Efficacy of Golimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients at High Risk of a Poor Prognosis: Post-Hoc Analysis of GO-FORTH Study using Cluster Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) in patients with poor prognostic factors (PPFs).

METHODS

This is a post-hoc analysis of GO-FORTH phase 2/3 study. Cluster analysis was used to determine a patient population with high-risk patterns based on seven PPFs suggested by EULAR recommendations and limited physical function. Radiographic progression, disease activity, and physical function and associated factors were evaluated over 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Overall, 261 RA patients were classified into three clusters characterised by high disease activity, high CRP levels, and limited physical function at baseline. GLM showed suppression of progressive modified total sharp score (mTSS) and decreases in Disease Activity Score 28‒joint counts with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and Health Assessment Questionnaire‒Disease Index, in all the clusters. In cluster C that showed almost all the PPF-characteristics, a higher rate of ΔmTSS≤0 was observed in GLM 100 mg group than in GLM 50 mg group (63.9% vs 46.5%). CRP concentration and physical limitation were associated with radiographic progression of cluster C in GLM treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

GLM was effective in RA patients in a subpopulation at high risk of PPF in GO-FORTH study. A dose of 100 mg may be more beneficial in preventing radiographic progression in this population. Short title: Impact of poor prognostic factors on GLM efficacy.

Golimumab improves health-related quality of life of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: Results of the go-care study

BACKGROUND

In recent years, improvement of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Ulcerative colitis (UC) has become a relevant measure for treatment efficacy.

METHODS

We report results from a multicenter prospective study in Italy investigating HRQoL in adult patients with UC treated with golimumab (GLM). Patients who had shown clinical response after a 6-week induction phase (w0), were followed for an additional 48 weeks (w48) (total 54-week treatment).

RESULTS

Of the 159 patients enrolled 90 completed the study. Compared to values at the beginning of treatment (n = 137), significant improvements were observed for mean total Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) scores at w0 (168.5) and w48 (181.7). Patients with baseline PMS above the median tended to have greater improvements in IBDQ at w0 (OR 2.037, p = 0.033) and w48 (OR 3.292, p = 0.027). Compared to beginning of GLM treatment, the mean Full Mayo Score (FMS) decreased by 5.9 points at w48, while mean Partial Mayo Score (PMS) decreased by 3.9 points at w0 and by 4.9 points at w48.

CONCLUSIONS

GLM improved HRQoL, disease activity and inflammatory biomarkers in UC patients with moderate-to-severely active disease. The greater the burden of disease activity at baseline, the greater the improvement of HRQoL after 24 and 48 weeks of treatment.

Rituximab as possible therapy in TNF inhibitor-induced IgA vasculitis with severe renal involvement

BACKGROUND

We observe the increasing use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients affected by chronic inflammatory diseases. These drugs provide good control of symptoms, contributing to significant improvement in the quality of life in individuals with high disease burden. On the other hand, along with their wider use and longer follow-up periods the number of reports regarding their adverse effects is also increasing. The reported complications include drug-induced vasculitis with possible kidney involvement. In the literature we can distinguish more frequently described ANCA-associated vasculitis and more rarely occurring immunoglobulin A vasculitis. Although uncommon, such complications may present with potentially life-threatening vital organ dysfunction; therefore, adequate monitoring and effective therapy are necessary.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report two cases of TNF inhibitor-induced vasculitis with severe acute worsening of renal function and significant proteinuria. The first patient was receiving golimumab therapy for ankylosing spondylitis and the second patient was treated with adalimumab for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. In the second case dialysis treatment was necessary and the patient presented recurrence of vasculitis after rechallenge with adalimumab. Both patients underwent renal biopsy which showed findings compatible with drug-induced IgA vasculitis and both were treated successfully with corticosteroids and rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of rituximab use in drug-induced IgA vasculitis with renal involvement. Combination of corticosteroids and rituximab can be an effective therapy in case of vasculitis with kidney failure and a preferable option for selected patients with drug-induced IgA vasculitis compared to cyclophosphamide. More studies are necessary to establish suitable short- and long-term treatment. Given the rarity of this disorder, case reports and case series can provide practical guidance until additional studies become available.

Golimumab-induced posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES): a case-based review

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurotoxic state which is characterized by seizures, headache, visual disturbances, paresis, and altered mental status. Golimumab is anti-tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (anti-TNF-α) that can be used in the treatment of rheumatologic diseases. Here, we present a patient who had developed PRES after golimumab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A 45-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency service with a newly onset severe headache, loss of vision in both eyes, and two generalized tonic-clonic seizures that lasted for 3 to 4 min. The patient had the diagnoses of AS for 12 years and hypertension for 3 years and receiving golimumab and carvedilol. The patient was diagnosed with PRES based on the current clinical and diffusion cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. On suspicion of being the trigger of this situation, golimumab was stopped. After starting anti-convulsant therapy and controlling blood pressure, the neurological findings recovered rapidly and no seizures were seen. Control MRI images, in the first month's visit, were normal. Although chemotherapeutic agents are well-known causes of PRES, there are few reported cases with anti-TNF-α agents in the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first case that developed PRES after golimumab. Demyelinating diseases are the most frightening neurologic complication of anti-TNF-α treatment; however, PRES should come to mind in patients presenting with neurological symptoms.

Effectiveness and Factors Associated with Response to Golimumab in Japanese Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Real Clinical Practice: The Phoenix Study

Introduction

There have been limited reports on the clinical efficacy of golimumab (GLM) in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in real clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the real-life effectiveness and factors associated with response to GLM in Japanese patients with UC.

Methods

This observational, retrospective, multicenter study was conducted in hospitals with expertise in inflammatory bowel disease treatment. Sixty-three patients treated with GLM and active UC were included in the analysis. Clinical remission (CR) (partial Mayo (pMayo) score ≤2) in the induction and maintenance phases after GLM treatment and associated factors were evaluated.

Results

The proportion of patients achieving CR in the induction and maintenance phases was 41.3% (26/63) and 46.0% (29/63, the last observation carried forward method was used for patients who discontinued treatment for reasons other than inadequate response), respectively. The median pMayo score was 5 (interquartile range (IQR): 4-6) at baseline, 3 (IQR: 1-5) in the induction phase, and 1 (IQR: 0-3) in the maintenance phase. Hemoglobin, platelet, and C-reactive protein levels changed, consistent with the pMayo score. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that biologic-naive status was an independent factor associated with CR in the induction (p = 0.0200) and maintenance (p = 0.0459) phases, and a disease duration of >60 months until GLM initiation was associated with CR in the induction phase (p = 0.0427).

Conclusions

The effectiveness of GLM in daily clinical practice has been confirmed in Japanese patients with active UC. Biologic-naive patients responded more to GLM in the induction and maintenance phases, and patients with disease duration of >60 months until initiation of GLM were more responsive in the induction phase.

Long-term golimumab persistence: Five-year treatment retention data pooled from pivotal Phase III clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis

INTRODUCTION

Golimumab, a monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), is used widely for treatment of rheumatic diseases. Long-term persistence is an important factor influencing therapeutic benefit and is a surrogate measure of efficacy. We compared five-year golimumab treatment persistence across studies, indications, and lines of therapy using pooled data from pivotal golimumab Phase III clinical trials.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis evaluated use of golimumab administered subcutaneously (50 or 100 mg every four weeks) for up to five years in 2228 adult participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; GO-BEFORE, GO-AFTER, and GO-FORWARD studies), psoriatic arthritis (PsA; GO-REVEAL study), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS; GO-RAISE study). Retention rate differences were evaluated by study, indication, and line of therapy using log-rank tests, and probability of treatment persistence was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Golimumab retention rates at Year 5 were consistently high when used as 1st-line therapy (69.8%) and did not differ significantly across the three indications tested (p = 0.5106) or across 1st-line studies (p = 0.2327). Retention at Year 5 was better in participants using golimumab as 1st-line than in those using it as 2nd-line (41.6%) therapy. Participants on 2nd-line golimumab therapy had a longer disease duration (median 9.2 years versus 3.7 years) than those on 1st-line golimumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the value of long-term golimumab therapy in patients with chronic, immune-mediated rheumatic diseases when used as 1st-line (RA, PsA, AS) or 2nd-line (RA) therapy. Key Points • Golimumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and is approved widely for the treatment of rheumatic autoimmune diseases. • We compared the probability of treatment persistence, or the time of continuous drug use, for golimumab across five Phase III studies spanning multiple rheumatic indications over five years. • Treatment persistence was favorable and did not differ significantly for participants with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, but persistence was greater when golimumab was used as 1st-line than as 2nd-line biologic therapy.

