Comparative assessment of chondral defect repair using migratory chondroprogenitors suspended in either gelled or freeze-dried platelet-rich plasma: An in vitro and ex vivo human osteochondral unit model study

BACKGROUND

Chondroprogenitors, with enhanced chondrogenic potential, have emerged to be a promising alternative for cell-based therapy in cartilage repair. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), widely used for intra-articular treatment, has a short half-life. Freeze-dried PRP (FD-PRP), with an extended half-life and retained growth factors, is gaining attention. This study compares the efficacy of Migratory Chondroprogenitors (MCPs) in gelled PRP and FD-PRP using in-vitro and ex-vivo models, assessing FD-PRP as a potential off-the-shelf option for effective cartilage repair.

METHODOLOGY

MCPs were isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage samples (n = 3), characterized through FACS and RT-PCR. For in-vitro analysis, cells were loaded into gelled PRP and FD-PRP scaffolds at a density of 1x106 cells per scaffold. Trilineage differentiation studies and live-dead assays were conducted on MCPs using Calcein AM/Propidium Homodimer-1. In ex-vivo analysis, MCPs of the same density were added to Osteochondral Units (OCU) with chondral defects containing PRP gel and FD-PRP scaffolds, harvested on the 15th and 35th days for histological examination. Controls included cell-free scaffolds.

RESULTS

Our in-vitro analysis demonstrates the robust viability of MCPs in both scaffolds, with no discernible impact on their differentiation capacity. Ex-vivo analysis of the OCU for cartilage repair showed that the chondrogenic potential characterized by the accumulation of extracellular matrix containing glycosaminoglycans and collagen type II production (with no alteration in collagen type X), was observed to be better with the gel PRP and the gel PRP containing MCP groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the preference for gel PRP as a superior synergistic scaffold for chondroprogenitor delivery.

Evaluation of ghrelin as a distinguishing marker for human articular cartilage-derived chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors

Purpose of the study

Cell-based therapeutics for articular cartilage repair primarily employed bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes. Research to overcome their limitation of formation of a functionally poor fibro-hyaline type of repair tissue led to the discovery of chondroprogenitors (CPCs), cartilage resident stem cells. These cells isolated by adhesion assay using fibronectin (FAA-CPs) and migration of progenitors from explants (MCPs) display higher chondrogenic and lower terminal differentiation potential. During in-vitro culture, chondrocytes tend to de-differentiate and acquire characteristics similar to stem cells, thus making it challenging to distinguish them from other cell groups. Ghrelin, a cytoplasmic growth hormone secretagogue, has been proposed to play a vital role in chondrogenesis, with reports of its higher expression in chondrocytes than BM-MSCs. The aim of this study was to compare the mRNA expression of Ghrelin between BM-MSCs, chondrocytes, FAA-CPs and MCP and the possibility of it serving as a distinguishing marker.

Methods

The four populations isolated from three human osteoarthritic knee joints were characterised by CD marker expression for positive (CD 90, CD73 and CD105) and negative (HLA-DR, CD34 and CD45) MSC markers and trilineage differentiation (adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic) and subjected to qRT-PCR to assess Ghrelin's gene expression.

Results

This study showed that all groups exhibited similar expression of CD markers and multilineage potential. Though chondrocytes showed greater expression of Ghrelin, it was not statistically significant to classify it as a distinguishing marker between these cell populations.

Conclusion

Ghrelin does not serve to differentiate the subpopulations in terms of their mRNA expression. Further evaluation using their associated enzymes and receptors could provide valuable information to uncover their potential as unequivocal biomarkers.

Systematic review of articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors for cartilage repair in animal models

Purpose of research

The potential for cartilage repair using articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors has recently gained popularity due to promising results from in-vitro and in-vivo studies. Translation of results from in-vitro to a clinical setting requires a sufficient number of animal studies displaying significant positive outcomes. Thus, this systematic review comprehensively discusses the available literature (January 2000-March 2022) on animal models employing chondroprogenitors for cartilage regeneration, highlighting the results and limitations associated with their use.As per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a web-based search of PubMed and SCOPUS databases was performed for the following terminologies: "chondroprogenitors", "cartilage-progenitors", and "chondrogenic-progenitors", which yielded 528 studies. A total of 12 studies met the standardized inclusion criteria, which included chondroprogenitors derived from hyaline cartilage isolated using fibronectin adhesion assay (FAA) or migratory assay from explant cultures, further analyzing the role of chondroprogenitors using in-vivo animal models.

