Mental Nerve Neurectomy: A Comparison of Titanium Screw Versus Gutta-Percha Oburation of the Mental Foramen

OBJECTIVE

 This study aims to compare the two mental foramen obturating techniques in parameters like operator's ease, postoperative displacement of obturation material, and remission of pain after peripheral neurectomy in patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

STUDY DESIGN

 This study adopts a single-centered comparative analytical approach.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

This study was performed in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry (AFID), from October 1, 2023, to February 10, 2024.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included and divided into two groups (30 each), and peripheral neurectomy was performed under local anesthesia. In one group, gutta-percha sticks were used to obturate the foramina, and in the other group, titanium screws were used. Postoperatively, the operator's ease, postoperative displacement, and relapse of pain were recorded.

RESULTS

 Titanium screws were easy to handle, and there was no relapse of pain because of no displacement postoperatively when compared with gutta-percha sticks, which were hard to manipulate and showed a relapse of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

 Titanium screws have better postoperative outcomes when compared with gutta-percha sticks in terms of the operator's ease, relapse of pain, and postoperative displacement.

A minimally invasive method for titanium mesh fixation with resorbable sutures in guided bone regeneration: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Titanium mesh has become a mainstream choice for guided bone regeneration (GBR) owing to its excellent space maintenance. However, the traditional fixation method using titanium screws impacts surgery efficiency and increases patient trauma. We report a novel method of fixing a titanium mesh using resorbable sutures. We assessed the feasibility of resorbable sutures for fixing a titanium mesh and whether it can serve as a stable, universal, and minimally invasive fixation method for a broader application of titanium meshes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing GBR with a digital titanium mesh fixed using titanium screws (TS group) and resorbable sutures (RS group) were observed at different time points. The stability of the fixation methods was evaluated on parameters such as titanium mesh spatial displacement, bone augmentation, and bone resorption.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients were included in this study. The exposure rate of the titanium mesh in the TS group was 16.67%, while no exposure was noted in the RS group. There was no significant difference in the parameters of titanium mesh spatial displacement, bone augmentation, and bone resorption between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The use of resorbable sutures for fixing a titanium mesh can achieve similar results to traditional fixation using titanium screws. Although this new fixation method can improve the efficiency of the surgery and reduce the risk of complications, the long-term clinical effects require further follow-up investigation.

Is the magnesium screw as stable as the titanium screw in the fixation of first metatarsal distal chevron osteotomy? A comparative biomechanical study on sawbones models

Background: Distal chevron osteotomy (DCO) is commonly performed in hallux valgus surgery. The fixation of the osteotomy is provided by various implants. The usage of biodegradable implants such as magnesium is gradually increasing due to the advantages they provide. In this study, we aimed to compare the fixation of DCO with magnesium or titanium screw biomechanically. Methods: Twenty sawbones were used. The samples were divided into two equal groups, including ten sawbones for fixation with single headless titanium (group-1) or magnesium screw (group-2). DCO and screw fixations were performed on all samples using the same technique. Biomechanical testing was applied to five samples in each group in cantilever and the other five in a physiological configuration using a computer connected to the electromechanical test machine. The obtained data were evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test, Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test on the IBM® SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) V22.0 software. Significance was accepted at the p < 0.05 level. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the magnesium screw and the titanium screw in terms of maximum force, maximum displacement and stiffness measurements in cantilever and physiological loadings (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: This study found no significant difference in biomechanical stability between the magnesium and titanium screws in DCO fixation on sawbones. Further studies with real bones are needed.

In vivo osseointegration and erosion of nacre screws in an animal model

The use of resorbable devices for osteosynthesis has become a subject of interest. Nacre has been proposed as a resorbable and osteoconductive material favoring bone apposition without triggering an inflammatory reaction. We compared the in vivo osseointegration and erosion of nacre screws in an animal model with titanium screws. Implantation of similar nacre and titanium screws was performed in the femoral condyles of adult rats. Animals (n = 41) were randomized in four groups sacrificed at day one, 1, 6, and 12 months. Microcomputed tomography (microCT) allowed 3D morphometry of erosion of nacre. Osseointegration was measured as the volume of trabecular bone bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) in a standardized volume of interest around each screw. Undecalcified bone histology was also done. Gross examination revealed a similar clinical osseointegration for titanium and nacre screws. A progressive erosion of nacre screws, but no erosion of titanium screws, was observed in microCT. The volume of nacre screws progressively decreased over time whereas no modification occurred for titanium. For titanium screws, BV/TV remained stable throughout the study. For nacre screws, the BV/TV decrease was not statistically different. A significant difference was found between nacre and titanium screws at 6 months but not at 12 months. The screw heads, outside the bone shaft, were not eroded even after 12 months. Erosion of nacre occurred during the entire study period, only within the bone shaft in direct contact with bone marrow. Bone apposition was observed on nacre surfaces without signs of erosion. Nacre is a promising biomaterial in maxillofacial surgery.

