathologic complete response) cases for therapeutic targeting. Frozen optimal cutting temperature compound-embedded core needle biopsies were obtained from 43 patients with TNBC before docetaxel- and carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. KIPA was applied to the native tumor lysates that were extracted from samples with high tumor content. Seven percent of all identified proteins were kinases, and none were significantly associated with lack of pCR. However, among a large population of "off-target" purine-binding proteins (PBP) identified, seven were enriched in pCR-associated samples (P < 0.01). In orthogonal mRNA-based TNBC datasets, this seven-gene "PBP signature" was associated with chemotherapy sensitivity and favorable clinical outcomes. Functional annotation demonstrated IFN gamma response, nuclear import of DNA repair proteins, and cell death associations. Comparisons with standard tandem mass tagged-based discovery proteomics performed on the same samples demonstrated that KIPA-nominated pCR biomarkers were unique to the platform. KIPA is a novel biomarker discovery tool with unexpected utility for the identification of PBPs related to cytotoxic drug response. The PBP signature has the potential to contribute to clinical trials designed to either escalate or de-escalate therapy based on pCR probability.

Significance

The identification of pretreatment predictive biomarkers for pCR in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy would advance precision treatment for TNBC. To complement standard proteogenomic discovery profiling, a KIPA was deployed and unexpectedly identified a seven-member non-kinase PBP pCR-associated signature. Individual members served diverse pathways including IFN gamma response, nuclear import of DNA repair proteins, and cell death.

Margetuximab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Several anti-HER2 agents are approved for third-line treatment and beyond (after first-line and second-line); however, no specific treatment strategy is recommended for third-line and beyond. Although these agents improve disease outcomes, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer remains incurable and there is an unmet need for effective therapies in the later line setting. This review focuses on the development of margetuximab-cmkb, a novel, Fc-engineered, anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, and its role in the systemic treatment of adult patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have received two or more prior anti-HER2 regimens, at least one of which was for metastatic disease.

Abstract 2136: Designing an immunofluorescence-based biomarker assay for detecting Rb and Phospho-Rb expression in HR+/HER2-breast cancer

Introduction: Cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have emerged as a major advance in treating hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer (HR+/HER2- BC), which accounts for over 60% of all breast tumors. However, response rate to CDK4/6i combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is only 50% or less, with de novo resistance seen in 15-30% in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic BC. Therefore, predictive biomarkers that can help select patients who are likely to derive clinical benefit from adding CDK4/6i to ET are urgently needed to spare non-responders from toxicities and cost. The long-term objective of our study is to design and develop a predictive biomarker assay that can be used on circulating tumor cells for evaluating tumor response to CDK4/6i [palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib]. In this research, we aimed to select internal controls that can be used for the immunofluorescence (IF) assay to evaluate the expression of Rb and phospho-Rb as potential predictive biomarkers for CDK4/6i therapy.

Methods: MCF7 and T47D parental (P) cells were treated with various concentrations of abemaciclib and palbociclib to determine their effects on cell growth by automated cell counting using Ensight® Multimode Plate Reader and on Rb and phospho-Rb expression by western blotting (WB) and IF using Leica SP8 STED confocal microscope. We also utilized derivatives of MCF7 and T47D cells resistant to estrogen deprivation (EDR) and/or Palbociclib (PalboR).

Results: Abemaciclib and palbociclib treatment resulted in a concentration-dependent decrease in cell growth of MCF7 P (IC50: 37.4 and 254.7 nM, respectively) and T47D P (IC50: 2.7 and 59.1 nM, respectively) cells. Abemaciclib also reduced the expression phospho/total-Rb in a concentration-dependent manner by both WB and IF. The IC50 for abemaciclib was 19 nM in MCF7 P and 24 nM in T47D P cells when detected by WB. Similarly, there was a concentration-dependent decrease in the phospho/total-Rb with abemaciclib treatment as detected by IF. Expression of both total Rb and phospho-Rb was undetectable in the P/PalboR T47D cells compared to T47D P cells by both WB and IF. Therefore, this cell line can be used as a control for lack of Rb expression. EDR/PalboR derivative of MCF7 had ~50% reduction in Rb and ~70% reduction in phospho-Rb by IF, supporting its use as a control for reduced Rb expression.

Conclusion: In summary, we have identified cell line models that can be used as internal controls for detecting the expression of total and phospho-Rb as predictive biomarkers of CDK4/6i treatment response in HR+/HER2- MBC patients. Ongoing performance validation studies are underway, including automated quantitation using digital whole slide fluorescent imaging to optimize the throughput and dynamic range of the assay.

Citation Format: Mantasha Tabassum, Alexis Ruiz, Noor M. Abdulkareem, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, George E. Miles, Meghana V. Trivedi. Designing an immunofluorescence-based biomarker assay for detecting Rb and Phospho-Rb expression in HR+/HER2-breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2136.

Circulating tumor DNA association with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer in TBCRC 030

Purpose

To examine circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its association with residual cancer burden (RCB) using an ultrasensitive assay in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT).

Patients and Methods

We identified responders (RCB-0/1) and matched non-responders (RCB-2/3) from the phase II TBCRC 030 prospective study of neoadjuvant paclitaxel vs. cisplatin in TNBC. We collected plasma samples at baseline, three weeks, and twelve weeks (end of therapy). We created personalized ctDNA assays utilizing MAESTRO mutation enrichment sequencing. We explored associations between ctDNA and RCB status and disease recurrence.

Results

Of 139 patients, 68 had complete samples and no additional NAT. Twenty-two were responders and 19 of those had sufficient tissue for whole-genome sequencing. We identified an additional 19 non-responders for a matched case-control analysis of 38 patients using a MAESTRO ctDNA assay tracking 319-1000 variants (median 1000) to 114 plasma samples from 3 timepoints. Overall, ctDNA positivity was 100% at baseline, 79% at week 3, and 55% at week 12. Median tumor fraction (TFx) was 3.7 × 10 -4 (range: 7.9 × 10 -7 to 4.9 × 10 -1 ). TFx decreased 285-fold from baseline to week 3 in responders and 24-fold in non-responders. Week 12 ctDNA clearance correlated with RCB: clearance was observed in 10/11 patients with RCB-0, 3/8 with RCB-1, 4/15 with RCB-2, and 0/4 with RCB-3. Among 6 patients with known recurrence five had persistent ctDNA at week 12.

Conclusion

NAT for TNBC reduced ctDNA TFx by 285-fold in responders and 24-fold in non-responders. In 58% (22/38) of patients, ctDNA TFx dropped below the detection level of a commercially available test, emphasizing the need for sensitive tests. Additional studies will determine if ctDNA-guided approaches can improve outcomes.

Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, and an Aromatase Inhibitor for HER2-Positive and Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic/Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: PERTAIN Final Analysis

PURPOSE

In PERTAIN's primary analysis (31 months' median follow-up), adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) with/without chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer (M/LABC). A potentially enhanced treatment effect was observed in patients with no induction chemotherapy. We present the final analysis (>6 years' median follow-up).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients (N = 258) were randomized 1:1 to pertuzumab (loading/maintenance: 840/420 mg) plus trastuzumab (loading/maintenance: 8/6 mg/kg) q3w and an AI (1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole daily) (Arm A), or trastuzumab and an AI (Arm B). Induction chemotherapy was at investigator discretion.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

PFS. Key secondary endpoints: overall survival (OS); safety.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 20.6 versus 15.8 months in Arms A and B, respectively (stratified HR, 0.67; P = 0.006). Median OS was 60.2 versus 57.2 months (stratified HR, 1.05; P = 0.78). Pertuzumab treatment effect was potentially enhanced in patients with no induction chemotherapy (26.6 versus 12.5 months). Any-grade adverse events (AEs) occurred in 122 patients per arm (96.1% versus 98.4%); grade ≥3 AEs in 72 (56.7%) and 51 (41.1%); serious AEs in 46 (36.2%) and 28 (22.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PFS benefit of pertuzumab was maintained and OS was similar between arms at final analysis. Adding pertuzumab may enhance activity in patients who do not require first-line chemotherapy for M/LABC. No new safety concerns were reported. These data provide additional evidence of the role of first-line pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive M/LABC.

Multiomics in primary and metastatic breast tumors from the AURORA US network finds microenvironment and epigenetic drivers of metastasis

The AURORA US Metastasis Project was established with the goal to identify molecular features associated with metastasis. We assayed 55 females with metastatic breast cancer (51 primary cancers and 102 metastases) by RNA sequencing, tumor/germline DNA exome and low-pass whole-genome sequencing and global DNA methylation microarrays. Expression subtype changes were observed in ~30% of samples and were coincident with DNA clonality shifts, especially involving HER2. Downregulation of estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated cell-cell adhesion genes through DNA methylation mechanisms was observed in metastases. Microenvironment differences varied according to tumor subtype; the ER+/luminal subtype had lower fibroblast and endothelial content, while triple-negative breast cancer/basal metastases showed a decrease in B and T cells. In 17% of metastases, DNA hypermethylation and/or focal deletions were identified near HLA-A and were associated with reduced expression and lower immune cell infiltrates, especially in brain and liver metastases. These findings could have implications for treating individuals with metastatic breast cancer with immune- and HER2-targeting therapies.

Proteogenomic Markers of Chemotherapy Resistance and Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Microscaled proteogenomics was deployed to probe the molecular basis for differential response to neoadjuvant carboplatin and docetaxel combination chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Proteomic analyses of pretreatment patient biopsies uniquely revealed metabolic pathways, including oxidative phosphorylation, adipogenesis, and fatty acid metabolism, that were associated with resistance. Both proteomics and transcriptomics revealed that sensitivity was marked by elevation of DNA repair, E2F targets, G2-M checkpoint, interferon-gamma signaling, and immune-checkpoint components. Proteogenomic analyses of somatic copy-number aberrations identified a resistance-associated 19q13.31-33 deletion where LIG1, POLD1, and XRCC1 are located. In orthogonal datasets, LIG1 (DNA ligase I) gene deletion and/or low mRNA expression levels were associated with lack of pathologic complete response, higher chromosomal instability index (CIN), and poor prognosis in TNBC, as well as carboplatin-selective resistance in TNBC preclinical models. Hemizygous loss of LIG1 was also associated with higher CIN and poor prognosis in other cancer types, demonstrating broader clinical implications.

SIGNIFICANCE

Proteogenomic analysis of triple-negative breast tumors revealed a complex landscape of chemotherapy response associations, including a 19q13.31-33 somatic deletion encoding genes serving lagging-strand DNA synthesis (LIG1, POLD1, and XRCC1), that correlate with lack of pathologic response, carboplatin-selective resistance, and, in pan-cancer studies, poor prognosis and CIN. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2483.

Abstract CT232: A randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HER2/neu peptide GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01

Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/neu protein delivered in combination with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb study, no recurrences were observed in the HER2+ population after 5 years of follow-up, if the patient received the 6 primary intradermal GLSI-100 injections (p = 0.0338). Immunotherapy elicited a potent response measured by skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 146 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events were observed considered related to the immunotherapy.

Trial Design: This Phase 3 trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo will be administered over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients will be stratified based on residual disease status at surgery, hormone receptor status, prior pertuzumab therapy and region. Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS), 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least 14 events have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo patients is 2.4% or greater. Up to 100 non-HLA-A*02 subjects will be enrolled in an open-label arm.

Eligibility Criteria: The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria:

1. HER2/neu positive and HLA-A*02

2. Residual disease or High risk pCR (Stage III at presentation) post neo-adjuvant therapy

3. Exclude Stage IV

4. Completed at least 90% of planned trastuzumab-based therapy

Trial Objectives:

1. To determine if GP2 therapy increases IBCFS

2. To assess the safety profile of GP2

3. To monitor immunologic responses to treatment and assess relationship to efficacy and safety

Accrual: Site selection and study start-up is in progress at multiple sites. Target enrollment is 598 subjects.

Contact information: Snehal Patel Greenwich LifeSciences, Inc. Stafford, TX Email: snehal.patel@greenwichlifesciences.com Website: greenwichlifesciences.com

Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences.

Citation Format: Snehal S. Patel, Jaye Thompson, Mira S. Patel, F. Joseph Daugherty, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F. Rimawi. A randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HER2/neu peptide GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT232.

