Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab combined with nab-paclitaxel, lobaplatin, and S-1 in neoadjuvant and conversion therapy for advanced gastric cancer: A study protocol of prospective single-center, randomized controlled and open label clinical trial (RNPLS-01)

Objective

Ramucirumab is a VEGFR2 antagonist. The aim of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab combined with nab-paclitaxel, lobaplatin and S-1 in neoadjuvant and conversion therapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

and analysis: This study is a prospective single-center, randomized controlled and open label clinical study, enrolling a total of 140 patients with advanced gastric cancer distributed across two distinct cohorts (Cohort A n = 70; Cohort B n = 70). The central focus of the study lies in evaluating the pathological complete response (pCR) of the cancer post-neoadjuvant or conversion therapy. Secondary endpoints encompass the assessment of the R0 resection rate subsequent to the aforementioned therapies, the occurrence of adverse events (AE), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the total response rate and its duration, the disease control rate (DCR), and the duration of overall response (DOR).

Ethics

Ethics approval has been obtained from the Ethics Committee at the First Affiliated Hospital (Xijing Hospital) of Air force Military Medical University (KY20232220-F-1).

Trial registration

This trial has been registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06169410 (registration date: December 5, 2023).

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ramucirumab as a Second-Line Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in Japan and South Korea: A Systematic Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer has the highest incidence and mortality in Eastern Asia. The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel (PTX) for patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA) have been established in clinical trials. To assess the effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy as a second-line treatment in real-world clinical practice in Eastern Asia and to pave the way for future research, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted.

METHODS

Studies published between January 2014 and December 2021 were identified in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and CBM databases.

RESULTS

This SLR included 23 studies from Japan and South Korea, of which 22 were retrospective and 11 were full-text articles. Most studies investigated RAM + PTX (range of median overall survival [mOS] 7.4-12.2 months; median progression-free survival [mPFS] 3.35-7.0 months). Data were limited for RAM, RAM + albumin-bound paclitaxel, and RAM + taxane. RAM + PTX was associated with longer survival (mOS 9.3-12.2 months vs. 5.2-9.7 months; mPFS 4.1-5.1 months vs. 3.0-4.1 months) than PTX. Patients with prior anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) exposure experienced longer mPFS (4.8 vs. 3.4 months) from RAM + taxane than those without prior anti-PD-1 exposure. Few patients (3.3-6.3%) discontinued RAM or RAM-based therapy because of adverse events (AEs). Hematological toxicities were most frequently occurring AEs and no new safety signals were identified compared to clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

RAM + PTX as a second-line treatment is effective and associated with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEA in real-world settings of Japan and South Korea. More studies are recommended to further evaluate effectiveness and safety of RAM or RAM-based therapy, especially after anti-PD-1 therapy, in a wider Eastern Asian population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

INPLASY registration number INPLASY2022120023.

A robust and validated LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of ramucirumab in rat and human serum using direct enzymatic digestion without immunoassay

A new liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was established to quantify the anti-gastric cancer fully human monoclonal antibody (ramucirumab) in rat and human serum. The surrogate peptide (GPSVLPLAPSSK) for ramucirumab was generated by trypsin hydrolysis and quantified using the isotopically labeled peptide GPSVLPLAPSSK[13C6, 15N2]ST containing two more amino acids at the carboxyl end as an internal standard to correct for variations introduced during the enzymatic hydrolysis process and any mass spectrometry changes. Additionally, the oxidation and deamidation of unstable peptides (VVSVLTVLHQDWLNGK and NSLYLQMNSLR) were detected. The quantitative range of the proposed method was 1-1000 μg/mL, and complete methodological validation was performed. The precision, accuracy, matrix effect, sensitivity, stability, selectivity, carryover, and interference of the measurements met the required standards. The validated LC-MS/MS method was applied to pharmacokinetic studies in rats administered ramucirumab at 15 mg/kg intravenously. Overall, a robust, efficient, and cost-effective LC-MS/MS method was successfully developed for quantifying ramucirumab in rat and human serum.

RELAY, Erlotinib Plus Ramucirumab in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated, Metastatic NSCLC: Outcomes by EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Variants

Introduction

EGFR gene mutations are drivers of NSCLC. The RELAY double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 study revealed superior progression-free survival (PFS) for ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) versus PBO (PBO + ERL) in patients with untreated advanced NSCLC and an EGFR-activating mutation. This exploratory analysis evaluated potential associations between EGFR exon 19 deletion (ex19del) variants and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients (N = 449) were randomized (1:1) to RAM plus ERL or PBO plus ERL. Plasma samples were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at 30-day post-study treatment discontinuation follow-up. Baseline and treatment-emergent gene alterations were investigated by Guardant360 next-generation sequencing. Patients with a valid baseline plasma sample and ex19del were included (RAM + ERL, n = 62; PBO + ERL, n = 72).

Results

The most common ex19del variant was E746_A750del (67.2%); EGFR E746 deletions (E746del) occurred more frequently than L747 deletions (74.6% versus 25.4%, respectively). TP53 mutations were the most frequently co-occurring baseline gene alterations. With treatment arms combined, median PFS was 18.0 months versus 12.5 months for patients with uncommon (non-E746_A750del, n = 44) versus common (E746_A750del, n = 90) ex19del variants (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.657 [95% confidence interval or CI:1.044-2.630]). Median PFS was longer with RAM plus ERL versus PBO plus ERL for patients with the common (15.2 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.564 [95% CI: 0.344-0.926]) and E746del (15.4 versus 9.9 mo; HR = 0.587 [95% CI: 0.363-0.951]) variants. Treatment-emergent post-progression EGFR T790M rates were higher in the common versus uncommon and E746del versus L747 deletion subgroups.

Conclusions

RAM plus ERL provides benefit and improves treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex19del variants.

Plasma Angiogenic Factors as Predictors of the Efficacy of Second-line Chemotherapy Combined with Angiogenesis Inhibitors in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From the GI-SCREEN CRC-Ukit Study

BACKGROUND

The significance of angiogenic factors as predictors of second-line (2L) chemotherapy efficacy when combined with angiogenesis inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains unestablished.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter prospective observational study, 17 angiogenic factors were analyzed in plasma samples collected at pretreatment and progression stages using a Luminex multiplex assay. Patients who received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (BEV group), FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM group), or FOLFIRI plus aflibercept (AFL group) as the 2L treatment were included. Interactions between pretreatment and treatment groups for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) were assessed using the propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

From February 2018 to September 2020, 283 patients were analyzed in the 2L cohort. A strong interaction was observed for PFS between BEV and RAM with HGF, sNeuropilin-1, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3. Interactions for RR between the BEV and RAM groups were observed for sNeuropilin-1 and sVEGFR-1. Contrarily, OS, PlGF, sVEGFR-1, and sVEGFR-3 differentiated the treatment effect between BEV and AFL. Plasma samples were evaluable for dynamic analysis in 203 patients. At progression, VEGF-A levels significantly decreased in the BEV group and increased in the RAM and AFL groups.

CONCLUSION

The pretreatment plasma sVEGFR-1 and sVEGFR-3 levels could be predictive biomarkers for distinguishing BEV and RAM when combined with chemotherapy in 2L mCRC treatment. Based on the VEGF-A dynamics at progression, selecting RAM or AFL for patients with significantly elevated VEGF-A levels may be a 2L treatment strategy, with BEV considered for the third-line treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN000028616.

New developments and standard of care in the management of advanced gastric cancer

Advanced gastric adenocarcinoma is a common disease with a poor prognosis whose treatment has for decades been based on cytotoxic chemotherapy, including platinum salts in first-line, and taxane or irinotecan in second or later line. Recent years have seen the emergence of new drugs that have improved patient survival, such as trastuzumab in first-line for HER2-positive tumors, ramucirumab alone or in combination with paclitaxel in second-line, and trifluridine-tipiracil beyond the second-line treatment. More recently, two monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated their efficacy in combination with oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy, nivolumab (anti-PD1) for PD-L1 CPS ≥5 tumors, and zolbetuximab for tumors overexpressing Claudin 18.2. In addition, regorafenib has been also showed effective in phase 3 trial for heavily pretreated patients. Based on phase 2 studies, trastuzumab-deruxtecan was approved in 2022 by the EMA for HER2-positive pretreated patients. This agent is currently evaluated in phase 3 study (DESTINY-Gastric04 trial), as are several other anti-HER2 (zanidatamab, margetuximab, tucatinib), immune checkpoint inhibitors, or targeted therapies (anti-FGFR2b).

Effect of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer according to the status of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression

Background

Ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor activity. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) might act upon VEGFR2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of combining ramucirumab and paclitaxel according to the status of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

This analysis included AGC patients who received ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as 2nd line therapy between December 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022, at Samsung Medical Center. All patient data analyses included an evaluation of PD-L1 expression using the combined positive score (CPS). We analyzed the efficacy and the survival of patients according to their PD-L1 expression.

