Antiphospholipid antibodies in COVID-19: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Many studies reported high prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in patients with COVID-19 raising questions about its true prevalence and its clinical impact on the disease course.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis and a systematic review to examine the prevalence of aPL and its clinical impact in patients with COVID-19.

RESULTS

21 studies with a total of 1159 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Among patients hospitalised with COVID-19, the pooled prevalence rate of one or more aPL (IgM or IgG or IgA of anticardiolipin (aCL) or anti-ß2 glycoprotein (anti-ß2 GPI) or antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin, or lupus anticoagulant (LA)) was 46.8% (95% CI 36.1% to 57.8%). The most frequent type of aPL found was LA, with pooled prevalence rate of 50.7% (95% CI 34.8% to 66.5%). Critically ill patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher prevalence of aCL (IgM or IgG) (28.8% vs 7.10%, p<0.0001) and anti-ß2 GPI (IgM or IgG) (12.0% vs 5.8%, p<0.0001) as compared with non-critically ill patients. However, there was no association between aPL positivity and mean levels of C reactive protein (mean difference was 32 (95% CI -15 to 79), p=0.18), D-dimer (mean difference was 34 (95% CI -194 to 273), p=0.77), mortality (1.46 (95% CI 0.29 to 7.29), p=0.65), invasive ventilation (1.22 (95% CI 0.51 to 2.91), p=0.65) and venous thromboembolism (1.38 (95% CI 0.57 to 3.37), p=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

aPLs were detected in nearly half of patients with COVID-19, and higher prevalence of aPL was found in severe disease. However, there was no association between aPL positivity and disease outcomes including thrombosis, invasive ventilation and mortality. However, further studies are required to identify the clinical and pathological role of aPL in COVID-19.

Hyperhomocysteinemia Relates to the Subtype of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Non-SLE Patients

Abnormal increases of antiphospholipid antibody and plasma homocysteine levels are recently emerging as nonlipidic risk factors for cerebral atherogenesis and thrombosis. Both antiphospholipid antibody and homocysteine share many similar bioeffects in hemostasis, but their interaction is still inconsistent. In this study, we examined the relation between the plasma homocysteine level and lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibody, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibody in patients with noncardiac cerebral ischemia. Systemic lupus erythrematosus patients were excluded. The results showed a higher frequency of moderate hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with an abnormal increase of lupus anticoagulant only. Neither the serum folate and cobalamin levels nor methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase allele mutation contributes to this result. Accordingly, homocysteine interacts with lupus anticoagulant to promote cerebral atherosclerosis and ischemia. The role of vasculopathic or prothrombotic autoantibody generation in response to specific pathological change such as hyperhomocysteinemia warrants further investigation.

[Advanced clinical laboratory studies in the graduate school of medicine--studies on pathogenic mechanisms of anti-phospholipid syndrome]

Anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined based on both clinical findings (recurrent arterial and/or venous thrombosis and recurrent fetal loss) and laboratory evidence of persistent anti-phospholipid antibodies (anti-cardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies, or LA activity). However, the precise mechanism responsible for arterial and/or venous thromboembolic complications in APS patients remains unclear. To clarify the association between the various types of anti phospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and thrombotic complications, we examined the prevalence of seven types of aPLs [anti-cardiolipin/beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies(anti-CL/beta2-GPI), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies(anti-PS/PT), anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-beta2-GPI), anti prothrombin antibodies (anti-PT), anti-protein C antibodies (anti-PC), anti-protein S antibodies(anti-PS), and annexin V antibodies(anti-AN)] in 168 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We confirmed that the presence of anti-CL/beta2-GPI, anti-PS/PT, and anti-beta2-GPI is closely related to arterial thrombosis, and that the presence of anti-protein S is closely related to venous thromboembolism. Furthermore, our in-vitro experiment suggests that anti-CL/beta2-GPI and anti-PS/PT may cooperate to promote platelet activation, and may be involved in the pathogenesis of arterial thrombosis. On the other hand, anti-protein S led to APC resistance, which may represent an important mechanism responsible for the development of venous thrombosis. Furthermore, our study showed that anti-CL/beta2-GPI causes a persistently high-level expression of tissue factor on monocytes, and this may increase the risk of atherosclerosis.

