Use of apixaban in adults with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias: The PROTECT-AR study

BACKGROUND

Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) and atrial arrhythmias (AA) face an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Limited data exist on the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in ACHD. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban in ACHD patients with AA.

METHODS

PROTECT-AR (NCT03854149) was a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted from 2019 to 2023. ACHD patients with atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia on routine apixaban treatment were included. The historical control group consisted of patients previously on vitamin K antagonist (VKA), who were analyzed prior to their transition to apixaban. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the composite of stroke or thromboembolism. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 218 ACHD patients with AA on apixaban, of which 73 were previous VKA users. The analysis covered 527 patient-years of prospective exposure to apixaban and 169 patient-years of retrospective exposure to VKA. The annualized rate of stroke or thromboembolism was 0.6% in the apixaban group and 1.8% in the VKA group (absolute difference - 1.2%; upper limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9%, lower than the predefined non-inferiority margin of +1.8%, Pnon-inferiority < 0.001). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 1.5% in the apixaban group and 2.4% in the VKA group (hazard ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.19-2.10, P = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

In ACHD patients with AA, routine apixaban use exhibited a non-inferior rate of stroke or thromboembolism compared to historical VKA use, alongside a similar rate of major bleeding.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous beta-blockers in acute atrial fibrillation and flutter is dependent on beta-1 selectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Intravenous beta-blockers are commonly used to manage patients with acute atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFl), but the choice of specific agent is often not evidence-based.

METHODS

A prospectively-registered systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials (PROSPERO: CRD42020204772) to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous beta-blockers against alternative pharmacological agents.

RESULTS

Twelve trials comparing beta-blockers with diltiazem, digoxin, verapamil, anti-arrhythmic drugs and placebo were included, with variable risk of bias and 1152 participants. With high heterogeneity (I2 = 87%; p < 0.001), there was no difference in the primary outcomes of heart rate reduction (standardised mean difference - 0.65 beats/minute compared to control, 95% CI - 1.63 to 0.32; p = 0.19) or the proportion that achieved target heart rate (risk ratio [RR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.36-1.97; p = 0.70). Conventional selective beta-1 blockers were inferior for target heart rate reduction versus control (RR 0.33, 0.17-0.64; p < 0.001), whereas super-selective beta-1 blockers were superior (RR 1.98, 1.54-2.54; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between beta-blockers and comparators for secondary outcomes of conversion to sinus rhythm (RR 1.15, 0.90-1.46; p = 0.28), hypotension (RR 1.85, 0.87-3.93; p = 0.11), bradycardia (RR 1.29, 0.25-6.82; p = 0.76) or adverse events leading to drug discontinuation (RR 1.03, 0.49-2.17; p = 0.93). The incidence of hypotension and bradycardia were greater with non-selective beta-blockers (p = 0.031 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Across all intravenous beta-blockers, there was no difference with other medications for acute heart rate control in atrial fibrillation and flutter. Efficacy and safety may be improved by choosing beta-blockers with higher beta-1 selectivity.

Gender Differences With Ibutilide Effectiveness and Safety in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have examined the use of ibutilide in noncardiac surgical populations. Our study considered the effectiveness and safety of ibutilide in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) in medical and surgical intensive care patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AF who were hemodynamically stable and received ibutilide after the initial diagnosis. Patients were administered 1 mg of ibutilide fumarate intravenous for 10 min with a second dose administered if AF persisted after 30 min. Patients were pretreated with intravenous magnesium sulfate if their blood magnesium level was <2 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Fifty seven total female patients and 99 male patients received ibutilide. Females had an 88% conversion rate to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) compared to 68% in males (P = 0.008). A 70% successful return to NSR was observed in patients from all groups pretreated with magnesium sulfate (P = 0.045). One year after discharge, 74% of the patients stayed in the NSR.

CONCLUSIONS

Within our population, pretreatment with magnesium sulfate followed by ibutilide was associated with increased conversion to NSR. Additionally, we noted that females had a higher conversion rate to NSR compared to males, regardless of whether they were pretreated with magnesium sulfate.

Hypotension and respiratory events related to electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) is common in the ED. Our previous work showed that hypotension and respiratory events were important adverse events that occurred in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for AF/AFL. The purpose of this study was to examine if (1) beta-blockers or calcium channel blocker use prior to ECV were associated with hypotension and (2) medications used for procedural sedation were associated with respiratory events.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of pooled study data from four previous multicentred studies on AF/AFL. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression to examine predictors of hypotension and respiratory adverse events.

RESULTS

There were 1736 patients who received ECV. A hypotensive event occurred in 62 (3.6%) patients. There was no significant difference in the odds of a hypotensive event in patients who received a beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker in the ED compared to no rate control. Procedural sedation with fentanyl (OR 2.01 95% CI 1.15-3.51) and home beta-blocker use (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.14-3.21) were significantly associated with hypotensive events. A respiratory event occurred in 179 (10.3%) patients. Older age (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.30- 3.15) and receiving midazolam for procedural sedation were found to be significantly associated with respiratory events (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.02-3.88).

CONCLUSION

Beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker use prior to ECV for AF/AFL was not associated with hypotension. However, sedation with fentanyl and home beta-blocker use was associated with hypotension. The use of midazolam for procedural sedation was significantly associated with respiratory events.

Intravenous Diltiazem Versus Metoprolol in Acute Rate Control of Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter and Rapid Ventricular Response: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial flutter (AFL) with rapid ventricular response (RVR) is a condition that often requires urgent treatment. Although guidelines have recommendations regarding chronic rate control therapy, recommendations on the best choice for acute heart rate (HR) control in RVR are unclear.

METHODS

A systematic search across multiple databases was performed for studies evaluating the outcome of HR control (defined as HR less than 110 bpm and/or 20% decrease from baseline HR). Included studies evaluated AF and/or AFL with RVR in a hospital setting, with direct comparison between intravenous (IV) diltiazem and metoprolol and excluded cardiac surgery and catheter ablation patients. Hypotension (defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg) was measured as a secondary outcome. Two authors performed full-text article review and extracted data, with a third author mediating disagreements. Random effects models utilizing inverse variance weighting were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test.

RESULTS

A total of 563 unique titles were identified through the systematic search, of which 16 studies (7 randomized and 9 observational) were included. In our primary analysis of HR control by study type, IV diltiazem was found to be more effective than IV metoprolol for HR control in randomized trials (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.50-9.04 with I2 = 14%); however, this was not found for observational studies (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.80 with I2 = 55%). In an analysis of observational studies, there were no significant differences between the two drugs in odds of hypotension (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.51-2.45 with I2 = 18%).

CONCLUSION

While there was a trend toward improved HR control with IV diltiazem compared with IV metoprolol in randomized trials, this was not seen in observational studies, and there was no observed difference in hypotension between the two drugs.

