1
|
Clark TL, Polonsky WH, Soriano EC. The Potential Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use on Diabetes-Related Attitudes and Behaviors in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Investigation of the Patient Experience. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024. [PMID: 38526557 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Background: Despite the known glycemic benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the attitudinal and behavioral changes underlying these glycemic improvements remain understudied. This study aimed to qualitatively explore these changes among a sample of adults with T2D. Methods: In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with adults with T2D who had been using CGM for 3-6 months as part of a larger community project in Ohio. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes across participants' experiences. Results: A total of 34 participants provided insights into their experiences with CGM. Six primary themes emerged: (1) Making the Invisible Visible, highlighting the newfound awareness of T2D in daily life. (2) Effective Decision-Making, emphasizing the use of real-time glucose data for immediate and long-term choices. (3) Enhanced Self-Efficacy, describing a renewed sense of control and motivation. (4) Diabetes-Related Diet Modifications. (5) Changes in Physical Activity. (6) Changes in Medication Taking. Conclusions: Participants reported a far-reaching impact of CGM on their daily lives, with many stating that CGM fostered a greater understanding of diabetes and prompted positive behavior changes. The observed attitudinal and behavioral shifts likely contributed synergistically to the significant glycemic benefits observed over the study period. This study highlights the technology's potential to bring about meaningful attitudinal and behavioral changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor L Clark
- San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Emily C Soriano
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Snoek FJ, Anarte-Ortiz MT, Anderbro T, Cyranka K, Hendrieckx C, Hermanns N, Indelicato L, McGuire BE, Mocan A, Nefs G, Polonsky WH, Stewart R, Vallis M. Roles and competencies of the clinical psychologist in adult diabetes care-A consensus report. Diabet Med 2024; 41:e15312. [PMID: 38385984 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Psychological care is recognised as an integral part of quality diabetes care. We set out to describe the roles and competencies of the clinical psychologist as a member of the multidisciplinary adult diabetes care team, focused on secondary care. METHODS The authors are clinically experienced psychologists involved in adult diabetes care, from Australia, Europe and North America, and active members of the international psychosocial aspects of diabetes study group. Consensus was reached as a group on the roles and competencies of the clinical psychologist working in adult diabetes secondary care, building both on expert opinion and a selective review and discussion of the literature on psychological care in diabetes, clinical guidelines and competency frameworks. RESULTS The clinical psychologist fulfils multiple roles: (1) as a clinician (psychological assessment and therapy), (2) as advisor to the healthcare team (training, consulting), (3) as a communicator and promotor of person-centred care initiatives and (4) as a researcher. Four competencies that are key to successfully fulfilling the above-mentioned roles in a diabetes setting are as follows: (a) specialised knowledge, (b) teamwork and advice, (c) assessment, (d) psychotherapy (referred to as STAP framework). CONCLUSIONS The roles and competencies of clinical psychologists working in diabetes extend beyond the requirements of most university and post-graduate curricula. There is a need for a comprehensive, accredited specialist post-graduate training for clinical psychologists working in diabetes care, building on the proposed STAP framework. This calls for a collaborative effort involving diabetes organisations, clinical psychology societies and diabetes psychology interest groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank J Snoek
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Teresa Anarte-Ortiz
- Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
- Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluacion y Tratamiento Psicologico, Instituto de Investigación Biomedica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Therese Anderbro
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katarzyna Cyranka
- Department of Psychiatry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
- Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Christel Hendrieckx
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychology, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Norbert Hermanns
- Forschungsinstitut Diabetes-Akademie Bad Mergentheim (FIDAM GmbH), Bad Mergentheim, Germany
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy of the University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Liliana Indelicato
- Divission od Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Brian E McGuire
- School of Psychology, University of Galway and Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andreia Mocan
- Center for Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Giesje Nefs
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
- Diabeter, National Treatment and Research Center for Children, Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Rose Stewart
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Hospitals and Health Care, North Wales, UK
| | - Michael Vallis
- Department of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang TS, Yip AKW, Klein G, Moore L, Hessler D, Polonsky WH, Fisher L. Training peers to deliver mental health support to adults with type 1 diabetes using the REACHOUT mobile app. Diabet Med 2024; 41:e15210. [PMID: 37634222 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
AIMS While peer support research is growing in the Type 1 diabetes (T1D) community, the peer supporter training (PST) process is rarely documented in detail. This study provides a comprehensive description of PST and evaluation for the REACHOUT mental health support intervention, and examines the feasibility and perceived utility of PST. METHODS Fifty-three adults with T1D were recruited to participate in a 6-hour, zoom-based PST program for mental health support. The program was structured in three parts: (1) internal motivation, resilience and empathy; (2) mindfulness, emotions and diabetes distress; and (3) active listening and deferring clinical questions to professionals. Candidates were evaluated based on eight pre-established competency criteria during a 5-day support trial with an assigned standardized T1D participant. Perceived usefulness of training skills was also assessed 3 months into the REACHOUT mental health support intervention. RESULTS Fifty-one of the fifty-three candidates who completed training achieved the criteria to graduate. Mean scores for the eight competency domains were: listens actively (4.55); asks open-ended questions (4.12); expresses empathy (4.42); avoids passing judgment (4.67); sits with strong emotions (4.44); refrains from giving advice (4.38); makes reflections (4.5); and defers medical questions (4.58). Of the skills learned during the PST, 95% rated interpreting and discussing diabetes distress profile and expressing empathy as moderately to extremely useful. CONCLUSIONS Findings demonstrate that it is feasible to recruit and graduate the number of trainees needed using a rigorous process. Only by making training protocols available can the PST be replicated and translated to other T1D populations (e.g. adolescents, parents of children with T1D).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tricia S Tang
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Annie K W Yip
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Gerri Klein
- BCDiabetes, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lauren Moore
- Lauren Moore Counseling, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Danielle Hessler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
- University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Lawrence Fisher
- Department of Family Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soriano EC, Polonsky WH. The Influence of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Psychosocial Outcomes in Insulin-Using Type 2 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1614-1622. [PMID: 35533137 PMCID: PMC10658676 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221094831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) on psychosocial outcomes in adults with insulin-using type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS A total of 174 insulin-using adults with T2D completed questionnaires assessing diabetes distress, hypoglycemic confidence, hypoglycemic fear, device-related emotional burden, and device-related trust before and after a six-month trial of rtCGM. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was assessed at the same time points; impaired hypoglycemic awareness (IAH) was assessed at baseline. Change in psychosocial outcomes was examined with t tests, then modeled as a function of baseline HbA1c and IAH and simultaneous change in HbA1c in multiple regression analyses. RESULTS Respondents were predominantly male (57.5%) and non-Hispanic white (67.8%). Significant improvement over the trial was observed in hypoglycemic fear (P = .031), hypoglycemic confidence (P < .001), diabetes distress (P < .001), and device-related emotional burden (P < .001). Impaired hypoglycemic awareness at baseline predicted greater improvement in hypoglycemic fear (P = .002), hypoglycemic confidence (P = .003), diabetes distress (P = .013), and device-related emotional burden (P < .001). Higher baseline HbA1c was linked with greater improvement in hypoglycemic fear (P = .030); HbA1c change over the trial was positively associated with change in diabetes distress (P = .010) and device-related emotional burden (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Introduction of rtCGM in adults with insulin-using T2D was associated with significant improvements in diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes over six months. Gains were significantly greater among participants reporting IAH and those with higher HbA1c at baseline, thus providing the first evidence regarding which users might more likely benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Blumer IR, Munshi MN, Polonsky WH. When Type 1 Diabetes Meets Dementia: Practical Strategies to Help Patients and Their Loved Ones. Clin Diabetes 2023; 42:322-328. [PMID: 38694245 PMCID: PMC11060630 DOI: 10.2337/cd23-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian R. Blumer
- University of Toronto, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Medha N. Munshi
- Joslin Geriatric Diabetes Programs, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Polonsky WH, Soriano EC. Psychosocial and Glycemic Benefits for Insulin-Using Adults With Type 2 Diabetes After Six Months of Pump Therapy: A Quasi-Experimental Approach. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231198533. [PMID: 37667482 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231198533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) use in adults with type 1 diabetes offers psychosocial and clinical benefits, but little is known about its impact on such outcomes in the type 2 diabetes (T2D) population. To address this gap, we conducted a quasi-experimental prospective study to assess psychosocial, glycemic, and behavioral changes over six months in T2D adults on multiple daily injections (MDI) who were interested in starting Omnipod DASH, comparing those who did versus did not start on it. METHODS In total, 458 adults with T2D completed baseline questionnaires assessing psychosocial dimensions (eg, diabetes distress), clinical metrics (eg, HbA1c [glycosylated hemoglobin]), and behavioral measures (eg, missed mealtime boluses). Six months later, 220 (48.0%) completed the same questionnaire again. To examine differences in outcomes over time between those who began CSII (n = 176) versus those who remained on MDI (n = 44), a latent change score approach was used. RESULTS The CSII users reported greater gains than MDI users on all major psychosocial metrics, including overall well-being (P < .001) diabetes distress (P < .001), perceived T2D impact on quality of life (P = .003), and hypoglycemic worries and concerns (P < .001). The CSII users similarly reported a larger decline in HbA1c than MDI users (P < .05) and greater declines in two critical self-care behaviors: number of missed mealtime boluses (P < .001) and number of days of perceived overeating (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS The introduction of CSII (Omnipod DASH) in T2D adults can contribute to significant psychosocial, glycemic, and behavioral benefits, indicating that broader use of CSII in the T2D population may be of value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Emily C Soriano