Clinical significance of different antiphospholipid antibodies in the WAPS (warfarin in the antiphospholipid syndrome) study

To assess the clinical significance of lupus anticoagulants (LAs) and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) toward thrombosis and abortions, we measured them in 112 patients whose samples were available at enrollment in the warfarin in the antiphospholipid syndrome (WAPS) study. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and coagulation test values in the highest and lowest tertiles were compared. When considered separately, IgG antibodies to β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) and prothrombin (aPT) were associated with anamnestic arterial and venous thrombosis, respectively, and those to annexin AV (aAnAV) with abortions. IgM antibodies to protein S and the lupus ratio of the dilute prothrombin time were associated with prospective thrombosis. No other association for IgM antibodies was seen. LA-positive patients who carried aβ2GPI antibodies were at risk of anamnestic arterial and total thrombosis and aPT antibodies to that of anamnestic venous and total thrombosis. LA-positive patients who carried IgG aβ2GPI and aAnAV antibodies were at risk for both anamnestic abortion and prospective thrombosis. Overall, these data support the inclusion of aβ2GPI antibodies in and suggest the removal of anticardiolipin antibodies from the laboratory criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome. They also suggest that the measurement of aPT and aAnAV antibodies is useful in some selected situations and that there is little role for IgM antibody detection.

Diagnostic biologique du syndrome des antiphospholipides

PURPOSE

The antiphospholipid syndrome is a bioclinical entity defined by the occurrence of thromboses, and/or obstetrical complications in the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, i.e. lupus anticoagulant and/or anticardiolipin antibodies. This review focuses on the methods for antiphospholipid antibodies detection and their clinical usefulness.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Lupus anticoagulant is the strongest risk factor for thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome. Twenty years after its description, anticardiolipin ELISA, despite a still improvable standardization and its lack of specificity, is still required for sensitive diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

A better knowledge of the beta-2-glycoprotein-I role in the pathophysiology of antiphospholipid syndrome might lead to the development of new markers of thrombotic risk.

Predictive value of persistent versus transient antiphospholipid antibody subtypes for the risk of thrombotic events in pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Study objectives were to determine, in children with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), (1) the association of antiphosholipid antibody (APLA) subtypes with thrombotic events (TEs) and (2) the predictive value of persistent versus transient antibodies for TEs. This is a cohort study of 58 SLE children in whom lupus anticoagulants (LAs), anticardiolipin antibodies (ACLAs), anti–β2-glycoprotein-I (anti–β2-GPI), and antiprothrombin (anti-PT) were assessed on at least 2 occasions (more than 3 months apart). Antibodies were classified as persistent (positive on at least 2 occasions) or transient (positive once). Outcomes were symptomatic TEs confirmed by objective radiographic tests identified retrospectively and prospectively. Seven of the 58 patients (12%) had 10 TEs; 5 patients had TEs during prospective follow-up. Persistent LAs showed the strongest association with TEs (P < .001). Persistent ACLAs (P = .003) and anti–β2-GPI (P = .002) were significantly associated with TEs; anti-PT (P = .063) showed a trend. Persistent or transient LAs and anti–β2-GPI showed similar strength of association, while ACLAs and anti-PT were no longer associated with TEs. Positivity for multiple APLA subtypes showed stronger associations with TEs than for individual APLA subtypes because of improved specificity. Lupus anticoagulant is the strongest predictor of the risk of TEs; other APLA subtypes provide no additional diagnostic value. Anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-PT require serial testing because only persistent antibodies are associated with TEs.

Antiphospholipid antibodies

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) have been associated with thromboembolic events. Since they were fi rst described in 1906, APAs have been the subject of multidisciplinary studies seeking to link them to potential pathophysiologic mechanisms. This review summarizes the different types of APAs, antigenic targets, clinical complications associated with APAs, and APA syndrome. In addition, the currently available methods for laboratory identification of lupus anticoagulants are discussed, as is the laboratory diagnosis of anticardiolipin antibodies.

