The effect of doxapram on survival and APGAR score in newborn puppies delivered by elective caesarean: A randomized controlled trial

Doxapram is marketed as a respiratory stimulant and is used by some veterinarians to help with neonatal apnoea, especially in puppies delivered by caesarean. There is a lack of consensus as to whether the drug is effective and data on its safety are limited. Doxapram was compared to placebo (saline) in newborn puppies in a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial using two outcome measures: 7-day mortality rate and repeated APGAR score measurements. Higher APGAR scores have been positively correlated with survival and other health outcomes in newborns. Puppies were delivered by caesarean and a baseline APGAR score was measured. This was immediately followed by a randomly allocated intralingual injection of either doxapram or isotonic saline (of the same volume). Injection volumes were determined by the weight of the puppy and each injection was administered within a minute of birth. The mean dose of doxapram administered was 10.65 mg/kg. APGAR scores were measured again at 2, 5, 10 and 20 min. One hundred and seventy-one puppies from 45 elective caesareans were recruited into this study. Five out of 85 puppies died after receiving saline and 7 out of 86 died after receiving doxapram. Adjusting for the baseline APGAR score, the age of the mother and whether the puppy was a brachycephalic breed, there was insufficient evidence to conclude a difference in the odds of 7-day survival for puppies that received doxapram compared to those that received saline (p = .634). Adjusting for the baseline APGAR score, the weight of the mother, the litter size, the mother's parity number, the weight of the puppy and whether the puppy was a brachycephalic breed, there was insufficient evidence to conclude a difference in the probability of a puppy having an APGAR score of ten (the maximum APGAR score) between those that received doxapram compared to those that received saline (p = .631). Being a brachycephalic breed was not associated with an increased odds of 7-day mortality (p = .156) but the effect of the baseline APGAR score on the probability of having an APGAR score of ten was higher for brachycephalic than non-brachycephalic breeds (p = .01). There was insufficient evidence that intralingual doxapram provided an advantage (or disadvantage) compared to intralingual saline when used routinely in puppies delivered by elective caesarean and that were not apnoeic.

Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Apnea of prematurity is a common problem in preterm infants that may have significant consequences on their development. Methylxanthines (aminophylline, theophylline, and caffeine) are effective in the treatment of apnea of prematurity. Doxapram is used as a respiratory stimulant in cases refractory to the methylxanthine treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of doxapram administration on the incidence of apnea and other short-term and longer-term clinical outcomes in preterm infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the role of doxapram in prevention and treatment of apnea of prematurity and prevention of reintubation in preterm infants (less than 37 weeks' gestation). We included studies comparing doxapram with either placebo or methylxanthines as a control group, or when doxapram was used as an adjunct to methylxanthines and compared to methylxanthines alone as a control group. We included studies of doxapram at any dose and route.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were clinical apnea, need for positive pressure ventilation after initiation of treatment, failed apnea reduction after two to seven days, and failed extubation (defined as unable to wean from invasive intermittent positive pressure ventilation [IPPV] and extubate or reintubation for IPPV within one week). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs enrolling 248 infants. Seven studies (214 participants) provided data for meta-analysis. Five studied doxapram for treatment of apnea in preterm infants. Three studied doxapram to prevent reintubation in preterm infants. None studied doxapram in preventing apnea in preterm infants. All studies administered doxapram intravenously as continuous infusions. Two studies used doxapram as an adjunct to aminophylline compared to aminophylline alone and one study as an adjunct to caffeine compared to caffeine alone. When used to treat apnea, compared to no treatment, doxapram may result in a slight reduction in failed apnea reduction (risk ratio [RR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20 to 1.05; 1 study, 21 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on need for positive pressure ventilation after initiation of treatment (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 6.74; 1 study, 21 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Doxapram may result in little to no difference in side effects causing cessation of therapy (0 events in both groups; risk difference [RD] 0.00, 95% CI -0.17 to 0.17; 1 study, 21 participants; low-certainty evidence). Compared to alternative treatment, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on failed apnea reduction (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.53 to 3.45; 4 studies, 84 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on need for positive pressure ventilation after initiation of treatment (RR 2.40, 95% CI 0.11 to 51.32; 2 studies, 37 participants; very-low certainty evidence; note 1 study recorded 0 events in both groups. Thus, the RR and CIs were calculated from 1 study rather than 2). Doxapram may result in little to no difference in side effects causing cessation of therapy (0 events in all groups; RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.15; 37 participants; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). As adjunct therapy to methylxanthine, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on failed apnea reduction after two to seven days (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.17; 1 study, 10 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on clinical apnea, chronic lung disease at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA), death at any time during initial hospitalization, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in the three comparisons, and need for positive pressure ventilation and side effects when used as adjunct therapy to methylxanthine. In studies to prevent reintubation, when compared to alternative treatment, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on failed extubation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.83; 1 study, 25 participants; very low-certainty evidence). As adjunct therapy to methylxanthine, doxapram may result in a slight reduction in 'clinical apnea' after initiation of treatment (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.98; 1 study, 56 participants; low-certainty evidence). Doxapram may result in little to no difference in failed extubation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.62; 1 study, 56 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of doxapram on side effects causing cessation of therapy (RR 6.42, 95% CI 0.80 to 51.26; 2 studies, 85 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported need for positive pressure ventilation, chronic lung disease at 36 weeks' PMA, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in the three comparisons; failed extubation when compared to no treatment; and clinical apnea, death at any time during initial hospitalization, and side effects when compared to no treatment or alternative treatment. We identified two ongoing studies, one conducted in Germany and one in multiple centers in the Netherlands and Belgium.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In treating apnea of prematurity, doxapram may slightly reduce failure in apnea reduction when compared to no treatment and there may be little to no difference in side effects against both no treatment and alternative treatment. The evidence is very uncertain about the need for positive pressure ventilation when compared to no treatment or alternative treatment and about failed apnea reduction when used as alternative or adjunct therapy to methylxanthine. For use to prevent reintubation, doxapram may reduce apnea episodes when administered in adjunct to methylxanthine, but with little to no difference in failed extubation. The evidence is very uncertain about doxapram's effect on death when used as adjunct therapy to methylxanthine and about failed extubation when used as alternative or adjunct therapy to methylxanthine. There is a knowledge gap about the use of doxapram as a therapy to prevent apnea. More studies are needed to clarify the role of doxapram in the treatment of apnea of prematurity, addressing concerns about long-term outcomes. The ongoing studies may provide useful data.

