Add-on treatment with cenobamate is already effective at low doses in refractory focal epilepsy: A prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Cenobamate, a novel antiseizure medication with a dual mechanism of action, has been shown in pivotal trials to significantly improve seizure control in treatment-resistant focal epilepsy. We aimed to evaluate whether these promising results could be confirmed in a real-world setting with a follow-up period of up to 12 months.

METHODS

Patients from a tertiary epilepsy center who received cenobamate add-on between June 2021 and October 2023 were followed up prospectively at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation for assessment of seizure outcomes and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The clinical cohort included 112 adult patients with 30% nonlesional cases and a wide spectrum of epileptogenic lesions underlying refractory focal epilepsy. We observed a significant reduction in monthly seizure frequency of all seizure types already after 3 months of treatment at a median cenobamate dose of 100 mg/day. Forty-six percent of patients were responders with a ≥50% seizure reduction, 26% had a ≥75% seizure reduction, and 9% became seizure-free. Among the 74 patients with available follow-up of 12 months, the responder rates reached 55%, 35%, and 19% for ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% seizure reduction, respectively. After 3 months of treatment, 38% of patients reported adverse effects, mainly (84%) mild to moderate in intensity. Adjustment of comedication allowed successful management of adverse effects in 32% of patients. At a group level, there was no correlation between the cenobamate daily dose and the incidence of adverse events.

SIGNIFICANCE

We found a clinically relevant response to cenobamate already at a low daily dose of 100 mg also in a patient cohort with a higher degree of drug resistance than in pivotal trials. Our prospectively collected data provide real-world evidence for high efficacy and good tolerability of the drug, although no standardized treatment protocol or comparison with a control group was applied.

Highly purified cannabidiol in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsies: A real-life impact on seizure frequency, quality of life, behavior, and sleep patterns from a single Italian center

Seizure frequency in treatment-resistant epilepsies seems to be decreased by cannabidiol (CBD), but contrasting data are available on its effect on sleep, behavior, and quality of life (QoL), and no data is reported on its effect on parental stress in patients with epilepsy (PWE). Thus, we conducted a retrospective study on a cohort of children and adults with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who had been treated with highly purified, pharmaceutical-grade CBD to evaluate its effects on seizure frequency, QoL, behavior, parental stress, and sleep. Eighteen patients (12 adults and 6 children) were included in the cohort and followed for a median of 9 months. At the last follow-up (Tn), nine patients (50%) were considered CBD responders with at least a 50% decrease in seizure frequency. No serious adverse effects were found. No statistically significant differences were found concerning sleep, including daytime sleepiness, and no statistically significant effect was found on parental stress at Tn. An improvement was found for social interaction in quality of life (p < 0.05) for all patients. Our results demonstrate that CBD is a safe and effective antiseizure medication (ASM). CBD doesn't seem to affect sleep measures in adults and children or worsen daytime sleepiness. However, CBD improves specific QoL measures, which could indicate a possible use of CBD for other childhood disabilities. No impact of CBD was seen on parental stress, which could possibly be due to the limited follow-up or could mean that parental stress is not dependent on seizure frequency.

Drug-resistant idiopathic generalized epilepsy: A meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) is a common epilepsy syndrome with early age onset and generally good seizure outcomes. This study aims to determine the incidence and predictive risk factors for drug-resistant IGE.

METHODS

We systematically searched three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) in November 2022 and included 12 eligible studies which reported long-term outcomes (mean = 14.05) after antiseizure medications (ASMs) from 2001 to 2020. We defined drug resistance as the persistence of any seizure despite ASMs treatment (whether as monotherapies or in combination) given the criteria of drug resistance varied in original studies. A random-effects model was used to evaluate the prevalence of refractory IGE. Studies reporting potential poor prognostic factors were included for subsequent subgroup meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of drug resistance in IGE cohorts was 27% (95% CI: 0.19-0.36). Subgroup analysis of the risk factors revealed that the psychiatric comorbidities (odds ratio (OR): 4.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.97-7.98), combined three seizure types (absences, myoclonic jerks, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures) (OR: 5.37, 95% CI: 3.16-9.13), the presence of absence seizure (OR: 4.38, 95% CI: 2.64-7.28), generalized polyspike trains (GPT) (OR: 4.83, 95% CI: 2.42-9.64), sex/catamenial epilepsy (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.97-5.37), and status epilepticus (OR: 5.94, 95% CI: 2.23-15.85) increased the risk of poor prognosis. Other factors, including age onset, family history, and side effects of ASMs, were insignificantly associated with a higher incidence of refractory IGE.

CONCLUSION

Drug resistance is a severe complication of IGE. Further standardized research about clinical and electroencephalography factors is warranted.