Abstract LB517A: The role of EGFR in resistance to tucatinib and its therapeutic implications

Tucatinib (Tuc) was recently approved for metastatic disease and is moving towards the early setting in HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Given the increasing clinical use of Tuc, resistance will likely soon emerge as a challenge. Here, we explore the yet unknown mechanisms of resistance to Tuc and identify treatment strategies to overcome it. Our recently developed models of BT474 (AZ and ATCC) with acquired resistance to Tuc (TucR) and their sensitive parental (P) were used. DNA-seq, RNA-seq, and RPPA/western blot were performed. Knockdown studies were performed using EGFR siRNA. Drug efficacy studies involved cell growth assays by imaging-based or methylene blue assays. We recently reported (SABCS 2021) that our BT474 TucR models acquired EGFR amplification. The TucR cells displayed elevated levels of phosphorylated (p) and total (t) EGFR, pHER2, pHER3, and downstream pAKT and pS6, which were substantially suppressed by the EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) gefitinib (Gef) or even further when combined with Tuc. Our new results demonstrate that EGFR knockdown selectively inhibits the growth and pHER2 levels in TucR vs P cells, supporting our hypothesis that heterodimerization of amplified EGFR with HER2 leads to higher pHER2 levels in TucR cells. We have recently also shown that TucR models were hypersensitive to Gef and this inhibition was further enhanced with Gef+Tuc, implying their survival dependence on EGFR. Here, we demonstrate that the TucR cells made resistant to 200nM Tuc maintain their resistant growth and elevated EGFR-dependent signaling even when exposed to 500nM, and can begrown as xenografts in the presence of clinically relevant dose of Tuc, emphasizing their true resistance via amplified EGFR. Importantly, both TucR models vs P cells were cross-resistant to trastuzumab but maintain partial sensitivity to TDM1. While the EGFR-specific antibody cetuximab (Cet) was partially effective as a single agent only in the ATCC model, it potently inhibited growth and induced cell killing in combination with Tuc in both models. A significantly greater inhibition in cell growth and survival was also observed when trastuzumab or TDM1 was combined with either Gef or Cet. Taken together, our results suggest that the activation of HER2 and the resistant growth and survival in the TucR models is completely dependent on the amplified EGFR, which we are currently further corroborating by additional mechanistic and xenograft studies. Whilst we have previously reported that resistance to lapatinib and neratinib confer cross-resistance to Tuc, our recent findings show that resistance to Tuc may be overcome using dual/pan-HER TKIs or the combination of potent EGFR and HER2 inhibitors. Overall, our novel findings hold crucial implications in light of the current treatment landscape of HER2+ BC and biomarkers of resistance, and places a particular emphasis on considerations to sequence currently available TKIs.

Citation Format: Jamunarani Veeraraghavan, Fu-Tien Liao, Tia Gordon, Pier Selenica, Sarmistha Nanda, Lanfang Qin, Yingjie Zhu, Juber A. Patel, Andrea Gazzo, Fabio Stossi, Michael A. Mancini, Carolina Gutierrez, Britta Weigelt, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, Rachel Schiff. The role of EGFR in resistance to tucatinib and its therapeutic implications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr LB517A.

A randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HER2/neu peptide GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, Flamingo-01

TPS1110

Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/ neu protein delivered in combination with Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers, the combination known as GLSI-100. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb study, no recurrences were observed in the HER2+ population after 5 years of follow-up, if the patient was treated with GLSI-100, survived and was followed from more than 6 months ( p = 0.0338). Immunotherapy elicited a potent response measured by skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 146 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events were observed considered related to the immunotherapy. Methods: This Phase 3 trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo will be administered over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients will be stratified based on residual disease status at surgery, hormone receptor status and region. Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in invasive breast cancer free survival (IBCFS), 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least 14 events have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo patients is 2.4% or greater. Up to 100 non-HLA-A*02 subjects will be enrolled in an open-label arm. Eligibility Criteria: The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria: HER2/neu positive and HLA-A*02; Residual disease or High risk pCR (Stage III at presentation) post neo-adjuvant therapy; Exclude Stage IV; Completed at least 90% of planned trastuzumab-based therapy. Trial Objectives: To determine if GP2 therapy increases IBCFS; To assess the safety profile of GP2; To monitor immunologic responses to treatment and assess relationship to efficacy and safety. Accrual: Site selection and study start-up is in progress at multiple sites. Target enrollment is 598 subjects. Clinical trial information: 05232916.

Effect of mevalonate pathway inhibitors on outcomes of patients (pts) with HER2-positive early breast cancer (BC) in the ALTTO trial

522

Background: Our preclinical findings suggest a role for the mevalonate pathway (MVA) in treatment resistance in HER2+ BC by providing alternative growth and survival signaling to bypass potent HER2 blockade, which could be overcome by the MVA inhibitors statins and nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (NBs). Here we explored the effect of MVA inhibitors’ use on pts’ outcomes in the ALTTO trial (BIG2-06; NCT00490139). Methods: In the ALTTO trial, 8381 pts with HER2+ BC were randomized to 1 year of adjuvant lapatinib (L), trastuzumab (T), L+T, or T→L. All pts with documented treatment start with statins or NBs < 1 year after randomization were considered as MVA inhibitors users. Survival curves, with a median follow-up of 6.9 years, for disease-free survival (DFS), distant relapse-free interval (DRFI), BC-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS) according to MVA inhibitors use were estimated by the Kaplan Meier method and Log-rank test. All multivariate survival analyses employed a Cox proportional hazards regression model, adjusting for tumor size, nodal status, hormonal receptor (HoR), menopausal status, BMI, timing of chemo, and randomization arm. We considered interactions terms in Cox’s model between MVA inhibitors use and randomization arm, hormonal status, and BMI group. Results: Among the 8381 pts included in this study, 493 and 299 were statins or NBs users, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the significant differences in pts’ characteristics according to MVA inhibitors use ( P <.005). In multivariate survival analyses, only NBs use was associated independently with better BCSS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23 - 0.84; P = 0.014). Statin use was not independently associated with prognosis but only in interaction with pts characteristics: worse DFS, BCSS and OS in pts treated with L+T, worse DRFI and OS in pts treated with HoR+ BC (respective interaction P-values <0.05 in the Cox’s model). Conclusions: NBs independently predicted improved BC-specific outcome in pts with HER2+ BC treated with adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Statin use was associated with an inferior outcome in pts with HoR+ disease and/or those treated with L+T. Whether this inferior association in statin users may reflect the underlying predisposition factors that can weaken the efficacy of anti-HER2 treatments and whether this effect was observed only in the L+T arm due to the more potent inhibition of the HER2 signaling pathway remain open questions. Further clinical investigations on the impact of MVA inhibitors on the outcome of pts with HER2+ BC are warranted. [Table: see text]

Abstract PD8-06: Acquired resistance to tucatinib is associated with EGFR amplification in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) models and can be overcome by a more complete blockade of HER receptor layer

Background: With recent approval of the irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib (N) and the HER2-specific TKI tucatinib (T) in the advanced setting and their edging towards the early setting in HER2+ BC, resistance will likely emerge as a challenge, as illustrated by the HER2CLIMB study, where only one patient with brain metastasis remained progression free after 2 years on T. We set out to define the mechanisms of resistance to T and treatment strategies to overcome it. Materials and Methods: Our previously characterized HER2+ BT474 models with acquired resistance to lapatinib (L; LapR) or N (NrbR) (SABCS20-PD3-09), and our recently developed models of BT474 and SKBR3 with acquired resistance to T (TucaR) developed through long-term exposure to increasing doses of T (up to 200nM) and their naïve parental (P) were used. Genomic (DNA-seq), transcriptomic (RNA-seq), and proteomic (RPPA, western blot) characterization were performed. Drug efficacy studies involved cell growth assays by the imaging-based IncuCyte system. Results: We recently reported that while LapR is associated with acquisition of HER2 L755S mutation, which partially reactivates the HER pathway, NrbR is associated with the additional co-acquisition of a pathogenic PIK3CA mutation. Preliminary analysis of 2 BT474 TucaR models (ATCC and AZ) showed highly elevated levels of phosphorylated (p) and total (t) EGFR, suggesting EGFR signaling activation. Levels of pHER2, pHER3, and downstream pAKT and pS6 were also markedly higher in the TucaR models compared to P or short-term T. The TucaR but not LapR or NrbR models exhibited EGFR amplification, explaining the higher EGFR levels and signaling. Further, the elevated pEGFR, pHER2, pHER3, pAKT, and pS6 levels in TucaR models were substantially suppressed by the EGFR-specific TKI gefitinib (G) (50, 500nM) or even further when combined with T (500 nM G+200nM T). These results suggest that the higher pHER2 levels in TucaR models is probably due to heterodimerization of the amplified EGFR with HER2 and subsequent HER2 phosphorylation. In contrast to the P cells where the apoptotic marker cleaved (c)-PARP was not induced with G alone (50, 500nM), but with T (200nM) or 500nM G+T, in the TucaR model, 500nM G alone was enough to induce c-PARP, which was further enhanced when combined with T, implying the survival dependence of TucaR cells on EGFR signaling. The TucaR models were hypersensitive to G compared to P cells, and this growth inhibition was further enhanced with G+T. Whilst we previously reported that the LapR and NrbR cells were cross-resistant to T, the TucaR cells remained highly sensitive to the pan-HER TKIs N, poziotinib, and pyrotinib. Finally, in a second HER2+ model SKBR3, at 200nM TucaR, we observed elevated pEGFR, pHER2, pHER3, and pAKT levels, the underlying mechanism of which is under investigation by genomic and molecular analysis. In-depth characterization of our TucaR models to determine the differential gene expression and signatures is ongoing to gain additional mechanistic insights. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that whilst complete blockade of the HER layer using N is evaded by acquisition of HER and PIK3CA mutations, resistance to the HER2 TKI T is associated with EGFR amplification, a finding that underscores the HER signaling pathway redundancy and cross-talk between HER receptors to compensate for partial blockade of the pathway. Further, while resistance to L and N confers cross-resistance to T, resistance to T may be overcome using pan-HER TKIs or the combination of potent EGFR and HER2 inhibitors. Together, our findings hold crucial implications in light of the current treatment landscape of HER2+ BC, with a particular emphasis on the considerations to strategize the treatment sequence of currently available TKIs.

Citation Format: Jamunarani Veeraraghavan, Sreyashree Bose, Ragini Mistry, Pier Selenica, Sarmistha Nanda, Lanfang Qin, Andrea Gazzo, Yingjie Zhu, Michael A Mancini, Fabio Stossi, Britta Weigelt, Jorge S Reis-Filho, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Rachel Schiff. Acquired resistance to tucatinib is associated with EGFR amplification in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) models and can be overcome by a more complete blockade of HER receptor layer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-06.