New Host-Directed Therapeutics for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection

Frequent and excessive use of antibiotics primes patients to Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), which leads to fatal pseudomembranous colitis, with limited treatment options. In earlier reports, we used a drug repurposing strategy and identified amoxapine (an antidepressant), doxapram (a breathing stimulant), and trifluoperazine (an antipsychotic), which provided significant protection to mice against lethal infections with several pathogens, including C. difficile However, the mechanisms of action of these drugs were not known. Here, we provide evidence that all three drugs offered protection against experimental CDI by reducing bacterial burden and toxin levels, although the drugs were neither bacteriostatic nor bactericidal in nature and had minimal impact on the composition of the microbiota. Drug-mediated protection was dependent on the presence of the microbiota, implicating its role in evoking host defenses that promoted protective immunity. By utilizing transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq), we identified that each drug increased expression of several innate immune response-related genes, including those involved in the recruitment of neutrophils, the production of interleukin 33 (IL-33), and the IL-22 signaling pathway. The RNA-seq data on selected genes were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and protein assays. Focusing on amoxapine, which had the best anti-CDI outcome, we demonstrated that neutralization of IL-33 or depletion of neutrophils resulted in loss of drug efficacy. Overall, our lead drugs promote disease alleviation and survival in the murine model through activation of IL-33 and by clearing the pathogen through host defense mechanisms that critically include an early influx of neutrophils.IMPORTANCEClostridioides difficile is a spore-forming anaerobic bacterium and the leading cause of antibiotic-associated colitis. With few therapeutic options and high rates of disease recurrence, the need to develop new treatment options is urgent. Prior studies utilizing a repurposing approach identified three nonantibiotic Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, amoxapine, doxapram, and trifluoperazine, with efficacy against a broad range of human pathogens; however, the protective mechanisms remained unknown. Here, we identified mechanisms leading to drug efficacy in a murine model of lethal C. difficile infection (CDI), advancing our understanding of the role of these drugs in infectious disease pathogenesis that center on host immune responses to C. difficile Overall, these studies highlight the crucial involvement of innate immune responses, as well as the importance of immunomodulation as a potential therapeutic option to combat CDI.

Comparative study on effectiveness of doxapram and pethidine for postanaesthetic shivering

INTRODUCTION

Postanaesthetic shivering is a common condition after surgery which needs proper management with pharmacologic agents so as to make postoperative period comfortable to the patient and prevent from the untoward complications that can arise from it. This study was done to compare the effectiveness of Pethidine and Doxapram in the treatment of postanaesthetic shivering.

METHODS

Patients were randomly divided into three groups, ten in each. All received volume of 3 ml as Group I (Doxapram 1.5 mg/kg), Group II (Pethidine 0.35 mg/kg) and Group III (Normal Saline). All patients were observed for 30 minutes after reversal of muscle relaxant and occurrence of shivering within this period was observed, scored and treated. All treated patients were observed for 10 minutes after the test drug was given for control of shivering and any untoward effects.

RESULTS

Pethidine was found more effective than Doxapram in treating postanaesthetic shivering as it was effective in 80% followed by Doxapram in 60% and Normal saline in 20%. Statistically the results between Normal saline and Pethidine was significant as P < 0.05. As statistical significance between Doxapram and Normal Saline was p = 0.16; and between Pethidine and Doxapram was p = 0.62, the difference is statistically not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Pethidine was found to be more effective compared to Doxapram in treating patients with postoperative shivering.

[Recommended treatment of apnea in premature infants. A review based on literature and own experience]

The authors reviewed the literature concerning different methods of treatment of apnea in premature infants. The authors consider that, apart from pharmacological treatment, noninvasive respiratory support methods play an important role in the prevention and treatment of newborns with apnea. The aim of the study is to present current recommendations concerning the principles of prevention and treatment of apnea in premature infants. The compiled recommendations are based on the data from literature and from the authors' own experiences.

A new look at the respiratory stimulant doxapram

A number of life-threatening clinical disorders may be amenable to treatment with a drug that can stimulate respiratory drive. These include acute respiratory failure secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-anesthetic respiratory depression, and apnea of prematurity. Doxapram has been available for over forty years for the treatment of these conditions and it has a low side effect profile compared to other available agents. Generally though, the use of doxapram has been limited to these clinical niches involving patients in the intensive care, post-anesthesia care and neonatal intensive care units. Recent basic science studies have made considerable progress in understanding the molecular mechanism of doxapram's respiratory stimulant action. Although it is unlikely that doxapram will undergo a clinical renaissance based on this new understanding, it represents a significant advance in our knowledge of the control of breathing.

Doxapram and aminophylline on bispectral index under sevoflurane anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the effect of two clinically available central nervous system stimulants, namely doxapram and aminophylline on arousal from sevoflurane anaesthesia and bispectral index.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective study was conducted in 90 adult females, ASA I-II, scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgeries at Taipei Medical University Hospital. At 5 min before the completion of surgery, under sevoflurane anaesthesia, patients were divided into three groups to receive doxapram 1 mg kg(-1), aminophylline 2 mg kg(-1) or saline placebo intravenous. Standard vital signs, end-tidal CO(2), end-expiratory sevoflurane concentration, bispectral index and neuromuscular blockade were measured plus clinical parameters of recovery from general anaesthesia.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, patients receiving doxapram or aminophylline showed a similarly faster recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia correlated with increase in bispectral index.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous administration of doxapram 1 mg kg(-1) or aminophylline 2 mg kg(-1) hastened the early recovery from sevoflurane anaesthesia. The arousal effect of aminophylline and doxapram appears to be similar.

Doxapram shortens recovery following sevoflurane anesthesia

PURPOSE

A randomized, double blind controlled trial was undertaken to investigate the effect of doxapram on recovery times and bispectral index following sevoflurane anesthesia.

METHODS

Upon completion of surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia, 60 adult patients were randomly allocated to receive either doxapram hydrochloride 1 mg.kg(-1) iv or saline placebo. Clinical recovery from anesthesia was assessed by time to eye opening on verbal command, hand squeezing on command, time to extubation, and the Aldrete recovery score. Bispectral index values, systolic blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded at baseline (before anesthesia), during surgery, and every minute for 15 min after administration of the study drug.

RESULTS

Time to eye opening was shorter in the doxapram group compared with the control group (6.9 +/- 2.2 min vs 9.9 +/- 3.1 min, P < 0.05). Mean bispectral index scores were also higher in the doxapram group compared with the saline placebo seven to eight minutes following administration of the study medication (P < 0.05). More rapid emergence was associated with a greater increase in heart rate with doxapram (P < 0.05 compared with placebo), but no differences in systolic blood pressure responses were observed in comparison with placebo.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that doxapram 1 mg.kg(-1) hastens early recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia, and this arousal effect correlates with higher bispectral index values.

