Reducing the Use of H2-Receptor Antagonists in the Long-Term-Care Setting

OBJECTIVES

To examine the patterns of H2 blocker use in the long-term-care setting and to assess the effect of educational interventions designed to improve H2 blocker utilization patterns.

DESIGN

Time-series quasi-experimental study and retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A large academically-oriented long-term-care facility.

PATIENTS

Institutionalized elderly patients with a mean age of 88 years receiving H2 blocker therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Two interventions involving group discussions with the medical staff, supporting educational materials, and physician-specific listings of patients receiving H2 blockers were employed sequentially over a 32-month period.

RESULTS

Each intervention resulted in substantial reductions in medication use (59.6% and 32.1%, respectively). Indications for H2 blocker use were determined retrospectively for patients identified as receiving therapy prior to the interventions (n = 110). Forty-one percent were found to be receiving therapy for reasons unsubstantiated by the medical literature. These patients were more likely to be discontinued from therapy than those receiving therapy for substantiated indications (P less than 0.01), consistent with the primary focus of the educational interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the excessive use of H2 blocker therapy in the long-term care setting responds to educational interventions with therapeutically appropriate reductions in utilization. Repeated interventions are necessary to maintain such reductions over time although there may be some reduction in the effectiveness of the intervention with repetition.

Use of proton pump inhibitors for the provision of stress ulcer prophylaxis: clinical and economic consequences

The provision of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) for the prevention of clinically significant bleeding is widely recognized as a crucial component of care in critically ill patients. Nevertheless, SUP is often provided to non-critically ill patients despite a risk for clinically significant bleeding of roughly 0.1 %. The overuse of SUP therefore introduces added risks for adverse drug events and cost, with minimal expected benefit in clinical outcome. Historically, histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) have been the preferred agent for SUP; however, recent data have revealed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as the most common modality (76 %). There are no high quality randomized controlled trials demonstrating superiority with PPIs compared with H2RAs for the prevention of clinically significant bleeding associated with stress ulcers. In contrast, PPIs have recently been linked to several adverse effects including Clostridium difficile diarrhea and pneumonia. These complications have substantial economic consequences and have a marked impact on the overall cost effectiveness of PPI therapy. Nevertheless, PPI use remains widespread in patients who are at both high and low risk for clinically significant bleeding. This article will describe the utilization of PPIs for SUP and present the clinical and economic consequences linked to their use/overuse.

Proton pump inhibitor prescribing and costs in a large outpatient clinic

Concerns have been raised regarding potential adverse effects and high costs of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Our objective was to assess issues of PPI utilization and expense in a large outpatient clinic population.

METHODS

Two hundred-fifty-nine outpatient records were reviewed regarding PPI prescribing and indications during 2009. A cost analysis was performed to project cost differences if histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were used as an alternative to PPIs in appropriate clinical situations.

RESULTS

Eighty-three (32.0%) were taking PPIs. Problem-listed gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was the primary diagnosis in 69 (83.1%) of patients on PPIs. GERD was not apparent by documented history and/or endoscopy in 46.3% of problem-listed GERD patients. Symptom severity had been documented in only 36.2%. Cost analysis projected substantial savings if H2RAs had been used initially for mild to moderate symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient PPI prescribing indications are not well documented and PPI use is probably excessive. H2RA therapy is likely underutilized.

Evolutions in both co-payment and generic market share for common medication in the Belgian reference pricing system

BACKGROUND

In Belgium, a co-insurance system is applied in which patients pay a portion of the cost for medicines, called co-payment. Co-payment is intended to make pharmaceutical consumers more responsible, increase solidarity, and avoid or reduce moral hazards.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to study the possible influence of co-payment on sales volume and generic market share in two commonly used medicine groups: cholesterol-lowering medication [statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) and fibrates] and acid-blocking agents (proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists).

METHODS AND DATA

The data were extracted from the Pharmanet database, which covers pharmaceutical consumption in all Belgian ambulatory pharmacies. First, the proportion of sales volume and costs of generic products were modelled over time for the two medicine groups. Second, we investigated the relation between co-payment and contribution by the national insurance agency using change-point linear mixed models.

RESULTS

The change-point analysis suggested several influential events. First, the generic market share in total sales volume was negatively influenced by the abolishment of the distinction in the maximum co-payment level for name brands and generics in 2001. Second, relaxation of the reimbursement conditions for generic omeprazole stimulated generic sales volume in 2004. Finally, an increase in co-payment for generic omeprazole was associated with a significant decrease in omeprazole sales volume in 2005. The observational analysis demonstrated several changes over time. First, the co-payment amounts for name-brand and generic drugs converged in the observed time period for both medicine groups under study. Second, the proportion of co-payment for the total cost of simvastatin and omeprazole increased over time for small packages, and more so for generic than for name-brand products. For omeprazole, both the proportion and the amount of co-payment increased over time. Third, over time the prescription of small packages shifted to an emphasis on larger packages.

CONCLUSIONS

As maximum co-payment levels decreased over time, they overruled the reference pricing system in Belgium. The changes in co-payment share over time also significantly affected sales volume, but whether physicians or patients are the decisive actors on the demand side of pharmaceutical consumption remains unclear.

Gastroprotective strategies in chronic NSAID users: a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing single-tablet formulations with individual components

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of competing gastroprotective strategies, including single-tablet formulations, in the prevention of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with chronic arthritis taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

We performed a cost-utility analysis to compare eight gastroprotective strategies including NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists, misoprostol, and single-tablet formulations. We derived estimates for outcomes and costs from medical literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of GI complications, compliance rates, and drug costs.

RESULTS

For average-risk patients, NSAID + PPI cotherapy was most cost-effective. The NSAID/PPI single-tablet formulation became cost-effective only when its price decreased from €0.78 to €0.56 per tablet, or when PPI compliance fell below 51% in the NSAID + PPI strategy. All other strategies were more costly and less effective. The model was highly sensitive to the GI complication risk, costs of PPI and NSAID/PPI single-tablet formulation, and compliance to PPI. In patients with a threefold higher risk of GI complications, both NSAID + PPI cotherapy and single-tablet formulation were cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

NSAID + PPI cotherapy is the most cost-effective strategy in all patients with chronic arthritis irrespective of their risk for GI complications. For patients with increased GI risk, the NSAID/PPI single-tablet formulation is also cost-effective.

Cost-effectiveness analysis: stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists

OBJECTIVES

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) present varying pharmacological efficacy in preventing stress ulcer bleeding (SUB) in intensive care units. The literature also reports disparate rates of ventilator-assisted pneumonia (VAP) as side effects of these treatments. We compared the cost-effectiveness of these two prophylactic pharmacological options.

