Correlation between the AMADEUS score and preoperative clinical patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in patients undergoing matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI)

BACKGROUND

Recently, the AMADEUS (Area Measurement And DEpth Underlying Structures) grading system has been introduced to evaluate and grade osteochondral lesions prior to cartilage surgery. The AMADEUS score has not been connected to clinical data in order to test a potential clincial impact.

PURPOSE

To examine the correlation between the AMADEUS score and preoperative patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series METHODS: Patients treated with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) were included in the study, unless exclusion criteria like BMI > 35, prior extensive meniscectomy or ongoing inflammatory arthritis were present. Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were graded according to the standardized AMADEUS protocol. The final AMADEUS score was correlated with preoperative patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs), including the IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee), the Lysholm score, the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) score, and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) score.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients with a mean age of 33.6 ± 11.5 years, a mean BMI of 25.1 ± 4.9, and a mean defect size of 2.3 ± 1.5 cm² were included in the study. More severe cartilage defects, indicated by the AMADEUS grade (R = 0.35, p = 0.01) and the AMADEUS score (R = - 0.36, p = 0.01) as well as larger chondral defects (R = 0.32, p = 0.03) show a moderate correlation with the higher COMI scores. No correlative capacity was demonstrated for the AMADEUS score and the IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores as well as for its subscales.

CONCLUSION

There is a moderate correlation of the COMI and the AMADEUS score in patients treated with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). All other patient-reported outcome measurement scores (PROMs) show no evidence of an association to the magnetic resonance-based AMADEUS score.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The clinical and scientific implication of the COMI score as a PROM tool can be recommended when working with the AMADEUS score and patients undergoing MACI.

The use of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage repair and regeneration: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The management of articular cartilage defects presents many clinical challenges due to its avascular, aneural and alymphatic nature. Bone marrow stimulation techniques, such as microfracture, are the most frequently used method in clinical practice however the resulting mixed fibrocartilage tissue which is inferior to native hyaline cartilage. Other methods have shown promise but are far from perfect. There is an unmet need and growing interest in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering to improve the outcome for patients requiring cartilage repair. Many published reviews on cartilage repair only list human clinical trials, underestimating the wealth of basic sciences and animal studies that are precursors to future research. We therefore set out to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the translation of stem cell therapy to explore what research had been carried out at each of the stages of translation from bench-top (in vitro), animal (pre-clinical) and human studies (clinical) and assemble an evidence-based cascade for the responsible introduction of stem cell therapy for cartilage defects. This review was conducted in accordance to PRISMA guidelines using CINHAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of Knowledge databases from 1st January 1900 to 30th June 2015. In total, there were 2880 studies identified of which 252 studies were included for analysis (100 articles for in vitro studies, 111 studies for animal studies; and 31 studies for human studies). There was a huge variance in cell source in pre-clinical studies both of terms of animal used, location of harvest (fat, marrow, blood or synovium) and allogeneicity. The use of scaffolds, growth factors, number of cell passages and number of cells used was hugely heterogeneous.

SHORT CONCLUSIONS

This review offers a comprehensive assessment of the evidence behind the translation of basic science to the clinical practice of cartilage repair. It has revealed a lack of connectivity between the in vitro, pre-clinical and human data and a patchwork quilt of synergistic evidence. Drivers for progress in this space are largely driven by patient demand, surgeon inquisition and a regulatory framework that is learning at the same pace as new developments take place.

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) in the knee: clinical outcomes and challenges

PURPOSE

Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) has demonstrated effectiveness in treating isolated cartilage defects of the knee but medium- and long-term evidence and information on the management of postoperative complications or partially successful cases are sparse. This study hypothesised that MACI is effective for up to 5 years and that patients with posttreatment problems may go on to obtain clinical benefit from other interventions.

METHODS

A follow-on, prospective case series of patients recruited into a previous controlled, randomised, prospective study or newly enroled. Patients were followed up 6, 12, 24 and 60 months after surgery. Outcome measures were Tegner (activity levels) and Lysholm (pain, stability, gait, clinical symptoms) scores. Zone-specific subgroups were analysed 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were treated with MACI. Median Tegner score improved from II to IV at 12 months; an improvement maintained to 60 months. Mean Lysholm score improved from 28.5 to 76.6 points (±19.8) at 24 months, settling back to 75.5 points after 5 years (p > 0.0001). No significant differences were identified in the zone-specific analysis. Posttreatment issues (N = 12/18.5 %) were resolved with microfracture, debridement, OATS or bone grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

MACI is safe and effective in the majority of patients. Patients in whom treatment is only partially successful can go on to obtain clinical benefit from other cartilage repair options. This study adds to the clinical evidence on the MACI procedure, offers insight into likely treatment outcomes, and highlights MACI's usefulness as part of an armamentarium of surgical approaches to the treatment of isolated knee defects.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective case control study with no control group, Level III.