Principal results

Analysis revealed that FAA chondroprogenitors demonstrated the ability to attenuate osteoarthritis, repair chondral defects and form stable cartilage in animal models. They displayed better outcomes than bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells but were comparable to chondrocytes. Migratory chondroprogenitors also demonstrated superiority to BM-MSCs in terms of higher chondrogenesis and lower hypertrophy, although a direct comparison to FAA-CPs and other cell types is warranted.

Major conclusions

Chondroprogenitors exhibit superior properties for chondrogenic repair; however, limited data on animal studies necessitates further studies to optimize their use before clinical translation for neo-cartilage formation.

Articular Cartilage Chondroprogenitors: Isolation and Directed Differentiation

Experimental data suggests that tissue-specific progenitors are present within hyaline articular cartilage with the potential to contribute to growth, maintenance, and repair. In this chapter, we show how colony-forming progenitor-like cells can be isolated from bovine articular cartilage using differential adhesion to fibronectin. Furthermore, we describe the optimal conditions and factors required to differentiate these progenitor cells to produce hyaline articular cartilage.

Supplementation of articular cartilage-derived chondroprogenitors with bone morphogenic protein-9 enhances chondrogenesis without affecting hypertrophy

INTRODUCTION

Chondroprogenitors (CPCs) have emerged as a promising cellular therapy for cartilage-related pathologies due to their inherent primed chondrogenic potential. Studies report that the addition of growth factors such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) and Bone Morphogenic Protein (BMP) enhance the chondroinducive potential in chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells. This study evaluated if supplementation of the standard culture medium for cell expansion with 1-34 PTH and BMP-9 would enhance the chondrogenic potential of CPCs and reduce their hypertrophic tendency.

METHODS

Human chondrocytes were isolated from patients undergoing total knee replacement for osteoarthritis (n = 3). Following fibronectin adhesion assay, passage 1 CPCs were divided and further expanded under three culture conditions (a) control, i.e., cells continued under standard culture conditions, (b) 1-34 PTH group, additional intermittent 6 h exposure with 1-34 PTH and (c) BMP-9 group, additional BMP-9 during culture expansion. All the groups were evaluated for population-doubling, cell cycle analysis, surface marker and gene expression for chondrogenesis, hypertrophy, multilineage differentiation and GAG (glycosaminoglycan)/DNA following chondrogenic differentiation.

RESULTS

Concerning growth kinetics, the BMP-9 group exhibited a significantly lower S-phase and population-doubling when compared to the other two groups. Qualitative analysis for chondrogenic potential (Alcian blue, Safranin O staining and Toluidine blue for GAG) revealed that the BMP-9 group exhibited the highest uptake. The BMP-9 group also showed significantly higher COL2A1 expression than the control group, with no change in the hypertrophy marker expression.

CONCLUSION

BMP-9 can potentially be used as an additive for CPCs expansion, to enhance their chondrogenic potential without affecting their low hypertrophic tendency. The mitigating effects of 1-34PTH on hypertrophy would benefit further investigation when used in combination with BMP-9 to enhance chondrogenesis whilst reducing hypertrophy.

An in vitro analysis of the effect of hyperosmolarity on the chondrogenic potential of human articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors

PURPOSE

Chondroprogenitors display promise for articular cartilage regeneration. It is imperative to standardize culture conditions, to further enhance chondrogenicity and reduce tendency for hypertrophy. Cartilage matrix provides a unique hyperosmolar microenvironment that enables native cells to resist compressive stress. However, commonly used culture media have osmolarities relatively hypoosmotic when compared to in-vivo conditions. Previous reports involving chondrocytes demonstrated enhanced chondrogenic potential secondary to utilization of hyperosmolar culture conditions. The study aimed to assess the effect of hyperosmolarity (either mimicking normal joint conditions or short-term hyperosmotic stress) on chondroprogenitor phenotype.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fibronectin adhesion assay derived human articular chondroprogenitors (n = 3) were divided into 3 groups: a) Control: cells grown in standard culture conditions (320 mOsm/L), b) Test A: cells grown in hyperosmolar media mimicking joint conditions (409 mOsm/L) and c) Test B: cells exposed to short-term hyperosmotic stress (504 mOsm/L) for 24 h, prior to assessment. Evaluation parameters included population doubling, cell size, surface marker expression, mRNA expression (markers of chondrogenesis, dedifferentiation and hypertrophy) and multilineage potential.