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Klonoff DC, Wang J, Rodbard D, Kohn MA, Li C, Liepmann D, Kerr D, Ahn D, Peters AL, Umpierrez GE, Seley JJ, Xu NY, Nguyen KT, Simonson G, Agus MSD, Al-Sofiani ME, Armaiz-Pena G, Bailey TS, Basu A, Battelino T, Bekele SY, Benhamou PY, Bequette BW, Blevins T, Breton MD, Castle JR, Chase JG, Chen KY, Choudhary P, Clements MA, Close KL, Cook CB, Danne T, Doyle FJ, Drincic A, Dungan KM, Edelman SV, Ejskjaer N, Espinoza JC, Fleming GA, Forlenza GP, Freckmann G, Galindo RJ, Gomez AM, Gutow HA, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hoang TD, Hovorka R, Jendle JH, Ji L, Joshi SR, Joubert M, Koliwad SK, Lal RA, Lansang MC, Lee WA(A, Leelarathna L, Leiter LA, Lind M, Litchman ML, Mader JK, Mahoney KM, Mankovsky B, Masharani U, Mathioudakis NN, Mayorov A, Messler J, Miller JD, Mohan V, Nichols JH, Nørgaard K, O’Neal DN, Pasquel FJ, Philis-Tsimikas A, Pieber T, Phillip M, Polonsky WH, Pop-Busui R, Rayman G, Rhee EJ, Russell SJ, Shah VN, Sherr JL, Sode K, Spanakis EK, Wake DJ, Waki K, Wallia A, Weinberg ME, Wolpert H, Wright EE, Zilbermint M, Kovatchev B. A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Validated by Clinician Ratings. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1226-1242. [PMID: 35348391 PMCID: PMC10563532 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221085273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A composite metric for the quality of glycemia from continuous glucose monitor (CGM) tracings could be useful for assisting with basic clinical interpretation of CGM data. METHODS We assembled a data set of 14-day CGM tracings from 225 insulin-treated adults with diabetes. Using a balanced incomplete block design, 330 clinicians who were highly experienced with CGM analysis and interpretation ranked the CGM tracings from best to worst quality of glycemia. We used principal component analysis and multiple regressions to develop a model to predict the clinician ranking based on seven standard metrics in an Ambulatory Glucose Profile: very low-glucose and low-glucose hypoglycemia; very high-glucose and high-glucose hyperglycemia; time in range; mean glucose; and coefficient of variation. RESULTS The analysis showed that clinician rankings depend on two components, one related to hypoglycemia that gives more weight to very low-glucose than to low-glucose and the other related to hyperglycemia that likewise gives greater weight to very high-glucose than to high-glucose. These two components should be calculated and displayed separately, but they can also be combined into a single Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) that corresponds closely to the clinician rankings of the overall quality of glycemia (r = 0.95). The GRI can be displayed graphically on a GRI Grid with the hypoglycemia component on the horizontal axis and the hyperglycemia component on the vertical axis. Diagonal lines divide the graph into five zones (quintiles) corresponding to the best (0th to 20th percentile) to worst (81st to 100th percentile) overall quality of glycemia. The GRI Grid enables users to track sequential changes within an individual over time and compare groups of individuals. CONCLUSION The GRI is a single-number summary of the quality of glycemia. Its hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia components provide actionable scores and a graphical display (the GRI Grid) that can be used by clinicians and researchers to determine the glycemic effects of prescribed and investigational treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- Florida State University College of Nursing, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - David Rodbard
- Biomedical Informatics Consultants LLC, Potomac, MD, USA
| | - Michael A. Kohn
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chengdong Li
- Florida State University College of Nursing, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | | | - David Kerr
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - David Ahn
- Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Nicole Y. Xu
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ananda Basu
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kong Y. Chen
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Danne
- Diabetes Center Auf der Bult, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Niels Ejskjaer
- Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Juan C. Espinoza
- Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thanh D. Hoang
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Linong Ji
- Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | | - M. Cecilia Lansang
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Wei-An (Andy) Lee
- LAC + USC Medical Center, Los Angeles County Department of Health Service, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust and The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lawrence A. Leiter
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Lind
- University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Umesh Masharani
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Viswanathan Mohan
- Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India
- Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Moshe Phillip
- Institute for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Schneider Children’s Medical Center of Israel and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | - Gerry Rayman
- Ipswich Hospital, East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation Trust and University of East Anglia, Ipswich, UK
| | - Eun-Jung Rhee
- Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Steven J. Russell
- Massachusetts General Hospital Diabetes Research Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Viral N. Shah
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Koji Sode
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Kayo Waki
- The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | - Mihail Zilbermint
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Miller E, Polonsky WH, Miller K. What Role Might There Be for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Assessment of Diabetes Risk? Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:S14-S20. [PMID: 37306445 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The term "prediabetes" has traditionally been used to describe the state of abnormal glucose homeostasis (dysglycemia) that could eventually lead to developing clinical type 2 diabetes. The HbA1c, oral glucose tolerance testing, and fasting glucose measurements represent the standard approaches for assessing risk. However, they do not predict with complete accuracy, nor do they provide individualized risk assessment to determine who will develop diabetes. Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides a more complete picture of inter- and intraday glucose excursions that may help clinicians and patients quickly identify dysglycemia and make informed personalized intervention decisions. This article discusses the utility of CGM as a tool for both risk assessment and risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden Miller
- Diabetes and Obesity Care LLC, Bend, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Kevin Miller
- Diabetes and Obesity Care LLC, Bend, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Polonsky WH, Guzman SJ, Fisher L. The Hypoglycemic Fear Syndrome: Understanding and Addressing This Common Clinical Problem in Adults With Diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2023; 41:502-509. [PMID: 37849521 PMCID: PMC10577500 DOI: 10.2337/cd22-0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
Although a broad literature on fear of hypoglycemia and its impact on people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes has accumulated over the past three decades, there has been surprisingly little guidance concerning how best to tackle this problem in clinical care. The aim of this article is to begin filling this gap by describing the "hypoglycemic fear syndrome," which we define as hypoglycemic fear that has become so overwhelming that it leads to avoidance behaviors and chronically elevated glucose levels. We begin by presenting several illustrative cases, describing the syndrome and how it is most commonly presented in clinical care, and detailing its most common precipitants. We then offer practical, evidence-based strategies for clinical intervention, based on the literature and our clinical experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Lawrence Fisher
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Polonsky WH, Fortmann AL, Soriano EC, Guzman SJ, Funnell MM. The AH-HA! Project: Transforming Group Diabetes Self-Management Education Through the Addition of Flash Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:194-200. [PMID: 36409486 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background: The majority of individuals referred to diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) programs do not access this resource. Of those who do, attrition is high, with anecdotal reports pointing to the didactic and impersonal nature of these programs contributing to low utilization and completion rates. In an effort to develop a more engaging form of DSMES for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), we constructed a nondidactic "discovery learning"-based DSMES program centered on real-time flash glucose monitoring (FGM). Methods: In this single-arm pilot study, 35 adults with T2D duration 1-5 years, ages 21-75 years, not using insulin and HbA1c ≥8.0% were introduced to FGM and participated in five weekly group sessions. DSMES content was personalized, emerging from the concerns and questions arising from participants' FGM discoveries. The primary outcome was glycemic change as assessed by blinded FGM at baseline and month 3. Secondary outcomes included psychosocial and behavioral measures. Results: There was a significant gain in percentage time in range (% TIR) 70-180 mg/dL from baseline (55%) to month 3 (74%), and a parallel drop-in percentage time above range (TAR) >180 mg/dL from 44% to 25% (Ps = 0.01). Overall well-being rose significantly (P = 0.04), whereas diabetes distress showed a nonsignificant drop. Participants reported improvements in healthy eating (P < 0.001) and physical activity, although the latter did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: These findings support a new approach to DSMES, a method that integrates FGM with a highly interactive and engaging patient-driven "discovery learning" approach to education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
- University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Addie L Fortmann
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Emily C Soriano
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Susan J Guzman
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Martha M Funnell
- Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dibato J, Montvida O, Ling J, Koye D, Polonsky WH, Paul SK. Temporal trends in the prevalence and incidence of depression and the interplay of comorbidities in patients with young- and usual-onset type 2 diabetes from the USA and the UK. Diabetologia 2022; 65:2066-2077. [PMID: 36059021 PMCID: PMC9630215 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05764-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS We aimed to investigate the prevalence and incidence of depression, and the interplay of cardiometabolic comorbidities, in the differentiation of depression risk between young-onset diabetes (diagnosis at age <40 years) and usual-onset diabetes (diagnosis at age ≥40 years). METHODS Using electronic medical records from the UK and USA, retrospective cohorts of adults with incident type 2 diabetes diagnosed between 2006 and 2017 were examined. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of depression, and risk of developing depression, in participants with young-onset type 2 diabetes compared with usual-onset type 2 diabetes were assessed separately by sex and comorbidity status. RESULTS In total 230,932/1,143,122 people with type 2 diabetes from the UK/USA (mean age 58/60 years, proportion of men 57%/46%) were examined. The prevalence of depression in the UK/USA increased from 29% (95% CI 28, 30)/22% (95% CI 21, 23) in 2006 to 43% (95% CI 42, 44)/29% (95% CI 28, 29) in 2017, with the prevalence being similar across all age groups. A similar increasing trend was observed for incidence rates. In the UK, compared with people aged ≥50 years with or without comorbidity, 18-39-year-old men and women had 23-57% and 20-55% significantly higher risks of depression, respectively. In the USA, compared with those aged ≥60 years with or without comorbidity, 18-39-year-old men and women had 5-17% and 8-37% significantly higher risks of depression, respectively. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Depression risk has been increasing in people with incident type 2 diabetes in the UK and USA, particularly among those with young-onset type 2 diabetes, irrespective of other comorbidities. This suggests that proactive mental health assessment from the time of type 2 diabetes diagnosis in primary care is essential for effective clinical management of people with type 2 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Dibato
- Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine at Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Olga Montvida
- Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine at Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanna Ling
- Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine at Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Digsu Koye
- Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine at Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William H Polonsky
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sanjoy K Paul