METHODS

We constructed a decision tree with a 60-day time horizon for patients at high risk for developing SUB, receiving either PPIs or H2RAs. For each treatment strategy, patients could be in one of three states of health: SUB, VAP, or no complication. Contemporary, clinically relevant probabilities were obtained from a broad literature search. Costs were estimated by using a representative US countrywide database. A third-party payer perspective was adopted. Cost-effectiveness and univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Probabilities of SUB and VAP were 1.3% and 10.3% for PPIs versus 6.6% and 10.3% for H2RAs, respectively. Lengths of stay and per diem costs were 24 days and US $2764 for SUB, 42 days and US $3310 for VAP, and 14 days and US $2993 for patients without complications. Average costs per no complication were US $58,700 for PPIs and US $63,920 for H2RAs. The H2RA strategy was dominated by PPIs. Sensitivity analysis showed that these findings were sensitive to VAP rates but PPIs remain cost-effective. The acceptability curve shows the stability of the probabilistic results according to varying willingness-to-pay values.

CONCLUSION

PPI prophylaxis is the most efficient prophylactic strategy in patients at high risk of developing SUB when compared with using H2RAs.

Healthcare costs of GERD and acid-related conditions in pediatric patients, with comparison between histamine-2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and acid-related conditions (GERD/ARC) are common in pediatric practice but their costs have not been well characterized.

AIM

To compare healthcare costs (HCC) and healthcare utilization (HCU) of pediatric GERD/ARC between groups of GERD/ARC patients initiated on histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and matched controls.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children (age < 18 years) diagnosed with GERD or ARC (exploratory category) were identified from a large US claims database (1999-2005) using ICD-9 codes. Costs of pediatric GERD/ARC were estimated by comparing 6-month post-diagnosis HCC between cases and matched controls. GERD/ARC-related HCC and HCU for the year 2005 were further compared between GERD/ARC patients initiated with PPIs vs. H(2)RAs in terms of the cost differences relative to pre-initiation (difference-in-difference) and using multivariate regression to adjust for demographics, pre-treatment health status and pre-treatment costs.

RESULTS

A total of 27 865 matched pairs were identified. GERD/ARC patients incurred on average more 6-month total HCC than controls ($2386). In 2005, 1010 pediatric patients were initiated on H(2)RAs or PPIs. About 61% were initiated on PPIs and incurred 1.8 times higher 6-month post-initiation GERD/ARC-related HCC than H(2)RA-initiated patients ($661 vs. $372, p < 0.001). Although total 6-month GERD/ARC-related HCC increased for both PPI- and H(2)RA-treated patients, the increase was 30% less for PPI-treated patients ($173 vs. $246, p = 0.521) in the difference-in-difference analysis and 69% less in the multivariate analysis ($109 vs. $347, p = 0.040).

LIMITATIONS

The use of an exploratory definition for GERD/ARC, administrative claims data and potential coding errors in diagnosis codes used in selection process may limit the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric GERD/ARC patients incurred significantly higher healthcare costs compared to similar children without GERD/ARC. Compared to patients initiated with H(2)RAs, patients initiated with PPIs had more baseline comorbidities, and lower GERD/ARC-related HCC after beginning treatment.

Effect and cost-effectiveness of step-up versus step-down treatment with antacids, H2-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors in patients with new onset dyspepsia (DIAMOND study): a primary-care-based randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Substantial physician workload and high costs are associated with the treatment of dyspepsia in primary health care. Despite the availability of consensus statements and guidelines, the most cost-effective empirical strategy for initial management of the condition remains to be determined. We compared step-up and step-down treatment strategies for initial management of patients with new onset dyspepsia in primary care.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years and older who consulted with their family doctor for new onset dyspepsia in the Netherlands were eligible for enrolment in this double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Between October, 2003, and January, 2006, 664 patients were randomly assigned to receive stepwise treatment with antacid, H(2)-receptor antagonist, and proton pump inhibitor (step-up; n=341), or these drugs in the reverse order (step-down; n=323), by use of a computer-generated sequence with blocks of six. Each step lasted 4 weeks and treatment only continued with the next step if symptoms persisted or relapsed within 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were symptom relief and cost-effectiveness of initial management at 6 months. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT); the ITT population consisted of all patients with data for the primary outcome at 6 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00247715.

FINDINGS

332 patients in the step-up, and 313 in the step-down group reached an endpoint with sufficient data for evaluation; the main reason for dropout was loss to follow-up. Treatment success after 6 months was achieved in 238 (72%) patients in the step-up group and 219 (70%) patients in the step-down group (odds ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.7-1.3). The average medical costs were lower for patients in the step-up group than for those in the step-down group (euro228 vs euro245; p=0.0008), which was mainly because of costs of medication. One or more adverse drug events were reported by 94 (28%) patients in the step-up and 93 (29%) patients in the step-down group. All were minor events, including (other) dyspeptic symptoms, diarrhoea, constipation, and bad/dry taste.

INTERPRETATION

Although treatment success with either step-up or step-down treatment is similar, the step-up strategy is more cost effective at 6 months for initial treatment of patients with new onset dyspeptic symptoms in primary care.

Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease and acid-related conditions: trends in incidence of diagnosis and acid suppression therapy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the incidence of diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and acid-related conditions (GERD/ARC) throughout childhood and characterize patterns of diagnosis and treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs).

METHODS

Cohorts of GERD/ARC children (age 0-18 years) were identified from a large US administrative claims database covering 1999-2005 using ICD-9 codes. Incidence, healthcare utilization (HCU), costs, therapy discontinuation and switching rates were compared between various age and patient groups.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2005 annual incidence of GERD/ARC diagnosis among infants (age ≤1 year) more than tripled (from 3.4 to 12.3%) and increased by 30% to 50% in other age groups. Patients diagnosed by GI specialists (9.2%) were more likely to be treated with PPIs compared to patients diagnosed by primary care physician (PCP). PPI-initiated patients doubled (from 31.5% in 1999 to 62.6% in 2005) and, when compared with H(2)RA-initiated patients, were associated with 30% less discontinuation and 90% less therapy switching in the first month, and with higher comorbidity burden and pre-treatment total HCU and costs when diagnosed by GI specialists.

LIMITATIONS

The use of an exploratory definition for GERD/ARC, administrative claims data and potential coding errors in diagnosis codes used in selection process may limit the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD/ARC incidence increased for children of all ages between 2000 and 2005. PCPs made the majority of diagnoses. PPI initiations have now surpassed H(2)RA initiations.

Costs and effects of various analgesic treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

To assess the balance between costs and upper gastrointestinal (GI) side effects of treatment with celecoxib, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone, NSAID plus misoprostol, NSAID plus histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H(2)RA), NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor (PPI), and Arthrotec in The Netherlands.

METHODS

A model was used to convene data from various sources on the probability of GI side effects and resource use. The probabilities of GI side effects for celecoxib and NSAIDs alone were derived from trial data. Calculations were based on 6 months of treatment, and were from a societal perspective. Distinction was made between low-, medium-, and high-risk patients. An extensive probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to address uncertainty.