When a little flutter gets a bit too exciting…

A middle-aged man with no previous cardiac history was admitted to the hospital being treated for thigh cellulitis, during his stay he developed palpitations and tachycardia which on initial ECG showed atrial flutter with a 2:1 AV block and evidence of an accessory pathway. He was subsequently given AV nodal blocking agents in the form of beta-blockers (bisoprolol) to slow his heart rate down; unfortunately, this led to hemodynamic instability due to 1:1 conduction of the atrial flutter down the accessory pathway. This case report demonstrates the importance of recognising pre-excitation on an ECG and the potential adverse effect of administering AV nodal blockade.

Medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in young patients with and without congenital heart disease

INTRODUCTION

The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success.

METHODS

Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success.

RESULTS

We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.

The diagnostic and therapeutic challenge of atrial flutter in children: a case report

BACKGROUND

Palpitations represent a common cause for consultation in the pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Unlike adults, palpitations in children are less frequently dependent from the heart, recognizing other causes.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 11-year-old male came to our pediatric ED for epigastric pain, vomiting and palpitations. During the previous 6 month the patient was affected by SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus). Electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed supraventricular tachycardia. Therefore, adenosine was administered unsuccessfully. The administration of adenosine, however, allowed us to make diagnosis of atypical atrial flutter. Multiple attempts at both electrical cardioversion, transesophageal atrial overdrive, and drug monotherapy were unsuccessful in our patient. Consequently, a triple therapy with amiodarone, flecainide, and beta-blocker was gradually designed to control the arrhythmic pattern with the restoration of a left upper atrial rhythm. There was not any evidence of sinus rhythm in the patient clinical history.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study underlines the rarity of this type of dysrhythmia in childhood and the difficulties in diagnosis and management, above all in a patient who has never showed sinus rhythm. Raising awareness of all available treatment options is essential for a better management of dysrhythmia in children.

Intrauterine management and outcomes of persistent fetal atrial flutter: A case report

BACKGROUND

Fetal atrial flutter (AF), accounting for 30% of all fetal tachyarrhythmias, predominantly (over 80%) manifests as a 2:1 atrioventricular conduction. Swift referral and timely intervention become imperative in instances of severe persistent arrhythmia.

CASE PRESENTATION

We discuss the case of a 32-year-old multiparous Chinese woman, at 30+2 weeks of gestation, wherein an ultrasonographic examination revealed persistent fetal AF (atrial rate ranging from 219 to 445 beats/min and ventricular rate from 219 to 228 beats/min, with a 2:1 or 1:1 down transmission) and minor ascites. Despite the maternal ingestion of digoxin and sotalol, the fetal heart rhythm remained uncorrected. Following this, at 32+3 weeks of gestation, an intramuscular injection of cedilanid, guided by ultrasound, was administered to the fetus. Postoperatively, the fetal ventricular rate demonstrated a decline after 6 days, and the ascites resolved. Subsequently, at 33+3 weeks, a cesarean section was necessitated due to maternal intolerance to the medication, resulting in the delivery of the infant. Remarkably, the infant's cardiac rhythm spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm within 5 min of birth. A follow-up conducted 1 year postpartum revealed no recurrence of AF.

CONCLUSIONS

This case illustrates that in the event of transplacental drug treatment failure, intrauterine therapeutic intervention should be considered. Moreover, it highlights the encouraging prognosis associated with fetal AF, as the cardiac rhythm spontaneously reverted to sinus rhythm postbirth in this instance.

Treatment, not delivery, of the late preterm and term fetus with supraventricular arrhythmia

OBJECTIVE

While in-utero treatment of sustained fetal supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) is standard practice in the previable and preterm fetus, data are limited on best practice for late preterm (34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks), early term (37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks) and term (> 39 weeks) fetuses with SVA. We reviewed the delivery and postnatal outcomes of fetuses at ≥ 35 weeks of gestation undergoing treatment rather than immediate delivery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series of fetuses presenting at ≥ 35 weeks of gestation with sustained SVA and treated transplacentally at six institutions between 2012 and 2022. Data were collected on gestational age at presentation and delivery, SVA diagnosis (short ventriculoatrial (VA) tachycardia, long VA tachycardia or atrial flutter), type of antiarrhythmic medication used, interval between treatment and conversion to sinus rhythm and postnatal SVA recurrence.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 fetuses presented at a median gestational age of 35.7 (range, 35.0-39.7) weeks with short VA tachycardia (n = 20), long VA tachycardia (n = 7) or atrial flutter (n = 10). Four (11%) fetuses were hydropic. In-utero treatment led to restoration of sinus rhythm in 35 (95%) fetuses at a median of 2 (range, 1-17) days; this included three of the four fetuses with hydrops. Antiarrhythmic medications included flecainide (n = 11), digoxin (n = 7), sotalol (n = 11) and dual therapy (n = 8). Neonates were liveborn at 36-41 weeks via spontaneous vaginal delivery (23/37 (62%)) or Cesarean delivery (14/37 (38%)). Cesarean delivery was indicated for fetal SVA in two fetuses, atrial ectopy or sinus bradycardia in three fetuses and obstetric reasons in nine fetuses that were in sinus rhythm at the time of delivery. Twenty-one (57%) cases were treated for recurrent SVA after birth.

CONCLUSION

In-utero treatment of the near term and term (≥ 35-week) SVA fetus is highly successful even in the presence of hydrops, with the majority of cases delivered vaginally closer to term, thereby avoiding unnecessary Cesarean section. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Implementation of an integrated emergency department acute atrial fibrillation pathway safely reduces cardioversions and hospitalisations: A comparative pre-post study

OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) accounts for high rates of ED presentations and hospital admissions. There is increasing evidence to suggest that delaying cardioversion for acute uncomplicated AF is safe, and that many patients will spontaneously revert to sinus rhythm (SR). We conducted a before-and-after evaluation of AF/AFL management after a change in ED pathway using a conservative 'rate-and-wait' approach, incorporating next working day outpatient clinic follow-up and delayed cardioversion if required.

METHODS

We performed a before-and-after retrospective cohort study examining outcomes for patients who presented to the ED in Christchurch, New Zealand, with acute uncomplicated AF/AFL in the 1-year period before and after the implementation of a new conservative management pathway.

RESULTS

A total of 360 patients were included in the study (182 'Pre-pathway' vs 178 'Post-Pathway'). Compared to the pre-pathway cohort, those managed under the new pathway had an 81.2% reduction in ED cardioversions (n = 32 vs n = 6), and 50.7% reduction in all cardioversions (n = 65 vs n = 32). There was a 31.6% reduction in admissions from ED (n = 54 vs n = 79). ED length of stay (3.9 h vs 3.8 h, net difference -0.1 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.6 to 0.3), 1-year ED AF representation (32.4% vs 26.4%, net difference -6.0% [95% CI -16.0% to 3.9%]), 1-year ED ischaemic stroke presentation (2.2% in both groups) and 7-day all-cause mortality rates (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.9]) were all similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a conservative 'rate-and-wait' strategy with early follow-up for patients presenting to ED with AF/AFL can safely reduce unnecessary cardioversions and avoidable hospitalisations.

