1
|
de Jong FC, Iflé IG, van der Made AC, Kooper D, de Jong JJ, Franckena M, Zuiverloon TC, van Criekinge W, Incrocci L, Zwarthoff EC, Boormans JL. A Genomic Urine Assay for Surveillance of Patients with Bladder Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 62:131-139. [PMID: 38496820 PMCID: PMC10940129 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who receive radiotherapy with curative intent are followed by imaging, cystoscopy, and urine cytology. However, interpretation of cytology and cystoscopy is hampered by the impact of ionizing radiation on cells. Objective To assess the diagnostic performance of a genomic urine assay to detect urinary tract recurrences in patients with MIBC treated by (chemo)radiation. Design setting and participants Patients with nonmetastatic MIBC who underwent (chemo)radiation with curative intent from 2016 to 2020 were prospectively included. Follow-up consisted of cystoscopy and upper tract imaging. Prior to cystoscopy, a urine sample was analyzed to assess mutations in the genes FGFR3, HRAS, and TERT and methylation of OTX1, TWIST1, and ONECUT2. The treating physician was blinded for the assay result. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary endpoint was a urinary tract recurrence. Cross-sectional sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed using a previously developed logistic regression model for the detection of bladder cancer with this assay. The secondary endpoint was the risk of a future urinary tract recurrence following a positive test and negative cystoscopy/imaging, using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results and limitations A total of 143 patients were included, and 503 urine samples were analyzed. The median study duration was 20 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 10-33), and the median time to a recurrence was 16 mo (IQR 12-26). In 27 patients, 32 urinary tract recurrences were diagnosed, including three upper tract tumors. Of 32 recurrences, 18 (56%) had a concomitant urine test available. The diagnostic model had an area under the curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.90) with corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 78 (95% CI 52-94), 77% (95% CI 73-81), and 99% (95% CI 97-100). When taking into account the anticipatory effect of the test, 28/32 (88%) recurrences were detected. A Cox regression analysis showed a hazard ratio of 14.8 for the development of a future recurrence (p < 0.001). A major limitation was the lack of a concomitant urine test result in 14/32 (44%) recurrences. Conclusions A genomic urine assay detected urinary tract recurrences after (chemo)radiation in patients with MIBC, and a positive test was strongly associated with future recurrences. Although validation in a large cohort is warranted, the test has the potential to limit frequent cystoscopies. Patient summary Radiotherapy is a bladder-sparing treatment in patients with bladder cancer. After treatment, these patients undergo visual inspection of the bladder by cystoscopy to detect possible recurrences. However, interpretation of cystoscopy is difficult due to the effects of radiation on the bladder lining. Hence, we analyzed the diagnostic value of a molecular urine test to detect recurrent disease in bladder cancer patients treated by radiotherapy, and we showed that the urine test has the potential to limit the number of cystoscopies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florus C. de Jong
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris G. Iflé
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angelique C. van der Made
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Kooper
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joep J. de Jong
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Franckena
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Luca Incrocci
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen C. Zwarthoff
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost L. Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Govers TM, Resnick MJ, Rastinehad AR, Caba L, Groskopf J, van Criekinge W. Cost-effectiveness of an urinary biomarker panel in combination with MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis. World J Urol 2023:10.1007/s00345-023-04389-w. [PMID: 37133554 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04389-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The health impact and cost-effectiveness of the biomarker test SelectMDx were evaluated when used in combination with MRI, in two US populations: biopsy naïve men and men with a previous negative biopsy. METHODS Using a decision model, the current MRI strategy was compared with two SelectMDx strategies: SelectMDx used before MRI to select men for MRI and SelectMDx used after a negative MRI to select men for biopsy. Parameters were informed by the literature most relevant for both populations. Differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs between the current strategy and the SelectMDx strategies were calculated using two different assumptions regarding PCa-specific mortality (SPCG-4 and PIVOT). RESULTS In biopsy naïve men, the use of SelectMDx before MRI results in a gain of 0.004 QALY per patient under the SPCG-4 scenario, and a gain of 0.030 QALY under the PIVOT scenario. The cost savings are $1650 per patient. When used after MRI, SelectMDx results in a QALY gain per patient of 0.004 (SPCG-4), and 0.006 (PIVOT) with $262 in cost savings. In the previous negative population, SelectMDx before MRI results in a QALY gain of 0.006 (SPCG-4) and 0.022 (PIVOT), with $1281 in cost savings per patient. SelectMDx after MRI results in a QALY gain of 0.003 (SPCG-4) and 0.004 (PIVOT) with $193 in cost savings. CONCLUSION Application of SelectMDx results in better health outcomes and cost savings. The value of SelectMDx was highest when used before MRI to select patients for MRI and subsequent biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim M Govers
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthew J Resnick
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Embold Health, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Jack Groskopf
- Department of Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lybaert L, Lefever S, Fant B, Smits E, De Geest B, Breckpot K, Dirix L, Feldman SA, van Criekinge W, Thielemans K, van der Burg SH, Ott PA, Bogaert C. Challenges in neoantigen-directed therapeutics. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:15-40. [PMID: 36368320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A fundamental prerequisite for the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy is the presence of functional, antigen-specific T cells within the tumor. Neoantigen-directed therapy is a promising strategy that aims at targeting the host's immune response against tumor-specific antigens, thereby eradicating cancer cells. Initial forays have been made in clinical environments utilizing vaccines and adoptive cell therapy; however, many challenges lie ahead. We provide an in-depth overview of the current state of the field with an emphasis on in silico neoantigen discovery and the clinical aspects that need to be addressed to unlock the full potential of this therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Evelien Smits
- Center for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Bruno De Geest
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karine Breckpot
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Therapy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luc Dirix
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Center for Oncological Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Steven A Feldman
- Center for Cancer Cell Therapy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kris Thielemans
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Therapy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sjoerd H van der Burg
- Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick A Ott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Massen M, Lommen K, Wouters KAD, Vandersmissen J, van Criekinge W, Herman JG, Melotte V, Schouten LJ, van Engeland M, Smits KM. Technical considerations in PCR-based assay design for diagnostic DNA methylation cancer biomarkers. Clin Epigenetics 2022; 14:56. [PMID: 35477541 PMCID: PMC9047347 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-022-01273-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background DNA methylation biomarkers for early detection, risk stratification and treatment response in cancer have been of great interest over the past decades. Nevertheless, clinical implementation of these biomarkers is limited, as only < 1% of the identified biomarkers is translated into a clinical or commercial setting. Technical factors such as a suboptimal genomic location of the assay and inefficient primer or probe design have been emphasized as important pitfalls in biomarker research. Here, we use eleven diagnostic DNA methylation biomarkers for colorectal cancer (ALX4, APC, CDKN2A, MGMT, MLH1, NDRG4, SDC2, SFRP1, SFRP2, TFPI1 and VIM), previously described in a systematic literature search, to evaluate these pitfalls. Results To assess the genomic assay location, the optimal genomic locations according to TCGA data were extracted and compared to the genomic locations used in the published assays for all eleven biomarkers. In addition, all primers and probes were technically evaluated according to several criteria, based on literature and expert opinion. Both assay location and assay design quality varied widely among studies. Conclusions Large variation in both assay location and design hinders the development of future DNA methylation biomarkers as well as inter-study comparability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje Massen
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Lommen
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim A D Wouters
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - James G Herman
- The Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, 15232, USA
| | - Veerle Melotte
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo J Schouten
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim M Smits
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Kessel KE, de Jong JJ, Ziel-van der Made AC, Roshani H, Haensel SM, Wolterbeek JH, Boevé ER, Oomens EH, van Casteren NJ, Krispin M, Boormans JL, Steyerberg EW, van Criekinge W, Zwarthoff EC. Abstract IA06: A urine assay to triage patients with hematuria for cystoscopy. Clin Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.bladder19-ia06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of a previously developed molecular assay to detect bladder cancer in a large prospective cohort of patients referred for hematuria.
Design, Setting and Participants: A urine sample was collected prior to cystoscopy and mutation/methylation status of 6 genes was determined in DNA from urinary cells and combined with age. This existing diagnostic model was validated on this cohort and optimized using logistic regression. Clinical usefulness was determined by the net benefit approach. Main outcome measures: Primary endpoint was the model performance to detect the presence of urothelial cancer, as indicated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Secondary endpoints were the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the optimal diagnostic model.
