IL-1RA in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus

There is evidence from animal and human studies that IL-1 might play an important role in the development and maintainence of inflammation in systemic lupus erythemathosus (SLE). We hypothesized that, in SLE, there might be a relative deficiency in the physiologic antagonist of IL-1, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA). We therefore treated three patients with active SLE in whom conventional therapy has failed with the human IL-1RA, Anakinra. In two of the three patients there was a transient effect on muscle pain and/or polyarthritis. In one patient with lupus myositis there was no effect at all. The therapy was well tolerated and the only significant side effect was a transient drop in complement levels (C3 and C4) without clinical or laboratory signs of increased SLE activity in all three patients.

The safety of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

The safety profile of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) has been studied with randomised, placebo-controlled trials involving 2932 patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. The most frequently reported adverse events were represented by injection site reactions (71%) and headache (13.6%). No statistically significant difference in the incidence of infections was observed among the patients treated with the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and the patients receiving placebo. In particular, the incidence of serious infections was 1,8% in rheumatoid arthritis patients on anakinra therapy and 0,7% in patients on placebo. The reported serious infections consisted of pneumonia, cellulitis, bone and joint infections, bursitis. No case of opportunistic infections or tubercolosis was observed. The results of clinical studies suggest that anakinra is a new well-tolerated drug for the treatment of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis.

Antirheumatic drugs and the risk of tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to quantify the rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis disease (TB) among a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to assess whether the independent use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is associated with the risk of developing TB.

METHODS

The study was performed using the PharMetrics Patient-Centric database (PharMetrics). The cohort consisted of all subjects with > or =1 occurrence of a diagnosis of RA during an inpatient or outpatient visit during the period of September 1998 through December 2003. Conditional logistic regression was used in a nested case-control analysis to estimate the rate ratio (RR) of TB with any use of biological or traditional DMARDs during the year before the index date. We also assessed the interaction between DMARDs and the current use of corticosteroids.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 112,300 patients with RA. A total of 386 cases of TB were identified, which resulted in an overall rate of 2.19 cases per 1000 person-years. The adjusted RR of TB for biological DMARD use is 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-1.9). Use of traditional DMARDs was also independently associated with TB (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5). RRs of developing TB disease with the use of biological or traditional DMARD were lower among current users of corticosteroids than among noncurrent users of corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

We found that the use of biological and traditional DMARDs is associated with an increased risk of developing TB in patients with RA, mainly among noncurrent users of corticosteroids.

Neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease responsive to interleukin-1beta inhibition

BACKGROUND

Neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease is characterized by fever, urticarial rash, aseptic meningitis, deforming arthropathy, hearing loss, and mental retardation. Many patients have mutations in the cold-induced autoinflammatory syndrome 1 (CIAS1) gene, encoding cryopyrin, a protein that regulates inflammation.

METHODS

We selected 18 patients with neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (12 with identifiable CIAS1 mutations) to receive anakinra, an interleukin-1-receptor antagonist (1 to 2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day subcutaneously). In 11 patients, anakinra was withdrawn at three months until a flare occurred. The primary end points included changes in scores in a daily diary of symptoms, serum levels of amyloid A and C-reactive protein, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate from baseline to month 3 and from month 3 until a disease flare.

RESULTS

All 18 patients had a rapid response to anakinra, with disappearance of rash. Diary scores improved (P<0.001) and serum amyloid A (from a median of 174 mg to 8 mg per liter), C-reactive protein (from a median of 5.29 mg to 0.34 mg per deciliter), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreased at month 3 (all P<0.001), and remained low at month 6. Magnetic resonance imaging showed improvement in cochlear and leptomeningeal lesions as compared with baseline. Withdrawal of anakinra uniformly resulted in relapse within days; retreatment led to rapid improvement. There were no drug-related serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily injections of anakinra markedly improved clinical and laboratory manifestations in patients with neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease, with or without CIAS1 mutations. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00069329 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Safety of extended treatment with anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety profile of anakinra after extended exposure in a diverse clinical trial population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A six month, randomised, double blind phase comparing anakinra (100 mg/day) with placebo was followed by open label anakinra treatment for up to three years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Concomitant non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, and other disease modifying antirheumatic drugs were permitted.

RESULTS

In all 1346 patients with rheumatoid arthritis received anakinra for up to three years. Patients had varying levels of disease severity, concomitant drug use, and comorbid conditions. Cumulative, exposure adjusted event (EAE) rates for all adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and deaths were similar during each year of anakinra treatment; the overall rate (0 to 3 years) was similar to that observed for controls during the blinded phase. The most frequent AEs were injection site reactions (122.26 events/100 patient-years), rheumatoid arthritis progression (67.80 events/100 patient-years), and upper respiratory infections (26.09 events/100 patient-years). The EAE rate of serious infections was higher for patients treated with anakinra for 0 to 3 years (5.37 events/100 patient-years) than for controls during the blinded phase (1.65 events/100 patient-years). However, if the patient was not receiving corticosteroid treatment at baseline, the serious infection rate was substantially lower (2.87 event/100 patient-years). The overall incidence of malignancies was consistent with expected rates reported by SEER. Neutralising antibodies developed in 25 patients, but appeared to be transient in 12; neutralising antibody status did not appear related to occurrence of malignancies or serious infections. There were no clinically significant trends in laboratory data related to anakinra.