Antiphospholipid thrombosis syndromes

Antiphospholipid antibodies are strongly associated with thrombosis and are the most common of the acquired blood protein defects causing thrombosis. Although the precise mechanism(s) whereby antiphospholipid antibodies alter hemostasis to induce a hypercoagutable state remain unclear, numerous theories, as previously discussed, have been advanced. The most common thrombotic events associated with anticardiolipin antibodies are deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus (type I syndrome), coronary or peripheral artery thrombosis (type II syndrome), or cerebrovascular/retinal vessel thrombosis (type II syndrome); occasionally, patients present with mixtures of these types (type IV syndrome). Type V patients are those with antiphospholipid antibodies and RMS. It is as yet unclear how many seemingly normal individuals who may never develop manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (type VI) harbor asymptomatic antiphospholipid antibodies. The relative frequency of anticardiolipin antibodies in association with arterial and venous thrombosis strongly suggests that these should be looked for in any individual with unexplained thrombosis; all three idiotypes (IgG, IgA, and IgM) should be assessed. Also, the type of syndrome (I through VI) should be defined if possible, as this may dictate both type and duration of both immediate and long-term anticoagulant therapy. Unlike those with anticardiolipin antibodies, patients with primary lupus anticoagulant thrombosis syndrome usually experience venous thrombosis. Because the aPTT is unreliable inpatients with lupus anticoagulant (prolonged in only about 40 to 50% of patients) and is not usually prolonged in patients with anticardiolipin antibodies, definitive tests, including ELISA for anticardiolipin antibodies, the dRVVT for lupus anticoagulant, hexagonal phospholipid neutralization procedure, and beta-2-GP-I (IgG, IgA, and IgM) should be immediately ordered when suspecting antiphospholipid syndrome or in individuals with otherwise unexplained thrombotic or thromboembolic events. If results of these tests are negative, in the appropriate clinical setting, subgroups should also be assessed. Finally, most patients with antiphospholipid thrombosis syndrome will fail warfarin therapy and, except for retinal vascular thrombosis, may fail some types of antiplatelet therapy; thus it is of major importance to make this diagnosis so that patients can be treated with the most effective therapy for secondary prevention--LMWH or UH in most instances, and clopidogrel in some instances.

The characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage from a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome

The purpose of this study was to investigate the biochemical characteristics as well as the occurrence and specificity of antiphospholipid antibodies in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from a patient with both antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome (APS) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Proteins, lipids, cells and autoantibodies were determined. Immunoglobulins were purified with affinity chromatography. Autoantibody identification was assessed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and with electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting and revelation with antihuman IgG-peroxidase conjugate. Antiphospholipid antibodies were found to be present in the BAL fluid as well as in the serum from a patient with APS. Specifically, antiphosphatidylserine and antiphosphatidic acid IgG antibodies in the BAL fluid and antiphosphatidylcholine and anticardiolipin IgG antibodies in the serum were detected at high levels. BAL fluid protein and the percentage of neutrophils were found to be increased. A quantitative as well as qualitative deficiency of surfactant phospholipids was also observed. Antibodies directed against surfactant phospholipids could cause surfactant abnormalities and an inflammatory reaction. These disorders may be one of the causes of the ARDS or a factor in the perpetuation of the inflammation.

Lack of association between antiphospholipid antibody and WHO classification in lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) in patients with biopsy proven lupus nephritis (LN) and to investigate if there is any association between the presence of serum aPL and WHO classes.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients (68 female and 3 male, mean age 31 years, range 10-67) meeting ACR criteria for the classification of SLE and with biopsy proven LN were included. For every patient, we evaluated anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant and renal biopsy classified according to the WHO classification criteria (activity and chronicity scores were included). Twenty-four hour urinary protein at the time of biopsy was considered.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients had class V LN, 27 had class IV, 11 had class III, 3 had class II and 1 had class I. Twenty-seven (40.2%) patients were aPL positive. The prevalence of aPL positive patients was 45% in class V, 33.3% in class IV and 45.6% in class III. We did not find any significant association between the presence of aPL and the WHO class (p = 0.61 with class V, p = 0.31 with class IV and p = 0.73 with class III). There was no association between the presence of aPL and activity (p = 0.52) or chronicity scores (p = 0.42). We also did not find any association between proteinuria and the presence of aPL (p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that there is no association between the presence of aPL and the different WHO classes. The presence of these antibodies does not seem to be related to histological activity or the chronicity of lupus nephritis nor proteinuria.

Six kinds of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in ovulatory mucus and seminal plasma from couples with repeated miscarriages

OBJECTIVE

Determination of aPLs in ovulatory mucus and in seminal plasma in 18 infertile couples (women, median age 33.2, range 28-39 years; men, median age 36.4, range 29-46 years) with repeated unexplained miscarriages (four to nine spontaneous abortions). Women with high levels of aPLs in sera were excluded from the study.