[Determinants of doxapram utilization: a survey of practice in the French Neonatal and Intensive Care Units]

Methylxanthines and doxapram have been used to stimulate breathing and to prevent apnea in preterm infants. The use of doxapram is controversial because the therapeutic index seems to be narrow and short-term adverse effects have been described.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the use of doxapram in the French neonatal and intensive care units.

METHODS

A structured postal questionnaire was sent to all the 236 neonatology and neonatal intensive care units of level IIa, IIb and III in France. The questionnaires were analysed after four months.

RESULTS

Answers were obtained from 159 chiefs of department (67.4%), 102 used doxapram (64.1%). Doxapram was mainly used as a second step, if methylxanthines failed to reduce the frequency of apneic spells (102/159 units, 64.1%). Doxapram was usually administered intravenously (91/102 units, 89.2%). Only 57 respondents (35.8%) did not use doxapram, because they were aware of the potential adverse effects or they did not know the drug. Monitoring of drug plasma concentrations was rarely performed (11/102 services, 10.8%). Nevertheless, there was a significant interest in this monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Doxapram is frequently used in France to reduce apnea of prematurity if methylxanthine therapy fails. Further studies are needed to determine safety of doxapram at short and long-term. A multicenter, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial would be interesting to perform, similar to the ongoing caffeine for Apnoea of Prematurity trial (CAP) . The French setting seems appropriate for this kind of study.

Doxapram treatment for apnea in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Recurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation. Doxapram has been used to stimulate breathing and so prevent apnea and its consequences.

OBJECTIVES

In preterm infants with recurrent apnea, does treatment with Doxapram lead to a clinically important reduction in apnea and use of intermittent positive airways pressure (IPPV), without clinically important side effects?

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE from 1966 - June 2004, EMBASE from 1980 - June 2001, CINAHL from 1982- June 2004. Text words 'doxapram', 'apnea or apnoea' and the MeSH term 'infant, premature' were used. Previous reviews including cross references, abstracts from conferences and symposia proceedings were also examined. Abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research were searched from 1996 - 2004 inclusive.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which doxapram was used for the treatment of apnea in preterm infants were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Each author evaluated the papers for quality and inclusion criteria. Independent data extraction was carried out.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one trial, which randomized 11 infants to intravenous doxapram and 10 infants to placebo, was found. There were fewer treatment failures after 48 hours in the group of preterm infants treated with doxapram (4/11) compared with the group treated with placebo (8/10). The wide confidence intervals made this result non-significant [RR 0.45 (0.20, 1.05)]. Only one infant, who was from the placebo group, was given IPPV. Of the seven responders by 48 hours in the group of 11 who received doxapram, five failed to respond between 48 hours and seven days after commencement of therapy. This gives a late failure rate of 9/11, similar to the short term failure rate in the placebo group of 8/10. It is not possible to evaluate the late responses of all those in the placebo group since they crossed over to a treatment arm.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Although intravenous Doxapram might reduce apnea within the first 48 hours of treatment, there are insufficient data to evaluate the precision of this result or to assess potential adverse effects. No long term outcomes have been measured. Further studies are needed to determine the role of this treatment in clinical practice.

Effect of doxapram on cerebral blood flow velocity in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Doxapram is used to treat apnea of prematurity when there is an insufficient response to methylxanthine treatment. As an unwanted side effect, reduced cerebral perfusion has been seen in methylxanthine-treated infants while effects of doxapram on the cerebral perfusion have not been studied yet.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen preterm infants treated with doxapram were included in the study. Birth weight ranged from 380 g to 1150 g (median 740 g), gestational age from 24 to 27 weeks (median 26 weeks). Infants received a doxapram loading dose (2.5 mg/kg) over a 30-minute period, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/h. Using Doppler sonography, blood flow velocities and the resistance index were measured in the anterior cerebral artery. Measurements were performed at baseline and 30 and 120 minutes after the start of doxapram.

RESULTS

Maximal systolic blood flow velocity (V(max)) decreased significantly after the infants had received the loading dose (V(max) baseline: 40.7 cm/s +/- 6.9 [mean +/- SD]; V(max) 30 min: 35 cm/s +/- 8.9; p = 0.0017) but returned to near baseline values at 120 min (38.5 +/- 9.0, p = 0.22). End-diastolic, time-averaged, and time-averaged maximal velocities did not change significantly at 30 or 120 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxapram induced a significant decrease in maximal cerebral blood flow velocity. Further studies are needed to assess whether this decrease may be critical to cerebral white matter perfusion in the vulnerable preterm infant.

Periextubation caffeine in preterm neonates: a randomized dose response trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of three dosing regimens of caffeine for preterm infants in the periextubation period.

METHODS

A randomized double-blind clinical trial of three dosing regimens of caffeine citrate (3, 15 and 30 mg/kg) for periextubation management of ventilated preterm infants was undertaken. Infants born <32 weeks gestation who were ventilated for>48 h were eligible for the study. Caffeine citrate was given as a once daily dose for a period of 6 days commencing 24 h prior to a planned extubation, or within 6 h of an unplanned extubation. The primary outcome measure was extubation failure, defined as neonates who were unable to be extubated within 48 h of caffeine loading or who required reventilation or doxapram dose within 7 days of caffeine loading. Continuous recordings of oxygen saturation and heart rate were undertaken in a subgroup of enrolled infants.

RESULTS

A total of 127 babies were enrolled into the study (42, 40, 45, in the 3, 15, and 30 mg/kg groups, respectively). No statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the incidence of extubation failure between dosing groups (19, 10, and 11 infants in the 3, 15, and 30 mg/kg groups, respectively), however, infants in the two higher dose groups had statistically significantly less documented apnoea than the lowest dose group. Of the 37 neonates with continuous pulse oximetry recordings, those on higher doses of caffeine recorded a statistically significantly higher mean heart rate, oxygen saturations and less time with oxygen saturations <85%.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial indicated there were short-term benefits of decreased apnoea in the immediate periextubation period for ventilated infants born <32 weeks gestation receiving higher doses of caffeine. Further studies with larger numbers of infants assessing longer-term outcomes are necessary to determine the optimal dosing regimen of caffeine in preterm infants.