Association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and incident atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We investigated the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on the incidence of AF and/or AFL in HFrEF patients. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched until March 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled patients with HFrEF. A total of six RCTs with 9467 patients were included (N = 4731 in the SGLT2i arms; N = 4736 in the placebo arms). Compared to placebo, SGLT2i treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of AF [relative risk (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval CI 0.44-0.86; P = 0.005] and AF/AFL (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.87; P = 0.004). Subgroup analysis showed that empagliflozin use resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of AF (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89; P = 0.01) and AF/AFL (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77; P = 0.002). By contrast, dapagliflozin use was not associated with a significant reduction in the risk of AF (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43-1.11; P = 0.12) or AF/AFL (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.53-1.27; P = 0.38). Additionally, a "shorter" duration (< 1.5 years) of treatment with SGLT2i remained associated with a reduction in the risk of AF (< 1.5 years; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.91; P = 0.02) and AF/AFL (< 1.5 years; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.80; P = 0.003). In conclusion, SGLT2i therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of AF and AF/AFL in patients with HFrEF. These results reinforce the value of using SGLT2i in this setting.

Association of Intravenous Potassium and Magnesium Administration With Spontaneous Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter in the Emergency Department

IMPORTANCE

Whether the simultaneous intravenous administration of potassium and magnesium is associated with the probability of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm (SCV) in the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess potassium and magnesium administration and SCV probability in AF and AFL in the emergency department.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A registry-based cohort study was conducted in the Department of Emergency Medicine of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria. All consecutive patients with AF or AFL were screened between February 6, 2009, and February 16, 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Intravenous administration of potassium, 24 mEq, and magnesium, 145.8 mg.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the probability of SCV during the patient's stay in the emergency department. Multivariable cluster-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the association between potassium and magnesium administration and the probability of SCV.

RESULTS

A total of 2546 episodes of nonpermanent AF (median patient age, 68 [IQR, 58-75] years, 1411 [55.4%] men) and 573 episodes of nonpermanent AFL (median patient age, 68 [IQR, 58-75] years; 332 [57.9%] men) were observed. In AF episodes, intravenous potassium and magnesium administration vs no administration was associated with increased odds of SCV (19.2% vs 10.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.53-2.57). In AFL episodes, in contrast, no association was noted for the probability of SCV with potassium and magnesium vs no administration (13.0% vs 12.5%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-1.69).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this registry-based cohort study on intravenous administration of potassium and magnesium suggest an increased probability of SCV in nonpermanent AF, but not AFL, during a patients' stay in the emergency department.

Canagliflozin and atrial fibrillation in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A secondary analysis from the CANVAS Program and CREDENCE trial and meta-analysis

AIM

To assess the effects of canagliflozin on the incidence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) and other key cardiorenal outcomes in a pooled analysis of the CANVAS and CREDENCE trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with type 2 diabetes and high risk of cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease were included and randomly assigned to canagliflozin or placebo. We explored the effects of canagliflozin on the incidence of first AF/AFL events and AF/AFL-related complications (ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/hospitalization for heart failure). Major adverse cardiovascular events and a renal-specific outcome by baseline AF/AFL status were analysed using Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, 354 participants experienced a first AF/AFL event. Canagliflozin had no detectable effect on AF/AFL (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.02) compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis, however, suggested a possible reduction in AF/AFL in those with no AF/AFL history (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99). Canagliflozin was also associated with a reduction in AF/AFL-related complications (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.86). There was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity by baseline AF/AFL history for other key cardiorenal outcomes (all P_interaction  > 0.14). Meta-analysis of five sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor trials demonstrated a 19% reduction in AF/AFL events with active treatment (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a significant effect of canagliflozin on the incidence of AF/AFL events could not be shown, however, a possible reduction in AF/AFL events in those with no prior history requires further investigation. Meta-analysis suggests SGLT2 inhibition reduces AF/AFL incidence.

Cardioversion of Post-Ablation Atrial Tachyarrhythmia with Ibutilide and Amiodarone: A Registry-Based Cohort Study

Patients with recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter constitute a rapidly growing cohort, but study-driven treatment recommendations are lacking. The present study aimed to compare the cardioversion success of ibutilide and amiodarone in patients with post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia. We included all episodes of post-ablation atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients treated with either intravenous ibutilide or amiodarone at an academic emergency department from 2010 to 2018. The primary endpoint was the conversion to sinus rhythm. The conversion rates were stratified by arrhythmia type, and multivariable cluster-adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of ibutilide and amiodarone on cardioversion success, given as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). In total, 109 episodes of 72 patients were analyzed. The conversion rates were 37/49 (76%) for ibutilide and 16/60 (27%) for amiodarone. Compared to amiodarone, ibutilide was associated with higher odds of conversion (multivariable cluster-adjusted OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.3–24.3). The cardioversion success of ibutilide was the highest in atrial flutter (crude OR 19.5, 95% CI 3.4–112.5) and focal atrial tachycardia (crude OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.5–47.2), but it was less pronounced in atrial fibrillation (crude OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.2–17.2). Randomized trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide Receptor Agonists for Atrial Fibrillation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major public health concern with a rising prevalence. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown the respective favorable effects on reducing the occurrence of AF/atrial flutter (AFL), comparative protective AF/AFL effects between above 2 novel antidiabetic agents remain unavailable. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs in reducing the risk of AF/AFL in patients with type 2 diabetes and estimate relative rankings of interventions. PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 1, 2020. All available randomized controlled trials comparing SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs with one another or placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes were included. Pooled results were shown as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used a frequentist network meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of interests. Thirty-six randomized controlled trials including 85,701 participants with type 2 diabetes were identified. Compared with placebo, both SGLT2is (RR: 0.82, 95% CI, 0.68-0.99) and GLP-1RAs (RR: 0.86, 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; RR long-acting ones: 0.87, 95% CI, 0.76-0.99; RR short-acting ones: 0.72, 95% CI, 0.45-1.14) significantly reduced AF/AFL risk. No significant difference between SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs was noted (RR: 0.95, 95% CI, 0.76-1.2). Compared with placebo, results from the analysis showed an RR of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.45-1.14) for short-acting GLP-1RAs and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.99) for long-acting GLP-1RAs in reducing the risk of AF/AFL. Compared with placebo, both SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs possessed favorable effects on reducing the risk of AF/AFL. However, no difference was observed when comparisons were made between them. In addition, long-acting ones may confer a more pronounced AF/AFL reduction benefit compared with placebo.

Efficacy and safety of dronedarone versus placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation stratified according to renal function: Post hoc analyses of the EURIDIS-ADONIS trials

BACKGROUND

The use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is complex because impaired renal clearance can cause increased drug levels, and risk of intolerance or adverse events. Due to the propensity for CKD to occur alongside atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL), it is essential that AAD safety and efficacy are assessed for patients with CKD.

HYPOTHESIS

Dronedarone, an approved AAD, may present a suitable therapeutic option for patients with AF/AFL and concomitant CKD.

METHODS

EURIDIS-ADONIS (EURIDIS, NCT00259428; ADONIS, NCT00259376) were identically designed, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trials investigating AF/AFL control with dronedarone 400 mg twice daily versus placebo (randomized 2:1). In this post hoc analysis, the primary endpoint was time to first AF/AFL. Patients were stratified according to renal function using the CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration equation and divided into estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) subgroups of 30-44, 45-59, 60-89, and ≥90 ml/min. Time-to-events between treatment groups were compared using log-rank testing and Cox regression.