CONCLUSION

Anakinra is safe and well tolerated for up to three years of continuous use in a diverse population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologic agents

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence rates of serious and nonserious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who start treatment with a biologic agent, and to compare these rates with those in patients with RA who receive conventional treatment.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included. Treating rheumatologists assessed adverse events and serious adverse events. All adverse events and serious adverse events experienced within 12 months after study entry were analyzed. Propensity score methods were applied to estimate which part of a rate increase was likely to be attributable to differences in patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Data were available for 512 patients receiving etanercept, 346 patients receiving infliximab, 70 patients receiving anakinra, and 601 control patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The total number of adverse events per 100 patient-years was 22.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 18.7-27.2) among patients receiving etanercept, 28.3 (95% CI 23.1-34.7) among patients receiving infliximab, and 6.8 (95% CI 5.0-9.4) among controls (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in the rate of serious adverse events were also observed. For patients receiving etanercept, those receiving infliximab, and controls, the total numbers of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years were 6.4 (95% CI 4.5-9.1), 6.2 (95% CI 4.0-9.5), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-3.9), respectively (P = 0.0016). After adjusting for differences in the case patient mix, the relative risks of serious adverse events were 2.2 (95% CI 0.9-5.4) for patients receiving etanercept and 2.1 (95% CI 0.8-5.5) for patients receiving infliximab, compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with biologic agents have a higher a priori risk of infection. However, our data suggest that this risk is increased by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

[Increased risk of infection with biological immunomodifying antirheumatic agents. Clear guidelines are necessary as shown by case reports]

Several potent immunosuppressive drugs have become available in the new millennium for patients with rheumatologic diseases, Crohn's disease and other autoimmune disorders. Five patient cases from Växjö central hospital (uptake area 178 000 individuals) with Listeria meningitis, Pneumocystis jiroveci and tuberculosis pneumonia, Listeria sepsis, Legionella pneumonia and E coli sepsis are described. A doubled risk for infections has previously been observed for RA patients, as compared to healthy individuals. There is clearly an increased risk of tuberculosis (depending on the actual and historic environmental prevalence) for patients on TNF antagonists, and therefore tuberculosis screening is now mandatory before start of therapy. Since TNF has a central role in the immune defence, an increased risk of opportunistic infections like listeriosis. mycobacteriosis, and invasive fungal infections has been established. Eight hospitals in southern Sweden participate in a register for the use of TNF blockers in rheumatologic diseases (South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group, SSATG). Guidelines for screening and treatment of latent and active tuberculosis, possible prophylactic antibiotic treatment for endocarditis and vaccination programs for patients on TNF antagonists are discussed.

Observational study on efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin 1 (IL1) receptor antagonist used in rheumatoid arthritis, has been documented in five randomised controlled studies. However, long term post-marketing efficacy data are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anakinra in clinical practice.

METHODS

All patients with rheumatoid arthritis who started anakinra in six hospitals between May 2002 and February 2004 were included in a two year prospective, in part retrospective, cohort study. Efficacy was assessed using the 28 joint disease activity score (DAS28) and the EULAR response criteria. Safety was evaluated using the common toxicity criteria. Drug survival and prognostic factors were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

After three months, 55% of the patients (n = 146) showed a response (43% moderate, 12% good). A subset of patients continuing anakinra after 18 months had a sustained clinical response compared with patients who switched to other disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (DAS28 improvement, 2.46 v 1.79). Drug survival was 78%, 54%, and 14% after three, six, and 24 months, respectively. The reason for discontinuation was lack of efficacy in 78% and adverse events in 22%. Except for higher drug survival in women (odds ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.97), no prognostic factors were found. Adverse events were reported 206 times in 111 patients, the most common being injection site reactions (36%). Serious adverse events occurred in 12% of the patients, with one classified as related.

CONCLUSIONS

The short term efficacy and safety profile of anakinra are comparable to those found in randomised clinical studies. However, the drug survival of anakinra after two years is low, mostly because of lack of efficacy.

Anakinra: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis

Anakinra (Kineret) is the first biologic drug that has been developed specifically as an interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist (Ra) and is derived from an endogenous IL-1Ra. The drug blocks the activity of IL-1 in synovial joints, reducing the inflammatory and joint destructive processes associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In randomized, placebo-controlled trials of up to 52 weeks' duration, anakinra has shown efficacy both as monotherapy and in combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with RA. It is subcutaneously administered and is generally well tolerated. Anakinra offers a useful addition to the range of drugs available for the treatment of RA.

Safety of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-1 blocking agents in rheumatic diseases

The three licensed TNF(alpha) blocking agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab) and the recombinant form of human interleukin-1-receptor antagonist (anakinra) have all been shown to be effective in patients with chronic rheumatic autoimmune diseases; they have also been associated with certain types of serious adverse events. As expected, much of the information on serious events have accumulated during the post-marketing period. Certain serious, but uncommon, adverse events have been observed with all three TNF(alpha) blocking agents, including serious bacterial infections, tuberculosis (TB) and certain opportunistic infections, demyelinating syndromes, and lupus-like reactions. These data suggest that these adverse reactions may be related to blockade of TNF(alpha) and may therefore represent class effects of these agents. However, the severity and degree of risk may not be the same with all three agents. Blockade of interleukin-1 activity with anakinra appears, at present, to be relatively safe. The safety profile of these products will continue to be developed through the use of the registry, periodic safety updates from the passive surveillance program, and safety data from controlled trials of biological therapy for other diseases. Physicians should minimize risks by patient selection and screening for opportunistic infections. Moreover, the choice of the biological agent must be tailored to minimize risks and maximize benefits.

Adverse cutaneous reactions to anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: clinicopathological study of five patients

BACKGROUND

Anakinra, a recombinant human form of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, is used to treat patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

OBJECTIVES

To report five patients with cutaneous adverse drug reactions due to anakinra and to evaluate the histopathological and immunohistochemical findings with the aim of understanding the possible mechanisms involved.

METHODS

Five patients of a series of 10 patients with RA undergoing treatment with anakinra in a clinical trial presented inflammatory lesions at the anakinra injection sites. In each case, clinical features were recorded and skin biopsy specimens were obtained. In one patient sequential biopsy specimens were obtained from skin lesions at different stages of development. Tissue sections of the biopsy specimens were stained with haematoxylin and eosin and May-Grünwald-Giemsa, and were immunoreacted with antibodies to leucocyte common antigen, CD68, CD3, CD45RO, CD20 and CD45RA.