RESULTS

Subjecting these cells to increased osmolarity in culture did not demonstrably favor chondrogenesis (control vs Test A: comparable COL2A1) while hyperosmotic stress further increased the tendency for hypertrophy and terminal differentiation (high COL1A1 and low COL2A1, P = 0.006). Additionally, growth kinetics, surface marker expression and multilineage potential were comparable across groups.

CONCLUSION

Chondroprogenitors displayed sensitivity to increase in osmolarity as chondrogenic phenotype did not improve, while hypertrophic propensity was heightened, although further analysis of culture and phenotypic parameters will aid in optimizing chondroprogenitor use in cartilage regeneration.

Articular chondroprogenitors in platelet rich plasma for treatment of osteoarthritis and osteochondral defects in a rabbit knee model

BACKGROUND

Articular chondroprogenitors are a promising contender for cartilage repair due to their inherent nature which stands primed for chondrogenesis and minimal hypertrophic preponderance. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) has been extensively used for treating cartilage defects and osteoarthritis (OA), due to its chondro-inductive properties and abundant pool of growth factors. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of chondroprogenitors injected with PRP versus PRP alone in the healing of experimentally created early OA and osteochondral defects (OCD) in a rabbit model.

METHODS

Adult New Zealand White male rabbits were used for cell and PRP isolation. Chondroprogenitors were isolated by fibronectin adhesion assay, labelled with iron oxide, characterized for surface markers, differential potential and expanded. PRP was isolated by double spin centrifugation using a TriCell kit. Study groups included (a) Monosodium iodoacetate induced early OA and (b) critical OCD. Following intervention (test arm: PRP+ chondroprogenitors and control arm: PRP), assessment was performed at 6- and 12-weeks which included histopathological examination and scoring (OARSI and Modified Wakitani score), immunohistochemistry analysis (Collagen type II and X) and synovial fluid S100A12 levels.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Comparable, evident healing was noticed in both test and control arms when the OA group samples were assessed at both time points. In the OCD group, PRP alone exhibited significantly better results than the test arm, although repair was notable in both interventions. Further evaluation of chondroprogenitors is required to assess their role as a standalone therapy and in combination with PRP to further cartilage regeneration.

Comparative analysis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors and chondrocytes to determine cell superiority for cartilage regeneration

INTRODUCTION

Chondroprogenitors, a promising therapeutic modality in cell-based therapy, are routinely isolated from articular cartilage by fibronectin differential adhesion assay. However, there is paucity of information regarding their biological profile and the lack of a marker that can reliably distinguish them from cultured chondrocytes due to possible dedifferentiation. Since chondroprogenitors have been classified as mesenchymal stem cells(MSCs), the aim of our study was to compare bone marrow-MSCs, chondroprogenitors and chondrocytes, and assess superiority for cartilage repair. An additional objective was to also compare CD49b as a differentiating marker for isolating chondroprogenitors as a recent report demonstrated significantly high expression in the surfaceome of migratory articular chondroprogenitors.

METHODS

Bone marrow aspirate and articular cartilage was obtained from three osteoarthritic knee joints. Study arms included a) bone marrow-MSCs, b) chondroprogenitors, c) cultured chondrocytes, d) chondrocytes cultured with additional growth factors and e) CD49b + sorted chondroprogenitors. Assessment parameters included population doubling, surface expression for positive, negative MSC markers and potential markers of chondrogenesis (CD29, CD49e, CD49b, CD166 and CD146), RT-PCR for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy and trilineage differentiation.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Chondroprogenitors exhibited efficient chondrogenesis (SOX-9 and COL2A1) and significantly lower tendency for hypertrophy (RUNX2), which was also reflected in trilineage differentiation where progenitors displayed minimal calcified matrix, efficient glycosaminoglycan deposition and high collagen type II uptake. CD49b did not serve as a marker for isolation as sorted chondroprogenitors performed significantly poorer when compared to fibronectin assay derived cells. Emphasis on preclinical studies utilizing progenitors of higher purity is the future direction.

