Patient Advocates for Clinical Research (PACER): A Step Toward Ethical, Relevant, and Truly Participatory Clinical Research in India

Background Clinical research presents a promising path for improving healthcare in contemporary India. Yet, researchers identify gaps in trust, awareness, as well as misconceptions about being a '"guinea pig." We proposed building the capacity of training patient advocacy groups (PAGs) in patient-centered clinical research and through them creating aware patients as research partners. Methodology Patient Advocates for Clinical Research (PACER) is a tiered program to share information and education about clinical research with PAGs. Tier one is a self-paced online learning course, followed by workshops on clinical research, Good Clinical Practice, research consent, case studies, and group discussions. Results A total of 20 PAGs represented by 48 participants, active in areas of pediatric cancer, breast cancer, multiple myeloma, type I diabetes, spinal muscular atrophy, sickle cell disease, and inflammatory bowel diseases, participated. Among 48 participants 30 successfully completed the online course (multiple-choice question evaluation score cut-off >70%), attaining an average score of 23.9 ± 2.1 out of 30. Overall, 48 participants attended workshop 1 and 45 workshop 2, with 140 participants joining the focus group discussion (FGD). An overall improvement of 9.4% (𝜒2 = 46.173; p < 0.001) for workshop 1 and 8.2% (𝜒2 = 25.412; p < 0.001) for workshop 2 was seen in knowledge gain about clinical research. The FGD raised issues such as misleading information from research teams, unethical recruitment, incomprehensible information sheets, and limited trial-related knowledge fostering fear of participation in clinical research. Conclusions Multimodal and tiered learning of clinical research such as that used by PACER has a good participatory and learning response from PAGs and may be further explored.

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on good clinical practice trials in oncology

Aim

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became pandemic on 11th March 2020 and it deeply stressed the healthcare system. Cancer patients represent a vulnerable population, so many recommendations have been approved to ensure optimal management. Clinical research was notably impacted by COVID too. This review aims to analyze the challenges occurred during a pandemic for the management of enrolled patients (enrollment, use of telemedicine visits, study procedures) and for the clinical trials system (from feasibility to selection visit, site initiation visit, monitorings, use of e-signature, deviations and discontinuations).

Methods

The studies included in the present review were selected from PubMed/Google Scholar/ScienceDirect databases.

Results

During the first phase of pandemic many clinical trials were suspended in accrual and, as the pandemic progressed, recommendations were established to guarantee the safety and the continuity of care of enrolled patients. In addition, lot of new strategies was found during the pandemic to reduce the negative consequences on clinical trial performance and to guarantee new opportunities of care in the respect of good clinical practice (GCP) in a bad scenario.

Conclusions

Among all modifiers, investigators would prefer to maintain the positive ones such as pragmatic and simplified trial designs and protocols, reducing in-person visits when not necessary and to minimizing sponsor and contract research organizations (CROs) visits.

Identifying and managing problematic trials: A research integrity assessment tool for randomized controlled trials in evidence synthesis

Evidence synthesis findings depend on the assumption that the included studies follow good clinical practice and results are not fabricated or false. Studies which are problematic due to scientific misconduct, poor research practice, or honest error may distort evidence synthesis findings. Authors of evidence synthesis need transparent mechanisms to identify and manage problematic studies to avoid misleading findings. As evidence synthesis authors of the Cochrane COVID-19 review on ivermectin, we identified many problematic studies in terms of research integrity and regulatory compliance. Through iterative discussion, we developed a research integrity assessment (RIA) tool for randomized controlled trials for the update of this Cochrane review. In this paper, we explain the rationale and application of the RIA tool in this case study. RIA assesses six study criteria: study retraction, prospective trial registration, adequate ethics approval, author group, plausibility of methods (e.g., randomization), and plausibility of study results. RIA was used in the Cochrane review as part of the eligibility check during screening of potentially eligible studies. Problematic studies were excluded and studies with open questions were held in awaiting classification until clarified. RIA decisions were made independently by two authors and reported transparently. Using the RIA tool resulted in the exclusion of >40% of studies in the first update of the review. RIA is a complementary tool prior to assessing "Risk of Bias" aiming to establish the integrity and authenticity of studies. RIA provides a platform for urgent development of a standard approach to identifying and managing problematic studies.

SNMMI Clinical Trial Network Research Series for Technologists: Application of Good Clinical Practice to Clinical Research in Medical Imaging

This article is part of a series developed by the Clinical Trials Network of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging to offer training and information for molecular imaging technologists and researchers about various aspects of clinical research. This article covers the topic of good clinical practice and how that relates to those portions of the Code of Federal Regulations that govern clinical research in the United States, such as title 21, part 312, and the Common Rule. The purpose of this article is to inform technologists and researchers about standard roles, documents, guidance, and processes that are elemental to the conduct of clinical trials and to offer additional resources for learning about these processes.

Building and implementing a quality assurance/quality improvement program for clinical research

Background

A major goal of the Clinical and Translational Science Award programs is to build and grow clinical and translational research, including the need to ensure that study teams are educated and adhere to best clinical research practices.

Objective

One of the primary objectives of the Center for Clinical and Translational Science at the University of Kentucky is to help investigators implement standard operating procedures and provide resources to conduct clinical research that is rigorous, ethical and safe.

Methods

The University of Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational Science sought to establish a Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement program for Principal Investigator (PI) initiated clinical research studies using Center for Clinical and Translational Science services. Initiated in 2011, this program's goal was to improve research design quality and from the start of the project, "find it, fix it", leading to improved PI education, without being viewed as punitive.