- Melbourne EpiCentre, Department of Medicine at Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- AstraZeneca, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Polonsky WH, Giorgino F, Rosenstock J, Whitmire K, Lew E, Coudert M, Alvarez A, Nicholls C, McCrimmon RJ. Improved patient-reported outcomes with iGlarLixi versus premix BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes in the SoliMix trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022; 24:2364-2372. [PMID: 36053820 PMCID: PMC9805099 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the SoliMix trial, which compared the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS SoliMix (EudraCT: 2017-003370-13), a 26-week, open-label study, randomized (1:1) 887 adults with T2D and HbA1c ≥7.5%-≤10.0% (≥58-≤86 mmol/mol) on basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) to once-daily iGlarLixi or twice-daily premix insulin, BIAsp 30. PROs were assessed using the Treatment-Related Impact Measure Diabetes (TRIM-D) and Global Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation (GTEE) questionnaires. RESULTS Over 26 weeks, iGlarLixi showed greater improvement from baseline versus BIAsp 30 in total TRIM-D score (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: 5.08 [3.69, 6.47]; effect size: 0.32) and in each TRIM-D domain, with the greatest differences seen in diabetes management (8.47 [6.11, 10.84]) and treatment burden (6.95 [4.83, 9.07]). GTEE scores showed a greater proportion of participants and physicians rated a complete or marked improvement of diabetes control with iGlarLixi (80.5%, 82.8%) versus BIAsp 30 (63.3%, 65.1%) at week 26. Post hoc analyses showed that after adjusting for HbA1c, body weight and hypoglycaemia outcomes, iGlarLixi continued to show greater improvements in TRIM-D total scores versus BIAsp 30. CONCLUSIONS In addition to better glycaemic control, weight benefit and less hypoglycaemia, once-daily iGlarLixi provided improved diabetes management, treatment burden and perceived effectiveness versus twice-daily premix BIAsp 30, further supporting iGlarLixi as an advanced treatment option in people with suboptimally controlled T2D on basal insulin plus OADs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francesco Giorgino
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic DiseasesUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly
| | | | | | | | - Mathieu Coudert
- Biostatistics and Programming DepartmentSanofiChilly‐MazarinFrance
| | | | | | - Rory J. McCrimmon
- Division of Systems Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dibato J, Montvida O, Polonsky WH, Chin KL, Paul SK. Young Adult Depression, Antidepressant Prescriptions, and Therapy Intensification in People With Incident Depression in the United States. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2022; 24. [DOI: 10.4088/pcc.21m03162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
|
14
|
Fisher L, Polonsky WH, Perez-Nieves M, Desai U, Strycker L, Hessler D. A new perspective on diabetes distress using the type 2 diabetes distress assessment system (T2-DDAS): Prevalence and change over time. J Diabetes Complications 2022; 36:108256. [PMID: 35810147 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To establish cut-points and thresholds for elevated diabetes distress; document change over time; and define minimal clinically important differences (MCID) using the new Type 2 Diabetes Distress Assessment System (T2-DDAS). METHODS A national sample of adults with type 2 diabetes completed the T2-DDAS CORE distress scale and the 7 T2-DDAS SOURCE distress scales at baseline and 6-months. Scores were computed separately for insulin- and non-insulin users. Spline regression models defined CORE cut-points and SEM formulas defined MCID. A rational "threshold" approach defined elevated SOURCE scores. RESULTS 471 participants (205 insulin, 266 non-insulin) completed both assessments. Analyses yielded ≥2.0 as the cut-point for both elevated CORE and elevated SOURCE. Prevalence of elevated CORE was 61.8 % (69.9 % over 6 months). Elevated SOURCE scores varied from 30.6 % (Stigma/Shame) to 76.4 % (Management); 87.5 % indicated at least 1 elevated SOURCE score. Most (77.1 %) reported multiple elevated SOURCES. 81.8 % with elevated CORE distress at baseline remained elevated at 6 months. MCID analyses yielded +/- 0.25 as significant change. Few differences between insulin- and non-insulin users occurred. CONCLUSIONS Elevated CORE distress is highly prevalent and persistent over time; most participants reported multiple SOURCES of distress. Findings highlight the need for comprehensive assessment of diabetes distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Fisher
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - W H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - U Desai
- Analysis Group, Boston, MA, USA
| | - L Strycker
- Oregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR, USA
| | - D Hessler
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Polonsky WH, Hood KK, Levy CJ, MacLeish SA, Hirsch IB, Brown SA, Bode BW, Carlson AL, Shah VN, Weinstock RS, Bhargava A, Jones TC, Aleppo G, Mehta SN, Laffel LM, Forlenza GP, Sherr JL, Huyett LM, Vienneau TE, Ly TT. How introduction of automated insulin delivery systems may influence psychosocial outcomes in adults with type 1 diabetes: Findings from the first investigation with the Omnipod® 5 System. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 190:109998. [PMID: 35853530 PMCID: PMC10901155 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate psychosocial outcomes for adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using the tubeless Omnipod® 5 Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System. METHODS A single-arm, multicenter (across the United States), prospective safety and efficacy study of the tubeless AID system included 115 adults with T1D. Participants aged 18-70 years completed questionnaires assessing psychosocial outcomes - diabetes distress (T1-DDS), hypoglycemic confidence (HCS), well-being (WHO-5), sleep quality (PSQI), insulin delivery satisfaction (IDSS), diabetes treatment satisfaction (DTSQ), and system usability (SUS) - before and after 3 months of AID use. Associations among participant characteristics, psychosocial measures and glycemic outcomes were evaluated using linear regression analyses. RESULTS Adults using the tubeless AID system demonstrated improvements in diabetes-specific psychosocial measures, including diabetes distress, hypoglycemic confidence, insulin delivery satisfaction, diabetes treatment satisfaction, and system usability after 3 months (all P < 0.001). No changes in general well-being or sleep quality were observed. The psychosocial outcomes assessed were not consistently associated with baseline participant characteristics (i.e., age, sex, diabetes duration, glycemic outcomes including percent time in range 70-180 mg/dL, percent time below range < 70 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c, or insulin regimen). CONCLUSIONS Use of the Omnipod 5 AID system was associated with significant improvements in diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for adults with T1D. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04196140.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5230 Carrol Canyon Road Ste 208, San Diego, CA 92121, United States; University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | - Korey K Hood
- Department of Pediatrics, Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, 279 Campus Drive, B300, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Carol J Levy
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Sarah A MacLeish
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States
| | - Irl B Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, 750 Republican Street, Building F, Floor 3, Seattle, WA 98109, United States
| | - Sue A Brown
- Division of Endocrinology, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C Hunt Dr, Charlottesville, VA 22903, United States
| | - Bruce W Bode
- Atlanta Diabetes Associates, 1800 Howell Mill Rd #450, Atlanta, GA 30318, United States
| | - Anders L Carlson
- International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet, HealthPartners, 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd, Minneapolis, MN 55415, United States
| | - Viral N Shah
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1775 Aurora Ct #A140, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Ruth S Weinstock
- Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E Adams St, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Anuj Bhargava
- Iowa Diabetes Research, 1031 Office Park Rd Suite #2, West Des Moines, IA 50265, United States
| | - Thomas C Jones
- Department of Research, East Coast Institute for Research at The Jones Center, 265 Sheraton Blvd, Macon, GA 31210, United States
| | - Grazia Aleppo
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 645 N Michigan Ave Ste 530, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Sanjeev N Mehta
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Lori M Laffel
- Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215, United States
| | - Gregory P Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1775 Aurora Ct #A140, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Jennifer L Sherr
- Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510, United States
| | - Lauren M Huyett
- Insulet Corporation, 100 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, United States
| | - Todd E Vienneau
- Insulet Corporation, 100 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, United States
| | - Trang T Ly
- Insulet Corporation, 100 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Polonsky WH, Soriano EC, Fortmann AL. The Role of Retrospective Data Review in the Personal Use of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Perceived Impact on Quality of Life and Health Outcomes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:492-501. [PMID: 35255224 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: To explore whether regularly reviewing one's own retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data might be linked with perceived quality of life (QoL) and glycemic benefits. Methods: Adults with type 1 diabetes (N = 300) or insulin-using type 2 diabetes (N = 198) using the Dexcom G5 Mobile or G6 Real-Time CGM (RT-CGM) system and receiving the weekly CLARITY summary report of their glucose data completed a survey exploring their use of the report and its perceived value and impact on QoL and glycemic outcomes. Regression analyses examined whether personal use of the report was associated with QoL, perceived glycemic outcomes, and RT-CGM metrics. Results: The majority reported that receiving and viewing the report contributed to improved hypoglycemic confidence (75.9%) and overall well-being (50.0%), reduced diabetes distress (59.3%-74.1%), and helped to improve A1C (73.1%) and reduce problems with hypoglycemia (61.8%) and chronic hyperglycemia (73.1%). Regularly reviewing the report with family or friends (positive predictor) and doing nothing with the report's information (negative predictor) were independently associated with QoL and perceived glycemic outcomes. Surprisingly, both predictors were also associated with poorer glycemic control (e.g., greater % time above range >180). Conclusions: These findings suggest that receiving a weekly RT-CGM summary report may contribute to QoL and health benefits, especially if the individual chooses to actively review and make use of the report's findings and openly reviews the findings with family or friends. Prospective studies are needed to more precisely determine how retrospective RT-CGM data summaries can best be presented and utilized effectively by adults with diabetes to enhance health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Emily C Soriano
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Addie L Fortmann
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Farooqi A, Gillies C, Sathanapally H, Abner S, Seidu S, Davies MJ, Polonsky WH, Khunti K. A systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the prevalence of depression between people with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes 2022; 16:1-10. [PMID: 34810141 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Diabetes can significantly impact quality of life and mental health. However, inconsistencies have been reported in the prevalence of depression in those with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and those without. Systematic reviews also included studies without adequate control subjects. We update existing literature, by comparing depression prevalence between individuals with and without Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCHINFO, from January 1985 to August 2021. Studies were excluded if they failed to have an adequate control group, specified type of diabetes, or reported depression prevalence by type of diabetes. RESULTS 44 studies were selected for inclusion. The prevalence of depression was significantly higher in people with Type 1 (22% vs 13%, OR = 2.10 (95% CI: 1.23, 3.52)), or Type 2 diabetes (19% vs 11%, OR = 1.76 (1.55, 2.01)) compared to those without diabetes. There was no association between study effect size and mean age or gender. Findings did not significantly differ between methods of depression assessment. Prevalence of depression in people with diabetes was higher in studies carried out in specialist care (36%, OR = 3.14 (2.12, 4.63)) compared to those in community or primary care (12%, OR = 1.51 (1.35, 1.70) and in low- and middle-income countries (OR = 2.58 (1.91, 3.50) compared to countries with high income economies (OR = 1.59 (1.39, 1.82)). CONCLUSIONS Depression prevalence remains significant in those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Effective chronic disease management in people with diabetes is important, particularly screening and managing depression and diabetes distress in specialist care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaisha Farooqi
- Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, UK.