Results

We included 117 patients in this analysis, and 80 patients (68.4%) had a PD-L1 CPS of one or more, 37 (31.6%) had five or more, and 19 (16.2%) had ten or more scores. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than one and one or more {PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; PFS: median 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.8 months] vs. median 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-4.7 months), P=0.93; PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; OS: median 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.6 months) vs. median 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.4-9.8 months), P=0.32}. PFS and OS did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than 5 and 5 or more [PD-L1 <5% vs. PD-L1 ≥5%; PFS: 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.5 months) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.8 months), P=0.57; OS: 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.5-8.3 months) vs. 10.0 months (95% CI: 1.1-18.9 months), P=0.07]. Interestingly, with a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10, PFS and OS did differ significantly [PD-L1 <10% vs. PD-L1 ≥10%; PFS: 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.3 months) vs. 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.3 months), P=0.05; OS: 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.5-7.9 months) vs. 18.9 months (95% CI: 6.5-31.3 months), P=0.04].

Conclusions

No biomarkers have been established to predict survival times after ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment. This analysis suggests that a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10 might be novel a biomarker to predict the survival of AGC patients treated with ramucirumab and paclitaxel.

Phase 2 Trial of Nivolumab and Ramucirumab for Relapsed Mesothelioma: HCRN-LUN15-299

Introduction

We hypothesized that ramucirumab could increase previously reported objective response rate (ORR) of 11% of single-agent nivolumab in the second-line therapy of unresectable mesothelioma.

Methods

This was a cooperative group, single-arm, phase 2 trial enrolling patients with unresectable mesothelioma after progression on more than or equal to one pemetrexed-containing regimen. Ramucirumab and nivolumab were given intravenously every 14 days for up to 24 months. The primary end point was ORR; secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks and overall survival (OS).

Results

Between April 2018 and October 2021, 34 patients were recruited. Median age was 72 (range: 40-89) years, 12% were women, and 79% of tumors had epithelial histology. Median follow-up was 10.2 months (interquartile range 19.6 mo [4.3-23.8]). ORR was 22.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.6%-41.1%) in all population and 43% (95% CI: 10%-82%) in patients with nonepithelioid histology. Of all patients, 45.2% (95% CI: 27.3%-64.0%) had stable disease. PFS rate at 24 weeks was 32% (95% CI: 17%-51%). Median PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI: 1.9-6.4 mo). Median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI: 6.3-23.5 mo). There was no grade greater than or equal to four toxicity. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in the tumor did not correlate with benefit from treatment. Activation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in response to treatment was associated with a trend toward improvement in PFS.

Conclusions

Nivolumab and ramucirumab combination was safe and generated PFS and OS rates and ORR that compare favorably with single-agent nivolumab in a similar patient population. The primary end point of 40% ORR was not reached. Further investigation of this regimen in mesothelioma with nonepithelioid histology may be warranted. Clinical Trial Information: NCT03502746.

Efficacy and safety of second-line therapy of docetaxel plus ramucirumab after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer (SCORPION): a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus platinum-based chemotherapy has been recognized as a standard first-line therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, no prospective clinical trials of docetaxel (DTX) plus ramucirumab (RAM) following first-line ICI plus platinum-based chemotherapy has been reported.

Methods

In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial, we enrolled patients with NSCLC from eight centres in Japan. Patients with metastatic NSCLC with disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy plus ICI were eligible for the study. Patients were intravenously treated with 60 mg/m2 of DTX and 10 mg/kg of RAM on day 1 with a strong recommendation of pegfilgrastim administration on day 2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in efficacy analysis population. Safety was assessed in all patients treated at least one dose. The ORR of the null and alternative hypotheses were 10% and 30%, with α error of 0.1 and β error of 0.1. This trial is registered with the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jCRTs041190077.

Findings

Between 16 January, 2020, and 24 August, 2021, 33 patients (median age 66 [range 42-79] years) were enrolled. Thirteen patients (41%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Twenty-five patients (78%) had an interval of <60 days after the last administration of ICI. In the efficacy analysis population (n = 32), the primary endpoint was met as 11 patients achieved partial response (PR), with ORR of 34.4% (80% CI, 23.1-47.2). Grade ≥3 anaemia and febrile neutropenia were observed in 2 (6%) and 3 (9%) patients, respectively. No treatment-related deaths and no new safety signals were observed.

Interpretation

DTX plus RAM demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients who have progressed on front-line ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The results of this trial can be a helpful reference in conducting further phase III trials of new second-line treatment options.

Funding

Eli Lilly Japan K.K.

Delayed severe hemothorax caused by a staple line of a bullectomy performed 11 years earlier

BACKGROUND

At present, relatively few lung surgeries are performed without endostaplers. Although there are few staple-related adverse events, severe events must be shared to improve safety.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 74-year-old male suddenly collapsed and was transferred to the Emergency Rescue department. He had shock vitals and contrast-enhanced CT revealed extensive right hemothorax with contrast leakage. He lost consciousness and tension massive hemothorax was suspected. We performed emergency thoracotomy at two sites and were able to achieve hemostasis and save the patient. Upon examining the patient's medical history after his condition stabilized, it was revealed that he was a lung cancer patient who was taking ramucirumab and cilostazol. In addition, the CT scan taken one month before onset revealed the bleeding site of the fifth intercostal artery were almost contact with the staple line from a prior right spontaneous pneumothorax surgery that was performed 11 years previously, which was seemed to damage the intercostal artery.

CONCLUSION

Despite the difficulty in achieving hemostasis due to drug administration history, we successfully treated a case of remote period massive hemothorax attributed to staples, thereby saving the patient. When using drugs that increase the risk of bleeding events, it may be important to consider the position of the staple line while assessing the risk. In the emergent or ICU setting, if the initial incision is not effective, the placement of a new second incision may be valuable.

Quality of Life with Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies have improved the prognosis for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers (la/mUC) but little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with this mode of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of changes in HRQoL global health and domain scores in patients with la/mUC receiving mAb therapies.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

MEDLINE and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meeting databases were searched from January 2015 to June 18, 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were updated on February 3, 2023. Eligible studies were prospective trials assessing HRQoL in patients with la/mUC treated with mAbs. Patients treated for local disease or with radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone were excluded. Meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded. The validity of randomized trials was assessed using the Risk-of-Bias-2 (RoB2) tool and the strength of outcome evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The data were analyzed via qualitative synthesis of the evidence.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Of the 1066 studies identified, nine were included (2364 patients); eight were interventional trials and one was an observational study. The mean change in global health score ranged from -2.8 to 1.9. Constipation, fatigue and pain symptoms, and emotional, physical, role and social functioning improved with treatment in at least two studies. No study demonstrated a significant improvement in global health score. Eight studies reported stability. In the RANGE trial, the global health score decreased. Only two studies had high internal validity according to RoB2 assessment. The HRQoL domain certainty was low, with moderate certainty only for the pain symptom domain. Disease- and treatment-related symptoms, tumor shrinkage, and disease recurrence were correlated to HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient HRQoL with mAb therapies for la/mUC did not worsen over time. HRQoL is influenced by several factors related to treatment, tumor characteristics, and the patient's health condition. Evidence was moderate at best and further studies are needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We reviewed the evidence on health-related quality-of-life for patients with advanced bladder cancer treated with antibody therapies. We found that quality of life does not worsen on treatment, and sometimes improves. We conclude that these treatments do not negatively affect quality of life, but further studies are needed to draw solid conclusions.

Effect of massive ascites on ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in patients with gastrointestinal cancers: a population pharmacokinetic analysis

PURPOSE

Considerable amounts of injected immunoglobulin G-based therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, such as ramucirumab, are distributed into ascites. This study aimed to examine the effect of massive ascites on ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.

METHODS

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ramucirumab was performed using data on serum ramucirumab concentrations of 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancers, including 8 patients with massive ascites. The Bayesian method using the final population pharmacokinetic model was utilized to estimate trough ramucirumab concentrations after the first dose and at steady state.

RESULTS

Population pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that massive ascites as well as body weight were influencing factors for ramucirumab clearance. The estimated ramucirumab clearance was significantly higher in patients with massive ascites than in those with no/mild ascites (0.020 ± 0.004 versus 0.013 ± 0.004 L/h, P < 0.001). The estimated trough ramucirumab concentrations were significantly lower in patients with massive ascites than in those with no/mild ascites after the first dose (26.4 ± 6.8 versus 36.1 ± 7.1 μg/mL, P < 0.001) and at steady state (41.4 ± 16.3 versus 65.9 ± 18.0 μg/mL, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the present study, the presence of massive ascites affected the pharmacokinetics of ramucirumab in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Our results suggest that dose optimization of ramucirumab may be necessary in patients with massive ascites due to higher ramucirumab clearance.

