1
|
Tatari CR, Andersen B, Kirkegaard P. "We're the very bottom, so it's going to be hard for you to 'catch any fish' around here…" understanding vulnerable Greenlanders' perspectives on cancer and barriers to screening in Denmark- A qualitative study. Int J Equity Health 2024; 23:11. [PMID: 38254148 PMCID: PMC10802048 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02094-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a major global health concern. Unfortunately, Indigenous populations such as Greenlanders living in Denmark, face significant disparities in cancer risk, incidence, diagnosis, care quality, and outcomes. In Denmark, vulnerable Greenlanders face challenges accessing cancer screening. The aim of this study was to explore their perceptions of cancer, barriers to participation in cancer screening, and potential for developing a tailored intervention. METHODS This qualitative study was based on participant observations and qualitative interviews. The sample comprised 46 participants from four distinct drop-in centres. Of these, 28 were vulnerable Greenlanders (19 women and 9 men), 9 were staff members (6 women and 3 men), and 6 were relatives (4 women and 2 men). The data were analysed through inductive content analysis. RESULTS Vulnerable Greenlanders in Denmark believed they were responsible for their own health and were generally satisfied with the healthcare system. However, they found it challenging to manage their own health and many depended on support from others. Fear of cancer and death shaped their attitudes towards screening. CONCLUSION For vulnerable Greenlanders in Denmark participation in cancer screening programmes was positively viewed for most but could be challenging. Different intervention ideas raised by the vulnerable Greenlanders, relatives and staff members could guide the development of strategies to increase participation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Rahr Tatari
- Department of Public Health Programmes, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lyngsøe S, Lophaven S, Jepsen R, Holmager T, Janssens A, Lynge E. Non-participation in a health examination survey in a rural-provincial area of Denmark - results from the Lolland-Falster Health Study (LOFUS). Scand J Public Health 2023:14034948231206879. [PMID: 37953717 DOI: 10.1177/14034948231206879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lolland-Falster Health Study (LOFUS) was a health examination survey that included self-administered questionnaires, clinical examinations, and the collection of biological samples, undertaken in 2016-2020 in a rural, socioeconomically deprived area with the lowest life expectancy in Denmark. The aim of this study was to examine the determinants of non-participation in LOFUS to evaluate the extent to which LOFUS data reflected the general population of the area. METHODS LOFUS invited randomly selected subjects together with their entire household. As determinants of non-participation, we analyzed age, sex, municipality of residency, citizenship, residency status, socioeconomic status, invitation type, and year of invitation. Relative risk regression was used to estimate the association between determinants and non-participation rate, mutually adjusted for other determinants. RESULTS In total, 53,313 subjects were invited of whom 18,949 (36%) participated. In the multivariable analysis, men had a 3% higher non-participation rate than women; subjects with citizenship other than Danish had a 3% higher non-participation rate than Danes. In-migrants had 6% higher non-participation than long-term residents. Compared with self-supported subjects aged 30-64, both publicly supported subjects of this age and younger and older subjects had higher non-participation rates: 16%, 16%, and 13%, respectively. Compared with self-supported, long-term residents, publicly supported in-migrants had 23% higher non-participation. CONCLUSIONS Only about one third of subjects invited to LOFUS participated. Yet, this is a relatively high participation rate compared with other recent health examination surveys in Denmark. Furthermore, there was a relatively flat social gradient in the non-participation rate across the studied determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Lyngsøe
- Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark
| | | | - Randi Jepsen
- Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark
| | | | - Astrid Janssens
- Bioethics and Health Humanities, Utrecht University Medical Center, University Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Unit of User Perspectives, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark and Center for Research with Patients and Relatives (ForSa-P), Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Le Bonniec A, Meade O, Fredrix M, Morrissey E, O'Carroll RE, Murphy PJ, Murphy AW, Mc Sharry J. Exploring non-participation in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Soc Sci Med 2023; 329:116022. [PMID: 37348182 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Worldwide, colorectal cancer is a major public health issue. Despite the existence of screening programmes in many countries, global uptake remains low. This meta-ethnography aimed to analyse qualitative literature to explore attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening and reasons for non-participation in eligible people that do not participate when invited. METHODS Systematic searches were conducted in five databases in May 2021. Critical appraisal of included studies was performed using the CASP checklist for qualitative studies. FINDINGS Thirteen studies were included. Three main themes and eight sub-themes were developed across studies: (1) Differences in motivation, with non-participants expressing a lack of knowledge and varying levels of intention to participate but not feeling screening was personally necessary; (2) Active aversion to screening expressed by fear, discomfort, disgust or not wanting to know; and (3) Contextual barriers of the healthcare system such as practical constraints or poor relationships with healthcare professionals. CONCLUSION Findings suggest multiple pathways to non-participation including ambivalence, aversion to the process and consequences of screening or lack of support. Persuasive messages and prompts to action to target ambivalence, reassurance regarding the screening procedures to target negative reactions, and increased support from healthcare professionals may be beneficial in increasing screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Le Bonniec
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | - Oonagh Meade
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | | | - Eimear Morrissey
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Ronan E O'Carroll
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Patrick J Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Discipline of General Practice, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew W Murphy
- HRB Primary Care Clinical Trials Network Ireland, Discipline of General Practice, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jenny Mc Sharry
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hoft G, Forseth B, Trofimoff A, Bangash M, Davis AM. Barriers to Participation in a Telemedicine-based, Family-based Behavioral Group Treatment Program for Pediatric Obesity: Qualitative findings from Rural Caregivers. Child Health Care 2023; 53:60-75. [PMID: 38239336 PMCID: PMC10794019 DOI: 10.1080/02739615.2023.2189116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
This study examined factors influencing rural caregivers' decision to decline participation in a healthy lifestyle intervention. Eligible caregivers of rural children who declined participation in a healthy lifestyle intervention were interviewed regarding reasons for declining. Inductive thematic analyses were conducted for responses. Caregiver interviews (n=16) resulted in 5 saturated themes: (1) rural families' household schedules prohibit participation, (2) preference for diverse treatment approaches, (3) desire for information across multimedia platforms, and more communication with a point-of-contact, (4) support for an inclusive approach integrated with existing school practices, and (5) caregivers had an understanding of behaviors that promote health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galen Hoft
- Center for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition – Department of Pediatrics - University of Kansas Medical Center - Kansas City, Kansas
- Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences – Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Bethany Forseth
- Center for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition – Department of Pediatrics - University of Kansas Medical Center - Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Anna Trofimoff
- Center for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition – Department of Pediatrics - University of Kansas Medical Center - Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Maheen Bangash
- Center for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition – Department of Pediatrics - University of Kansas Medical Center - Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ann M. Davis
- Center for Children’s Healthy Lifestyles & Nutrition – Department of Pediatrics - University of Kansas Medical Center - Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maia I, Moreira C, Ramos E, Santos AC. The effect of non-participation on the prevalence of food insecurity in a population-based cohort in Portugal. J Public Health Policy 2022. [PMID: 36038767 DOI: 10.1057/s41271-022-00362-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Non-participation can be a source of selection bias. We evaluated the effect of non-participation on food insecurity prevalence among 2942 young adults from the EPITeen cohort (Portugal), which we have followed since assembling the cohort in 2003-2004. We conducted a cross-sectional study when the cohort participants were 26 years old. To examine the effect of non-participation, we statistically imputed the missing data on food security status using multivariate imputation by chained equations based on characteristics associated with food insecurity, specifically household income perception, education and household structure from 21 or 24 years of age follow-ups. In our cohort, non-participation caused ~ 2% difference in the food insecurity prevalence: 11.0% (95% CI 9.0-13.0) for 954 participants and 12.6% (95% CI 11.1-14.1) after imputation. These estimates are close to evidence from other European countries and sustain the relevance of developing public health interventions to promote food security, especially considering the negative nutritional and health outcomes associated with food insecurity.