An assessment of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell and human articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitor cocultures vs. monocultures

BACKGROUND

Cell based therapy in cartilage repair predominantly involves the use of chondrocytes and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). Co-culture systems, due to their probable synergistic effect on enhancement of functional chondrogenesis and reduction in terminal differentiation have also been attempted. Chondroprogenitors, derived from articular cartilage and regarded as MSCs, have recently garnered interest for consideration in cartilage regeneration to overcome limitations associated with use of conventional cell types. The aim of this study was to assess whetherco-culturing bone marrow (BM)-MSCs and chondroprogenitors at different ratios would yield superior results in terms of surface marker expression, gene expression and chondrogenic potential.

METHODS

Human BM-MSCs and chondroprogenitors obtained from three osteoarthritic knee joints and subjected to monolayer expansion and pellet cultures (10,000 cells/cm²) as five test groups containing either monocultures or co-cultures (MSC: chondroprogenitors) at three different ratios (75:25, 50:50 and 25:75) were utilized.

RESULTS

Data analysis revealed that all groups exhibited a high expression of CD166, CD29 and CD49e. With regard to gene expression, high expression of SOX9, Aggrecan and Collagen type I; a moderate expression of Collagen type X and RUNX2; with a low expression of Collagen type II was seen. Analysis of pellet culture revealed that chondroprogenitor monoculture and chondroprogenitor dominant coculture, exhibited a subjectively larger pellet size with higher deposition of Collagen type II and glycosaminoglycan.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study is suggestive of chondroprogenitor monoculture superiority over MSCs, either in isolation or in a coculture system and proposes further analysis of chondroprogenitors for cartilage repair.

A three-dimensional in vitro culture environment of a novel polymer scaffold, yielding chondroprogenitors and mesenchymal stem cells in human chondrocytes derived from osteoarthritis-affected cartilage tissue

Objective

We evaluated the expression of stem/progenitor biomarkers in osteoarthritic tissue derived chondrocytes cultured using a three-dimensional (3D) thermo-reversible gelation polymer (TGP).

Methods

The chondrocytes from discarded biopsy tissues obtained from human elderly patients with osteoarthritis were cultured using the 3D-TGP up to six weeks.

Results

The chondrocytes grew in a tissue-like manner, without de-differentiation into fibroblasts, and the cells thus tissue-engineered were proven positive for CD49e, OCT4, CD-105 and STRO-1 by immunohistochemistry.

Conclusion

This study establishes the efficacy of this 3D-TGP platform for clinically useable in-vitro tissue-engineered cartilage for improvising the clinical outcome of cell therapy for cartilage repair.

In vitro chondrogenic differentiation of human articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors using pulsed electromagnetic field

BACKGROUND

The ability to grow new cartilage remains the standard goal of any treatment strategy directed at cartilage repair. Chondroprogenitors have garnered interest due to their applicability in cell therapy. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) favors chondrogenesis by possible upregulation of genes belonging to TGFβ superfamily. Since TGFβ is implicated in chondrogenic signalling, the aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of PEMF to induce chondrogenesis via endogenous TGFβ production in chondroprogenitors vs differentiation using chondrogenic medium inclusive of TGFβ.

METHODS

Chondroprogenitors were harvested from three non-diseased human knee joints via fibronectin assay. Passage 3 pellets were subjected to four different culture conditions: a) negative control contained chondrogenic medium without TGFβ2, b) positive control contained medium with TGFβ2, c) PEMF 1 contained medium of negative control plus single exposure to PEMF and d) PEMF 2 contained medium of negative control plus multiple exposures to PEMF. Following differentiation (day 21), pellets were assessed for gene expression of ACAN, SOX9, COL2A1, TGFβ1, TGFβ2, and TGFβ3. Alcian blue staining to detect glycosaminoglycan deposition was also performed. Medium supernatant was used to detect endogenous latent TGF-β1 levels using ELISA.

RESULTS

All study arms exhibited comparable gene expression without any significant difference. Although positive control and PEMF study arms demonstrated notably better staining than negative control, the level of latent TGF-β1 was seen to be significantly high in supernatant from positive control (P < 0.05) when compared to other groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that PEMF induced chondrogenesis might involve other signalling molecules, which require further evaluation.

Characterization of human articular chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors derived from non-diseased and osteoarthritic knee joints to assess superiority for cell-based therapy

PURPOSE

Cell based therapy is constantly underway since regeneration of genuine hyaline cartilage is under par. Much attention has been afforded to chondroprogenitors recently, as an alternative cell substitute for cartilage repair. Although single source derivation of chondrocytes and chondroprogenitors is advantageous, lack of a characteristic differentiating marker obscures clear identification, which is essential to create a biological profile and is also required to assess cell type superiority for cartilage repair.