Real-world effectiveness of golimumab in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis and an inadequate response to initial TNFi therapy in Greece: the GO-BEYOND prospective, observational study

The impact of golimumab (GLM) on remission or low disease activity (LDA) was evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), progressive psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or severe axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), who failed previous treatment for their rheumatic disease with one initial tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor (TNFi). This is a multicenter, prospective, real-world observational 18-month study, conducted in Greece. The primary endpoint, assessed at 6 months, included the proportion of patients attaining LDA and/or remission (Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on C-reactive protein [DAS28-CRP] ≤ 3.2), minimal disease activity (MDA; MDA criteria), and moderate disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] score 4-7), respectively. Other endpoints evaluated the persistence to GLM treatment and its impact on patients' work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] instrument) and quality of life (QoL; EuroQoL5 dimensions 3 levels [EQ-5D-3L] questionnaire). Descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Kaplan-Meier method were used for analyses. At 6 months, LDA was achieved by 46.4% of patients with RA, MDA by 57.1% of patients with PsA, and BASDAI 4-7 by 24.1% of patients with axSpA. For all study patients, persistence rates on GLM were high (85.1-93.7%) over 18 months; all WPAI domain scores and the EQ-5D-3L index score improved significantly (p < 0.001) from baseline to 18 months. GLM treatment was effective in patients with RA, PsA, or axSpA who had failed previous treatment with one TNFi and led to significant WPAI and QoL improvements. Persistence rates were high. Trial registration number and date of registration: As per the local regulations the study has been registered at the national registry for non-interventional studies https://www.dilon.sfee.gr/studiesp_d.php?meleti_id=MK8259-6995 .

Incident psoriasis under treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients-analysis of the BiKeR registry

The efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for the treatment of psoriasis is well established, but patients may develop psoriasis for the first time while on TNFi as a paradoxical effect. Limited data on this association in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are available. Safety data from patients registered to the German Biologics registry (BiKeR) were analyzed. Patients were grouped by treatment regime: single TNFi, multiple TNFi, non-TNFi biologics or bDMARD-naïve control group receiving methotrexate. TNFi-associated psoriasis was defined as incident diagnosis of psoriasis after starting TNFi treatment. Patients with a history of psoriasis or psoriasis arthritis prior to TNFi therapy were excluded. Event rates using AEs reported after first dose were compared by Wald's test. A total of 4149 patients were treated with a TNFi (etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab), 676 with a non-TNFi biologic (tocilizumab, abatacept, anakinra, canakinumab) and 1692 with methotrexate only. A total of 31 patients were diagnosed with incident psoriasis while on one of the above treatments. Compared with methotrexate, psoriasis was more frequent in the TNFi cohorts (RR 10.8, p = 0.019), specifically in the subgroup of TNF antibodies (RR 29.8, p = 0.0009), whereas no significant signal was observed with etanercept. Also, non-TNFi-treated patients presented high incident psoriasis rates (RR 25.0, p = 0.003). Our findings indicate a higher rate of incident psoriasis in JIA patients treated with TNFi monoclonal antibodies or non-TNFi biologic treatment. JIA patients receiving monoclonal antibody TNFi or non-TNFi bDMARD should be monitored for incident psoriasis. Medication change, if topical skin treatment remains insufficient, may be considered.

Four-years retention rate of golimumab administered after discontinuation of non-TNF inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

In patients with rheumatic diseases, the use of biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) after discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) is known to be effective. However, data on the use of TNFi after discontinuation of non-TNFi bDMARDs or tsDMARDs (non-TNFi) are scarce. This study assessed the 4-years golimumab retention in patients with rheumatic diseases when used after discontinuation of non-TNFi.

METHODS

Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 72), psoriatic arthritis (PsA; n = 30) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA; n = 23) who initiated golimumab after discontinuation of non-TNFi from the Spanish registry of biological drugs (BIOBADASER) were analyzed retrospectively. The retention rate (drug survival or persistence) of golimumab up to 4 years was evaluated.

RESULTS

The golimumab retention rate was 60.7% (51.4-68.8) at year 1, 45.9% (36.0-55.2) at year 2, 39.9% (29.8-49.7) at year 3 and 33.4% (23.0-44.2) at year 4. Retention rates did not differ significantly whether golimumab was used as second, third, or fourth/subsequent line of therapy (p log-rank = 0.462). Golimumab retention rates were higher in axSpA or PsA patients than in RA patients (p log-rank = 0.002). When golimumab was administered as third or fourth/subsequent line, the 4-years retention rate after discontinuation of non-TNFi was similar to that after discontinuation of TNFi.

CONCLUSION

In patients who discontinued non-TNFi, most of whom received golimumab as third/subsequent line of therapy, one-third of patients remained on golimumab at year 4. Retention rates were higher in patients with axSpA and PsA than in those with RA.

Sustained low functional impairment in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): which are the primary outcomes that should be targeted to achieve this?

OBJECTIVES

To (i) determine whether sustained disease activity states, as measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), impact function, and (ii) evaluate characteristics predicting sustained low functional impairment in a prospective axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) cohort.

METHODS

Biologic Treatment Registry Across Canada (BioTRAC) was a multi-center, prospective registry that collected real-world data on axSpA patients receiving infliximab or golimumab between 2006 and 2017. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to test baseline characteristics, treatment, and duration (at 6 and 12 months vs. only at 6 or 12 months vs. neither) of low BASDAI (< 3), ASDAS-inactive disease (ID)(< 1.3), and ASDAS-low disease activity (LDA) in predicting sustained low Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)(< 3) between 12 and 18 months. The adjusted impact of achieving low disease state at 6 and/or 12 months on BASFI at 18 months was analyzed by generalized linear models.

RESULTS

Eight hundred ten patients were enrolled. 33.7%, 13.4%, and 24.7% achieved sustained low BASDAI, ASDAS-ID, and ASDAS-LDA, respectively. In univariable GEE of baseline variables, age and baseline BASDAI, BASFI, and ASDAS significantly predicted sustained low BASFI. In multivariable GEE, sustained low BASDAI (p < 0.001), low BASDAI only at 6 or 12 months (p = 0.001), and baseline BASFI (p < 0.001) were the only predictors of sustained low BASFI. Sustained ASDAS-ID (p = 0.040) and ASDAS-LDA (p < 0.001) were also predictors when forced into the model. Similar results were obtained when evaluating the BASFI score at 18 months.

CONCLUSION

Sustained BASDAI < 3 may be a valid and feasible target for a treat-to-target strategy in axSpA having function as treatment goal.

A Real-World Claims Database Study Assessing Long-Term Persistence with Golimumab Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan

INTRODUCTION

The persistence of golimumab (GLM) treatment in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been evaluated previously, but evidence of long-term real-world use is lacking. This study assessed the long-term persistence of GLM use, its influencing factors, and impact of prior medications in patients with RA in actual clinical practice in Japan.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with RA using data from a hospital insurance claims database in Japan. The identified patients were stratified as only GLM treatment (naïve), had one biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD)/Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor treatment prior to GLM [switch (1)] and had at least two bDMARDs/JAK prior to GLM treatment [switch (≥ 2)]. Patient characteristics were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression methods were used to analyze GLM persistence at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years and the associated factors. Treatment differences were compared using a log-rank test.

RESULTS

GLM persistence rate in the naïve group was 58.8%, 32.1%, 21.4%, and 11.4% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years, respectively. Overall persistence rates in the naïve group were higher than in switch groups. Higher GLM persistence was observed among patients aged 61-75 years and those concomitantly using methotrexate (MTX). Also, women were less likely to discontinue treatment compared to men. Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, initial GLM dose of 100 mg, and switch from bDMARDs/JAK inhibitor were related to a lower persistence rate. As a prior medication, infliximab showed the longest persistence for subsequent GLM, and using this as a reference, tocilizumab, sarilumab, and tofacitinib subgroups had significantly shorter persistence, respectively (p = 0.001, 0.025, 0.041).

CONCLUSION

This study presents the long-term real-world results for persistence of GLM and its potential determinants. These most recent and long-term observations demonstrated that GLM and other bDMARDs continue to benefit patients with RA in Japan.

Early MOnitoring of REsponse (MORE) to Golimumab Therapy: Results of a Multicentre, Prospective Observational Trial

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic goal of clinical remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is achieved after biological therapy only in 16-39%. Individualization of therapeutic intervention would benefit from prediction of early response.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of our study was to assess golimumab (GLM) trough serum level of ≥2.5 μg/mL in combination with a reduction of faecal calprotectin (FC) of ≥50% at week 6 compared to baseline to predict clinical response at week 26 after regular GLM intake.

METHODS

Patients with moderate to severe active UC and planned GLM treatment were recruited for a prospective, multicentre, observational study in Germany. Prediction of clinical response was assessed by FC and GLM trough level. Missing data were imputed as therapy failure according to the last observation carried forward method.

RESULTS

Fifty nine patients have been enrolled. 54% of patients were anti-TNF naïve. Clinical response at week 6 was a significant predictor for achieving clinical response at week 26 (odds ratio [OR] 10.97, confidence interval [CI], 2.96-40.68; p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with a GLM trough level of ≥2.5 μg/mL and a ≥50% reduction of FC at week 6 had an OR of 5.33 (95% CI, 0.59-47.84) to achieve clinical response at week 26.

CONCLUSION

Clinical response at week 6 is the best predictive marker for achieving clinical response at week 26. Consideration of significant reduction of FC and trough GLM serum levels could improve prediction of response.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Golimumab for Ulcerative Colitis in a Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center in Japan

PURPOSE

Golimumab (GLM) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antibody preparation known to be less immunogenic than infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab. Few reports on GLM in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are available. This study aimed to review the long-term durability and safety of GLM in a pediatric center.