Collapse
|
6
|
Leick C, Larsen LB, Larrabee Sonderlund A, Svensson NH, Sondergaard J, Thilsing T. Non-participation in a targeted prevention program aimed at lifestyle-related diseases: a questionnaire-based assessment of patient-reported reasons. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:970. [PMID: 35562735 PMCID: PMC9107116 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13382-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Having an unhealthy lifestyle is associated with a higher risk of developing lifestyle-related diseases. Current evidence suggests that interventions targeting health-risk behaviors can help people improve their lifestyles and prevent lifestyle-related diseases. However, preventive programs are often challenged by low participation rates. Reasons for non-participation include lack of time and/or interest, and/or no perceived need for lifestyle intervention. This study explores causes for non-participation in a sample of people who chose not to take up a targeted preventive program (TOF pilot2 study). Patient-reported reasons as well as sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle factors are in focus. METHODS A total of 4633 patients from four Danish GP clinics received an invitation to take part in the TOF pilot2 study. Patients who chose not to participate in the TOF pilot2 study were asked to fill in a questionnaire concerning reasons for non-participation, lifestyle, BMI and self-rated health. Descriptive analyses were used to summarize the results. RESULTS A total of 2462 patients (53.1%) chose not to participate in the TOF pilot2 study. Among these, 84 (3.4%) answered the full questionnaire on reasons for not participating, lifestyle, BMI and self-rated health. The most common reasons for non-participation were lack of time, having an already healthy lifestyle, and feeling healthy. Based on their self-reported lifestyle 45 (53.6%) of the non-participants had one or more health-risk behaviors including smoking, unhealthy diet, BMI ≥ 35 and/or sedentary lifestyle and were therefore eligible to receive the targeted intervention at the GP or the MHC in the original TOF pilot2 study. CONCLUSION When planning future preventive programs it is important to know the main reasons for patients to not participate. This study provides rare insight into why people opt out of health interventions and advances the evidence base in this area. Our results may inform efforts to better involve these patients in preventive health programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration number: NCT02797392 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Leick
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Lars Bruun Larsen
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.,Steno Diabetes Center Sjælland, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Anders Larrabee Sonderlund
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Nanna Herning Svensson
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Jens Sondergaard
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Trine Thilsing
- Department of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9A, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lubi K, Savicka V, Koor M, Nool I, Tupits M, Mets-Oja S. Practice theoretical approach on the reasons why target group women refrain from taking breast cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:3053-3058. [PMID: 33836938 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Despite the availability of effective breast cancer screening programmes, there are only six countries in the European Union reaching the recommended target rate of 70% screened. In addition to the individual reasons for refraining from breast cancer screening, this research aims to follow earlier suggestions to use a practice theoretical approach. METHODS The study sites were Estonia and Latvia, where 9 and 12 semi-structured interviews were conducted, respectively. Convenience and snowball sampling methods were used. The research was approved by ethics committees in both countries. The interviews passed textual analysis and coding. RESULTS The findings revealed that there are three major types of reasons - habitual, practical, and emotional - that influence the formation of the final decision to participate in breast cancer screening. CONCLUSION The implementation of an individualistic approach is not sufficient to bring along desired health behaviour. All groups of reasons, individual and societal context are involved in the decision formation. Thus, structurally provided approaches and messages should be re-conceptualised and re-designed accordingly. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Future screening related campaigns and public health education should address the concerns derived from different types of reasons for refraining from screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadi Lubi
- Tallinn Health Care College, Health Education Center, Kännu 67, 13418 Tallinn, Estonia; Department of Communication Studies, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema iela, Rīga LV-1007, Latvia.
| | - Vita Savicka
- Department of Communication Studies, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema iela, Rīga LV-1007, Latvia.
| | - Marilyn Koor
- Tallinn Health Care College, Health Education Center, Kännu 67, 13418 Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Irma Nool
- Tallinn Health Care College, Chair of Nursing, Kännu 67, 13418 Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Mare Tupits
- Tallinn Health Care College, Chair of Nursing, Kännu 67, 13418 Tallinn, Estonia.
| | - Silja Mets-Oja
- Tallinn Health Care College, Health Education Center, Kännu 67, 13418 Tallinn, Estonia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown J, Goodridge D, Thorpe L, Hodson A, Chipanshi M. Factors influencing practitioners' who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:134. [PMID: 34583710 PMCID: PMC8479895 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00703-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evolving medical technology, advancing biomedical and drug research, and changing laws and legislation impact patients’ healthcare options and influence healthcare practitioners’ (HCPs’) practices. Conscientious objection policy confusion and variability can arise as it may occasionally be unclear what underpins non-participation. Our objective was to identify, analyze, and synthesize the factors that influenced HCPs who did not participate in ethically complex, legally available healthcare. Methods We used Arksey and O’Malley’s framework while considering Levac et al.’s enhancements, and qualitatively synthesized the evidence. We searched Medline, CINAHL, JSTOR, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global from January 1, 1998, to January 15, 2020, and reviewed the references of the final articles. We included articles written in English that discussed the factors that influenced physicians and registered nurses (RNs) who did not participate in end-of-life (EOL), reproductive technology and health, genetic testing, and organ or tissue donation healthcare areas. Using Covidence, we conducted title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening against our eligibility criteria. We extracted the article’s data into a spreadsheet, analyzed the articles, and completed a qualitative content analysis using NVivo12. Results We identified 10,664 articles through the search, and after the screening, 16 articles were included. The articles sampled RNs (n = 5) and physicians (n = 11) and encompassed qualitative (n = 7), quantitative (n = 7), and mixed (n = 2) methodologies. The care areas included reproductive technology and health (n = 11), EOL (n = 3), organ procurement (n = 1), and genetic testing (n = 1). One article included two care areas; EOL and reproductive health. The themed factors that influenced HCPs who did not participate in healthcare were: (1) HCPs’ characteristics, (2) personal beliefs, (3) professional ethos, 4) emotional labour considerations, and (5) system and clinical practice considerations. Conclusion The factors that influenced HCPs’ who did not participate in ethically complex, legally available care are diverse. There is a need to recognize conscientious objection to healthcare as a separate construct from non-participation in healthcare for reasons other than conscience. Understanding these separate constructs will support HCPs’ specific to the underlying factors influencing their practice participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Brown
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Regina, 111-116 Research Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 3R3, Canada
| | - Donna Goodridge
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, E1216, Health Sciences Building, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
| | - Lilian Thorpe
- Departments of Community Health and Epidemiology and Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, E3218, Health Sciences Building, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada
| | - Alexandra Hodson
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Regina, 111-116 Research Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 3R3, Canada
| | - Mary Chipanshi
- Nursing Liaison Librarian, University of Regina Library, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK, S4S 0A2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ishii K, Tabuchi T, Iso H. Combined patterns of participation in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screenings and factors for non-participation in each screening among women in Japan. Prev Med 2021; 150:106627. [PMID: 34019930 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Finding effective strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screening (CCS), breast cancer screening (BCS) and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) for women is an important public health issue. Our objective was to examine combined patterns of participation in these three screenings and investigate the factors associated with non-participation in each. We analyzed 115,254 women aged 40-69 who were age-eligible for all three screenings from a 2016 nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Japan. Eight screening patterns were defined as full-participation (CCS + BCS + CRCS), partial-participation (CCS + BCS, CCS + CRCS, BCS + CRCS, CCS, BCS, CRCS), and non-participation (none). Multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, marital status, educational attainment, employment status, self-rated health, current hospital visits, and smoking status was performed to evaluate the factors associated with each screening pattern, using full-participation as the reference category. Screening rates for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer were 45.0%, 46.2%, and 40.4%, respectively. Although only 26.9% of women participated in all three screenings, more than 60% participated in at least one screening. Unstable employment, low educational attainment, low self-rated health, and current smoker were associated with both non-participation and partial-participation, especially single-participation in cervical and breast cancer screening. For example, self-employed women were more likely to be non-participants [aOR 2.80 95%CI: 2.65-2.96], single-participants for CCS [aOR 2.87 95%CI: 2.57-3.20], and BCS [aOR 2.07 95%CI: 1.85-2.33] than permanent workers. It may be useful to consider related factors for non-participation patterns to encourage partial-participants to have other cancer screenings by utilizing one cancer screening as an opportunity to provide information about other screenings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanako Ishii
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tabuchi
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69, Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Iso
- Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thompson J, Ng J, Armstrong B, Feletto E, Ha T. Differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did and did not undergo screening: Results from the 45 and Up Study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 72:101936. [PMID: 33839458 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2021.101936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program is a free population-based screening program aiming to identify precancerous lesions and early colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood tests in average-risk Australians. The participation rate in people invited to screening was 42 % in 2017-2018, well below the 56.6 % target level. Increasing screening in high-risk groups; such as those with a subsequent diagnosis of colorectal cancer, will improve the efficiency of the program. METHODS Patients were participants in the Australian 45 and Up (cohort) study; aged 55 or 65 years between May 2006 and June 2008. Patients reported a history of colorectal cancer in their enrolment questionnaire and whether or not they had screened before diagnosis. Demographic, lifestyle, dietary and health related characteristics were compared between those who did and did not participate in screening. RESULTS 339 participants who self-reported having colorectal cancer were included. Participants who were female, overweight (≥ 25 kg/m2), consumed less than the recommended five servings of vegetables per day, consumed ≤ 14 standard drinks per week (compared to non-drinkers) or did not meet physical activity guidelines were significantly less likely to have participated in screening. CONCLUSION Considerable investment has been placed in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program and the focus now is on improving participation. Our study has taken a unique approach to identifying high-risk groups by exploring factors related to screening participation in colorectal cancer patients. These findings can further leverage the program by targeting high-risk populations to reduce the colorectal cancer burden in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Ng
- University of Wollongong, Australia.
