[Flow cytometry increases the proportion of valuable samples in cerebrospinal fluid with normal cell count in malignant blood diseases]

BACKGROUND

The alteration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in hematologic neoplasms is a poor prognostic marker. The characteristics of CSF are usually analyzed by flow cytometry or cytology. However, paucicellular CSF samples (≤5 cells/dL) can sometimes be considered unsuitable for analysis due to the low number of events.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the proportion of samples reported as suitable for analysis obtained by cytometry (FCM) and cytology in paucicellular CSF samples.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

169 samples ofpaucicellular CSF corresponding to 115 patients with hematologic neoplasms were selected. The samples were obtained by lumbar puncture in tubes conditioned with EDTA and Transfix®. We characterized the immunophenotype ofCSF samples with an 8-color panel, and 55 samples (32%) were in a small sample tube (SST). In all cases, monocytes were identified by CD14 labeling and T lymphocytes by CD3 labeling. The acquisition was carried out in a FACSCantoII® cytometer, and the analysis was performed using Infinicyt® software.

RESULTS

The proportion of samples suitable for analysis was higher in FCM compared to cytology (98% vs 61%, p < 0.000). We identified the presence of T lymphocytes and/or monocytes in most samples (98% and 90%, respectively). In the SST samples, the number of events recorded in low-volume samples (< 1 mL) was lower than in samples with higher volume (140 vs 556, p < 0.001), with a median of identification of 3 cell populations.

CONCLUSION

FCM allows the analysis of a higher proportion ofpaucicellular CSF samples than cytology in hematologic neoplasms study.

Cerebrospinal fluid findings in patients with hematologic neoplasms and meningeal infiltration

Neoplastic cell infiltration into the central nervous system (CNS) is a serious complication of hematological neoplasms. Cytomorphology (CM) and flow cytometry (FC) have been used to detect meningeal infiltration. The association between CSF findings with the results of CM and FC is still poorly understood. We retrospectively evaluated CSF findings in 72 patients with hematological neoplasm and meningeal infiltration detected either by CM or FC. We compared CSF cell count, total protein concentration, and lactate concentration according to the type of hematological neoplasm. We also compared these CSF findings according to the FC and CM results (FC + CM + , FC + CM-, and FC-CM +). The proportion of patients with positive FC was higher than with CM (FC - 91.7%; CM - 63.9%). Thirty-five (48.6%) patients with meningeal infiltration had normal CSF cell count, normal total protein concentration, and normal lactate concentration. The proportion of cases in which these CSF parameters were normal did not differ according to the type of hematological neoplasm. The positivity of CM was significantly higher in patients with > 3 cell/mm³ (P = 0.015) but the positivity of FC was not significantly different between patients with > 3 cell/mm³ or ≤ 3 cells/mm³. Patients with positive CM had more CSF cells (P = 0.0005) and higher lactate concentration (P = 0.0165) than patients with negative CM. The absence of CSF changes in cell count and total protein and lactate concentrations does not exclude the presence of meningeal infiltration. Although CM is considered the gold standard, the probability of positive CM is low in patients without CSF abnormalities in these parameters. Patients with hematological neoplasm with suspected meningeal infiltration should be investigated with both methods.

Assessment of the Utility of Cytology and Flow Cytometry of Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the utility and limitations of both flow cytometry (FC) and cytology for the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a practical clinical setting.

METHODS

A total of 393 consecutive CSF samples from 171 patients submitted for both cytomorphologic and FC assessments were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both FC and cytology findings were negative for malignancy in 315/393 samples (80%), and either positive (POS) or suspicious/atypical (SUSP/AT) in 7% of samples. This resulted in high agreement between FC and cytology (87%). Minor discrepancies were present in 4% of the cases. In 28 samples, an abnormal population was detected by FC but not by cytology.