Abstract P4-01-01: Resistance to next generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC): Role of HER and PIK3CA mutations and development of new treatment strategies and study models

Background: We recently reported that acquired resistance to the dual HER1/2 TKI lapatinib (Lap) was mediated by HER2 L755S, while resistance to the pan-HER TKI neratinib (Nrb) was associated with co-acquisition of an additional pathogenic PIK3CA mutation. Though the role of HER2 mutations is gaining attention in HER2-positive (+) BC, less is known about their role and clinical implications in next generation TKI resistance, particularly when co-occurring with PIK3CA mutations in HER2+ BC. Investigating optimal treatment combinations and the development of new clinically relevant 3D models are warranted.Materials and Methods: HER2+ BT474 parental (P) cells and models with acquired resistance to Lap (LapR) and Nrb (NrbR) (SABCS20-PD3-09) were used. Xenografts established in mice using P, LapR, and NrbR cells and 3D organoids derived from these xenografts using the Hans Clevers (HC, PMID 29224780) or Mark Burkard (MB, PMID 31175091) method were characterized by qRT-PCR and western blot. Drug efficacy was assessed by growth changes in 2D and 3D models using the IncuCyte system or by microscopy-based analysis. Results: We previously showed that Lap and Nrb resistance confers cross-resistance to tucatinib (Tuca) and trastuzumab, and that targeting the HER and downstream PI3K pathway, especially using small molecule agents that are key for treatment of CNS lesions, is effective only in combination with Nrb or poziotinib (Pozio), but not Tuca. Our new studies revealed that the MEK inhibitor (i) AZD6244 (selumetinib; Sel), mTORi everolimus (Eve), and selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant (Ful) were not effective as single agents in inhibiting the growth of either LapR or NrbR models. Whilst the LapR cells were highly sensitive to the irreversible HER1/2 TKI afatinib (Afa) and the irreversible dual/pan-HER TKI pyrotinib (Pyro) as single agents, the NrbR models were cross-resistant to both TKIs, highlighting the importance of the co-occurring PIK3CA mutation in resistance. Interestingly, Afa and Pyro were only partly effective when combined with Eve+Ful, Sel+Eve, or Sel+the PIK3CAi alpelisib in inhibiting NrbR growth. Consistent with our previously reported findings for Nrb and Pozio, Pyro was highly effective with TDM1. As opposed to the P xenografts, the LapR and NrbR tumors grew in the presence of the respective TKI, confirming their resistant phenotype in vivo. P and resistant xenograft-derived organoids (XDOs) were successfully established using the HC but not MB method, but the HC-derived XDOs were subsequently grown in MB condition and used for molecular and functional studies. Preliminary characterization showed that the LapR tumors and XDOs harbor HER2 L755S, whereas the NrbR tumors and XDOs also have a concomitant PIK3CA E542V mutation, findings that are in line with our 2D results, suggesting that the xenografts and XDOs retain and recapitulate the molecular profile of their 2D or tumor counterparts. Early drug efficacy studies indicate that, akin to the 2D models, the LapR XDOs are highly sensitive to Nrb, whereas both the LapR and NrbR XDOs exhibit cross-resistance to Tuca but remain sensitive to Pozio.Conclusions: Our data suggest that the potency of next generation irreversible HER TKIs in HER2+ BC may be challenged by the emergence of mutations in HER2, together with other co-occurring downstream mutations, such as PIK3CA. Our findings present a clear roadmap for the development of combinatorial therapies that should be individualized for patients with HER2+ BC. Our newly developed XDO strategy may offer a new platform to confirm and prioritize optimal drug combinations to overcome this resistance and may facilitate the near future development of patient-derived organoids for precision medicine of resistant HER2+ BC.

Citation Format: Sreyashree Bose, Ragini Mistry, Chia Chia Liu, Sarmistha Nanda, Lanfang Qin, Pier Selenica, Andrea Gazzo, Yingjie Zhu, Michael A. Mancini, Fabio Stossi, Irmina Diala, Lisa D. Eli, Britta Weigelt, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, C. Kent Osborne, Rachel Schiff, Jamunarani Veeraraghavan. Resistance to next generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HER2-positive breast cancer (BC): Role of HER and PIK3CA mutations and development of new treatment strategies and study models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-01.

Abstract OT1-18-07: A randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HER2/neu peptide GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy

Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/neu protein delivered in combination with an FDA-approved immunoadjuvant Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF, Sargramostim, Leukine) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb clinical trial, no recurrences were observed in the HER2/neu positive adjuvant setting after median 5 years of follow-up, if the HLA-A*02 patient received the 6 primary intradermal GLSI-100 injections over the first 6 months (p = 0.0338) in a pre-specified subgroup analysis. Furthermore, the immunotherapy elicited a potent immune response measured by local skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 138 patients that have been treated with GLSI-100 to date over 4 clinical trials, GLSI-100 was well-tolerated and no serious adverse events were observed related to the immunotherapy. This Phase III trial aims to reproduce the Phase IIb trial and will explore the use of GLSI-100 as adjuvant therapy to increase invasive disease-free survival in HER2/neu positive and HLA-A*02 patients, post-surgery and following the first year of treatment with any trastuzumab-based therapy. Method: This Phase 3 trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy or an approved biosimilar, 6 intradermal injections of GLSI-100 or placebo (Bacteriostatic Saline/WFI) will be administered for the primary immunization series over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters will be administered over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years of treatment. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 1 additional year follow-up for a total of 4 years following the first year of treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. An interim analysis is planned, and patients will be stratified based on prior and current treatments. Study Size - Interim Analysis: Approximately 498 patients will be enrolled. To detect a hazard ratio of 0.3 in IDFS, 28 events will be required. An interim analysis for superiority and futility will be conducted when at least half of those events, 14, have occurred. This sample size provides 80% power if the annual rate of events in placebo-treated patients is 2.4% or greater. Eligibility Criteria: The patient population is defined by these key eligibility criteria:

Trial Objectives:

Contact information: Website: greenwichlifesciences.com. Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences.

Citation Format: Snehal S Patel, David B McWilliams, Christine T Fischette, Jaye Thompson, F. Joseph Daugherty, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F Rimawi. A randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HER2/neu peptide GLSI-100 (GP2 + GM-CSF) in patients with residual disease or high-risk PCR after both neo-adjuvant and postoperative adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-18-07.

Abstract PD1-05: Targeting the FRA1-dependent transcriptional nexus in high FOXA1-driven endocrine-resistant and metastatic breast cancer

Background: Aberrant activation of the pioneer transcription factor (TF) FOXA1 contributes to endocrine resistance and metastasis in ER+ breast cancer (BC) by promoting genome-wide enhancer and transcriptional reprogramming that engages the AP-1 TF complex. Identification of central transcriptional nexuses in this deregulated network is key for developing new therapeutic interventions focusing on transcriptional programs. We previously identified FRA1, among the AP-1 components, as the top super-enhancer target forming a FOXA1/FRA1-centered transcriptional axis to activate genes enriched in luminal B-subtype BC and ER+ metastases. To further dissect the FOXA1/FRA1-centered transcriptional axis and its potential therapeutic role, we employed integrative multi-omics data analysis and functional studies targeting FRA1 using our MCF7-parental (P) and FOXA1-amplifed tamoxifen-resistant (TamR) preclinical models. Methods: RNA-seq data were obtained in MCF7-P and TamR cells with FOXA1 and/or AP-1 (FRA1 and c-Jun) perturbation via overexpression and/or si/shRNA knockdown (KD). Differential gene expression was analyzed using DESeq2 or the limma-voom R package. ChIP-seq-based genome-wide FOXA1 binding sites were further refined by intersection with promoter-tethered regions (PTRs) denoting Hi-C-mapped chromatin looping. Genomic binding of FOXA1/c-Jun and H3K27ac modification at target gene loci were aligned and visualized by IGV. Significance of gene set enrichment was determined using a chi-square test adjusted for multiple comparisons. Clinical relevance was examined using an RNA-seq dataset of ER+ metastatic BC (SABCS19-GS2-02). Clonogenicity, soft agar, and wound-healing assays were performed using MCF7-TamR cell derivatives engineered for doxycycline (Dox)-inducible KD of FRA1 or NS shRNA. Significance of the KD effects in functional assays was determined using a linear mixed-effects model. Results: We found that FRA1 and the two embryonic TFs SOX9 and KLF4 that harbor FOXA1-bound PTRs were commonly down-regulated in TamR cells upon KD of FOXA1, FRA1, or c-Jun. We observed increased c-Jun binding at the FOXA1-bound super-enhancer and the PTR looping to the FRA1 gene locus in TamR vs. P cells, suggesting a feed-forward mechanism by which FRA1 transcription is strengthened by the AP-1-engaged super-enhancer in TamR cells. Among the FOXA1-activated genes in TamR cells, a subset of secretory protein-encoding genes was more enriched in the genes commonly dependent on both FRA1 and c-Jun, vs. the genes depending on either FRA1 or c-Jun alone. This FOXA1/FRA1/c-Jun-activated secretome is enriched for multiple biological processes engaged in tumor metastasis and associated microenvironmental niches, and was upregulated in clinical ER+ metastases vs. primary tumors. A larger proportion of this secretome, including CXCL8 and S100P, also relies on ER preferentially in TamR vs. P cells (40% vs. 16%, respectively). FRA1 KD using two different shRNA sequences in TamR cells reduced SOX9 and KLF4 expression levels, and significantly diminished clonogenicity, soft agar colony formation, and wound healing, compared to the control NS KD. Conclusions: Our integrative bioinformatics analyses reveal a feed-forward mechanism on FRA1 activation in amplifying high-FOXA1-induced transcriptional reprogramming in endocrine resistance. A prometastatic secretome activated by FRA1/c-Jun may represent a main transcriptional output of the FOXA1/FRA1-dependent nexus in promoting ER+ disease progression. These identified key transcriptional nexuses may present network hotspots susceptible to therapeutic interventions in which FRA1 inhibition could be used as a new transcriptional program-oriented therapy to treat advanced ER+ BC.

Citation Format: Chia Chia Liu, Lanfang Qin, Carmine De Angelis, Sarmistha Nanda, Resel Pereira, Martin J. Shea, Agostina Nardone, Rinath Jeselsohn, Ofir Cohen, Nikhil Wagle, Zhijie Liu, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, C. Kent Osborne, Rachel Schiff, Xiaoyong Fu. Targeting the FRA1-dependent transcriptional nexus in high FOXA1-driven endocrine-resistant and metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-05.

Abstract P1-07-04: Potential role of the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in tumors achieving pCR in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52

Background: The NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 neoadjuvant clinical trial was conducted to test if the addition of estrogen deprivation (ED) would improve the pCR rate in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer patients (pts) treated with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP). A numerical increase in pCR rate was observed with ED (46.1% v 40.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant. We have previously quantitated T cells (CD8, FOXP3), macrophages (CD68), and immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1, PD-L1) with multiplex immunofluorescence in B-52 and shown that CD68 and FOXP3 cells were associated with pCR but not CD8 cells. Our purpose was to determine the associations of FCGR genotypes and immune cells with pCR. Methods: A single baseline, pre-treatment FFFPE tissue section per case (N=181) was used to perform a 7-plex multiplex immunofluorescence procedure using opal fluorophores for staining. The Vectra Pathology System and inForm analysis software (Akoya Biosciences) was used for imaging and quantitation of CD8, CD68, FOXP3, PD-1, and PD-L1 cells in both the tumoral and stromal regions. Stromal data is reported here. Favorable- and unfavorable- FcGγR genotypes for FCGR2A-131H/R and FCGR3A-158V/F alleles were determined via the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Rates of pCR with pts with 1 or 2 favorable alleles was compared to pts who were homozygous for the unfavorable allele. Within each genotype, Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test the association of markers with pCR and within each treatment. Results: No significant association of FCGR2A and 3A alleles with pCR was detected in the entire B-52 cohort, however, among pts with favorable FCGR genotypes (FCGR2A-131-HH, or H/R, FCGR3A-158- VV, or VF HR) the median value of the % CD68 cells was significantly higher in tumors that achieved pCR v those that did not (p=0.0004, p=0.0006), respectively. In pts who were homozygous for the FCGR2A or FCGR3A unfavorable alleles, there was no significant difference in the median values of the % of CD68 cells between pCR and no-pCR tumors. Further stratification of tumors by treatment showed that pts with an FCGR2A or FCGR3A favorable genotype and whose tumors achieved pCR had a higher median value of CD68 only in the TCHP + ED arm (p=0.0007, p=0.0003), respectively and not in the TCHP arm (p=0.059; p=0.21). Higher levels of PD-L1 were associated with pCR in pts with FCGR3A- favorable genotypes, but higher levels of FOXP3 were associated with pCR regardless of genotype. In contrast to the other cell types, higher PD-1 or CD8 cells showed no association with genotypes. Conclusions: This is an exploratory study examining the potential role of ADCP in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer and supports the notion that ADCP may be one mechanism that promotes the elimination of tumor cells in a subset of pts in the neoadjuvant setting. Tumors that achieve pCR have higher % of CD68 cells, in pts with favorable FCGR2A and 3A genotypes than pts who do not. However, in pts with unfavorable FCGR3A or FCGR2A genotypes there was no difference in the median CD68 levels in pCR v no-pCR tumors. When tumors were further stratified by CD68 levels, FCGR3A genotypes, and treatment, the association of pCR in tumors with high CD68 and FCGR3A favorable genotypes was seen only in the TCHP+ED arm. This may indicate that ED may improve pCR rates in some tumors with more macrophages and favorable genotypes. Macrophages are known to have estrogen receptors, and estrogen has been shown to promote the alternative activation of macrophages, potentially dampening down the immune response. Thus, one could speculate that ED may block the estrogen-induced alternative activation of macrophages, allowing the classically activated macrophages to phagocytize tumor cells. Support: BCRF, U10CA180868 & Admin Sup, U24CA196067, Genentech, NSABP Foun.