| | - Bruce Armstrong
- University of Sydney, Australia; University of Western Australia, Australia.
| | | | - Tam Ha
- University of Wollongong, Australia; Sax Institute, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Heathcote J, Perri F, Violante GL. The rise of US earnings inequality: Does the cycle drive the trend? Rev Econ Dyn 2020; 37:S181-S204. [PMID: 32834717 PMCID: PMC7303048 DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2020.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
We document that declining hours worked are the primary driver of widening inequality in the bottom half of the male labor earnings distribution in the United States over the past 52 years. This decline in hours is heavily concentrated in recessions: hours and earnings at the bottom fall sharply in recessions and do not fully recover in subsequent expansions. Motivated by this evidence, we build a structural model to explore the possibility that recessions cause persistent increases in inequality; that is, that the cycle drives the trend. The model features skill-biased technical change, which implies a trend decline in low-skill wages relative to the value of non-market activities. With this adverse trend in the background, recessions imply a potential double-whammy for low skilled men. This group is disproportionately likely to experience unemployment, which further reduces skills and potential earnings via a scarring effect. As unemployed low skilled men give up job search, recessions generate surges in non-participation. Because non-participation is highly persistent, earnings inequality remains elevated long after the recession ends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabrizio Perri
- Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and CEPR, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Broekstra R, Maeckelberghe ELM, Aris-Meijer JL, Stolk RP, Otten S. Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:62. [PMID: 32711531 PMCID: PMC7382031 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00504-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Large-scale, centralized data repositories are playing a critical and unprecedented role in fostering innovative health research, leading to new opportunities as well as dilemmas for the medical sciences. Uncovering the reasons as to why citizens do or do not contribute to such repositories, for example, to population-based biobanks, is therefore crucial. We investigated and compared the views of existing participants and non-participants on contributing to large-scale, centralized health research data repositories with those of ex-participants regarding the decision to end their participation. This comparison could yield new insights into motives of participation and non-participation, in particular the behavioural change of withdrawal. Methods We conducted 36 in-depth interviews with ex-participants, participants, and non-participants of a three-generation, population-based biobank in the Netherlands. The interviews focused on the respondents’ decision-making processes relating to their participation in a large-scale, centralized repository for health research data. Results The decision of participants and non-participants to contribute to the biobank was motivated by a desire to help others. Whereas participants perceived only benefits relating to their participation and were unconcerned about potential risks, non-participants and ex-participants raised concerns about the threat of large-scale, centralized public data repositories and public institutes, such as social exclusion or commercialization. Our analysis of ex-participants’ perceptions suggests that intrapersonal characteristics, such as levels of trust in society, participation conceived as a social norm, and basic societal values account for differences between participants and non-participants. Conclusions Our findings indicate the fluidity of motives centring on helping others in decisions to participate in large-scale, centralized health research data repositories. Efforts to improve participation should focus on enhancing the trustworthiness of such data repositories and developing layered strategies for communication with participants and with the public. Accordingly, personalized approaches for recruiting participants and transmitting information along with appropriate regulatory frameworks are required, which have important implications for current data management and informed consent procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Broekstra
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, FA 40, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - E L M Maeckelberghe
- University Medical Center Groningen, Institute for Medical Education, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J L Aris-Meijer
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, FA 40, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R P Stolk
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, FA 40, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S Otten
- Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tatari CR, Andersen B, Brogaard T, Badre-Esfahani SK, Jaafar N, Kirkegaard P. Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark - a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:921. [PMID: 32532227 PMCID: PMC7291658 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening programmes for cervical cancer, breast cancer and colorectal cancer have been implemented in many Western countries to reduce cancer incidence and mortality. Ethnic minority women are less likely to participate in cancer screening than the majority population. In worst case this can result in higher incidence rates, later diagnosis and treatment and ultimately inferior survival. In this paper we explored the perceptions about cancer and perceived barriers towards cancer screening participation among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark. METHODS Interview study with ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark. The interviews were transcribed verbatim followed by an inductive content analysis. RESULTS Cancer was perceived as a deadly disease that could not be treated. Cancer screening was perceived as only relevant if the women had symptoms. Knowledge about cancer screening was fragmented, often due to inadequate Danish language skills and there was a general mistrust in the Danish healthcare system due to perceived low medical competences in Danish doctors. There was, however, a very positive and curious attitude regarding information about the Danish cancer screening programmes and a want for more information. CONCLUSION Ethnic minority women did not have sufficient knowledge about cancer and the purpose of cancer screening. Perceptions about cancer screening were characterised by openness and the study showed positive and curious attitudes towards screening participation. The findings emphasise the importance of culturally adapted interventions for ethnic minority women in attempts to reduce inequality in screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Rahr Tatari
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Sara Koed Badre-Esfahani
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Negin Jaafar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Badre-Esfahani S, Larsen MB, Seibæk L, Petersen LK, Blaakær J, Andersen B. Low attendance by non-native women to human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening - A Danish nationwide register-based cohort study. Prev Med Rep 2020; 19:101106. [PMID: 32426214 PMCID: PMC7226879 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cervical cancer is preventable through human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening. However, possibly due to systemic, individual (e.g. low socio-economic staus) and socio-cultural barriers, it is likely that non-natives, especially non-westerns, are more prone to attend neither vaccination nor screening (combined non-attendance). This is disturbing as the non-native population in Denmark is predicted to rise to 21% by 2060. We aimed to investigate differences in combined non-attendance by nativity and region of origin, and to analyse the association between country of origin and combined non-attendance adjusted for socio-economic status. Setting 1.6.2007–31.12.2016 Denmark. Methods Logistic regression was performed to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for combined non-attendance. Results 170,158 women were included. Overall combined non-attendance was 11.8% [11.7–12.0]; 10.0% [9.8–10.1] for native women and 27.1% [26.4–27.7] for non-native women, with highest degrees among Middle-Eastern and North-Africans (30.1% [29.2–30.9]). Even when adjusted for socio-economics, women from Middle-East and North-Africa had substantially higher odds of combined non-attendance than natives (adj. OR = 7.5 [6.3–8.9] for Somali women). Conclusion Denmark has a relatively low degree of combined non-attendance. However, cervical cancer preventive programmes seem to be better tailored to the needs of native women and do not appear to cater sufficiently to the needs of the fast-growing non-native populations, particularly not to the needs of Middle-Eastern and North African women. In order to secure more just cervical cancer prevention, future studies are recommended to develop tailored intervention sensitive to the need of non-native women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Badre-Esfahani