Results

Since the initiation of our Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement program, PI acceptance has been good and we have expanded its footprint and adjusted our review style to better match the needs of our PIs. This article discusses our experiences with Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement program development and growth.

Conclusion

A Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement program can be developed that is efficient, effective, educational and well accepted by all clinical research stakeholders.

Good clinical practice improves rigor and transparency: Lessons from the ACTIVE trial

Clinical trials are governed by principles of good clinical practice (GCP), which can strengthen the achievement of rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research. Rigor, reproducibility, and transparency are key for producing findings with greater certainty. Clinical trials are closely supervised, often by a clinical trial coordinating center, data safety and monitoring board, and a funding agency, with policies that are a manifestation of GCP and support rigor, reproducibility, and transparency. The multisite Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) study is an example clinical trial of relevance to a psychology and aging audience that utilized many protocols that can be applied to single-laboratory designs, including a manualized protocol with accompanying scientific rationale, predefined analysis plans, standardization of procedures across field sites, assurance of competence of study staff in study procedures, transparent coding/entry/transmittal of data, regular quality assurance, and open publication of data. Despite substantial resource discrepancies between the two, single-laboratory studies can model the GCP principles utilized in large clinical trials to provide an excellent foundation for rigor, reproducibility, and transparency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

SNMMI Clinical Trials Network Research Series for Technologists: Introduction

The field of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging has grown tremendously over the past several years with the approval of new imaging agents, diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, and radiopharmaceutical therapies. Clinical research continues to expand within nuclear medicine and molecular imaging departments. Working as a nuclear medicine technologist on a clinical trial or with investigational radiopharmaceuticals can be quite different from working in an approved-drug setting in the clinic. Nuclear medicine technologists involved in clinical trials can be at the front line of following rigorous trial requirements and ensuring good-quality data. The details of working in clinical research are often not taught in nuclear medicine technologist programs. As such, there is an emerging need for education about clinical research for both experienced and new nuclear medicine technologists, particularly for those working with investigational radiopharmaceuticals. This article is an introduction to the SNMMI Clinical Trials Network Research Series for Technologists. This series of articles aims to provide education on working in the context of a clinical trial within the nuclear medicine department. The following 7 topics will be addressed in the series: ethical issues in clinical research, application of good clinical practice to clinical research in medical imaging, contract research organizations with application in clinical imaging, a clinical research primer on the regulatory process for how and when radiopharmaceuticals can be used and the role of the institutional review board, use of imaging agents in therapeutic drug development and approval, imaging agent trials, and imaging agents with radiopharmaceutical therapies in clinical trials. Other topics may be added over the course of the development of the series.

The Welsh Eating Disorder Service Review 2018, Scottish Eating Disorder Service Review 2021 and recommendations of best practice in comorbid eating disorders and diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes and eating disorders are frequently comorbid. This particular comorbidity is not only often poorly recognised, but is difficult to treat and has a high mortality.

METHOD

In this article, we will briefly review the relationship between diabetes and eating disorders. We will review the current NICE and other guidance and reports concerning both diabetes and eating disorders in the United Kingdom. We will then describe the recommendations of the 2018 Welsh Government Eating Disorder Service Review and the 2021 the Scottish Government Eating Disorder Service Review regarding diabetes and eating disorders, which will lead to service change.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that this is a relatively underdeveloped but important area where there needs to be further service development and more collaboration between diabetes and eating disorder services.

Preventive Measures and Management of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia

Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) has been studied worldwide as part of device-related healthcare infection. CAUTI is one of the most commonly reported infections in the literature, which occurs during clinical practice in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and non-ICU departments. Many studies have covered the CAUTI rate in Saudi Arabia mainly in the ICU covering single or multiple hospitals as surveillance for device-related infections in the ICU. Few studies have conducted an interventional approach that examined the implementation of infection control protocols and then compared them to international practice as a standard. This review aims to explore the literature to provide insight into the infection control practices that have been reported in Saudi Arabia during the last two decades on the preventive measures and clinical consequences of CAUTIs. Very few studies have recorded the pattern of resistant microorganisms that burdens clinical practice in ICUs concerning CAUTIs. Only one study compared the type of catheter materials and discussed the effect of these materials on reducing CAUTIs. It is essential to cover catheter utilization and to understand how a sufficient infection control protocol with educational programs for healthcare personnel can transform practice, for the better, regarding CAUTI rates in Saudi hospitals. There is a demand for more interventional and epidemiological studies on the causes and factors affecting the rate of CAUTI in the area. Studies may help reduce the CAUTI incidence rate, which consequently reduces the costs and morbidity associated with this type of infection and other healthcare-related infections.

Status of clinical research in neurology in Germany-A national survey

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To provide an overview on the status of clinical research in neurology in Germany.

METHODS

German university hospitals, nonuniversity hospitals, and neurological medical practices were surveyed regarding their clinical research activities during the period 2013 to 2017.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of university hospitals, 10.6% of nonuniversity hospitals, and 5.2% of medical practices in Germany responded to our questionnaire. More than 80% of the clinical studies conducted have been phase III/IV and noninterventional trials (NISs), whereas <1% have been phase I and 3.5% investigator-initiated trials (IITs). University hospitals have conducted most of the phase II-IV trials. NISs have been predominantly performed by medical practices. Fifty-six percent of the university hospitals and less of the nonuniversity institutions confirmed the implementation of standard operating procedures (SOPs). In university hospitals, on average, 11 physicians had acquired a good clinical practice certificate. Overall, 43% of all trials have been performed in neuroimmunology.