| | - Clare Gillies
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK
| | | | - Sophia Abner
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Sam Seidu
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK; NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, UK
| | | | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, University of Leicester, UK; Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Desai U, King SB, Perez-Nieves M. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the emotional side of type 2 diabetes: A re-envisioning of the assessment of diabetes distress. J Diabetes Complications 2022; 36:108103. [PMID: 34916146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To develop an updated, more theoretically sound system for describing and assessing diabetes-related emotional distress (DD) in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS Items were developed from qualitative interviews with 11 adults with T2D and 6 clinicians, then categorized as reflecting a core emotional experience of DD or a primary source of DD. Items were then administered to a national sample of TCOYD Registry participants. Data were analyzed using both exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses. Reliability (alpha) and construct validity also were assessed. RESULTS EFAs with 599 adults (258 insulin users, 341 non-insulin users) yielded a coherent DD Core scale and 7 DD Source scales (management demands, healthcare provider, hypoglycemia, long-term health, interpersonal issues, shame/stigma, healthcare access), which were confirmed by CFA. All alphas were >0.65. DD Core and DD Source scales were associated with criterion variables (all p < .001). Higher DD Core scores were linked to higher HbA1c, BMI, more frequent severe hypoglycemia, and poorer self-management (all p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Good reliability and validity were found for this two-part T2DD Assessment System. It reflects a more contemporary and actionable approach to DD assessment that distinguishes between its key emotional dimension and its underlying contributors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine caregivers' experiences with real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) data sharing and its impact on quality of life (QoL) and health outcomes. METHODS Parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (N = 303) and spouses/partners of T1D adults (N = 212) using the Dexcom G5 Mobile or G6 RT-CGM system and who were actively following their T1Ds' RT-CGM data completed a survey examining their perceived value of data sharing, the impact of sharing on their own QoL and their child/partner's health, and how they used RT-CGM data to support their T1Ds' diabetes management. Regression analyses examined whether their actions were linked to reported changes in QoL and health outcomes. RESULTS Respondents were predominantly non-Hispanic White (91.1% parents; 88.7% partners), female (78.2% parents; 54.7% partners), and college-educated (65.3% parents; 61.8% partners). The majority reported that data sharing had enhanced hypoglycemic confidence (97.7% parents; 98.1% partners), overall well-being (60.4% parents; 63.2% partners), and sleep quality (78.0% parents; 61.3% partners). Of note, three positive caregiver actions were broadly consistent and significant predictors of QoL and health benefits for both parents and partners: celebrating success related to glycemic control, providing encouragement when glycemic control is challenging, and teamwork discussions about how the caregiver should respond to out-of-range values. CONCLUSIONS RT-CGM data sharing was associated with a range of QoL and health benefits for caregivers. Degree of benefits was influenced by the collaborative actions taken by caregivers to support their child's or partner's diabetes management. To determine the most effective strategies for collaborative data sharing, longitudinal trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
- William H. Polonsky, Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5230 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Polonsky WH, Arora R, Faurby M, Fernandes J, Liebl A. Higher Rates of Persistence and Adherence in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Once-Weekly vs Daily Injectable Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in US Clinical Practice (STAY Study). Diabetes Ther 2022; 13:175-187. [PMID: 34918213 PMCID: PMC8776963 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-021-01189-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reducing dosing frequency may lower treatment burden and improve persistence and adherence. This retrospective, observational study assessed persistence and adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating once-weekly or daily injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in US clinical practice. METHODS The study used data from adults (≥ 18 years) with T2D who were included in the IBM MarketScan Explorys Claims-EMR Data Set for ≥ 180 days pre-index and ≥ 365 days post-index, were GLP-1 RA and insulin naïve at first claim (index date) for once-weekly or daily injectable GLP-1 RAs (follow-up: index date + 365 days), and were propensity score (PS) matched 1:1 by baseline characteristics. Persistence, defined as the stay time, was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. Adherence was defined as a proportion of days covered of 0.8 or greater. To assess whether patients with more advanced disease would benefit from long-acting treatments, patients were matched to the baseline characteristics of basal insulin initiators using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS The PS-matched cohorts (n = 784 each) had similar baseline characteristics. Once-weekly regimens were associated with significantly higher persistence than daily treatments (median stay time: 333 vs 269 days; hazard ratio 0.80 [95% confidence interval 0.71, 0.90]; p < 0.01) and with significantly higher adherence than daily regimens at 6 months and 12 months (p < 0.01 for both). Mean glycated haemoglobin reductions were greater with once-weekly than with daily treatment at 6 months (- 1.1% vs - 0.9%; p < 0.01) and 12 months (- 0.9% vs - 0.7%; p = not significant); adherent patients experienced greater reductions than those with poor adherence. Results were similar in the IPTW-matched analysis. CONCLUSION In US clinical practice, once-weekly injectable treatments are associated with better persistence and adherence than daily regimens over 1 year. Once-weekly regimens may also benefit patients with more advanced T2D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5230 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 208, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA.
- University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Riya Arora
- Novo Nordisk Service Centre Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India
| | | | | | - Andreas Liebl
- Center for Diabetes and Metabolism, m&i-Fachklinik Bad Heilbrunn, Bad Heilbrunn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oser TK, Litchman ML, Allen NA, Kwan BM, Fisher L, Jortberg BT, Polonsky WH, Oser SM. Personal Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Clinical Efficacy and Economic Impacts. Curr Diab Rep 2021; 21:49. [PMID: 34882273 PMCID: PMC8655087 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-021-01408-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews recent clinical efficacy research and economic analysis of the use of personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in type 2 diabetes (T2D). RECENT FINDINGS Studies from the past 5 years include a variety of randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and other studies which generally favor CGM over self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in T2D, especially among people with T2D treated with insulin. Concurrently, some studies show no significant difference, but there is no evidence of worse outcomes with CGM. CGM is frequently associated with greater reduction in HbA1c than is SMBG. HbA1c reductions tend to be greater when baseline HbA1c is higher. Reductions in hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia have also been demonstrated with CGM in people with T2D, as have comfort with, preference for, and psychosocial benefits of CGM compared to SMBG. There is a small but growing evidence base on the economics and cost-effectiveness of CGM in T2D. CGM has been clearly demonstrated to have clinical benefits in people with T2D, especially among those treated with insulin. Economic and cost-effectiveness data are more scant but are generally favorable. CGM should be an important consideration in the management of T2D, and its use is likely to increase as efficacy data accumulate further and as costs associated with CGM gradually decrease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara K. Oser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17thAvenue, Room 3513, Box F496, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | | | - Nancy A. Allen
- University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Bethany M. Kwan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17thAvenue, Room 3513, Box F496, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Lawrence Fisher
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Bonnie T. Jortberg
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17thAvenue, Room 3513, Box F496, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | | | - Sean M. Oser
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 East 17thAvenue, Room 3513, Box F496, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Aleppo G, Beck RW, Bailey R, Ruedy KJ, Calhoun P, Peters AL, Pop-Busui R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Bao S, Umpierrez G, Davis G, Kruger D, Bhargava A, Young L, Buse JB, McGill JB, Martens T, Nguyen QT, Orozco I, Biggs W, Lucas KJ, Polonsky WH, Price D, Bergenstal RM. The Effect of Discontinuing Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin. Diabetes Care 2021; 44:2729-2737. [PMID: 34588210 PMCID: PMC8669539 DOI: 10.2337/dc21-1304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the effect of discontinuing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) after 8 months of CGM use in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal without bolus insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This multicenter trial had an initial randomization to either real-time CGM or blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for 8 months followed by 6 months in which the BGM group continued to use BGM (n = 57) and the CGM group was randomly reassigned either to continue CGM (n = 53) or discontinue CGM with resumption of BGM for glucose monitoring (n = 53). RESULTS In the group that discontinued CGM, mean time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL, which improved from 38% before initiating CGM to 62% after 8 months of CGM, decreased after discontinuing CGM to 50% at 14 months (mean change from 8 to 14 months -12% [95% CI -21% to -3%], P = 0.01). In the group that continued CGM use, little change was found in TIR from 8 to 14 months (baseline 44%, 8 months 56%, 14 months 57%, mean change from 8 to 14 months 1% [95% CI -11% to 12%], P = 0.89). Comparing the two groups at 14 months, the adjusted treatment group difference in mean TIR was -6% (95% CI -16% to 4%, P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS In adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin who had been using real-time CGM for 8 months, discontinuing CGM resulted in a loss of about one-half of the initial gain in TIR that had been achieved during CGM use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Aleppo
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Roy W Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | | | - Anne L Peters
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Shichun Bao
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | | | | - Laura Young
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - John B Buse
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Thomas Martens
- International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet Internal Medicine, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Ian Orozco
- Carteret Medical Group, Morehead City, NC
| | | | - K Jean Lucas
- Diabetes and Endocrinology Consultants, PC, Morehead City, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
The advent of connected insulin pens will generate an avalanche of digital insulin data, especially in the context of prandial- and multiple daily injection-insulin regimens. There is a need for the diabetes community to develop standards for such data, analogous to what has been achieved using the ambulatory glucose profile and associated metrics for glucose, permitting harmonization of data reporting for multiple devices and facilitating integration of glucose, insulin, food intake, and physical activity data. Several studies have estimated the timing of meals by analyses of glucose excursions but using diverse criteria. There is need for uniform criteria for multiple types of insulin boluses, including premeal, perimeal, delayed, missed, and correction boluses to facilitate research studies and patient care. This article contains a first preliminary proposal for standards regarding reporting of insulin dosing data. Clinical usage of these reports will require sensitive communication between health care providers and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - David Rodbard