Number needed to treat and associated cost analysis of cenobamate versus third-generation anti-seizure medications for the treatment of focal-onset seizures in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in Spain

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a serious neurological disease, ranking high in the top causes of disability. The main goal of its treatment is to achieve seizure freedom without intolerable adverse effects. However, approximately 40% of patients suffer from Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) despite the availability of the latest options called third-generation Anti-Seizure Medications(ASMs). Cenobamate is the first ASM approved in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures (FOS) in adult patients with DRE. The introduction of a new drug increases the number of therapeutic options available, making it important to compare it with existing alternatives in terms of clinical benefit and efficiency.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical benefit, in terms of the Number Needed to Treat (NNT), and the efficiency, in terms of Cost per NNT (CNT), associated with cenobamate versus third-generation ASMs used in Spain for the adjunctive treatment of FOS in patients with DRE.

METHODS

The Number Needed to Treat data was calculated based on the ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom endpoints (defined as the percentage of patients achieving 50% and 100% reduction in seizure frequency, respectively), obtained from pivotal clinical trials performed with cenobamate, brivaracetam, perampanel, lacosamide, and eslicarbazepine acetate. The NNT was established as the inverse of the treatment responder rate minus the placebo responder rate and was calculated based on the minimum, mid-range Daily Defined Dose (DDD), and maximum doses studied in the pivotal clinical trials of each ASM. CNT was calculated by multiplying the annual treatment cost by NNT values for each treatment option.

RESULTS

In terms of NNT, cenobamate was the ASM associated with the lowest values at all doses for both ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom compared with the alternatives. In terms of CNT, for ≥50% responder rate, cenobamate was the ASM associated with the lowest CNT values at DDD and lacosamide and eslicarbazepine acetate at the minimum and maximum dose, respectively. For seizure freedom, cenobamate was associated with the lowest CNT value at DDD and the maximum dose and lacosamide at the minimum dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Cenobamate could represent the most effective ASM in all doses studied compared to the third-generation ASMs and the most efficient option at DDD for both ≥50% responder rate and seizure freedom. This study could represent an important contribution towards informed decision-making regarding the selection of the most appropriate therapy for FOS in adult patients with DRE from a clinical and economical perspective in Spain.

Gabapentin monotherapy for epilepsy: A review

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders, affecting more than 50 million people globally. In this review we summarised the evidence from randomised controlled trials of gabapentin used as monotherapy for the treatment of focal epilepsy, both newly diagnosed and drug-resistant, with or without secondary generalisation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of gabapentin monotherapy for people with epileptic focal seizures with and without secondary generalisation.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 24 February 2020) on 25 February 2020. CRS Web includes randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRA), and the specialised registers of Cochrane Review Groups including the Cochrane Epilepsy Group. We also searched several Russian databases, reference lists of relevant studies, ongoing trials registers, conference proceedings, and we contacted trial authors.

RESULTS

We found five randomised controlled trials (3167 participants) comparing gabapentin to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and differing doses of gabapentin as monotherapy for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and drug- resistant focal epilepsy with or without secondary generalisation. Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, risk of bias, and extracted data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence and present seven patient-important outcomes in the "Summary of findings" tables. The quality of evidence was very low to moderate due to poor reporting quality, poor trial design, and other risks of bias, such as selective presentation of findings and potential heavy industry input. Better quality research may change our certainty in the effect estimates. None of the included trials reported on the number of people with 50% or greater reduction in seizures and time to withdrawal (retention time) in an extractable way. Gabapentin-treated participants were more likely to withdraw from treatment for any cause (285/539) than those treated with lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate pooled together (695/1317) (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25; 3 studies, 1856 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but not carbamazepine. Fewer people treated with gabapentin withdrew from treatment owing to adverse events (190/525) than those treated with carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate (479/1238), (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91; 1763 participants, 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), but not lamotrigine.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentin as monotherapy probably controlled seizures no better and no worse than comparator AEDs (lamotrigine, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate). Compared to carbamazepine, gabapentin was probably better in retaining people in studies and preventing withdrawals due to adverse events. The most common side effects associated with gabapentin were ataxia (poor co-ordination and unsteady gait), dizziness, fatigue, and drowsiness.