METHODS

The medical records of 17 pediatric patients (eight boys and nine girls) who received GLM at the National Center for Child Health and Development were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The median age at GLM initiation was 13.9 (interquartile range 12.0-16.3) years. Fourteen patients had pancolitis, and 11 had severe disease (pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index ≥65). Ten patients were biologic-naïve, and 50% achieved corticosteroid-free remission at week 54. Two patients discontinued prior anti-TNF-α agents because of adverse events during remission. Both showed responses to GLM without unfavorable events through week 54. However, the efficacy of GLM in patients who showed primary nonresponse or loss of response to IFX was limited. Four of the five patients showed non-response at week 54. Patients with severe disease had significantly lower corticosteroid-free remission rate at week 54 than those without severe disease. No severe adverse events were observed during the study period.

CONCLUSION

GLM appears to be safe and useful for pediatric patients with UC. Patients with mild to moderate disease who responded to but had some adverse events with prior biologics may be good candidates for GLM. Its safety and low immunogenicity profile serve as favorable options for selected children with UC.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Golimumab for the Prediction of Long-Term Clinical Remission in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A considerable number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who initially respond to golimumab (GLM), an anti-TNF-α antibody, gradually lose clinical response. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed to optimize serum anti-TNF-α antibody concentrations before the loss of response; however, little is known about ideal serum GLM concentrations. We aimed to evaluate whether the serum GLM trough levels (TLs) early after the initiation of induction therapy affect the long-term outcomes in UC and to identify the early GLM TLs that should be targeted for better long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients were prospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 54 weeks, and we measured the serum GLM TLs at weeks 6, 10, and 14. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to identify optimal GLM TL thresholds early after induction therapy that were associated with clinical remission at week 54.

RESULTS

The GLM TL at week 14, but not at weeks 6 or 10, was significantly associated with clinical remission at week 54 (median [IQR] 1.6 [1.3-1.6] μg/mL vs. 0.9 [0.6-1.3] μg/mL; p = 0.04). The area under the ROC curve for GLM TLs at week 14 was 0.78. We identified a week-14 GLM TL of 1.1 μg/mL as the target threshold for achieving clinical remission at week 54.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate the value of early serum GLM TLs in predicting the long-term outcomes of GLM for patients with UC.

Two-year clinical outcomes after discontinuation of long-term golimumab therapy in Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate long-term post-discontinuation outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNF-αi) which was then discontinued.

METHODS

Sixty Korean patients with RA who participated in a 5-year GO-BEFORE and GO-FORWARD extension trials were included in this retrospective study. Golimumab was deliberately discontinued after the extension study (baseline). Patients were then followed by their rheumatologists. We reviewed their medical records for 2 years (max 28 months) following golimumab discontinuation. Patients were divided into a maintained benefit (MB) group and a loss-of-benefit (LB) group based on treatment pattern after golimumab discontinuation. The LB group included patients whose conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s) were stepped-up or added/switched (SC) and those who restarted biologic therapy (RB).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at baseline was 56.5 years and 55 (91.7%) were females. At the end of follow-up, 23 (38.3%) patients remained in the MB group. In the LB group, 75.7% and 24.3% were assigned into SC and RB subgroups, respectively. Fifty percent of patients lost MB after 23.3 months. Demographics and clinical variables at baseline were comparable between MB and LB groups except for age, C-reactive protein level, and corticosteroid use. Restarting biologic therapy was associated with swollen joint count (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.55) and disease duration (adjusted HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23) at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategies after discontinuing TNF-αi are needed to better maintain disease control and quality of life of patients with RA.

The efficacy and safety of TNF inhibitor (golimumab) as salvage treatment in patients with refractory noninfectious uveitis

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) is recently reported to treat noninfectious uveitis (NIU) effectively. However, as a new kind of TNFi, golimumab is just on the market in China for several years, and its administration for NIU treatment lacks sufficient evidence. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of golimumab in refractory NIU patients.

METHODS

Thirty NIU patients with 49 affected eyes refractory to conventional treatments (corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents) were consecutively enrolled. They received treatment of TNFi (50 mg golimumab every 4 weeks) for at least 6 months. The anterior chamber cell grade, vitreous haziness grade, central macular thickness, and visual acuity were evaluated at baseline, month (M) 1, M3, and M6.

RESULTS

After treatment, the anterior chamber cell grade declined from baseline (0.6 ± 0.7) to M6 (0.3 ± 0.5) (P < 0.001); the vitreous haziness grade decreased from baseline (1.2 ± 1.2) to M6 (0.4 ± 0.5) (P < 0.001); meanwhile, the central macular thickness also reduced from baseline (351.4 ± 90.8 μm) to M6 (271.8 ± 54.4 μm) (P < 0.001). In terms of visual acuity (LogMAR), it showed a declined trend from baseline (0.5 ± 0.3) to M6 (0.4 ± 0.2), but without statistical significance (P = 0.096). Subgroup analyses revealed that TNFi history related to decreased golimumab efficacy. In addition, 13.3% of patients had adverse events, including elevated liver enzymes (6.7%), fatigue (3.3%), and rash (3.3%).

CONCLUSION

Golimumab is effective and safe for refractory NIU treatment, while a large-scale trial is still needed for verification.

Two cases of Erythrodermic psoriasis treated with Golimumab

Introduction and importance

Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a very severe subtype of psoriasis, with a challenge poses in its treatment, as currently available therapies often provide unsatisfactory results, for those many biologics have been used in the treatment of EP such as Golimumab which has been extensively studied for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, and chronic plaque psoriasis. However, no clinical trials have been performed for EP.

Case presentation

We report two cases of a 23-year old female, and a 31-year male who presented with severe psoriasis that previously un respond to ultraviolet B phototherapy, methotrexate, cyclosporine, and topical agents. Skin lesions worsened progressively and developed into erythroderma. Therefore, we administered golimumab 50 mg, which lead to the improvement of the skin lesions according to the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score after the first administration; lesions improved further throughout the treatment course.

Conclusion

Golimumab may be an alternative treatment for Erythrodermic psoriasis patients unrespond to other treatments even it did not have the FDA approval, so this is an off label indication and treatment.

•

Erythrodermic psoriasis is a very severe subtype of psoriasis, with a challenge poses in its treatment.

•

Golimumab is tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

•

Golimumab is FDA approved treatment for psoriatic arthritis, and chronic plaque psoriasis. However, no clinical trials have been performed for the treatment of erythrodermic psoriasis.

Pharmacological treatment of COVID-19: an opinion paper

The precocity and efficacy of the vaccines developed so far against COVID-19 has been the most significant and saving advance against the pandemic. The development of vaccines has not prevented, during the whole period of the pandemic, the constant search for therapeutic medicines, both among existing drugs with different indications and in the development of new drugs. The Scientific Committee of the COVID-19 of the Illustrious College of Physicians of Madrid wanted to offer an early, simplified and critical approach to these new drugs, to new developments in immunotherapy and to what has been learned from the immune response modulators already known and which have proven effective against the virus, in order to help understand the current situation.

The effects of golimumab on patient centric outcomes amongst rheumatoid arthritis patients in Greece. The GO-Q study

This study aimed at assessing the impact of golimumab on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world settings. GO-Q was an observational, prospective, 12-month study, which recruited patients with moderate-to-severely active RA initiating golimumab treatment per label in rheumatology clinics and private practices. Primary endpoint was the change in PROs [EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disease Index (HAQ-DI), and Work Productivity and Activity Index for RA (WPAI:RA)] after 12 months of treatment. Other endpoints included Disease Activity Score for 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), healthcare resource utilization, and golimumab adherence. Changes in continuous variables from baseline were evaluated with the paired t test. One hundred forty-five patients were recruited. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] EQ-5D-3L index increased significantly at 12 months versus baseline [from 0.427 (0.206) to 0.801 (0.229); p < 0.0001], with changes as early as 3 and 6 months (both p < 0.0001). Accordingly, there were statistically significant changes in all WPAI:RA domains from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months (p < 0.0001). Patients' function improved gradually from the third month until the end of follow-up (p < 0.0001 for all time-points). Thirty (27.3%) and 60 (54.6%) patients achieved remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) and low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2), respectively, at 12 months. Adherence rate to golimumab was high (mean [SD] 90.3% (7.5) at 12 months). In patients with moderate-to-severely active RA, golimumab significantly improved HRQoL, physical function, and work productivity and activity, with improvements in disease activity over 12 months in real-world settings.