Results: In 838 patients, the mutation/methylation status could be determined for all genes. Urothelial cancer was observed in 112 patients (98/457 in the gross and 14/381 in the microscopic hematuria group). Application of the existing model resulted in an AUC of 0.93. Combining the assay with the type of hematuria resulted in the final optimal model with an AUC of 0.96 (96% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 99% negative predictive value). The assay also detected all six upper tract urothelial tumors that are not visible by cystoscopy. Net benefit analysis showed that the urine test should be preferred over “cystoscopy for all.” Application of the optimal model on patients whose biomarker status was incomplete resulted in the identification of 5 additional tumors. Implementing the urine test as a triage tool could lead to a 53% reduction in cystoscopies.
Conclusions: The urine test detects urothelial cancer with a very high accuracy and is ready for clinical implementation.
Citation Format: Kim E.M. van Kessel, Joep J. de Jong, Angelique C.J. Ziel-van der Made, Hossain Roshani, Stefan M. Haensel, Josien H. Wolterbeek, Egbert R. Boevé, Eric H.G.M. Oomens, Niels J. van Casteren, Manuel Krispin, Joost L. Boormans, Ewout W. Steyerberg, Wim van Criekinge, Ellen C. Zwarthoff. A urine assay to triage patients with hematuria for cystoscopy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Bladder Cancer: Transforming the Field; 2019 May 18-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(15_Suppl):Abstract nr IA06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wim van Criekinge
- 9Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Ghent, Belgium,
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Govers TM, Hessels D, Vlaeminck-Guillem V, Schmitz-Dräger BJ, Stief CG, Martinez-Ballesteros C, Ferro M, Borque-Fernando A, Rubio-Briones J, Sedelaar JPM, van Criekinge W, Schalken JA. Cost-effectiveness of SelectMDx for prostate cancer in four European countries: a comparative modeling study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2018; 22:101-109. [PMID: 30127462 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0076-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low specificity of prostate-specific antigen results in a considerable number of unnecessary prostate biopsies in current practice. SelectMDx® predicts significant prostate cancer upon biopsy and is used to reduce the number of unnecessary initial prostate biopsies. Furthermore, potential overtreatment of insignificant prostate cancer can be reduced. Besides the diagnostic accuracy of the test, also the context in a specific country determines the potential health benefit and cost-effectiveness. Therefore, the health benefit and cost-effectiveness of SelectMDx were assessed in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. SUBJECT AND METHODS A decision model was used to compare the current standard of care in which men undergo initial prostate biopsy in case of an elevated prostate-specific antigen, to a strategy in which SelectMDx was used to select men for biopsy. Model inputs most relevant to each of the four countries were obtained. With use of the model long-term quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and healthcare costs were calculated for both strategies. RESULTS In all four countries, the SelectMDx resulted in QALY gain and cost savings compared with the current standard of care. In France, SelectMDx resulted in 0.022 QALYs gained and cost savings of €1217 per patient. For Germany, the model showed a QALY gain of 0.016 and a cost saving of €442. In Italy, the QALY gain and cost savings were 0.031 and €762. In Spain 0.020 QALYs were gained and €250 costs were saved. CONCLUSIONS The results of the model showed that with SelectMDx, QALYs could be gained while saving healthcare costs in the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer. The significant presence of overtreatment in the current standard of care in all four countries was the main factor that resulted in the beneficial outcomes with SelectMDx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Virginie Vlaeminck-Guillem
- Medical Unit of Molecular Oncology and Transfer, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University Hospital of Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils of Lyon, Lyon, France.,Cancer Research Centre of Lyon, U1052 INSERM, CNRS 5286, Léon Bérard Centre, Lyon I University, Lyon, France
| | - Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
- BSD: Urologie24, Nuremberg and Dept. of Urology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, Ludwig Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Angel Borque-Fernando
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitatio Miguel Servet, IIS-Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Jose Rubio-Briones
- Department of Urology, Fundación instituto Valenciano, de oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Jack A Schalken
- Department of Urology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang R, van Leeuwen RW, Boers A, Klip HG, de Meyer T, Steenbergen RDM, van Criekinge W, van der Zee AGJ, Schuuring E, Wisman GBA. Genome-wide methylome analysis using MethylCap-seq uncovers 4 hypermethylated markers with high sensitivity for both adeno- and squamous-cell cervical carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018; 7:80735-80750. [PMID: 27738327 PMCID: PMC5348351 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cytology-based screening methods for cervical adenocarcinoma (ADC) and to a lesser extent squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) suffer from low sensitivity. DNA hypermethylation analysis in cervical scrapings may improve detection of SCC, but few methylation markers have been described for ADC. We aimed to identify novel methylation markers for the early detection of both ADC and SCC. Results Genome-wide methylation profiling for 20 normal cervices, 6 ADC and 6 SCC using MethylCap-seq yielded 53 candidate regions hypermethylated in both ADC and SCC. Verification and independent validation of the 15 most significant regions revealed 5 markers with differential methylation between 17 normals and 13 cancers. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR on cervical cancer scrapings resulted in detection rates ranging between 80% and 92% while between 94% and 99% of control scrapings tested negative. Four markers (SLC6A5, SOX1, SOX14 and TBX20) detected ADC and SCC with similar sensitivity. In scrapings from women referred with an abnormal smear (n=229), CIN3+ sensitivity was between 36% and 71%, while between 71% and 93% of adenocarcinoma in situ (AdCIS) were detected; and CIN0/1 specificity was between 88% and 98%. Compared to hrHPV, the combination SOX1/SOX14 showed a similar CIN3+ sensitivity (80% vs. 75%, respectively, P>0.2), while specificity improved (42% vs. 84%, respectively, P < 10-5). Conclusion SOX1 and SOX14 are methylation biomarkers applicable for screening of all cervical cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Wang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Cancer Research Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Robert W van Leeuwen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Cancer Research Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Aniek Boers
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Cancer Research Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry G Klip
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Cancer Research Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim de Meyer
- Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bio-informatics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bio-informatics, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ate G J van der Zee
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Cancer Research Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Cancer Research Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G Bea A Wisman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Cancer Research Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spallotta F, Cencioni C, Atlante S, Garella D, Cocco M, Mori M, Mastrocola R, Kuenne C, Guenther S, Nanni S, Azzimato V, Zukunft S, Kornberger A, Sürün D, Schnütgen F, von Melchner H, Di Stilo A, Aragno M, Braspenning M, van Criekinge W, De Blasio MJ, Ritchie RH, Zaccagnini G, Martelli F, Farsetti A, Fleming I, Braun T, Beiras-Fernandez A, Botta B, Collino M, Bertinaria M, Zeiher AM, Gaetano C. Stable Oxidative Cytosine Modifications Accumulate in Cardiac Mesenchymal Cells From Type2 Diabetes Patients. Circ Res 2018; 122:31-46. [DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.117.311300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2017] [Revised: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Rationale:
Human cardiac mesenchymal cells (CMSCs) are a therapeutically relevant primary cell population. Diabetes mellitus compromises CMSC function as consequence of metabolic alterations and incorporation of stable epigenetic changes.
Objective:
To investigate the role of α-ketoglutarate (αKG) in the epimetabolic control of DNA demethylation in CMSCs.
Methods and Results:
Quantitative global analysis, methylated and hydroxymethylated DNA sequencing, and gene-specific GC methylation detection revealed an accumulation of 5-methylcytosine, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, and 5-formylcytosine in the genomic DNA of human CMSCs isolated from diabetic donors. Whole heart genomic DNA analysis revealed iterative oxidative cytosine modification accumulation in mice exposed to high-fat diet (HFD), injected with streptozotocin, or both in combination (streptozotocin/HFD). In this context, untargeted and targeted metabolomics indicated an intracellular reduction of αKG synthesis in diabetic CMSCs and in the whole heart of HFD mice. This observation was paralleled by a compromised TDG (thymine DNA glycosylase) and TET1 (ten–eleven translocation protein 1) association and function with TET1 relocating out of the nucleus. Molecular dynamics and mutational analyses showed that αKG binds TDG on Arg275 providing an enzymatic allosteric activation. As a consequence, the enzyme significantly increased its capacity to remove G/T nucleotide mismatches or 5-formylcytosine. Accordingly, an exogenous source of αKG restored the DNA demethylation cycle by promoting TDG function, TET1 nuclear localization, and TET/TDG association. TDG inactivation by CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or TET/TDG siRNA knockdown induced 5-formylcytosine accumulation, thus partially mimicking the diabetic epigenetic landscape in cells of nondiabetic origin. The novel compound (S)-2-[(2,6-dichlorobenzoyl)amino]succinic acid (AA6), identified as an inhibitor of αKG dehydrogenase, increased the αKG level in diabetic CMSCs and in the heart of HFD and streptozotocin mice eliciting, in HFD, DNA demethylation, glucose uptake, and insulin response.