CONCLUSIONS

The status of clinical research in neurology in Germany is predominated by NISs and late-phase trials, potentially due to a general lack of easily accessible funding, which leads to a highly competitive environment and fewer opportunities to perform early-phase clinical trials as well as IITs. Our results indicate that there is substantial need for structured support for creating and implementing SOPs to maintain quality standards and guarantee uniformity of performance. This survey assessed many aspects of clinical research and serves as guidance for providing ideas for structured improvement of clinical research in neurology in Germany.

Analyzability of newly developed/commercially promoted drugs among young medical and dental doctors

INTRODUCTION

The development of a new chemical entity into a drug is of indispensable importance for the progression of health care. As physicians play the main and important part of any clinical trial, it is necessary to know about their awareness about clinical research, drug development, good clinical practices, and regulatory authorities.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess and compare the knowledge and awareness toward drug development process among medical interns, dental interns, and postgraduates (PGs).

METHODOLOGY

This was a cross-sectional study enrolling 186 professionals of medical college and 110 professionals of dental college in Punjab who were given a prevalidated questionnaire that included 27 questions related to knowledge regarding drug development process. Data were analyzed for percentage correct responses, mean values, and intergroup comparison by applying t-test using SPSS version 20, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA.

RESULTS

It was found that medical and dental college professionals had a very poor awareness and knowledge about drug development process to the tune of 33%. Professionals of dental college had 53.7% knowledge of clinical research in comparison to 43.2% of medical college. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference for sections on drug development, clinical research, and regulatory authority among interns and PGs was found with interns possessing better knowledge.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that regulatory authorities such as Board of Studies of various medical universities, Dental Council of India, and Medical Council of India must take necessary steps to increase the knowledge of drug development process among dental and medical professionals. Incorporation of this topic in educational curriculum in the initial stages of graduation and postgraduation would be beneficial.

Are older adults insufficiently included in clinical trials?-An umbrella review

Treatment guidelines are primarily based on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RCTs tend to some extent to exclude older adults despite the fact that physicians need guidance when treating this patient group. By summarizing existing literature, we aimed to (a) quantify the proportion of RCTs and other clinical studies (CTs) that did not adequately include older adults; (b) identify the main barriers for this non-inclusion; and (c) identify suggested solution for inclusion of older adults in RCTs and other CTs. In this umbrella review, Embase and PubMed were searched for relevant papers, and 2701 papers were identified. The subsequent screening resulted in 22 papers. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program was used as quality assessment tool to evaluate these 22 papers. We found that: (a) The most frequent outcome designating missing inclusion of older adults was the use of age limit as exclusion criterion in studies-the proportion of this was 10%-60%; (b) barriers for inclusion were mainly exclusion criteria, logistic challenges and financial constraints; and (c) more extensive inclusion would require more explicit inclusion criteria, merely application of exclusion criteria when absolutely needed, change of researchers' attitude, further inclusion of supporting relatives to overcome the logistical challenges and more financial funding.

Intention-to-Treat Analyses for Randomized Controlled Trials in Hospice/Palliative Care: The Case for Analyses to be of People Exposed to the Intervention

CONTEXT

Minimizing bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) includes intention-to-treat analyses. Hospice/palliative care RCTs are constrained by high attrition unpredictable when consenting, including withdrawals between randomization and first exposure to the intervention. Such withdrawals may systematically bias findings away from the new intervention being evaluated if they are considered nonresponders.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to quantify the impact within intention-to-treat principles.

METHODS

A theoretical model was developed to assess the impact of withdrawals between randomization and first exposure on study power and effect sizes. Ten reported hospice/palliative care studies had power recalculated accounting for such withdrawal.

RESULTS

In the theoretical model, when 5% of withdrawals occurred between randomization and first exposure to the intervention, change in power was demonstrated in binary outcomes (2.0%-2.2%), continuous outcomes (0.8%-2.0%), and time-to-event outcomes (1.6%-2.0%), and odds ratios were changed by 0.06-0.17. Greater power loss was observed with larger effect sizes. Withdrawal rates were 0.9%-10% in the 10 reported RCTs, corresponding to power losses of 0.1%-2.2%. For studies with binary outcomes, withdrawal rates were 0.3%-1.2% changing odds ratios by 0.01-0.22.

CONCLUSION

If blinding is maintained and all interventions are available simultaneously, our model suggests that excluding data from withdrawals between randomization and first exposure to the intervention minimizes one bias. This is the safety population as defined by the International Committee on Harmonization. When planning for future trials, minimizing the time between randomization and first exposure to the intervention will minimize the problem. Power should be calculated on people who receive the intervention.

Screening and management of preinvasive lesions of the cervix: Good clinical practice recommendations from the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecologic Societies of India (FOGSI)

In India, there are marked variations in resources for cervical cancer screening. For the first time, resource-stratified screening guidelines have been developed that will be suitable for low middle-income countries with similar diversities. The current article describes the process and outcomes of these resource stratified guidelines for screening and treatment of preinvasive lesions of cervix. Evidence from literature was collated and various guidelines were reviewed by an expert panel. Based on the level of evidence, guidelines were developed for screening by human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, cytology and visual inspection after application of acetic acid (VIA), and management of screen positive lesions in different resource settings. Expert opinion was used for certain country-specific situations. The healthcare system was stratified into two resource settings - good or limited. The mode of screening and treatment for each was described. HPV testing is the preferred method for cervical cancer screening. VIA by trained providers is especially suitable for low resource settings until an affordable HPV test becomes available. Healthcare providers can choose the most appropriate screening and treatment modality. A single visit approach is encouraged and treatment may be offered based on colposcopy diagnosis ('see and treat') or even on the basis of HPV test or VIA results ('screen and treat'), if compliance cannot be ensured. The Federation of Obsterician and Gynaecologists of India Good Clinical Practice Recommendations (FOGSI) GCPR are appropriately designed for countries with varied resource situations to ensure an acceptable cervical cancer prevention strategy.

