Factors associated with changes in satisfaction with care

OBJECTIVE

Satisfaction with care is an important outcome for evaluating the effectiveness of medical care. Many factors can influence satisfaction, including disease state, healthcare utilization, and health-status changes. However, few studies have investigated the association between these factors and changes in satisfaction.

DESIGN

This study examined the influence of personal characteristics, type of health plan, disease states, and healthcare utilization on changes in satisfaction with care in a prospective cohort over a 12-month period through two surveys, baseline and follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

Enrollees in one of three different commercial health plans: point-of-service product, an unrestricted fee-for-service product, and a preferred-provider organization product.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Two multivariate logistic regression models were constructed. The first model evaluated factors that predicted increased satisfaction with care between the two surveys. Compared with respondents who reported no change in health status, both those with improved health status (odds ratio [OR], 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.03-1.61) and those with declines in health (OR, 1.29, CI95, 1.03-1.61) were significantly more likely to report an increase in satisfaction with care. Those with a history of hospitalization were also more likely to report an increase in satisfaction with care (OR, 1.27, CI95, 1.01-1.59). The second multivariate logit model evaluated factors that predicted decreases in satisfaction with care from the baseline survey. Those with reported declines in health status were more likely to report decreases in satisfaction with medical care (OR, 1.43, CI95, 1.13-1.79). Neither age, gender, race, type of health plan, disease state, nor doctor's office visits were related to observed changes in satisfaction with medical care.

CONCLUSION

Changes in satisfaction with care appear to be related to changes in health status. However, the relation between these two attributes is not intuitively apparent.

Albunex: a safe and effective commercially produced agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography

Microbubble solutions of sonicated human serum albumin have been shown to be effective echocardiographic contrast agents free from adverse effects on coronary blood flow, left ventricular function, and systemic hemodynamics. Albunex is a commercially prepared solution of air-filled albumin microspheres prepared from sonicated 5% human serum albumin. The effects of Albunex on coronary blood flow, left ventricular function, and systemic hemodynamics, as well as contrast enhancement were evaluated in 10 open chest, anesthetized dogs. After an intracoronary injection, Albunex did not alter left atrial, left ventricular systolic or end-diastolic, or mean aortic pressures. It did not cause a coronary hyperemic response, alter left ventricular systolic thickening, or lower the peak positive left ventricular dp/dt. It did not alter these measurements even in the presence of a critical coronary stenosis. The contrast opacification produced by Albunex microbubbles was dose dependent (optimal dose range of 0.033 to 0.5 ml/kg), with attenuation occurring at higher doses. In conclusion, although Albunex provides adequate contrast enhancement, intracoronary injection of Albunex does not significantly alter coronary blood flow, left ventricular function, or systemic hemodynamics. Because of the standardized size and concentration of the microspheres, Albunex may be an ideal agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans. II. Assessment of coronary blood flow reserve

The hypothesis that myocardial contrast echocardiography could be used to simultaneously assess coronary blood flow reserve and the size of the perfusion bed supplied by a coronary artery was examined in nine patients and six dogs. All patients were undergoing cardiac catheterization and had single vessel coronary artery disease (greater than or equal to 85% stenosis of either the proximal left anterior descending or the left circumflex coronary artery); the six dogs had a critical stenosis of the left circumflex coronary artery. Three milliliters of sonicated Renografin-76 (mean microbubble size 6 micron) was injected into the left main coronary artery before and after intracoronary administration of papavarine, 6 to 9 mg. The beds supplied by the normal and stenotic vessels could not be differentiated during contrast echocardiography before injection of papavarine. However, after papavarine, the normal vascular bed showed significantly more contrast enhancement than did the bed supplied by the stenotic artery. This disparity in contrast enhancement made it possible to delineate the size of the bed perfused by the stenotic vessels. When quantitative analysis of the time-intensity curves obtained from the echocardiograms was performed in the dogs, the absolute values for the area under the curve, peak contrast intensity and curve width did not correlate with absolute blood flows measured with radiolabeled microspheres. However, the ratios of the areas under the curves derived from the two vascular beds before and after papavarine correlated well with the ratios of blood flows between the two beds during the same stages (r2 = 0.73 by linear regression and r2 = 0.85 by an exponential function). In comparison, the ratios of peak amplitudes and curve widths before and after papavarine had poor correlations with ratios of flows from the two beds (r2 = 0.18 and 0.02, respectively). In conclusion, myocardial contrast echocardiography can be used to simultaneously assess coronary blood flow reserve and the size of the perfusion bed supplied by a stenotic vessel.