Influence of background cardiovascular risk factors on VEGF inhibitor-related adverse vascular events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors are widely used in chemotherapy for non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of the current study was to examine the impact of background cardiovascular risk factors on VEGF inhibitor-related adverse vascular events (VEGF-related AVEs) in patients with NSCLC who also had comorbidities.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 118 NSCLC patients treated with bevacizumab or ramucirumab from April 2010 to December 2022. We compared baseline cardiovascular risk factors with VEGF-related AVEs.

RESULTS

VEGF-related AVEs and discontinuation due to VEGF-related AVEs were reported in 54 patients and 21 patients, respectively. VEGF-related AVEs were significantly more common with male sex, smoking history, history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, or cardiovascular disease. Discontinuation due to VEGF-related AVEs was significantly more common in patients with history of hypertension or chronic kidney disease. VEGF-related AVEs were significantly more common in patients with ≥ 3 cardiovascular risk factors than patients with < 3. Discontinuation due to VEGF-related AVEs was significantly more common in patients with ≥ 4 cardiovascular risk factors than patients with < 4. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that male sex, hypertension, and ≥ 6 cycles of VEGF inhibitors were each associated with VEGF-related AVEs and hypertension was associated with discontinuation due to VEGF-related AVEs.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that history of hypertension was independently associated with increased risk of both VEGF-related AVEs and discontinuation due to VEGF-related AVEs. In conclusion, we need to be aware of VEGF-related AVEs when using VEGF inhibitors for patients with ≥ 3 cardiovascular risk factors.

Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab With Primary Prophylactic Pegylated Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Support for Elderly Patients With Advanced NSCLC: A Multicenter Prospective Single Arm Phase 2 Trial: DRAGON Study (WJOG9416L)

Introduction

Docetaxel plus ramucirumab could be a promising treatment for chemo-naive elderly patients with NSCLC, but high incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is a critical concern. We thus adopted a routine primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) to reduce FN and maximize the efficacy of docetaxel plus ramucirumab in elderly patients.

Methods

This is a single arm phase 2 trial for chemo-naive elderly patients (aged ≥75 y) with advanced NSCLC. Docetaxel (60 mg/m2, d 1) plus ramucirumab (10 mg/kg, d 1) with PEG-G-CSF (3.6 mg, d 2) was administered every 3 weeks until progression. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) (expected ORR: 35%).

Results

Between February 2018 and January 2021, 54 patients were enrolled. Median age was 78 (range: 75-86). A total of 21 (38.9%) partial response, 22 (40.7%) stable disease, nine (16.7%) progressive disease, and two (3.7%) not assessable were confirmed, resulting in ORR of 38.9% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 27.7%-51.0%) and disease control rate of 79.6%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.2 (95% CI: 4.2-6.9) and 12.7 (95% CI: 10.2-18.9) months, respectively. There were one (1.9%) FN, two (3.7%) bleeding grade greater than or equal to 3, and one (1.9%) treatment-related death (pneumonitis). Pneumonitis occurred in five patients (9.3%). Main adverse events grade greater than or equal to 3 were observed: four (7%) thrombocytopenia; three (5.6%) neutropenia; six (11.1%) hyposodium; five (9.3%) infection; five (9.3%) hypertension; four (7.4%) anorexia; and three (5.6%) oral mucositis.

Conclusions

Docetaxel plus ramucirumab with PEG-G-CSF revealed efficacy and safety for chemo-naive elderly patients with NSCLC. Primary prophylactic PEG-G-CSF highly prevented FN.

Correlation Between Tumor Response and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer Receiving Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel as Second-Line Therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. The first-line treatment for GC is a combination of platinum and fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. Based on the positive results of RAINBOW and REGARD trials, ramucirumab either alone or in combination with paclitaxel has proved to be a safe and active option for second-line treatment in GC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Advanced GC patients who received a 28-day cycles of ramucirumab and paclitaxel until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity were evaluated. Eligible patients had ECOG PS ≤ 1 and adequate organ function. Baseline characteristics were assessed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used for survival analyses.

RESULTS

In our single institution experience, we included a total of 67 patients. A median OS of 8 months and a median PFS of 4 months, were recorded. In patients experiencing an initial partial response (PR), we observed a significant association between tumor response and survival outcomes (OS and PFS). The OS and PFS were 15 and 11 months in patients who experienced PR compared to 8 and 4 months in patients without PR (p = 0.02; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel yielded the highest overall response rate reported to date for patients with previously treated advanced GC. In our experience, the initial tumor response is associated with a greater survival benefit which could be further improved by the identification of biomarkers predicting response.

Randomised phase II trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus trifluridine/tipiracil for previously treated patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (RETRIEVE study, WJOG15822G)

BACKGROUND

Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in the third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC), esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. While single-arm phase II trials showed promising outcomes of FTD/TPI plus ramucirumab (RAM) as third- or later-line treatments for advanced GC or EGJ cancer, there have been no clinical trials to directly compare FTD/TPI plus RAM with FTD/TPI monotherapy. Therefore, we have started a randomised phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FTD/TPI plus RAM compared with FTD/TPI monotherapy as third- or later-line treatments in patients with advanced GC and EGJ adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This RETREVE trial (WJOG15822G) is a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre phase II trial comparing FTD/TPI plus RAM versus FTD/TPI monotherapy in a third- or later-line setting. Eligibility criteria include age of > 20 years; performance status of 0 or 1; unresectable or recurrent gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma; confirmed HER2 status; refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine, taxane or irinotecan; refractory to RAM (not intolerant); and at least a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily, evening of day 1 to morning of day 6 and evening of day 8 to morning of day 13) was administered orally every 4 weeks, and RAM (8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety. The expected hazard ratio of PFS is set as 0.7, assuming 4-month PFS rate of 27% in FTD/TPI monotherapy and 40% in FTD/TPI plus RAM. The number of subjects was 110, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.10 and power of 0.70.

DISCUSSION

This study will clarify the additional effect of RAM continuation beyond disease progression on FTD/TPI in the third- or later-line setting for patients with advanced GC or EGJ cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCTs041220120.

Ramucirumab plus irinotecan / leucovorin / 5-FU versus ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction, who failed one prior line of palliative chemotherapy: the phase II/III RAMIRIS study (AIO-STO-0415)

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab is the standard of care second-line therapy in gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). As the number of taxane pretreated patients in the perioperative or first-line setting is increasing, it is unknown whether these patients benefit from re-applying a taxane in using the combination of paclitaxel and ramucirumab. Furthermore, the rates of neurotoxicity with first-line FOLFOX or FLOT range from 30%-70%, making second-line taxane-containing therapy less suitable to a meaningful portion of patients. This patient group is likely to benefit from a taxane-free second-line chemotherapy regimen, such as FOLFIRI and ramucirumab (FOLFIRI-Ram). Therefore, the RAMIRIS phase III trial evaluates the effects of the regimen of FOLFIRI-Ram in the second-line treatment after a taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEA.

METHODS

The RAMIRIS trial is a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II/III study comparing treatment of FOLFIRI-Ram (arm A) with paclitaxel and ramucirumab (arm B). The Phase II is already closed with 111 enrolled patients. In the phase III, 318 taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to FOLFIRI (5-FU 2400 mg/m² over 46 h i.v., irinotecan 180 mg/m² i.v.; 5-FU 400 mg/m² bolus; leucovorin 400 mg/m² i.v.; on day 1 and 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm A) or paclitaxel 80 mg/m² (days 1, 8, 15, q28) with ramucirumab 8 mg/kg every two weeks (Arm B). The primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and objective overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate and safety and quality of life as assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

The already completed RAMIRIS phase II demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of FOLFIRI-Ram. Especially docetaxel-pretreated patients seemed to markedly benefit from FOLFIRI-Ram, with favorable response- and PFS rates and lower toxicity. This offers a rationale for the phase III trial. If the RAMIRIS III trial transfers and confirms the results, they will affect the current treatment guidelines, recommending the combination therapy of FOLFIRI-Ram for taxane-pretreated patients with advanced GEA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03081143 Date of registration: 13.11.2015.

