Elasticity-based boosting of neuroepithelial nucleokinesis via indirect energy transfer from mother to daughter.
PLoS Biol 2018;
16:e2004426. [PMID:
29677184 PMCID:
PMC5931692 DOI:
10.1371/journal.pbio.2004426]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Neural progenitor cells (NPCs), which are apicobasally elongated and densely packed in the developing brain, systematically move their nuclei/somata in a cell cycle–dependent manner, called interkinetic nuclear migration (IKNM): apical during G2 and basal during G1. Although intracellular molecular mechanisms of individual IKNM have been explored, how heterogeneous IKNMs are collectively coordinated is unknown. Our quantitative cell-biological and in silico analyses revealed that tissue elasticity mechanically assists an initial step of basalward IKNM. When the soma of an M-phase progenitor cell rounds up using actomyosin within the subapical space, a microzone within 10 μm from the surface, which is compressed and elastic because of the apical surface’s contractility, laterally pushes the densely neighboring processes of non–M-phase cells. The pressed processes then recoil centripetally and basally to propel the nuclei/somata of the progenitor’s daughter cells. Thus, indirect neighbor-assisted transfer of mechanical energy from mother to daughter helps efficient brain development.
The development of large brain structures, such as the mammalian cerebral cortex, depends on the continuous and efficient production of cells by neural progenitor cells. Neural progenitor cells are elongated and span the developing brain wall. The nuclei and bodies of these cells move cyclically between the apical and basal surfaces, and they divide every time they reach the apical surface. While we understand how individual cells achieve this cycle, how the movements of several progenitor cells are coordinated with one another remains elusive. By using a combination of live imaging and mechanical experiments, coupled with mathematical simulations, we show that cell crowding at the apical surface, where progenitor cells divide, creates a subapical microzone that is compressed and elastic. We then show that when each mother cell rounds up, preparing for division, it pushes this elastic microzone laterally, thereby storing mechanical energy. After cell division, this mechanical energy is transferred to the daughter cells, propelling them along the axis of movement in the direction of the basal surface, in an energy-saving manner. Our mathematical simulations show that timely departure of newly generated daughter cells is critical for the overall tissue structure of the cerebral proliferative zone.
Collapse