METHODS

Cells obtained from three non-diseased/osteoarthritic human knee joints each, were expanded in culture up to passage 10. Characterization studies were performed using flow cytometry; gene expression was studied using RT-PCR; growth kinetics and tri-lineage differentiation was also studied to construct a better profile of chondroprogenitors as well as chondrocytes.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Our results showed that both cell populations exhibited similar cell surface characteristics except for non-diseased chondroprogenitors, which showed markedly low expression of CD34 and high expression of CD166. Trilineage data was suggestive of multilineage potential for both cell types with chondroprogenitors showing notably higher glycosaminoglycan and lower calcified matrix deposition. Data acquired from this study aided in describing cellular behavior of human articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors in conditions not reported earlier. Our comparative analysis suggests that sorting based on a combination of markers (CD34- and CD166+) would yield a population of cells with minimal contamination by chondrocytes, which may provide translatable results in terms of enhanced chondrogenesis and reduced hypertrophy; both indispensable for the field of cartilage regeneration.

Evaluation of CD49e as a distinguishing marker for human articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors

BACKGROUND

Cell-based therapy in cartilage repair can benefit from the use of chondroprogenitors; a cell type classified as mesenchymal stem cells, demonstrating reduced hypertrophy. Fibronectin, routinely used to isolate chondroprogenitors, classically binds to α5β1 integrins (CD49e + CD29), of which CD49e is said to be highly expressed in progenitors. The aim of our study was to assess the specificity of CD49e as a distinguishing marker for chondroprogenitors; because studies report low expression in fresh chondrocytes (FCs), but recent conflicting data has exhibited incremental expression of CD49e in cultured chondrocytes.

METHODS

FCs were isolated from three human osteoarthritic knee joints and CD49e- cells (sorted by flow cytometry) were cultured in adherent and non-adherent conditions and reassessed for CD49e and CD29 at multiple time points. Colony-forming efficiency (CFE) following fibronectin adhesion assay was calculated for FC, CD49e+ and CD49e- cells.

RESULTS

A statistically significant increase in CD49e and CD29 expression was seen in both adherent and non-adherent cultures of CD49e- cells (P < 0.01), as early as 24 h. All groups grew clonally and CFE was similar without any significant difference. CD49e- chondrocytes turned positive when cultured, possibly due to an inherent phenotypic drift, seen after release from cartilage and not because of plastic adherence or chondroprogenitor overgrowth, as non-adherent cultures also showed high expression.

CONCLUSIONS

As the specificity of CD49e is questionable, there is a pressing need for a specific differentiating marker, to isolate a pure population of chondroprogenitors, as this cell type shows inherent chondrogenesis and reduced hypertrophy, both requisites for cartilage repair.

An injectable heparin-conjugated hyaluronan scaffold for local delivery of transforming growth factor β1 promotes successful chondrogenesis

Cartilage lacks basic repair mechanisms and thus surgical interventions are necessary to treat lesions. Minimally-invasive arthroscopic procedures require the development of injectable biomaterials to support chondrogenesis of implanted cells. However, most cartilage tissue engineering approaches rely on pre-culture of scaffolds in media containing growth factors (GFs) such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1, which are crucial for cartilage formation and homeostasis. GFs media-supplementation is incompatible with injectable approaches and has led to a knowledge gap about optimal dose of GFs and release profiles needed to achieve chondrogenesis. This study aims to determine the optimal loading and release kinetics of TGF-β1 bound to an engineered GAG hydrogel to promote optimal cartilaginous matrix production in absence of TGF-β1 media-supplementation. We show that heparin, a GAG known to bind a wide range of GFs, covalently conjugated to a hyaluronan hydrogel, leads to a sustained release of TGF-β1. Using this heparin-conjugated hyaluronan hydrogel, 0.25 to 50 ng TGF-β1 per scaffold was loaded and cell viability, proliferation and cartilaginous matrix deposition of the encapsulated chondroprogenitor cells were measured. Excellent chondrogenesis was found when 5 ng TGF-β1 per scaffold and higher were used. We also demonstrate the necessity of a sustained release of TGF-β1, as no matrix deposition is observed upon a burst release. In conclusion, our biomaterial loaded with an optimal initial dose of 5 ng/scaffold TGF-β1 is a promising injectable material for cartilage repair, with potentially increased safety due to the low, locally administered GF dose. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Cartilage cell-based products are dependent on exogenous growth factor supplementation in order for proper tissue maturation. However, for a one-step repair of defects without need for expensive tissue maturation, an injectable, growth factor loaded formulation is required. Here we show development of an injectable hyaluronan hydrogel, which achieves a sustained release of TGF-β1 due to covalent conjugation of heparin. These grafts matured into cartilaginous tissue in the absence of growth factor supplementation. Additionally, this system allowed us to screen TGF-β1 concentrations to determine the mimimum amount of growth factor required for chondrogenesis. This study represents a critical step towards development of a minimally-invasive, arthroscopic treatment for cartilage lesions.