RESULTS

Assuming an average patient, the total costs per 6 months of therapy were: celecoxib 255 Euro, NSAIDs alone 166 Euro, NSAID plus misoprostol 285 Euro, NSAID plus H(2)RA 284 Euro, NSAID plus PPI 243 Euro, and Arthrotec 187 Euro. Treatment with celecoxib was associated with the lowest number of GI side effects and related deaths. Incremental costs per life-year saved for Arthrotec compared to NSAIDs alone were 5676 Euro for all patients and 526 Euro for medium-to-high-risk patients, whereas for high-risk patients, Arthrotec dominated NSAID alone. For celecoxib compared to Arthrotec, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were 56,667 Euro, 33,684 Euro, and 15,429 Euro, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Assuming a limit of 20,000 Euro per life-year gained, from an economic point of view, Arthrotec is the preferred treatment when all patients or medium-to-high-risk patients are considered. In high-risk patients, celecoxib is the preferred treatment strategy.

The role of proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Efficacy (healing, symptom relief) and cost-effectiveness are the principal reasons for the rapidly increasing use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

EFFICACY

Mean healing rates pooled from clinical trials are as follows: on omeprazole (OME) 20 mg vs. H2-receptor antagonist. H2RA (cimetidine (CIM) 1.6 g or ranitidine (RAN) 300 mg) (eight studies) at 4 weeks, 67% vs. 37%: at 8 weeks, 81% vs. 49%: on lansoprazole (LAN) 30 mg vs. H2RA (three studies), 83% vs. 47% and 91% vs. 63% at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. The benefit is greatest in severe disease because the H2RAs are disproportionately less effective. Heartburn is more rapidly relieved and in a higher proportion: at 4 weeks, on OME 20 mg vs. H2RA. 77% vs. 47% and on LAN 30 mg vs. H2RA, 81% vs. 46%. Both PPIs are effective in H2RA-refractory disease, approximately 80% healing occurring in 8 weeks. Relapse rates after healing vary from 25% to 85% at 6 months. Maintenance therapy sustains remissions: relapse at 1 year is, on OME 20 mg vs. RAN 300 mg (2 studies), 12% vs. 79%, and 28% vs. 55% (and 38% on OME 10 mg); on LAN 30 mg vs. 10 mg vs. RAN 600 mg, 20% vs. 31% vs. 68%. The effectiveness of the lower dose allows for dose titration.

COST EFFECTIVENESS

The higher drug costs for the PPIs are offset by their higher efficacy, making their use cost effective, particularly in severe disease. Efficacy and cost effectiveness are likely to further expand the use of PPIs at the expense of H2RAs as increasing numbers of patients with milder disease are treated.

Medical evidence and health policy: a marriage of convenience? The case of proton pump inhibitors

RATIONALE

In Belgium, several policies regulating reimbursement of acid suppressant drugs and evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice were issued in a short period of time, creating a unique opportunity to observe their effect on prescribing.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the evolution of prescriptions for acid suppressants and explore the interaction of policies and practice recommendations with prescribing patterns.

METHOD

Monthly claims-based data for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H(2)-antihistamines by general practitioners, internists and gastroenterologists were obtained from the Belgian national health insurance database (1997-2005). The evolution of reimbursed defined daily doses and expenses after introduction of reimbursement regulations and dissemination of practice recommendations was explored.

RESULTS

Recommendations had no impact on prescribing. All changes can be related to concomitant policies. Lifting reimbursement restrictions for cheaper products did not control growth or save costs in the long term. Only restricting reimbursement of all PPIs managed to curb the growth. We observed an unintended increase of non-omeprazole PPIs by gastroenterologists.

CONCLUSIONS

Reimbursement policies influence prescribing, but their effect can be unintended. A dialogue between policymakers and guideline developers, and evidence-based policies that are linked to clinical guidelines, could be an effective way to pursue both cost-containment and quality of care.

[Cost-effectiveness analysis for the treatment of non-erosive reflux disease]

Non-erosive reflux disease(NERD) is a common condition and acid-suppressing agents are the mainstay of treatment. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing a PPI, lansoprazole (LPZ) and a H2RA, ranitidine (RAN) for the treatment of NERD in Japan was performed using a decision analysis. The time period studied was one month and payer or patient' s perspective was considered. Efficacy data were estimated from a randomized clinical trial. Expected days without symptom (healthy days) were 20 for LPZ 15 mg/day and 16 for RAN 300 mg/day. Direct costs were 4,750 yen for LPZ and 4,358 yen for RAN. Cost-effectiveness ratio (direct costs/healthy days) was 238 yen for LPZ and 272 yen for RAN. Considering the results from a large-scale survey of GERD patients in Japan, the slightly higher price of LPZ was outweighed by its greater efficacy, also from the patient's willingness to pay perspective. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine with regard to both efficacy and cost-effectiveness and therefore is the preferred therapeutic agent for treatment of NERD.

Pharmaco-economic considerations in the long-term management of peptic ulcer disease

Pharmaco-economic consequences of available therapeutic strategies in the management of duodenal ulcer disease are of increasing importance. Terminology and methodology in economic evaluation need to be clarified: direct and indirect costs of duodenal ulcer disease have to be calculated, and results expressed in terms of efficacy, utility or benefits. The economic analysis then compares costs or cost-effectiveness ratios of various strategies. Macro-economic evaluations conducted in France have shown that the overall cost of duodenal ulcer disease was FF 3.5 billion in 1987 in private practice. Several evaluations have shown that indirect costs accounted for more than 50% of the total expense. From a microeconomic point of view, several studies have been conducted with ranitidine and cimetidine. Our own study has shown that one year of treatment with ranitidine 150 mg/day resulted in a decrease in the use of medical resources (clinic visits, endoscopic investigations, duration of hospital stay) and work days lost, when compared with placebo. This resulted in a smaller cost of the ranitidine strategy (FF 2031 per patient for one year for the community, vs. FF 2823 for the placebo strategy). Similar cost-effectiveness ratios for the ranitidine strategy have been shown in the USA. Costs savings have also been demonstrated during long-term treatment with cimetidine for up to 3 years. Studies performed according to Markov's chain model have shown that the costs of continuous and intermittent treatments are identical, the expenses related to investigations and mortality being greater with the latter. More studies are warranted to evaluate the efficiency of the different strategies used in the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Impact of the reclassification of omeprazole on the prescribing and sales of ulcer healing drugs

OBJECTIVES

To investigate if the reclassification of omeprazole from a prescription only medicine to pharmacy sale status had an impact on the prescribing and sales of ulcer-healing drugs and whether deprivation had any influence on this.

SETTING

Primary care, Wales, UK.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis (March 2002 to February 2005) of prescription data and pharmacy sales data.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Number of items per 1,000 population.