Effects of Different Drug Therapies and COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination on Semen Quality in a Man with Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report

Background and Objectives: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a condition that affects 0.1% to 0.5% of the adult population. The aim of this case report was to investigate the possible effects of the drugs taken for treatment of AS as well as mRNA vaccination for COVID-19 on semen quality by performing a highly detailed analysis. Materials and Methods: Sperm characteristics were examined by light microscopy, DNA fragmentation (DFI) was analysed by flow cytometry and morphology was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: Semen analysis under therapy with (1) celecoxib and sulphasalazine showed: concentration 47 million/mL, 53% progressive motility, 7% normal morphology and 9.6% DFI, (2) Golimumab and before mRNA Vaccination showed: concentration 108 million/mL, 82% progressive motility, 1% normal morphology and 7.6% DFI, and (3) Golimumab and after 3 doses of mRNA Vaccination showed: concentration 142 million/mL, 85% progressive motility, 1% normal morphology and 6.8% DFI. TEM revealed head, neck and tail abnormalities, as well as the presence of cells with incomplete spermiogenesis white cells and phagocytes in the sample under therapy with celecoxib and sulphasalazine. Golimumab treatment lead to an increased incidence of elongated heads but in general reduced inflammation as no white cells were evident in TEM. Conclusion: The anti-inflamatory drugs celecoxib and sulphasalazine had no adverse effect on sperm quality as all parameters were within normal limits and the patient achieved under that treatment 2 pregnancies following natural conception that lead to the birth of a healthy boy and girl respectively. Anti-TNFa treatment with Golimumab exerted a negative effect on morphology but not on concentration, motility and DFI. After 3 doses of mRNA Vaccination, sperm concentration increased while motility, morphology and DFI remained similar to the values before vaccination suggesting no negative effect of the mRNA vaccine for COVID-19 on sperm quality.

Effectiveness and Safety of Golimumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter, Prospective, Postmarketing Surveillance Study

Background/Aims

Golimumab has been used for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) since 2013. However, there is limited data on the effectiveness and safety of the real-world use of golimumab in Asian patients.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. We enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were administered subcutaneous golimumab at 46 medical centers between May 2014 and November 2019. The primary outcome was the effectiveness and safety of golimumab at week 22. Clinical outcomes and adverse events were assessed according to partial Mayo score at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22.

Results

A total of 130 patients were included (mean age 45.7±16.0 years). The clinical response/remission rates at weeks 2, 6, 14, and 22 were 40.4%/22.9%, 56.0%/35.8%, 70.6%/49.5%, and 67.9%/48.6%, respectively. Based on full Mayo score at week 14, clinical response and remission rates were 84.2% and 39.5%, respectively. Mucosal healing rate was 65.8%. In multivariate analysis with logistic regression, longer disease duration was significantly associated with a higher clinical response rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.136; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.006 to 1.282; p=0.040 at week 6; aOR, 1.256; 95% CI, 1.049 to 1.503; p=0.013 at week 22). A higher baseline Mayo endoscopic subscore was significantly associated with a lower clinical response rate at week 6 (aOR, 0.248; 95% CI, 0.089 to 0.692; p=0.008). The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 4.6% (6/130, nine events). No serious unexpected adverse drug reactions or deaths were reported.

Conclusions

Golimumab was effective and safe as an induction and maintenance treatment for Korean patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

The effects of golimumab on work productivity and quality of life among work-active axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients treated in the routine care in Greece: the 'GO-UP' study

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of golimumab, on work productivity, activity limitation, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

This real-world, multicenter, prospective study consecutively enrolled adult consented work-active patients with axSpA or PsA, newly initiated on golimumab as per the approved label. Prior receipt of > 1 prior biologic, or switching from another tumor-necrosis factor inhibitor due to primary non-response or safety reasons was not allowed. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Specific Health Problem and the EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D)-5-Level instruments were completed by the patients to assess the impact of golimumab on work productivity and activity impairment, and generic QoL, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, 121 eligible patients (mean age: 45.4 years; median disease duration: 11.3 months), 51 diagnosed with PsA and 70 with axSpA, were enrolled by 19 rheumatologists. Over a 11.9-month median observation period, < 1% of injections were missed (as collected by patient diaries), and the 12-month golimumab retention rate was 91.7%. At 3, 6, and 12 months post baseline, in the overall population, work productivity loss improved by a median of 31.4%, 44.2%, and 50.0%; activity impairment improved by 40.0%, 40.0%, and 50.0%; and the EQ-5D UK-weighted utility index improved by 0.24, 0.32, and 0.36 points, respectively (p < 0.001 for all). Statistically significant improvements in these measures were also noted in the PsA and axSpA subpopulations.

CONCLUSION

In the routine care in Greece, golimumab displays beneficial effects on work productivity, daily activities, and QoL in work-active patients with axSpA and PsA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number and date of registration: As per the local regulations the study has been registered at the national registry for non-interventional studies https://www.dilon.sfee.gr/studiesp_d.php?meleti_id=MK8259-6083 .

Clinical effectiveness of golimumab in ulcerative colitis: a prospective multicentre study based on the Swedish IBD Quality Register, SWIBREG

OBJECTIVES

Clinical trials demonstrated that golimumab is effective in anti-TNF naïve patients with ulcerative colitis. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of golimumab in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study, conducted at 16 Swedish hospitals. Data were collected using an electronic case report form. Patients with active ulcerative colitis, defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥2 were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were clinical effectiveness at 12 weeks and 52 weeks, i.e. response (defined as a decrease in Mayo score by ≥3 points or 30% from baseline) and remission (defined as a Mayo score of ≤2 with no individual subscores >1).

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included. At study entry, 70% were previously exposed to anti-TNF, 16% to vedolizumab, and 96% to immunomodulators. The 12 and 52-week drug continuation rates were 37/50 (74%) and 23/50 (46%), respectively. The 12-week response rate was 14/50 (28%), the remission rate, 8/50 (16%) and the corresponding figures at week 52 were 13/50 (26%) and 10/50 (20%). Among patients who continued golimumab, the median Mayo score decreased from 7 (6-9) at baseline to 1 (0-5) at 52 weeks (p < .01) and the faecal calprotectin decreased from 862 (335-1759) µg/g to 90 (34-169) µg/g (p < .01). Clinical response at week 12 was highly predictive of clinical remission at week 52 (adjusted OR: 73.1; 95% CI: 4.5‒1188.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of golimumab treated patients represented a treatment refractory patient-group. Despite this, our results confirm that golimumab is an effective therapy in ulcerative colitis.

Primary tuberculosis cutis orificialis; a different face of the same coin

Primary tuberculosis cutis orificialis (TCO) is a rare form of extrapulmonary TB. The Lack of respiratory symptoms and similarity of the presentations to other oral lesions can pose a diagnostic dilemma. Hence, delaying treatment and potentially devastating consequences

Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) as a treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis refractory to adalimumab (ADA).

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre study including patients with JIA receiving GLM for active uveitis after failing ADA. JIA- and uveitis-related data, including intraocular inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity, corticosteroid-sparing potential, and ocular complications were evaluated at start of GLM treatment, at 1 month and 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter during GLM administration. We further investigated the association of response to GLM with primary and secondary failure of ADA treatment.

RESULTS

Ten patients were studied, all female (17 affected eyes, mean age 14.3 + 6.7 yrs., mean follow-up 25.2 + 21.7 mos). Two patients were switched to GLM because of primary non-response to ADA. Eight were switched because of loss of response (LOR). In 5 of the latter LOR was associated with neutralizing anti-ADA-antibodies. Response to GLM was observed in all 8 patients with LOR, while the 2 patients with primary non-response to ADA also did not respond to GLM. Three of the 8 responders experienced LOR. At the end of follow-up 4 of the 5 remaining responders had achieved complete response. One had achieved partial response.

CONCLUSION

GLM is an efficacious therapeutic option in patients who experience LOR to ADA. Our data indicate that patients without primary response to ADA should be rather switched to a biologic agent with a different mode of action instead of further blocking the TNF-alpha pathway.

Long-term effectiveness and drug survival of golimumab in patients affected by psoriatic arthritis with cutaneous involvement

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of golimumab (GLM) in improving joint, periarticular structures and cutaneous manifestations in patients with moderate to severe psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with cutaneous psoriasis in different real-life clinical settings and 48-month drug survival.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory records were collected from PsA patients treated with GLM at baseline (T0) and after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of treatment. Comparisons were performed using a paired t-test or Wilcoxon test. Drug survival rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Data from 105 patients were collected. PsO occurred in 80% of patients and enthesitis in 78%, peripheral and axial arthritis in 63.8% and 35.3%, respectively, while erosions in 36.2%. The main comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (31.4%) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) (19%). A statistically significant improvement in articular and cutaneous psoriasis was registered at T48 of GLM-therapy in clinical (DAPSA p < 0.0001; PASI p < 0.01; BASDAI p < 0.0001) and laboratory (CRP < 0.05) indexes. Gender (p = 0.652), BMI (p = 0.655), smoking habit (p = 0.466), and line of treatment (p = 0.208) did not affect treatment efficacy nor persistence. At T48, 42% of patients discontinued GLM: the most frequent reason was an insufficient response or loss of efficacy (28.6%).

CONCLUSION

A 48-month GLM high drug persistence of PsA patients was observed in real-life, in patients presenting high disease activity, elevated prevalence of comorbidities, and more than one line of treatment at baseline. Patients' characteristics as gender, smoke, BMI, different lines of treatment, and concomitant methotrexate treatment affected treatment persistence, making GLM effective and safe in moderate-severe PsA in a long-term real-life setting. Key Points • Golimumab was effective in psoriatic arthritis, including both musculoskeletal and cutaneous manifestations. • Golimumab effectiveness and drug survival were not affected by comorbidities and patient-related characteristics. • The 4-year drug survival curves confirm the efficacy and safety of golimumab in psoriatic arthritis patients in a real-life setting.