RESULTS

The onset of reaction was within the first month of treatment and appeared as well-defined erythema and oedema involving the injection sites. In two patients the treatment had to be discontinued because of the skin reaction, and in one patient it was associated with systemic involvement. All biopsy specimens exhibited marked dermal oedema and a lichenoid dermal infiltrate composed mainly of lymphomononuclear cells with prominent populations of eosinophils and large CD68+ dermal macrophages and an increase in the number of mast cells, which were spindle shaped in a significant proportion.

CONCLUSIONS

Cutaneous toxicity is a frequent, usually well-tolerated complication of treatment with anakinra in patients with RA, although in some cases it can be associated with systemic involvement. The most relevant histopathological findings include dermal oedema and a lichenoid, perivascular and periadnexal predominantly lymphomononuclear infiltrate, with many eosinophils and the presence of enlarged CD68+ macrophages. These findings resemble those seen in skin reactions in patients receiving chemotherapy and colony-stimulating factors. We also found an increase in mast cell numbers that could be a specific effect of anakinra.

Safety study of intraarticular injection of interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

Interleukin 1 (IL-1) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA). In animal models of OA, IL-1 blockade by IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) can slow the progression of disease. We examined the safety of intraarticular (IA) injections of recombinant human IL-1Ra in patients with knee OA.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter trial was conducted using the continual reassessment method. Six doses were considered, 0.05 mg up to 150 mg IL-1Ra, and the trial was double-blind regarding the dose administered. Patients with symptomatic knee OA and without synovial fluid effusion were included. Acute inflammatory reaction (the primary endpoint defining intolerance) was recorded if pain increase over 30 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale and synovial fluid effusion occurred within 72 h after the IA injection. As a secondary aim, efficacy was estimated (by total pain and Western Ontario and McMaster University OA functional index) until Month 3.

RESULTS

One patient received 0.05 mg and 13 patients received 150 mg of IL-1Ra. No acute reaction occurred (one patient experienced postinjection joint swelling with no pain) and the 150 mg dose was considered the maximum tolerated dose (intolerance level 0%; confidence interval 0, 9.1%). A significant improvement was still observed until Month 3 in the 13 patients who received 150 mg IL-1Ra: pain improved by -20.4 +/- 23.3 mm (p = 0.008) and WOMAC global score by -19.5 +/- 20.1 (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

IA injection of IL-1Ra in patients with knee OA was well tolerated and did not induce any acute inflammatory reaction. The feasibility of such IA injections of IL-1Ra opens a promising therapeutic perspective for patients with OA.

Serious infections associated with anticytokine therapies in the rheumatic diseases

The ability to target and neutralize macrophage-derived inflammatory cytokines, particularly tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), has emerged in recent years as one of the most important advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and several other systemic inflammatory diseases. In rheumatoid arthritis, for example, these biological agents rapidly reduce signs and symptoms of joint inflammation and profoundly slow the progression of joint damage. However, data that have emerged following Food and Drug Administration approval of these agents have alerted clinicians to an increased likelihood of opportunistic infections in patients treated with these agents, particularly tuberculosis. The effect of TNF inhibition on the frequency of infection with more common bacterial pathogens is less clear. Animal models of tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections have demonstrated the importance of TNF-alpha in controlling and containing intracellular pathogens. The spectrum of infections reported to date in the setting of anti-TNF-alpha treatment is reviewed here. In addition, relevant animal data illustrating potential mechanistic roles for TNF-alpha in host responses to infection are also reviewed.

Biologic agents for the treatment of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: current status

Biologic therapies, primarily anticytokine therapies, are being increasingly used in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). Levels of a variety of proinflammatory cytokines have been shown to be elevated in the peripheral blood and synovial fluid and tissue in children with JRA. In a blinded, randomized, controlled trial in children with severe, long-standing, polyarticular-course JRA not responsive to standard therapies, etanercept showed a statistically significantly greater response rate than placebo. Approximately 75% of these children responded to etanercept. Etanercept has been efficacious in 50-60% of children with active systemic JRA in open clinical trials with acceptable tolerance. Adverse events seen in children treated with etanercept have been similar in type and frequency to those reported in adults. Infliximab has been studied in several open clinical trials in both polyarticular and systemic JRA and found to, overall, have demonstrated efficacy in approximately 60% of patients. Approximately 3-5% of patients have demonstrated infusion reactions or frank allergic reactions and 9% developed new autoantibodies. Anakinra has been studied in children with polyarticular JRA. Approximately 65% of patients developed injection-site reactions and 68% demonstrated a response to the medication. Anakinra may have increased efficacy in systemic JRA. Interleukin (IL)-6 is highly related to the systemic disease manifestations in systemic JRA and two patients treated with a monoclonal antibody to the IL-6 receptor have demonstrated significant improvement with prolonged clinical control with continued treatment. A particular pediatric concern is the effect of immunosuppressive biologics in children who are exposed to or develop varicella. These children should be treated, both in terms of prophylaxis and aggressive antivaricella treatment, as for other immunosuppressed children. Anticytokine biologics have demonstrated great promise in the treatment of JRA and a variety of other pediatric rheumatic diseases, although at this time the randomized, placebo-controlled data are limited only to etanercept in children with polyarticular JRA. Randomized trials are ongoing to better define both the efficacy and safety of these novel treatments for children with JRA and other rheumatic diseases.

Preliminary results of safety and efficacy of the interleukin 1 receptor antagonist anakinra in patients with severe lupus arthritis

BACKGROUND

Joint involvement occurs in most patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and severe lupus arthritis is often refractory to conventional treatments. Anakinra is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but its therapeutic potential has not been proved in patients with SLE.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety/tolerability and efficacy of anakinra in patients with SLE with leading joint involvement.

METHODS

In patients with SLE with active polyarthritis and no other uncontrolled systemic/organ manifestations, 100 mg/day anakinra was self administered subcutaneously for 3 months. Disease activity was assessed by VAS, number of swollen/tender joints, ECLAM score, and serological and immunological measures.