Citation Format: Katherine L Pogue-Geile, Ying Wang, Huichen Feng, Corey Lipchick, Patrick Gavin, Rim S Kim, Reena S Cecchini, Samuel A Jacobs, Ashok Srinivasan, Sandra M Swain, Eleftherios Mamounas, Charles E Geyer, Jr, Priya Rastogi, Peter C Lucas, C. Kent Osborne, Soonmyung Paik, Norman Wolmark, Mothaffar F Rimawi. Potential role of the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in tumors achieving pCR in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-04.

Abstract OT2-11-09: Lidera breast cancer: A phase III adjuvant study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) vs physician’s choice of endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer (ER+/HER2- EBC)

BACKGROUND ETs that target ER activity and/or estrogen synthesis are the mainstay of ER+ BC treatment. Despite best management, up to 20% of pts with ER+/HER2- eBC develop resistance (in some cases due to the acquisition of tumor mutations in ESR1 that can drive estrogen-independent transcription and proliferation) and still have high recurrence rates on standard ETs. New treatment alternatives for ER+/HER2- eBC are needed to reduce risk of recurrence and improve survival, tolerability, quality of life, and adherence. Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal oral selective ER antagonist and degrader (SERD). It achieves robust ER occupancy and is active against tumors that retain ER-sensitivity or have ESR1 mutation(s). Giredestrant has been demonstrated to be more potent in vitro and achieves higher ER occupancy in vivo than fulvestrant, the only currently approved SERD. Early phase clinical studies have demonstrated that single-agent giredestrant (30 mg daily) has promising clinical and pharmacodynamic activity, and is well-tolerated in the ER+/HER2- eBC and metastatic BC settings. TRIAL DESIGN This is a phase III, global, randomized, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant giredestrant vs physician’s choice of adjuvant ET in pts with medium- and high-risk stage I-III histologically confirmed ER+/HER2- eBC. Pts are randomized 1:1 to oral 30 mg daily giredestrant or physician’s choice of standard ET (tamoxifen, anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane, given according to prescribing information). Stratification factors are risk (medium vs high, based on anatomic [tumor size, nodal status] and biologic features [grade, Ki67, gene signatures if available]); geographic region (US/Canada/Western Europe vs Asia-Pacific vs rest of the world); prior chemotherapy (no vs yes); and menopausal status (pre-/perimenopausal vs postmenopausal). Beginning on Day 1 of Cycle 1, pts will be treated with giredestrant or physician’s choice of standard ET for at least 5 years. Continuing physician’s choice of standard ET after 5 years is at discretion of the investigator and per local standard of care. ELIGIBILITY Female/male pts with medium-/high-risk stage I-III ER+/HER2- eBC; prior curative surgery; completion of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (if administered) and/or surgery &lt;12 months prior to enrolment; no prior ET (up to 4 weeks of [neo]adjuvant ET is allowed). For men and pre-/perimenopausal women, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist will be given per local prescribing information (mandatory for pts in the giredestrant arm). AIMS Primary endpoint: Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; IDFS (STEEP definition, including second non-primary BC); disease-free survival; distant recurrence-free survival; locoregional recurrence-free interval; safety; pharmacokinetics; pt-reported outcomes. In addition, this study aims to improve health equity in research and expand clinical trial access. The study will also use/develop digital healthcare solutions, which will enable better understanding of patients’ needs and their adherence to ET. STATISTICAL METHODS The primary endpoint analysis will use a stratified log-rank test at an overall 0.05 significance level (two-sided). An interim analysis and a futility analysis are planned, and an independent data monitoring committee will be in place. ACCRUAL Target enrollment is 4100 pts globally once the study is open for enrollment. CONTACT INFORMATION For more information or to refer a patient, email global.rochegenentechtrials@roche.com or call 1-888-662-6728 (USA only). Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT04961996.

Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Peter Schmid, Nadia Harbeck, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Sara A Hurvitz, Sherene Loi, Shigehira Saji, Kyung Hae Jung, Gustavo Werutsky, Daniil Stroyakovskii, Vanesa López-Valverde, David Tesarowski, Chenglin Ye, Michael Davis, Tanja Badovinac Crnjevic, Pablo Diego Perez-Moreno, Charles E Geyer, Jr. Lidera breast cancer: A phase III adjuvant study of giredestrant (GDC-9545) vs physician’s choice of endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer (ER+/HER2- EBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-11-09.

Biomarkers of Response and Resistance to Palbociclib Plus Letrozole in Patients With ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To determine (i) the relationship between candidate biomarkers of the antiproliferative (Ki67) response to letrozole and palbociclib alone and combined in ER⁺/HER2^- breast cancer; and (ii) the pharmacodynamic effect of the agents on the biomarkers.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

307 postmenopausal women with ER⁺/HER2^- primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole for 14 weeks; letrozole for 2 weeks, then letrozole+palbociclib to 14 weeks; palbociclib for 2 weeks, then letrozole+palbociclib to 14 weeks; or letrozole+palbociclib for 14 weeks. Biopsies were taken at baseline, 2 and 14 weeks and surgery at varying times after stopping palbociclib. Immunohistochemical analyses were conducted for Ki67, c-PARP, ER, PgR, RB1, CCNE1, and CCND1.

RESULTS

Higher baselines ER and PgR were significantly associated with a greater chance of complete cell-cycle arrest (CCCA: Ki67 <2.7%) at 14 weeks and higher baseline Ki67, c-PARP, and CCNE1 with a lower chance. The interaction with treatment was significant only for c-PARP. CCND1 levels were decreased c.20% by letrozole at 2 and 14 weeks but showed a tendency to increase with palbociclib. CCNE1 levels fell 82% (median) in tumors showing CCCA but were unchanged in those with no CCCA. Only 2/9 tumors showed CCCA 3-9 days after stopping palbociclib. ESR1 mutations were found in 2/4 tumors for which surgery took place ≥6 months after starting treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

High CCNE1 levels were confirmed as a biomarker of resistance to letrozole+palbociclib. Ki67 recovery within 3-9 days of discontinuing palbociclib indicates incomplete suppression of proliferation during the "off" week of its schedule.

Management of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Estrogen receptor (ER) is the major driver of most metastatic breast cancers (mBCs). Endocrine therapy (ET) is the most effective treatment for ER + mBC, but its effectiveness is limited by high rates of de novo and acquired resistance. A growing understanding of the biological characteristics and complexity of the ER pathway and the mechanisms of ET resistance has led to the development of a new generation of targeted therapies. One such mechanism is the cell cycle signaling pathways, which lead to the development of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) that have, in turn, transformed the management of such tumors. Another important mechanism is the alteration of the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway. Drugs targeting each component of these pathways are currently used in clinical practice, and several more are in development. As a result, a myriad of new targeted therapies are consistently being added to the clinical oncologist armamentarium. Navigating the evolving and highly complex treatment landscape of HR + /HER2- mBC remains both an art and a challenge. In this review, we discuss the biological features of HR + /HER2- mBC and the different mechanisms of resistance to ET. We also discuss the management of mBC as the disease changes from endocrine-sensitive to endocrine-resistant.

Activation of the IFN Signaling Pathway is Associated with Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Activation in ER-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are highly effective against estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺)/HER2^- breast cancer; however, intrinsic and acquired resistance is common. Elucidating the molecular features of sensitivity and resistance to CDK4/6i may lead to identification of predictive biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets, paving the way toward improving patient outcomes.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Parental breast cancer cells and their endocrine-resistant derivatives (EndoR) were used. Derivatives with acquired resistance to palbociclib (PalboR) were generated from parental and estrogen deprivation-resistant MCF7 and T47D cells. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were performed in palbociclib-sensitive and PalboR lines. Gene expression data from CDK4/6i neoadjuvant trials and publicly available datasets were interrogated for correlations of gene signatures and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Parental and EndoR breast cancer lines showed varying degrees of sensitivity to palbociclib. Transcriptomic analysis of these cell lines identified an association between high IFN signaling and reduced CDK4/6i sensitivity; thus an "IFN-related palbociclib-resistance Signature" (IRPS) was derived. In two neoadjuvant trials of CDK4/6i plus endocrine therapy, IRPS and other IFN-related signatures were highly enriched in patients with tumors exhibiting intrinsic resistance to CDK4/6i. PalboR derivatives displayed dramatic activation of IFN/STAT1 signaling compared with their short-term treated or untreated counterparts. In primary ER⁺/HER2^- tumors, the IRPS score was significantly higher in lumB than lumA subtype and correlated with increased gene expression of immune checkpoints, endocrine resistance, and poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Aberrant IFN signaling is associated with intrinsic resistance to CDK4/6i. Experimentally, acquired resistance to palbociclib is associated with activation of the IFN pathway, warranting additional studies to clarify its involvement in resistance to CDK4/6i.

Abstract CT256: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of the HER2/neu peptide GP2 + GM-CSF versus bacteriostatic saline/WFI placebo as adjuvant therapy after any trastuzumab-based therapy in HER2-positive women with operable breast cancer

Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/neu protein delivered in combination with an FDA-approved immunoadjuvant Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF, Sargramostim, Leukine) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb clinical trial completed in 2018, no recurrences were observed in the HER2/neu positive adjuvant setting after median 5 years of follow-up, if the HLA 2+ patient received the 6 primary intradermal injections over the first 6 months (p = 0.0338) in a pre-specified subgroup analysis. Furthermore, the GP2 immunotherapy elicited a potent immune response measured by local skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 138 patients that have been treated with GP2 to date over 4 clinical trials, GP2 treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were observed related to the GP2 immunotherapy. This Phase III trial aims to reproduce the Phase IIb study and will explore the use of GP2 + GM-CSF as adjuvant therapy to prevent the recurrence of breast cancer in HER2/neu positive and HLA 2+ patients, post-surgery and following the first year treatment with any trastuzumab-based therapy.

Trial Design: This Phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy or an approved biosimilar, treatment with GP2 + GM-CSF or placebo (Bacteriostatic Saline/WFI ) will be administered intradermally for the 6 primary immunization series over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years of treatment. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 2 years follow-up for a total of 5 years following the first year treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy or approved biosimilar. An interim analysis is planned and patients will be stratified based on prior and current treatments, among other factors.

Eligibility Criteria: The majority of breast cancer patients will be HER2/neu positive and HLA 2+, disease-free, conventionally treated node-positive, post breast tumor removal surgery and following the first year treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy.

Trial Objectives:To determine if GP2 therapy reduces recurrence in HER2/neu positive breast cancer patients.

To monitor the in vitro and in vivo immunologic responses to GP2 therapy and correlate these responses with the clinical outcomes.To monitor for any unexpected adverse events and toxicities related to GP2 therapy.

Accrual: The target enrollment is up to approximately 500 patients.

Contact information: snehal.patel@greenwichlifesciences.com

Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences.

Citation Format: Snehal S. Patel, David B. McWilliams, Christine T. Fischette, Jaye Thompson, F Joseph Daugherty, C Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F. Rimawi. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of the HER2/neu peptide GP2 + GM-CSF versus bacteriostatic saline/WFI placebo as adjuvant therapy after any trastuzumab-based therapy in HER2-positive women with operable breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT256.

Lumpectomy followed by radiation improves survival in HER2 positive and triple-negative breast cancer with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared to mastectomy alone

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to compare the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS in patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 breast cancer (HER2+ BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in relation to the amount of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) after locoregional management by either mastectomy without radiation or lumpectomy and whole-breast radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of HER2+ BC and TNBC patients' charts and histopathology slides with clinical stage of T1-T2 N0 who presented at our facility between January 2009 and December 2019. Locoregional treatment included either mastectomy without RT (M) or lumpectomy with RT (L+R). TILs were assessed by three pathologists using the guidelines of the 2014 TILs working group. A competing risk model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to analyze correlations between TILs levels and clinical outcome.