RESULTS

At baseline, most (86%) patients demonstrated a mild or mild-to-moderate eGFR decrease. Median time to first AF/AFL recurrence was significantly longer with dronedarone versus placebo for all eGFR subgroups except the 30 to 44 ml/min group, where the trend was similar but statistical power may have been limited by the small population. eGFR stratification had no significant effect on serious adverse events, deaths, or treatment discontinuations.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that dronedarone could be an effective therapeutic option for AF with an acceptable safety profile in patients with impaired renal function.

Predictors of dronedarone plasma drug concentrations and effect on atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter recurrence: Analyses from the EURIDIS and ADONIS studies

BACKGROUND

In this post hoc analysis, we assessed patient characteristics as predictors of dronedarone trough concentrations and characterized the relationship of trough concentrations of dronedarone with its efficacy and safety.

HYPOTHESIS

Dronedarone is recommended as a 400 mg twice daily dose taken orally with meals. We hypothesize that drug concentration/bioavailability of dronedarone, measured as above- and below-median trough concentrations, does not impact the efficacy outcomes.

METHODS

Average trough concentrations (Ctrough_avg ) across multiple timepoints were calculated for each patient, and patient Ctrough_avg values were categorized as below-median or above-median concentrations. The effect of patient baseline characteristics on dronedarone Ctrough_avg was assessed in the below-median versus above-median groups. The effect of dronedarone in each Ctrough_avg group versus placebo on risk of first atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) recurrence and safety was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 1795 plasma samples were available from 507 dronedarone-treated patients. An above-median Ctrough_avg was associated with age ≥75 years, female sex, lower weight, higher pacemaker use, and higher oral anticoagulant use. The risk of adjudicated first AF/AFL recurrence was significantly lower with dronedarone versus placebo in the below-median (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.91; p = .0054) and above-median groups (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50-0.81; p = .0002). No difference in risk of AF/AFL recurrence was observed between the above- and below-median groups. Safety and tolerability of dronedarone were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Significant reduction in AF/AFL recurrence was observed in patients treated with dronedarone versus placebo, regardless of dronedarone concentrations above or below the median value.

[The Chinese expert recommendations on the clinical use of dronedarone]

Dronedarone, a class Ⅲ antiarrhythmic drug, is a deiodinated benzofuran derivative of amiodarone. It has similar antiarrhythmic effects with amiodarone, but much lesser adverse effects than amiodarone, particularly in those outside the heart. It is suggested to use dronedarone for the rhythm control of atrial fibrillation/flutter, for it has been shown to prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter and reduce rehospitalization in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter. Dronedarone is not recommended for the rhythm control in patients with long-term persistent atrial fibrillation or permanent atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation patients with reduced ejection fraction. Liver function, electrolyte tests and an electrocardiogram should be performed before and after the drug initiation. Potential interactions with other kinds of drugs have to be taken into consideration as well.

Perioperative Management of Flecainide: A Problem-Based Learning Discussion

Flecainide is a first-line antiarrhythmic drug used to treat atrial arrhythmias and/or supraventricular tachycardia in those without coronary artery disease or structural heart disease. Even though it is an older antiarrhythmic, flecainide accounted for 1.6 million prescriptions in the United States in 2016, and its utilization is generally increasing. Despite its popularity, flecainide may predispose patients to rapid atrial flutter with resultant hemodynamic compromise, particularly in the physiologically stressful perioperative period. This article reviews the pharmacology of flecainide, describes problematic arrhythmias that may arise specifically during flecainide use, and offers recommendations for perioperative flecainide management.

Multiple antiarrhythmic transplacental treatments for fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis

BACKGROUND

Fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia is a common reason for referral to fetal cardiology. Multiple antiarrhythmic transplacental medications can be used to treat these diseases. Debates remain regarding the standardized therapy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched from inception to September 2020. A handsearching for gray literature, including unpublished conference articles, will be performed. The randomized control trials, case-control, and cohort studies will be accepted, no matter what the languages they were reported. We will first focus on the effectiveness of the therapy on fetal cardiac rhythm and/or heart rate. Then we will do further analysis of preterm delivery, fetal hydrops, intrauterine fetal demise, and maternal side effects. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale will be used to assess the risk of bias of the randomized controlled trials, case-control, and cohort studies, respectively. Two independent reviewers will carry out literature identification, data collection, and study quality assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by a third reviewer. Statistical analysis will be conducted using the STATA 13.0 software.

RESULT

The results will provide helpful information about the effect of multiple antiarrhythmic transplacental therapies in pregnancies with supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter, and demonstrate which therapy is more effective.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion drawn from this systematic review will benefit the patients with fetal supraventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Outcomes Associated with Dronedarone Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

The antiarrhythmic drug dronedarone was designed to reduce the extra-cardiac adverse effects associated with amiodarone use in treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter (AF/AFL). This epidemiological study used a retrospective cohort design to compare risk of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and death in AF/AFL patients treated with dronedarone versus other antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). AF/AFL patients with incident dronedarone fills were matched by propensity score (PS) to incident users of other AADs. The primary study outcome was hospitalization for cardiovascular (CV) causes within 24 months after the first study drug fill. A secondary composite outcome comprised hospitalization for CV causes or all-cause mortality during follow-up. In the AF/AFL patient cohort meeting eligibility criteria, 6,964 incident users of dronedarone and 25 607 incident users of other AADs were identified. The PS-matched cohort comprised 6,349 Dronedarone users (91.2% of all eligible) and 12,698 other AAD users. Dronedarone patients had a significantly lower risk of hospitalization for a CV event compared to Other AAD users (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval = 0.79 to 0.96). This was consistent with results for the composite outcome (hazard ratio=0.86; 95% confidence interval = 0.78 to 0.95). In conclusion, AF/AFL patients initiated on dronedarone versus other AADs had significantly lower risk of CV hospitalizations as well as the composite CV hospitalization / death from any cause.

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation on Flecainide Therapy

Flecainide pill-in-the-pocket therapy is a pharmacologic treatment option for patients with infrequent episodes of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. We report a case of wide complex tachycardia due to atrial flutter with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction in a patient who took pill-in-the-pocket flecainide without concomitant atrioventricular nodalblockade.

Successful treatment of neonatal atrial flutter by synchronized cardioversion: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia. In the ECG tracing, it is marked by a fast, irregular atrial activity of 280-500 beats per minute. AFL is known to be a rare and also life-threatening rhythm disorder both at the fetus and neonatal period. AFL may result in circulatory failure, and in a more severe form, it may lead to a non-immune fetal hydrops. However, with early prenatal diagnosis and proper treatment, the majority of AFL cases show a good prognosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a neonate who was born at 34 weeks of gestational age by C-section because of risk for birth asphyxia, based on abnormal CTG tracing, which had no characteristic rhythms for fetal decelerations. A third day his heart rate was 220/bpm. ECG has shown supraventricular tachycardia with narrow QRS. The administration of adenosine resulted in the obvious appearance of "sawtooth wave" typical for AFL. Arrhythmia was resistant to the therapy of amiodaron. Then cardioversion was performed and the rhythm converted to normal.