Amelioration of Cisplatin-induced renal inflammation by Recombinant Human Golimumab in Mice

BACKGROUND

One of the most commonly used anti-cancer agents, Cisplatin (CDDP) often causes nephrotoxicity by eliciting inflammation and oxidative stress. Golimumab, an anti-TNF biologic, is prescribed for the management of numerous inflammatory ailments like psoriatic and rheumatoid arthritis ulcerative colitis, and ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE

Current study has explored the effects of anti-TNF biologics golimumab on mice due to cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity.

METHOD

Renal toxicity was caused by administration of single cisplatin injection at 25 mg/kg by intraperitoneal (i/p) route. Golimumab (24 mg/kg, s.c.) was administered consecutively for 7 days. The parameters such as renal functions, oxidative stress, inflammation, and renal damage were evaluated on the 7th day of experiments.

RESULTS

Cisplatin administration caused nephrotoxicity as shown by a significant elevation of various parameters viz; serum creatinine, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), urea nitrogen (BUN), and cystatin C. There was a significant rise in urinary clusterin, kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), and β-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG) concentrations in the animals treated with cisplatin-. The markers of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde, reduced glutathione, and catalase), inflammation (IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-1β, MCP-1, ICAM-1, and TGF-β1), and apoptosis (caspase-3) were also altered in serum and/or kidneys of cisplatin animals. Further, cisplatin-caused histopathological changes in proximal tubular cells as observed in the H&E staining of renal tissue. Golimumab treatment reduced all markers of kidney injury and attenuated cell death. Golimumab significantly reduced inflammatory cytokines TNFα, IL- 6, MCP-1, IL- 1β, ICAM-1, and TGF-β1 and increased anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in cisplatin-intoxicated mice.

CONCLUSION

The study results suggest that golimumab prevented nephrotoxicity induced by cisplatin- through inhibition of oxidative stress, apoptotic cell death inflammatory response, thus improving renal function.

Real-world data for golimumab treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis in Japan: interim analysis in post-marketing surveillance

Background/Aims

Golimumab (GLM) is an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α drug approved for treating moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC). A 52-week post-marketing surveillance (PMS) was initiated to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in patients with UC in Japan. We present an interim report of the ongoing PMS.

Methods

Patients received 200 mg of subcutaneous GLM at week 0, 100 mg at week 2, and 100 mg 4 weekly thereafter. The safety analysis set included 392 patients with UC, and the effectiveness analysis set 387 patients. Safety and effectiveness were assessed at week 6.

Results

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 8.2% (32/392) and serious ADRs in 4.6% (18/392). The most frequent ADRs were infection and infestation (3.3%), with herpes zoster being the most common. ADRs were significantly higher in patients with concomitant corticosteroid use (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40–9.68). No significant difference in ADR incidence was observed between patients aged ≥65 and <65 years (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.35–3.47). Six-week effectiveness of GLM was confirmed by a decrease in the partial Mayo score (–2.3; 95% CI, –2.6 to –2.1) and C-reactive protein levels (–0.64; 95% CI, –0.92 to –0.36), including in the biologics-experienced population.

Conclusions

The safety and effectiveness of GLM at week 6 in a real-world setting were demonstrated in patients with UC in Japan. ADR patterns were consistent with previous reports with no new safety signals. Concomitant corticosteroid use may be associated with increased ADR incidence. The final results of the ongoing PMS are necessary for further evaluation.

The onset of ulcerative colitis upon Helicobacter pylori eradication in a 72-year-old woman: report of a rare case with a 3-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies suggest an inverse association between H. pylori infection/exposure and inflammatory bowel disease prevalence/incidence, however, there are no reports of individual patients who developed a "non-transient" ulcerative colitis (UC) following H. pylori eradication.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 72-year-old female with an elderly-onset UC developed upon H. pylori eradication and a 3-year follow-up of the progression to steroid-dependent colitis complicated with enteropathic arthritis and final containment of the disease with golimumab. In our patient, H. pylori eradication was associated with the development of pancolitis that evolved into clinically, endoscopically, and pathohistologically confirmed UC.

CONCLUSIONS

The case of our patient provides a unique clinical context for a growing body of literature suggesting molecular mechanisms involved in the interaction of genes, environment, and microbiota to be of critical importance in the etiopathogenesis of UC, and thus, provides a valuable set of complementary translational information for preclinical and epidemiological research on the topic.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Golimumab in Rheumatic Diseases: Post-Marketing Surveillance in Korea

Introduction

Golimumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Inhibition of TNF-α by golimumab inhibits the inflammatory response, thereby modulating the immune response in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Although the efficacy of golimumab has been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), various patient populations, such as those at high risk of infection, including those with latent tuberculosis and various comorbidities, or on co-administered medications, were excluded from the RCTs. Therefore, safety cannot be sufficiently evaluated by RCTs in the patient group with heterogenous characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of golimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondyloarthritis (AS) in a real-world setting in Korea.

Methods

We conducted an open-label, prospective, non-interventional study as post-marketing surveillance. Safety was evaluated by collecting and recording adverse events, and effectiveness was evaluated by assessing disease activity using DAS28-CRP, DAS28-ESR, ACR20, and ASAS20 outcome measures. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of adverse events, and changes in disease activity scores from baseline were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

A total 673 patients were enrolled, of whom 621 were included in the safety analysis. During the study, 97 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 62 patients (10.0%). The most frequently reported ADRs were related to infection, including nasopharyngitis (0.8%), upper respiratory tract infection (0.6%), and herpes zoster (0.5%). The mean (± standard deviation) changes from baseline in global disease activity at weeks 12 and 24 were − 3.37 ± 2.529 and − 3.68 ± 2.404, respectively, with statistical significance. In those patients with RA, 72.5 and 47.0% of individuals had a good response based on DAS28-CRP and DAS28-ESR outcomes at week 24. At week 24, 71.4% of patients with PsA had an ACR20 response and 72.9% of patients with AS had an ASAS20 response.

Conclusion

In the real-world setting, golimumab was safe and effective in Korean patients with RA, PsA, and AS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00352-6.

Subcutaneously Administered Anti-TNFs for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched, US Health Claims Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab and golimumab are subcutaneously administered anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) biologics used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). To date, no studies have directly compared treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with UC receiving these therapies in a real-world setting. The objective of this study was to compare these outcomes among patients with UC treated with either adalimumab or golimumab using a US claims database.

METHODS

Patients with UC treated with golimumab or adalimumab were identified using the US Optum Clinformatics^® Data Mart database. Outcomes of interest included treatment patterns (discontinuations, dose optimizations, persistence, and concomitant medication use) and HRU (outpatient office visits, emergency room [ER] visits, and inpatient stays). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to account for differences in confounding variables between groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 990 patients were identified (golimumab: n = 277; adalimumab: n = 713). After PSM, 246 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the adalimumab and golimumab groups over the full follow-up period in terms of treatment discontinuations (53.7% vs. 51.2%; P = 0.5881), dose optimizations (35.4% vs. 39.4%; P = 0.3515), or persistence (338.2 vs. 361.2 days; P = 0.4194). During the year after initiating therapy, there were no significant differences in concomitant immunosuppressant (21.9% vs. 21.7%; P = 0.9686) or corticosteroid use (74.7% vs. 78.8%; P = 0.3573) or in HRU outcomes including outpatient office visits (93.3% vs. 94.0%; P = 0.7660), ER visits (15.2% vs. 10.9%; P = 0.2238), and inpatient stays (15.2% vs. 13.6%; P = 0.6680).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide PSM cohort study of patients with UC receiving golimumab or adalimumab, no significant differences were observed between groups for treatment patterns or HRU outcomes. High rates of concomitant corticosteroid use, treatment discontinuations, and HRU while on therapy highlight key unmet needs in the treatment of UC.

Serum PR3-ANCA Is a Predictor of Primary Nonresponse to Anti-TNF-α Agents in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) agents are effective for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Nonetheless, a proportion of patients fail to respond to these agents as therapy for induction of remission. Recent studies indicated that perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (p-ANCA) may predict response to anti-TNF-α agents in UC patients. However, whether PR3-ANCA can predict primary nonresponse (PNR) to anti-TNF-α agents has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to examine whether PR3-ANCA can predict PNR to anti-TNF-α in UC patients.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective study. Data were extracted from 50 patients with UC who had measurements of PR3-ANCA and received anti-TNF-α agents for the first time as induction therapy. The primary endpoint of this study was a proportion of patients with PNR stratified by PR3-ANCA positivity. PNR to anti-TNF-α agents was defined as failure to achieve reduction in partial Mayo score by 2 or more points and change to other therapeutics within 6 weeks.

Results

Fourteen (28%) of the 50 patients were PR3-ANCA positive. Seventeen (34%) of the 50 patients demonstrated PNR. Eleven (78.6%) of the 14 PR3-ANCA-positive patients demonstrated PNR, while 6 (16.7%) of the 36 PR3-ANCA-negative patients demonstrated PNR. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PR3-ANCA positivity was associated with PNR to anti-TNF-α agents (odds ratio 19.29, 95% CI: 3.30-172.67; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

PR3-ANCA positivity can predict PNR to anti-TNF-α agents in UC patients.