Conclusions:
Restoring the epimetabolic control of DNA demethylation cycle promises beneficial effects on cells compromised by environmental metabolic changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Spallotta
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Chiara Cencioni
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Sandra Atlante
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Davide Garella
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Mattia Cocco
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Mattia Mori
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Raffaella Mastrocola
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Carsten Kuenne
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Stefan Guenther
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Simona Nanni
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Valerio Azzimato
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Sven Zukunft
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Angela Kornberger
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Duran Sürün
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Frank Schnütgen
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Harald von Melchner
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Antonella Di Stilo
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Manuela Aragno
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Maarten Braspenning
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Miles J. De Blasio
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Rebecca H. Ritchie
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Germana Zaccagnini
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Fabio Martelli
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Antonella Farsetti
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Ingrid Fleming
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Thomas Braun
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Andres Beiras-Fernandez
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Bruno Botta
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Massimo Collino
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Massimo Bertinaria
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Andreas M. Zeiher
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| | - Carlo Gaetano
- From the Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (F. Spallotta, C.C., S.A., S.Z., D.S., F. Schnütgen, H.v.M., A.F., I.F., A.M.Z., C.G.); University of Turin, Torino, Italy (D.G., M. Cocco, R.M., A.D.S., M.A., M. Collino, M. Bertinaria); Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia CLNS@Sapienza Rome, Italy (M.M.); Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany (C.K., S.G., T.B.); Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (S.N.); Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden (V.A
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bosch LJW, de Wit M, Pham TV, Coupé VMH, Hiemstra AC, Piersma SR, Oudgenoeg G, Scheffer GL, Mongera S, Sive Droste JT, Oort FA, van Turenhout ST, Larbi IB, Louwagie J, van Criekinge W, van der Hulst RWM, Mulder CJJ, Carvalho B, Fijneman RJA, Jimenez CR, Meijer GA. Novel Stool-Based Protein Biomarkers for Improved Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Case-Control Study. Ann Intern Med 2017; 167:855-866. [PMID: 29159365 DOI: 10.7326/m17-1068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for detecting hemoglobin is used widely for noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but its sensitivity leaves room for improvement. OBJECTIVE To identify novel protein biomarkers in stool that outperform or complement hemoglobin in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas. DESIGN Case-control study. SETTING Colonoscopy-controlled referral population from several centers. PARTICIPANTS 315 stool samples from one series of 12 patients with CRC and 10 persons without colorectal neoplasia (control samples) and a second series of 81 patients with CRC, 40 with advanced adenomas, and 43 with nonadvanced adenomas, as well as 129 persons without colorectal neoplasia (control samples); 72 FIT samples from a third independent series of 14 patients with CRC, 16 with advanced adenomas, and 18 with nonadvanced adenomas, as well as 24 persons without colorectal neoplasia (control samples). MEASUREMENTS Stool samples were analyzed by mass spectrometry. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify protein combinations that differentiated CRC or advanced adenoma from control samples. Antibody-based assays for 4 selected proteins were done on FIT samples. RESULTS In total, 834 human proteins were identified, 29 of which were statistically significantly enriched in CRC versus control stool samples in both series. Combinations of 4 proteins reached sensitivities of 80% and 45% for detecting CRC and advanced adenomas, respectively, at 95% specificity, which was higher than that of hemoglobin alone (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Selected proteins could be measured in small sample volumes used in FIT-based screening programs and discriminated between CRC and control samples (P < 0.001). LIMITATION Lack of availability of antibodies prohibited validation of the top protein combinations in FIT samples. CONCLUSION Mass spectrometry of stool samples identified novel candidate protein biomarkers for CRC screening. Several protein combinations outperformed hemoglobin in discriminating CRC or advanced adenoma from control samples. Proof of concept that such proteins can be detected with antibody-based assays in small sample volumes indicates the potential of these biomarkers to be applied in population screening. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Center for Translational Molecular Medicine, International Translational Cancer Research Dream Team, Stand Up to Cancer (American Association for Cancer Research and the Dutch Cancer Society), Dutch Digestive Foundation, and VU University Medical Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J W Bosch
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Meike de Wit
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Thang V Pham
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke C Hiemstra
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Sander R Piersma
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Gideon Oudgenoeg
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - George L Scheffer
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra Mongera
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Jochim Terhaar Sive Droste
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Frank A Oort
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Sietze T van Turenhout
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Ilhame Ben Larbi
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Joost Louwagie
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Rene W M van der Hulst
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Chris J J Mulder
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Remond J A Fijneman
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Connie R Jimenez
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- From Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; MDxHealth, Herstal, and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bosch LJW, Trooskens G, Snaebjornsson P, Coupé VMH, Mongera S, Haan JC, Richman SD, Koopman M, Tol J, de Meyer T, Louwagie J, Dehaspe L, van Grieken NCT, Ylstra B, Verheul HMW, van Engeland M, Nagtegaal ID, Herman JG, Quirke P, Seymour MT, Punt CJA, van Criekinge W, Carvalho B, Meijer GA. Decoy receptor 1 ( DCR1) promoter hypermethylation and response to irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017; 8:63140-63154. [PMID: 28968978 PMCID: PMC5609910 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Diversity in colorectal cancer biology is associated with variable responses to standard chemotherapy. We aimed to identify and validate DNA hypermethylated genes as predictive biomarkers for irinotecan treatment of metastatic CRC patients. Candidate genes were selected from 389 genes involved in DNA Damage Repair by correlation analyses between gene methylation status and drug response in 32 cell lines. A large series of samples (n=818) from two phase III clinical trials was used to evaluate these candidate genes by correlating methylation status to progression-free survival after treatment with first-line single-agent fluorouracil (Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil) or combination chemotherapy (Capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan (CAPIRI/FOLFIRI)). In the discovery (n=185) and initial validation set (n=166), patients with methylated Decoy Receptor 1 (DCR1) did not benefit from CAPIRI over Capecitabine treatment (discovery set: HR=1.2 (95%CI 0.7-1.9, p=0.6), validation set: HR=0.9 (95%CI 0.6-1.4, p=0.5)), whereas patients with unmethylated DCR1 did (discovery set: HR=0.4 (95%CI 0.3-0.6, p=0.00001), validation set: HR=0.5 (95%CI 0.3-0.7, p=0.0008)). These results could not be replicated in the external data set (n=467), where a similar effect size was found in patients with methylated and unmethylated DCR1 for FOLFIRI over 5FU treatment (methylated DCR1: HR=0.7 (95%CI 0.5-0.9, p=0.01), unmethylated DCR1: HR=0.8 (95%CI 0.6-1.2, p=0.4)). In conclusion, DCR1 promoter hypermethylation status is a potential predictive biomarker for response to treatment with irinotecan, when combined with capecitabine. This finding could not be replicated in an external validation set, in which irinotecan was combined with 5FU. These results underline the challenge and importance of extensive clinical evaluation of candidate biomarkers in multiple trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J W Bosch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Trooskens
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle M H Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Mongera
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josien C Haan
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susan D Richman
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jolien Tol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Tim de Meyer
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Luc Dehaspe
- MDxHealth, SA, Liège, Belgium.,Genomics Core Facility, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Bauke Ylstra
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk M W Verheul
- Department of Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manon van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology and Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - James G Herman
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology and Tumour Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew T Seymour