METHODS

aPL screening included cardiolipin (Sevac Prague), L-alpha-phosphatidic acid, L-alpha-phosphatidylethanolamine, L-alpha-phosphatidyl-DL-glycerol, L-alpha-phosphatidylinositol, and L-alpha-phosphatidyl/serine (Sigma, USA). These were determined in isotypes IgG and IgA by an ELISA method. Statistical analysis of aPL results was made by cut-off levels of aPLs for both Ig isotypes by using 3 SD or 95th percentile calculated by STATGRAPHICS. Control group was created from four fertile healthy couples.

RESULTS

Levels of aPLs in ovulatory cervical mucus were in the majority very low, except for IgA-aPLs-inositol. Very high interindividual differences in aPLs were found in seminal plasma. IgA-aPL-ethanolamine and -DL-glycerol, and IgG-aPL-L-serine and -DL-glycerol predominated in seminal plasma. Extremely high IgA levels of aPLs in all above-mentioned antigens, except cardiolipin, were found in one man of an infertile couple.

CONCLUSION

The passage of abnormal aPLs levels from seminal plasma into the site of conception during often repeated, unprotected intercourses is supported by the findings.

[Lupus anticoagulants versus antiphospholipid antibodies]

The antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) present in "antiphospholipid-protein syndrome and autoimmune disorders" are associated with thromboembolic episodes, such as venous and/or arterial thrombosis and fetal loss. Patients with antiphospholipid antibodies have, by definition, laboratory abnormalities in either coagulation assays or various solid phase immunoassays ELISA or radioimmunoassays (RIA). These assay systems were initially thought to detect antibodies against phospholipids. The problem was complicated when it was reported that phospholipid is not the sole antigen but only a part of it, the other contribution being due to b2-glycoprotein I (b2-GP I). More findings, demonstrate that the aPL are in fact anti-b2-GP I antibodies directed against a epitope which is expressed when b2-GP I is bound to anionic phospholipid or another suitable surface. Recent studies have demonstrated that antibodies related to lupus anticoagulant (LA) induce an anticoagulant activity in b2-GP I. Some of these LA require binding to phospholipid. However, not all LA require b2-GP I as a cofactor. Human prothrombin is an antigen for some LA IgG's. Finally, a subclassification of phospholipid-dependent coagulation test anticoagulants is described, there appear to be several subclasses of LA, and the clinical and laboratory criteria required to establish the diagnosis of antiphospholipid-protein syndrome is emphasised.

[New targets of antiphospholipid antibodies]

"Antiphospholipid" antibodies (aPL) are a heterogenous group of autoantibodies with clinical importance because of their association with thrombotic events, both venous and arterial. Traditionally, aPL have been assayed using phospholipid-dependent tests and are classified as lupus anticoagulants and anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA), based on the method of detection. Most antibodies associated with the aPL syndrome and detected in standard assays are actually directed against two phospholipid-binding plasma proteins, beta 2 glycoprotein I and prothrombin. These antibodies can also be detected in immunoassays (ELISA) utilizing purified protein antigens, in the absence of phospholipids. The main advantage of beta 2 GPI-ELISA compared with conventional cardiolipin-ELISA appearing from initial clinical studies is greater specificity for the aPL syndrome, due to (i) ignorance of "authentic" ACA that interact directly with cardiolipin; (ii) detection of species specific anti-beta 2 GPI antibodies poorly reactive with bovine beta 2 GPI in the cardiolipin-ELISA. Other proteins proposed as target antigens of aPL are protein C, protein S, annexin V, high- and low-molecular weight kininogens, the latter being involved in the binding of antibodies to phosphatidylethanolamine. The possibility that particular autoantibodies (or combinations of autoantibodies) explain the observed clinical spectrum of the aPL syndrome is attractive, but much remains to be learned about their pathogenicity and origin in order to improve diagnosis and therapy.

Antiphospholipid-protein antibodies: clinical use of laboratory test results (identification, predictive value, treatment)

Antiphospholipid-protein antibodies (APA) are a family of immunoglobulins which recognize protein-phospholipid complexes. Among the proteins implicated are: beta 2 Glycoprotein I, prothrombin, Annexin V, protein C, and protein S. Laboratory tests are used to identify, predict potential clinical complications, and manage patients with the antiphospholipid-protein syndrome (APS). Emerging evidence suggests laboratory tests can be used to stratify relative risk of patients with APA.