CONCLUSIONS

As neonatal AFL might be resistant to conventional pharmacotherapy, one needs to remember about the possibility of electrical cardioversion in the pediatric cardiology referral center. Moreover, CTG monitoring is of limited use because it does not record fetal heart rhythms > 200/min and echocardiography at the reference center is practically the only method to monitor the condition of the fetus with abnormal rapid heart rhythm.

Pharmacologic Cardioversion of Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We conduct a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis to indirectly compare and rank antidysrhythmic drugs for pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to March 2019, limited to human subjects and English language. We also searched for unpublished data. We limited studies to randomized controlled trials that enrolled adult patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and compared antidysrhythmic agents, placebo, or control. We determined these outcomes before data extraction: rate of conversion to sinus rhythm within 4 hours, time to cardioversion, rate of significant adverse events, and rate of thromboembolism within 30 days. We extracted data according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses network meta-analysis and appraised selected trials with the Cochrane review handbook.

RESULTS

The systematic review initially identified 640 studies; 19 met inclusion criteria. Eighteen trials that randomized 2,069 atrial fibrillation patients provided data for atrial fibrillation conversion rate outcome. Bayesian network meta-analysis using a random-effects model demonstrated that antazoline (odds ratio [OR] 24.9; 95% credible interval [CrI] 7.4 to 107.8), tedisamil (OR 12.0; 95% CrI 4.3 to 43.8), vernakalant (OR 7.5; 95% CrI 3.1 to 18.6), propafenone (OR 6.8; 95% CrI 3.6 to 13.8), flecainide (OR 6.1; 95% CrI 2.9 to 13.2), and ibutilide (OR 4.1; 95% CrI 1.8 to 9.6) were associated with increased likelihood of conversion within 4 hours compared with placebo or control. Overall quality was low, and the network exhibited inconsistency.

CONCLUSION

For pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation within a 4-hour ED visit, there is insufficient evidence to determine which treatment is superior. Several agents are associated with increased likelihood of conversion within 4 hours compared with placebo or control. Limited data preclude any recommendation for cardioversion of recent-onset atrial flutter. Further high-quality study is necessary.

Potassium infusion increases the likelihood of conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation-A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal antiarrhythmic management of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (ROAF) or atrial flutter is controversial and there is a considerable variability in clinical treatment strategies. It is not known if potassium infusion has the potential to convert ROAF or atrial flutter to sinus rhythm (SR). Therefore, we aimed to investigate if patients with ROAF or atrial flutter and plasma-potassium levels ≤4.0 mmol/L have increased probability to convert to SR if the plasma-potassium level is increased towards the upper reference range (4.1-5.0 mmol/L).

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled, single-blinded trial, patients with ROAF or atrial flutter and plasma-potassium ≤4.0 mmol/L presenting between April 2013 and November 2017 were randomized to receive potassium chloride (KCl) infusion (n = 60) or placebo (n = 53). Patients in the KCl group received infusions at one of three different rates: 9.4 mmol/h (n = 11), 12 mmol/h (n = 19), or 15 mmol/h (n = 30).

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the number of conversions to SR between the KCl group and placebo [logrank test, P = .29; hazard ratio (HR) 1.20 (CI 0.72-1.98)]. However, KCl-infused patients who achieved an above-median hourly increase in plasma-potassium (>0.047 mmol/h) exhibited a significantly higher conversion rate compared with placebo [logrank P = .002; HR 2.40 (CI 1.36-4.21)] and KCl patients with below-median change in plasma-potassium [logrank P < .001; HR 4.41 (CI 2.07-9.40)]. Due to pain at the infusion site, the infusion was prematurely terminated in 10 patients (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although increasing plasma-potassium levels did not significantly augment conversion of ROAF or atrial flutter to SR in patients with potassium levels in the lower-normal range, our results indicate that this treatment may be effective when a rapid increase in potassium concentration is tolerated and achieved.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter Stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc Score

Importance

Current guidelines support treating atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) as equivalent risk factors for ischemic stroke stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc scores, recommending anticoagulation therapy for patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or higher, but some studies found differences in clinical outcomes.

Objective

To investigate differences in clinical outcomes among AF, AFL, and matched control cohorts.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide cohort study analyzed data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2012. Follow-up and data analysis ended December 31, 2012. A total of 219 416 age- and sex-matched individuals participated in the study. Clinical outcomes were compared after stratification by CHA2DS2-VASc score (possible score range, 0-9; higher scores indicate greater risk of ischemic stroke).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Ischemic stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause mortality among the AF, AFL, and matched control cohorts were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

This study comprised 188 811 patients in the AF cohort (mean [SD] age, 73.8 [13.4] years; 104 703 [55.5%] male), 6121 patients in the AFL cohort (mean [SD] age, 67.7 [15.8] years; 3735 [61.0%] male), and 24 484 patients in the matched control cohort (mean [SD] age, 67.3 [15.6] years; 14 940 [61.0%] male). The patients with AF were older, were more predominantly female, and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores than the patients with AFL and the control participants. After stratification by CHA2DS2-VASc score, the incidence densities (IDs; events per 100 person-years) of ischemic stroke (AF cohort: ID, 3.08; 95% CI, 3.03-3.13; AFL cohort: ID, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.28-1.62; controls: ID, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92-1.03), heart failure hospitalization (AF cohort: ID, 3.39; 95% CI, 3.34-3.44; AFL cohort: ID, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.39-1.74; controls: ID, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.29-0.35), and all-cause mortality (AF cohort: ID, 17.8; 95% CI, 17.7-17.9; AFL cohort: ID, 13.9; 95% CI, 13.4-14.4; controls: ID, 4.2; 95% CI, 4.1-4.4) were significantly higher in the AF cohort than in the matched control cohort. For the AFL cohort vs the matched control cohort, the incidences of heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality were significantly higher across all levels, but the incidence of ischemic stroke was only significantly higher at CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 5 to 9. For the AF cohort vs the AFL cohort, the incidences of ischemic stroke and heart failure hospitalization were significantly higher at a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1 or higher, but the incidence of all-cause mortality was significantly higher only at CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 1 to 3.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found different clinical outcomes between patients with AFL and AF and those without AF and AFL. The current recommended level of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in preventing ischemic stroke in patients with AFL should be reevaluated.