Impact of prior bevacizumab therapy on the incidence of ramucirumab-induced proteinuria in colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

The association between prior bevacizumab (BEV) therapy and ramucirumab (RAM)-induced proteinuria is not known. We aimed to investigate this association in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

mCRC patients who received folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus RAM were divided into with and without prior BEV treatment groups. The cumulative incidence of grade 2-3 proteinuria and rate of RAM discontinuation within 6 months (6M) after RAM initiation were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

We evaluated 245 patients. In the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model including prior BEV, age, sex, comorbidities, eGFR, proteinuria ≥ 2 + at baseline, and later line of RAM, prior BEV treatment contributed to proteinuria onset (P < 0.01). A shorter interval between final BEV and initial RAM increased the proteinuria risk; the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the intervals of < 28 days, 28-55 days, and > 55 days (referring to prior BEV absence) were 2.60 (1.23-5.51), 1.51 (1.01-2.27), and 1.04 (0.76-1.44), respectively. The rate of RAM discontinuation for ≤ 6M due to anti-VEGF toxicities was significantly higher in the prior BEV treatment group compared with that in the no prior BEV treatment group (18% vs. 6%, P = 0.02). Second-line RAM discontinuation for ≤ 6M without progression resulted in shorter overall survival of 132 patients with prior BEV treatment (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Sequential FOLFIRI plus RAM after BEV failure, especially within 55 days, may exacerbate proteinuria. Its escalated anti-VEGF toxicity may negatively impact the overall survival.

A real-world study of Afatinib plus ramucirumab in treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent reports suggested combining ramucirumab with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to overcome EGFR resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, evidence supporting the activity of afatinib and ramucirumab is lacking. This study investigated the survival benefits and safety profile of afatinib plus ramucirumab in patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, metastatic NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were retrospectively retrieved. Patients who received first-line sequential afatinib followed by ramucirumab and the first-line combination of afatinib plus ramucirumab were included. The Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) of all included patients, patients on sequential afatinib followed by ramucirumab (PFS1), and patients on the up-front combination of afatinib and ramucirumab (PFS2).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included (25 women; median age: 63 [45-82] years). The median follow-up of the included patients was 17 months (range 6-89 months). the median PFS for the whole cohort was 71 months (95% CI 67.2-74.8) with eight events during the follow-up. The median PFS1 and PFS2 were 71 months (95 CI not defined) and 26 months (95% CI 18.6-33.4), respectively. In terms of OS, the median OS for all patients and patients on sequential treatment was not defined, while the median OS for patients on upfront combination was 30 months (95% CI 20.9-39.1). There was no significant association between EGFR mutation type and PFS1 or PFS2.

CONCLUSIONS

Afatinib plus ramucirumab could improve the PFS of patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC at a predictable safety profile. Our data also suggest a survival benefit of adding ramucirumab to afatinib in patients with uncommon mutations, which should be investigated further.

Exploratory Analysis of Patients With Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma With or Without Liver Metastasis From the Phase 3 RAINBOW Study

PURPOSE

Liver metastasis (LM) is reported in approximately 40% of patients with advanced/metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma; mGEA) and is associated with a worse prognosis. This post-hoc analysis from the RAINBOW trial reported the efficacy, safety, and biomarker outcomes of ramucirumab and paclitaxel combination treatment (RAM+PAC) in patients with (LM+) and without (LM-) LM at baseline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients (n=665) were randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis to receive either RAM+PAC (LM+: 150, LM-: 180) or placebo and paclitaxel (PL+PAC) (LM+: 138, LM-: 197). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using stratified Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. The correlation of dichotomized biomarkers (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) with efficacy in the LM+ versus LM- subgroups was analyzed using the Cox regression model with reported interaction P-values.

RESULTS

The presence of LM was associated with earlier progression than those without LM, particularly in patients receiving PL+PAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68). RAM+PAC treatment improved OS and PFS irrespective of LM status but showed greater improvement in LM+ than that in LM- (OS HR, 0.71 [LM+] vs. 0.88 [LM-]; PFS HR, 0.47 [LM+] vs. 0.76 [LM-]). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between patients with and without LM. No predictive relationship was observed between biomarker levels (VEGF-C, D; VEGFR-1,2) and efficacy outcome (OS, PFS) (all interaction P-values >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RAM provided a significant benefit, irrespective of LM status; however, its effect was numerically stronger in patients with LM. Therefore, RAM+PAC is a clinically meaningful therapeutic option for patients with mGEA and LM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01170663.

Sequencing strategies with ramucirumab and docetaxel following prior treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Ramucirumab (RAM) and docetaxel (DOC) are commonly used after first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we aimed to elucidate sequencing strategies of RAM and DOC following prior treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), cytotoxic agent (CTx) alone, bevacizumab (BEV), and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

METHODS

We recruited patients with NSCLC who received RAM and DOC and compared the groups with and without prior ICI, CTx alone, BEV, and TKI, respectively. By tumor response to such treatments, the patients were further classified into "complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)," "stable disease," and "progressive disease" groups, respectively. We compared RAM and DOC efficacy among these groups.

RESULTS

In total, 237 patients were registered. In the group with prior ICI, the objective response rate and disease control rate were significantly higher than those without prior ICI (p = 0.012 and 0.028, respectively), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was also significantly longer (p = 0.027). There were no significant differences in PFS between the groups with and without CTx alone, BEV, and TKI. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior ICI was an independent factor associated with better PFS. Furthermore, the prior ICI group with CR + PR significantly prolonged PFS compared to the group without prior ICI (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

RAM and DOC may be preferably administered after ICI, rather than after CTx alone, BEV, or TKI, and, furthermore, enhanced if the prior ICI has a favorable tumor response.

Anti-angiogenic agents for NSCLC following first-line immunotherapy: Rationale, recent updates, and future perspectives

The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with or without chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for patients who do not have actionable mutations has proved to be a major paradigm shift in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the transition of ICIs, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, to a first-line setting has left an unmet need for effective second-line treatment options, which is an area of intense research. In 2020, we reviewed the biological and mechanistic rationale for anti-angiogenic agents in combination with, or following, immunotherapy with the aim of eliciting a so called 'angio-immunogenic' switch in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the latest clinical evidence of the benefits of incorporating anti-angiogenic agents into treatment regimens. While there is a paucity of prospective data, several recent observational studies indicate that the marketed anti-angiogenic drugs, nintedanib or ramucirumab, are effective in combination with docetaxel following immuno-chemotherapy. Addition of anti-angiogenics, like bevacizumab, have also demonstrated clinical benefit when combined with first-line immuno-chemotherapy regimens. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing these agents in combination with ICIs, with encouraging early results (e.g., ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in LUNG-MAP S1800A). Also, several emerging anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs are currently being assessed in phase III trials following immunotherapy, including lenvatinib (LEAP-008), and sitravatinib (SAPPHIRE) It is hoped that these trials will help expand second-line treatment options in patients with NSCLC. Areas of focus in the future will include further molecular dissection of the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and the various response-progression profiles to immunotherapy observed in the clinic and the monitoring of the dynamics of immunomodulation over the course of treatment. Improved understanding of these phenomena may help identify clinical biomarkers and inform the optimal use of anti-angiogenics in the treatment of individual patients.

Use of ramucirumab for various treatment lines in real-world practice of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Ramucirumab was shown to be effective as a second-line treatment after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with alpha-fetoprotein levels > 400 ng/mL in a worldwide phase 3 trial. Ramucirumab is used in patients pretreated with various systemic therapies in clinical practice. We retrospectively examined the treatment outcomes of ramucirumab administered to advanced HCC patients after diverse systemic therapies.

METHODS

Data were collected from patients with advanced HCC who received ramucirumab at three institutions in Japan. Radiological assessments were determined according to both Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 and modified RECIST and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 was used to assess adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients treated with ramucirumab between June 2019 and March 2021 were included in the study. Ramucirumab was administered as second, third, fourth, and fifth-line treatment in 13 (35.1%), 14 (37.8%), eight (21.6%), and two (5.4%) patients, respectively. Most patients (29.7%) who received ramucirumab as a second-line therapy were pretreated with lenvatinib. We found grade 3 or higher adverse events only in seven patients and no significant changes in the albumin-bilirubin score during ramucirumab treatment in the present cohort. The median progression-free survival of patients treated with ramucirumab was 2.7 months (95% confidence interval, 1.6-7.3).

CONCLUSION

Although ramucirumab is used for various lines of treatment other than second-line immediately after sorafenib, its safety and effectiveness were not significantly different from the findings of the REACH-2 trial.

Impact of ramucirumab pharmacokinetics in combination with docetaxel on the efficacy and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody, has been approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its pharmacokinetic properties in clinical practice are unknown. We aimed to measure ramucirumab concentrations and conduct a retrospective pharmacokinetic analysis using real-world data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III-IV and recurrent NSCLC who received ramucirumab plus docetaxel were evaluated in this study. After the first administration, the ramucirumab trough concentration (C_trough) was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Patient characteristics, adverse events, tumor response, and survival time were retrospectively extracted from medical records from August 2, 2016 to July 16, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were examined to assess serum ramucirumab concentrations. C_trough ranged from below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ) to 48.8 µg/mL (BLQ ≤ 1st quartile (Q1) ≤ 7.34, 7.34 < 2nd quartile (Q2) ≤ 14.7, 14.7 < 3rd quartile (Q3) ≤ 21.9 and 21.9 < 4th quartile (Q4) ≤ 48.8 µg/mL). The overall response rate was significantly higher in Q2-4 than that in Q1 (p = 0.011). The median progression-free survival was marginally longer, and overall survival was significantly longer in Q2-4 (p = 0.009). The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in Q1 was significantly higher than in Q2-4 (p = 0.034) and associated with C_trough (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Patients with higher ramucirumab exposure had a high ORR and prolonged survival time, whereas patients with lower ramucirumab exposure were characterized by a high GPS and poor prognosis. Cachexia may reduce the exposure level of ramucirumab in certain patients, reducing the clinical benefits of ramucirumab treatment.