RESULTS

The number of prescription items for ulcer-healing drugs across Wales increased in each year of the study. The number of items per 1,000 population for proton pump inhibitors increased by 12.4% (473.3 to 531.8 items) in 2003/04 and 13.8% (531.8 to 605.1 items) in 2004/05, whereas the number of items per 1,000 population for H2 antagonists fell by 6.2% (149.1 to 139.9 items), and 5.7% (139.9 to 131.9 items) during 2003/04 and 2004/05, respectively. The sale of items per 1,000 population of H(2) antagonists increased by 34.3% (19.8 to 26.6 items) in 2003/04, but fell by 8.6% (26.6 to 24.3 items) in 2004/05. In February 2005, 12 months after reclassification, omeprazole accounted for 7.6% (2.0 items per 1,000 population) of the total sales (26.3 items per 1,000 population) of ulcer-healing drugs from pharmacies in Wales. Areas with high multiple deprivation and unemployment were significantly associated with the prescribing of ulcer-healing drugs, H2 antagonists and proton pump inhibitors. Multiple deprivation, unemployment and low income explained 21% of the variation in prescribing of ulcer-healing drugs. The sale of omeprazole through pharmacies was not related to these deprivation characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Twelve months after the reclassification of omeprazole the market growth of H2 antagonists sold from pharmacies was halted although there was no apparent impact on the prescription of ulcer-healing drugs. As a consequence there was no saving to the health service drug budget associated with the reclassification of omeprazole.

PPIs are therapeutically interchangeable and ideal for a managed care intervention such as therapeutic MAC

PPIs Are Therapeutically Interchangeable and Ideal for a Managed Care Intervention Such as Therapeutic MAC Mabasa and Ma recently published a pharmacy claims database review on the effect of a therapeutic MAC intervention for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). A therapeutic MAC program establishes a therapeutic maximum allowable cost for a drug category and, unless medical necessity exists, requires patients to pay the drug cost difference when a nonpreferred agent is dispensed. In their Canadian employer group, rabeprazole 10 mg daily was the preferred agent,2 costing Can 71� daily. They found a 22.1% reduction in drug cost per patient per year (PPPY) in the intervention therapeutic MAC group (from Can $357 to Can $278 PPPY) versus a 4.1% increase in the comparison group (from Can $293 to Can $305 PPPY). In response to this study, Peter Wahlqvist, an employee of AstraZeneca, the manufacturer of esomeprazole, has written a letter to the editors of JMCP to highlight a number of fundamental flaws.

Preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: are older strategies more cost-effective in the general population?

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relative cost-effectiveness of five gastroprotective strategies for patients in the general population not judged to be at high gastrointestinal (GI) risk requiring regular traditional (t) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for over 3 weeks: tNSAID/H(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs); tNSAID/proton pump inhibitors (PPIs); tNSAID/misoprostol; COX-2 preferential NSAIDs or COX-2-specific NSAIDs (COXIBs).

METHODS

A systematic review of outcomes and UK cost data were combined in an incremental economic analysis. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were generated for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.

RESULTS

Cost-utility analysis showed a tNSAID with a H(2)RA is safer and less costly than tNSAIDs alone, and equally effective and less costly than COXIBs. tNSAID/misoprostol was also dominated by tNSAID/H(2)RA due to withdrawal caused by side-effects reducing overall health status. The incremental increase in QALYs gained by using COXIBs instead of tNSAID/H(2)RA would cost 670,000 pounds per QALY gained. The incremental increase in QALYs gained by using tNSAID/PPI instead of COXIBs would cost 26,000 pounds per QALY gained. If the decision-maker will pay up to 140,000 pounds per extra QALY, the optimal strategy is tNSAID/H(2)RA. If the decision-maker will pay over this the optimal strategy is tNSAID/PPI.

CONCLUSION

The economic analysis suggests that there may be a case for prescribing H(2)RAs in all patients requiring NSAIDs. Our recommendations are tentative due to the quality of the data available and the assumptions we have had to make in our model, and it is possible that other strategies may be preferred in patients with higher baseline GI risk.

"Proton-pump inhibitor-first" strategy versus "step-up" strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition, and acid-suppressing agents are the mainstays of treatment. For the acute medical management of GERD, two different strategies can be proposed: either the most effective therapy, i.e., proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), can be given first, or histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) can be attempted first (the "step-up" approach).

METHODS

A clinical decision analysis comparing the PPI-first strategy and the H2RA-first "step-up" strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis in Japan was performed, using a Markov chain approach.

RESULTS

The PPI-first strategy was consistently superior to the step-up strategy with regard to clinical outcomes for the patient and with regard to cost-effectiveness (direct cost per patient to achieve clinical success). This superiority was robust within the plausible range of probabilities according to the sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPI-first strategy is superior to the H2RA-first "step-up" strategy with regard to both efficacy and cost-effectiveness and therefore, the PPI-first strategy is the preferred therapeutic approach for the acute medical treatment of reflux esophagitis.

A prospective randomized trial of either famotidine or omeprazole for the prevention of bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection and the healing of endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulceration

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that inhibitors of gastric acid secretion prevent bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection for mucosal gastric neoplasm. However, uncertain whether an histamine2-receptor antagonist or proton-pump inhibitor is more effective.

AIM

To evaluate prospectively the effectiveness of famotidine or omeprazole for ulcer management after endoscopic mucosal resection.

METHODS

From July 2003 to October 2004, 57 patients were randomly assigned to famotidine or omeprazole for the management of endoscopic mucosal resection. Both drugs were given intravenously for the first 2 days, thereafter by mouth. The bleeding rates after endoscopic mucosal resection, the effects on the healing of endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulceration, and cost-benefits were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients received famotidine and 29 received omeprazole. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in patient characteristics. The bleeding rates after endoscopic mucosal resection were not significantly different (18% vs. 14%) between the groups. Similarly, no differences were seen in the size of the endoscopic mucosal resection-induced ulceration at 1, 30 and 60 days after resection between groups. The total costs of anti-secretory agents demonstrated a significant cost-benefit to those treated with famotidine (10,420 yen vs. 17,782 yen).

CONCLUSIONS

Famotidine is suggested as a better alternative to omeprazole for the management of endoscopic mucosal resection, as it showed a clear cost-benefit, and the healing results after endoscopic mucosal resection were similar for the two treatment strategies.