Treatment of apnea of prematurity

In the last decade, knowledge regarding the neurodevelopment and functional aspects of the respiratory centers during postnatal maturation has increased substantially. However, an increase in such knowledge has not provided a basis for change in practice. The diagnosis of apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of exclusion. All causes of secondary apnea must be ruled out before initiating treatment for AOP. Treatment will depend on the etiology as well as effectiveness and tolerability of the treatment by the patient. The primary goal of any treatment of AOP is to prevent the frequency of apnea lasting >20 seconds, and/or those that are shorter, but associated with cyanosis and bradycardia. The clinical management of AOP is not much different today than it was two decades ago, with pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment options remaining the mainstay of therapy. Methylxanthines are still the most widely used pharmacologic agents. Due to the wider therapeutic index of caffeine and ease of once daily administration, it should be the preferred agent. Doxapram, or nonpharmacologic treatment measures such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure, may be considered in infants who are unresponsive to methylxanthine treatment alone. Treatment should be continued until there is complete resolution of apnea, and for some time thereafter. The choice of method for weaning treatment remains one of individual physician preference. Discharge from hospital after apnea requires close monitoring and some infants will require home apnea monitors. The decision to provide a home apnea monitor should be individualized for each patient, depending on the effectiveness of treatment and clinical response.

Doxapram for ventilatory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

COPD is a progressive illness and in the later stages, exacerbations may lead to ventilatory failure. The combination of hypoxia and hypercapnia can lead to coma and death. Correction of these blood gas abnormalities is a medical emergency. Doxapram is a respiratory stimulant used to stimulate respiration in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of doxapram on gas exchange and clinical outcomes in people with ventilatory failure due to acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in the field, study authors and drug companies. Following electronic searches conducted in November 2001 one further unpublished study has been included in the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing doxapram with other treatments or placebo in people with ventilatory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials involving 176 people were included. The trials were of variable quality. Doxapram was marginally superior to placebo in preventing blood gas deterioration. In the two studies comparing doxapram and non-invasive ventilation the results were conflicting: an early small study suggested non-invasive ventilation was superior. However, a subsequent larger study in severe participants suggested doxapram was equally effective in terms of blood gases changes, with no differences observed in mortality and frequent treatment failure.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Doxapram can improve blood gas exchange over the first few hours of treatment. Newer techniques such as non-invasive ventilation may prove to be more effective, although there is no randomised trial evidence to this effect.

Isolated mental developmental delay in very low birth weight infants: association with prolonged doxapram therapy for apnea

OBJECTIVE

We investigated factors associated with isolated mental delay in infants weighing < 1250 g at birth.

STUDY DESIGN

With a case-control design, matching variables for 40 cases included gestation, birth weight, sex, grade of intraventricular hemorrhage, and socioeconomic status. Case subjects had a mental developmental index < 70, and controls had a mental developmental index > or = 85, according to the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II at 18 months' corrected age.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the case and control subjects for neonatal complications and antenatal or postnatal steroid use. There was a marked difference in the cumulative dosage and duration of doxapram therapy used for apnea of prematurity (total dose 2233 +/- 1927 mg vs 615 +/- 767 mg, P < .001; duration 45.2 +/- 32.5 days vs 19.4 +/- 23.4 days, P < .001 for case subjects and control subjects, respectively). Multivariate analysis did not identify additive predictive variables.

CONCLUSION

Isolated mental delay in infants weighing < 1250 g at birth was associated with the total dosage and duration of doxapram therapy for severe apnea. Although this may be a marker for cerebral dysfunction manifesting as apnea of prematurity, possible adverse effects of doxapram or its preservative, benzyl alcohol, on the developing brain deserve further study.

Risks and benefits of therapies for apnoea in premature infants

Apnoea in infants can result from a wide range of causes, and requires thorough evaluation before deciding on appropriate treatment. Continuous monitoring of premature infants with apnoea is mandatory in order to define the pathophysiology and type of apnoea; selection of treatment involves careful assessment of aetiology, as well as efficacy and tolerability in each individual case. The objective of treatment is to prevent the deleterious consequences of apnoeas that last >20 seconds and/or are associated with bradycardia, cyanosis or pallor, and occur more often than once an hour over a 12-hour period. Apnoea management involves both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment. We suggest methylxanthines as first-line therapy for idiopathic apnoeas; evidence suggests that caffeine is better tolerated and as efficacious as theophylline (since it is particularly efficacious against the 'central' component of idiopathic apnoea of prematurity). If treatment fails, additional measures such as doxapram may be appropriate when hypoventilation is present, or nasal continuous positive airway pressure when upper airway instability or obstructive apnoeas are predominant. Apnoea prophylaxis is an additional reason to advocate prenatal maturation with betamethasone. Weaning from treatment is attempted 4 to 5 days after complete resolution of apnoea, beginning with the last treatment introduced. Monitoring should be maintained for 4 to 5 days to detect any relapse of recurrent and severe apnoeas, which would lead to the resumption of the most recently withdrawn treatment.

Current options in the management of apnea of prematurity

Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is a common problem that affects premature infants and, to a lesser degree, term infants. Apnea of prematurity appears to be due to immaturity of the infant's neurologic and respiratory systems. Apnea of prematurity is a diagnosis of exclusion that can be made only when other possible infectious, cardiologic, physiologic, and metabolic causes of apnea have been ruled out. The fundamental principles for managing apnea of prematurity include monitoring the infant closely while instituting supportive care measures such as tactile stimulation, continuous positive airway pressure, or mechanical ventilation. When necessary, pharmacologic therapy may be used to stimulate breathing. The first-line agents of choice for the management of AOP are the methylxanthines. And, for second-line therapy, a switch to a different class of agent, such as the respiratory stimulant doxapram, is an option. Of the methylxanthines, theophylline is the most extensively used. However, a review of the literature suggests that caffeine citrate may be the agent of choice for AOP. Comparative clinical studies have demonstrated that caffeine is at least as effective as theophylline, has a longer half-life, is associated with fewer adverse events, and, in addition, has a greater ease of administration. Caffeine stimulates the respiratory and central nervous systems more effectively and penetrates into the cerebrospinal fluid more readily than theophylline. In addition, because of stable plasma levels, caffeine has a wide therapeutic margin and few side effects. In contrast, theophylline plasma levels may fluctuate widely, which necessitates frequent monitoring and has a higher incidence of adverse events than caffeine. Before the FDA approval of caffeine citrate (Cafcit) for administration either intravenously and/or orally, caffeine preparations were "homemade." A few studies suggest that use of pharmacotherapy to treat AOP is not generally associated with long-term sequelae, although more data are needed before this can be definitively concluded.

Prophylactic doxapram for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants undergoing endotracheal extubation

BACKGROUND

When preterm infants have been given intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) for respiratory failure, weaning from support and tracheal extubation may be difficult. A significant contributing factor is thought to be the relatively poor respiratory effort and tendency to develop hypoventilation and apnea, particularly in very preterm infants. Doxapram stimulates breathing and appears to act via stimulation of both the peripheral chemoreceptors and the central nervous system. This effect might increase the chance of successful tracheal extubation.