Treatment efficacy of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy in patients with alpha-fetoprotein producing gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Alpha-Fetoprotein Producing Gastric Cancer (AFPGC) is an aggressive subgroup of gastric cancer. Recently ramucirumab has shown survival benefits in hepatocellular carcinoma, but only in those with higher Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) levels. However, the efficacy of ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy in AFPGC remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 352 patients who received ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy between June 2015 and December 2019. AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were elevated at diagnosis and correlated with the disease state during treatment. Non-AFPGC was defined when serum AFP levels were normal at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among the 352 patients, 28 patients were defined as AFPGC and 246 patients were defined as non-AFPGC. AFPGC was characterized by high frequency of liver metastasis and low frequency of peritoneal metastasis compared to non-AFPGC. Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response rates in AFPGC (39.1% vs 24.8%, p = 0.198) and disease control rates (86.9% vs 61.5%, p = 0.028) than those of non-AFPGC, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months (95%CI 3.9-7.1) in AFPGC and 4.0 months (95%CI 3.6-4.6) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.36, p = 0.66), and median overall survival (OS) was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.4-20.8) in AFPGC and 9.2 months (95% CI 8.1-10.4) in non-AFPGC (HR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.08, p = 0.11), respectively. In multivariate analysis, AFPGC was not a negative prognostic factor both for PFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab containing chemotherapy showed higher response and comparable survival in AFPGC compared to those of non-AFPGC. Considering the generally poor prognosis of AFPGC, ramucirumab-containing chemotherapy might be a promising treatment option in AFPGC.

Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in Chinese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and elevated alpha-fetoprotein after sorafenib (REACH-2 China): A randomised, multicentre, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

In the global REACH-2 study, ramucirumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). REACH-2 China study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in Chinese patients with advanced HCC (NCT02435433).

METHODS

REACH-2 China was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done at 31 centres in China between Sep 16, 2015, and March 15, 2021. Patients with advanced HCC and AFP ≥400 ng/mL after first-line sorafenib were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously or placebo Q2W, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was OS. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat, and safety in patients who received any treatment.

FINDINGS

Of 104 Chinese patients enrolled (44 in the global study and 60 in the China extension study), 70 received ramucirumab and 34 received placebo. Median OS was 9·1 months in the ramucirumab group and 6·2 months in the placebo group (HR = 0·854 [95% CI: 0·536, 1·359]). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event were hypertension (5 [7·1%] of 70 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 1 [2.9%] of 34 in the placebo group), pneumonia (5 [7·1%] vs 1 [2·9%]), and hyponatraemia (4 [5·7%] vs 0 [0%]).

INTERPRETATION

Ramucirumab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS compared to placebo for Chinese patients with advanced HCC and elevated AFP, although lacking statistical superiority. Ramucirumab was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile. The results are consistent with those of the global REACH-2 study, supporting a favourable risk-benefit profile for ramucirumab in this population.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company, USA.

Ramucirumab plus triplet chemotherapy as an alternative salvage treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab is indicated for salvage treatment after failure of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the application of ramucirumab at later-line treatment in real-world practice has not received much discussion.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 70 patients with mCRC who received ramucirumab plus chemotherapy at National Taiwan University Hospital between 2018 and 2019.

RESULTS

Compared with those who received third- or later-line ramucirumab treatment, patients who received second-line ramucirumab treatment had significantly longer median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD; 6.7 vs 3.6 months, P = .004) and median overall survival (mOS; not reached vs 7.6 months, P = .009). Multivariate analyses revealed that second-line ramucirumab and triplet chemotherapy backbone were the only independent predictive factors for long mTTD and mOS. Patients who received ramucirumab with triplet chemotherapy had a significantly longer mOS than did patients who received ramucirumab with doublet chemotherapy (not reached vs 5.6 months, P = .002). Among those receiving second-line ramucirumab treatment, combination with triplet chemotherapy led to a longer mTTD than did combination with doublet chemotherapy, but the difference was non-significant (not reached vs 4.4 months, P = .108). By contrast, in patients receiving fourth- or later-line ramucirumab, combination with triplet chemotherapy led to significantly longer mTTD than did combination with doublet chemotherapy (8.0 vs 2.9 months, P = .032).

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab plus triplet chemotherapy may be an alternative regimen in patients with mCRC, particularly as a later-line treatment modality.

Distribution of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies into ascites in advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: case reports and literature review

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, including ramucirumab and nivolumab, are used to treat advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Malignant ascites is often accompanied by peritoneal metastasis in AGC patients. However, the distribution of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies into ascites has yet to be adequately investigated.

METHODS

We determined serum and ascites concentrations of ramucirumab or nivolumab and total IgG in three AGC patients with massive ascites. When serum and ascites samples were obtained on the same day, the ascites-to-serum ratio (A/S ratio) of the concentration of monoclonal antibodies was evaluated. The relationship between time after last infusion and the A/S ratio of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies was examined using 15 datasets from the present study and the literature.

RESULTS

Ramucirumab and nivolumab were detected in massive ascites at considerable amounts (A/S ratios of 0.24-0.35 for ramucirumab and 0.17-0.55 for nivolumab). A positive correlation was detected between the A/S ratios of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and the time after last infusion (r = 0.747). Removal of ascites using paracentesis eliminated at least 15.3%-30.3% and 5.2-27.4% of the injected ramucirumab and nivolumab, respectively. Endogenous IgG, as well as therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, were distributed into ascites; the A/S ratios for IgG were 0.22-0.45.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, including ramucirumab and nivolumab, are distributed into massive ascites in AGC patients concomitantly with endogenous IgG. In these patients, retention of ascites and its removal may result in decreased systemic drug exposure to ramucirumab and nivolumab.

Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy in second-line (2L) advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) based on HER2 status and analyze prognostic factors.

METHODS

The study includes patients from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry with aGEC and known HER2 status who received 2L between 2016 and 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and multivariable Cox regression analysis was done to adjust for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Of the 552 patients who met the selection criteria, 149 (26.9%) had HER2-positive aGEC, 89 were treated with chemotherapy, and 60 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel, and 403 had an HER2-negative aGEC, 259 were treated with chemotherapy, and 144 with ramucirumab-paclitaxel. In the whole sample, 2L PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8-3.2), 2L OS, 5.7 months (5.2-6.3), and ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.78, p < 0.0001) and OS (HR 0.68, 0.55-0.83, p = 0.0002). Median PFS of ramucirumab- paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 3.5 vs 2.8 months (HR 0.67, 0.54-0.83, p = 0.0004) in HER2-negative, and 4.7 vs 2.7 months (HR 0.57, 0.40-0.82, p = 0.0031) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. Median OS for ramucirumab-paclitaxel versus chemotherapy was 6.6 vs 5 months (HR 0.67, 0.53-0.85, p = 0.0007) in HER2-negative, and 7.4 vs 5.6 months (HR 0.70, 0.53-1.04, p = 0.083) in HER2-positive aGEC, respectively. ECOG-PS, tumor burden, Lauren subtype, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with an aGEC from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry, 2L treatment with ramucirumab-paclitaxel was superior to chemotherapy in PFS, OS and response rate, independent of HER2 status.

RELAY, ramucirumab plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib in untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: exposure-response relationship

PURPOSE

In RELAY, ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with untreated, metastatic, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present the exposure-response relationship of RAM from RELAY.

METHODS

Patients received ERL (150 mg/day) with either RAM (10 mg/kg) or placebo (PBO + ERL) every 2 weeks (Q2W). A population pharmacokinetic model predicted RAM minimum concentration after first dose (Cmin,1), and at steady state (Cmin,ss), which were used to evaluate correlation between RAM exposure and efficacy and safety. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were utilized to evaluate exposure-efficacy by Cmin,1 quartile. Exposure-safety was evaluated by assessing incidence rates for safety parameters by Cmin,ss quartile, with ordered categorical analysis used for ALT/AST only.