RESULTS

Four patients with SLE were studied; anakinra was safe in all four patients and no drug related serious adverse events occurred. A subjective benefit was seen in all patients and a trend towards better activity measures after 4 weeks. After an initial response, one patient left the study because of an arthritic flare after 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

In this study anakinra was apparently safe and well tolerated and led to clinical and serological improvement. Anakinra might be an interesting alternative in individual patients with lupus arthritis not responding to conventional treatments.

Overview of benefit/risk of biological agents

Targeted tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists, first approved by the FDA in 1998, have had a significant impact on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In general, the benefit/ risk ratio for these agents and the IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, has been quite favorable. However, infrequent adverse events can be serious and require continued pharmacovigilance. Infections, particularly tuberculosis and less commonly fungal infections, are among the most serious adverse events, especially given delays in diagnosis due to subtle or atypical presentations. Questions have also arisen regarding whether anti-TNF-alpha agents increase the risk of lymphoma, a complicated issue confounded by the multiple risk factors for lymphoma in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low observed incidence rates of lymphoma, requiring prolonged monitoring. Additional rare reported complications include systemic lupus erythematosus-like syndromes, congestive heart failure and demyelinating syndromes (including cases resembling progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy). Ongoing post-marketing surveillance of these and other serious adverse events is necessary to determine the true incidence rates, and whether a reassessment of the overall risk-benefit of tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists will be required.

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of anakinra for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults: a systematic review and economic analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in adults.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic bibliographic databases. Scrip, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) submissions for new drug applications, European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) reports and the pharmaceutical company submission to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies were identified that included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or economic evaluations of anakinra in adult patients with RA. Existing health economic reviews were also assessed. Data were extracted and quality assessed using a structured approach. The Birmingham Rheumatoid Arthritis Model (BRAM) was used to compare disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) sequences, chosen to reflect current clinical practice, with and without anakinra, at different points in the DMARD sequence.

RESULTS

Five high-quality RCTs of anakinra in adult patients with RA, involving a total of 2905 patients, of whom 2146 received anakinra, were identified. The results of the clinical trials were consistent with clinical benefit (compared with placebo) as measured by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) composite response rate at 6 months. Variation in response rate was seen across the trials, which is likely to be a reflection of the size of the trials and the wide range of doses evaluated. Consistent benefit was seen at the higher dose evaluated. Benefit was evident both with monotherapy and when used in combination with methotrexate. Data on the efficacy end-points evaluated in a large pragmatic safety study have not been made available, which is of concern. Anakinra treatment was associated with a high incidence of injection-site reactions. Serious adverse events were infrequent, but longer term follow-up is required. No fully published economic evaluations of anakinra in patients with RA were identified. The BRAM gives a base-case estimate of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of anakinra of 106,000 pounds to 604,000 pounds/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). In the sensitivity analyses substantial variations were made in key parameters and ICERs were shown to be responsive. However, ICERs did not drop below 50,000 pounds/QALY in any univariate sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Anakinra can be considered modestly effective in the treatment of RA based on ACR response, although no conclusion can currently be made on the effect of treatment on disease progression. Adjusted indirect comparison suggests that anakinra may be significantly less effective at relieving the clinical signs and symptoms of RA, as measured by the ACR response criteria, than tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors all used in combination with methotrexate, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The BRAM produces an ICER for anakinra substantially higher than those for infliximab and etanercept. However, patients may respond to anakinra when they have not responded to other TNF inhibitors, as these agents have a different mechanism of action. Thus, anakinra may produce a clinically significant and important improvement in some patients that they could not otherwise have achieved. Further research would be valuable in the following areas: RCTs to evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost of anakinra over the longer term; comparative trials of anakinra with other DMARDs and biological modifiers; assessment of the role of anakinra in the treatment of patients who have failed to achieve a benefit while taking infliximab or etanercept; assessment on the impact of DMARDs and anakinra on joint replacement, mortality and quality of life; controlled clinical trials of combination therapy with two anticytokines; investigations into newer biological therapies; and the utility of radiographic outcomes in clinical trials of RA.

The safety of anakinra in high-risk patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: six-month observations of patients with comorbid conditions

OBJECTIVE

To determine in a placebo-controlled, double-blind trial the safety profile of daily anakinra (Kineret) use in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and concurrent comorbid conditions.

METHODS

In 169 centers in 9 countries, 1,414 patients with active RA were randomly assigned to receive either anakinra (100 mg) or placebo treatment (4:1 anakinra-to-placebo allocation ratio), with study drug administered by daily subcutaneous injection for 6 months. The current post hoc analysis assessed baseline comorbid conditions, and patients were considered at high risk for the occurrence of adverse events if they had a history of at least one of the following: cardiovascular event, pulmonary event, central nervous system-related event, infection, diabetes, malignancy, or renal impairment. Within each treatment group (anakinra or placebo), incidence rates were summarized for serious adverse events, infectious events, and serious infectious events in high-risk patients and compared with these incidence rates in patients without comorbid conditions.

RESULTS

The majority of patients in the trial had one or more comorbid conditions. In these high-risk patients, there were no differences in the incidence of serious adverse events or infectious events between treatment groups. The incidence of serious infectious events with anakinra use was similar between high-risk patients (2.5%) and the entire study population (2.1%) and was not attributable to any single comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Results of the analysis of adverse events in patients with active RA and coexisting comorbidities suggest that the favorable safety profile of anakinra is maintained in a high-risk patient population.

Open label trial of anakinra in active ankylosing spondylitis over 24 weeks

OBJECTIVE

To examine the therapeutic effect of the interleukin 1 (IL1) receptor antagonist anakinra in ankylosing spondylitis in an open label trial.