- St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,MDxHealth, SA, Liège, Belgium
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tomar T, Alkema NG, Schreuder L, Meersma GJ, de Meyer T, van Criekinge W, Klip HG, Fiegl H, van Nieuwenhuysen E, Vergote I, Widschwendter M, Schuuring E, van der Zee AGJ, de Jong S, Wisman GBA. Methylome analysis of extreme chemoresponsive patients identifies novel markers of platinum sensitivity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. BMC Med 2017; 15:116. [PMID: 28641578 PMCID: PMC5481993 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0870-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite an early response to platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the majority of patients will relapse with drug-resistant disease. Aberrant epigenetic alterations like DNA methylation are common in HGSOC. Differences in DNA methylation are associated with chemoresponse in these patients. The objective of this study was to identify and validate novel epigenetic markers of chemoresponse using genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in extreme chemoresponsive HGSOC patients. METHODS Genome-wide next-generation sequencing was performed on methylation-enriched tumor DNA of two HGSOC patient groups with residual disease, extreme responders (≥18 months progression-free survival (PFS), n = 8) and non-responders (≤6 months PFS, n = 10) to platinum-based chemotherapy. DNA methylation and expression data of the same patients were integrated to create a gene list. Genes were validated on an independent cohort of extreme responders (n = 21) and non-responders (n = 31) using pyrosequencing and qRT-PCR. In silico validation was performed using publicly available DNA methylation (n = 91) and expression (n = 208) datasets of unselected advanced stage HGSOC patients. Functional validation of FZD10 on chemosensitivity was carried out in ovarian cancer cell lines using siRNA-mediated silencing. RESULTS Integrated genome-wide methylome and expression analysis identified 45 significantly differentially methylated and expressed genes between two chemoresponse groups. Four genes FZD10, FAM83A, MYO18B, and MKX were successfully validated in an external set of extreme chemoresponsive HGSOC patients. High FZD10 and MKX methylation were related with extreme responders and high FAM83A and MYO18B methylation with non-responders. In publicly available advanced stage HGSOC datasets, FZD10 and MKX methylation levels were associated with PFS. High FZD10 methylation was strongly associated with improved PFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71; P = 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.65; P = 0.003). Consistently, low FZD10 expression was associated with improved PFS (HR = 1.36; 95% CI, 0.99-1.88; P = 0.058). FZD10 silencing caused significant sensitization towards cisplatin treatment in survival assays and apoptosis assays. CONCLUSIONS By applying genome-wide integrated methylome analysis on extreme chemoresponsive HGSOC patients, we identified novel clinically relevant, epigenetically-regulated markers of platinum-sensitivity in HGSOC patients. The clinical potential of these markers in predictive and therapeutic approaches has to be further validated in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tushar Tomar
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolette G Alkema
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Leroy Schreuder
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gert Jan Meersma
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim de Meyer
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Harry G Klip
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi Fiegl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Els van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ate G J van der Zee
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Steven de Jong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - G Bea A Wisman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bosch LJW, Luo Y, Lao VV, Snaebjornsson P, Trooskens G, Vlassenbroeck I, Mongera S, Tang W, Welcsh P, Herman JG, Koopman M, Nagtegaal ID, Punt CJA, van Criekinge W, Meijer GA, Monnat RJ, Carvalho B, Grady WM. WRN Promoter CpG Island Hypermethylation Does Not Predict More Favorable Outcomes for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated with Irinotecan-Based Therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:4612-22. [PMID: 27121793 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 03/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE WRN promoter CpG island hypermethylation in colorectal cancer has been reported to increase sensitivity to irinotecan-based therapies. We aimed to characterize methylation of the WRN promoter, determine the effect of WRN promoter hypermethylation upon expression, and validate a previous report that WRN promoter hypermethylation predicts improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with irinotecan-based therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN WRN methylation status was assessed using methylation-specific PCR and bisulfite sequencing assays. WRN expression was determined using qRT-PCR and Western blotting. WRN methylation status was correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 183 patients with mCRC. Among these patients, 90 received capecitabine monotherapy as first-line therapy, and 93 received capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) therapy as part of the CAIRO phase III clinical trial. RESULTS WRN mRNA and WRN protein expression levels were low in colorectal cancer cell lines and in primary colorectal cancer and were largely independent of WRN methylation status. Patients with methylated WRN colorectal cancer had a shorter OS compared with patients who had unmethylated WRN colorectal cancer (HR = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.2; P = 0.003). Patients with unmethylated WRN showed a significantly longer PFS when treated with CAPIRI compared with capecitabine alone (HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.32-0.70; P = 0.0001). In contrast, patients did not benefit from adding irinotecan to capecitabine when WRN was methylated (HR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.69-1.77; P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS WRN expression is largely independent of WRN promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Moreover, we could not validate the previous finding that WRN promoter hypermethylation predicts improved clinical outcomes of mCRC treated with irinotecan-based therapy and found instead the opposite result. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4612-22. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J W Bosch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yanxin Luo
- Clinical Research Division, Department of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Victoria V Lao
- Clinical Research Division, Department of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Trooskens
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Sandra Mongera
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Weiliang Tang
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle Washington
| | - Piri Welcsh
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle Washington
| | - James G Herman
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. MDxHealth SA, Liège, Belgium
| | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raymond J Monnat
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle Washington. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Beatriz Carvalho
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - William M Grady
- Clinical Research Division, Department of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tomar T, Alkema NG, Meersma GJ, Meyer TD, Criekinge WV, Klip HG, Zee AGJVD, Jong SD, Wisman GBA. Abstract B19: Genome-wide integrated epigenomics identifies FZD-X as novel modulator for platinum sensitivity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.chromepi15-b19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The major hindrance for successful treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients stems from platinum-based chemotherapy resistance. In cancer, the epigenetic alterations like DNA methylation, play a crucial role in regulation of genes related to response towards chemotherapies. Identifying these epigenetically regulated key genes, which modulate platinum response, may improve patient selection, response to therapy, and find novel targeted strategies to overcome platinum resistance. Here we applied integrated epigenomics approach to identify novel genes associated with high grade serous ovarian cancer platinum response.
We performed next generation sequencing on methylation-enriched genomic DNA of ovarian cancer patient material from responders (≥18 months progression free survival, n=8) and non-responders (≤6 months progression free survival, n=10) to platinum chemoresponse. Expression data of same patients was also integrated to identify differentially methylated and expressed genes. These genes were validated further on external patients cohort using bisulfite-pyrosequencing and other publically available datasets. Furthermore, candidate genes were functionally tested on ovarian cancer cell lines panel using several in vitro assays.
Based on integrated epigenomics analysis, we identified Frizzled receptor (FzdX) as an epigenetically regulated gene, significantly unmethylated (p<0.0005) and highly expressed (p<0.003) in non-responder group of ovarian cancer patients. Further, FzdX was successfully validated by bisulfite-pyrosequencing on independent external patient cohort (responder: n=21 and non-responder: n=31). Concordant hypermethylation and corresponding gene silencing of FzdX was observed in a large panel of ovarian cancer cell lines (n=11). Additionally, demethylating agents caused reduction in methylation and high expression of FzdX in ovarian cancer cell lines, confirming FzdX as an epigenetically regulated gene. Targeted genetic inhibition of FzdX using siRNAs in ovarian cancer cell lines caused significant sensitization towards cisplatin treatment in short and long-term survival assays. FzdX silencing made ovarian cancer cells more apoptosis prone as showed by apoptotic acridine orange staining and high expression of cleaved PARP and caspase 3. Furthermore, siRNAs mediated silencing of FzdX in ovarian cancer cell lines led to reduction in their migratory and invasion potential as compared to control counter parts in various functional assays.
Conclusively, our integrative epigenomics analysis revealed FzdX as novel epigenetic modulator for platinum-sensitivity in ovarian cancer patients, which might be exploited for predictive and therapeutic approaches.
This study has been granted by the Dutch Cancer Society, KWF (RUG 2010-4833).