RESULTS

Analyses included 216 patients treated with RAM + ERL and 225 patients treated with PBO + ERL. Adjusting for significant baseline covariates, no exposure-efficacy relationship was identified in RELAY: PFS hazard ratio (mean, 95% confidence intervals) for the Cmin,1 quartiles were 0.67 (0.45-0.99), 0.77 (0.53-1.12), 0.57 (0.38-0.84), and 0.50 (0.33-0.76). No apparent exposure-safety relationship was observed for selected safety endpoints, including Grade ≥ 3 hypertension, diarrhea, and dermatitis acneiform, and any grade hypertension, any grade and Grade ≥ 3 proteinuria, and any grade ALT/AST increased within liver failure/liver injury.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was observed between RAM exposure and response, suggesting that the RELAY regimen of RAM 10 mg/kg Q2W with ERL is an optimized, efficacious, and safe first-line treatment for patients with untreated, metastatic, EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02411448.

Protocol of OGSG 1901: a phase II trial of ramucirumab plus irinotecan for patients with early relapsed gastric cancer during or after adjuvant docetaxel plus S - 1 therapy

BACKGROUND

Although docetaxel plus S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy has been a standard of treatment for stage III gastric cancer, there is no established chemotherapy for patients with recurrence during or within six months after the completion of adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy.

METHODS

The OGSG 1901 trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II trial evaluating ramucirumab plus irinotecan for gastric cancer patients with early relapse after adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy. The key eligibility criteria were: 1) histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma 2) patients who were on docetaxel plus S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after the confirmation of pathological stage III, 3) patients with early relapse, i.e., recurrence during or within 6 months after the completion of docetaxel plus S-1 therapy, and 4) patient with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2, day 1) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg, day 1) will be administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints are overall response rate, progression-free survival, and safety. The number of patients has been set at 40 based on the threshold and expected median survival times of 7 and 11 months, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.05 and power of 0.80. The enrollment and follow-up periods are 2 and 1.5 years, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The results of this trial will indicate whether the ramucirumab with irinotecan regimen has the potential to be a recommended treatment regimen for patients with recurrence gastric cancer during or within 6 months after the completion of adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ( jRCTs05119071 , October 6, 2019).

Second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Time for more individualized treatment options?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequently diagnosed primary tumor of the liver and is usually detected as advanced disease. It is an aggressive disease that often progresses rapidly when it fails to respond to treatment. As such, patients have limited opportunities to try different subsequent-line treatment regimens. In the last 5 years, the number of agents and/or regimens available for the treatment of advanced HCC has significantly increased, which has made treatment choices for this patient population increasingly complex. In the second-line setting, several phase III trials of regorafenib (RESORCE), ramucirumab (REACH/REACH-2), and cabozantinib (CELESTIAL) have demonstrated clinically meaningful survival benefits in patients with the disease. However, the median overall survival of patients with advanced HCC remains unchanged at approximately 12 mo from the start of systemic second-line therapy, with a limited duration of response. Evidence from the REACH/REACH-2 trials demonstrated for the first time that baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels can be used as an identification factor to select those who are likely to benefit the most from ramucirumab treatment. Ramucirumab is both well tolerated and efficacious and has a clinically acceptable safety profile. Therefore, it should be considered an option for patients with AFP levels ≥ 400 ng/mL.

Real-World Data Analysis of Second-Line Antiangiogenic Targeted Treatments Following Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies and First-Line FOLFOX for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Introduction

Evidence is lacking on second-line and later treatments for patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer (CRC) who receive first-line anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy. In this study, we explored the real-world treatment sequences, treatment duration, and factors associated with treatment sequences and durations in Japanese patients with CRC.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study used a Japanese administrative claims database (April 2008 to July 2021). Patients with confirmed CRC (presumed RAS wild-type) who received first-line FOLFOX (leucovorin + 5-fluorouracil + oxaliplatin) plus anti-EGFR therapy in or after May 2016, followed by second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy plus an antiangiogenic drug, were included. Treatment durations were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with treatment duration.

Results

Analysis populations consisted of 1163 (first-line and second-line) and 645 (third-line) patients. At the start of first-line therapy, 67.8% of patients were male, the mean age was 64 years, 83.4% had left-sided CRC, and 84.3% were prescribed FOLFOX plus panitumumab. For second-line therapy, patients were prescribed bevacizumab (63%), ramucirumab (27%), or aflibercept beta (10%). Median (95% CI) treatment durations from the start of second-line therapy to the end of antitumor drug therapies were similar for bevacizumab (12.5 months [11.2, 14.0]), ramucirumab (12.5 months [11.2, 14.8]), and aflibercept beta (14.0 months [10.4, 17.0]). Treatment duration from second-line was positively associated with first-line treatment duration of 6 months or more, CRC surgery before starting first-line therapy, and liver surgery during first-line therapy, and was negatively associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs before second-line therapy.

Conclusion

Real-world data revealed that all three antiangiogenic drugs were used as second-line therapy after first-line anti-EGFR antibodies and showed similar treatment durations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02122-4.

Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab and docetaxel in previously treated patients with squamous cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RAM/DOC) therapy is currently the standard for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), irrespective of histology. However, in the clinical trial, only the first-line platinum-based chemotherapy refractory patients were enrolled and the eligible criteria was strict to avoid hemoptysis, especially in squamous cell NSCLC (Sq). Thus, the efficacy and safety data on ramucirumab for Sq in real-world settings after immune checkpoint inhibitors monotherapy or combination therapy approved as novel first-line therapy is lacking.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent RAM/DOC therapy at four institutions. Clinical data on the initiation of RAM/DOC were collected from medical records. Treatment outcomes were assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

Overall, 237 patients with NSCLC were included and 38 (16%) had squamous cell carcinoma. There were no significant differences in median progression-free survival and overall survival between Sq and non-Sq patients (5.8 months vs. 4.3 months, P = 0.0937; 15.2 months vs. 13.4 months, P = 0.714, respectively). Of all patients, 13 (5%) developed pulmonary hemorrhage. According to histological analysis, there was no significant difference in pulmonary hemorrhage proportion between Sq and non-Sq cohorts (2/38 vs. 11/199, respectively, P = 0.947).

CONCLUSIONS

For previously treated patients with Sq, the efficacy and safety of RAM/DOC therapy were confirmed in a real-world setting and were similar to non-Sq.

SOCRATE-PRODIGE 55 trial: A randomized phase II study to evaluate second-line ramucirumab alone or with paclitaxel in older patients with advanced gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients ≥ 70 years old constitute 40% of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). Ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel is a therapeutic option validated in the second-line treatment of advanced GC, but as older patients are at higher risk of severe toxicity, due to comorbidities and/or frailty, we aimed to evaluate second-line Ramucirumab alone or combined with Paclitaxel in terms of overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) in patients ≥ 70 years-old with advanced GC.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-comparative, prospective phase II clinical trial, the main inclusion criteria are: patients ≥ 70 years old, with advanced GC having progressed after first-line chemotherapy or in the six months following the last administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, with WHO performance status <2. They are randomized to receive either ramucirumab alone (arm A) or ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel (arm B). The primary endpoint is 6-month OS and QoL evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 questionnaire. The secondary endpoints include other parameters of QoL, time to definitive deterioration (TTDD) in QoL and TTDD in autonomy, treatment toxicities, other parameters of survival and disease control, identification of geriatric and nutritional prognostic scores and predictive factors of treatment safety and efficacy. OS of 60% is expected at 6 months (H0:40%). Using a Simon-minimax design, with one-sided α risk of 2% and 80% power for OS, and considering 5% lost to follow-up, it is necessary to randomize 56 patients in each arm.

PERSPECTIVES

As older patients are at higher risk of chemotherapy toxicity, ramucirumab alone could be an interesting alternative to Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab, as a second-line therapy for patients ≥ 70 years old with advanced GC, and needs to be evaluated.

Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment in HER2-positive gastric cancer: subgroup analysis of a nationwide, real-world study in Korea (KCSG-ST19-16)

BACKGROUND

A subgroup analysis of data from a nationwide study (KCSG-ST19-16) was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The KCSG-ST19-16 study enrolled a total of 1063 patients from 56 hospitals in South Korea with advanced gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, who had received second-line treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel. HER2 status was known for 994 (93.5%) of these patients, who were thus included in the subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 163 of 994 patients (16.4%), had HER2-positive gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment was significantly higher in patients with HER2-positive disease compared to those with HER2-negative disease (23.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.9-30.1] vs. 15.1% [95% CI, 12.3-17.9], p = 0.025). The median progression-free survival was longer in patients with HER2-positive versus HER2-negative disease, but the difference was not statistically significant (4.3 months [95% CI, 3.7-5.3] vs 3.7 months [95% CI, 3.4-4.0], p = 0.054). There was no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the groups (9.8 months [95% CI, 8.9-12.3] vs 10.1 months [95% CI, 9.2-10.9], p = 0.564).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HER2-positive gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, the objective response rate to second-line treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel was significantly higher compared to patients with HER2-negative disease. However, an increased response to treatment was not associated with an improvement in OS.