Usefulness of High-Dose Oral Flecainide for Termination of Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Children

A high dose of oral flecainide has been used for acute termination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter or intra-atrial re-entry tachycardia (AFL-IART) in adults. The use of flecainide for these conditions in children has not been well described. We describe our institutional experience on acute termination of AF or AFL-IART in children with a single high dose of oral flecainide in a hospital setting. All patients who received a single high dose of oral flecainide from 2009 to 2016 who were <21 years of age were included. Patients were treated only if AF or AFL-IART was less than 24 hours of duration. The dose was 300 mg for patients >70 kg, 200 mg for patients 40 to 70 kg, and 5 mg/kg for patients <40 kg. Charts were reviewed to determine demographic information, flecainide dose, termination of arrhythmia, and time to termination. There were 22 patients identified. The median age was 16 years (range 4.6 to 20.3) with a median weight of 75 kg (range 19 to 112). There were 13 patients with AF (11 with a normal heart, 85%) and 9 patients with AFL-IART (1 with a normal heart, 11%) (p <0.05). The median dose of flecainide given was 3.6 mg/kg (range 2.7 to 6.1) or 136 mg/m² (range 90 to 171). AF in all patients (13/13, 100%) and AFL-IART in 5 of 9 patients (55%) terminated acutely (p <0.05). All patients with normal heart (12/12, 100%) and 6 of the 10 patients (60%) with heart disease have their arrhythmia terminated acutely (p <0.05). The only patients whose tachycardia did not terminate were 4 patients with IART and heart disease. The arrhythmia terminated in a median time of 60 minutes (range 30 to 120). There were no adverse events or proarrhythmia encountered. In conclusion, a single high dose of oral flecainide successfully terminated AF of less than 24 hours' duration in all pediatric patients without side effects. This approach is less effective for AFL-IART in patients with heart disease.

Digoxin for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials

Background

During recent years, systematic reviews of observational studies have compared digoxin to no digoxin in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and the results of these reviews suggested that digoxin seems to increase the risk of all-cause mortality regardless of concomitant heart failure. Our objective was to assess the benefits and harms of digoxin for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter based on randomized clinical trials.

Methods

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, SCI-Expanded, BIOSIS for eligible trials comparing digoxin versus placebo, no intervention, or other medical interventions in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in October 2016. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were heart failure, stroke, heart rate control, and conversion to sinus rhythm. We performed both random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses and chose the more conservative result as our primary result. We used Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to control for random errors. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the body of evidence.

Results

28 trials (n = 2223 participants) were included. All were at high risk of bias and reported only short-term follow-up. When digoxin was compared with all control interventions in one analysis, we found no evidence of a difference on all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR), 0.82; TSA-adjusted confidence interval (CI), 0.02 to 31.2; I² = 0%); serious adverse events (RR, 1.65; TSA-adjusted CI, 0.24 to 11.5; I² = 0%); quality of life; heart failure (RR, 1.05; TSA-adjusted CI, 0.00 to 1141.8; I² = 51%); and stroke (RR, 2.27; TSA-adjusted CI, 0.00 to 7887.3; I² = 17%). Our analyses on acute heart rate control (within 6 hours of treatment onset) showed firm evidence of digoxin being superior compared with placebo (mean difference (MD), -12.0 beats per minute (bpm); TSA-adjusted CI, -17.2 to -6.76; I² = 0%) and inferior compared with beta blockers (MD, 20.7 bpm; TSA-adjusted CI, 14.2 to 27.2; I² = 0%). Meta-analyses on acute heart rate control showed that digoxin was inferior compared with both calcium antagonists (MD, 21.0 bpm; TSA-adjusted CI, -30.3 to 72.3) and with amiodarone (MD, 14.7 bpm; TSA-adjusted CI, -0.58 to 30.0; I² = 42%), but in both comparisons TSAs showed that we lacked information. Meta-analysis on acute conversion to sinus rhythm showed that digoxin compared with amiodarone reduced the probability of converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, but TSA showed that we lacked information (RR, 0.54; TSA-adjusted CI, 0.13 to 2.21; I² = 0%).

Conclusions

The clinical effects of digoxin on all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, quality of life, heart failure, and stroke are unclear based on current evidence. Digoxin seems to be superior compared with placebo in reducing the heart rate, but inferior compared with beta blockers. The long-term effect of digoxin is unclear, as no trials reported long-term follow-up. More trials at low risk of bias and low risk of random errors assessing the clinical effects of digoxin are needed.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016052935

WITHDRAWN: Pharmacological cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and flutter

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the commonest cardiac dysrhythmia. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There are two approaches to the management of atrial fibrillation: controlling the ventricular rate or converting to sinus rhythm in the expectation that this would abolish its adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in adults on the annual risk of stroke, peripheral embolism, and mortality.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (2000 to 2002), EMBASE (1998 to 2002), CINAHL (1982 to 2002), Web of Science (1981 to 2002). We hand searched the following journals: Circulation (1997 to 2002), Heart (1997 to 2002), European Heart Journal (1997-2002), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (1997-2002) and selected abstracts published on the web site of the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (2001, 2002).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials or controlled clinical trials of pharmacological cardioversion versus rate control in adults (>18 years) with acute, paroxysmal or sustained atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, of any duration and of any aetiology.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer applied the inclusion criteria and extracted the data. Trial quality was assessed and the data were entered into RevMan.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two completed studies AFFIRM (n=4060) and PIAF (n=252). We found no difference in mortality between rhythm control and rate control relative risk 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.31).Both studies show significantly higher rates of hospitalisation and adverse events in the rhythm control group and no difference in quality of life between the two treatment groups.In AFFIRM there was a similar incidence of ischaemic stroke, bleeding and systemic embolism in the two groups. Certain malignant dysrhythmias were significantly more likely to occur in the rhythm control group. There were similar scores of cognitive assessment.In PIAF, cardioverted patients enjoyed an improved exercise tolerance but there was no overall benefit in terms of symptom control or quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm is superior to rate control. Rhythm control is associated with more adverse effects and increased hospitalisation. It does not reduce the risk of stroke. The conclusions cannot be generalised to all people with atrial fibrillation. Most of the patients included in these studies were relatively older (>60 years) with significant cardiovascular risk factors.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Detection after Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke

INTRODUCTION

Long-term cardiac monitoring with implantable loop recorders (ILRs) has revealed occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and flutter (PAF) in a substantial minority of cryptogenic ischemic stroke (CIS) patients. Herein, we aim to define the prevalence, clinical relevance, and risk factors for PAF detection following early poststroke ILR implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of CIS patients (n = 100, mean age 65.8 years; 52.5% female) who underwent ILR insertion during, or soon after, index stroke admission. Patients were prospectively followed by the study cardiac electrophysiologist who confirmed the PAF diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses compared clinical, laboratory, cardiac, and imaging variables between PAF patients and non-PAF patients.

RESULTS

PAF was detected in 31 of 100 (31%) CIS patients, and anticoagulation was initiated in almost all (30 of 31, 96.8%). Factors associated with PAF detection include older age (mean [year] 72.9 versus 62.9; P = .003), white race (odds ratio [OR], 4.5; confidence interval [CI], 1.8-10.8; P = .001), prolonged PR interval (PR > 175 ms; OR, 3.3; CI, 1.2-9.4; P = .022), larger left atrial (LA) diameter (mean [cm] 3.7 versus 3.5; P = .044) and LA volume index (mean [cc/m²]; 30.6 versus 24.2; P = .014), and lower hemoglobin (Hb)A1c (mean [%] 6.0 versus 6.4; P = .036). Controlling for age, obesity (body mass index > 30 kg/m²; OR, 1.2; CI, 1.1-1.4; P = .033) was independently associated with PAF detection.