Significance of aPL IgG subclasses

Human immunoglobulin G (IgG) is comprised of four subclasses with distinct structural and biologic properties. Patients with autoimmune disease, in general, show an overall increase in serum IgG as well as skewing in subclass distribution for particular autoantibodies. Antinuclear antibodies and anti-double stranded DNA antibodies, for example, are primarily IgG1 and IgG3. In contrast, anticardiolipin antibodies show a skewing towards presence of IgG2 presence is associated with arterial and venous thrombotic complications. Selective absorption of IgG2 from high titer sera abrogates aCL ELISA binding. Pathogenicity of aCL may be related to IgG2 in an important way. The precise mechanism of action and nature of the inducing stimulus are not yet clear.

Different target specificities of phospholipid-dependent antibodies

Phospholipid dependent antibodies are usually measured with assays for antiphospholipid/anticardiolipin antibodies (aPLA) or for lupus anticoagulant (LA) activity. Most of them are targeted to complexes of beta 2-glycoprotein I (beta 2-GPI) and anionic phospholipids (PLP) or to prothrombin for some LA. New understandings allow a better standardisation and optimisation of assays' reactivity. Antigenic targets of phospholipid dependent antibodies were studied on plasmas from 38 patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and presenting aPLA and/or LA. Using human beta 2-GPI-PLP complexes as solid phase antigen offers the highest sensitivity for measuring aPLA. Many aPLA, but not all, also react with beta 2-GPI coated on solid phase, however there is no evidence until now that this latter reactivity shows a closest association with the clinical context. Most of the patients with LA present an immunological reactivity to beta 2-GPI alone or to prothrombin, when these proteins are coated on solid phase. In two cases there was a reactivity to only beta 2-GPI-PLP complexes. For the various immunoassays, using NUNC type I plates offers a good binding capacity for coating antigens. They are then present at enough density on solid phase for insuring an efficient binding of autoantibodies. This is an important factor for assay sensitivity and reproducibility. Interestingly, in 1 case with LA, autoantibodies were reactive with coated beta 2-GPI alone but not with its PLP-complexes. In another case reactivity to beta 2-GPI was much higher than that to beta 2-GPI-PLP.

Kaolin clotting time and dilute Russell's viper venom time distinguish between prothrombin-dependent and beta 2-glycoprotein I-dependent antiphospholipid antibodies

Antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies include anticardiolipin (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) antibodies. LA antibodies recognize the complex of lipid-bound (human) prothrombin, in this way inhibiting the phospholipid-dependent coagulation reactions, whereas aCL antibodies are directed towards beta 2-glycoprotein I (beta 2-GPI) bound to an anionic lipid surface. According to their behavior in coagulation reactions, we have divided aCL antibodies into two groups: aCL-type A, which inhibit the phospholipid-dependent coagulation reactions because they enhance the binding of beta 2-GPI to the procoagulant phospholipid surface; and aCL-type B antibodies, which are devoid of anticoagulant properties. We report the distinctive laboratory and clinical profiles of 25 patients with well-characterized, phospholipid-dependent inhibitor of coagulation. Fourteen patients had LA antibodies (aCL-type B were concomitantly present in 10 cases, while in the other four, aCL titer was normal), and the other 11 had aCL-type A antibodies. The laboratory evaluation of the two groups showed the dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) to be the most abnormal coagulation test in the aCL-type A-positive group, whereas the kaolin clotting time (KCT) was the most abnormal assay in the LA-positive group. In fact, the ratios of the coagulation times of patient plasma over normal pooled plasma (mean +/- standard deviation) for LA versus aCL-type A antibodies were 1.48 +/- 0.27 versus 2.20 +/- 0.42, P = .0001, and 2.22 +/- 0.42 versus 1.50 +/- 0.42, P = .0003, for the dRVVT and KCT, respectively. No differences were observed either in the ratios of the activated partial thromboplastin times and the prothrombin times or the plasma levels of beta 2-GPI and prothrombin. Conversely, aCL titers were significantly higher in aCL-type A-positive patients (147 +/- 44 U) than in the LA-positive group (61 +/- 55 U; P = .0003). We ruled out the possibility that platelet contamination of plasma could account for the observed coagulation profiles, as the two patterns were reproduced in platelet-free plasma. In addition, we performed clotting tests in plasma in the presence of phospholipids and calcium after addition of factor IXa or factor Xa. The assay performed with factor Xa was more sensitive to the presence of aCL-type A antibodies, while the assay performed with factor IXa was preferentially sensitive to LA-containing plasmas, supporting the earlier findings with the dRVVT and KCT assays.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)