Utility of proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal hemorrhage

Proton pump inhibitors inhibit gastric acid secretion thereby promoting the healing of peptic ulcers and decreasing the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding. An intravenous formulation of the PPI pantoprazole is now available in the United States. Some clinicians have prescribed this product after endoscopic hemostasis of acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage to prevent recurrence. Historically, the evidence is weak for the use of histamine H2-receptor antagonists in this role. Fifteen original studies on the use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors in this setting are reviewed. The evidence for their efficacy is similarly weak and does not justify the increased cost of their use in this setting. Larger, more definitive studies on proton pump inhibitors are needed to clarify their role in the control of acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

[Evaluation of the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: proton pump inhibitor versus histamine-2-receptor antagonist]

GERD is a common condition and acid-suppressing agents are the mainstay of treatment. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing a PPI, lansoprazole (LPZ) and a H2RA, famotidine (FAM) for the maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis in Japan was performed using a Markov chain approach. The time period studied was 6 months and payer perspective was chosen. Transition probabilities were estimated from meta-analyses. Expected days without esophagitis (healthy days) were 166 for LPZ 30 mg/day, 161 for LPZ 15 mg/day and 143 for FAM 40 mg/day. Direct costs were 55,624 yen for LPZ 30 mg/day, 42,078 yen for LPZ 15 mg/day and 67,969 yen for FAM 40 mg/day. Cost-effectiveness ratio (direct costs/healthy days) was 335 yen for LPZ 30 mg/day, 262 yen for LPZ 15 mg/day and 477 yen for FAM 40 mg/day. Lansoprazole was superior to famotidine with regard to both efficacy and cost-effectiveness and therefore is the preferred therapeutic agent for the maintenance treatment of GERD.

Economic evaluation of etoricoxib versus non-selective NSAIDs in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients in the UK

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential economic implications of using etoricoxib versus non-selective NSAID alternatives in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the UK.

STUDY DESIGN

Decision-analytical modelling was used to calculate the expected costs and consequences of the use of etoricoxib compared with non-selective NSAIDs alone, NSAIDs plus proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), NSAIDs plus histamine H2 receptor antagonists and NSAIDs plus misoprostol over a continuous treatment period of 1 year.

METHODS

The model considered direct medical costs from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and used data from phase IIb and III clinical trials of etoricoxib to determine probabilities of gastrointestinal (GI) events. Model outcomes were defined as resource-consuming GI-related events, including clinically evident gastroduodenal perforations, symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcers, or upper GI bleeding (collectively, PUBs ['perforation, ulcers and/or bleeding']). Resource utilisation and costs (2002 values) for the treatment of OA and RA as well as GI events were based on published literature and information available from UK-specific sources.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS

The model suggests that etoricoxib is cost saving compared with non-selective NSAIDs plus PPIs or non-selective NSAIDs plus misoprostol. The model also suggests that etoricoxib is cost effective in terms of the incremental cost per QALY gained for non-selective NSAIDs alone (pound 19,766) and for non-selective NSAIDs plus H2 antagonists (pound 9350). The incremental cost of etoricoxib per PUB avoided was pound 12,446 versus non-selective NSAIDs alone and pound 6438 versus NSAIDs co-prescribed with H2 antagonists. For patients without the presence of specific GI risk factors (history of GI event, corticosteroid use or disability), etoricoxib may be cost effective for patients over age 56 years, assuming a cost-effectiveness threshold of pound 30,000 per QALY gained. Etoricoxib may also be cost effective in patients of all ages who had at least one specific GI risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The model suggests, with its underlying assumptions and data, that etoricoxib is a cost-effective alternative to therapeutic regimens involving non-selective NSAIDs for OA or RA, from the UK NHS perspective. Etoricoxib may be cost saving and dominant over non-selective NSAIDs used together with a PPI or misoprostol. When compared with non-selective NSAIDs alone or non-selective NSAIDs co-prescribed with H2 antagonists, the incremental cost per QALY gained with use of etoricoxib was within the generally accepted threshold for cost effectiveness (less than pound 30,000 per QALY gained).

[On-demand treatment with gastric acid inhibitors for gastroesophageal reflux disease]

Gastric acid inhibitors are effective and safe drugs for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Since reflux disease is frequent in Western populations, the use of gastric acid inhibitors leads to a considerable financial burden to the community. However, a large proportion of the patients with reflux symptoms do not take their medication continuously but use the drugs as required by their symptoms. This opens the possibility of a more cost-effective approach in which optimal symptom relief is achieved in combination with cost reduction. The type of on-demand therapy must be based on the individual pattern of reflux symptoms. In this approach, the patient determines the actual therapy whereas the physician functions as advisor. It is presently unknown whether any adverse effects result from the long-term on-demand therapy of reflux disease.

[As-needed treatment with gastric acid inhibitors in gastroesophageal reflux disease]

Although proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists are usually prescribed for continuous use by patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, at least 50% of such patients do not take their medication daily and some take it only sporadically. On-demand treatment with proton pump inhibitors or H2-receptor antagonists is safe and cost-effective. Indications are: (a) incidental reflux episodes of short duration, (b) periodic reflux lasting several weeks or months, (c) chronic reflux not requiring continuous treatment. On-demand treatment is unsuitable for patients with reflux disease who either require daily medication or in whom the maximal dosage is insufficient. There are three types of on-demand treatment. Type 1: use of medication only in case of incidental symptoms. Type 2: continuous medication for 2-4 weeks when symptoms appear. Type 3: continuous use because of chronic symptoms, but the interval between doses is determined by the patient on the basis of his symptoms. All antacids can in principle be used for on-demand treatment; for type 3 treatment, antacids with a rapid onset of action are preferred. A favourable response to the two weeks of initial therapy is a good predictor for successful on-demand treatment.

Arthritis treatment in Hong Kong--cost analysis of celecoxib versus conventional NSAIDS, with or without gastroprotective agents

BACKGROUND

Selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors have been reported to cause fewer gastrointestinal complications when compared with conventional, non-selective, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

AIM

To analyse the cost of celecoxib (selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor) and conventional NSAID regimens for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis from the perspective of a public health organization in Hong Kong.

METHODS

A decision tree was used to analyse the cost of celecoxib, NSAID alone, NSAID plus histamine2-receptor antagonist, NSAID plus misoprostol and NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor over 6 months. Model outcomes were no gastrointestinal toxicity, gastrointestinal discomfort, symptomatic ulcer, anaemia with occult bleeding and serious gastrointestinal complications. The clinical probabilities were estimated from clinical trials. Resource utilization for gastrointestinal events was determined locally. Sensitivity analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The 6-month costs per base-case analysis were as follows: NSAID plus histamine2-receptor antagonist, 1404 HK dollars (1 US dollar = 7.8 HK dollars); celecoxib, 1545 HK dollars; NSAID alone, 1610 HK dollars; NSAID plus misoprostol, 2213 HK dollars; NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor, 2857 HK dollars. The model was sensitive to the patients' underlying gastrointestinal risk scores, daily cost of NSAID regimen, risk ratio of NSAID plus histamine2-receptor antagonist for symptomatic ulcer, daily cost of celecoxib and daily cost of histamine2-receptor antagonist.

CONCLUSIONS

Celecoxib appeared to be the least costly alternative in patients with intermediate to high gastrointestinal risk for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in Hong Kong.