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930 Randers, NO, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M B Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930 Randers, NO, Denmark
| | - L Seibæk
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - L K Petersen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 2, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark.,OPEN Open Patient Data Explorative Network, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - J Blaakær
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 2, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - B Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 15, DK-8930 Randers, NO, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vuillermoz C, Stene LE, Aubert L, Motreff Y, Pirard P, Baubet T, Lesieur S, Chauvin P, Vandentorren S. Non-participation and attrition in a longitudinal study of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:63. [PMID: 32171236 PMCID: PMC7071581 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00943-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-participation and attrition are rarely studied despite being important methodological issues when performing post-disaster studies. A longitudinal survey of civilians exposed to the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, France, was conducted 6 (Wave 1) and 18 months (Wave 2) after the attacks. We described non-participation in Wave 1 and determined the factors associated with attrition in Wave 2. METHODS Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare participants in both waves with those who participated in the first wave only. Analyses were performed taking the following factors into account: socio-demographic characteristics, exposure to terror, peri-traumatic reactions, psychological support, perceived social support, impact on work, social and family life, and mental health disorders. Characteristics of new participants in Wave 2 were compared with participants in both waves using a chi-square test. RESULTS Of the 390 persons who were eligible to participate in the survey, 190 participated in Wave 1 (participation rate: 49%). The most frequently reported reason for non-participation was to avoid being reminded of the painful event (32%, n = 34/105). In Wave 2, 67 were lost to follow-up, 141 people participated, of whom 123 participated in Wave 1 (re-participation rate: 65%) and 18 were new. Attrition in Wave 2 was associated with socio-demographic characteristics (age, French origin) and location during the attacks, but not with terror exposure or mental health disorders. Compared with those who participated in both waves, new participants declared less social and psychological support since the attacks. CONCLUSIONS Attrition at 6 months was not associated with exposure to terror or mental health disorders, which indicates that any bias in future analyses on IMPACTS on mental health outcomes will be limited. Our findings suggest the importance of adapting similar surveys for people of foreign origin and of improving strategies to avoid attrition of younger people, for example by using social media, peers, and the educational environment. The present study also revealed that a high level of exposure to terror and a lack of social and psychological support after a terrorist event could impede individuals' participation in similar surveys in the short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cécile Vuillermoz
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Maurice Halbwachs (CNRS-UMR8097, EHESS, ENS), F75014, Paris, France.
| | - Lise Eilin Stene
- Norwegian centre for violence and traumatic stress studies (NKVTS), Oslo, Norway
| | - Lydéric Aubert
- Santé publique France, Direction des régions, F94415, Saint-Maurice, France
| | - Yvon Motreff
- Department of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F75012, Paris, France
- Santé publique France, Direction des maladies non transmissibles et traumatismes, F94415, Saint-Maurice, France
| | - Philippe Pirard
- Santé publique France, Direction des maladies non transmissibles et traumatismes, F94415, Saint-Maurice, France
| | - Thierry Baubet
- CESP Inserm 1178, Université Paris 13, Paris, France
- Psychopathology Department for Children, Adolescents, General Psychiatry and Specialized Addiction, APHP Hôpital Avicenne, F93009, Bobigny, France
- Centre national de Ressources et de Résilience (CNRR), Paris, France
| | - Sophie Lesieur
- Department of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F75012, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Chauvin
- Department of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F75012, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Vandentorren
- Santé publique France, Direction des régions, F94415, Saint-Maurice, France
- Department of Social Epidemiology, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, F75012, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ramakers A, Aaltonen M, Martikainen P. A closer look at labour market status and crime among a general population sample of young men and women. Adv Life Course Res 2020; 43:100322. [PMID: 36726255 DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2019.100322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Those in the most criminally active age groups are facing particular difficulties in entering the labour market and accumulating stable work experiences. This study uses a large representative sample of Finnish adolescents to examine how different labour market statuses are associated with crime. Both for men and women, within-individual variation in employment is inversely linked to all crime measures considered, albeit to a different extent. In addition, qualitatively different categories of non-employment (e.g., non-participation without legitimate reason, studying, being on parental leave) are distinctly associated with crime. The findings underscore the importance of a detailed conceptualization of labour market status in research that aligns with the changed nature of employment and approximates the actual labour market experiences of young adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Ramakers
- Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology, Leiden University, Steenschuur 25 2311 ES Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Mikko Aaltonen
- Institute of Criminology and Legal Policy, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Norfjord van Zyl M, Akhavan S, Tillgren P, Asp M. Non-participation in mammographic screening - experiences of women from a region in Sweden. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:219. [PMID: 32050943 PMCID: PMC7017469 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-8306-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding women’s life conditions regarding their non-participation in different health-promoting and disease-preventing activities is important as it may draw attention to potential areas for improvement in the healthcare sector. Mammographic screening, a disease-preventing service, facilitates early detection of any potential malignancies and consequently prompts initiation of treatment. The reasons for non-participation in mammographic screening can be understood from different perspectives, such as socioeconomic and lifestyle-related determinants of health. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of women’s experiences and perceptions about non-participation in mammographic screening in a Swedish region with a single mammographic facility. Methods Data from individual semi-structured interviews, conducted in 2018 with eleven women between the ages of 48 and 73, were analysed by a qualitative content analysis. Results The findings reveal three main categories: 1) doubts regarding mammographic screening and its organisation, 2) sense and sensibility in the decision to refrain from mammographic screening, and 3) dependency and options. These three categories indicate aspects, such as the individual’s life situation, accessibility to the offered service, and the flexibility of the healthcare system, that need to be considered to improve the organisation of mammographic screening. Conclusion Listening to the women’s voices regarding their experiences and perceptions about mammographic screening is important as individual characteristics and social circumstances interact with healthcare and affect the degree of participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Norfjord van Zyl
- Division of Public Health Sciences, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden.