Biomechanical Loading Comparison between Titanium and Bioactive Resorbable Screw Systems for Fixation of Intracapsular Condylar Head Fractures

Osteosynthesis resorbable materials made of uncalcined and unsintered hydroxyapatite (u-HA) particles, poly-L-lactide (PLLA), are bioresorbable, and these materials have feasible bioactive/osteoconductive capacities. However, their strength and stability for fixation in mandibular condylar head fractures remain unclear. This in vitro study aimed to assess the biomechanical strength of u-HA/PLLA screws after the internal fixation of condylar head fractures. To evaluate their biomechanical behavior, 32 hemimandible replicas were divided into eight groups, each consisting of single-screw and double-screw fixations with titanium or u-HA/PLLA screws. A linear load was applied as vertical and horizontal load to each group to simulate the muscular forces in condylar head fractures. Samples were examined for 0.5, 1, 2, and 3-mm displacement loads. Two screws were needed for stable fixation of the mandibular condylar head fracture during biomechanical evaluation. After screw fixation for condylar head fractures, the titanium screws model was slightly more resistant to vertical and horizontal movement with a load for a small displacement than the u-HA/PLLA screws model. There was no statistically significant difference with load for large displacements. The u-HA/PLLA screw has a low mechanical resistance under small displacement loading compared with titanium within the limits of the mandibular head fracture model study.

Biomechanical dynamic comparison of biodegradable pins and titanium screws for operative stabilization of displaced radial head fractures

For radial head osteosynthesis, biodegradable implants are gaining in importance to minimize cartilage destruction and implant impingement and to supersede implant removal. Since loss of reduction and pseudarthrosis remain challenging complications, new implants should at least provide comparable biomechanical properties as commonly used metal implants. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment by polylactide pins to titanium screws and to quantify the produced cartilage defects. Eight pairs of human cadaver radii with a standardized Mason type II fracture were stabilized either by two 2.0-mm polylactide pins or titanium screws. The produced cartilage defects were quantified using an image analyzing software. Quasi-static loading was performed axially and transversally for 10 cycles each between 10 and 50 N. Afterward, implant loosening was tested by axial loading up to 10,000 cycles, followed by load to failure testing. Polylactide pins showed less construct stiffness under axial (p = 0.017) and transversal (p = 0.012) loading, and one polylactide pins construct failed after two cycles of transversal loading. At axial loading, a high correlation between bone mineral density and construct stiffness was observed among polylactide pins (R = 0.667; p = 0.071), which was not seen among titanium screws (R = 0.262; p = 0.531). No difference in implant loosening was recorded after 10,000 cycles (p = 0.237); however, one polylactide pins construct failed after 30 cycles and failure loads were higher for titanium screws (p=0.017). Polylactide pin produced smaller cartilage defects (p=0.012). In conclusion, simple radial head fractures treated by polylactide pins show less biomechanical stability than treated by titanium screws, particularly in osteoporotic bone which might lead to secondary loss of reduction. Due to smaller cartilage defects and equal properties under continuous loading, polylactide pins might represent a gentle alternative in patients with good bone quality making subsequent implant removal redundant.

The influence of screw type, alloy and cylinder position on the marginal fit of implant frameworks before and after laser welding

Misfit at the abutment-prosthetic cylinder interface can cause loss of preload, leading to loosening or fracture of gold and titanium screws.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of screw type, alloy, and cylinder position on marginal fit of implant frameworks before and after laser welding.

METHODS

After Estheticone-like abutments were screwed to the implants, thirty plastic prosthetic cylinders were mounted and waxed-up to fifteen cylindrical bars. Each specimen had three interconnected prosthetic components. Five specimens were one-piece cast in titanium and five in cobalt-chromium alloy. On each specimen, tests were conducted with hexagonal titanium and slotted gold screws separately, performing a total of thirty tested screws. Measurements at the interfaces were performed using an optical microscope with 5mm accuracy. After sectioning, specimens were laser welded and new measurements were obtained. Data were submitted to a four-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons test (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Slotted and hexagonal screws did not present significant differences regarding to the fit of cylinders cast in titanium, either in one-piece casting framework or after laser welding. When slotted and hexagonal screws were tested on the cobalt-chromium specimens, statistically significant differences were found for the one-piece casting condition, with the slotted screws presenting better fit (24.13 microm) than the hexagonal screws (27.93 microm). Besides, no statistically significant differences were found after laser welding.

CONCLUSIONS

1) The use of different metal alloys do exert influence on the marginal fit, 2) The slotted and hexagonal screws play the exclusive role of fixing the prosthesis, and did not improve the fit of cylinders, and 3) cylinder position did not affect marginal fit values.