DISCUSSION

PAF was detected with high prevalence following early postcryptogenic stroke ILR implantation and resulted in significant management changes. Older age, increased PR interval, LA enlargement, and lower HbA1c are significantly associated with PAF detection. Controlling for age, obesity is an independent risk factor. A larger prospective study is warranted to confirm these findings.

Antenatal antiarrhythmic treatment for fetal tachyarrhythmias: a study protocol for a prospective multicentre trial

INTRODUCTION

Several retrospective or single-centre studies demonstrated the efficacy of transplacental treatment of fetal tachyarrhythmias. Our retrospective nationwide survey showed that the fetal therapy will be successful at an overall rate of 90%. For fetuses with hydrops, the treatment success rate will be 80%. However, standard protocol has not been established. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the protocol-defined transplacental treatment of fetal tachyarrhythmias. Participant recruitment began in October 2010.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The current study is a multicentre, single-arm interventional study. A total of 50 fetuses will be enrolled from 15 Japanese institutions. The protocol-defined transplacental treatment is performed for singletons with sustained fetal tachyarrhythmia ≥180 bpm, with a diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter. Digoxin, sotalol, flecainide or a combination is used for transplacental treatment. The primary endpoint is disappearance of fetal tachyarrhythmias. The secondary endpoints are fetal death related to tachyarrhythmia, proportion of preterm birth, rate of caesarean section attributable to fetal arrhythmia, improvement in fetal hydrops, neonatal arrhythmia, neonatal central nervous system disorders and neonatal survival. Maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse events are evaluated at 1 month after birth. Growth and development are also evaluated at 18 and 36 months of corrected age.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Institutional Review Board of the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center of Japan has approved this study. Our findings will be widely disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000004270.

[Digoxin poisoning: new prospects for therapy]

The filter has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the removal of beta-2 microglobulin in patient undergoing hemodialysis. We used the filter (the patient agrees) off label, in the course of digitalis intoxication and we have shown that the filter is capable of removing the drug effectively.

Dronedarone: An Amiodarone Analog for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter

Objective:

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety profile of dronedarone for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Data Sources:

A literature search was conducted using the search terms dronedarone, SR 33589, atrial fibrillation, and antiarrhythmic medication in MEDLINE (1966–February 2007), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970–February 2007), and EMBASE (1990–February 2007). References from the identified trials and selected review articles were evaluated. Additional information, including abstracts and posters, was obtained from Sanofi-Aventis.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Published studies and meeting abstracts evaluating the effects of dronedarone in humans and animals were reviewed.

Data Synthesis:

Dronedarone is a novel antiarrhythmic medication to treat atrial fibrillation. Dronedarone has a multifaceted mechanism of action similar to that of amiodarone. Dronedarone works by blocking potassium, sodium, and calcium channels and exhibits antiadrenergic properties. The drug has been evaluated at doses of 400, 600, and 800 mg twice daily. It prolonged the time to atrial fibrillation recurrence to 60–158 days compared with 5–59 days with placebo and decreased heart rate during atrial fibrillation by 12–25 beats/min in clinical trials. Major adverse events include gastrointestinal side effects and risk of proarrhythmia. Dronedarone may increase the risk of mortality in patients with congestive heart failure.

Conclusions:

Dronedarone is a new antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to better define dronedarone's safety profile and place in therapy.

A Novel SCN5A Mutation Associated with Drug Induced Brugada Type ECG

Background

Class IC antiarrhythmic agents may induce acquired forms of Brugada Syndrome. We have identified a novel mutation in SCN5A, the gene that encodes the α-subunit of the human cardiac sodium channel (hNa_v1.5), in a patient who exhibited Brugada- type ECG changes during pharmacotherapy of atrial arrhythmias.

Objective

To assess whether the novel mutation p.V1328M can cause drug induced Brugada Syndrome.

Methods

Administration of pilsicainide, a class IC antiarrhythmic agent, caused Brugada- type ST elevation in a 66-year-old Japanese male who presented with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), type I atrial flutter and inducible ventricular fibrillation (VF) during electrophysiological study. Genetic screening using direct sequencing identified a novel SCN5A variant, p.V1328M. Electrophysiological parameters of WT and p.V1328M and their effects on drug pharmacokinetics were studied using the patch-clamp method.

Results

Whole-cell sodium current densities were similar for WT and p.V1328M channels. While p.V1328M mutation did not affect the voltage-dependence of the activation kinetics, it caused a positive shift of voltage-dependent steady-state inactivation by 7 mV. The tonic block in the presence of pilsicainide was similar in WT and p.V1328M, when sodium currents were induced by a low frequency pulse protocol (q15s). On the contrary, p.V1328M mutation enhanced pilsicainide induced use-dependent block at 2 Hz. (Ki: WT, 35.8 μM; V1328M, 19.3 μM).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that a subclinical SCN5A mutation, p.V1328M, might predispose individuals harboring it to drug-induced Brugada Syndrome.

Fetal and Neonatal Arrhythmias

Cardiac arrhythmias are an important aspect of fetal and neonatal medicine. Premature complexes of atrial or ventricular origin are the main cause of an irregular heart rhythm. The finding is typically unrelated to an identifiable cause and no treatment is required. Tachyarrhythmia most commonly relates to supraventricular reentrant tachycardia, atrial flutter, and sinus tachycardia. Several antiarrhythmic agents are available for the perinatal treatment of tachyarrhythmias. Enduring bradycardia may result from sinus node dysfunction, complete heart block and nonconducted atrial bigeminy as the main arrhythmia mechanisms. The management and outcome of bradycardia depend on the underlying mechanism.

[Antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial flutter before planned cardioversion]

INTRODUCTION

atrium flutter and fibrillation are the heart rhythm disorders that increase the risk of life-dangerous complications, e.g. cardioembolic stroke, pulmonary embolism. Recommendations for managing patients with atrial fibrillation - atrial flutter, with paroxysm duration over 48 hours, demand anticoagulant therapy. Oral anticoagulants, which are the antagonists of K vitamin (Varpharin) and the new oral anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban), are used during the per-manipulative procedure of patients with atrial flutter before restoring the sinus rhythm with transesophageal cardiac pacing.

AIM

the present investigation aims to compare efficiency and safety of Varpharin and Rivaaroxaban in treatment patients with atrial flutter before planned cardioversion with transesophageal heart pacing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Varpharin (control group) - in doses equivalent for reaching the target МНВ - or Rivaroxaban (research group), 20 mg., were prescribed to 42 patients with coronary heart disease, concomitant arterial hypertension, and non-valvular paroxysm of atrial flutter with more than 48-hour duration, divided into two groups. There was held the general clinical, echocardioscopy examination. Thrombotic Risk Factor Assessment was made according to the CHA2DS2-VASc scale, Hemorrhagic Risk Factor Assessment was performed according to the HAS-BLED scale, and clinical symptoms assessment was made according to the EHRA scale. The heart rhythm was restored with the transesophageal heart pacing.