Health services utilization with reference drug pricing of histamine(2) receptor antagonists in British Columbia elderly

BACKGROUND

In October 1995, British Columbia introduced a reference pricing policy for five therapeutic classes of drugs, including histamine(2) receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs), for beneficiaries of its prescription drug program, Pharmacare.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate utilization trends in consumption of health services in a cohort of Pharmacare beneficiaries to determine if a worsening of health outcomes could be detected after implementation of the reference pricing policy.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Two cohorts, "control" (21 months before the reference pricing policy) and "exposed" (at risk for policy effects), were followed for 21 months. Using a longitudinal generalized linear model (Poisson), and controlling for age, sex, and prescriptions in unique drug classes, trend lines in each of these time series were compared for 3 periods: 9 months before policy implementation (or corresponding index date in the control cohort), 6 months after policy implementation, and a subsequent 6-month period.

SUBJECTS

Two cohorts, each of size 10,000, were constructed by randomly sampling the population of Pharmacare beneficiaries exposed to H(2)RAs and other antisecretory drugs for 1993 through 1996.

MEASURES

Prescriptions, physician office visits and associated transactions (ie, laboratory tests), emergency room visits, hospitalizations, hospital length of stay, and vital statistics.

RESULTS

Differences between periods and between cohorts for health services utilization were not significant or decreased after imposition of the reference pricing policy.

CONCLUSION

For these measures, there has been no worsening of health outcomes associated with implementing the reference pricing policy.

The cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for the prevention of recurrent peptic ulcer hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Several strategies exist for the prevention of recurrent ulcer-related hemorrhage, yet the cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated and remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of competing management strategies considering both nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs status and the accuracy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) testing.

METHODS

Decision analysis was used to compare the cost-per-recurrent hemorrhage prevented for 11 strategies over 1 yr. Clinical and costs estimates were derived from a systematic review of the medical literature and the Medicare Fee Schedule and Drug Topics Redbook. Sensitivity analyses were performed for important variables.

RESULTS

The test/retest eradication strategy with maintenance proton pump inhibitor therapy for H. pylori-negative patients was most effective (prevention of recurrence in 96.0%). The test/retest eradication strategy with maintenance histamine-2 receptor antagonist therapy for H. pylori-negative patients was least costly ($1070). The test/retest strategies were dominant with average cost-effectiveness ratios of $1118-1310/recurrent hemorrhage prevented with maintenance antisecretory therapy. The average cost-effectiveness ratios for "selective" H. pylori eradication strategies with maintenance antisecretory therapy were $1263-1673. The model was robust to varying estimates over prespecified ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Test/retest strategies for H. pylori are cost-effective for the prevention of recurrent ulcer-related hemorrhage because they maximize H. pylori detection and eradication, resulting in fewer recurrent hemorrhages and fewer patients requiring antisecretory therapy.

Cost impact of switching histamine(2)-receptor antagonists to nonprescription status

BACKGROUND

There is a recent trend to switching medications from prescription to nonprescription status. Often, such switches are accompanied by dramatic changes in utilization due to increased availability or decreased insurance coverage. The histamine(2)-receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) underwent such status change in the UK in 1994, the US in 1995, and Canada in 1996.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of the status change for H(2)RAs on the market for gastrointestinal (GI) agents in the US, UK, and Canada.

METHODS

IMS market sales data from 1992 to 1997 were procured. All costs were converted to 1997 US dollars using the consumer price index. Per capita sales figures were determined using population data from the US Census Bureau's International Database.

RESULTS

Overall spending on GI remedies increased in all 3 markets between 1992 and 1997; however, the contribution of prescription sales and number of prescriptions varied across the 3 countries. An increased market share for nonprescription H(2)RAs occurred in the US, correlating with a decline in prescription numbers for GI remedies. The opposing trend occurred in the UK, where market share of nonprescription H(2)RAs was minimal and use of prescription H(2)RAs increased. Prescription and nonprescription H(2)RA sales could not be differentiated for Canada.

CONCLUSIONS

The impact of the H(2)RA status change varied across countries. Differences in utilization may be attributed to many factors such as differing healthcare systems, patient convenience, and physician prescribing practices. Further research is required to identify the reasons for differences in utilization and to quantify the potential clinical impact.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of long-term management strategies for heartburn

OBJECTIVES

To compare the expected costs and outcomes of seven alternative long-term primary care strategies for the management of patients with moderate-to-severe heartburn over a 1-year period.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate costs and effects (weeks with heartburn symptoms and quality adjusted life years [QALYs]) for each strategy. Meta-analyses were used to synthesize acute treatment and maintenance studies and physician surveys to collect information on patient management. The impact of uncertainty on the base case results was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Probability distributions were defined for key model parameters and techniques of Monte Carlo simulation were used to draw values from these distributions. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) conditional on the monetary value decision makers are willing to pay for a symptom-free day or QALY were created for each strategy.

RESULTS

In the base case, no strategy was strictly dominated by any other strategy. However, two strategies (maintenance H2-receptor antagonists H2RA] and step-down proton pump inhibitor PPI]) were dominated through principles of extended dominance. The least costly and least effective strategy was intermittent H2RA, while maintenance PPI was the most costly and most effective.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis showed that the best way of managing patients with heartburn depends on how much society is willing to pay to achieve health improvements. Based on the commonly quoted threshold of US 50,000 dollars per QALY, the optimal primary care strategy for managing patients with moderate-to-severe heartburn symptoms is to treat the symptoms with a PPI followed by maintenance therapy with an H2RA to prevent symptomatic recurrence.

Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease

When choosing between mutually exclusive treatment options, it is common to construct a cost-effectiveness frontier on the cost-effectiveness plane that represents efficient points from among the treatment choices. Treatment options internal to the frontier are considered inefficient and are excluded either by strict dominance or by appealing to the principle of extended dominance. However, when uncertainty is considered, options excluded under the baseline analysis may form part of the cost-effectiveness frontier. By adopting a Bayesian approach, where distributions for model parameters are specified, uncertainty in the decision concerning which treatment option should be implemented is addressed directly. The approach is illustrated using an example from a recently published cost-effectiveness analysis of different possible treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. It is argued that probabilistic analyses should be encouraged because they have potential to quantify the strength of evidence in favor of particular treatment choices.

Impact of reference-based pricing for histamine-2 receptor antagonists and restricted access for proton pump inhibitors in British Columbia

BACKGROUND

Two programs to reduce expenditures for common gastrointestinal drugs were introduced simultaneously by British Columbia (BC) Pharmacare in 1995. Reference-based pricing restricted reimbursement for all histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) to the cost of the least expensive H2RA available, generic cimetidine. Special authority restricted reimbursement for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to patients who met certain eligibility criteria. We evaluated the effect of reference-based pricing for H2RAs and special authority for PPIs on dispensing and reimbursement for senior citizen beneficiaries of BC Pharmacare.

METHODS

Itemized monthly claims data for upper gastrointestinal drugs were obtained from BC Pharmacare for all beneficiaries 65 years of age or older. Periods before and after implementation of reference-based pricing and special authority were compared with respect to defined daily doses dispensed per 100,000 beneficiaries, BC Pharmacare reimbursement per 100,000 beneficiaries, BC Pharmacare reimbursement per defined daily dose and beneficiary contributions per defined daily dose. We used regression models to project forward trends in expenditures observed before implementation of the new policies and hence to estimate accrued cost savings.