Factors associated with long-term retention of treatment with golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of the Spanish BIOBADASER registry

BACKGROUND

Retention of biological treatment provides a marker of drug effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Retention of golimumab was high in clinical trial extensions and real-world studies up to 5 years in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the probability of real-world long-term retention of treatment with golimumab up to 7 years after treatment initiation.

METHODS

This retrospective noninterventional study involved analysis of the Spanish biological drugs registry, BIOBADASER. Adults who had ever received golimumab for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and had initiated it > 6 months before the analysis date, were included.

RESULTS

Among 685 patients (28.5% RA, 42.9% SpA, 28.6% PsA), the overall probability of retention of golimumab treatment since initiation was 71.7% (95% confidence interval 68.1-74.9) at year 1, 60.5% (56.5-64.2%) at year 2, 55.6% (51.5-59.5%) at year 3, 50.6% (46.2-54.8%) at year 4, 45.1% (40.1-50.0%) at year 5, 44.2% (39.0-49.3) at year 6, and 39.5% (32.8-46.2) at year 7. Retention was greater in patients with axial SpA or PsA versus RA (p < 0.001) and when golimumab was used as first-line treatment versus third or later lines (p < 0.001). Factors associated with greater golimumab retention in Cox regression included use as first-line biological therapy, having axial SpA or PsA rather than RA, and concomitant methotrexate therapy. Steroids were associated with lower retention.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study of RA, axial SpA, and PsA patients, the retention rate of golimumab was 39.5% at year 7. Key Points • Retention of biological treatment provides a marker of drug effectiveness and patient satisfaction. • This real-world study of 685 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) showed that golimumab treatment had a retention rate up to 39.5% at year 7. • Greater golimumab retention was associated with use as first-line biological therapy, having axial SpA or PsA rather than RA, and concomitant methotrexate therapy.

Golimumab improves work productivity in patients suffering from moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: results of a prospective study over 24 months

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with recurrent episodes of debilitating symptoms negatively affecting work productivity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The use of biologics in UC treatment improves work and HRQoL but prospective long-term data concerning the treatment with TNFα inhibitor golimumab in UC patients are still rare. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the change in work productivity, capacity for daily activities and HRQoL in UC patients treated with golimumab in Germany.

METHODS

Using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, the change in work productivity and in capacity for daily activities after 3 months and over the whole observational period of 24 months were assessed (both primary endpoints). Disease-specific and health-related quality of life (QoL) were analyzed with the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), the Short-Form 12 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-12), and the Partial Mayo Score (secondary endpoints). Further, disease-related hospitalization rates were assessed.

RESULTS

This prospective non-interventional study included 286 patients. Thereof, 212 patients were employed at baseline (modified intention to treat analysis set employed at baseline, mITTe). 61.3% of the mITTe patients had moderate and 17.0% had severe UC. Three months after initiation of golimumab therapy, total work productivity impairment (TWPI) score and activity impairment score improved significantly from baseline with a mean change of - 17.3% (p < 0.0001) and - 14.4% (p < 0.0001), respectively. Results persisted over 24 months (mean change TWPI score: - 24.5%, mean change activity impairment score: - 30.0%). Disease- and health-related QoL also improved significantly under golimumab treatment as indicated by increased IBDQ [mean change: 28.0 (SD: ± 36.1, month 3), 42.1 (SD: ± 39.5, month 24)] and SF-12 scores [PCS-12: 45.9 (SD: ± 8.5), MCS-12: 4.9 (SD: ± 10.6, month 3), PCS-12: 5.9 (SD: ± 9.0), MCS-12: 6.4 (SD: ± 11.1, month 24)]. Disease-related hospitalization rate decreased from 16.0% (BL) to 4.3% at month 24 and the mean number of missed working days due to UC decreased from 8.2 (SD: 17.6, BL) to 0.7 (SD: 2.1) after golimumab induction.

CONCLUSIONS

Golimumab leads to notable long-term improvements in work productivity, daily activity, HRQoL, and disease-related hospitalization rates in patients with moderate to severe UC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PEI (Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany) Registration Nr: NIS#255 ( https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/awb/nis-0201-0300/0255.html ).

Isolated myelitis in a patient with Behcet's disease during golimumab therapy

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are increasingly used for various autoimmune diseases. Demyelinating events in the CNS, including myelitis, are reportedly associated with TNF-α inhibitor exposure. Behcet's disease rarely involves the spinal cord. A 51-year-old Japanese woman presented with back pain, leg weakness, and numbness during golimumab administration, a TNF-α inhibitor, for Behcet's disease. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multifocal myelitis in the cervical and thoracic spinal cords. Discontinuation of golimumab and steroid therapy were effective and the symptoms have not relapsed. Although it is possible that the patient's myelitis was part of the symptoms of neuro-Behcet's disease, we believe that golimumab likely played a role in the myelitis development.

[Clinical analysis of golimumab in the treatment of severe/refractory cardiovascular involvement in Behcet syndrome]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness and safety of golimumab in the treatment of severe/refractory cardiovascular Behcet syndrome (BS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of nine patients diagnosed with severe/refractory cardiovascular BS and treated with golimumab from February 2018 to July 2020 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. We analyzed levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), imaging findings, and the doses of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents during the period of combined treatment with golimumab.

RESULTS

Nine patients were enrolled, including 8 males and 1 female, with a mean age and median course of (37.0±8.6) years and 120 (60, 132) months, respectively. Seven patients presented with severe aortic regurgitation combined with other cardiovascular involvement secondary to BS. Two patients presented with large vessel involvement, including multiple aneurysms and vein thrombosis. Prior to golimumab treatment, seven patients were treated with glucocorticoids and multiple immunosuppres-sants [with a median number of 3 (1, 3) types] while still experienced disease progression or elevated inflammation biomarkers during postoperative period. Eight patients with disease progression, uncontrolled inflammation and history of severe postoperative complications required effective and fast control of inflammation during perioperative period. One patient had adverse reaction with tocilizumab and switched to golimumab during perioperative period. The patients were treated with golimumab 50 mg every 4 weeks, along with concomitant treatment of glucocorticoid and immunosuppressants. After a median follow-up of (16.3±5.6) months, all the patients achieved clinical improvement. Vascular lesions were radiologically stable and no vascular progressive or newly-onset of vascular lesions was observed. The eight patients who experienced cardiac or vascular operations showed no evidence of postoperative complications. The ESR and hsCRP levels decreased significantly [16.5 (6.8, 52.5) mm/h vs. 4 (2, 7) mm/h, and 21.24 (0.93, 32.51) mg/L vs. 0.58 (0.37, 1.79) mg/L (P < 0.05), respectively]. The dose of prednisone was tapered from 35 (15, 60) mg/d to 10.0 (10.0, 12.5) mg/d. No prominent adverse reactions were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that golimumab is effective in the treatment of severe/refractory cardiovascular BS. Combination immunosuppression therapy with golimumab contributes to control of inflammation, reduction of postoperative complications and tapering the dose of glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants.

A propensity score weighted comparison of Vedolizumab, Adalimumab, and Golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

No real-life study on the comparative effectiveness of Vedolizumab (VDZ), Adalimumab (ADA), and Golimumab (GOL) in ulcerative colitis (UC) is currently available.

AIMS

To compare the effectiveness of the three biologics in consecutive patients with UC.

METHODS

A three-arms propensity score-adjusted analysis was performed using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting method.

RESULTS

463 treatments (VDZ: n = 187; ADA: n = 168; GOL: n = 108) were included (median follow-up: 47.6 weeks). At 12 weeks (n = 463), a steroid-free remission was reported in 24.1% patients in the VDZ group, in 33.3% patients in the ADA group, and in 30.6% patients in the GOL group (p = n.s. for all comparisons). At 52 weeks (n = 377), a steroid-free remission was reported in 51.5% patients in the VDZ group, in 31.2% patients in the ADA group, and in 29.4% patients in the GOL group (p = 0.002 for VDZ vs. ADA, p = 0.001 for VDZ vs. GOL, p = n.s. for ADA vs. GOL). Cox survival analysis demonstrated that patients treated with VDZ had reduced probability of treatment discontinuation compared to those treated with ADA (HR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.64, p < 0.001) and GOL (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.46, p < 0.001), while patients treated with ADA had reduced risk of treatment discontinuation compared to those treated with GOL (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.50-1.00, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ was superior to ADA and GOL at 52 weeks and as treatment persistence, while ADA showed a superior treatment persistence compared to GOL.

Efficacies of first and second tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in refractory ulcerative colitis patients in real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Switching tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors is an important treatment option for refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who fail the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, although many questions about this option remain unanswered.