A phase II multicenter trial assessing the efficacy and safety of first-line S-1 + ramucirumab in elderly patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer: KSCC1701

BACKGROUND

The mainstream first-line chemotherapy for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer (ARGC) is combination therapy including platinum-based agents. With the progressive aging of the society, the incidence of gastric cancer in elderly patients is increasing. However, elderly patients cannot tolerate these agents because of renal dysfunction or low quality of life. The KSCC1701 study explored the efficacy and safety of S-1 + ramucirumab in elderly patients with ARGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients aged ≥70 years with ARGC were eligible. Patients received S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily for 4 weeks in 6-week cycles) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression. The primary end-point was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate. The anticipated lower threshold of 1-year survival was set at 40% in light of previous S-1-based regimens. The secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), OS, the overall response rate (ORR) and safety.

RESULTS

Between September 2017 and November 2019, 48 patients (34 men and 14 women) were enrolled in this study. The median patient age was 77.5 years, and all patients had a performance status of 0 (n = 20) or 1 (n = 28). The 1-year OS rate was 65.2%, which met the primary end-point. The median survival time and median PFS were 16.4 and 5.8 months, respectively. The ORR was 41.9%. The most frequent grade 3/4 (≥15%) adverse events were neutropenia, anorexia and anaemia.

CONCLUSION

Considering these findings, S-1 + ramucirumab appears to be an excellent treatment option for elderly patients with ARGC. (250 words). This trial has been registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Registry under the number jRCTs071180066.

Opposite response of lung adenocarcinoma and its choroidal metastases upon ramucirumab plus docetaxel therapy after immunotherapy: a case report

We report a unique case of advanced non-small cell lung cancer that exhibited the opposite response to its unilateral choroidal metastases upon ramucirumab plus docetaxel treatment. A combination of cisplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab was administered as first-line treatment, resulting in shrinkage of all the lesions. However, although the patient was continued on a course of pembrolizumab, all the lesions had recurred approximately two months later. Ramucirumab plus docetaxel, administered as sequential treatment, resulted in maintained shrinkage of the choroidal lesions, yet all the other lesions progressed. Ramucirumab may be a suitable therapy for choroidal metastases, especially if administered immediately after immunotherapy.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis (CROSS SELL study)

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX + RAM) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is an improved, more convenient form of PTX and is non-inferior to PTX. Although some retrospective and single-arm phase II studies regarding nab-PTX + RAM have been reported, comparative studies are lacking. Here, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of nab-PTX + RAM and PTX + RAM using propensity score matching.

METHODS

Clinical data of 265 patients treated for AGC with nab-PTX + RAM or PTX + RAM were retrospectively collected. Nab-PTX was administered at dosages of 100 mg/m2, replacing PTX in the standard PTX + RAM regimen. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

In total, 190 (72%) patients were matched. The median PFS was 5.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-6.3] and 4.7 (95% CI 3.2-5.3) months in the nab-PTX + RAM and PTX + RAM groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.03, p = 0.07]. The median OS was 11.5 (95% CI 9.2-15.0) and 9.9 (95% CI 8.0-12.7) months, respectively (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.07, p = 0.12). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed more frequently in the nab-PTX + RAM group (72% vs. 56%, p = 0.03). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Nab-PTX + RAM exhibited more favorable trends in terms of PFS and OS but was more myelosuppressive than PTX + RAM. As neutropenia is commonly manageable toxicity, nab-PTX + RAM presents a treatment alternative for AGC. Further studies including randomized, controlled studies are warranted.

FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with or without prior docetaxel - results from the phase II RAMIRIS Study of the German Gastric Cancer Study Group at AIO

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab and paclitaxel is the standard second-line therapy in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We report the efficacy and safety analyses of FOLFIRI and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab after the failure of a platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy.

METHODS

This multicenter, investigator initiated, phase II trial randomised patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to either FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM) (arm A) or paclitaxel plus RAM (arm B). The primary end-point was 6-month overall survival (OS) rate, with a proportion of ≥65% in arm A considered a positive signal for further investigation.

RESULTS

111 patients (65% of patients had prior docetaxel) were enrolled and 110 patients qualified for ITT population (arm A, 72; arm B, 38). The study did not meet the primary end-point for the comparison with historical control, as 6-month OS rate in the FOLFIRI plus RAM arm was 54% (95% CI 44-67). In between arm comparison, OS was similar (hazard ratio, HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.62-1.52]), while objective response rates (ORRs) and PFS were numerically better in arm A versus arm B (HR for PFS 0.73; ORR, 22% versus 11%). These differences were largely attributed to favourable efficacy results for arm A in docetaxel-pretreated patients (HR, 0.49; ORR, 25% versus 8%). In the safety population (n = 106), grade 3-5 adverse events were similar between arms (arm A, 75%; arm B, 68%).

CONCLUSION

The RAMIRIS trial demonstrated feasibility of FOLFIRI plus RAM. While the study was formally negative, it provided a signal to further investigate this combination for the group of patients with previous docetaxel therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03081143.

Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Ramucirumab (RAM) plus Docetaxel (DOC) is one of the standard treatments after first-line treatment failure in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of RAM plus DOC in older patients. We aimed to clarify these and elucidate the prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study, conducted at four medical facilities in Japan, we evaluated the efficacy and safety data for two groups (<65 and ≥ 65 years). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to reveal the prognostic factors for better PFS and OS. Patient characteristics and adverse events (AEs) in both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney's U and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 237 patients were included, of whom 43% (n = 103), and 57% (n = 134) were aged <65, and ≥ 65 years. Median OS was 12.2 (95% CI: 9.4-15.0), and 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.8-18.8), respectively, and there were no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.534). Multivariate analysis identified DOC dose reduction (none vs performed, HR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.62-4.35, p < 0.001) as an independent prognostic factor for OS in older patients, and a similar result was shown for the PFS. Grade ≥ 3 all AEs were identified in 42.7% and 56.7% of younger and older patients, respectively, and there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.033); however, the difference between the groups disappeared with primary DOC dose reduction (p = 0.526).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of RAM plus DOC administration in older, pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC was comparable to those of younger patients, whereas RAM plus DOC should be cautiously administered to older patients because of severe toxicity. Moreover, appropriate DOC dose reduction may be recommended for increased survival benefit and safety in such patients.

Phase I/Ib study of crenolanib with ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second-line therapy for advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab is a standard second-line regimen for patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, but clinical benefit remains modest. One potential resistance mechanism to VEGFR2 inhibition is activation of the PDGF/PDGFR pathway, which can be blocked by the selective inhibitor crenolanib. Therefore, we performed a phase I/Ib study of crenolanib in combination with paclitaxel/ramucirumab.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma refractory to first-line therapy received escalating doses of crenolanib [60 mg twice daily (BID) to 100 mg three times daily (TID)] in combination with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 and ramucirumab 8 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary objective was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of crenolanib. Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion cohort to assess 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) at the MTD.

RESULTS

We enrolled 19 patients in the dose escalation phase and 8 patients in the dose expansion phase at the MTD of crenolanib 100 mg BID. Common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events included leukopenia (19%), anemia (11%) and neutropenia (11%). In the 14 patients treated at the MTD, 6-month PFS was 43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23-78%] and the objective response rate (ORR) was 42% (95% CI 15-72%). The trial was terminated early due to withdrawal of crenolanib by the sponsor.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of crenolanib to paclitaxel/ramucirumab is safe and well-tolerated at a dose level up to 100 mg BID.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03193918. June 19, 2017.

Phase 1b study of ramucirumab in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin in chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown the potentials of anti-angiogenesis inhibitors in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This single-institutional phase 1b study aimed to determine the recommended dose of ramucirumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody) in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin for extensive-stage SCLC.

METHODS

Chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage SCLC were enrolled and received ramucirumab (day 1 and 15) with irinotecan (60 mg/m2, day 1, 8, and 15) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2, day 1) every 4 weeks for four cycles, followed by biweekly maintenance ramucirumab. The recommended ramucirumab dose (10 or 8 mg/kg) was determined using a traditional 3 + 3 design, and the number of patients treated at the recommended dose was set at 10 to evaluate drug efficacy and tolerability (UMIN000032671).

RESULTS

The first 3 patients that received irinotecan plus cisplatin with ramucirumab 10 mg/kg did not experience dose-limiting toxicities. Thus, the recommended dose of ramucirumab was set at 10 mg/kg, and 10 patients received this dose. The objective response rate was 100% (95% CI, 69-100%), with a median progression-free survival of 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.3-9.0) and median overall survival of 22.4 months (95% CI, 12.1-not reached). Grade 3 neutropenia and hypertension were observed in 4 and 2 patients, respectively. No ramucirumab-related deaths were noted; hypertension and bleeding events were observed in 5 and 6 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the satisfactory tolerability and efficacy of ramucirumab at 10 mg/kg in combination with irinotecan plus cisplatin in chemo-naïve patients with extensive-stage SCLC.