- Biomedical Informatics Consultants LLC, Clinical Biostatistics Department, Potomac, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Martens T, Beck RW, Bailey R, Ruedy KJ, Calhoun P, Peters AL, Pop-Busui R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Bao S, Umpierrez G, Davis G, Kruger D, Bhargava A, Young L, McGill JB, Aleppo G, Nguyen QT, Orozco I, Biggs W, Lucas KJ, Polonsky WH, Buse JB, Price D, Bergenstal RM. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021; 325:2262-2272. [PMID: 34077499 PMCID: PMC8173473 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.7444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to be beneficial for adults with type 2 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy, but its use in type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of CGM in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin in primary care practices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 15 centers in the US (enrollment from July 30, 2018, to October 30, 2019; follow-up completed July 7, 2020) and included adults with type 2 diabetes receiving their diabetes care from a primary care clinician and treated with 1 or 2 daily injections of long- or intermediate-acting basal insulin without prandial insulin, with or without noninsulin glucose-lowering medications. INTERVENTIONS Random assignment 2:1 to CGM (n = 116) or traditional blood glucose meter (BGM) monitoring (n = 59). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level at 8 months. Key secondary outcomes were CGM-measured time in target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL, time with glucose level at greater than 250 mg/dL, and mean glucose level at 8 months. RESULTS Among 175 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [9] years; 88 women [50%]; 92 racial/ethnic minority individuals [53%]; mean [SD] baseline HbA1c level, 9.1% [0.9%]), 165 (94%) completed the trial. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 9.1% at baseline to 8.0% at 8 months in the CGM group and from 9.0% to 8.4% in the BGM group (adjusted difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -0.8% to -0.1%]; P = .02). In the CGM group, compared with the BGM group, the mean percentage of CGM-measured time in the target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL was 59% vs 43% (adjusted difference, 15% [95% CI, 8% to 23%]; P < .001), the mean percentage of time at greater than 250 mg/dL was 11% vs 27% (adjusted difference, -16% [95% CI, -21% to -11%]; P < .001), and the means of the mean glucose values were 179 mg/dL vs 206 mg/dL (adjusted difference, -26 mg/dL [95% CI, -41 to -12]; P < .001). Severe hypoglycemic events occurred in 1 participant (1%) in the CGM group and in 1 (2%) in the BGM group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin without prandial insulin, continuous glucose monitoring, as compared with blood glucose meter monitoring, resulted in significantly lower HbA1c levels at 8 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03566693.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Martens
- International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet Internal Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Roy W. Beck
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ryan Bailey
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
| | | | | | - Anne L. Peters
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | | | | | - Shichun Bao
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Georgia Davis
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Laura Young
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | - Janet B. McGill
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Grazia Aleppo
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Ian Orozco
- Carteret Medical Group, Morehead City, North Carolina
| | | | - K. Jean Lucas
- Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants PC, Morehead City, North Carolina
| | | | - John B. Buse
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Polonsky WH, Fortmann AL, Price D, Fisher L. "Hyperglycemia aversiveness": Investigating an overlooked problem among adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2021; 35:107925. [PMID: 33836966 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.107925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the problem of adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) who purposefully keep their glucose levels low, and to explore contributors to, and possible impact of, this potentially dangerous phenomenon. METHODS We developed three self-report items as a means to identify individuals who endorse a consistent preference for hypoglycemia over hyperglycemia ("Hyperglycemia Aversives"). In a large T1D survey (n = 219), validated measures of well-being, emotional distress and hypoglycemic awareness, and glycemic metrics derived from the past 14-day period, were used to examine whether Hyperglycemia Aversives could be characterized as a distinct group. RESULTS Hyperglycemia Aversives comprised 16.4% of the sample. This unique group demonstrated significantly higher mean %TIR (71.6% vs. 63.6%) and %TBR (5.1% vs. 2.2%), lower mean %TAR > 250 mg/dL (6.0% vs. 10.1%), and higher rates of impaired hypoglycemic awareness and recurrent severe hypoglycemia episodes than the remaining study sample ("Non-Aversives") (all ps < 0.01). The two groups did not demonstrate significant differences on psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We identified a group of T1D adults reporting a consistent preference for hypoglycemia over hyperglycemia. These individuals achieve significantly greater %TIR and less %TAR, but at the cost of greater %TBR and more frequent severe hypoglycemia episodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
| | - A L Fortmann
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - D Price
- Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States of America
| | - L Fisher
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Snoek FJ, Fisher L, Polonsky WH, Stuckey H, Hessler D, Tang T, Hermanns N, Mundet X, Silva M, Sturt J, Okazaki K, Hadjiyianni I, Desai U, Perez-Nieves M. Overcoming psychological insulin resistance: A practical guide for healthcare professionals. Prim Care Diabetes 2021; 15:619-621. [PMID: 33785288 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Despite the demonstrated benefits of using insulin, nearly a third of the patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are initially reluctant to initiate insulin therapy when it is first recommended by their healthcare provider (HCP). Several studies have documented the reasons for this phenomenon known as psychological insulin resistance (PIR) and also identified actionable strategies for HCPs to assist people with T2D to overcome their PIR. However, most strategies are based on the experiences of HCPs, rather than of patients. Based on findings from a study exploring real-world patient experience around HCP actions for mitigating PIR, we suggest that HCPs use collaborative strategies throughout the course of T2D treatment to 1) explore reasons for PIR, 2) help patients overcome PIR, and 3) follow-up regarding experience with insulin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank J Snoek
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lawrence Fisher
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA; University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Tricia Tang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Xavier Mundet
- Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Maria Silva
- Instituto Multidisciplinar de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gilbert TR, Noar A, Blalock O, Polonsky WH. Change in Hemoglobin A1c and Quality of Life with Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use by People with Insulin-Treated Diabetes in the Landmark Study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:S35-S39. [PMID: 33470882 PMCID: PMC7957368 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Background: Initiating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can affect hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and patients' relationship with their diabetes. We used real-world HbA1c data to quantify short-term changes in glycemia and validated psychosocial questionnaires to assess changes in quality-of-life indicators in people during their first few months of CGM use. Methods: Eligibility was assessed during calls to Dexcom sales regarding its G6 CGM System. Eligibility criteria included ages 25-65 years, type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) on intensive insulin therapy (IIT), and no prior CGM use. Participants used a web-based portal to complete the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) and the 14-item Hypoglycemia Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS); provided validated HbA1c measurements; and shared their CGM data pre- and 3-5 months post-CGM initiation. Satisfaction and ease of use with the G6 System were also assessed. Results: Data were available from 248 patients (182 with T1D, 66 with T2D; 57% male, 88% non-Hispanic white). Mean (standard deviation) HbA1c fell significantly from 8.2% (1.9%) at baseline to 7.1% (1.1%) at the end of the study (P < 0.001); more than half (54.4%) of those with initial HbA1c values >7% experienced absolute HbA1c reductions of >1%. Significant reductions in diabetes distress (DDS) and hypoglycemic concerns (HABS) were observed (P < 0.001). Most (93%) participants were satisfied or very satisfied with the G6 System and 73% found it very easy to use. Conclusions: The first 3 months of CGM use was correlated with improvements in psychosocial outcomes and improved HbA1c levels for people with T1D or T2D who use IIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R. Gilbert
- Endocrinology Center of Southwest Louisiana, Lake Charles, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam Noar
- Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
- Address correspondence to: Adam Noar, BA, Dexcom, Inc., 6340 Sequence Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Olivia Blalock
- Endocrinology Center of Southwest Louisiana, Lake Charles, Louisiana, USA
| | - William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Background: To examine experiences with real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) data sharing and its impact on health-related outcomes. Methods: Adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) (N = 302) using the Dexcom G5 Mobile or G6 RT-CGM system and sharing data with ≥1 family/friend follower completed a survey exploring their perceived value of data sharing, the impact of sharing on health and quality of life (QoL) outcomes, and how their chief follower (CF) used shared data to support their diabetes management. Regression analyses examined whether CF actions were linked to reported changes in health and QoL outcomes for the T1D adult. Results: The majority had lived with T1D >10 years, (76.5%), used RT-CGM >1 year (58.0%), and identified their spouse/partner as CF (51.9%). Data sharing reportedly contributed to improved hypoglycemic confidence (for 89.4% of respondents), improved overall well-being (54.3%), and reduced diabetes distress (36.1%). Benefits related to data sharing included fewer episodes of severe hypoglycemia (62.2%), better sleep (52.4%), and A1C improvement (47.3%). In particular, three positive CF actions were independent predictors of health and QoL benefits: celebrating success related to glycemic control, providing encouragement when glycemic control is challenging, and teamwork discussions about how CF should respond to out-of-range values. Conclusions: RT-CGM data sharing was associated with a range of health and QoL-related benefits. The occurrence of benefits was influenced by the collaborative management approaches taken by RT-CGM users and their data-sharing followers. Longitudinal trials are needed to determine the most effective patterns of collaborative data sharing, leading to their implementation into routine diabetes management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California
- Address correspondence to: William H. Polonsky, PhD, Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5230 Carroll Canyon Rd., Suite #208, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Addie L. Fortmann
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Uzoigwe C, Radin M, Hamersky CM, DeKoven M, Holt C, Karkare S, Polonsky WH. Quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes after switching to insulin degludec: results from a cross-sectional survey. Qual Life Res 2021; 30:1629-1640. [PMID: 33550540 PMCID: PMC8178133 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02753-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Five quality of life (QoL) domains are particularly important to patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using basal insulin-sense of physical well-being, sense of safety regarding hypoglycemia, sense of diabetes as burdensome, feelings of freedom and flexibility, and sleep quality. METHODS An online survey assessed these QoL domains in adult patients with T2D in the USA who had switched from a previous basal insulin to insulin degludec (IDeg): modified versions of the World Health Organization (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Hypoglycemia Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS; confidence and anxiety subscales only), and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS; emotional burden and regimen-related distress subscales only); three items assessing feelings of freedom and flexibility; and one item assessing sleep quality (hours of restful sleep). Patients rated each item for their previous basal insulin and currently while using IDeg. Correlations between sleep quality and the other QoL scales were also assessed. RESULTS In total, 152 patients completed the survey and were included in the study sample. Patients reported significantly improved scores while using IDeg on all WHO-5, DDS, HABS, feelings of freedom and flexibility item scores, and total raw/mean subscale scores (P < 0.0001). Patients also reported a significantly greater number of hours of restful sleep [mean (SD) 6.6 (2.0) vs. 5.5 (1.8); P < 0.0001]. Better sleep quality statistically significantly correlated with improved QoL in all other domains assessed. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with IDeg after switching from a previous basal insulin was associated with statistically significant improvements in all QoL domains assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chioma Uzoigwe
- Novo Nordisk Inc., 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, NJ, 08536, USA.