Utilization of Mobile Application for Better Implementation of Good Clinical Practice in a Biorepository Sample Collection Process: Functions of PancMoBio in Biobanking

Preanalytical variables of biospecimens play a vital role in biobanking. Currently, there is a lack of a convenient and precise methods to document these variables. Paper documentation and computer-based Lab Information Management System software are the most common solutions, but both have clear disadvantages. An application named PancMoBio was newly developed in our pancreas biobank, with the guidance of good clinical practice principles as well as the incorporation of technical support from professional software companies. With portable electronic devices running this application, all data can be precisely collected in a synchronous manner during sample collection and processing. PancMoBio comprises two major modules-recording and searching-and five submodules in the recording module: blood sample collection, solid tumor tissue sample collection, cystic tumor sample collection, plasma sample separation, and serum sample separation. Compared with other methods, our application was found to be more convenient and accurate in recording preanalytical variables and demonstrated improved capability in facilitating real-time quality control and quality assurance. It was apparent that PancMoBio could improve the integrity of biospecimen and biobank quality management. Thus, it should be considered for further utilization in biobanking.

The evolution of clinical trials: Can we address the challenges of the future?

The authors describe key challenges facing the clinical trials community and propose solutions to these issues, including the role the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative can play in addressing these issues. Specifically, the authors reflect on clinical trial globalization and the harmonization of frameworks and requirements across regions; the challenges associated with balancing the desire for external validity, pragmatic trials, and precision medicine; clinical trial transparency; and operational complexity and the expense of clinical trials. By addressing these challenges, future clinical trials will be more feasible, relevant, and credible, and support both the continuing altruistic contributions of patients and the collection of more meaningful data.

Effect of a planned training session on good clinical practice knowledge in research professionals: A pilot study

Context

Adherence to good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines by the researcher provides public confidence that the rights, safety and well-being of human participants involved in research are protected. It has been observed that researchers require basic GCP training. Considering this, we had decided to conduct a training session on overview of GCP.

Aims

To strengthen the knowledge and awareness regarding GCP.

Settings and Design

The design of the study was quasi-experimental one group, pre-test and post-test design and the study was conducted at ACTREC among healthcare professionals at Tata Memorial Centre.

Methods and Material

A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data in pre and post-test. A total of 138 participants were participated in the study. The training session was pre-planned which included a lecture followed by the question-answer session.

Statistical Analysis Used

Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to assess the effect of the planned teaching programme. Macnemar test was used for item wise comparison of pre and post-test scores. Mann Whitney test was used to determine the significant difference between knowledge scores and selected demographic variables.

Results

This study has resulted in overall improvement of knowledge with a median difference of 5 with P-value <0.001. There was a statistically significant improvement of knowledge between pre and post-test of those having GCP training in the past, working group and education.

Conclusions

The exercise of holding training program was found to be significant in improving the knowledge base of participants, especially investigators and study coordinators.

Understanding the influence of individual variables contributing to multivariate outliers in assessments of data quality

Mahalanobis distance is often recommended to identify patients or clinical sites that are considered unusual in clinical trials. Patients extreme in one or more covariates may be considered outliers in that they reside some distance from the multivariate mean, which can be thought of as the center of the data cloud. Less often discussed, patients whose data are believed to be "too good to be true" are located near the centroid as inliers. In order to efficiently investigate these anomalies for potential lapses in data quality, it is important to understand how the individual variables contribute to each multivariate outlier. There is a lack of literature describing a reasonable workflow for identification of outliers and their subsequent investigation to understand how each variable contributes to an observation being considered extreme. We describe how to identify multivariate inliers and outliers, classify outliers according to varying levels of severity, and summarize the contributions of variables using principal components in a manner that is accessible to a wide audience with straightforward interpretation. We illustrate how numerous data visualizations, including Pareto plots, can facilitate further review even in studies containing numerous observations and variables. We illustrate these methodologies using data from a multicenter clinical trial.

A comparison of five international clinical trial registers with the South African register for access to information and usability

Introduction

in November, 2005, the South African (SA) National Department of Health (NDoH) mandated that, as from the 1^st December, 2005, all new clinical trials to be conducted in the country must be registered on the South African National Clinical Trials Register (SANCTR). The objective was to compare access to the information contained in and the usability of the SANCTR with five other international on-line clinical trials registers.

Methods

Access to SANCTR was determined through the use of three search engines using the keywords “South African Clinical Trials.” Five high-profile international registers were identified and accessed for comparative purposes. Each register was investigated for information on trials conducted in South Africa using a standardised data extraction form which listed 24 data items. The usability of the various on-line registers was determined through a self-administered questionnaire adapted from the five key usability factors previously defined in literature. Heuristic evaluation was carried out with 10 'experts' (Pharmacy staff and postgraduate students at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU)). Data generated from the heuristic evaluation were analysed using descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

The SANCTR website had the highest ranking for access amongst the registers in all three selected search-engines after an internet search using the keywords “South African Clinical Trials”. The total number of clinical trials registered varied among the registers. The WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) recorded 2 599 trials carried out in South Africa, with 2 260 registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov register, 2 196 in the SANCTR and 978, 149 and 174 in the European Union (EU), International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) and Pan African Clinical Trials (PACTR) registers respectively. The websites ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN provided greater overall information per clinical trial registered and provided information on all 24 clinical trials data items. The PACTR had information on 23 of the 24 data items. The WHO and EU registers each contained 19 data items. The SANCTR provided the least information, only 11 data items. The heuristic evaluation identified ClinicalTrials.gov as the 'best' site, while the PACTR had the lowest rating for layout and design. The EU register and SANCTR were the least easily navigable. The respondents had the least satisfaction while using the 'Search' option in the SANCTR. Users also reported the SANCTR and the PACTR had the lowest overall user-friendliness.