RESULTS

We reviewed 211 patients' charts. Of them, 190 proceeded to the final analysis. Patients were split into groups of "low TILs" and "high TILs" based on a 50% TILs cut-off. Of them 26% had high TILs, 48% received RT, 97% received chemotherapy, all HER2+ BC patients received HER2-directed therapy and all HER2+ BC that were also hormone receptor positive (HR+) received endocrine therapy (ET). In patient with low TILs, L+R did not improve outcomes compared to M. Moreover, patients with high TILs had a significant improvement of their DFS and OS with L+R when compared to M.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study reflect that a selected group of HER2+ BC and TNBC with elevated TILs, L+R is associated with improvement of 5-year DFS and 5-year OS.

Abstract 2992: Proteogenomic characterization of triple-negative breast cancer patient-derived xenografts reveals molecular correlates of differential chemotherapy response and potential therapeutic targets to overcome resistance

Background: Chemotherapy is essential for the management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Identification of biomarkers that may indicate treatment efficacy will be critical to improve patient stratification prior to treatment. To elucidate molecular determinants underlying chemotherapy response, we conducted a proteogenomic study using TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) treated with chemotherapy.

Approach: 50 TNBC PDXs were treated with either docetaxel or carboplatin. Changes in tumor volume after 4 weeks from baseline were evaluated. Genomic, transcriptomic, and mass-spectrometry-based proteomic profiling were performed on baseline tumors prior to treatment to identify associations with chemotherapy response. Fisher's exact tests were used to test for significant enrichment of mutation and copy number events (p&lt;0.05). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis was performed for pathway analyses.

Results: At the DNA level, genomic aberrations in BRCA2 and BCL2 were enriched in carboplatin-responsive PDXs, while ARID1B aberrations were enriched in docetaxel-responsive PDXs. Gene-drug response correlations supported by both mRNA and protein-based measurements, but not mRNA or protein alone, for both carboplatin and docetaxel treatment in PDXs were associated with prognosis from basal and claudin-low human breast tumors in receipt of any chemotherapy from the METABRIC dataset. These data suggest that the combination of mRNA and protein data increased power to identify genes related to clinical outcome in TNBC. Some of the top genes overexpressed at both mRNA and protein levels in chemoresistant PDXs are targets of approved drugs, many of which have not been evaluated for their ability to augment response to taxane- or platinum-based chemotherapies. These genes are being investigated as therapeutic targets as well as markers of chemotherapy response. At the pathway level, both RNA and protein data associated models resistant to both agents with enhanced oxidative phosphorylation and translation regulation. Protein data further associated resistant models with elevated cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins. In contrast, both RNA and protein data associated tumors sensitive to both agents with genes involved in the E2F-Rb axis and cell cycle progression. Moreover, DNA mismatch repair and mRNA processing pathways were uniquely associated with carboplatin and docetaxel sensitivity, respectively, while amino acid metabolism and MAPK signaling pathways were uniquely associated with carboplatin and docetaxel resistance, respectively.

Conclusion: Taken together, proteogenomic analysis of PDX tumors identifies diverse genes and pathways associated with chemotherapy response and further suggests potential therapeutic opportunities in TNBC.

Citation Format: Jonathan T. Lei, Chen Huang, Ramakrishnan R. Srinivasan, Suhas Vasaikar, Lacey E. Dobrolecki, Alaina N. Lewis, Christina Sallas, Susan G. Hilsenbeck, C Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, Matthew J. Ellis, Varduhi Petrosyan, Alexander B. Saltzman, Anna Malovannaya, Gerburg Wulf, Daniel C. Kraushaar, Tao Wang, Gloria V. Echeverria, Bing Zhang, Michael T. Lewis. Proteogenomic characterization of triple-negative breast cancer patient-derived xenografts reveals molecular correlates of differential chemotherapy response and potential therapeutic targets to overcome resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2992.

Abstract 1077: Acquired neratinib resistance is associated with acquisition of HER2 and PIK3CA mutations and can be overcome using potent drug combinations in HER2-positive breast cancer models

The role of HER2 and PIK3CA mutations in anti-HER2 resistance is gaining more importance in HER2-positive (+) breast cancer. We recently reported that acquired resistance to lapatinib (Lap)-containing regimens is mediated by HER2 L755S, which could be overcome using the irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib (Nrb). However, less is known about the role of L755S in resistance to next-generation TKIs, particularly when co-occurring with PIK3CA mutations. HER2+ BT474 cell models with primary or sequential acquired resistance (R) to Lap (LapR) or Nrb (NrbR) and their parental (P) counterparts were profiled for alterations in signaling and gene expression by RPPA, western blot, and RNA-seq. For drug efficacy studies, change in cell growth was assessed using imaging-based high-throughput system. Proteomic profiling revealed partial restoration of HER2 phosphorylation and downstream signaling in the LapR and NrbR derivatives. RNA-seq analysis showed that the LapR and NrbR models, but not P cells, harbor HER2 L755S mutation. Importantly, the NrbR but not LapR cells also co-acquire a PIK3CA pathogenic mutation. GSEA analysis of RNA-seq data showed significant downregulation of G2/M checkpoint in the R derivatives compared to P cells, suggesting genetic instability. In line with the presence of HER2 and PIK3CA activating mutations and HER pathway reactivation in the R models, GSEA revealed an enrichment of mTORC1 and KRAS signaling in the R cells. Furthermore, enrichment of epithelial mesenchymal transition signature and downregulation of apical surface genes was observed in the R models compared to P cells, suggestive of their aggressive phenotype. Interestingly, the LapR cells remained sensitive to Nrb, though a higher dose (IC50: ~50nM) was required compared to P cells (IC50: ~2nM). The LapR and NrbR cells were cross-resistant to the HER2-selective TKI tucatinib, and trastuzumab. We recently showed that the NrbR cells were either partially or completely sensitive to poziotinib or TDM1, respectively, suggesting their therapeutic promise against HER2- and PIK3CA-mutant tumors. Of note, our studies using small molecule agents targeting HER and its downstream pathway to facilitate treatment of CNS lesions suggest that AKT or mutant PIK3CA inhibitors are effective only when combined with either neratinib or poziotinib, but not tucatinib, findings which we are currently expanding to xenograft-derived organoids. Overall, our findings suggest a complex disease evolution upon resistance to neratinib but indicate their potentially continued efficacy in overcoming resistance through drug combinations. Ongoing integrative omics analysis to determine the genomic and mutational complexity and landscape will uncover additional mechanistic insights and guide the discovery of other actionable targets.

Citation Format: Jamunarani Veeraraghavan, Ragini Mistry, Sarmistha Nanda, Sreyashree Bose, Chia Chia Liu, Vidyalakshmi Sethunath, Martin J. Shea, Tamika Mitchell, Meenakshi Anurag, Michael A. Mancini, Irmina Diala, Alshad S. Lalani, Fabio Stossi, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, Rachel Schiff. Acquired neratinib resistance is associated with acquisition of HER2 and PIK3CA mutations and can be overcome using potent drug combinations in HER2-positive breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1077.

Neratinib plus trastuzumab is superior to pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer xenograft models

Lapatinib (L) plus trastuzumab (T), with endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumors, but without chemotherapy, yielded meaningful response in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) neoadjuvant trials. The irreversible/pan-HER inhibitor neratinib (N) has proven more potent than L. However, the efficacy of N+T in comparison to pertuzumab (P) + T or L + T (without chemotherapy) remains less studied. To address this, mice bearing HER2+ BT474-AZ (ER+) cell and BCM-3963 patient-derived BC xenografts were randomized to vehicle, N, T, P, N+T, or P+T, with simultaneous estrogen deprivation for BT474-AZ. Time to tumor regression/progression and incidence/time to complete response (CR) were determined. Changes in key HER pathway and proliferative markers were assessed by immunohistochemistry and western blot of short-term-treated tumors. In the BT474-AZ model, while all N, P, T, N + T, and P + T treated tumors regressed, N + T-treated tumors regressed faster than P, T, and P + T. Further, N + T was superior to N and T alone in accelerating CR. In the BCM-3963 model, which was refractory to T, P, and P + T, while N and N + T yielded 100% CR, N + T accelerated the CR compared to N. Ki67, phosphorylated (p) AKT, pS6, and pERK levels were largely inhibited by N and N + T, but not by T, P, or P + T. Phosphorylated HER receptor levels were also markedly inhibited by N and N + T, but not by P + T or L + T. Our findings establish the efficacy of combining N with T and support clinical testing to investigate the efficacy of N + T with or without chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ BC.

Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses in CSF and plasma from TBCRC049, an ongoing trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of tucatinib, trastuzumab and capecitabine for the treatment of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) in HER2 positive breast cancer

1044

Background: Tucatinib is a potent and highly selective HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for use in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer (MBC) who have received ≥1 prior HER2-based regimen in the metastatic setting, including patients with brain metastases (BM). TBCRC049 (NCT03501979) is an investigator-initiated phase 2 single-arm study currently enrolling to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tucatinib, trastuzumab and capecitabine in HER2+ BC with newly diagnosed LM. Here, we report the pre-specified pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis for the first 15 patients to determine bioavailability of tucatinib and its predominant metabolite, ONT-993, in the CSF. Methods: Eligible patients included adults with HER2+ MBC, KPS > 50, and newly diagnosed, untreated LM (defined as positive CSF cytology and/or radiographic evidence of LM, plus clinical signs/symptoms). Patients with treated or concurrent/new BM were allowed. The primary endpoint is overall survival with an accrual goal of 30 pts. Parallel PK samples were collected in plasma and CSF via Ommaya reservoir on day 1 of cycles 1 and 2 at 0h (baseline), 2-3h, 5-7h and 24h (optional) following initiation of tucatinib 300 mg BID. Tucatinib and ONT-993 were quantified in plasma (n=15) and CSF (n=13) using validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods. Results: Tucatinib and ONT-993 plasma concentrations were consistent with previous studies and exhibited high interindividual variability. Tucatinib and ONT-993 were detectable in the CSF within 2 hours post tucatinib administration; concentrations ranged from 0.57 to 25 ng/mL for tucatinib (IC50 for tucatinib against HER2 is 3.3 ng/mL) and 0.28 to 4.7 ng/mL for ONT-993. Tucatinib concentrations in the CSF per timepoint were in a similar range to unbound plasma (plasmaub) tucatinib. CSF to plasmaub ratios were generally consistent over time; the steady-state (cycle 2) median tucatinib CSF to plasmaub ratio was 0.83 (0.19 to 2.1). ONT-993 CSF to plasmaub ratios were similar to tucatinib CSF to plasmaub ratios. Conclusions: In patients with LM from HER2+MBC who were treated with tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine, tucatinib and ONT-993 were detectable in the CSF of all patients at median levels similar to plasmaub tucatinib. This is the first documented evidence of tucatinib distributing into the CSF in patients with HER2+MBC. Efficacy and safety of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine in patients with HER2+ LM will be reported upon completion of TBCRC 049 accrual. Clinical trial information: NCT03501979 .

Neoadjuvant weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by dose dense adriamycin/cyclophosphamide in locally advanced triple negative breast cancer: A single-center experience in a safety net hospital

e12629

Background: Locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer comprising 10-15% of new diagnoses each year. Optimization of neoadjuvant therapy is necessary to decrease risk of relapse. Carboplatin has been explored as an addition to standard chemotherapy to increase rates of pathologic complete response (pathCR) and improve disease free (DFS) and overall survival. Studies have shown varying degrees of benefit, and the ideal usage of carboplatin remains unclear. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted in the Harris County Health System to examine outcomes of patients receiving carboplatin. 71 patients with TNBC were identified as treated with weekly carboplatin at an AUC of 2 and paclitaxel followed by dose dense adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (ddAC) between 2015 and 2020. Results: The average age at diagnosis was 50 (range 31 – 73). 44 (62%) patients were Hispanic, 19 (27%) were African American. 11 (15%) were BRCA carriers. 30 (42%) patients had clinical Stage II disease, 41 (58%) patients had clinical stage III disease. 53 (75%) patients had T3 or T4 disease. 48 (68%) patients had nodal disease at diagnosis. The pathCR rate for the overall population was 43%, of the patients who did not achieve a pathCR, 6 (15%) had residual cancer burden (RCB) I, 21 (51%) had RCB II, and 14 (34%) had RCB III at the time of surgery. 5 year disease free survival (DFS) after surgery for all patients was 70% (95% CI 56-86%). 5 yr DFS was 63% (95% CI 45-88%) for patients without pathCR compared to 79% (95% CI 62-100%) for patients with pathCR (p = 0.3, logrank test). 61% of patients had between 3 – 5 adverse events. 30 (42%) patients required a treatment delay. 12 (17%) patients required treatment discontinuation. The most common serious adverse event was neutropenia affecting 9 (12%) patients. Conclusions: Our single center data in a safety net clinical setting demonstrates that a neoadjuvant regimen of weekly carboplatin/taxol followed by ddAC was safe and efficacious in a high-risk group of primarily minority patients. Despite having more advanced disease compared to patients in randomized trials receiving weekly carboplatin such as GeparSixto, our patients still had similar response rates. Additionally, our data supports the continued use of pathCR as a valid indicator of disease free and overall survival.