METHODS

Anakinra (100 mg) was given subcutaneously daily over 24 weeks to 20 NSAID refractory patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Thirteen completed the study. Clinical outcome assessments included disease activity, function, metrology, patients' and physicians' global assessment, peripheral joint assessment, quality of life, and C reactive protein. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of sacroiliac joints or spine, using gadolinium DTPA as contrast agent, was done before treatment in 15/20 patients, and in 10 patients at study end. The primary end point was the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) and ASAS (assessments in ankylosing spondylitis) short term response after six months.

RESULTS

Using an intention to treat analysis, an ASAS 20% response (ASAS 20) was achieved in five patients, ASAS 40 in four, and ASAS 70 in two after 24 weeks. There was no change in mean C reactive protein (22.3 v 33.1 mg/l) or in MRI score. The drug was well tolerated. Injection site reaction was the commonest adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

In this open study, anakinra improved spinal symptoms in only a small subgroup of patients with active ankylosing spondylitis.

Combination therapy with etanercept and anakinra in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential for additive or synergistic effects of combination therapy with the selective anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent etanercept and the anti-interleukin-1 agent anakinra.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-four patients in whom rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was active despite methotrexate therapy were treated with subcutaneous etanercept only (25 mg twice weekly), full-dosage etanercept (25 mg twice weekly) plus anakinra (100 mg/day), or half-dosage etanercept (25 mg once weekly) plus anakinra (100 mg/day) for 6 months in a double-blind study at 41 centers in the US. Patients had never previously received anticytokine therapy. Patient response was measured with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set criteria, a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire, and the Disease Activity Score. Safety was assessed by the number of adverse events and clinical laboratory values. Plasma concentrations of both agents and antibody formation against both agents were also assessed.

RESULTS

Combination therapy with etanercept plus anakinra provided no treatment benefit over etanercept alone, regardless of the regimen, but was associated with an increased safety risk. Thirty-one percent of the patients treated with full-dosage etanercept plus anakinra achieved an ACR 50% response, compared with 41% of the patients treated with etanercept only. This result was not statistically significant (P = 0.914). The incidence of serious infections (0% for etanercept alone, 3.7-7.4% for combination therapy), injection-site reactions, and neutropenia was increased with combination therapy. Combination therapy had no effect on the pharmacokinetics or immunogenicity of either agent.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with etanercept and anakinra provides no added benefit and an increased risk compared with etanercept alone and is not recommended for the treatment of patients with RA.

Aktueller Stand der Therapie mit TNF?-Antagonisten bei ankylosierender Spondylitis und undifferenzierter Spondyloarthritis

The Spondyloarthritides (SpA) comprise a group of inflammatory rheumatic diseases which mostly affect the spine and the larger peripheral joints. The most common entities in this group are ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis (uSpA). Treatments with disease-modifying or remission-inducing properties for patients with AS are so far not available. However, in the light of relevant individual and socioeconomic consequences this is an unmet medical need. Recently, etanercept in addition to infliximab has shown substantial efficacy which might even be disease controlling. For both TNFalpha blocking agents, large randomized placebo-controlled trials have proven their efficacy with an acceptable profile of adverse events. In open trials these drugs also work in patients with uSpA. There is some hope now that the TNFalpha blocking agents could stop the development of AS in patients starting with uSpA.

Effects of anakinra monotherapy on joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Extension of a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of treatment on the radiologic manifestations of joint damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who participated in a 24-week extension study of a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist.

METHODS

The patients had entered a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anakinra was self-administered by subcutaneous injection of 30, 75, or 150 mg/day. Upon completion of the placebo-controlled phase, the patients entering the extension study who had received placebo were randomized to one of the 3 treatment dosages for a further 24 weeks, and the patients who had been initially randomized to one of the 3 anakinra dosages continued to receive the same dosage. Radiographs of the hands were obtained at baseline and at 24 and 48 weeks. The radiographs were evaluated using a modified Sharp method.

RESULTS

A total of 472 patients were recruited. The mean change in the total modified Sharp score of 178 patients who completed 48 weeks treatment, including all dosages, was significantly less than the change observed in 58 patients who received placebo for 24 weeks and anakinra for 24 weeks (p = 0.015). A significant reduction in the change of the total modified Sharp score was observed in the patients who received anakinra 75 and 150 mg/day. The total modified Sharp score was reduced significantly more during the second 24-week treatment period, compared to the first (p < 0.001). Significant reductions in the second 24-week period were observed following anakinra 75 mg/day (p = 0.006) and 150 mg/day (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Patients with RA who received anakinra for 48 weeks demonstrated significant slowing of radiographic joint damage. The treatment effect observed after the first 24-week period appeared to increase when anakinra was continued for 48 weeks.

A multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial of anakinra (Kineret), a recombinant interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with background methotrexate

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of 100 mg daily anakinra (Kineret), a recombinant form of the naturally occurring interleukin 1 receptor antagonist, plus methotrexate (MTX) in reducing the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patients with active RA (n = 506) despite current treatment with MTX were enrolled in this multicentre, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled study. Patients received subcutaneous injections of anakinra 100 mg/day or placebo. They were assessed monthly for 6 months for improvement in signs and symptoms of RA and for adverse events. The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of patients attaining ACR20 response at week 24.

RESULTS

Significantly greater proportions of patients treated with anakinra compared with placebo achieved ACR20 (38% v 22%; p<0.001), ACR50 (17% v 8%; p<0.01), and ACR70 (6% v 2%; p<0.05) responses. The response to anakinra was rapid; the proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at the first study assessment (4 weeks) was twice as high with anakinra as with placebo (p<0.005). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant responses were also seen in individual components of the ACR response (for example, Health Assessment Questionnaire, pain, C reactive protein levels, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Anakinra was well tolerated, with a safety profile, similar to that of placebo with one exception: mild to moderate injection site reactions were more common with anakinra than with placebo (65% v 24%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms previous observations from a dose-ranging study showing that anakinra, in combination with MTX, is an effective and safe treatment for patients with RA who have inadequate responses to MTX alone.