| | - Sharareh Akhavan
- Division of Public Health Sciences, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Per Tillgren
- Division of Public Health Sciences, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Margareta Asp
- Division of Caring Sciences and Health Care Pedagogics, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23, Västerås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Poli A, Kelfve S, Motel-Klingebiel A. A research tool for measuring non-participation of older people in research on digital health. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1487. [PMID: 31703655 PMCID: PMC6842243 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7830-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare services are being increasingly digitalised in European countries. However, in studies evaluating digital health technology, some people are less likely to participate than others, e.g. those who are older, those with a lower level of education and those with poorer digital skills. Such non-participation in research - deriving from the processes of non-recruitment of targeted individuals and self-selection - can be a driver of old-age exclusion from new digital health technologies. We aim to introduce, discuss and test an instrument to measure non-participation in digital health studies, in particular, the process of self-selection. METHODS Based on a review of the relevant literature, we designed an instrument - the NPART survey questionnaire - for the analysis of self-selection, covering five thematic areas: socioeconomic factors, self-rated health and subjective overall quality of life, social participation, time resources, and digital skills and use of technology. The instrument was piloted on 70 older study persons in Sweden, approached during the recruitment process for a trial study. RESULTS Results indicated that participants, as compared to decliners, were on average slightly younger and more educated, and reported better memory, higher social participation, and higher familiarity with and greater use of digital technologies. Overall, the survey questionnaire was able to discriminate between participants and decliners on the key aspects investigated, along the lines of the relevant literature. CONCLUSIONS The NPART survey questionnaire can be applied to characterise non-participation in digital health research, in particular, the process of self-selection. It helps to identify underrepresented groups and their needs. Data generated from such an investigation, combined with hospital registry data on non-recruitment, allows for the implementation of improved sampling strategies, e.g. focused recruitment of underrepresented groups, and for the post hoc adjustment of results generated from biased samples, e.g. weighting procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Poli
- Division Ageing and Social Change (ASC), Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden
| | - Susanne Kelfve
- Division Ageing and Social Change (ASC), Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden
- Aging Research Center (ARC), Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm University, Gävlegatan 16, 113 30 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andreas Motel-Klingebiel
- Division Ageing and Social Change (ASC), Linköping University, Kungsgatan 40, 601 74 Norrköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hertzum-Larsen R, Kjær SK, Frederiksen K, Thomsen LT. Participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants and Danish-born women in Denmark. Prev Med 2019; 123:55-64. [PMID: 30796926 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
In this nationwide register-based cohort study, we examined cervical cancer screening participation among immigrants in Denmark by country and region of origin. Furthermore, we assessed whether differences in screening participation between immigrants and Danish-born women were explained by sociodemographic or health-related characteristics, and examined predictors of participation among immigrants. Using high-quality registries, we identified women invited for cervical cancer screening during 2008-2009 and retrieved individual-level data on sociodemographic-, health- and immigration-related characteristics. A total of 610,907 women were followed for up to 2.9 years after screening invitation. We estimated the probability of participation using the Aalen-Johansen estimator and the hazard ratios (HRs) of participation using Cox regression. The probability of participation within follow-up was 74.5% (95% CI, 74.4%-74.6%) in Danish-born women; 61.2% (95% CI, 60.4%-62.1%) in Western immigrants; and 61.3% (95% CI, 60.9%-61.8%) in non-Western immigrants. Participation in immigrants varied by region of origin from 44.3% (95% CI, 41.4%-47.4%) in immigrants from North America, New Zealand and Australia to 67.8% (95% CI, 65.4%-70.3%) in immigrants from South- and Central America. Substantial variation was seen between specific countries of origin. Differences in participation between immigrants and Danish-born women were not explained by sociodemographic or health-related characteristics. Predictors of low participation in immigrants included lower income, unemployment, being unmarried, having a history of schizophrenia or other psychoses, and ≤5 years' stay in Denmark. In conclusion, cervical cancer screening participation in immigrants varied by region and country of origin, but all immigrant groups had lower participation than Danish-born women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Hertzum-Larsen
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne K Kjær
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Juliane Maries Vej 10, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Frederiksen
- Unit of Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Louise T Thomsen
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Larsen SH, Virgilsen LF, Kristiansen BK, Andersen B, Vedsted P. Strong association between cervical and breast cancer screening behaviour among Danish women; A register-based cohort study. Prev Med Rep 2018; 12:349-354. [PMID: 30450274 PMCID: PMC6234495 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 09/30/2018] [Accepted: 10/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
High coverage is essential for the effectiveness of national screening programmes. Identifying non-screeners across different screening programmes may help inform strategies to improve uptake. This study aims to analyse the association between previous cervical cancer screening (CCS) coverage and participation in breast cancer screening (BCS). This historical register-based cohort study included 91,787 Danish women aged 50-64 years who were invited to participate in the first organised round of BCS in the Central Denmark Region (CDR) in 2008-09. CCS coverage was defined as having a smear registered in the 5 1/2 years preceding the BCS, and BCS participants were divided into participants and non-participants and further categorised as active non-participants (ANP) if they cancelled and passive non-participants (PNP) if they abstained from the appointment. Of all 91,787 women included in the study, 62,391 (68%) were covered both by CCS and participated in BCS. Women not covered by CCS were more likely to be non-participants in BCS than women covered by CCS (PRRadjusted = 2.80, 95% CI: 2.68-2.93). Both PNP (PRRadjusted = 3.99, 95% CI: 3.80-4.19) and ANP (PRRadjusted = 2.50, 95% CI: 2.34-2.68) were more likely not to be covered by the CCS. In conclusion, non-coverage by CCS was strongly associated with nonparticipation in BCS. Specific groups of women only participated in one screening programme. To increase uptake, future interventions may specifically target these groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Larsen
- Research Unit for General Practice, The Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - L F Virgilsen
- Research Unit for General Practice, The Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - B K Kristiansen
- Department for Public Health Programs, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 1, 8930 Randers, Denmark
| | - B Andersen
- Department for Public Health Programs, Randers Regional Hospital, Skovlyvej 1, 8930 Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - P Vedsted
- Research Unit for General Practice, The Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care (CaP), Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
de Rooij BH, Ezendam NPM, Mols F, Vissers PAJ, Thong MSY, Vlooswijk CCP, Oerlemans S, Husson O, Horevoorts NJE, van de Poll-Franse LV. Cancer survivors not participating in observational patient-reported outcome studies have a lower survival compared to participants: the population-based PROFILES registry. Qual Life Res 2018; 27:3313-3324. [PMID: 30167937 PMCID: PMC6244797 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1979-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The ‘Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long-term Evaluation of Survivorship’ (PROFILES) registry collects patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from short- and long-term cancer survivors in the Netherlands, in a population-based setting. The aim of this analysis is to assess the generalizability of observational PRO research among cancer survivors by comparing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and survival of participants and non-participants in cancer survivors invited for questionnaire research through the PROFILES registry. Methods Between 2008 and 2015, cancer survivors with different cancer diagnoses (N = 14,011) were invited to participate in PROFILES registry studies, of whom 69% (N = 9684) participated. Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and survival data, collected through the Netherlands Cancer Registry, were associated with participation versus non-participation in multivariable logistic regression analyses and cox proportional hazard regression models, respectively. Results Participants had a significantly better survival compared to non-participants (HR = 1.47, P < .01). Participation was associated with male gender, being 60–70 years old, high socio-economic status, receiving any treatment, receiving radiotherapy, having no comorbidities, and a cancer diagnosis 2–3 years before invitation. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) might be up to 1.3 points lower (scale 0–100) using hot deck imputation compared to non-imputed participant data. Conclusions Cancer survivors not participating in observational PROs research significantly differ from participants, with respect to socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, and survival. Their HRQoL scores may be systematically lower compared to participants. Therefore, even in PRO studies with relatively high participation rates, observed outcomes may represent the healthier patient with better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belle H de Rooij
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. .,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicole P M Ezendam
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floortje Mols
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Melissa S Y Thong
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Simone Oerlemans
- The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Husson
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole J E Horevoorts