A phase 1/2 trial of ORIN1001, a first-in-class IRE1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

3080

Background: ORIN1001 is a first-in-class small molecule with a novel, unique enzyme and mode of inhibition that selectively inhibits Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α (IRE1) RNAse and blocks X-Box Binding Protein 1 (XBP1) activation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). IRE1α/XBP1 has been implicated in a host of pathologies, and molecules that modulate it are under intense investigation for the treatment of oncologic, metabolic, neurodegenerative and other diseases. ORIN1001 has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with standard of care across multiple animal models including breast, prostate, lung, liver, pancreatic, brain, colon, ovarian, esophageal, and hematologic cancers and is now undergoing first-in-human testing. Methods: A phase 1, open label, 3+3 dose escalation trial is testing ORIN1001 administered PO daily to patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (single agent) or relapsed refractory breast cancer (in combination with Abraxane). The phase 1 dose escalation part of the trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of ORIN1001. After identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the single agent, the dose expansion part of the trial will test ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane. Results: As of Jan 25, 2021, 22 patients with advanced cancer have received ORIN1001 dosed at 100mg, 200mg or 300mg per day in 21-day continuous cycles with a median age of 61 (range 42-77). The pts had received a median of 4 prior line of treatments. Two DLTs were observed at 200 mg with thrombocytopenia and rash. MTD has not been reached. Common (>15%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included nausea, vomiting, rash, fatigue, and hypokalaemia. The vast majority of these events were Grade 1-2 in severity. Seven (32%) pts had at least 1 TRAE grade≥ 3, the most frequent of which were thrombocytopenia (N=3) and rash (N=3). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis showed ORIN1001 exposure to increase in a dose proportional manner. Mean t1/2 at steady state was 18 hrs. Thirteen pts were evaluated for preliminary efficacy. Best response, per RECIST 1.1, was stable disease (SD) in 8 pts while 5 pts had progressive disease (PD). For 2 ongoing patients with advanced liver or colorectal cancer, duration of treatment has exceeded 300 days and 570 days, respectively. Conclusions: To date, the phase 1 part of the first-in-human trial has demonstrated a reasonable safety and pharmacokinetic profile for ORIN1001 at 100mg and 200mg dose levels. While efficacy data have yet to mature, chronic dosing achieved in pts with heavily treated advanced solid tumors, suggests clinical potential for in the setting of advanced solid cancers. The phase 2 part of the trial testing ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane is currently enrolling pts with advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03950570.

Trial in progress: A phase 1b/2 study of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in combination with trastuzumab in patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer (TBCRC 050)

TPS1098

Background: Approximately 20% of breast cancers (BC) express the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although HER2-directed therapies result in improved patient outcome, resistance ultimately occurs. Poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are currently indicated in cancers that express germline mutations in the DNA repair proteins BRCA1/2 due to their synthetic lethality against the homologous recombination repair (HR) pathway. In addition to its role in DNA damage repair, PARP1 has also been implicated in other cellular functions, including co-activation of genes such as NF-κB, which regulate tumor proliferation and HER2 drug resistance. Our group identified that HER2+ BC overexpress the PARP1 and phospho-p65 protein. In HER2+ BC cells and animal models, PARP inhibitors initiated apoptosis independent of a DNA repair deficiency, via inhibition of NF-kB signaling. Key proteins (p65, IKK-α) of the NF-κB-mediated growth pathways were reduced and IκBα was increased in the presence of PARPi, implicating another oncologic pathway in which HER2+ BC cells may be dependent. Methods: The study is a phase 1b/2, multicenter, single arm clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of niraparib 200 mg orally days 1-21 with trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (cycle 1 loading dose of 8 mg/kg) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2+ BC. Eligible patients include metastatic HER2+ BC, progression on at least 1 prior HER2-targeted therapy, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-1, and LVEF ≥ 50%. Stable/treated CNS disease allowed. Prior PARPi and known germline BRCA 1/2 excluded. Forty patients will be enrolled at 7 US sites within the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium. The primary objectives are determining the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the combination and assessing the objective response rate. The phase 1b cohort has been completed (N=6). Enrollment in phase 2 began February 2021 with a total accrual goal of 40. Gehan’s two-stage design will be used assuming the response rate is at least 24% and the response rate will be estimated with Clopper-Pearson exact method. Correlative aims include assessing blood and tissue biomarkers (e.g. PARP1, p65, phosphor-p65, let-7a miRNA, NF-kB, ctDNA, etc.) for association with clinical benefit and to predict response to therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03368729 .

A prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of the HER2/neu peptide GP2 + GM-CSF versus bacteriostatic saline/WFI placebo as adjuvant therapy after any trastuzumab-based therapy in HER2-positive women with operable breast cancer

TPS604

Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/ neu protein delivered in combination with an FDA-approved immunoadjuvant Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF, sargramostim, leukine) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb clinical trial completed in 2018, no recurrences were observed in the HER2/neu positive adjuvant setting after median 5 years of follow-up, if the HLA 2+ patient received the 6 primary intradermal injections over the first 6 months ( p = 0.0338) in a pre-specified subgroup analysis. Furthermore, the GP2 immunotherapy elicited a potent immune response measured by local skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 138 patients that have been treated with GP2 to date over 4 clinical trials, GP2 treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were observed related to the GP2 immunotherapy. This Phase III trial aims to reproduce the Phase IIb study and will explore the use of GP2 + GM-CSF as adjuvant therapy to prevent the recurrence of breast cancer in HER2/neu positive and HLA 2+ patients, post-surgery and following the first year treatment with any trastuzumab-based therapy. Methods: This phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy or an approved biosimilar, treatment with GP2 + GM-CSF or placebo (bacteriostatic saline/WFI ) will be administered intradermally for the 6 primary immunization series over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years of treatment. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 2 years follow-up for a total of 5 years following enrollment. An interim analysis is planned and patients will be stratified based on prior and current treatments, among other factors. Eligibility Criteria: The majority of breast cancer patients will be HER2/ neu positive and HLA 2+, disease-free, conventionally treated node-positive, post breast tumor removal surgery and following the first year treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy. Trial Objectives: 1. To determine if GP2 therapy reduces recurrence in HER2/ neu positive breast cancer patients. 2. To monitor the in vitro and in vivo immunologic responses to GP2 therapy and correlate these responses with the clinical outcomes. 3. To monitor for any unexpected adverse events and toxicities related to GP2 therapy. Accrual: The target enrollment is up to approximately 500 patients. Contact information: snehal.patel@greenwichlifesciences.com Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences.

Change in management based on actionable mutations in metastatic breast cancer in an ethnically diverse cohort: Single institution experience

e13067

Background: Recently, next generation sequencing (NGS) has been used with increasing frequency to guide therapy decisions for patients with metastatic solid tumors. NGS is a DNA sequencing technology that detects somatically acquired mutations. If an actionable mutation is identified, it may affect prognosis and guide therapy. At our institution we serve a large proportion of minority and underserved patients and analyzed their NGS results to determine if there was a change in management. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer treated at one of two sites at Baylor College of Medicine who underwent NGS via Tempus between 2018-2020 were included. Tempus provided access to the variant database for these patients. We analyzed the charts of 43 patients who underwent NGS via Tempus on tissue, blood or both. In those patients with clinically actionable mutations, we noted if there was a change in management. Utilizing Redcap, we extracted demographics, sites of metastasis, biomarker activity and site, genomic sequencing, and duration and sequencing of therapies given along with clinical trial information. Results: Of the 43 patients included in this analysis, the mean age was 55 years, 33% were African American, 30% were Hispanic, 21% were white/non-Hispanic, 12% were Asian, 4% were other. Two thirds of patients were treated in the Harris Health System (a safety net hospital with a unique and diverse population) while one third was treated at the Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center (a private academically affiliated institution). Of the 43 patients, 14 had PIK3CA mutations and 3 had a change in management. 2 patients had microsatellite instability (MSI) and received immunotherapy, and 1 patient had a HER2 mutation and entered a clinical trial with Neratinib. Additionally, 2 patients were incidentally found to have MUTYH germline mutation which is associated with polyposis. Conclusions: With increasing frequency, patients with metastatic malignancy undergo NGS in order to determine if there is an actionable mutation that can guide their next line of treatment. However, this technology could be cost prohibitive for many underserved patients. Our study analyzes a unique and diverse population of patients, many of whom are underserved. We were able conduct this testing in our cohort, study the frequency of somatic mutations and monitor for change in treatment. Of the variants analyzed, PIK3CA mutations are actionable and patients can receive Alpelisib + Fulvestrant- however many did not. There was not a large shift in management based on the incorporation of this DNA sequencing technology which suggests that, unlike the case of other solid tumors, there aren’t yet as many actionable targets for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Shared decision making along with consideration of cost is paramount for these patients as we shift into an era of highly personalized medicine.

Genetic assessment of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the Harris Health System: A five-year, single-center experience

10587

Background: Identifying patients with hereditary breast cancer is critical since lifetime breast cancer risk is as high as 85% for those with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and preventive interventions can reduce that risk. However, genetic assessments and counseling are often underutilized among racial/ethnic minority populations. Reducing this genetic testing gap is important since hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndromes occur among racial/ethnic minorities at least as frequently as non-Ashkenazi Jewish, non-Hispanic White populations. More information on variants in these populations is also needed to better define their genetic susceptibility. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients evaluated for genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer by a genetic counselor between October 1, 2009 and September 30, 2014 in Harris Health System which is a large, county health system composed mostly of underserved and minority patients. Data from 2015-2019 is currently being extracted and we are reporting the first 5 years of data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient data. Results: 659 patients underwent genetic counseling (10.5% non-Hispanic White, 24.4% Black, 56.9% Hispanic, 5.9% Asian, and 2.3% other). Five patients had Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. The majority of patients completed testing (87.4%) with 72.7% receiving financial assistance. Among those who did not complete testing, only 12.0% declined, while 66.3% did not meet guideline-based criteria or were recommended to have an affected relative tested. Multigene panel testing was not available until April 2014, so most underwent BRCA sequencing (75.0%) and/or a BRCA large rearrangement test (61.0%). 36.1% received multigene panel testing, 4.6% single site analysis, and 4.4% p53 sequencing. Deleterious mutations occurred in 98 (14.9%) patients: BRCA1 (n = 60), BRCA2 (n = 25), PALB2 (n = 7), ATM (n = 3), and other (n = 3). The distribution of races/ethnicities among those with deleterious mutations was similar to the overall population (7.1% non-Hispanic White, 18.4% Black, 69.4% Hispanic, 3.1% Asian, and 2.0% other). 80.6% of those with deleterious mutations had breast cancer. High rates of bilateral mastectomies were performed in patients with deleterious mutations: BRCA1 60%, BRCA2 55%, PALB2 57.1%, and ATM 33%. Risk-reducing salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 56.7% BRCA1, 60% BRCA2, 28.5% PALB2, and 33.3% other mutation carriers. Conclusions: We demonstrate that with the support of financial assistance programs, most patients who receive genetic counseling will accept genetic testing in a socioeconomically underserved, racially/ethnically diverse population. Identification of high-risk patients in these groups is critical since pathogenic variants in this population were common and more than half underwent risk-reducing procedures.