Anakinra: new preparation. Weakly effective in rheumatoid arthritis

(1) There is no consensus on the best treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis when a first-line agent fails (most often methotrexate). Among the recent immunosuppressants, etanercept should be used before infliximab. (2) Anakinra, an interleukin-1 type 1 receptor antagonist, was recently authorised in the European Union as a second-line treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in combination with methotrexate. (3) There are no published trials comparing anakinra with other slow-acting antirheumatic drugs (especially infliximab and etanercept). In one clinical trial in patients who did not respond adequately to methotrexate, the combination anakinra + methotrexate was more effective than methotrexate + placebo on ACR 20%, ACR 50% and ACR 70% criteria, but the clinical relevance of these results is doubtful. (4) An indirect comparison suggests that etanercept is more effective than anakinra + methotrexate. (5) In a placebo-controlled trial of anakinra, 75% of patients had reactions at the injection site. Serious infections, neutropenia and anti-anakinra antibodies were also reported. There is no evidence that anakinra is any safer than etanercept. (6) Anakinra + etanercept offers no gains in efficacy, just an increased risk of severe infections. (7) Subcutaneous injections of anakinra are required daily (twice-weekly subcutaneous injections for etanercept). (8) In short, there is no argument for using anakinra as a second-line treatment for rheumatoid arthritis; it does not improve disease management.

[Biologicals in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthropathies]

The ongoing evaluation of the cytokine-cascade and the steadily growing knowledge about cytokine mediated processes seem to open striking therapeutical options in the fields of sepsis, autoimmune and chronic inflammatory joint or bowel diseases via modulation or inhibition of the cytokine-cascade. There is no doubt about the efficacy of the various anticytokine-treatments in the therapy of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A large number of preclinical and clinical studies forms the scientific basis for these almost widely established therapies. These so-called "biologicals" are fully accepted as disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, equal to or even more potent than the classical substances. On the one hand, these agents are acting as tumor necrosis factor-alpha-blockers, like a chimeric (human/mouse) monoclonal anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-antibody (Infliximab), a recombinant soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptor p75 fusion protein (Etanercept), and a fully humanized anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha-antibody (Adalimumab); on the other hand a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (Anakinra) is used in clinical practice. Generally these drugs are very well tolerated; the most common adverse events are higher infection rates (including tuberculosis) and injection-site reactions for the subcutaneously administered agents. Of course one should be aware of the possibly elevated risk for malignancies although there is no evidence for that so far, but the observation time since launching of these drugs is considerably short. To conclude, involved physicians should use these new "tools" very carefully and critically, because long-term tolerance and safety is a matter of ongoing investigation and last but not least because of the growing importance of cost effectiveness when using such expensive medications. Above all initiation and monitoring of those therapies should be restricted to rheumatologists

Durability and Rapidity of Response to Anakinra in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory disease that ultimately leads to disability and functional decline. Because patients usually develop RA in mid-life, they may experience its consequences for 20-30 years or longer. Proinflammatory cytokines, notably interleukin (IL)-1 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha, are believed to play significant pathophysiological roles. Clinical trials of biologicals that block these cytokines confirm their importance.Anakinra, a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist, improves clinical signs and symptoms, and slows radiographic progression in patients with active RA. In clinical trials, patients receiving anakinra doses >1 mg/kg, whether administered alone or in combination with methotrexate, were two to three times more likely than patients receiving placebo to achieve a sustained ACR20 (American College of Rheumatology criteria) response. Notably, bone erosion slows to a greater extent and shows accelerated benefit when anakinra treatment is continued for periods beyond 24 weeks. Anakinra has a rapid onset of action, with substantial improvements in biochemical indices (C-reactive protein) seen within 1 week and clinical responses (ACR20 or joint counts) seen within 4 weeks of starting treatment. Anakinra is generally well tolerated, with injection site reactions being the most common adverse event. These reactions are generally mild and typically resolve within 2-3 weeks of treatment. The anakinra product labelling does include a warning regarding an increased risk of infections of 2% in anakinra-treated patients versus <1% in patients receiving placebo.

Unterarmphlegmone unter Anakinra (Interleukin-1-Rezeptor-Antagonist)

INTRODUCTION

Biological modifiers (BM) are very effective in a high percentage of patients with rheumatoid arthritis being resistant to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). In the beginning, the therapy with the BMs was thought to be of low risk. However, due to the increase of application, a few lethal septical complications have been reported.

CASE REPORT

A 38 year old male with rheumatoid arthritis and insulin deficiency diabetes mellitus achieved remission under the therapy with Anakinra within three days. Due to a spontaneous disrupture of the finger extensor tendons operative revision was performed. A phlegmon from the dorsum of the hand to the cubita was found five months after resection of a septical cubital bursa.

CONCLUSION

The very effective suppression of the immune system by the BMs should not lead to noncritical therapy in patients with history of infections of bone, joints and soft tissue, because inactive organism may start growing and lead to undetected lethal sepsis.

Monitoring by rheumatologists for methotrexate-, etanercept-, infliximab-, and anakinra-associated adverse events

OBJECTIVE

To determine what monitoring protocols rheumatologists use to identify adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with methotrexate (methotrexate), etanercept (etanercept), infliximab (infliximab), and anakinra (anakinra), how often rheumatologists encounter treatment-altering adverse events in their RA patients receiving these treatments, and how they feel about and comply with the current monitoring guidelines.

METHODS

Three hundred ten physician members of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) were notified by e-mail of a survey that was posted on our rheumatology Web site. Questions were closed-ended and multiple choice in format.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three responses were received (40%). Most rheumatologists reported that they utilize the ACR recommended screening tests at baseline before methotrexate treatment is initiated. Seventy-nine percent reported that treatment-altering abnormalities had occurred in <5% of their methotrexate-treated RA patients, and 88% reported that such abnormalities had occurred in <10% of such patients, in the previous 3 years. Forty-one percent believed liver function monitoring guidelines need to be changed; 59% said they would agree with new guidelines that would include a recommendation for liver function monitoring every 3-4 months. Most rheumatologists were not aware of any guidelines for monitoring by blood tests in RA patients treated with biologic agents, yet the majority reported that they order blood tests before patients start these therapies and on followup.