OBJECTIVES

In preterm infants being weaned from IPPV and in whom endotracheal extubation is planned, does treatment with doxapram reduce the use of intubation and IPPV, or reduce other morbidity, without clinically important side effects? In this regard, how does doxapram compare with standard treatment or with an alternative treatment such as methylxanthine or CPAP? Subgroup analyses were prespecified according to birth weight and/or gestational age, use of co-interventions (methylxanthines or nasal CPAP), and route of administration (intravenous or oral).

SEARCH STRATEGY

The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group as outlined in the Cochrane Library was used. This included searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies included published trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation in which preterm or low birth weight infants being weaned from IPPV were given doxapram compared with standard care or other treatments, to facilitate weaning from IPPV and endotracheal extubation. Trials were independently assessed by the authors before inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used. Each author extracted data separately; the results were compared and any differences resolved. The data were synthesized using the standard method of Neonatal Review Group with use of relative risk and risk difference.

MAIN RESULTS

Two trials involving a total of 85 infants compared doxapram and placebo. In both the individual trials and the meta-analyses there were no significant differences between the doxapram and placebo groups in any of the outcomes (failed extubation, death before discharge, respiratory failure, duration of IPPV, side effects, oxygen at 28 days or oxygen at discharge). There was a trend towards an increase in side effects (hypertension or irritability leading to cessation of treatment) in the doxapram group [summary RR 3.21 (0.53, 19.43). In one of these two trials (Huon 1998) an 'alarming rise in blood pressure' occurred in five infants in the doxapram group and none of the controls, although in only one was treatment withdrawn. One additional trial involving only eight infants compared doxapram with aminophylline, but there were insufficient data for meaningful analysis.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The evidence does not support the routine use of doxapram to assist endotracheal extubation in preterm infants who are eligible for methylxanthine and/or CPAP. The results should be interpreted with caution because the small number of infants studied does not allow reliable assessment of the benefits and harms of doxapram. Further trials are required to evaluate the benefits and harms of doxapram compared with no treatment or with other treatments, such as methylxanthines or CPAP, to evaluate whether it is more effective in infants not responding to these other treatments, and to assess whether the drug is effective when given orally.

Doxapram treatment for apnea in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Recurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation. Doxapram has been used to stimulate breathing and so prevent apnea and its consequences.

OBJECTIVES

In preterm infants with recurrent apnea, does treatment with doxapram lead to a clinically important reduction in apnea and use of Intermittent positive airways pressure (IPPV), without clinically important side effects?

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches were made of the Oxford Database of Perinatal trials, the Cochrane Collaboration Clinical Trials Register, MEDLINE (using text words 'doxapram', 'apnea or apnoea' and Mesh term 'infant, premature') previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, mainly in the English language. Also an expert informant's search in the Japanese language was made by Prof. Y. Ogawa in 1996.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which doxapram was used for the treatment of apnea in preterm infants were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Each author evaluated the papers for quality and inclusion criteria. Independent data extraction was carried out.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one trial, which randomized 11 infants to intravenous doxapram and 10 infants to placebo, was found. There were fewer treatment failures after 48 hours in the group of preterm infants treated with doxapram (4/11) compared with the group treated with placebo (8/10). The wide confidence intervals made this result non-significant [RR 0.45 (0.20, 1.05)]. Only one infant, who was from the placebo group, was given IPPV. Of the seven responders by 48 hours in the group of 11 who received doxapram, five failed to respond between 48 hours and seven days after commencement of therapy. This gives a late failure rate of 9/11, similar to the short term failure rate in the placebo group of 8/10. It is not possible to evaluate the late responses of all those in the placebo group since they crossed over to a treatment arm.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although intravenous doxapram might reduce apnea within the first 48 hours of treatment, there are insufficient data to evaluate the precision of this result or to assess potential adverse effects. No longterm outcomes have been measured. Further studies are needed to determine the role of this treatment in clinical practice.

Doxapram versus methylxanthine for apnea in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Recurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation. Doxapram and methylxanthine drugs have been used to stimulate breathing and so prevent apnea and its consequences.

OBJECTIVES

In preterm infants with recurrent apnea, how does treatment with doxapram compare with treatment with theophylline in leading to a clinically important reduction in apnea and use of mechanical ventilation, without clinically important side effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group, as outlined in the Cochrane Library, was used.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All trials utilising random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which doxapram was compared with methylxanthine (e.g. theophylline) for the treatment of apnea, were eligible. There must have been an effort to exclude specific causes of apnea.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used to select trials, assess quality and to extract and synthesize data. The methodological quality of each trial was reviewed by the second author blinded to trial authors and institution(s). Additional information was requested from authors to clarify methodology. Each author extracted the data separately, then they were compared and differences resolved. Meta-analysis was carried out with use of relative risk and risk difference.

MAIN RESULTS

In these trials involving a relatively small number of preterm infants with apnea of prematurity, there is no apparent difference between the effect of intravenous treatment with doxapram or methylxanthine on the incidence of apnea within 48 hours. There were no infants reported to have been given mechanical ventilation on either treatment. No adverse effects were reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Implications for practice. The overall results of these small trials suggest that intravenous doxapram and intravenous methylxanthine are not different in their effectiveness in the short term in the treatment of apnea of prematurity. Caution is warranted as the number of patients in these trials is too small to exclude an important difference between these two treatments or to exclude the possibility of less common side effects. Longer term outcome of infants treated in these trials has not been reported. Implications for research. Further studies would require a large number of infants, stratified by gestation, to clarify which infants are likely to benefit and whether there might be differences in responses or side effects with these two drugs at different ages. It would be valuable to include important clinical outcomes such as use of mechanical ventilation as well as subsequent growth and development in future studies. Responses to treatment would have to take account of co-interventions, such as nasal continuous airway pressure which is frequently used post-intubation.

Severe side effects and drug plasma concentrations in preterm infants treated with doxapram

A high-performance liquid chromatography method has been developed for simultaneous determination of doxapram and its metabolites including ketodoxapram, the main and only active metabolite. The aim of the study was to evaluate this microtechnique and to report the cases involving severe adverse effects to determine toxic plasma levels in neonates. The method was found to be selective, and showed a good baseline separation of doxapram and metabolites. Recovery, linearity, intraday/interday precision, and limit of detection determined in aqueous solutions and in spiked plasma were satisfactory. The assay is simple, rapid, and plasma-sparing, which represents a true advantage in managing neonates. Case analysis was performed in two consecutive periods: 124 preterm infants in the first period and 173 in the second period. Severe toxic effects were observed in 4 cases in the first period, with doxapram plus keto-doxapram levels 9 mg/L. In the second period, only one case was observed. High-range plasma concentrations were significantly less frequent in the second period than in the first one. The authors conclude that measuring doxapram plus keto-doxapram in plasma may be of interest to avoid severe toxic effects in preterm neonates treated with doxapram.