Spontaneous recurrent seizures in an intra-amygdala kainate microinjection model of temporal lobe epilepsy are differentially sensitive to antiseizure drugs

The discovery and development of novel antiseizure drugs (ASDs) that are effective in controlling pharmacoresistant spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRSs) continues to represent a significant unmet clinical need. The Epilepsy Therapy Screening Program (ETSP) has undertaken efforts to address this need by adopting animal models that represent the salient features of human pharmacoresistant epilepsy and employing these models for preclinical testing of investigational ASDs. One such model that has garnered increased interest in recent years is the mouse variant of the Intra-Amygdala Kainate (IAK) microinjection model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). In establishing a version of this model, several methodological variables were evaluated for their effect(s) on pertinent quantitative endpoints. Although administration of a benzodiazepine 40 min after kainate (KA) induced status epilepticus (SE) is commonly used to improve survival, data presented here demonstrates similar outcomes (mortality, hippocampal damage, latency periods, and 90-day SRS natural history) between mice given midazolam and those that were not. Using a version of this model that did not interrupt SE with a benzodiazepine, a 90-day natural history study was performed and survival, latency periods, SRS frequencies and durations, and SRS clustering data were quantified. Finally, an important step towards model adoption is to assess the sensitivities or resistances of SRSs to a panel of approved and clinically used ASDs. Accordingly, the following ASDs were evaluated for their effects on SRSs in these mice: phenytoin (20 mg/kg, b.i.d.), carbamazepine (30 mg/kg, t.i.d.), valproate (240 mg/kg, t.i.d.), diazepam (4 mg/kg, b.i.d.), and phenobarbital (25 and 50 mg/kg, b. i.d.). Valproate, diazepam, and phenobarbital significantly attenuated SRS frequency relative to vehicle controls at doses devoid of observable adverse behavioral effects. Only diazepam significantly increased seizure freedom. Neither phenytoin nor carbamazepine significantly altered SRS frequency or freedom under these experimental conditions. These data demonstrate that SRSs in this IAK model of MTLE are pharmacoresistant to two representative sodium channel-inhibiting ASDs (phenytoin and carbamazepine) and partially sensitive to GABA receptor modulating ASDs (diazepam and phenobarbital) or a mixed-mechanism ASD (valproate). Accordingly, this model is being incorporated into the NINDS-funded ETSP testing platform for treatment resistant epilepsy.

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity and the later development of epilepsy in a chemotherapy-associated brain damage

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy in childhood leukemia potentially induces brain lesions and neurological sequelae. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is known as a treatment-associated complication; however, the full clinical spectra of PSH remain to be elusive.

CASE REPORT

A 5-year-old girl was diagnosed of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M5. After the intensification therapy, she developed recurrent symptoms of episodic tachycardia, hypertension and perspiration lasting for several hours per day. The low-frequency-high-frequency ratio on Holter electrocardiography was rapidly increased from 0.84 to 2.24 at the onset of the paroxysmal event, whereas the video-monitoring electroencephalography (EEG) never identified ictal patterns of epileptiform discharges during the episodes. Thus, the diagnosis of PSH was given at 7 years of age. Myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures frequently appeared from 10 years of age, which poorly responded to anticonvulsants. EEG showed diffuse slow-wave bursts with multifocal spikes. Serial head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed diffuse cerebral and hippocampal atrophy, but not inflammatory lesions in the limbic system.

CONCLUSION

We first demonstrate a pediatric case with PSH who developed drug-resistant epilepsy 3 years after the onset of PSH. Our data suggest the pathophysiological link of persistent PSH with chemotherapy-associated brain damage.

Functional characterization of novel bumetanide derivatives for epilepsy treatment

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common type of focal epilepsies, affecting approximately 35 million people worldwide. Despite the introduction of numerous novel antiepileptic drugs during the last decades, the proportion of patients with therapy-resistant TLE is still high. As an impaired cellular chloride homeostasis appears involved in disease pathophysiology, bumetanide, an antagonist to Na-K-Cl cotransporters, gained interest as potential therapeutic option. However, bumetanide induces a strong diuretic effect and displays poor penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). To reduce these unwanted effects, we modified the already described BUM690 by exchanging the allyl-into a trifluoro-ethyl group to yield BUM532. Furthermore, we exchanged the nitrogen for oxygen in the trifluoro-ethyl group to yield BUM97. In the intrahippocampal kainic acid mouse model of TLE BUM532 ± phenobarbital (PB), bumetanide ± PB and PB alone significantly reduced hippocampal paroxysmal discharges (HPDs) but not spike trains. By contrast, treatment with BUM97 suppressed HPDs as well as spike trains dose-dependently, more pronounced compared to the other tested compounds and exerted a synergistic anticonvulsant effect with PB. Moreover, at higher doses BUM97 achieved long-lasting reduction of spike trains. In pentylenetetrazole-induced acute seizures only BUM532 combined with a sub-effective dose of PB increased the seizure threshold. No diuretic effects were observed at any dose of the three derivatives. Our data demonstrate the successful optimization of the pharmacological profile of bumetanide and the potential of the improved derivative BUM97 for the treatment of therapy-resistant TLE, in particular in combinatorial drug regimens with a GABA mimetic.