Comparison of incremental concentrations of micron-sized superparamagnetic iron oxide for labelling articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors

INTRODUCTION

In vivo tracking of labelled cells can provide valuable information about cellular behavior in the microenvironment, migration and contribution of transplanted cells toward tissue regeneration. Articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors (CPs) show promise as a candidate for cell-based therapy as they have been classified as mesenchymal stem cells with inherent chondrogenic potential. Iron oxide labelling is known to withstand harsh processing techniques known to be associated with staining of osteochondral specimens.

AIM AND METHODS

The aim of our study was to investigate the feasibility of labelling CPs with micron-sized super paramagnetic iron oxide (M-SPIO) particles and to study the effects of this approach on the labelling efficiency, viability, maintenance of phenotype and potential for differentiation. Human CPs were isolated using fibronectin adhesion assay, passage 2 cells were labelled using three concentrations of M-SPIO (12.75 μg/ml, 25.5 μg/ml and 38.25 μg/ml). At sub confluence, cells were assessed for a) iron uptake by Prussian blue stain and colorimetry b) viability using 7-amino actinomycin D, c) MSC marker expression by flow cytometric analysis and d) trilineage differentiation potential.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Iron uptake was higher with increase in M-SPIO concentration whereas CD73, CD90 marker expression significantly decreased and chondrogenic potential appreciably reduced with increase in M-SPIO concentration. In conclusion, 12.75 μg/ml M-SPIO can successfully label human articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors with minimal effect on cellular viability, MSC marker expression and potential for differentiation.

Allogeneic platelet rich plasma serves as a scaffold for articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors

Limited self-restorative ability of the cartilage has necessitated the use of cell and tissue engineering based therapies. Recent advances in the isolation, expansion and characterization of articular cartilage derived chondroprogenitors(CPs) has gained popularity in its role for cartilage repair. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is a reliable biological scaffold for in-vitro and in-vivo studies with reported therapeutic applications in cartilage and bone pathologies. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether human allogeneic PRP could serve as a biological scaffold for chondroprogenitors (CPs) in cartilage repair. CPs were isolated from the superficial layer of three osteoarthritic knee joints by fibronectin adhesion assay and characterized using flow cytometric analysis. Allogeneic citrated blood was harvested from three subjects to obtain PRP. CPs at a concentration of one million cells per ml were gelled with PRP using calcium chloride. The PRP-CP scaffolds were subjected for adipogeneic, osteogenic, chondrogeneic differentiation and processed for post differentiation-staining studies (Oil Red O, Von Kossa, Alcian blue staining), immunofluorescence (collagen II) and live dead assays (Calcein AM-Ethidium Homodimer). We show that PRP was able to sustain CP cell viability and differentiate towards adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic lineage under appropriate culture conditions. We also noted positive extracellular matrix production in PRP-CP scaffolds cultured without chondrogenic supplementation. Our results suggest that PRP could be a promising bio-active scaffold due to its synergistic effect in supporting cell proliferation, maintaining cell viability and favoring extracellular matrix production. PRP can be used as biological scaffold for the delivery of CPs in cartilage healing.

Resident mesenchymal progenitors of articular cartilage

Articular cartilage has poor capacity of self-renewal and repair. Insufficient number and activity of resident mesenchymal (connective tissue) progenitors is likely one of the underlying reasons. Chondroprogenitors reside not only in the superficial zone of articular cartilage but also in other zones of articular cartilage and in the neighboring tissues, including perichondrium (groove of Ranvier), synovium and fat pad. These cells may respond to injury and contribute to articular cartilage healing. In addition, marrow stromal cells can migrate through subchondral bone when articular cartilage is damaged. We should develop drugs and methods that correctly stimulate resident progenitors for improvement of repair and inhibition of degenerative changes in articular cartilage.