Evolution of Survival Impact of Molecular Target Agents in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is expected to improve as multiple molecular target agents (MTAs) are now available. However, the impact of the availability of sequential MTAs has not been fully verified yet.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We retrospectively collected the data on the whole clinical course of 877 patients who received any MTAs as first-line systemic therapy for advanced HCC between June 2009 and March 2019. The study population was divided into 3 groups according to the date of first-line MTA administration (period 1: 2009-2012, n = 267; period 2: 2013-2016, n = 352; period 3: 2017-2019, n = 258). Then, we compared the number of MTAs used, overall survival (OS), and MTA treatment duration among the 3 groups. Analysis was also performed separately for advanced-stage and nonadvanced-stage HCC. The proportion of patients who received multiple MTAs was remarkably increased over time (1.1%, 10.2%, and 42.6% in periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively, p < 0.001). The median OS times were prolonged to 10.4, 11.3, and 15.2 months in periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.016). Similarly, the MTA treatment durations were extended (2.7, 3.2, and 6.6 months in periods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p < 0.001). We confirmed that the correlation between OS and MTA treatment duration was strengthened (period 1: 0.395, period 2: 0.505, and period 3: 0.667). All these trends were pronounced in the patients with advanced-stage HCC but limited in the patients with nonadvanced-stage HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

The availability of multiple MTAs had steadily improved the prognosis of patients with advanced HCC patients, particularly advanced-stage HCC patients.

Phase 1b study of ramucirumab in combination with erlotinib or osimertinib for untreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients with asymptomatic brain metastases

OBJECTIVES

The study was designed to investigate the safety of ramucirumab administered in combination with erlotinib or osimertinib for patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and asymptomatic brain metastases, a patient subgroup in which these regimens have remained untested.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase 1b study (RELAY-Brain) consisted of two cohorts with three patients each. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases received ramucirumab every 2 weeks plus either daily oral erlotinib or osimertinib until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage of grade ≥ 2.

RESULTS

Six patients were enrolled. Neither DLT nor serious or unexpected adverse events were observed. One treatment-related adverse event of grade ≥ 3 (hypertension of grade 3) was apparent. Common adverse events were generally manageable. The median number of ramucirumab administrations was 18.5 (range, 13 to 31), and there were no detected episodes of CNS hemorrhage. Five of the six patients showed an objective systemic response. Although only one patient had a measurable CNS lesion at baseline, a confirmed intracranial partial response was observed.

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab in combination with erlotinib or osimertinib showed safety for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with brain metastases.

Ramucirumab in combination with dacarbazine in patients with progressive well-differentiated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (RamuNET): study protocol for a multicenter single-arm trial

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic chemotherapy combinations and targeted agents represent established treatment concepts in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). However, response rates, side effects and outcome data strongly vary among these therapeutic approaches. Head-to-head comparisons between chemo- and molecular therapies are missing and secondary resistances frequently occur. The RamuNET trial aims to identify the effectiveness of dual treatment with DTIC and ramucirumab in progressive advanced PNET patients.

METHODS

The RamuNET study is an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective single-arm trial to evaluate the efficacy of ramucirumab in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC) over a period of at least 6 months. Patients with progressive well-differentiated and metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are eligible. The study aims to include 45 patients over a period of 24 months with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The primary endpoint is disease control after 6 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, biochemical response, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. Based on the hypothesis that 80% of the patients can achieve a disease control after 6 months, the sample size calculation follows an exact binomial single-stage design. H0: p < =p0 = 60% versus H1: p > =p1 = 80%, alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.1.

DISCUSSION

This study investigates a new therapeutic approach using the combination of cytotoxic and targeted antiangiogenic therapy in advanced PNET. If positive, this trial will be the basis for a randomized two-arm study to investigate the combination of ramucirumab and DTIC against other established therapies in PNET.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT: 2017-001207-68 . Date of registration: 2018.01.03.

Infusion-related reaction to ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

An infusion-related reaction (IRR) is a well-known adverse event related to monoclonal antibodies, and antihistamine premedication is recommended to prevent IRRs. Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy is the standard second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Ramucirumab is a fully human antibody, suggesting that the incidence of IRRs is lower, however, the current recommendation for the proper use of ramucirumab is antihistamine premedication, but the incidence and severity of ramucirumab-induced IRR without antihistamine premedication have not been elucidated.

METHODS

A retrospective study to evaluate the incidence of ramucirumab-induced IRRs in unresectable CRC patients treated by ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy. If the incidence of IRR without antihistamine premedication was not higher than that of cetuximab in a previous report (5.7%), planning a prospective study was considered.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with unresectable CRC who had been treated by ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy were identified. Of them, 106 (72%) patients received intravenous antihistamine premedication. An IRR occurred in 2 patients (1.4%), 1 grade 2 and 1 grade 3. They received antihistamine and steroid premedication. On the other hand, IRRs were not observed in 41 patients without antihistamine premedication, and the incidence of IRRs was significantly lower compared with the previous report of cetuximab (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ramucirumab-induced IRRs without antihistamine premedication is low. Not using antihistamine premedication can decrease medical costs. These findings warrant further investigation in large-scale cohorts to clarify the incidence and severity of ramucirumab-induced IRRs and further clarify the proper use of ramucirumab.

A post-marketing observational study of ramucirumab in patients with gastric cancer in Japan

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ramucirumab monotherapy and combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer in the real-world setting.

METHODS

This single-arm, prospective, multicenter, non-interventional, observational, post-marketing study was conducted in Japan from August 2015 to March 2019. Patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer and newly prescribed ramucirumab were followed for up to 12 months after first treatment. Data on adverse events and survival were collected via Electronic Data Capture.

RESULTS

Of 687 enrolled patients, 658 were eligible for analysis. Most patients received either ramucirumab monotherapy (123/658; 18.7%) or ramucirumab plus paclitaxel combination therapy (528/658; 80.2%). The majority of patients reported ≥ 1 adverse events in both the combination therapy (any grade, 479/528; 90.7%; ≥ Grade 3, 321/528; 60.8%) and monotherapy groups (any grade, 77/123; 62.6%; ≥ Grade 3, 42/123; 34.2%). The most common any grade adverse events were neutropenia (combination: 49.6%; monotherapy: 8.9%), fatigue (combination: 19.5%; monotherapy: 13.8%), and decreased appetite (combination: 18.2%; monotherapy: 10.6%). Grade 5 adverse events were reported in 4 patients, including metastases to meninges, pneumonia aspiration, death, and gastric perforation; of these, gastric perforation was deemed treatment-related. Median survival time was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval: 4.1-6.8 months) following monotherapy and 11.0 months (95% confidence interval: 9.8-12.2 months) following combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis adds to the limited data available on ramucirumab use in a real-world setting, demonstrating similar safety and effectiveness for ramucirumab in treating advanced gastric cancer in routine clinical practice in Japan to that of global clinical trials.

Ramucirumab Plus Erlotinib Versus Placebo Plus Erlotinib in Patients With Untreated Metastatic EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: RELAY Japanese Subset

Introduction

The phase 3 RELAY global study (NCT02411448) revealed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) with ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) compared with placebo plus ERL (PL + ERL) in untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-0.76, p < 0.0001]). This prespecified analysis evaluates efficacy, safety, and postprogression EGFR T790M rates of RELAY patients enrolled in Japan.

Methods

Patients were randomized (1:1) to oral ERL (150 mg/d) plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg) or PL every 2 weeks. End points included PFS (primary), safety (secondary), and biomarker analyses (exploratory). Plasma samples collected at baseline and poststudy treatment discontinuation were evaluated for EGFR T790M mutations by next-generation sequencing.

Results

The Japanese subset included 211 of 449 (47.0%) RELAY patients (RAM + ERL, n = 106; PL + ERL, n = 105). Median PFS was 19.4 versus 11.2 months for RAM + ERL versus PL + ERL treatment (HR = 0.610 [0.431-0.864]) in the Japanese intent-to-treat population, 16.6 versus 12.5 months (HR = 0.701 [0.424-1.159]) in the EGFR exon 19 deletion subgroup, and 19.4 versus 10.9 months (HR = 0.514 [0.317-0.835]) in the EGFR exon 21 L858R subgroup, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or above with RAM + ERL included hypertension (24.8%, all grade 3) and dermatitis acneiform (23.8%). Postprogression treatment-emergent T790M rates were similar between arms (RAM + ERL: 47%, 9 of 19 patients; PL + ERL: 50%, 20 of 40 patients).

Conclusions

Clinically meaningful efficacy was observed with RAM + ERL versus PL + ERL in the RELAY Japanese subset, with no new safety concerns. Postprogression T790M rates were similar across treatment arms, indicating the addition of RAM did not affect the ERL-associated EGFR T790M rates at disease progression.