RESULTS

the per-manipulative procedure of the patients of research group (21 days were suggested according to the guidelines) shortened, unlike the patients of control group (the period of target МНВ selection had made 30,76±0,62days), the reduction of the symptoms severity by EHRA was considered in dynamics. According to the results of transesophageal heart pacing, the heart rhythm of 15 research group patients restored, and 6 research group patients had atrial fibrillation. Among the patients of the control group, 6 had their heart rhythm restored, as 10 patients had the atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

the use of Rivaroxaban during the per-manipulative procedure before planned cardioversion with transesophageal heart pacing causes shortening of the permanipulative period, reduces the risk of development of symptoms of heart failure, helps to restore the heart rhythm of the patients with atrium flutter.

Tachycardia in the Neonate

Atrial flutter (AFL) is the second most common type of tachyarrhythmia in the fetus and neonate. An atrial rate of 240 to 360 beats per minute, 2:1 atrioventricular conduction, and a "saw tooth" appearance on electrocardiogram (ECG) are characteristic. On echocardiogram, bilateral atrial dilatation is the most common finding. Treatment is dependent on the severity of symptoms; delivery is usually indicated in the case of fetal heart failure or hydrops fetalis, whereas postnatal AFL is most commonly treated with direct current cardioversion (DCC). This article presents an illustrative case in which the patient presented antenatally via abnormal nonstress testing and subsequent fetal echocardiogram that was concerning for AFL. Postnatal ECG confirmed this diagnosis and the patient received DCC on the day of birth, followed by digoxin and propranolol as maintenance therapy.

Hybrid therapy in the management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Because of the sub-optimal outcomes and associated risks of medical therapy as well as the recent advances in non-pharmacologic strategies, a multitude of combined (hybrid) algorithms have been introduced that improve efficacy of standalone therapies while maintaining a high safety profile. Antiarrhythmic administration enhances success rate of electrical cardioversion. Catheter ablation of antiarrhythmic drug-induced typical atrial flutter may prevent recurrent atrial fibrillation. Through simple ablation in the right atrium, suppression of atrial fibrillation may be achieved in patients with previously ineffective antiarrhythmic therapy. Efficacy of complex catheter ablation in the left atrium is improved with antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation followed by permanent pacemaker implantation is an effective and safe treatment option for selected patients. Additional strategies include pacing therapies such as atrial pacing with permanent pacemakers, preventive pacing algorithms, and/or implantable dual-chamber defibrillators are available. Modern hybrid strategies combining both epicardial and endocardial approaches in order to create a complex set of radiofrequency lesions in the left atrium have demonstrated a high rate of success and warrant further research. Hybrid therapy for atrial fibrillation reviews history of development of non-pharmacological treatment strategies and outlines avenues of ongoing research in this field.

The role of dronedarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation/flutter in the aftermath of PALLAS

Dronedarone is an amiodarone analog that differs structurally from amiodarone in that the iodine moiety was removed and a methane-sulfonyl group was added. These modifications reduce thyroid and other end-organ adverse effects and makes dronedarone less lipophilic, with a shorter half-life. Dronedarone has been shown to prevent atrial fibrillation/ flutter (AF/AFl) recurrences in several multi-center trials. In addition to its rhythm control properties, dronedarone has rate control properties. In patients with decompensated heart failure, dronedarone treatment increased mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations. When dronedarone was used in elderly high risk AF/AFl patients, excluding those with advanced heart failure, cardiovascular hospitalizations were significantly reduced. The results of the PALLAS trial suggest that dronedarone should not be used in the long-term treatment of patients with permanent AF. Post-marketing data have demonstrated rare hepatic toxicity to be associated with dronedarone use. Updated practice and regulatory guidelines have positioned dronedarone as a front-line antiarrhythmic in many patients with AF/Fl. However, the drug should not be used in patients with advanced heart failure and in patients who develop permanent AF.

Impacts of patient characteristics on the effectiveness of landiolol in AF/AFL patients complicated with LV dysfunction: Subgroup analysis of the J-Land study

Introduction

Results from the multicenter trial (J-Land study) of landiolol versus digoxin in atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction revealed that landiolol was more effective for controlling rapid HR than digoxin. The subgroup analysis for patient characteristics was conducted to evaluate the impact on the efficacy and safety of landiolol compared with digoxin.

Methods

Two hundred patients with AF/AFL, heart rate (HR) ≥ 120 beats/min, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 25–50% were randomized to receive either landiolol (n = 93) or digoxin (n = 107). Successful HR control was defined as ≥20% reduction in HR together with HR < 110 beats/min at 2 h after starting intravenous administration of landiolol or digoxin. The subgroup analysis for patient characteristics was to evaluate the impact on the effectiveness of landiolol in AF/AFL patients complicated with LV dysfunction.

Results

The efficacy in patients with NYHA class III/NYHA class IV was 52.3%/35.3% in landiolol, and 13.8%/9.1% in digoxin (p < 0.001 and p = 0.172), lower LVEF (25–35%)/higher LVEF (35–50%) was 45.7%/51.1% in landiolol, and 14.0%/12.7% in digoxin (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001), CKD stage 1 (90 < eGFR)/CKD stage 2 (60 ≤ eGFR < 90)/CKD stage 3 (30 ≤ eGFR < 60)/CKD stage 4 (15 ≤ eGFR < 30) was 66.7%/59.1%/39.6%/66.7% in landiolol, and 0%/13.8%/17.0%/0% in digoxin (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, p = 0.015 and p = 0.040).

Conclusions

This subgroup analysis indicated that landiolol was more useful, regardless of patient characteristics, as compared with digoxin in AF/AFL patients complicated with LV dysfunction. Particularly, in patients with impaired renal function, landiolol should be preferred for the purpose of acute rate control of AF/AFL tachycardia.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-014-0111-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias in patients with essential arterial hypertension--clinical and evolutive correlations

AIM OF THE STUDY

The analysis of supraventricular rhythm disorders encountered in hypertensive patients and the establishment of correlations with other associated risk factors, duration of hypertension, the evolution and prognosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included a group of 110 patients, 80 men and 30 women, aged between 40 and 85, admitted in the 1st Cardiology Clinic during 2010-2013, diagnosed with essential arterial hypertension second and third degree. For the detection of arrhythmic events surface 12-lead ECG and 24-hour Holter monitoring were used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Supraventricular arrhythmias encountered in the patients of the group were: ESA (mostly isolated, but also doublets, atrial bigeminy), atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia. Some arrhythmias may be an expression of the excessive activation of the sympathetic nervous system or on the contrary, vagal predominance, (ex. sinus bradycardia). Part of the arrhythmias occurring in hypertensive patients are hypertensive heart disease expressions, others are due to associated risk factors (smoking, alcohol) and even medication administered. In some cases, rhythm disturbances disappear with the normalization of the blood pressure; however, most of the times, the specific combination of anti-arrhythmic medication with antihypertensive medication is required.

CONCLUSIONS

Supraventricular arrhythmias are frequently found in hypertensive patients, especially in those with long-term, uncontrolled hypertension, with impact on the evolution, prognosis and therapeutic management.