Effect of doxapram on episodes of apnoea, bradycardia and hypoxaemia in preterm infants

AIM

To study the effect of doxapram on the frequency of apnoea, bradycardia and hypoxaemia.

METHODS

Fifteen infants, median gestational age at birth 27 weeks (range 24-30), age at study 27 days (12-60), with >/=6 episodes of bradycardia or hypoxaemia/6 h despite serum caffeine levels in the therapeutic range, received doxapram either intravenously (0.5-2 mg/kg/h) or orally (2-8 mg/kg every 2 h). Six-hour recordings of pulse oximeter saturation (S(P)O(2)), pulse waveforms, ECG, breathing movements and nasal airflow were performed immediately before as well as 1, 3 and 6 days after onset of treatment. Recordings were analysed for apnoea (>/=4 s), bradycardia (heart rate < 2/3 of baseline) and hypoxaemia (S(P)O(2) </=80%).

RESULTS

There was no difference between enteral and intravenous administration; results are therefore presented for the total group. Doxapram resulted in a significant decrease in the frequency of apnoea [22 (11-27) vs. 14 (7-23)/h, p < 0.01], bradycardia [3 (0-7) vs. 1 (0-3)/h, p < 0.01] and hypoxaemia [8 (0-18) vs. 2 (0- 17)/h, p < 0.01] already after 1 day of treatment, which was sustained throughout the 6-day study period. Side effects included an increase in the proportion of time spent awake [5 (0-24) vs. 12% (3-28), p < 0.01] and in gastric residuals [0% of feeding volume (0-5) vs. 4% (0-19), p < 0.05]. Enteral was switched to intravenous doxapram in 3 of 9 infants because of gastrointestinal side effects.

CONCLUSION

Doxapram substantially reduced the frequency of apnoea, bradycardia and hypoxaemia in these patients with caffeine-resistant apnoea of prematurity. Enteral administration, however, was not tolerated in a significant proportion (33%) of infants.

[A comparative study about the therapeutic effect of theophylline and doxapram in apnoeic disorders]

The objective of this study was to prove the superiority of doxapram compared to theophylline therapy in apneas of prematurity in very low birth weight infants. Therefore all VLBW infants (gestational age < 35 weeks) were randomized if they had in a 2 hours-interval more than 2 apneas, 4 bradycardias or 4 oxygen desaturations. They received either theophylline (loading dose 5 mg/kg b. w., 3 mg/kg b. w. bid) or doxapram by continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/h. Apneas, bradycardias and desaturations were recorded from the trend analysis of our monitoring system over the first 3-days and a 7 days period and compared statistically (Mann-Whitney U-test). Plasma levels of both drugs and a polysomnographic recording were obtained during steady state conditions in parallel to a behavioral observation according to Prechtl. The recorded events were again compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Twenty patients were treated with theophylline, 14 with doxapram. In 9 patients of each group we could perform a polysomnography and behavioral observation. The incidence of apneas, bradycardias and desaturations in a 7 days-interval was not significantly different between both groups. Analyzing the first 3 days of treatment, however, we could detect a significantly lower rate of apneas in the doxapram group (2.5 apneas compared to 7 in the theophylline group, p < 0.037). In the polysomnographic recording and in our behavioral observations we could not record any significant differences between both groups. Therefore we can conclude that theophylline and doxapram are comparable in the treatment of apneas of prematurity, however, doxapram is superior to theophylline in reducing the rate of apneas in the first 3 days of treatment.

Low-dose doxapram for treatment of apnoea following early weaning in very low birthweight infants: a randomized, double-blind study

The effects of low-dose doxapram (0.5 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) in combination with caffeine were evaluated on apnoea frequency following weaning from mechanical ventilation, and on blood pressure, in very low birthweight (BW) premature infants. Twenty-nine infants with BW < or=1250 g, gestational age at birth (GA) <34 weeks and postnatal age <5 d, who required minimal respiratory support, were included. Following randomization, they received a loading dose of caffeine citrate and a continuous infusion of doxapram (doxapram, n=14) or placebo (n=15) was started. They were extubated 8 h after starting the infusion, which was continued for 5 d. During this period, weaning was well tolerated in both groups, apnoeas occurred less frequently and there was a greater increase in systolic blood pressure in infants treated with doxapram than in controls. Plasma doxapram levels were also higher than expected. It is therefore suggested that doxapram, even at low doses, should not be used during the first few days of life. Careful monitoring of blood pressure is required if doxapram is used later.

[Treatment of apnea in prematurity]

Continuous monitoring of premature infants with apnea is mandatory in order to define the pathophysiology and the type of apnea, and to assess the efficacy and tolerance of the treatment. Etiological treatment must be first considered before deciding on a symptomatic treatment adapted to the type of apnea. In our practice, methylxanthines are the first line treatment considering their efficiency on the 'central' component of apnea of prematurity. In case of treatment failure, doxapram or continuous positive pressure can be associated to methylxanthines, especially when obstructive apnea or hypoventilation are predominant. The first attempt to stop the treatment is undertaken 4 to 5 days after complete resolution of apnea, starting with the last treatment used, the monitoring being maintained 4 to 5 days in order to detect eventual new apnea.

Doxapram in hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure

An 81-yr-old man with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypercapnia presented to the emergency department (ED) obtunded and in acute respiratory distress. He had instructed his family to refuse intubation but agreed to all other measures to sustain his life. Treatment measures included the administration of intravenous doxapram, which was followed promptly by a marked improvement in his respiratory function and mentation. Respiratory stimulants may be useful as a temporizing measure in this difficult ED therapeutic problem.

The minimum effective doses of pethidine and doxapram in the treatment of post-anaesthetic shivering

This study was designed to find the minimum effective doses of doxapram and pethidine to stop post-anaesthetic shivering. Two hundred and twenty healthy patients who shivered following routine surgery were allocated randomly to receive one of 10 doses of doxapram (0.18, 0.23, 0.29, 0.35, 0.41, 0.47, 0.7, 0.93, 1.17 and 1.4 mg.kg-1), one of five doses of pethidine (0.12, 0.18, 0.23, 0.29 and 0.35 mg.kg-1) or saline. Probit analysis demonstrated that the number of patients who stopped shivering with doxapram was independent of the amount of drug given in this dose range. The lowest dose of doxapram (0.18 mg.kg-1) was significantly more effective than placebo (p < 0.01). For pethidine there was a dose-dependent effect on shivering to a maximum of 95% of patients successfully treated with 0.35 mg.kg-1. We conclude that 0.35 mg.kg-1 of pethidine is the minimum dose required to treat post-anaesthetic shivering effectively. We also conclude that 0.18 mg.kg-1 of doxapram is as effective as 1.4 mg.kg-1 in the treatment of post-anaesthetic shivering. Further study is required to find the minimum effective dose of doxapram.