| | - Michael Radin
- Novo Nordisk Inc., 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, NJ, 08536, USA
| | - Carol M Hamersky
- Novo Nordisk Inc., 800 Scudders Mill Road, Plainsboro, NJ, 08536, USA
| | | | | | | | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.,University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Danne T, Joish VN, Afonso M, Banks P, Sawhney S, Lapuerta P, Davies MJ, Buse JB, Lin D, Reaney M, Guillonneau S, Snoek FJ, Bailey TS, Polonsky WH. Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Sotagliflozin plus Insulin Versus Insulin Alone. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:70-77. [PMID: 32721228 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2020.0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: Diabetes-related distress is common among persons affected by diabetes and is associated with suboptimal glycemic control and complications, thus constituting a relevant patient-report outcome (PRO). Improving glycemic control may reduce diabetes distress and improve treatment satisfaction. This post hoc analysis evaluated PRO data for a pooled cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) receiving sotagliflozin as adjunct to optimized insulin in the inTandem1 and inTandem2 studies. Methods: Clinically meaningful changes in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs) and the two-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS2) total and individual scores were examined in the pooled data from the first 24 weeks of the studies. Results: In the cohort of patients with a baseline DTSQs total score ≤32 (∼76% of entire cohort), nearly twice as many patients treated with sotagliflozin 200 (45.9%) or 400 mg (42.3%) experienced a >3-point improvement from baseline versus those treated with placebo (24%). Treatment with sotagliflozin led to statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvements across all DTSQs items. Approximately 42% of all patients were considered to have a high risk of diabetes distress (total DDS2 score ≥6) at baseline following insulin optimization. More patients shifted from high to low risk with sotagliflozin compared with placebo (∼40% vs. 23%; P ≤ 0.0002). The baseline-adjusted difference in DDS2 from placebo was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced by -0.5 and -0.6 for sotagliflozin 200 and 400 mg, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with T1D treated with sotagliflozin in addition to optimized insulin therapy reported meaningful improvements in treatment satisfaction and diabetes distress. NCT02384941 and NCT02421510.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Danne
- Department for General Pediatrics, Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Clinical Research, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Vijay N Joish
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA
| | | | - Phillip Banks
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA
| | | | - Pablo Lapuerta
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Woodlands, Texas, USA
| | | | - John B Buse
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dee Lin
- Sanofi US, Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | - Frank J Snoek
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Polonsky WH. Tedious, Tiresome, and Dull: An Unrecognized Problem That We Can Solve. Diabetes Spectr 2021; 34:85-89. [PMID: 33627999 PMCID: PMC7887534 DOI: 10.2337/ds20-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Editor's Note: This article is adapted from the virtual address Dr. Polonsky delivered as the recipient of the American Diabetes Association's (ADA's) Outstanding Educator in Diabetes Award for 2020. He delivered the address in June 2020 during the Association's 80th Scientific Sessions, held online as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute and University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Polonsky WH, Fortmann AL. The influence of time in range on daily mood in adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2020; 34:107746. [PMID: 33077350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the impact of time in range (TIR) on mood in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS We followed a cohort of 219 T1D adults, all currently employing a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system (RT-CGM), to investigate how daily changes in CGM metrics were associated with nightly reports of positive and negative mood over a two-week period. RESULTS Greater daily %TIR (70-180 mg/dL) and less time in "severe" hyperglycemia (% time above range (TAR) > 300 mg/dL) were both significantly associated with higher ratings on all positive mood elements and lower ratings on most negative mood elements (all ps < 0.05). When entered together as predictors, %TIR but not %TAR >300 emerged as an independent predictor of many of the positive and negative mood variables. Neither daily changes in time spent in hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dL) nor glycemic variability (represented by the coefficient of variation) were significantly related to reported mood. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first evidence that time in range (%TIR) is associated with, and likely enhances, daily mood. Consistent with previous studies, we also found that more time spent in "severe" hyperglycemia is linked to more negative mood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W H Polonsky
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, USA; Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - A L Fortmann
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Polonsky WH, Layne JE, Parkin CG, Kusiak CM, Barleen NA, Miller DP, Zisser H, Dixon RF. Impact of Participation in a Virtual Diabetes Clinic on Diabetes-Related Distress in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes 2020; 38:357-362. [PMID: 33132505 PMCID: PMC7566922 DOI: 10.2337/cd19-0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The Onduo Virtual Diabetes Clinic is a telehealth program for people with type 2 diabetes that combines mobile app technology, remote personalized lifestyle coaching, connected blood glucose meters, real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) devices, and clinical support from board-certified endocrinologists. This analysis evaluated change in diabetes distress among 228 program participants who reported moderate distress (score 2.0-2.9) or high distress (score ≥3.0) on the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS17) at enrollment. Participants reported significant reductions in overall distress from 3.0 ± 0.8 at baseline to 2.5 ± 0.9 (P <0.001) at an average of 6 months of follow-up. Significant reductions in all DDS17 subscale scores were observed; most notable were reductions in the regimen-related and emotional distress subscales (-0.9 and -0.4, respectively; both P <0.001). Significantly greater reductions in overall distress (P = 0.012) and regimen-related distress (P <0.001) were reported by participants who were prescribed and used intermittent rtCGM (n = 77) versus nonusers (n = 151). Although the generalizability of these findings may be limited by the study's small sample size and potential for self-selection bias, these results do suggest that telemedicine programs such as the Onduo VDC could be a valuable tool for addressing the problem of diabetes-related distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Liu J, Fan L, McAuliffe-Fogarty AH. Worries and concerns about hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes: An examination of the reliability and validity of the Hypoglycemic Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS). J Diabetes Complications 2020; 34:107606. [PMID: 32354623 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To examine the factor structure, validity and reliability of the Hypoglycemic Attitudes and Behavior Scale (HABS) in T1D adults (previously examined only in T2D adults), and to determine if it has unique value, after controlling for hypoglycemic fear. METHODS The original 14 HABS items were submitted to a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with T1D participants. Construct validity criteria included diabetes distress, generalized anxiety, well-being, hypoglycemic fear, hypoglycemia history and self-reported glycemic control. RESULTS A CFA yielded a similar 3-factor solution, with all items loading on the same factors as in the analyses with T2D adults: Hypoglycemia Anxiety, Avoidance and Confidence. Higher levels of Anxiety and Avoidance were significantly associated with poorer well-being and higher levels of generalized anxiety, diabetes distress and hypoglycemic fear, with correlations in the reverse direction for Confidence. After controls (including hypoglycemic fear), the HABS subscales were significantly linked to several criterion variables. CONCLUSIONS Though originally developed and validated with T2D adults, the HABS demonstrates sufficient validity and reliability for use with a T1D population; and it captures unique critical elements of hypoglycemic concerns. Thus, it may contribute to a greater understanding of hypoglycemia management and more targeted clinical interventions in a T1D population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W H Polonsky
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, United States of America; Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
| | - L Fisher
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - D Hessler
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - J Liu
- T1D Exchange, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - L Fan
- Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Diabetes, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Background: Hypoglycemic confidence (HC) represents the degree to which an individual feels secure regarding his or her ability to stay safe from hypoglycemia-related problems. Self-report scales assessing HC in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) have found that greater HC is associated with better glycemic control and that HC rises significantly after real-time continuous glucose monitoring is introduced. To determine whether HC might be similarly meaningful in the partners of T1D adults, we developed the Hypoglycemic Confidence Scale for Partners (Partner-HCS). This article describes the construction and validation of the Partner-HCS and examines how HC in T1D partners is related to hypoglycemia-related experience and key psychosocial constructs. Methods: Items were developed from interviews with seven T1D partners, resulting in 12 self-report items. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then conducted on data collected from T1D partners (n = 218). Variables to establish construct validity for the Partner-HCS included partner-reported diabetes distress, hypoglycemic fear, generalized anxiety, and confidence regarding glucagon use, as well as frequency of recent severe hypoglycemia in the T1D adult. Hierarchical regression analyses examined the unique contribution of Partner-HCS scores, independent of hypoglycemic fear, to key psychosocial constructs and hypoglycemia-related factors. Results: EFA of the 12 items yielded a single-factor solution, accounting for 51.2% of the variance. Construct validity was demonstrated by significant univariate associations with key psychosocial constructs. Importantly, Partner-HCS total score was, independent of hypoglycemic fear, significantly associated with diabetes distress (P < 0.05), overall relationship satisfaction (P = 0.004), number of severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last 6 months (P < 0.05), and confidence using glucagon (P = 0.007). In total, 38.5% of T1D partners indicated relatively low HC. Conclusions: HC is an important facet of the experiences of T1D partners. It is related to, yet distinct from, hypoglycemic fear. The Partner-HCS is a reliable, valid method for assessing HC in partners of T1D adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California
| | - Addie L Fortmann
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Anh Nguyen
- Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Winkley K, Upsher R, Polonsky WH, Holmes-Truscott E. Psychosocial aspects and contributions of behavioural science to medication-taking for adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2020; 37:427-435. [PMID: 31837158 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this narrative review was to determine the contribution of behavioural and psychosocial research to the field of medication-taking for adults with type 2 diabetes over the past 25 years. We review the behavioural and psychosocial literature relevant to adults with type 2 diabetes who are treated with oral antidiabetes agents, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and insulin. Delayed uptake of, omission of and non-persistence with medications are significant problems among adults with type 2 diabetes. At each stage of the course of diabetes, during which medication to lower blood glucose is initiated or intensified, ~50% of people take less medication than prescribed. Research aimed at increasing optimal medication-taking behaviour has targeted 'forgetfulness', developing interventions which aid medication-taking, such as reminder devices, with limited success. In parallel, investigation of beliefs about medication has provided insights into the perceived necessity of and concerns about medication and how these inform medication-taking decisions. Guidance is available for health professionals to facilitate shared decision-making, particularly with insulin therapy; however, interventions addressing medication beliefs are limited. Optimal medication-taking behaviour is essential to prevent hyperglycaemia in adults with type 2 diabetes. Evidence from the past 25 years has demonstrated the association between medication beliefs and medication-taking behaviour. Health professionals need to address medication concerns, and establish and demonstrate the utility of diabetes medication with the individual within the clinical consultation. There are interventions that may assist diabetes health professionals in the shared decision-making process, but further development and more robust evaluation of these tools and techniques is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Winkley
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, UK
| | - R Upsher
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - W H Polonsky
- Behavioural Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - E Holmes-Truscott
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The success of diabetes technologies depends on the attitudes and behavior of the individuals who choose to adopt them. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and sensor-augmented pump systems may positively affect diabetes-related quality of life (QOL), although the influence on QOL outcomes seems to be modest and the results from randomized controlled trials are limited and controversial. In contrast, more consistently positive QOL-related responses are apparent from observational data. The newer generations of devices hold the promise for more strongly enhancing diabetes-related QOL. Appropriate training and ongoing support are likely to be the key to successful uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5405 Oberlin Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121, USA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of people with diabetes, especially those with type 1 diabetes (T1D), are using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems to support their diabetes self-management, yet even so only approximately 30% of individuals with T1D meet the American Diabetes Association HbA1c target of 58 mmol/mol (7.5%) for children and 53 mmol/mol (7.0%) for adults. We aimed to produce a useful tool for people with diabetes to improve personalized understanding of CGM. METHOD A brief leaflet titled "Guidelines to Improve Glucose Control Using CGM" was developed for people with diabetes. Semistructured interviews were held with 12 adults with T1D, focusing on their views regarding the relevance, readability, and usability of the newly revised leaflet. Participants were specifically asked to share what they would find most useful in terms of information and advice provided as well as how to make use of that in the context of their own diabetes self-management. Data were analyzed thematically and used to inform revisions of the leaflet content. RESULTS Data highlighted information and advice needs as well as personalization in terms of own diabetes management. CONCLUSIONS CGM systems are associated with improved medical and psychosocial outcomes, especially when used effectively to meet the individual needs of the user. Ensuring greater understanding of the individual's expectations when first starting CGM, matching experience and skills to meet those expectations, and tailoring use to the individual needs of each person with diabetes (PWD) are all required to achieve widespread and consistent benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine D. Barnard-Kelly
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences,
Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
- BHR Limited, Fareham, UK
- Katharine D. Barnard-Kelly, PhD, CPsychol,
AFBPsS, BHR Limited, 42 Kilmiston Dr, Fareham, Hampshire PO16 8EG, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shumway M, Fisher L, Hessler D, Bowyer V, Polonsky WH, Masharani U. Economic costs of implementing group interventions to reduce diabetes distress in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the T1-REDEEM trial. J Diabetes Complications 2019; 33:107416. [PMID: 31473079 PMCID: PMC6823162 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.107416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS This study evaluated the implementation costs of two group interventions, one focused on diabetes education (KnowIt) and one focused directly on diabetes distress (OnTrack), that reduced diabetes distress and HbA1C in adults with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes (T1DM) in the T1-REDEEM trial. METHODS Resources used to provide interventions were enumerated using activity-based micro-costing methods. Costs were assigned to resources in 2017 US dollars. US median wage and benefit rates were used to calculate costs of staff time. Cost per unit change was calculated for diabetes distress and HbA1C. RESULTS For both interventions, per participant implementation costs were approximately $250 and cost per 1.0 percentage point (11 mmol/mol) change in HbA1C was $1400. Cost per unit change in diabetes distress was $364 for KnowIt and $335 for OnTrack. No statistically significant differences in costs were observed. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to examine the costs of implementing interventions targeting diabetes distress in the context of T1DM. Both interventions had per participant implementation costs in the lower end of the range of previously examined diabetes self-management interventions ($219 to $5390). These inventions and their costs merit further attention because reducing diabetes distress may impact long term T1DM outcomes. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.govNCT02175732.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Anxiety/economics
- Anxiety/etiology
- Anxiety/therapy
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Depression/economics
- Depression/etiology
- Depression/therapy
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/economics
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy
- Group Processes
- Health Care Costs
- Humans
- Implementation Science
- Middle Aged
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data
- Patient Education as Topic/economics
- Patient Education as Topic/methods
- Psychological Distress
- Psychotherapy, Group/economics
- Psychotherapy, Group/methods
- Self Care/economics
- Self Care/methods
- Stress, Psychological/economics
- Stress, Psychological/epidemiology
- Stress, Psychological/etiology
- Stress, Psychological/therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Shumway
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0884, San Francisco, CA 94143-0884, USA.
