A randomised control trial on oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone pessary for luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization cycles

This study aimed to evaluate the pregnancy rates, adverse reactions, and medication costs of two luteal phase support regimens: oral dydrogesterone and micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) pessary in in vitro fertilization cycles. A randomized open-label trial with participants randomly assigned to either 400 mg MVP twice daily or 10 mg dydrogesterone three times daily. The primary endpoints were pregnancy rates, and the secondary endpoints included tolerance, miscarriage rates, and medication cost. Per-protocol principle analysis was performed. The baseline characteristics of the 162 participants were similar. Dydrogesterone had statistically similar (p>0.05) positive pregnancy test rates fifteen days post embryo transfer (35.8% vs. 32.7%), clinical pregnancy rates at the gestational age of 6 weeks (32.1% vs. 28.8%), ongoing pregnancy rates (26.4% vs. 23.1%) and miscarriage rates at 14 weeks of gestation (9.2% vs. 9.4%) and safety profile to MVP. Dydrogesterone was better tolerated as vaginal itching was significantly more prevalent in the MVP arm (p=0.008). Dydrogesterone is significantly less expensive than MVP pessary. Oral dydrogesterone and MVP pessary had similar pregnancy rates and adverse effects. Dydrogesterone appears more user-friendly and less expensive in cases of luteal-phase support in in vitro fertilization cycles.

intramuscular progesterone for luteal-phase support in vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the difference in the live birth rates (LBRs) between vaginal progesterone and intramuscular progesterone as luteal-phase support in programmed vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles and determine whether the association was moderated by overweight/obesity.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary reproductive medicine center.

PATIENT(S)

Patients who underwent transfer of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst in a programmed cycle between January 2018 and June 2021.

INTERVENTION(S)

Vaginal or intramuscular progesterone as luteal-phase support. Analysis was performed using the generalized estimating equation framework and multivariate regression models. Interaction testing was used to determine whether overweight/obesity (body mass index of ≥25 kg/m²) moderated the association between progesterone replacement and LBRs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was live birth. The secondary outcomes were biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and total pregnancy loss.

RESULT(S)

A total of 6,905 programmed cycles (4,616 with vaginal progesterone and 2,289 with intramuscular progesterone) were included in the analysis. In the general cohort who underwent cryopreserved blastocyst transfer, the LBRs were 46.23% and 48.62% in the vaginal and intramuscular progesterone groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.01; adjusted OR [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98), with a significantly increased rate of pregnancy losses in the vaginal progesterone group compared with that in the intramuscular progesterone group (22.22% vs. 18.90%; OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.40). Among normal-weight women, the LBR in the vaginal progesterone group was lower than that in the intramuscular progesterone group (aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95). On the other hand, among women with overweight/obesity, the LBRs were similar between the 2 groups of progesterone replacement (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.86-1.33). Interaction testing of the routes of progesterone administration and overweight/obesity was significant.

CONCLUSION(S)

Luteal-phase support with vaginal progesterone was associated with reduced LBRs compared with intramuscular progesterone for vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer, and the association was modified by maternal overweight/obesity. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms behind the association.

Single-Dose Versus Multiple-Dose GnRH Agonist for Luteal-Phase Support in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI Cycles: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Although gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist has been introduced as a beneficial luteal phase support (LPS), the optimal strategy of GnRH agonist remains unclear. This network meta-analysis was therefore performed to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of multiple-dose versus single-dose GnRH agonist protocol for LPS in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles.

METHODS

We searched relevant studies in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from their inception util to September 2021. Live birth, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and clinical abortion rate was evaluated. Pairwise and network meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan and ADDIS based on random-effects model, respectively. Moreover, the prioritization of protocols based on ranking probabilities for different outcomes were performed.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs met our eligibility criteria. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that multiple-dose protocol of GnRH agonist was effective for increasing live birth rate (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.83, p=0.01) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.56, p=0.05) as well as decreasing clinical abortion rate (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.90, p=0.02). Meanwhile, single-dose protocol of GnRH agonist was effective for increasing clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.89, p=0.007) and multiple pregnancy rate (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.12 to 5.78, p=0.03). However, network meta-analysis only confirmed that multiple-dose protocol of GnRH agonist was the best efficacious strategy for live birth rate (OR 2.04, 95% CrI 1.19 to 3.93) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR 2.10, 95% CrI 1.26 to 3.54).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of NMA, multiple-dose protocol may be the optimal strategy for patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles owing to its advantage in increasing live birth and clinical pregnancy rate. Moreover, single-dose protocol may be the optimal strategy for improving multiple pregnancy rate. However, with the limitations, more RCTs are required to confirm our findings.