Conclusion

The fact that the SANCTR contains less information on SA clinical trials than other registers and is the least user-friendly warrants utmost attention. The study puts forward a case to the regulatory authority (currently the Medicines Control Council) as it takes on a new structure and working arrangements as the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority to optimise the SANCTR to be more user-friendly and contain more complete information on clinical trials conducted in SA.

Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research: A multisite pilot evaluation of the good clinical practice online training course

INTRODUCTION

The Best Practices in Social and Behavioral Research Course was developed to provide instruction on good clinical practice for social and behavioral trials. This study evaluated the new course.

METHODS

Participants across 4 universities took the course (n=294) and were sent surveys following course completion and 2 months later. Outcomes included relevance, how engaging the course was, and working differently because of the course. Open-ended questions were posed to understand how work was impacted.

RESULTS

Participants rated the course as relevant and engaging (6.4 and 5.8/7 points) and reported working differently (4.7/7 points). Participants with less experience in social and behavioral trials were most likely to report working differently 2 months later.

DISCUSSION

The course was perceived as relevant and engaging. Participants described actions taken to improve rigor in implementing trials. Future studies with a larger sample and additional participating sites are recommended.

[Discussion on the Existing Problems and Countermeasures of Medical Devices (Ⅱ) Clinical Trial]

To provide reference for further improve the level of medical devices clinical trial, to ensure the medical devices quality combing with the problems found in the medical devices clinical trial in Shandong province, the problems and countermeasures of medical devices (Ⅱ) clinical trial were explored. Four countermeasures were put forward to solve the problems of medical devices (Ⅱ) clinical trial from different angles including sponsors, clinical trials institutions and the important part of clinical trials:raising the threshold of entry, consummating relevant laws and regulations, establishing quality management system, strengthening personnel training, attaching great importance to CRA and CRC.

A need to simplify informed consent documents in cancer clinical trials. A position paper of the ARCAD Group

Background

In respect of the principle of autonomy and the right of self-determination, obtaining an informed consent of potential participants before their inclusion in a study is a fundamental ethical obligation. The variations in national laws, regulations, and cultures contribute to complex informed consent documents for patients participating in clinical trials. Currently, only few ethics committees seem willing to address the complexity and the length of these documents and to request investigators and sponsors to revise them in a way to make them understandable for potential participants. The purpose of this work is to focus on the written information in the informed consent documentation for drug development clinical trials and suggests (i) to distinguish between necessary and not essential information, (ii) to define the optimal format allowing the best legibility of those documents.

Methods

The Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive (ARCAD) Group, an international scientific committee involving oncologists from all over the world, addressed these issues and developed and uniformly accepted a simplified informed consent documentation for future clinical research.

Results

A simplified form of informed consent with the leading part of 1200-1800 words containing all of the key information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements and 'relevant supportive information appendix' of 2000-3000 words is provided.

Conclusions

This position paper, on the basis of the ARCAD Group experts discussions, proposes our informed consent model and the rationale for its content.

Impact of educational intervention on knowledge, attitude and awareness of good clinical practice among health care providers

Background:

Clinical trials play an important role in the generation of evidence-based data in health care practices. To ensure the credibility of data and the safety and well-being of the patients Good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines play an important role. At present, we have little knowledge about awareness of GCP guidelines among health care providers in India.

Aim:

To assess the level of awareness, and perception of the health care providers toward GCP and subsequent change in these after a dayer training session on GCP guidelines.

Settings and Design:

A cross-sectional descriptive questionnaire-based study was conducted amongst health care providers, that is, doctors, dentists, nurses of a Tertiary Health Care and Teaching Institute.

Materials and Methods:

Participants were given descriptive questionnaire; they completed the questionnaire before and after undergoing a day training program in GCP guidelines.

Statistical Analysis Used:

The impact of the effectiveness of educational intervention among healthcare professionals was evaluated by two-tailed Z-test.

Results:

Out of 120 participants, 80 were medical doctors, 20 dental doctors, and 20 nurses. A dayse training program on GCP guidelines was found to increase positive attitudes toward various aspects of clinical trials.

Conclusion:

A day's training program on GCP guidelines may help to increase the knowledge as well as awareness about principles and techniques of clinical research, which will increase the credibility of clinical research in the country.

A Toolkit for the Management of Protocol Deviations

BACKGROUND

The DIA's Good Clinical Practice and Quality Assurance Community (DIA GCP/QA) created a working group to develop templates for a protocol deviation standard operating procedure (SOP) and protocol deviation handling plan (PDHP).

METHODS

The working group consisted of QA auditors, data managers, statisticians, and clinical monitors from several pharmaceutical companies, academia, and independent auditing firms. Various examples of standard operating procedures, data handling plans, and auditing plans were examined, and the core elements extracted into the initial PD SOP and PDHP templates. The draft templates were presented at a workshop at the DIA 51st Annual Meeting held in June 2015 in Washington, DC, and feedback was incorporated. The workshop came at the heels of a previously published position paper, "The Lifecycle and Management of Protocol Deviations."