CONCLUSIONS

FC and cytology are important complementary methods for analyzing CSF samples. In cases where cytology is SUSP/AT and FC is inconclusive or negative, additional specimens should be submitted for immunostaining, cytogenetics, and/or molecular studies.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: cytopathologic findings

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare, aggressive hematopoietic neoplasm, which in the past was also known variously as blastic NK cell lymphoma, agranular CD4+ natural killer cell leukemia, and CD4+/CD56+ hematodermic neoplasm. BPDCN is now believed to arise from plasmacytoid dendritic cells, but its exact etiology is still unknown. We report here on the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology of a BPDCN, a hypercellular specimen comprised of malignant, singly dispersed cells with scant to moderate amounts of pale blue, agranular cytoplasm, and uniform round to oval nuclei, fine chromatin, prominent nucleoli, occasional cytoplasmic microvacuoles, and pseudopodia. Neither mitoses nor karyorrhexis were identified. Flow cytometry of the CSF demonstrated that the malignant cells expressed bright CD45, HLA-DR and CD33, dim CD4, heterogeneous CD56, and partial CD123. The importance of clinical, histopathological, and phenotypic correlation is emphasized. Clinical and histopathological correlation and a literature review are also presented. The poor clinical outcome makes it important to accurately report this rare tumor in a CSF specimen.

CSF flow cytometry greatly improves diagnostic accuracy in CNS hematologic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of flow cytometric immunophenotyping in comparison with classic cytomorphology for diagnosing CNS localizations of hematologic malignancies, and to evaluate the implications of CSF pleocytosis and protein content in this context.

METHODS

We reviewed the results of diagnostic evaluations of all CSF samples analyzed for localization of a hematologic malignancy between 2001 and 2004 at our center.

RESULTS

A total of 1,054 samples from 219 patients were available for analysis. Sixty patients had a CSF localization diagnosed by positive flow cytometry, cytomorphology, or both. The first sample was positive by flow cytometry in 44 (73%) patients, by cytomorphology in 19 (32%). Four first samples were positive by cytomorphology but negative by flow cytometry. Patients with positive cytomorphology had more frequent clinical symptomatology (95% vs 58%) and CSF pleocytosis (84% vs 25%), and tended to a poorer progression-free survival than patients with positive flow cytometry only. OR for CNS localization in case of CSF pleocytosis was 10.1 (95% CI 4.9 to 20.8); OR for CNS localization in case of elevated protein content was 2.9 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.4). Nevertheless, 26 of 137 (19%) patients with normal cell count and protein concentration had a CNS localization.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic value of flow cytometry is more than twice that of cytomorphology. However, cytomorphologic examination of the CSF has additional diagnostic and possibly prognostic value, and should still be performed in conjunction with flow cytometry.

Disease- and treatment-related elevation of the neurodegenerative marker tau in children with hematological malignancies

Children acquire neuropsychologic dysfunctions after chemotherapy for hematologic malignancy. In this study, putative changes in levels of CSF-tau (a marker of neural dysintegrity) in leukemic children prior to and during chemotherapy were studied. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained before and during treatment from patients with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL, n = 10), non-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/NHL (non-B-ALL, n = 48), acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 9), other malignant diseases (n = 9), and six control children. A sandwich-type ELISA (INNOTEST hTAU-Ag) was used for measuring CSF-tau. Sixteen out of 50 patients with hematological malignancies, including the patients with proven leukemic CNS invasion, already showed high CSF-tau levels at baseline (>300 pg/ml). The pre-induction treatment for non-B-ALL, consisting of only corticosteroids and methotrexate (MTX), resulted in a significant increase of tau at day 8 (on average to 535 pg/ml). Larger increases as compared to baseline levels of CSF-tau were observed in patients treated for B-NHL with systemic vincristine, corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, and intrathecal MTX (mean 776 pg/ml at day 8). In two AML patients with CNS invasion, CSF-tau increased during chemotherapy up to 1,500 and 948 pg/ml, respectively. In one non-B-ALL patient with MTX-induced clinical neurotoxicity, CSF-tau was above the detection limit of 2,000 pg/ml. Almost one-third of the patients with hematological malignancies had elevated CSF-tau levels at diagnosis. Transient high levels of CSF-tau, reaching levels observed in other neurodegenerative disorders, were observed during induction chemotherapy for non-B-ALL, B-NHL and CNS+ AML. The clinical implications of both observations will be the subject of further study.