| | - Lawrence Fisher
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0900, San Francisco, CA 94143-0900, USA
| | - Danielle Hessler
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0900, San Francisco, CA 94143-0900, USA
| | - Vicky Bowyer
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0900, San Francisco, CA 94143-0900, USA
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5405 Oberlin Drive #100, San Diego, CA 92121, USA
| | - Umesh Masharani
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Box 1222, San Francisco, CA 94143-1222, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Leahy JJL, Aleppo G, Fonseca VA, Garg SK, Hirsch IB, McCall AL, McGill JB, Polonsky WH. Optimizing Postprandial Glucose Management in Adults With Insulin-Requiring Diabetes: Report and Recommendations. J Endocr Soc 2019; 3:1942-1957. [PMID: 31608313 PMCID: PMC6781941 DOI: 10.1210/js.2019-00222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Faster-acting insulins, new noninsulin drug classes, more flexible insulin-delivery systems, and improved continuous glucose monitoring devices offer unprecedented opportunities to improve postprandial glucose (PPG) management and overall care for adults with insulin-treated diabetes. These developments led the Endocrine Society to convene a working panel of diabetes experts in December 2018 to assess the current state of PPG management, identify innovative ways to improve self-management and quality of life, and align best practices to current and emerging treatment and monitoring options. Drawing on current research and collective clinical experience, we considered the following issues for the ∼200 million adults worldwide with type 1 and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes: (i) the role of PPG management in reducing the risk of diabetes complications; (ii) barriers preventing effective PPG management; (iii) strategies to reduce PPG excursions and improve patient quality of life; and (iv) education and clinical tools to support endocrinologists in improving PPG management. We concluded that managing PPG to minimize or prevent diabetes-related complications will require elucidating fundamental questions about optimal ways to quantify and clinically assess the metabolic dysregulation and consequences of the abnormal postprandial state in diabetes and recommend research strategies to address these questions. We also identified practical strategies and tools that are already available to reduce barriers to effective PPG management, optimize use of new and emerging clinical tools, and improve patient self-management and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Grazia Aleppo
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vivian A Fonseca
- Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - Irl B Hirsch
- Treatment and Teaching Chair, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Anthony L McCall
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.,Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Janet B McGill
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jendle J, Birkenfeld AL, Polonsky WH, Silver R, Uusinarkaus K, Hansen T, Håkan‐Bloch J, Tadayon S, Davies MJ. Improved treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly semaglutide in the SUSTAIN trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:2315-2326. [PMID: 31215727 PMCID: PMC6771774 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate treatment satisfaction with semaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, versus placebo/active comparators in the SUSTAIN clinical trial programme. METHODS In SUSTAIN 2-5 and 7, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-perceived treatment satisfaction, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia. Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the effects of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs), weight loss (≥5%) or achieving glycaemic (HbA1c < 7%) targets on treatment satisfaction. RESULTS Overall treatment satisfaction increased from baseline to end of treatment with all treatments across trials. Improvements were significantly greater with semaglutide versus comparators/placebo in SUSTAIN 2-5 (all P < 0.05), and generally greater in patients who achieved versus did not achieve weight loss and glycaemic targets, often with greater improvements with semaglutide 1.0 mg versus comparator/placebo in both weight loss groups. In SUSTAIN 7, improvements in overall treatment satisfaction were generally similar between semaglutide and dulaglutide, irrespective of weight loss or glycaemic control. In SUSTAIN 7, changes in overall treatment satisfaction score were generally lower in patients with versus without GI AEs at week 16 (except dulaglutide 0.75 mg), but similar by week 40. Perceived hyperglycaemia was significantly reduced from baseline to end of treatment with semaglutide versus all comparators/placebo (all P < 0.05). No differences between treatments were observed for perceived hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS Semaglutide was associated with significantly greater (SUSTAIN 2-5) or similar (SUSTAIN 7) improvements in overall treatment satisfaction versus comparators/placebo. Improvements in overall treatment satisfaction were generally greater in patients achieving versus not achieving treatment targets. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01930188 (SUSTAIN 2), NCT01885208 (SUSTAIN 3), NCT02128932 (SUSTAIN 4), NCT02305381 (SUSTAIN 5) and NCT02648204 (SUSTAIN 7). EudraCT: 2012-004827-19 (SUSTAIN 2), 2012-004826-92 (SUSTAIN 3), 2013-004392-12 (SUSTAIN 4), 2013-004502-26 (SUSTAIN 5) and 2014-005375-91 (SUSTAIN 7).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Jendle
- Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro UniversityÖrebroSweden
| | - Andreas L. Birkenfeld
- Department of Medicine IIICarl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
- Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Helmholtz Center Munich at Technische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
| | - William H. Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, University of California San DiegoSan DiegoCalifornia
| | - Robert Silver
- Southern New Hampshire Diabetes and EndocrinologyNashuaNew Hampshire
| | - Kari Uusinarkaus
- DaVita Medical GroupUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineColorado SpringsColorado
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Addressing the emotional side of diabetes and its management has received considerable attention in recent years. At the centre of most of these efforts is the concept of 'diabetes distress', a generic term that captures the primary sources and intensity of emotional distress associated with diabetes and its management over time. As interest in diabetes distress has grown, however, it has been difficult to integrate and translate the various strands of clinical research in a manner that can guide diabetes distress intervention efforts in the real world of clinical care. The aim of this paper is to fill this gap by outlining practical strategies for intervention in clinical settings and to assist diabetes healthcare professionals in thinking through how diabetes distress might be addressed practically in their clinics. To address these goals, this review is divided into five sections: a definition of diabetes distress, ways diabetes distress can be assessed and monitored, information about diabetes distress for use in intervention planning, topics to be considered for inclusion in diabetes distress interventions, and alternatives for where in the care process a diabetes distress intervention might be considered. We focus on diabetes distress experienced by adults with both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Fisher
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Ca, USA
| | - W H Polonsky
- University of California, San Diego, Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, Ca, USA
| | - D Hessler
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Ca, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ray KK, Kendall DM, Zhao Z, Peng X, Caballero AE, Polonsky WH, Nordstrom BL, Fan L, Curtis BH, Davies MJ. A multinational observational study assessing insulin use: Understanding the determinants associated with progression of therapy. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:1101-1110. [PMID: 30565369 PMCID: PMC6590265 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To describe global patterns of insulin treatment and to assess the impact of patient, provider, health system and economic influences on treatment decisions for patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS This prospective cohort study of insulin-treated patients with T2D was conducted across 18 countries categorized as high, upper-middle or lower-middle income regions. Information collected from patients included knowledge of diabetes, experiences and interactions with their healthcare provider. Physician information included specialty, practice size, availability of diabetes support services, volume of diabetes patients treated and time spent per patient. Physicians determined an individualized haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target for each patient by the start of the study. Changes in T2D therapies and HbA1c were recorded for 2 years. RESULTS Complete treatment data were available for 2528 patients. Median age was 61 years and median duration of diabetes was 11.4 years. Changes to treatment regimen occurred in 90.0% of patients, but changes were less common in countries with a higher economic status (P < 0.001). Most treatment changes involved insulin, with changes in dose the most common. Overall predictors of change in insulin therapy included younger age, use of any insulin regimen other than basal only, higher mean baseline HbA1c and longer duration of T2D. HbA1c levels remained constant regardless of regional economic status. At baseline, 20.6% of patients were at their HbA1c target; at 2 years this was 26.8%. CONCLUSIONS Among insulin-treated patients with T2D, treatment changes were common; however, only approximately one-fourth of individuals achieved their HbA1c target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kausik K. Ray
- Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health, Imperial CollegeLondonUK
| | - David M. Kendall
- Global Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolisIndiana
| | - Zhenxiang Zhao
- Global Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolisIndiana
| | - Xiaomei Peng
- Global Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolisIndiana
| | | | | | | | - Ludi Fan
- Global Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and CompanyIndianapolisIndiana
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Stuckey H, Snoek FJ, Tang T, Hermanns N, Mundet X, Silva M, Sturt J, Okazaki K, Hadjiyianni I, Cao D, Ivanova J, Desai U, Perez-Nieves M. Identifying solutions to psychological insulin resistance: An international study. J Diabetes Complications 2019; 33:307-314. [PMID: 30709604 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To identify actions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) that facilitate the transition to insulin therapy (IT) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) adults. METHODS Included were T2Ds in seven countries (n = 594) who reported initial IT reluctance but eventually began IT. An online survey included 38 possible HCP actions: T2Ds indicated which may have occurred and their helpfulness. Also reported were delays in IT start after initial recommendation and any period of IT discontinuation. RESULTS Exploratory factor analysis of HCP actions yielded five factors: "Explained Insulin Benefits" (EIB), "Dispelled Insulin Myths" (DIM), "Demonstrated the Injection Process" (DIP), "Collaborative Style" (CS) and "Authoritarian Style" (AS). Highest levels of helpfulness occurred for DIP, EIB and CS; lowest for AS. Participants who rated DIP as helpful were less likely to delay IT than those who rated DIP as less helpful (OR = 0.75, p = 0.01); participants who rated CS and EIB as helpful were less likely to interrupt IT than those who rated these as less helpful (OR = 0.55, p < 0.01; OR = 0.51, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Three key HCP actions to facilitate IT initiation were identified as helpful and were associated with more successful initiation and persistence. These findings may aid the development of interventions to address reluctance to initiating IT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Polonsky
- University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Lawrence Fisher
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Frank J Snoek
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tricia Tang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Xavier Mundet
- Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Maria Silva
- Instituto Multidisciplinar de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Edelman S, Belton A, Down S, Alzaid A, Capehorn M, Gamerman V, Nagel F, Lee J, Emmerson J, Polonsky WH. Physician-patient communication at prescription of an additional oral drug for type 2 diabetes and its links to patient outcomes - New findings from the global IntroDia® study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019; 149:89-97. [PMID: 30685350 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate experiences of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at the clinic visit when an additional oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) is prescribed, and how this affects their quality of life, self-management and key outcomes. METHODS We surveyed adults with T2DM from a large multinational study of patient-physician communication during early T2DM treatment (IntroDia®). We examined their experiences when an additional OAD is prescribed ("add-on") after initial OAD monotherapy, focusing on 24 key conversational elements, overall patient-perceived communication quality (PPCQ), and associations with current patient-reported outcomes. The links between PPCQ and people's efforts to delay add-on therapy were also assessed. RESULTS 4235 people with T2DM prescribed an additional OAD, or a combination of two, were analysed. Exploratory factor analyses of the conversational elements during add-on yielded three coherent, meaningful factors: Encouraging (Cronbach's α = 0.62), Collaborative (α = 0.81), and Discouraging (α = 0.81). PPCQ was positively associated with Encouraging (β = +1.252, p < 0.001) and Collaborative (β = +1.206, p < 0.001), but negatively associated with Discouraging (β = -0.895, p < 0.001). Better PPCQ at add-on was associated with less diabetes distress, greater well-being and better self-care at the present time. Approximately 20% of people bargained (two-thirds successfully) with their physician to delay additional medication. Non-bargaining individuals reported significantly better mean PPCQ, diabetes distress, well-being and self-care than those who bargained. CONCLUSIONS Encouraging and patient-inclusive conversations at add-on moments may improve patient well-being and self-care outcomes. People with T2DM who attempted to delay additional medication reported poorer PPCQ and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Edelman
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
| | - Anne Belton
- The Michener Institute of Education at UHN, 222 St. Patrick Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1V4, Canada.