Endocrine-Based Treatments in Clinically-Relevant Subgroups of Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A precise assessment of the efficacy of first-/second-line endocrine therapies (ET) ± target therapies (TT) in clinically-relevant subgroups of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not yet been conducted. To improve our current knowledge and support clinical decision-making, we thus conducted a systematic literature search to identify all first-/second-line phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCT) of currently approved or most promising ET ± TT. Then, we performed a meta-analysis to assess progression-free (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS) benefit in several clinically-relevant prespecified subgroups. Thirty-five RCT were included (17,595 patients). Pooled results show significant reductions in the risk of relapse or death of 26-41% and 12-27%, respectively, depending on the clinical subgroup. Combination strategies proved to be more effective than single-agent ET (PFS hazard ratio (HR) range for combinations: 0.60-0.65 vs. HR range for single agent ET: 0.59-1.37; OS HR range for combinations: 0.74-0.87 vs. HR range for single agent ET: 0.68-0.98), with CDK4/6-inhibitors(i) + ET being the most effective regimen. Single agent ET showed comparable efficacy with ET+TT combinations in non-visceral (p = 0.63) and endocrine sensitive disease (p = 0.79), while mTORi-based combinations proved to be a valid therapeutic option in endocrine-resistant tumors, as well as PI3Ki + ET in PIK3CA-mutant tumors. These results strengthen international treatment guidelines and can aid therapeutic decision-making.

Abstract PD3-02: Final analysis of PERTAIN: A randomized, two-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of first-line pertuzumab given in combination with trastuzumab plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer

Background The role of bidirectional cross talk between the HER2 and estrogen receptors in resistance to anti-HER2 and endocrine therapy has been studied extensively (Kaufman et al. J Clin Oncol 2009; Arpino et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007). The CLEOPATRA study showed that first-line pertuzumab (P) + trastuzumab (H) + docetaxel (T) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) significantly compared with placebo + H + T in patients (pts) with HER2-positive metastatic BC (MBC) (Baselga et al. N Engl J Med 2012; Swain et al. Lancet Oncol 2013; N Engl J Med 2015; N Engl J Med 2020). PERTAIN (NCT01491737) was the first randomized phase II trial to assess the addition of P to H + an aromatase inhibitor (AI) ± induction chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of pts with HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive MBC or locally advanced BC (LABC). PERTAIN met its primary PFS endpoint at 31 months’ median follow-up, with a potentially enhanced effect in some groups, such as pts who did not receive induction chemotherapy (Rimawi et al. J Clin Oncol 2018). We present the final analysis at more than 6 years’ median follow-up, including updated PFS, mature OS (secondary endpoint), and updated safety. Methods Pts were randomized 1:1 to P + H + AI (Arm A) or H + AI (Arm B). P was given as an 840 mg intravenous (IV) loading dose followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks (q3w); H IV, at 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg q3w; anastrozole, at 1 mg daily; or letrozole, at 2.5 mg daily. Induction IV chemotherapy with T q3w or weekly paclitaxel could be given for 18-24 weeks at the investigator’s discretion before the start of endocrine therapy. Treatment was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were stratified by induction chemotherapy (yes/no) and time since adjuvant hormone therapy (&lt;12 months, ≥12 months, no adjuvant hormone therapy). Time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Pts were randomized across 71 sites and 8 countries between Feb 2012 and Oct 2014. Intent-to-treat populations were 129 pts per arm; safety populations, 127 and 124 in Arms A and B, respectively; induction chemotherapy was received by 75 and 71 pts, respectively. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Efficacy results are shown in the table. One hundred twenty-two pts per arm reported adverse events (AEs) at any grade (96.1% in Arm A; 98.4% in Arm B); 72 (56.7%) and 51 pts (41.1%) had grade ≥3 AEs, the most common grade ≥3 AEs (≥5.0%; Arm A vs. Arm B) being hypertension (11.8% vs. 10.5%), diarrhea (9.4% vs. 2.4%), and neutropenia (3.1% vs. 7.3%).

Conclusions With a median follow-up of more than 6 years at final analysis, the PFS benefit of adding P to H + an AI was maintained. OS was similar between arms. A potentially enhanced treatment effect was observed by addition of P to H + an AI in pts who did not receive induction chemotherapy after randomization. There were no new safety concerns at final analysis. Overall, PERTAIN provides additional evidence on the role of P + H in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive MBC/LABC and suggests that some pts benefit from P + H + AI without induction chemotherapy.

Arm AArm BMedian PFS, mo HR (95% CI)ITT21160.7 (0.5-0.9) p=0.006With induction17170.7 (0.5-1.0) p=0.08No induction27120.7 (0.4-1.0) p=0.07Median OS, mo HR (95% CI)ITT60571.1 (0.7-1.5) p=0.8With induction59661.2 (0.7-1.9) p=0.5No induction65540.9 (0.5-1.6) p=0.7CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent-to-treat; mo, months.

Citation Format: Grazia Arpino, Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Sabino De Placido, Dirk Klingbiel, Valentine Revelant, Christine Wohlfarth, Raf Poppe, Mothaffar F Rimawi. Final analysis of PERTAIN: A randomized, two-arm, open-label, multicenter phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of first-line pertuzumab given in combination with trastuzumab plus an aromatase inhibitor in patients with HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-02.

Abstract PD3-09: HER2 L755S mutation is acquired upon resistance to lapatinib and neratinib and confers cross-resistance to tucatinib and trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer cell models

Background: The role of HER2 mutations in anti-HER2 resistance is gaining more importance in HER2-positive (+) breast cancer (BC). The common HER2 L755S mutation is further enriched in metastatic lesions compared to primary tumors. Despite their mounting significance, effective therapies for HER2-amplified/mutant tumors are lacking. We recently reported that acquired resistance to lapatinib (Lap)-containing regimens is mediated by HER2 L755S, which could be overcome by the irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib (Nrb). However, less is known about the role of L755S in resistance to new generation TKIs, and the clinically implementable therapeutic strategies to overcome it. Materials and Methods: Our recently developed HER2+ BT474 cell models with acquired resistance to Lap (LapR) or Nrb (NrbR), developed through long-term exposure to increasing doses of the respective drug, and their naïve parental (P) counterparts were used. The resistant derivatives and their cognate P cells were subjected to proteomic (Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) and western blot) and transcriptomic (RNA-seq) characterization. For drug efficacy studies, change in cell growth was assessed using the in situ imaging-based high-throughput IncuCyte system. Results: Proteomic profiling of the resistant models and their P equivalents revealed partial restoration of HER2 phosphorylation and downstream signaling in the LapR and NrbR derivatives. Consistent with activated mTOR signaling observed in the resistant cells, we detected reduced levels of phospho (p)-RAPTOR S792, which is otherwise essential to inhibit the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1). In addition, p-P38MAPK T180/Y182 levels were reduced. RNA-seq analysis revealed the presence of HER2 L755S mutation in the LapR and NrbR derivatives, but not in P cells, suggesting that the HER signaling reactivation could be attributed to acquisition of HER2 L755S. Interestingly, the NrbR cells co-harbor other pathogenic mutations in key BC related genes, the therapeutic and functional significance of which is being investigated. Importantly, the NrbR derivatives were cross-resistant to Lap and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (T). Next, we determined the efficacy of Nrb and the HER2-selective TKI tucatinib (Tuca), both recently approved for metastatic HER2+ BC, either alone or in combination with T. Nrb effectively inhibited the growth of LapR cells, although a higher dose (IC50: ~50nM) was required to inhibit the growth compared to that needed for naïve P cells (~IC50: ~2nM). When combined with T, Nrb was effective in inhibiting the LapR cell growth, though the inhibitory effect may very well be driven entirely by Nrb. On the other hand, the resistant derivatives were cross-resistant to Tuca, both as a single-agent and in combination with T. We then evaluated the efficacy of the antibody drug conjugate TDM1 and the irreversible pan-HER TKI poziotinib. In contrast to the high sensitivity of P cells to both these agents, a spectrum of effect was observed in the NrbR derivatives, with responses ranging from partial growth inhibition by poziotinib to complete response with TDM1, suggesting their therapeutic potential against tumors harboring HER2 mutations. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that HER2 mutations, particularly HER2 L755S, that emerge under the pressure of potent HER2-targeted therapy may confer cross-resistance to other single agent or combination HER2-targeted therapy. This holds important therapeutic implications in light of current treatment landscape. An in-depth molecular characterization of our resistant models to determine the differential gene expression and mutational profile is ongoing to gain additional mechanistic insights and to guide discovery of other actionable targets.

Citation Format: Jamunarani Veeraraghavan, Ragini Mistry, Sarmistha Nanda, Vidyalakshmi Sethunath, Martin Shea, Tamika Mitchell, Meenakshi Anurag, Michael A. Mancini, Fabio Stossi, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, Rachel Schiff. HER2 L755S mutation is acquired upon resistance to lapatinib and neratinib and confers cross-resistance to tucatinib and trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer cell models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-09.

Abstract PS3-30: Peri-operative diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in breast cancer: A meta-analysis

Background: Accurate determination of the extent of tumor is essential when a breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is considered. Due to its high sensitivity, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for the accurate diagnosis and surgical planning of breast cancers. However, a recent meta-analysis showed that peri-operative evaluation with MRI leads to higher mastectomy rates in patients that could have potentially underwent BCT.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the pre-operative diagnostic accuracy of MRI to ultrasonography (US) in breast cancer.

Methods: We identified eligible studies that examined peri-operative tumor size using MRI and US and compared it to its pathological counterpart. Databases of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were reviewed. To keep the study homogenous, only studies evaluating invasive ductal carcinoma were included and studies evaluating ductal carcinoma in-situ and lobular ductal carcinoma were excluded. An accurate tumor estimation by MRI or US was defined as within 10 mm from the pathological tumor size. An overestimation was defined as imaging tumor size more than 10 mm larger than its pathological counterpart. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model with 2-sided p-value of 0.05 set as the significance level.

Results: Twenty-five studies with 3,562 patients were included in the final analysis. MRI was 1.6-fold more accurate than US in preoperative diagnostic evaluation of breast cancer (OR 1.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-2.18, p-value &lt;0.00001). However, MRI was 20 folds more likely to overestimate the tumor size compared to US (OR 20.25; 95% CI 9.46-43.33; p-value &lt;0.0001).

Conclusion: MRI remains the most accurate modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer. However, it is highly likely to overestimate tumor size and can result in unnecessary mastectomies. US is a reasonable diagnostic option for most patients with breast cancer.

Citation Format: Jason A Mouabbi, Zeyad Sako, Ahmed Abdalla, Tarik Hadid, Mothaffar F Rimawi. Peri-operative diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in breast cancer: A meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-30.

Abstract OT-13-03: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of the HER2/neupeptide GP2 + GM-CSF versus bacteriostatic saline/WFI placebo as adjuvant therapy after any trastuzumab-based therapy in HER2-positive women with operable breast cancer

Background: GP2 is a biologic nine amino acid peptide of the HER2/neu protein delivered in combination with an FDA-approved immunoadjuvant Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF, Sargramostim, Leukine) that stimulates an immune response targeting HER2/neu expressing cancers. In a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase IIb clinical trial completed in 2018, no recurrences were observed in the HER2/neu positive adjuvant setting after median 5 years of follow-up, if the HLA 2+ patient received the 6 primary intradermal injections over the first 6 months (p = 0.0338) in a pre-specified subgroup analysis. Furthermore, the GP2 immunotherapy elicited a potent immune response measured by local skin tests and immunological assays. Of the 138 patients that have been treated with GP2 to date over 4 clinical trials, GP2 treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were observed related to the GP2 immunotherapy. This Phase III trial aims to reproduce the Phase IIb study and will explore the use of GP2 + GM-CSF as adjuvant therapy to prevent the recurrence of breast cancer in HER2/neu positive and HLA 2+ patients, post-surgery and following the first year treatment with any trastuzumab-based therapy.

Trial Design: This Phase III trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center study. After 1 year of trastuzumab-based therapy or an approved biosimilar, treatment with GP2 + GM-CSF or placebo (Bacteriostatic Saline/WFI ) will be administered intradermally for the 6 primary immunization series over the first 6 months and 5 subsequent boosters over the next 2.5 years for a total of 11 injections over 3 years of treatment. The participant duration of the trial will be 3 years treatment plus 2 years follow-up for a total of 5 years following the first year treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy or approved biosimilar. An interim analysis is planned and patients will be stratified based on prior and current treatments, among other factors.

Eligibility Criteria: The majority of breast cancer patients will be HER2/neu positive and HLA 2+, disease-free, conventionally treated node-positive, post breast tumor removal surgery and following the first year treatment with trastuzumab-based therapy.