Citation Format: Tushar Tomar, Nicolette G. Alkema, Gert Jan Meersma, Tim De Meyer, Wim van Criekinge, Harry G. Klip, Ate GJ van der Zee, Steven de Jong, G. Bea A. Wisman. Genome-wide integrated epigenomics identifies FZD-X as novel modulator for platinum sensitivity in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Chromatin and Epigenetics in Cancer; Sep 24-27, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tushar Tomar
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,
| | | | - Gert Jan Meersma
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | - Harry G. Klip
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,
| | | | - Steven de Jong
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,
| | - G. Bea A. Wisman
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Clausen MJAM, Melchers LJ, Mastik MF, Slagter-Menkema L, Groen HJM, van der Laan BFAM, van Criekinge W, de Meyer T, Denil S, Wisman GBA, Roodenburg JLN, Schuuring E. Identification and validation of WISP1 as an epigenetic regulator of metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2015; 55:45-59. [PMID: 26391330 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Accepted: 08/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients. However, in approximately one third of OSCC patients nodal metastases remain undetected, and thus are not adequately treated. Therefore, clinical assessment of LN metastasis needs to be improved. The purpose of this study was to identify DNA methylation biomarkers to predict LN metastases in OSCC. Genome wide methylation assessment was performed on six OSCC with (N+) and six without LN metastases (N0). Differentially methylated sequences were selected based on the likelihood of differential methylation and validated using an independent OSCC cohort as well as OSCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Expression of WISP1 using immunohistochemistry was analyzed on a large OSCC cohort (n = 204). MethylCap-Seq analysis revealed 268 differentially methylated markers. WISP1 was the highest ranking annotated gene that showed hypomethylation in the N+ group. Bisulfite pyrosequencing confirmed significant hypomethylation within the WISP1 promoter region in N+ OSCC (P = 0.03) and showed an association between WISP1 hypomethylation and high WISP1 expression (P = 0.01). Both these results were confirmed using 148 OSCC retrieved from the TCGA database. In a large OSCC cohort, high WISP1 expression was associated with LN metastasis (P = 0.05), disease-specific survival (P = 0.022), and regional disease-free survival (P = 0.027). These data suggest that WISP1 expression is regulated by methylation and WISP1 hypomethylation contributes to LN metastasis in OSCC. WISP1 is a potential biomarker to predict the presence of LN metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn J A M Clausen
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lieuwe J Melchers
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam F Mastik
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Lorian Slagter-Menkema
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Otorhinolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- Pulmonology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Bernard F A M van der Laan
- Otorhinolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Mathematical Modelling Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tim de Meyer
- Department of Mathematical Modelling Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Simon Denil
- Department of Mathematical Modelling Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - G Bea A Wisman
- Gynecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan L N Roodenburg
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Derks S, Cleven AHG, Melotte V, Smits KM, Brandes JC, Azad N, van Criekinge W, de Bruïne AP, Herman JG, van Engeland M. Emerging evidence for CHFR as a cancer biomarker: from tumor biology to precision medicine. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2015; 33:161-71. [PMID: 24375389 PMCID: PMC3988518 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-013-9462-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Novel insights in the biology of cancer have switched the paradigm of a “one-size-fits-all” cancer treatment to an individualized biology-driven treatment approach. In recent years, a diversity of biomarkers and targeted therapies has been discovered. Although these examples accentuate the promise of personalized cancer treatment, for most cancers and cancer subgroups no biomarkers and effective targeted therapy are available. The great majority of patients still receive unselected standard therapies with no use of their individual molecular characteristics. Better knowledge about the underlying tumor biology will lead the way toward personalized cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the evidence for a promising cancer biomarker: checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains (CHFR). CHFR is a mitotic checkpoint and tumor suppressor gene, which is inactivated in a diverse group of solid malignancies, mostly by promoter CpG island methylation. CHFR inactivation has shown to be an indicator of poor prognosis and sensitivity to taxane-based chemotherapy. Here we summarize the current knowledge of altered CHFR expression in cancer, the impact on tumor biology and implications for personalized cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Derks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen H. G. Cleven
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Melotte
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim M. Smits
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johann C. Brandes
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Atlanta VA Medical Center Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Nilofer Azad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- MDxHealth, Irvine, CA USA
| | - Adriaan P. de Bruïne
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - James G. Herman
- Department of Tumor Biology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Manon van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Melotte V, Yi JM, Lentjes MHFM, Smits KM, Van Neste L, Niessen HEC, Wouters KAD, Louwagie J, Schuebel KE, Herman JG, Baylin SB, van Criekinge W, Meijer GA, Ahuja N, van Engeland M. Spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope 1 and forkhead box protein E1 are promising markers for the detection of colorectal cancer in blood. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2014; 8:157-64. [PMID: 25538088 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-14-0198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Identifying biomarkers in body fluids may improve the noninvasive detection of colorectal cancer. Previously, we identified N-Myc downstream-regulated gene 4 (NDRG4) and GATA binding protein 5 (GATA5) methylation as promising biomarkers for colorectal cancer in stool DNA. Here, we examined the utility of NDRG4, GATA5, and two additional markers [Forkhead box protein E1 (FOXE1) and spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope 1 (SYNE1)] promoter methylation as biomarkers in plasma DNA. Quantitative methylation-specific PCR was performed on plasma DNA from 220 patients with colorectal cancer and 684 noncancer controls, divided in a training set and a test set. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to measure the area under the curve of GATA5, NDRG4, SYNE1, and FOXE1 methylation. Functional assays were performed in SYNE1 and FOXE1 stably transfected cell lines. The sensitivity of NDRG4, GATA5, FOXE1, and SYNE1 methylation in all stages of colorectal cancer (154 cases, 444 controls) was 27% [95% confidence interval (CI), 20%-34%), 18% (95% CI, 12%-24%), 46% (95% CI, 38%-54%), and 47% (95% CI, 39%-55%), with a specificity of 95% (95% CI, 93%-97%), 99% (95% CI, 98%-100%), 93% (95% CI, 91%-95%), and 96% (95% CI, 94%-98%), respectively. Combining SYNE1 and FOXE1, increased the sensitivity to 56% (95% CI, 48%-64%), while the specificity decreased to 90% (95% CI, 87%-93%) in the training set and to 58% sensitivity (95% CI, 46%-70%) and 91% specificity (95% CI, 80%-100%) in a test set (66 cases, 240 controls). SYNE1 overexpression showed no major differences in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion compared with controls. Overexpression of FOXE1 significantly decreased the number of colonies in SW480 and HCT116 cell lines. Overall, our data suggest that SYNE1 and FOXE1 are promising markers for colorectal cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Melotte
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Joo Mi Yi
- Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (DIRAMS), Busan, South Korea
| | - Marjolein H F M Lentjes
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Kim M Smits
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Leander Van Neste
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands. MDxHealth, Herstal, Belgium
| | - Hanneke E C Niessen
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Kim A D Wouters
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Kornel E Schuebel
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James G Herman
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen B Baylin
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Gerrit A Meijer
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nita Ahuja
- Department of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Surgery, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Department of Urology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Manon van Engeland
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aavik E, Lumivuori H, Leppänen O, Wirth T, Häkkinen SK, Bräsen JH, Beschorner U, Zeller T, Braspenning M, van Criekinge W, Mäkinen K, Ylä-Herttuala S. Global DNA methylation analysis of human atherosclerotic plaques reveals extensive genomic hypomethylation and reactivation at imprinted locus 14q32 involving induction of a miRNA cluster. Eur Heart J 2014; 36:993-1000. [PMID: 25411193 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS We conducted a genome-wide analysis to identify differentially methylated genes in atherosclerotic lesions. METHODS DNA methylation at promoters, exons and introns was identified by massive parallel sequencing. Gene expression was analysed by microarrays, qPCR, immunohistochemistry and western blots. RESULTS Globally, hypomethylation of chromosomal DNA predominates in atherosclerotic plaques and two-thirds of genes showing over 2.5-fold differential in DNA methylation are up-regulated in comparison to healthy mammary arteries. The imprinted chromatin locus 14q32 was identified for the first time as an extensively hypomethylated area in atherosclerosis with highly induced expression of miR127, -136, -410, -431, -432, -433 and capillary formation-associated gene RTL1. The top 100 list of hypomethylated promoters exhibited over 1000-fold enrichment for miRNAs, many of which mapped to locus 14q32. Unexpectedly, also gene body hypermethylation was found to correlate with stimulated mRNA expression. CONCLUSION Significant changes in genomic methylation were identified in atherosclerotic lesions. The most prominent gene cluster activated via hypomethylation was detected at imprinted chromosomal locus 14q32 with several clustered miRNAs that were up-regulated. These results suggest that epigenetic changes are involved in atherogenesis and may offer new potential therapeutic targets for vascular diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Einari Aavik
- Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A. I. Virtanen Institute, Kuopio, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627 (Neulaniementie 2), Kuopio, FIN-70211, Finland