Early-Pregnancy Dydrogesterone Supplementation Mimicking Luteal-Phase Support in ART Patients Did Not Provoke Major Reproductive Disorders in Pregnant Mice and Their Progeny

Progestogens are frequently administered during early pregnancy to patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART) to overcome progesterone deficits following ART procedures. Orally administered dydrogesterone (DG) shows equal efficacy to other progestogens with a higher level of patient compliance. However, potential harmful effects of DG on critical pregnancy processes and on the health of the progeny are not yet completely ruled out. We treated pregnant mice with DG in the mode, duration, and doses comparable to ART patients. Subsequently, we studied DG effects on embryo implantation, placental and fetal growth, fetal-maternal circulation, fetal survival, and the uterine immune status. After birth of in utero DG-exposed progeny, we assessed their sex ratios, weight gain, and reproductive performance. Early-pregnancy DG administration did not interfere with placental and fetal development, fetal-maternal circulation, or fetal survival, and provoked only minor changes in the uterine immune compartment. DG-exposed offspring grew normally, were fertile, and showed no reproductive abnormalities with the exception of an altered spermiogram in male progeny. Notably, DG shifted the sex ratio in favor of female progeny. Even though our data may be reassuring for the use of DG in ART patients, the detrimental effects on spermatogenesis in mice warrants further investigations and may be a reason for caution for routine DG supplementation in early pregnancy.

Additional luteal support might improve IVF outcomes in patients with low progesterone level in middle luteal phase following a GnRH agonist protocol

AIM

The purpose of the study was to explore the efficacy of additional luteal support (ALS) for patients with low progesterone (P4) level in the middle luteal phase.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 1401 women who underwent their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment with a GnRH agonist protocol was analyzed. Patients were divided into five groups according to P4 level in the middle luteal phase (group I>40ng/mL, group II 31-40 ng/mL, group III 21-30 ng/mL, group IV 11-20 ng/mL and group V 0-10 ng/mL. Besides routine luteal support, the group V was offered with additional oral dydrogesterone 10 mg twice daily to HCG test (ALS group).

RESULTS

After a multiple regression analysis, a similar higher hCG positive rate, clinic pregnancy rate and lower early pregnancy loss rate were achieved in group I and group V. In contrast to group I, group IV demonstrated significant lower HCG positive rate (OR = 0.65 [0.43; 0.99], p = .05), lower clinic pregnancy rate (OR = 0.60 [0.41; 0.88], p < .01) and significant higher early pregnancy loss rate (OR = 1.80 [1.08; 2.99], p = .02). The group III also resulted in significant lower clinic pregnancy rate (OR = 0.56 [0.36; 0.87], p = .01). The live birth rate tended to be higher in group I and group V but without a significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Following agonist protocol, additional luteal support might improve IVF outcomes in patients with low serum P4 level in the middle luteal phase.

Progesterone Hypersensitivity: A Challenge for Luteal Support

Progesterone hypersensitivity is a rare phenomenon which can occur after both endogenous and exogenous exposures. We present a case of hypersensitivity to various forms and routes of exogenous progesterone. A 27-year-old female presented with primary infertility. Investigations revealed Grade 1 endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome. Three cycles of intrauterine insemination were attempted which were unsuccessful and in vitro fertilization was proceeded. Six blastocysts of Grade A were formed and cryopreserved. Artificial cycle was used for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer (FET). However, due to failure to use exogenous progesterone due to hypersensitivity reaction, Modified Natural Cycle (MNC) was used. A follicle was formed using ovulation induction with tamoxifen and human menopausal gonadotropin. Ovulation was induced by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and natural progesterone from corpus luteum was used. FET was done when endometrium was 8 mm. Pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound and β-hCG levels and continued uneventfully. Endogenous progesterone can be used as an alternative for endometrial preparation for FET in patients with exogenous progesterone hypersensitivity.

A comparative study of dydrogesterone and micronized progesterone for luteal phase support during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability and patients' satisfaction after the use of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal micronized progesterone for luteal-phase support (LPS) among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). A total of 210 women (aged 20-40 years old) with a history of infertility, who underwent controlled ovarian stimulation for fresh intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer cycles, were included in the study. Consequently, they were randomized to receive LPS with dydrogesterone 20 mg twice daily (n = 96) or micronized progesterone 400 mg twice daily at the day of oocyte retrieval (n = 114). The clinical success rate (31% versus 33%; p = 0.888), miscarriage rate (5.0% versus 3.0%; p = 0.721), ongoing pregnancy rate (30.0% versus 30.0%; p = 1.000), implantation (22.0% versus 24.0%; p = 0.254) and multiple pregnancy rate (5.30% versus 7.20%; p = 0.394) were comparable among the two groups. Serum progesterone levels were significantly lower among the patients receiving dydrogesterone than the control group (13.62 ± 13.83 ng/ml versus 20.66 ± 18.09 ng/ml; p = 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference regarding the patients' satisfaction (p = 0.825) and tolerability (0.790) between the two groups. Our results showed that oral dydrogesterone (40 mg/day) is as effective as vaginal micronized progesterone considering its clinical outcomes and patients' satisfaction and tolerability, for LPS among women undergoing IVF.