RESULTS

The PD SOP and the PDHP templates are presented in this article. They are a starting point, and each company will need to modify to suit its individual needs.

CONCLUSIONS

This article expands on the position paper to include concrete tools for the management of protocol deviations, including best practices for detection, classification, mitigation, and management of protocol deviations with a goal to reduce the impact on subject safety and data integrity.

The Good Clinical Practice guideline and its interpretation - perceptions of clinical trial teams in sub-Saharan Africa

OBJECTIVES

To explore the advantages and challenges of working with the Good Clinical Practice (GCP)-International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) E6 guideline and its interpretation from the perspective of clinical trial teams based in sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS

We conducted 60 key informant interviews with clinical trial staff at different levels in clinical research centres in Kenya, Ghana, Burkina Faso and Senegal and thematically analysed the responses.

RESULTS

Clinical trial teams perceived working with ICH-GCP as highly advantageous and regarded ICH-GCP as applicable to their setting and efficiently applied. Only for informed consent did some clinical trial staff (one-third) perceive the guideline as insufficiently applicable. Specific challenges included meeting the requirements for written and individual consent, conditions for impartial witnesses for illiterates or legally acceptable representatives for children, guaranteeing voluntary participation and ensuring full understanding of the consent given. It was deemed important to have ICH-GCP compliance monitored by relevant ethics committees and regulatory authorities, without having guidelines applied overcautiously.

CONCLUSION

Clinical trial teams in sub-Saharan Africa perceived GCP as a helpful guideline, despite having been developed by northern organisations and despite the high administrative burden of implementing it. To mitigate consent challenges, we suggest adapting GCP and making use of the flexibility it offers.

Enhancing clinical evidence by proactively building quality into clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Stakeholders across the clinical trial enterprise have expressed concern that the current clinical trial enterprise is unsustainable. The cost and complexity of trials have continued to increase, threatening our ability to generate reliable evidence essential for making appropriate decisions concerning the benefits and harms associated with clinical interventions. Overcoming this inefficiency rests on improving protocol design, trial planning, and quality oversight.

METHODS

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative convened a project to evaluate methods to prospectively build quality into the scientific and operational design of clinical trials ("quality-by-design"), such that trials are feasible to conduct and important errors are prevented rather than remediated. A working group evaluated aspects of trial design and oversight and developed the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative quality-by-design principles document, outlining a series of factors generally relevant to the reliability of trial conclusions and to patient safety. These principles were then applied and further refined during a series of hands-on workshops to evaluate their utility in facilitating proactive, cross-functional dialogue, and decision-making about trial design and planning. Following these workshops, independent qualitative interviews were conducted with 19 workshop attendees to explore the potential challenges for implementing a quality-by-design approach to clinical trials. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative project team subsequently developed recommendations and an online resource guide to support implementation of this approach.

CONCLUSION

The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative quality-by-design principles provide a framework for assuring that clinical trials adequately safeguard participants and provide reliable information on which to make decisions on the effects of treatments. The quality-by-design workshops highlighted the value of active discussions incorporating the different perspectives within and external to an organization (e.g. clinical investigators, research site staff, and trial participants) in improving trial design. Workshop participants also recognized the value of focusing oversight on those aspects of the trial where errors would have a major impact on participant safety and reliability of results. Applying the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative quality-by-design recommendations and principles should enable organizations to prioritize the most critical determinants of a trial's quality, identify non-essential activities that can be eliminated to streamline trial conduct and oversight, and formulate appropriate plans to define, avoid, mitigate, monitor, and address important errors.

Ensuring sustainability of software tools and services by cooperation with a research infrastructure

Sustainability of project output and especially of the maintenance and further development of software is of growing concern for the research community. In the personalized medicine project p-medicine solutions that address this sustainability problem were developed and discussed in a workshop. They involve a number of interrelated and mutually supportive measures including the creation of a service center, building modular software, using common data standards, mutual service exchange with a research infrastructure, Open Source and fee-based software provision, joint promotion and deployment of tools in a regulated, clinical trial situation. These ideas join a nascent literature seeking to understand how project output can be put into a sustainable environment and to suggest solutions that may be useful for academic projects in general.

A multileveled approach in psoriasis assessment and follow-up: A proposal for a tailored guide for the dermatological practice

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a complex and heterogeneous disease resulting from interactions between genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. To make the most optimal treatment decision, the dermatologist must therefore have a detailed overview of the patient's history and lifestyle.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to offer an overview of the various relevant aspects in clinical dermatological assessment of psoriasis patients, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary and integrated clinical approach.

METHODS

We gathered information on psoriasis management and developed a tailored checklist covering all health-related aspects associated with psoriasis.

RESULTS

Demographics, personal and family history were elaborately described as well as drug history to discuss how they affect psoriasis management. Relevant patient information such as the vaccination status or cardiovascular profile were included in the checklist as well and treatment recommendations were adapted and updated in accordance with evidence-based literature. This checklist also emphasizes the importance of drug surveillance, proper follow-up and specialist referral, and why the dermatologist needs to address these health-related aspects when assessing psoriasis patients, going beyond optimal skin care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive overview can be used as a consultation checklist for good clinical practice in psoriasis patient management and aid in treatment decision.