Comparison of the acute effects on gas exchange of nasal ventilation and doxapram in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is useful in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated by ventilatory failure. The effects of NIPPV were compared with those of the respiratory stimulant doxapram on gas exchange in patients with COPD and acute ventilatory failure.

METHODS

Patients admitted with acute exacerbations of COPD and type 2 respiratory failure (Pao2 < 8 kPa and PaCO2 > 6.7 kPa) who did not improve with conventional treatment were randomised to receive either NIPPV or intravenous doxapram. Blood gas tensions were monitored for four hours.

RESULTS

In nine patients who received NIPPV the arterial PaO2 improved from a mean (SE) of 5.9 (0.4) kPa to a maximum of 8.1 (0.6) kPa which was maintained at four hours. Eight patients who received doxapram had a similar baseline Pao2 of 5.6 (0.4) kPa which rose to a maximum of 7.3 (0.5) kPa but this was not maintained at four hours. The improvement in Pao2 in patients on NIPPV was accompanied by a fall in Paco2 but, in contrast, in those who received doxapram there was no improvement in Paco2.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPPV may be more effective than doxapram in the management of acute ventilatory failure complicating COPD.

Doxapram reversal of respiratory failure in a patient refusing assisted ventilation

A 75-year-old man with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and epistaxis experienced progressive respiratory failure after receiving an injection of meperidine and hydroxyzine in preparation for nasal packing. The patient and his family refused endotracheal intubation; despite aggressive medical care, he continued to deteriorate toward an expected fatal outcome. An i.v. infusion of doxapram hydrochloride at 2 mg/min rapidly reversed his downhill course and hypercarbic coma. This case illustrates the potential usefulness of doxapram in the emergency setting. The mechanism of action, indications, dosing methods, and potential side effects of this agent are discussed.

Use of doxapram hydrochloride injection as an alternative to intubation to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnia

We report three cases in which doxapram hydrochloride injection was used as an additional method of treating and stabilizing patients with chronic hypercapnia and hypoxia. Patients with such impaired respiratory drives would otherwise require intubation for medical management. In the appropriate setting, the use of doxapram hydrochloride injection has the potential to decrease morbidity and cost and shorten hospitalization as compared with intubation. This treatment also may be a viable option to treat patients for whom intubation is not an option.

Double-blind comparison between doxapram and pethidine in the treatment of postanaesthetic shivering

Sixty patients who shivered after routine surgery under general anaesthesia were allocated randomly to receive normal saline (n = 20), doxapram 1.5 mg kg-1 (n = 20) or pethidine 0.33 mg kg-1 (n = 20). Both doxapram and pethidine were effective in treating postoperative shivering 2-3 min after i.v. administration. In the group who received normal saline, 15 patients were still shivering 10 min after treatment, whilst in the doxapram group only three patients were shivering at that time. In the pethidine group, all patients had stopped shivering by 7 min after treatment. We conclude that both doxapram and pethidine were effective in the treatment of postoperative shivering.

Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease

Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive airways disease (COAD) are a common cause of admission to hospital, and have a high mortality. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has been used successfully in patients with respiratory failure due to neuromuscular and skeletal disorders, but the outcome of treatment in patients with COAD is less well known. We carried out a prospective randomised controlled trial of conventional treatment versus conventional treatment plus NIPPV, in 60 patients with acute ventilatory failure due to exacerbations of COAD. For the NIPPV group there was a rise in pH, compared with a fall in the controls (mean difference of change between the groups 0.046 [95% CI 0.06-0.02, p < 0.001]), and a larger fall in PaCO2 (mean difference in change between the groups 1.2 kPa [95% CI 0.45 to 2.03, p < 0.01]). Median visual analogue scores over the first 3 days of admission showed less breathlessness in the NIPPV group (2.3 cm [range 0.1-5.5]) than in the control group (4.5 cm [range 0.9-8.8]) (p < 0.025). Survival rates at 30 days were compared for intention-to-treat and efficacy populations. In the efficacy mortality comparison, mortality in the NIPPV group was reduced: 1/26 vs 9/30 (relative risk = 0.13, CI = 0.02-0.95, p = 0.014). This effect was less in the intention-to-treat analysis: 3/30 vs 9/30 (relative risk = 0.33, CI = 0.10-1.11, p = 0.106). In patients with acute ventilatory failure due to COAD who received NIPPV there was a significant rise in pH, a reduction in PaCO2 and breathlessness, and reduced mortality.

Doxapram improves pulmonary function after upper abdominal surgery

The effects of doxapram on postoperative pulmonary function were studied in 40 ASA I and II patients randomly allocated to receive either doxapram 1.8 mg.kg-1.h-1 or placebo for 2 h immediately after elective cholecystectomy. The two groups displayed similar reductions of carbon dioxide production at 2 h and 6 h postoperatively, whereas oxygen consumption remained at preoperative levels for 24 h. Minute ventilation was similarly reduced in the two groups at 2 h and 6 h postoperatively, with corresponding increases in PaCO2. PaO2 was similarly and significantly decreased in both groups postoperatively, whereas P(A-a)O2 remained unchanged at 2 h and 6 h in doxapram-treated patients. FRC was reduced postoperatively in both groups, significantly more so in the control group at 6 h. Various indices of intrapulmonary gas distribution, including the functional (nitrogen) dead space, underwent similar changes in the two groups. By contrast, the physiological dead space was reduced in doxapram-treated patients at 2 h, 6 h and 24 h postoperatively, whereas no significant changes were seen in the control group. The ventilatory equivalent for CO2 was significantly lower in the doxapram-treated group, implying higher ventilatory efficiency. Our findings indicate that infusion of doxapram postoperatively attenuates the impairment of pulmonary function postoperatively, chiefly via effects on V'A/Q' ratios. No side effects of doxapram were observed.