RESULTS

Before reference-based pricing and special authority, the numbers of defined daily doses that were dispensed and total BC Pharmacare reimbursements for H2RAs appeared to be declining gradually, whereas those for PPIs were rising. With reference-based pricing, the monthly defined daily dose of cimetidine dispensed increased more than 4-fold, to 116,257 per 100,000 beneficiaries, while those of other restricted H2RAs decreased by more than half, to 50,927 per 100,000 beneficiaries. Special authority immediately reduced the dispensed volumes of PPIs by one-fourth, but growth in volume then appeared to resume at its previous rate. The estimated annualized cost savings achieved by reference-based pricing and special authority were $1.8 million to $3.2 million for H2RAs (depending on the estimation method used) and $5.5 million for PPIs. However, beneficiary contributions for H2RAs increased from negligible amounts to approximately 16% of total drug expenditures.

INTERPRETATION

Reference-based pricing and special authority appear to have been successful in altering prescribing habits and reducing provincial expenditures for upper gastrointestinal drugs, but they have increased the financial burden on senior citizen beneficiaries.

Cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy at a company occupational health clinic in Japan

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a common disorder that follows a chronically relapsing course. Many clinical trials have proven the efficacy of H2-blockers in the long-term management of chronic relapsing PUD. On the other hand, 30% of patients with duodenal ulcer (DU) receiving maintenance therapy with H2-blockers experience ulcer recurrence yearly. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is now recognized as the major cause of PUD. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in comparison to maintenance therapy with H2-blocker in a 1-year period at a company occupational health clinic. Ninety-nine with PUD tested for H. pylori were positive. Forty-nine patients received H. pylori eradication, and the remaining 50 patients were treated with ranitidine (RAN) 150 mg for 1 year according to their demands. H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 42 patients (86%), and 41 (98%) of these 42 patients remained free of symptoms for the remainder of the study period. The lifetable probability of ulcer recurrence during 1 year was significantly lower for patients who received eradication (6.1%) compared with those who received RAN alone (24.0%). The total cost for H. pylori eradication was lower than that for maintenance therapy along our study design (102,664 yen vs 150,356 yen). A decision tree was illustrated and the total cost were calculated by using sensitivity analysis. When we used baseline probabilities in sensitivity analysis, the total cost for eradication was lower than that for maintenance therapy (104,647 yen vs 154,468 yen). H. pylori eradication is cost-effective therapy for patients with PUD in comparison to maintenance therapy with RAN at an on-site occupational health clinic in Japan.

The effect on social welfare of a switch of second-generation antihistamines from prescription to over-the-counter status: a microeconomic analysis

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently held a meeting to determine whether the status of second-generation antihistamines (SGAs) should be switched from prescription (Rx) to over-the-counter (OTC) status.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a conceptual microeconomic framework for addressing issues regarding the impact of such a switch on social welfare.

METHODS

A review of the economic literature on Rx-to-OTC switches was conducted. Relevant articles published in English between 1990 and 2001 were identified through searches of ABI Info, EconLit, PsychInfo, MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, AIDSLINE, and HealthStar, as well as a general Internet search for statements in the press or on the FDA Web site. The search terms used were Rx, prescription, OTC, over-the-counter, second-generation antihistamines, nonsedating antihistamines, first-generation antihistamines, and sedating antihistamines. Microeconomic models focusing on consumer surplus were employed to determine the potential price response and social-welfare implications of a switch of SGAs to OTC status.

RESULTS

Unlike the agents involved in previous Rx-to-OTC switches, SGAs are still under patent protection. Economic theory suggests that a firm that is protected by a patent will price aggressively. The market for OTC SGAs is likely to be more elastic due to a lack of insurance coverage for OTC products; hence, drug manufacturers would be likely to charge a lower price if SGAs were sold OTC. However, a lower price does not necessarily guarantee an improvement in social welfare; the net impact is determined by whether the increase in consumer surplus outweighs the deadweight loss (losses of consumer and producer surplus not transferred to other parties). Additionally, the assumption of a price reduction would be called into question if there were inequalities in marginal costs between the Rx and OTC markets. In this situation, the postswitch price might increase or not be reduced significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

It is uncertain whether granting OTC status to SGAs would be cost saving to society, particularly as these drugs are patent protected. The social-welfare implications of such a switch would depend heavily on pricing strategies and consumer behavior. Further analyses are needed to determine how both factors influence social welfare; only then can the costs and benefits of a switch be understood completely.

[Pharmacoeconomics in the therapy of peptic ulcer]

The great prevalence and chronic nature of peptic ulcers traditionally represent a great economic load for the system of health care. The exponentially growing therapeutic and diagnostic possibilities of the treatment of peptic diseases are under a strong economic pressure from health-insurance companies. The use of an economic model for the management of peptic diseases aims to maximize health benefit from limited sources of the health services. It can be said already now that the detection of the Helicobacter pylori infection ranks among the most important discoveries of the 20th century. Elimination of the Helicobacter pylori infection can produce a dramatic reduction in relapses of peptic ulcers, which is reflected not only in the improved quality of life but also in a subsequent economic contribution. The present authors paid attention to the financial costs of the combined therapy for eradication of the Helicobacter pylori infection in the course of the years 1998-2001.

On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations

Since gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a prevalent condition characterised by frequent relapses, long-term costs of management for this disease are high. Thus, strategies to decrease resource expenditures without impairing patient quality of life are desirable. On-demand therapy (one-dose when symptoms occur) and intermittent therapy (short course of medication when symptoms occur) are attractive since pharmaceutical expenditures may be decreased, and many patients self-employ this strategy. The purpose of this paper was to examine the economic implications of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD. A review of selected studies evaluating medication suitable for on-demand or intermittent administration was performed. A complete search for published studies on the cost effectiveness of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD was conducted, and the results discussed in detail. Antacids, alginates, topically active agents, histamine(2)-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors have all demonstrable efficacy compared with placebo when administered on-demand. Proton pump inhibitors constitute the most effective pharmacological means to treat GORD. Although step-up strategies initially using less potent medication may decrease resource use, cost-effectiveness analysis illustrates that on-demand or intermittent therapy with proton pump inhibitors may be reasonable options. Further work that defines quality of life and patient preferences associated with GORD may allow for proper allocation of resources for the management of this condition.

A practice-based approach for converting from proton pump inhibitors to less costly therapy

CONTEXT

Projected cost for lansoprazole, the formulary proton pump inhibitor (PPI) at our institution, was $1.8 million in 1999. While some patients require PPI therapy, many could control their symptoms with a histamine H2-receptor antagonist blocker (H2 blocker) at a much lower cost.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a practice-based approach to converting patients from PPIs to H2 blockers.

DESIGN

Before-after study.