Good intentions and ICH-GCP: Trial conduct training needs to go beyond the ICH-GCP document and include the intention-to-treat principle

BACKGROUND

It is assumed investigators and statisticians fully understand the importance of avoiding missing outcomes and the intention-to-treat principle during design and analysis phases of a randomised controlled trial in order to obtain the most valuable and reliable results. However, many personnel undertaking day-to-day trial conduct and data collection commonly rely exclusively for guidance on the widely implemented, indeed regulated, International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice document as the guideline and standard for trial conduct.

PURPOSE

This article describes adverse consequences of omission of intention-to-treat principles from training for trial personnel and explores the need for training in addition to the International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice guideline document.

METHODS

Data from the Breast Boost Study were used to illustrate a comparison of actual results, where vigilant senior investigators re-enforced intention-to-treat requirements throughout all aspects of trial conduct with results that could easily have occurred if study personnel did not understand the importance of intention-to-treat principles. Experience as a co-ordinating centre for an international trial (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 08.06 Breast STARS) acted as an audit of data-management culture regarding intention-to-treat in Australia and New Zealand.

RESULTS

Despite the Breast Boost Study exceeding planned accrual, it was demonstrated that the study, which found a statistically significant result, could have reported a negative or inconclusive result under the scenario of trial conduct personnel having lack of understanding of the importance of avoiding losses to follow-up. Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology 08.06 co-ordination experience verified that data-management culture in Australia and New Zealand does not adequately recognise intention-to-treat principles, and this is reflected in trial conduct.

LIMITATIONS

Trial data described are limited to two trials and in the Australian and New Zealand setting.

CONCLUSION

To be both scientifically and ethically valid, guidelines for trial conduct should include and stress the importance of the intention-to-treat principle and in particular avoiding missing outcomes. Our discussion highlights the vitally important role played by personnel involved in day-to-day trial conduct. Inclusion of scientific principles in guideline documents and/or training which goes beyond International Conference on Harmonisation-Good Clinical Practice to include intention-to-treat is essential to achieve robust research results. Related aspects of randomised trial consent and ethics are discussed.

Why are clinical trials necessary in India?

Clinical trials are emerging as an important activity in India as it is an essential component of the drug discovery and development program to which India is committed. The only robust way to evaluate a new medicine is by doing properly designed clinical trials. In addition to advancing science, clinical trials offer myriad benefits to the participants. The recent hue that created in India about clinical trials is probably an exaggeration of facts. However, these points to the need for ensuring proper compliance with the regulatory norms and proper training of concerned personnel in good clinical practice (GCP). This will ensure that India continues to reap the benefits of clinical trials and also become a world leader in this field.

Usability on the p-medicine infrastructure: an extended usability concept

Usability testing methods are nowadays integrated into the design and development of health-care software, and the need for usability in health-care information technology (IT) is widely accepted by clinicians and researchers. Usability assessment starts with the identification of specific objectives that need to be tested and continues with the definition of evaluation criteria and monitoring procedures before usability tests are performed to assess the quality of all services and tasks. Such a process is implemented in the p-medicine environment and gives feedback iteratively to all software developers in the project. GCP (good clinical practice) criteria require additional usability testing of the software. For the p-medicine project (www.p-medicine.eu), an extended usability concept (EUC) was developed. The EUC covers topics like ease of use, likeability, and usefulness, usability in trial centres characterised by a mixed care and research environment and by extreme time constraints, confidentiality, use of source documents, standard operating procedures (SOA), and quality control during data handling to ensure that all data are reliable and have been processed correctly in terms of accuracy, completeness, legibility, consistence, and timeliness. Here, we describe the p-medicine EUC, focusing on two of the many key tools: ObTiMA and the Ontology Annotator (OA).

Ethicovigilance in clinical trials

This article provides an ethical critique of the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) documents. While the previous criticisms of GCP are entirely correct, there is much more wrong with the document than has previously been acknowledged, including a circular definition and an astonishing vagueness about ethical principles. In addition to its failure to provide adequate ethical protection of participants, the procedurally dense nature of GCP lends itself to a box-ticking culture where important ethical issues are overlooked because they are not 'mentioned on the form'. In contrast, the DoH is a much more effective ethical document, but actually goes too far in one respect. It transpires that the best ethical guidelines for clinical research would be neither over-prescriptive in regard to particular ethical issues (as the DoH is) nor neglectful of them (as GCP is); correctly framed ethical principles will provide sufficient protection to participants while also ensuring a culture of ethicovigilance in clinical trials.

Legal Requirements, Definitions, and Standards for Non-interventional Drug Studies: A Global Picture of Variability-Results and Conclusions From a Single-Institution Survey

Non-interventional studies (NIS) have become increasingly important in the continuous benefit-risk assessment of medicines. However, the diversity in study designs and in requirements necessitates a careful planning of NIS. In view of a changing regulatory environment, a company-internal online survey was initiated to gather information on existing standards, definitions, and requirements for NIS and to draw advice for the future conduct of multinational NIS. Answers from 45 countries worldwide depicted a global picture of variability in terms of legal and regulatory requirements for NIS. Definitions and terminology are lacking harmonization, and different good practice standards are concurrently in use. Variations in terms of applicable standards and requirements were observed within most geographic regions. The methodological variety in terms of study designs and the divergent perspectives on NIS constitute communicative barriers. Because of the absence of one worldwide applicable good practice standard, differences in semantics and regulatory systems contribute to system disparities.

Journey from clinical practice to clinical research

We have experienced a significant change into 'the way we practice' since we stepped into the area of clinical research. The training in good clinical practice (GCP) made us capable of imparting the excellence. We describe the experience of our journey from clinical practice to clinical research.