METHODS

The efficacy of the second anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in refractory UC patients who failed the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy was examined using the Mayo score as a measure of disease activity at week 8. The efficacy of the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy before treatment and at weeks 8 and 52 was also evaluated in real-world practice.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in remission induction and maintenance between infliximab and adalimumab as the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in UC patients. Of 123 UC patients, 21 (17.1%) switched tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Eight (38.1%), 4 (19.0%), 7 (33.3%), and 2 (9.5%) patients switched from infliximab to adalimumab, infliximab to golimumab, adalimumab to infliximab, and adalimumab to golimumab, respectively. Three (100%) with intolerance to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, 5 (41.7%) with loss of response to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy, and 1 (20.0%) with no improvement with the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy had clinical remission at week 8.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors is more effective for refractory UC patients who are intolerant and lose response to the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy rather than for those showing no improvement with the first anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy. Patients with primary failure of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy should be switched to another class of drug.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of infliximab and golimumab in ankylosing spondylitis patients from a Canadian prospective observational registry

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to describe the profile of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with either infliximab (IFX) or subcutaneous golimumab (GLM) treatment in Canadian routine care setting along with assessing long-term effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

AS patients who were eligible for treatment with IFX or subcutaneous GLM as per their respective Canadian product monographs were enrolled into the BioTRAC registry from 2005 to 2017. The study visits occurred at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in clinical outcomes and acute phase reactants. Safety was evaluated by assessing the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug survival rates.

RESULTS

A total of 389 IFX- and 421 GLM-treated patients were enrolled. A significant decrease in disease duration at baseline was observed in the IFX cohort, from a median of 8.0 in 2005-2008 to 1.0 years in 2009-2015 (p < 0.001). A reduction in baseline BASFI score (p = 0.011) and proportion of patients in ASDAS very high disease activity (p = 0.004) was also observed over time. Meanwhile, in the GLM cohort, most disease parameters remained similar from 2010 to 2017. Treatment with both agents significantly improved all disease parameters over time with similar efficacy between the two agents. The incidence of AEs and SAEs were 136 and 131 events/100 PYs and 10.5 and 8.45 events/100 PYs for IFX- and GLM-treated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both IFX and GLM treatment in AS significantly reduced disease activity in most outcome measures in a similar fashion and were well tolerated in Canadian routine care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00741793 .

Long-term effectiveness and safety of infliximab, golimumab and golimumab-IV in rheumatoid arthritis patients from a Canadian prospective observational registry

BACKGROUND

Long-term clinical registries are essential tools to evaluate new therapies in a patient population that differs from those in randomized clinical trials. The objectives are to describe the profile of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with anti-TNF agents in Canadian routine care.

METHODS

RA patients eligible for treatment with Infliximab (IFX), golimumab (GLM) or intravenous golimumab (GLM-IV) as per their respective Canadian product monographs were enrolled into the BioTRAC registry between 2002 and 2017. Study visits occurred at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Effectiveness was assessed by changes in disease activity. Safety was evaluated by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and drug survival.

RESULTS

Of the 890 IFX-, 530 GLM- and 157 GLM-IV-treated patients, the proportion of females ranged from 77.0-86.6%, the mean ages from 55.8-57.7 and the mean disease duration from 6.5-8.6 years. A significant decrease in baseline disease duration and disease activity parameters (DAS, TJC, SJC, HAQ, AM stiffness, MDGA, PtGA, CRP, ESR) was observed over time. Treatment with IFX, GLM- and GLM-IV significantly improved all disease parameters over time. The incidence of AEs was 105, 113 and 82.6 /100 PYs and the incidence of SAEs was 11.7, 11.2 and 4.68 /100 PYs for IFX, GLM- and GLM-IV-treated patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Differences in baseline characteristics between patients treated with an anti-TNFs over time shows the evolution of treatment modalities over time. All treatments significantly reduced disease activity and improved functionality in a similar fashion. The incidence of adverse events was consistent with the safety profiles of IFX and GLM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00741793 (Retrospectively registered on August 26, 2008).

Dose Adjustment of Methotrexate Administered Concomitantly with Golimumab for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japanese Real-World Clinical Settings

Introduction

The combination of methotrexate (MTX) with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) is a recommended treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients showing an inadequate response to MTX monotherapy. However, the adequate dose of MTX, especially in long-term treatment with bDMARDs/MTX combination therapy, remains under-addressed. Since RA patients require long-term treatment, we examined the effects of using golimumab (GLM) in the long run as well as its persistency and associated factors.

Methods

We used the Japan Medical Data Center Inc. (JMDC) administrative claims data of 489 patients receiving GLM therapy for calculating the persistency in patients with constant, reduced, or escalated MTX dosing. The factors associated with GLM persistency were assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling, controlling for the dose adjustment of concomitant MTX, age, sex, RA disease period, and the initial dose of GLM or concomitant MTX during GLM/MTX combination therapy.

Results

During GLM/MTX combination therapy, up to 52% of patients were reported to experience dose adjustments of concomitant MTX treatment (i.e., dose reduction and escalation in 34% and 18% of patients, respectively). Persistency was similar in the MTX dose-reduction patients and the MTX dose-constant patients. In the Cox proportional hazard model, no significant differences were observed in association with GLM persistency, including with respect to MTX dose adjustment.

Conclusions

GLM prescription was continued in 80% or more (1 year) and 50% or more (3 years) of RA patients receiving reduced concomitant MTX dosing, suggesting that MTX dose adjustment (including MTX reduction) could be considered in GLM/MTX combination therapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00228-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Golimumab effectiveness in biologic inadequate responding patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis in real-life from the Italian registry GISEA

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of golimumab in biologic inadequate responder (IR) patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Spondyloarthritis (SpA), and Psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

We analyzed 1424 patients on golimumab from the GISEA registry. Drug survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis in biologic-naïve, 1-biologic IR, ≥2-biologics IR patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) of discontinuing golimumab at 2 years were assessed by multivariate Cox regression. Patients achieving CDAI based low disease activity (LDA) or BASDAI<4 were calculated at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

In RA (n.370), the 2-years survival on golimumab was 61.4% in 1-biologic IR, 51.9% in≥2-biologics IR, and 73.1% in biologic-naive patients (P=0.002 vs≥2-biologics IR). In SpA (n.502), the survival was similar among 1-biologic IR (80%), ≥2-biologics IR (76.5%), and biologic-naive (74.6%) patients (P>0.05). In PsA (n.552) the survival was 72% in 1-biologic IR, 72.5% in≥2-biologics IR, and 71.8% in naïve-biologic (P>0.05). Predictors of golimumab discontinuation were monotherapy (HR 1.65) for RA, female gender for SpA (HR 2.48) and PsA (HR 1.57). In RA, patients on CDAI-LDA were lower in 1-biologic IR (40%) or≥2 biologics IR (40%) than in biologic-naïve (60%) group at 6 months (P=0.02), but no difference was observed at 12 months. In PsA and SpA, the percentage of patients on CDAI-LDA or BASDAI<4 at 6 months was almost identical across the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Golimumab had similar effectiveness in biologic-failure and biologic-naïve SpA and PsA, but seems to be less effective in multi-failure RA patients, especially as monotherapy. The best outcomes were seen in male patients.

Behcet's disease with peripheral nervous system involvement successfully treated with golimumab: a case report and review of the literature

Nervous system involvement is a rare and serious complication of Behcet's disease (BD), and the peripheral type is rarer. This article aimed to describe a case of BD with the peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement and present a comprehensive literature review. One case of BD with PNS involvement was reported and related literature was retrospectively reviewed via PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus database. The patient was resistant to traditional treatments, such as glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, but had rapid quiescence after using golimumab. Our literature review suggests that the involved peripheral nerves in BD were diverse, the most common were the tibial nerves and peroneal nerves, vasculitis might be the main cause, and prednisone was still the cornerstone of treatment. TNF-α inhibitors have been increasingly used for refractory BD in recent years. This well-illustrated case demonstrates the potential benefit of golimumab to the patient with PNS involvement. Given the diversity and complexity of PNS involvement, we recommend golimumab as a new trial treatment in clinical practice.

Golimumab in real-world practice in patients with ulcerative colitis: Twelve-month results

BACKGROUND

The introduction of biologics has revolutionized the management of the chronic inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis (UC), with many patients experiencing significant improvements not only in their symptoms but in other outcomes relevant to individuals and society as a whole. In Germany, there are no prospective data > 3 mo that assess the work productivity, daily activities and quality of life (QoL) of patients with moderate-to-severe UC treated with golimumab.

AIM

To assess change in work productivity, capacity for daily activities and QoL in UC patients treated with golimumab in Germany.

METHODS

The validated Work Productivity Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire was used to analyze the change in work productivity, the capacity for daily activities after three months (primary endpoint) and disease specific and health related QoL (HRQoL) up to 1 year (secondary endpoints). The changes in work productivity and activity impairment were evaluated every three months until month twelve compared to baseline. Disease-specific and health-related QoL were assessed with the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire and with the short-form 12 health survey questionnaire (SF-12).

RESULTS

This prospective non-interventional study included 287 patients. The analysis population was comprised of 282 patients who had completed at least two visits. At baseline, 61% of patients had moderate UC and 18% had severe UC. Furthermore, 75% of patients worked full-time or part-time at baseline. A total of 212 patients who were employed at the start of the study (employed population) were evaluated for the primary endpoint. Golimumab significantly reduced all WPAI sub-scores compared to baseline after three, six, nine and twelve months after the start of treatment (P < 0.0001). In addition, disease-specific QoL and HRQoL, as measured by the SF-12 questionnaire, improved significantly with golimumab at all evaluation times (P < 0.0001 in each case vs baseline).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of moderate-to-severe UC with golimumab leads to significant improvements in patient’s work productivity, daily activity and QoL over twelve months.

Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Golimumab and Its Predictors of Response in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Golimumab is a new anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody for patients with ulcerative colitis.

AIMS

To assess the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of golimumab in daily clinical practice and to identify predictors of response.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated with golimumab in 22 Italian centers were enrolled. Clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic data were prospectively collected before and during treatment. A subgroup of patients completed a questionnaire to assess personal satisfaction with a golimumab autoinjector system.

RESULTS

A total of 196 patients were included. After 3 months, 130 patients were responders (66.3%) and showed significant reductions in mean partial, total, and endoscopic Mayo scores and in mean ESR, C-reactive protein, and fecal calprotectin levels (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a higher total Mayo score (p < 0.001, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8) and naïve status to anti-TNF-alpha (p = 0.015, OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.5) were predictive of a favorable response. Seventy-seven (39.3%) of the 130 responders maintained a response at month 12 of therapy. There were 17 adverse events, 28 patients needed hospitalization, and 15 patients underwent surgery. Self-administration of the drug was appreciated by most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of golimumab in daily clinical practice were confirmed for the short- and long-term treatment of patients with active ulcerative colitis. Patients naïve to the anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody and those with a higher total Mayo score were more likely to respond to golimumab.

Association Between Nursing Support Levels and Effectiveness of Golimumab in the Management of Patients with Rheumatologic Diseases

INTRODUCTION

The main objective of this study was to assess the level of nursing support received by biologic-naïve rheumatological patients treated with golimumab during their first cycle.

METHODS

Adult patients (N = 119; aged 46.9 ± 13.4 years (mean ± standard deviation); 49.6% males), with rheumatoid arthritis (N = 40), ankylosing spondylitis (N = 58) or psoriatic arthritis (N = 21), and treated with golimumab (first tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor) during a first reimbursement cycle were included by 17 Belgian centers. Patients were categorized in three levels of nursing support (intense, medium, or low). They filled in a non-validated and exploratory questionnaire about satisfaction, quality, and helpfulness of information.

RESULTS

The nursing support was considered intense, medium, or low for 98 (82.4%), 10 (8.4%), and 11 (9.2%) patients, respectively. All disease activity scores improved versus baseline, and 90% of the patients qualified for treatment prolongation without major differences between nursing level groups. The proportion of patients able to self-inject golimumab was 88, 90, and 73% in the intense, medium, and low support groups, respectively. Satisfaction was high in all three nursing support groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective open-label study has confirmed the short-term effectiveness of golimumab in three rheumatological diseases, with most of the patients qualifying for reimbursement renewal. The limited sample size and the fact that the vast majority of patients benefited from an intense nursing support did not allow drawing definite conclusions concerning the impact of the nursing level on the treatment effectiveness and changes in the disease activity. Nurses seem however to play a crucial role in this short-term study but this remains to be confirmed in a longer-term study.

Golimumab as the First-, Second-, or at Least Third-Line Biologic Agent in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Ankylosing Spondylitis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Noninterventional Study in Germany

INTRODUCTION

While golimumab (GLM) has demonstrated efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in several randomized clinical trials with biologic-naïve patients, observational data from biologic-experienced patients are sparse. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of GLM used as the first-, second-, or at least third-line biologic agent in RA, PsA, and AS patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of the noninterventional, prospective, 24-month GO-NICE study of RA, PsA, and AS patients who initiated GLM 50 mg subcutaneously once monthly in a real-world setting in Germany.

RESULTS

In 1454 patients with RA, PsA, or AS, GLM was administered as the first-line (n = 305, 286, 292, respectively), second-line (n = 104, 136, 130, respectively), or at least third-line (n = 64, 79, 58, respectively) biologic agent. In RA patients (n = 473), the time since first diagnosis was 9.7, 10.1, and 14.3 years, respectively. The DAS28 score at BL was 5.0, 4.9, and 5.1 in patients using GLM as a first-, second-, and third-line biologic agent, respectively, and dropped significantly in all groups. After 3 months of treatment, 27.5%, 19.5%, and 14.5% of patients were in remission; the corresponding values after 24 months were 45.3%, 50.0%, and 33.3%, respectively. In PsA patients (n = 501), time since fist diagnosis was 12.4, 13.7, and 13.8 years, respectively. Based on PsARC, a response was achieved at 24 months in the first-, second-, and third-line use of GLM in 76.4%, 51.0%, and 50.0% of the patients. In AS patients (n = 480), the time since first diagnosis was 9.4, 9.8, and 12.4 years in patients using GLM as the first-, second-, and at least third-line biologic agent, respectively. After 24 months of treatment, the mean BASDAI scores decreased significantly (p < 0.001 vs. BL) to 2.1, 2.9, and 2.9 in the patients using GLM as the first-, second-, and at least third-line treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Golimumab is an effective treatment in patients with RA, PsA, and AS, irrespective of any pretreatment with biologic agents.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313858.

Real-Life Comparison of Different Anti-TNF Biologic Therapies for Ulcerative Colitis Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Head-to-head comparison studies evaluating the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs in inflammatory bowel disease patients are lacking.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-TNF-α drugs used in clinical practice in a cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Retrospectively, 122 UC patients treated with infliximab (IFX) originator and biosimilar, adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab (GOL) were included. We performed an ITT analysis to evaluate clinical response and remission, steroid-free clinical remission, and endoscopy response according to the different time points of the follow-up. Baseline and post induction predictor factors of these outcomes were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models. Moreover, a propensity score-based weighting analysis was performed. Data were analyzed using R and STATA11 software.

RESULTS

The overall clinical response was 77% after induction, 81.4% at 30 weeks, and 76.9% at 52 weeks, while the steroid-free clinical remission was 39.7, 46, and 54.6%, respectively. After induction, a higher rate of treatment failure was observed in the GOL group. At the end of follow-up, lower rates of steroid-free clinical remission and clinical response were obtained by GOL. At week 52, endoscopic response was achieved by 46.5% of the population.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the different anti-TNF treatments, moderate-to-severe UC seems to respond better to IFX and ADA, whereas GOL seems to be less effective, despite a similar good safety profile.

Identification of Target Golimumab Levels in Maintenance Therapy of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Associated With Mucosal Healing

INTRODUCTION

Golimumab is approved as a therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Recent data also demonstrate efficacy in Crohn's disease (CD); however, little is known about target drug levels to achieve endoscopic remission.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of IBD patients on maintenance golimumab. Median trough levels were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression was used to construct a probabilistic model to determine sensitivity and specificity of levels predicting mucosal healing.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients on maintenance golimumab were included (n = 39 CD, n = 19 UC/IBD-unclassified [IBDU]). Forty percent (n = 23) were cotreated with an immunomodulator, 95% (n = 55) of patients were anti-TNF experienced, and 15.5% (n = 9) had 3 or more prior biologic therapies. Forty-four percent of patients achieved mucosal healing with endoscopic response in a further 26% of patients. Clinical remission was recorded in 41% of patients, and 82% had clinical response. Patients were treated with doses generally higher than the approved maintenance dose. In CD patients, median golimumab trough levels were higher in patients with mucosal healing (8.8 μg/mL vs 5.08 μg/mL, P = 0.03). After calculation of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for mucosal healing vs nonresponse, a trough level >8 μg/mL was associated with mucosal healing, with 67% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and a likelihood ratio of 3:4.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with golimumab was associated with mucosal healing in 44% of all IBD patients. Higher golimumab levels were associated with mucosal healing in CD. These findings support the need for prospective studies to determine target golimumab levels in IBD, which may impact current clinical practices in relation to selection of maintenance dosing.

Effect of Golimumab Dose Escalation in Japanese Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Post-Hoc Analysis of Post-Marketing Surveillance Data

Introduction

While dose escalation of golimumab has been used for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who demonstrate an inadequate response to the standard dose, its effectiveness has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome observed by dose escalation of golimumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the daily clinical setting.

Methods

A post hoc analysis was performed of data from the 24-week post-marketing surveillance conducted in Japan (n = 5154). A total of 301 patients with moderate or high disease activity at baseline who underwent dose escalation of golimumab were assessed for effectiveness at 24 weeks based on several variables, such as DAS28-CRP, SDAI, and CDAI, as well as for medication persistence through 24 weeks. In addition, the study population was stratified by the time to dose escalation, and effectiveness was likewise evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with a moderate/good EULAR response to golimumab at 24 weeks.

Results

Patients with golimumab dose escalation showed significant improvement of the clinical signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis at 24 weeks, as indicated by reduction of the DAS28-CRP (∆0.89), SDAI (∆8.64), and CDAI (∆8.28) scores. This result was relatively consistent across the subgroups stratified by the timing of dose escalation. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, 78.1% of the patients continued to receive golimumab at 24 weeks, and this was also similar among the subgroups stratified by the time to dose escalation. Multivariate analysis identified male sex and previous biologic therapy as factors that were significantly associated with the clinical response at 24 weeks.

Conclusion

In real-world clinical practice, improvement of disease activity was observed after uptitration of golimumab from 50 to 100 mg regardless of the timing. Male patients and biologic-naive patients were more likely to respond to dose escalation of golimumab.

Trial Registration

UMIN-CTR, Identifier: UMIN000015895.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00198-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.