Trial Objectives:To determine if GP2 therapy reduces recurrence in HER2/neu positive breast cancer patients.To monitor the in vitro and in vivo immunologic responses to GP2 therapy and correlate these responses with the clinical outcomes.To monitor for any unexpected adverse events and toxicities related to GP2 therapy.

Accrual: The target enrollment is up to approximately 500 patients.

Contact information: snehal.patel@greenwichlifesciences.com

Funding: This trial is supported by Greenwich LifeSciences.

Citation Format: Snehal S Patel, David B McWilliams, Christine T Fischette, Jaye Thompson, F Joseph Daugherty, C Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F Rimawi. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial of the HER2/neupeptide GP2 + GM-CSF versus bacteriostatic saline/WFI placebo as adjuvant therapy after any trastuzumab-based therapy in HER2-positive women with operable breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-13-03.

Abstract PS15-01: Radiation therapy improves survival in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer with high-level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes

Background: Scientific evidence strongly indicates that locoregional control in early-stage breast cancer (BC) by lumpectomy with radiation therapy or by mastectomy yields similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A recent retrospective review of a Danish prospective database demonstrated strong favorable interaction between radiotherapy (RT) and all BC subtypes that contain high amount of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

Objective: We aim to compare DFS and OS in patients with early-stage HER2-positive BC, whose tumors demonstrate high involvement by TILs after locoregional treatment by either mastectomy or lumpectomy and whole breast radiotherapy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts and histopathology slides of patients with HER2-positive BC with clinical stage T1-T2 N0, who were treated in our center between January 2009 and December 2018. Locoregional management included either mastectomy (no radiation group) or lumpectomy with whole breast irradiation (radiation group). Stromal TILs were estimated using hematoxylin-eosin staining, according to the recommendations of the TILs working group 2014. This was performed by 3 independent pathologists who were blinded to the clinical course of the patients. A competing risk model, Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to estimate correlations between TILs and clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 110 charts were reviewed and 99 were included in the final analysis. Patients were dichotomized into groups of “low-TILs” and “high-TILs” using a 40% cut off. Approximately 25% of patients (26/99) were “high-TILs” and around 50% of the “high-TILs” and “low-TILs” patients received RT. In all groups, around 90% of patients received chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy. All hormone receptor-positive patients received adjuvant endocrine therapy. While RT did not result in significant DFS or OS advantage in the low-TILs group, patients with high-TILs had significant improvement of DFS and OS with the addition of RT. Table 1 depict the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS in "high-TILs" and "low-TILs" groups in relation to RT, respectively.

Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, our findings indicate that in high-TILs early-stage HER2-positive BC, RT was associated with significant improvement of 5-year DFS and OS. The exact mechanism is not well understood. However, this observation is important and warrants confirmation in prospective clinical trials.

5-year DFS5-year OSHigh TILsLow TILsHigh TILsLow TILsRT group100%90%100%83%No RT group65%90%72%93%p-value0.0270.960.0250.184

Citation Format: Jason A Mouabbi, Momal Chand, Ramen Sakhi, Ishaq A Asghar, Daniel Ockner, Tarik Hadid, Carrie L Dul, Mothaffar F Rimawi, Amer Aref. Radiation therapy improves survival in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer with high-level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS15-01.

Abstract SP139: HER2 targeted therapy: Determinants of response and mechanisms of resistance

HER2-positive (+) breast cancer (BC), accounting for 15-20% of all BCs, is characterized by overexpression, mostly via gene amplification, of HER2. HER2 is a key member of the HER family of 4 tyrosine kinase receptors. Multiple clinically available HER2-targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and antibody-drug conjugates have revolutionized the outcome of patients with HER2+ BC. Despite these effective therapies, intrinsic and acquired resistance still occurs, posing a major challenge in the clinical management of this disease. A better understanding of the determinants of response and mechanisms of resistance may help develop personalized treatment approaches and new strategies to overcome resistance. Tumors that are truly addicted to HER2, clinically reflected especially under chemotherapy-sparing HER2-targeted therapy regimens, are associated with high and homogeneous levels of HER2 gene amplification, protein, and activity. Even in these HER2-addicted tumors, the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy can be jeopardized by deregulations in the downstream PI3K pathway (e.g., PIK3CA mutations), which can lead to constitutive activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway and resistance. Given the functional redundancy of signaling from multiple HER receptor dimers and compensatory signaling within the pathway, dual anti-HER2 therapy has proven superior to single agents in achieving a more comprehensive blockade of the entire HER receptor layer and in anti-tumor efficacy. Further, in the HER2+ tumors that co-express ER, an unblocked, re-expressed and/or reactivated ER signaling can provide alternative proliferative and survival signals to evade sustained HER2 blockade, thus underscoring the need for concurrent blockade of HER2 and ER signaling. Nevertheless, effective inhibition of HER2 might prove challenging in some cases due to molecular masking of the HER receptors (e.g., mucins) or due to the de novo presence or acquisition of genetic, epigenetic or post-translational alterations in HER2 itself, including activating HER2 mutations (e.g., L755S), and p95HER2. We recently reported that acquired resistance to HER2-targeted therapy, especially TKIs, is mediated by the common HER2 L755S mutation, the clinical importance of which is underscored by the observation that this and other HER mutations are further enriched in the metastatic lesions compared to primary HER2+ tumors. On the other hand, when HER2 does remain effectively inhibited under potent HER2-targeted therapy, resistance can arise due to the upregulation of alternative escape pathways that transmit proliferative stimuli. These include activation of other receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g., AXL, FGFR), other downstream/intracellular signaling (e.g., SRC, YES1), or metabolic pathways (e.g., FASN and mevalonate pathways). Our recent data suggest that the mevalonate pathway offers an escape mechanism by providing alternative signaling through the YAP/TAZ-mTORC1-survivin axis to activate a transcriptional program that promotes resistant cell proliferation and survival, which can be overcome using inhibitors of mevalonate pathway (e.g., statins). Importantly, activation of the key cell cycle regulator cyclin D1/CDK4 complex has been shown to mediate resistance to HER2-targeted therapy and that CDK4/6 inhibitors, at least partly by also inhibiting mTORC1 activity, can overcome this resistance. Finally, the role of tumor microenvironment, including host immune components (e.g., TILs) and extracellular matrix components signaling via integrins, have been shown to play a role in modulating tumor response to treatment and in resistance. Together, these findings suggest new strategies to enhance sensitivity and overcome resistance to HER2-targeted therapy, some of which are already under clinical development.

Citation Format: R Schiff, J Veeraraghavan, C De Angelis, C Osborne, MF Rimawi. HER2 targeted therapy: Determinants of response and mechanisms of resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr SP139.

Abstract 1911: HER2 L755S mutation is associated with acquired resistance to lapatinib and neratinib, and confers cross-resistance to tucatinib in HER2-positive breast cancer models

Despite the availability of potent HER-targeted agents, de novo and acquired resistance is common and continues to pose a major challenge, especially in the advanced setting. Amassing evidence point to the importance of HER2 mutations, including the most common HER2 L755S mutation, in mediating anti-HER2 resistance. The HER2 L755S mutation, in particular, is observed to be enriched in metastatic lesions compared to primary breast tumors. The need for effective therapy to treat tumors harboring HER2 mutations prevails. We have previously reported that acquired resistance to lapatinib (L)-containing treatments, mediated by HER2 L755S, could be overcome by the recently FDA-approved irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) neratinib (N). While N has shown great promise in patients with HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer, its efficacy is somewhat limited. More recently, tucatinib, a HER2-selective TKI, has been shown to be effective in HER2-positive (+) brain metastases. Its potency in the context of HER2 mutations, however, has not yet been fully studied. In this study, we used the HER2+ BT474-L resistant (LR) cells, harboring endogenous HER2 L755S mutation, and parental (P) cells to first determine whether tucatinib may be effective in overcoming resistance mediated by HER2 mutations. Our results showed that while N effectively inhibited the growth of LR cells, although at a dose higher than that needed to inhibit the growth of naïve P cells, tucatinib failed to inhibit the growth of LR cells. Our results suggest that HER2 L755S mutation may confer cross-resistance to tucatinib. To further study mechanisms of resistance to 2nd generation anti-HER2 agents, we recently developed cell models with acquired resistance to N, through long-term exposure of the BT474-P and LR cells to increasing doses of N. These cells were profiled by reverse phase protein array (RPPA) and western blot analysis, which revealed restoration of HER2 phosphorylation in the NR derivatives, despite being cultured in the continuous presence of N. Interestingly, RNA-seq analysis revealed the presence of HER2 L755S mutation in all the NR derivatives, but not in the P cells, suggesting that the reactivated HER2 signaling observed in NR cells could be attributed to the emergence/acquisition of HER2 L755S mutation. Furthermore, while the P cells were highly sensitive to tucatinib, L, and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (T), the NR derivatives were totally resistant to these agents, suggesting that N resistance may also confer cross-resistance to tucatinib, L, and T. Additional molecular characterization to examine differential gene expression and mutational profile of the resistant derivatives, as well as testing of novel anti-HER2 regimens and drug combinations targeting downstream mediators to overcome resistance, both in vitro and in vivo, is ongoing.

Citation Format: Jamunarani Veeraraghavan, Ragini Mistry, Sarmistha Nanda, Vidyalakshmi Sethunath, Martin Shea, Tamika Mitchell, Meenakshi Anurag, Michael A. Mancini, Fabio Stossi, C. Kent Osborne, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, Rachel Schiff. HER2 L755S mutation is associated with acquired resistance to lapatinib and neratinib, and confers cross-resistance to tucatinib in HER2-positive breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1911.

A multiparameter classifier to predict response to lapatinib plus trastuzumab (LT) without chemotherapy in HER2+ breast cancer (BC)

1011

Background: Several trials have shown 25-30% pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in patients with HER2+ BC treated with LT therapy (+ endocrine therapy if ER+), but no chemotherapy (CTX). We hypothesize that a multiparameter classifier, comprised of HER2 gene and protein levels, intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), HER2-enriched (E) subtype, and PIK3CA mutation status can identify patients whose tumors are “addicted” to HER2 signaling and are likely to achieve pCR from a CTX-sparing de-escalation strategy. Methods: Baseline specimens from 2 trials (TBCRC023 [NCT00999804] and PAMELA [NCT01973660]) of neoadjuvant CTX-sparing LT (+ endocrine therapy if ER+) in HER2+ BC were used. HER2 protein and ITH (scored for % 3+ by IHC), and gene amplification (HER2:CEP17 ratio and copy number (CN) by CISH) were measured on the same slide by the dual gene protein assay (GPA). HER2-E and PIK3CA mutation status were assessed by research-based PAM50 and MSK-IMPACT platforms, respectively. A decision tree algorithm was used to determine the GPA cutoffs and to construct the classifier of response (by pCR) in TBCRC023, which was then validated in PAMELA. Results: Of the evaluable patients from TBCRC023 (N = 130) and PAMELA (N = 151), GPA data were available for 121 and 94 cases, respectively. Both cohorts exhibited similar distributions for HER2 ratio, CN, and % 3+, and a strong correlation between HER2 ratio and CN (R > 0.92). In TBCRC023, 73 cases had data from GPA, PAM50, and IMPACT, of which 15 had pCR. Recursive partitioning identified cutoffs of HER2 ratio > 4.6 and % 3+ > 97.5% in both the GPA data cohort (N = 121) and complete data cohort (N = 73). With PAM50 and IMPACT data, the model added HER2-E and PIK3CA wild-type (wt). For practical reasons, the classifier was locked as HER2 ratio ≥ 4.5 AND % 3+ ≥ 90% AND PIK3CA-wt AND HER2-E, which yielded a PPV of 55% and NPV of 94%. Validation in PAMELA using 45 cases with data for all 3 assays yielded PPV of 44% and NPV of 82%. 29 TBCRC023 cases without IMPACT data could be predicted to be non-pCR, of which 26 were correct (NPV = 89%). In PAMELA, 66 additional cases could be predicted to be non-pCR, of which 54 were correct (NPV = 81%). Conclusions: We have constructed a multiparameter classifier that can predict pCR with targeted therapy alone that compare to pCR rates of CTX + dual anti-HER2 in unselected patients. Prospective validation in a clinical trial is warranted. [Table: see text]