Myocardial contrast echocardiography without significant hemodynamic effects or reactive hyperemia: a major advantage in the imaging of regional myocardial perfusion

All agents used for myocardial contrast echocardiography to date produce adverse hemodynamic effects and alter coronary blood flow. It was hypothesized that because 5% human albumin, when sonicated for use as a contrast agent, is neither hyperosmolar nor a calcium chelator, it would not have significant effects on coronary blood flow, left ventricular function or systemic hemodynamics. Albumin microbubbles of two distinct sizes (mean size 2.9 and 5.8 micron) were produced and compared with nonsonicated albumin, nonsonicated Renografin, sonicated Renografin and hand-agitated Renografin for their effects on hemodynamics, coronary blood flow and regional left ventricular systolic thickening in 15 open chest anesthetized dogs. None of the albumin solutions significantly altered left atrial, left ventricular systolic and end-diastolic and mean aortic pressures. These agents did not cause a coronary hyperemic response or alter left ventricular systolic thickening, but slightly lowered the peak positive left ventricular maximal rate of rise in pressure (dP/dt) (-4.1 +/- 5.4%, p less than 0.01). In contrast, all the Renografin solutions caused significant changes in all these variables (p less than 0.02). In six dogs. albumin solutions did not alter these variables even in the presence of critical coronary stenosis. The contrast opacification produced by 5.8 micron albumin microbubbles was equivalent to that produced by sonicated Renografin. Compared with an equivalent amount of saline and nonsonicated albumin solutions, 10 ml of sonicated albumin did not produce any evidence of infarction, embolization or hemorrhage in the myocardium, brain or kidneys of rabbits.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The importance of defining left ventricular area at risk in vivo during acute myocardial infarction: an experimental evaluation with myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography

Because the left ventricular "area at risk" is the most important determinant of ultimate infarct size, it would be useful to know the size of the area at risk during acute myocardial infarction to make therapeutic decisions. We therefore performed a series of experiments in four groups of dogs. In group I dogs (n = 15) we attempted to determine whether current methods of assessing left ventricular function during acute myocardial infarction reflect the true size of the area at risk. At each of two to five sequential stages, a more proximal coronary occlusion was performed to produce a larger area at risk until cardiovascular collapse occurred. At each stage, the area at risk (measured by myocardial contrast echocardiography), hemodynamic variables, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured. Hemodynamic variables became abnormal when the area at risk was large (25% to 40% of the left ventricle), whereas LVEF became abnormal when the area at risk was of moderate size (18%). When cardiac output and LVEF were normalized to baseline values, a close inverse relationship was noted between these variables and area at risk. In contrast, there was a poor relationship between normalized mean arterial pressure and area at risk (r = .42). In group II dogs (n = 9) the area at risk was measured serially over 6 hr after coronary occlusion. The size of the area at risk remained unchanged regardless of the transmural extent of the ultimate infarct. The circumferential endocardial extent of the area at risk closely predicted the circumferential endocardial extent of the infarct at 6 hr in eight of nine dogs that developed an infarct. Group III dogs (n = 7) underwent the same protocol as group II dogs, but the duration of occlusion was 3 hr. The circumferential endocardial extent of the area at risk closely predicted the circumferential endocardial extent of the infarct. Group IV dogs (n = 5) underwent subtotal coronary occlusion. Although regional wall motion abnormalities were noted in this group, no area at risk could be defined. We conclude that although a close inverse relationship is noted between normalized cardiac output and area at risk, the absolute values for cardiac output and other hemodynamic variables become abnormal only when the area at risk is large (25% to 40%); measurement of LVEF may provide a better assessment of the size of the area at risk than hemodynamic variables.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Epidemiology of serious burn injuries

The incidence of serious burn injuries has been determined for the Commonwealth of Virginia during a 21 month period. The data set included all patients with burn injuries who entered the hospital and were considered to be in serious enough condition to require treatment in a hospital. The risk for burn injury was calculated by age, race and sex. Examination of the date revealed large differences in the magnitude of age-specific incidence rates between men and women and the white and nonwhite population. Differences in the economic status of the population may explain a large proportion of the variation in the crude burn rates.