| | - Henri Lumivuori
- Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A. I. Virtanen Institute, Kuopio, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627 (Neulaniementie 2), Kuopio, FIN-70211, Finland
| | - Olli Leppänen
- Centre for R&D, Uppsala University/County Council of Gävleborg, Gävle, Sweden
| | - Thomas Wirth
- Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A. I. Virtanen Institute, Kuopio, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627 (Neulaniementie 2), Kuopio, FIN-70211, Finland
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Häkkinen
- Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A. I. Virtanen Institute, Kuopio, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627 (Neulaniementie 2), Kuopio, FIN-70211, Finland
| | - Jan-Hinrich Bräsen
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrich Beschorner
- Department of Angiology, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Zeller
- Department of Angiology, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | | | - Wim van Criekinge
- Laboratory for Bioinformatics and Computational Genomics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kimmo Mäkinen
- Vascular Surgery Unit, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
- Department of Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, A. I. Virtanen Institute, Kuopio, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627 (Neulaniementie 2), Kuopio, FIN-70211, Finland Science Service Center and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hughes LAE, Melotte V, de Schrijver J, de Maat M, Smit VTHBM, Bovée JVMG, French PJ, van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ, de Meyer T, van Criekinge W, Ahuja N, Herman JG, Weijenberg MP, van Engeland M. The CpG island methylator phenotype: what's in a name? Cancer Res 2013; 73:5858-68. [PMID: 23801749 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-4306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Although the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) was first identified and has been most extensively studied in colorectal cancer, the term "CIMP" has been repeatedly used over the past decade to describe CpG island promoter methylation in other tumor types, including bladder, breast, endometrial, gastric, glioblastoma (gliomas), hepatocellular, lung, ovarian, pancreatic, renal cell, and prostate cancers, as well as for leukemia, melanoma, duodenal adenocarninomas, adrenocortical carcinomas, and neuroblastomas. CIMP has been reported to be useful for predicting prognosis and response to treatment in a variety of tumor types, but it remains unclear whether or not CIMP is a universal phenomenon across human neoplasia or if there should be cancer-specific definitions of the phenotype. Recently, it was shown that somatic isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutations, frequently observed in gliomas, establish CIMP in primary human astrocytes by remodeling the methylome. Interestingly, somatic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, and loss-of-function mutations in ten-eleven translocation (TET) methylcytosine dioxygenase-2 (TET2) associated with a hypermethylation phenotype, are also found in multiple enchondromas of patients with Ollier disease and Mafucci syndrome, and leukemia, respectively. These data provide the first clues for the elucidation of a molecular basis for CIMP. Although CIMP appears as a phenomenon that occurs in various cancer types, the definition is poorly defined and differs for each tumor. The current perspective discusses the use of the term CIMP in cancer, its significance in clinical practice, and future directions that may aid in identifying the true cause and definition of CIMP in different forms of human neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A E Hughes
- Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Epidemiology and Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht; Department of Surgery, Orbis Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Department of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tomar T, Alkema NG, De Meyer T, van Criekinge W, Klip HG, Meersma GJ, van der Zee AGJ, de Jong S, Wisman GBA. Abstract 646: Identification of novel epigenetic biomarkers for platinum-based chemotherapy resistance in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Platinum-based chemotherapy has been standard of care for advanced stage ovarian cancer (OC) patients since the last 3 decades. However, majority of patients relapse within 6 months with drug-resistant disease, which entitle OC among the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Besides ‘’classic’’ clinicopathological features of the primary tumor, no biological parameters have shown clinically predictive and prognostic value for chemoresponse in OC. In the present study, we are focusing on the identification of novel DNA methylation markers in response to platinum-based chemotherapy in high grade serous OC. To accomplish this aim, we performed next generation sequencing on methylation-enriched genomic DNA, isolated from frozen OC patient material from responders (more than 18 months progression free survival) and non-responders (less than 6 months progression free survival) to platinum chemoresponse (n=10 in each group).
Subsequent robust biostatistics and comparative expression data analysis revealed a list of significantly differentially methylated genes of which a number were checked by methylation specific PCR (MSP) on a large platinum sensitive and resistance OC cell line panel. Gene ontology analysis showed that these genes are frequently associated with cell-fate determination, lineage commitment, transcriptional factor binding and ions-transporter system.
Selected candidate methylation markers are currently being validated by pyrosequencing. Moreover, these selected markers are in-silico validated with publically available methylation and expression databases. Next, selected candidate methylation markers will be validated by quantitative-MSP on an independent OC patient cohort. Ultimately, this study will provide a DNA methylation profile for identifying those patients that may benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy in combination with epigenetic treatment modalities.
Citation Format: Tushar Tomar, Nicolette G. Alkema, Tim De Meyer, Wim van Criekinge, Harry G. Klip, Gert Jan Meersma, Ate GJ van der Zee, Steven de Jong, G. Bea A. Wisman. Identification of novel epigenetic biomarkers for platinum-based chemotherapy resistance in high grade serous ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 646. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-646
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tushar Tomar
- 1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Nicolette G. Alkema
- 1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Tim De Meyer
- 2Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wim van Criekinge
- 2Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Harry G. Klip
- 1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Gert Jan Meersma
- 1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ate GJ van der Zee
- 1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Steven de Jong
- 3Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - G. Bea A. Wisman
- 1Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Steenbergen RDM, Ongenaert M, Snellenberg S, Meijer CJLM, Polyak K, Bloushtain-Qimron N, Snijders PJF, van Criekinge W. Abstract 4248: Methylation specific digital karyotyping of human papillomavirus type 16 E6E7 expressing keratinocytes identifies novel methylation targets in cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) types is causally related to the development of cervical cancer and a subset of other anogenital and head and neck cancers. HrHPV-induced malignant transformation of epithelial cells is associated with (epi)genetic aberrations in host cell genes, including alterations in DNA methylation often affecting tumor suppressor gene expression. This study aimed to comprehensively unravel genome-wide DNA methylation events linked to a transforming hrHPV-infection, which is characterized by deregulated expression of the viral oncogenes E6 and E7 in dividing epithelial cells. Hereto, primary human keratinocytes transduced with HPV16E6E7 and their untransduced counterparts were subjected to methylation-specific digital karyotyping (MSDK) to screen for genome-wide DNA-methylation changes at different stages of HPV-induced transformation. Integration of the obtained methylation karyotype with genome-wide expression profiles of cervical carcinomas identified 34 genes with increased methylation in HPV-transformed cells and reduced expression in cervical carcinomas. For 12 genes (CLIC3, CREB3L1, FAM19A4, LFNG, LHX1, MRC2, NKX2-8, NPTX-1, PHACTR3, PRDM14, SOST and TNFSF13) specific methylation in HPV-containing cell lines was confirmed using a real-time methylation specific PCR (MSP) detection platform. Except from NPTX-1, methylation of none of these genes has to the best of our knowledge been linked to hrHPV-induced cancers before. Subsequent analysis of FAM19A4, LHX1, NKX2-8, NPTX-1, PHACTR3 and PRDM14 in cervical tissue specimens revealed an increase in methylation of all six genes with disease progression. All genes were commonly methylated in cervical carcinomas, with highest frequencies of up to 100% detected for FAM19A4, PHACTR3 and PRDM14. NKX2-8, PHACTR3 and PRDM14 were already methylated in approximately one third of precancerous lesions, indicating that their alterations represent relatively early events in cervical carcinogenesis.
In conclusion, MSDK analysis of HPV16 transduced keratinocytes at different stages of HPV-induced transformation resulted in the identification of novel methylation events in cervical carcinogenesis, including methylation of FAM19A4, LHX1, NKX2-8, PHACTR3 and PRDM14 gene promoters. These genes may provide promising triage markers for assessment of the presence of (pre)cancerous cervical lesions in hrHPV-positive women.
Citation Format: Renske D M Steenbergen, Maté Ongenaert, Suzanne Snellenberg, Chris JLM Meijer, Kornelia Polyak, Noga Bloushtain-Qimron, Peter JF Snijders, Wim van Criekinge. Methylation specific digital karyotyping of human papillomavirus type 16 E6E7 expressing keratinocytes identifies novel methylation targets in cervical carcinogenesis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4248. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4248
Collapse
|
21
|
Bosch LJW, Trooskens G, Snaebjornsson P, Haan JC, Pelosof L, Koopman M, Tol J, Louwagie J, Dehaspe L, Ylstra B, Verheul H, van Engeland M, Nagtegaal ID, Herman JG, Punt CJA, van Criekinge W, Carvalho B, Meijer GA. Abstract 1155: Promoter CpG island hypermethylation of Decoy Receptor 1 (DCR1) is associated with poor response to irinotecan in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-1155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Heterogeneity in the biology of colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with variable responses to standard chemotherapy. We aimed to identify DNA hypermethylated genes as predictive biomarkers for irinotecan treatment of patients with metastatic CRC.
Material and Methods
The presence of DNA methylation for a selected panel of 22 genes was assessed by methylation specific PCR (MSP) on primary tumors of 185 patients with metastatic CRC treated with first-line capecitabine (CAP, n=90) or a combination of capecitabine and irinotecan (CAPIRI, n=95) in the phase III CAIRO trial. Methylation status of each gene was correlated to progression free survival (PFS) by treatment regimen. Genes for which methylation status associated with response to irinotecan, were validated in 166 patients treated with first-line CAP (n=78) or CAPIRI (n=88).