Obstructive, mixed, and central apnea in the neonate: physiologic correlates

In an attempt to determine physiologic responses to neonatal apnea, we evaluated changes in heart rate and oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry during 2082 episodes of apnea lasting 15 seconds or more in 47 infants less than 34 weeks of gestational age with idiopathic apnea of prematurity. Of these episodes, 832 (39.9%) were central, 1032 (49.6%) were mixed, and 218 (10.5%) were obstructive. Oxygen saturation decreased with increasing duration of apnea regardless of type or treatment, and the decrease in saturation was correlated with preapnea saturation. The baseline heart rate was similar for all apnea types. Infants receiving doxapram had a lower baseline heart rate (137.8 +/- 10.5 beats/min) than did infants receiving no therapy (142.8 +/- 16.6 beats/min) and infants receiving theophylline (149.7 +/- 15.0 beats/min) (p = < 0.001). A heart rate fall to less than 100 beats/min was seen more frequently with central apnea than with mixed or obstructive events, and in infants who were not receiving therapy. Falls in heart rate were significantly less in infants receiving doxapram (27.8% +/- 18.0%) than in infants receiving theophylline (44.5% +/- 19.0%) or no therapy (48.4% +/- 18.3%) (p = < 0.001). The most common heart rate pattern overall was a gradual decrease interrupted by accelerations, whereas an initial heart rate acceleration was the most common pattern in obstructive apnea. We conclude that heart rate response to neonatal apnea is a complex and is dependent on therapy and on type and duration of apnea.

Almitrine and doxapram in experimental lung injury

Almitrine and doxapram, two structurally unrelated peripheral chemoreceptor agonists, have been shown to enhance hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in anesthetized dogs. We hypothesized that these drugs would increase pulmonary vascular tone and improve gas exchange in canine lung injury caused by oleic acid (OA). Pulmonary hemodynamics and gas exchange were investigated in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs before and after intravenously administered OA 0.09 ml/kg and again after placebo (n = 6), almitrine 2 micrograms/kg/min (n = 6), or doxapram 20 micrograms/kg/min (n = 6) in a randomized order. Cardiac output (Q) was manipulated using a femoral arteriovenous bypass and an inferior vena cava balloon catheter to construct mean pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa)-Q plots in order to discriminate active from passive changes in Ppa. Gas exchange was assessed by measuring arterial PO2 and intrapulmonary shunt, determined using a sulfur hexafluoride infusion. OA increased Ppa over the range of Q studied, and it deteriorated gas exchange by an increase in intrapulmonary shunt. After OA, placebo had no effect on Ppa, arterial PO2, or intrapulmonary shunt. Both almitrine and doxapram further increased Ppa at all levels of Q studied, but they did not affect indices of gas exchange after OA. We conclude that in this experimental model of acute lung injury, almitrine and doxapram induce pulmonary vasoconstriction without, however, diverting blood flow toward better oxygenated lung regions.

Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease: risk factors and use of guidelines for management

BACKGROUND

On the basis of a retrospective survey by this unit it was suggested that patients with acute ventilatory failure should be given sufficient controlled oxygen treatment to raise the arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) to above 6.6 kPa, with the addition of a respiratory stimulant if the hydrogen ion concentration ([H+]) rose above 55 nmol/l and assisted ventilation if the patient remained acidotic despite these measures. This study was designed to verify the prognostic factors that determine survival in acute ventilatory failure and determine the outcome when our guidelines were implemented.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty nine episodes of acute hypercapnic (type II) respiratory failure were studied prospectively in 95 patients admitted with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive lung disease. Patients had to have a PaO2 below 6.6 kPa and an arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) above 6.6 kPa while breathing air.

RESULTS

The mortality associated with episodes of acute ventilatory failure was 12%. Patients who died tended to be older and were significantly more acidotic, hypotensive, and uraemic on admission than those who survived, but they had similar degrees of hypoxaemia and hypercapnia. Death occurred in 10 of the 39 episodes in which arterial [H+] rose to 55 nmol/l or above, compared with seven of the 100 episodes in which it remained below 55 nmol/l. The respiratory stimulant doxapram was used in 37 episodes and was associated with a reduction in [H+] below 55 nmol/l within 24 hours in 23 episodes. Assisted ventilation was used in only four episodes.

CONCLUSION

Arterial [H+] is an important prognostic factor for survival. Most patients treated according to the guidelines outlined above can be managed successfully without assisted ventilation.

Doxapram for the initial treatment of idiopathic apnea of prematurity

The ventilatory effects of doxapram in the initial pharmacotherapy for apnea in the newborn were evaluated in 8 premature infants with idiopathic apnea. All received doxapram for 48 h at 0.25 mg/kg/h on the first day and 1 mg/kg/h on the second day. The ventilatory effects and the airway occlusion pressure (p0.1) were measured by means of a face mask, and a pneumotachograph. Compared to the pretreatment period, the mean of the frequency of central apnea greater than or equal to 15 s decreased significantly (p less than 0.01) by 48 and 75% during the first and second day, respectively. Both doses significantly increased inspiratory drive measured by airway occlusion pressure by 20% (p less than 0.05) and 32% (p less than 0.01) on the first and second day of drug treatment, respectively. Minute ventilation, tidal volume and mean respiratory flow significantly increased only with 1 mg/kg/h of doxapram, accompanied by a significant decrease in transcutaneous PCO2. No side effects were noted. Data suggested that doxapram alone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/h is effective for the treatment of neonatal apnea.

Low-dose doxapram for apnea unresponsive to aminophylline in very low birthweight infants

This study was designed to test whether the addition of low-dose (less than or equal to 1.5 mg/kg/h) doxapram may help wean from positive airway pressure very low birthweight (less than or equal to 1250 g) infants with apnea unresponsive to aminophylline. Doxapram infusion was started at 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg/h and increased as necessary up to a maximum of 1.5 mg/kg/h. Average birthweight (N = 12) was 1026 +/- 170 g (mean +/- SD, range 740 to 1250), gestational age 27.8 +/- 2.6 weeks (range 24 to 34), postnatal age 24.2 +/- 9.4 days (range 13 to 40), central spun hematocrit 44% +/- 4% (range 38% to 48%), and theophylline level 57.1 +/- 7.7 mumol/L. Doxapram therapy resulted in weaning to a head box in 11 of 12 patients; two required a subsequent course after stopping doxapram. Since the only observed toxicity was mild irritability in one patient, we conclude that very low birthweight infants with apnea unresponsive to aminophylline and older than 1 week of age often respond to the addition of low-dose doxapram with only minimal side effects. Since there was a negative correlation between theophylline level and the effective doxapram dose (r = -.64, N = 13, P less than .05), we recommend that treatment with doxapram be considered in the United States only in those infants with a theophylline level greater than or equal to 88.8 mumol/L, in order to limit the cumulative dose of benzyl alcohol administered.