The Key Aspects of Neonatal and Infant Neurological Examination: The Ballard Score, the Infant's Head with Hydrocephalus and Assessment in a Clinical Setting

The physical examination of the newborn is essential in diagnosing neurological or neurosurgical conditions in the newborn. This article focuses on three clinical assessments of newborns and infants that are especially important if neurological problems are suspected: The Ballard score, the examination of the head in a baby with (suspected) hydrocephalus, and the neurological and developmental evaluation of an infant in an ambulatory setting. A textual description and a link to a video describe each assessment.

Evaluation of the correlation of the new Ballard scoring with the ultrasonographic optical nerve sheath diameter and brain volume of preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurements with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in preterm infants are similar.

AIM

We measured ultrasonographic ONSD and calculated the brain volumes of preterm infants using two-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and explored the relationships thereof with gestational age, birth weight, head circumference, and new Ballard score.

METHOD

This prospective study included preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit without intracranial pathology. Two images per eye were obtained from a linear array ultrasound transducer placed on the patient's superior eyelid. The ONSD was measured 3 mm behind the globe. The brain was considered an ellipsoid, and estimated absolute brain volumes were calculated by subtracting the volumes of the two lateral ventricles from the total brain volumes.

RESULTS

A total of 143 preterm infants (male 74, female 69) included in the study. The mean gestational age of the study population was 29.7 weeks (23-36), and the mean birth weight was 1390 g (500-2850). There was a significant difference in ONSD between the male and female gender. A significant, strong, and positive correlation was found between ONSD measurements and gestational age (r 0.901, p < 0.001), new Ballard score (r 0.946, p < 0.001), birth weight, head circumference, and brain volumes.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that ONSD measurements are highly correlated with anthropometry, and it could be a promising bedside, non-invasive objective tool for the determination of exact gestational age postnatally along with the new Ballard score.

The assessment of gestational age: a comparison of different methods from a malaria pregnancy cohort in sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND

Determining gestational age in resource-poor settings is challenging because of limited availability of ultrasound technology and late first presentation to antenatal clinic. Last menstrual period (LMP), symphysio-pubis fundal height (SFH) and Ballard Score (BS) at delivery are therefore often used. We assessed the accuracy of LMP, SFH, and BS to estimate gestational age at delivery and preterm birth compared to ultrasound (US) using a large dataset derived from a randomized controlled trial in pregnant malaria patients in four African countries.

METHODS

Mean and median gestational age for US, LMP, SFH and BS were calculated for the entire study population and stratified by country. Correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson's rho, and Bland Altman plots were used to calculate mean differences in findings with 95% limit of agreements. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated considering US as reference method to identify term and preterm babies.

RESULTS

A total of 1630 women with P. falciparum infection and a gestational age > 24 weeks determined by ultrasound at enrolment were included in the analysis. The mean gestational age at delivery using US was 38.7 weeks (95%CI: 38.6-38.8), by LMP, 38.4 weeks (95%CI: 38.0-38.9), by SFH, 38.3 weeks (95%CI: 38.2-38.5), and by BS 38.0 weeks (95%CI: 37.9-38.1) (p < 0.001). Correlation between US and any of the other three methods was poor to moderate. Sensitivity and specificity to determine prematurity were 0.63 (95%CI 0.50-0.75) and 0.72 (95%CI, 0.66-0.76) for LMP, 0.80 (95%CI 0.74-0.85) and 0.74 (95%CI 0.72-0.76) for SFH and 0.42 (95%CI 0.35-0.49) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.74-0.79) for BS.

CONCLUSIONS

In settings with limited access to ultrasound, and in women who had been treated with P. falciparum malaria, SFH may be the most useful antenatal tool to date a pregnancy when women present first in second and third trimester. The Ballard postnatal maturation assessment has a limited role and lacks precision. Improving ultrasound facilities and skills, and early attendance, together with the development of new technologies such as automated image analysis and new postnatal methods to assess gestational age, are essential for the study and management of preterm birth in low-income settings.