Single priming dose of meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine (NeisVac-C®) in infants

Since the introduction of the meningococcal C conjugate (MCC) vaccine in the pediatric population in 1999, numerous clinical studies have confirmed the immunogenicity and safety of the NeisVac-C(®) vaccine, and several have observed a strong immune response after a single priming dose, which could be successfully boosted. Maximizing protection of infants with as few vaccine doses as possible would increase the general acceptability of the immunization strategies and support broader coverage without increasing vaccination costs. This was a randomized feasibility study of a single priming NeisVac-C(®) vaccine dose administered at 4 or 6 months of age, compared to the currently licensed two dose priming at 2 and 4 months of age, followed by a booster vaccination at 12-13 months of age. High seroprotection rates and serum bactericidal antibody (rSBA) titers were observed in all study groups, whether a single or two dose priming vaccination was administered, at all time points investigated: one month after the priming vaccination(s) (>99% of subjects rSBA≥8), prior to booster vaccination (>65% of subjects with rSBA≥8, with the lowest titers and GMTs seen in the two dose priming group), as well as after booster vaccination administration (99% with rSBA≥128 in all three study groups, with the highest GMT of 2472 seen in the 4 month single dose group). This study confirmed trends seen in previous reports that a single-dose priming vaccination at 4 or 6 months of age can be considered a valuable alternative to the currently licensed two-dose priming vaccination schedule.

International models of investigator-initiated trials: implications for Japan

BACKGROUND

Academic/institutional investigator-initiated clinical trials benefit individuals and society by supplementing gaps in industry-sponsored clinical trials.

MATERIALS

In May 2010, experts from Japan, the Republic of Korea, the UK, and the United States, met at a symposium in Tokyo, Japan, to discuss how policies related to the conduct of clinical trials, which have been shown to be effective, may be applied to other regions of the world.

RESULTS

In order to increase the availability of anticancer drugs world-wide, nations including Japan should examine the benefits of increasing the number of investigator-initiated clinical trials. These trials represent one of the most effective ways to translate basic scientific knowledge into clinical practice. These trials should be conducted under GCP guidelines and include Investigational New Drug application submissions with the ultimate goal of future drug approval.

CONCLUSIONS

To maximize the effectiveness of these trials, a policy to educate health care professionals, cancer patients and their families, and the public in general on the benefits of clinical trials should be strengthened. Finally, policies that expedite the clinical development of novel cancer drugs which have already been shown to be effective in other countries are needed in many nations including Japan to accelerate drug approval.

Food and Drug Administration guidance: supervisory responsibilities of investigators

Conducting clinical trials for diabetes can present researchers with a number of regulatory questions. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has increased regulatory enforcement at clinical sites, with an increased emphasis on oversight by principal investigators (PIs; referred to by the FDA as the clinical investigator). The FDA has issued a guidance document, "Guidance for Industry: Investigator Responsibilities-Protecting the Rights, Safety, and Welfare of Study Subjects" (2009), to assist investigators and sponsors. This guidance document breaks new ground regarding the FDA's expectations for investigator oversight of subinvestigators and study staff. The guidance document corresponds with a sharp increase in FDA warning letters to PIs for noncompliance with good clinical practice regulatory requirements. For the first time, an FDA guidance document discusses issues such as the delegation of authority, standard operating procedures, and training of study staff. The FDA provides specific examples with particular emphasis given to appropriate delegation of duties by the PI and ensuring that the clinical staff entrusted to carry out the trial has had adequate training and experience in order to allow them to perform the designated tasks.

Serious adverse events in randomized psychosocial treatment studies: safety or arbitrary edicts?

Human subjects protection policies developed for pharmaceutical trials are now being widely applied to psychosocial intervention studies. This study examined occurrences of serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in multicenter psychosocial trials of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. Substance-abusing participants (N = 1,687) were randomized to standard care or standard care plus either contingency management or motivational enhancement. Twelve percent of participants experienced 1 or more SAEs during the 27,198 person-weeks of follow-up. Of the 260 SAEs recorded, none were judged by the data safety monitoring board to be study related, and there were no significant differences between experimental and control conditions in SAE incidence rates. These data underscore the need to reconsider the rationale behind, and appropriate methods for, monitoring safety during psychosocial therapy trials.

Are all clinical studies sponsored by industry not valid?

Industry-sponsored studies have such a bad reputation that some journals require an additional statistical analysis by an independent statistician. This commentary discusses some of the reasons why academic people tend to believe that "academic" science is better than industry-driven science. Most likely, when it comes to publications, the risk of fraud exists in both worlds as the pressure to publish "significant" data is prevalent in both worlds. In contrast to the academic world, the level of control by regulatory bodies for industry-sponsored studies is much higher. Therefore, the quality of industry-driven studies is high, at least when it comes to the quality of data. One of the main reasons why academic people are so skeptical about the pharmaceutical industry is a lack of knowledge about the work done in industry. It is as demanding and scientific as in other industries. In turn, many physicians working in the pharmaceutical industry have low self-esteem. Also, the pharmaceutical industry should improve its self-presentation adequately to get rid of its bad image. There is a clear need for more communication between both worlds in order to better understand the mutual difficulties and needs.

Good clinical practice and the conduct of clinical studies in pediatric oncology

This article discusses the principles that guide good clinical practice standards, with particular emphasis on how they to relate to pediatric oncology research and recent efforts at harmonization. The authors review the clinical trials process and the roles of the participants, highlighting the pivotal role of the clinical investigator and the research team, and briefly review the historical aspects of drug development regulations in the United States and the current regulatory paths for pediatric oncology drug development. Where relevant, historical events that underlie many of the regulations and their current applications are described, and practical examples are provided.