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, CoRPS - Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Green E, Bennett H, Brayne C, Matthews FE. Exploring patterns of response across the lifespan: the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:760. [PMID: 29914423 PMCID: PMC6006958 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5663-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With declining rates of participation in epidemiological studies there is an important need to attempt to understand what factors might affect response. This study examines the pattern of response at different adult ages within a contemporary cross-sectional population-based cohort, the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN). METHODS Using logistic regression, we investigated associations between age, gender and Townsend deprivation level for both participants and non-participants. Weighted estimates of the odds ratios with confidence intervals for each demographic characteristic were calculated. Reasons given for refusal were grouped into three broad categories: 'active', 'passive' and illness preventing interview. RESULTS An association of age and participation was found, with individuals in middle age groups more likely to participate (age group 48-57 OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5-2.2 and age group 58-67 OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.7-2.4). Overall, there was no difference in participation between men and women. An association with deprivation was found, with those living in the most deprived areas being the least willing to participate (fifth quintile OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.7). An interaction between age and gender was found whereby younger women and older men were more likely to agree to participate (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION Our findings highlight some of the factors affecting recruitment into epidemiological studies in the UK and suggest that targeted age-specific recruitment strategies might be needed to increase participation rates in future cohort investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Green
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 113 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| | - Holly Bennett
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carol Brayne
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona E. Matthews
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hjort-Pedersen K, Olesen AW, Garne E, Sperling L. Reasons for non-participation in malformation scans in Denmark: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:231. [PMID: 29898683 PMCID: PMC6001061 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1877-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to estimate the proportion of women giving birth in two hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark who did not attend the malformation scan and to elucidate the reasons for not participating. Methods In this register-based descriptive study, we used patient administration systems to identify women who had given birth at two Danish hospitals between March 2013 and January 2015. We then linked this information with the hospital database for fetal medicine (Astraia) to identify women who did not attend the malformation scan at week 18–20. We reviewed the medical records of these women to validate the data and to identify the reason for non-participation. Results Of 7690 births, 153 (2%) women did not attend the malformation scan. The main reason for non-participation was a passive deselection (81%). Most of these women were not present in Denmark at the time of the malformation scan (61%) and few women declined (8%). Conclusions Less than 2% of a birth cohort in two major hospitals in Denmark did not attend the free offer of a malformation scan. Most of these women (81%) did not actively decide against the malformation scan. Very few (0.2%) declined the malformation scan. Non-attendance is not always due to an active decision made by the pregnant woman. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1877-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karina Hjort-Pedersen
- Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kloevervaenget 10, 10th floor, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. .,OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Annette Wind Olesen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Soendre Blvd., 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Ester Garne
- Paediatric Department, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Lene Sperling
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Soendre Blvd., 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Harder E, Juul KE, Jensen SM, Thomsen LT, Frederiksen K, Kjaer SK. Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark. Prev Med 2018; 111:94-100. [PMID: 29501474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer occurs most often in under-screened women. In this nationwide register study, we described differences in sociodemographic characteristics between passive and active non-participants and examined socio-demographic characteristics, reproductive history, and mental and physical health as potential determinants for passive non-participation compared with participation in the Danish cervical cancer screening program. Screening history in women aged 23-49 years invited for cervical cancer screening in 2008-2009 was retrieved from the Danish Pathology Databank with information about dates of invitation and unsubscription. We identified participants (n = 402,984), active non-participants (n = 10,251) and passive non-participants (n = 63,435) within four years following baseline invitation and retrieved data about the study population from high-quality registries. We examined differences in socio-demographic characteristics of passive and active non-participants, and used multiple logistic regression analyses to identify potential determinants of passive non-participation. We found that active and passive non-participants differed in relation to socio-demography. When compared with screening participants, the odds of passive non-participation was increased in women who originated from less developed countries; were unmarried; had basic education or low income; had four or more children; smoked during pregnancy; had multiple induced abortions; or had a history of obesity, intoxicant abuse or schizophrenia or other psychoses. In conclusion, in this nationwide, prospective, population-based study, differences in socio-demographic characteristics between passive and active non-participants were found. Furthermore, sociodemography, reproductive history, and mental and physical health were determinants for passive non-participation. Addressing inequalities in screening attendance may help to further decrease the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Harder
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle, and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten E Juul
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle, and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Signe M Jensen
- Unit of Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Louise T Thomsen
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle, and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Frederiksen
- Unit of Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne K Kjaer
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle, and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 8, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kandola DK, Banner D, Araki Y, Bates J, Hadi H, Lear SA. The Participant Recruitment Outcomes (PRO) study: Exploring contemporary perspectives of telehealth trial non-participation through insights from patients, clinicians, study investigators, and study staff. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018; 11:75-82. [PMID: 29998203 PMCID: PMC6008707 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Telehealth has been proposed as an alternative means to providing traditional modes of care while alleviating the need for participant travel and reducing overall healthcare costs. The purpose of this study was to explore contemporary perspectives of patients and stakeholders regarding non-participation in telehealth trials. Methods We undertook a two-phase exploratory qualitative study to understand the reasons behind patient non-participation in telehealth. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with non-participating patient participants (n = 8) and stakeholders (n = 27) including clinicians, study investigators, and study staff. An analysis of interview data were undertaken and guided by a qualitative descriptive approach. Findings Patients and stakeholders reported many barriers to telehealth participation including technological barriers, limited understanding of disease, and an understated need for services. Both groups had some overlap in their concerns but also provided unique insights. Conclusion The analysis of study findings revealed perspectives of patients and stakeholders including barriers to participation as well as suggestions for future telehealth initiatives. Further research is needed to explore non-participation including patient readiness to assist in the development of future telehealth programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damanpreet K Kandola
- School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada.,School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada
| | - Davina Banner
- School of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada
| | - Yuriko Araki
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Joanna Bates
- Centre for Health Education Scholarship, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Haidar Hadi
- Northern Medical Program, Department of Medicine, University of Northern British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada.,Northern Health Authority, Prince George, British Columbia, V2L 5B8, Canada
| | - Scott A Lear
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canada.,Division of Cardiology, Providence Healthcare, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tiittala P, Ristola M, Liitsola K, Ollgren J, Koponen P, Surcel HM, Hiltunen-Back E, Davidkin I, Kivelä P. Missed hepatitis b/c or syphilis diagnosis among Kurdish, Russian, and Somali origin migrants in Finland: linking a population-based survey to the national infectious disease register. BMC Infect Dis 2018; 18:137. [PMID: 29558910 PMCID: PMC5859750 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3041-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migrants are considered a key population at risk for sexually transmitted and blood-borne diseases in Europe. Prevalence data to support the design of infectious diseases screening protocols are scarce. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis B and C, human immunodefiency virus (HIV) infection and syphilis in specific migrant groups in Finland and to assess risk factors for missed diagnosis. METHODS A random sample of 3000 Kurdish, Russian, or Somali origin migrants in Finland was invited to a migrant population-based health interview and examination survey during 2010-2012. Participants in the health examination were offered screening for hepatitis B and C, HIV and syphilis. Notification prevalence in the National Infectious Diseases Register (NIDR) was compared between participants and non-participants to assess non-participation. Missed diagnosis was defined as test-positive case in the survey without previous notification in NIDR. Inverse probability weighting was used to correct for non-participation. RESULTS Altogether 1000 migrants were screened for infectious diseases. No difference in the notification prevalence among participants and non-participants was observed. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was 2.3%, hepatitis C antibodies 1.7%, and Treponema pallidum antibodies 1.3%. No cases of HIV were identified. Of all test-positive cases, 61% (34/56) had no previous notification in NIDR. 48% of HBsAg, 62.5% of anti-HCV and 84.6% of anti-Trpa positive cases had been missed. Among the Somali population (n = 261), prevalence of missed hepatitis B diagnosis was 3.0%. Of the 324 Russian migrants, 3.0% had not been previously diagnosed with hepatitis C and 2.4% had a missed syphilis diagnosis. In multivariable regression model missed diagnosis was associated with migrant origin, living alone, poor self-perceived health, daily smoking, and previous diagnosis of another blood-borne infection. CONCLUSIONS More than half of chronic hepatitis and syphilis diagnoses had been missed among migrants in Finland. Undiagnosed hepatitis B among Somali migrants implies post-migration transmission that could be prevented by enhanced screening and vaccinations. Rate of missed diagnoses among Russian migrants supports implementation of targeted hepatitis and syphilis screening upon arrival and also in later health care contacts. Coverage and up-take of current screening among migrants should be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Tiittala