| | - Susan Down
- Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, 2nd Floor, Mallard Court, Express Park, Bristol Road, Bridgwater, Somerset TA6 4RN, United Kingdom.
| | - Aus Alzaid
- Prince Sultan Military Medical City, PO Box 7897, Riyadh 11159, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Matthew Capehorn
- Rotherham Institute for Obesity, and Clifton Medical Centre, Doncaster Gate, Rotherham, South Yorkshire S65 1DA, United Kingdom.
| | - Victoria Gamerman
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road, PO Box 368, Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA.
| | - Friederike Nagel
- Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Binger Straße 173, D-55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
| | - Jisoo Lee
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Binger Straße 173, D-55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
| | - James Emmerson
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Binger Straße 173, D-55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
| | - William H Polonsky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5405 Oberlin Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Down S, Alzaid A, Polonsky WH, Belton A, Edelman S, Gamerman V, Nagel F, Lee J, Emmerson J, Capehorn M. Physician experiences when discussing the need for additional oral medication with type 2 diabetes patients: Insights from the cross-national IntroDia® study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019; 148:179-188. [PMID: 30641173 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Physician-patient communication when discussing the need for additional oral medication for type 2 diabetes (add-on) may affect the self-care of people with this condition. We aimed to investigate physicians' recalled experiences of the add-on consultation. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of physicians treating people with type 2 diabetes in 26 countries, as part of a large cross-national study of physician-patient communication during early treatment of type 2 diabetes (IntroDia®). The survey battery included novel questions about physician experiences at add-on and the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. RESULTS Of 9247 eligible physicians, 6753 responded (73.0% response rate). Most (82%) agreed that physician-patient discussions at add-on strongly influence patients' disease acceptance and treatment adherence. Half the physicians reported ≥1 challenge in most or all add-on conversations, with a significant inverse relationship between frequency of challenges and Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy score (standardised β coefficient: -0.313; p < 0.001). Physicians estimated that only around half their patients with type 2 diabetes follow their self-care advice. Exploratory factor analysis of physician beliefs about why their patients did not follow recommendations yielded two distinct dimensions: psychosocial barriers (e.g. depressed mood) and personal failings of the patient (e.g. not enough willpower) (r = 0.37, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Physicians' empathy and beliefs about their patients may play a significant role in their success with the add-on conversation and, consequently, promotion of patient engagement and self-care. Although the study was limited by its retrospective, cross-sectional nature, the findings from IntroDia® may inform efforts to improve diabetes care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Down
- Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Parkgate House, East Reach, Taunton, Somerset TA1 3ES, United Kingdom.
| | - Aus Alzaid
- Prince Sultan Military Medical City, PO Box 7897, Riyadh 11159, Saudi Arabia.
| | - William H Polonsky
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Behavioral Diabetes Institute, 5405 Oberlin Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
| | - Anne Belton
- The Michener Institute of Education at UHN, 222 St. Patrick Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 1V4, Canada.
| | - Steven Edelman
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
| | - Victoria Gamerman
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road, PO Box 368, Ridgefield, CT 06877, USA.
| | - Friederike Nagel
- Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Binger Straße 173, D-55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
| | - Jisoo Lee
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Binger Straße 173, D-55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
| | - James Emmerson
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Binger Straße 173, D-55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
| | - Matthew Capehorn
- Rotherham Institute for Obesity, and Clifton Medical Centre, Doncaster Gate, Rotherham, South Yorkshire S65 1DA, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Stuckey H, Fisher L, Polonsky WH, Hessler D, Snoek FJ, Tang TS, Hermanns N, Mundet-Tuduri X, da Silva MER, Sturt J, Okazaki K, Cao D, Hadjiyianni I, Ivanova JI, Desai U, Perez-Nieves M. Key factors for overcoming psychological insulin resistance: an examination of patient perspectives through content analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2019; 7:e000723. [PMID: 31908792 PMCID: PMC6936574 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand participant perceptions about insulin and identify key behaviors of healthcare professionals (HCPs) that motivated initially reluctant adults from seven countries (n=40) who had type 2 diabetes (T2D) to start insulin treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Telephone interviews were conducted with a subset of participants from an international investigation of adults with T2D who were reluctant to start insulin (EMOTION). Questions related to: (a) participants' thoughts about insulin before and after initiation; (b) reasons behind responses on the survey that were either 'not helpful at all' or 'helped a lot'; (c) actions their HCP may have taken to help start insulin treatment; and (d) advice they would give to others in a similar situation of starting insulin. Responses were coded by two independent reviewers (kappa 0.992). RESULTS Starting insulin treatment was perceived as a negative experience that would be painful and would lead down a 'slippery slope' to complications. HCPs engaged in four primary behaviors that helped with insulin acceptance: (1) showed the insulin pen/needle and demonstrated the injection process; (2) explained how insulin could help with diabetes control and reduce risk of complications; (3) used collaborative communication style; and (4) offered support and willingness to answer questions so that participants would not be 'on their own'. Following initiation, most participants noted that insulin was not 'as bad as they thought' and recommended insulin to other adults with T2D. CONCLUSIONS Based on these themes, two actionable strategies are suggested for HCPs to help people with psychological insulin resistance: (1) demonstrate the injection process and discuss negative perceptions of insulin as well as potential benefits; (2) offer autonomy in a person-centred collaborative approach, but provide support and accessibility to address concerns. These findings help HCPs to better understand ways in which they can engage reluctant people with T2D with specific strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lawrence Fisher
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, University of California, San Diego, Del Mar, California, USA
| | - Danielle Hessler
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Frank J Snoek
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tricia S Tang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Kentaro Okazaki
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Dachuang Cao
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | - Urvi Desai
- Analysis Group Inc Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tang T, Hessler D, Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hadjiyianni I, Cao D, Reed B, Kalirai S, Irani T, Ivanova J, Desai U, Perez-Nieves M. Successful Health-Care Provider Strategies to Overcome Psychological Insulin Resistance in the US and Canada. Can J Diabetes 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2018.08.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
49
|
Goldman JD, Gill J, Horn T, Reid T, Strong J, Polonsky WH. Improved Treatment Engagement Among Patients with Diabetes Treated with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Who Participated in the COACH Support Program. Diabetes Ther 2018; 9:2143-2153. [PMID: 30218432 PMCID: PMC6167296 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0501-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistence with basal insulin therapy can be suboptimal, despite recent improvements in insulin formulations and delivery systems. Patient support programs may help increase adherence. This study evaluated the impact of the Toujeo® COACH support program, which provides patients with continuing and individualized education and advice on lifestyle changes, by assessing its effect on number of refills and days on therapy. METHODS The study population included 1724 patients with diabetes who filled a first prescription for insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) between April and December 2015 and received a welcome call from a Guide, and 1724 matched control patients from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse® prescription claims database. Control patients received Gla-300 but did not enroll in the program. These patients were matched based on age, gender, location, prior use of insulin, insulin dose, number of concomitant drugs, and copay tier. RESULTS The COACH and control groups comprised 52% men and 48% women; 22% were aged 18-47 years, 23% were 48-55 years, 27% 56-61 years, and 28% ≥ 62 years. Most (99%) had used insulin in the year before receiving the welcome call. At 6 months, patients in the COACH group had refilled their prescription 3.2 times on average, compared with 2.4 times for control patients (P < 0.0001); at 9 months, the average number of refills was 4.7 and 3.6, respectively (P < 0.0001). The average number of days on therapy at 6 months was 102.2 days in the COACH group and 81.5 days in the control group (P < 0.0001); at 9 months, the average number of days on therapy was 151.9 and 121.6, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Patients in the COACH program were significantly more likely to refill their prescriptions and stay on therapy. Patient support programs such as the COACH program could be an effective way to help improve diabetes care. FUNDING Sanofi US, Inc. and McKesson Corporation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tony Horn
- Symphony Health, LLC, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Timothy Reid
- Mercyhealth Diabetes Center, Janesville, WI, USA
| | - Jodi Strong
- Ministry Medical Group, Stevens Point, WI, USA
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, CA, USA
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fisher L, Hessler D, Polonsky WH, Masharani U, Guzman S, Bowyer V, Strycker L, Ahmann A, Basina M, Blumer I, Chloe C, Kim S, Peters AL, Shumway M, Weihs K, Wu P. T1-REDEEM: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Diabetes Distress Among Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2018; 41:1862-1869. [PMID: 29976567 PMCID: PMC6105321 DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of two interventions to reduce diabetes distress (DD) and improve glycemic control among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Individuals with T1D (n = 301) with elevated DD and HbA1c were recruited from multiple settings and randomly assigned to OnTrack, an emotion-focused intervention, or to KnowIt, an educational/behavioral intervention. Each group attended a full-day workshop plus four online meetings over 3 months. Assessments occurred at baseline and 3 and 9 months. Primary and secondary outcomes were change in DD and change in HbA1c, respectively. RESULTS With 12% attrition, both groups demonstrated dramatic reductions in DD (effect size d = 1.06; 78.4% demonstrated a reduction of at least one minimal clinically important difference). There were, however, no significant differences in DD reduction between OnTrack and KnowIt. Moderator analyses indicated that OnTrack provided greater DD reduction to those with initially poorer cognitive or emotion regulation skills, higher baseline DD, or greater initial diabetes knowledge than those in KnowIt. Significant but modest reductions in HbA1c occurred with no between-group differences. Change in DD was modestly associated with change in HbA1c (r = 0.14, P = 0.01), with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS DD can be successfully reduced among distressed individuals with T1D with elevated HbA1c using both education/behavioral and emotion-focused approaches. Reductions in DD are only modestly associated with reductions in HbA1c. These findings point to the importance of tailoring interventions to address affective, knowledge, and cognitive skills when intervening to reduce DD and improve glycemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Vicky Bowyer
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Charles Chloe
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Sarah Kim
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anne L Peters
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Martha Shumway
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Karen Weihs
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ
| | - Patricia Wu
- Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|