Results
Decoy Receptor 1 (DCR1) was identified as a novel hypermethylated gene in CRC. In CAPIRI treated patients, DCR1 methylation was correlated to a shorter PFS compared to patients with unmethylated DCR1 (hazard ratio [HR]=0.4 (95%CI =0.3-0.7), p = 0.0009). In patients with methylated DCR1 PFS did not improve with CAPIRI treatment, compared to treatment with CAP (discovery set: HR=0.8 (95%CI=0.5-1.3, p=0.4); validation set: HR=1.1 (95%CI 0.7-1.7, p=0.6)), in contrast to patients with unmethylated DCR1 (discovery set: HR=2.5 (95%CI 1.7-3.3, p=0.00004); validation set: HR=1.7 (95%CI 1.1-2.0, p=0.004)).
Conclusion
CRC patients with methylated DCR1 did not benefit from adding irinotecan to capecitabine therapy, indicating that DCR1 methylation status may guide selecting metastatic CRC patients for irinotecan-based therapy.
Citation Format: Linda JW Bosch, Geert Trooskens, Petur Snaebjornsson, Josien C. Haan, Lorraine Pelosof, Miriam Koopman, Jolien Tol, Joost Louwagie, Luc Dehaspe, Bauke Ylstra, Henk Verheul, Manon van Engeland, Iris D. Nagtegaal, James G. Herman, Cornelis JA Punt, Wim van Criekinge, Beatriz Carvalho, Gerrit A. Meijer. Promoter CpG island hypermethylation of Decoy Receptor 1 (DCR1) is associated with poor response to irinotecan in colorectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1155. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1155
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lorraine Pelosof
- 3Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | | - Bauke Ylstra
- 1VU University Medical center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Henk Verheul
- 1VU University Medical center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon van Engeland
- 8GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology and Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - James G. Herman
- 3Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Swarts DRA, Henfling M, van Neste L, van Suylen RJ, Dingemans AM, Dinjens WNM, Haesevoets A, Rudelius M, Thunnissen E, Volante M, van Criekinge W, van Engeland M, Ramaekers FCS, Speel EJM. Abstract 2380: Reduced CD44 and OTP gene expression are strong indicators of poor prognosis in pulmonary carcinoids. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-2380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Pulmonary carcinoids are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors showing usually a favorable prognosis. However, there is a risk for late recurrence and/or distant metastasis. Because histological classification in typical and atypical (AC) carcinoids is difficult and its reliability to predict disease outcome varies, we evaluated three genes as potential prognostic markers, i.e., OTP, CD44 and RET.
Methods: These genes were analyzed in 56 frozen carcinoids by quantitative RT-PCR. RET was further studied by methylation and mutation analysis. Immunohistochemistry for CD44 and OTP protein expression was performed on 292 carcinoids.
Results: Low mRNA expression levels of CD44 (p=1.3e-5) and OTP (p=0.012), and high levels of RET (p=0.0025), were strongly associated with a low 20-year survival of carcinoid patients. High RET expression was not related to promoter hypomethylation or gene mutations. A direct link between gene expression and protein levels was confirmed for CD44 and OTP, but not for RET. Within all carcinoids as well as ACs, absence of CD44 protein was significantly associated with low 20-year survival (p=8.6e-5 and p=0.00015, respectively). The absence of nuclear OTP followed by complete loss of expression was also significantly associated with unfavorable disease outcome in all carcinoids (p=2.9e-5). Multivariate analysis revealed that CD44 and OTP immunostaining combined with histopathology is the optimal indicator for patient outcome.
Conclusions: Our study indicates that CD44 and OTP are strong indicators of poor outcome. We therefore argue for implementation of these markers in routine diagnostics in addition to histopathology to improve subclassification of pulmonary carcinoids into prognostically relevant categories.
Citation Format: Dorian RA Swarts, Mieke Henfling, Leander van Neste, Robert J. van Suylen, Anne-Marie Dingemans, Winand NM Dinjens, Annick Haesevoets, Martina Rudelius, Erik Thunnissen, Marco Volante, Wim van Criekinge, Manon van Engeland, Frans CS Ramaekers, Ernst-Jan M. Speel. Reduced CD44 and OTP gene expression are strong indicators of poor prognosis in pulmonary carcinoids. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2380. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2380
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marco Volante
- 7University of Turin at San Luigi Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bosch LJW, Oort FA, Neerincx M, Khalid-de Bakker CAJ, Terhaar sive Droste JS, Melotte V, Jonkers DMAE, Masclee AAM, Mongera S, Grooteclaes M, Louwagie J, van Criekinge W, Coupé VMH, Mulder CJ, van Engeland M, Carvalho B, Meijer GA. DNA methylation of phosphatase and actin regulator 3 detects colorectal cancer in stool and complements FIT. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011; 5:464-72. [PMID: 22135045 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-11-0315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Using a bioinformatics-based strategy, we set out to identify hypermethylated genes that could serve as biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in stool. In addition, the complementary value to a Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) was evaluated. Candidate genes were selected by applying cluster alignment and computational analysis of promoter regions to microarray-expression data of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. DNA methylation was measured by quantitative methylation-specific PCR on 34 normal colon mucosa, 71 advanced adenoma, and 64 CRC tissues. The performance as biomarker was tested in whole stool samples from in total 193 subjects, including 19 with advanced adenoma and 66 with CRC. For a large proportion of these series, methylation data for GATA4 and OSMR were available for comparison. The complementary value to FIT was measured in stool subsamples from 92 subjects including 44 with advanced adenoma or CRC. Phosphatase and Actin Regulator 3 (PHACTR3) was identified as a novel hypermethylated gene showing more than 70-fold increased DNA methylation levels in advanced neoplasia compared with normal colon mucosa. In a stool training set, PHACTR3 methylation showed a sensitivity of 55% (95% CI: 33-75) for CRC and a specificity of 95% (95% CI: 87-98). In a stool validation set, sensitivity reached 66% (95% CI: 50-79) for CRC and 32% (95% CI: 14-57) for advanced adenomas at a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 86-100). Adding PHACTR3 methylation to FIT increased sensitivity for CRC up to 15%. PHACTR3 is a new hypermethylated gene in CRC with a good performance in stool DNA testing and has complementary value to FIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J W Bosch
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
van Vlodrop IJH, Niessen HEC, Derks S, Baldewijns MMLL, van Criekinge W, Herman JG, van Engeland M. Analysis of promoter CpG island hypermethylation in cancer: location, location, location! Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:4225-31. [PMID: 21558408 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-10-3394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The genetic and epigenetic alterations that underlie cancer pathogenesis are rapidly being identified. This provides novel insights in tumor biology as well as in potential cancer biomarkers. The somatic mutations in cancer genes that have been implemented in clinical practice are well defined and very specific. For epigenetic alterations, and more specifically aberrant methylation of promoter CpG islands, evidence is emerging that these markers could be used for the early detection of cancer as well as prediction of prognosis and response to therapy. However, the exact location of biologically and clinically relevant hypermethylation has not been identified for the majority of methylation markers. The most widely used approaches to analyze DNA methylation are based on primer- and probe-based assays that provide information for a limited number of CpG dinucleotides and thus for only part of the information available in a given CpG island. Validation of the current data and implementation of hypermethylation markers in clinical practice require a more comprehensive and critical evaluation of DNA methylation and limitations of the techniques currently used in methylation marker research. Here, we discuss the emerging evidence on the importance of the location of CpG dinucleotide hypermethylation in relation to gene expression and associations with clinicopathologic characteristics in cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris J H van Vlodrop
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Melotte V, Qu X, Ongenaert M, van Criekinge W, de Bruïne AP, Baldwin HS, van Engeland M. The N-myc downstream regulated gene (NDRG) family: diverse functions, multiple applications. FASEB J 2010; 24:4153-66. [PMID: 20667976 DOI: 10.1096/fj.09-151464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 215] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The N-myc downstream regulated gene (NDRG) family of proteins consists of 4 members, NDRG1-4, which are well conserved through evolution. The first member to be discovered and responsible for the family name was NDRG1, because its expression is repressed by the proto-oncogenes MYCN and MYC. All family members are characterized by an α/β hydrolase-fold motif; however, the precise molecular and cellular function of these family members has not been fully elucidated. Although the exact function of NDRG family members has not been clearly elucidated, emerging evidence suggests that mutations in these genes are associated with diverse neurological and electrophysiological syndromes. In addition, aberrant expression as well as tumor suppressor and oncogenic functions affecting key hallmarks of carcinogenesis such as cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, invasion, and stress response have been reported for several of the NDRG proteins. In this review, we summarize the current literature on the NDRG family members concerning their structure, origin, and tissue distribution. In addition, we review the current knowledge regarding the regulation and signaling of the NDRG family members in development and normal physiology. Finally, their role in disease and potential clinical applications (their role as detection or prognostic markers) are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Melotte
- Department of Pathology, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Eijsink JJH, Lendvai A, Deregowski V, Klip HG, Verpooten G, Dehaspe L, de Bock GH, Hollema H, van Criekinge W, Schuuring E, van der Zee AGJ, Wisman B. Abstract 4917: A four-gene methylation marker panel as triage test in hr-HPV positive patients. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: Currently no cervical neoplasia specific methylation markers with high sensitivity and specificity are available for use in population-based screening on (pre)malignant cervical neoplasia. Aim of the study was to identify new methylation markers and to design and validate a methylation marker panel for triage of hr-HPV positive patients.