CONCLUSION

Our survey indicates that treatment-altering liver function abnormalities in methotrexate-treated RA patients are rare, and more than half of rheumatologists agree that a less stringent monitoring regimen should be considered. Rheumatologists and pharmaceutical companies might work together to develop guidelines for monitoring of patients treated with biologic agents.

Secondary immune deficiencies associated with biological therapeutics

Biological therapeutics have been utilized in the past several years for the treatment of various autoimmune, cardiovascular, and neoplastic conditions. As these agents target both pathologic and physiologic components of inflammatory and immune systems, the scientific community has been challenged to identify potential secondary immune deficiencies associated with their use. This article will focus on biological agents used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, including tumor necrosis factor-a inhibitors, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4 Ig), rituximab, and interleukin-1 receptor agonist (IL-1Ra). Both clinical and in vitro studies have been done to explore the potential immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive effects of these agents.

Addressing the safety of anakinra in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Anakinra (Kineret; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) is the first and only recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist available for therapeutic use. It has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Commission for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Anakinra, as an anti-rheumatic therapy, has been assessed in five placebo-controlled clinical trials, either alone or in combination with methotrexate. These trials have shown anakinra to be efficacious and well tolerated by most patients, with the most frequently reported adverse events being mild-to-moderate injection-site reactions that generally resolved rapidly. One of these trials was a large, prospective safety study, which included typical RA patients with a wide variety of co-morbid conditions and receiving concomitant medications. This confirmed that anakinra is a well-tolerated treatment in an RA population representative of that seen by the practising rheumatologist.

Infections and biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Infections are common in patients with rheumatic disorders. Reasons for such vulnerability include alterations of immunoregulation, disease severity, debility, co-morbid illnesses and the use of immunosuppressive medications. The advent of new biological agents has precipitated a further examination of the links between infection, the underlying disease and its treatment, resulting in several interesting observations. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), the major pro-inflammatory cytokines, play important roles in host defence against infection. Inhibition of their activity could therefore be anticipated to augment the risk of infection in patients with pre-existing abnormalities of immune regulation. Slight increases in the rates of infection were noted in the clinical trials of IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra). In addition, a small number of opportunistic infections have been observed with the TNF inhibitor, etanercept. However, a marked increase in opportunistic infection, particularly tuberculosis, has occurred with the use of infliximab, an agent that also blocks TNF activity. The precise mechanisms by which these agents predispose to infection are currently being explored. The answers are likely to add significantly to our knowledge of how immune dysfunction contributes both to the pathophysiology of disease and the complications of therapy.

Anakinra: the first interleukin-1 inhibitor in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is an immunologically mediated inflammation of joints of unknown aetiology and often leads to disability. This inflammatory process may also involve extra-articular connective tissue. New therapeutic approaches have been made by inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is regarded as one of the most important mediators in the development of synovialitis. In this article, anakinra (Kineret), the first direct antagonist to IL-1, is discussed, in particular the efficacy and safety data from clinical trials. More than 10,000 patients have been treated with anakinra with significant improvement of inflammation and pain; the rate of radiologically visible progressive joint damage was significantly reduced. Among the adverse events, injection site reactions were most frequent, followed by a mild increase in infections. No activation of tuberculosis, as in tumour necrosis factor-alpha antagonist administration, has so far been reported.

Anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (r-metHuIL-1ra), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A large, international, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of anakinra (a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) in a large population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), typical of those seen in clinical practice.

METHODS

A total of 1,414 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 100 mg of anakinra or placebo, administered daily by subcutaneous injection. Background medications included disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, corticosteroids, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, alone or in combination. The primary end point was safety, which was evaluated by adverse events (including infections), discontinuation from study due to adverse events, and death.

RESULTS

Safety was evaluated in 1,399 patients (1,116 in the anakinra group and 283 in the placebo group; 15 patients were randomized but did not receive any study drug) during the initial 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of this long-term safety study. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and concomitant medications were similar between the 2 groups. The study group included patients with numerous comorbid conditions and a wide range of RA disease activity. Serious adverse events occurred at a similar rate in the anakinra group and the placebo group (7.7% and 7.8%, respectively). Serious infectious episodes were observed more frequently in the anakinra group (2.1% versus 0.4% in the placebo group). The rate of withdrawal due to adverse events was 13.4% in the anakinra group and 9.2% in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Results from this large, placebo-controlled safety study demonstrate that anakinra is safe and well tolerated in a diverse population of patients with RA, including those with comorbid conditions and those using multiple combinations of concomitant therapies. Although the frequency of serious infection was slightly higher in the anakinra group, no infection was attributed to opportunistic microorganisms or resulted in death.

Anakinra

Anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist, is the first biological agent approved to block the pro-inflammatory effects of IL-1 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In a double-blind, randomised trial in 472 patients with active, severe or very severe rheumatoid arthritis, recipients of subcutaneous anakinra 150 mg/day achieved higher response rates [assessed using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) composite score] and accumulated more mean productivity days after 6 months than placebo recipients. However, the response rates and accumulated productivity days of patients receiving subcutaneous anakinra 30 or 75 mg/day for 6 months were similar to those of placebo. With respect to the total Genant radiographic scores, the same study showed that all anakinra treatment regimens slowed disease progression after 6 months to a greater extent than placebo. In double-blind, randomised trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, combined treatment with anakinra and methotrexate was associated with higher ACR 20, 50 and 70 response rates than with methotrexate alone. Anakinra, used alone or in combination with methotrexate, was generally well tolerated, with the most frequent adverse event being a mild injection-site reaction of transient duration. Infections requiring antibacterial therapy or hospitalisation occurred more commonly in anakinra recipients than in placebo recipients, but were a rare cause for discontinuation of anakinra therapy (approximately 1%) in clinical trials.