- Doctoral Programme in Population Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. .,Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Matti Ristola
- Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahdentie 2, 00250, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kirsi Liitsola
- Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jukka Ollgren
- Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Päivikki Koponen
- Department of Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heljä-Marja Surcel
- Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.,Oulu University Hospital, Biobank Borealis of Northern Finland, Aapistie 5B, 90220, Oulu, Finland
| | - Eija Hiltunen-Back
- Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahdentie 2, 00250, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Irja Davidkin
- Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pia Kivelä
- Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahdentie 2, 00250, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kerry SM, Morgan KE, Limb E, Cook DG, Furness C, Carey I, DeWilde S, Victor CR, Iliffe S, Whincup P, Ussher M, Ekelund U, Fox-Rushby J, Ibison J, Harris T. Interpreting population reach of a large, successful physical activity trial delivered through primary care. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:170. [PMID: 29361929 PMCID: PMC5781315 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5034-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Failure to include socio-economically deprived or ethnic minority groups in physical activity (PA) trials may limit representativeness and could lead to implementation of interventions that then increase health inequalities. Randomised intervention trials often have low recruitment rates and rarely assess recruitment bias. A previous trial by the same team using similar methods recruited 30% of the eligible population but was in an affluent setting with few non-white residents and was limited to those over 60 years of age. Methods PACE-UP is a large, effective, population-based walking trial in inactive 45-75 year-olds that recruited through seven London general practices. Anonymised practice demographic data were available for all those invited, enabling investigation of inequalities in trial recruitment. Non-participants were invited to complete a questionnaire. Results From 10,927 postal invitations, 1150 (10.5%) completed baseline assessment. Participation rate ratios (95% CI), adjusted for age and gender as appropriate, were lower in men 0.59 (0.52, 0.67) than women, in those under 55 compared with those ≥65, 0.60 (0.51, 0.71), in the most deprived quintile compared with the least deprived 0.52 (0.39, 0.70) and in Asian individuals compared with whites 0.62 (0.50, 0.76). Black individuals were equally likely to participate as white individuals. Participation was also associated with having a co-morbidity or some degree of health limitation. The most common reasons for non-participation were considering themselves as being too active or lack of time. Conclusions Conducting the trial in this diverse setting reduced overall response, with lower response in socio-economically deprived and Asian sub-groups. Trials with greater reach are likely to be more expensive in terms of recruitment and gains in generalizability need to be balanced with greater costs. Differential uptake of successful trial interventions may increase inequalities in PA levels and should be monitored. Trial registration ISRCTN.com ISRCTN98538934. Registered 2nd March 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally M Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary's University of London, London, SE 1 2AT, UK.
| | - Katy E Morgan
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Elizabeth Limb
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Derek G Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Cheryl Furness
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Iain Carey
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Steve DeWilde
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Christina R Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Peter Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Ulf Ekelund
- Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PO Box 4014, 0806, Oslo, Norway.,MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 OQQ, UK
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Kings College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Judith Ibison
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wilson C, Rooshenas L, Paramasivan S, Elliott D, Jepson M, Strong S, Birtle A, Beard DJ, Halliday A, Hamdy FC, Lewis R, Metcalfe C, Rogers CA, Stein RC, Blazeby JM, Donovan JL. Development of a framework to improve the process of recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs): the SEAR (Screened, Eligible, Approached, Randomised) framework. Trials 2018; 19:50. [PMID: 29351790 PMCID: PMC5775609 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2413-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research has shown that recruitment to trials is a process that stretches from identifying potentially eligible patients, through eligibility assessment, to obtaining informed consent. The length and complexity of this pathway means that many patients do not have the opportunity to consider participation. This article presents the development of a simple framework to document, understand and improve the process of trial recruitment. METHODS Eight RCTs integrated a QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) into the main trial, feasibility or pilot study. Part of the QRI required mapping the patient recruitment pathway using trial-specific screening and recruitment logs. A content analysis compared the logs to identify aspects of the recruitment pathway and process that were useful in monitoring and improving recruitment. Findings were synthesised to develop an optimised simple framework that can be used in a wide range of RCTs. RESULTS The eight trials recorded basic information about patients screened for trial participation and randomisation outcome. Three trials systematically recorded reasons why an individual was not enrolled in the trial, and further details why they were not eligible or approached, or declined randomisation. A framework to facilitate clearer recording of the recruitment process and reasons for non-participation was developed: SEAR - Screening, to identify potentially eligible trial participants; Eligibility, assessed against the trial protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria; Approach, the provision of oral and written information and invitation to participate in the trial, and Randomised or not, with the outcome of randomisation or treatment received. CONCLUSIONS The SEAR framework encourages the collection of information to identify recruitment obstacles and facilitate improvements to the recruitment process. SEAR can be adapted to monitor recruitment to most RCTs, but is likely to add most value in trials where recruitment problems are anticipated or evident. Further work to test it more widely is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Wilson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Leila Rooshenas
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Sangeetha Paramasivan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Daisy Elliott
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Marcus Jepson
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Sean Strong
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Land North, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire PR2 9HT UK
| | - David J. Beard
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Alison Halliday
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Freddie C. Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK
| | - Rebecca Lewis
- Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, SM2 5NG UK
| | - Chris Metcalfe
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
- Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration University of Bristol, School of Social and Community Medicine, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Chris A. Rogers
- Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 7 Queens Building, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW UK
| | - Robert C. Stein
- NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7DN UK
| | - Jane M. Blazeby
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
| | - Jenny L. Donovan
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS UK
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West, University Hospitals Bristol, 9th Floor, Whitefriars Lewins, Bristol, BS1 2NT UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rothmann MJ, Möller S, Holmberg T, Højberg M, Gram J, Bech M, Brixen K, Hermann AP, Glüer CC, Barkmann R, Rubin KH. Non-participation in systematic screening for osteoporosis-the ROSE trial. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:3389-3399. [PMID: 28875257 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4205-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 08/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Population-based screening for osteoporosis is still controversial and has not been implemented. Non-participation in systematic screening was evaluated in 34,229 women age 65-81 years. Although participation rate was high, non-participation was associated with comorbidity, aging other risk factors for fractures, and markers of low social status, e.g., low income, pension, and living alone. A range of strategies is needed to increase participation, including development of targeted information and further research to better understand the barriers and enablers in screening for osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION Participation is crucial to the success of a screening program. The objective of this study was to analyze non-participation in Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, a two-step population-based screening program for osteoporosis. METHODS Thirty-four thousand two hundred twenty-nine women aged 65 to 81 years were randomly selected from the background population and randomized to either a screening group (intervention) or a control group. All women received a self-administered questionnaire designed to allow calculation of future risk of fracture based on FRAX. In the intervention group, women with an estimated high risk of future fracture were invited to DXA scanning. Information on individual socioeconomic status and comorbidity was obtained from national registers. RESULTS A completed questionnaire was returned by 20,905 (61%) women. Non-completion was associated with older age, living alone, lower education, lower income, and higher comorbidity. In the intervention group, ticking "not interested in DXA" in the questionnaire was associated with older age, living alone, and low self-perceived fracture risk. Women with previous fracture or history of parental hip fracture were more likely to accept screening by DXA. Dropping out when offered DXA, was associated with older age, current smoking, higher alcohol consumption, and physical impairment. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to population-based screening for osteoporosis appear to be both psychosocial and physical in nature. Women who decline are older, have lower self-perceived fracture risk, and more often live alone compared to women who accept the program. Dropping out after primary acceptance is associated not only with aging and physical impairment but also with current smoking and alcohol consumption. Measures to increase program participation could include targeted information and reducing physical barriers for attending screening procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Rothmann
- Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Kloevervaenget 10, 6.sal, 5000, Odense C, Odense, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - S Möller
- Odense Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - T Holmberg
- Department of Health Promotion and Prevention, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Højberg
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Research, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J Gram
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Endocrinology, Hospital of Southwest Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - M Bech
- KORA, the Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K Brixen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - A P Hermann
- Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Kloevervaenget 10, 6.sal, 5000, Odense C, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - C-C Glüer
- Section Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Christian-Albrechts-Universitäts zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - R Barkmann
- Section Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Christian-Albrechts-Universitäts zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - K H Rubin
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Odense Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reinikainen J, Saarsalmi P, Härkänen T, Jousilahti P, Karvanen J, Männistö S, Tolonen H. Non-participation modestly increased with distance to the examination clinic among adults in Finnish health examination surveys. Scand J Public Health 2017; 46:752-754. [PMID: 29143578 DOI: 10.1177/1403494817739502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Health examination surveys (HES) provide important information about population health and health-related factors, but declining participation rates threaten the representativeness of collected data. It is hard to conduct national HESs at examination clinics near to every sampled individual. Thus, it is interesting to look into the possible association between the distance from home to the examination clinic and non-participation, and whether there is a certain distance after which the participation activity decreases considerably. METHODS Data from two national HESs conducted in Finland in 2011 and 2012 were used and a logistic regression model was fitted to investigate how distance was related to non-participation. RESULTS We found out that non-participation modestly increased with distance to the examination clinic. An additional analysis indicated that the option of having an examination at home may decrease the effect of distance to participation. CONCLUSIONS Long distances from home to the examination clinic are one reason for low participation activity. Possible bias caused by these differences in participation could be decreased by providing the option of a home examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Perttu Saarsalmi
- 2 Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Finland
| | | | | | - Juha Karvanen
- 3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Jyvaskyla, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hughes-Morley A, Young B, Hempel RJ, Russell IT, Waheed W, Bower P. What can we learn from trial decliners about improving recruitment? Qualitative study. Trials 2016; 17:494. [PMID: 27733181 PMCID: PMC5062905 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1626-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trials increasingly experience problems in recruiting participants. Understanding the causes of poor recruitment is critical to developing solutions. We interviewed people who had declined a trial of an innovative psychological therapy for depression (REFRAMED) about their response to the trial invitation, in order to understand their decision and identify ways to improve recruitment. Methods Of 214 people who declined the trial, 35 (16 %) gave permission to be contacted about a qualitative study to explore their decision. Analysis of transcripts of semi-structured interviews was informed by grounded theory. Results We interviewed 20 informants: 14 women and six men, aged 18 to 77 years. Many interviewees had prior experience of research participation and positive views of the trial. Interviewees’ decision making resembled a four-stage sequential process; in each stage they either decided not to participate in the trial or progressed to the next stage. In stage 1, interviewees assessed the invitation in the context of their experiences and attitudes; we term those who opted out at this stage ‘prior decliners’ as they had an established position of declining trials. In stage 2, interviewees assessed their own eligibility; those who judged themselves ineligible and opted out at this stage are termed ‘self-excluders’. In stage 3, interviewees assessed their need for the trial therapy and potential to benefit; we term those who decided they did not need the trial therapy and opted out at this stage ‘treatment decliners’. In stage 4, interviewees deliberated the benefits and costs of trial participation; those who opted out after judging that disadvantages outweighed advantages are termed ‘trial decliners’. Across all stages, most individuals declined because they judged themselves ineligible or not in need of the trial therapy. While ‘prior decliners’ are unlikely to respond to any trial recruitment initiative, the factors leading others to decline are amenable to amelioration as they do not arise from a rejection of trials or a personal stance. Conclusions To improve recruitment in similar trials, the most successful interventions are likely to address patients’ assessments of their eligibility and their potential to benefit from the trial treatment, rather than reducing trial burden. Trial registration International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN85784627. Registration date 10 August 2011. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1626-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adwoa Hughes-Morley
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. .,York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Bridget Young
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Roelie J Hempel
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Ian T Russell
- Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Waquas Waheed
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.,NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Normansell R, Holmes R, Victor C, Cook DG, Kerry S, Iliffe S, Ussher M, Fox-Rushby J, Whincup P, Harris T. Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings. Trials 2016; 17:178. [PMID: 27039181 PMCID: PMC4818945 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Trials in primary care to increase physical activity (PA) typically experience poor recruitment rates and may not recruit those with lower PA levels and who are most in need of the intervention. Despite the well-publicised benefits of physical activity, the majority of adults in the UK remain inactive and, therefore, at greater risk of many health problems. Our aim was to investigate the reasons for non-participation in the PACE-UP trial, which is a primary care pedometer-based walking intervention. This is important for successful recruitment and retention in future PA trials and programmes. Method We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded telephone interviews with 30 participants, aged 45–75 years, purposively sampled from those declining participation in the PACE-UP trial. Recruitment continued until data saturation and a demographically balanced sample was achieved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to thematic analysis. Results Interviewees supported walking as suitable exercise for most people in this age group, recognised the importance of this type of research and general practice as an appropriate setting. Key reasons for declining were: the perception of being already ‘too active’; existing medical conditions; work; travel and other commitments. Less frequently cited reasons included reluctance to be randomised, the intervention’s duration, wearing a pedometer, perceived inappropriateness of trial literature and a preference for a different kind of PA or for a group activity. Conclusions Whilst most interviewees perceived themselves to be sufficiently active, an important minority did not participate due to existing medical conditions and other commitments. Recruitment to future PA trials might be improved by tailoring activity to compensate for medical problems, and adapting PA interventions to fit around work and travel commitments. Ensuring that patient-targeted literature is succinct and inclusive and that equipment is user-friendly are also important. Primary care is seen as an appropriate setting for PA trials and programmes. Trial registration ISRCTN98538934.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Normansell
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK.
| | - Rebecca Holmes
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Christina Victor
- Gerontology and Health Services Research Unit, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Derek G Cook
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Sally Kerry
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Michael Ussher
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Julia Fox-Rushby
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, London, UB8 3PH, UK
| | - Peter Whincup
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| | - Tess Harris
- Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 ORE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Markkula N, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, Pirkola S, Peña S, Saarni S, Ahola K, Mattila AK, Viertiö S, Strehle J, Koskinen S, Härkänen T. Prevalence and correlates of major depressive disorder and dysthymia in an eleven-year follow-up--results from the Finnish Health 2011 Survey. J Affect Disord 2015; 173:73-80. [PMID: 25462399 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2014] [Revised: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/07/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up-to-date epidemiological data on depressive disorders is needed to understand changes in population health and health care utilization. This study aims to assess the prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD) and dysthymia in the Finnish population and possible changes during the past 11 years. METHODS In a nationally representative sample of Finns aged 30 and above (BRIF8901), depressive disorders were diagnosed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI) in 2000 and 2011. To account for nonresponse, two methods were compared: multiple imputation (MI) utilizing data from the hospital discharge register and from the interview in 2000 and statistical weighting. RESULTS The MI-corrected 12-month prevalence of MDD was 7.4% (95% CI 5.7-9.0) and of dysthymia was 4.5% (95% CI 3.1-5.9), whereas the corresponding figures using weights were 5.4% (95% CI 4.7-6.1) for MDD and 2.0% (95% CI 1.6-2.4) for dysthymia. Women (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.6-3.4) and unmarried people (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.2-2.0) had a higher risk of depressive disorders. There was a significant increase in the prevalence of depressive disorders during the follow-up period from 7.3% in 2000 to 9.6% in 2011. Prevalences were two percentage points higher, on average, when using MI compared to weighting. Hospital treatments for depressive disorders and other mental disorders were strongly associated with nonparticipation. LIMITATIONS The CIDI response rate dropped from 75% in 2000 to 57% in 2011, but this was accounted for by MI and weighting. CONCLUSIONS Depressive disorders are a growing public health concern in Finland. Non-participation of persons with severe mental disorders may bias the prevalence estimates of mental disorders in population-based studies.
Collapse
|