Methods: Quantitative methylation specific PCRs (MSP) on OpenArray™ platform, representing 424 primers of 213 cancer specific methylated genes, were performed on frozen tissue samples from 84 cervical cancer patients and 106 normal cervices. The top 20 of ranked methylation markers were validated by LightCycler® MSP experiments. Then the top 3 methylation markers based on ROC analysis were selected for further clinical validation in combination with C13ORF18 (previously identified by our group), on cervical scrapings from 74 cervical cancer patients, 69 normal cervices and 148 patients referred with an abnormal Pap smear. Finally, a scenario analysis for population based screening program was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of our methylation panel to conventional liquid based cytology after primary hr-HPV testing.
Results: Three cervical neoplasia specific methylation markers (JAM3, EPB41L3 and TERT) discriminated strongly between cervical scrapings from cervical cancer patients and healthy controls (p<0.0001). Our methylation panel (JAM3, EPB4lL3, TERT and C13ORF18) detected 94% of cervical cancers, 82% CIN3+ and 65% CIN2+, while specificity was 79% for CIN0/1 lesions. Scenario analysis showed that primary hr-HPV testing combined with our methylation marker panel as a triage test resulted in a higher identification of CIN3 and cervical cancers, a higher percentage of correct referrals and less patient-doctor contacts compared to hr-HPV testing in combination with liquid based cytology.
Conclusion: Our study resulted in the discovery of three new cervical neoplasia specific methylation markers. Our methylation panel comprising 4 genes might be an alternative triage test after primary hr-HPV testing and its possible application deserves to be further explored in large population-based screening programs for cervical neoplasia.
This study was supported by OncoMethylome Sciences S.A., Liège, Belgium, by the Dutch Cancer Society (NKB) (project-number RUG 2004-3161) and by the “Direction générale des Technologies, de la Recherche et de l'Énergie” of the Walloon Region of Belgium.
Note: This abstract was not presented at the AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010 because the presenter was unable to attend.
Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4917.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Agnes Lendvai
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Harry G. Klip
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Luc Dehaspe
- 2OncoMethylome Science S.A., Liège, Belgium
| | | | - Harry Hollema
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Ed Schuuring
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Bea Wisman
- 1University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
van Vlodrop IJH, Baldewijns MML, Smits KM, Schouten LJ, van Neste L, van Criekinge W, van Poppel H, Lerut E, Schuebel KE, Ahuja N, Herman JG, de Bruïne AP, van Engeland M. Prognostic significance of Gremlin1 (GREM1) promoter CpG island hypermethylation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol 2009; 176:575-84. [PMID: 20042676 DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Gremlin1 (GREM1), a bone morphogenetic protein antagonist and putative angiogenesis-modulating gene, is silenced by promoter hypermethylation in human malignancies. Here we study GREM1 methylation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and its impact on tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Three GREM1 promoter CpG island regions (i, ii, iii) were analyzed by methylation-specific PCR and/or bisulfite sequencing in ccRCC cell lines and ccRCCs from two independent patient series. Results were correlated with clinicopathological and angiogenic parameters. Bisulfite sequencing of ccRCC cell lines showed GREM1 methylation, associated with absence of GREM1 mRNA. GREM1 methylation prevalence in ccRCCs varied between regions: 55%, 24%, and 20% for regions i, ii, and iii, respectively. GREM1 region iii methylation was associated with increased tumor size (P = 0.02), stage (P = 0.013), grade (P = 0.04), tumor (P = 0.001), and endothelial cell (P = 0.0001) proliferation and decreased mean vessel density (P = 0.001) in a hospital-based ccRCC series (n = 150). In univariate analysis, GREM1 region iii methylated ccRCCs had a significant worse survival when compared with unmethylated ccRCCs (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.29 to 4.28), but not in multivariate analysis (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.74). In a population-based validation series (n = 185), GREM1 region iii methylation was associated with increased Fuhrman grade (P = 0.03) and decreased overall survival (P = 0.001) in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.52 to 3.53 and HR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.44 to 3.59, respectively). The strong correlation between GREM1 region iii promoter methylation and increased malignancy and its correlation with active angiogenesis indicates a role for GREM1 in ccRCC carcinogenesis and tumor angiogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris J H van Vlodrop
- Department of Pathology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hellebrekers DMEI, Lentjes MHFM, van den Bosch SM, Melotte V, Wouters KAD, Daenen KLJ, Smits KM, Akiyama Y, Yuasa Y, Sanduleanu S, Khalid-de Bakker CAJ, Jonkers D, Weijenberg MP, Louwagie J, van Criekinge W, Carvalho B, Meijer GA, Baylin SB, Herman JG, de Bruïne AP, van Engeland M. GATA4 and GATA5 are potential tumor suppressors and biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:3990-7. [PMID: 19509152 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The transcription factors GATA4 and GATA5 are involved in gastrointestinal development and are inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Here, we evaluated GATA4/5 promoter methylation as potential biomarkers for noninvasive colorectal cancer detection, and investigated the role of GATA4/5 in colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Promoter methylation of GATA4/5 was analyzed in colorectal tissue and fecal DNA from colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls using methylation-specific PCR. The potential function of GATA4/5 as tumor suppressors was studied by inducing GATA4/5 overexpression in human colorectal cancer cell lines. RESULTS GATA4/5 methylation was observed in 70% (63/90) and 79% (61/77) of colorectal carcinomas, respectively, and was independent of clinicopathologic features. Methylation frequencies in normal colon tissues from noncancerous controls were 6% (5 of 88, GATA4; P < 0.001) and 13% (13 of 100, GATA5; P < 0.001). GATA4/5 overexpression suppressed colony formation (P < 0.005), proliferation (P < 0.001), migration (P < 0.05), invasion (P < 0.05), and anchorage-independent growth (P < 0.0001) of colorectal cancer cells. Examination of GATA4 methylation in fecal DNA from two independent series of colorectal cancer patients and controls yielded a sensitivity of 71% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 55-88%] and specificity of 84% (95% CI, 74-95%) for colorectal cancer detection in the training set, and a sensitivity of 51% (95% CI, 37-65%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI, 84-100%) in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS Methylation of GATA4/5 is a common and specific event in colorectal carcinomas, and GATA4/5 exhibit tumor suppressive effects in colorectal cancer cells in vitro. GATA4 methylation in fecal DNA may be of interest for colorectal cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debby M E I Hellebrekers
- Departments of Pathology and Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Criekinge W, Schotte P, Heyninck K, Beyaert R. The yeast three-hybrid system as a tool to study caspases. Methods Mol Biol 2004; 282:243-54. [PMID: 15105569 DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-812-9:243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Caspases are cysteine proteases that play an essential role during apoptotic cell death and inflammation. They are synthesized as catalytically dormant proenzymes, containing an N-terminal prodomain, a large subunit (p20) containing the active site cysteine, and a small subunit (p10). The active enzymes function as tetramers, consisting of two p20/p10 subunit heterodimers. Both subunits contribute residues that are essential for substrate recognition. Activation of caspases culminates in the cleavage of a set of cellular proteins, resulting in disassembly of the cell or proinflammatory cytokine production. Inappropriate caspase activation contributes to or accounts for several diseases. The identification of caspase-interacting proteins that might act as activators, substrates, or inhibitors is therefore an attractive step in the development of novel therapeutics. However, caspase substrates and other proteins that bind specifically with the active heterodimeric p20/p10 form of caspases will escape detection in a classical two-hybrid approach with an unprocessed caspase precursor as bait. Alternatively, a number of so-called three-hybrid systems to analyze more complex macromolecular interactions have been developed. We describe the use of a three-hybrid approach adapted to the needs of caspases to detect and analyze the interaction of mature heteromeric caspases with protein substrates or inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim van Criekinge
- Department of Molecular Biomedical Research, Ghent University-VIB, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|