SETTING

Portland Veterans Affairs Primary Care Clinics.

INTERVENTION

We developed guidelines and educated clinicians about the use of PPIs and H2 blockers. To help physicians convert appropriate patients from PPIs to H2 blockers, we gave them a list of their patients receiving PPIs, form letters for patients explaining the conversion, and structured prescription forms. Patient lists and e-mail reminders, as well as feedback on institutional performance, were sent to clinicians during the intervention period.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of PPI and H2 prescriptions per enrollee and pharmacy costs.

RESULTS

The average number of PPI prescriptions per enrollee at our institution decreased from 0.39 in the 9 months before the intervention to 0.27 in the 9 months after the intervention. The associated pharmacy costs decreased from an average of $43 to $28 per enrollee per quarter, a difference of $15 or a savings of $80,000 per quarter. Accounting for the decrease in medication prices during the study, this difference was $11 per patient per quarter, corresponding to a savings of about $60,000 per quarter. With respect to the conversion process, more than 70% of clinicians felt the intervention had a big impact on how they prescribed PPIs and H2 blockers. Eighty-two percent of clinicians converted patients from PPIs to H2 blockers during clinic time; 56% did so during administrative time. Overall, more clinicians considered the intervention to be helpful rather than a hassle.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of PPI prescriptions decreased during the intervention and was sustained at least three quarters afterward. This low-intensity, practice-based intervention may serve as a model for other health care systems.

GERD management. Strategies recommended for primary care practice

Primary care physicians are on the front lines in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Therefore, they need the most current information available regarding how to achieve the best outcomes possible. Much clinical evidence indicates that when prescribed for initial and maintenance therapy, the proton pump inhibitors are effective for symptom relief and cost-effective in maintaining remission. In this article, Drs Kuritzky and Rodney discuss several step management strategies that could well be "just what the doctor ordered."

Pharmacoeconomic issues of the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diagnoses in a gastroenterologist's practice. Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) describes the retrograde movement of gastric contents through the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) to the oesophagus. GER can occur physiologically and may be accompanied by symptoms. The introduction of endoscopes and ambulatory devices for continuous monitoring of oesophageal pH (24 h pH monitoring) has led to great improvement in the ability to diagnose reflux disease and reflux-associated complications. The development of pathological reflux and GERD can be attributed to many factors. Pathophysiology of GERD includes transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), incompetent LES because of a decreased lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and deficient or delayed oesophageal acid clearance. Uncomplicated GERD may be treated by modification of lifestyle and eating habits in an early stage of GERD. The various agents currently used for treatment of GERD include mucoprotective substances, antacids, H2-blockers, prokinetics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Although these drugs are effective, they do not necessarily influence the underlying causes of the disease by improving the oesophageal clearance, increasing the LESP or reducing the frequency of TLESRs. The following article gives an overview regarding current concepts of the pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of GERD stressing on pharmacoeconomic issues of the treatment and discusses the advantages and disadvantages for step-up and step-down therapy.

A simple institutional educational intervention to decrease use of selected expensive medications

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a simple educational intervention can influence use of prescription medications at an institution.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis of prescribing behavior before and after an educational intervention.

SETTING

A large, urban, free-standing academic rehabilitation hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Physicians, residents, and physician extenders.

INTERVENTIONS

The hospital's pharmacy department provided simple written educational material about cost differences of various prescription medications to attending and resident physicians, nurse leaders, and case managers. Telephoned reminders were given when targeted medications were prescribed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total prescription medication use was recorded monthly for 12 months before and after the intervention. Pharmaceuticals monitored were subcutaneously administered anticoagulants, histamine type 2 (H2) blockers, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

RESULTS

A 32% decrease in use of the more costly anticoagulant and a 20% increase in use of the less costly anticoagulant (p <.0001), representing an estimated annual savings of nearly $66,000. Use of more costly H2 antagonist decreased 50% and use of less costly H2 antagonist increased 128% (p <.0001). With written intervention only, use of more costly NSAIDs declined 28%, whereas use of less costly NSAIDs increased 58% (p <.0020).

CONCLUSION

Providing physicians with simple pharmaceutical cost information and telephone reminders decreased the use of targeted more costly medications.

Current medical and surgical treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common disorders in medicine. The options of medical versus surgical therapies have been highlighted by more potent acid suppression medications and by the introduction of minimally invasive surgery for GERD. Many factors will impact on the treatment selection for each individual patient: the underlying pathophysiology, typical vs atypical symptoms, presence of reflux complications, and success and limitations of medical and surgical treatments. Medical antireflux therapy is very effective and safe, but long-term maintenance therapy is required for most patients. Minimally invasive antireflux surgery has provided excellent results, but outcome is dependent on patient selection and surgical expertise. Careful pre-operative evaluation is essential to determine the optimal treatment and surgical approach.

Therapeutic substitution of cimetidine for nizatidine was not associated with an increase in healthcare utilization

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in healthcare utilization resulting from a formulary switch to cimetidine from nizatidine at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of administrative and clinical data 6 months before and 6 months after the therapeutic substitution.

METHODS

The 704 patients who were switched from nizatidine to cimetidine were included in the study. Administrative data included total and primary care clinic visits, emergency room visits, gastrointestinal (GI)-related radiological studies, and GI endoscopic procedures. Discharge summaries were examined, and rates of total and GI-related hospitalizations were calculated.

RESULTS

There was no evidence of increased utilization of healthcare resources during the 6 months after the formulary switch. Estimated monthly pharmaceutical savings for the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System were $7260.

CONCLUSIONS

A formulary switch from nizatidine to cimetidine can be accomplished at significant pharmaceutical cost savings, and this retrospective study suggests that this can be done without increasing other aspects of healthcare resource utilization.

Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer: three-day antibiotic eradication regimen

BACKGROUND

The most widely used treatments for ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori eradication consist of a 1-2 week regimen of a proton pump inhibitor plus two or three antimicrobials.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, cost, and tolerance of a three-day regimen with three antibiotics vs. a 10-day treatment with a proton pump inhibitor or vs. a ranitidine bismuth citrate triple therapy.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-one patients with endoscopically-proven H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcers were recruited to the study. Recruited patients were assigned to one of the following four regimens: (I) omeprazole 40 mg o.m. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 10 days (OAC: 55 patients); (ii) omeprazole 40 mg o.m. on days 1-5, plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. on days 3-5 (OACM: 56 patients); (iii) ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 10 days (RAC: 54 patients); (iv) ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. on days 1-5, plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. on days 3-5 (RACM: 56 patients). Fisher's exact test was used to compare data regarding healing and eradication in the four groups.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat eradication and ulcer healing rates for the RACM regimen were 95% and 98%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed, relating to the eradication and healing of ulcers, between RACM and either the RAC or OAC regimens.

CONCLUSION

The three-day antibiotic therapy with amoxycillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole in addition to ranitidine bismuth citrate is a very effective anti-H. pylori regimen.