Infection complications associated with the use of biologic agents

Despite the considerable clinical, radiologic, and functional benefits of biologic inhibitors in inflammatory arthritides, some concern exists regarding the occurrence of infections in patients treated with these agents. Clearly, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, heart disease, disability, and concurrent immunosuppressive medication all contribute to the risk of infection. Increased and closer observation may be in part responsible for some of the reported increases in the rates of mild infections with these drugs. The development of serious infections, particularly TB, in patients taking infliximab seems to be greater than would be expected in this population. Furthermore, experimental data from in vitro investigations and animal models demonstrate a link between decreased TNF alpha activity and increased susceptibility to TB. Why some patients, but not others, succumb to rapidly disseminated infection is unknown but may be related to the extent of TNF inhibition in different individuals. This difference in inhibition may also explain why the incidence of TB seems to be increased with infliximab in comparison with the other TNF blockers. Attribution analysis is the method used to assess the likelihood of a connection between two occurrences and includes such factors as temporal association, few alternative explanations, analogy with similar cases, and biologic plausibility. The putative relationship between anti-TNF treatment and infection is further strengthened by the presence of these factors [101]. Continued vigilance is therefore required in the use of biologic agents in patients with RA, most of whom are already in some way immunocompromised. Everyone who is under consideration for such treatment should be carefully evaluated for the presence of infection, and prophylactic antituberculous therapy should be used if latent TB is discovered. Both patients and primary physicians need to be aware of the possibility that serious infection may develop; if such a problem is diagnosed, the biologic inhibitor should be discontinued until adequate treatment has been completed. Caution is advised in patients with recurring infections and in those with severe comorbidities, for example, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus or heart failure. Administration of live vaccines to patients taking these drugs is not recommended, but patients should be brought up-to-date with all immunizations relevant to their age group before commencement of therapy. Physicians prescribing biologic agents should be encouraged to report any suspected drug-related adverse event. Long-term observation will be required to determine the exact nature of the relationship between cytokine inhibition and infection.

Kineret: efficacy and safety in daily clinical practice: an interim analysis of the Kineret response assessment initiative (kreative) protocol

Data from 166 patients who had completed 6 months of anakinra (Kineret, r-metHuIL-1Ra) therapy under the conditions of daily clinical practice showed an efficacy and safety profile comparable to the data known from clinical trials. Patients significantly responded as early as 1 month following initiation of therapy. The data suggest that anakinra may also be effective in patients who have failed tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blocking agents. Injection-site reactions were reported less frequently than in clinical trials, indicating that these reactions seem to require less therapeutic attention under non-clinical trial conditions.

[Therapeutic use of "biologics" in inflammatory joint and spinal diseases]

At present, two principles of biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis and other chronic inflammatory joint and spine diseases (juvenile polyarticular idiopathic arthritis, spondarthritides) are available for use in clinical practice. These are the TNF-alpha antagonists etanercept and infliximab as well as the human recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra. All three biologics have significant short and long-term therapeutic effects on clinical and humoral inflammatory activity compared to placebo treatment in controlled clinical trials and even radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis can be with halted. Principally, safety and tolerability of TNF- and IL-1 antagonist are good. However, local skin reactions at injection sites and infections of the upper respiratory tract and urinary tract have to be considered. Severe infections are rare except for an increased frequency of tuberculous infection observed with infliximab worldwide. The induction of autoantibodies including antibodies to double-stranded DNA and neuralizing antibodies to etanercept and infliximab themselves can occur though their clinical significance is still upon debate. It is important to notice that the advantages of the use of biologics in individual patients has carefully to be balanced against their high costs and the increased risk of infectious side effects. Therefore, guidelines of international experts recommend the clinical use of biologics mostly for patients resistant or intolerable to conventional treatment.

What are the risks of biologic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis? An update on safety

The tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) blockers infliximab and etanercept and the recombinant interleukin 1 (IL-1) receptor antagonist anakinra are effective in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, information in the medical literature and public domain is used to consider the safety of these biologic agents. TNF-alpha inhibition with infliximab has been associated with reactivation of tuberculosis and possibly development of other opportunistic infections (histoplasmosis, listeriosis. and pneumocystis). Exacerbations of multiple sclerosis and other central nervous system events have been reported with etanercept and infliximab. Recently, a review of preliminary data from an ongoing phase II study suggests that infliximab may worsen congestive heart failure. On the basis of clinical trials, there appears to be a higher incidence of serious infections seen in anakinra patients compared with controls; the particular combination of anakinra and etanercept may be associated with a higher incidence of serious infections and clinically significant leukopenia. Additional data are needed to understand whether all these safety issues are unique to an individual biologic agent or representative of a class effect. At this time, treating physicians must carefully weigh the benefits of these new biologics against their risks, particularly in patients at risk of infection.

Safety of anakinra, a recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (r-metHuIL-1ra), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and comparison to anti-TNF-alpha agents

Anakinra is a recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) recently approved by the FDA as a new therapy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Four clinical trials have been completed which have demonstrated that anakinra is an effective anti-rheumatic therapy either used alone or in combination with methotrexate. The most frequent adverse events reported in the clinical trials are injection-site reactions which are generally mild to moderate and rapidly resolve. A large, prospective safety study which allowed a wide-variety of comorbid conditions and concomitant medications demonstrated that anakinra therapy is a well-tolerated treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in the patient population seen by the practicing rheumatologist. Unlike therapies designed to affect TNF-alpha, there have not yet been reports of the development of tuberculosis or other fungal infections, demylinating syndromes or worsening of congestive heart failure. The safety profile of etanercept and infliximab were similar to that of anakinra in the phase I-phase III clinical trials. Unlike anakinra, these medications were not studied in the usual rheumatoid arthritis population which includes a number of patients with a wide variety of co-morbid disease and utilizing a number of concomitant anti-rheumatic medications. Post approval, several safety concerns, including patients at risk for serious infection and the emergence of latent tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections have emerged with the use of anti TNF therapy.